Slashdot Mirror


Teleworking in the UK?

neiljt writes "As a UK-based IT worker living about a 90-minute journey from London, I am interested in the idea of working from home, or teleworking. In the UK, however, the take-up of this practice has been less than frantic. My own immediate plan is to find work at home here in the UK, however my ultimate aim would be to find employment, which gives me the freedom to live where I choose. What barriers exist to working in the UK for a non-UK (e.g. US) employer. What about a UK citizen living outside the UK working for a UK or US employer? (Feel free to substitute your country of residence)"

"The arguments will probably be familiar to most here, but I will state them anyway, just to be sure you know how I'm thinking.

Advantages for me:

  • Save journey time of 3 hours per day
  • Save travel expenses
  • Save travel frustration (delays, crowds, mobile phone idiocy, etc.)
  • Be fresh and alert when I start work
  • Feel better at the end of the working day
  • Be at work promptly each day
  • Work in a pleasant/relaxed environment
  • Ready access to my (large) technical library
Advantages for my employer:
  • Cost savings
  • Office space savings
  • Improved productivity
  • Increased motivation
Advantages for society:
  • Reduced traffic congestion
  • Reduction in total travel and therefore pollution
There are a number of disadvantages and factors to consider, though none should be insurmountable. A couple might be:
  • Employer needs to monitor quantity and quality of work performed
  • Internet connectivity (mine currently limited to 56Kb)
The above illustrates that some take-up of the teleworking approach would be in the everybody's interests, but I am frustrated at the lack of good quality resources I have been able to find on the subject. There seems to be plenty available explaining the concept, but very little in the way of actual assignments or contacts. Of course I may have been looking in the wrong places, so if you know better (and I hope you do), please share.

It would be interesting to hear both from employers who support (or would support) this model, and from employees who have successfully negotiated employment at home.

In general, have your experiences been positive? If you have had problems, how have they been resolved? And now that the technology has been available for at least 10 years, will teleworking ever take off in the UK?"

301 comments

  1. My experience by warmcat · · Score: 5, Informative
    I am also UK based and have worked from home like this.

    A couple of years ago I worked for a fabless semiconductor company coming in to their offices (50 miles away) one day a week and working the rest of the time from home. I was already set up with a cablemodem and PCs, there was no problem doing the actual work and keeping in touch by telephone. So "the problems" have "been solved", in IT-type work.

    All of your advantages seem realistic, a disadvantage you'll probably have to add is to have to carefully manage your motivation. I found that a phone call and a chat would cheer me up and get me going if the news was positive, more often in that company the news was negative or depressing and it requires some mindgames then to keep yourself pouring energy into the work and not slumping in the chair thinking "what's the use?". Being on the phone regularly and documenting where you are at in a place easily visible from the office (CVS, email project dumps, etc) can deal with the monitoring problems in a good way.

    However, this company had the most amazing political situations going on. I found that by not physically being there all the time there it was easy to miss out on the latest twists and turns in the ongoing sagas, and that in such a hothouse political situation that can be a big drawback. I also found that there was a tendancy by others to regard myself as less committed, simply by lack of physical presence, even though in every other way it was clear I was playing more than a full role. So there are psychological issues in not being physically present when problems and bad or good news comes up, you are not seen to be proactive when someone else is always first on the scene to fight the fire, since the call is going to come to the office.

    The advantages are clear, especially if you have children. But the disadvantages make themselves felt pretty clearly too, if you cherish hopes of getting a more managerial responsibility over time, you might find this system is not helping you towards that. In the end I quit after 14 months, when the political sagas reached a point where it was clear there was no growth path for myself (and in fact anyone else based in their UK office as far as I could see, three other people also left out of a total staff of 8 while I was there).

    1. Re:My experience by krist0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am living in the netherlands atm and i agree with the above, especially on the part of how when you are not constantly in the office, it affects how you are seen in the organisation, out of sight, out of mind.

      Its true that there are alot of positive and negative points about working from home, the most important thing i found for myself was making a area at home that is solely dedicated to work, because if you are sitting in front of the TV with a laptop on your lap, you aren't gonna be too focused on your work.

      Mind you, its also a huge time saver as well, as 2 hours work at home (say if you are trying to document something large and complicated) is greater than a whole day at office (constant interuptions)

      i think working from home should only be done when its appropriate, but shouldn't be a regular thing unless you are a outside contractor (paid on completion) or if you have small kids or something like that.

      --
      all you are, is all you are, i'm so sorry for you.
    2. Re:My experience by hbackert · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was working for the IT department of an austrian company in Tokyo. The company grew and office space is expensive, especially if you need to move to another building. The simple fix was, to let some of the developers and translators, who were working already several years at the company, work from home. After all, those do not need physical appearance and they prefer (due to the nature of work) a quiet environment. Something which is difficult to get in a japanese company.

      Worked out well, as it was easy to check they are working by checking the results. The employees (not all wanted to work from home) were generally happy, some office space was saved, travel money (paid usually by the company) was saved, in the end, everyone was happy.

      I think the trick in this excercise was, so let experienced workers work from home. People who are known to be able to motivate themself. And as everyone could check the productivity, the usual problem of teleworking, not being able to tell if the employee watches TV or works 8 hours, did not apply here.

    3. Re:My experience by tacocat · · Score: 1

      I you have provided some excellent evidence that work is a social interaction between people.

      Oh Yeah, you get money in there too.

      It doesn't need to be a social event. But many people in the world make it that way as evidenced by the ongoing political games and rumour-mongering that goes on regularly.

      The other problem you have here in America is trust. No one trusts someone who works from home. The core of the Corporation naturally assumes that you are a slacker if you are not making appearances.

    4. Re:My experience by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I also found that there was a tendancy by others to regard myself as less committed, simply by lack of physical presence, even though in every other way it was clear I was playing more than a full role.

      You'll probably never get over this though. If no one can see you at work, you're not working. You could be sleeping at your desk and your coworkers would have a higher view of you than a telecommuter. I don't know if it's jealously or just plain incomprehension of the fact that someone doesn't need to sit their butt at the office to do work for the company.

      It's not like you're sitting there sorting and filing papers or working at a factory. All you need is a computer with an Internet connection and most of us could do 99% of our jobs in our pajamas from home. Of course, then you get the frightening prospect that your work could just as easily be farmed off to some low-payed worker in India. It's a double-edged sword.

    5. Re:My experience by krist0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      My theory about why it doesnt happen to much is the simple fact that most managers (not ALL) have no clue what their techies are doing, or what needs to be done.

      I'm a network engineer, when things work, no one complains, if its broken, i get attention, but day to day, my boss has no idea what i do (come to think of it, neither do i....well, slashdot for one thing)

      the simple fact is (to quote dilbert) your boss usually knows two things about you

      When you arrive/leave.
      What you look like.

      Take those away, they have no idea how to judge you....

      its not always the case (thank you allah, buddah elvis) but usually is.

      --
      all you are, is all you are, i'm so sorry for you.
    6. Re:My experience by Cally · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My experience is that the political stuff varies from company to company. Current employer has an amazingly low level of background political radiation. We have several people who very rarely come in, including someone who works from the Czech republic... and anyway, most of us (geek types) do most of our in-office communication using mail/IRC/whatever anyway. What difference does it make whether someone's on the next floor or the next country, either way you won't see them very often. So long as they answer mail, it doesn't really matter.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    7. Re:My experience by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know there are as many opinions about this as there are people, but, for me, working from home is not even desirable for the reasons it's supposed to be good.

      *When there was someone in the house and I worked from home, (a) I couldn't get anything done but more importantly (b) I didn't want to see her that damn much anyway.

      *When there wasn't anybody in the house, my god how maddening to get up, go sit over there, do stuff, go over there, go to sleep, repeat. Like being in an institution.

      This isn't the usual "it's no good because you can't get your work done" thing", this is the "it's no damn fun" thing. It's just my opinion, and I'm sure some people have completely different experiences, but I was WAY happier going over to *that* building to do shit just cause I at least get to see two different buildings! and I have a reason to shave and get out of the pajamas...

      But an office is a drag too. My favorite was when I was an accounting consultant. We had about 35 clients. I'd be in one place in the morning, another in the afternoon, sometimes one place for a whole week, sometimes at home. The variety of environments and people was stimulating.

    8. Re:My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This applies in general, not just to teleworking:
      If you are doing a job where no-one actually monitors your output, then you have no feedback encouraging you to work. If you do a job where it is not possible to judge your productivity by looking at your output, then you have no feedback encouraging you to work.
      If you work in job or organization like this, you arn't going to enjoy work.

    9. Re:My experience by RMH101 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Point 2 is fair enough, Point 1 can be easily taken care of by turning up at the office at random intervals holding a screwdriver or length of cat5 and muttering...

    10. Re:My experience by xA40D · · Score: 1

      more often in that company the news was negative or depressing and it requires some mindgames then to keep yourself pouring energy into the work and not slumping in the chair thinking "what's the use?".

      Well, I work in an office with a bunch of other sysadmins. And the above mindset describes how we see our jobs 90% of the time. Come 1pm and my mind switches off anway. So being in the office past then is relatively pointless.

      I was off ill yesterday, slept until about 11am, then decided to check my mail, whilst watching some TV. Three hours later I realised I'd actually managed to do more work that I had in the preceding week.

      Unfortuately, as with most places I've worked, management assume "bums in seats" equates to "getting stuff done". Particularly when management don't have a clue about what you actually do.

      So, I've come to the conclusion that I'm actually paid to sit in an office and get bored. Sysadmining is what I do, for free, to occupy my time.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    11. Re:My experience by MogX · · Score: 1

      I work(ed) for a large UK retail company who encouraged homeworking for IT staff - supplied the kit, extra lines etc. This was the main reason I stayed with them, living 50 miles from the office. When IT was outsourced to a US-based consultancy (3 guesses), this was officially scrapped, although they still expected us to support out of hours(!). The main reason given was that it cost too much (evidently they were still supplying phone lines for those who had left years before, but that didn't seem to be a issue). So now I have a 3 hour round trip per day, and feel awkward about leaving before 6, even though I could still be working well beyond this when homeworking. The US culture seems to assume that you have no life out of the office - very few of my new 'colleagues' have partners or children. Now looking for jobs nearer home... Dave

    12. Re:My experience by realdpk · · Score: 1

      In the US, if you have an area in your home solely dedicated to work (second computer and everything) you can take a home office deduction on your taxes (IANATaxGuy).

    13. Re:My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny that. The firm I work for was doing very well... Until it was taken over by an American firm.

      It seems they were hoping to make a killing, but then the .com bubble burst. Now they seem to be doing their best to screw the entire company into the ground - and sod the employees and their lives.

      Best line in recent times was from the MD:

      "We need to become profitable - I'm eager to meet this target as my bonus depends on it. The only way we can become profitable is to sack 34% of the staff. This is obviously a challenging time for all employees"

    14. Re:My experience by juraj · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hello work. I'm from slovakia and I have been working from home for two years now.


      Personally, not needing to pay attention to political sagas is an advantage for me, since I don't have to care about that. I have my work done and I don't have to bother with unrelated stuff.


      The disadvantage is, that you are not seen and people don't think you are commited. They will eventually see the hard work, when something bad happens and they see how promptly you can solve issues.


      Now I'm also a contractor for other companies, also working from home mostly. I don't have to be anywhere during working hours, I just need to have my laptop and cellphone connection with me in case something bad happens. And of course I need to have my work done. Pretty nice, I wouldn't change.

    15. Re:My experience by codeboost · · Score: 1

      The one thing I miss is the co-workers which you can call to your monitor, show them the code and brainstorm on the problem. Also, if you don't have to be somewhere in the morning (and your company is 8 hours behind your time zone), then it doesn't make sence to wake up in the morning ;). I usually work at night and my day-night cycle is screwed. It also implies a lot of self-motivation and time-management. I can work for 12 hours a day for two days in a row and then take a day off, which is hard to accomplish when working in the office. Apart from these, I love working from home - I listen to my music loud, drink my favourite cofee, eat home-cooked meals and keep an eye on my girlfriend :-).

    16. Re:My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found that it is good to have the option, but people eventually start creeping back into the office due to the lonliness experienced at home.

      The last company I worked for gave me the option to start work whenever it was convenient, allowing me to dodge the rush hours/school run congestion.

      Having the option to work from home also gave me the opportunity to stay at home on fridays when the evening traffic appeared to double. I would start work at around 10.00am mon-thu, and at 07.00am(08.00+?) on fri. This meant i could relax in the afternoon on friday and be in the pub at a respectable time.

    17. Re:My experience by doinky · · Score: 1
      This is absolutely the case. I'm at a friggin' STARTUP now where the operations manager now wants to install monitoring software on peoples' PCs to make sure they're working; after imposing core hours of 9-5 (no room for the magma or crust on that core) and constantly walking around making sure asses are in seats.

      At the large company I worked at (Big Blue), telecommuting was "an option" which meant that if you cleared it a long time ahead, it was OK once in a while; which is, of course, useless; since I usually wanted to telecommute on mornings where the weather looked good (to work with the windows open).

      At the medium company I worked at (video cards), telecommuting was my way of life for 9 months, but only because I was one of only two people left at the local site after a bunch of people quit; and the other guy was already working at home. These pantloads eventually turned the screws and graced me with a crappy little office as well. (Plus, when we had the core 4 programmers including me; we actually had to use a temporary sublease where all of us shared a single 28.8Kbps modem line for network connectivity for a month - because of an screwup at company legal with our lease at some new office space. Despite the fact that we all had cable modems or ADSL at home; this particular pantload thought he couldn't trust us (but somehow didn't realize that he wouldn't know if we were in the office anyways due to the 2,000 mile distance).

      There is no escape from pointy-haired bosses.

    18. Re:My experience by kmilani2134 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The thing I find annoying about working from home is that on days when I am home my girlfriend thinks that the house should be cleaner and various chores should be done before she gets home from her job.

      Fortunately, this is an extra motivation to actually do my office work and try to limit the interruptions of doing "house work" just because I am home.

      --
      Those who trade freedom for security will lose both, and deserve neither" -- Ben Franklin
    19. Re:My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here the bigger problem with being able to work from home and your employer will prbably wake up to it once some budget gets cut or the company needs to downsize...if they can have you do the work so eaisily from home or from another country whats the harm with them laying you off and paying some schmuck in India 6 bucks an hour to do your job where thats actualy great pay? It's allready happening with quite a few companies that arent just "telemarketing" or "help desk" companies. I'd personaly recomend grinning and bearing it b/c the day the axe needs to swing I'd sure hate to be one of the people working from home no matter how good you are. If I'm wrong please do correct me...

    20. Re:My experience by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      "I am living in the netherlands atm"

      Wow! I thought my place was cramped! I suppose when most of the money has been withdrawn from the machine you have more room...

      graspee

    21. Re:My experience by darnok · · Score: 2, Informative

      > This isn't the usual "it's no good because you
      > can't get your work done" thing", this is the
      > "it's no damn fun" thing.

      As someone who used to work from home 1-2 days a week, I can sympathise with this. I got around it by partnering up with a work colleague who also worked from home and working together at either his or my house every so often. Having another human around can make things a lot easier, especially if there's always a subconscious concern of "do people really think I'm productive when I'm working at home?" in the back of your mind...

      That said, having worked from home shortly after the birth of my first child, there's plenty of times when you really do want to be home alone. In my case, I resorted to getting 8hrs work done in a 24hr period, however possible; when you're rocking a baby to sleep at 2am, you actually can get some work done (even reading printed documents) and neither of my 2 kids have developed obvious social problems because their Dad read a few documents while they were dozing off with a bottle.

    22. Re:My experience by NetSettler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If no one can see you at work, you're not working. You could be sleeping at your desk and your coworkers would have a higher view of you than a telecommuter. I don't know if it's jealously or just plain incomprehension of the fact that someone doesn't need to sit their butt at the office to do work for the company.

      I've telecommuted on and off for about a third of my 20+ year career in computers, and I've thought about this a lot.

      I think the real problem here is that if you are away, the superficial information bosses are used to using to tell if you're working go to pieces and they have to either (a) come up with equally superficial ways of judging you at home or (b) [and they really dread this] decide to judge you on what you actually do.

      Now, I don't think that it should necessarily even be the case that a boss could do his/her underling's job. However, I think the problem that comes with judging people on what they actually do is that many managers are either ill at ease or downright unqualified to say whether the people working for them are in fact doing their job if the actual criterion to be used is "understanding what they are doing" or "knowing whether what is being done is being done right". And the lack of desire to own up to this is a big problem. Managers have to figure out when and who to trust, and that's not always easy.

      I've worked at companies where when you were tired, you just took a nap and no one said anything. After all, wasn't that better than sitting at the console sleepily, one eye on the clock waiting for 5pm so you could duck out after a day of getting nothing done? People came and went when they wanted, too. But this meant that managers had to have the skill to judge who was producing and who wasn't, and the confidence to put their own reputation on the line in asserting this belief and trust.

      At MIT, many years ago, I asked why I had to take so many hardware courses for a degree in software. I was told that they didn't know how to grade software, and so they wanted me to take at least some courses that they did know how to grade. Working at a technical job is a lot like this--you have to both do the work assigned you, plus also some busy work that they know how to grade you on.

      Slashdot reader TaraByte struck a chord with me with some sad but true commentary on another article, including the remark "For extra credit, send in your report at 8pm or later." This is so familiar. I've had situations where I was working my heart out for up to 80 hrs a week at home, barely eating and sleeping, and it went entirely unnoticed by management until once, not realizing the effect it would have, I sent a status report at 3am (a perfectly normal working hour for me). Someone in company management picked up on the timestamp on my report and said "wow, he's working really hard" (without, I'm quite sure, checking to see if I had been asleep at 3pm that day). I had been working really hard, and was glad to have it realized, even if the "evidence" that led to the conclusion was bogus.

      --

      Kent M Pitman
      Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

    23. Re:My experience by bears · · Score: 1
      True in the UK too. HOWEVER, that portion of your home then becomes liable for capital gains tax when you sell the place. So generally the deducation isn't worth it in the long term.


      IANA Tax Advisor.

  2. Salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you are willing to work for $8000/yr, I think you have an excellant chance. That seems to be the current rate for teleworking in the US now.

    1. Re:Salary by Malc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      +1 Interesting? It sounds like a bloody joke! I earn that in a month teleworking.

    2. Re:Salary by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I earn that in a month teleworking.

      Who do you work for, and are they hiring?

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    3. Re:Salary by Malc · · Score: 1

      They're looking for a project manager and an IT manager/DBA. They don't want any more telecommuters. They're in San Jose.

    4. Re:Salary by __past__ · · Score: 1

      "San Jose"? Yer sure that you telecommute in the UK?

    5. Re:Salary by Malc · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'm in Toronto. I've been thinking of returning to the UK though... and I wouldn't have to quit my job either.

  3. loneliness by kevin+lyda · · Score: 4, Interesting

    sounds silly, but it isn't. you're on your own for a lot of the time. you have to do things to keep yourself from going crazy. maybe i've been really lucky, but except for a few rotten apples i've always had great co-workers. and not being able to work with them kind of sucks actually.

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    1. Re:loneliness by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

      you have to do things to keep yourself from going crazy

      Care to elaborate on the 'things' you have to do ? Do the voices in your head make you do them ?

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:loneliness by kevin+lyda · · Score: 2, Interesting

      go out for lunch with friends in your area from time to time. call coworkers/friends. if you can find a group of teleworkers in your area, get together.

      --
      US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    3. Re:loneliness by the_bahua · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think it's important what the "things" are. He is just making a point that if you're all by yourself, working for a living, boredom and loneliness settle in more easily.

      I personally don't think I could ever work consistently from home. I need human interaction. A more pressing concern, however, is that the boredom will drive you(or me, at least) to stop working more often than it would at work.

      That's one nice thing about work. You are there with a purpose. Working from home, to me, would be like wandering around a mall, in my eighties.

    4. Re:loneliness by tigersha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ask any frustrated new mother who sits at home with baby. The situation is similar. Raising a baby is a lot of work (and you have to be on call all the time) but there is little social contact.

      Work is for many people as much a social activity as it is a financial activity. Being with coworkers who are roughly doing the same as you and working for the same goals does make a difference and being alone will driveyou crazy.

      Also, the whole "discussions at the watercooler" effect tends to go away if you are not there. Those discussion are sometimes very important.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    5. Re:loneliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      correct

    6. Re:loneliness by scottme · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I work from home a couple of days each week, from choice, because I can get peace & quiet to work uninterrupted. I'm not sure I'd want to do it full-time, for reasons such as have been highlighted by other posters - like personal motivation, the need to see people face-to-face once in a while, meetings with partners, vendors, etc.

      However, at the company I work for, there are some useful things to help stave off the loneliness thing:
      • we have an internal IM system, which means that most of my colleagues are easily reachable and I get a sense of "who's in", even though like me, many of them may well be working at home. In fact, since many of them are in different coutries and timezones, I don't see them even when I'm in the office.
      • we also have a series of internal discussion groups on an NNTP server, covering all kinds of technical and non-technical topics. There are several "watercooler" type groups where people exchange funny stories, gossip, and so on. All of it strictly business-related, of course :-)

      Neither of these things is hard to set up, and they go a surprisingly long way to make up for the lack of a sense of community that comes from working on your own at home.
    7. Re:loneliness by Malc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I wasn't awake in time to post this: you beat me to it. Getting up in a timely manner - especially if you're in a different time zone - takes a lot of discipline. I've been working from home for 3.5 years. It's been tough at times. It didn't help that starting the job coincided with moving not just to a new city, but a new country. You're right: the loneliness is the hardest part of working like this, and if you suffer from seasonal changes, winters can become especially nasty. I didn't think I did, until the last three winters.

      All my friends are my wife's friends. Well, I've started making some of my own, but when you don't get out socially on your own terms, it's slow. You've really got to work hard on getting to meet people, or you'll go crazy for social interaction... and no, chatting on the phone or IM or email with people at work 3,000 miles (my case) won't cut it. It's almost driven me on a couple of occasions to quit, take the 40-50% pay cut to work locally here in Toronto, but work in an office again.

      It's hard to network when you work from home. It's hard for your career to progrees when you work from home: you have to work on easily packaged projects, and more senior roles involving management of others are less effective. You have to have a team that communicates well. Personally, if I were in a hiring position, I wouldn't take on anybody like me who can't even get to the office.

      The flexibility makes up for a lot of it. I'm in a position that allows me to re-arrange my hours as I see fit. It takes a lot of self-discipline though, and a lot of trust by my employer. If I want to run errands during the day, or go for a run, I do. If I want to meet my wife for beer when she finishes work, I do. If I want to sleep in the next day with a hang over, I do.

    8. Re:loneliness by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would have to agree with this statement. I am currently employeed as a pre Sales technical consultant with a mobile computing software firm. It can get quite lonely when working from home. A few things to do to make up for it:

      - Have friends close by who also work from home. Regular 'Lunch Meetings' gets you out of the house. Especially today since London is in the middle of sunshine (About time right!). Also Friday 4pm is 'Beer O' Clock' with the mates to wind down from the week.

      - If you are working for a US company the timezone difference can be hard. I always check my email once before going to bed at night. I usually end up spending an hour then dealing with any issues that may have otherwise wasted a day in the US. This makes me a little more relaxed when taking an extra hour in the middle of the day for lunch. I kind of feel like I haved earned it.

      - Meet up with your 'workmates' at least once every 2 weeks. There are 3 of us in the UK (2 slaes guys and me). It is good to get together, bitch about the US people and let of steam. Also builds those 'water cooler' relationships you don't get being alone.

      - ADSL (512K is plenty for me), WLAN and a mobile phone is all you need. I connect to our US office via VPN for access to Exchange and the network drives. Web based presentations are done via WebEx and conference calls. It works well.

      - If you can get your employer to say you have to work at home you can claim tex rebates in the UK. You can claim (Number of Rooms in house/Number of rooms used for business) for Electricity, Councli tax, Heating and Rent (you cannot claim for mortgage payments).

      --
      [Please type your sig here.]
    9. Re:loneliness by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Work is for many people as much a social activity as it is a financial activity.

      I had a full telecommute position for a few months - I'd love to find another.

      I get my social interaction from my actual friends, from the people at my dojo, from the poets and musicians I see at open mic nights and the like.

      OTOH, I've been in the office and not spoken to anyone the whole day.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    10. Re:loneliness by kmilani2134 · · Score: 1

      One year I worked from home full time and I ended up knowing the United Parcel Service delivery guy on a first name basis. (I was buying a lot of books from fatbrain.com, which was a very good online technical bookstore until they were assimilated into Barnes and Noble.com and nothing has been as good since.) Bit of a tangent there. sorry.

      --
      Those who trade freedom for security will lose both, and deserve neither" -- Ben Franklin
    11. Re:loneliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lonliness?! Are you NUTS?!?!?

      I am so glad I work from home I dont' think I would ever go back to the office. Ever.

      No people bothering me. I can do a days work in a third of the day. No lame ass conversations by the cooler. No people jumping into my office to chit chat... plus I can work naked.

    12. Re:loneliness by Malc · · Score: 1

      "- If you can get your employer to say you have to work at home you can claim tex rebates in the UK. You can claim (Number of Rooms in house/Number of rooms used for business) for Electricity, Councli tax, Heating and Rent (you cannot claim for mortgage payments)."

      If you sell your house, don't you have to pay capital gains? Or is that just if you've run a business out of it? I heard some advice in the UK a few years back that suggested making an office a dual purpose room by adding a bed, and thus avoiding the tax.

  4. it isn't that uncommon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    the entire programming dept. of the company I work for telework and have been for the last 3 years. We go into the office 1 day a week for production meetings, though often one or more of us is on a conference call for those too. So long as your type of work allows it. I highly recommend getting one or more broadband connections to your home (I have adsl and cable in case one dies), and using a conference call service (there are many at about 8p/minute if you google for them).

    1. Re:it isn't that uncommon by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      Well thats news to me. Obviously your case is more the exception than the rule. Few employers will tolerate employees off site for 4 days a week. I sometimes wrangle a day at home to get some peace and quiet but normally I gotta be there to keep the boss, customers, operations, and the dev team happy

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:it isn't that uncommon by aunitt · · Score: 1

      I can personally vouch for some of these conference services. Shout99 has a good conference service plus lots of other information for freelancers. Or you could try Conference So Easy or Call Vox for similar packages.

      I'm lucky in that I work only a few minutes from my office but it is still very useful to be able to work at home at times. Less distractions are a wonderful thing when you have some difficult code to think through and it makes it a lot easier to get into the zone.

    3. Re:it isn't that uncommon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I previously worked for an IT department of a large company in the US and they allowed programmers who are over an hour drive to the office to work from home 4 days a week if they desired to. Once the programmer attains the skills and experience to be promoted to the Systems Analyst level they are required to be at the office more often and their work load would determine the number of days they would be able to work from home. This arrangement has been working for them for at least 4 years. All "on call" problems are handled via telecommuting.

  5. Advantages. by 1s44c · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Yes there are advantages to teleworking.
    Yes it would save company money.

    It will never catch on though. Bosses like to have their staff lined up in little cubicles. They like to feel in control. In the minds of most bosses empire building, politics, and wanting to look like they are in charge is important. Company money isn't.

    How many times has your company wasted money on stupidity because some overpaid fool thought it was a good idea??

    My company does this often.

    1. Re:Advantages. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      It will never catch on though. Bosses like to have their staff lined up in little cubicles. They like to feel in control. In the minds of most bosses empire building, politics, and wanting to look like they are in charge is important. Company money isn't.

      I've always liked having my team in the office with me and it's nothing to do with cubicals or being in control.

      With teleworkers you can't just turn around and ask them a question, meetings are more of a pain (no visual aspect, you can't use a flip-board or huddle around someones pc) and whilst they might be more productive at home, everyone else who relies on something from them finds their productivity goes down because they have to take extra steps to get hold of them.

      I've never had a situation where working from home has been a perminant thing for some people and I'm sure that all the above could be solved if it was. But for ad-hoc days working from home, it's often more of a problem for the co-workers than anything else.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    2. Re:Advantages. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee you work for EDS too?

    3. Re:Advantages. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      How many times has your company wasted money on stupidity because some overpaid fool thought it was a good idea??

      Hmm, well when I worked at ENRON the upper management rarely made stupid decisions...

      And even over here at SCO things are really smooth... nothing but competence and honest businessmen at the top.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Advantages. by AlecC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It will never catch on though. Bosses like to have their staff lined up in little cubicles. They like to feel in control. In the minds of most bosses empire building, politics, and wanting to look like they are in charge is important. Company money isn't.

      How many times has your company wasted money on stupidity because some overpaid fool thought it was a good idea??


      That is the way companies were in the past. If doesn't have to be the way companies are in the future. Once upone a time all employees had timecards and clocked in and out - they still do for "warm body" type jobs where you have to have somebody - almost anybody - present. But for brainwork type jobs, successful employers long ago found that it is not worth splitting hairs over clocking on and off times. A more relaxed attitude gives better motivation, and if anything leads to people working more, mot less, hours (in most cases - and the exceptions probably aren't very productive even when present).

      If it has enough benefits, companies that cannot do it will go out of business and be replaced by those that can do it. But the fact is that the benefits do not much exceed the costs. And the greater part of the benefits accrue to the employee, not to the employer. Since the usual format is that the employer has more power, they are not motivated to overcome whatever difficulties occur.

      Two things can change this. The first is to give yourself some power over the company. This is uaually by having skills they cannot get elsewhere. If you are competing against other moderately skilled people for a job, they will naturally prefer the commuter to the teleworker, for reasons that have been given. However, if you have some scarce skills, and make it clear that you are only willing to telework, they may have to accept you. this may involve a bit of arm-wrestling - refuse the communting job, then call a month later and ask if they have filled that hard-to-fill post - or are using expensive cosultants and/or contractors. Secondly, you can share some of the benefits which you get with them. Yes, they get some benefits - but (empirically) not enough to motivatge them. You get a 27% reduction in your effective working day (11 hours to 8) and save commuting costs. Share some of that with them - ask for less money than the commuter.

      An interesting example is MySQL AB, the company behind the excellent MySQL. They are a true virtual company: their employees are scattered all over Europe (plus some in the US), and rarely meet. Obviously, as a pure virtual company, they have had to conquer the problems from day one. But also, they have found a way of teaming a larger number of skilled indivduals in a narrow technical field than you would expect to be able to gather in any single commuting area. If the world is your fishpons, any single city looks small.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    5. Re:Advantages. by r_o_driscoll · · Score: 1

      Maybe the answer is more technology, like web-cams on everyone's desk, at work and at home. That way the manager gets to feel they're still in control *and* you get to bug your coworkers. This would also mean meetings could be held remotely. You could give a presentation without your pants on!

    6. Re:Advantages. by Cally · · Score: 1

      > It will never catch on though.
      >

      I dunno what colour the sky is where you live, but believe it or not lots of people are ALREADY telecommuting, at least some of the time. I can't think of anywhere I've worked in the last ten years where SOME home working was the norm. Apart from a certain horrible US mega-corp, management tend to judge by results. 'Presenteeism', ie being in the office in body but absent in mind (for whatever reason) really doesn't work. Any decent employer should trust you to get the work done - if you do so, who cares where (or when) you did it?

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    7. Re:Advantages. by realdpk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For a lot of people, being available so that people can just walk up to you and ask you a question is a big inconvenience - especially developers. The solution here is to have a ticketing system mediating all questions. This increases productivity for everyone because everyone benefits from the answers to questions - not only those who were within earshot and were listening in.

      Meetings can be more of a pain, but quite honestly, meetings are automatically a pain. Most meetings are non-interactive - they're manager-to-employees dissemination of information. I have not been in a interactive meeting that could not have been handled over e-mail, and in fact, in our 24x7 environment, this makes more sense because it can involve everyone.

    8. Re:Advantages. by 1s44c · · Score: 2, Funny


      You could give a presentation without your pants on!


      Never again!

    9. Re:Advantages. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      For a lot of people, being available so that people can just walk up to you and ask you a question is a big inconvenience - especially developers.

      Agreed.

      Meetings can be more of a pain, but quite honestly, meetings are automatically a pain. Most meetings are non-interactive - they're manager-to-employees dissemination of information.

      As you rightly stated before, this is probably more due to the fact you're in IT and i'm not. Most meetings I go to are very interactive.

      I have not been in a interactive meeting that could not have been handled over e-mail, and in fact, in our 24x7 environment, this makes more sense because it can involve everyone.

      Again, probably the environment. Unfortunately for me when your inbox gets over 300 emails a day, the last thing you want to do is fill it with even more emails on something that could have been solved with a 30 minute meeting.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    10. Re:Advantages. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      With teleworkers you can't just turn around and ask them a question,

      E-mail. It's better to put it in writing anyway.

      meetings are more of a pain

      That's not a bug, that's a feature! 90% of meetings are an absolute waste of time.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    11. Re:Advantages. by Khazunga · · Score: 1
      With teleworkers you can't just turn around and ask them a question
      The case is, with developers, you can't either. Even if they are present, constant interruption drives down productivity like a stone. I estimate I can take ~30min to achieve the same efficiency, after an interruption and a context switch. Worse, some tasks just can't be done if I can't get a two hour of "Don't Bother Me Unless the Building is On Fire" interval.

      Alas, 90% of the managers can't even imagine how can someone concentrate so much on a task, let alone understand the need for peace and quiet. I don't say this with a negative contour. It's that management involves mostly human interaction, while development involves mostly mental modelling. It's different, and it takes some effort to see the other side.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    12. Re:Advantages. by chez69 · · Score: 1

      I want to work from home because of interruptions. I have a project lead that calls me at least 10 times a day from her fucking speakerphone when she is only 1 row over from me. I also have a co-worker that calls me at least 8 - 9 times a day and comes by my cube several times. Other co-workers come by as well as the boss. If i could work from home I would get 2 - 3 times as much done as I do now.

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
    13. Re:Advantages. by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      As a full time teleworker that started from home day one and didn't spend any time in the office, I missed out on some of the corporate culture. I was hammering out code by 8:00am and generally hammered code until my brain fried ... somewhere between 5pm and 8pm. No interruptions, no slack time, and no office hooliganism.

      The first time (about a year later) I went to spend a week or two in the office I maintained my routing, was banging out code in a borrowed cube by 8am, trying to maintain my focus while I watched the others come streaming in over the next two hours, spend time in the kitchen making coffee and eating bagels, water cooler chats about family, speakerphone conversations with their girlfriends, the chicken-chatter hen partys between the non-programmer women in the office, discussions about nail and hair colors, nerf football games in the hallways, bogus meetings that take three hours, 'can you help me because I can't print or get my email off the internet?', oh'crap another email virus, hour or so for lunch, another hour getting a bunch of people coordinated to go to lunch at the same time at the same place, folks bailing at 4:30pm, general social banter and chatter and the all important Quake3Arena duel at 5pm.

      I was like WTF! Here I am at the house spending a good 5-10 hours straight 'in the zone' and I can't imagine these guys doing 5 hours of work per day combined.

      There are advantages to being in the office atmosphere, but productivity isn't one of them.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  6. Try the banks by mccalli · · Score: 4, Informative
    Well, I live in Marlow, which to reach the centre of London is about a 90 minute trip. I'm a contractor and have worked in a few City and Docklands-based banks. Most banks now allow VPNs from home. It's not the norm to work from home, but many are pretty flexible these days.

    Of course, I'm a developer. Not sure what it's like for non-pure IT staff.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Try the banks by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I live in Amersham, and it takes me about an hour each way into London in my car each day (I work in Covent Garden). I don't really see any problems with this kind of commuting - I don't need to get up particularly early (I need to be in the office by 09:30, so I leave around 08:00) and I usually get home at around 19:15.

      I've considered teleworking (possible for maybe 30% of my work), but I ENJOY London and all it's facilities, I don't want to be stuck in a small town (even a nice one like Amersham or Marlow) all of the time. You've got to ask yourself, what would you DO with that extra 2 or 3 hours? I'm pretty sure I'd just waste it myself.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:Try the banks by mccalli · · Score: 1
      You've got to ask yourself, what would you DO with that extra 2 or 3 hours? I'm pretty sure I'd just waste it myself.

      No kids, right...?

      Seriously, a couple of years ago I would have agreed with you entirely. Now, I need to get back to see my baby daughter. Having said that, I use my commuting time as a bit of break where I can do what I need, not what what my daughter needs, not what my wife needs, not what work needs...just some time for me to chill out, listen to music and relax.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:Try the banks by Malc · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who lives in Aylesbury. It used to take him 60-90 minutes to commute to Marlow, a mere 20-25 miles. I'm shocked it takes you just an hour... I would guess you're 30 minutes from Marylebone on the train.

    4. Re:Try the banks by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Yep, it takes about half an hour on the train to Marylebone from Amersham (though it's NOT reliable or comfortable), 45mins to CG. Unfortunately, I commute to work with my girlfriend (who works in Camden), so replacing the car with the train for us would mean spending somewhere between £15 to £20 per DAY, where we currently put around £35 worth of fuel in the car per WEEK for the same result.

      The train doesn't even compete it is SO expensive, and you still need a car to live the rest of your life anyway!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    5. Re:Try the banks by Malc · · Score: 1

      Ya, they're really ding you if you travel before 9am. And you're lucky if you can get a seat during commuter hours. I always found it was a pretty (comparatively????) good service at other times though.

      Heh: we used to take the train on Wednesday nights Amersham. Rock night at the Iron Horse. I think they stopped it in the mid-90s though. Amersham was probably glad to get rid of us arseholes from Douglas Hurd's Lager Lout Capital of Europe: Aylesbury.

    6. Re:Try the banks by fw_dude · · Score: 1

      I use to live in Beaconsfield, and my father worked on Old Marylebone Rd in London. He took the 6:15 ( I think this is the express train to Marylebone Station) train everymorning and it only took him 45 min to get to work. He was usually home by about 6:30 p.m. everyday.

    7. Re:Try the banks by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You've got to ask yourself, what would you DO with that extra 2 or 3 hours? I'm pretty sure I'd just waste it myself.

      Now that's pathetic.

      What could you do with two or three extra hours a day, 10-15 hours a week??? Read books. Watch films. Learn to play guitar. Study a martial art. Spend time with friends. Take a class at your local college. Write poetry. Play with the dog. Play volleyball. Volunteer for some cause you think is important.

      If you can't find an interested way to spend that time, you are in serious need of a life transfusion.

      You'd rather spend all that time stuck in your car? Ugh.

      I find a half-hour commute to be just on the edge of bearable. I'd slit my wrists if I to drive 90 minutes each way every day just to go sit in front of a computer, especially when there's a perfectly good computer less than five meters from my bed.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    8. Re:Try the banks by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "What could you do with two or three extra hours a day, 10-15 hours a week??? Read books. Watch films. Learn to play guitar. Study a martial art. Spend time with friends. Take a class at your local college. Write poetry. Play with the dog. Play volleyball. Volunteer for some cause you think is important."

      I'd probably take you more seriously here if you weren't (like me) wasting your time at Slashdot instead of saving the whale (or whatever) that would obviously be a better fit for your ambitions.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  7. In Layman's Terms... by Ridge · · Score: 4, Funny

    Advantages for me:

    Save journey time of 3 hours per day - (I can sleep in an extra 3 hours)
    Save travel expenses - (Forget the car, I can use my Snoopy slippers)
    Save travel frustration (delays, crowds, mobile phone idiocy, etc.) - (I only have to trip over my dog)
    Be fresh and alert when I start work - (Morning crack and coffee)
    Feel better at the end of the working day - (I'm drunk by 0930)
    Be at work promptly each day - (Work starts when I wake up... bitch)
    Work in a pleasant/relaxed environment - (Did I mention my crack and coffee?)
    Ready access to my (large) technical library - (Google)

    Advantages for my employer:
    Cost savings - (I can browse for porn at home)
    Office space savings - (No need for a cubicle, I don't have to leave bed)
    Improved productivity - (crack!)
    Increased motivation - (I can say 'fuck you' to my employer and not be heard)

    Advantages for society:
    Reduced traffic congestion - (I'm a maniac driver, if I don't have to leave home no one will die due to my poor driving skills)
    Reduction in total travel and therefore pollution - (When I soil my britches no one will notice)

    There are a number of disadvantages and factors to consider, though none should be insurmountable. A couple might be:

    Employer needs to monitor quantity and quality of work performed - (That's what webcams are for, watch while I surf porn sites, smoke crack, drink my coffee, and soil myself)
    Internet connectivity (mine currently limited to 56Kb) - (My employer should cough up some dough so I can get a broadband connection so I can be more productive in my porn browsing)

    1. Re:In Layman's Terms... by Jellybob · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only on /. could this be insightful.

    2. Re:In Layman's Terms... by caluml · · Score: 3, Funny

      Insightful? It's the crack references that got the mods going on that one...

    3. Re:In Layman's Terms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "Work in a pleasant/relaxed environment - (Did I mention my crack and coffee?)"

      Dude, if you find crack + cafienne relaxing, you've got bigger problems than Slashdot can help you with. Personally, I recommend a nice 10ml heroin, i/v, for that nice warm relaxezzzzzzzzzzz -where was I? Course if you really can't face leaving the pipe alone you can always get into speedballs (cook 'em both up together.) Breakfast of champions! Or it least it was, before random drug tests were introduced.

      incidentally the reason random drug testing is so rare in the UK is because most companies would have to fire 70% of their technical staff. UK readers KNOW this is true ;)

    4. Re:In Layman's Terms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its also rare because those companies would face lawsuits and prosecutions from their employees under Human Rights and Employment laws. You know, the stuff the U.S is supposed to have but everyone ignores.

    5. Re:In Layman's Terms... by class_A · · Score: 1
      incidentally the reason random drug testing is so rare in the UK is because most companies would have to fire 70% of their technical staff. UK readers KNOW this is true ;)

      a shockingly accurate statistic :-)

  8. But how can you annoy your co-workers?? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Funny
    We all know how fun work is.

    Around lunch time when I leave the office I especially love to turn my speakers on full blast and execute a perl program that turns makes Mozilla go here 10 minutes after I leave.

    I also make sure sure Xscreensaver is on with a password so my other coworkers can shut it off.

    However I found my speakers in the parking lot with piss all over them after I did this. My boss permanently took awhile my priveldge to use speakers after that incident. :-(

    1. Re:But how can you annoy your co-workers?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, did you find out who pee'd on your speakers?

    2. Re:But how can you annoy your co-workers?? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      My boss. :-)

    3. Re:But how can you annoy your co-workers?? by Golthar · · Score: 1

      Ahahahah.

      Sad thing is I actualy watched it until its over ;-)
      Shame I don't have speakers at work..

    4. Re:But how can you annoy your co-workers?? by VerseGuru · · Score: 1

      SSH to your colleagues computers and run osascript -f 'say "insert witty comment here"' obviously the possibilities are endless but you'll need to know the login for the current user (made easier if your're the sysadmin ;) and have to be running OS X on the target computer. But unless you have a webcam in the office you won't be able to see the victims response... This also has productive uses too, e.g. if my boss isn't running IM and I need to chat I just SSH in and launch it for him...

    5. Re:But how can you annoy your co-workers?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That is a good thing. Trust me. I dare you to listen to the mpg for more then a few seconds. It sounds so horrible that no man woman or child on Earth could do it.

      Its really really bad. No its scary!

    6. Re:But how can you annoy your co-workers?? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      No you haven't heard the worst.

    7. Re:But how can you annoy your co-workers?? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      Forget to hyperlink the url.

      This is the worst.

    8. Re:But how can you annoy your co-workers?? by barryfandango · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that BillyGates, haven't laughed that hard in a long time.

      Now please provide instructions on how to get that f*cking song out of my head.

      --
      In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    9. Re:But how can you annoy your co-workers?? by rnturn · · Score: 1

      I found that having a copy of the old roaches program is useful for remotely annoying your coworkers. Especially the ones who run an X server under Windows (they tend to have all access controls turned off by default). But if you don't have that program available, xclock or xmessage works just as well.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  9. If you really want to work at / very near home... by jlanng · · Score: 5, Insightful

    .. and you want that to be somewhere nice... The best option is to start your own business.

  10. I do this, but it takes time by moebius_4d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I work from home full-time, and make a good rate doing it. (Occasionally I have business travel, to client sites, say about 10 days/year.) I work for an software consultancy.

    The way I got here was to work for this group full-time on-site on a number of different engagements over a few years. When the first opportunity to work at home came up, I took it. I provide my own hardware and net connectivity.

    Since I have proven my ability to get results and to do whatever it takes to satisfy the customer, I got this chance. Since I still make my dates and satisfy the customer, I am still afforded this opportunity.

    It has its downsides, no doubt. My 2-year old daughter doesn't always understand when I can't interrupt myself and come do what she wants. But the time I've been able to spend with her has been priceless, from coming up to eat lunch with her, to dropping by the pool in the afternoon for a half-hour swim, it's been wonderful.

    I consider myself lucky and work hard to keep this opportunity in my life.

  11. Thinks about the problems as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    As someone who works from home part of each week, there are a few disadvantages to consider.
    • a phone conference isn't anywhere near as effective as a face to face meeting when discussing ideas between more than 2 people
    • you have to have a sensible collaboration stratergy - on several occasions 2 people working on the same file have lost each others changes due to not knowing what each was working on
    • having someone to bounce ideas off sat "next to you" is often helpful
    1. Re:Thinks about the problems as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      you have to have a sensible collaboration stratergy - on several occasions 2 people working on the same file have lost each others changes due to not knowing what each was working on
      You're not using a source control system!?! You have bigger problems than the presence of teleworkers. Get one IMMEDIATELY!
    2. Re:Thinks about the problems as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're not using a source control system!?! You have bigger problems than the presence of teleworkers. Get one IMMEDIATELY!
      tell me about it - however convinicing management about that, and educating other staff on using it (especially the managers that do some programming) is taking time. The management doesn't think it a high enough priority in our current situation.
    3. Re:Thinks about the problems as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't most Brits "gay" -- homosexuals?

  12. Working (from) abroad by daBass · · Score: 1

    The best way is to set up your own company, being employed by a foreign company is a PITA, both for you as well as their HR department.

    1. Re:Working (from) abroad by vidarh · · Score: 4, Informative
      It can also be tax heaven. For people working in the UK and considering working for a foreign company, or for that matter even doing consultancy work in the UK, I would recommend looking into offshore Employee Benefit Trusts, and consultancies that can help you with them. There's at least one Isle of Man based one that can handle all of it for you for a small percentage of income (unfortunately can't remember the name).

      Essentially the deal is that the UK tax system is heavily rigged towards rich people (aren't they all, but the UK more than most), but Employee Benefit Trusts can often be utilized by mere mortals too.

      If you are employed by an offshore company, and that company pay you a salary, you still have to pay normal income tax. However, nothing forces the company to pay you everything as salary. Instead, they can pay you a "low" salary (low for the IT sector) of up to about £20k-£25k a year, which will be taxed at the lower tax bands, and pay an amount into an employee benefit trust every three months or so.

      Technically the trustee is independently deciding what the money should go to - that is a requirement for trusts to be able to pay out to UK residents in a tax efficient manner. However the company will recommend that the money be paid to the employee (you) in a tax efficient manner. Since the trustee is legally bound to act in the beneficiarys best interest, it would be almost unprecented for the trustee not to do so.

      The net result can be that with proper planning you end up paying 15-20% income tax at most, even with salaries 4-5 times the UK national average, or more.

      It could in theory be used if you're working full time for a UK company too, but I doubt they would be ready to take the hassle, as you would need to be employed by some offshore shell company for it to work.

  13. UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    British employers are very sceptical over this, because they trust their employees least, second to USA.

  14. i'm a web monkey, working from home in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    as other posters have stated, its hard to keep the motivation up when you work at home. the company i work for also doesn't really have any offices so we don't do meetings etc - we just stay in touch by idling on irc all day :)

  15. 3 hours per day... Sitting in traffic... by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    5 days per working week is 15 hours per week.

    Assume 25 days holiday per year which is 5 weeks, so 47 working weeks/year times 15 hours per week is 705 hours per year spent sitting in traffic...

    Assuming 16 waking hours per day, you spend 44 days per year of your awake life just sitting in traffic. A month and a half? That's gotta be fun.

    Assuming a working lifetime of say 40 years of the same, that'd be 1760 days, or nearly 5 years of your life you'd spend sitting in a cage, listening to Chris Tarrant on the radio.

    Now, isn't that an interesting, exciting, useful, challenging and productive way to spend 5 years of your life?

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:3 hours per day... Sitting in traffic... by mccalli · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Assuming 16 waking hours per day, you spend 44 days per year of your awake life just sitting in traffic. A month and a half? That's gotta be fun.

      It can be. Honestly.

      How? Well, I work during the day. I have a 16-month old daughter to look after when I get home, and I often have paperwork too. The travel time can be quite relaxing in comparison - time to sit on your own for a bit, listen to some music...no trouble. If you're capable of relaxing rather descending into road-rage, then it actually can be a good time. A break to get a moment's thinking time for yourself.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    2. Re:3 hours per day... Sitting in traffic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your uncle is gay and your grandparents suck.

    3. Re:3 hours per day... Sitting in traffic... by frankmanowar · · Score: 0

      exactly what is the point of saying things like that? Don't you have anything better to do? And why hasn't this guy been "trolled" yet? are the moderators out there?

      --

      "Other bands play, but Manowar KILLS"
    4. Re:3 hours per day... Sitting in traffic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We (the KaT clan) specialise in CTC and CTF. If you feel like joining, e-mail me @ the address below.....and be proud to be a KaT clan member !

      --
      Chris Dennett
      chris_dennett@chrisnco.nospam.freeserve.c o.uk

  16. Old fashioned teleworking by Captain+Pedantic · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You could move to near where your place of work is. In doing so you would....

    Save journey time of 3 hours per day

    Save travel expenses

    Save travel frustration (delays, crowds, mobile phone idiocy, etc.)

    Be fresh and alert when you start work

    Feel better at the end of the working day

    Be at work promptly each day

    You would also find that you will get better connectivity than 56kbit.

    --

    None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
    1. Re:Old fashioned teleworking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats fine if you can afford a £2M 1 bedroom broom cupboard in the centre of London... sadly, most developers cannot.

    2. Re:Old fashioned teleworking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only stuck with 56kbps if you live in the middle of Nowhere, Devon. If he's 90 minutes outside of any city or town he very likely has access to ADSL and probably Cable too.

      Let me guess, you live in Nowheere, Devon and you and a whole other two people have complained to BT becuase they won't enable your exchange?

    3. Re:Old fashioned teleworking by hplasm · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Commuting is the most pathetic human activity.

      It is akin to migratory animals who have no choice but to spend half their lives moving south, then the other moving north.

      Moving house to be near work is nearly as bad as being a migrant beast. This is the 21stC ... why should we still live to work. Whatever happened to all of the "increased leisure time" that technology was supposed to bestow on us all??

      Bah!! Work To Live - Not Live To Work!!

      /rant

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    4. Re:Old fashioned teleworking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm looking at moving out of london because for what a poky 2-bedroom flat on the outskirts costs me (800 quid a month) I can have a 4-bedroom house in Yorkshire. We are, incidentally *not* in an expensive part of London.

    5. Re:Old fashioned teleworking by SnAzBaZ · · Score: 1

      90 Minutes? I live ~25minutes outside of Bristol and there is no adsl or cable anywhere in my area.

    6. Re:Old fashioned teleworking by spiny · · Score: 1

      is that near Nomansland then ?

      http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=283347&y =1 14009&z=3&sv=nomansland&st=3&tl=Nomansland,+Devon+ [Town]&searchp=newsearch.srf&mapp=newmap.s rf

      as for living 90mins from london and only having dialup, it's entirelt possible. i live 15 miles from a major city and my local exchange hasn't been enabled yet, and cable seems to have passed us by ...

      --

      Fry: heh, Yakov Smirnoff said it
      Leela: No he didn't.
    7. Re:Old fashioned teleworking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up to a point

      Where I last worked (Camden) houses where £375k plus - we had 4 murders in 18 months 3 out of the cannal and the dismebered trainee Rabbi they found in bin liners 100 yards from the office

  17. I work remotely sometimes by danormsby · · Score: 1
    I work for a company that is based in San Diego but I'm based at a client in Stevenage, UK. I frequently take a day off from Stevenage and work at home over a VPN to the San Diego machines. I don't think I'd like to work from home full time, but it is great to have the option to do this.

    Savings for the employer are that when there is a traffic jam or freak snow storm, the employee can continue to work from home.

    --
    Omnis amans amens
    1. Re:I work remotely sometimes by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      What about IP traffic jams?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  18. I found it incredibly depressing by mark2003 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have worked for several consultancies, including big 5, who all allowed home working, mainly due to the fact that they never had enough hot desks in the offices.

    Whilst for some tasks it works really well, e.g. reading documentation, writing presentations etc., for most work I find that it inhibits communication between colleagues. Communication (or lack of) is one the biggest issues that companies face. Many companies spend a fortune implementing all kinds of systems and processes to improve communication, but often the most efficient and cheapest way is to have the entire project sitting at adjacent desks. People then just tend to chat about problems, solutions etc.

    Personally though my biggest problem was sitting at home by myself for an entire day with no-one to talk to. I also found it much harder to motivate myself and would often just put things off while I watched day time TV. Maybe I'm just a lazy b*stard but I don't think I'm that unusual.

    1. Re:I found it incredibly depressing by inflex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I sympathise - I'm in the same situation. I've got $$$ waiting on some new [relatively simple] features to come out in my product, but even the promise of money just doesn't kick start my zest to code.

      Instead, I sit here watching slashdot hoping that someone will post a recepie for a major fog-clearing, zest inducing power juice.

      Excuse my while I now go get beaten up in Tekken III by my wife.

    2. Re:I found it incredibly depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.
      I presently work for a small company ~ 10 staff. Most of us work from home. After about 12 months out of an office environment, I was starting to get quite depressed.

      Not having the other people around for the majority of your working day, can IMHO start to effect your health.I wouldn't recommend teleworking as a long term situation.

      Further more, when the team has to be 'on project', it feels 10x more productive to have the team together in one space.

      Just my throughts...
      New Zealand residient, looking forward to working in the UK later this year.

    3. Re:I found it incredibly depressing by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Many companies spend a fortune implementing all kinds of systems and processes to improve communication, but often the most efficient and cheapest way is to have the entire project sitting at adjacent desks. "

      M&M mars does this.

      No cubicles! Just desks and rows of desks for groups of employee's who are on the same project. Some of the programmers even share one long foldout table so they can work together if the group is tiny enough.

      Hell even the CEO does not have private office. They have standard desks just placed at the front of the big room so other executives can talk to them if they need to.

      Its a great idea.

      People worried about productivity? Well if you goof off everyone will see. Also communication like what you mentioned is always there. I would much rather have this then cubicles.

      Cubicles are ugly and make me uncomfortable. They are almost slave like in a way. Its like a tiny personal prison.

    4. Re:I found it incredibly depressing by mark2003 · · Score: 1

      I've never had a cube or a office - it makes it really dificult to surf the internet rather than work :(...

      You are very right about the communication though, we all sit here chatting about work over our monitors. Although having a CEO without an office is a bit dodgy - how do they have discussions about financials, redundancies and all those other things that need to done in private? At most companies anyone involved in finance or HR has to have privacy, the former so that general employees cannot be accused of insider trading, leak news to the press etc. and the latter so they can slag everyone off, plan how they will fire everyone and generally be really nasty without people knowing about it.

    5. Re:I found it incredibly depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Although having a CEO without an office is a bit dodgy - how do they have discussions about financials, redundancies and all those other things that need to done in private?"

      Easy conference rooms. The CEO as well as the other executives have their own private meeting rooms reserved for them whenever they need a group discusion.

    6. Re:I found it incredibly depressing by SWestrup · · Score: 1

      I did telework for a games company for 6 months and I found just the opposite. I would wake up in the morning, get a coffee, read my mail and would find the latest task list and/or bug report sitting there.

      My reaction would be to pull up the code and start to fix it. Four hours later I would realize that I was still in my bathrobe, I hadn't had breakfast or my morning shower and my coffee was long cold. In short I found that I had to explicitly time the number of hours of work I did in a week, so that I wouldn't end up doing 80-hour weeks, just because I could. It took a month or so before I got to the point that I would say, "Okay, thats 50 hours this week, so even if its now only thursday afternoon, I can stop work until monday."

      And I suppose it never got lonely or depressing since I seldom make friends at work anyway. (Not that I get on badly with my workmates, but they aren't the people I would CHOOSE to spend my time with.) Besides my SO has a home office so she's always around, even if she's often busy.

    7. Re:I found it incredibly depressing by Kazparr · · Score: 1
      Communication (or lack of) is one the biggest issues that companies face.


      lack of people doing real work because they are too obsessed with meetings has always been a bigger problem everywhere i've worked.
    8. Re:I found it incredibly depressing by chez69 · · Score: 1

      Gosh this would suck. I get interrupted enough as it is.

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
  19. Re :Teleworking in the UK? by TallEmu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Disadvantages for you I can think of are timezones and exchange rates.

    The A$ is currently worth not very much at all (too lazy to look it up) so working "over here" would not be possible - A$50 is a decent enough hourly rate in Sydney, which I think is about 16 pounds and around US$25. I doubt, therefore that someone in the US or UK would want to Telework to Aus. (but contact me with outsourcing opportunities *grin*).

    Timezones. I used to have an office in Switzerland (I am based in Sydney) during the .com boom times. It was hell trying to co-ordinate properly. Language, culture, timezones and the asshole quotient (French people) made it difficult to work effectively - and we had an office!!

    It is amazing that an 8 hour time difference and a lack of understanding on the other side made it difficult. I was regularly attending meetings at 2am and staying back until 7 or 8 on a daily basis. We couldn't change hour working hours much as we had Aussie customers to deal with.

    Now I am working from home by necessity, and I must say I find it more effective, but this is a factor of who I work with rather than the location.

    Motivation is key. Time management is a must. Install instant messaging client to reduce comms cost and provide a feeling of connectivity - you can page people to say hi, ask a question.

    Working from home you can also get a sense of Isolation, of not being part of the "real world".

    It was good recently that I had to go work in the city, put on a suit and get on the train. I enjoyed the variation, it got me out of the house - and also made me appreciate my lair more when I got back home!

  20. Working at home.... by cymantic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Watch out - if you work from home the employer is responsible for making sure that the environment is suitable for working in. This might not mean a saving for the employer if they have to kit you out with chair/desk etc at home as well as at work (if you have to come in every now and then), they will at least have to send someone round to check out your _office_ space.

    I'm currently managing to work from home ok, even though it's my three kids holiday.

    Advantages for me are plenty (especially for avoiding pointless commuting), advantages for work..... well as a programmer I get disturbed less at home so can get more work done, it also means I'm available to do any work any hour of the day/night.

    Broadband connection, VPN is essential though. I have done bits from home over 56kbps and it's not fast enough for real work, although using citrix might help you there.

  21. Re:My take on it... by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Our sister office is in London. Having worked with my UK based compatriots for a few years now, I can safely say that while they have no objections about working late hours THEY DON'T DO S**T DURING THEIR ENTIRE WORK DAY.

    I work in the UK.

    I hate to say it, but you are right in a lot of cases.

    I see a lot of people talk about football and do very little work all day. They then start working at 5 pm just so they can be seen to be working hard when the boss walks past later.

    I don't do this, I work when I'm paid to work. But I see people getting pay raises for this.

  22. To all employers by caluml · · Score: 3, Informative
    I was just thinking about this today, coincidentally. I've noticed that I've taken less sick days since I started working for a very employee-friendly company that allows me to work from home if there is work that I can do at home.
    I think it boils down to the fact that some days, when you wake up, you just don't feel like getting up. On those days, at a company that doesn't allow home working, you might be tempted to ring in, and call a sickie. But if you are allowed to work from home, you would probably roll back to sleep for a few minutes, and then get up, and do some work from home.

    The company I work for also provides me with company paid ADSL which terminates in the lab I work for, thus meaning that I can simply plug in to the lab network at any time. This has a bonus for them, as quite often, at weekends, and evenings, if I think of something, rather than wait until the next working day, and/or maybe forgetting it by then anyway, I will log in, and do some work in my own time.

    I really appreciate the way this company treats its employees, and I think the motto is: Trust your employees, don't treat them like slaves, and they will work happier, and be more productive. At least, that's how I'm finding it.
    I know someone that worked through a whole weekend for free, moving servers from one part of the city to the other - from 9 am to 10pm on both days. They arrived at work on Monday about 5 minutes late, and the boss pulled them up about it. Forget thanking them for their hard work (for free!) over the weekend. They quit that job soon after, and got a job with a funky little tech company, and now work harder, as their work is appreciated.
    Obviously, I understand that some kinds of work can't be done from home, but I think in the majority of case, where people write documents, support networks, answer phone calls, they should be trusted with the opportunity to work from home for say one day a week.

    I digressed slightly towards the end there, didn't I? But I see working from home as an example of how a company treats its employees.

  23. I've done this before by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Basic Field support job... basicly a business where time tied to a desk was lost money.

    Most of my best work was done from home. My computers were faster, my connection was faster, I had software the boss wouldn't buy, and saved a 4hour commuite from hell. It wasn't every day I was at home, but about 1/2 the work week was done from the home office, well till eventually I gave up on the whole going to the office.

    The boss didn't really approve though... basicly under the old impression of, "if I can't see you working, you are not working", but at the very least had server logs, VPN access, database access to somewhat justify why I wasn't in the office. Simple answer, "I was working" It was honestly a case where it was pointless to hit traffic go to the office, just to check my e-mail to see what projects were schedualed for the day, then drive back home to complete them.

    But eventually there was an argument over paying me for work done in my home office, basicly a documented claim in e-mail about how he doesn't pay for what I do on my own time, which was fine by me, so I just billed the clients directly rather then going through him, and made more money. He wasn't happy, but it was his choice.

    But the point is that telecommuting can work, provided you don't have an employer who's a total bozo. In my case simple call forwarding to my mobile, or mobile to my land line, gave the illusion of a tradidational office setting. Phone the office, need to talk to the staff, the staff answers. (Little diffrence in America being the cell holder pays for the air time, never the caller, but the office switchboard should accomplish this illusion quite well). I know also that the network known now as t-mobile supported fax to mobile services, where the subscriber who recieved a fax on the mobile could route it to any number of their choosing, again making it easy for the staff not to be near the physical office fax.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:I've done this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Little diffrence in America being the cell holder pays for the air time, never the caller, but the office switchboard should accomplish this illusion quite well)
      Actually, in America- both parties pay. Confusing, isn't it?

      To understand the American model, think of the airtime minutes as a tank of gas, and long-distance charges as toll booths. Whenever you're on the cellular - 'the car is running' - you're using up your minutes, but only the party originating the call (taking the toll road) pays the LD charge if there is one. As an American, the European model seems (equally) mindblowingly different, though it amounts to less double-charging overall.

      See, in the US, carphones and cellular were born as an addition to the phone network- various companies buying a few phone lines and radios, and/or a big-name telecom selling you the privelege... look to the history of MCI for an example. Our area codes are still allocated by geography (and 'monopolies' retained by the local Bell operating companies, now mostly owned by Verizon or SBC) rather than by provider, so when purchasing a mobile, you pick your 'home' city, and everyone within that local area (or state; sometimes the numbers are a little 'blessed') doesn't get charged LD when calling you- such 'local' calls are generally free with your normal home phone service. Everyone else gets charged long distance, but there's *some* sense to that- the calls have to be routed to systems in your home state (even if only to *then* be relayed across the cellular provider's network to you, out halfway across the country), and the US is a big country. Where it breaks down is cellular-to-cellular calling, where both parties' minutes tick down- and if the originator isn't on a national plan, they get charged LD as well. Some providers now offer free (no minute-count, no LD) calls to other users on their networks, which smells a bit Microsoftian to me.

      As far as I can tell, in Europe everyone is used to getting screwed with per-minute charges when originating local calls, so the 'originator pays' system seems sensible- from a billing perspective, cellphones are treated as a 'pure' extension of the telephone network, instead of two separately chargeable services. In the US, we'd have a psychological block over paying to call someone who'd be free to call on a landline- and thus, the twice-billed system persists.

      It's lame, but also perversely optimistic- we expect the 'airtime' aspect to someday scale flat (one affordable fee for unlimited talk time, as we handle our local landline service, uncapped Internet service, and cable TV), while Europe seems to expect per-minute charges to persist (but scale downwards?) forever. Thing is, the costs of maintaining/growing a network as a whole tend rapidly to outweigh the costs of utilizing it, so the 'American Dream' has its heart in the right place, while the European model may be doomed to repeat the fate of the telecoms that proceeded it- if you optimize for profit on per-minute charges, you aren't guaranteed profit for reserving/expanding capacity in the network, leading to poor QoS that drives users off the network (and onto cellphones, as it happened). If you're charging flat rates that cover the costs of reserving the maximum capacity a single subscriber could possibly utilize, you get a more robust network, more profit, and probably a more satisfied customer (even if they're paying $5.00/month and only using "$0.05" of capacity).

      Basically, in the US, you get this weird-but-interesting model where everything eventually wants to cost $19.99, especially information commodities where the 'cost of generation' is conceivably free. (Note both the RIAA and phone providers' senses of self-worth, in that both one CD and one month of local phone service cost more than the $9 'the Internet' costs.) Heck, if nuclear power had panned out, that'd be how our electric bills would look.

  24. I thought the term was telecommuting. by k03+kalle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Isn't the proper term telecommuting? Has this changed while I was in Basic training? Or is this a UK type of thing...? ;) -kalle

    1. Re:I thought the term was telecommuting. by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      In the US the employee utilizes the communications network is used as a replacement for the commute, hence the term telecommute.

      In the UK the home bound employee utilizes the lack of monitoring possible due to the communications network as a replacement for actual work, hence the term teleworking.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  25. Work barriers... by jkrise · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What barriers exist to working in the UK for a non-UK (e.g. US) employer.What barriers exist to working in the UK for a non-UK (e.g. US) employer."

    1. Cricket: Learn the rules of this (supposedly) gentleman's game. And no, this is not baseball played with a smaller heavier ball. It isn't a chirping insect either.

    2. Conversation: Folks in the UK are quick to note when you're being sarcastic. They're also a bit more relaxed, and can laugh at themselves. Not so high strung as the folks across the pond.

    3. Beer: The local flavors are so different, and the temperature varies a lot.

    4. Dating: More 'F' geeks around, more opinionated as well.

    5. Football hooliganism: Forget NBA, this is the UK. Don't venture miles near a match, especially the big leaguers.

    6. Getting online: is much more expensive, but lots better and smoother in the UK.

    7. Driving, power voltage, frequency, etc..

    A few more, but I'm in a rush.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Work barriers... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      8. Cars: Most American cars probably wouldn't fit on the roads. It would be a bit of a squeeze getting them into the country

      9. Language: Let's put it this way - You do not want to venture out wearing pants a vest and suspenders in the UK.

      10. Transport: Public transport (with the exception of night bus services) tends not to work. Don't attempt to take a trainunless you take at least 3 day's worth of rations.

      11. ????

      12. Profit.

    2. Re: Work barriers... by unapersson · · Score: 1

      > 9. Language: Let's put it this way - You do not
      > want to venture out wearing pants a vest and
      > suspenders in the UK.

      If you do get caught out just claim you're off to a Rocky Horror Picture Show re-run.

    3. Re:Work barriers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's put it this way - You do not want to venture out wearing pants a vest and suspenders in the UK.

      WHat do you mean? That was almost the uniform in my old all boys boardings school.

    4. Re:Work barriers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10. Transport: Public transport (with the exception of night bus services) tends not to work.

      But you can't beat the smell of fried chicken and vomit on a night bus.

    5. Re:Work barriers... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Or, indeed, the Amyl Nitrate I was subjected to continuously all the way from Trafalgar Square to fucking CROYDON.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  26. You need a visa. by crovira · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You'll be dealing with the INS. As self-serving a bunch of human beings as you're likely to encounter. They make sure you wear brown lipstick because they have some things (a visa and the power to toss you onto the next plane to nowhere,) only one of which you want.

    It doesn't get worse than that unless you're black, don't dress in visibly wealthy "old money" style and just went through a stop sign...

    America is a great place as long as you have money... Its pretty damn dismal when you don't.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:You need a visa. by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      As an Irish citizen who went through the process of acquiring permanent residency in the US while living in Amsterdam, I can only commend the INS and Embassy staffers for their efficiency, politeness and friendly attitudes. My experiences in dealing with the INS has been the opposite of yours.

  27. Re:Re :Teleworking in the UK? by TallEmu · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I forgot to add... I really really miss my whiteboard. Great to grab a few of the team and a whiteboard to collaborate.

    Telephone doesn't cut it, regular meetings help, but I still miss my whiteboard. Even though the markers hardly ever worked.

  28. He can't afford the accomodation by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 4, Informative

    A tiny 2 bedroom flat in London city center can cost £200k-£500k GBP which would be $320k-$800k.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by stephenbooth · · Score: 1, Funny

      And he probably wouldn't save that much travelling time. At peak times pavements can get so jammed it often takes 30 minutes or more to walk a couple of hundred yards.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    2. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      I used to have a ONE bedroom flat in Great Titchfield St in Westminster - it took me about 15minutes to walk to work. That flat cost slightly less than my current 3 bedroom house in Amersham, though it does take me an extra 45mins to get to work...

      still, they collect the rubbish 2 or 3 times a day in Westminster...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Total rubbish. I'm renting a slightly out of city center property (2 bedroom with garden) for £675UKP/month

      2 bedroom flat around here is about £140,000 tops!

    4. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      shitty boroughs don't count - no-one wants to live in Streatham or Tooting.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    5. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      shitty boroughs don't count - no-one wants to live in Streatham or Tooting.

      No wonder, with names like that!

    6. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Battersea. Acton's not too bad, though...

    7. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by Cally · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > A tiny 2 bedroom flat in London city center can cost £200k-£500k GBP
      > which would be $320k-$800k.
      >

      So get a few friends together and rent a house. We paid £1100 pcm for a 4 bedroom place with std. mod cons, front & back garden, 7 mins walks from the tube. (Granted, this was a bit of a bargain, but they're still out there if you're prepared to look.) Get a geek house going and you might be able to club together for a leased line, too. And think of the savings in video rentals when the Matrix, LotR etc come out ;)

      And anyway, tech workers in central London still earn a fsck of a lot more than the average wage, even post-boom and with the City firing thousands. In fact this HELPS- without all those huge bonuses, the demand for very high-end gaffs has dropped off a lot, and theoretically at least that'll ripple down the accomodation food-chain. IYSWIM.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    8. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      laugh it up, you'll probably fing 25 towns in the USA that are named after them...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    9. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a schoolboy in Westminster - he should go back to school and spend the night in my old dorm room.

    10. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by Alan+Cox · · Score: 1

      Two bedroom with garden is about 50,000 here, less if you are away from the city centre. 140,000 buys you a small mansion 8)

      I never understood why people work in London 8)

    11. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must be deepest-darkest Wales then!

    12. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by edwazere · · Score: 1

      Quick honest question, in that area with house prices at those levels, can you get broadband?
      What I mean is, are we talking in the sticks, or in a reasonably populated area?

      I live in the cotswolds, about 15 minutes from Cheltenham, about 2 and a half hours from London, and houses here (in the whole area) start at about £110,000 for a mid terrace 2 bed. I still have great difficulty trying to get a place, partly because I need broadband to work, and partly 'cos houses cost so much.

      Of course moving to Wales has some big advantages, but the local support gigs I do here might not be to happy!

      P.S. I can't believe that I'm responding to a post by the Alan Cox!

      --
      -- You ain't seen me, right?
    13. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "I never understood why people work in London"

      Then you've obviously never really SEEN London :-]

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    14. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      A tiny 2 bedroom flat in London city center can cost £200k-£500k GBP which would be $320k-$800k.

      Yes - in Mayfair or Hampstead or somewhere silly like that.

      But London is fairly well set up for commuting, on some routes at least. I can get from my home in Hertfordshire (where things are green, spacious, and far, far cheaper than London) to my job in the City in 30-35 minutes. I can get a train straight to two airports, and I'm ten minutes walk from the shops. You just have to be a little smart about avoiding the obvious places to live, because they become hotspots as insane demand drives up the price. Do a little research, and you can find somewhere affordable and convenient.

    15. Re:He can't afford the accomodation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but there are no bloody jobs in Wales.

      I'd rather pocket my £27k than live somewhere where I get ignored in all the local pubs...

  29. it's nice but hard to find by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    I did that for a while and it's great (and I'd like to do it again) but it takes a place where you can work without other bits of life getting in the way. If you have kids, annoying roommates, annoying family, or whatever you may find it hard to concentrate. Also you don't get as much freedom as you might want because if you live out of state or out of the country it causes tax problems (and other kinds of redtape)for your employer (unless they are big enough to already have offices in that area).

    I liked it rather well for system admin work but found that my day to day life was to distracting to stay in the zone for programming work. If you have a way to block those things out then you should be fine. On the other hand I found that I worked almost constantly because I enjoy my work and without having to drive to and fro and work precise hours I felt less of a sepperation between work and play.

    As for advice of how to get such work.. good luck unless your current employer or someone you know is willing to hire you to telecommute. With the economy in general in a piss poor condition it's hard to be picky about what jobs you take. On the other hand that can be a good bargaining chip if you find a willing listener.. a lot of money can be saved by not needing to pay for extra office space and so on.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  30. Re:If you really want to work at / very near home. by Benm78 · · Score: 1
    Absolutely!

    Working in your own business has many more advantages, but some disadvantages as well. You should consider trading security for freedom if you choose this option.

    The good thing is, with borders becoming more open and broadband internet more common, it will probably get easier to do so. At least within the EU, which is more and more becoming one big country rather than a collection of small ones.

    Although that development itself has a myraid of disadvantages, it could improve freedom of choice regarding residence and clientele.

  31. Broadband by benjiboo · · Score: 3, Informative

    The biggest issue in the UK is the availability of broadband in rural areas. With a bit of luck, as more people want to take up teleworking, this might help smaller towns and villages reach the critical mass for telco installation of broadband to be cost effective....

    --
    Vacancy for signature. Apply within.
    1. Re:Broadband by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Good point, check out http://www.adslguide.org.uk/ for details of which exchanges have DSL enabled. Work out which exchange services your propsed living place by getting a phone number or post code for the place in question (or a local business if you can't find one)

      Sigh, only 45 registrations for my exchange, and the trigger for further action from BT is at least 300. That makes me... 1784th in line to be enabled.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    2. Re:Broadband by Smid · · Score: 1

      Can get two way satellite, www.aramiska.com and others which covers from Ireland to Czech Republic. That will solve your broadband problem if you live halfway up a hill in middle of nowhere.

      Of course the latency is bad, but nothings perfect.

  32. Set up your own company by pubjames · · Score: 2, Insightful


    It's really not difficult to set up your own company in the UK. Also, you don't have to live in the UK to be director of a company based in the UK.

    Having your own company gives you much more flexibility than just working for a single employer. It also gives you more flexibility with regards to how you pay your taxes.

    Where you live can be transparent to your clients - you can have a UK-based address with someone to answer and redirect your phone calls quite cheaply. Your clients don't necessarily need to know you're coding whilst sitting by the pool with a cool drink in the south of France or wherever. Go for it.

    1. Re:Set up your own company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There are some (not insurmountable) complications with this, as I've found out working from my home in Spain for the last 4 years. All government bodies seem to be OK with using a forwarding address (e.g. your accountant) except the VAT man. They rejected the accountant's address and apparently have a list of major mail forwarding company addresses which they'll also query. I eventually found a small outfit and succeeded in getting the address change accepted. Of course, this makes mail even slower; I had once missed a VAT return and the threatening letter took ages to arrive. I was lucky that they tend to let you off if you have a good record of getting the returns in on time. I have my bank statements sent directly to me, though I think the bank once questioned this. However, I keep quite a healthy balance, so it's in their interest to pay the extra postage.

      While coding by the pool may be a nice thought, the truth is you have to work hard at making teleworking work. If you're slacking off, being unproductive and faking hours worked, it will be noticed and that will be the end. I have a separate space where I work, a separate phone line for business calls and I pay for a higher speed ADSL line. I make myself work pretty much standard hours each day, all day ... that is, be disciplined. It does get boring, working alone all day and there are weeks that I don't leave the house: get up, daughter off to school, up to work, at end of day, downstairs for dinner, play with daughter, crash in bed ... repeat 5 times. But then I don't spend hours commuting and, the telling thing, I maintain UK pay rates while working here - which is the only reason I've put up with it for this long.

    2. Re:Set up your own company by rmonday · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It doesn't often make sense to form a standard company/corp in a country other than the one you live in full-time (or, in the US, outside the state you live in).

      This is because most countries have a "control" test - if the shareholders/directors of a company live in that country, the company can be taxed there.

      For example if you have a UK co and live full-time in France, the French authorities (as well as the UK!) can tax it. Nightmare of paperwork. Of course they have to find it but nowadays any arrangement that relies on secrecy is doomed to failure, eventually.

      But the lower tax solution: incorporate offshore and then live in a country which does not have such rules, or live in multiple countries for part of the year without being a resident in any of them (a great lifestyle which I did for years).

      Note that many clients would have problems paying some of the more "offshore" places like Nuie, Vanuatu etc. The Isle of Man is the best place to form a company for European Union people (in fact best for most).

      Rob

  33. Re:My take on it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This makes you a sucker. How does it feel, sucker?

    No, I lose the pay raise, but I gain 3 hours a day.

    I also get the same or more work done.

  34. EU by Anime_Fan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What barriers exist to working in the UK for a non-UK (e.g. US) employer.

    I don't know about being a US resident working in the US (it's outside the boundries of the European Community)...

    For the EU, there would be no problem in attaining a permit to work (it is after all the EU)... The one thing I'm unsure of is taxes (here in Sweden, you pax taxes to the municipality you live in (as opposed to the one you work in)... The employer on the other hand pays taxes based on where you work.

    I'm not really in to tax laws between countries and such... *Sigh*

  35. Another my experience by swordfishBob · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm in Australia, and I telework 4 days a week. Actually, I telework about 6 days a week and turn up in the office on the other day, but have very flexible hours. I've also done some technical writing for a usa company. (free plug: www.devx.com) Situation: I got my setup as I have to provide after-hours remote support to our manufacturing sites during the production season (cotton harvest, March-July). Also, I do both development and network admin tasks, and cannot focus on the devt with all the interruptions in the office. Still being in place once a week does help the relations with other staff - even without realising it we tend to give people more credibility in person than remotely. "The office" is only half an hour away, but that's "the next town" - ie around here it's considered a hassle driving that long to get to work. otoh, half of "the office" (including my manager) is being relocated to another town 5 hours away. I got the option to choose, and chose to stay. Most didn't get an option, they were told. I started with a modem-router, then moved to ISDN, and now ADSL, which I've ramped up to the highest speed available here. (I do at times download huge fixpacks and tools under development subscriptsions with IBM and MS). Foreign Work I was approached via email to do some tech writing, by someone who observed my activity on a relevant newsgroup. I'm paid a flat rate per article of a certain size, in $US. (The jolly exchange rate movements have wiped 20% off my current invoice - dang!) This has worked fairly well, with an added bonus that I can write while my editor is asleep, giving next-day turnaround on minor edits. I have to declare the income as "other foreign income", ie it doesn't fit in any normal categories on the tax form. Actually the tax office wouldn't even know unless they audited my bank account records. Lifestyle Working from home with flexible hours has been great, as I have two young children. It meant I could be at home with #1 while my wife was in hospital with #2. It also means my wife can do part-time work. The lifestyle thing can go either way. There's the danger that you won't self motivate. There's also the risk that you end up spending every waking moment in front of the computer, working, feeling no other sense of identity. You can start in your pyjamas and forget to get dressed. (That's if it actually matters). It works for some. It doesn't work for others. Having a dedicated "work area" is essential, especially if anyone else lives in the house. It's then easy to define "I'm at work now" by which room you're in. Finding work It's just another arena for the same question - how do you find work at all? It can depend on contacts, on reputation, on spending time hunting or you might just fluke it like I did. It depends on managers' perceptions and requirements. Good Luck. I hope it works for you, but don't forget to go meet people sometimes :-)

    --
    -- All your bass are below two Hz
    1. Re:Another my experience by swordfishBob · · Score: 1
      Humble apologies for forgetting the

      's and hitting the wrong button.

      --
      -- All your bass are below two Hz
  36. out of London by Cally · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm also in the UK, coincidentally about 90 mins from (central) London. Before I took this job I'd lived & worked in London for 8 years. I was/am amazed at the way everyone seems to accept spending hours a day sitting in car commuting. Give me trains any day - you can read, sleep, finish that last minute report... :)

    Some of my group are often on the road visiting clients (mostly doing firewall installs but also presales and other consultancy); personally I'm looking forward to the time I get myself some proper accomodation, work pay for broadband and I can do my (pentesting) work from home at least some of the time. That said, I'd go bonkers if I never came into the office at all.

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    1. Re:out of London by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "Give me trains any day - you can read, sleep, finish that last minute report"

      And what magic railway would this be? Cars win every time for me.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:out of London by mydigitalself · · Score: 1, Funny

      you must have some ninja talents to be able to sleep and finish your last minute report standing up sniffing the arm-pits of everyone around you.

    3. Re:out of London by Cally · · Score: 1

      living IN London and commuting OUT means you always get a seat - in fact you often get a carriage for yourself. In a total of 9 months commuting first to Aylesbury, then to Maidstone from central London, ISTR the train was only late a couple of times - a very pleasant surprise, given the horror stories you hear.

      That said, my journey started at Brixton - end of the Victoria (tube) line, so again I was guaranteed a seat, so I might be biased there, too.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    4. Re:out of London by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Give me trains any day - you can read, sleep, finish that last minute report...

      Now I'm a train buff, and I like trains...but...

      (Disclaimer: I don't live in the UK, only occasionally visit)
      It really depends on where you need to go on the trains. If you're going anywhere served by Connex trains it's pretty miserable for commuting. Although I like the old 4VEP EMUs that Connex run (from an enthusiast's point of view), they really suck hard when it comes to commuting. They are cramped, sweltering in the summer, have very narrow corridors so people jog your elbows as they go by. They are fairly rough-riding machines too. I could not sleep on or read or do a report on one of those things!

      It's not that bad everywhere of course - if you're on South West Trains on the Waterloo - Exeter line, they have nice low density airconditioned DMU stock with air suspension. A very civilized way to travel. Nice big windows to look out of if you just want to relax. Good ride quality, and enough space to read/use a laptop/go to sleep. Same comment goes for the HSTs out of Paddington (not to mention they do PAD - RDG in 23 minutes) or the Wessex Electrics that run down to Poole. Thames trains also got rid of the old "bog units" about 10 years ago - but the new units are high-density stock (i.e. cramped in the rush hour) and are not airconditioned (i.e. sweltering in the summer) apart from the new units they used to replace the loco hauled services they had running up to Oxford (which are low density seating and airconditioned).

  37. Re:If current trends continue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India is quite attractive. There are fewer americans :)

  38. Re:If you really want to work at / very near home. by inflex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Starting your own business is great. . . but don't expect overnight success. I've been working for the last 3 years almost 'non-stop' apart from a change of country and wedding.

    Really, it depends on your personality. Do you have sufficent self-motivation, can you whip your own butt into doing work when you'd really rather just laze in front of the TV.

    It's a choice - do you want the comfort of a consistant (??) pay cheque but without the freedom of time-choice, or vice-versa.

    I recently had the opportunity to telecommute if I was to become an employee of another company, doing almost the same thing I'm doing now - but, then it struck me - the most important thing to me is the ability to do as I please, I'm just exceedingly fortunate that I manage to still make enough sales.

    Regards.

  39. Collaborative development by benjiboo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Do you think we'll ever see virtual software houses taking off, e.g. a bunch of developers all over the world who never meet in person, developing applications *and* actually making any money??

    It would be interesting to hear if open source developers think that this might work - I imagine it's a similar style of working albeit with different motivations....

    --
    Vacancy for signature. Apply within.
    1. Re:Collaborative development by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      I believe the team that produced Gunman (a game from Valve using the Half-Life engine) didn't meet everyone in person until the release party.

  40. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For about 200 rupees a day, you should be able to answer phones for Hewlett Packard/Compaq!

  41. Conference calls?? Why not VoIP? by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    It amazes me that you first pay for adsl and cable, and then you spend extra money on a conference call. Why didn't you use VoIP?

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    1. Re:Conference calls?? Why not VoIP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because VoIP is not worth the investment across the company just yet. Perhaps in a few years, but the UK does not have great deals on it today.

  42. oh come on... by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

    I've seen the file 'The Net'

    of course its feasible other wise they would not have made such a realistic in depth computer movie about it.

    Simon

    --
    Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
  43. Telecommuting by herwin · · Score: 1

    If you can find a DSL connection and an employer who likes the idea, you should have no difficulty. On the other hand, US employers are rather leery of employing teleworkers in the UK. Two reasons--UK tax rules, and the fact that most US workers do not have a contract and most do in the UK.

  44. Re:My take on it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's so funny, an american calling the british lazy.

  45. Working from home by schouwl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please thing of that you will become lonely and strange if you do that for longer time.

    Move to the city or find a job close to home.

    I am currently living in Tokyo a city that is 3 times bigger than London so I know what I am talking about for NOT commuting.
    It is "normal" for Japanese to commute 1 1/2 hours each way after working 12 hours here.

    Regards,
    Lars

    1. Re:Working from home by schouwl · · Score: 1

      I forgot to tell that we have 12 Mbit internet connection here for less than you get a 512 kbit for in Europe.

    2. Re:Working from home by mancuskc · · Score: 1

      London - population 12 million. (Including Greater London)

      (Source (http://www.discover-london.info/london_informatio n.htm)

      Size: approx 1620 square Km

      Tokyo - population 12.3 million,

      (Source: Tokyo Metro Survey 2001 estimate for 2003)

      Size: approx 2187 square Km

      Which is interesting - I always thought Tokyo had a higher population density than London. But Tokyo isn't three times bigger - population wise it's the same (near as dammit) and by area it's less than twice the size.

      Perhaps you were talking about London GA?

      --
      When I were your age, all round here were fields...
  46. TAX / VISA / Permits by NeonSpirit · · Score: 1
    Whilst it may be technicaly possible to work from anywhere ( if the job allows ) there are numerous TAX / VISA etc reasons why an employer may not want cross border working.

    For example: you are a UK citizen working for a US company remotely, who pays you? Who do you pay income tax to? Who is responsible for paying NI? Do you need a work permit / VISA? Also with the time difference between the UK and the US the woking day overlap may be as little as a few hours, this makes scheduling a pain.

    All these issues can be resolved, but you will have to be an exceptional emloyee to make it worth the employers time and/or effort.

    Within the EU things will be easier, but maybe not easy enough, and then there is the potential language barrier :-)

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered.....my life is my own.
    1. Re:TAX / VISA / Permits by TallEmu · · Score: 1

      I think if you are a UK citizen working for a US company (remotely) then, the following would apply:

      VAT is not chargeable as it is an "export" sale.

      US company pays your company.

      As an employee of "your company" you are responsible for NI, VAT (on inputs, so mostly refunds I imagine) and PAYE. Mike

    2. Re:TAX / VISA / Permits by NeonSpirit · · Score: 1
      This implies that you set up a company, which in turn is contracted by the US company to perform a task. This company would then be liable for income tax, NI contributions etc as you say.

      However if you try do do the same as an individual IMHO it will be a lot more complicated. Like I said there are ways and means to make it work, but is it worth the trouble to eihter the party? Especialy the empolyer in the current market where there are probably sufficient local people available and looking for work.

      --
      I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered.....my life is my own.
    3. Re:TAX / VISA / Permits by TallEmu · · Score: 1

      True. If you take a decision that you want to work on a contract basis for overseas companies (or even domestic companies) then it is probably essential that you have a company.

      As you rightly point out, it could be a lot of trouble dealing with an employee relationship over international boundaries. Certainly the responsibility for simplification of the "selling" of such services falls to the vendor, and not the customer.

      Even for me doing work for companies is Austtralia, it makes sense to have a separate legal entity for all sorts of reasons, taxation - income tax in particular, not to mention potential liability and insurance issues.

      We've done some work for an Irish company, and if we had to do it on a personal basis it wouldn't fly at all. But any company can pay an invoice.. after all, they do it every day for other services or domestic contractors.

    4. Re:TAX / VISA / Permits by Malc · · Score: 1

      Talk to an accountant or solicitor first! You might find that you have no tax liability in the UK.

    5. Re:TAX / VISA / Permits by bsharma · · Score: 1

      >>Whilst it may be technicaly possible to work from anywhere ( if the job allows ) there are numerous TAX / VISA etc reasons why an employer may not want cross border working. How are you different from a "One man subsidiary" company? That said, I feel it is better if you have a "contractor" relation with your foreign "employer" for legal simplicity.

  47. I frequently work from home by HidingMyName · · Score: 1

    However, there are several times a week that I must report on site (I work for a University). Working from home means that you aren't on site for customer support duties, which can be important for small employers. From your point of view, your desire to work for international companies (e.g. U.S.) may be unrealistic. The tech sector in the U.S. is having a very tough time of it for the last 3 years, and unless you have very special skills, there is plenty of local talent that you will have to compete against. Competing on a price basis is going to be tough because much off site development is being shipped to India in the U.S. due to a talent pool (IIT grads are strong and labor costs are lower).

  48. Management is the barrier IMO by objwiz · · Score: 1

    In the US, anyways, it seems like the real problem to getting to work at home is managment. Most managers think if they can't see you (wiggling your mouse around) then they can't know if you actually working.

    Most IT management philosophies do not consider managing progress or productivity by the state of the code. They are based around managing hours a person works.

    It's interesting to note that in the US sales organizations have done extremely well implementing work at home. I attribute this success to the fact that sales organgizations manage by results (sales $$$) not hours at the office.

  49. Beware... by Duncan3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you can work from home, then you're proving to your employer that someone in Asia could work from their home for 1/5 your salary. There is a good chance you will ever find yourself unemployed as soon as it's "working really well for the company".

    The reality is your employer was simple beta testing its remote worker processes.

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  50. Nor can we by akadruid · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Whereas an identical flat within 1 1/2hrs commute costs £120-£350k.
    UK average salary: £27,000
    Minimum salary to buy the cheapest as a first time buyer: £35,000.

    Is there any link between 9% voting turnout in 20-24 yr old bracket and UK government total ignorance of issues that affect this group? Hell yeah.

    Another interesting fact: the group most likely to vote, 50-55 yr old bracket, own the high %age of property in the UK.

    Current soaring UK house prices are not an accident - they are a deliberate government policy.

    The ratio of house prices to salaries in the UK is now at it's highest since records began in 1900.

    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
    1. Re:Nor can we by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, that average salary is a pretty meaningless number. The MAJORITY of people earn significantly less.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:Nor can we by Cally · · Score: 1

      > Current soaring UK house prices are not an accident - they are a
      > deliberate government policy.
      >
      >The ratio of house prices to salaries in the UK is now at it's highest
      >since records began in 1900.

      thanks to the Daily Moron^w Mail and Express, obsessing over house prices... the Private Eye piss-takes of their obsession is hardly funny any more, one of them had a shock horror front page lead yesterday about terrorism causing a world (!) house price crash. Like that would be a bad thing.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    3. Re:Nor can we by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it would be if you'd just bought one :-(

    4. Re:Nor can we by mccalli · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The ratio of house prices to salaries in the UK is now at it's highest since records began in 1900.

      Aah, but the mortgage rates are also some of the lowest since records began. This makes mortgages more affordable than they have been for a long time.

      Don't get me wrong - I'm a UK house owner, yet would love to see a house price crash. Why? Because at the moment all the high prices mean is that various people get to swap pieces of paper about with big numbers printed on them. What does it matter if both my house and the house I'm buying went up £100k in the last two years? Actual value hasn't gone up - the relative cost is the same. However without first time buyers to drive the market, no-one can sell at the bottom level. Which means there's no-one to buy at the middle level. Which in turn means there's no-one to buy at the top level...you get the idea.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    5. Re:Nor can we by Malc · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be a problem if a price crash made your house worth less than your mortgate (negative equity)? Unless you're rich, you probably wouldn't be able to move.

    6. Re:Nor can we by Cally · · Score: 1

      nah, just skimming 'em on a newstand for my daily dose of misanthropy-induced despair, phear and loathing ;)

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    7. Re:Nor can we by mccalli · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't it be a problem if a price crash made your house worth less than your mortgate (negative equity)?

      Yes - that's the final trap of course. I'm lucky enough that it's unlikely to happen to me, but if you bought a couple of months before the crash began...

      Actually, it already is affecting my thinking. There are certain houses that I won't buy at the moment, because I believe they will soon be worth less than I paid for them.

      It's a fairly short-term view though - five years or so tops? In the long run, property in the UK always goes up and rarely comes down. The trouble is that inflation used to be higher, so your wages went up more and the real value of your mortgage decreased over time. That no longer occurs, for the moment.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    8. Re:Nor can we by Malc · · Score: 1

      Well Ian, I read an interesting article in The Economist this evening. Yeah, fun Friday night, eh!? ;) It looks like they're predicting doom and gloom about the housing market. I remember them predicting the same thing about the stock market in the late 90's... they got the year that they made the predictions *completely* wrong, but the forecast came true three years later. The US economy hasn't recovered yet. So, I would be willing to give them the time of day...

  51. A nightmare.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Having worked for a year as a Network Consultant from home, I found it to be a nightmare.

    I still needed to travel to the office at least once a week for meetings, or to trial equipment in the employers labs.

    I ended up working longer hours, and was made to feel bad if I left home after my contractual 5pm finish time. Of course, you can claim tax breaks through having a home office, but this just adds complication to your tax return...

    The biggest thing I noticed, was not feeling part of the 'team'. I could turn up to events, and no-one would know who I was....pretty bad considering I brought in a large part of their profits!!

    I wish anyone else trying tele-working out the best of luck!

  52. catbert awaits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you are thinking about working for a US employer, you will either want to find someone who is already in the UK, or work by contract. to pay you as an employee, they have to pay taxes, and there's no way that someone is going to want to take that on just for you.

    there are tons of great people on the street right now. you will need to use your network. there's no way that an unusual working condition is going to get past hr, no matter what the benefits for the company might be.

  53. How About Paneris? by Sonicated · · Score: 1

    Have you taken a look at paneris.org? From their website " PanEris is home to a collective of web developers working together as a virtual corporation. We partner with organisations who wish to outsource the development of their Internet sites, and the information systems behind them.".

    They are very opensource freindly, the only downside is that most of their work is in Java!

    1. Re:How About Paneris? by daSilva · · Score: 1

      Hi, has anyone here actually worked in a Paneris project and could share his/hers experience?
      I am thinking of doing something similar in Brazil and would like to see what people tought.
      tks

    2. Re:How About Paneris? by timp23 · · Score: 1

      Hi, I have only worked at PanEris since founding it in 1994. Brief History The real breakthough came in 1997 when I was joined by two other programmers full time and we struck up an informal relationship with an ISP to do all their web programming. We surfed the boom pretty well, though made little money. We developed some tools and ways of working which make sense. (See http://melati.org/ as well as http://paneris.org/). Currently pretty slow due to most people (3 out of 5 core members) getting real jobs and the remaining two becoming fathers. However we are still afloat, still supporting our existing customers, still recruiting, waiting for the next interesting project. The difficulty is and would still be getting customers who are prepared to work in a web-only fashion, just getting people to consistently use a mailing list and to reply to emails in a timely and coherent fashion is more of a learing curve than I would ever have believed. The reasons why PanEris is appealing are still true, the flexibility to work where and more importantly when you like is great, particularly if you have children. Quite a few of the PanEris projects are 'open' ie you can read every single piece of correspondence on the project. yours Tim Pizey

  54. I don't know about you... by the_olo · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... but I receive daily literally tons of e-mail offers about working at home, and for Real Money, That Really Works, you know?

  55. Middle Management - the real probleg by orangeguru · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Germany / Munich here (although I have worked in the UK and US as well)

    Technology and organisation are not the real problem - it's usually middle management and their fear of lossing control.

    I have been freelancing for many companies, who were all "capable" of supporting teleworking. But the decision was mostly based on how paranoid the middle management guys were. And if they felt "secure" and "empowered" to let go of their cubicle slaves.

  56. I'm Doing This by esme · · Score: 5, Informative
    I live in Brighton (well, Hove, actually) and telework as a programmer for a university in San Diego. My wife and I used to be there physically (she as a grad student, me as a regular employee). When she got a position at the U. of Sussex, we came and I kept my job.

    The benefits you mention really are great. Especially if you're used to being salaried and managing your own time and working without much guidance. It's very easy to get distracted by housework, spending time with the kids, surfing the net, etc.

    The only complaints I have are ones that other people have brought up: not being there physically has side effects. Other than email, the only contact I have with the office is a weekly 1-hour phone call, and a two or three day visit every six months or so. So I'm totally out of the office politics. My department used to be software-only, and recently got merged with the main IT department, so this can cause some stress. You can go in physically more often, so I'd suggest going in at least once every week or two to prevent this.

    The other side of not being there is the reduced personal interaction. I'm a total introvert, so I didn't think it would be an issue, but it still is. You need to make sure you get human contact and don't just withdraw into your cocoon.

    And one more thing -- expect the taxes to be really complicated if you work for a company in a different country. And expect both countries to be completely unhelpful when you're trying to figure anything out -- at least that's my experience. Just yesterday I had someone from the Centre for Non-Residents (e.g., UK expats) tell me they probably knew the answers to my questions, but wouldn't talk to me b/c I'm resident in the UK.

    -Esme

    1. Re:I'm Doing This by brunns · · Score: 1

      Funny - I've never heard of anyone living in Hove. It's always "Brighton (Hove, actually)".

      --

      If you moderate me down I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    2. Re:I'm Doing This by peterpi · · Score: 1
      Ah, Hove actually, that lovely town right next to Brighton on the South Coast of England.

      I also work in Hove actually, but I work in Brighton.

      Isn't it a nice day in Hove actually today? I'm going to the beach after work (near the Meeting Place cafe).

    3. Re:I'm Doing This by peterpi · · Score: 1

      I also went to Sussex University (COGS 98-01, CompSci). I might know you, but then again I probably don't.

    4. Re:I'm Doing This by esme · · Score: 1

      Speaking of the advantages of teleworking, I spent a fair bit of the afternoon in the back garden with my daughter in a paddling pool.

      Probably not a selling point for the boss, but it keeps me happy.

      -Esme

    5. Re:I'm Doing This by esme · · Score: 1

      Even better, in the US, I lived in La Jolla, which has exactly the same relationship to San Diego as Hove has with Brighton -- quieter coastal suburb. So I moved from San Diego (La Jolla, actually) to Brighton (Hove, actually).

      -Esme

  57. takes a written plan to beat procrastination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have trouble with the motivation thing too. The only way I could get round it was to write plans, lots of plans. I'd list all the things I needed to do to get things done, and if any of them looked too big, I'd try to break them up like solving a maths problem - tackle what looks easy until it falls apart.

    And then I'd try to prioritise these things and work them into a schedule. When I started, I had an overview, but I only scheduled one day at a time. I'd schedule lunch as well. And I'd try to make each day's thing look easy. And then I'd email the schedule to someone. It's good if you can trust your boss with this. But you need to get your boss to understand that the schedule is for me not you. They like their schedules to show bigger pictures and sometimes you can't do that or you get overwhelmed. If you can't trust a boss, try a friend who is not a co-worker. Emailing the thing off somewhere increases your committment to actually doing some of the things on the schedule.

    When I'm really good I'd write tomorrow's schedule at the end of each day (schedule plan time). This would be really handy the next morning when I couldn't always remember where I was at, the schedule would actually set me back into my train of thought. There should be at least two or three different things on the schedule each day. If the schedule says the same thing each day eg "code sales app" for days on end then you haven't broken it down enough.

    If I wrote a plan, I had a fair chance of keeping the daytime tv at bay, if I didn't then the tv won. I've been thinking about selling my tv.

    There's a bit of help on the web, key in "procrastination" and "overcome" etc

    Overcoming Procrastination
    Dealing with Procrastination
    And I read most of the sample chapters I could find at Amazon, but the uni stuff to help students helped me.

    Of course when your dot-com company runs out of money and makes you redundant, it is really really hard to overcome that kind of disappointment. However, I must, because I still have a system to finish before I have something coherent or useful to add to my resume.

    And I know I like coding - because I happily slapped together something to help out my local club keep score when they hosted a championship recently. There is something else going on in my head that makes me put off doing things I enjoy.

    1. Re:takes a written plan to beat procrastination by inflex · · Score: 1

      Yes, resolving your project/day into easially approached quanta is a big key to unlocking your productivity. Now I just have to get around to that stage.

      Personally I work for myself, I am my own company. Currently I already sell quite a few licences of my application - but there's a lot more waiting out there for me if I can get my rear into Gear.

      Thanks for the URLs.

    2. Re:takes a written plan to beat procrastination by mark2003 · · Score: 0, Funny

      I sure the URLs will be really useful - I'll look at them later once Neighbours has finished...

  58. EU teleworking agreement by Bazzargh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You might want to look into the 2002 EU teleworking agreement.
    This page has a reasonable description (skip down to the bit about the main points) although some of the links seem to be broken.

    The agreement is voluntary but lots of large companies do follow this. My own experience was that companies often prefer to have you work *part time* in the office rather than full time at home, to avoid the onus of a health and safety inspection of your house (I can't remember if this one is required under UK law, we have some regs which differ from the EU agreement). There are definite tax implications in the UK when you work from home, and you should allocate a room or an area in your house as your 'home office'. (the issue was, IIRC, that if the company provide you with furniture and/or equipment - as is often the case because of their health and safety duty of care - then this can be taxed as an additional benifit, unless you use it *exclusively* for work)

    If you belong to a professional organization or union they will almost certainly be able to provide you with better advice than anyone /. . If you are self-assessed for tax you definitely want to contact the DTI/Revenue or your accountant to make sure you're not going to get screwed for extra tax.

    You should also read this note on working outside of the UK.

    Disclaimer: IANAL, but I did serve as a union official 3 years or so ago, and dealt with a couple of teleworking cases.

    -Baz

  59. Re:Re :Teleworking in the UK? by AlecC · · Score: 1

    Technology can solve that. Agfes ago I saw an ad for an APP which did a shared whiteboard on a PC - displayed on several PCs, anybody can write on it. Needs a sound channel as well.

    One of my ideas for "when I get round to it" is a pair-progrsamming IDE. Two users with same display on screen, VoIP chat, multiple windows, two pointers for pointing things out. "Programmer in charge" can edit in his window(s), "Second Programmer" can browse code in his window to point things out but not edit. Roles change with a single click. Kibitzers can watch - visibly (e.g. management can "look over shoulder", but not spy) and drop in suggestions via an IRC-type window.

    If one programmer could drop out and be replaced, you could get true rolling software development, with people dropping in and out as time is available. Egoless programming, many eyes on the same code. What could you do in a 60-hour round-the-world development session over one weekend?

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  60. Re:Fact by s-meister · · Score: 1

    If this were true we'd have died out centuries ago...

  61. From an Employer's Perspective by NibbleAbit · · Score: 3, Interesting
    For 15 years now, I have hired nothing but 'work at home' programmers, both locally (in Canada) and abroad. Locally is definately easier. I spend 5 to 15 hours per week on the phone with programmers, all of them long distance, but at least in the same country. When I hired abroad, I found I was much more concious of phone costs, and conversations were much briefer. There is also the curency issue. We get paid in our local currency, and I don't like taking the exchange risk. It can quickly take a marginal profit (a project gone bad) to a loss.

    I have no problem trying overseas programmers again, but only for very well defined projects, and not where the client requirements are in the slightest bit fluid.

  62. Re:My take on it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds about right.

    We don't produce any more. We have no outputs.

    It doesn't matter if we work hard or do nothing, then end result is the same.

  63. Re:Re :Teleworking in the UK? by TallEmu · · Score: 1

    you had me 'till "egoless programming" ;)

    Anything to enable interaction and collaboration is a fantastic idea, but sometimes you need that personal touch. Roll on the VR version of your concept. I'm sitting in Sydney in my comfy slippers, virtually working in a 3d simulated environment in San-Francisco with programmers from all over the world.

    And you never need to iron your suit.

  64. The Slow Approach by md81544 · · Score: 1
    I'm taking the slow approach with my current employers... when the opportunity arises, I tell them it would be more efficient to work from home. We agree deliverables and then in (maybe) three or four days I come back with the completed code. Doesn't matter whether I worked like a demon for one day and took three days off, or kept regular hours. As long as I deliver, they are happy.

    If we all try to push for these small steps where we can, then hopefully general perception of telecommuting will change. I'd love to be able to work from home every day.

  65. Visibility by Builder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are a couple of downsides. If you're not visible, in the office and working, when the next round of redundancies roll around, your name will be high on the list

    Secondly, finding a company to let you do this is nearly impossible. I currently work from home about 1/3 of the time. I'm in the office 8 hours a day and then work from home 2 - 4 hours a day. The work I do at home is of the same quality that I perform in the office, but generally the same chunk of work takes less time at home due to fewer interruptions. Despite this, we are not allowed to work from home. Management will not allow it, despite having presented a fairly good business case.

  66. coupla comments... by stridebird · · Score: 1
    * Ready access to my (large) technical library

    I can really relate to that. It's the achilles heel in on-the-road code plans, unfortunately, but that's not quite your problem. I for one still can't quite go totally digital for information look-up needs, although increasingly i do use web resources. No matter, it's not desirable to work without decent paper manuals, you just can't beat their random-access times and scannability.

    That said, my home office library, currently used only for the odd evening session, is WAY WAY better then the junk on the shelves here in the office. I often yearn for it mid-way through a toughie, frustratingly picturing the page on the manual i need but no way to connect to the info therein.

    Advantages for my employer:
    * Cost savings
    * Office space savings

    Yeah OK sounds good to the ployer but don't do yourself out here. If you start to work full time from home then you have to acknowledge the costs that you will incur. Your employer should recognise the cost benefit to them and transfer some to you to cover your overheads. And you should book your costs accordingly for tax purposes - heating, rent, equipment, coffee, consult your local tax inspector...

    /bin/bird/

  67. What about US to UK? by stubblehead · · Score: 1

    Since the exact countries I'm interested in are being posted, does anyone have any advice for someone in the US looking to work in London (or anywhere in the UK)? Personal classified reads: Currently a web developer, Masters degree in 2 years, willing to settle.

    I'd need something beforehand to get a Visa to work there and I'm only looking to go for 1-2 years (I have no attachments whatsoever). Any advice from experience or observation would be much appreciated.

    --

    Rock!
    1. Re:What about US to UK? by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      Some advise. Don't. I am an australian living in london. I have been here for a year. IT sucks. IT so expensive. So crowded. So disorganised. So dirty. ITs terrible. Its not like New York or something where you can get out into the country. THer eis no country here. Just wait till you catch the tube during rush hour. THe weather is crap and the beer sucks.

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    2. Re:What about US to UK? by Fishd · · Score: 1

      I find London pretty horrible too... I go there as little as possible. The unfortunate thing is the IT market is so flat right now in the UK(*) that's it's pretty much the main source of work.

      As for the "there is no countryside" comment, I couldn't disagree more. Once you've escaped Londons gravitational forcefield (i.e. the M25, Englands largest carpark) the surrounding area features some really pleasant greenery. The further north you go the better it gets, the Peak District and the Lakes are really tranquil!

      *If anyone can prove me wrong on the job front I'm desperate to get out of the hell hole that is IBM!!!

    3. Re:What about US to UK? by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      true but its not like australia or the us where we have national parks the size of small european countries. the lakes district is really small. i went there and was quite surprised how small it was.

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  68. Employer trust by Malc · · Score: 1

    From what I've read, mostly on the BBC's web site and in The Economist, the biggest thing holding back teleworking in the UK is trust (sorry, I have no links.) I've been paying particular attention to these stories as I've been working from home for a few years and we've been considering moving back to the UK for a while. It sounds like management types don't trust their employees and so won't let them do it. What a great working environment, eh? And so much the employees being professionals.

  69. Advantages.-Virtual Corp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "An interesting example is MySQL AB, the company behind the excellent MySQL. They are a true virtual company: their employees are scattered all over Europe (plus some in the US), and rarely meet. Obviously, as a pure virtual company, they have had to conquer the problems from day one. But also, they have found a way of teaming a larger number of skilled indivduals in a narrow technical field than you would expect to be able to gather in any single commuting area. If the world is your fishpons, any single city looks small."

    And hence the solution to the tech slump. The jobs are in one place. The technical resources in another. Why do the people shuffle, when technology reduces, or eliminates the need? Everyone's too busy thinking inside the box.

  70. Reminds me of Dilbert by wagemonkey · · Score: 1
    There was a period when Dilbert was teleworking/telecommuting. He was standing in his dressing gown (u.s.=robe?) talking to Dogbert at 9:30 and saying "Now I'm working from home do I owe the company the 7 hours I spent at the office or the 2 hours I worked when I was there?"

    I've done it, because of a relocate I went from 5 days in the office to 1-3 days at home and 3-1 days in the office - yep I went to a 4 day week too, which was fine with me. I worked my 8 hours (got the work done), but often that was 4 hours in the morning and 4 hours in the evening with the afternoon spent shopping (better midweek than weekend), seeing films, spending time with wife and friends. If the commute hadn't been so grim it would have been great, but I was commuting from one end of the Central line to nearly the other end of the District line. I got a lot of reading done but there was plenty of stress on my bladder during a 1.5 - 2 hour jouney with no facilities. And that was a good day ;-(

    1. Re:Reminds me of Dilbert by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      man that sucks. the 2 worst lines london. the district line is painful. especially in summer.

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    2. Re:Reminds me of Dilbert by Fishd · · Score: 1

      The Dilbert that it reminds me of is the one where Diblert asks the Pointy-hair Boss if he can work from home, the Pointy-haired Boss replies "But if you're not here, how can I manage you?" and Dilbert comes back with the corker "You're managing me right now and all you're doing is stopping me from working" ...

      There is so much truth in every Dilbert strip it's frightening! A cow-orker of mine once started carrying a copy of the Dilbert Principle around at work, it featured a table listing the 10 most stupid things managers do, he checked 8 off the list before handing in his resignation!

  71. Re:My take on it... by Cally · · Score: 1

    Sure, it's called a quid pro quo. I'll turn up late, spend a few hours on Slashdot & keeping up with list traffic (luckily, my employer recognises that reading Bugtraq, incidents et al is an essential part of work...) - OTOH I'll pull 80 hour, 6 or 7 day weeks now and again without grumbling. Seems to work out OK - the work gets done, on deadline.

    Anyway, the lad types who talk about football & sex all the time are rarely very good company anyway.

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  72. Out of London -- into Telford by stevebrowne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As someone else has said, the best way is to start your own company and find your own clients. I know that can't be done in some cases, but if it's an option, then it should be taken with both hands.

    I've worked from home for the last 3 years or so, initially in London (New Malden) and now in Telford. It seemed mad to be living in an expensive London suburb when I didn't need to commute at all. And now we are out of the cramped London conditions, next to the countryside, with NO TRAFFIC JAMS!!!

    Again, being in IT, it's fairly easy to get everything you need installed at home. A clutch of PCs and servers, software, some kind of Internet connectivity, and a telephone.

    With a permanent Internet connection, IM helps you stay in touch, and to be honest I probably make more of an effort to chat when i see friends & family all over the world appear on my IM list. It'll be better if ADSL is actually going to make it to my local exchange...

    Telford is about 2.5 - 3 hrs from London, so not exactly a huge distance away, and my trips there (and to Reading) can take place up to 3 times a week without any problems - any more than that and it would be a bit tiring...

    But as someone else has said - if you have kids, it's great. My first child I was working a 1-1.5hr drive away. She was just getting up when I left, and just going to bed when I got back. She seemed to grow up really quickly. My second child, I was working only a 15 minute scooter ride away; I saw much more of her and could take part in more of the school related things. With child number 3, he has just hit 2 years old, and he has a strop when I have to go out for the day! He is so used to me being there, that when I'm not, his whole world gets shattered.

    The ability to pop out if needed, take a day off at short notice, and basically decide your own game plan is fantastic.

    And long may it continue, I hope...

    --
    stuff goes here
  73. An experience of this: by evrybodygonsurfin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work for a small software/web company located about half an hour outside of London

    About six months ago, it was decided that all technical members of staff would be allowed to work from home whenever they wanted as long as they weren't supposed to be in a meeting or something.

    About half of the staff here have never bothered doing this; I have tried it a few times but usually come in. Why?

    • While it might sound great, it is actually pretty depressing seeing what goes on in your street during the day.
    • You just get a call on your cellphone every five minutes about some trivial query that would usually be shouted across the office.
    • You inevitably need some essential item that you have left on your desk.
    • If I, personally, work from home my wife expects me to have fully cleaned the house and prepared dinner when she gets back.
    • In short, you can keep it. I'm friends with the guys I work with and I like taking my lunch at a pub on the side of the Thames...

    1. Re:An experience of this: by malfunct · · Score: 1
      I agree with your points, especially the bit about your wife. I sit on the computer at night to get some small task done that I don't want to make time for at work during my work day and my wife calls me ever 5 minutes for something. I know darn good and well if I was home all day that I would still get called every 5 minutes for something.

      I am for allowing people to work from home, but at the same time people should be judged soley on the amount of output they generate and not by the number of hours they claim to put in. I'd have to work twice as long to get the same amount of work done at home.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

  74. Teleworking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I support ADSL teleworkers for my company and I must it seems to work well for a lot of people.

    However, a lot of corporate laptop builds and models don't seem to cope to well and some users find it a complete nightmare and waste of time.

    This mainly tends to be where their laptop can't handle the load of the secure VPN client and extra data being hoofed in.

    Personally I'd be glad to work from home, even though I don't live far from my work place.

  75. But if you telecommute by dynayellow · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then you won't have to take the train into London, which means that there will be no opportunities for someone to be murdered under baffling circumstances, only to be revealed that the secret Davis-Harkinson plans are somehow involved, leading to a deadly knife-fight on the roof of the club car in the dead of night.

    Is THAT what you want?

  76. Teleworking by noidd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interesting thread.

    I wanted to work from home, none of my previous customers were happy with me doing it since they paid me per hour. Paying people per hour gave them this strange compulsion to actually have me on site so that I could see that I was actually working.

    I changed my relationships with my customers such that I now quote for "lumps of work" or "deliverables". They say "We want XYZ", I say "Thats £2.50". How I do it is none of their concern - how long it takes me, what I do in the intervening time is my business - not theirs.

    How do you sell that view?

    Advantages to Customer:
    1) Liability. When things go wrong, if the consultant is on a time-based contract then the bill to the customer is as long as it takes to fix the problem. Ie, open-ended liability. If things go wrong YOU get the bill. Goodbye IR35.
    2) Accountability. Once you have given the customer the comfort level they need that you can provide the services to them competantly, they are more than happy to outsource their non-core business functions out.
    3) Cost. If the customer insists on working you on T+M, provide an incentive. I have two rates, Rate A is for formal training and knowledge transfer or anything which is ON-SITE. Rate B is for anything else which is OFF-SITE.

    I'm not going to publish my rates here, but to give you an idea - my discounted rate (offsite) is 40% of my normal rate (on-site).

    This means that the customer saves 40% on his costs if he doesn't mandate my consultants being on-site.

    What does this mean for me now?

    Well, I've been working mainly from the home office for the best part of two years, my customer visits are on average two or three times a month.

    I have my green-card, I'm emigrating to the US on July 1st. What difference does this make to my customer? None at all. Does my customer mind? Not in the slightest. If they need me on site a few days consultancy easily covers travel expenses.

    My customer continues paying my UK company. My company continues paying UK taxes. I continue paying (some) UK taxes, and according to two Tax Attournies in the US I am exempt from US taxes.

    I don't believe them.

    Hope that gives you some ideas and food for thought.

  77. remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ive been working remote for roughly eight months now. it helps if you have a good case to make with your employer. in my case, i am self motivated and have a good skill set so my employer decided it was better to give me the opportunity to work remote than lose me to another company. i for my part have been determined to work hard such that there is no question as to whether im working or not. if anyone that matters, like your manager, has to wonder if you're working you're probably not..... also i've made extensive use of AIM/MSN/IRC, e-mail & telephone so my co-workers can contact me instantly almost any time of the day which has helped tremendously.

  78. Be careful for what you wish for.... by Carbon+Unit+549 · · Score: 1

    ...you just might get it. As an aerospace engineer who spends all of his time programming, I used to think how wonderful it would be when aerospace companies would allow telecommuting. However, now we are faced with competing with workers from countries with much lower costs of living than the USA, like Russia, Poland, Ireland, and India. So I may ultimately have wished myself right out of a job.

    --

    nohup rm -rf ~/. >& zen &

    1. Re:Be careful for what you wish for.... by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Worker costs in Ireland are not much lower than the US -- the main advantage for US employers in hiring Irish companies are a business environment much like that in the US (e.g., strong commercial laws, low corporate taxes), native English speakers and an available pool of highly qualified workers. Factor in the higher "hidden" social costs (employer social security contributions, etc.) and I think you will find that the differences are negligable.

  79. local coffeehouse by lpret · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I used to work at Starbucks, and a customer would come in at about 10-11 in the morning and stay until about 5-6 with his laptop and work. We got to talking, and he was a developer for a software company in Seattle (this is in Dallas). He said he tried working at home, but he needed to get out of the house and go somewhere to see other people and interact.

    So perhaps working out of home isn't the best idea, but perhaps your local coffeehouse might allow that simple social interaction that would help.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:local coffeehouse by jkarlin · · Score: 1
      Totally off-topic, but I just had to comment on your sig. I get so sick of people misquoting this line. You're missing the most important word in the damn thing and it's left out just to make it a blanket statment instead of a point of discussion. Know what it is yet? Here's the actual quote.
      "People who are willing to give up essential freedoms for the sake of short term security, deserve neither freedom nor security."
      <get on high horse>

      Did you catch it? Essential Freedoms. So know, instead of a scary statment about the dangers of an oppressive regime, it becomes a question of what is an essential freedom, a balancing act between the two. We give up the freedom to kill and steal when we enter a society don't we? But how much freedom are we willing to concede? Not an easy question is it? But I think the question is worth asking instead of covering it up for a cheap shot.
      </get on high horse>
      --
      Things fall down...People look up... And when it rains, it pours.
  80. Doesn't work by andy1307 · · Score: 1
    Advantages for my employer:
    Improved productivity

    According to scientific studies, telecommuting actually lowers productivity. My companies allows telecommuting infrequently(depends on the manager). Telecommuting is an advantage when you are working long hours. Work in the office for 10 hrs, come home, go to the gym, work for a couple of hours more.

    1. Re:Doesn't work by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Actually no. What the studies found was that during the inital periods a good home bound developer will produce easily 20% more work per week than he was doing at the office. Part of this is to 'prove' that telecommuting works, part was the lack of interruptions, and the serene workspace, and time spent working instead of commuting.

      After 3-6 months he starts to adapt to the new surroundings, reclaims the two hours per day that he used to spend commuting (generally uses them for additional sleep) and his output gains taper off, levelling off at around a net 10% gain over what was possible from the office.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  81. Re:My take on it... by Alioth · · Score: 1

    Same things go for everywhere. I spent 7 years working in the USA. Same thing went on there, too. Except they talked about American football, or pick up trucks, or conservative politics.

    Personally, I found my most productive hours was if I came in very early (5:30 am). I could get more work done between 5:30am and 9am than I could usually get done between 9am and 6pm due to lack of pointless meetings and lack of interruptions.

  82. How to deal with bureaucrats by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    And one more thing -- expect the taxes to be really complicated if you work for a company in a different country. And expect both countries to be completely unhelpful when you're trying to figure anything out -- at least that's my experience. Just yesterday I had someone from the Centre for Non-Residents (e.g., UK expats) tell me they probably knew the answers to my questions, but wouldn't talk to me b/c I'm resident in the UK.

    Bureaucrats have a stupidity level above and beyond everyone else's - it's either a job requirement or a badge of honour. (I swear, if they were an AD&D character class, Intelligence and Wisdom scores under 6 would be prime requisites, and being a pain in the ass would get them a 10 percent experience bonus.)

    Next time you have to deal with that department, withhold your number when you call (dial 141 then the number as you normally would, if I remember correctly) and just pretend that you're calling from abroad. If anyone questions why you're phone conversation has no time delay on it, tell them you're calling from your holiday home in Ireland or France. And if being in another EU country doesn't count, then tell them that you're calling from Norway. (If they ask you for a contact telephone number, just give your mobile - with international roaming a standard option on all UK mobiles, they won't be able to refute your "overseas" location.)

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:How to deal with bureaucrats by kinnell · · Score: 1
      If anyone questions why you're phone conversation has no time delay on it, tell them you're calling from your holiday home in Ireland or France

      Even better, wait a couple of seconds before replying to anything they say, play a video of a foreign soap opera in the background, and hold a large saucepan in front of the phone to get a tinny echo.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  83. Re:My take on it... by erinacht · · Score: 1

    THEY DON'T DO A? SHIT DURING THEIR ENTIRE WORK DAY

    Perhaps their toilet facilities are better at home so they prefer to wait until then...

    I personally love spending part of my working day laying meters of brown cable and getting paid my normal hourly rate.

    Contractors - SHIT at work, make your brown-time their down-time.

    :-)

  84. You missed some downsides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I work from home. Overall, its pretty good, though i find myself missing the office. I am a "loner" by nature, and keep myself to myself. however, i find i really miss the social interaction of an office. Its just little things like saying 'morning!' to that guy at the desk you walk past every morning, it really keeps you human. I find myself becoming very introverted and detached (to the point where i feel it to be unhealthy) unless i make a serious effort to get out and see friends. Another thing is its very hard to stay motivated. I really enjoy the work i do, but day after day, waking up at the office, spending 9 hours working by yourself not saying a word to anyone (or even rolling your eyes with someone at some stupid comment made by a coworker) it gets very hard. It's strange the effect it has long term. Theres definately a difference between corresponding via email or over the phone to actually being physically present with someone, seeing the reactions they make to what you say and so on.

    it depends on your situation really. maybe you have a partner you live with, or kids you want to be able to pick up from school, that would be different. but i live by myself and more or less spend monday to thursday in complete isolation (friday nights i go out). That may sound nice, especially if you have coworkers you dislike, but after a while, lame as it sounds, you start to miss it, becauuse (at least for me) there's coworkers you like as well.

    these are quite important things i feel. there are some serious pluses to working from home, but everything comes with a price. try work it so you go into the office one or two days a week. If they know you're going to be in on certain days, generally they'll schedule meetings requiring you and other stuff on those days youll be in.

  85. Teleworking is heroin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing to be warned about, teleworking is heroin. The more you do, the more you'll resent coming into work and the more the cubical will be unbearable. Since you go into the office less, when you are in there you spend all your time socializing with your co-workers.
    Teleworking has gotten so addictive to me that I've passed on jobs that offered a 50% raise but no telelworking. So, teleworking is great, but just be warned.

  86. Teleworking in Scotland by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

    I live in Edinburgh, and work at the other side of the country. I only get to work from homw two days a week, but it makes a huge difference to the amount of spare time I've got, and the amount of time i spend in the car. SSH is the best thing since sliced bread! I use it ever day to connect to computers in the office, run X applications remotely, check code into CVS, and surf the company Intranet.

  87. Re:Re :Teleworking in the UK? by AlecC · · Score: 1

    The tem "Egoless programmin" is a little misunderstood, but I don't know a better one for it. It does not imply lack of pride in what you do, it implies tha twhat you are working on is a contribution to a shared project. Which means not being paranout about "my" code. Conventions and comments should always be so that another person could pick up from you at any time. CVS or such should be used so that if anybody spots a stupid mistake in your code, they can easily fix it, and your reaction is "thanks for improbing my product" not "get your filthy hands off my code".

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  88. It's all about the discipline by zacharay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm a US citizen currently living in the UK (also about 90 min from London) and have worked from home for nearly 3 years. The first time was as out of necessity to help take care of our 3-year old when my wife was ordered on bed-rest whilst pregnant with twins. I arranged to write code for my employer from home and go to the office when we had other help around. At the time I only lived about 10 min from the office so going in on occasion or even on short-notice wasn't an issue.

    The next time was after relocating to Germany to work for the European office of a US internet consultancy. The company went under when the dot-com bubble burst and I took a job with a US software company which was expanding into Europe. I was living in the north of Germany and this company's German office was in the south of the country (about a 7-hour drive). I worked remotely and travelled to customer sites for several months and then relocated to the UK but continued to work from home full-time.

    Since then, I've changed employers again but was able to negotiate working from home 3-4 days a week.

    My experience:

    -I agree that you need your own space in the house. When daddy's in his office the kids need to understand that they can't be screaming outside his door or barging in whenever they want.

    -If you've got a dedicated connection, being on IM or at least being able to quickly reply to email is an invaluable way of keeping in touch with colleagues and even partners or customers.

    -Being remote doesn't have to hamper career progression or management opportunities. If you're working for a multi-national company and most of the folks who report to you (and the folks to whom you report) are in another country it doesn't really matter if you're talking to them from home or the office.

    -My current client is in Milan but my deliverables don't require me to be on-site so, again, it doesn't matter if I'm working on my tasks from home or the office.

    -I've been on conference calls with executives from customer or partner companies across Europe and discovered that more than one of us are calling in from home (I've even heard they're kids in the background).

    -Regular communication (phone, email, IM) during the day with fellow workers can help address loneliness and isolation.

    -Keep consistent hours. Start and finish work at the same time and for Pete's sake, change out of your pyjamas before you clock in.

    I'll admit it takes discipline but getting those extra 4-5 hours a day to spend with the family is all the motivation I need.

  89. I didn't really like working from home by semanticgap · · Score: 1

    I've done a lot of work from home over the past two years, and it was a miserable experience.

    I have two kids age 2 and 6 - so about the only time I could get any work done was at night, and after a while this nocturnal lifestyle got really annoying (I'd go to sleep at 5am only to be awakened by kids at 7am)

    The bottom line is that it was really difficult for me while my employer was saving money, time and trouble. I bought into this thing initially because it seemed cool - but two months later I essentially had to quit this job.

    I think the ideal scenario is when the employer provides you a good place to work (preferably a quiet office with a window), yet does not insist that you are there 9 to 5 every day.

    I also found that the act of "going to work" puts my brain in "work mode", but it is much more difficult to get into that mode when you're sitting only a few steps away from TV, kitchen, shower. I found my train of though constantly getting interrupted with chores I had to do around the house - "do I finish this code now, or do I go fix that curtain". I know many accountants, lawyers, etc work out of their houses - I don't know how they do it. I found that I just don't have that level of discipline (and not really interested in developing it either).

  90. Don't promote that by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    As we have learned here in the US... When your job can be done remotely, it can be done anywhere. You can try to apply this to any function where the output is data files (Software development, Circuit design, most things engineering). Once it becomes OK to have someone work remotely, you'll have to compete with the rest of the world. People in China, India, Eastern Europe, Taiwan, Korea, etc... they are all cheaper than YOU. There are short and long term problems with this, as well as potential real benefits in the very long term.

  91. Making the move by VerseGuru · · Score: 1

    Having been working for the same company for the past six years in London, last month I actually took the step of moving abroad (to Cannes, France...); for reasons split between reducing living costs and wanting a change in lifestyle.

    Being responsible for a company network and also doing production (websites, graphic work) this isn't too much of a problem to carry out remotely and was easily arranged due to a reduction in the size of the company - in fact we're giving up the office altogether, resulting in everyone starting to work as a remote team, although due to our fairly specific roles communication follows fairly direct routes between each other.

    For the past month I have even managed to work over a dialup connection (no, not ideal but it takes time to get ADSL installed when France Telecom engineers go on strike) much to my suprise finding that it is actually quite easy to cut back on badwidth usage (latency is my only problem...) this would have been hard had the company been larger and if I were supporting more users though!

    This kind of situation is easy enough to support using IM, screen sharing and project management tools, I also have a UK number which makes it look to clients like I'm still in the country! But one has to be careful to choose the most appropriate method of comms, for example it can be hard to explain a concept by IM when it's not clear what both parties are talking about and easy to waste hours when a telephone call could have bee a lot easier, but it doesn't have to be more expensive - if one uses a SIP/VOIP system for example (although dedicated handsets are really required). And the PM system is important - the employer or project manager needs to know they can easily keep track of what remote workers are doing and where there are with a project. Personally I use a to-do list with a sharing capacity, but I found nobody ever looked at it and always wanted to ask me directly, this is only slightly less true with the PMS and one can find that you spend far more time explaining what you are doing when working remotely, reassuring the employer that you arn't lazing around on the beach with a beer (but then if there was Wi-Fi on the beach...).

    Previously I lived about a 15 minute scooter ride away from the office so travel was not an issue, although at previous times I used to be up to an hour away, now I'm a mere 10 second stumble from my bed - but as a result I do miss observing and interacting with the world every day, working from home could lead to becoming somewhat divorced form the real world. Working in the same physical location as colleagues does also install a little more necessity into ones work ethic, wheras in ones own home you must have a very strong will not to become distracted, developping a schedule to which you can stick to, although this is less true of a support-role where working from home is actually ideal - you can distract yourself easily but still be ready to respond - without being bored! "Helpdesk, Hello? Yes It'd be my absolute pleasure to help you with that horizontal rule you're having trouble deleting in Word, anything to distract me from the blue skies and cold beer whilst you're stuck in your miserable little cubicle". Think of the karma that could be generated by shipping entire support teams to a remote island somewhere with gigabit dark fibre back to the realworld. Actually this why they get outsourced to India, no that's the cost, the sunny disposition is third after being slightly harder to understand...

    I think remote working has many benefits for certain professions (paticularily ICT service industries, key knowledge-holders and anyone just manipulating data), but will never be practical for most others.

    Cost wise it is obviously cheaper not to travel, and you can choose to live somewhere cheaper, but you will also see communication-related charges go up, but these should be covered by your employer as they should see reduced overheads, unless you are working for yourself, but working f

  92. 90 minutes to London? by analog_line · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a UK-based IT worker living about a 90-minute journey from London

    So you live, what, 2 miles outside the city limits?

    Thank you, I'll be here all week, you're a great crowd.

  93. If your management resists... by rnturn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...they are probably seeing this list of advantages/disadvantages like this:

    Advantages for me:

    • Save journey time of 3 hours per day (Not our problem)
    • Save travel expenses (Not our problem)
    • Save travel frustration (delays, crowds, mobile phone idiocy, etc.) (Not our problem)
    • Be fresh and alert when I start work (Not our problem. We expect that anyway.)
    • Feel better at the end of the working day (Not our problem)
    • Be at work promptly each day (Not our problem. Can't you just leave earlier? Obviously your estimate of 90 minutes was incorrect.)
    • Work in a pleasant/relaxed environment (Is there something wrong with your cubicle?)
    • Ready access to my (large) technical library (We hired you not your technical library. Besides, don't you have a back seat or trunk in which you could keep those books?)

    Advantages for my employer:

    • Cost savings (How?)
    • Office space savings (Not if I fire you and hire someone much cheaper who's in the office so I can watch over them.)
    • Improved productivity (Don't really care how much work per unit of time you are able to put out as long as the work gets done.)
    • Increased motivation (You want motivation? Be at your desk by 8:00 or you're fired. How's that for motivation?)

    Advantages for society:

    • Reduced traffic congestion (Congestion? Hmm. I've never heard my driver complain about any congestion.)
    • Reduction in total travel and therefore pollution (How does this make money for the company? Besides you must have missed the memo about car-pooling. Now your commute is 2-1/2 hours... each way.)

    There are a number of disadvantages and factors to consider, though none should be insurmountable. A couple might be:

    • Employer needs to monitor quantity and quality of work performed (And we cannot even begin to explain to you how important this is to managers.)
    • Internet connectivity (mine currently limited to 56Kb) (That's funny. We've had excellent connectivity since the company provided those T1 lines.)

    So if you're having trouble getting approval to work from home. You might be running into these attitudes.

    Have a nice day!

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  94. Company culture by tbee · · Score: 2, Informative

    Another dutch guy working at home.

    I switched company to be able to work at home, not because my former employer didn't allow me to, but because it was not part of the culture of that company (I would have been the first) and I expected political trouble like described above.

    The new company solely exists of homeworkers, each having a small office at home usually with some additional seats so if teamworking is required you either visit your collegue or all go to the small central office (basically only two meeting rooms and a small kitchen).

    --
    Tbee (or not?)
  95. Re:My take on it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Jarius, is that you? What the fuck are you doing on slashdot, you're supposed to be working! GET BACK TO WORK, ASSHOLE!

  96. career ceiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having telecommuted for a few years, I know it can be great from a productivity point of view. If you are a good worker your bosses will like this. But you will miss out on any chances to supervise others, which is necessary for career growth beyond being a "highly paid programmer". Depends on where you want to head. Think about your 5 year plan also.

  97. full time telecommuter experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've been a fulltime telecommuter in the US for the past 3 years. Before I offer my 2 cents (er, shillings?) on how to become a teleworker, let me add to your list of disadvantages.

    - It's lonely. I didn't think it would bother me, but after 3 years, I'm starting to feel it.
    - You get left out of a lot of discussions. Think of all the time a decision is made in the hallway between two offices. You won't be involved, and will have to live with the decisions made.
    - It can be difficult to disengage from work. When you work in an office, all you have ot do is leave. Since I work from home, I find myself sitting down after the kids are in bed to check email or review documents. It has taken a real effort to stop working at a reasonable time.

    I don't mean to make it sound like a bad way to go. I wouldn't change my situation for anything. One advantage you didn't cover is the flexibility you can get form telecommuting. I am able to spend a couple of hours a week helping at my kids schools. Something I couldn't do if I were 90 miles away at the office.

    Now, if you still wan't to become a teleworker, here is how I did it.

    1) When I took my current job, I made sure the company was open to it. I didn't start working form home right away though.
    2) As I reached certain milestones with regard to training, usefullnes and autonomy, I started discussing it in earnest with my manager. I started by working from home 1 day a week, and advertising the benefits the company was receiving. "Hey, look at what I did yesterday. I could have never got that much done with all the interruptions in the office"
    It took me about 18 months to get to a full time teleworker status. I now go to the office about once a month to meet with people. This is critical to maintain relationships and find new projects/opportunities within the company.

    As for the technology, I have VPN connection running over DSL. I use email, telephone and AIM. Occasionally I will use netmeeting to share a screen with someone. I have not seen a need for video conferencing.

  98. One major stumbling block by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

    If a company can "tolerate" telecommuting, then they will most likely go with less expensive countries, such as India where they can pay about $2 USD per hour. All things being equal, bosses prefer to see physical people, and will pay a premium for that. Thus, must jobs will either be in the office, or 3rd-world.

  99. Telecommute in NYC by kmilani2134 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I moved to NYC seven years ago and decided at that time that I would take my time here to set myself for the possibility of telecommuting on a full time basis, once I decided to move to a cheaper, less urban location.

    I am working for a Marketing Consulting firm in more or less of a support role, but as time has gone on, I have selectively chosen projects that could be done remotely and tried to not take any projects that relied on me being physically tied to any one place.

    The end result is that if I wanted to move now, I could move and keep my job in NYC. I find this especially attractive because wages in NYC are very high to compensate for a high cost of living, but when I move, my cost of living should be much lower.

    Working from home is also attractive to me because of all of the airborne allergies I have. I run air purifiers at home and they make a huge difference in how good I feel. Unfortunately, I am actually allergic to my employer's offices. But since I am there a couple days a week I just have to take my meds and deal with it.

    --
    Those who trade freedom for security will lose both, and deserve neither" -- Ben Franklin
  100. hey moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you plan on working in IT from home?

    you gonna install arrays and change cards from home?

    idiot

  101. Hunter Gatherer days..... by bsdparasite · · Score: 1
    Even in the hunter gatherer days, humans needed to be in groups. The greatest disadvantage of working from home is just that. You are "working" from "home". There is something to be said about some days when you are constantly interrupted and the weather is fabulous outside. And yeah...commuting is a bi+ch! But, meeting your fellow hunters is a great way to start your day.

  102. Take Action Against the FCC (OT) by syrupMatt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This Monday, FCC Chair Michael Powell will hold his vote on media
    consolidation. There's nothing special about that date -- it's totally
    arbitrary. The vote will conclude a process which has shown deliberate
    disregard for the views and opinions of the American
    people. Powell has refused to even release the actual language of
    the rule change -- it won't be known until after the vote. And he's
    only held a single meeting to hear the views of the public. Even when a
    bipartisan group of Senators requested that he give Congress some time
    to discuss the impact of this change, Powell brushed them off.

    Chairman Powell still has the power to delay the rule change and allow
    time to have a democratic debate about its consequences. Please call
    him today and ask him to allow a real public debate on an issue of such
    massive importance.

    You can reach Powell's office at:
    (202) 418-1000

    Once you've made your call, please let us know at:
    http://moveon.org/fcccall.html

    --
    "Moving through the masses like a fish through water." syrup
  103. Working from Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Working from home is a holy grail. There are many advantages and disadvantages as pointed out by others.

    I've only been able to do this properly in two jobs. One where we were supporting a rollout in Japan and I negotiated to work remotely from Sydney, Australia since there's only 1 hour time difference. Worked OK for 6 months but although the UK bosses were happy the Japanese couldn't deal with me being at the end of a phone rather than in their office. I missed out on a whole load of things going on the office too.

    On returning to the UK, I got a job where they were happy to allow this kind of working but since it only took 5 minutes to drive to their office it didn't really make sense except for out of hours support.

    In the current economic climate, us IT workers have little negotiating power but things may change if/when things pick up.

    I still dream of being able to live in Cornwall or Cumbria and work remotely but I don't think it's viable as a long term solution. Perhaps a compromise of a week in the office and a week at home would work.

  104. I telecommute over 3000 miles a day... by MrIcee · · Score: 1
    While I'm not in england, some of my clients are in the UK as well as elsewhere around the world (though the majority are in the mainland US).

    My company is headquartered in Indiana, and our servers are also located in Indiana. However, I live on the Big Island of Hawaii. Since Hawaii is separated by 2500 miles of ocean in all directions we rate as one of the most remote places on the planet (note, remote does not mean inaccessable).

    Going to work means getting up, making coffee, and trudging upstairs to the computer lab. There I have multiple computers running real-time sensors with alarms to my remote servers. Constantly SSHed into them I type with very very long fingers (thousands of miles long) over cable modem. Back before cable modem I used dual dialup lines and that was also adaquate.

    I also have servers at my significant others houses from which I can do the same monitoring and work when there and not at my place... as well as Handspring-to-cellphone for emergency telnet sessions while on the road (or hiking or playing in the lava).

    Depending on your direct industry, face to face meetings are rarely needed these days. About 80 to 90% of our clients never meet us and all communication is done by email (preferably) and phone.

    What are the minimum requirements? Good FED-X, Good phone service, Good internet, Clean air and lots of fun things to do around you at all times.

    What are the downsides? Your work is your home (I'm assuming here that you will be working from your home)... thus it is also your prison. Make sure to distance your work from your actual living quarters. My servers are set to alarm if they can't see the remote systems, which I can hear in the main part of the house... but other than that - you need to be able to seperate your home life from your work life or the home becomes a hell.

    Good luck and Aloha Nui Loa

  105. Telecommuting -- The false hope by HydeMan · · Score: 1

    The big danger with the telecommuting paradigm, especially for IT workers, is that you eliminate the primary factor that keeps your job located in your home country (UK). If your job was easily transferrable to a telecommuting job, then why wouldn't your employer replace you with a guy who will work for 1/10th the cost in India or China? Location is just about the only advantage that you have over this cheap but very capable labor, and so I would not be so hasty to discard it. If you want to promote the "work anywhere" strategy, then prepare to compete against those in China and India. I hear they work for $10/hour and live like kings in their native country. I doubt you could say the same for the UK.

  106. We already work like this in India ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We already work for US company here in India
    - for much less that you people from UK would like
    to get.

  107. Don't forget to look at taxes by prowley · · Score: 1

    IANAL, IANAA Beyond the issues you mention, one that you should not forget, lest you been pulled into a very dark hole, is taxes. This mostly applies to having a job in one country and living in another, but there may actually be tax relief for working at home.
    Avoid traps: being taxable in both places - make sure the countries have a tax treaty, or that the country where your employer is only taxes residents, not "workers." - e.g. US and UK have a tax treaty
    Seek tax havens: being a citizen of the UK is a pretty good deal, if you are not ordinarily domiciled in the UK, and don't stuff bank accounts there with cash, you are not taxed by the UK. This means you could move to a place with low/no income tax and smile every time you get a paycheck. Even if you DO live in the UK, if your income never crosses the shore in the same tax year in which it is earnt, it is not classed as income and is not taxable - see avoid traps.

  108. Re:If you really want to work at / very near home. by Benm78 · · Score: 1
    I think most of the self-employed out there will agree with me that putting in long hours is way easier if its your own company.

    But I do agree it takes a lot of self-motivation at some points, especially when you need to do things you do not enjoy.

    Most of the business-owners will have no problem spending lots and lots of time on their product or core service, but 'we' also need to spend a lot of time and effort on things like marketing, account management and administration.

    For me the bottom line is: Being self-employed allows one to combine play and work. As an employee, all work and no fun does make you a dull boy ;)

  109. Same here... especially in government. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trust me, it's the same in the US. I guess folks at the top are into the Horatio Alger-type stuff, but underlings everywhere pretty much avoid work at all costs.

    The problem is even worse government, which can run in the red as much as it wants. I took an internship at a government office (city of Baltimore) and, aside from the three competent people who actually kept the place afloat, no one did anything until ten-thirty or had any clue in hell what they were supposed to be doing. The administrator "in charge" of the place knew absolutely nothing about our field and only got the job because she knew the mayor. There were at least five secretaries, none of whom (apparently) did any work or knew even in the slightest what went on in the building, in spite of, you know, the big huge machines with labels on them like 'Dell.' There was one lady in a cubicle who was put in place by a previous administration and was totally unknown to the current one. The mailbox she dropped her work at hadn't been checked in years.

  110. It's better than telecommuting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the US at least, teleworking is generally referred to as "telecommuting," which of course makes absolutely no sense at all. I mean, isn't getting in my car and driving to work 'distance-traveling'?

    I'm going to say "teleworking" from now on.

  111. Working from home by stalinvlad · · Score: 0
    I drive a taxi, could this help me?

    Yeah like GTA, I could virtua myway to fares!

    There would be like a plastic guy, you know an avanter, and, like yeah it be me, an my joystick,whooooooooooooo dat be cool

  112. This is a risky busines. by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

    I have a friend, he's about 50 and has a PhD from Columbia. He is one of a few in the world in his speciality - the 3D analysis of seisimic echo data for the oil industry. He has been here in NZ about 6 or 7 years now. To begin with his employers just put up with the fact that he was in a different time zone, and he was paid the same as if he was an employee in the office. The money saved on commuting and the much lower cost of living was spent on a number of trips back to the office in the US. A while ago the original small company was bought out by a larger one, which was in turn was absorbed by a large conglomerate. Very quickly after that my friend was replaced by a much younger local worker who turned up at the office every day and did as he was told. My friend now finds himself out of work with a set of skills completely inappropriate for the local economy. Another aquaintance is working here doing programming on embedded controls. When he arrived the pay was very generous but the exchange rate has changed from 27 to 35 over the last 6 months. So he has had to take a pay fairly hefty cut in pay. Fortunately that friend has a more marketable skillset locally. I knew somebody else who tried this some years ago and had to return to the real world. The benefit for the employee coming to NZ is that the lifestyle is superb when compared to that which is available to employees in big cities in the Northern Hemisphere. The advantage to the employer is that they can expect, literally, overnight solutions to their problems. The hazards are that you can lose your income at the drop of a PHB's bad day. Exchange rates. Failure of the telecom system. We have had one 4 or 5 hour outage over the last 14 months.

  113. Do consulting at home by phone by Skapare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you'd like to do independent consulting from home, you might want to try out KEEN at the UK site or the US site. This site allows people with questions to get connected with you for help, and you get paid. I have no association with the site other than someone showed it to me a couple weeks ago.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  114. Teleworking Pros and Cons by TW+Burger · · Score: 1

    After reading the comments posted here I have little to add to the excellent observations and descriptions of experiences. I have worked as a freelance teleworker (software/IT/technology consultant) for several years and have not seen a single person I have worked for in that time. Everything I do is over telephone, fax or the Internet.

    My favorite part of telecommuting is that it forces managers to clearly define tasks and goals in writing. When I worked in an office and was verbally instructed to perform a task that did not have a positive outcome, the manager usually denied her/his involvement.

    I do miss office socializing. However, the politics I can do without and I can join clubs or do volunteer work if I wish to meet people.

    Teleworking requires trust between employee and employer. This is the usual barrier to a business setting up this work structure. Also, managers may feel they are losing power if they can not oversee your work directly and generally oppose teleworking efforts.

    As a consultant I do not have this problem. Work is paid for after completion so my motivation is assured. When previously working in an office I (and I am sure most of you) have seen coworkers spend entire days feigning work and actually doing very little despite management productivity efforts.

  115. Webex by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    You don't have to miss this. Go check out www.webex.com and use it for free for a 15 minute test drive ( I think - they used to have it like that, not sure if they still do ) and have your buddies watch your screen while you describe problems over the phone. I work remotely and we do this all the time.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  116. Pair programming IDE by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    Easy, it is called VisStudio 6.0 or whatever you want to use. Often when I am in the office (which isn't often) I am there to fix problems I don't know how to fix, but one of the other guys do ... so we load my code on his machine and he types at the keyboard with me standing over his shoulder. I am driving at a fundamental level, and he is handling the actual typing of code, converting my concepts and direction into whatever API calls he wants to ... the lead programmer isn't actually coding he is looking at the big picture and understands what the rest of the program is doing and needs from this particular piece of code, and he is looking at the smaller picture of getting syntax of API calls correct.

    Works well.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:Pair programming IDE by AlecC · · Score: 1

      Wbhat you describe is classic pair programming - see the varius books on Extreme Programing. But it only works if you are in the same room. What I want is an IDE that allow the same thing if you are on different continent. The Open Source community is scattered across the world - and mostly works from home. You can't do what you desctibe between your home in (say) LA and mine in England.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  117. Not true. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    TIme zones and real availability during crisis makes that a non issue for certain fields.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.