Slashdot Mirror


X-Box Hackers Trying to Blackmail Microsoft?

wumarkus420 writes "According to this article from CNet News, an anonymous X-Box security research team is threatening Microsoft: either release a digitally-signed official Linux bootloader or face the release of a new exploit that supposedly works without a modchip. While I doubt Microsoft 'negotiates with terrorists,' this should still turn out to be a good I-told-you-so if the exploit is verified." Sounds like a good way to end up in jail.

55 of 894 comments (clear)

  1. Morons by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Funny
    What a brilliant plan.

    "Reveal your trade secrets Gates, or we will set in motion a chain of events that will conclude with our incarcaration in a vile butt-slamming federal prison! We're warning you!"

    1. Re:Morons by k1llt1me · · Score: 5, Funny

      Their Australian... They already live in a penal colony. What do they have to lose...

    2. Re:Morons by mikeophile · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are obviously not familiar with minimum security resort prisons.

    3. Re:Morons by iceT · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Reveal your trade secrets Gates"

      Well, they didn't REALLY ask for any trade secrets. All they want is a boot-loader that is digitally signed so it can run on the xbox WITHOUT A MOD CHIP. They didn't ask MS how to MAKE a bootloader.. There is no loss of trade secret... only loss of control for the XBOX...

      I wonder what would happen in Microsoft released a LINUX kit for the XBOX, including a distro, and the works (a la Sony and the PS/2)... The loader could still be proprietary...

      --
      -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
    4. Re:Morons by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 4, Funny

      maybe, if they can anonymously do it anonymously

    5. Re:Morons by cyborch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Luckily the DMCA does not exist outside the US, and I will gladly host information on how to install linux on an x-box. That's not illegal here (Denmark).

    6. Re:Morons by TheLastUser · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Remember the god ol days, when buying a product meant that you had some rights regarding how you used it?

      How come if I buy, say, a tennis raquet, and use it instead to play squash, nobody f**king cares. But if I take an Xbox and decide to use it play an open-source squash simulator, the gestapo will throw me into the aforementioned "vile butt-slamming federal prison".

      And for that matter, what's with all the "vile butt-slamming" in federal prisons? Can't we have some sort of 3 slaps law?

    7. Re:Morons by NortWind · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ... to allow people who bought VIDEO GAME systems to use things other than the game software they are entitled to ...

      I don't think you understand what it means to own something. If I were to buy an Xbox, I could legally use it as a boat anchor, a footwarmer, or to run any software I wish to run on that computer. It's only a video game system if you choose to use it to play video games.

      ...and hoping to recoup some of their money on expensive software.

      Microsoft can hope all they like, but buying an Xbox doesn't legally compel the buyer to get even one game. You can buy it and smash it just to admire the the pieces if you want. That's your right as the owner.

      The hacker types want them to do this in order to run an operating system that's not only free, but is in direct competition

      Yes. Why shouldn't they be able to run their legal software on hardware they own? You don't have to sign a EULA to buy an Xbox.

      ... if they don't provide a free bootloader, the hackers will release a mod that allows you to (presumably) boot unsigned programs...

      That's the deal they are offering. They are saying "Let us run legal software that we have a fair use right to run on our own hardware, without compromising your security system *or* we will allow any software to be run whether it is signed by MS or not."

  2. Microsoft would never negotiate with terrorists by mikeophile · · Score: 5, Funny

    They hate the competition.

    1. Re:Microsoft would never negotiate with terrorists by Surak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only reason that's funny is that it's true.

      WHy can't you get modded Funny *AND* insightful? :)

  3. *slaps forehead and winces* by Bame+Flait · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These morons are just going to make the case for tougher enforcement and DRM.

    It's not a war we want - because (and not to be trite) everyone will lose. Throw these criminals in jail and get on with it.

    1. Re:*slaps forehead and winces* by OrenWolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that they aren't doing anything criminal.

      *unless* they require some portion of Microsoft's own code to reflash the BIOS (or in the resultant BIOS that is flashed), adding a drop of solder to my XBOX is *not* illegal. Running any software on my XBOX is *not* illegal. I own it.

      Where they would be "criminals" is if, and only if, they've stolen some MS proprietary code.

      And thankfully, the DMCA doesn't apply in Australia.

    2. Re:*slaps forehead and winces* by EpsCylonB · · Score: 5, Funny

      if your tinfoil is in a roll and not already on your head then you are comprimised.

    3. Re:*slaps forehead and winces* by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Maybe the whole thing is a Redmond-sponsored false flag operation to provide Microsoft with an "example" in support its DRM lobbying efforts. "

      Maybe you're paid by Microsoft to sound like a conspiracy nut so we'll ignore this possiblity.

    4. Re:*slaps forehead and winces* by OrenWolf · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yes they are, it's called "blackmail".
      A person is guilty of blackmail if, with a view to gain for himself or another or with intent to cause loss to another, he makes any unwarranted demand with menaces; and for this purpose a demand with menaces is unwarranted unless the person making it does so in the belief - (a) that he has reasonable grounds for making the demand; and (b) that the use of the menaces is a proper means of reinforcing the demand.

      Are we suggesting that everyone that threatens to release an exploit if a company doesn't patch a problem is a blackmailer?

      They're suggesting that they'll toss away their info if Microsoft doesn't make it *required* to use such means to use Linux. In other words, the party "that he has reasonable grounds for making the demand", because the exploit is a *legal* way to do what they want, and they're asking for another legal means to do what they want, or else they will release theirs.

    5. Re:*slaps forehead and winces* by Pieroxy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, it is obviously illegal to play a DVD on your linux box. Even through you own:
      * Linux
      * The hardware
      * The DVD

      It is still illegal to watch a DVD on your box because the MPAA guys didn't grant a license to any software vendor that release a software DVD player for Linux. What is illegal is actually to circumvent the CSS encoding of DVDs without paying for it.

  4. Pipedot. Geek news without the slant. by Speare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, c|net did a pretty good job of covering the story without the scare-mongering, sensationalistic crap that this poster did. People could read the article and draw their own conclusions, rather than shepherding the flock to the appropriate anti-X rhetoric opinion.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  5. Bluff. by Squidgee · · Score: 5, Insightful
    They really think MS would release an official LINUX bootloader?! Of course not.

    THis is, plain and simple, a bluff. If they had a way to do it, they'd release it; why wouldn't they? Who needs an official bootloader if you can boot Linux without a modchip?

    It's a bluff to bully MS into allowing Linux on the Xbox. And it isn't going to work.

    1. Re:Bluff. by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Easier than what? Booting a game and picking a save file?

      You only have to do it once, flash your bios, and that's that.

      Unless they found a way to flash the bios without shorting the WE pads (ie; without opening the box), I wont be impressed. It's just a variation on a theme.

      They come off like script kiddies. Threatening people with anothers skills/products.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  6. Legality by phritz · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This is obviously illegal under the DMCA ... but what real laws are they breaking?

    Does this legally qualify as blackmail? I can't think of any other laws that would apply here.

  7. I remember... by Daimaou · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember trying this back in the days of Windows 95. I said, "Microsoft, you either release Windows 95 for free, or I will give away a secret code, 111-1111111, which will render your 'key-code' security invalid and allow everyone to pirate your OS."

    They didn't listen, so I released it.

  8. I think I saw this on GI Joe once... by LordYUK · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who do they think they are, Cobra?

    I mean, gee... This sounds like some corny Saturday morning cartoon plot...

    "reveal your secret or face my wrath!"

    Now all we need is for them to declare that they have an army of fanatical zealots devoted to the cause of bringing their plan to frutation, i.e., Linux on the X-box...

    oh, wait...

    hmm...

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
  9. How to make linux look stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful


    yeah really professional guys,thanks for that

    what happens when IT/CTO managers read antics like this ?, you think it furthers Linux adoption or sets it back ?, i know we would look rather stupid if this article came up at one of our board meetings,

  10. Simply more direct than usual by genomancer · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Not saying I agree with them, but all they're doing is being more upfront than most anti-DRM/P2P/etc progressive technologies are. Half the topics on Slashdot these days of whether a corporation should support or fight a technology resolve to "If they don't support it, it'll get released anyway, so they might as well".. these guys are just coalescing that "vague threat" into a direct warning. Intelligent? No.. it's not a great way to fight a guerilla tech-war.. but in a way it's more honourable than the alternative.

    G

  11. Re:Howdy ho by dnaSpyDir · · Score: 5, Funny

    They have about as much pull as pee wee herman.

    now would that be inside or outside of a theatre?

    sorry,couldn't resist :-)

  12. Linux terrorists by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    O yeah, it sucks to be your own worst enemy. Not "release the specs", not "allow other OSes to run", no. "Make Linux run on this thing or else". All Microsoft has to do is turn around and say See? This is what open source is all about! You've heard about al-Qaeda and Hamas, but you ain't seen nothing until you face the the Pensacola LUG!!

    Take gun, aim at foot, pull trigger. Repeat until death.

  13. Re:Playing Nice With Vendor Notification? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful
    They can't release a patch because the flash update jumper is not connected. People couldn't flash their Xbox without opening it and voiding their warranty; Xboxes would have to be returned to service to be updated.

    Of course, Microsoft can fix the problem in upcoming Xboxes, which will happen if they do release the exploit.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. This is the wrong approach. by csguy314 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Trying to twist Microsoft's arm into releasing an official Linux bootloader is definitely the wrong way to go. If people were able to convince MS that there was actually a market for that sort of thing then they might do it themselves, but that's doubtful. Nevertheless, trying to blackmail MS into doing it will only increase the already massive resentment MS suits feel towards the open source movement.
    And quite frankly it doesn't make the Linux crown look very nice. Not that MS has very moral business practices; but there's no need to lower ourselves to their level.

    --
    This is left as an exercise for the reader.
  15. seems risky by Tancred · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like a good way to end up in jail.

    True. However, if the story is true, then the blackmailers are quite technologically savvy. If they also have the willpower (e.g. not bragging about it), it could be next to impossible to trace.

  16. Re:The land of the free by goldspider · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "if the DMCA didn't exist then they wouldn't need to blackmail M$."

    And if I were rich, I wouldn't have to rob a bank.

    So does the fact that I'm not rich justify my robbing a bank?

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  17. Um... by r00k123 · · Score: 4, Funny
    This "secret" has been public for a while now.

    There was even a /. story about it: here

    Big threat...the info is already out there.

    "I demand MS give me a copy of WinXP signed by BILL GATES HIMSELF or I will REVEAL THAT THE SECRET DOS COMMAND TO LIST ALL FILES!"

    -Ben

  18. It's a trap! by Rayonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is all an elaborate ploy by Microsoft to get everyone to buy an Xbox. They want you to believe that either A) Linux bootloader will be released, or B) 37337 exploit will be released. Don't fall for it!

    Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got to fashion a tinfoil helmet to block the RFID chip the dentist put in my molar.

  19. Re:Waste of Time by Squidgee · · Score: 4, Insightful
    B. It's real, they are missing the big picutre. MS looses money on every XBox sold. If they signed a Linux Bootloader that would be an endorsment of a way to loose money and I wouldn't doubt it to be against their own EULA for uses of the XBox.

    ENOUGH with the "MS loses money for every Xbox sold". So, if we the /. readers are to read you comment, then MS doesn't want to sell Xboxes? Ludicrous.

    MS sells Xboxes at a loss so they can gain an upper hand over the rest of the Videogame market. They have much larger profit margins than the rest (Sony, Nintendo), so they can lower prices to such a level where the rest can't compete. Then they don't need to worry about lowering prices because they'll have beaten out the other consoles.

    AND, for every Xbox bought MS loses less money. There fore they want more sold, not fewer.

    The "Buy an Xbox and MS loses money" argument is stupid stupid stupid. MS wants you to buy and Xbox. They lose more money for every Xbox on the shelves than every one brought home.

  20. Re:Pipedot. Geek news without the slant. by GMontag · · Score: 4, Funny

    Excuse me Sir. We have traditions straddling two millinea AND two centuries here.

    Are you proposing that we stomp on the most sacred?

  21. Hardware less hack! by snoozerdss · · Score: 4, Funny

    up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, B, A, B, A, select, start! ;)

    --
    Snoozer.
  22. Re: calling their bluff by mboots · · Score: 5, Informative

    RTFA, please. The "hackers" would prefer a legally signed bootloader, since it would not have the side effect of allowing pirated games to run on the Xbox. That's why they aren't releasing their mods right away - they're giving M$ the chance to do the right thing. And actually, you can already boot linux without a modchip; see here for details.

  23. Re:Pipedot. Geek news without the slant. by calethix · · Score: 5, Funny

    no offense to you but..
    only on slashdot would a post suggesting to actually read the article get a +5 insightful ;)

  24. Re:The land of the free by palewhitemale · · Score: 5, Funny

    oh snap, he called out your metaphor.

  25. Sooooo.... by Doomstalk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're trying to force Microsoft to release a piece of software that turns the Xbox into a cheap PC that Microsoft sells at a significant loss. I'm sorry, but I don't see that as especially likely. The modification they propose still requires you to solder the mainboard of the Xbox, and to flash the BIOS. That's only moderately cheaper and easier than installing a modchiop, and a lot more prohibitive than popping a disc into the drive. Let's not also forget that flashing your BIOS in that fashion effectively bars you from playing Xbox Live, since it automatically scans the BIOS on load. Many mod chips, on the other hand, can be switched on and off making them a much more reasonable solution for many pirates.

  26. This won't work by recursiv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quite simply, Microsoft has not motivation to comply. How does the "research group" expect to keep their method from leaking? It will leak regardless. So Microsoft either makes an official linux bootloader for Xbox or not... Hmm.... tough choice.

    --
    I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
  27. Mod parent down by acidrain69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you had *read* the article, you'd realize that if MS releases an official bootloader, this will *avoid* piracy. The group says they will release the exploit if MS refuses, and the exploit, which allows Linux to boot, ALSO allows for piracy, while an official boot loader wouldn't.

    RTFA.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  28. Re:Waste of Time by OrenWolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Almost.

    You're forgetting the obvious.

    Each XBOX is a loss to Microsoft. Supply channels mean there aren't a lot of em on store shelves anyway.

    Microsoft's greatest fear? A situation where someone buys an XBOX, and *no* games. Ever.

    Let's pull a number out of my ass and say the MS needs someone to buy 2 games to "break even" on an XBOX sale. If you buy an XBOX, Mod it, run Linux and/or pirated games exclusively on it, then all you've done is cost them money. They've lost money on you.

    If modding the XBOX becomes trivial, the chance that less games will be bought, and that the magic number of required games will *not* be exceeded for them to be profitable grows. THAT is the issue.

    It's not "Microsoft doesn't want you to buy an XBOX", its "Microsoft doesn't want you to buy an XBOX and *nothing else*".

  29. If I were Bill Gates.... by sllim · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would put these kids in jail first. I would push for terrorist charges. I would try to get one of those sentences where they are not allowed within 15 feet of a computer for like 15 years.

    Then (just to piss them off) I would release Linux for the xBox just as they asked.

    The icing on my cake? I would charge like $100 for it.

    Alas, Bill isn't that entertaining.
    He probably has better things to do with his life then screw with these two morons.

  30. Maiman's laser was pointless too. by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    *Sigh*

    Why is it that the first response of just about everyone is "who cares"? Are there really that few of you who just do things because they are challenging?

    There are a fairly wide variety of reasons to want to do this. The single most interesting reason for me is the ability to play *any* media using this single console. DVDs, VCDs, CDs, Streamed content, networked files, internet radio, flash, movie trailers...Anything I can play using a standard PC, *plus* i already have it connected into my system to play "Halo", "Brute Force", "Outlaw Golf", and a whole host of other games. Also, I can play all my old favorites, using various emulators...pacman, galaga, rastan, etc, etc...

    All of this in a console that I already own. Why the hell would I *not* want to do this? Particularly if all it takes is a one time investment of 10 minutes getting the $10 memory card setup. Crist, it's not even a *stretch* for me to make the choice.

    You know what's even better? I worked on the filesystem code for the xbox-linux project early on, before the prizes were offered. I *still* got $4500 for that work. That paid for my time and all the consoles I'll want to buy for the next 10 years. Never has a paycheck been so gratifying.

    So tell me how foolish I am, berate my hobby as pointless or shortsighted. Then you go buy an xbox *and* a pc, that's fine. I'll just sit back and laugh at you.

  31. Re:He's right by baka_boy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, since they're asking for a signed bootloader, that would suggest that the X-Box uses cryptographic signatures to verify binaries. The whole point of that is that, while the bootloader binary itself could be copied and distributed freely, any modifications would immediately cause rejection, as the new binary wouldn't match its signature. For a modified bootloader, you'd need something like the exploit they're threatening to release, in order to circumvent the normal security checks.

  32. this just in!!! by macshune · · Score: 5, Funny

    SYDNEY--Four teenage boys were found clinging to life today, after being thrown through 98 windows in a normally quiet suburban Sydney.

    "We don't know for sure who did it, but this looks like the work of the MSDS--the Microsoft Defenestration Squad," said a Syndey Police Department spokesperson

    The boys alledgedly had developed an easy way to circumvent the anti-piracy controls on Microsoft's game console, the X-Box. Reportedly, they tried to blackmail Microsoft with the information to try get a version of the Linux operating system to run on the X-Box. Microsoft never reponded to their blackmail.

    The MSDS is wanted in 56 countries for a wide range of crimes. Everything from extortion stemming from unreasonable licensing agreements, to the now familiar chucking-folks-out-the-windows routine used to discourage competitors.

    Sydney hospital officials say that the boys are making a good recovery and will be released by the end of the next week.

  33. Why not? by fm6 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It works in the movies!

  34. viva la freenet! by pillohead · · Score: 4, Funny

    That was my first thought, freenet that baby let all those 15 users know how to mod thier x-box.

  35. This isn't blackmail by benjamindees · · Score: 4, Informative
    definition

    Extortion of money or something else of value from a person by the threat of exposing a criminal act or discreditable information.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  36. Uh uh by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    All they want is a boot-loader that is digitally signed so it can run on the xbox WITHOUT A MOD CHIP.
    Which Microsoft will never do. Once such a boot loader was out there, you could run any software on an XBox. If Microsoft is unable to control what software gets run on the XBox, they get no licensing fees from XBox developers. Since the XBox itself is sold at a loss, that'd be the end of the whole platform.
  37. The Racket Racket by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Suppose tennis rackets were very expensive to make. No one can afford to buy them, until somebody gets the idea of selling them at a loss, and making a profit by selling tennis court time. They've patented tennis courts, of course, so you can't just build your own. Then people discover that squash is public domain, so they start playing squash instead. How soon would it be before it was illegal to play squash with a tennis racket?

    I hear you saying, "That's lame. You can't use regulate people's behavior to that level." I certainly agree. And eventually the big IP hoarders will figure this out. But in the meantime -- well, I was never any good at tennis.

    1. Re:The Racket Racket by arose · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too expensive to make? Buy a damn RacketCube.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  38. Signed Linux = Hacked Xbox by Gray · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm somewhat impressed the author of the article got the skinny on the 007 trick, but he missed the real point.

    For non-Xbox nerds, it works like this.

    The XBox has internal flash for the BIOS.
    To enable flashing, all just need to jumper one point (referred to as the D0 point) to ground.

    The 007 trick is an buffer exploit that allows you to boot linux, once you've got linux running, assuming you jumpered D0, you can reflash your internal BIOS with a hacked version (which ignores keys). You'll never play Xbox Live, but you can now play pirate DVDs and copy games to your hard drive.

    With only the buffer exploit, it's at least a challenge, but if MS was to release a signed Linux distro, the process would be trivial. Jumper D0, boot MS-Xlinux, FTP to Xbox, upload bios burner app, pow. Hacked Xbox.

    It's *extreamly* unlikely MS would ever do this. These guys can release easier solutions for buffer overflow related methods, but nothing can have as much potential for evil as a signed linux distro.

  39. Re: Don't be so sure... by llin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Denmark was the first country to adopt the EUCD (DMCA++). Here's a good EUCD status page. It has the same broad anti-circumvention tool proscriptions as the DMCA.

  40. pointless by geoff+lane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they really have a mod-less hack to allow unsigned code to boot on the xbox the correct thing to do is release it.

    There is no way MS will allow Linux or any other OS to boot on xbox as that effectively makes the system open and then MS wouldn't make any money selling certificates.

    Besides, MS will now play the terrorist card and you _know_ how well that plays in Washington.