Slashdot Mirror


Safari Beta 2 Available

pldms writes "Safari Beta 2 is available via Software Update or from the Safari page. This is build 73, for those who've had 'exclusive' access to previous development versions since beta 1 ;-) The blurb: 'Safari Beta 2 introduces tabbed browsing to conveniently see and switch between multiple web pages in a single window, and AutoFill to instantly fill out web forms and password fields. This update also features increased standards compatibility and improved application stability.'" I had to set Lax Certificate Checks in the Debug menu to use it with Slashdot ... and its secure cookie check is still quite broken (either saves secure cookies without the secure flag, or sends out secure cookies to insecure sites, which would violate RFC 2965 where it says "no less than the same level of security").

48 of 370 comments (clear)

  1. Can't Wait by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damn job! Interfering with my ability to play with Safari at home. I can't wait to see how the tabbed browsing implementation looks/feels.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    1. Re:Can't Wait by babbage · · Score: 5, Informative
      Don't wait!
      ssh $user@$your_home_computer sudo softwareupdate "SafariUpdate-1.0 Beta 2 (v73)"
      Et voila -- Safari updated remotely :-)
  2. Hmm...can't feel much difference :) by Paladeen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmm...in the About Safari window it's listed as 1.0 beta (v.73).

    Doesn't seem to be that much different from the previously leaked v67 :).

    1. Re:Hmm...can't feel much difference :) by Caleb+Rutan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, one thing they fixed, (which is important for web-application people like me) is the form file upload method. In .67 it was broken: no file browser would appear when you clicked 'Choose File', so that is definitely an improvement. It worked in .60, but they managed to break it in between.

      Not that anyone using .67 (myself included) had any right to complain about broken features in an unreleased version ;)

      --
      -- caleb
    2. Re:Hmm...can't feel much difference :) by jsmith38 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Another thing that I noticed in 67 is that when I would Hide Safari, it would crash sometimes.

      I've been trying to make 73 crash by hiding, in the last few minutes to no avail.

      Also, the auto fill feature button is different (I know your wanting functional improvments).

      Another new feature is the "Reset Safari" found under the Safari menu. It appears to empty your cache, delete cookies, history, etc. Nice if you don't want your boss/wife finding all that porn you've been looking at.

      There are more options when you right click on somethign (ctrl-click).

      Some pdf don't automatically launch for me though after downloading them, I had this problem with 67, but not with 60.

      There appears to be more options in the preferences too.

    3. Re:Hmm...can't feel much difference :) by TheCrimsonUnbeliever · · Score: 5, Funny

      <quote>I've been trying to make 73 crash by hiding, in the last few minutes to no avail.</quote>

      Thanks for that - I have the most wonderfully funny picture of a mac-geek hiding from his computer

      "......"

      *jumps up*

      "BOO"

      *safari crashes*

  3. Mmmmm, nice... by berniecase · · Score: 5, Funny

    With browsers this quick, Apple's going to have a hard time selling faster machines :-)

    1. Re:Mmmmm, nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      With browsers this quick, Apple's going to have a hard time selling faster machines

      That's ok, they don't have any ;)

    2. Re:Mmmmm, nice... by furballphat · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's a send bug report feature in Safari. Turn the button on in the view menu.

    3. Re:Mmmmm, nice... by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, threading is still something 'new' for Apple to grasp and implement. OSX does some nice things, but simple stuff that should have been threaded in 1.0 doesn't even seem to be on their radar.

      Just like Safari, it does some nice things and has great speed compared to other Mac Browsers but it doesn't even have the basic threading abilities that IE had back in 1998. Apple should be more on the ball and this should have been a part of the original design specifications and not something they will add.

      Just like the basic file manager operations in 1.0 of OSX, multi-threading was barely there, and what little has been added has been stuck in like it was an afterthought and instead of something that just should have been in the design. They should have at least paided attention to Microsoft as Windows(NT)'s file managmenet has beening this for a long time.

      It also just kills me that Apple installation software will fill the screen, like the user wants to set and watch it install. In the Windows world, this is unheard of. Even if the installation screen is maximized, we can just hit minimize and go on with our work while it installs.

      Every time I have to install QuickTime for a user, it makes me shake my head, since the QuickTime screen not only fills the screen with no option to minimize, but it even does this during the entire download process. Sure I can flick the Windows Key and go back to work, but what were they thinking? Every time I install QuickTime I think, Apple, you just are not getting the whole multi-application pre-emptive thing and what it means for your users.

      Apple, "Keep thinking of what your new pre-emptive core allows your software and your users to do. They shouldn't have to wait for ANYTHING if they don't want to."

      Unfortunately this thinking will take some catching up, Microsoft has had a pre-emptive OS since 1993, threading and other issues for simultaneous application usage for users is far more mature in all of the NT products especially XP.


      (And please don't flame me with how Unix has been preemptive since such and such. I know the history of Unix and I also know that difference between the NT kernel and what kernels are available in the Unix world.

      And we would just waste ten messages debating why I disagree with Apple's OSX mach kernel decision. Which is why OSX on a whole is subject to less responsiveness than Linux or WindowsXP(NT).)

  4. The writing is on the wall.. by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    Apple has Safari.
    Safaris are for big, strong dudes.
    Acronym for big, strong dudes is "BSD"
    BSD is dying.
    Apple has a BSDish system under the hood.

    ergo: Apple is dying.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  5. Keyboard Implementation by henele · · Score: 5, Informative

    For a touch of karma whoring, for the people who never played around with an 'unreleased' beta (which includes me), the keyboard/mouse controls for tabbed browsing (which is turned off by default, and has it's own tab in the new Safari Preferences).

    Apple-Click : Opens a link in a new tab.
    Apple-Shift-Click : Opens a link in a new tab and selects it.
    Apple-Option-Click : Opens a link in a new window behind the other one.
    Apple-Option-Shift-Click : Opens a link in a new window and selects it.

    There is also the check box option to always display the tab bar, plus 'Select new tabs as they are created', which alters the above keyboard setup.

    I'm on my iBook at the moment, so I'm not sure how these interface with multi-button mice, but I guess you could configure the buttons to correlate with these modifiers, if you haven't already...

    1. Re:Keyboard Implementation by henele · · Score: 5, Informative

      Additionally, tabs aren't specifically noted in the 'Window' menu - there is not distinction between a window containing one page and one tab of many in a different window.

      Secondly

      Apple-Shift-Left or Right : Switches to the previous or next tab in a window, which is nice. It is also circular, so going right when browsing the final tab will bring you back to the first...

    2. Re:Keyboard Implementation by fhammond · · Score: 5, Informative

      It gets better..

      You can use these features with the right-mouse-button click google.com search. This is where you RMB click a word and one of the options is a google search of that word. Before this new build, it wasn't that useful, as the google search would be done in the same window (i.e. navigating you away for the page you were on).

      Safari rocks!

  6. The perfect browser? by CptTripps · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had my doubts about Safari. After a few days of "testing" it out, I forgot how painful it was to use IE. Sure there are occations that Safari won't open a page or something, but this beta is better than most 5.X brosers that have been around for a while.

    The new tabbed interface is VERY well done. I'm very happy with it now. Could be the perfect browser....for me at least.

    --


    My .sig can beat up your honor student.
    1. Re:The perfect browser? by pldms · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hmm. I'm not sure about perfect, but I was with you in spirit for a while as I tried out the new version. It's an impressive upgrade. Tabs are nice. Speed has improved. All looked well...

      Then I went to an ftp site.

      For those unaware, Safari can't browse ftp. It delegates it to another application. This is curious, yet might be ok if weren't for the fact that the application in question is the finder, which attempts to mount the ftp site as a disk.

      Annoying. And it gets worse, because mounting a remote ftp site often seems to threadlock the entire OS: the dreaded spinning wheel of death.

      So I'm currently rebooting thanks to Safari.

      (posted using Camino)

      --
      Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
      me a number based on the order in which I joined
    2. Re:The perfect browser? by pldms · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Call me lucky or average, but I've not had any real problems with using the finder to do the FTP stuff

      You're lucky. Dunno about average.

      I've no idea why it occurs, but it's nasty when it does. (Maybe because I'm using NAT? Other clients work. Alignment of the planets?) I doesn't always happen, but it's been regular enough for me to avoid it like the plague.

      I guess it breaks down to the following:

      1) Why can't safari browse ftp?
      2) Why don't Apple provide Internet Config anymore, so I can punt ftp onto something less nasty (you can use IE for this, bizarrely).
      3) Why can't Apple fix the kernel?

      So Safari is only a minor factor, but it leads to a catastrophic slide to oblivion on occasions.

      Anyway, enough whining. It's still a nice browser.

      --
      Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
      me a number based on the order in which I joined
    3. Re:The perfect browser? by Xenex · · Score: 4, Informative
      "And it gets worse, because mounting a remote ftp site often seems to threadlock the entire OS: the dreaded spinning wheel of death."

      Interesting - this locked up your entire system? On dial-up, I've seen it cause Finder to lock up and need a Force Quit, but never lock the entire OS. I've just followed mbkkelsey's advice and used Vince to change the ftp 'helper' application. In my quick test, I used Transmit and it worked flawlessly.

      Of course, it would still be a whole lot nicer if Safari could handle the FTP itself, just like virtually every other modern browser...
  7. You had me there for a second by arvindn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Phew... When I saw a link to an RFC which was purportedly about about security I was sure it was the evil bit thingy. Had to click on the link to verify that it was a different RFC!

  8. New: "Open in Tabs" item in Bookmarks Bar menus by Rouxfus · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a novel new feature related to the Tabs that bears mention. If you have folder/menus in your Bookmark Bar populated with bookmarks, there's now a menu item at the bottom of that pull-down menu that says "Open in Tabs". If you select this it will create a new tab for all the bookmarks in that group of bookmarks! This is similar to a feature in Camino that lets you set up tab groups. What I'd like to see is the ability to save a tab group or "workspace" out to a special .webloc type file that I can use to launch a bunch of URLs from the dock, or by double clicking, etc. Maybe there's a way to do this right now?

    1. Re:New: "Open in Tabs" item in Bookmarks Bar menus by MidKnight · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The "open in tabs" feature is somewhat buggy. Any existing tabs disappear; and the "back" button after all of the new tabs show up takes the browser back to the previous tabs.

      I think this is actually the desired behavior. It allows you to treat a collection of links as a single "location" you can go to, instead of treating each separate tab as a wholly separate instance. While it might take some getting used to, I kinda like it. I can open up my 'News' pages in a single click and, after browsing all the tabs, return back to whatever I was doing beforehand with another single click.

      That's something I always appreciate about Apple -- their willingness to push a UI feature to its limits....

  9. Re:Right-mouse button Google feature by pnaro · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hold down the command key while right-clicking on the word and selecting "Google Search". It will open up the results in a new tab

    --
    If we can't fix it, we'll fix it so nobody else can!
  10. Re:Right-mouse button Google feature by derbs · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can. Simply hold down the command key when you pop the menu up, and it opens the search in a new tab.

    Maybe a hierachial (sp?) menu feature here would be a slicker solution though...

  11. Re:What the heck is... by Rosyna · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, even if it was mentioned you probably wouldn't read it since you missed the huge X icon and the words Apple at the top of the news item.

  12. Re:mmmm, Safari by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 3, Funny

    A good percentage of the people who come to my site are on *some* revision of safari.

    Hey, now *there's* a bellwether for you! Who needs Gallup Polls and sophisticated statistical sampling when an AC will share abstracts from his homepage's usage log with us, eh?

  13. Re:Ummm... by BlueGecko · · Score: 4, Informative

    Go to Preferences, click on Tabs, check "Enable Tabbed Browsing."

  14. Serious question by taeric · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is it that makes this browser so much better then the others?

    I have some friends now that recently switched to the apple side of computing, and I can't help but laugh at them on some of the stuff they applaud Apple for. This browser is one of them.

    They claim it is faster, but I just don't see how that is possible. The bottleneck in most all browsing I do is the network. Have they simply found a way to make it seem faster? Have other browsers on the Mac been slow in the past? I don't get it.

    As a reference. I use IE at work, and Phoenix (or should that be the browser formerly known as Phoenix) at home. While I do appreciate some of the benefits of Phoenix over IE, I honestly think it is a toss up between them.

    I think most of my problems nowdays are with sites that are just ugly. However, I can't tell the difference -- or maybe I just don't care -- between the way any browsers handle fonts and whatnot. I also can't notice most of the differences between how sites render. I do appreciate the fact that most sites appear stable in all browsers now.

    So... what is so great about Safari?

    1. Re:Serious question by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Interesting
      They claim it is faster, but I just don't see how that is possible. The bottleneck in most all browsing I do is the network.

      I think it's a case of just an efficient rendering algorithm versus the retarded code inside Internet Explorer for the Mac (or the PC for that matter). It renders much faster, so with a fast site it feels faster overall.

      Yeah, with a slow site Safari is slow, but that's not what people are talking about. We know the bottleneck is ultimately the network- that's not a newsflash. Safari makes the user end as quick as possible.

      I just wish some browser maker would do better caching. I'm so tired on clicking "Back" and the browsers sits and spins for a long time. It's in the freaking cache, you dimwit pile of crap! It's only one page back! I've seen this stupid behavior in every browser on Macs, PCs and Suns regardless of user settings.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    2. Re:Serious question by feldsteins · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't help but laugh at them on some of the stuff they applaud Apple for...They claim it is faster, but I just don't see how that is possible.

      Mac users can be a bit silly with these things, it's true. But as a non-Mac user you probably take some things for granted - like having a fast web browser. One that is highly optimized for your OS. We've never really had that and it does make a difference, network bottlenecks notwithstanding.

      --
      You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
  15. Damn sexy. by viktor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok, updated Safari. Tabbed browsing support means Safari is now my default browser.

    But I want to transfer the bookmarks from the bookmark bar in Camino to Safari. Seems like a lot of trouble. Because, well, it couldn't... or, it's OS X but yet... could bookmarks be drag-n-droppable? Between browsers from two entirely different places? They couldn't...

    But they are. And that's damn sexy.

    It just works.

    1. Re:Damn sexy. by frankie · · Score: 4, Informative
      transfer the bookmarks from the bookmark bar in Camino to Safari.

      I was about to post my usual mention of Safari Enhancer when I realized what you were saying. Safari recognizes URL drags into the bookmarks bar from pretty much any source, including .webloc files and text selections. Definitely cool. Makes me wonder why other browsers don't do the same.

      Please mod parent up.
  16. Best of both worlds by cenonce · · Score: 3, Informative

    Finally! Tabbed browsing... the one feature I missed from Camino!

    From the fifteen minutes I've used it so far, Safari now "acts" a lot like Camino

    Now I get the speed of Safari with the features of Camino!

    Camino has been quite crashy for me (as others posting have mentioned as well) so I'll hold off the final verdict to see if Safari crashes less (though, I will state that it crashed less anyway... it just didn't have tabs!) :)

    -A

  17. Tabs could be trouble at work by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Funny

    I surfed over to the Debka file for and my tab for that page reads.

    http://www.debka.com/

    DEBKAfile, Political Anal

    Not something I'd want my boss seeing.

  18. Any news on bookmark searching? by henele · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the things which makes me use iTunes on certain machines is the indiscriminate search feature and how it works so well with both librarys and playlists.

    I would really like to see it added in someway to Safari as now it is my main browser my bookmarks, despite attempted organisation are beginning to get out of control.

    Swapping the Google search panel for a bookmark search interface (when you flick the bookmark switch, which checked titles and URLs) would be cool, and as a 'power' feature if you could searched cached versions of the bookmark's pages as well it would be excellent (please inform me if another browser already has that functionality)...

  19. Bugzilla users beware :( by helixblue · · Score: 3, Informative

    For whatever reason, this version of Safari, as well as v.71, won't work with the cookies in Bugzilla. On two machines I've tried it on both bugzilla.mozilla.org and our own internal versions of it. Kind of annoying to work with tickets all day at work and have to keep re-logging in. Hopefully this issue has a nice workaround either on the Safari or the Bugzilla side.

    I currently recommend a nightly build of Camino instead for these users. It now has a pretty nifty & flexible Google search bar finally (obligatory screenshot). I do miss the spell-as-you-type feature in Safari however.

  20. It's not that much better, it's just handy by ianscot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What is it that makes this browser so much better then the others?

    Safari is not the greatest thing since penicillin. It won't save the world. It's not even a full release version.

    What it is: a relatively svelte, quick-feeling (and yes that's partly just render speed), nicely spare browser that feels fine to use. Look at a page in Safari next to, say, Opera. The leanness of Safari stands out in several senses: render speed, clean layout, just the speed with which the program loads.

    It's like a tool that feels good in your hand. Apple has a way of producing stuff like that. That's what your friends mean.

    (And when your friends start claiming iCal as one of Apple's triumphs, then you can suspect them. There's a program in serious need of practical work, and much more of a beta than Safari. Slow as molasses, too.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  21. Bookmark menu 'Open in Tabs' button by OS24Ever · · Score: 4, Informative

    OK, for the record, when looking in your bookmarks and seeing the 'Open in Tabs' button when you think 'what does this do?' don't do it on a very full menu.

    It opens every bookmark in that menu in it's own tab. Woot. talk about a lotta web pages

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  22. Re:mouseover a link ? by wavedeform · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you mean "how do I see what a link points to without following the link?" then you need to turn on the Status Bar from the View menu. Then a link that you're hovering over is displayed at the bottom of the window.

  23. Changing protocol helpers by mbkkelsey · · Score: 3, Informative

    Use Vince to change your default ftp helper. It's kind of like the protocol helper prefs in Classic IE.

  24. Stuff That's Been Fixed by bedouin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) You can finally use a secure proxy: in past versions this was broken for some reason (anybody who has had it disabled for the past few months might want to re-enable it now).

    2) Cookies are finally working on PHP nuke sites: previous versions would lose preferences right after signing in.

    3) I can finally login to my university's registration system. It uses this software; I'm guessing other schools rely on it too.

    Anything else?

    Arabic language support is still not quire right (certain letters in words are being displayed too small). A Windows Media Player plugin might be nice, but that probably is on the shoulders of M$ more-so than Apple. Other than that everything is perfect; tabs were something I was expecting anyway, and the right-click Google search was a surprise bonus.

  25. Wither Camino/Chimera? by MacAndrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another thread here touting Camino was mysteriously modded "flamebait" so here goes...

    I have used and loved Chimera for many months for many reasons. As other have found, the renamed Camino is crash-prone, strange in the very last nightly build of Chimera before the trademark-conflict name change (which you can find easily by anonymous FTP to their server) is great. I downgraded to Build 2003030408 and am content.

    Now comes Safari, also great, except the lack of tabbed browsing and that awful brushed metal stuff. OK, tabbed browsing is now checked off on the feature list. Safari shares a startling number of other features, and then some. Eventually Safari will be indistinguishable from Camino/Chimera. Congratulations Apple, what a coup.... (Hey guys, add keywords for bookmarks so I can continue to google with "g keyword keyword" and I'll switch.)

    So what's the deal for independent software efforts? Bust yourself to develop and demonstrate new UI and core technologies to have them lifted by a large for-profit computer maker? Granted the open source Camino is intended to create new work without profit, but at some point it will also lose the "profit" of public attention, and wither away, and cease to produce new things.

    At the least I'd like to see Safari give a nod to Chimera. At the best I'd like an answer from Apple how they're not doing the Internet Explorer thing in miniature, and how non-Apple developers will continue to inspire and be inspired when they face having their work negated in a mere twitch of the tail of the whale.

    I'm a Mac person, and back to the years before the Mac (the Apple ][+ is in a box). I think Apple has often done the right thing and will continue to (often) do the right thing. But there is something disturbing in their generous production of free software, similar in effect if not (I hope) intent to what Redmond has done. Be careful, Apple.

  26. Autofill coolness... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anyone else notice that Autofill now not only works, it gets info from the (system wide) AddressBook? Change your address in one place for envelopes, Palm Business Cards, and now your browser!

    Ok, so it is minor. Still cool.

    --
    'Sensible' is a curse word.
  27. If software update doesn't work by derbs · · Score: 3, Informative

    If software update doesn't show the new Safari, make sure the old one's in the root of your Applications folder, otherwise it won't recognise it.

  28. Re:Sad by OmniVector · · Score: 3, Insightful
    not sad at all. i'm a long time galeon/mozilla/konqueor user from linux, and the moment i tried this browser i was in heaven. It's the most simple, powerful browser i've ever seen and it's the fastest to boot. It sure would be nice if the rest of the interface community would get a hint.
    which is nicer to see when you right click on the background of a webpage, this:
    • Safari
    • view source
    • save page as
    or
    • Konqueror
    • up
    • back
    • forward
    • reload
    • open in new window
    • open in background tab
    • open in new tab
    • add to bookmarks
    • open with...
    • preview in...
    • create k3b cd
    • copy to
    • move to
    • select all
    • stop animations
    • view document source
    • view document information
    • security
    • set encoding


    mind you, i see all that crap EVERY time i rightclick on the background in konqueror. why do i see create data cd? why do i see open in new tab? i'm not even right clicking on a link!
    If browser makers reduced half this clutter it wouldn't even be nearly as useful and powerful as safari.
    --
    - tristan
  29. Can't wait for KDE 3.2 by Telex4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is great. I don't have a Mac, and I have no intention of getting one, but I really like seeing good progress in Safari, since by the time KDE 3.2 comes out, I'll get most of those advances in my own lurvely Konqueror.

    Thanks Apple! :)

  30. Actually, the RFC says... by i_am_pi · · Score: 3, Informative
    Secure
    OPTIONAL. The Secure attribute (with no value) directs the user
    agent to use only (unspecified) secure means to contact the origin
    server whenever it sends back this cookie, to protect the
    confidentially and authenticity of the information in the cookie.

    The user agent (possibly with user interaction) MAY determine what
    level of security it considers appropriate for "secure" cookies.
    The Secure attribute should be considered security advice from the
    server to the user agent, indicating that it is in the session's
    interest to protect the cookie contents. When it sends a "secure"
    cookie back to a server, the user agent SHOULD use no less than
    the same level of security as was used when it received the cookie
    from the server.
    That means to me that Safari's behavior, while logically stupid, is correct according to the RFC, which says "SHOULD use no less", not "MUST". Plus, supporting secure cookies is entirely optional.

    Pi
  31. yes, of course by lordpixel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder if you're a troll or just someone who likes to sounds clever?

    It also just kills me that Apple installation software will fill the screen, like the user wants to set and watch it install. In the Windows world, this is unheard of. Even if the installation screen is maximized, we can just hit minimize and go on with our work while it installs.

    Most Windows installers maximize their window, whereas all common Mac installers just use a regular window.

    How many Windows users do actually minimize the installer screen though? How many just sit watching its pretty blue bar?

    Every time I have to install QuickTime for a user, it makes me shake my head, since the QuickTime screen not only fills the screen with no option to minimize, but it even does this during the entire download process. Sure I can flick the Windows Key and go back to work, but what were they thinking? Every time I install QuickTime I think, Apple, you just are not getting the whole multi-application pre-emptive thing and what it means for your users.

    Oh! Now in this paragraph we can all see you're not talking about installers on the Mac after all, you're talking about you're talking about the Quicktime for Windows installer. The fact you cannot minimize it sounds annoying, true. However, as you point out you can always press Windows-M to get rid of it. Or Alt-Tab one assumes...?

    So infact the set of users who are effected by this issue comes down to those people who

    • actually want to minimize an installer rather than just watching it
    • don't know how to Windows-M or Alt-Tab

    In other words, its a tiny annoyance in Apple's Windows installer which, while it should be corrected, has almost no effect on anyone...

    Unfortunately this thinking will take some catching up, Microsoft has had a pre-emptive OS since 1993, threading and other issues for simultaneous application usage for users is far more mature in all of the NT products especially XP.

    Have you actually any examples, beyond vague suggestions that the Mac "File Manager" wasn't multi-threaded enough in Mac OS X 10.0 ? I mean, I wouldn't claim its perfect even in 10.2, but then I've used Windows NT and its "File Manager" for over half a decade now, and you know, it has a few threading issues too. I don't want to be rude, but other than your poorly constructed installer rant, you don't actually seem to have any examples.

    And we would just waste ten messages debating why I disagree with Apple's OSX mach kernel decision. Which is why OSX on a whole is subject to less responsiveness than Linux or WindowsXP(NT).)

    Of course, you have links you could share with us to actual profiling results showing comparisons between MacOS, Windows and Linux (et al.). These show conclusively where "responsiveness differences" occur, and then proceed to demonstrate how these are surely caused by the Mach micro kernel and not any other factor like, just for example: hardware or boneheaded programing in the File Manager or GUI?

    Please do post such material. It would be very interesting.

    --

    Lord Pixel - The cat who walks through walls
    A little bigger on the inside than out

  32. How to make Safari smaller by azav · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you notice, this browser is 10.2 meg. After doing a get info on the file, I noticed that it supported languages that I would never use. To make your Safari smaller, do a get info on it, click the languages arrow and remove all the langs you don't want/need.

    Removing French, German and Japanese brought the file size down to 7.6 meg.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...