Slashdot Mirror


TV Brick - Open Source TV Streaming?

Anders Jacobsen writes "Nexedi has released the TV Brick - an open source-based box for TV capture and streaming over the Internet. Primarily targeted towards Japanese families living in France (seeing that popular Japanese channels like Yomiuri TV and NHK Sogo are unavailable outside Japan), the idea is that is you plug one of these boxes to a TV antenna and a broadband connection in Japan, and the other to a broadband plug and a TV in France; instant 'magic' happens and all the goodness of Japanese TV is in your living room." We also covered the OpenBrick project a few months back.

236 comments

  1. Egg People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    (see graphics on the site)

    Now poached eggs everywhere can watch Pokemon!

    1. Re:Egg People? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      What site?

      seems to be quite /.-ed at the mo

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    2. Re:Egg People? by red_dragon · · Score: 1

      What'cha mean, Weebl and Bob are going to use it too? I can imagine it already: turn the device on and it blurts "want pie now!" out loud, then it stops working until you bring a pie. Or a donkey.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
  2. So the Japanese in France are saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We get signal!!

    1. Re:So the Japanese in France are saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think you mean <>

  3. Talk about a specialized target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japanese families living in France? How many of those are there?

    1. Re:Talk about a specialized target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, according to this - 21,785 but I don't think that is only ex-pats and not recentaly naturalize citizens. That is unless those numbers are in 1,000's and somebody just forgot to notate it.

    2. Re:Talk about a specialized target by mjmalone · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure they arent in the thousands, last I checked there werent 312 million japanese people living in the USA.

    3. Re:Talk about a specialized target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      U should check again, last time I looked there were only about 127 million japamese people living in Japan http://www.jinjapan.org/stat/stats/01CEN23.html.
      I doubt there are more living in the USA.

    4. Re:Talk about a specialized target by brotherscrim · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna go out on a limb here, but unless all Americans are Japanese, I think you have your number off by an order of magnitude or so...

  4. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get Direct Tv or Dish network. That will do it. Why pirate the signal?

    1. Re:What? by doublesix · · Score: 1

      I had DirectTV for a while ... the only japanese TV I could find was Iron Chef.

    2. Re:What? by 73939133 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not "pirating". People pay for getting the signal in Japan (actually, it's probably public television and they pay television taxes for it) and then they privately access it through a broadband connection.

    3. Re:What? by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

      Actually, the NHK people wil come by every year, and you have to pay them for public TV.

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    4. Re:What? by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's what I was saying: that's how people pay television taxes in many countries.

  5. Watch out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thats not a brick, its a tentacle!

    1. Re:Watch out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I thought it was about cross-dressing lego ...

    2. Re:Watch out by El+Pollo+Loco · · Score: 1

      "That's not a pencil! That's a steamroller!" "I'll kill that salesman...." And he did... Goons. Old radio show. No one will get this.

  6. Market size by worst_name_ever · · Score: 5, Funny
    Primarily targeted towards Japanese families living in France

    Okay, now that is definitely what I call a niche market. Heck, why not go all-out and also market it towards Brazilian families living in Slovenia?

    --

    In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    1. Re:Market size by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

      This is probably built for the CEO of the Japanese company just so that he can go to his summer home or something. I agree that this is one hell of a niche though :)

    2. Re:Market size by Andorion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know if "targeted towards" is the right wording - there's a good chance that they were the inspiration for the product, but I doubt "Japanese families living in France" would be the only ones interested.

      ~Berj

    3. Re:Market size by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I think France is an example (only saw it in the diagram, not anywhere in the actual announcement.

      Seems that Japan-Euro application is most likely because of "compatible copyright law":

      The use of TVBrick appliances for private use within the same family is compatible with Copyright Law in Europe and in Japan. This is why Nexedi is selling TVBrick to families only, mainly Japanese.

      Who knows, maybe there _are_ lots of families of Japanese businessmen that live in Europe.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    4. Re:Market size by torpor · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's a pretty big market - I'd say at least a couple hundred thousand potential customers in France alone, for Japanese TV channels.

      And, Franco-cultural phobia being what it is, it's little wonder that people want to pipe in channels from their motherland.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    5. Re:Market size by Arpie · · Score: 1

      The parent post meant to be funny, but I would seriously consider it. I pay $25 a month for one (semi-crippled) Brazilian channel on sattellite.

      I would happily invest some time and money to get rid of the $25 monthly charge, especially if I could get the other broadcast channels and the image quality wasn't that crappy.

      I live in the US, not Slovenia, but even though I didn't RTFA (slashdotted already?) I expect this technology will work anywhere?

      Of course, the sattellite companies are probably sh1tt1ng their pants to lose customers (like me) who pay a premium for this relatively small service. What are the legal implications of this? They probably won't go after single users, but if a company is trying to capitalize on this, can we expect to see legal action?

      --
      /* TAANSTAFL */
    6. Re:Market size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I pay $25 a month for one (semi-crippled) Brazilian channel on sattellite.

      Oh, yeah? And what do you get, if I may ask?

      I suggest "TV Cultura", a government-owned TV from the São Paulo state in Brazil. Cream of the cream, the best we have here: Brazilian music shows, interviews with important folks, first-quality children programmes (hi, Brittons!) etc.

  7. Limited value? by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Why would I want live streaming video from Japan in France? If it was to watch episodes of a TV show I liked, why couldn't I just download them from gnutella or the equivalent? That saves me having to watch commercials.

    Also, what about bandwidth? Compression of a stream is considerably less than what is possible for a pre-existing file. If everyone starts doing this, soon all bandwidth will cease to exist. And for what? A cheap parlor trick.

    But the worst problem of all is how to maintain community standards at a national level. Internet rebroadcasting from Japan to France is no big deal, since France is already very decadent and would probably even welcome some tentacle rape porn. But what if someone in either Japan or France tried to beam that kind of junk into the precious minds of the US's children?

    1. Re:Limited value? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You have a lot to learn about trolling, young one. This effort gets a grade of "W", for Weak.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Limited value? by Pii · · Score: 4, Funny
      Quite right...

      So many possibilities squandered.

      For instance, there should definately have been a crack about French authorities busting heads over the fact that this streaming Japanese content wasn't properly voiced-over in French, with Japanese subtitles... Preserving their culture, and all that.

      **chuckle** French Authorities Busting Heads! Sometimes, I kill myself.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    3. Re:Limited value? by Baikala · · Score: 1

      Uh, "the precious mind of the US's children" who would dare? Every body knows the US kids own the most naive and inocent minds of the world. What could happen if the next generation of world policers and pop culture evangelizers is allowed to get in contact with porn or even violence?

      --
      16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
    4. Re:Limited value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't feed the Troll.

    5. Re:Limited value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never heard of erick, feeding the mensa babe troll is hilarious, and $$$$$exygal always had good porn links. But didn't $$$$$exy retire the /. scene a while ago?

    6. Re:Limited value? by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      You'd think people would put alittle effort into these things.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    7. Re:Limited value? by shadowcabbit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Despite the obvious troll, there is a point nestled in there, and one which probably deserves a little attention (as well as a counterpoint). The above poster's comment asks whether or not this is a valid use of the technology when other methods of obtaining the shows exist-- as stated, gnutella, Kazaa, etc. The drawback comes when you consider the time factor. Rarely does a show get taped, digitized, and distributed within hours of its release-- there are, of course, exceptions, but not many. This makes things like, say, the 6 o'clock news a bit less timely when it comes three days later. The idea behind the brick (as far as I can tell without having read the article) is streaming, live video. (While "streaming" and "live" could potentially be used to describe tentacle rape porn, let's keep this academic discussion marginally professional, shall we?) Thus, a Japanese family in Versailles with relatives (say, a brother-in-law's family) in Sendai could keep track of the news, and/or hear about the Angels obliterating Tokyo, etc. without having to wait for someone to digitize it out of the goodness of their hearts.
      Incidentally, I give the whole project about 3 weeks before the MPAA, RIAA, and USDA all jump on it as "copyright infringement". Just another case of complacent corporations losing out because they didn't bother to develop the technology first.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    8. Re:Limited value? by Choron · · Score: 1

      I know you tried to be funny but if you look at the way the Japanese satellite system works, it's awfully restricted.
      You cannot have any channel on a Japanese satellite network if it's not properly subtitled, that explains why the choice is so limited.
      Of course you can get a 2 metre dish and get signals from "foreign" satellites but only a luck few get that kind of space.

      --
      "Naughty, naughty, naughty, you filthy old soomka !"
    9. Re:Limited value? by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      If it was to watch episodes of a TV show I liked, why couldn't I just download them from gnutella or the equivalent?

      Can you really get that wide a variety of TV showes from gnutella? I've only seen a few geek shows (Buffy, Enterprise) - I haven't even found Andromeda. Secondly, between watching the shows live, or spending hours searching and trying to find a reliable source or wait 18 hours to have it drop right before the ending, I think I'd rather watch it live.

    10. Re:Limited value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The MPAA and RIAA probably don't care much about the rebroadcasting of Japanese media, and the analogous Japanese organizations (if they even exist) don't have the legal clout (and government support) to enforce copyrights the way they do here.

  8. TV? Brick? by medscaper · · Score: 4, Funny
    TV...Brick...

    What a concept.

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    1. Re:TV? Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone else rememeber this as a product that was sold in the late 70s. It was a foam rubber brick that you could throw at the TV when something happened, like in sporting events, that you didn't like.

    2. Re:TV? Brick? by istartedi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Elvis. A man ahead of his time.

      (OK, he shot the lousy box, but it's the same idea)

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  9. silly muggle.... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 5, Funny
    instant 'magic' happens

    I hope that I don't open a VNC window with you around. You'll probally think that I opened a portal to the other computer.

    1. Re:silly muggle.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean that really isn't a portal to the other computer????

    2. Re:silly muggle.... by Surak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah. Actually, I think that's a pretty apt way to describe it. A portal to another computer. I think I'll use that analogy next time someone asks what 'VNC' is. Thank you, kind sir!

    3. Re:silly muggle.... by asscroft · · Score: 1

      :5900 They don't call them ports for nothin'!

      --
      because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  10. Franco-Japanese families? by eyegone · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Primarily targeted towards Japanese families living in France...

    Is this really a significant market?

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    1. Re:Franco-Japanese families? by Surak · · Score: 1

      Is this really a significant market?

      Actually, yeah. Those and the Franco-Chinese as well. Slashdot user salimma actually has an interesting piece in his journal about some Franco-Chinese literature (Balzac, in fact (sp?)) he was reading as well.

    2. Re:Franco-Japanese families? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this post more insightful than the other two that said the same thing 3 minutes earlier? Not only isn't it very insightful (after all do you really know how many Japanese live in France) but it is horribly redundant.

    3. Re:Franco-Japanese families? by zwoelfk · · Score: 1

      Is this really a significant market?

      Dunno, but I'm interested in picking one of these up! I'm in Japan about 6 months of the year (and am an American) and sometimes I'd like to catch something on TV in The States -- and as it happens, I have a house with cable there not being used while I'm gone, so... perfect!

      In other words, it's significant to me.

      Z.

    4. Re:Franco-Japanese families? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thtats what hapeens when you mod your own post up.

  11. heh by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    ..all the goodness of Japanese TV is in your living room.

    Heck, if that sentence fragment isn't enough to send everyone running out to buy a Brick I don't know what is.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:heh by UWC · · Score: 1

      While awkward and maybe incorrect, it seems that the sentence is complete, not a fragment. If you'll note, there is a verb there. It's just timid and small, hiding between "TV" and "in."

    2. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if your inability to recognize a complete sentence isn't enough to... Aw, forget it. You're not worth it.

    3. Re:heh by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      The best part about Japanese TV is, you don't really need to know Japanese to understand it. It's primarily food and travel shows, with one person explaining what's going on while everyone else says, "Oooh," "Ahhh," and "Delicious!"

      You get cable and it's mostly American shows (and a couple of German) dubbed/subbed into Japanese. Hit the bilingual button on your remote and it's in the native language. I get Animal Planet, Discovery Channel, CNN, Fox, and Cartoon Network, among others.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  12. Free satellite access! by indros13 · · Score: 3, Funny
    So, if you just want to get access to a whole bunch of free channels, set this sucker up on the DirecTV display at your local Best Buy store and beam it to your home computer!

    "Turn on the Fun!"

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    1. Re:Free satellite access! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Except when some halfwit changes the channel to Oxygen, you have to go back down to Best Buy and change it back to Spike Lee TV.

  13. Hmmm by SlayerofGods · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't it be Japanese people living anywhere in the world besides japan?
    And the marketer is thinking far to small easy to use tech like that has far more many uses then that.

    --

    Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
  14. Excellent technology by 403Forbidden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a great use for video capture.

    Now people can view foreign programs, use their computer+tv at the same time, as well as a number of other things and the TV execs can't do much to morally sway users against it as it would have all the commercials intact.

    1. Re:Excellent technology by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      the TV execs can't do much to morally sway users against it as it would have all the commercials intact.


      No, but cable and satellite providers might have a little something to say. I'm not sure what Japanese laws are, but if people have to pay in Japan to get satellite or cable, the providers may consider this stealing unless it's explicitly being paid for. And, if the article ever stops being slashdotted, I'll read it to see if it mentions anything about this.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    2. Re:Excellent technology by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      It's being paid for by whatever method is being used to feed the data into the Japan-based box. The example given is an antenna, so it's being paid for by commercial views.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    3. Re:Excellent technology by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      It's being paid for by whatever method is being used to feed the data into the Japan-based box.

      Thanks. The site is still totally /.-ed for me. I'd still be concerned about non-antenna based situations where a person uses the Japan-based box on a feed from friends of family members.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    4. Re:Excellent technology by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sorry to double-reply, but I just got through to the site. It looks like they cover this area:

      Because reproduction of home TV channels happens in a private manner within the same family, the use of TVBrick to watch home TV channels is compatible with international Copyright Law.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    5. Re:Excellent technology by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Remember the canadian website which were streaming tv from the us? They got shot down so fast their ears were ringing. Copyright is the greedy monster that wants more.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    6. Re:Excellent technology by mrmag00 · · Score: 1

      In the US, it's quite illegal to rebroadcast media. I don't see how this is any different.

    7. Re:Excellent technology by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Now people can view foreign programs, use their computer+tv at the same time, as well as a number of other things and the TV execs can't do much to morally sway users against it as it would have all the commercials intact.

      Nope... the TV execs will already have a problem with this.

      Think of it this way, a "brick" in Atlanta beams the NBC affiliate to a viewer in Boston... same NBC shows with the ads in tact? Nope. The Boston NBC station shows Boston aimed ads in the local spots, the Atlanta based station shows Atlanta aimed ads that are likely meaningless to the Boston viewer... and that'll have the Boston NBC affilate owner upset. This fight has happened already, see the DBS local-into-local rules...

      Sending the BBC programs over to the USA is exactly the same problem, the BBC wants to be able to sell their shows to American TV companies, and there are some shows that the BBC has purchased the rights to air in the UK that they don't have the ability to sell the international rights too because somebody else owns those...

      "The Industry" hates anything that lets a show from one "TV zone" travel into another...

    8. Re:Excellent technology by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      They're not marketing it in the US. And the parent wasn't referring to legality, but "morally sway"ing users to view what they are doing as wrong.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  15. Been there, done that by sosume · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The process is really easy. Get a TV tuner card that is supported under your favourite unix-like flavour, for instance a Hauppage BT 878. Open a remote X session and start the TV application. Voila. (maybe some reencoding should be done to get it all the way to france- 100 mbit works if you don't mind :)

    In other news, I wonder what a beowulf cluster of these would take for bandwidth..

    1. Re:Been there, done that by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I've tried this with my BT 878-based card when I was in school. SSH X Tunneling worked very poorly from the computer lab to the dorms: even though there was a 10 megabit link, I couldn't stream video much larger than about 80x60 pixels. The little window was also really color-distorted, and I couldn't get audio to work at all.

      This is clearly where re-encoding comes into play, but it takes a beefy PC to encode to DivX or another good-quality codec on the fly. And good luck finding a 100 Mbit link between Japan and France, unless you happen to be a major university or something...

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Been there, done that by Abcd1234 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm... so you say you might need to encode the video due to bandwidth limitations. Well, that throws out using straight X (what you're describing) (and, no, compressing the X protocol is not sufficient... it doesn't meet compression requirements AND it introduces latency for which you'd have to compensate).

      So, we'll have to encode the video at the source and decode at the sink. Oh, and then there's audio. We gotta transport that, somehow, too... sending it in the raw would be silly, since bandwidth is still an issue. Well, we'll encode and decode that, too. And while we're at it, we might as well write some software to set up the transport pipe, enable the capture device, encoders, decoders, etc, etc...

      Oh, wait, I've just re-invented the TV Brick...

    3. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your right...that is so easy! Anyone could do it...it's as easy as opening a beer (a cold free one).

      Moron - like everyone knows how to use that Linux crap.

    4. Re:Been there, done that by akb · · Score: 1

      Ugg, remote X display of video. That sounds like it would be terrible for any reasonable res video. Why not just setup a streaming server which was designed to deliver video as effeiciently as possible?

    5. Re:Been there, done that by anewsome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someone please mod this clown down as a troll. He obviously has never tried this and has no clue what he is talking about. X windows displaying a full screen moving TV picture over a broadband connection? Yeah, I'd like to see him try that.

    6. Re:Been there, done that by 73939133 · · Score: 2, Informative

      it introduces latency for which you'd have to compensate

      There is no need to "compensate for latency" if all you are doing is watching video.

      Note also that there are a number of X-extensions supporting image and video decompression on the display. So, sending a video stream through the X protocol to the display can actually be quite reasonable.

    7. Re:Been there, done that by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Just one problem... you have to use *nix...

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    8. Re:Been there, done that by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Like what? I'd love to use my laptop as a bedroom tv. Tried it through SSH , too slow even on 100mbit. There isn't a null cipher, which I think would help. Blowfish works a lot better than 3des, but not good enough. I only want it on my lan anyway. So what can I do to make this work? Got a link?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:Been there, done that by 73939133 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You probably have neither the server software nor the X extensions to be able to do this the X11 way. My point was simply that, in principle, it's quite feasible to use X11 for video streaming through the X11 protocol. In fact, it's a shame that people haven't built more software to do this because it would be much cleaner and nicer than the DRI hacks and viewers people are kludging together right now.

      In any case, the simple answer to your question is: use VideoLAN.

  16. Zero Vision by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1, Funny

    In A.D. 2003 Broadcast was beginning.
    Captain: What happen ?
    Mechanic: Somebody set up us the boob tube
    Operator: We get signal
    Captain: What !
    Operator: Main screen turn on
    Captain: It's You !!
    CaTV: How are you gentlemen !!
    CaTV: All your channel are belong to us
    CaTV: You are on the way to destruction
    Captain: What you say !!
    CaTV: You have no chance to watch make your time
    CaTV: HA HA HA HA ....
    Captain: Take off every 'zignal'
    Captain: You know what you doing
    Captain: Move 'zignal'
    Captain: For great reception

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  17. Well it would be even better.... by botzi · · Score: 0
    ...Primarily targeted towards Japanese families living in France...

    Yup, next are the Eskimo in South Africa, followed shortly by all the aussies in Russia etc....
    I didn't mean to laugh, but they can't be targeting a two-digit number of "clients", can they????
    Otherwise, it's pretty cool idea, and we will definitely see more of it, the tool seems neat too and in the moment there's some real use of it, i'll get one....;o))

    --
    1. No sig. 2. ???? 3. Profit!!!
  18. Poor name choice? by ...+James+... · · Score: 4, Informative

    How long until they get sued by these guys:
    VBrick Systems

    Seems like it's essentially doing the same thing and, to me, the name seems awfully similar...

    1. Re:Poor name choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose that would all depend on who owns what patents and where. Otherwise I could definitely see a case for one being deceptively familiar with the other.

    2. Re:Poor name choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry. I had patents on the brain. The real issue here is not patents but trademarks. I was just thinking of an earlier post about Jeff Bezos.

      Now I will wait 2 minutes........

    3. Re:Poor name choice? by ResQuad · · Score: 1

      Thats very true, but havent you knowticed, as soon as you put an "open" in front of what you are doing its ok and you are left alone for the most part.

      I mean look at other project, like:
      Open Office
      Open Mosix

      Etc.

    4. Re:Poor name choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that their prices are 300x more expensive.

    5. Re:Poor name choice? by warpSpeed · · Score: 1
      How long until they get sued by these guys: VBrick Systems

      Or these guys

      The names are similar, and they have money.... That is all it seems to get some larger corps knickers in a bunch now a days.

    6. Re:Poor name choice? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Compubrick 160 has both of these fools beat.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  19. That is a great idea by JazFresh · · Score: 5, Interesting
    especially for expatriates. I've lived a few countries and I'm always miffed that I'm missing out on some TV shows I grew attached to in those countries. Now I'm moving from the US soon and so I'll miss out on HBO's The Wire. I'll have to wait for the season to end and for it to come out on DVD before I can see what happens!

    The alternative is to get friends to tape the shows and send them over/digitise them (an imposition on them) or waste hours of time trying to get net copies. And neither of those options are helpful if the show you like is esoteric.

    I had thought about setting up a Tivo (esp. now that you can manage Tivo via the web) and pulling the data off it, but you need a big upstream link for that, plus a 'co-lo' in a friend's house. But at least it's not so much of an imposition.

    1. Re:That is a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I had thought about setting up a Tivo (esp. now that you can manage Tivo via the web) and pulling the data off it, but you need a big upstream link for that "

      This product requires a 3-Mbit uplink also.

    2. Re:That is a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you culd get them from kazza.

    3. Re:That is a great idea by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      SPORTS, I miss local sports, I need live feeds, give it to me now!!!!!!

    4. Re:That is a great idea by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Funny

      Funny, being irretrievably AWAY from U.S. television is one of the things I like MOST about going overseas.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:That is a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just moved to the US and am really missing quality international sports coverage - Football (what's called soccer over here), Rugby and Cricket. My only option is Satellite, but I already pay for cable, so don't want to have to fork out for both.

      So this is definately not targeted just towards Japanese living in France. Any expats living in the US will know how hard it is to get anything other than NFL and Baseball here.

      And just in time for the Rugby World Cup.

  20. Must control fist of death...... by TJ6581 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm not entirely sure what that website sells but I know that I want to punch the crap out of it.

    --
    "Freedom of speech has always been the abstract red-headed stepchild of the Constitution"
    -Suck
    1. Re:Must control fist of death...... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure what that website sells but I know that I want to punch the crap out of it.
      You Sir (or Ma'am) have just been befriended.

  21. Legal? by connsmythe96 · · Score: 1

    How long before this is ruled illegal in the US?

    --
    if(!cool) exit(-1);
    1. Re:Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long before what is ruled illegal in the US? Either it infringes on copyright or it doesn't. No new specific law needs to be created to cover it. At this point it doesn't even have anything to do with the US. Or were you just fishing for US bashing karma?

    2. Re:Legal? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Been there. Done that.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re:Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me son, you'll be a very old man by then....

    4. Re:Legal? by leeet · · Score: 1

      Why do you think the cable companies fought like hell when a canadian company decided to broadcast online?

      They are afraid to lose all those advertising dollars. Do you think the mom and pop shops will pay cash if they know most people don't even see their adds because they're watching a canadian broadcast? Phone companies saw the move and they now own most backbones. The cable companies (except AOL/TW) are still way behind.

      I believe that in the short future, there won't be cable/phone companies anymore but simply connectivity companies. Time to seel your cable companies stocks while they're still worth something...

      --
      -- Leeeter than leet
  22. Cisco IPTV? by jtseng · · Score: 1

    Does this do the same thing as Cisco's IPTV product?

    --

    Sanity.html - Error 404 not found

  23. Working on this device by .Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting



    I did some work on this device - although, admittedly, my involvement ended a few months ago. The article doesn't mention the biggest problem we had working on it - the lack of a real "tv standard" on the internet. Consider that the stream may have originated from either a PAL, NTSC, or even something else (though we concentrated on those two only) and on the fly conversion between those two to a PC codec of sorts is not something trivial. Basically frames need to be discarded dynmaically in order to sync with the given display unit. Unlike other conversion devices, we didn't have the luxury of selectively removing/doubling frames based on what looks the best, we had to do it on the fly with streaming data. Basically what we did was sacrifice a small amount of compression for the sake of image smoothness, allowing us the freedom to guess the appropriate frames to manipulate. I'd say I'm about 95% happy with the results, but if you know what to look for you can see the artifacts. But it is open source, so improvements will be implememnted over time.

    --

    Thanks,
    Bruce
    1. Re:Working on this device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that this is dot Bruce.

    2. Re:Working on this device by mikeage · · Score: 1

      Is this true? I mean, for someone who tries his best to impersonate the real Bruce Perens (oh, uh.. yeah... there's a dot there), and has often lied on copyright posts (by pretending to be Bruce), I think your credibility is... how do you say... .Gone.

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    3. Re:Working on this device by Kintanon · · Score: 1

      Everytime I see the phrase "the real Bruce Perens" I just can't help think of Eminem....

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  24. Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV by mr_majestyk · · Score: 5, Funny

    This page provides an overview of some typical Japanese TV shows:
    * A game show in which a grandmother has to answer questions about pop culture in order to prevent her grandson from being catapulted into the air by a bungee machine.
    * "Guess what's on your head!"- a game show in which contestants try to guess what type of insect or reptile is crawling around on the top of their heads.
    * A show called Super Jockey in which people with products to promote (usually beautiful women) play a game where they have to change into a skimpy bikini before a curtain drops which will reveal them if they haven't finished changing, and then they have to sit in scalding hot water. For every second they manage to stay in the water, they are allowed to promote their product for one second

    1. Re:Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV by tomlouie · · Score: 2, Informative

      The poor Geocities page is overloaded. Here's the Google cache:

      http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:DjSPfHvc4_U J: www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Bunker/5921/psycho.html +%22super+jockey%22&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UT F-8

    2. Re:Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV by pcol · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV

      And you know what? All of the stuff you listed sounds pretty damn funny, and certainly original.

      That's two qualities the American media seems to find desperately hard to achieve, probably because they spend too much time trying to spit out something that will appeal to absolutely everyone, which of course is impossible.

      So as a result, we have 5 billion sitcoms about a middle-age couple with 2.5 kids, a dog, and an SUV. The husband is a passive-aggressive jerk always getting into trouble with the missus because he's a moron, the wife is a no-bullshit woman, and the kids are very young, quiet and never say a word(very realistic). The other half of the primetime lineup are murder crime shows convincing the american public that they're going to get murdered or blown up by the zillions of terrorists running around(as a side note, anyone else notice that crime shows seem to be the place to break the public in on more and more invasive "crimefighting" technologies? Joe Q. Public sees all that wonderful technology at work- it's instant, always catching the bad guy, etc...it's like Ashcroft's personal heaven.)

    4. Re:Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 4, Funny
      A show called Super Jockey in which people with products to promote (usually beautiful women) play a game where they have to change into a skimpy bikini before a curtain drops which will reveal them if they haven't finished changing, ...

      I don't know if you were trying to put down Japanese television, but that "Super Jockey" show idea has me desparately searching for a friend in Japan I can ship a brick too.

      --
      Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    5. Re:Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So as a result, we have 5 billion sitcoms about a middle-age couple with 2.5 kids, a dog, and an SUV.

      I see you didn't get the memo. All of these shows and been cancelled and replaced with "reality" TV.

    6. Re:Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Or if you wanted the pictures too, you could use the archive.org cache.

    7. Re:Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      This would have a been a semi-believable rant about 5 years ago. Before Survivor, American Idol, Fear Factor, Temptation Island, Who Wants To Marry a Millionaire, The Bachelor, The Bachlorette, Joe Millionaire, Survivor II-V, American Juniors, etc, etc, etc ,etc.

      What they discribed above is neither "funny", nor "original", and you can get the same shit in America. Its called Reality TV, and it blows.

    8. Re:Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV by glenstar · · Score: 1
      Ah... Super Jockey! I lived in Tokyo for a awhile and every Sunday was *glued* to my television at 3:00PM to watch Super Jockey. My absolute favorite episode had a guy with his legs up in the air, a brick on his crotch, and a man with a sledgehammer trying to break the brick. Hysterical.

      It's things like this that make me want to pack up the family and head back...

    9. Re:Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Reality TV has people trying to guess what kind of insect is crawling around on top of their head? OK.

      I'm not likely to find out by watching, so I guess I need to take your word for it. (But I wouldn't pay a plugged nickle to see it anyway.)

      P.S.: If you think it's so bad, why do you watch it?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    10. Re:Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      re sig:

      ^imminetize^imminentize

      -uso.
      BTW, IMHO it's not "Reality TV", it's "TV game shows".

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    11. Re:Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Where did I say that I watched it? You can't watch any other TV without having ads for the stuff thrown in your face. I figure someone has to be watching it for it to happen.

      I know for a fact I've seen ads for them eating bugs and stuff on Fear Factor, so is it really that much different from guessing what's on your head? Does it suddenly become "wacky and cool" because its Japanese trash television and not American trash television?

      The funny thing is, America gets a bad rap for shitty TV, but half those shows (Survivor, Who wants to be a millionaire, & American Idol (obviously under a different name)) started in other countries. I'm just waiting for "Whats this junk on my head, man?" to premier on Fox. Should be fantastic!

    12. Re:Here's what you're missing on Japanese TV by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Sorry. That's a pormateau word (to use a term from Lewis Caroll). It's a combination of imminent as in "real soon now!" and immanent, as in existing in the physical world.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  25. do as the locals do by pytheron · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This strikes me much the same as groups of American students in Europe bee-lining towards the golden arches and huddling there until it's time to go back to the hotel/hostel.. it would be nice if people living in a foreign culture made an effort to integrate, rather than creating a mini-home from home. I can't imagine the expat community miss those wacky game shows too much.

    --
    "I am not bound to please thee with my answers" [William Shakespeare]
  26. Japanese TV by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, I wouldn't want to miss the latest in cruelty TV if I moved away...

    Can you win this box in a contest? ;- )

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Japanese TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of an SNL sketch entitled "Who Wants to Eat?", starring Darrel Hammond as Regis Philbin in a WWTBAM descendant; he was in some slavic country and the starving contestants were competing for various food items.

      "You could stick with the bag of wheat. Or you could risk everything and go for this tasty goat!"

  27. Two problems for average US consumer by irving47 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. MPAA who?
    2. A lot of cable modem users are getting bandwidth limits imposed on them. Some companies (like cox) are limiting home users to 3 GB per month down, 1 up... How many hours of this TV Brick thing would that be?

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
    1. Re:Two problems for average US consumer by mbone · · Score: 1

      Re: Question 2:

      Well, we (http://www.americafree.tv) webcast MPEG4 video at 340kbps. At that rate, 3 GB is 20 hours per month, which is more than most people watch on-line (us, at least).

      BTW, I have COX and routinely upload 10 GB or so per month and have not been limited _yet_.

    2. Re:Two problems for average US consumer by fliplap · · Score: 1

      Troll.

      You seem to be implying that Cox is limiting users to 3GB down 1GB up when this is down right false. Cox has imposed a 30GB down, 7GB up SOFT LIMIT. Which means that although this is in thier policy they are not actually restricting everyone, only people that consistantly break the limit every month.

      Even in those cases the case is only looked into if they get complaints about speed. I run a monitor on my router and we go over the 30GB limit every month, but no one complains, so Cox doesn't care.

      More over, I have no idea why you think the MPAA would stop this, they tend to go after movie pirates more than TV.

    3. Re:Two problems for average US consumer by Funksaw · · Score: 1

      3 GB per month down?

      I download more than that in linux distributions... sure, getting nytimes.com in 2 seconds instead of 10 is nice, but that's not why I have broadband - I can't imagine anyone thinking that 3GB/mo fits any defintions of "broadband."

      I mean, hell, at that point, I might as well just use my 56.6k modem. Thanks for telling me this, I'm definetly going to make sure that my service provider does not put download limits on how much per month I can download - I don't mind speed caps, but I DO mind data caps.

      -- Funksaw

    4. Re:Two problems for average US consumer by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      I tried the url, but there is nothing there.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    5. Re:Two problems for average US consumer by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1
      2. A lot of cable modem users are getting bandwidth limits imposed on them. Some companies (like cox) are limiting home users to 3 GB per month down, 1 up... How many hours of this TV Brick thing would that be?

      The Cox limits are 30GB down per month, 2GB max per day, and 7.5GB up per month, 1GB max per day.

    6. Re:Two problems for average US consumer by irving47 · · Score: 1

      You're right. I apologize for getting the numbers wrong. It totally invalidates my argument! Oh wait... no it doesn't. My point was that video streaming adds up fast, and I'm wondering how quickly one would exceed the limit, regardless what it is.
      But seriously. I do apologize for not having the numbers or looking them up before posting.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    7. Re:Two problems for average US consumer by irving47 · · Score: 1

      Quite right. Sorry about getting the numbers wrong. I should have looked them up.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    8. Re:Two problems for average US consumer by Saeger · · Score: 1
      I mean, hell, at that point, I might as well just use my 56.6k modem

      And so would I, but AOL TimeWarner still hasn't capped their RoadRunner service.

      With a 56K modem you could transfer about 12GB per month (with unlimited local calls to stay online 24/7), which is way more than many of those insane broadband caps. And I used to have a dual-56K "shotgun" modem - so that would be ~24GB month, which is about half what I xfer now.

      Of course... always-on, low latency, and streaming, isn't something dialup can provide.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  28. The magic of open brick by mbone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is an application of open brick, a really cool Linux based appliance. I think that the tiny market (Japanese in France) is not such an issue - more that this has the potential of leading to the commoditification of Linux and open source - not on the desktop, but as cheap single use hardware apps.

  29. Obligatory obscure SNL Japanese TV reference by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    "But first, you must fight the Bear!"

  30. Broken Link by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 0, Troll

    That link you provided doesn't seem to work, here is the correct link.

    1. Re:Broken Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This one seems to be broken as well. Maybe you meant to type this instead.

    2. Re:Broken Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that one seems broken as well, try this one instead

    3. Re:Broken Link by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      Neh.

      -uso.
      Hauppauge WinTV Go! - Fails under Win98SE, works perfectly on RH8 Linux

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
  31. Image a beowulf cluster of these! by tundog · · Score: 0

    Iron chef + Anime + Sumo Wrestling all @ the same frequency!

    --
    All your base are belong to us!
  32. I wonder how long it'll take before... by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...some court finds that this is a circumvention device on the broadcasting rights that are limited to Japan, and declares this illegal. Any slashlaywers care to comment? ;)

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:I wonder how long it'll take before... by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      RTA:

      The use of TVBrick appliances for private use within the same family is compatible with Copyright Law in Europe and in Japan. This is why Nexedi is selling TVBrick to families only, mainly Japanese.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    2. Re:I wonder how long it'll take before... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      I doubt if anybody is going to get too upset about it, so long as it is 9 frames per second with "poor" image quality (according to the FAQ)

  33. some more info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Since it looks like they are currently watching Japanese television and have no bandwith for a Slashdotting, here is more info from the site:

    TV Brick Systems > en > affiliate > TV Brick Systems > Personal Multimedia > TVBrick
    Home Server

    TVBrick: it's like Home! Watch all Home TV Channels from abroad by connecting to
    your Home TV antena from abroad.

    Features

    TVBrick is a Home Server designed for International Families who must stay abroad
    and who need to keep a tight relation with their Home country and family.

    Current Features:
    * View all Home TV channels from abroad
    * Connect to the Internet by Wireless network when you stay at Home
    * Improve communication with your family when you stay abroad

    Future Features
    * Talk by Internet Phone with your family for free
    * Share digital snapshots of life abroad with your family in your Home country

    System

    In order to watch Home TV channels from abroad, a TVBrick Home Server appliance must
    be installed at your Home in your home country and connected to the broadband
    Internet access of your home family. It becomes then possible to watch all Home TV
    channels from abroad by connecting to your home TVBrick either with a standard PC or
    with the optional TVBrick player. A password will be required to connect to your
    home TVBrick in order to make sure that only people of the same family can access
    Home TV channels. Because reproduction of home TV channels happens in a private
    manner within the same family, the use of TVBrick to watch home TV channels is
    compatible with international Copyright Law.

    Easy Setup

    Using the TVBrick appliance is very easy: remote users connect to the TVBrick secure
    home page with a standard PC and Web Browser which can be operated anywhere in the
    world. It is also possible to connect with the optional TVBrick player which
    includes a joystick based user interface similar to a video game. Once the TVBrick
    home server is connected to family broadband Internet access and to television,
    there is absolutely nothing to change.

    World Class Technology

    TVBrick uses the Linux Open Source / Free Operating System developped by American,
    European and Japanese engineers. The TVBrick appliance is based on the OpenBrick
    platform (www.openbrick.org). Because it includes no fan, no hard disk and no moving
    parts, TVBrick is 100% silent and can be operated 24 hours a day. This is a major
    difference with other Home Servers: the use of TVBrick when you stay abroad will not
    disturb your family asleep because TVBrick simply makes absolutely no noise.

    Service

    NipponBrick TV is sold online by Nexedi (www.nipponbrick.com). After ordering and
    paying your NipponBrick TV home server, Nexedi will ask you some information about
    your broadband Internet connection in Japan. In case your family in Japan does do
    not use yet a broadband Internet connection in Japan, Nexedi will assist you to
    subscribe to a high quality broadband Internet Connection. Nexedi will then
    configure your NipponBrick TV home server in our laboratories and test it. Once it
    is fully tested, we will ship it by UPS World Wide Express. Your family in Japan
    will then receive your NipponBrick TV home server by Takkyubin, UPS partner in
    Japan. Nexedi native Japanese staff will then call your family in Japan to assist
    them connect your NipponBrick TV home server to the Japanese TV network and to the
    Internet. Nexedi will test connectivity to make sure your NipponBrick TV home server
    is fully operational. Our international staff will then contact your family abroad
    to provide assistance how to use OpenBrick, either with your personal computer or
    with the optinoal NipponBrick TV personal view. Our international staff can speak
    the following languages: Japanese, Engl

    1. Re:some more info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To see the whole comment, click on the (#6332994) above (maybe this link works, too).

    2. Re:some more info by fputs(shit,+slashdot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Compile with -Wall for instant beowulf satisfaction?

      --
      I am the bastard of base minus 12! Turing was the ejaculate of my complete machine!
    3. Re:some more info by randomErr · · Score: 1

      Cats: All Your Bases Are Belong To Us.

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    4. Re:some more info by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      Victoly! Congraturation! A winner is you!

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
  34. Kill Your Television by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I think of "TV Brick" it's usually in a different context. (replace hammer with brick) Generally after watching yet another Laci Peterson segment on CNN.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Kill Your Television by akb · · Score: 1

      Video of anarchist hippy kids smashing TVs in front of NBC.

    2. Re:Kill Your Television by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

      Actually, some Italian guy patented a system consisting of a plastic brick, with some sort of sensor and a radio emitter inside, that would shut down the TV when you threw the brick at it. Cool :-)

      --
      Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  35. The targets are... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Primarily targeted towards Japanese families living in France..."

    Secondarily targeted towards slashdot readers with WAY too much time on their hands...

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
    1. Re:The targets are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ? Given the growing anime market in the US, and the sluggish acceptance and distribution of an anime/japanimation only tv station (Comcast has it, but only on their digital tuners, and it's really sort of by demand, from all I've read; sluggish mainly due to the stupidity of how they are choosing to charge and distribute such a channel), if it were legal, I'd love to be able to get streamed Japanese television.

      Cable and dish all have their places, as does Ku and C band sat or sat/pay services, but they really don't cover everything, even if you have the time to flip through the satellite times/listings.

      I find it odd that anyone, in this day and age, has to wait months for a DVD release. While I speak as an anime nut, when I was learning Spanish, I loved to tune into the US Spanish speaking channels (Univision). I'd think that this sort of market would be huge. Foreign language students might be interested in watching native country shows. Immigrants likewise. If you were a Buffy fan in, like, Europe, you could view the US show an hour, not days, within the US viewing.

      This *could* be a burgeoning marketplace. It isn't because of the damn regulatory laws and the hold on the media that is simply being squandered.

  36. Hmm by SlipJig · · Score: 1

    I can think of more fun things to do with TVs and bricks...

    --
    Read my keyboard review.
  37. Tab A? by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Primarily targeted towards Japanese families living in France

    Yeah, reading and following the setup and assembly instructions is gonna be no problem.

  38. Quality? by ad0le · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can't imagine that the quality of a TV signal across a DSL connection could obtain reasonable enough framerates for cross-country viewing. What about censorship legalities of people receiving signals that are not allowed in their country. Networks are gonna have a field day with this one.

    --
    My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch.
  39. ob:smartass remark by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Maybe you would like "Japanese people living outside of Japan BUT NOT IN THE U.S." better?!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:ob:smartass remark by SlayerofGods · · Score: 0

      Should be dumbass remark cause thats wrong.
      The artical clearly says "are unavailable outside Japan" so Japanese in the U.S. are SOL as well.
      So what I said was perfectly fine.

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
  40. Damn you all! by jbardell · · Score: 1

    So I get home from work, and load up /. Only 60 someodd visible replies on this topic, so I go to view the link...and the damned thing is ALREADY /.ed. ::bangs head on desk::

  41. MOD PARENT DOWN! KNOWN TROLL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have in my hands a list of 148 trolls on Slashdot. This Miss Physics Genius is the head of the list. She uses her gender and slutty disposition to gather karma...but she never actually puts out! We at Slashdot need to show teases like PhysicsGenius that working up fellow Slashdotters into a sexual frenzy and then not delivering will not be tolerated.


    Thank you!


    ET

  42. Ooooh, I could get a real BBC feed in America! by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

    I would love this!!

    I watch quite a bit of BBC America programming, but I would love to be able to see NEW episodes of shows, instead of the reruns I see now.

    Unfortunately, there are probably waaay too many laws this technology would be breaking. :(

    1. Re:Ooooh, I could get a real BBC feed in America! by akb · · Score: 1

      I guess the UK needs to work on cultivating its culture of piracy. Maybe you should work with the folks that run Sharereactor, they keep pretty up to date on quite a few TV series. They even have Japanese stuff.

  43. whoosh whoosh "Is this thing on?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "These are not the trolls you are looking for..."

  44. 3 Major Markets by randomErr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyone is carpin that this targeted for a narrow market. It could have some very large scale appeal. Here's 3 I came up with:

    1. Home video at Work - Watch Opera on your home cable at work.

    2. Video Survaliance - Watch what your wife and pets are doing while your at work.

    3. Pr0n/Underground Video - Watch what your wife and pets are doing while your at work.

    Enjoy cheap digital TV from the comfort of your couch, not scrunched over your computer.

    You could also setup a video broadcasting station for less $2000 and no experince.

    Keep LDTV alive! - Low Def TV for the underground!

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:3 Major Markets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You could also setup a video broadcasting station for less $2000 and no experince."

      You could but it would be cheesy since you wouldn't have the bandwidth to support more than a couple of viewers at one time.

    2. Re:3 Major Markets by jbardell · · Score: 2, Funny

      3. Pr0n/Underground Video - Watch what your wife and pets are doing while your at work. You sick bastard. I like it :)

    3. Re:3 Major Markets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *BUT* unless you can multicast it the average adsl/cable modem connection will handle only 1 viewer looking at sub vhs quality video.

  45. Japanese people have enough bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Keep in mind that for a few years already Japan has straight-to-the-home 100MBit Optical Fiber Internet Access. And it's cheap. The initial installation fee is about $300. After that, it only costs 60$ per month.

    And you thought DSL and cable modems were fast.
    Wow, America is still so far behind. They've only just started trials for fiber-to-the-home(FTTH) in Silicon Valley recently. $2400 install fee + 75$ month I think.

    1. Re:Japanese people have enough bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny, I remember BellSouth doing some product trials in ATL about six years ago called IFITL, for Integrated Fiber In The Loop. Which is to say, they ran 100Mbit fiber to your NT. so fuck off about americans being backward.

    2. Re:Japanese people have enough bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow, America is still so far behind.

      You guys just don't get it do you? America is a much larger area to cover than places like Japan and Europe. About 25% of the population isn't even concentrated around a major city. There is 3 million square miles of land in the United States of America alone. Compared to Japan it is impossible to plan a fiber roll-out on that scale.

    3. Re:Japanese people have enough bandwidth by dr3vil · · Score: 1

      Wow. So Japanese people can get 100MBit Optical Fiber Internet Access in France? Amazing.

    4. Re:Japanese people have enough bandwidth by leeet · · Score: 1

      Yes true and in fact, even DSL is available at 12 Mbps (for about $25), not a whimpy 1.5Mbps (which is more like 500-700k in my case)

      --
      -- Leeeter than leet
  46. For that matter ... by torpor · · Score: 1

    ... where are the free streaming TV channels on the 'net these days?

    It makes no sense to me that I can't tune into CNN over the 'net. Or MTV. Or BBC One. Oh, wait, maybe I can tune into BBC One.

    I really wanna watch TV, but I'm a computer geek and there is no way in hell (having just recently moved to Germany) that I want to buy a TV and set up a satellite receiver just for that.

    I've already *got* broadband. How come I can't tune into any stations with it?

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  47. Japanese: I want my Iron Chef TV! by HydeMan · · Score: 1

    Sure it is. Do you know how many Japanese in France are dying to watch the Iron Chef in the original tongue? You know that the French cannot stand those guys, since the French believe they produce the best food and chef's in all the world, but every time an Iron Chef goes against a French weenie, the Fenchie goes down hard. So, getting the content in the original Japenese is crucial for maximum effect and minimum Frenchie bias.

  48. Legal? by bc8o8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How long do you think it will be before the Cable Companies convince the govt to make this illegal??

    Think about it. If you could set this up on one system, and have hundreds of people access it (which if it's not possible now, it soon will be) then why pay for cable?? Find a server somewhere that plays some shows that you like, and watch them from there.

    I'd be willing to bet that within 6 months of the first one being sold in the US the Nexedi will be in court.

    It's a shame though, I could have some fun with this!!

  49. Buzz Free? by smokin_juan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does it drop frames and skew time or could i expect to get all the siezures that the anime creators intended?

  50. 9FPS?? by indole · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the FAQ:

    How good/bad is the image quality?
    The sound quality is very good. The image quality is poor. This is due to the fact that international Internet connectivity is not yet fast and stable enough to transmit high bandwidth streams. TVBrick is now tuned to provide a sub-VHS quality image at 9 frames per second.[emphasis mine] ...This is expected to change within 2 years.
    Oh yeah, this is a real viable alternative.
    --
    (2,3-Benzopyrrole)
    1. Re:9FPS?? by randomErr · · Score: 1

      From the FAQ:
      How good/bad is the image quality?
      The sound quality is very good. The image quality is poor. This is due to the fact that international Internet connectivity is not yet fast and stable enough to transmit high bandwidth streams. TVBrick is now tuned to provide a sub-VHS quality image at 9 frames per second.[emphasis mine] ...This is expected to change within 2 years.:
      Oh yeah, this is a real viable alternative.

      Have you ever seen SSTV - Slow Scan TV - on Short Wave? This a boone my friend for a simple broadcast method.

      I'll bet that they are waiting for a completely opened source streaming codec to come out.(Think OGG-TV).

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    2. Re:9FPS?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The image quality is poor. This is due to the fact that international Internet connectivity is not yet fast and stable enough to transmit high bandwidth streams.
      Yeah, international connectivity - Live TV right from the oposite side of the planet (I'm in Hawaii): SIC Radical (Portugal, music), CNL (Portugal, news).

      Looks pretty good connectivity to me...

      Have you also noticed the size and resolution of the stream?

      BTW, I get also pretty good connectivity from Japan (AvexNet Music Channel, Impress TV).

      So... who needs MTV or CNN?

  51. shameless plug by akb · · Score: 1

    There's no money in streaming over the Internet, it costs too much.

    Check out my site it lets people submit interesting videos they've seen on the web. I recently added a playlist for Real Video so you can watch it like a channel.

  52. ROFL by Bruha · · Score: 1

    The proxy server could not handle the request GET /.

    Now that's just funny.

  53. OpenBrick Knoppix? by randomErr · · Score: 1

    Can I get an on CD distro of OpenBrick like I can get Knoppix?

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  54. satellite feeds by akb · · Score: 1

    I wish someone would hook this up to a KU satellite and make it public. There's a lot of content that flows across there that's copyright clear. Heck there's even copyright clear stuff on DISH network satellite, a bunch of the stuff on Free Speech TV is available for noncommercial copying/viewing, like Democracy Now! and Indymedia Newsreal.

  55. Will it work in other regions?? by bladeohlsson · · Score: 1

    My wife is from Japan and she would LOVE to have this thing. Does it owrk outside france? Also, the sitre appears to be slashdotted, is there a mirror?>

    --
    http://www.ohlssonvox.com
  56. You obviously haven't seen the Laughing Dog by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter WHAT language you speak, the Silly Go Lucky Adventures of the Laughing Dog is totally wacky by any measure. Who WOULDN'T pay to have such bizarrenes inserted in their daily video stream? --

  57. Holy crap!!! by torpor · · Score: 1

    You rock. Lets make babies.

    Oh, wait you're probably a dude. Never mind.

    This is *exactly* what I've needed for the last 13 minutes. I'm so frickin' bored - so much bandwidth, nothing worth watching... until now!!!

    Thanks. Feel free to plug away.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Holy crap!!! by akb · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks. And there I was considering letting the domain expire because I don't get much traffic.

      Please submit videos that you see 'round on the net.

    2. Re:Holy crap!!! by torpor · · Score: 1

      You should get on music-bar@ampfea.org and try to rally those guys a little bit about getting behind your project.

      It's a great idea, and frankly I think you should definitely *NOT* let it expire ... just get more people involved. I fell asleep watching your playlist last night, and it was very, very welcome!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  58. clue alert: Everyone loses to the Iron Chef.... by Spamlent+Green · · Score: 1

    It would seem whenever anyone (Frenchie, Alton Brown, etc..) goes up against an Iron Chef they lose. Somehow I suspect the "judges" are less than impartial.

  59. Re:Tab A? (obligatory Simpsons quote) by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 1

    "English side ruined. Must use French instructions. Le grille? what the hell is that?"

    --
    "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
  60. Great, now I need an HDTV brick by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I live in Denver which has pathetic (read: none) support for over the air HDTV from anywhere but downtown.

    I use the Dish network for a few HD channels, but I think what I need is an HDTV brick that sits in LA or somewhere with decent broadcast HDTV, and then streams that back to my house on demand. I'm tired of fighting with Dish to get a CBS feed, and would love to just bypass them...

    When people start selling shows on demand instead of channels, then we'll see some interesting changes in TV. In particular lots of people are getting TV;s now that are capable of supporting HDTV resolutions but have very little content to display on them, imagine the marker for a box that let you buy all HDTV programming!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  61. Obligatory Simpsons Reference! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perfect! Then the Japanese living in France can watch "The Happy Smile Super Challenge Family Wish Show." Do you remember this episode? I wouldn't want to miss a show that punishes ignorance instead of rewarding knowledge!

  62. Love their 502 Error Page ;-) by jfowlie · · Score: 1

    Looks like they have correctly identified the source of their problem:

    Proxy Error
    The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.

    The proxy server could not handle the request GET /.

  63. RTPtv (The DelcoBox) by Josuah · · Score: 1

    While I worked at the Berkeley Multimedia Research Center, one of the graduate students there Matt Delco worked on RTPtv, which is basically TV-quality Motion-JPEG between two machines.

    1. You needed a special encoder and decoder card to decode 30fps (60 fields per second) Motion-JPEG sent over RTP. This card costs $400.

    2. You needed 20Mbps for a excellent video transmission, plus 1.4Mbps for excellent audio transmission.

    3. This enabled you to receive TV-quality video and audio over the Internet. (That's what excellent refers to up there.)

    4. You can buy two cheap Linux boxes (mini-ATX?micro-ATX) including the $400 card for a total of about $1500 each. $3000 total.

    But you need to have that 21.4Mbps sustained data transfer. We used Internet2 and internal 100Mbps switched networks. That's the kicker.

  64. You need one of these then by Snaller · · Score: 1
    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  65. Overkill by Detritus · · Score: 1
    19.2 Mbps is enough for ATSC HDTV using MPEG2@HL.

    My PVR can record very watchable NTSC at 2 Mbps.

    The problem is finding cheap MPEG encoders.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  66. Telephone Brick by dave3138 · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted something like this that "extended" a phone line. Something like this: You plug this magic box into your phone line & broadband at home. Then then take magic box #2, give it a broadband connection anywhere in the world and it's magically a phone jack from your house. Does anything of this sort exist?

    1. Re:Telephone Brick by coldguy · · Score: 1

      Vonage does something like this, except you only need magic box #2 (known as a Cisco ATA 186 (that'd be Analog Telephone Adaptor)). They deliver phone service over IP, incoming calls are routed from their switch to your broadband connection. I'm looking at getting something like this for myself, I just looked and also found netinternational and VoicePulse, who offer similar services, I'm sure there are others...

  67. Fly in the ointment: Bandwidth by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1
    Sorry to double-reply, but I just got through to the site. It looks like they cover this area:

    Because reproduction of home TV channels happens in a private manner within the same family, the use of TVBrick to watch home TV channels is compatible with international Copyright Law.


    So what they're saying is that, for EVERY "family" that wants to view, say, Japanese TV in france, you need a SEPARATE STREAM from a SEPARATE BRICK, from Japan to France, to send their SEPARATE COPY of the (re)digitized signal.

    Do you have ANY IDEA what kind of bandwidth you're talking about here? This is a VIDEO signal we're talking about - 30ish pictures per second, and even a 640x480 image is worth almost eight million bits before compression. Potentially you can compress a lot. But even heroically compressed the streams are very large for any reasonable signal quality.

    With every Japanese "family" member vacationing in France sending their own personal copy of a popular show, it doesn't take many "families" to completely saturate the fibers that can route signals from Japan to France. So you can bet that, if the described use isn't a violation of their carriers' terms-of-service now, it will be within a couple weeks after this usage pattern becomes established.

    At that point, any use of the box will violate either copyright or the terms-of-service. Then (if they haven't already), the media conglomerates will go to court and say there's no legal use...

    The only way to avoid the bandwidth crunch with multiple users is multicast - which explicitly violates the "family use" exception. This leads to the same situation that already lost in Canada (as already mentioned in a nearby post).
    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  68. glad to know that I don't have to do it by wannasleep · · Score: 2, Insightful

    COOL! I was going to do the same. Now, I can just use it and debug it (if necessary). As an immigrant in the US, where it is impossible to get any decent foreign TV, and the quality of the news sucks (especially when it comes to heavy biasing , to promoting whatever government agenda and to the total lack of independence), it am very glad that I can access different programs. Not that the programs of my coutry be that incredibly better, but they are of reasonable quality and allow me to be part of my original culture. One of the worst things that happen to somebody who lives abroad is going back and not understanding what people are talking/laughing about. Really makes you feel bad. So, I AM ALL FOR IT. Just find a better name..

  69. Ever exceeded the upload limit? by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    Cox once sent me a nastygram threatening to pull my service because I had exceeded their (then) limit of 500 MB upload in one day. As it turns out, I hadn't; they had instituted some sort of automated threat generator that was misprogrammed and sent out the message to anyone whose system didn't answer a ping. My firewall blocked it and I got the email. A whole bunch of other people got it too and must have burned down the cox tech support lines, because they later sent out a groveling message apologizing for the episode. But my point (and I do have one) is that if they have a email like that, they presumably monitor at least the upload limits. So, have you ever exceeded that limit with no consequence?

  70. Re:clue alert: Everyone loses to the Iron Chef.... by HydeMan · · Score: 1

    Despite the obvious comparison to the Harlen Globetrotters insane winning percentage, I don't think the Iron Chef is blatantly fixed. When you have the type of judges that they collect (actrors, psychics, politicians), the winning percentage is bound to be in favor of the famous Iron Chef's. If they wanted unbiased judging, they would use figure skating judges from France. :)

    Anyhow, it doesn't matter if its fixed or not, the Frenchies still don't like losing, and will gladly piss on anything that isn't French.

  71. Re:Overkill-OpenCore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The problem is finding cheap MPEG encoders."

    Isn't the opencore project working on that?

  72. When they said "brick" . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . I thought they meant Volvo.

  73. Aussies by bradintheusa · · Score: 1

    This means I can watch the Cricket and Aussie Rules Footy in North America. This is soo cool it wull be sued out of existence.

  74. Re:Open Soulce Terivision by usotsuki · · Score: 1

    Terebi-burikku ka? Anou...Well, TiVo does, doesn't it?

    -uso.

    --
    Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
  75. Re:Fly in the ointment: Bandwidth by usotsuki · · Score: 1

    This is Japan we're talking about. 24 or 25 frames per second. :)

    -uso.
    But France uses PAL, don't they? And Japan uses NTSC.

    --
    Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
  76. Re:Fly in the ointment: Bandwidth by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    This is Japan we're talking about. 24 or 25 frames per second. :)

    But France uses PAL, don't they? And Japan uses NTSC.


    That's why I said "thirtyISH" frames per second. Different standards, different frame rates. But they all have to be in that ballpark, because much slower and they don't fuse, while much faster and you're wasting bandwidth.

    (Broadcast standard frame rates tend to be a rational-number multiple of the local power supply frequency to prevent jiggle from bad power supply filtering in older design sets. Crawling distortion is less obnoxious than rapid shimmy.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  77. Japanese TV by BranchingLichen · · Score: 1

    It's horrible, why would anybody want to watch it? Even though, I have to admit that "Rudolf and Ippaiattena" is pretty cool. Weekdays7:20 to 7:30.

  78. Ingenious way to perpetuate Japanese language by Linuxathome · · Score: 1

    Imagine if ALL the media companies in Japan somehow saw the light and not only tolerated swapping of media over the internet using this device, but encouraged it -- I would be enticed to buy the device myself and brush up on my Japanese just to watch interesting shows. My children would easily pick up the language by watching the tele, and eventually more people would know how to speak Japanese -- this would bring tremendous economic benefits to Japan as a whole. I'm telling you, the Japanese are planning world domination! ;-)

  79. Family?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The use of TVBrick appliances for private use within the same family


    family as in Corleone family ???

  80. Will the real Bruce Perens please stand up? by yerricde · · Score: 1
    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  81. Peercast has a Japanese TV stream... by SirDaShadow · · Score: 1

    ...by giles, the author of Peercast Click here to get peercast
    You also need NSV video plugin for Winamp Click here to get Winamp

    1. Re:Peercast has a Japanese TV stream... by SirDaShadow · · Score: 1

      For those who already know what I'm talking about and are interested in watching and disseminating Japanese TV, click on this link while you have peercast running: Japanese TV

  82. Re:Japanese: I want my Iron Chef TV! by generic-man · · Score: 1

    Except for the occasional special, Iron Chef has been off the Japanese airwaves for years. Only in the US, and other countries that get the Food Network, can you see it with any degree of regularity nowadays.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  83. No tentacle porn on TV by leeet · · Score: 1

    Those are at rental places dudes...

    --
    -- Leeeter than leet
  84. Re:Market size - Not just for japan by leeet · · Score: 1

    The company is in France but if you take a look at the site (did you?) there are models for america, europe and africa (PAL, SECAM and NTSC).

    --
    -- Leeeter than leet
  85. The Original "TV Brick" by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

    I remember, back in the 70's or 80's, seeing ads for a "TV Brick". It was a piece of foam the shape and color of a brick, that you could toss at the TV when it pissed you off, without breaking the TV.

    In retrospect, I'm not absolutely certain this was a real product -- the ad might've been a parody. Then again, it was the era of Pet Rocks.

    --
    Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  86. Re:Fly in the ointment: Bandwidth by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

    Well, at least you had the idea of doing the math but your intuition is way off. A good TV picture is easily compressed to 1 or 2 megabits per second. Do you have any idea how many such streams would be needed to saturate even one fiber optic cable? Of course it depends on modulation technique and other details but your scenario of the fibers being saturated is farfetched. What is even more important is that bandwidth needed by an individual is not outrageous. I have 250 kbits with my cheap DSL line and that is within a factor of 4 or 5. If telecom prices were anything like processors, memory or drive space the bandwidth for video would be routinely available either now or soon and always dropping in price.

    There is of course the issue of copyright always looming. Let's say you have a house and you decide to install gigabit ethernet. From a standpoint of bandwidth you could easily send webcam, DVD, HDTV, digitized NTSC TV from anywhere on that network to anywhere else. Is there a legitimate case for considering copyright infringement is you want to watch a program in your bedroom rather than the media room?

    Assuming you decided a family should be able to view in the room of its choice, what has essentially changed if that room is in France and both ends have sufficient bandwidth (bought and paid for by the individuals)? If the source individual is being paid by the receiving individual I can see where the copyright owner might feel something is wrong with that picture. If no money or other consideration is changing hands (e.g. in the case of a dispersed family) how it gets a chance of being anyone else's business (from a practical, technical standpoint).

  87. What's that sound? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute... what's that sound? I hear a faint...

    screaming in the distance...

    Ah, the entertainment corporations are screaming like they are giving birth to a hairbrush. Anally.

    The next sound you hear will be that of legislators passing laws outlawing repiping of TV signals over the Internet. It'll be mixed up with the sounds of broadcasters and cable/satellite companies firing fusilades of cash.

  88. Great for those silent movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hm, then you sposed to send the sound using esound or something and have it all out of sync??? X won't do the audio, the only real way would be some kind of mpeg encoding or something... think about the distances too, x would eat all the bandwidth

    1. Re:Great for those silent movies... by sosume · · Score: 1

      Just use a hardware mpeg-compressor. It will do great and deliver movies in realtime.

  89. Re:Fly in the ointment: Bandwidth by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    Analogue TV in France uses SECAM.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  90. Re:Fly in the ointment: Bandwidth by usotsuki · · Score: 1

    Ouch. Does any other country in the *world* use SECAM?

    -uso.

    --
    Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
  91. Re:Fly in the ointment: Bandwidth by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    Much of eastern Europe chose SECAM, supposedly so it would be difficult to receive Western TV broadcasts.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com