Slashdot Mirror


Electronic Paper Advances

ke4roh writes "Electronic paper comes a step closer," says a Reuters article today. The paper, made by E-ink bends and makes for a higher contrast display, perhaps for e-books and cell phones. It reminds me of Jim Willard's Paper Computer, but their web site is history. Slashdot previously discussed color electronic paper."

194 comments

  1. Scratchy? by Loopsnut · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will I have to worry about electrocution when I wipe my bum?

    1. Re:Scratchy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if said bum is carrying an electric cattle prod.

    2. Re:Scratchy? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Will I have to worry about electrocution when I wipe my bum? "/i.

      I'd be more worried about creating a spark in a contained space like that.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Scratchy? by og_sh0x · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sure, they have paperless toilets. It's called a bidei.

    4. Re:Scratchy? by da'+WINS+pimp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea, just what I need, data shooting up my bum!

      --

      "I'm just here to regulate funkyness." - James Gandolfini, as Winston in The Mexican
    5. Re:Scratchy? by KilerCris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, since the paper computer is solar powered, you don't have anything to worry about. I doubt you get much sun back there

    6. Re:Scratchy? by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      Sure, they have paperless toilets. It's called a bidei.

      And it's spelled bidet.

      But no one on /. needs to know how to spell bidet.

      After all, what self-respecting geek would actually go looking for something that aids personal hygiene? It's tough enough to get them to shower.

      And whose mother would actually install a bidet in her basement?

    7. Re:Scratchy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only when you use the iLoo.

    8. Re:Scratchy? by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. The sun shines out of mine!

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    9. Re:Scratchy? by B747SP · · Score: 1
      Sure, they have paperless toilets. It's called a bidei.

      OK, so what about those paperless office things, what are they called? :-)

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  2. 'aper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'awright mate, 'owes it 'oing?

  3. Paper, not aper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you meant paper, not aper.

    Aper: Any of various large, tailless Old World primates of the family Pongidae, including the chimpanzee, gorilla, gibbon, and orangutan. (in other words, a monkey)

  4. "Electronic aper comes a step closer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aper?

    Electronic monkeys a reality then?!?!?

    1. Re:"Electronic aper comes a step closer" by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 1
      d00d! What the fuck have you benn? and where? plz share and bring back the crapflooders too i miss them.

      Your pal, --sdem

      --

      --sdem
  5. I might as well be one of the first to say it.. by L.+VeGas · · Score: 4, Funny

    Electronic aper comes a step closer

    Get your hands off me, you damn, dirty electronic aper.

    1. Re:I might as well be one of the first to say it.. by Digypro · · Score: 1

      Thanks to the unlimited editability of the internet - Your joke no longer makes sense. I bet you wish this was in print!

    2. Re:I might as well be one of the first to say it.. by rf0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Run..Run for the mountains. No wait mountain gorilas

      Rus
      - had to much caffine -

    3. Re:I might as well be one of the first to say it.. by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      I am not a banana... I am a man.

  6. aper by Mr.+Spectre · · Score: 1, Insightful

    is that electronic aper? paper? or diaper? We could really use some electronic diapers for my daughter, ones that let us know when to change her!

    1. Re:aper by markana · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'll find that most infants already come with an audible alert mechanism for that. Factory-standard equipment.

  7. What has changed? by geeber · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering that E-ink has been around for quite some time (probably more than a year, though I am not sure), anyone know what is substaintially new about this press release? The article is detail-lite.

    1. Re:What has changed? by bivouac_2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly. Before we get caught up in the concept of wearble displays, I want my flying car! Heck I want my flying Jetsons-esque city! Crap, I settle for an affordable HDTV.

    2. Re:What has changed? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      A photo of an actual working prototype that is flexible?

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    3. Re:What has changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is $799 not affordable to you? Different people have different definitions of "affordable." For instance, this month I would not consider an HDTV affordable if it weren't for the fact that I bought one last year.

      I'll never go back, that's for DAMN sure.

    4. Re:What has changed? by geeber · · Score: 1

      I could have sworn they had demonstrated a flexible version quite some time ago, but I could be mistaken. I can't find the link now.

    5. Re:What has changed? by canajin56 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A friend tells me they already have something like it in Japan. He has several shopping cards that keep track of "points" you have. They are made of laminated paper, and are flexable. When you use it, the numbers written on the paper change to reflect your "point" balance.

      I havn't seem it for myself though.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    6. Re:What has changed? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      ..does your friend know any more detail - we could find it on the net...

    7. Re:What has changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a clever use of old technology for modern-style convenience, but it's also an old technique. Before we computerized, the library I used to work at had machines that would take the card from the back of the book and punch it with the current date and the user's ID (from a metal band on their library card) for our file of checked-out books. It clipped off a chad from the edge to keep track of where to stamp. I still have bad memories of manually sequentially searching a month and a half of cards to find one misfiled record.

  8. Recycling by rf0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well this saves on problem of cutting down loads of trees (well to an extent) but I wonder how much energy is needed to produce this. Also is it going to replace getting the daily newspaper on the way to getting on the train? Also what about if it goes flat? Some sort of solar panel prehaps?

    Rus

    1. Re:Recycling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cutting down trees and making paper out of them and delivering them requires energy too.

    2. Re:Recycling by foo+fighter · · Score: 0, Insightful

      e-paper doesn't make any sense to me.

      paper-paper is super cheap because of the abundance of renewable resources available for its manufacture. If you want to update what's on the paper, just make the changes in Word and print a new copy. Why is that so hard?

      I'm all for technology and progress, but epaper is one of those solutions in search of a problem.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    3. Re:Recycling by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "paper-paper is super cheap because of the abundance of renewable resources available for its manufacture. If you want to update what's on the paper, just make the changes in Word and print a new copy. Why is that so hard?"

      Are you serious? Do you really think it's about paper being hard to use? Honestly dude, you must be intentionally trying not to see the value here in order to score some insightful moderations.

      Here are a few useful applications of e-paper:

      - Single-page newspapers and books. Not only would you not have to worry about portability, but you wouldn't have to worry about bookmarks either.

      - Billboards would be much easier to update. No more repainting or repapering them, just send a new graphic to them and they change automatically. They could even cycle the ads.

      - Credit cards could show your balance available.

      Etc etc etc.

      Paper may grow on trees, but there are serious problems with it accumulating. The 'make the changes in Word and print a new copy' may sound deceptively sensible until you realize you have to get rid of the original copy.

      Right now I'm reviewing a manual for a product my company is developing. This means lugging a stack of paper around. It's obnoxious. I'd LOVE to have a single sheet of paper that updates whenever I press the 'next page' button. I guess I could read it off my PocketPC, but it's awfully small...

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Recycling by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Also what about if it goes flat?

      IIRC, it only uses power when it changes state (text changes). If it runs out of juice, you are simply stuck on the current page.

    5. Re:Recycling by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 4, Funny
      paper-paper is super cheap because of the abundance of renewable resources available for its manufacture.

      What, do you think paper grows on TREES??

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    6. Re:Recycling by foo+fighter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      - Single-page newspapers and books. Not only would you not have to worry about portability, but you wouldn't have to worry about bookmarks either.

      Yeah, yeah, yeah. I still haven't seen an ebook interface that is as intuitive as a real book or paper. It's pretty easy to see a paperclip (or whatever) in the top of a book. Having to press a few buttons to "mark" a place, then press a few more buttons to get back to that place is a PITA.

      And the difficulty of moving around books and papers is greatly exaggerated.

      - Billboards would be much easier to update. No more repainting or repapering them, just send a new graphic to them and they change automatically. They could even cycle the ads.

      One, it's more difficult than "just" sending a new graphic to them. How do you get the graphic there? Two, keeping an e-paper sign lit up costs a lot more in electricity than paper-paper.

      - Credit cards could show your balance available.

      Whoopdy-freaking-do. If that's a problem, you have bigger problems.

      Paper may grow on trees, but there are serious problems with it accumulating.

      It's called "recycling". Which is much easier to do with paper than electronics.

      The arguments for epaper are just not compelling in my opinion.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    7. Re:Recycling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      recycling does not undo the bleaching process and the byproducts that are extremely damaging to the earth.

      recycling is a good thing, but using less of enviromentally damaging products is better.

    8. Re:Recycling by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      Luddite troll...

      haven't you seen "Minority report" yet??? That should give you some ideas for applications...

      You must really enjoy printing out fresh copies all the time. I was under the distinct impression that computers would have brought us the "paperless" office by now, but if you had your way we'd be buried neck deep in printouts... Got shares in Printer companies??? enjoy paying ridiculous amounts for soot in a fancy cartridge??? Love reloading printer paper drawers???

      paper super cheap??? give me a break... all that bleach and water used in it's manufacture...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    9. Re:Recycling by johny_qst · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, yeah, yeah. I still haven't seen an ebook interface that is as intuitive as a real book or paper. It's pretty easy to see a paperclip (or whatever) in the top of a book. Having to press a few buttons to "mark" a place, then press a few more buttons to get back to that place is a PITA.
      I wonder if it would really require such a PITA to deal with this. You read the page that you were last reading.... nothing else in the way. When you need the next page hit the page + button.
      And the difficulty of moving around books and papers is greatly exaggerated.
      I think the point made was more about the difficulty in composting/landfilling/recycling the old editions.
      One, it's more difficult than "just" sending a new graphic to them. How do you get the graphic there? Two, keeping an e-paper sign lit up costs a lot more in electricity than paper-paper.
      I believe the system is designed to include wireless networking. Anyplace that would have sufficient people moving past to warrant advertising should definitely by the time this is implemented have WiFi in abundance.
      Whoopdy-freaking-do. If that's a problem, you have bigger problems.
      This is such an intelligent point I had to say something. Like perhaps the Banks would offer access to a complete statement and cancelled checks etc... all on the card itself.... 'the portal to your financial world' the point being that the options boggle the imagination for a lot of people. Some would rather shoot it down.
      It's called "recycling". Which is much easier to do with paper than electronics.
      How much do you know about recycling? Do you realize the amount of energy that must be put into the recycling process is enormous. Very little recycled material actually gets back into the flow of goods as a lot is landfilled and we see no problem with just cooking another batch of plastics out of oil. The use of this type of paper would make buying your newspaper pointless... you bought the newspaper and it updates every morning with the new edition and every evening with the late edition. You would not need to produce another piece until yours broke. Or the new model came out with the chrome finish and the ipod interface design. While you find the arguments aren't compelling. I would like nothing more than to see people finally realize they can have a paperless office. Unless you are legally obligated to the SEC or some other regulatory agency to keep hard-copies lying around, why waste the trees? Now if we could just start using hemp for paper the argument gets quite different.... we'll save that one for another time.

      --
      Fnord.sig
    10. Re:Recycling by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Yeah, yeah, yeah. I still haven't seen an ebook interface that is as intuitive as a real book or paper."

      Download an e-book to PocketPC. You don't even need to use a bookmark in it because it remembers where you last were.

      "And the difficulty of moving around books and papers is greatly exaggerated."

      Ever had a book fall out of your hands, land on the floor, and close? Ever have a book that's not very excited about being open? Ever try to pack two books into your bagage for a long trip? I made that mistake once.

      "One, it's more difficult than "just" sending a new graphic to them. How do you get the graphic there? Two, keeping an e-paper sign lit up costs a lot more in electricity than paper-paper."

      One, it's not more difficult than sending the graphic there. Can you honestly say that walking up to a billboard, plugging a connector into your laptop, and pressing the upload button is signficantly harder than hiring a couple of people to get the billboard printed, rolled up, and glued? (It's more fun in Portland since we like to have rain 90% of the year...)

      Two, ectricity's only needed to change the image. Once the power's off, the image stays in place. Perhaps you didn't RTFA? They talk about it on E-ink's site.

      "Whoopdy-freaking-do. If that's a problem, you have bigger problems."

      Who said anything about it being a problem? Damn cool feature if you ask me.

      "It's called "recycling". Which is much easier to do with paper than electronics."

      Again, no. Recycling paper involves destroying and reassembling the paper, losing elements in the process. Worse, because of paper's lack of resiliency, you have to use a lot more of it, thus creating the need for a much larger supply of it. In the case of e-paper, recycling it is just a matter of sending a new image to it. No replacement paper needed just to fix a typo.

      "The arguments for epaper are just not compelling in my opinion. "

      You're not going to find a compelling reason because you're not even trying to see it. You're too busy poo-pooing it. I imagine the reason for that is because you feel you sound more intelligent when you don't see the latest and greatest as being interesting. "Well I can see right through this!"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:Recycling by NineNine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Again, no. Recycling paper involves destroying and reassembling the paper, losing elements in the process. Worse, because of paper's lack of resiliency, you have to use a lot more of it, thus creating the need for a much larger supply of it. In the case of e-paper, recycling it is just a matter of sending a new image to it. No replacement paper needed just to fix a typo.

      And the stuff needed to make "E-paper"? Plastics (oil) that don't degrade, heavy metals that not only are around for thousands of years, but are toxic, etc. I'd imagine that the environmental damage done by 100 reams of paper doesn't even rival that of one sheet of "E-paper".

    12. Re:Recycling by SubtleNuance · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      We dont have to cut down trees for paper right now. Very usefull paper can be made from hemp, rice, corn and other renewable sources.

      The reason we dont? Vested Capital and Shortterm thinking by impotent politicians. Capitalists shoot down regulations to keep trees from being cut... because right NOW its cheaper to do it... the future be damned, they're gettin' rich..

    13. Re:Recycling by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "And the stuff needed to make "E-paper"? Plastics (oil) that don't degrade, heavy metals that not only are around for thousands of years, but are toxic, etc. I'd imagine that the environmental damage done by 100 reams of paper doesn't even rival that of one sheet of "E-paper". "

      I find that unlikely for two reasons:

      1.) I doubt that these its of paper will be very cheap. I imagine it'll cost quite a bit just to get one. I have over 5,000 sheets of paper sitting at home right now just waiting to be used.

      2.) Have you read how thick this paper is? We're talking about minute amounts of resources here.

      You could potentially be right. There are unknown variables here, like what gets lost when making a sheet? How long does a sheet last? etc.

      The thing is, though, I seriously doubt these things will be sold in anywhere near the volume of regular paper. We'll likely see them in a tablet form factor hooked up to a PDA-Esque interface.

      Unless the volume of e-paper was ridiculously high, the benefits from less paper being used would outweigh the cost of materials going into it. We still need trees to breath.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    14. Re:Recycling by Echoloc8 · · Score: 1

      Trees are a cash crop; paper makers grow their own forests from which paper is made. The papermaking trade does not contribute to deforestation in any way.

      The U.S. has more forest now than when the Pilgrims landed.

      --
      ----- Remove the obvious from the above address to reply.
    15. Re:Recycling by NineNine · · Score: 1

      We still need trees to breath.

      Who do you think maintains most of the forest in North America? It's the paper/wood pulp industries. It sure as hell isn't the computer hardware industry.

    16. Re:Recycling by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1
      Here are a few useful applications of e-paper:

      - Single-page newspapers and books. Not only would you not have to worry about portability, but you wouldn't have to worry about bookmarks either.

      - Billboards would be much easier to update. No more repainting or repapering them, just send a new graphic to them and they change automatically. They could even cycle the ads.

      - Credit cards could show your balance available.

      Etc etc etc.


      Plus, all paper could have built-in DRM. No more worrying about people hanging on to books for years to be read again and again, or even worse to be given to other readers in violation of the EULA. Now we can require all paper to go blank after a preset time interval unless reactivated through the users Passport account.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    17. Re:Recycling by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      We dont have to cut down trees for paper right now. Very usefull paper can be made from hemp, rice, corn and other renewable sources.

      The reason we dont? Vested Capital and Shortterm thinking by impotent politicians. Capitalists shoot down regulations to keep trees from being cut... because right NOW its cheaper to do it... the future be damned, they're gettin' rich..

    18. Re:Recycling by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      Yes, and forests naturally need maintainance, considering how badly they were doing before we humans showed up. And to the grandparent, most of the oxygen in air comes from photoplankton.

    19. Re:Recycling by Orne · · Score: 1

      The National Interagency Fire Center statistics show that the average # of acres destroyed by forest fires have decreased by a factor of 10 over the last century...

      So I'd say yes, before humans started fighting forest fires, nature was doing quite badly.

    20. Re:Recycling by mikerich · · Score: 1
      "And the difficulty of moving around books and papers is greatly exaggerated."

      Ever had a book fall out of your hands, land on the floor, and close? Ever have a book that's not very excited about being open? Ever try to pack two books into your bagage for a long trip? I made that mistake once.

      But I can't write on it. With paper I don't just read the document, I interact with it, change it, comment it and so on.

      With e-paper I can't jot a note in the margin, scribble a diagram, work out a calculation, mark up a typescript or even do the crossword.

      As soon as you add those features, not only does e-paper become more expensive but also energy hungry.

      E-paper looks okay as a display-only medium; anything you want to interact with - well I'll choose paper. If nothing else I'll be able to light a fire with it.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    21. Re:Recycling by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I believe the system is designed to include wireless networking. Anyplace that would have sufficient people moving past to warrant advertising should definitely by the time this is implemented have WiFi in abundance.

      Why use WiFi when the sign could have a simple cellular phone and modem in it? For that matter, use a digital phone and skip the modem. The bandwidth/latency required to download ads to a billboard are minimal - it can stream at 9600bps 24x7. If it takes a while, so what? The ads are purchased for weeks/months at a time, and you could preload them with start/stop dates.

      A 30 x 15 foot sign with 0.5 inch pixels would be 260k pixels. 3 bytes/pixel * 8 bits/byte = 6.2Mbits. At 9600 bps, that's 648 sec = 10.8 min for an uncompressed image.

      Use .25 inch pixels, and you're still under 45 min.

      Use jpeg to compress a .25 inch pixel image 10:1, and you're looking at 5 min for a megapixel image or 20 min for a 4 megapixel image (0.125 inch pixels). I'd guess that's small enough for typical viewing distances for billboards.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    22. Re:Recycling by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      That's working off the false assumption that forest fires are a bad thing.

  9. Wearable displays by deke_2503 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Just what I needed, clothes that can change style at my command! If I get a shirt made of electronic paper, one minute it can be red, the next blue, and then I can make it look tie-dyed!

    Now, whenever I wear the same shirt every day of the week, nobody will know!

    1. Re:Wearable displays by goatasaur · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just remember that 0 0 255 and 255 0 0 do not go together.

      --
      ~D:
    2. Re:Wearable displays by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sigh. Why does everyone insist on using base 256 for colors? A floating point 0 - 1 range is SOO much easier to work with /rant

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    3. Re:Wearable displays by jtosburn · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Just remember that 0 0 255 and 255 0 0 do not go together.

      Unless you're designing a new /. special interest area.

    4. Re:Wearable displays by Zirnike · · Score: 1
      Add in something like bluetooth, and you can hack in and change the alpha value on some people...

      Kinda reminds me of a book, 'Sentanced to Prism'. Good concepts, not well written... But anyway. Woman wandering around in a suit. The suit displayed ads. Every once in a while, in a random pattern, the suit would go totally transparent for about a second, and then the ads would pop up again. Now THAT is advertising.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    5. Re:Wearable displays by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Hey, dude, who designed yer shirt? Mandlebrot?

    6. Re:Wearable displays by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Just remember that 0 0 255 and 255 0 0 do not go together.

      If you've got 255 255 255 in there too, it seems pretty damn good to me.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  10. My fav quote by daveatwork · · Score: 5, Funny

    My fav quote from one of my fav business men, Mr. Dyson: "A paperless office is about as likely as a paperless toilet." ;-) always makes me chuckle... Dave

    1. Re:My fav quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what you dont know about the three shells?

    2. Re:My fav quote by daveatwork · · Score: 1

      fuck, shit, arse, bollox There, who needs the damn shells? (Coward, i expect you to understand this)

    3. Re:My fav quote by Exiler · · Score: 1

      You mean it'll only work for the japanese?

      --
      Banaaaana!
    4. Re:My fav quote by rf0 · · Score: 1

      Is that the dyson as in hoovers?

      Rus

    5. Re:My fav quote by daveatwork · · Score: 1

      yup, Dyson as in the guy who invented the Duel Cyclone system used in.... well, dysons ;-)

    6. Re:My fav quote by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, water guns could be much more effective in an office then TPS reports.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    7. Re:My fav quote by ToadSprocket · · Score: 1

      You have been fined one credit for a violation of the verbal morality statute.

      --


      If this article confuses you, don't worry. It was posted yesterday in a much clearer fashion.
    8. Re:My fav quote by HermanZA · · Score: 1

      No, those two seashells are for the toilet...

    9. Re:My fav quote by daveatwork · · Score: 1

      w00t!

    10. Re:My fav quote by u19925 · · Score: 1

      Paperless toilets are far more likely than paperless office. in most civilized nations, it is customery to wash your ass with water than just wipe it with paper.

    11. Re:My fav quote by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      At The Ohio State University, we actually have a paperless office, at least in the IT department. It works great, and I can access all the documents and info that would normally be at my 'desk' from any internet connected computer with a web browser. Beats the hell out of lugging a briefcase around, and if I want to send a document to a coworker, I can do it instantly over our web-based system.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    12. Re:My fav quote by tzanger · · Score: 1

      Paperless toilets are far more likely than paperless office. in most civilized nations, it is customery to wash your ass with water than just wipe it with paper.

      Pardon my rudeness, but I have to ask -- how is it you can really clean your ass without some kind of supreme water pressure? I mean for normal shits sure, a little wash is all you need, but for some of those disgusting deposits there's scrubbing to be done, man!

  11. I can't wait for this stuff... by jonfelder · · Score: 1

    It'll be so nice when you can have a nice easy to read paperback sized device that holds an entire library. Maybe the paper could even back lit...no more cumbersome book lights at night! Another version that is 8.5 x 11 could be used for magazines and the like.

    Build in some wireless access and I could have a whole newstand at my finger tips while on the crapper.

    1. Re:I can't wait for this stuff... by daveatwork · · Score: 1

      just dont wipe your arse with it!

    2. Re:I can't wait for this stuff... by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      True true...although I think it'd be difficult to mistake a magizine sized epaper device with toilet paper. :-)

    3. Re:I can't wait for this stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you're out of TP...

    4. Re:I can't wait for this stuff... by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      Well if I were somehow compelled to use the epaper as TP, if it had wireless access I could pull up the Microsoft webpage first. :-) At least then it wouldn't be a total loss.

  12. sci-fi wins again by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone else read Stephen Baxter? In nearly all his stories (very hard sci-fi), there are 'softscreens' which are essentually these paper displays His stories are usually set 5-10 years in the future, which would put him pretty close to the mark on this technology. I do wonder about the power supply though. Seeing that I can barely get a day's worth of stand-by on my cell phone with a tiny text screen it seems keep these things powered up might require an equally revolutionary energy store.

    --
    1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
    1. Re:sci-fi wins again by rf0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well if they are used in some portable sence how about trying to get some kenetic energy. I remeber a while ago Compaq (as it was then) was playing with the idea of using power from the kayboard to recharge batteries. now that was a good idea

      Rus

    2. Re:sci-fi wins again by Saige · · Score: 5, Informative

      I do wonder about the power supply though. Seeing that I can barely get a day's worth of stand-by on my cell phone with a tiny text screen it seems keep these things powered up might require an equally revolutionary energy store.

      The thing to remember when talking about e-ink is that power will not be needed to keep information displayed. Power will be required for the wireless data reception, and for changing what is displayed, but various e-ink technologies that have been mentioned all have means of showing information that are not energy intensive.

      I'm not sure offhand exactly how it works, but usually involves some sort of small particle or such with, say, black on one side, and white on the other, and they are rotated to show a particular pattern of 'pixels', and then take no energy to remain in that pattern.

      This is one of the big wins of e-ink - along with the fact that done properly, it should look little different from plain old paper. (though it is definitely not there yet)

      If you equipped an 'e-ink newspaper' with the ability for the user to query for updates, instead of the paper constantly checking a wireless frequency, then power consumption could be quite minimal.

      I do look forward to fully interactive e-ink, so that, say, you could have a notebook with e-ink paper, you jot down notes with a stylus, the paper shows the proper marks so it feels just like regular writing, but with the options to save notes, recall them later, and memory that allows one notebook to keep the information that a whole stack of real notebooks couldn't hold. Can you imagine having an e-ink journal, for example, that could hold a lifetime's worth of data in it, so you could recall anything you've ever written/drawn on the e-ink pages?

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    3. Re:sci-fi wins again by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

      interesting... however i sure do hope they come up with another term for it then 'e-ink', saying that aloud makes me sound like i'm from fargo

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
    4. Re:sci-fi wins again by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I do look forward to fully interactive e-ink, so that, say, you could have a notebook with e-ink paper, you jot down notes with a stylus, the paper shows the proper marks so it feels just like regular writing, but with the options to save notes, recall them later, and memory that allows one notebook to keep the information that a whole stack of real notebooks couldn't hold."

      We already have this - it's called an etch-a-sketch. To save documents, don't shake it. To erase documents, do shake it.

      You can even save many pages (write smaller) and best of all the batteries last forever!

      --
      Beep beep.
    5. Re:sci-fi wins again by quake74 · · Score: 1
      I do wonder about the power supply though. Seeing that I can barely get a day's worth of stand-by on my cell phone with a tiny text screen
      Dude, this is offtopic, but you really need a new cell if your battery life is so bad. Most of the new ones will give you several days of stand-by life.
    6. Re:sci-fi wins again by Dylan+Zimmerman · · Score: 1

      The e-paper systems that I've seen involve electrostaticly charged black balls in a white solution. When you charge a plate on one side of the cell, the balls move to that side and stick there, turning the cell black.

      Really, interactive e-ink isn't that technologicaly different from normal e-paper. You just need a pressure sensitive coating that generates a charge (like, say, piezoelectric crystals) and a button to erase it. Then, you just need some extra circuitry to save the state somewhere. Read it off like ferite core memory and save the charges somewhere when the user flips pages.

    7. Re:sci-fi wins again by bhtooefr · · Score: 0

      OT again, but are you locking your keypad? Are you not pressing the buttons EVEN IF THE KEYPAD IS LOCKED (Mitsubishi phones will backlight under these conditions)? Is the cell analog or digital? If digital, what brand and what model?

    8. Re:sci-fi wins again by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      Lurr: We demand to eat one human for each Omicronian that was eaten.
      Zapp: Fair enough. How many is that?
      Kif: 198 Billion, sir.
      Lurr: Very well. You will provide us with 198 billion humans. And, uh, small fries.
      Ndunda: Lurr!
      Lurr: Oh, all right, cottage cheese.
      Kif: [Whispers to Zapp] Sir, there aren't that many human beings.
      Zapp: A thought occurs: There aren't that many humans.
      Lurr: We'll wait a few weeks while you shore up the numbers.
      Zapp: Hmm? 198 billion babies in a few weeks. We'll need an army of super-virile men scoring 'round the clock! I'll do my part. Kif, clear my schedule.
      Kif: [Sighs, turns over and shakes an Etch-A-Sketch]

    9. Re:sci-fi wins again by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Most of the new ones will give you several days of stand-by life.
      Except if you're in the middle of no-frikken-where, or alternatively it seems, in my office.

      Phone (transmitting keep-alives): hello? Helloo? HELLLOOO!
      Tower : Speak up, dammit!
      *Phone crackles with corona discharge* H-E-L-L-O!
      Tower : yeah, thats fine, keep it up.

      User (20 minutes later): WTF? Flat again?

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    10. Re:sci-fi wins again by TGK · · Score: 1

      Well they could call it Digital Ink, or Dink for short :)

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    11. Re:sci-fi wins again by mikerich · · Score: 1
      Well there is always the Xerox PARC original electronic paper called Gyricon.

      It uses a slightly different idea. It has two sheets of plastic forming the faces of the paper, with a sandwich of beads in the middle. The beads have two hemispheres - one white, one black.

      When an electric current is passed over the beads they rotate to show one face or another - effectively each bead is a 1-bit pixel. Take away the power and the bead remains in position until another charge is applied.

      It seems to be a much lower tech approach than the MIT proposal since all the electronics are in the device creating the images rather than in the paper. So I'm guessing that Gyricon could be much cheaper than E Ink's product.

      Xerox spun off Gyricon as the Gyricon Media company who already have two products in the marketplace - SmartPaper and MaestroSigns. They have been used for advertising and smart signs in the US. So you can instantly update thousands of point-of-sale signs or price tags over RF.

      I'd never thought of it as a big problem, but this page on the Gyricon site shows the sort of numbers involved and the market opportunity for smart signs.

      Very clever.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    12. Re:sci-fi wins again by tunabomber · · Score: 1

      I remeber a while ago Compaq (as it was then) was playing with the idea of using power from the kayboard to recharge batteries. now that was a good idea

      You're damn right that's a good idea!!!

      Then I'd be able to go on Slashdot and compose long,rambling,poorly substanciated posts that also include random jokes about CowboyNeal's mass,"obligatory" but totally irrelevant Star Wars/LOTR/Simpsons/Matrix quotes, as well as many context-adjusted meme regurgitations...

      And then at the bottom I could write:
      "Just charging my iPaq!"

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
  13. Some good info... by LamerX · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here are some good links for those of you who want to know more...

    http://www.eink.com/

    http://www.biblio-tech.com/BTR901/January_2001/e -i nk_for_e-books__.html

    ink_for_e-books__.html
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi /english/sci/tech/newsid_1 292000/1292852.stm

    http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/stories/story/0, 10 738,2656348,00.html

    1. Re:Some good info... by Corporate+Gadfly · · Score: 5, Informative
      > Here are some good links for those of you who want to know more...
      With a little bit more effort, here's the same links as hyperlinks (no nasty spaces, no cut-and-paste).

      E ink homepage
      E-Ink boost for mobile electronic reading
      E-paper moves a step nearer
      E-Paper Here Sooner Than You Think
      --
      Corporate Gadfly
      Jonathan Archer: the most beaten up Enterprise captain in Star Trek history
    2. Re:Some good info... by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      There's another interesting technology at Iridigm.

    3. Re:Some good info... by prockcore · · Score: 1

      With a little bit more effort, here's the same links as hyperlinks (no nasty spaces, no cut-and-paste).

      That's amazing! Someone should patent this technology. Imagine, just being able to click on a word and have it take you to a different page!

  14. You just know what will happen though.... by gilesjuk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some idiot will ask how to put it into the photocopier or fax machine :)

    1. Re:You just know what will happen though.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Is this so crazy, if the contrast is high enough?

    2. Re:You just know what will happen though.... by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      It is if you can just press a print button and have a high quality print.

      Putting the e-paper through a standard fax machine will break the e-paper.

    3. Re:You just know what will happen though.... by ehiris · · Score: 1

      I would pay to see you copying your Word files. Is your monitor High Contrast?

    4. Re:You just know what will happen though.... by Soko · · Score: 1

      Not the ultimate idiot, though.

      BOFH: "$LUSER, why is there white-out and hi-lite marker all over the e-paper I gave you?"
      $LUSER: "Ummmmm..." *BLANK_STARE*
      BOFH: "Thought so. I have to kill you now."

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    5. Re:You just know what will happen though.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I work, they wouldn't even tell me about it. Two days later I'd go to use the laser printer and I'd have to unjam the E-paper that's wound all around the fuser.

    6. Re:You just know what will happen though.... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Sure, printing on it will ruin the paper (even if it doesn't break, what good is it if you can't read the original e-text any more).

      But why should it break when put trought "scanner" part of fax machine or photocopier?

    7. Re:You just know what will happen though.... by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Probably because although it is epaper it will still be thicker than paper?

      I'm sure there will also be a nice thick plastic section at the top or the bottom of the unit which will house any circuitry required as well as batteries. This will jam in a fax machine.

  15. Sure it's cool but ... by jrl87 · · Score: 1

    Although is thought to be an inovation that will significantly reduce paper consumption, based on my knowledge it will not. It may replace standard paper, but eventually it will get dirty, torn, and/or just become too old to use. It would be beneficicial if they made it with a very heavy lamination on it; preferably one heavy enough you could put it in the dishwasher or something.

    1. Re:Sure it's cool but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just as a paper sheet it might be fairly easy / cheap to replace. Fortunately it is not as fragile or costly to produce as an LCD screen.

  16. Slashdot editors at it again by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    In this case, don't you mean an "aperless" toilet?

    ;-D

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  17. The disposability problem and convergence by VT_hawkeye · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd worry that e-paper won't get past the disposability problem.

    One of the attractions of newspapers and magazines is that you can just get rid of them when you're done with them -- unless you have a compulsive desire to keep archives of the local paper, you probably throw it away, recycle it, or (in mass transit settings) leave it for the next guy once you're done with it. People already complain about having too much stuff to keep track of (hence the convergence attempts between PDAs, cell phones and digital cameras); an e-paper notebook would just add to that problem.

    1. Re:The disposability problem and convergence by that_guy · · Score: 1

      Your enotebook could probably take the place of your pda given enough time, and there was an article a while back about a lcd monitor that took pictures too (although b&w very grainy)

      Of course, then you would have people holding up a flimsy piece of paper at you and saying "Say cheese" :)

      --

      Driving backwards on the highway of life
    2. Re:The disposability problem and convergence by Noofus · · Score: 1

      Of course, then you would have people holding up a flimsy piece of paper at you and saying "Say cheese" :)

      How is that any different than the current crop of useless camera technology: camera phones. Seriously talk about a solution looking for a problem. Ive never once thought to myself 'gee I wish I had a digital camera built into my phone right now'. I even recently bought one of those phones with the color screens (only because all the greyscale screen phones all seemed to suck). I still cant for the life of me figure out why I need a color screen on my phone.

    3. Re:The disposability problem and convergence by anonymous+loser · · Score: 1

      one word: pornography

    4. Re:The disposability problem and convergence by HermanZA · · Score: 1

      and when that nice girl walks by, you can make her clothes go transparent?

  18. Clothing by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Now, its only a given this will advance to clothing. What will the first applications be with clothing? i'm guessing accessories that can change patterns/color when you want, or are animated (albeit slowly).

    Now, for my other suggestion.....how about once we all have genetic identifiers given to us by the MicroRIMPAAment (that is M$, RIAA, MPAA, and government for those who didn't get it) we can have clothing that senses our embedded (as in under your skin) identifier chip and helps make society more "secure". All of a sudden in the school lab, my shirt starts blinking bright red and messages saying "PIRATE" start flashing all over me. Or how about when a nice muslim man tries to fly somewhere. Well, why bother hiring the minimum wage people to frisk him when you can simply have a detector that makes his shirt read TERRORIST when he walks through. You laugh now....but I will be safe with my tin foil ha........err.......body suit.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Clothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a douche bag. You portray that bluntly enough as is, noone needs a sign.

    2. Re:Clothing by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      And you are a troll who lacks the basic social knowledge necessary to pick up on a joke when you see one. O, and bonus points for posting that AC.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  19. pictures? by ivanmnemonic · · Score: 1

    where can i find some pictures of this stuff? i wanna see it!

    1. Re:pictures? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Some magazine has a big story with pictures in their print edition a few weeks back....

      ^ thats a joke; but seriously what happens where publishers display different content to purchasers of the hard copy over the web version, and how will newsagents sell their wares.
      I for one mainly pick up magazines that interest me by browing through my local shop.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  20. In the same vein... by foo+fighter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Whatever happened to print on demand publishing. It seemed to be a promising technology, much more promising than "epaper" but I can't find anyone using it anywhere.

    It seems like it would be a sweet deal for publishers and book sellers by cutting out a major cost source: the distributor. You go to a bookstore, find a paperback you like and take it to the counter. While you are paying for it, your copy is being printed in the back room. It's spit out onto the counter and the copy you picked up from the shelf is put back. This would be great to keep from being overstocked in a pulp-fiction title or technology book past its useful life.

    Digital copiers (even digital color copiers) are not expensive anymore, so I just don't get why we don't see this.

    For the same reasons, I don't understand why retailers have stacks of CDs in bins. Just have a dupe machine in the back room with a digital color copier for the liner notes. While you are paying for your CD it's being created in the back room. Again, you cut a major expense by knocking out the distributor.

    I thought the Internet was supposed to enable exactly these types of situations, but they are no where to be seen.

    What's up with that?

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:In the same vein... by jgerman · · Score: 1

      Why stick the book at all? Why not browse through a terminal? Bookstores could be a lot smaller.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    2. Re:In the same vein... by switcha · · Score: 2, Informative

      While it's a pitch for their server, Apple had a puff-piece on Trafford Publishing not too long ago. It's a brief look at how print-on-demand can be successful, at least on a small scale.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    3. Re:In the same vein... by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      One major drawback is binding, the binding on the Xerox publish on demand system sucked horribly. I imagine given enough time and resources someone could come up with an almost instant binding solution that would work about as well as a paperback, but I don't think the tech will ever rival a well bound hardback book. The problem with the CD's would be players that can't read from dye based cd's and the fact that dye based cds dont last as long. It would however greatly lower the distribution cost of cd's but it really doesn't matter because the real costs are in the promotions department, the physical production and distribution of a cd probably comes in around $1.50

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:In the same vein... by that_guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When I'm choosing books I like to be able to feel them, judge them on their physical characteristics. (What the cover looks like, quality of paper, size, etc)

      Plus I usually flip through the book, read a couple pages just to see if I like the tone. It just wouldn't be the same :)

      --

      Driving backwards on the highway of life
    5. Re:In the same vein... by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Digital copiers (even digital color copiers) are not expensive anymore, so I just don't get why we don't see this."

      When you are printing 20,000,000 books it is an order of magnitude cheaper to use a proper industrial printing system designed to print x,000,000 books than x,000,000 smaller printing systems. This is more than enough to overcome the cost of distribution.

      Your system would be better for small runs of reasonably unpopular books, but wouldn't be cost effective for (say) Harry Potter. Because without Harry Poter et al the small decentralised model wouldn't sell enough to make money, the whole thing ends up back as a centralised system with one big printer that just (in large part) ignores the less popular books that only a few people want.

      --
      Beep beep.
    6. Re:In the same vein... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      For the same reasons, I don't understand why retailers have stacks of CDs in bins. Just have a dupe machine in the back room with a digital color copier for the liner notes. While you are paying for your CD it's being created in the back room. Again, you cut a major expense by knocking out the distributor.

      I have actually seen these in a few places.

      In Disneyland, for example, there is a music store which makes custom CDs for you (but only for certain Disney music: Soundtracks, music from the rides, etc). You walk up to a computer terminal, select the tracks you want, and hit "Burn it baby".

      The computer burns a CD for you (takes about 10 minutes), and you pick it up at the counter. No custom labels.

      I got one CD of 15 tracks of music from the Haunted Mansion, and a bunch of music from other parts of the park.

      The Haunted Mansion music real fun to use during Halloween. The music is plenty eerie, but doesn't scare the fsck out of the little trick-or-treaters.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    7. Re:In the same vein... by seinman · · Score: 1

      Because bookstores smell good.

    8. Re:In the same vein... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Check out my former employer (as a temp):

      XLibris

      1. Authors sign up
      2. pay fee
      3. books get formatted, listed on Amazon (and Books In Print)
      4. folks order on Amazon (or their bookstore)
      5. print on demand publisher creates the book
      6. ships to store/customer
      7. royalty goes to Author.

      Authors get much higher royalties this way, but zero marketting, shelfspace, etc.

      Also, with XLibris (unlike some competitors), Authors keep their copyright. They can unlist with XLibris at any time, and sell their book to someone else, whatever.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    9. Re:In the same vein... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

      i thought a single cd cost around $255,000 to produce?
      or is that just an RIAA myth

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    10. Re:In the same vein... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Why would I want to wait for my book to print out. I go to the bookstore because it's there and I want it now. If I wanted to wait I'd go to amazon and wait 8 days for it to get to me.

    11. Re:In the same vein... by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      Well, you buy the copy in your hand and then they put the new copy out?

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    12. Re:In the same vein... by saneax · · Score: 2, Interesting
      We are still far from printing online like u say there is a vein attempt being made. U can see at Internet Printing Protocols which are yet to be defined and agreed upon. Particular of interest would be RFC2567 and RFC2568.

      When we understand the way books are printed we would only understand its very different than what we would assume.Burning CD's and printing Books is quite different, CD printing is in a digital format, while plain paper printing, binding is a lot more time consuming and costly affair. Custom Internet books printed through digitial copier machines would cost a hell lot.

      --
      0 0
    13. Re:In the same vein... by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      One word: replicators

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    14. Re:In the same vein... by jgerman · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I love book stores. I much prefer a dead tree book to an electronic one. But the odds are slim that if print on demand becomes common place you'll see bookstores in the state they are now. Maybe a few, catering to the people that like them. Or maybe enough people will reject the idea. But from a business standpoint, less rent, little or no theft, ect. it's easy to see what a company like Borders would choose.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    15. Re:In the same vein... by that_guy · · Score: 1

      You might be able to have some sort of compromise, where there are a section of popular printed books to browse through, and you can have them print one if you want to "test" it. Then either buy it or they put it on the shelf. That way you have some dead tree books already there, but not taking up nearly as much space, and they would probably get sold eventually.

      --

      Driving backwards on the highway of life
    16. Re:In the same vein... by jgerman · · Score: 1

      It's all a moot point though, until print on demand becomes a reality. I for one would love to be able to roll into any bookstore and get the "out of print" books I've had to track down the hard way.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  21. I hate every aper I see... by switcha · · Score: 2, Funny
    Electronic aper comes a step closer

    I hate every aper I see...from chimpan-a to chimpan-z.

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  22. Re:What will the community do with this? by gilesjuk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I somehow think to make this technology practical that having e-paper acting as a computer is a waste of resources.

    It's better off being a kind of terminal, then minimal storage and CPU power will be needed on the device.

    These won't be slimline Tablet PCs.

  23. msnbc has purty pictures of it by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://msnbc.com/news/910466.asp?0cv=CB20

    it reminds me of pictures of the first transistors bell labs- all bulky and ungainly

    but in it's picture you see the future gleaming bright ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:msnbc has purty pictures of it by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Everyone forgets the main reason this is cool:

      Reflective lighting. No one cares about the brightness of a book (or how it looks in the sun) because it doesn't rely on backlighting/liquid crystal/whatever. The first time people use these devices, they'll be just as enthralled as the first time they played pong, and interacted with a television. It's that different.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:msnbc has purty pictures of it by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Yup...it's pretty purty. But it has one drawback: as well as you can see the paper in the light, you won't be qable to spot it at night.

      Now if they could somehow combine this with OLED technology, you'd have a even more amazing piece of tech :)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  24. DIY Macs and electronic paper: What's next? by burgburgburg · · Score: 1

    Dehydrated water? Battery powered tissues? Glowing cars? Oh wait, they're already planning on building that.

    1. Re:DIY Macs and electronic paper: What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just set up a loudspeaker system on your car that screams "I'm a fag!!" repeatedly?

    2. Re:DIY Macs and electronic paper: What's next? by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Glowing cars? ...planning on building that

      That's neat, but I want my glowing motorcycle.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  25. MSNBC has a good picture by ehiris · · Score: 1
  26. useless waste of r&d and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see absolutely no application for this e-paper crap! Think about it.. when was the last time you inadvertently decided to write on paper over typing or something? Paper is useful because its in abundance. You write some notes, they serve their purpose and you crumple it up and throw it away! What am I suppose to do? Carry this reusable paper around with me at all times with my trusty magic pencil so I can tap the blank page and take some notes .. first time anybody gets even remotely comfortable with that they will crumple it up throw it away an then 'DOH!'

  27. What's next... by BigRedPimp · · Score: 1

    scriptless kiddies? :P

  28. Here's some info... by OldFart58 · · Score: 1

    Well, you might try here:

    Xerox Publishing

    Somebody must be buying this stuff - it is expensive to R&D/produce...

    Have fun!

    OldFart 8-)

  29. Magnadoodle? by dspfreak · · Score: 1
    If you read about the technology on the company's web site, it sounds a lot like a high resolution Magna-doodle (except it's electrostatic, not magnetic).

    So to turn the page, do you shake it, or run the little bar along the side?

    --
    "Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions." -- G. K. Chesterton
    1. Re:Magnadoodle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although the parent is a humourous comment, there is a valid point. How long did it take before your magna-doodle went dead? Eventually, the magnetic fillings would lose their potency, or you'd get areas of the screen that wouldn't work.

      Everybody's seen a jumbotron, LED, or LCD display with dead pixels. I'm wondering how reliable this system is, flexibility nonwithstanding. If you accidentally tear a newspaper, no big deal. If you tear this e-paper, it would probably cease to function and you'd have to shell out for a new one.

  30. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trees save YOU!

  31. Don Lancaster's the man for you by studboy · · Score: 1

    our friend Don Lancaster has it all figured out: get a good (PostScript) printer, Adobe Acrobat, and some other stuff -- see his Book-on-Demand library.

  32. The perfect companion... by lazlo · · Score: 3, Funny
    Cool, it's the perfect combination. Electronic paper to go in the printer attached to your cardboard computer.

    Now just add in a few wooden peripherals, and the occasional pigeon for the networking, and you'll be all set!

    --
    Pound! Bang! Bin! Bash! is this a shell script or a Batman comic?
    1. Re:The perfect companion... by Zirnike · · Score: 1

      And just think how much cooler your origami math will be...

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    2. Re:The perfect companion... by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Now just add in a few wooden peripherals...

      You left out the link: Wood peripherals.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  33. e-books and wireless paper... by bytes2bu · · Score: 1

    I bought into this whole e-book concept and bought an RCA ebook reader a couple of years ago. I still haven't found it useful enough for the initial purchase. Content is the biggest problem as well as cost. I could buy a paperback version of the ebook cheaper and I didn't have to pay $300 to see it.

    I love the idea of ebook and epaper... but honestly it sounds like a lot of hype that'll take so long to get to market I'll be pumping books directly into my brain through a wireless link from my DIY mac! :-)

  34. Re:ZAP! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    You sound like my wife.

    She has been known to pick up hot soldering irons by the wrong end. She put it down pretty quick though...

  35. Japanese & Paper by www.microsoft.com · · Score: 1

    eLink has an office in the Tokyo, Japan area.
    And this ePaper is the thirth product of the company.

    Its first attempt to produce a cool paper product wasn't a hit.

    The second set of cool paper products is more interesting.

    Japanese Paper owns.

    Whats dumb? Instructions on toilet paper.
    Whats dumber than that? reading them.
    Whats even dumber? Reading them and learning something.
    Dumbest of all? Reading them and having to correct something you've been doing wrong.

  36. The last decameter... by OldFart58 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There exists a real need for moving some of the bits I see on my CRT (actually, 3 20" CRTs as one virtual desktop, but I digress 8-) a few meters over, in a form factor appropriate to the venue.

    Specifically, I'm talking about moving some of the bits described in this article, like those you can find here , onto digital paper so that I can then wander over to my lavish master bathroom, where I'd like to then peruse same either sitting on the porcelain throne or wallowing in the hot jacuzzi in close proximity.

    A laptop/pda does not (IMHO) fit the bill here - but a (preferably steamproof 8-) 'digital' paperback (uploadable via a USB socket in the spine, perhaps) would certainly be welcome. At the cost of a half-dozen paperback novels (~US$50) I think they'd sell a boatload of the things... I'd buy one!

    Have fun!

    OldFart 8-)

  37. Evil E-Paper Application by StefanJ · · Score: 3, Funny

    God, I probably shouldn't write this down, because it could get implemented for real and then even if the developer never saw this post I'd get blamed and . . .

    Anyway.

    Imagine if the price tags fixed on stores shelves were made of this stuff. Not only would it allow Wal-Mart to slash prices without using that hideous flying yellow smile-face robot*, but the prices could be CUSTOMIZED to YOU, flickering to show a new value as you enter an aisle.

    People who try to avoid this scheme by wearing retina-shield glasses or digging out there ID implant would be charged full price

    Stefan

    * Wal-Mart has done an excellent job covering up the Toledo incident, in which the store's slashbot disembowelled a kid wearing a number jersey. The splatter of blood on that diabolical smiling yellow face inspired a protest button that, for some reason, is still worn by comic book afficianodoes.

    1. Re:Evil E-Paper Application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, this idea (sans the personalization) was one of the first commercial uses of E-Ink's technology. I think it was JC Penny that was testing them. . .

    2. Re:Evil E-Paper Application by muzthe42nd · · Score: 1

      over here in blighty, safeways has something like this. LCD pricetags....

      --
      Pfft - Sorry, what?
  38. What a dumb bitch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /AC for a reason

    1. Re:What a dumb bitch! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. Her sister got hot glue on her finger and...did what comes naturally. She had a blister on her finger *AND* her lip!

  39. Electronic Toilet Paper by superpulpsicle · · Score: 0

    Now... if I can go anywhere and do my business with just 1 piece of electronic toilet paper, you'll certainly have my money.

  40. Source for e-ink news/sites at the ODP by tiltowait · · Score: 1

    And with a bit more effort, you can link to the ODP E-Ink category where those links were taken from directly!

    Hrm, I usually post whoring comments like this as anon, but no checkbox for some reason... oh well, I did create the ODP category at least.

  41. E-Paper by poor_boi · · Score: 0

    While the economical, ecological and informational value of epaper is undeniable, there's something to be said for "having it in ink." I'd hate to have my bookshelf wiped out by a solar flare or malicious EMP field.

    Not to rain on anyone's parade -- epaper is cool -- but there's a reason the 10 commandments were written in stone and not scratched in the dirt. Allegorically speaking...

    1. Re:E-Paper by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Like your bookshelf is right now impervious to fire, earthquakes or floods?

      With an electronic system, you'd still own a license to the books, and could possibly restore them from the publishers onto your new e-paper after the flare is over.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:E-Paper by poor_boi · · Score: 0

      You're right, but DRM scares me. I like to touch the things I own. Call it asthetic, because it ain't practical. Until your life gets th' ole "rd /s /q".

    3. Re:E-Paper by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      With an electronic system, you'd still own a license to the books, and could possibly restore them from the publishers onto your new e-paper after the flare is over.

      Just like the record companies are so happy to restore electronic copies of music you've purchased when you get your CD collection stolen.

  42. clickable link here by tiltowait · · Score: 1

    Doh, not my day.
    Here ya go. Looks like the server is kinda erratic tho.

  43. Fancy applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Instead of embedding it in paper, embed it in many more fabrics.

    - Dynamic camo for soldiers, and lots of James-Bond-ish gadgets like a programmable, dynamic passport

    - Fancy clothing that changes colour and motif (display your iTunes graphics on your shirt while dancing ? And imagine the hacking opportunities, displaying pr0n on your friends' back)

    - Animated (and highly annoying) packaging like that cereal cardbox from Minority Report

    - Ultrathin watches that consist just of a band of plastic, and maybe can display other useful information...

    - Animated programmable tattoos, like those of SciFi book "Vertical Horizon"

    The possibilities are nearly endless...

    I believe it'd be accompanied by technology that would make screens detachable, maybe associated with that "pocket server" by IBM, mentioned in a recent /. article. Now this "wearable computer" just needs some input device...

  44. Good for checks! by Anonvmous+Cowrad · · Score: 2, Funny

    This kind of paper comes in handy when you are shopping.

    Yeah check said $1324.22 when I gave it to the cashier...

  45. Helpful info in the article by Chairboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the article:
    "The human eye blends these resulting patterns of black- or white-topped capsules into text displayed in a traditional column."

    Oh, is THAT how pixels work?

  46. A legal issue by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    This is from an editor who we had give a talk at an SF con recently.

    One problem is that contracts (at least, those signed before e-books and print-on-demand were anticipated) tend to have clauses giving certain rights back to the author once the book has been out of print for a certain period.

    It is ambiguous whether availability as an e-book or print-on-demand book constitutes being 'in print'. Publishers and authors may prefer to avoid the ambiguity. (Of course, they could renegotiate.)

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  47. Crapping on microsoft! by macshune · · Score: 1

    Woohoo! I'll be able to read the paper (and then use it to wipe up) after I've pooped on microsoft!

    1. Re:Crapping on microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woohoo! I'll be able to read the paper (and then use it to wipe up) after I've pooped on microsoft!

      And no webcam?

  48. How to power e-paper by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

    If it uses so little power, it could be powered from the microwave energy coming from your cellphone, or other peoples cell phones around you. Perhaps the cellphone could be constantly 'connected' to the e-paper which would allow you to download new content, or surf the internet. The cellphone could also monitor power consumption needs and perhaps give the e-paper a little boost when needed.
    Just an idea, but it would be a good convergence of technology

  49. Not an unreasonable idea by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    Paperless toilet = bidet + hot air dryer.

    (Careful with the temperature regulation on that dryer, though; who needs a singed sphincter?)

  50. Duh! by Malfourmed · · Score: 2, Funny
    Also what about if it goes flat?
    It's paper - it's already flat! ;-)
  51. And with a little more effort... by lpret · · Score: 1

    Here's the same hyperlinks, except categorized all on one page that discusses how to use such technologies. E ink usage in the future (with addendum)

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  52. Electronic paperclips? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    I still haven't seen an ebook interface that is as intuitive as a real book or paper. It's pretty easy to see a paperclip (or whatever) in the top of a book.

    Then the e-paper people will invent an electronic paperclip that will be just as visible. It could even jump around and make sounds to attract your attention if you think it's not visible enough. In fact, you could even program to do things like help you type a letter!

  53. What would be *really* cool by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    A DIY Mac in a box made from electronic paper.

  54. Electronic Paper? by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    Wow E-paper that can be WiFied, what will they come up with next. Just think, now covert advertisers will be able to spam you by war driving around changing your E-paper. Think of the propoganda possibilities, come election time your E-clothing can display political messages. Everyone running around displaying advertising. The world will become one big billboard.

    The message cheapened by the medium, Marshall would puke! Info tech gone mad, in the Global village.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  55. electronic paper -- poof! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We know what you're reading, you can only read it once, you can't make a copy, and we can change it at will. Wonderful.

  56. what's so cool about eink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC.

    I saw a talk by someone at e-ink about this product at the recent American Physical Society in Austin, TX. The talk was fantastic. The reason this article came out is because their work was also just this week published in Nature which, for those of you who aren't scientists, is a big deal.

    Basically it works using charged particles. White particles are one charge, black particles are the other charge. When a voltage is applied on the backplane, one charge moves away and the other is attracted. Problem is, we were told, that the charged particles just swimming around together had a tendency to follow gravity when the voltage was turned off, much like an etch-a-sketch. They solved this problem by encapsulating the charged particles in slightly larger microspheres. That way they can hold the microspheres in place with a polymer that doesn't inhibit the motion of the charged particles inside. The encapuslated particles get held in place, presumably by Van der Waals forces, and don't have the etch-a-sketch problem. It's an elegant solution. So far, this only works in black and white (or a two-color display).

    What's so cool about this product is that, unlike liquid crystal displays, it has a very wide viewing angle. The current evolution of the product can be bent (also unlike LCDs) a few times without serious degradation of the image. This ability will increase when they move to conducting polymers for the backplane (which is currently limiting the flexibility). It requires no power to hold the picture/text once it's been set. So even if it requires more power than they'd like to set it, it requires none until they want to change it again.

    I saw the demo that's pictured, and it really looked like they'd taken a type-set piece of paper and laminated it. And it'd been stable for several months with no degradation.

    This is good news for those of us (like my husband and me) who have been lusting after the idea of a book that can contain whole libraries. Imagine a book of these pages, with a wireless connection, and hard-drive in the spine. This is also really useful for store displays and advertisements. And if they get color displays working, that'll really take off.

    1. Re:what's so cool about eink? by HEbGb · · Score: 1

      I saw this demo also. It was bogus - they imply that this is a 96dpi matrix display, but in fact, it's a static text image that cannot change. Big whoop. They're a LONG way from making a usable matrix display *that can actually change*.

      This stuff is total hype. I'm willing to bet that the only reason they soliciting press is that they're low on money, and have to hit up still more VC's.

    2. Re:what's so cool about eink? by Dr+Zubi · · Score: 1

      That's absolutely and totally wrong. If you bothered reading any of the details, you'd see that the image is totally changeable. They built a thin film transistor array (same as on a laptop LCD screen) but on flexible steel foil. This TFT array drives the electronic ink. E Ink did have some blinking, static image signs that they sell. You're confusing the two.

  57. papercomputer.com by mixy1plik · · Score: 0

    http://web.archive.org/web/20000711012244/www.pape rcomputer.com/pages/generalinfo.htm

  58. Di-aper? by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

    is that electronic aper? paper? or diaper?

    Oh crap, now there's two of them!

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  59. Re:What will the community do with this? by TGK · · Score: 1

    I think Niel Stephenson had the best ideas about this. E-Paper is the ULTIMATE PDF. The system needs only rudimentry image processing and a few other features built into it.

    Use this technology to extend to Real Space what we allready do in Virtual Space. No computer user has any problem with the idea that a 200 page document can be represented as an icon. Extend that. Why not have that same 200 page document represted as a single page? Images, animations, graphs, even minorly interactive material can be included with fairly tiny changes.

    Point is there's no need for this to allow any sort of high end use. Games? Why bother? The intent would be to use these in place of larger, bulkier documents. There's no need to replace the Walt Disney World flyers with these, but one detailing the US taxcode might be usefull to some people.

    --
    Killfile(TGK)
    No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  60. Printing, Memory, and old versions of newspapers? by MP*Birdman · · Score: 1

    having a newspaper be automatically sent to your single sheet of e-paper sounds neat and all, but what sort of memory do these things have? Can they store the newspaper from 2 weeks ago, for when you're looking for that special article to show someone? Or can they handle multiple different newspapers all sending that day's edition to you, without just overwriting them all with whichever arrives last?

    What if you want to make a copy of a classified ad? Can you print it off easily, store it in special memory, or anything similar?

    There are more advantages to a real newspaper than just its pervasiveness.