Slashdot Mirror
Geocaching Crackdown?
thejuggler writes "Some cities and counties are banning or considering banning geocaching in their parks. "It's good, clean, wholesome fun - just do it someplace else," said Brian Adams, chief of resource protection for the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway, which has banned geocaching. The geocaching.com website claims there are over 600 caches within 100 miles of the twincities."
Althouh I enjoy 'geocaching', I can see their point. What's to seperate these caches from ordinary litter.
Yep, I never spell check.
More incorrect spellings can be found he
Naturally, the headline is a bit of an exaggeration of the article - only some parks are talking about banning it outright, and they do have a point - some of the material being left is unsuitable, large numbers of people traipsing to the same point causes erosion, etc. But if the caches are moved regularly, and only suitable material is left, then it wouldn't be a problem - except who would regulate it?
I really think most cities should band geocaching within their city limits all together, just to protect themselves against terrorist acts.
While the dweebish geocachers might think it's all good clean fun, a way to show off their disposable income with a high tech gewgaw and exchange some swag for other swag, terrorists are finding web pages full of GPS coordinates in the midst of populated cities.
Do we really want to see a poor man's cruise missile strike Central Park, loaded with Anthrax or Sarin? How many Americans are going to have to die because some insane Muslim hooked up a GPS to to the autopilot of a Beechcraft and loaded it with Iraqi made chemical and biologican Weapons of Mass Destruction?
Now, you know and I know that anything that gets those flabby, pasty white geeks away from their computers for a few hours is a good thing, but they should find an outdoor hobby that doesn't compromise the security of American's cities.
"It's good, clean, wholesome fun - just do it someplace else,"
Later on..
"We like geocachers, we really do. We just wish they'd all goto Hell and die."
Outdoor digital photography, mostly in New Engl
I have geocached for a while now. It seems like it has changed though, and is attracting a much wider following. When I moved to the Charleston area two years ago, there were about 20 caches nearby. Now we have 243. With some many more people involved, it can create a lot of traffic. The best places for caches are off the beaten path where they are unlikely to be disturbed by people who may have ill-intentions. This is precisely where the traffic hurts the most. I haven't read the article yet, still can't get it to load, but as someone who loves spending times outdoors, I'm not sure where I stand on this. It's a fun hobby, but with too many people not being cautious about thier impact on the surroundings, it could be not that great for the park or area the cache is in.
-Michael
Doesn't this have to do with *saving* the parks? If someone slashdots a park (say, trampling nature areas), wouldn't it be nice to have a cache?
This is a great idea, most people have become so hard-wired to their televisions, their computers, and their video games, that we as a human race are beginning to forget the natural beauty in the world. We are shown on television that big buildings, 8 lane highways, and sprawling suburbs are things of marvel or beauty, just watch the discovery cluster if you dont believe me. Many times we hear about park representatives trying to get people into their parks so they dont lose funding or become development areas. Now they are becoming upset that people are visiting their parks? make up your mind!
just my several cents
The cities should just list all their public litter bins as geocaches. That way, the geocachers can have their fun, there is nothing left lying around spoiling beauty spots, and if they're lucky, they won't have to empty their bins so often.
If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
Robert Sime, a Richfield dad, takes his 4-year-old daughter out about twice a month. He said parks should adjust to what the public sees as legitimate use. "When volleyball came along, they all put in courts for that," he said.
This is one of the most insightful comments in the whole article. Instead of trying to fight the geocachers they should be helping them to establish the cache sites. The park would be able to create a more terrain friendly cache site, and in turn they would get more visitors.
Isn't this the kind of visitor you'd like in your park?
"Ninety percent of us pick up bottles and cans, whatever we find. It's part of the game," she said.
Many times you are not searching for an object left by someone else, but you are looking for a static object, such as a tombstone.
As long as you are looking for a virtual cache, are you okay?
One problem with geocaching I see is that eventually trails will be created to caches far out in the woods. People always take the route starting from the nearest trail and the path of least resistance through the woods. This means that if enough people goto this same cache, a path will be worn in the woods. Once a path is there, what's the point of a GPS? You follow the path right to the cache. You can't move the cache obviously so what do you do? Perhaps people can show some sportsman ship and pick random places to start their trek to the cache.
Outdoor digital photography, mostly in New Engl
This isn't the first time someone's complained about geocaching in public-owned lands. Ideally, geocaching wouldn't produce any problems -- you locate the stash, extract it, exchange one item for your own, and re-stash it -- except that the fun of geocaching comes when you have to hunt a bit. That sometimes means digging up the ground, climbing (and re-climbing) trees, or otherwise moving or stressing things that shouldn't be constantly moved or stressed.
The Petrified Forest National Park in the U.S. doesn't allow visitors to pick up bits of petrified wood off the ground, asking them to buy it from the gift shop instead, because it would eventually lead to the removal of all the small samples that make the place what it is. Imagine geocachers roaming and digging all around that place.
Sometimes, preserving natural beauty means inconveniencing the same visitors who've come to see it. I don't consider this unreasonable, since there's still thousands of acres of land, public and unowned, that geocachers can still use. They may not be as scenic to get to, that's all.
As it is i see this as a short lived sport. Right now, it's at the fun stage, where people enjoy it, trust it, and relatively few people are doing it.
What happens though, when it's wildly popular? We'll have some incident where that lunchbox cache is booby trapped, and some kid gets hurt. Then, the news will jump all over it as some dangerous unregulated, unapproved event on public property. And of course, you'll have to think of the children. Blah.
I'd like to try it, if i had the $, and the caches in the area, but alas, i don't.
Perhaps if they try to move it to areas in the country, along rivers, or along regular hiking and biking trails? You could label each cache on the net as a drive, walking, or bike riding cache. These are just some of my own suggestions. I declare them open source and free, do what you will with them. Good luck to them, if this turns out to be a niche, even better. :P
They allow this guy to speak on behalf of the park administration?
"It's good, clean, wholesome fun -- just do it someplace else."
Translation:
"Good, clean, wholesome fun has no place in our state and national parks."
"Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
Contact: Brian Adams, Chief, Resource Protection @ 715-483-3284 x 629 Please voice your opinion to Brian for banning geocaching after admitting "It's good, clean, wholesome fun..."
There's a type of cache that's becoming very popular, called a "virtual cache." Nothing is stored on the site, it's just a coordinate, and a clue as to what you're supposed to find there. I'd like to see them ban that. What are they going to do, ban GPS units?
There have been a few cases of serious damage caused by cachers. In one instance, a cache was placed within 10 feet of a teepee ring, which is considered a sensitive archaeological site. If you've seen how the ground gets trampled around a cache, you'd see how this could be a problem. I can certainly understand the park officers being upset that someone posted a "please trample the grass" sign on such a site.
I do think it's a BIT hypocritical though; the public parks are always aching to increase flow through the park to keep their budgets, but apparently they just want people to come in the gate, get the headcount, eat a picnic out of their trunk and leave. When those people start exploring, they get upset.
OTOH, I have seen geocachers that have no interest in exploring. They beeline straight to the coordinates, tramping anything in the way, do their logging, and tromp straight out. But many of us spend an afternoon checking out the trails while we're there, which is exactly why the parks are (supposed to be) there.
Maybe the former types of cachers should take up benchmark hunting instead.
Someone said the site was /.ed... Not for me, so here's the artcle:
MINNESOTA: GPS treasure hunt under fire
BY BOB SHAW
Pioneer Press
Ian Stevens checks his GPS unit, as rain drips off the end of his ponytail.
The GPS arrow points to the east, and Stevens begins another session of geocaching -- a sport like a high-tech scavenger hunt -- in Cottage Grove's Ravine Park.
Three park officials walk up. Will they kick him out?
Not today. The developing friction between geocachers and park officials doesn't materialize.
"Did I hear you say you were geocaching? You are the first one I have seen here," said parks manager Mike Polehna, who seems intrigued. "There's no problem as long as you aren't disturbing the natural areas of the park."
But officials in other parks, faced with an onslaught of geocachers, are scrambling to develop restrictions. Recently, St. Croix National Scenic Waterway in Wisconsin announced a ban on geocaching, and other parks are considering lesser restrictions.
Whatever they decide, they have no choice but to deal with it. Geocaching didn't exist a few years ago, but now, according to the official geocaching Web site, there are more than 600 caches within 100 miles of the Twin Cities.
The sport depends on two new technologies: the Internet and handheld GPS units, which use satellite signals to show the user the precise longitude and latitude of their location.
The geocachers search for a nearby cache on the Web site, record the longitude and latitude of their prize, and then use GPS locators to get within a few yards of the caches. Usually, the caches are in plain sight or under twigs or leaves -- never buried in dirt.
Caches contain such things as trinkets, souvenirs or coins. Searchers are free to take or leave what they like. They then sign into the logbooks.
At home, they record their work on the Web site. Online conversations develop between finders and placers of geocaches.
But it's not for everyone.
"My husband thinks it's the most moronic sport ever," said Nola Cutts, co-chairwoman of the state Geocaching Association, who goes geocaching with her children twice a week. "But he's into fly fishing, so I guess we all have our own moronic sports."
The group was started, she said, "to educate parks departments about what geocaching is and to show them we are not evil people tearing up the parks.
"Ninety percent of us pick up bottles and cans, whatever we find. It's part of the game," she said.
Cutts, 43, of Anoka, takes several of her five children when she goes geocaching. "It gets the kids outdoors, away from TV," said Cutts. "We see wildlife. We talk."
Robert Sime, a Richfield dad, takes his 4-year-old daughter out about twice a month. He said parks should adjust to what the public sees as legitimate use. "When volleyball came along, they all put in courts for that," he said.
The sport even attracts geo-tourists. Jonathan Gorton, a 43-year-old Milwaukee man who says he has a condition like muscular dystrophy, visits the Twin Cities "because we have pretty much picked Milwaukee clean. We found 428 caches."
That kind of fanaticism bothers some park officials, who say geocaching leads to geotrashing.
They don't want anything left behind in parks.
They worry that hundreds of people tramping through their woods will damage plants and habitat.
"It's good, clean, wholesome fun -- just do it someplace else," said Brian Adams, chief of resource protection for the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway, which has banned geocaching.
Earlier this year, he and park officials were startled to learn of several geocache sites in their park. On one site, said Adams, balloons were left. "That's not a good thing. Waterfowl and birds eat brightly colored things," said Adams.
In Minnesota, other park officials don't express such vocal opposition.
"It gets people outdoors, which is kind of neat," s
Congratulations! Now we are the Evil Empire
Going for a good old fashion bushwalk/hike. All you need is a map and some water etc. No expensive equipment. You don't need a goal to marvel in the beauty of nature. Make that your goal to hike to somewhere new and beautiful like a secluded waterfall where you can go for a swim or a big hill with a view. HOw many of the geocaches actually stop to look at the enviroment they are walking through.
While parks rangers are alwas trying to get people to the parks it ahs to be the right tyoe of people. 50,000 people to a park is good but not if they are the kind that trash the place. Like the 2 guys on jet skis on Sydney harbour who were rounding up the penguins and running over them. THis was after the penguins had returned for the frist time in 50 years or something.
-- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
While allowing horses and stating that "mountain bikes are distructive, cause erosion and take up too much room on the trails."
Parks are for everyone and the park authorities need to learn to adapt and accomodate.
The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
My dad and I both enjoy geocaching. In an effort to increase its popularity in our area, we have placed caches in local parks and other scenic places. One of our ideas was a multicache of all the Civil War forts in our county (there are 6). Two of them are on National Park land. We requested permission to place caches there, and after not hearing anything back for about a month, we placed the caches in inconspicuous areas in the parks. For a few months, we read logs of people who were really enjoying the caches and most of them remarked on how they never even knew about the sites before geocaching. Then things turned sour.
We started reading logs of people being harassed by park rangers. Some reported the park rangers about to arrest the geocachers for stepping off the path. We soon received an e-mail from a NPS official telling us that we were breaking the law by leaving the caches in the park. In the e-mail he specifically mentioned that geocachers dig up earth to find caches (all the caches were above ground) and that they tear up property and litter. None of these statements are true. We had to sneak in to get the caches back without getting arrested ourselves (apparently the park rangers were on the lookout for us).
How do you fight such ignorance? We sent back logs of people saying how much they enjoyed the areas and never knew of their existance before the caches were placed along with letters explaining the 'cache in, trash out' policy of geocaching, but to no avail. Any ideas where to go from here?
The article is heavily drama. I am a geocacher that knows two of the people mentioned in the article. When they say "Three park officials walk up. Will they kick him out? Not today," they're referring to Washington County Park Officials that not only allow geocaching, but promote it as well. Drama, Drama, Drama...
;-)
p ?t=219
p ?t=108
t ails.aspx? ID=44584
t .asp?A=11 922
Nola Cutts, mentioned in the article, said this:
"LOL -- You know what? I talked for the better part of an hour with this reporter about my philosophy of "leave no trace" and my "trash out" activities and the progress MnGCA [Minnesota Geocaching Association] was making with having people pick up garbage on the trails and how I thought geocaching was environmentally friendly in that regard..... You have all heard this from me before
Toward the end of the interview we were JOKING about how my husband hates to geocache and how I hate to fly fish. So what quote does he use, my speech about recycling or fly fishing? AAAAKKKKK!"
They chose to make an almost faticious battle between the parks and the unknown techno-nature-hippies instead of talking about how interesting Geocaching is, and not only that, but most Geocachers that I know of in the Twin Cities, and I know that most with the Minnesota Geocaching Association also help clean up city, county and state parks during caching trips. I'm dissapointed the article was even made, and even more so that it's on Slashdot!!!
The reporter failed to mention that the MN DNR is working on a plan for Geocaching in State Parks as well.
On a final note, that is my visi.com they found mentioned in the 2nd to last paragraph.
Reference URLs:
Thread about article with the MN Geocaching Association:
http://mngca.org/forum/viewtopic.ph
Thread about relations with MN DNR with the MN Geocaching Association:
http://mngca.org/forum/viewtopic.ph
Cache that was visited in the article:
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de
Ian Stevens' Geocaching Profile (King Boreas) - the main cacher in the article - also an interesting note that he has *placed* more caches than any other cacher:
http://www.geocaching.com/profile/defaul
-s4xton
My name is Aaron Landry, and I approve this message.
The GPS arrow points to the east, and Stevens begins another session of geocaching -- a sport like a high-tech scavenger hunt -- in Cottage Grove's Ravine Park.
Geocaching is a high-tech treasure hunt, not a high-tech scavenger hunt. In a scavenger hunt, you know what you're looking for, but you don't know where it is; in a treasure hunt, you know where it is, but you don't know what it is.
Tarsnap: Online backups for the truly paranoid
There is a saying with geocachers called "Cache In - Trash Out". Basically, it means that whenever you go geocaching, you're supposed to leave the park better than when you came (ie. picking up trash). There is even a day for this.
I know some parks in my area that have become usuable because of this. This guy needs to get a clue and figure out that geocaching is not ruining parks.
Didn't you guys see his name? It is obvious why he is against geocaching. As a child he left the city to escape the constant taunts and comparisons to the other Brian Adams. However someone found out his dark secret and left a copy of the Robin Hood movie soundtrack in the geocache inside of his park ranger office. Needless to say he was traumatized by the event.
"They worry that hundreds of people tramping through their woods will damage plants and habitat."
Maybe someone should point out to these people that the idea for a park is _for humans to use it_. Now, it's certainly true that you don't want people to use it in such a way as to cause unnecessary damage, but building a park then worrying that people will go there is moronic, to say the least. It often seems to me that "conservationism" has gone so far that the people in charge are forgetting _why_ they're supposed to be conserving these places.
the geocachers? I would consider them cool if they used map/compass and not a gadget from Fry's. finding section markers in the middle of the mojave desert = fun. with a GPS receiver it's trivial.
Better block it all off/make it illegal so that people will just stay home.
I never understand the mentality of these folks. First, we don't get enough money because no one visits, then too many people are coming/going to the same place.
It's like the age old ban kids from downtown because they use skateboards. Ban kids from 'cruising', ban people from the park. You keep banning people from doing things you're just going to turn them into criminals for doing something that doesn't harm anyone
As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.
I am the only one who had no idea what geocaching was? At first I was think maybe a web proxy server (a la what AOL does), but I couldn't figure out why someone would stick a server in a public park. HA!
'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
1. - We must preserve these lands for future generations (of humans).
2. - Humans aren't allowed in these lands. Humans should stay in concrete boxes, close to the center of urban areas. Any other behavior is sprawl.
by setting up cache sites in high crime areas.
Some places we could start:
Methadone Clinics
Blood & Crips Hangouts
Recent Stabbing/Shooting/Jumper Down/ locations
Train tracks of dimly lit urbab train station.
People would go to secret locations and leave messages and spy related items, never to return. Their contacts would then come at a totally different time and pick up said items.
Geo Caching would provide far to many 'False Positives' to the Keystone Kops chasing terror suspects.
Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
In my opinion, all local parks are social parks. I was furious when they banned mountain biking (all parks in Monroe County, NY--near Rochester, NY) but still allowed horses. If erosion was the issue, then it's not a social park, and you should treat it as a nature park and only allow people on foot (or equivalent.)
The root cause is that we need to determine the purpose of our parks. Once the definitions are established, the allowable and not allowable behaviors become clear. The short answer for now is that if there's barbeques or a frisbee golf course, you can geocache; if there's a sign-in sheet and dedicated nature paths, you can't.
--- Jason Olshefsky
Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)
It's your hell. You go there. I'm going to have an ice cream.
Yay.
If parks are upset because this is going on without any kickback for them, they're obviously missing the concept of Cache In/Trash Out (previously mentioned, I know). There's also some states (such as here in North Carolina) that allow placing caches after paying for permits. Better than an outright ban, at least. Caches are supposed to be maintained anyway, so that seems to work for a lot of people here.
All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
I guess I am willing to conclude that if:
Every story on something I KNOW something about gets it wrong
...then it is fair to assume that MOST stories get it wrong MOST of the time. It isn't that I am cynical. I just don't think the media/journalists are in the business of telling the truth. They want to entertain. They want to sell. OK, well, noted. But if you want facts, you are aren't going to get them from a newspaper or channel 9.
(PS: You are in charge of visi.com?! Wow... Personal aside to Saxton(34078)
I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
As with anything that becomes popular, it presents itself to abuse. More so with fads. Posting this on /. was a bad idea. It really isn't suitable for mass consumption. Slashdot crowd isn't what it used to be. Hopefully geocaching won't "catch-on". Hopefully some joe-schmoe doesn't decide that it will be fun to plant an unpleasant surprise for a cache.
Good behavior and respect is like common sense. It's rare among the general populace. I would want the practice of this activity be limited to those that are in the know, if I were into this sort of thing. Best kept secrets are best kept by being secret, or rather obscurity.
I might suggestion that geocaching be taught through a buddy-like system instead of hanging it out there for anyone to just pick up.
"Last one in is a rotten goblin!" - Kepp
Since www.geocaching.com is slashdotted, I'll post an explanation of GeoCaching.
Geocaching is where people will hide a cache, usually a tupperware container full of small trinkets, in a park or woods and use a GPS to save the coordinates. The cache is usually hidden somewhat so that passerbys don't see it in the open.
A person will go to the geocaching website, find the coords of a cache and use their GPS to find it. When they find it, they'll take out a trinket and put one in. There's usually a log book as well in it to sign (as well as one on the geocaching website).
I work on an air force base. One day a few months ago, I heard that traffic was backed up going out of one of the gates that is near a freeway overpass.
Someone had reported that a person had left a suspicious package near the overpass.
They closed the gate, called out the bomb squad, cavalry, etc., only to find that the suspicious package was a geocache.
So be careful where you place your geocache, consider who might be watching and what conclusions they might jump to.
check out this thread (login required?) from 2 years ago where a cacher got a ticket for "treasure seeking on federal land" when a ranger discovered a hidden cache.
I think ESPN is missing a critical market. Dorks and dork sports. ESPN 3's line-up could be: Geocashing, RC Car Racing, Chess, D&D, Simpsons The Quiz Show, etc...
I've now been geocaching for over two years. In that time, I've learned more about the environment and *done* more about the environment than I had done in the previous 24 years of my life. Geocaching is directly responsible for that.
Thanks to what I've learned geocaching, when I go on hikes with friends, I'm the person imploring them to stay on the trails (*especially* if the trail is wet and muddy, since walking around the puddle will only make it wider). I've taught several people that bringing a canvas sack and trash bag along on a hike makes picking up litter a breeze.
One example: I was out in the Henderson Swamp area of the Atchafalaya basin area of Louisiana last weekend. While out there, I picked up approximately 13 pieces of floating litter (depends on what you count... I counted the two plastic wrappers individually). Why did I spend my valuable personal watercraft time and gas on cleaning up a couple miles of litter along I-10 over the swamp? Because I learned to do it from CITO (Cache In, Trash Out) and geocaching. Geocaching has made me a more nature-conscious person... it'd be a shame to ban it more. (Note: In places like, say, Yellowstone near Old Faithful, I would be the first person to vote for a geocaching ban, but in, say, Baton Rouge parks... that'd be counter-productive.)
Incidentally, I learned nature from geocaching, and I learned software rights from Linux. I've spent most of my free time for the last half-year developing an application for geocaching... alas, there are not enough Linux-loving application programmers who are also geocachers, and so a native Linux port isn't forthcoming, unfortunately... maybe one day...
Software Developer "This would be a great job if it wasn't for the user"
Park Ranger "This would be a great job if it wasn't for the visitors"
Software Developer "Look at all those bugs"
Park Ranger "Look at all those bugs"
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
Geocaching is perfect for getting people out of their homes and getting some exercise - especially from those who don't consider themselves "hikers". There has been one solved murder case because of geocaching. A dead body was found along a river bank 100 yards from a geocache. A geocacher found the body and immediately notified authorities. In turn, a murder case was solved. This has been about two years ago. Last summer, while in Canada, I found a stash of Marajuana under some tree cover. I told the local authorities and they investigated the matter. So, you see.. geocaching is a perfect way for the little people make a difference in this world. Later, happycat64.
At the risk of being accused of simply promoting my own web site... (Okay, okay. I'm shamelessly promoting my own web site, but it is germane to the discussion) ...here is a map showing all 414 geocaches in the Minneapolis - St. Paul area:
n t_paul.shtml
http://www.brillig.com/geocaching/minneapolis-sai
I have noticed that quite a few geocaches in the Minnesota area have been lost or otherwise removed over the past few weeks. Some of this is no doubt due to the usual loss of caches during the summer months, but I wonder if some of the loss is due to this new crackdown.
BTW, the National Park Service has for the past two years or so had a policy banning all physical (i.e. non-virtual) geocaches from their lands. Their position is that geocaches come under the heading of "abandoned property" and, as such, they confiscate caches as they find them.
-Buxley
Buxley's Geocaching Waypoint (geocaching's other website =)
Here's the e-mail for the folks at the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway who have banned cacheing though they admit its "good clean wholesome fun." Jeesh. SACN_Interpretation@nps.gov
Tim
Just a few years ago there was a big complaint from the National Park Service that no one ever visited the parks. No people are going and they are complaining that people are going, walking and seeing the parks? Something doesn't set right with me.
I am a geocacher and I have never seen a cache cause damage to a location.
Two years from now, if they get the regulations, they will again be complaining that no one visits the parks again.
I live in the Santa Cruz, California area and there's quite a large number of caches around here. Some of the most popular are in the city, such as MicroCaches where tiny containers are slipped into niches. When you think about it, cache stashing in town is a very tricky business as you don't want it found by just anyone and you want seekers to find it, log entry and rehide without attracting too much attention. I'm considering placing a micro just because they get lots of visits, can be very challenging to place/find, and are just plain neat! Besides, even kids can get involved with this kind of activity, that just gives me a case of the warm fuzzies (which, curmudgeon that I am, doesn't happen often.)
This is precisely where the traffic hurts the most. I haven't read the article yet, still can't get it to load, but as someone who loves spending times outdoors, I'm not sure where I stand on this. It's a fun hobby, but with too many people not being cautious about thier impact on the surroundings, it could be not that great for the park or area the cache is in.
I haven't read it, yet, either, but I'll draw on this bit about unwanted traffic.
Most certainly a poorly planned cache, which encourages bushwhacking through sensitive environments or leaves a lot of beaten down undergrowth, should be terminated. But turning away traffic from parks?!?! What the fsck is that? Parks are for the public, and that includes responsible GeoCachers! I've had a belly-full of people stealing mountain bike trails ("Oh, it damages the environment, but the horses are OK") for similar reasons. I've been on trails which have existed for decades and are in good condition. OTOH horses really shread trails and create errosion problems. Occassionally there's a trail that biking has done damage to, but permanent closure isn't the answer, better trail maintenance is.
All that said, I've only been GeoCaching for a month, but I'm out int he parks (paying FEES!) and having a marvelous time (Check some photo collages at this site and I've recently stashed my first cache (look on Geocaching.com for "A Room With A View") and took pains to be certain it won't pollute the environment (It's a steel ammo box), no danger to critters (steel and no food inside) and seekers won't damage the area by seeking it. It's a bit of a tough cache so it probably won't see more than a few visits a year.
In these times, why not See America First, and let this great outdoor activity be a part of that. Fight these sit-on-their-arses members of the No Fun Club!
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
this is more modern variant of a game that has been played in the UK and no doubt other countries for decades. 'Post Boxes' are hidden around the UK containing stamps plus other souvenirs and map references to other 'Post Boxes.' Rather than use GPS participants use a good old fashioned map and compass.
Firstly, I'm an irregularly active cacher (78 finds or so at last count). I find the hobby to be a lot of fun, and good exercise. It gets me motivated to go to parks I might overlook and to hike deeper into them than I normally would. I've also attended numerous local caching events, and met a lot of nice people.
In all the 78 caches that I've found, I've never seen any sign that the placement of this cache was even visible, much less causing any damage to the surrounding environment with a single exception. I once found the contents of a cache scattered all over the side of a hill. Why? Because somebody had not read the rules, and had left cookies in the cache. Oh well. What did I do? I carefully gathered every scrap of stuff and repackaged it all. Problem solved.
Caching is an environmentally friendly activity. It gets people out to parks they normally wouldn't, and gets them to pick up trash in those parks. Just one motivated individual can clean up a lot of trash, and caching puts hundreds or thousands of them out every weekend.
I do understand the motivation in trying to limit damage to sensitive areas, say, where endangered birds or plants can be found, but cachers are more than willing to try to adopt these reasonable restrictions. There is currently a ban on geocaching in national parks. Guess what? You won't find any caches in national parks. I hope that state parks do not follow suit in making a general ban, but instead work with geocachers to try to establish reasonable guidelines for the placement of caches. The idea of moving caches at least once every 12 months to prevent trail formation is a sane and reasonable solution, and I doubt that any cacher would have any issues with that.
Give it a try. It's a lot of fun.
There is much pleasure to be gained in useless knowledge.
Just thought I'd pass on some personal experience. I started geocaching more than a year ago and let me tell you, this is a great deal of fun. I've done more hiking in the last year than I've ever done in my life. Being a software engineer, I desperately need some solid exercise and gyms are a complete waste of money, IMHO. Having a goal (finding the cache) is much more enjoyable than taking a walk. Having done close to fifty caches, I can say that none of these affects the environment. In fact, Geocaching promotes taking a trash bag with you to pick up the litter left by the rest of the fair-weather hikers. Who raised these littering boneheads is beyond me. Geocaching is not allowed in the National Park system which I find ridiculous. A recent experience at the Grand Canyon affirmed my opinion that evironmentalists are hypocrits and elitists. I attended a nighttime slide show entitled "The sounds of the canyon". The ranger made it very clear that the park service doesn't like the helicopters flying around even though they have a strict flight path. They also make it very clear that it's illegal to ignore anyone in trouble. The next morning, I rose at oh-dark-hundred to go to Yaki Point to take sunrise pictures. Having driven out to the site, I discovered that the National Park service in it's infinite wisdom closed the access road to vehicular traffic. I parked at a picnic area and started to hike in with all my camera gear. Twice a shuttle bus blew past me even though I tried to flag them down. When I finally made it out to the point, I spent about an hour taking pictures. The only sound I could hear was the sound of those damn shuttle busses. IMHO, The National Park Service has become extremist in it's view of visitors. If you're not a serious outdoorsman, we don't want you past the visitor center. This is evidenced by Denali's one access road into the park on which you're only allowed to travel if you take the scheduled bus trip or if you've got a backcountry permit.
This geocaching idea is great. Never again will I have to hike out my own trash!
Of course, this ruins the old trick of sneaking a bowling ball into a friend's backpack that he'll be forced to hike out with...
I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
Look, I think Geocaching is the dorkiest thing since Boba Fett Underoos and I'd sooner have sex with a walrus than ever take part in it.
Nevertheless, it's very clear that it's nothing but harmless fun for those who enjoy it, and conscientiously executed at that. There are people out there leaving campfires burning and tossing litter into streams, and you're worrying about THIS? Get some perspective, please.
"Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
Now, on a more serious note, when I explain the geocaching thing to friends or co-workers, if they still look at me funny after I explain the whole GPS and prize-exchange thing, then I just use my standard: "Okay... just think of it as an excuse to go hiking.". Ultimately, I think that that's the end result: marginally more people getting out of their homes and walking around in nice, big public areas and getting some fresh air.
Now, although the rangers and park officials claim that they'd like more people to appreciate the outdoors, I think they'd prefer that they appreciate them from afar. Like just about every other line of work, I'm sure they often mumble amongst themselves: "This job would be great if it weren't for the customers".
Bottom line: If you want more people at the park, then you've got more people at the park. Deal with the increased foot traffic... that's what you're paid to do... to manage the park. However, if you *don't* want more people, then either close the damn park entirely or require permits or something. But don't go preaching about how people should get back to nature if you're not prepared for them to do it during your shift.
As of last year the Minnesota Department Of Natural Resources cracked down on geocaching in state parks. They claimed that people were harming the environment by not staying on the marked trails. This shouldn't really come as a surprise to those of us who live in MinneSNOWta. In the late nineties they banned mountain biking from state parks...claimed it damaged the environment...but horses were OK on the trails. Last year it was geocaching. This year it's ATV's. What will be next?
The main thing to remember is that those of us who live in this tundra called Minnesota are quite lucky. We are just hours away from the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. The BWCA contains 1.2 million acres of woods to play in. The Canadian Quetico borders the BWCA, adding another million acres. Of course you can add the Superior National Forest on to that (parts of which are considered part of the BWCA), and you have several thousand more acres to play in. All of these areas support Geocaching as a valid sport and activity.
I agree that it is sad to see geocaching being banned from areas near the Twin Cities. However, we are still better off than a lot of states.
There was a parks meeting here in Loveland to disuss this subject. Many Geocachers showed up and had a say in it. In the end they banned all Geocaches in the parks including Virtual Caches. A virtual caches is when you give coordinates to a point of interest ie: Nice statue, big tree, spectacular view. But nothing is actually left that was not there before. They decided this was bad. Never mind it infringes on free speech. Banned! Next. It was really amazing and wrong.
I think the geocachers in the state where the article was written need to take a clue from the Maryland Geocaching Society ( http://www.mdgps.net ). This is from their self-description and sounds VERY appropriate:
The Maryland Geocaching Society is an organization for Geocachers run by Geocachers. The group was originally founded in order to preserve Geocaching in our State Parks. At that time Maryland State Parks, in particular the Patapsco State Park was asking for the removal of all caches from the property which they managed. Recognizing this as a very serious issue regarding the sport in the area, a group of avid geocachers gathered to form the Maryland Geocaching Society. The very first order of business was to reach out to park officials in an effort to come to an understanding and save the State Park Geocaches. Through a lot of hard work, patience and cooperation a set of State Park guidelines was finally agreed upon and adopted by Patapsco State Park. This same set of guidelines would later go on to be adopted state wide! If our founding members had not stepped up when they did, there is no telling how many parks we as geocachers would be shut out of.
I think pre-registering geocaches on State Park land is important to the health of the trails and non-trail environments. Getting people outside and bringing attention to our much maligned parks is important and geocaching done on park land is a great way to do both (as any...and many here...of the geocachers know).
By laying out guidelines to protect state lands (many of which mirror guidelines that geocaching.com/GroundSpeak lay out in the first place for caching etiquette), the parks will stay healthy and no worse for the wear and the people will get out to enjoy some of the non-urban delights around them.
This of course does not preclude urban caches which are a lot of fun too (and feel much more like espionage...even given the current temperment of most Americans towards city-lurking).
Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
Most parks in our area have either zero or one geocaches in them and probably about 10,000 pieces of actual trash. Put another way, within 100 miles of my home, there are 400 GeoCaches. How many items of trash are there within 100 miles?
So, if I remove ten pieces of trash, then add one geocache, the park is winning overall.
Even if you consider a geocache to be 'trash', it's an utterly negligable increment on the load of trash in most of the parks I've visited.
Then there is the 'cache in - trash out' initiative where geocachers go a-hunting with a large black bin bag and remove LARGE quantities of trash along with visiting the geocache.
Geocaching is at worst benign and at best a glorious way to find great new places to go. It's an ideal use of public land.
www.sjbaker.org
Gee, how would you like to have to go all over the place and pick up someone elses crap they leave behind?
Apparently, this is what geocachers do, and yes they like to do it (as when they go on these geocaching expeditions they clean up real litter).
Honestly, no one is stopping you from going on a crusade to hunt down every cache in the world and throw it in the garbage. Or a bonfire, hey.
I think some things you are missing about this hobby are:
1) It promotes parks and excercise therein by making a game out of the experience
2) Yes, one hello kitty lunchbox (or something) gets left in the park, but many pounds of garbage are collected by the cachers who visit the park and taken out as a simple goodwill gesture
3) This is not something that directly affects you. I mean really, who pissed in your cornflakes this morning, anyway? I'm sorry some moderator doesn't know what a troll is and made you out to be one, but does this really bother you so much? Why?
I am a firm believer in the "leave only footprints" ethos myself, but I consider these caches an acceptable compromise just as we accept paved trails and mile markers and posts and chains and crap (I mean, really, we could do without them, but they serve a purpose so we live with the compromise). If you do not, and you see one, then dispose of it properly and feel proud you did something for the park. And like I said, the cachers have gone to the trouble of telling you *exactly where to find them!*
So if you really really want to, you can go get every damned one of them, throw them away, pile them on Microsoft/AOL/Disney's doorstep, mail them to RMS (or the cachers themselves) in protest, whatever you like! What are they gonna do to you? Post on slashdot?!