Wireless LAN Equipment Shipments Up
MrBounce writes "Worldwide shipments of wireless local-area network equipment increased by 120 percent in 2002 from a year ago. So who are the current market leaders in this field?"
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Worldwide population is also up in 2003 and we don't want to know who the most prolific producer is either.
I wonder if the IP over avian carrier rfc would be included as a wireless protocol.
Will be real nice if/when wireless networks become the "standard".. :-)
Nothing more annoying than untangling 1km of CAT5 every time you have a LAN party
But these shipment numbers made sense. I bought both a wireless router and AirPort card for my iBook this year.
Really and did the cheap whore increase their market value?
Equipment Shipments?
What other rhyming headlines can we expect?
Stouter Routers available soon
Software Can Plan your WLAN
Take a look at this notebook?
Name your suggestions!
In March, Cisco announced an agreement to buy Linksys a cheap whore, which will significantly boost Cisco's position in the market this year, both on a revenue and shipment basis, Gartner said.
Dumbass mods will fall for anything.
Cisco announced an agreement to buy Linksys a cheap whore
Why can't my company make agreements like that! We just get boring ol' stock and cash deals.
I wonder just how much the proliferation of this technology, and that of the broadband Internet which makes it usefull for the household market, has been catalysed by free music's presence...
"In March, Cisco announced an agreement to buy Linksys a cheap whore"
Mods, this one was short. You have NO excuse this time. STOP MODDING CUT-N-PASTES UP!
"Worldwide shipments of wireless local-area network equipment increased by 120 percent in 2002 from a year ago."
RIAA has attributed this increase to an increasing sharing of music by *thieves* on the internet. SCO is claiming that the increase in the sale of wireless LAN equipment is primarily due to linux. Ans since linux has SCO's IP, SCO is planning to sue all the manufactures of wireless LAN.
Boy, given that Apple was shipping wireless on their computers back in 1999, it is interesting to see that they don't seem to be represented here. It could be due to a small market share I suppose, but Apple has paid the price for leadership again and again by innovating and then everyone else jumping on board.
Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
Not exactly the headline of the century, but it is good to know I guess.
Running cat-5 sucks...
I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand. -Confucius
Production of 2003 Volkswagon Beetles is up infinity% from last year! Incredible!
Wireless is new. Since it didn't flop, of course they are going to manufacture more. Who cares if there was twice as much manufactured as last year? WHY IS THIS NEWSWORTHY??
-- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
Nortel has some really good product: here, their VOIP handsets/desktop phones and software-based-voip-phones are *very* cool... coupled with a 802.11x AP, it is VERY COOL. Ipaq + 802.11x CF Nic + Nortel Software == wirless phone in your office.
the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
In related news, Pringles shipments were up by %110.
Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
Scientists are still trying to figure out how businesses can make money from selling access wi-fi networks.
If you don't know what a Mesh Network is, you should read up on it. There are some very cool applications.
You can fly in a helicopter at 300 mph+ and sustain an Internet Connection.
City governments are also using this technology to deploy cameras around their cities.
Any kind of technology is always scary when government gets ahold of it. However, I still have some questions about it's security though.
http://www.meshnetworks.com
a) It's a nice break from SCO stupidity and bashing
b) It's a nice break from Microsoft stupidity and bashing
c) There was still a site in the world that hadn't been Slashdotted yet
d) None of the above
e) All of the above
"It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
A fellow grad student and I got talking about this at our university's wireless lab ...
Most current wireless scheme assume sparse usage concentrations. As more and more people start using these devices, interference will increase markedly and reduce performance for all. Just think what would happen if every single person in your appartment or neighbourhood had a wireless network setup? We would see a 15-50% degradation in wireless bandwidth!
Not to mention other devices operating in the 2.4Ghz unregulated spectrum like microwave ovens and those damn cordless phones!
It's a sad state of affairs that Linksys is at the top of the heap...there are plenty of companies that make better products.
I wish consumers would focus more of quality rather than cost...after all, if they did, we wouldn't have to deal with Wal-Mart anymore!
I just finished placing my online order for various Linksys Wireless equipment, then surf over to /. and the top story is "Wireless LAN Equipment Shipments Up...top vendor is Linksys".
Man, those internet tracking and market analysis systems are getting too advanced now... :-)
I don't believe this quite qualifies as no vendors produce hardware for this specific purpose.
In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
they left out the words "like a"
In other news:
- shipment of carburetors is down
- shipment of 2400 baud modems is down
- shipment of black and white televisions is down
Duh!
It is technology. It moves *forward*.
Would you really want a cheap whore? It's kinda like buying a high milage cheap car... there's no telling what you'll find under the seat... nevermind the gas tank or the tailpipe!
Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
This is probably a good time to create a current review of the long distance (>> 300 ft) Wireless solutions that are available in the market.
Richochet is one http://www.ricochet.com/
and another is Vivato http://www.vivato.net/
What are the other ones in the market?
To see a world in a grain of sand, and then to step back and see the beach where the sand lies
... but tell that to my cat, because I stole her "cat toy", a flexible pole with a string and a mouse attached to run my wires thru the wall... worked great too!!
I only look human.
My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
Well in the last few years two out of the three major issues with wireless have been fixed. Plus now there's more widespread applications for wireless technology is amazing. Cause everything to communicate without drilling holes and running wires and it's all portable.
Wireless (especially 802.11b) is in major universities, businesses, and homes all across america. It's "the new craze" get broadband and a wireless router along with a laptop and surf the net while outside, in your room, or wherever.
For what people need networking for wireless usually is it 9 times out of 10 and it is far more acceptable and eye appealing than drilling holes and running wire everywhere. Plus it's cool to have a laptop with no wires surfin the net, still has a cool "wow" factor.
Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
Let's just that wireless requires Big Company infrastructure. Make the Wireless big enough and perhaps it will be decentralized. Make it encrypted and everyone can/will use it.
Make it so that no one wireless is the chokepoint and you will have redundancy that backbones can only dream about. And All this for FREE!
Sigs are dangerous coy things
Cisco is 28% of wireless lan revenue since they own Linsys now =) I find it interesting what this says about the overall market, Cisco/Aironet which is the large enterprise leader slipped behind Linksys in revenue even though the typical Cisco/Aironet product costs ~8X what the typical Linksys product does, so small companies and consumers must be outbuying enterprises by around 8X =)
There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
Yeah the latency does suck. It adds about 50 ms to the time from when you click the mouse button until the weapon actually fires in UT2003. Maybe not such a big deal for most noobs, but when you're running, jumping, dodging, and firing the t-loc up into the air, that extra 50ms throws off your aim enough that you'll miss even when you're firing point-blank range right into the center of your opponent's chest. You have to aim about 3 to 5 "virtual feet" in front of the opponent's direction of travel to "lead" the shot in order to compensate for the latency.
UT2003 SSEN Clan: www.ssenclan.com
Not to be totally off-topic since I am asking a wireless related question...
What is the state of WPA for Linux (in particular RedHat 9)? Any projects I should look at to be able to use it? I've got a Proxim 802.11b Gold card.
It could be due to a small market share I suppose, but Apple has paid the price for leadership again and again by innovating and then everyone else jumping on board.
Not really. Remember Apple only has a small (5%) market share in computers to begin with and their wireless gear generally is only sold to people who have Macs. And not everyone who has a Mac uses the wireless so the population is even smaller. It's not really surprising they wouldn't be near the top given how popular 802.11b has become.
Plus Apple doesn't make their own wireless gear. They OEM it from others. Lucent at one point (still?) was the maker of some of their stuff if I recall. They were innovative in using it but they never really were the technology innovators here. They were just smart enough to realize that it was useful ahead of almost everyone else.
SLASHDOT CITY--Slashdot.org has been brought up on animal cruelty charges because of an experiment involving the deaths of over 20,000 carrier pigeons.
"We were just starting to test a new slashdot webserver using carrier pigeons. All of a sudden tens of thousands of anonymous cowards started posting, overwhelming the pigeons' bandwidth," said the Slashdot.org official on the condition of anonymity.
The official said later that the pigeons somehow got malformed information (packets) and started crashing into each other, eventually resulting in their deaths.
There were reports of a large, troll-like creature in the area as well, but so far those claims are unsubstantiated.
Or in a press release.
Hell, I get my internet from a provider's tower over 4.5 MILES away from my house. I only have a lowly Linksys WET11 802.11b bridge too. Of course I also have a 24db parabolic reflector antenna on a 40 foot pole pointed back to the ISP's antenna, and good clear line-of-site between the two antennas. I generally get 11Mbps to their access point with 70% "signal quality" and 85-90% "signal strength".
Maybe what you might want in this case is a "Fast IR" port/hub. I haven't seen anything much like this on PC's, but many brands of laptop have "Fast IR" (4Mbps) ports. I'm not sure what the latency on this is, but I'd imagine it might be better than WiFi. You can also build your own wireless serial adaptor, I used to have instructions for this but they are now lost.
/. geek could think of that.
The trick would be connecting >2 persons via IR, which I guess would require an IR-hub of some sort - but I'm not sure where one could get something that. Maybe some enterprising
but having
a latency so that you have to lead your target
almost sounds like a feature rather than a bug
to me.
It is when you're the only one who knows about it, but playing against seasoned veterans who also know this, and are very adept at dodging back and forth constantly, it makes them too darned hard to hit B-}
It is relatively NEW. More than doubled sales are evidence that it has not flopped, so the products are WORTHY. Therefore, this is NEWsWORTHY.
The unofficial
TechKnowledge claims that even though the shipment volumes will grow, the revenues from the wireless LAN sales will decline , since this market is currently experiencing oversupply.
However, this is bonanza time for consumers and businesses, here are some quotes from the market report quoted above:
The average price for a chip that enables connections for an 802.11b wireless LAN (WLAN), also known as Wi-Fi, was $16.06 in 2002, but that price will drop to $6.61 by the end of 2003.
The price for chips based on the 802.11g standard is also expected to fall this year, from $18 per chip in 2002 to $9.68 by the end of 2003
My geek-wannabie of a neighbour just got WLAN installed. Time to cancel that xDSL subscription.
More.free.open.access.points.
What's the deal with the new WPA standard? Are there any cheap access points that are WPA ready? Will Linux support WPA?
I have an old orinico residential gateway, and I'd like to upgrade to a faster system, but I want to wait for WPA.
booya!
The following list contains information regarding what types of encryption are used by specific security systems/functions/applications/protocols. Glaring security vulnerabilities with WEP are also listed.
WEP (Wired Equivalency Protection) - Uses a shared key, RC4 Encryption at 40, 64, 128, or 256 bit. The key is shared. Authentication is one way. Due to the design of RC4 (intended to be used over a synchronous stream), WEP designers have to make RC4 change the key for each packet. This means that the keys are quickly reused, and thus a sinffer can eventually - and usually rather quickly in large networks - determine the key loop. The SSID (Service Set ID) is sent over the wire either unencrypted or encrypted using weak algorithims.
VPN (Virtual Private Networking) - IPSec, PPTP, L2TP, SSH, and even SSL
TACACS/+ (Terminal Access Controller Access Control System) - Uses kerberos style authetication that does not require keys to be sent over the wire. Uses two factor authorization (what you know and what you own, or what you know and what you are)
SSH (Secure SHell) - RC4, 3DES, Blowfish, and AES-256. OpenSSH does not use any patented algorithims.
IPsec (Internet Protocol Security*) - Diffie-Hellman key exchange between peers on a network. Public key cryptography is applied to the Diffie-Hellman exchanges to safeguard against spoofing and man-in-the-middle attacks. IPSec uses standard algorithims such as DES for data encryption. Keyed (HMAC) and non-keyed (MD5, SHA) hasing for packet authentication. Signed digital certificates are used to provide proof of identity. TCP control packets are authenticated, preventing DOS attacks (such as those used against PPTP) that rely on TCP control packets.
So this is why when I come home and connect to my secure wireless LAN, I friggin' find like NINE of the buggers in my locale.
Thanks, a friggin million. Once upon a time I only had to hit 'OK'.
Bloody technology. GO TO HELL!!!
Let's all fake them out by posting a whole bunch of comments about warchalking. I got a great laugh out of how the big media reported that one the first time around.
They were fooled once; they can be fooled again!
Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
GPRS... CDMA... many many 2.xG and 3G protocols...
Actually I have been selling products from www.2wire.com when I sign people up for DSL service. and I think the products are pretty sweet. DSL Modem, Wireless Access Point, HPNA, NAT Router, Packet Filetering Firewall..... Drool. All for $50 bucks when they sign up for the service. (After Rebate of course.) So if you want to signup for DSl and get your hands on one of these babies, call me at 1-877-672-
No, Seriously If you are a Southwestern Bell Customer I'd love to hear from you.
I feel so dirty.
Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543
Damn! I remember when Ricochet first rolled out in San Jose (as Metricom, I think) back in the early 90s. In 1999, I had a Ricochet modem for my laptop, and it was great -- sending email from Caltrain at the station stops, working from the middle of Golden Gate Park...
And then, what, just a couple years ago, they went tits up. Poof! They had rolled out infrastructure in New York, San Francisco, Chicago, and were working on spreading all over Los Angeles. They had money trouble and disappeared. And now, they're back, in San Diego and Denver?!
I wouldn't get too excited about Ricochet, man. They'll hose ya.
Oh, go on, check out my job.
Could you just broadcast whatever non-commercial music you want over your own wireless setup and have your neighbors repeat it so that you can get hte signal anywhere in your home town?
Anyone have info on doing this with a combination of wireless, cable modems, and low power fm transmitters?
It seems that production of 2002 Volkswagon Beetls is down inifity% to a year-long low of zero cars. If production continues at this rate, production will become negative, and in one year there will be NO MORE 2002 VOLKSWAGON BEETLES on the planet! If I owned one, I'd sell it a soon as possible before it self-destructs!
In 2 years, we expect to ship the non-existant cars to other planets to create a negative quantity of 2002 BEETLES on our planet. This trend will continue, and 10 years, 90% of human effort on the planet will involve shipping these non-existant cars.
That's, of course, if current trends continue.
HIV Crosses Species Barrier... into Muppets
Richochet was back and written about in Slate about 6 months ago. But I wonder if they are doing well right now ....
Here are the excerpts from the article
The New Old Thing - Ricochet
A wireless technology returns to become the Wi-Fi for suburbia.
Dec 06, 2002
Article location
http://slate.msn.com/id/2074905/
Ricochet's network was scooped out of bankruptcy court last year by Denver's Aerie Networks, which hopes to revive the service as a viable alternative to DSL or cable modems. The technology that drives Ricochet is devilishly simpleâ"a network of shoe-box-sized transceivers that ....
The service has been reactivated in Denver and, just last month, San Diego. The Bay Area may be next. ....
To see a world in a grain of sand, and then to step back and see the beach where the sand lies
...Fb-.
My blog can kick your blog's ass
Ok, so Apple wasn't the first to sell wireless networks, but they were the first to sucessfully market it to consumers. Once the consumers got it home then those consumers realize that wireless networks also could be awesome in a business environment. Apple make it affordable and easy enough for home users and small business owners to establish wireless networking and they deserve full credit for that.
How can they not even show up on the list?
Anybody knows if there are COMMERCIAL 802.11b VPN routers that have been tested and are known to work with Linux clients (freeS/WAN for example)?
laptops ~~~> 802.11b VPN connection~~> Internet.
I agree. I've been setting up a WLAN at the office and have decided to leave the AP's wide open, no WEP, no MAC filtering, SSID broadcast on. Their only connection is to one Linux box running a PPTP VPN daemon (PoPToP) and a DHCP server. If you get past the VPN, you're on the LAN. Otherwise, you're stuck. Only drawback is the VPN's overhead (and having a PPTP client).
Unfortunately, the current implementations don't scale to the size of even the current internet - because they requre every node to know about every other (in case it needs to forward a packet).
(Routing table explosions were what drove the switch from RIP to BGP in the first place.)
They'll get there eventually. Meanwhile, imagine them as drops of mercury. When two touch they join. And when two equal-sized drops join, each "atom" (machine) in the big drop needs twice as much table space as it needed in the separate little drop.
Now imagine them joining, and joining, and joining, until the whole world is covered by one big drop. Somewhere along the way the tables get too big for your handheld, VoIP phone, toaster, or what-have-you.
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
I don't see the real problem at all. Linksys and D-Link are two companies I have much respect for, because time after time, they've brought the price down to earth on networking equipment that the casual home user just couldn't justify purchasing before.
When 100Base-T was still pretty new, network cards often supported it - but home users still ran at 10Base-T because the cost of a hub/router that handled the higher speed was prohibitive. Then Linksys (and D-Link) brought out those cheap 100Base-T routers. Shortly afterwards, prices plummeted across the board.
They did it again with wi-fi adapters and gateways. (Residential gateways like the Lucent RG series were still in the $300-349 range until just after the Linksys stuff came out in the sub $200 price range.)
Now they're doing the same for integrated wi-fi routers/print sharing boxes/Internet sharing boxes.
Is it top quality stuff? Heck no... But it basically works, and at their prices, you can afford to throw one away and replace it if it does die on you after a year or two.
Be confident in your purchase of Linksys Wireless equipment. Linksys rocks. Anyone that is thinking of buying D-Link, please save yourself the time and hassle. D-Link wireless products suck major donkey dick.
If you think this is just a troll, read some comments on D-link wireless products, especially the DI-714. Pathetic.
Buffalo Technology was the No. 3 vendor in market share, followed in order by D-Link and Proxim.
In war driving about 14,000 access points in the northwest the results are fairly consistent with the numbers the article mentions:
Popular ESSID's:
1. linksys 2051 (17.4%)
2. default 967 (8.22%)
3. Wireless 526 (4.47%)
4. MSFTWLAN 374 (3.18%)
5. WLAN 176 (1.49%)
6. tsunami 131 (1.11%)
7. IntelWLAN 124 (1.05%)
8. 101 119 (1.01%)
9. tmobile 118 (1.00%)
10. SpeedStream 101 (0.85%)
I'll let you figure out which default SSID is from which vendor
Every four seconds a woman has a baby.
Our problem is to find this woman and stop her.
I always found this picture interesting, projected world population growth in megacities from a CIA report called "Global Trends 2015." Check it out here. That picture never fails to blow my mind...
I've been suffering through the terrible performace of a DLink DWL-650 card for about 6 months. It has a miserable range that gets spotty through a singele wall at 10 feet, difficult at 30 feet and unusable at 50 feet. I finally ordered Proxim's Orinoco Gold card and found out why it's a cause celebre among those in the know. Seventy feet from the base station, sitting on my deck, my new card offers a high speed, uninterrupted connection, whereas my old card used to cut out every minute or so at that same spot-- rendering any internet use impossible. The Orinoco Gold takes a licking -- perhaps lowering its throughput a bit -- but keeps on ticking, never losing the connection.
I used to think that the bad performance I experienced was a limitation of the 802.11b protocol, but I was mistaken -- it's only the implementation of the protocol on the DLink card that was terrible. I think your readers may want to know that before they plop down $$$ to dot their house with Airport stations a la Paul Butin's suggestion, they should give a quality WiFi card a shot.
Hubbah
You want to know why shipments are up? I'll tell you why. It's because these companies are paying people to buy it! With all the rebates, coupons, and specials available the past few months, I am actually making money by buying this stuff!
Now I just need to figure out what to do with my extra 3 wireless routers. I'm currently thinking "Christmas presents". ;-)
I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
But who need more than 10Base-T for home usage? Are you sure you understand what Base-T stand for?