Slashdot Mirror


Pictures of Earth From Mars

11223 writes "Mars Global Surveyor has snapped a picture of Earth from its Mars orbit. This picture, the first of its kind, shows Earth, the Moon, and Jupiter. Earth is visible as a half disc exposing North and South America; apparently the Moon had to be "processed" into the picture."

290 comments

  1. Hey! by kidlinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see my house from here!

    --
    -kidlinux.
    1. Re:Hey! by SeederGOD · · Score: 0, Troll

      so if you want to see it, try to go outside and look on it from sidewalk :) you don't need MGS to look on your house

    2. Re:Hey! by billimad · · Score: 5, Funny

      if you look real close you can see a tiny flash of light as a web server goes up in flames.

    3. Re:Hey! by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is, after all, from the I-can-see-my-house-from-here dept.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:Hey! by dotgod · · Score: 4, Funny
      I can see my house from here!

      Hey! I didn't know Bill Gates read Slashdot!

    5. Re:Hey! by pangu · · Score: 1


      Hey! I didn't know Bill Gates read Slashdot

      And posts as kidlinux!

    6. Re:Hey! by kidlinux · · Score: 1

      Heh, I didn't even notice that..
      Looks like the moderators didn't either :P

      --
      -kidlinux.
    7. Re:Hey! by squidfood · · Score: 1
      I can see my house from here!

      Is it that bit right next to the Great Wall?

    8. Re:Hey! by Jenova · · Score: 1

      Off topic, but where did this quote came from?

    9. Re:Hey! by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >>Off topic, but where did this quote came from?

      ST:Enterprise. There was an episode where a race of aliens showed the Klingons some Holo-technology. They programmed the Klingon homeworld into the device, and during the demo the Klingon captain said "I can see my house from here".

      --
      Huh?
    10. Re:Hey! by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      It's much older than that.

      WARNING: OFFENSIVE TO CHRISTIANS

      I recall hearing an old joke about Jesus up on the cross. He calls for Paul, and tells him that "Paul, I can see your house from here!" (joke redacted for size).

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    11. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's OK, 'cause Christians are offensive to me.

    12. Re:Hey! by vidarlo · · Score: 1

      ERR!!!Sorry...the big wall ain't in the picture....it was south and north america. Sorry bud! You've gotta move your house!

    13. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was more reminded of Warcraft 2, where if you click on the Goblin Balloonists long enough they say "I can see my house"

    14. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That's a full EARTH, Butch!"

  2. Very nice. by Randolpho · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Or rather, it would be, if it weren't already slashdotted. :(

    I hope one day to see that picture "in the flesh".

    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
    1. Re:Very nice. by `Sean · · Score: 1

      Yeah...Slashdotted before the first post is pretty bad. Mirrors? ;)

    2. Re:Very nice. by Farscry · · Score: 1

      Yeah; only 3 comments and the server's already choking. Then again, most of the space agency servers are ALWAYS very slow.

      --
      Mmmmm.... Pigeons. Sometimes, they come with notes attached...it's like...a fortune cookie with wings.
    3. Re:Very nice. by polymath69 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Space.com has the pictures, and is not (yet) slashdotted.

      --

      --
      I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
    4. Re:Very nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "in the flesh"

      Typical Slashdot. We get an amazing photo and already we are looking for the pr0n angle

    5. Re:Very nice. by terkozer · · Score: 5, Informative
      National Geographic has picked up the article as well...

      It can be found here

    6. Re:Very nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      if you want the full resolution tiffs (and jpgs too) look at the jpl site:

      jupiter and moons

      earth and moon

      itty bitty earth and jupiter

    7. Re:Very nice. by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      again, most of the space agency servers are ALWAYS very slow.

      Yet another reason why they need a bigger budget!

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    8. Re:Very nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh? typical slashdot idiocy is more like it. by "in the flesh" he means he wants to see it first hand. as in he hopes to make it to mars himself one day. duh!

  3. Fake fake fake by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


    That picture has been Photoshop'd. We never landed on the moon. Consume. Marry and reproduce.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Fake fake fake by Drathus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, it's a good thing then this pic was taken from Mars' orbit then, isn't it? =)

      (Yes, I know you post was humor. =P)

    2. Re:Fake fake fake by Drathus · · Score: 1

      (Though I guess the Moderators need an injection of a sense of humor.)

    3. Re:Fake fake fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (And you need an injection of beef, by the sound of it).

    4. Re:Fake fake fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I know silly, I meant that other "classic" space thing was faked. Which it was. Elvis did it after he and JFK faked the assassination. Where's my tinfoil hat?

    5. Re:Fake fake fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Consume. Marry and reproduce.

      ``Consume Mary and reproduce!?'' What do you think we are? Pod people?

    6. Re:Fake fake fake by KewlPC · · Score: 2, Informative

      For those not in the know, it should've been "Consume." and "Marry and Reproduce."

      They're from the John Carpenter film They Live, in which aliens are trying to take over the planet, and have bribed some human leaders into helping. The aliens masquerade as humans, and insert subliminal messages into advertisements. Roddy Piper, who plays the protagonist, finds a special pair of sunglasses that allow him to see things as they really are. There's a scene where he walks outside and sees some billboards. Then he puts on the sunglasses, and sees what the billboards really say: one says "Consume", another says "Marry and reproduce".

    7. Re:Fake fake fake by KewlPC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's also the movie that Duke Nukem 3D stole the line "I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." from.

    8. Re:Fake fake fake by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention the film unknowingly triggered a sunglasses shortage among the tinfoil hat crowd worldwide.

      They Live rules. "I'm here to kick ass, and chew bubble gum...and I'm all out of bubble gum."

    9. Re:Fake fake fake by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Consume. Marry and reproduce.

      Why don't you eat shit and fuck off, asshole. :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    10. Re:Fake fake fake by BenTels0 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you didn't. We, the humans of the Earth (i.e. Sol-3) on the other hand, did.

  4. I love astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's me mooning Mars, and a couple of neighbors, there on the west coast of Florida. Smile!

  5. Martian and Bugs Bunny by DJ+Rubbie · · Score: 1, Funny

    This reminds me of that Martian dude from Bugs Bunny and Tweety Show...

    --
    Please direct all bug reports to /dev/null
    1. Re:Martian and Bugs Bunny by bludstone · · Score: 1

      Marvin the martian

      "The eliudium pew 36 explosive space modulator! that creature has stolen the SPACE MODULATOR."

      --

      no .sig
    2. Re:Martian and Bugs Bunny by cmburns69 · · Score: 4, Funny

      oooh this makes me very angry!

      An online Starcraft RPG? Free, only at
      In soviet russia, all your us are belong to base!
      Karma: redundant

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    3. Re:Martian and Bugs Bunny by Gibble · · Score: 1

      Where's the KABOOM? There was supposed to be an earth shattering KABOOM!!

      --
      Gibble: Descriptive of an emotional state in which one's mind is scrabbling for some purchase on reality
    4. Re:Martian and Bugs Bunny by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      >eliudium pew 36

      I remembered hearing it as "Eludium Q-36" explosive space modulator.

      but it appears you are correct

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    5. Re:Martian and Bugs Bunny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 line of content, 3 lines of gratuitous sig... ahh, slashdot!

    6. Re:Martian and Bugs Bunny by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

      Yup

      An online Starcraft RPG? Free, only at
      In soviet russia, all your us are belong to base!
      Karma: redundant

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    7. Re:Martian and Bugs Bunny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you're going to have a three lines of crappy sig, will you at least put it in your damn signature! Some people have signatures turned off for a reason, numbnuts.

    8. Re:Martian and Bugs Bunny by bludstone · · Score: 1

      Kickass. It was from memory too.

      Woo, what a waste of brainspace.

      --

      no .sig
  6. "Processed" into the picture? by dobedobedew · · Score: 1

    As if the people who claim the NASA missions to the moon are hoaxes didn't have enough ammuntion already...

    1. Re:"Processed" into the picture? by GammaTau · · Score: 1, Troll

      As if the people who claim the NASA missions to the moon are hoaxes didn't have enough ammuntion already...

      Oh, come on. The Moon is a Propaganda Hoax. The Mad Revisionist is even offering $100,000 for anyone who provides them, by e-mail, conclusive physical evidence of the existence of the moon.

    2. Re:"Processed" into the picture? by Grandmasta · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was processed into the picture BECAUSE IT DOESN'T EXIST! We never landed on the moon -- THE MOON IS A HOAX!

      okay, I'm done. ^_^

    3. Re:"Processed" into the picture? by Clomer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sadly, you're probably right. Fortunately, they explained exactly how it was "processed" and why, as well as provided links to the original, unprocessed images.

      The simple fact is that it is virtually impossible to get a good, unprocessed image of this type because of how much of a difference in brightness there is between the Earth and the Moon. I once read somewhere that the moon only reflects about 10% of the light that hits it. It's dark grey, essentially the color of asphalt, but it looks white in the sky because you see it against the pitch black background. The Earth, OTOH, reflects about 45% of the light that strikes it, which makes it's apparent magnitude (brightness) much higher when seen from afar. This is why they had to process it the image.

      --
      Intelligent responses welcome, flames will be met with marshmallows.
    4. Re:"Processed" into the picture? by geekoid · · Score: 4, Informative

      they have NO ammunition. There 'evidence' is caused by the fact they have no understanding of basic photographic principles, and think the the moon is just like the earth.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:"Processed" into the picture? by barakn · · Score: 1

      Wow.... My favorite is A Lunar Revisionist performs a statistical experiment PROVING the moon non-material. Note that the wine bottle was empty.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    6. Re:"Processed" into the picture? by moebius_4d · · Score: 1

      Sorry this is so late, but if you see this, I'd appreciate a reply.

      If what you say is true, why does the moon still look white when we see it in the daytime against a blue sky? I've seen the moon in full dark, indigo, dark blue, all the way to a very light carolina blue, and it's always white. (Excepting harvest moon and similar atmospheric effects.)

      I'd have thought it was because the light from the moon was actually mostly white light.

    7. Re:"Processed" into the picture? by Clomer · · Score: 1

      Good question. It actually is white light, just not very much of it. That is, the proportions of Red/Green/Blue are pretty close to equal, but the brighness tab is turned down, so to speak. If you see pictures of moon rock that were returned by the Apollo astronauts, (which, naturally, are the same color as the moon itself), you can see that they are, in fact, fairly dark. Maybe not as dark as asphalt like I said in my original message, but pretty close. Do a google image search for "Moon Rock" and you'll see what I mean.

      --
      Intelligent responses welcome, flames will be met with marshmallows.
    8. Re:"Processed" into the picture? by moebius_4d · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your thoughtful answer. I guess I'm old enough now, and have had science change its collective mind about enough things, that I am prepared to believe just about anything about the universe provided some plausible explanation is attached. I mean, if you had said in reply that the moon is really almost black but that atmospheric diffraction makes it look white, and had a link to, say, NASA or JPL, I'd have clicked through expecting to read more or less that exact explanation. Hey, we can stop light, we have working quantum dots and quantum computers, the the universe is beige, and mitochondria used to be on their own. ?!

      The funny thing is how bright it seems in those old Apollo shots, but of course there's no atmosphere to speak of either.

      Anyway, thanks again for the reply. :)

  7. Already /.ed by BWJones · · Score: 1

    Done, fin, kaput. Man, there has got to be some system in place to temporarily mirror sites before posting on Slashdot, yes?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Already /.ed by feepness · · Score: 1

      Done, fin, kaput. Man, there has got to be some system in place to temporarily mirror sites before posting on Slashdot, yes?

      Yes, but then Slashdot wouldn't have a reason to sell subscriptions? It occurs to one that Slashdot now PROFITS from Slashdotting.

      Ethics aside, I doubt they will fix it anytime soon.

    2. Re:Already /.ed by BWJones · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      As a followup, I would be interested in discovering what the statistics are for a Slashdotting? How many hits are typically recieved after a post on slashdot? What are the most Slashdot resistant configurations? Where are the limitations usually found in a Slashdotting? Is it the router, the OS, the ethernet bandwidth? Hard drive speed? For instance, with a really fat internet connection will a site like this one running on a lowly iMac withstand a Slashdotting?

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    3. Re:Already /.ed by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Off topic? What did this get modded as off topic for? The site was slashdotted, so what else is there to talk about except the effects of slashdotting?

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    4. Re:Already /.ed by flewp · · Score: 1

      What about offering the mirrors to subscribers only?

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    5. Re:Already /.ed by heff · · Score: 1

      dont bother..some of the mods are power trippers. it goes along with that whole bastard operator from hell/god/superioity complex thats found in the computer circle.

      --

      --

      |-_-| . o O ( bEef!)

    6. Re:Already /.ed by Fesh · · Score: 1

      Better yet, how about selling an advanced warning subscription? You buy the subscription and they email you before the link goes up for the reader subscribers to warn you that you're about to get nuked...

      Y'know... Just in case something were to... happen.

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    7. Re:Already /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is a nice web site you have here. It would be a shame if something unfortunate happened to it."

    8. Re:Already /.ed by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      the computer circle jerkers, that is...

      (Score: -1, Flamebait) ;)

  8. Mission Accomplished by Renegade+Lisp · · Score: 4, Funny
    Beautiful, absolutely beautiful. But surely, they did wait until North America was in full view for the image? If not, who would recognize the Earth, after all?

    But humor & politics aside, this is a great picture. You would think that just for this picture a considerable fraction of the mission's budget would have been justified.

    1. Re:Mission Accomplished by Sinus0idal · · Score: 1

      Heh, when compared with the second globe, it doesn't appear to match at all - looks more like Africa and Europe from where I'm sitting... :-)

    2. Re:Mission Accomplished by eurostar · · Score: 0, Troll

      North American side ?
      you mean the dark side of the earth ?

      with excuses to Pink Floyd...

    3. Re:Mission Accomplished by Renegade+Lisp · · Score: 1
      It's just that we don't have the money... *sigh*

      Keep going, America.

    4. Re:Mission Accomplished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a little nuts, aren't you?

    5. Re:Mission Accomplished by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      How else are you going to be able to say, "Hey, there's my house!"

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:Mission Accomplished by djward · · Score: 1
      But surely, they did wait until North America was in full view for the image? If not, who would recognize the Earth, after all?

      Mr. Wong (about Mars): We own entire Western Hemisphere. That the best hemisphere!
      Prof. Farnsworth: It's the same way on Earth!

    7. Re:Mission Accomplished by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      The second globe is the first one with the countries pasted on top. They could at least have pasted the coastline and not the whole interior

    8. Re:Mission Accomplished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question here is of course: who felt trolled by my comment? :-)

    9. Re:Mission Accomplished by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      I personally wish they had taken the photo 0900-1000 GMT. The only thing close to a population center on the night side in the picture is Hawaii. I'm curiouts to see if the Eastern Seaboard could be picked out at night from that position.

  9. Uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a single comment and slashdotted....

  10. Nice pics of home by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Kinda fuzzy, but that's ok. Makes us almost look lost in the nothingness. Staggering that they could even get that pic.

    1. Re:Nice pics of home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earth is visible as a half disc exposing North and South America
      Well, since we here in North America are paying the bills on this thing, we get to be in the picture. Imagine if they waited until Japan, China, Russia, etc. were "face up", and then snapped the picture!

    2. Re:Nice pics of home by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Staggering that they could even get that pic.

      They didn't, technically. The camera on the MGS is grayscale. They used stock photos to apply color to the images. They're totally forthcoming about this and the technique if you go straight to the source.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  11. Is this first post? by mshiltonj · · Score: 1

    The damn site is already slashdotted.

    1. Re:Is this first post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You act like Slashdot is the only site in existance. Even Yahoo has a link (as do other news sites). The "slashdot effect" is hardly confined to Slashdot.

  12. Slashdotted before out of "The Mysterious future" by Binestar · · Score: 1, Informative

    Mirror available here. Please do not mod this up, and go gently, also once you've seen it please mirror somewhere else, this is only a T1 for gods sake! =)

    --
    Do you Gentoo!?
  13. Images look funny by dtolton · · Score: 1, Troll

    I was looking at those images and for some reason they just didn't look right to me. If you browse down the page a bit, you'll see that not only was the moon "processed" into the image. Essentially the entire "earth" and Jupiter images were "processed" as well.

    Why does Jupiter look so big in that picture? Did anyone catch what magnification that picture was taken at? Jupiter was behind the earth, and a long ways away, why does it still look so big?

    Looks like the server puked under the load, hopefully they'll come back up soon.

    --

    Doug Tolton

    "The destruction of a value which is, will not bring value to that which isn't." -John Galt
    1. Re:Images look funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because jupiter is big you hymie troll.

      As big as yo momma

    2. Re:Images look funny by goober · · Score: 1
      Why does Jupiter look so big in that picture? Did anyone catch what magnification that picture was taken at? Jupiter was behind the earth, and a long ways away, why does it still look so big?

      Is this a joke or a troll? Or both?

      It looks big because it is big.

    3. Re:Images look funny by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not quite. His mamma's shadow is the black thing behind the earth and Jupiter.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    4. Re:Images look funny by DJ+Rubbie · · Score: 1

      Jupiter is still more than 10 times larger than the Earth, and since it is more than 5 times away, it makes sense the Earth is about half as large as Jupiter in the picture. It may not look that way because the Earth is a crecent in that picture.

      --
      Please direct all bug reports to /dev/null
    5. Re:Images look funny by Sinus0idal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why does it look so big!? You kidding? Uh, probably because Jupiter is 11.2 times larger than Earth, and has a mass 318 times that of Earth... Any maybe due to the fact that Jupiter is more massive than all the other known planets in our solar system combined?

    6. Re:Images look funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mamma's so fat she jumped up in the air and got stuck.

    7. Re:Images look funny by antis0c · · Score: 5, Informative

      I downloaded the unprocessed images of Earth. The only difference is Earth is colorized, and the moon brightness is enhanced.

      --

      ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
    8. Re:Images look funny by Cranx · · Score: 1

      Well, if Jupiter looks that large in the skies of Mars, and we're closer to Jupiter than Mars is, why doesn't Jupiter appear even LARGER in our sky?

      Or am I missing something?

    9. Re:Images look funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom's got more chins than a Chinese phone book.

    10. Re:Images look funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The red spot on Jupiter alone could hold two Earths. Was this a joke?

    11. Re:Images look funny by travisbecker · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why does Jupiter look so big in that picture?

      From one of the astronomy programs I have, I was able to get this data for 08-May-2003:

      Earth-Mars range: 1.398e8 km
      Jupiter-Mars range: 9.438e8 km

      Earth radius: 6378.12 km
      Jupiter radius: 71492.35 km

      So using

      size = atan( radius / range )

      we obtain apparent sizes from Mars:

      Jupiter: 0.0043 deg
      Earth: 0.0026 deg

      So Jupiter should be almost twice as big, even though it's almost 7 times farther away. One can probably also figure out the magnification based on the image.

      Travis

    12. Re:Images look funny by escher · · Score: 1

      Jupiter appears that large because when you zoom in at that magnitude objects appear as if they were closer together. Don't believe me? Go grab a video camera and try it out.

    13. Re:Images look funny by fiiz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hehe,

      thanks, thanks, thanks.
      I was actually wondering, and couldn't be bothered to do the calculation myself.
      It's nice to see something that's not a wild uninformed guess every now and then on /.

      Keep it up, and, guys, *mod parent up.* ;-p
      from a thankful astrophysicist.

      --

      yours ever, fz.
    14. Re:Images look funny by Darthnice · · Score: 1

      1. It is a view from what is essentially a low powered telescope, not an unmagnified view. They both look like dots with the naked eye.

      2. 'Closer' in what sense? The orbit of Mars is closer to the orbit of Jupiter than the orbit of Earth is to the orbit of Jupiter. Depending on the time of the orbital years for each planet, Mars or Earth might be closer to Jupiter (consider the when Earth and Jupiter are on the same side of the sun, and Mars is on the opposite)

    15. Re:Images look funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or am I missing something?

      3rd grade science, apparently.

      I'll give you a hint:

      My Very Excellent Mother Just Sent Us Nine Pizzas

    16. Re:Images look funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or am I missing something?

      Yes, quite a bit. First, the orbit of Mars is between those of Jupiter and Earth. But, that's not to say that we aren't closer to Jupiter, because right now, we are. So you're basically right on that. For now.

      But the main thing is... don't you think those pictures were taken with quite a lot of magnification? With a large enough telescope, Jupiter does appear that large in our sky. Do you ever wonder why we can't see nebulae and all those other cool things out in space with the naked eye? If they appear so huge in photographs taken from the earth (or in orbit around the earth) why don't they appear that big to us? Why, it's the miracle of telescopes and magnification!

      Seriously, you either had a brainfart (happens to all of us) or you don't belong here.

    17. Re:Images look funny by Cranx · · Score: 1

      Why would I really remember something YOU learned in 3rd grade? I don't recall memorizing the position of the planets as being a requirement in any of my classes; and even if it were, why would I still remember them?

    18. Re:Images look funny by Cranx · · Score: 1

      Actually, I just didn't think that perhaps the two planets were that close to each other in the Martian sky and the zoom was making them spread apart in the photo. I thought it was only moderately zoomed, but it was just an assumption; I had no real reason for assuming that.

      Trust me, it was a brainfart, but you're correct: I do not belond here. I generally cannot tolerate the morons around /.

    19. Re:Images look funny by Cranx · · Score: 1

      I was just making really dumb assumptions about the zoom level. I caught that Jupiter was beyond Earth in that shot, but I was screwing up my perspective by assuming the zoom was really low on the shot, when obviously it was VERY magnified.

    20. Re:Images look funny by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      I don't recall memorizing the position of the planets as being a requirement in any of my classes; and even if it were, why would I still remember them?

      And besides, they've MOVED since then!

      Ye gods! Where do they find these people?

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    21. Re:Images look funny by Cranx · · Score: 1

      You are SO FUNNY! You kill you! You saw me write "position" and made a funny! Planets move along their orbital paths and made a funny!

      HAHAHAHA!!!

    22. Re:Images look funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would I still remember them?

      Because there are only nine planets, its common knowledge and its not exactly an easy sort of thing to forget?

      Remembering the positions of the nine planets is a requirement in pretty much any school in the western hemisphere. Does it worry you that you have apparently forgotten basic everyday knowledge?

    23. Re:Images look funny by Redmega · · Score: 1

      Yo mamma's so fat she's got smaller fat women orbiting around her.

    24. Re:Images look funny by Cranx · · Score: 1

      It's really not everday knowledge. I've been checking around with random IT people I know and not a single one could walk through all nine planets in order.

      What I want to know is why so many people think it is. Most people can't say off the top of their heads how many ounces are in a pint, or how many pints in a quart.

      Now THAT is everyday knowledge (or should be).

      Knowing the order of all nine planets is NOT everyday knowledge. Unless, I guess, you live in a semi-fantasy world where earthlings travel about Earth's solar system.

      You guys aren't having delusions are you? You do realize there is no reason to know the order of the planets, don't you? I mean, if you teach astronomy, or work for Nasa perhaps, sure, you should know this...but...outside of that, it's just trivia. Other trivia you learn in school are things like "how many electrons in a sodium atom?"

      Now, if you lived in a fantasy world where, for some reason, most people needed to know this, then I would expect you to make statements like "you must be a moron if you don't know this, because this is everyday knowledge."

      You know, the funniest part (to me) is, I have a pretty good memory and I could easily go find the order of the planets and commit them to memory. But I won't be doing that. It's not worth the time it takes. There's zero point to it; it serves no purpose. If I *did* learn them at one time 30 years ago when I was in grade school, my brain clearly did the right thing in dumping that information promptly.

    25. Re:Images look funny by binarybum · · Score: 1

      more likely the eastern hemisphere...

      never overestimate the school systems of the americas.

      I became aware of the planets and their relative solar distances on my own, it was never a requirement for any class.

      --
      ôó
  14. my description of dead link by Brigadier · · Score: 5, Funny



    Well since it's slashdotted let me describe it for everyone. it looks like the picture they took from the moon only .... muuuch much much smaller

    1. Re:my description of dead link by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      It's not Slashdotted, they are just serving the images from Mars.

  15. Hey! by TWX · · Score: 1

    "Hey. Check out that funky moon!"

    With apologies to "Amazon Women on the Moon"

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  16. Only US residents should be allowed to view images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Europeons can launch their own damn surveyor!

  17. "Improving" the photos by Soulfader · · Score: 4, Funny

    I like how they explained how they combined and colorized the pictures. I can't help but think, however, that the temptation to "improve" it a bit more with giant Earthbound meteors would be nigh overwhelming... =)

  18. How convinient ;) by Soulfarmer · · Score: 0

    that it shows South and North America. Could it be accident? What would it have taken to get Europe or Asia in the picture? NASA headquartes in the Eastern block? :D

    Nice one in any case. And I do not have a hobby flamebaiting or snitching trolls. Trolls are in my mind at least, a thing for tabletop games ;)

    --
    -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
  19. Mirror? by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Informative

    Whoa, I was gonna try and mirror these images ... but to no avail! The webserver stopped dead during the subscriber preview time. Oh well, here's a BitTorrent link for everything I was able to get before the site went down:

    BitTorrent images mirror link

  20. Mirror by realdpk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Or maybe this is "another mirror" by the time I finish posting this. The site is getting pounded hard. This is just the JPEG that was linked to, not the entire site.

    429319 byte JPEG. It's on a beefy connection, have a blast.

    It's really too bad /. doesn't have any consideration for other sites when they post links.

    1. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's another mirror.

      Obligatory plug: Join the SurveyComplete panel.

    2. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just don't understand art, do you?

      Believe me, this is a beautiful site to be seen! You just have to focus really hard before you can "see" it. Okay, this requires a little imagination; let your creative mind be your vehicle. Let it _move_ you to another place.

      First, you find yourself in complete darkness. Or is this your conscience? You decide; it's art goddammit. Then it hits you. You are not in complete darkness, there is a dot. No, wait a minute... there is not one dot, but two! Two dots. But are they really dots? ...yadda..yadda...

      I can't believe this was actually posted. Both the stupid image and this stupid reply. :-) Have a nice day.

    3. Re:Mirror by Migrant+Programmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thanks for the mirror, it was mighty fast =)

      I cropped up a wallpaperable version of the image that you can get here (9821 byte PNG). It looks nice on a black desktop.. sure puts things in perspective!

    4. Re:Mirror by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your link. It amazes me that people still post 429K jpegs when the same image quickly converted to PNG is 39K without losing anything. An 8 bit GIF is 8K and given the nature of the image, losing the colour doesn't really hurt much at all. Sniff sniff... won't somebody please think of the bandwidth!!

      --
      "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
    5. Re:Mirror by realdpk · · Score: 1

      jpegtopnm < earth_jupiter_100.jpg | pnmtopng > earth_jupiter_100.png

      PNG version.

      Enjoy. :)

      Btw, I don't know if anyone cares, but the average download speed for people hitting the JPEG link is so far 58.3KB/s. Not that I'm arguing against posting smaller PNGs, I was just curious and maybe other people were too. :)

    6. Re:Mirror by dimator · · Score: 1

      Try this: open the png in one tab, and the jpeg in another. Switch back and forth; they look exactly the same.

      Moral of the story: use png. :)

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    7. Re:Mirror by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      PNG images will only get better compression ratios than JPEG on images that have large areas that are the same color, such as a mostly black image with a few (small) planets in it.

      Under most circumstances, for actual pictures, using JPEG instead of PNG will result in smaller files.

    8. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's really too bad /. doesn't have any consideration for other sites when they post links."

      If webmasters were smart they would block access to their site when /. is the referer.

  21. Damn it the earth seems round...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean there was no need to manipulate the image to that sort of extreme.

  22. "Proccessed" the moon in? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So the moon is indeed a projection from the ground, and we blew it up during a botched nuke test?
    HA! I thought so!

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:"Proccessed" the moon in? by Lord_Breetai · · Score: 1

      So the moon is indeed a projection from the ground, and we blew it up during a botched nuke test?

      HA! I thought so!

      Pheh, everyone knows the moon was destroyed twice, once by Mutenroshi and again by Piccolo to reverse the Saiya-jin ape transformation.

      --
      "You are only young once, but you can be immature forever." -www.animemusicvideos.org
  23. Re:Slashdotted before out of "The Mysterious futur by KrispyKringle · · Score: 5, Informative
    Seems like a good way to test my pII 400:

    mirror here.

    If you can, mirror it somewhere else, too.

  24. What happened by Timesprout · · Score: 1

    to all they stars. were they removed from the photo ?

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:What happened by AlabamaMike · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ahh ... one who hasn't heard of the moon shot conspiracy. Basically, the stars are of much lower magnitude than the celestial bodies being imaged, and therefore they don't show up in this picture. Many have tried to claim that evidence of the vast NASA conspiracy lies in the fact that no stars are to be seen on any of the photos taken by Apollo astronauts. If you've had any exposure to physics (or if you can perform logical deduction on your own) you'd be keen to why this happens the way it does.
      -A.M.

      --
      Pimpin' all the Karma Hoes!
    2. Re:What happened by sethaw · · Score: 1

      to all they stars. were they removed from the photo ?

      Well obviously nasa must of used the same techniques as they did when the created that moon landed hoax a few years back. hehe :)

    3. Re:What happened by sholden · · Score: 1

      Or if you've ever taken a non-flash photo at night - that wasn't actually of the stars...

  25. Another Pic by BurritoWarrior · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From National Geographic:

    Pics.

  26. Another mirror by Renegade+Lisp · · Score: 2
    here.

    This is only the main page, all links point to NASA.

    1. Re:another mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      404.

  27. Re:Slashdotted before out of "The Mysterious futur by Binestar · · Score: 1

    Well, the server is handling it, but the T1 is showing signs of strain.

    My log file is moving so fast it's just a blur on a tail -f =)

    --
    Do you Gentoo!?
  28. Re:Slashdotted before out of "The Mysterious futur by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please do not mod this up

    Did people just outright ignore this request, or what?

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  29. Better format? by zapp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The JPEG image is ~415kb, and the site (and mirrors) are getting hit pretty hard already.

    Since the image is like 99.99999% pure black, wouldn't it have made more sense to use GIF or something? When i saved the image as a GIF it took up 8kb.

    Yeah yeah, I know... gif is copyrighted, but you get my point.

    --
    no comment
    1. Re:Better format? by Lxy · · Score: 4, Informative

      what about PNG? it should give you an image of comperable size without people lashing about how evil Unisys is.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    2. Re:Better format? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How 'bout .png format images? They have even smaller filesizes and no nasty legal issues.

    3. Re:Better format? by CWCarlson · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indeed. Converted with the Gimp at compression level 6, this 429,319 byte image shrinks to a mere 40,714.

      Not bad, for a 24-bit non-lossy image format.

      --- Chris

    4. Re:Better format? by robsimmon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, the raw (black and white, not contrast adjusted) image is saved as a GIF - and it's still pretty big 'cause there's some invisible noise in the black.

      In any case, JPEG does LZW (or similar) compression as a final step, so a JPEG would also have been very small if the noise was removed.

    5. Re:Better format? by fobbman · · Score: 1

      Don't feel guilty and save it as a PNG. I saved it at quality 6 and got it down to about 34k.

    6. Re:Better format? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just save it at quality 0 in Gimp. Then download advancecomp (part of the advanceMAME project), and extract advpng. Use the command advpng -z -4 on the image, and it will get really small!

    7. Re:Better format? by RedBear · · Score: 1
      Since the image is like 99.99999% pure black, wouldn't it have made more sense to use GIF or something?

      It's a little-known fact that converting all the black to white will reduce the image size by about 99% for each black pixel that's converted.

      And if you believe that, you need sleep even worse than I do.
    8. Re:Better format? by KewlPC · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that GIFs can only have 8-bit indexed color, which means you've got a maximum of 256 different colors.

      Both PNG and JPEG support 24-bit true color (which uses 8 bits for each channel, and is not indexed), giving a maximum of around 16.7 million colors.

    9. Re:Better format? by julesh · · Score: 1

      No, JPEG doesn't do LZW or similar as a final step. LZW is a dictionary compressor. JPEG uses huffman coding, which is just a single symbol redundancy eliminator. LZW typically achieves substantially better compression than huffman alone. Huffman is usually used with some other compression technique (eg a dictionary, as in deflate, or a lossy encoding as in JPEG) to make up the difference.

  30. Europa by Fastball · · Score: 1, Funny

    All these worlds are yours to explore except Europa. Attempt no landing there.

    1. Re:Europa by Drathus · · Score: 1

      Use them together.

      Use them in peace.

    2. Re:Europa by realdpk · · Score: 1

      The good of the many outweigh the good of the few, or the one.

    3. Re:Europa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " ... buried for all eternity in the center of a dead planet, buried alive ... buried alive ..."

      "KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN !!!!!!!!!!"

    4. Re:Europa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can't always get what you want.

      But if you try real hard, sometimes, you get what you need.

    5. Re:Europa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your Europa are belong to us.

  31. Re:Only US residents should be allowed to view ima by johannesg · · Score: 1

    Like this one? Give it a break already, it launches in just ten days...

  32. Re:Slashdotted before out of "The Mysterious futur by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'm mirroring from you as fast as I can (2.5K or so). I think that's you, not me, as my downstream is a lot faster than my up. Fun fun fun, though; I never get this many hits on this box.

  33. Celestia by msheppard · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pretty kewl to enter the date/time May 8, 9:00Est, navigate to mars and see the rendered view for yourself. Celstia lets you do this, it's a free solar system simulator. Really high-quality too IMHO. It gets the image pretty close. Make Jupiters moons a little brighter, and the earth is too clear, but it's still an educational exersize... but then again what isn't.

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
    1. Re:Celestia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  34. Where did all the stars go? by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 2

    I see planets but no stars? Am i missing something!?

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:Where did all the stars go? by pinkboi · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the stars were flooded out by the sun and they had to darken the whole image?

      --
      "The absurd is clear reasoning recognizing its limits"
      -Albert Camus
    2. Re:Where did all the stars go? by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

      It's clearly a hoax! I can't believe how NASA always forgets to add some pretty stars to their faked images from space.

    3. Re:Where did all the stars go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh. Flamebait? Did your brain get slashdotted, moderator?

    4. Re:Where did all the stars go? by klui · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is also explained in those moon hoax debunker sites. Basic photography. If you can see stars, the planets would be overexposed. If you want to see the planets, you won't see the stars.

    5. Re:Where did all the stars go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean that the filmmakers doing Star Wars, Star Trek, etc, don't understand basic photography?

    6. Re:Where did all the stars go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. They do understand cinematography, though. Which is why you see stars streaking past a fast moving ship, and you hear explosions and ships whoosing past you even though you're in a vacuam.

    7. Re:Where did all the stars go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hear the whooshing because they are using stereo VLF antennae as microphones, not air breathing microphones.

    8. Re:Where did all the stars go? by jcast · · Score: 1

      I see planets but no stars? Am i missing something!?

      Apparently, you're missing stars.

      *ducks*
      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    9. Re:Where did all the stars go? by BrodyVess · · Score: 1

      It was stupid. It wasn't funny. I've seen too many fights here there and yon. I also dont take shit from people who don't think enough of themselves to log in.

      --
      No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
  35. all the way from mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    that explains the lag, i guess ;)

  36. That's no Earth... by LordHunter317 · · Score: 1

    It's a space station!

    *rimshot*

  37. This picture is OLD by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 5, Funny


    I'd say over 5000 years old! This picture was one of the last ones taken by our ancestors before they boarded the last ships off of Mars towards Earth. After laying waste to all of Mars' natural resources and destroying the atmosphere, they needed a new place to call home. With the buildings and cars turning into fine iron dust under the heavy beating of the UV rays of the sun, they took one last snapshot and headed for Earth. Of course, there was a problem on the ride here and the computer lost all of its memory with only the hairdressers and accountants surviving the trip...

    I think you know how the rest went.

    It's good to see the picture's survived this long...it bodes well for Kodak and Fuji in our future.

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
    1. Re:This picture is OLD by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows this. That's why Mars is the God of War.

    2. Re:This picture is OLD by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Thats a Philip K. Dick story isn't it?

    3. Re:This picture is OLD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about the begining, but the last sentence refers to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

  38. Astrology on Mars by smooge · · Score: 2, Funny

    So I wonder what my horoscope would be if I lived on Mars?

    --
    -- SJS smooge at smoogespace dot com
    1. Re:Astrology on Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will be very cold tomorrow, but don't fret, fair Libra - at least it won't rain or snow!

  39. New Trek theme? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    "On a five year mission thru the dangerous Omicron nebula to figure out who the f8cking hell slashdotted Earth!"

  40. Where's The Earth-Shattering Kaboom? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

    The earth will be gone in just a few minutes. It obstructs my view of venus.

    Now, where the $@#& is the Illudium Q-38 Explosive Space Modulator?

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  41. Re:Slashdotted before out of "The Mysterious futur by Binestar · · Score: 1

    Try again... just restarted apache, and the load seems to be letting down a bit.

    --
    Do you Gentoo!?
  42. Boom by szquirrel · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you examine the image very closely, you can see their server. The explosion is visible from space.

    --
    Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.
  43. Makes you realize how big Jupiter is... by mooman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you go to the space.com website, they show you that in that shot, Jupiter is about 7 times farther away from the viewpoint, but it still appears dramatically larger than earth in the full image.

    We all know Jupiter is big but this rare chance to phyicially see it compared to our own planet is kinda profound...

    or maybe I just need to get out more.

    --
    In the Portland, Ore area and like card games? Check out: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/portlandgames/
    1. Re:Makes you realize how big Jupiter is... by djtack · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you go to the space.com website, they show you that in that shot, Jupiter is about 7 times farther away from the viewpoint, but it still appears dramatically larger than earth in the full image.

      This is partly due to the long focal length of the lens. It distorts perspective, the same way a photographer can make the moon apear much larger by taking the picture with a long telephoto, at a distance from the subject.

      But no doubt, it was inspiring to see Earth and Jupiter in the same frame together.

    2. Re:Makes you realize how big Jupiter is... by harborpirate · · Score: 1

      Getting a little offtopic here, but when I was in college, I wrote a c+OPENGL program that depicted all the planets and the distances between them to scale. The planets were all aligned so that the user could easily "fly" between them.

      You could set the fly speed to whatever you wanted, and then see how long it would take to get from place to place. I was actually shocked to find that while the inner solar system went by in a blur, just how long it took between the outer planets. The program was taking such huge steps that you'd miss Mercury by hundreds of thousands of miles, yet you'd have to hold down the key for minutes at a time to get between the outer planets. (And, somewhat hilariously, zip by them when you got close because you didn't let up on the key quickly enough)

      I knew the planets were very far apart, but that program really helped put it in perspective. I think it would be great to let schoolchildren play with a such a program to give them an idea just how vast the solar system is.

      --
      // harborpirate
      // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
    3. Re:Makes you realize how big Jupiter is... by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Informative

      One word: Celestia

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    4. Re:Makes you realize how big Jupiter is... by julesh · · Score: 1

      This is partly due to the long focal length of the lens. It distorts perspective, the same way a photographer can make the moon apear much larger by taking the picture with a long telephoto, at a distance from the subject.

      Are you sure? I would have thought that the relative sizes of the objects as they appeared at the point from which the picture was taken would have to appear constant.

      The strange telephoto effects work by placing an object much further away than you think it is, so the relative appearances are different to what you expect.

    5. Re:Makes you realize how big Jupiter is... by Ryan+C. · · Score: 1

      You are correct julesh. The telephoto trick doesn't rely on changing the focal length so much as it does on changing the distance of the camera from the subjects. You can't change the relative size of objects by switching lenses and staying in the same spot.

      Jupiter really is that much bigger than the big blue marble.

      -Ryan C.

      --
      -Ryan C.
  44. Nasa is good at this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "apparently the Moon had to be "processed" into the pic"

    I suspect it must be done pretty well ..considering they have experience processing the moon into pics ever since they did it with Neil Armstrong back in 1969.

    1. Re:Nasa is good at this by gol64738 · · Score: 1

      yes, i realize this was put in for a laugh. the problem is that some of our younger youth are actually starting to believe this crap.

      you've got envangelists running around the country preaching that the moon landings were faked and that no jews were harmed in ww2.

      our history is extremely important to our future. why the fuck would we want to distort it?

  45. Re:What happened to stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Even in space, starlight is very faint - when you expose for planets (which are just reflecting the sun's light) the star's light is just way to faint to register. If they had exposed to show the stars, both planets would just be super big blobs many many many times overexposed.

  46. Re:That's no funny comment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a total bomb...

  47. It's not South America, it's Africa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prove me wrong!

  48. Hi-Res plz kthnxbye by Mondoz · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see a high-res version of this... Like from a Hubble-sized telescope around Mars...

    Yeah, I know it wouldn't really look like anything we haven't seen before, but to know that this pic was taken from the orbit of another planet...

    --
    /sig
  49. not slashdotted yet. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1, Troll

    http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/22may_alie nearth.htm?list522264

    Or at least i can still see it.
    YEp, whorin for karma.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  50. in just a few seconds by Fishstick · · Score: 1
    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  51. Hmm by Tyrdium · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NASA's spending millions of dollars to put these things in space, so why don't they host it on a server (which they definitely could afford) that won't get slashdotted?

  52. Crappy theater... by JudgeDredd · · Score: 1

    FOCUS!!!

  53. Optimal image format by Wonko42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Is there some reason why this image, which is mostly black with just a few colored fingernail-sized areas, needs to be a 419K JPEG? When I converted it to a 69K PNG, I couldn't even tell the two images apart.

    1. Re:Optimal image format by Blue+Lozenge · · Score: 1

      I sure hope you couldn't tell them apart---PNG is lossless compression. :)

    2. Re:Optimal image format by avorpa · · Score: 1

      Of course not! PNG is lossless, the two images will be exactly the same, not just indistinguishable to you.

    3. Re:Optimal image format by Wonko42 · · Score: 1

      This was PNG-8, which is limited to a 255-color palette. There was some dithering involved, thus the reason for my comment.

    4. Re:Optimal image format by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1

      The pictures were taken with a Kodak DC3200 taped to the outside of the satellite.

      The only other option was a QT movie.

      Just a guess...

      --
      Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  54. Come on honey let's watch the "Earth-rise" by oaf357 · · Score: 1

    I'm glad I saw this earlier because it seems that their site is buckling under the increased hits.

  55. gee wiz. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see what the big deal is! I take a photo of the earth from every planet in the solar system that I visit.

    Geez....so passe!
    Evil Man

  56. Here is a Mirror by Aczlan · · Score: 1

    Click Here


    Aaron Z

    --
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote
  57. Not the first far-earth pictures by TFloore · · Score: 5, Interesting

    NASA has been doing cool pictures from far away for a while. Two that are worth looking at:

    Solar System Family Portrait
    This one is nice, but earth is really only about 4 pixels, so you can't see all that much detail. :) This is a Voyager 1 picture taken in 1980, I think.

    Saturn in shadow
    This is a nice shot of Saturn by the Galileo probe, taken with about half the planet in shadown. Read the write-up there, it's kind of cool.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is... Oops. Frank, I've got your sig again! Where's mine?
  58. another mirror by abhisarda · · Score: 1

    Here's another Mirror. Do not mod this up if the other mirrors are holding up fine.

  59. Ahhhhh, FTM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still under the delusion that someone, somewhere, cares what you think.

  60. Dude! by fidget42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Where's my car?

    --
    The dogcow says "Moof!"
  61. North America in 2001 by PateraSilk · · Score: 1

    But surely, they did wait until North America was in full view for the image? If not, who would recognize the Earth, after all?

    Did you know that whenever Earth appears in "2001: A Space Odessey" North America is always pointed toward us--even if this means that it's high noon at the north pole? I guess Kubrick didn't want his audience getting confused.

    --
    Danke tres mucho, tovarishch.
  62. Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not.. The images could have been just as easily made completely in photoshop, or redshift or similiar.

    Pretty pictures are the only 'value' to the space program these days, who amongst us know whether they are 'real' or just mockups anyhow.

    What a load of shit this is, the only thing we will be doing in space anytime soon is filling it with satellites for spying, or entertainment, still nice to see your tax dollars at work making pointless pretty pictures.

  63. WOW... by NeoGeo64 · · Score: 1

    That picture is pretty breathtaking... do you think life ever existed on Mars?

  64. ASCII of earth from mars by Andreas(R) · · Score: 5, Funny

    The server is /.'ed, here is the ASCII-image of earth from Mars:

    .

    1. Re:ASCII of earth from mars by laxrox · · Score: 1

      ...and here is Jupiter:

      o

  65. Re:Fake fake fake Jupiter full/Earth half image by klui · · Score: 1

    Guess all those "we didn't land on the moon" folks will say that the full image with Jupiter will say it's a fake, too. Why is it that one planet is half-full while the other is full? Space.com says since Jupiter is beyond the sun. The orbital diagram helped, too.

  66. *Sigh* by PateraSilk · · Score: 1

    If only I could see this with a backyard telescope.

    --
    Danke tres mucho, tovarishch.
    1. Re:*Sigh* by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      If only I could see this with a backyard telescope.
      Of course you can, you just need to be in somebody else's backyard.

      --

  67. Re:Here is a Mirror --- NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This mirror SUCKS,

    All the links to the large versions of the pictures lead to DEAD links and if that wasn't enough its full of pop-up banners. WTF???

    This mirror Stinks and I don't Like it.

  68. Re:Slashdotted before out of "The Mysterious futur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The essence of moderators. They don't read what they mod, and if they do, they don't understand it, and if they understand it, they ignore it. Moderator, you are truly a remarkable person! I salute you!

  69. Smooth by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read someplace that the earth - on scale is more perfectly smooth than a machined steel ball bearing. If you were to scale the nicest ball bearing you could find to the size of the earth it would have pits and ridges, mountains and valleys far larger than anything on earth.

    Earth looks pretty smooth from these distances

  70. Grayscale? Grayscale?!?! by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Funny
    And how much did they spend on this thing?

    They take one of the coolest pics ever, and they do it with a grayscale camera...

    *rolls eyes*

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  71. Hey!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's that big slice running through Florida?

    1. Re:Hey!! by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Thats the Gap. Mind the dragon.

  72. "Processed"? WTF does this mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It amazes me that so many allegedly "educated" people have fallen so quickly and so hard for a fraudulent fabrication of such laughable proportions. The very idea that a gigantic ball of rock happens to orbit our planet, showing itself in neat, four-week cycles -- with the same side facing us all the time -- is ludicrous. Furthermore, it is an insult to common sense and a damnable affront to intellectual honesty and integrity. That people actually believe it is evidence that the liberals have wrested the last vestiges of control of our public school system from decent, God-fearing Americans (as if any further evidence was needed! Daddy's Roommate? God Almighty!)

    Documentaries such as Enemy of the State have accurately portrayed the elaborate, byzantine network of surveillance satellites that the liberals have sent into space to spy on law-abiding Americans. Equipped with technology developed by Handgun Control, Inc., these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up. That's right, neighbors .. the next time you're out in the backyard exercising your Second Amendment rights, the liberals will see it! These satellites are sensitive enough to tell the difference between a Colt .45 and a .38 Special! And when they detect you with a firearm, their computers cross-reference the address to figure out your name, and then an enormous database housed at Berkeley is updated with information about you.

    Of course, this all works fine during the day, but what about at night? Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!) That's where the "moon" comes in. Powered by nuclear reactors, the "moon" is nothing more than an enormous balloon, emitting trillions of candlepower of gun-revealing light. Piloted by key members of the liberal community, the "moon" is strategically moved across the country, pointing out those who dare to make use of their God-given rights at night!

    Yes, I know this probably sounds paranoid and preposterous, but consider this. Despite what the revisionist historians tell you, there is no mention of the "moon" anywhere in literature or historical documents -- anywhere -- before 1950. That is when it was initially launched. When President Josef Kennedy, at the State of the Union address, proclaimed "We choose to go to the moon", he may as well have said "We choose to go to the weather balloon." The subsequent faking of a "moon" landing on national TV was the first step in a long history of the erosion of our constitutional rights by leftists in this country. No longer can we hide from our government when the sun goes down.

    1. Re:"Processed"? WTF does this mean? by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      So clouds are patriotic protectors of liberty?

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:"Processed"? WTF does this mean? by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 1

      I had a talk with my astronomy teacher on this topic of processing. Apparently what is done, is the color information is squashed so that a basic 3:1 compression can be done with hardly any effort at all. Alongside the huge image file, is a color table that lets it be re-added back at the other end. Albeit it's as crappy color as TV. This is very common among pictures taken from space.

    3. Re:"Processed"? WTF does this mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could see "Funny" for this. I could see "Troll" or "Flamebait" too. But what idiot modded it "Insightful?"

  73. Don't kid yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No matter what, he belongs on /.

  74. Mirror by MakaveliFIN · · Score: 0

    That site seems to be totally slashdottet, so I made a mirror: http://www.nwps.ws/mars_images/

  75. Re:Fake fake fake Jupiter full/Earth half image by Metasquares · · Score: 1

    Only after they air a TV show that calls it fake.

  76. Re:Slashdotted before out of "The Mysterious futur by eclectro · · Score: 1

    Thanks, I appreciate deeply those who mirror and make the world better :)

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  77. Re:Another Pic by reconn · · Score: 1

    Earth as seen from mars: a slashdot poster immediately thinks of Marvin the Martian while National Geographic thinks of The War of the Worlds.

    --
    Everything that was once directly lived has receded into a representation. -debord
  78. oh great by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1, Redundant

    awesome! We slashdotted mars

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  79. Now, if we could only see all the spammers on Mars by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    THAT would be a beautiful picture!

  80. this picture sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This photo doesn't impress me. Take a look at this shot of M31, our closest neighbor galaxy at 2 Million light years away. Andromeda is made up of around 10^11 stars. Now that's impressive. The solar system is so darn small-scale.

  81. They Colorized it??? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    Where's the disclaimer for "this film has been modified from its original format; the film has been modified to fit your CRT screen." I smells me a Ted Turner behind this conspiracy!

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  82. No different than on Earth: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You will not get laid today.

  83. Re:Slashdotted before out of "The Mysterious futur by imaginate · · Score: 1

    Well said. Thanks, all...

  84. Horrible Graphics by Dareth · · Score: 1

    These graphics are terrible... I mean how the hell do they expect us to get into the "realism" of whatever this game they are reviewing is, if the graphics suck so bad. Why don't they get a real picture to use...

    If this is the best they can do, I am going back to my mud... nice ASCII art on there!!!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  85. Fast and working mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This seems to be a fast mirror: http://nwps.ws/mars_images/

  86. Re:the picture is incorrect ! by JoeRobe · · Score: 1

    That puts some parts of north america at the equator, which is impossible, as no parts of NA are one the equator. If you use a program like Celestia, you can actually mimic what the MGS saw (except that it's a clearer image of course), and their assignment is correct. The center of the image is northern south america. Way up high, almost going onto the oher side of the Earth is NA itself

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
  87. DSN Stations by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 1

    They probably took the picture between DSN tracking passes. There are three DSN stations: Goldstone, California, Madrid, Spain, and Canberra, Australia. In the picture it looks like the Southern hemisphere has the best view of Mars, so they were probably using Canberra for their downlink... so they took the picture when Canberra was out of view.

    So rather than try and take a picture of south America, they were probably just avoiding taking a picture of Australia

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
  88. Better resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Grayscale cameras get better resolution than color cameras. You get to use all the photosensors for light levels, instead of having 3 for each pixel, as you do in color cameras. RGB, remember?

    1. Re:Better resolution by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Are there any cameras that record the frequency and the intensity/energy of incoming photons? So instead of filtering out everything except for R, G, B or infrared, you could post-process the data later to get whatever color planes you wanted? You could get better resolution than RGB (or fewer exposures), and not have to deal with hardware filters.

  89. Hmmmm, interesting by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, I decided I couldn't see details well enough, so here in our office, we opened up the pic in GIMP.. If you adjust "Brightness" and "Contrast" all the way up (127 on each), illuminated objects really stand out..

    I'm looking at something I don't understand though.. What we're looking at is the full shapes of the objects, plus refraction from the atmosphere, right?

    The "Earth" is a vertically aligned rectangle with bright bars of red, green, blue, with splatters of yellow and aqua. There's a grey box coming off the left side.

    The "moon" is a white dot with a black and white checkerboard pattern going to it's right.

    Jupiter now appears as a larger white blob, with only a little bit of blue at the bottom, but instead of a diffused pattern, or even a finite box around it, there are three boxes, stretching from the top, left and a smaller from te right.

    The right-most moon only has a tall rectangle with a similiar checkerboard pattern to the Earth's moon.

    The far left moon has a lesser pattern than the Earth's moon, but it's still aparent.

    The 2nd from the left moon has a distinctly different pattern.

    What we're finding most pecular is that there are absolutely no stars aparent in this picture.

    From the Earth, Mars looks like a bright star, in a field of stars.. Shouldn't a view from the same distance (Mars -> Earth = Earth -> Mars) have a similiar sky view? At least the larger stars should jump out at us in this picture. At least we should be seeing more stars by cranking the contrast all the way up... I'm not expecting like spectacular starfield views or anything, but I'd expect at least one..

    This honestly looks like a serious photo-shop job. Someone took a black background, dropped on a few very small images, with Jupiter being the only one with distinct patterns.

    It's seriously missing stars.. Bringing the contrast up a bit should at least show *SOMETHING* in there.. Looking at a night's sky from Earth, even with the city lights, if you can see Mars, you can see huge starfields.. I don't think I've ever seen Mars, and not seen any stars...

    I wanna see a real picture..At least that'd be cool. :)

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:Hmmmm, interesting by ZigMonty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is the same mistake that the Moon landing hoax theorists make. The planets are so much brighter than the stars that it's pretty near impossible to take a photo showing both clearly. Either the planets are clear and the stars are underexposed (invisibile) or the stars are clear and the planets are overexposed (featureless white).

    2. Re:Hmmmm, interesting by SiliconEntity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In my experience, looking at Jupiter with a telescope, it is not uncommon to see stars nearby that are somewhat fainter than Jupiter's moons. It's surprising to me, given the large area of the photograph, that no stars appear bright enough to show up, since Jupiter's moons are quite bright looking in the picture.

      Here's one example I found with google, someone's photo of Jupiter and Venus. It's a little similar, you see Jupiter in the lower left with 3 moons, and Venus in the upper right. And there are a fair sprinkling of stars about.

      Now the difference is that this is a longer exposure, you can see that Jupiter and Venus are way overexposed. That's necessary to see the Jupiter moons.

      I think the Mars picture has been tweaked quite a bit. You should not see that much detail on Jupiter if the moons were that bright. So they turned down Jupiter, they turned up the moons, and they didn't turn up the stars, so we don't see them.

    3. Re:Hmmmm, interesting by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Funny
      The "moon" is a white dot with a black and white checkerboard pattern going to it's right.

      ::morning pre-coffee grogginess, not bothering to do anything to check::

      JPEG artifacts. Next.

      ::yaaaawn::

    4. Re:Hmmmm, interesting by Jeffv323 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I bet most of what you see are compression artifacts. I just turned up the contrast on the JPEG for kicks, and what interests me, is the fact that the shadow side of the earth becomes visible. Maybe it could be due to refraction of light in the atmosphere or actual city lights (could it?) but I don't know enough about optics and light to answer that. At least jpeg compression could be ruled out.

      Here's the original. Here's my version.

      Also, somebody said something about the original grayscale GIF right from the camera being available. I couldn't find it but if anybody else has it, please post a link.

      -- Jeff

      --
      I'm a minister!
    5. Re:Hmmmm, interesting by Zakabog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone explained this before, but if you want a picture of the planets with stars, the planets will be overexposed. If you want the planets exposed correctly the stars will be too dark to see. Besides turning up contrast and brightness isn't going to expose the image more, if I take a picture with a 1/2000 shutter speed of a dark room, no amount of brightness, contrast, changing will make it a clear picture.

    6. Re:Hmmmm, interesting by laughing_badger · · Score: 4, Informative
      Astronomer, image processing guy, blah blah... Right, there will be sufficient light from the sun scattered from the illuminated atmosphere and then rescattered from the dark hemisphere towards the camera to make the dark hemisphere visable. You can see a similar effect by looking at a half moon on a dark night. You will be able to see the 'dark' side of the moon illuminated by light that has been reflected from the surface of the Earth. Its called Earthshine.

      Yep, bang on about most of the effects that the parent saw being compression artifacts.

      Ok, now as to why there are no stars. The Earth recieves a lot more solar radiation than Mars (distance squared). Presume that the albedo (amount reflected) is the same. So you have a lot more photons going into your camera if you take a picture of the Earth from Mars than vv. This means that you can use a shorter exposure and hence less stars will appear. Then do JPEG compression and watch the few point-like stars get smoothed out. Also, we don't know what else has been done to the image. Subsample and point like stars can go.

      If you want to hunt around in the depths of an image looking for cool stuff, start off with an unprocessed original.

      --
      Help children born unable to swallow - www.tofs.org.uk
  90. Specialization is for Insects by belloc · · Score: 1
    Sorta related:

    "A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects." -- Lazarus Long (Robert A. Heinlein, Time Enough for Love, 1973)

    Belloc

    --
    I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
  91. Sizes of celestial bodies by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 1

    Earth looks smaller in the picture, but is closer? Jupiter looks larger but is further away? Looking at the map with the orbits Earth is in between Jupiter and Mars.

    --
    Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
  92. will be nice when humans are taking it by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    1 month after they leave earth...if we can ever get moving on the interplanetary propultion system that buzz aldren and friends have been working on, we can get to mars in 1 month and Jupitor in about 9.

    hello dave.... :-)

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  93. What I don't get is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why don't we send satellites with cameras like the ones on spy Satellites which can read number plates from space.What has nasa got to hide?! ;)

  94. Re:Better format? PNG? by sbwoodside · · Score: 1

    How about PNG? I saved it as PNG using GraphicConverter and it was 52 K. But I agree GIF gives even better results (but maybe lossy?)

    simon

  95. Earth from Mars! by Perdition · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can clearly make out the face of Artuk, leader of our blessed Martian society, and I think the other part looks like a horsie.

    --
    Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
  96. Wow! UPI Really has the Crap Slinger on High Today by GMontag · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well, a slightly different version of this story was submitted on Thursday May 22, @03:56PM . Enjoy!

  97. Now all they need... by rune2 · · Score: 1

    Is an arrow pointing to the blue dot with the label "You are here".

  98. Re:Better format? PNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > But I agree GIF gives even better results (but maybe lossy?)

    not lossy in resolution, lossy in colors.

    Both PNG and GIF save pixel by pixel, GIF is limited to 256 colors.

    Just use PNG for charts/screenshots and jpg for photos and don't think about it.

  99. Pale Blue Dot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "... Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there - on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.

    The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors, so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.

    Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves."

    -- Carl Sagan, excerpt from Pale Blue Dot

  100. Re:the picture is incorrect ! by Ardias · · Score: 1

    Take another look at the picture. It clearly shows the equator going through South America. The mouth of the Amazon River is right at the equator, and you can tell from the shape of SA where that is.

  101. Alright! by mmortal03 · · Score: 1

    Awesome! My new wallpaper! Wait...

  102. Holy Percival Lowell, Batman! by tlambert · · Score: 2, Funny

    Holy Percival Lowell, Batman!

    I *swear to God*, there's *canals* on Earth!

    -- Terry

  103. Re:Better format? PNG? by sbwoodside · · Score: 1

    "Just use PNG for charts/screenshots and jpg for photos and don't think about it."

    yes ... in every case but this one ...

  104. Interesting effect with contrast turned up by Jeffv323 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I just turned up the contrast on the JPEG for kicks, and what interests me, is the fact that the shadow side of the earth becomes visible. Maybe it could be due to refraction of light in the atmosphere or actual city lights (could it?) but I don't know enough about optics and light to answer that.


    Here's the original.
    Here's my version.


    Also, somebody said something about the original grayscale GIF right from the camera being available. I couldn't find it but if anybody else has it, please post a link.


    -- Jeff

    --
    I'm a minister!
    1. Re:Interesting effect with contrast turned up by hanglooser · · Score: 1

      Here is the one of earth: http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2003/05/22/R05 -00763.gif And Jupiter: http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2003/05/22/R05 -00763.gif

  105. nice picture ... by anythings-possible-b · · Score: 1, Interesting

    18:18 23/5/2546

    TOPIC: time-shift

    really a interessting picture. considering the light that shines from the sun on jupiter and the earth.
    if the photon was emitted from the same atom in the sun, one photon would have travel to jupiter,
    reflected and hit the CCD camera on der mars-orbiter, the other photon from the sun hit earth and
    reflected and then hit the CCD camera on the mars-orbiter.
    and then the photon that just went sun-mars-orbiter. kind of like a big laser-experiment on an solar-system-scale.
    i don't quit know what this mean though ... probably that what the CCD-camera from the mars-orbiter saw from
    jupiter wasen't the acctual position of jupiter at all.
    different time-lines, hey!

    in the aligment picture on the "http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2003/05/22/" shows
    there is a "stright" line from jupiter from to earth to mars. maybe some light emitted from jupiter is still
    pinging back an forth between jupiter and earth and mars and earth.
    i wonder what the aliens would say if they knew we "stole" some light with the CCD changed it it
    radiowaves and send it back to earth, just to reproduce it a tousand times over, thru the internet ; )

    next-time nasa should put a mirror in orbit around jupiter, earth and mars and then start lasering away.
    should be interessting. messuring the gravitational-well around our sun.

    to bad they didn't show the distance jupiter-sun and sun-mars.

    anyway, from earth to mars it's 463 sec
    from earth to jupiter it's 3146 sec.

    maybe nasa would learn to play ball, meaning if the wanted to shoot a laser say from earth to mars to jupiter
    back at earth, they would have to anticipate where mars and jupiter would be in 463 sec respective
    3146 sec. true. like american football where the quaterback anticipates where the guy who's going to catch the ball
    will be in 5 to 10 sec. it's not like the guy catching the ball is stationary.

    okay the laser from earth to jupiter to mars (missing earth on it's way) back to earth would take ... errr ... 7220sec. (i got a D- in mathe so don't reply if i calculated this wrong)
    now THAT would be a hell of a quarterback if he could "throw" those photons ahead. lucky the planets aren't
    running around on the playground ... ; )
    -
    "hey, and stan, i would recommend you reevaluate the way you LOOK if you're going to see holly, just a thought."

  106. Erosion .... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... is a bitch....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  107. Re:Only US residents should be allowed to view ima by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, maybe a few people who would take seriously such an arrogant suggestion should learn to *spell* "Europeans", but anyway apart from that
    you'd better forfeit all the astronomical research done in Europe (say, from Galileo on), and the support given by ESA and European facilities to various NASA projects. And not just
    from Europe, either, but also places like Australia.

  108. HI, mr mod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Youre an idiot. How exactly is offering a second link a troll? REdundant, maybe.

  109. Re:Slashdotted before out of "The Mysterious futur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, well, it's hard to tell what's what without the context. And no, the "Show Context" button doesn't really work. Sure, it takes you to page with tons of comments, and then it's up to you to find the one you're looking at, since the names aren't shown until you get to the full page and you have to search by keywords. GRR!

  110. 2003... by bjorky · · Score: 1

    My God, it's devoid of stars!

    --

    "Defenestration" is to throw out of a window; what's a word for throwing 'Windows' out of something?
  111. MSSS Mars Mission Images - Image Processing by DaVinChip · · Score: 1

    This is quite a dumb idea: We have a picture of Earth taken from Mars; we also know exactly what the Earth looks like. This way, an algorithm can be designed to convert the blurry Earth picture into something better. Then, with this calibrated, apply it to the other planets and voilà! You have enhaced your telescopes resolution. (Yes, I know, this has been used before, but this time we can really test the algorithm)

  112. Re:the picture is incorrect ! by JoeRobe · · Score: 1

    Right. Um, I think we're agreeing here, are we not?

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to invent it.