Slashdot Mirror


Rent a Segway

Arjun Ram writes "MSNBC.com is reporting that renting a segway would cost as much as $20 for each 30-minute increment, for up to 90 minutes. Users can also pay $5 for a test drive, or 'pre-glide' as Lambeth calls it. Neat!"

284 comments

  1. liability by mrpuffypants · · Score: 0

    not, however, that the company makes you sign a weiver that says if you injure yourself while on the segway it's your own damn fault. Watch out for cracks in the pavement!

    1. Re:liability by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

      damn, that was terrible spelling....never first post before your morning coffee!

    2. Re:liability by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

      GWB tard? No.. he already been re-tard.

      --
      meh
    3. Re:liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and I'm sure if you bought a bike, rode it, fell, and skinned a knee you'd be able to sue to manufacturer for your own stupidity.

    4. Re:Liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't tell me that something that weighs 250+ lbs, can go 12mph is safe on the sidewalk.

      So a fat jogger is unsafe, too, right?

    5. Re:liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      put "segway accident" in google. Click on the accessatlanta.com link. It's been taken down, so
      you need to click on google's cache of the page. The photograph of the victim was taken down by accessatlanta, but the text remains.

    6. Re:liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the rich, elite one that thinks he can spend your money better than you can, Senator Haircut, I think his name is.

  2. at 20$ for 30 minutes by rootofevil · · Score: 1

    its still cheaper than a trip to disneyland.

    get on kids, this is your E ticket...

    --
    turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    1. Re:at 20$ for 30 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      both are overpriced crap, IMO.

  3. ...and go where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, aside from pedestrian-friendly cities like Boston and New York, where the hell would you take it from one place to another and back in a half hour?

    1. Re:...and go where? by wik · · Score: 1

      Put the rental place near a running/rollerblading trail. Customers can go all the way to one end and back, while looking sillier than the freaks in dayglow spandex.

      With that price, it's an amusement, not a practical device for getting you from point A to point B. Besides, where would you park without it being stolen?

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    2. Re:...and go where? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      motorized vehicles are not welcome on running/rollerblading trails. Nor are they on sidewalks.

      Vehicles like the segway belong in the road -- with the cars... maybe the desire to be responsible with personal transportation, and its associated infrastructure can change the depth of some of the associated problems (sprawl, pollution, inhumane citydesign, obesity..etcetc).

    3. Re:...and go where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Segway won't work in NY. Sidewalks are too crowded. If some dumbass on a Segway ran into me as he blabbed on his cell phone, I'd punch him. And some punk kid would steal the Segway.

    4. Re:...and go where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, aside from pedestrian-friendly cities like Boston and New York

      I imagine it would be more fun in pedestrian-hostile cities where they might let you use things like that on the sidewalk.

    5. Re:...and go where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in Spokane. The place that rents it is, I belive, located in Riverfront park (site of the 1974 World Expo). It's a big huge park you can tool around in, and it's immediately adjacent to downtown too. Although I don't see anyone renting one of these for actual transportation, but instead for fun or to try them out.

    6. Re:...and go where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Machinaw Island (place in Michigan where no cars are allowed)

    7. Re:...and go where? by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny

      But, but ... Jeff Bezos and Steve Jobs told me that whole cities would be built around it! Are you saying they make incredible claims with no basis in reality?!?!?!!?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    8. Re:...and go where? by mrleisure · · Score: 1

      I took my Segways to New York City this weekend. I rode down Broadway through Times Square in the midst of a huge mob of pedestrians on Friday and Saturday nights. There were no problems whatsoever. I got dozens of positive comments from people around me, and no negativity.

      If I ran into you I would deserve a punch in the face, because I would have to be aiming for you and it would have been a first strike.

      Be sure you know firsthand what you're talking about before you declare the Segway unfit for sidewalk use. Actually get on and try it in a dense crowd, it's simply not a problem. Until you actually ride this machine, there is no way you can have a good idea of what it is.

    9. Re:...and go where? by jdeking1 · · Score: 1

      Well, here in Florida bike lanes are ubiquitous in the urban areas I've lived in. They are wide enough for Segways. That's not to say I'd rent a Segway on a regular basis, but at least I know I'd have a place to ride one if I did.

      --
      "A generation which ignores history has no past and no future." -- Robert Heinlein
    10. Re:...and go where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New York is a pedestrian friendly city? Not with those big fucking cracks in the sidewalk and the thousands of SUV drivers who think that a red light means the next 4 cars can go through the intersection.

  4. Why? by JustAGuyNamedStu · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Still overpricing something that doesn't DO anything. Too many americans are overweight.. but we don't do anything about it. Now we've got this thing.. *sigh* What ever happened to WALKING somewhere?

    --
    I really have no idea what I am talking about.
    1. Re:Why? by opti6600 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Stu, allow me to tell you something. This is probably the biggest misconception amongst people in the community.

      I'm 15, and probably the youngest Early Adopter out there. An Early Adopter is an owner who purchased their Segway HT through Amazon, and was one of the first units shipped. I ordered mine, for example, an hour and a half after the launch back in November. A Segway i-Series is by no means cheap, about $5000 retail. I chose mine in lieu of a car for now, and hoped that it would make my life a bit easier and productive.

      Now, over two months in use, my i-Series has in no way disappointed. My commute to school leaves a smile on my face as I follow the scenic route I plan in the morning, a beautiful alternative to driving on US-1. I no longer contribute to the thermal and chemical pollution of cars or even buses, and my method of transportation is just as unique as the people whose smiles reach from ear to ear as they see me. I've made new friends and acquaintances with the HT as my conversation piece, even. It has actually made Miami a safer place for me.

      Now, to address your "fat" comment. Most of us have come to a definite conclusion about the Segway in regards to concerns like yours. I'm a geek, like so many others out there in /. are. I used a car to get everywhere before my HT, and I never walked much farther than from my computer chair to the fridge, or from class to class. Now not only do I get out and see the environment (as shoddily preserved as it may be!), but I have a new form of exercise. It may not seem like much here, but you would be quite surprised to learn that using an HT is a good bit of work for your legs. You don't notice it at first, but the ache is there for about two weeks. The fine muscle control over muscles you didn't really know existed is a definite exercise. Okay, I understand how someone -could- get fatter if they were a fitness nut, walked or jogged everywhere, and suddenly replaced that with a Segway HT. But that's not the point of the Seg, folks. The company itself states, and those of us in the community agree, that the Segway HT isn't intended to replace walking, it's designed to replace short car trips that have disastrous effects on our environment, and our pockets too.

      If anybody has any further questions or comments regarding the Segway, my experiences, or just about anything, feel free to drop me an email (opti6600@bellsouth.net).

      Best regards,
      Jordan Prevé

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Who is Xenu?

      I'm going to tell you a story. Are you sitting comfortably? Right, then I'll begin.

      Once upon a time (75 million years ago to be more precise) there was an alien galactic ruler named Xenu. Xenu was in charge of all the planets in this part of the galaxy including our own planet Earth, except in those days it was called Teegeeack.

      Now Xenu had a problem. All of the 76 planets he controlled were overpopulated. Each planet had on average 178 billion people. He wanted to get rid of all the overpopulation so he had a plan.

      Xenu took over complete control with the help of renegades to defeat the good people and the Loyal Officers. Then with the help of psychiatrists he called in billions of people for income tax inspections where they were instead given injections of alcohol and glycol mixed to paralyse them. Then they were put into space planes that looked exactly like DC8s (except they had rocket motors instead of propellers).

      These DC8 space planes then flew to planet Earth where the paralysed people were stacked around the bases of volcanoes in their hundreds of billions. When they had finished stacking them around then H-bombs were lowered into the volcanoes. Xenu then detonated all the H-bombs at the same time and everyone was killed.

      The story doesn't end there though. Since everyone has a soul (called a "thetan" in this story) then you have to trick souls into not coming back again. So while the hundreds of billions of souls were being blown around by the nuclear winds he had special electronic traps that caught all the souls in electronic beams (the electronic beams were sticky like fly-paper).

      After he had captured all these souls he had them packed into boxes and taken to a few huge cinemas. There all the souls had to spend days watching special 3D motion pictures that told them what life should be like and many confusing things. In this film they were shown false pictures and told they were God, The Devil and Christ. In the story this process is called "implanting".

      When the films ended and the souls left the cinema these souls started to stick together because since they had all seen the same film they thought they were the same people. They clustered in groups of a few thousand. Now because there were only a few living bodies left they stayed as clusters and inhabited these bodies.

      As for Xenu, the Loyal Officers finally overthrew him and they locked him away in a mountain on one of the planets. He is kept in by a force-field powered by an eternal battery and Xenu is still alive today.

      That is the end of the story. And so today everyone is full of these clusters of souls called "body thetans". And if we are to be a free soul then we have to remove all these "body thetans" and pay lots of money to do so. And the only reason people believe in God and Christ was because it was in the film their body thetans saw 75 million years ago.

      Well what did you think of that story?

      What? You thought it was a stupid story?

      Well so do we. However, this story is the core belief in the religion known as Scientology.* If people knew about this story then most people would never get involved in it. This story is told to you when you reach one of their secret levels called OT III. After that you are supposed to telepathically communicate with these body thetans to make them go away. You have to pay a lot of money to get to this level and do this (or you have to work very hard for the organisation on extremely low pay for many years).

      We are telling you this story as a warning. If you become involved with Scientology then we would like you to do so with your eyes open and fully aware of the sort of material it contains.

      Most of the Scientologists who work in their Dianetics* centres and so called "Churches" of Scientology do not know this story since they are not allowed to hear it until they reach the secret "upper" levels of Scientology. It may

    3. Re:Why? by fastdecade · · Score: 1

      "My commute to school leaves a smile on my face"?

      Do you ride your segway on Astroturf?

    4. Re:Why? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      No, see, the funniest part is watching the people who will drive their SUV (Stupid Ugly Vehicles) 2 miles to the local gym club, spend 10 minutes driving around the parking lot looking for the parking space that is the absolute closest to the front doors as humanly possible, and take the elevator to the 2nd floor... ...so they can spend 20 minutes "working out" on a Stairmaster!

      (Not as absurd as it sounds, you see it a lot if you pay attention...)
      =Smidge=

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It may not seem like much here, but you would be quite surprised to learn that using an HT is a good bit of work for your legs. You don't notice it at first, but the ache is there for about two weeks.

      Great. Now just standing is considered strenuous exercise thanks to the Segway. The old joke about doing "beer curls" for exercise is coming closer to reality.

    6. Re:Why? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm 15, and probably the youngest Early Adopter out there.

      It costs $ to be an 'early adopter' (which btw is a universal term for "person who buys new kit, has little regard for $)

      A Segway i-Series is by no means cheap, about $5000 retail. I chose mine in lieu of a car for now, and hoped that it would make my life a bit easier and productive.

      Assuming for a second that your not a astro-turfish shill, Where exactly does a 15 year old get $5000 to spend on crap like this? "in lieu of a car for now"? and you are planning on buying a car too?

      You indulgent little shit, buy a goddamn bike and give the rest of the cash daddy-gives to United Way.

    7. Re:Why? by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      Yes, Americans are way too lazy...and I count myself as one of them.

      We don't walk anymore it seems. Just to go down to the store we take the car. How many people use cabs in New York instead of walking the couple of blocks?

      I'm GROSSLY overweight. I"m 41 and if I don't change my ways, I won't be around to see my son grow up.

      So that's it, I'm getting up...going to stop sitting in front of the damn computer and get outside and do some walking!

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rich (and incredibly cheap paying to me) people I work for got that beat. The wife drives 1.5 hours one way, to have some guy in a shiny suit charge her 2$ a MINUTE to stand there and tell her to work out on this exercise machine. That's her "personal trainer and health consultant". Sometimes she hires my girlfriend to drive her, because she is so "exhausted" she can't drive herself back.

      And she's GOT an entire really big attached sunroom off their 3 story mansion with a full sauna and a collection of expensive workout machines. The sauna has a complete sound system including voodoo "healing tapes" that play "soothing sounds".

      The guy is almost as bad, always wanting to "work out and get in shape" because he was a football player back in college, so he goes out with a weed whip, hits about 5 weeds practicing his golf swing I guess, and is exhausted, drives to the nearest town to get 50$ worth of restaurant take out food (not fast food, from real restaurants), drives back, 30 mile round trip.

    9. Re:Why? by opti6600 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm sorry here buddy, but could we keep this at a mature level for a minute? I'd love to know why the moderators even considered giving you anything more than flamebait for a minute.

      All of my kvetching aside, though. Listen, I'm an Early Adopter because of where I live, the time I live in, and my mindset. I live in Miami. The traffic is to say the least, hellish. Gas prices are through the roof, and even regular unleaded nowadays can cost upwards of $1.80 a gallon. Insurance costs? Insanity.

      Using a Segway is a statement and a way I live my life. It says that I'm not an ignorant peon who realizes the folly of using 100-year old technology to move from point A to point B at the cost of our environment. It says that I'm enough of a geek to realize the potential of this technology. Above all, it's an opportunity for me to gain simple independence and unique standing at the benefit of my own mind.

      My HT was paid for in large by my father, but also in part by myself, with the profits from a small network consulting firm I run (about a 70-30 split of the cost there). He would have ended up paying for a car in less than a few months, so even a Kia Rio (MSRP $5k) would cost more than a HT. Funny you mention United Way...I'll mention round figures for a moment - our family contributes in excess of $30k a year to various charitable organizations, United Way amongst them (yes, real organizations, not the NRA or Walk America).

      Do you for some strange reason think that a bike would resolve my transportation issues, or that of anyone else? I don't dispute the exercise potential of a bicycle for a minute, however its real transportation value is little, if any. My morning commute is 5.7 miles on the street, and another 10 miles or so on the Miami-Dade Metrorail. As a matter of fact, bicycles aren't allowed on the Metro during rush-hour, and as such, I wouldn't be able to use it for my commute if I wanted to. I carry about 30-40 pounds of stuff on a daily basis between my laptop, backpack, and any other gear I may have with me. Bikes are not only less safe, but they are more of an inconvenience and less rugged than the HT for my purposes. I can't bike to school every day in khakis and a decent shirt and show up in proper condition in 90F weather with 80-95% humidity and sunshine.

      Take a break from ignorance, perhaps ask some questions first next time. I don't mind questions, I do however mind being insulted (ignorant little shit - how low can you go?).

      Oh, and no, I'm probably not going to be looking at a car. The costs are prohibitive, and I don't see a need for one at this point. My HT works perfectly for my needs.

      Once again, if you have any questions (or insults even), please contact me whenever you like at opti6600@bellsouth.net.

      Best regards,
      Jordan Prevé

    10. Re:Why? by opti6600 · · Score: 1

      I know it sounds ridiculous, but consider it for a moment. To move on a Segway HT, you must apply continual forward force. Granted, its not much, but it's more than I'd get sitting in a car. You're using muscles the whole ride.

      You aren't standing on a Segway, you're always leaning. There is no simple throttle other than your body weight. And while yes, you can just throw yourself forward, it's not safe or appropriate to do so. You have to keep fine motor control over yourself at all times.

      If you're ever in the Miami are, just drop me a line and we can set you up for a demo.

    11. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Sorry foolio the only statement a segway makes is that you are a big dork with too much money.

      "our family contributes in excess of $30k a year to various charitable organizations"

      What do you want a medal for being rich? Some families actually have to LIVE on $30k. Am i supposed to be impressed?

      So like so many "innovations" the segway is simply a positional good used by the rich to flaunt their wealth.

      Well if you wanna show off your money buy a bmw, driving a segway says rich brat AND dork.

    12. Re:Why? by opti6600 · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid it makes that statement only to the average ignorant individual. It's unfortunate you can't realize what people strive for these days.

      And if you had read the previous post, I was simply responding to his points. We call that "intelligent discussion". Rant somewhere else, I'm afraid you simply can't understand the underlying concept here, and hence have no real purpose in providing your unfortunately uninformed opinion.

    13. Re:Why? by Ilikeions · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm 15, and probably the youngest Early Adopter out there... I used [drive] a car to get everywhere before my HT...
      Isn't the legal driving age 16 in the US? Is this to say you "used [to drive] a car to get everywhere" with a Learner's Permit?
    14. Re:Why? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Bah. I can't believe people are buy this thing for 5,000 bucks. I can see a nitch marked it such as the mentioned security gard at disney land but not for the every day joe. To expensive and range isn't long enough.

      When I was 15 I didn't walk to school ether but I wasn't to fucking lazy that I had to have a 5,000 dollar toy drag my fat ass around. I had a $35 skateboard and $35 was expensvie for one then.

      Leaning in the direction you want you fat ass to go isn't excersise. Now a skateboard that requires skill. Ditch your fucking over price toy and get somethign that requires you to do something. A skateboard or bicycle comes to mind. Your body will thank you and you will look much cooler, instead just a fat lazy geek.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    15. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno why I'm responding to this, but I figure you're probably from out of the country. Every state sets its own driving age, and Florida's is 15.

      Peace.

    16. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What ever happened to WALKING somewhere?

      Yeah, and you walk everywhere you go.

      Right.

    17. Re:Why? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "It says that I'm not an ignorant peon who realizes the folly of using 100-year old technology to move from point A to point B at the cost of our environment."
      1. Century-old internal combustion engines weren't anywhere near as efficient as they are today
      2. What exactly produces the electricity you use to charge your Segway?
      "Above all, it's an opportunity for me to gain simple independence and unique standing at the benefit of my own mind."

      Is it just me, or did you just say that the most important reason you had one was that it made you look cool?

      "Do you for some strange reason think that a bike would resolve my transportation issues, or that of anyone else?"

      What could a Segway do to solve someone's transportation problems that a bicycle could not?

      "As a matter of fact, bicycles aren't allowed on the Metro during rush-hour, and as such, I wouldn't be able to use it for my commute if I wanted to."

      And Segways are? You're one of those people that believes that Segway users are still somehow pedestrians, aren't you? I suspect the only reason that Segway's are "allowed" on the train is that a city employee hasn't taken you to task on it yet.

      "I carry about 30-40 pounds of stuff on a daily basis between my laptop, backpack, and any other gear I may have with me."

      How is it better to wear all that on your back than to distribute it between your back and saddle bags?

      "Bikes are not only less safe, but they are more of an inconvenience and less rugged than the HT for my purposes."

      Like how, exactly? I somehow don't see a Segway doing much off-road...

      "I can't bike to school every day in khakis and a decent shirt and show up in proper condition in 90F weather with 80-95% humidity and sunshine."

      Why not? It's the very same weather you Segway your way to school in, and a bicycle can move faster than a Segway, shortening your time outside.

    18. Re:Why? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Listen, I'm an Early Adopter because of where I live, the time I live in, and my mindset.
      So, you define yourself in relation to market demographics? Do you also consider yourself a "consumer"?

      The traffic is to say the least, hellish.

      Traffic is hellish becaues of sprawl and the personal-auto paradigm.

      Gas prices are through the roof

      Gas prices in the SouthEast are some of the cheapest in the USA. The USA has some of the cheapest petrol on the planet. When you say prices are 'through the roof', your wrong.Insurance costs? Insanity.

      Because of colluding, gouging insurance companies.. thats ANOTHER issue.

      unique standing at the benefit of my own mind.

      What?

      He would have ended up paying for a car in less than a few months

      Cant ride the bus? or walk/bike? To hear the entitlement argument spoken from a position of such privilage - wow.

      Do you for some strange reason think that a bike would resolve my transportation issues, or that of anyone else? I don't dispute the exercise potential of a bicycle for a minute, however its real transportation value is little, if any. My morning commute is 5.7 miles on the street, and another 10 miles or so on the Miami-Dade Metrorail. As a matter of fact, bicycles aren't allowed on the Metro during rush-hour, and as such, I wouldn't be able to use it for my commute if I wanted to. I carry about 30-40 pounds of stuff on a daily basis between my laptop, backpack, and any other gear I may have with me. Bikes are not only less safe, but they are more of an inconvenience and less rugged than the HT for my purposes. I can't bike to school every day in khakis and a decent shirt and show up in proper condition in 90F weather with 80-95% humidity and sunshine.

      blah blah blah - Im sorry, this is not only irrelevant, but terrible embarassing. #1) you didnt get my point regarding sprawl - you live too far from school, because of sprawl, get it? #2) hearing you suggest, you've done someone a favour because you bought a $5K segway -- because riding a bike would keep you from being fashionable @ school -- is unspeakably depressing.

    19. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? It's the very same weather you Segway your way to school in,

      You're the one your coworkers refer to as the "stinky guy in the last cubicle", aren't you?

    20. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although it is true every state sets their own driving age, Florida's is 16. 15 years is the age for one must be to have a Learner's Driver licence in which you must be accompanied by a fully licensed driver 21 years of age or older. ref: http://www.hsmv.state.fl.us/handbooks/English/ch_2 01.html#anchor42926

    21. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello,

      While I admire the unabashed enthusiasm you're showing for the Segway on a cynical site like Slashdot (I'm an AC, after all :-) I really have to take issue with this.

      "Muscle control" does not mean exercise. Exercise means getting your metabolism up for sustained periods of time. Have you ever broken a sweat from leaning on the Segway in finely controlled ways? It's like saying you're a jazz afficionado because you have a Dave Brubeck record you like to listen to a lot. "Muscle control" does not burn many calories. Take my word for it: even walking is a hundred times the exercise that Segway is.

      I'm glad you like using it, but let's be realistic about this.

    22. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather be caught riding a motorized wheel chair than a Segway.

      Segway is no more than a dumb marketing effort. For a 15 year old, I'm sure it's the dorkest thing you can ride on. You came to /. bragging about it probably because other kids beat you up too much for acting like a sucker.

      I do encourage you to keep trying to write like an adult; you may actually get some chix with that. Who knows.

      I suggest that you ride longboard skateboards like most other kids should be doing at 15. There are motorized ones at a fraction of the price of a Segway.

    23. Re:Why? by fliplap · · Score: 1

      Here here to the longboard. I ride my long board to school everyday. Although I bought a car, I can't afford to live close enough to school to skate there. Moreover, I can't afford a fucking segway (and my parents aren't about to help out with that). As a college student my $100 long board was probably one of my better investments, hell, i spend more than that on alcohol. As for homeboy up there, fixing your daddy's buddies computers does NOT constitute network consulting, nor does running cat5 to your room and the living room. Quit being a wuss and go get a real job (yes, some of us had real jobs @ 15)

    24. Re:Why? by Chuqmystr · · Score: 1
      I'm 36. I like bikes. $5K is way too much scratch to pay for a scooter, IMO. For $5k I can get me a really nice mountain bike, a good road bike, a good commuter bike as well as a Bob trailer to haul stuff with. More than enough stuff to negate most short car trips. Oh, and for that kind of cash I can also get a nice laptop backback, a new iPod (not recomended cycling gear, use at your own risk), extra tubes, a good helmet, and perhaps a couple monthly train passes to help extend the range of my bike(s). You get the picture.

      No, I'm no tree hugger. I just hate traffic jams and smogy air. I especialy dislike seeing so many SUVs (AKA living room on wheels) piloted by inattentive, rude, angry cellphone wielding moms contributing to said traffic jams. I've spent much time commuting by bike/train and by car to work in one of the worst commutes in Southern California and in all the road time I've spent over the years I've almost NEVER seen an SUV being used as a carpool vehicle. The usual population is one small woman driver doing anything but driving (usually eating/makeup/yacking on the phone. Simutainiously. Guys don't get off the hook either. They usually are working a laptop/shaving/eating/reading/phone yacking. Simutainiously...) and one small brat in the back cooing away at the built in Disney Brain Melting box, AKA video system.

      Oh, yeh, back to the bikes thing. I see these same screwballs making short drives in their Denali/Expedition/Escalade/H2/Conquistadore 5000/whatever piece of shit all the time. When I say short I mean like from the next street over or up the block from me to the gym or market two miles away or the elementary school 1 block away! Now, if said people were to get a decent bike capable of hauling a few items and perhaps a kiddie trailer then they could make said short trips to the market for a few goods, maybe even drop the little one(s) at daycare or preschool. Do enough of those and they can do away with that SUV trip to the gym altogether. Obviously the bike isn't an answer to all commuting/hauling needs, like a big trip to the market. I much prefer a pickup truck to one of my bikes when it comes to hauling home concrete and fenceposts from the hardware store 8 miles down the road. Bike commuting isn't for everyone and can be inconvienient. But I don't see many folks making any sort of effort to even try anything like I'm suggesting. Not many who are more than capable at least.

      All I'm saying is give it a try once in awhile. Maybe even consider a bike commute or at least a carpool in your Urban Assault vehicle. I see quite a few old timers around here pushing those 60 plus pound tricycle things around at a good clip so I'm sure most of you can get your fat ass on a 25lb commuter bike with a rack and grocery basket on the back and get around for a couple of miles every couple of days. I'm sure you can also find someone within a few miles of you at both work and home ends of the work commute willing to try a carpool. At least hang up the phone and get fully dressed and fed before you hit the road. Perhaps you'll not run me over as you make your way to the freeway.

    25. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww, how nice, YOUR FAMILY gives to United Way. I FUCKING GIVE OUT OF MY PAYCHECK. Not only to I contribute each and every fucking month, but I'm a college student who pays all his own expenses and doesn't have a cushy job like your parents. Moreover, I do it because its the right thing todo, not because its a huge tax write off that will get me into the next bracket down so I can avoid paying for the things in society that help keep my family filthy fucking wealthy and protects them in case one day they aren't filthy fucking wealthy.

      I can't bike to school every day in khakis and a decent shirt and show up in proper condition in 90F weather with 80-95% humidity and sunshine.

      Oh you poor baby, you might show up at school like you got some exercise, you know, like the OTHER KIDS. What seems really odd to me is that you live 15.7 miles from the nearest highschool...so far that you need to go 5.7 miles to public transport and another 10 miles from there. OH WAIT. You goto some cushy private school don't you?

      Bikes are not only less safe, but they are more of an inconvenience and less rugged than the HT for my purposes.

      Less safe? Whats wrong with that? Are you just completely spineless? Or have you not figured out yet that chicks dig scars? No matter how classy she is, when you tell her you got it BMX'n, skateboarding, or cliff diving in mexico, she's gonna think its hot. Now, what are you gonna tell her when she asks where you got your segway. "My daddy bought it for me." Here's where she thinks one of 2 things "What a dork" or "Ooo, his daddy has money, I wonder if his daddy has money for me"

      You snot nosed little brat, you can keep your segway and keep looking like a dork, the only people you're making friends with are the ones impressed by your toys and money. I'm happy you've become friends with all those people, it will keep them away from me.

    26. Re:Why? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "You're the one your coworkers refer to as the "stinky guy in the last cubicle", aren't you?"

      If by "skinny" you mean "weighs over 230 lb," then yes. But just because I'm overweight and out-of-shape doesn't mean I can't walk the five miles to class in the same "unbearable" weather our original poster finds himself trying to cope with.

    27. Re:Why? by opti6600 · · Score: 1

      Right on what network consulting constitutes.

      What do you think about deploying Cisco/Microsoft networks for 50-client corporate networks? That's what dNS does. Usual rate nets about $75/hr. We also mop up after idiot MIS/IT staff, which apparently aren't in short supply.

      Perhaps that'll give you an idea of what a "real job" at 15 is. Oh, or is a real job at 15 mowing lawns for $5 an acre?

    28. Re:Why? by opti6600 · · Score: 1

      Oh, definitely! I'm just saying it's more exercise than sitting on my butt here all day, that's all. People seem to think it's just standing there, but it's a lot more than that.

    29. Re:Why? by opti6600 · · Score: 1

      Although there's a neat loophole. My friends and I don't use this too often, but it can come in handy (although with the Seg I don't need it anymore). We all have our own business ventures, some properly incorporated under Florida law. Therefore, we can take advantage of the Florida clause stating something to the effect of learner's drivers being able to drive to and from work unaccompanied, and I -know- you can circumvent the time restrictions on a 16-year old license using that method also.

      Ahh...loopholes!

    30. Re:Why? by zutroy · · Score: 1

      Why not? It's the very same weather you Segway your way to school in, and a bicycle can move faster than a Segway, shortening your time outside.

      Apparently you've never ridden a bike 5 miles in 90 degree weather. You tend to get sweaty and smelly. This kid has some valid reasons for getting a Segway instead of a car. It's not a toy for him, it's a genuine car replacement, and it seems odd that you're berating him for it.

    31. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to read. I said "stinky", not "skinny".

      As in "stinky after pedaling a bike 5 miles in 90 degree weather".

    32. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rented a Doodlebug once in 1953. $5 an hour, didn't go anywhere, just for the hell of it

    33. Re:Why? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Apparently you've never ridden a bike 5 miles in 90 degree weather. You tend to get sweaty and smelly."

      Yes, I have, and I also know that the same happens just from standing around in that kind of weather. And I doubt you get much more sweaty riding a bicycle at 20 MPH for 15 minutes than you would standing on a Segway for 30. Certainly not a $4500 difference.

      "This kid has some valid reasons for getting a Segway instead of a car."

      From what I've seen they're relatively misguided. He claims that it's better for the environment, but a bicycle doesn't use electricity from coal-fired plants. He claims that you can take a Segway on a train when bicycles are forbidden, but as we've seen before in other cities, that's mostly because city officials haven't gotten around to either making a new law or clarifying existing ones. He mentioned that it's easier to carry a load on a Segway than a bicycle, but even if you keep all the load on your back, leaning forward while riding a bicycle lessens the compression on the rider's spine. He mentioned scenery he could see from a Segway that is just as viewable from either a bicycle or on foot.

      About the only vaguely "valid" reason he seems to have for owning a Segway (if I'm reading it correctly) is that it makes him feel like he looks cool (apparently a more important reason in his mind than environmental concerns, as seen by both the wording of his post and his apparent ignorance on where electricity comes from). Whether or not he actually looks cool is debatable (and of no real concern to me), but I see no reason to applaud his decision to spend $4500+ on nothing but vanity.

    34. Re:Why? by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

      I no longer contribute to the thermal and chemical pollution of cars or even buses

      Wrong, my friend. You contribute the same pollution, because the energy to power that thing was obtained by burning fossil fuels (or maybe nuclear in some places... which could be good or bad I suppose).

      In fact since significant energy is lost to efficiency when you change its form, you're actually burning more fuel than if you did so directly and skipped the step of charging that thing by replacing it with a gas motor. I guess you can figure the cost of transporting gas vs the cost of laying power lines, but I doubt that compensates in the big picture.

      Segways pollute just like other vehicles. Anything that does work (in the physical sense) is going to have issues. Just like "hydrogen cars" are total BS.

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    35. Re:Why? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "In fact since significant energy is lost to efficiency when you change its form,"

      Actually, going from fossil fuel to electrical energy is more efficient (and more managable) than going from fossil fuel to mechanical energy. This is why most diesel locomotives today are actually diesel-electric and why commercial shipbuilders are dabbling with the concept.

    36. Re:Why? by demonbug · · Score: 1

      I just have to ask, have you considered trying an amazing machine called a bicycle? They are incredibly easy to use, very safe (assuming you use them responsibly), and I hear you can buy even a very good one for less than 1/5th the price of a Segway. I know, you have to actually move your legs a little bit to make them move, but to go at Segway-like speeds takes practically no energy at all. In addition, when you feel like going faster, the bicycle will allow you to go nearly as fast as you want. Why, I have heard that bicycles can travel at up to 160 mph, and for distances up to 200 miles. Amazingly, with all that utility, bicycles weigh less than half of what a Segway weighs (often times less than a quarter!), and there is extensive infrastructure in place in many cities that allow for easy storage during the day.
      So, just what is it about the Segway that attracted you? Low speed? High cost? Short range?

      Seriously, what is it about a Segway that would attract anyone to using one?

    37. Re:Why? by opti6600 · · Score: 1

      Actually I've been looking into getting a Litespeed...I got the chance to demo one when a friend at camp brought his. I just need to find the time these days to actually use it.

      I'll agree with you in frowning on SUVs, they're such a waste. And for those of you that didn't know, wavelengths Journal is an alternative energy publication - I'm actually -officially- using the Seg as alternative transportation!

    38. Re:Why? by -padre- · · Score: 0

      And I'm sure you have no problem securing dates on your Segway. ... oh wait, this is Slahdot... nevermind...

      --
      "hey man got a light?"
    39. Re:Why? by opti6600 · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about other users...but I charge my HT on solar power quite a bit. MAST Academy is home to the only Solar I/II curriculum in the state of Florida, and as such, we have a good bit of equipment. At least half of my charges are done at school, where I've rigged up my HT to charge off of a few photovoltaic panels and an inverter. It's quite neat.

      By the way...anybody in Miami this week should get in touch with me if they're interested in the Solar Celebration this Wednesday.

    40. Re:Why? by opti6600 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'll have to say I'm impressed. *points to demonbug's comment* - what you wrote was mature, well-written, and objective. Thanks!

      Okay, I'll be happy to recap for you. First let's start on the reasons I cannot use a bike.

      - My commute is 5.7 miles a day. This is in Miami weather, so I would show up as a complete sweatball by the time I hit my school.
      - 5.7 miles is if I use the Metrorail. Unfortunately, Metrorail doesn't allow bikes during rush hour (from 7-9 AM). My school gets in at 8 AM, so that makes a bit of a trouble to get to school in a timely manner in the mornings.
      - There are a number of situations where bikes can't be used as safely as a Segway can, particularly in Miami. This is mostly where we have low-hanging branches, sidewalk obstructions, things like that, and Miami streets aren't exactly fun experiences.

      What attracts me to using a Segway? Well, I've covered it so many times I don't think it needs repeating, but I'll sum it up in one sentence. The Segway is clean, simple, fun, effective, different, advanced, and above all low-cost and efficient (you have to think in long-term).

    41. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your segway costs more than any car that I or my parents have ever owned. If you have $5K to spend on a segway, you probably go to one of those schools where kids also come to school in humvees.

      You are truly the king of wankers.

    42. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      youll be dead in 10 years from heart disease
      no girl will look sidways at you 'cause you are a dork
      you are lazy
      great dad organised you some IT work congrats ,turn up to my office for an interview on a wankerway and i would not even bother to speak to you , the fact that you(daddy)spent $5000 tells me a lot . i.e you should never have responsibility for a budjet
      the electricity to take your fat arse to school creates toxic waste
      yes my bike Al frame did require a huge amount of energy to produce but it was a once off cost
      I keep fit on my daily commute
      for $5000US you could by an amazing high performance bike , actually you could by one for each day of travel to school , after several weeks you would be fit ,and the ride would be simple , you would not sweat as much (surly you have showers and deadarant

    43. Re:Why? by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      Leaning may be more effort than simply standing...but it's not "a lot more than that." Don't try to make the Segway out to be exercise in any form please, that's just ridiculous.

    44. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, I have, and I also know that the same happens just from standing around in that kind of weather

      If you get all stinky and sweaty just standing around, then I think you must weigh over 230lbs and are seriously out of shape.

  5. How to ruin your social life by A+Proud+American · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... in three easy steps.

    1) Rent a Segway
    2) Cart on over to the neighborhood Barnes 'n Noble
    3) Rent an Internet station, browse Slashdot ;-)

    1. Re:How to ruin your social life by king_penguin_05 · · Score: 0

      We all know that if you list things with numbers you have to add
      4)???
      5)Profit!

      --
      "I can't drive 55. It only goes 38."
  6. Huh? by GMontag · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These things are supposed to replace cars in some sort of "brave new world" and they cost more for 20 min. than a pickup truck costs for all day?

    Sorry, you lost me on the segway.

    1. Re:Huh? by GMontag · · Score: 1

      oops! replace all 2 with 3

    2. Re:Huh? by fleener · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the poster says it costs $20 for a 30 minute ride and labeled thats "neat!" Either he's got money to burn, or he's a troll. The only argument that might hold water for that price would be, "Cheaper than a prostitute! Woohoo!"

    3. Re:Huh? by GMontag · · Score: 1

      Aren't those HBO hookers in NYC around that much for tooth-free oral?

    4. Re:Huh? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What portion of your tax-dollars are spent on highways, bi-ways, 4lane roads and other elements of urban-sprawl? Cities are being DESIGNED TO REQUIRE an automobile. Not only is the auto *personally* expensive, but sprawl costs your community big-BIG $$$. More roads to clear of snow, more roads to patrol, greater distances of electrical/water/sewage services all NEEDLESS spending because people are encouraged to WANT this mindless suburban-commuter lifestyle.

      If you *aren't* forced (because of city-design) to spend $$$ on a 'truck', how much less would you be required to maintain the same standard of living? Could you turn in your auto, move downtown and vacation an additional 4 weeks per year? maybe.. maybe-not. The bottom line is that NorthAmerica needs a re-think on its personal transportation / city design ideas....

      Im not saying the segway is the future of the world, I *am* saying it is welcome in a more reasonably-scaled urban environment.

      Im tired of paying for sprawl and highways... not only is it irresponsible for the planet, it is expensive. I want a reasonable public transit system, and human-scale transportation (bikeways/walkways/segways(maybe))

    5. Re:Huh? by GMontag · · Score: 1

      What portion of your tax-dollars are spent on highways, bi-ways, 4lane roads and other elements of urban-sprawl?

      The part payed for by my fuel taxes. Unfortunately, much of that gets robbed for bike trails, METRO rail and busses (exempt from the fule taxes of course) and a host of other things that I rarely use, but I pay for them whether I use them or not.

      Here we go again with this taste/fashion arguement of "sprawl", that has beed defined every bit as well as "saturday night special", i.e., it is just a libel without definition.

      Believe it or not, many people do not want to live in large cities. We have different tastes than you do, so please stop trying to impose your "taste" on us.

    6. Re:Huh? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Believe it or not, many people do not want to live in large cities
      if by many you mean less than 25% in the USA
      Or, in Canada, the 23% of Canadians who live in a rural environment.

      We have different tastes than you do, so please stop trying to impose your "taste" on us
      Do you commute to work? do you live in a suburban or (truly) rural environment?

      Here we go again with this taste/fashion arguement of "sprawl"

      fashion and taste are irrelevant. SPRAWL is real. Drive between detroit and dearborn. Between Toronto and Mississauga. Between %yournearestcity% and %somebedroomcommunity%. People who are buying $150k cookie cutter houses on 120x200 lots anyplace the land is flat is the problem. They depend on massive highways and byways to get their kids to school, food for dinner, a cup of coffee (starbucks drivethrough..). It is ecological suicide. The property that we are building these suburbs is (nearly gauranteed) to be the most productive in NorthAmerica (thats because communities in NA where plopped ontop of good agricultural land)

      The part payed for by my fuel taxes. Unfortunately, much of that gets robbed for bike trails, METRO rail and busses

      Do you *really* believe this? Reread my earlier post - your FUEL taxes dont even pay for the paving/maintenance/building of roads(!). The other issues (the sprawl itself) IS NOT payed by you -- its payed by everyone. BTW, each situation is different, but public transit is a minor expense in relation to the roads themselves... and bike trails/pedestrian transit routes -- really, common, are you joking? Most NA cities pay little more than lip service to these needs, let alone spend actual $. ARe you bloody kidding???

    7. Re:Huh? by weave · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Shh, be careful not to give away the secret of carlessness. I don't own a car and hence live as if I'm rich, even though I'm not. That extra several hundred dollars a month I don't spend on payments, fuel, insurance, and repairs goes into other fun stuff, like flying from the pathetic east coast to Arizona 2-3 times a year first class on America West so I can hike Picacho Peak, The White Tanks, Estrella, eat big steaks at Crazy Eds and Pinnacle Peak Patio, etc, etc...

      But it is a choice and I'd not want to force others to follow it. Not owning a car can be inconvenient at times, but for those times, there are car rentals. You also need to ensure you buy a house near a decent transit line... But if done right, it's fairly painless.

    8. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You central planning Fascists really need to get a life.

    9. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not a troll hes a stealth marketer my friend.

      And worse slashdot probably got a kickback for posting that lame ass story.

    10. Re:Huh? by GMontag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow! That was about as authoritative as using the WWP as a source for union issues, WSWS as a source for Economics, or Pacifica Radio as a source for ANYTHING to do with free choice.

      Nice try though.

      BTW, your in your sig, you use the same time tested method, well documented by George Orwell and others, that the Communist press has been using for ages to cease arguement. Then again, that is what you used when you invoked the dreaded "sprawl" word.

      As Orwell wrote, in the closing passages of chapter XI, in Homage to Catalonia: "It is as though in the middle of a chess tournament one competitor should suddenly begin screaming that the other is guilty of arson or bigamy. The point that is really at issue remains untouched. Libel settles nothing."

    11. Re:Huh? by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1
      You make a very good point. People need to choose which is best. However the problem I see is growing up with my parents 45 miles from the "big city", there is no public transportation at all. As I grew up it was just a societal thing where you take drivers-ed at school, get a part time job, buy a car, and pay the insurance. Nobody talked as if it was an option, that we had other choices. This was the only way that they talked about, everybody from peers, to parents, to administrators, to teachers, to politicians. We have a cycling club, but they just do it for fun, not for commuting or even any type of advocacy.

      This is where changes can be made, in education and infrastructure. For instance when a new road is created if bike lanes would be required they would be very inexpensive.

      --
      Need to calculate something?

    12. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attacking sources rather than arguments? Aw man, you so lost this argument.

    13. Re:Huh? by jagapen · · Score: 1
      Believe it or not, many people do not want to live in large cities. We have different tastes than you do, so please stop trying to impose your "taste" on us.

      Pot. Kettle. Black.

    14. Re:Huh? by GMontag · · Score: 1

      LOL! Excuse me? That is very cute.

      I do not wish to force others to live anyplace they decide not to choose on their own. Please point out where I have advocated any such thing?

    15. Re:Huh? by weave · · Score: 1
      You don't usually have to live in a "big city" to scrap your car, although it certainly makes it easier. Numerous areas outside of large metro areas are served quite well by commuter rail. You can often find places that are on the edge of denser areas near a transit line that also have close walkable or bikable areas in parks or "back roads" areas.

      The last time I bought a house, my agent had said he had never heard of anyone with my requirements. I gave him a list like "has to be within 10 minute walk of a transit line that has rush hour service, and 30 minute walk from a line that has non-peak service. Must be within walking distance to a convenience store. Must be within walking distance to decent park land or areas that are unlikely to get developed (trust lands, etc, etc...)

      If you have a bunch of kids, then of course, forget it, although you can often still get by with a one-car household instead of two -- if hitched.

    16. Re:Huh? by jagapen · · Score: 1

      First of all, I was responding to this statement:

      We have different tastes than you do, so please stop trying to impose your "taste" on us.

      In light of:

      Here we go again with this taste/fashion arguement of "sprawl", that has beed defined every bit as well as "saturday night special", i.e., it is just a libel without definition.

      Here you're telling somebody that they don't really mean what they mean. I'm sure SubtleNuance knew what he/she meant by "sprawl," I know what he/she meant by "sprawl;" everybody I've ever talked to about the subject shares the same meaning of "sprawl," as well as all the literature I've read on the topic. It's a fairly well-defined word for a large number of people in the United States. Perhaps it means something different to you, but don't impose your standards on us, please!

      Believe it or not, many people do not want to live in large cities. We have different tastes than you do, so please stop trying to impose your "taste" on us.

      Believe it or not, many people also do not want to live in suburban hell. Many people would like to live in human-scale neighborhoods where they can walk in safety and comfort. Many people do not like the assholes in automobiles threatening their lives if they, God forbid, want to get around by bicycle. Many people do not like the strip-mall blight, destruction of farmland and wilderness, air and water pollution, 12-lane highways and the requirement that one have a car to get anywhere.

      Unfortunately, we can't have sprawl and compact communities in the same place since they're mutually exclusive. If people working to effect compact communities and human-scale (versus auto-scale) development are considered to be imposing their tastes on others, then the current physical environment is the result of other people imposing their tastes on them. Fair is fair.

      Why should the people on the receiving end of a screw-job sit down and shut up, as you're telling them to do? If you don't like it, don't impose your tastes. Move.

      (For what it's worth, anti-sprawl people don't want to live in big cities, either, which is why they oppose the big cities gobbling up so much land.)

    17. Re:Huh? by GMontag · · Score: 1

      Wow, you are really out there.

      Engaging in newspeak by calling single-family housing and suburbs "sprawl" is nothing but a distraction. It certainly is nothing like forcing someone to live in a filthy down-town cattle pen, aka, a high-rise.

      I did not tell that fellow to stay in the city and nobody is marching him out to the suburbs at the point of a gun, 1950's style China.

      It is quite amazing that some of you folks wish to turn any disagreement into some imposition on your "rights". Well, here is a newsflash for you, you have no right to make me agree with you. It does not matter how gutter you wish to speak, it won't change that fact.

      If some people wish to live in gated communities who are you to prevent them?

      If people want to live in less densly populated areas, have a nice home and a yard, let the kids play, a seperate bedroom for every kid, a workshop for every parent, a media room, etc. somehow that is some kind of threat to you? How about being able to open a window below the 20th floor without choking on the smell of fermented human urine, who are you to tell them no?

      Oh, and if you don't want every piled into a big city, but you don't want them escaping to the suburbs, then good luck. Here on earth things are different.

      BTW, if suburbs are so roundly hated, why do so many people live there by choice?

      Please, run along with your Communistic ideals. Individuals do not need a central committee to make their housing arrangements.

    18. Re:Huh? by Colonel+Blimp · · Score: 0

      I'm planning on hopping in my Delorean (the Edsel is in the shop) and winging my way down there wearing my XFL T-shirt "He Hate Me!", drinking my Crystal Pepsi (better than the new coke), and seeing if I can get my Segway! I'll send ya all a betamax of the trip!

    19. Re:Huh? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If people want to live in less densly populated areas, have a nice home and a yard, let the kids play, a seperate bedroom for every kid, a workshop for every parent, a media room, etc. somehow that is some kind of threat to you? How about being able to open a window below the 20th floor without choking on the smell of fermented human urine, who are you to tell them no?

      I have a theory that people who live in the suburbs hate everyone. They do their best to avoid all human contact.

      These people by SUV's as third-homes in which they spend a few hours each day driving on 16-lane highways to get to-and-from their suburban homes with neighbours who love eachother so much that they don't want to get out of their cars to open their doors, they separate their yards with arsenic-treated fences and close all the windows to block the sound of central airconditioners in the summer.

      I knew one fellow who would never actually step outside or speak to anyone except his family or coworkers except for the weekends. His skin was desparately pale. He would get up, have breakfast, enter his attached garage, hit the garage door opener button on the right side of the visor, back out, drive along the highway, coffee in hand, radio going. About an hour later, he would arrive at his workplace downtown, hit the button on the left of his visor, drive into his office tower, park in his allotted spot, work, then do the reverse to go home.

      Your assumption that living downtown means smelling your neighbour's urine, to me says that you're among these mizerable people who simply doesn't want to deal with anyone outside your family or workplace.

      ... granted... people generally are just as much assholes downtown as they are in the suburbs... and as such there is a greater density of assholes per square metre downtown as in the suburbs... meaning that their urine, blasting stereos, hyped-up cars, late drunken screaming etc is more prevalent... but buying a fully-detached air conditioned home in the suburbs along with a matching SUV and "media room!", doesn't make you part of any solution... the money we pour into 16-lane highways would be better spent on trains, and your houses would be better as parks and farmland.

      IMHO, the real problem is the way people treat one another... and I don't know how to fix that.

      P.s. what do your kids do when they are too old to 'play?'

    20. Re:Huh? by GMontag · · Score: 1

      That was quite funny! I hope you are modded up for your efforts.

      P.s. what do your kids do when they are too old to 'play?'

      Well, if they are male are they ever too old to play? Mine is in college now.

    21. Re:Huh? by macshit · · Score: 1

      I did not tell that fellow to stay in the city and nobody is marching him out to the suburbs at the point of a gun, 1950's style China.

      No, but quite a bit of government funding has gone into subsidizing `car oriented' development. That's all people are saying.

      It is quite amazing that some of you folks wish to turn any disagreement into some imposition on your "rights".

      Heh, you say, after whining in exactly the same way yourself...

      BTW, if suburbs are so roundly hated, why do so many people live there by choice?

      Because, in fact, there is little choice in many places.

      Please, run along with your Communistic ideals. Individuals do not need a central committee to make their housing arrangements.

      Rant much?

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    22. Re:Huh? by macshit · · Score: 1

      BTW, a followup to myself, to clarify a bit.

      I'm not saying that somehow suburbia was created by the government against the will of the people -- clearly what suburbia promises appeals to the desires of many, even if it often falls (very) short in practice. Dreams are very strong, and often by the time you wake up, it's too late.

      However, as a previous poster pointed out, there's often a conflict between the desires of suburb dwellers, city residents, and those who live in rural areas, and governments' tendency to massively subsize what was viewed as the `next big thing' (suburbs, highways, etc) with little real idea of the consequences, had a big influence over the course of development in this century.

      In other countries that often have less space, and longer histories of urban living, there's sometimes less conflict between the three, but it's always a touchy thing.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    23. Re:Huh? by GMontag · · Score: 1

      Umm, what government subsizied Herndon, VA, suburb of Washington DC?

      Hint, it was NOT Washington, DC.

      Answer, it was the people that live in Herndon, VA. They decided they wanted a town, incopropated it, created a tax system, they even have their own police force that the people that live there pay for themselves.

      Washington DC is a net recipient of the taxes of everyplace around it as well as the entire nation. Same with other big cities that have federal monies for public transport, etc.

      Camden NJ sure as heck is not subsidized by Philly either.

      Unincorporated areas? The developer usually has to pay to get the utilities brought in AND usually has to pay for road improvements in the general area, all of this being passed to the residents in the cost of the homes.

      In the US the roads you are complaining about being "subsidized" are normally payed for by the people who live around them and the people that use them. Longer roads, like Interstate Highways are payed for IN PART by the tax payer portion of the US, maintenance through fuel taxes, etc.

      Public bus riders pay little or nothing for the roads they ride on. Yes! True! The bus they ride in contributes nothing to the road funds. No State or local fuel taxes are payed for by the bus service, nor by the riders. The public bus services are subsidized by the fuel taxes that individual motorists pay through fuel taxes, same with commuter trains, to make up for the losses they rack up because they will not charge their riders the total cost of a ride.

      Bike riders? Unless they are paying some sort of regestration that goes to the bike trails then they are not paying any more than a tourist or a recluse home owner. If they are on a road they can thank the motorists on that road for it.

      Wherever some people get the idea that a subdivision was somehow "created" wiith the tax dollars of the big city up the road I will never know, but that ain't the way it is.

      Now, you probably already knew all of this so please quit trying to fool others with your stories.

    24. Re:Huh? by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      I have a theory that people who live in the suburbs hate everyone. They do their best to avoid all human contact.

      Ok, let me help you out here then. You are wrong. I live in a suburb. I don't hate everyone. I don't try to avoid human contact. In fact, I don't even own an SUV *gasp*

      So I like a big yard and a nice sized house? Does that mean I hate people? Not at all. I enjoy a little space, but for the most part, I know all of my neighbors, I spend time with other people, and generally enjoy life. Does this make me an evil capitalist pig? Fine.

      IMHO, the real problem is the way people treat one another... and I don't know how to fix that.

      Here's a hint: start with yourself.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    25. Re:Huh? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      • Here's a hint: start with yourself.

      See, there you go spouting your suburban venom when all I did was rattle off an obviously over-the-top generalization about suburban life. :-)

      I'm going to head off on my bicycle now. I've carefully planned my route to avoid the suburban commuting routes. They're too dangerous, if I'm not outright flattened, some slob might come after me with a tire-iron.

      (o.b. on-topic comment: Segways are pointless.)

    26. Re:Huh? by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1
      See, there you go spouting your suburban venom when all I did was rattle off an obviously over-the-top generalization about suburban life. :-)

      You know, it did come off as rather venomous. I guess I was in a fouler mood this morning. :-)

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    27. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who said anything about fascism? you libertarian-anarchists need to get over yourselves -- ever think that people shouldnt be allowed to sabotage the planets' future just because you goofballs cant stop thinking of yourselves for a moment? Responsible urban-planning will not be the result of 2million people's decisions - chaos will be the result (the sprawl we have now).

  7. Look like a pansy for free by jackalope · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't see paying $20 to look like a pansy for 30 minutes. Most people can find ways to do that for free.

  8. erm by ramzak2k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    20 bucks ? thats more expensive than renting a car. The last time I saw, these things weren't half as expensive as a car.

    Lets see how long the sizzle lasts.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    1. Re:erm by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1

      If I sold my car (1991 Celica ST) privately...I'd still need about $2000 to buy a Segway HT...and yet I fall right into their prime market (live 3 miles from work in Boston with easy access to everything I need in the scooter's power range).

      --
      Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
    2. Re:erm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pay $20 for cab rides all the time. That's more expensive than renting a car, too. So?

    3. Re:erm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you pay for the taxi drivers service and the vehicle- wouldnt make a perfect analogy.

  9. "How 'IT' works" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, the box with that title cracks me up... as there is ABSOLUTELY no explanation on how this thing works there, only some technical details... HEH. America, Land of the TARDOS. Well-armed Nazi Tardos, okay, and they would whoop my ass any day... but still so retarded I will probably half laugh and half cry when they come to invade my country... it's the weak whiny fatso invasion, run for your lives!!

    1. Re:"How 'IT' works" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On behalf of all the weak, whiney, fatso TARDOS in America, I apologize for the future invasion of your country.

      However, you will be happy to know that once your oil is run dry, we'll let you have your country back again.

  10. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Segway rents you.

  11. IAWTP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with this post.

  12. renting is kinda needed for many... by ptorrone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    renting is a good idea, the ht for many people is a big investment, trying one out first is often worth it. the challenge with the segway ht is most people can't imagine what's like to use a self-balancing device like the ht and if it would make sense for their travel needs. i have a segway ht, and at first, the my commute took a little longer that i calculated mostly because people would stop and ask me questions, most would ask to try it out and many would be so impressed with the technology and ease of use, they would purchase one, i didn't expect that either, in my city (seattle) there are quite a few people with segway hts, also the city uses them as opposed to cars for many tasks.

    i'm up to 800 miles on mine, click here to read the trip log.

    the city of seattle let me interview them, so good info (some of it pretty technical, but very detailed) can be found here.

    cheers,
    pt

    1. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one thing I remeber about Seattle was a number of steep hills. How does the Segway handle those?

    2. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      i go over the queen anne hill each day (a 18 to 25% grade in some areas). it's pretty impressive.

    3. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by sllim · · Score: 1

      No offense, but you are the most annoying person on the planet.
      Did your Mom ever tell you that?
      Seriously, if the people buying Segways are the sort of people that don't capitilize (too lazy to hit the shift key, need a Segway to get from there front door to the mailbox, yeah I think we are onto something) and insist on calling it the ht then I don't want to be associated with them.

      In what universe is the Segway ever a good idea?

    4. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      ht, ht, ht :-] i use the segway -ht- to go to work and back over 800 miles so far. it might not be a good idea for you, but that doesn't mean it's not a great solution for others. my Shift key works fine, i'm writing this on a mobile device. no offense, but if i were you i'd stick to playing females in role playing games (i'm quoting you) you play rpgs as chick

    5. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by sllim · · Score: 1

      Um, yes I do play RPG's as chicks.
      I like looking at them.

      And if you read the thread you will see that there are a conisderable number of people that do it as well.

      And your point is??????

      I still think there is a correlation between you being too lazy to walk to the mailbox and your unwillingless to use a caps lock key.

      At the end of the day I may be a nerd, but you are a dork. In the heirarchy of things I am still supperior.

    6. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a psychotic fucking asshole.

      Has anyone evar told you that?

    7. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BAHAHA!!!! Someone with the balls to not use a car and ride around on a Segway is way way cooler than someone like you, a l0ser playing games with men pretending to be a little girl or something. You even spelled "supperior" wrong. AHHAHAHAHHA!!!!!!

    8. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, if he used the cap lock key it would be the same as not using the shift key. All the letter would be CAPS. I think that fellow is correct, stick to playing games pretending to be chick you sick little monkey. Maybe one day you'll get laid. NOT.

    9. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree that riding around on a segway seems pretty fruity, people in glass houses really shouldn't throw stones.

      Before you cast dispersions on others, you've got some serious issues of you're own to deal with. If you're not careful, you could find yourself in some dive motel, strung out on crack, selling your body for your next treatment at the neighborhood pumping party.

    10. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by sllim · · Score: 1

      I will never stoop to posting as an AC.
      I am fit enough to not need a fruity (not my choice of words, you brought it up) Segway.
      And I have enough dexterity to use the shift key properly, but I am not anal enough to run a spell checker on a Slashdot post.

      Say what you want about my dating habits, but when I take your Mom out at least I have somewhere to put her. Where do you put a date on one of those Segway things?
      Or do you just put it in your closet?
      The Segway I mean, not the date.

    11. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Please stop astroturfing.

    12. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know all the retarded segway owners had /. accounts and mod points. Why it must have took all two of you dumbasses to mod that down!

      Just more confrimation that the truth hurts and you don't want to hear or acknowledge it.

    13. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this guy astroturfing? The topic is about Segways and he has one, doesn't work for the company and seems to enjoy it. I've seen you posts here Spunk you SPAM everyone with your Linux crap. If anything tis' you who ASTROTURFS.

    14. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by Spunk · · Score: 1

      I rarely post about Linux. Why resort to lying to defend this guy?

      Just look at his posting history for one. For another his "Book of Seg" site reads just like marketing copy. Isn't it just a little suspicious to you that someone who does guerrilla marketing "won" a segway and now keeps a diary about it? Please read the comments from when it was posted here.

      What's in it for me? I find this sort of advertizing deceitful, that's all. Nothing against Segway, I'd love to rent one actually.

    15. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah several people have told him, but just like a marketing droid they just don't get it.

      I bet right as I am typing this they are jerking off to their scooter.

    16. Re:renting is kinda needed for many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure ptorron, like you are one to talk.

      Just like a girl you seem to have an unhealthy obcession with your image of how you look on a scooter.

      So you call him a loser because he plays games? What about your unhealthy obsession with the scooter, your constant PR speak and whoring about said scooter, and the fact that your life revolves arround that scooter?

  13. Amusement parks by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As someone else pointed out earlier, these would be great for amusement parks. I just wonder if they could keep enough around to rent so that it wouldn't piss people off who couldn't get time on one. $40/hour seems like a good way to keep the users down to a minimum to start with, but I could eventually see a park having a few hundred around to use for, let's say, $15/hour or so, or perhaps $80/day. Put a little credit card slider thingy on it so you can 'pay as you go' and you're all set. $40/hour is just too pricey at the moment for most people, but amusement parks *do* seem a somewhat logical place to do 'rentals'. It's an enclosed area where people already do a large amount of walking, and are looking for entertaining/fun experiences.

    1. Re:Amusement parks by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      I'd agree with that. I can think of times, especially later in the day after you've walked an entire park one time through that an ol' segway for $20 - $40 for the rest of the day would be ideal.

      They could even use the govenor key so that you can't go full speed to avoid running people down, though that could be a ride in and of itself.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    2. Re:Amusement parks by Rinikusu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, unless they use a smart-card/key system or have "parking-at-the-rides", I don't see this being viable for amusement parks. I've been to Six Flags and the place is *packed*, could you imagine trying to find "parking spots" for the rented Segway whilst you go toss your cookies on some behemoth Roller Coaster?

      Now, the zoo, on the other hand, it might make more sense. You don't really have to park and leave the thing unattended for extreme stretches of time, you can roll through the exhibits.. Hey! Segway the Guggenheim! :)

      Also, golf courses might be a decent place to try them out. Rig up a "trailer" for the clubs (Or just sling them on your back) and away you go..

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    3. Re:Amusement parks by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      It's fairly common at Amusement parks for people to travel in groups, not alone. The Segway seems like a mostly solitary means of transit. I just can't visualize two adults and three kids all on Segways, being something Amusement parks would want moving around as a unit.

    4. Re:Amusement parks by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      They have these things called Golf Carts at the golf course. They have largeish rubber wheels that enable them to roll around on the grass.

    5. Re:Amusement parks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear god, mod this man up!

    6. Re:Amusement parks by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Carrying capacity of Segway HT i-Series: 250 lbs.
      Full golf bag: 25lb.
      Weight of average /. reader: limitless.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Amusement parks by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      I don't see this being viable for amusement parks. I've been to Six Flags and the place is *packed*, could you imagine trying to find "parking spots" for the rented Segway whilst you go toss your cookies on some behemoth Roller Coaster?

      At some parks, that would be true. But, at others, it wouldn't be a problem.

      I saw Segways in use for the first time at Disney World, by park staff and by a street vendor. At that time, I thought it would probably be a worthwhile addition to their "rental fleet".

      Disney has stroller rentals and stroller parking (and attendants) for all the major "attractions" (what they call rides). Parking a Segway would be no problem.

      Disney World is also (usually) less crowded than the Six Flags (and other amusement parks) I've visited.

  14. Not Gonna Work by moehoward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems that they whole purpose of the Segway was to get rid of using cars, not get rid of walking. Seems that this rental thing is trying to supplant walking. It was supposed to be for inner-city commutes, not tourism.

    The more this thing flops, the more I'm proven right that it was going to flop. It's the next Furby.

    They will never be able to make enough money on this to cover their huge start up costs and ongoing fixed costs. Look for company announcements about restructuring or refocus in the next 12 months. Followed by discounts, chapter 7, and inevitable lawsuits about accidents.

    Unless, of course, they start running them on hydrogen. Then, I'll buy 12 of them.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:Not Gonna Work by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      It's the next Furby.
      Furby was not a flop - they sold millions of the buggers... that was the goal.

    2. Re:Not Gonna Work by moehoward · · Score: 1

      The Furby was in interesting use of technology. Sort of. And I use the word "use" loosely.

      Neat to look at. Cute. Interesting. Lots of "imagine the possibilities" karma around it. But, ultimately, all dressed up with nowhere to go. In other words, a lot like the Segway.

      --
      "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    3. Re:Not Gonna Work by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      The only Furbies I had were a big box of Happy Meal Furbies that I bought at auction and tried to hock on eBay (big, big mistake). They weren't very impressive.

  15. If only they were cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can see it now.. the sun shining, birds singing, old people on scooters riding around with their shopping on the handlebars and over in the distance in an abandoned skatepark a bunch of kids busting up SICK moves on their Segways. A new extreme sport is born. Geriatric Scootering.

  16. $20/30mins ? $5 for a test drive ??? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In less than 2 segway hours, you can buy an okay used bicycle. For around 20 segway hours, you can get yourself a brand new bicycle with electric assistance that'll go just as well as the segway, for hundreds or thousands of miles, faster, and without letting you fall flat on your face when the batteries die.

    I know it's cool technology, and the balancing act is impressive to watch, but from an economics standpoint, no segway for me, no siree ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:$20/30mins ? $5 for a test drive ??? by GMontag · · Score: 1

      Umm, I think you are seeing through their "point" way too well. The idea is to remove choice, not add any.

      If the folks at the parks let the "guests" bring bikes then you would be right, but they don't.

    2. Re:$20/30mins ? $5 for a test drive ??? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then check out this bike :

      http://www.bromptonbike.com/

      I use this bike everywhere I have to be socially acceptable, and in the bus, train and airplanes. Granted it's not given, but it's a lot less than a car, or a segway for that matter.

      Then again, I live in Europe ;-)

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:$20/30mins ? $5 for a test drive ??? by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      In an old tech magazine, there was a picture (actually, two pictures) of a bicycle designed for the Toyota ideas contest. That bike could be folded into a wheelchair. The Brompton looks exactly like the idea-bike folded into wheelchair ;7

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    4. Re:$20/30mins ? $5 for a test drive ??? by Eight+01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A folded Brompton fits into a bag which is quite manageable - a worst-case technique for bringing the bike into a place that "doesn't allow bikes". If they don't know a bike is in the bag, they can't tell you they aren't allowed.

      For people not familiar with the Brompton, it folds much smaller than the usual folding bikes. It also folds so that it can stand or be rolled in the folded state. The chain is in the center of the folded bicycle, away from anything it may dirty. It is a great design.

    5. Re:$20/30mins ? $5 for a test drive ??? by Spunk · · Score: 1

      You're European and your user name is a Dukes of Hazzard character? It boggles the mind :)

      Cool link.

  17. Why should I pay for a test drive? by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they want me to buy one of these things, why should I have to pay $5 to test it? They're going to have to do better than that to get me to waste my money on crap like this.

    --
    -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
    1. Re:Why should I pay for a test drive? by Spunk · · Score: 1

      This isn't the Segway company renting them out, it's some random guy. He doesn't want you buying one.

  18. yeah right by spoonist · · Score: 1, Insightful
    We put GPS ... units on them so we could track their location but its hidden within the machine so don't bother looking for it.

    Sure thing dude. A GPS receiver and tracking transmitter are SO tiny, dare I say microscopic, that there's NO WAY anyone could find it in your Segway. NOT!

    It's not like the Segway is the size of a dump truck where it would be a pain in the neck to look for.

    There are only so many places they could hide it in the Segway: in the post, in the handles, and in the part you stand on.

    Gimme some Torx drivers and I'll find it in under 10 minutes.

    1. Re:yeah right by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Funny

      hell, bring a large roll of lead foil, wrap it up, and drive away...

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    2. Re:yeah right by tftp · · Score: 1
      Actually, if anyone badly wants the rental Segway, he will just shove it into the trunk of a car. The metal lid is not RF transparent, so it will act as a decent Faraday cage.

      But that' not all. The transmitter in the Segway can not be too powerful, and it does not have a good antenna. This means that the communication distance is probably limited to most of the park at best. As soon as you distance yourself from the monitoring receiver (at the office, probably) the signal disappears, along with the Segway.

      The only realistic way to track Segway across a larger distances would be to equip it with a satellite transmitter. However, this is expensive, and it still requires unobstructed view of the sky (since sat uplinks are in microwave band and can't penetrate most materials.) I don't think it is worth of trouble. Also, don't forget that GPS receiver itself requires view of the sky to receive the location.

      In other words, the GPS tracking setup - even if it really exists - is mostly scare tactic used to keep honest people honest. But if someone wants to steal the Segway, it is ridiculously easy. He wouldn't even need to rent one, he'd just steal one that is parked next to a public restroom.

    3. Re:yeah right by B747SP · · Score: 1

      No need to find the GPS receiver, just bring your own GPS receiver with you, and hang it on the handlebar. A pair of receivers operated in close proximity will jam each other, and neither of them will give appropriate results. GPS receivers don't work in faraday cages either, so just make sure that the mini-pantech you hired (for $20!) to carry the Segway away with has a metal body, and you're set.

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  19. Let us remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he's just an entrapenueur trying to cash in on the novelty. This is probably why he doesn't have Michael Kamen's support.

    I see a lot of responses that try to define the Segway by this one rental guy. The cost of the rental, the length of rental time, etc. has nothing to do with the company Segway or it's inventors, other than it is exploiting their product.



    "be kind, please unwind"

  20. more fun to... by zogger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... more fun to *accidentaly* hack the segway, install your rc car controllers and a servo for the steering, bungee cord* a blow up love doll on it, then drive it around to watch peoples expressions.

    Really,to not be silly, I see segways as way more useful as a robot base to work from. Who needs a dedicated robot for each task? Like the roombah, a segway could have an adaptor for house vacuuming, then it could go outside and mow the lawn. This is just the normal "tractor" concept, one platform that has "modules" that attach that can do a myriad of tasks.

    Inter-factory/warehouse/office deliverybot perhaps. Remote controlled security guards that roam the hallways at night,perhaps use one for transporting various things inside hospitals, things of that nature that a human might normally do but would be better to just have a drone do, freeing up the humans for the more demanding and specialised work. Geez, just floor washing and buffing at night in stores it would be neat. All done with the same base and just different attachments. Tons of different uses really. It has real decent range, is highly maneuverable, and will carry some decent weight. Seems a natural to me.

    *all good projects need a bungee cord and duct tape someplace, it's da roolz n stuff

  21. OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone admitting they one and operate one?

    I have seen the cops at Chicago Ohare driving those around...I am embarassed for them.

    1. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? OWN OWN OWN OWN, not "one," you fucking tard.

  22. My Segway rental report by AdamBa · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I was on a Disney cruise ship in February and they were letting you ride a Segway around the basketball cout for 10 minutes for some "nominal" fee ($10 or $15 as I recall). So I wandered up there with my 1-year-old son and tried it out, and filed this report in email:

    "On Friday I rode on a Segway, that newfangled two-wheeled transporter. Disney has some promotional deal with them and was offering 10-minute rides. I was watching Noah for a while so I strolled him up and parked him on the edge of the basketball court. The Segway is technologically cool but I am baffled by people who think it is going to revolutionize anything. There may be a small niche for people who need to go twelve miles an hour with both hands occupied, but it's pretty small. The thing was pretty easy to ride. I only fell off twice, once when I was trying to determine how fast you could go around a corner (and found out the answer), and once when I got off at the end and it decided to back up and attack my shins, then lurch forward ten feet before slowly keeling over in a rough approximation of the climactic scene of 'Bonnie and Clyde'. The cast member [Disney-speak for employee] who was helping me assured me everything was fine and the machine just had to be reset. He whipped up out his little reset key and applied it to the reset dealie, which seemed to have no effect. I quickly grabbed the stroller and left, glancing over my shoulder once to see him ministering to the thing with a worried look on his face. Still a few bugs in the system I guess. When we get our final bill, I will check if there is an item for $4,995 marked 'destroyed Segway'".

    - adam

  23. My moped is faster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It goes 40MPH and gets 100 miles to the gallon. Riding a moped may be embarassing... But getting passed on a Segway you rented by someone riding a moped - that's REALLY embarassing.

    1. Re:My moped is faster by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I have some friends that where laughing at a guy on a moped. I said those exact words to them, "he's getting a 100 miles to the gallon." They stopped laughing.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  24. WTF is a segway ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now answer.

    1. Re:WTF is a segway ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you read the article there is a description of a segway as well as several pictures

  25. Bike! by kaamos · · Score: 2, Insightful
    My point exactly, and on a bike you can go faster then 12.5 miles/hour, for longer then 11 miles, ride in the street and not risk smashing into a passerby, and more important in Canada, a bike can ride in snow! (really, though I am not held responsible for any injury you will sustain from trying this. I am not a trained professional, just a canadian ;-))

    --
    In Canada, we don't fancy things like socks
  26. Why so expensive? by turbosaab · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The pricing seems a bit high for such a short-term rental. $40/hour might work for a test-drive, but won't allow people to use the Segways as anything more than a toy. Renting Segways daily or weekly in cities would make a lot of sense. They would be perfect for tourists, etc, who want to explore "on foot". Around $40-50/day should be profitable and still be affordable. The initial cost for a unit is under $10,000 and the electricity to charge them is negligable. Are maintenance costs and/or life expenctancy bad enough to prevent this from being practical?

    1. Re:Why so expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well since driving the segway is definatly the mark of a loserish moron it will be PERFECT for tourists.

  27. Impolitecally Inforgiven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah ! The great US tradition of tecno-smitten goofs continually laying out obscene amounts of money for a freakish assortment of impractical toys, thus financing immature technological applications (or mere con jobs, or both), until they go belly up (either party) or sometimes develop into consumer affordability.

    If something cool yet affordable were really required, all it would take would be a cheap tech nearly off-the-shelf version - with, say, a spring driven mechanism. Carbon, aramid, fibres are quite cheap and workable, now, so they could be easily used.

    As for power source, why, there finally would be a decent employment for those windscreen smudgers that pester everyone at street crossings. And similar sundry. They could become spring-drive winders. I'm sure it would cost much, much less than US$40.00 / hour. And the added employment would mean more money for them to pay for their stay at the shelters. Added incentive to the economy ! Economic rebound !

    And, besides the obvious social value of finally giving these folk a socially relevant function again (besides that of making any run-down loser in an old car feel superior to *someone*), it would be *ecologically* sane ! Yes! I said sane !

    'b-mhua-haha-haha-haaaaaa.... :>

    If there were some demand, I imagine production could be outsourced to India / Pakistan. Local use would not be too considerable, though. In spite of the ample supply of "winders" there (as in most urban-minded 3rd to nth world countries), they already make ample and intense use of bicycles, scooters and motorcycles.

    Wouldn't it be much cheaper to just change sidewalks into air-cushions and ride on a flat disc with reins ? Like those tabletop air-hockey-game things ? Much more fun, too.

  28. Medical uses by assaultriflesforfree · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been surprised at how little (if any, really) I've seen about the possible uses of the HT as a very useful medical device, particularly when considering Kamen's history in medical technology.

    For example, I'm working with a patient right now who had a little complication after having some titanium implanted in his back. They had to remove the brace, but the screws they had to leave are now causing incredible pain. Just yesterday, he was so relieved that he could finally actually sit down in a seat and watch TV thanks to some new medication. His day consists entirely of standing and lying down, and switching between the two is almost unbearable. He is able to walk but only with a cane, slowly, and with much pain. Needless to say, a wheelchair is out of the question, if for no other reason than that it would be even more painful. I told him he might look into the Segway as a possible way to get around. At any given time (such as now), I have 2-4 patients (on a 24 patient max unit) that have some problem, be it with their back, knees, feet, or whatever, that makes walking either extremely painful or extremely difficult and hazardous, and my unit has nothing to do with treatment of those types of problems. Taking your dog for a walk, carrying groceries, walking without pain... Simple things most of us take for granted, but which unfortunately many people aren't able to do or enjoy.

    Lots of people seem to think these things are useless, or that they're only good for lazy people. It seems to me that such an opinion stems from a reaction to their cost vs. usage value for the average person. Personally, I'd like to see insurance companies catch on to this and start providing these things to patients with cases that warrant it. I could see them greatly reducing costs in a variety of treatment areas while also allowing many disabled people to return to regain some of the lost joy of life, not to mention return to work.

    1. Re:Medical uses by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      how is your patient going to fair after a up-to-12MPH tumble off one of these things?

    2. Re:Medical uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This tesimonial by doctor schill, all praise to lord Kamen for blessing us with this miracle"

      Anyone who talks about Kamen like he's more than just a moron and uses the terms "ht" to describe the shitway is a STEALTH MARKETER.

      Piss Off.

    3. Re:Medical uses by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The segway takes some time to get used to and as others have pointed out under this article often misbehaves, running into people when it's supposed to be parking itself, and so on. If you were already familiar with driving one then it might be a useful solution but for someone who has already been injured they are 100% useless.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  29. Learn to spell, you fucking tard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's entrepreneur, ass-hole.

    Looks like the public school system fails the nation's tax-payers yet again.

  30. New at your Ford dealer... by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    I wanted to test drive the new Explorer, but it was $5 to have the sales person open the door, and $20 to drive it around the block.

    Yeah, I know. This guy isn't selling them, but at $5 to stand on the thing for a few seconds, it's a freakin' crime.

    1. Re:New at your Ford dealer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they probably expect high demand.

  31. Walking by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
    Because walking is illegal in the USA... someone I knew went to Los Angeles and was arrested for walking ("jaywalking") :-) I guess somewhere along the line someone decided that cars have right of way over humans (I think this only applies on motorways in the UK - they have signposts on the entrances).

    Well ok, it was probably because he got lippy to the cop...

    1. Re:Walking by Cyberdyne · · Score: 1
      Because walking is illegal in the USA...

      Nope. Walking's fine; that's why they have sidewalks ("pavements" to UKians).

      someone I knew went to Los Angeles and was arrested for walking ("jaywalking") :-)

      That's illegal in Germany, too, and rightly so. It's dangerous, and those sidewalks and pedestrian crossings are put there for a reason. Roads are for cars (and other wheeled vehicles), not for walking on.

      I guess somewhere along the line someone decided that cars have right of way over humans (I think this only applies on motorways in the UK - they have signposts on the entrances).

      They decided roads are for cars, and sidewalks are for people. Much safer that way.

      Well ok, it was probably because he got lippy to the cop...

      That doesn't help matters, certainly! ;-)

    2. Re:Walking by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      Pedestrian fatalities per million population in 1996

      • Detroit: 50 (1998-2000)
      • Los Angeles: 25 (1998-2000)
      • USA: 19
      • Great Britain: 17
      • Germany: 14
      • Seattle: 10 (1998-2000)
      • Netherlands: 7

      So it seems the best idea is to get rid of cars and put lots of bicycles on the road :-) See also here

  32. It's dangerous enough being a pedestrian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to watch out for moron's in their cars trhying to run over you while turning right on red. So now they want to put motorized vehicles on the sidewalk with you?

    And how long before their are "mods" on the internet/Slashdot telling how you can speed them up to 35 mph, the rated capacity of the motor?

    And now, you can get on one without the training Segway says people need. Sounds like a recipe for disaster. Thank god for trial lawyers. They will end this menace if the politicians won't.

    1. Re:It's dangerous enough being a pedestrian by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now there is a ideal. Wonder how difficult it would be to take out the motor/battery assembly and put in one from say a weedeater or a chainsaw?

      I imagine you couldn't remove the electric motor and it still work but I don't think it would stop you from replacing the battery with a small generator and engine. You might even be able to get some decent range out of the bitch.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    2. Re:It's dangerous enough being a pedestrian by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      You can't do this because the balance of the unit depends on having electric motors connected to the wheels independently; In order to keep its balance it will move either wheel (or both of them) forward or backward as appropriate.

      If you replaced the electric drive system with something else you wouldn't be able to stay on the thing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:It's dangerous enough being a pedestrian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could use that to cut up some of them french fried potatoes.

  33. why not just use a bike? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    why spend $5k on this stupid scooter when you can
    buy a decent mountain bike for under $300 ??? You can go faster on a bike and you won't get stranded either.


    i guess we're getting so fat ass and lazy now??

    1. Re:why not just use a bike? by dentar · · Score: 1

      I don't know why some frelling yotz modded you as flamebait, but I agree with you wholeheartedly. I, even though I'm relatively out of shape, will bicycle against anyone who thinks their segway, or "IT" can beat me on either speed or endurance.

      --
      -- I am. Therefore, I think!
    2. Re:why not just use a bike? by mesach · · Score: 1

      I got stranded many times on my old mountain bike, Breaking the chain isn't fun when you are a long way from where you parked, same with getting a HUGE spine from a cactus through your whole tire, and not having enough patches

      --
      moo.
    3. Re:why not just use a bike? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Amen, but if you really want to spend some money. You can get one of those hi-tech magnisem bikes for 1,500.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    4. Re:why not just use a bike? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry... but W H A T?

      Are you too stupid to avoid a HUGE cactus? Too out of shape to roll a bike with a flat? And, how do you compare a $50 mountain bike to a $5000 Segway?

    5. Re:why not just use a bike? by mesach · · Score: 1

      when the thorns are all over the trails, they arent easy to avoid.

      No I'm not to outta shape to roll the bike, but it was about a mile out on the single track, all that did was piss me off(just started the ride too)>

      And in NO WAY was I comparing a $50 mtn bike(mine was $1800, proving that even the expensive ones break down) with a $5k segway... the original poster stated essentially that if you have a mtn bike you it won't leave you stranded! Read the original post before you get all huffy, then you will understand the context of my post.

      --
      moo.
  34. They're common in NYC already by howardcohen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    FYI, they're now a common sight in Central Park on weekends, among the rollerbladers, cyclists, joggers and strollers.

  35. Rent them at the Zoo! by LaszarusLhong · · Score: 1

    Speaking of amusement parks, another great location for renting these would be a zoo.

    I'm specifically thinking of the San Diego zoo, which has a very large footprint. There are some hilly areas, but this would be great for people who can stand, but just can't take alot of walking around.

    Additionally, it could be a good revenue stream for the zoo. I would much, much rather give my money to rent one of these to the zoo than Walt Disney Corporation.

    Cheers,

    Lasz

  36. You stupid little punk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If I saw you on your Segway, I'd jack you.

    1. Re:You stupid little punk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, cuz yer a jerk?

  37. WHY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the HELL does anyone think this stupid thing is cool??? Scooters are not cool, especially this thing. If you are not old or handicapped use your LEGS, you lazy clod!

  38. Ride One Free by MikeD83 · · Score: 1

    Dean Kamen, inventor of the Segway, is also founder of the high school FIRST robotics competition. At most regional events, including nationals, there is a venue setup to allow everyone to try out the Segway. Check it out...US FIRST.

  39. Where this would be good... by jonbrewer · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see Segway rentals overtake motor scooter rentals in places like Block Island. You've got the range to easily cover the entire island, and none of the noise, pollution, or danger of fat Americans buzzing around on motor scooters meant for people half their size.

  40. Price by solprovider · · Score: 1

    $40 per hour is definitely closer to renting a jetski for amusement than a car for travel. Do these things have a purpose?

    I did see one used recently. A security guard at Epcot at Disneyworld was using it between the Innovations buildings, never moving more than 30 feet at a time. He was asked to take a photo, and took the picture without getting off of it. He was probably under orders to stay on it.

    I thought it was a great idea for security to be able to move fast. But they already have golf carts, which have the additional ability of transporting unwell customers and emergency equipment.

    Segways only weigh 83 pounds, and are small enough to store in the trunk of a midsize sedan, so theft would be a major concern.

    Again, where is the use in the real world?

    --
    I spend my life entertaining my brain.
    1. Re:Price by wik · · Score: 1

      I can see it now:

      A segway with an upright stretcher for transporting ill customers. Slide the sickly senior on a stretcher and send 'em south for surgery.

      I have actually heard of amusement parks (and other such venues) who were interested in it for transport for their guards/employees. I imagine that it'll remain a novelty like the jetski, however. At least the segways have the advantage that they're quieter (although any sound comparison with a jetski isn't saying much).

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
  41. Exercise is Better by CowboyRobot · · Score: 1

    I was fascinated by the Segway during the Ginger/IT mystery a few years ago, but only saw a Segway in action for the first time a couple of weeks ago. Strolling down Riverside Park in Manhattan were hundreds of people walking, jogging, biking, and rollerblading - all enjoying the fresh air and getting a little exercise. Then one guy came rolling by (at about the same speed as the joggers) on his Segway, and he seemed like the laziest guy in the world. It was at that moment that I decided I had no interest in ever getting one.

    --
    every stain tells a story
  42. are you kidding? by boarder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, while a ticket to Disneyland is expensive and you may not enjoy it, think about what this really costs.

    $20 for 30 minutes. That's it. A ticket to Disneyland costs about $50 for a 12 hour day (or you can get the 4 day ticket for about $150). Add on the cost of food and souveniers and all that crap kids must have, and you'll be at around $120 for 12 hours. That's only $10/hour, whereas the Segway is $40/hour.

    If anyone at Segway Inc. wants an idea why they have a stupid business plan, all they have to do is look at the economics of their machine. I can rent a car for $20/day, but they are charging $20/half hour for something that is supposed to replace cars in the city.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
    1. Re:are you kidding? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Segway doesn't appear to have anything to do with this other than making the machines. This is just a few entrepreneurs cashing in on the hype.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:are you kidding? by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      so exactly how many people are there like you - you know, the ones who cant pick up on sarcasm?

      neither is an attractive proposition - disneyland just blows unless you are under 10 or serverly mentally impaired, and the half hour segway rental is just a dumb and boring idea.

      i was mocking both at once. thanks for ruining it.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
  43. Liability by raoulotoole · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "...users are asked to sign waive any liability claims if they are in an accident.""

    I thought this thing was so safe. Who takes the liability when the accident involves another person?

    Don't tell me that something that weighs 250+ lbs, can go 12mph is safe on the sidewalk.

  44. Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Harley Davidson Sportster rental: $75 / day
    Harley Davidson Sportster retail price : $5,975

    Segway retail price: $4,950
    Segway rental price: $60 for 90 minutes.

  45. It's time to face it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Segway is one big, fat, honking failure. No amount of PR can save it now. The damned thing was over-hyped to begin with and the consumers know it.

    It's too slow for the highway, too big and fast for the sidewalk, and too expensive for what it does do. What was the "genius" inventor thinking?

    Rent one? Hell, I don't even want to see one!

  46. We now know step 2! by MrPerfekt · · Score: 1

    Step 1. Buy seemingly useless Segway.
    Step 2. ???^H^H^HRent Segway
    Step 3. Profit!!

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!
  47. Astroturfing...not quite. by opti6600 · · Score: 1

    I'm an enthusiast. That's all. Check out my associations, I'm quite unaffiliated with Segway LLC or its related companies.

    I only have direct work relationships with wavelengths Journal, dreamlabs Network Services, and indirect associations with Miami-Dade County Public Schools and CRESA Partners LLC.

  48. Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Harley Davidson: Hella cool, one of the few great things to come out of America.

    Segway: Mega dorky, one the many stupid peices of crap produced by America.

  49. Beautiful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such visceral negativity really brightens my day.

  50. I knew it! by Qacker · · Score: 1
    My mom gets Newsweek and it says (C)MSNBC on the cover. I was always a little worried that MS stood for MicroSoft but my parents thought I was paranoid. Now that I have been to the MSNBC site it is aparently a MS news thing.

    MSNBC is optimized for Microsoft Internet Explorer Windows Media Player

    ©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

    What is the world coming to...

    --
    Learn lisp today!
  51. GPS by 200_success · · Score: 1
    We put GPS ... units on them so we could track their location but its hidden within the machine so don't bother looking for it.

    I think he's bluffing.

  52. WTF? by jhylkema · · Score: 1

    Why in the name of (insert name of deity of your choice here) is this even on Slashdot?? What, con-artist, stock manipulator, and patent abuser Jeff Bezos of Amazon.bomb sells it so it must be cool?

    Folks, if you want to pay $40, you can often get an hour of AIRPLANE rental! Let's see here . . . overpriced yuppie toy or Cessna 152, hmmm . . . And for five grand, I could scare up a very nice (and very lightly used) car. These Segway jerkoffs want me to pay that for a scooter? Gimmie a break! As for replacing cars, the damn things are already illegal in several cities.

    This is supposed to be "news for nerds." To my knowledge, no self-respecting nerd would be caught dead on one of these things. The only people who would are idiot ex-dot-commers with more money than brains.

    Please, /. editors, no more Segway stories! This is hardly "stuff that matters."

    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Please, /. editors, no more Segway stories! This is hardly "stuff that matters."
      If it isn't "stuff that matters," why have you posted two comments on this article? If you don't like the article, stop posting comments, you fool! Go read something you want to read! I can't stand when people post comments to articles, saying that they don't want to read that article. WTF are you doing posting a comment, then?
  53. From the article by jhylkema · · Score: 1

    Look where this beat-off that's renting the things, Larry Lambeth, is located. That's right, Spokane, Washington, the Town That Means Well. Yes, the same Spokane that took out a HUD loan to build a Nordstrom store when it already had two.

    I can scarcely see doing this in "trendy" cities like Seattle or San Francisco, especially given the rampant unemployment and downsizing that's going on.. Spokane? A city that tries hard not to be trendy? Riiiight! In fact, one of its selling points is how un-trendy and un-cool it is.

    Wonder if this will be the first case of a Segway getting repoed.

  54. It works for me. Not for everyone. by toybuilder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Segway is as "pointless" as the horseless carriage and the velocipeds from 100-120 years ago.

    In 1897, the Sears Catalog sold "safety bicycles" (i.e., pedal-and-chain style, versus the big "penny farthing" type) for $25. That's equivalent to about $2,200 year-2003 dollars.

    The Segway dropped from $10,000 two years ago, to $7,000 last year, to $5,000 now. Give it time.

    It will find its place in the spectrum of transportation choices. Some people will always walk. Some people will always drive gas-guzzling SUV's and exotic cars that cost more than my 2 bedroom home. Most people will find something in between.

  55. If you can get there on a Segway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you can get there walking. This is for the utterly lazy.

    1. Re:If you can get there on a Segway... by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      i wouldn't walk 15 miles total per day going to work and back...but i do take my segway. i used to take a car. sometimes i take a bike. lazy? lazy is posting as "Anonymous Coward" those are just keystroke, good gawd man.

      cheers,
      pt

  56. Stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid fat f*cking Americans. No wonder you're the most overweight people on planet earth! How about walking? That stupid device, which a normal person wouldn't be caught dead on, isn't even fast.

    1. Re:Stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid fat f*cking Americans.

      Yeah, we're stupid and fat. That's why we own the motherfucking planet, right, troll?

  57. Another Austroturfer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So here you are, bragging about the size of your peni^H^H^H^Hwallet on an internet site and using feel good marketing speak.

    Humm, I think you are just an austroturfer, and looking at your history confirms it. I wonder if all 108 of your comments are just like the current 24 and you can't shut up with the bragging about your $$$ and your scooter.

    Why don't you waste you time at some other site related to the scooter instead of posting PR stuff to every /. story you can work the scooter into.

    I don't think ExpensiveOverhypedScooterOwningRabidPrSpewingFanbo ys.com has been taken yet.

  58. Chumps by dbc001 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    You people are chumps. The segway may have some interesting technology, but it's more of a marketing experiment than a technological breakthrough. They've pulled out every trick in the book, from lobbying local governments to planting media articles like this one (remember those astroturfed fan sites they made?), to the exaggerated sales on Amazon.com .

    If you ever thought about buying a segway, or fantasized about how cool it might be to have one - you're just a sucker! That's right, you've been had.

    The saddest people are the ones who think they're cool because they call it an "ht". Those are the real victims of marketing. Do you think Pepsi is cool? Does the Coca-Cola logo make you think of "good times"? Have you been asking your friends if they're "gellin" like they do in the commercial?

    This isn't a flame or a troll. This is the sad truth. There are people out there that are so stupid that they actually believe a $5000 tricycle is "cool".

    -dbc

  59. Sour Grapes Saturate Slashdot by Phoenix666 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wow, what stinging resentment from the same crowd that was drooling over these things 18 months ago. Why is that? Is it because they didn't magically go on sale at every corner market and WalMart in the country for $20?

    The arc of this meme was 1) Wow, this is the niftiest thing ever gimme gimme gimme. 2) Well gee I just got laid off from my dot-com and $3K is, well, just unfair. 3) What self-respecting American would trade in a gas-guzzling SUV for a goofy thing like this? and finally, 4) I am so socially insecure that I'm going to pile on and pan something that I still secretly think is awesome and would love to have but can't afford.

    Well, I thought these things were awesome when they came out, and still do. If I could afford one, I'd buy it. I live in New York, and having these things replace cars would be a godsend. There's nothing more maddening than being in Midtown in rush hour or the Village on the weekends with guidos from Jersey trying to run you down in their I-Roc Z's.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:Sour Grapes Saturate Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just not something most of us would use.

      I can go to the grocery store with 2 kids and bring home 8 bags of groceries in the snow and rain in my suv. I can also go to Lowes and bring home a new lawn mower with it. It shines when we're on vacation.

      Can you do that on a sickway? Thought not.

      $3K buys a lot of gasoline that can be used by real humans doing real tasks.

      Come down from the clouds and see how most of really live.

  60. Yeah, Kamen, I Gotcher Munny Riiiight Heah by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

    40 bucks an hour? When for that price, I can get a rental car for a day, and a rental bicycle for a week?

    The rental prices alone continue to make it obvious that the Segway is a machine powered not by electricity but by hype. Hype is fickle, basically fraudulent and can disappear for good in a short second.

    I'm sure Kamen's promotional apparatus is very, very annoyed with people like me, who have become so resolved against bulldada like the Segway that we can't be converted and must be attacked. In order to get my money (which is the entire point to running the Engine of Hype {tm}) they will have to frisk my body for my wallet, since even at gunpoint I will resist and must be killed into submission.

    Despite such drama -- and sadly for the Kamenistas -- there's only so much they can do to get my money. But their hook (the alleged product, the Segway Transporter) is too expensive to effectively hide in some fee assessed by some government agency. It should stand as perfectly obvious that this high price makes it impossible to lure me into buying it voluntarily, as well as renting it.

    The reality of the Segway is that by its design, maintenance costs and purchase price, its application is very, very limited and will thus be compelled to remain there. The purchase price alone is a major undermine of the hype and guarantees niche-marketdom. But I do get tired of hearing people talk the thing up, as if this very, very limited machine can actually revolutionize our transportation world. But I guess that's only to be expected given the dotcom era we are still mired in.

    --
    [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  61. Don't dis Bezos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many of you can afford a Neal Stephenson lawn ornament?

    http://www.msnbc.com/news/904842.asp? cp1=1

  62. Sounds like a hooker by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    50$/hr

    Some dude back at my highschool paid one 5$ to cop a feel.

  63. Some information that the article missed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The name of the company in Spokane is Fun Transport. For more information, go to www.Fun-Transport.com.

    Yes, they are aware that they will be /.-ed... I just went down and told them about the article. They asked me to put the name and website up here.

    And yes, I took a Pre-Glide. WHEEE!!!! It's FUN, even on the slow speed.

    This is the perfect transportation for where the rental stand is, in the park in the center of Spokane.

  64. Why not just a moving sidewalk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That way nobody hits anybody, and the fat asses don't have to walk. Society is getting lazier and lazier. It's pretty sad when one doesn't want to walk at the destination one is at. Why even bother with real life, just jack into virtual reality.

  65. Segway no longer cool. by Animats · · Score: 1
    Saw someone on a Segway in downtown San Jose last week, trying to pick up girls. They didn't go for it.

    Saw another one in downtown Palo Alto. Walgreens wouldn't let him ride it into the store, and he was trying to figure out where to park it.

  66. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy said "stinky" not "skinny". Why would skinny make any sense whatsoever?

    He was referring to the fact that taking a Segway somewhere in 90 degree weather is going to result in a hell of a lot less sweat and odor than riding a bike.

  67. Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Maybe if enough people had Segways, more cities would be pedestrian friendly. Unfortunately, at these prices, few people will have Segways. The main appeal seems to be the clever engineering rather than the cost-benefit.

    One notable PF city (San Francisco) has gone and banned the Segway. I blame this on kneejerk anti-business attitudes. Now, "kneejerk" is not a word I use lightly -- it's too popular with right-wingers who are too lazy to properly rebut the arguments of left-wingers. (Indeed, you could say that using the word is itself usually a kneejerk reaction.) I say "kneejerk" in this case because the main anti-Segway group loves to make comparisons with SUVs and other corporate stupidities. But they themselves admit that there's only been one Segway-related injury so far.

    The big concern seems to be that Segways will be misused by irresponsible riders who will speed down sidewalks, scattering senior citizens right and left. But the Segway designers seem to have anticipated precisely this issue: how fast your Segway can go is determined by which key you use to turn it on. The keys are conspicuously colored, so it would be easy to require Segwayers to use the "beginner" key in heavily trafficed areas. That limits the scooter to 6mph, which is about how fast most people walk.

    1. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      One notable PF city (San Francisco) has gone and banned the Segway.
      Totally false. San Francisco has banned Segways from the sidewalks. You can take them on the street, if you're brave enough -- just like a bicycle. It seems completely appropriate to me that the burden of bravery should be on you, for riding a Segway, rather than on me, just trying to walk down the street without getting run over by some yuppie who'd rather ride a $5,000 electric scooter than use the legs god gave him.
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by fm6 · · Score: 1, Troll
      The maximum speed of a Segway is twelve miles an hour. If riding it on a busy street isn't illegal, it should be.

      Grow up. Not everybody has the "legs God gave him". There's older people, people with respiratory problems, etc. Even a healthy person has a limited range on in a hilly city like SF.

      You apparently resent the prosperity of potential Segway users. You're within your rights to be prejudiced (even if it is a little childish). But that's not an excuse to avoid addressing the issues. Do you have actual evidence that a Segway operated with the Beginner's Key is a threat to pedestrians? Come back when you do. And spare me your bigotry.

    3. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by tupps · · Score: 1

      I don't know about most cities in the US but here in Australia Skateboards, Scooters, Rollerblades, etc are all banned on City streets. It is just to dangerous and crowded for people crusing about on scooters. 12mph is about the same speed as a slow bicycle rider, and they are definately not allowed on the street.

      --
      Go out and get sailing!
    4. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by driptray · · Score: 1

      In Australia, bicycles must be ridden on the street. They are not allowed to be ridden on the footpath.

      It's not just speed that is relevant to whether the footpath or the street is appropriate - it's how nimble the device is, and how much space it takes up. Segways seem to me to be much more "pedestrian-like", whereas bikes are much more "car-like". Segways don't take up much room, and they can stop and turn very quickly, with an almost zero turning-circle. They move just like a pedestrian, but faster. And if it's crowded, they don't have to move faster.

    5. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by fm6 · · Score: 1
      I certainly agree that any vehicle that goes 12 MPH is too fast for the sidewalk. And typically bicyclists travel at least twice that fast. Indeed, bicyclists often seem to have trouble obeying street speed limits.

      Same goes for skateboards and rollerbladers, which also have safety issues that don't relate to speed. Although I have to confess, I hate seeing skateboards banned -- I enjoy watching them, even though I'd never get on one!

      But a Segway can only go 12 MPH if you operate it with an "open country" key. Of course that should be illegal on a sidewalk. But there is also a "sidewalk" key (8 mph) and a "beginner" key (6 mph).

      I don't want to sound like I feel very put out that I can't operate a Segway in SF. I don't own one, and won't until the price comes down. That won't happen until there's a lot of history with the vehicle in other cities. By then, I think, people in SF will realize how silly the ban is.

    6. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by tupps · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about bicycles, but Rollerblades, Skateboards skooters as well. All these are very much like the Segway in there stopping and potential speeds. On a busy sidewalk there just isn't room for these devices. And of *course* everyone is just going to go at walking speed on these when it is crowded.

      --
      Go out and get sailing!
    7. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by tupps · · Score: 1

      To me 8mph is still quite fast, more like slow jogging speed. I live in Melbourne that like SF has big wide footpaths. During the morning and afternoon these footpaths are very crowded, you would be lucky to walk at 1 or 2mph. Even for people on rollerblades it becomes quite awkward to get around all the obstacles etc as you are constantly shifting left and right. I am sure that stopping and making a shifting around people/buskers/outside cafes/dogs/ street merchants/everything else is going to be quite a hassle.

      --
      Go out and get sailing!
    8. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by driptray · · Score: 1

      Well, you did say that bicycles weren't allowed on the street....and that aint true.

      But I disagree that rollerblades, skateboards and scooters are similar to segways. From the videos I've seen of segways, they seem to be far more agile, maneouverable and stable than anything else on wheels. They can stop very quickly if they have to. I don't think they'd cause a problem on even the most crowded footpath - all that would happen is that the segway user would have to travel at the same speed as the pedestrians.

      I like the segway, but I'm unlikely ever to buy one. For very short distances I'll walk, and for medium distances I ride a bike (on the road). The segway seems to be aimed at people who are too lazy, scared or incapacitated to ride a bike, but I'd much rather those people be on a segway than in cars creating traffic that slows me down on my bike!

    9. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by fm6 · · Score: 1
      I think I'd go crazy if I went out for a stroll, and couldn't go faster than 2 MPH!

      When you talk about busy streets filled with idlers, merchannts, and buskers (we call them "street musicians") the issue isn't speed, but control. That's why rollerbladers are such a nuisance -- it isn't hard to go slow on blades, it's hard to stop, at any speed! That's not true of the Segway, since it's controlled by instinctive body postures. You see somebody in front of you, you instinctively lean back, and the thing stops. Check out these videos.

      The real concern on a crowded sidewalk isn't careless or poorly trained Segway riders. The real concern is malicious riders. I would think there'd be a way to handle this without completely banning the product.

    10. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by tupps · · Score: 1

      Well I am not talking about a stroll (eg when you want to go for a walk) I am talking about the 8:00-->9:00AM and 5:00->6:00PM and lunch times in the city when the streets are packed. Lots of people getting on Trams, going to the subway. Sort of imagine the scene from the Matrix (1st one) where Neo is in the test simulator (girl in the red dress scene) walking along the street dodging everyone. That is what busy streets end up looking like, but without everyone walking in an orderly manor. It is frustrating to walk in, and I am sure it would be frustrating on a segway, especially with jostling etc.

      --
      Go out and get sailing!
    11. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by tupps · · Score: 1

      Actually I don't mind the cars on my bike rides (ride ~30k/18miles to and from work) if the traffic is really banked up. Most of the roads I ride on have bike lanes, which are about 1 meter wide and are next to the parked cars. You still have to watch for cars coming in/out of parking spots but if the traffic is stopped then you don't have to worry as much. We also have a bike 'start position' which is a 2 meter spot in front of the cars at traffic lights which means the cars always have 3 or 4 bikes in front of them.

      --
      Go out and get sailing!
    12. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by fm6 · · Score: 1
      OK, I admit it, it'd be stupid to use a Segway in a situation like that. But should it be illegal? And what about the rest of the day?

      In San Francisco, you have a similar situation in subway stations, streetcar stops, etc. I think I might actually go along with a ban on segways at such locations, and perhaps a certain distance away.

      But it's a moot point. Nobody's gonna spend US$5K for something like this. Segway's big hope was that entities like the post office and warehouse operators would buy huge numbers of them, and that would drive the price down. But it's not happening. I'm just carping because the anti-Segway activists in SF are behaving with the usual self-righteous stupidity.

    13. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by tupps · · Score: 1

      I don't see it in Australia either. It would be getting close to 2/3 the cost of a small car. Plus we have pretty good public transport (not excellent but good). Trams will go to most suburbs 10km from the city and the Train and Bus networks extends much further than that. So for anyone in the inner city (Segway target) you would get about 3 years of tram tickets, and you don't have to recharge your tram!

      --
      Go out and get sailing!
    14. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Well, you guys seem to have a relatively sane attitude towards transit issues. Here in the U.S. there's a serious prejudice against anything resembling mass transit. We even built our biggest bridge in such a way that it could not be retrofitted to support trains!

      This prejudice has turned American cities into congested, smoggy messes, where thousands of people are unemployed simply because they can't find a job that will cover the cost of buying a car. Perhaps Dean Kamen thought he could get people of their cars if he could provide them with an alternative to public transit. I mean, we're talking about people who own $50,000 SUVs! What's a $5,000 scooter?

      Actually, there's only one reason the Segway exists. It's just a variation of Kamen's revolutionary IBot Wheel Chair, which has been stuck in the FDA approval process for years. The IBot certainly has a future (imagine a wheel chair that climbs stairs and allows the user to talk without any neck craning!), but the Segway is probably just an idea looking for an application.

    15. Re:Go to a pedestrian-friendly city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree that Segway sidewalk bans are silly.

      Wheelchairs are capable of going quite fast, if the user really feels like it, but it would be completely crazy to ban wheelchairs on that basis.

  68. Try one today (Sunday) for FREE by jeremedia · · Score: 1

    Los Angeles Downtown Marriot, 4:30 - 6:00. Should be fun. I really don't understand the hostility some of you feel over this thing. Subjects that lead to Geek Rage would be an interesting research topic.

  69. Cheaper in Vancouver, BC by darewreck · · Score: 1

    Here in Vancouver, BC, a guy invested some $100,000 in segways and is offering them at $20.00 per hour or $100 per day (24 hours). Now all that remains is for the city and the insurance corporation (ICBC) to come to some agreement on whether or not to allow these on sidewalks or on streets and what liability it should have. As usual lots of red tape unless you have friends in the city council to make people look the other way while they make the money.

    1. Re:Cheaper in Vancouver, BC by biafra · · Score: 1

      wow, sweet... Do you have any more info on this guy? I just moved here and I'd love to be in line on day one.

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:Cheaper in Vancouver, BC by Jetson · · Score: 1
      The Vancouver Segway rental site is on Granville Island. The city is trying to decide how to classify it:
      1) As an electric vehicle it would require a license and insurance, even though ICBC (the socialized insurance scam) refuses to license or insure electric vehicles.
      2) As a non-vehicle, it would be banned by existing bylaws against the use of skateboards, etc. on public property.
      (And if it floats then it must be ... a witch!)

      Maybe the Segway folks should put a tiny wind-up key on it somewhere so that it can be classified as a "gas/electric-assisted human-powered vehicle", in which case it can fall into the same category as the classic moped....

      The alternative would be to add a 3rd wheel and a basket and try to convince people it was just another one of those electric shopping carts that the grey-haired speed freaks like to zoom around in.

    3. Re:Cheaper in Vancouver, BC by darewreck · · Score: 1

      I read about this in the Province newspaper for Thursday May 15th. As another poster has pointed out, there is debate now as to where to allow the use of the segways. Sorry I can't be more helpful, I didn't know at the time that this was going to become a /. news item :(

    4. Re:Cheaper in Vancouver, BC by biafra · · Score: 1
      even though ICBC (the socialized insurance scam)

      Don't complain too much about ICBC or you'll wind up with a system like Alberta (I just escaped from 5 years there). When I first moved to that provence they wanted 4-5k/yr for simple car insurance. They based this on the fact that I was a white, unmarried male who was under 25. They did not take into account the fact that I had never had an accident, never had a speeding ticket, and never had a parking ticket. That really made me wish I was back in BC paying ICBC :>

      --
      :wq
  70. I was planning on doing this by IHateUniqueNicks · · Score: 1

    My dad and I actually came up with the idea to charge for test drives at local malls, at $1/min, there are bound to be dozens of people willing to pay each day.

    The logistics became a problem though when trying to get insurance, as well as the fact that we'd have to travel to the US to take training before they'd ship us any segways. And on top of all that, according to their sales, we could only order 2.

    So the idea kind of died.. :(

  71. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Erm, I believe somebody would probably say that "you failed it here."

  72. I don't know about everyone else but... by Cowclops · · Score: 1

    I never had a problem with riding my bike around Block Island. It would be nice if they outlawed scooters on the island, but I don't think its even that big of a problem to start off with.

  73. The Segway Stretcher by solprovider · · Score: 1

    I cannot envision how it could work without unbalancing the Segway, but the concept of having someone strapped in and at the mercy of the driver in such an unstable vehicle is quite humorous.

    ---
    Could they find some way to add a tow hitch that does not interfere with the Segway's operation? Since the base rotates forward and back, maybe they could make the tow truck have an open channel so the hitch could move up and down.

    The Segway has a top speed of 12 mph. Do they have the power to pull anything? If the speed is being limited by the controls, which seems possible since the top speed is determined by which key is used, then maybe the power is already there. But that leaves the possibility of mods that allow much faster movement. There are some people who would be zipping around at 40 mph until they damaged themselves, bystanders, or property.

    I cannot imagine to would be a comfortable ride for anybody being pulled on a stretcher on the tow truck. And if it slows the Segway, then having four people run with the stretcher would be both faster and more comfortable.

    ---
    I did think of one use for Segways: parking enforcement. Zip around putting parking tickets on cars. It is unlikely that anyone would steal one with police markings.

    --
    I spend my life entertaining my brain.
    1. Re:The Segway Stretcher by wik · · Score: 1

      That was, of course, a joke. I doubt you could put anything in tow, especially since it would screw with the balance.

      As far as parking enforcement goes, anything that makes their lives easier should be completely banned (at least in Pittsburgh). :-)

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
  74. Re:It works for me. Not for everyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Segway dropped from $10,000 two years ago, to $7,000 last year, to $5,000 now. Give it time.

    Or just add a 3rd wheel and drop the price to $500 now.
  75. I did not pay to test drive a Z06 Corvette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would I pay to test drive a scooter?

    Why would I pay more to rent a scooter than it costs to rent a Corvette or any other more expensive item?

  76. Darn Bikes by fm6 · · Score: 1
    In the U.S., we have bicycle paths that are supposed to give bicyclists an escape for our psychotic motorists. (Well, not all American motorists are crazy, but most of the ones in Silicon Valley are!) Problem is, they're always in some pleason area that attracts strollers, and there's no room for bicylists!

    One of the hazards of being a pedestrian around here is bicyclists who just ignore crosswalks, stop signs, and traffic signals.

    One last irony: SF actually has more fatal pedestrian accidents per capita than any place in the U.S. The main culprit is that strange group of people who don't understand that a red light means "stop right now" not "stop, unless you think you can make it accross the intersection before the cross traffic appears." The obvious cure is red-light cameras (intersections that have them in SF have drastically fewer accidents) but such cameras are widely considered to be tools of an evil fascist conspiracy.

  77. Flat-lander alert! by Jetson · · Score: 1
    What could a Segway do to solve someone's transportation problems that a bicycle could not?

    Spoken like a true flat-lander. Have you never biked up a long hill? I can go for miles on flat land without breaking a sweat, but somehow always end up drenched after a two or three mile stretch of 8% grade. At least on a Segway the rider doesn't need to leave time in the morning commute for a shower upon arrival at the destination.

    1. Re:Flat-lander alert! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Spoken like a true flat-lander."

      The original poster lives in Miami. Florida isn't exactly known for its mountainous terrain.

  78. Finally saw a Segway in action..... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

    It was at a local Flea Market. Some 6'+ guy was coasting along on the thing in tight crowds, silently running over people's feet, I'm sure. Sure was easy to spot with his head sticking up above the crowd.

    The guy was obviously there to show off because the other 3 people he was with were still using their feet to get around. Or maybe they were there to carry the stuff he buys because he surely couldn't carry it with him on the Segway.

    Maybe the next time I go to that flea market, I'll ride my motorcycle through the crowds. At least I have saddlebags to carry my stuff in.

  79. 4 Words by casad · · Score: 1

    Tel - E - Port - Er

    All problems solved. =)

  80. SHT is? by nothingtodo · · Score: 1

    I'd pay a few dollars to test ride it just to see how it stays up and controls itself but I would not do it more than once. I doubt these things would work in amusement parks. Where would you put it if you want to stop and eat or go on rides? People don't follow road rules either so you'd basically be riding as slow as the walkers weaving in and out. You can get two 50cc scooters and plus have money left over for the price of one of these SHTs.

    --
    -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
  81. Segway!!!!!!1111!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blah Blah Blah my Segway(TM). Blah Blah look at my expensive Segway(TM).

    Blah Blah Look at me, I am an attention whore and can't shut the fuck up about the Segway(TM).

    1. Re:Segway!!!!!!1111!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geek jealousy at it's best. The Segway looks cool and that dude has a pretty cool site.

    2. Re:Segway!!!!!!1111!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up ptorrone.

      So I take it if killing yourself looks cool, and that person thinks they are cool, then it would be cool to do so. Sure the idea is cool, but it doesn't hide the fact that you look like a dork and act like a marketing person.

      If I was jealous would be whining about wanting to fuck it like you do, and saying I want one.

      I couldn't care less about it, I am just sick of astroturffers with an unhealthy obsession and seem to be getting an erection from talking about it.

  82. true on the renting by boarder · · Score: 1

    Yes, the renting is a few other people cashing in on the hype, but the overall price is set by Segway. Those things are ridiculously expensive for what you get. If they were cheaper to buy, then the renters could charge less. That was my point.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  83. Land or World by boarder · · Score: 1

    If you are saying Disneyland just blows unless you are under 10, I can't argue for or against since I've never been there. I have been to Disney World since I've become an adult, and it was actually pretty fun (well, it was fun since I didn't go with kids but with other adults). Epcot center is pretty cool, if only for good food and to have fun with their "technology" exhibits. They even have dance clubs for adults in the park.

    As for picking up on sarcasm, I understood what you were trying to say, but I just felt that the point of your sarcastic statement could be enhanced with cold facts. Disney Land/World is pretty damned expensive, and the Segway is even worse (which is what I showed using data).

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.