Slashdot Mirror


Berkeley TCP socket interface for the Apple IIgs

Scott C. Linnenbringer writes "In case you wanted to do something cool with your fancy little Apple IIgs in the back room, you can use GS/TCP to implement a standard BSD socket interface, allowing you to connect via SLIP, MacIP, and soon PPP on a GNO/ME (GNO Multitasking Environment) UNIX system for the IIgs, now completely abandoned, open-sourced and labeled freeware. GS/TCP also comes with ftp and inetd, built with ORCA/C directly from BSDi sources (hacked, of course,) and a text web browser for GNO/ME can be found at the website."

226 comments

  1. Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just when you thought the web couldn't get any slower....

  2. Inevitable question, sorry... by r84x · · Score: 4, Funny
    In case you wanted to do something cool with your fancy little Apple IIgs in the back room...

    What if I already have a beowulf cluster of them?

    --
    Karma: Can there be a void?

    .. -. - . .-. .-. --- -...

    1. Re:Inevitable question, sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, this guy can still help you - with advice on how to be less of a geek.

  3. Acronyms, This one has plenty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TAHWTMA = This arcticle has way to many acronyms.

    Can you imagine a non techie reading this article.

    1. Re:Acronyms, This one has plenty by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      A non-techie doesn't care if the apple IIgs now has a TCP socket, also this is slashdot 99% of the people here know what the acronyms are and my guess would be the 1% who doesn't are just random people who ran across a link to slashdot and wondering what its about and most likly will never come back

    2. Re:Acronyms, This one has plenty by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      TAHWTMA = This arcticle has way to many acronyms.

      At least try to get your terminology right. It's TAH/WTMA.

  4. News Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is news because the date on the picture is February, 1996?

  5. One more spawn for our beloved BSD by sokkelih · · Score: 2, Insightful

    BSD lives forever. And there is nothing that you can do about it. :)

  6. Franklin Ace 1000 by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    That's nice and all but when can I get this for my Franklin Ace 1000? hmmm?

    1. Re:Franklin Ace 1000 by jdray · · Score: 1

      Maybe $20 to a nostalgia nut. Maybe $2 to anyone else.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
  7. Networked Choplifter Baby... by bokumo · · Score: 0, Funny

    Sweet! I can't wait to play Choplifter over the Internet!

    --
    Physicists do it with a big bang!
    1. Re:Networked Choplifter Baby... by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      omg. that brings me back. I wish I could still play choplifter. Alas, all the disks for my Franklin Ace 1000 are dead. /me wept

    2. Re:Networked Choplifter Baby... by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      Use MAME, or any number of emulators. A google search for choplifter brought up the rom as well.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    3. Re:Networked Choplifter Baby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats nothing, i can remember plaing banana toss in dos qbasic back in the day

    4. Re:Networked Choplifter Baby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you kids with your graphical games. What the hell was wrong with text based gaming I ask you?!?

    5. Re:Networked Choplifter Baby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      grab the rom and an emulator at ftp.apple.asimov.net/pub/apple_II

    6. Re:Networked Choplifter Baby... by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      Use MAME, or any number of emulators. A google search for choplifter brought up the rom as well. Sweet! I cant wait for you to get a sense of humor!

    7. Re:Networked Choplifter Baby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! You had text-based gaming? When I was young, the only output our games displayed was raw binary! And to play, we had to hand-crank the difference engine and put in our slate punch cards (which we hand-chiseled out of the quarry OURSELVES!), and then wait two weeks for the response! AND WE LIKED IT!

  8. haha by Datasage · · Score: 1

    This is another one of those cool but completly useless projects.

    Seriously, if your reading this, your probably have a better computer than an Apple IIgs.

    --
    In America we are imprisoned by our fear of them.
    1. Re:haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Datasage: Seriously, if your reading this, your probably have a better computer than an Apple IIgs.

      Faster? Yes.
      Better? No.

      /s-o

    2. Re:haha by Agent+R · · Score: 1

      Maybe not so useless. It would certainly make a good dumb terminal if one needed it.

      --
      !@#$% whole-grain cereal. When I want fiber, I eat some wicker furniture. - G. Carlin
    3. Re:haha by Space+Coyote · · Score: 1

      Datasage: Seriously, if your reading this, your probably have a better computer than an Apple IIgs. Faster? Yes. Better? No. /s-o Here here!

      --
      ___
      Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    4. Re:haha by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      What?!? I have an Apple //c and a Hacker //e (//e classic rip-off)! Beats your IIgs ANY DAY!

    5. Re:haha by jdray · · Score: 1

      Not so dumb. Ever use one?

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    6. Re:haha by Agent+R · · Score: 1

      Yes I have.

      --
      !@#$% whole-grain cereal. When I want fiber, I eat some wicker furniture. - G. Carlin
  9. A novel idea. by jromz03 · · Score: 1

    Kudos to those who pulls off stuff like these.

  10. How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by leereyno · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not familiar with the current legal status of the Minix source code, but I think it would be interesting to see a port of it to the IIgs. I don't have any illusions about such an effort yielding anything of practical use, I just think it would be cool. The x86 version of Minix will run on a PC/XT, a system whose processor lacks any sort of memory protection functionality, with 256k of memory and a single 360k floppy drive.

    If an OS like contiki can be crafted for a C64, surely Minix or something like it can be made to work on the IIgs.

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by usotsuki · · Score: 5, Informative

      Minix is BSD-licensed now.

      It's theoretically possible. The IIgs's CPU is a 65816, a 16-bit variant of the 65C02. It has 24-bit memory addressing (like the 286). The IIgs came standard with 512K RAM, not too shabby for 1986. If GNO can run on top of GS/OS, I don't see why Minix can't be ported to it.

      I suggest someone might want to download KEGS and a 65816 assembler, and maybe the GNO tools and try to bootstrap Minix on it.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    2. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by bobthemonkey13 · · Score: 3, Informative
      IANAL, but as far as I know, Minix is almost public domain: you can do nearly anything with it (licence here).

      As far as portability, the older version of Minix (1.5) runs on 68k (Amiga, Atari, and Macintosh) and SPARC, as well as x86 (32- and 16- bit). However, the 6502 used in the Apple 1/2/3 series is quite a bit more primitive than even a MMU-less x86 or 68k. In particular, fewer and smaller registers means more swapping to memory, which in turn reduces speed and increases code size. The 16-bit version of the 6502 used in the IIgs would be somewhat better than the 8-bit 6502s in the older Apples, but maybe not by enough. Also, Minix uses a microkernel architecture, which is all very nice from a theoretical standpoint, but causes a severe performance hit on really old hardware.

      Is Minix on IIgs possible? Theoretically yes, since it's a Universal Turing Machine*. However, it's unlikely to fit within the extremely limited memory and speed constraints. Crafting a new OS from scratch would probably be much easier. But yes, it would be damn cool.

      (*Yes, a UTM is assumed to have infinite storage space, so for theoretical purposes I'm assuming that we can hook a 6502 IIgs up to 512MB SDRAM or something.)

    3. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by arekusu · · Score: 1

      nitpick: the ROM 1 IIgs came with 256k. The ROM 3 came with 1 meg.

    4. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minix is BSD-licensed now.

      What isn't?

      (sorry, off-topic :)

    5. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      In particular, fewer and smaller registers means more swapping to memory, which in turn reduces speed and increases code size.

      That's the "glass is half empty" viewpoint. The "half full" viewpoint says that the 6502 gives you 256 registers with the special optimized opcodes for fast access to the lowest 8 bits of memory space.

      An obvious architecture enhancement for the 6502 would be to implement those 256 memory locations in on-chip registers. (I'm not familiar with the 65816, so I dont' know if they actually did anything like that.)

    6. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      Well, the least RAM I ever saw on a IIgs - and schools were known to scrimp on their computers back then - was 512K. We had a 1.25 MB original (unsigned) and a 512K ROM 1.

      Only one other IIgs, a 512K ROM 1, in the entire school.

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    7. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by Matt+Ownby · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can confirm that the first ][gs's came with 256k of RAM because that's how much our "Woz" had when we got it. I believe sometime later they started shipping all of them with 512k instead.

      Man I have so many cool memories of the Apple ][gs!

    8. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by Yakko · · Score: 1

      I believe it was more like this:

      ROM00: "Woz" edition and originals; 256k RAM
      ROM01: 256k mainboard plus memory card with 256k on it
      ROM03: 1MB+256k

      I still use my ROM01 IIgs on occasion, though I wish I could get KEGS working for some Unix variant other than HP-UX (honestly, I haven't tried lately).

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    9. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Informative
      That's the "glass is half empty" viewpoint. The "half full" viewpoint says that the 6502 gives you 256 registers with the special optimized opcodes for fast access to the lowest 8 bits of memory space.

      ...and the 65816 had the direct-page register, which lets you direct zero-page operations to any 256-byte chunk of the first 64K of memory. For context switching, you could set the direct-page register to a different value for each process and write the processor registers to the same (reserved) bytes in each page.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    10. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Well, you wouldn't want to direct them to just any 256-byte chunk of the first 64K of memory. Assuming you're using IIgs-specific graphics, you still wouldn't want to point them to 0xc000 lest they start flipping softswitches and suddenly a critical block on your disk gets wiped out.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    11. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Well, you wouldn't want to direct them to just any 256-byte chunk of the first 64K of memory. Assuming you're using IIgs-specific graphics, you still wouldn't want to point them to 0xc000 lest they start flipping softswitches and suddenly a critical block on your disk gets wiped out.

      I've not done too much GS-specific programming (even after 10 years, I've stuck mostly with 8-bit code)...but if I'm not mistaken, the softswitches aren't in bank 0 when you kick the processor into native mode. If that's the case, you would have all of the first 64K available since the softswitches would've been mapped into a different bank. (I could be wrong, though...can't seem to find a memory map just now to confirm if this is true.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    12. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by apetime · · Score: 1
      As far as I can remember, the IIgs came standard with 256k RAM. The Apple Memory Expansion board that most (I think) shipped with had another 256k onboard with places to put up to about 1 meg total, as far as I remember. I don't recall the exact amount.

      The IIgs was the first computer I had, and sputtered along with 512k for the longest time. The third happiest day of my life was when the package containing a whole bunch of little RAM chips that I'd ordered from some company that was in inCider magazine finally arrived. It came in a shiny anti-static bag, and all the little chips were embedded in a piece of black foam. I proceeded to stick the chips, one by one, on to the memory board, and booted up to see the GS/OS desktop appear! Faster than before! I proceeded to mess around with RAM disks and got it booting up pretty fast.

      The next day, I switched on the computer, eager to do a little more tinkering, when it REFUSED TO BOOT. I was terrified, and not knowing what else to do, I opened the computer and started poking at stuff. Turns out I had installed one of the chips in upside down. Once I'd fixed that, everthing worked. Still bothers me to this day, why it booted up the first time with no problems..

      Those were the days..

    13. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think you're right. They're actually in 0xe0c000 on the IIgs and ghosted to 0x00c000 for use by older code. In fact, banks 0xe0 and 0xe1 are both ghosted to banks 0x00 and 0x01.

      Man, I'm firing neurons that haven't seen activity in years!

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    14. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Well, if you have to, just throw in some 8-bit code, as the 65816 has pretty damn good 65c02 emulation...

    15. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by jdray · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're bringing back memories now. I didn't have the "upside down chip" issue, but I fully remember the happy day when I received and installed my battery-backed RAMdisk from Applied Engineering. I think it had a meg on it. Wow, did that machine ever boot fast.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    16. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Ok, how about a uClinux port to the IIgs? uClinux might be able to run, so that will make the "31337 1!n!x uz3rz" happy...

    17. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I had KEGS or another IIGS emulator running on Mandrake 9 last year. Don't ask me to do it again though..man what a pain in the ass.

      All I wanted to do was play the best version of Neuromancer ever made. The Amiga version sucked in comparison to the IIGS version. The C64 port was what I started with originally.

    18. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by Timex · · Score: 1

      I bought MY IIgs with 1.25MB RAM... about four or five years ago, i found a place that sold memory cards for the GS-- that took SIMMs! My IIgs (ROM01, stock CPU) now has 8MB RAM!

      I, for one, would LOVE to see a unix variant ported to the GS... I don't have the drive space to put GNO/ME on. <sigh>

      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    19. Re:How about something like Minix for the IIgs? by marcomarrero · · Score: 1

      The 65816 is just too slow, and it's a bad instruction set for multitasking. Nintendo made the same mistake in the SNES, Gradius III proves it's not fast enough.

      Why AppleIIgs? The only great thing about it is the fantastic Ensoniq sound chip. I do admit that it's more efficient than a 4.77 Mhz PC - remember that the 8088 uses an 8 bit memory bus with generic technology.

      People have been multitasking OS/9 in the "slower" 8-bit 6809 CoCo 2/3 in the 80's.

  11. Heh... by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is good news, i havn't done anything with my IIgs but play Oregon Trail, Carmen Sandiago and Number Munchers.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Heh... by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Do you remember that weird robot maze game? I wish I could remember its name, or even enough details so I can search for it. :)

    2. Re:Heh... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      "Berzerk"?

      "Intruder alert, intruder alert. Kill the human".

    3. Re:Heh... by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Robotron perhaps?

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    4. Re:Heh... by smithmc · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is good news, i havn't done anything with my IIgs but play Oregon Trail, Carmen Sandiago and Number Munchers.

      Gee, I hope those are legal versions of Oregon Trail and Carmen Santiago, or else this really lame rapper dude will be very mad!

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    5. Re:Heh... by dissy · · Score: 1

      Rocky's Boots perhaps?

      You can read more about it, see screenshots, and even download it, from its creators site here.

      You went into a robot and had to 'program' its hardware to do tasks in a maze like setting.

    6. Re:Heh... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about:
      Bolo - control a tank in a maze, destroy enemies and their nests/hives.

      Drol - cute platform game where you control a robot which is supposed to save little kids.

      Berzerk?

      Borg?

      Too many maze games ;).

      --
    7. Re:Heh... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      I didn't buy em, but when the school gave me the computer i got a garbage bag full of floppies too.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    8. Re:Heh... by realdpk · · Score: 1

      That is very similar if not the game. You'd program robots but you would not always be inside robots. You could get like chips, I think, and give htem to robots? Man... hazy memory. I bet my ol Jr High still has the game in a shelf, ha.

    9. Re:Heh... by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Ah ha!

      Robot Odyssey I: Escape from Robotropolis

      http://uvl.arteh.com/gameinfo/20412

      According to that, it was the unofficial sequel to Rocky's Boots. Thanks for the tip!

    10. Re:Heh... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Nope- no maze, unless you count the electrodes, which were like land mines.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  12. The Bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No dissing the IIgs. I cut my teeth on that thing when the alternatives were a 286 with crappy cga graphics or IIE unless you had a pile of cash. I'm glad someone posted this....it's motivation enough to brave the dust of the attic eaves and break that baby out. I probably won't get past a nostalgic Bard's Tale game or two though.

    Long live the IIgs!

  13. Not the only TCP/IP stack for the IIgs by The+Blue+Meanie · · Score: 5, Informative

    Any reason there's no mention of marinetti in this article? Marinetti implements a TCP/IP stack for the IIgs, but works under the IIgs' native interface, GS/OS. There's telnet, ftp, AIM, and email apps already, and even the beginnings of a *graphical* web browser for it. And yes, it's open source as well.

    --
    "I feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." -- Tom Lehrer
    1. Re:Not the only TCP/IP stack for the IIgs by The+Blue+Meanie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And at the risk of getting modded down for replying to my own post, I forgot to mention that marinetti also supports the LanceGS, a 10Base-T ethernet card for the IIgs. Don't laugh, it really works!

      --
      "I feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." -- Tom Lehrer
    2. Re:Not the only TCP/IP stack for the IIgs by dochood · · Score: 1

      Yikes!!!! $155 for a network card for a IIgs? The machine itself is probably worth around $25!

      But now, I know what to look for on eBay... who knows, maybe I'll stumble across one. I have a IIgs, and a bunch of Basic games I wrote in HS that I'd like to get moved over to PC so that I can run them under an emulator.

      dochood

    3. Re:Not the only TCP/IP stack for the IIgs by The+Blue+Meanie · · Score: 1
      I have a IIgs, and a bunch of Basic games I wrote in HS that I'd like to get moved over to PC so that I can run them under an emulator.

      If all you want to do is move data from your IIgs to a PC, don't waste your money on a network card - us psychos that do filesharing to the IIgs from the Mac/Linux boxes via AppleTalk need them. Just make yourself a cheap null modem cable and grab a copy of the ADT (Apple Disk Transfer) software. It moves disks between the Apple // and the PC pretty quickly over the serial port. They're only 140K after all. Once the disks are imaged onto the PC, there's even DOS-level utilities for manipulating the files on the images directly.

      For those who maybe want to pull the old Apple //'s out of the attic and use them again, drop by comp.sys.apple2 and join the fray. There's still a fairly active group of people using them.

      For the record, my IIgs has a 7MHz accelerator, 8 Megs of RAM, CD-ROM, 2Gig hard drive, two 5.25" drives, two 3.5" superdrives, 14" monitor (Apple's was only 12") and a full 101-key keyboard. Quite a fun machine to use, even still today. A LanceGS is next on my list to add.

      --
      "I feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." -- Tom Lehrer
    4. Re:Not the only TCP/IP stack for the IIgs by aonaran · · Score: 1

      Do you have pictures?

      Sounds like an interesting setup.

    5. Re:Not the only TCP/IP stack for the IIgs by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Yikes!!!! $155 for a network card for a IIgs? The machine itself is probably worth around $25!

      That's kept me away from buying one...fortunately, newer versions of Marinetti also support MacIP. Get yourself a LocalTalk-to-Ethernet bridge of some sort and connect through that. (A bridge could be a hardware device, like a Cayman GatorBox (cheap when they turn up on eBay), or it could just be software, such as LocalTalk Bridge running on an older Mac. You'd need a MacIP gateway somewhere...not sure what software will do this, but the GatorBox has this functionality. If all you want to do is share files (and don't care about Internet access from your IIGS), netatalk running on Linux will do that with AFP-over-TCP.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    6. Re:Not the only TCP/IP stack for the IIgs by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      marinetti also supports the LanceGS, a 10Base-T ethernet card for the IIgs. Don't laugh, it really works!

      The UMF is strong with this one.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    7. Re:Not the only TCP/IP stack for the IIgs by jdray · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I bought a LocalTalk to Ethernet bridge about a year ago on eBay for $45, brand new in the box (well, it was old shelf stock, but never used). I unsealed the manuals to see how hard it would be to use, then the client I had bought it for (data migration project) decided that the data just wasn't that important. The bridge just sits there, taking up space on my desk. I keep thinking that I'll put it on the network and hook up some old Macs, but haven't had the time. :-(

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    8. Re:Not the only TCP/IP stack for the IIgs by Lee+Cremeans · · Score: 1

      Yikes!!!! $155 for a network card for a IIgs? The machine itself is probably worth around $25!

      Indeed...the price they're asking for that card is nothing short of ridiculous, considering that good PC network cards (I'm thinking 10/100 here; I'm not experienced with gigabit cards) rarely go for more than $50 these days, and can be found for $10-20 or so if you're willing to deal with Realtek chips and the like.

      Considering the fact that the IIgs really isn't fast enough to appreciate Ethernet, and has a serial-based networking system built in (LocalTalk) that's actually decently fast for a computer of its power and age, and can be bridged to Ethernet for cheap (someone's already mentioned the GatorBoxes on eBay), I'd skip it...and spend that $150 on a CF memory card and adapter. :D

      -lee

  14. And the winner is... by m00nun1t · · Score: 3, Funny

    Against some VERY stiff competition, I nominate this article for the coveted /. "Nerdiest Article of the Year".

    I mean, sheesh, more acronyms in that description than unwilling virgins on this site...

    1. Re:And the winner is... by ruiner13 · · Score: 1
      "I mean, sheesh, more acronyms in that description than unwilling virgins on this site..."

      What the hell is an unwilling virgin? All the geeks (aka virgins) I know sure aren't unwilling, they're just unable to close the deal.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    2. Re:And the winner is... by damiam · · Score: 1

      Unwilling to be a virgin (yet still one anyway).

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  15. Why, you ask? by Valar · · Score: 0, Funny

    Because we can.

    But, seriously, I remember Apple IIes from grade school. They lagged when interpreting text based BASIC games... I mean, all of my programming assignments... Sounds like this stuff would make them keel over, more likely than not. Then again, the problem may have been the BASIC...

    1. Re:Why, you ask? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      The problem may have been the 'interpreted.'

      BASIC code can be compiled to fast binaries, too.

    2. Re:Why, you ask? by Endareth · · Score: 2, Informative

      I remember Apple IIes from grade school

      This article refers to the IIgs which is a completely different beastie. The IIgs was well ahead of it's time, and capable of supporting multiple hard drives, quite decent graphics, and a decent sound system. Used to play some really funky games on my friend's one :-). Think more Amiga than Apple for this one.

      --
      Disclaimer: The above comment was made while under the influence of too much coding and not enough sleep.
    3. Re:Why, you ask? by Valar · · Score: 1, Funny

      mmm. The BASIC. We hates it. We hates it! *hisses loudly then runs off to hide behind his K&R*

    4. Re:Why, you ask? by usotsuki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah yes. Applesoft BASIC.

      More correctly, Apple's adaptation of Miro$oft BASIC-6502. Yeah. From 1977. No wonder it was teh suxor. But it was nice to cut my teeth on, although I would've killed for a C compiler back when I was using the ][...or the IIgs later...

      BTW the BASIC on the IIgs doesn't take any advantage of the 65816. *sigh*

      -uso.
      Want an Apple //e emulator? See my link above!

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    5. Re:Why, you ask? by FyreFiend · · Score: 3, Interesting


      The IIgs was well ahead of it's time

      I could be way off but didn't the IIgs come out in '86 (or at least some time after the Mac)? I do know that it was slower then the Mac Plus which I thought was out at the same time and while the IIgs did have color the dispay was rather blocky. As for multiple hard drives, so could the Mac with it's built in SCSI (I know there were add on cards for the IIgs to handle SCSI as well but I don't think they came standard).

      --
      - Apple Computer......proudly going out of business for over twenty years.
    6. Re:Why, you ask? by Endareth · · Score: 1

      Can't remember release dates, but while the clock speed on the IIgs was far slower than the Mac Plus, it was actually a decent bit faster computer. I don't really recall specifics, but from using them side-by-side the IIgs would definately have been my computer of choice.

      --
      Disclaimer: The above comment was made while under the influence of too much coding and not enough sleep.
    7. Re:Why, you ask? by FyreFiend · · Score: 1

      While I did like the Apple ][ computers (I still have my ][e that was upgraded to a IIgs) I always found Macs to feel faster and less clunky.
      For most people I knew with IIgs's (including me) the main draw was the ability to run the old Apple ][ software on the same box as a modern (well, sort of modern for it's time) OS with a GUI. The lack of backwards compatability with the old Apple ][ software was the Mac's weak point in the early days.
      That being said, for most people the gs was too litttle to late in the day of Macs.

      --
      - Apple Computer......proudly going out of business for over twenty years.
    8. Re:Why, you ask? by RALE007 · · Score: 1
      I couldn't recall if the IIgs proceeded Mac's or not, so I did a little research and found that you are correct.

      According to this website: http://www.soltec.net/~cbsc/512k/dates.html Mac's were introduced in January 1984, Mac Plus in January 1986, and the IIgs later in September 1986.

      --
      Beware blue cats moving at .99c
    9. Re:Why, you ask? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It's faster because of the 65xxx architecture. 2.5 MHz on a 65xxx processor is the equivalent of 10 MHz on a 80x86 processor or (I think, I'm not quite sure, though - it might be only 5 MHz) a 680x0 processor. In addition, the Mac had some serious code bloat, whereas you might have been on a ProDOS 16 command prompt on the GS. GS/OS might also have been written better, and the GS might have been loaded up with more RAM than the Plus. The 68000 in the Plus would have been 8(?) MHz.

    10. Re:Why, you ask? by Corydon76 · · Score: 1
      Apple's adaptation of Miro$oft BASIC-6502

      Actually, it was Microsoft's code, licensed by Apple. If you examine the BASIC interpreter, you'll find 10 bytes near the end which aren't being used for anything:

      a6 d3 c1 c8 d4 c8 d5 c4 ce ca

      If you XOR these digits with 0x87 (the character code for the BEL on the Apple II) and reverse the order, you'll get "MICROSOFT!"

      The BASIC code included in the earlier Apple ][ and Apple ][+ contained Integer BASIC, which was written by Steve Wozniak. You may be confusing Integer BASIC (no floating point) with Applesoft BASIC (with floating point).

    11. Re:Why, you ask? by Corydon76 · · Score: 1
      A few corrections:

      First, the processor ran at 2.8MHz, although the speed was sometimes said to be only 2.5MHz, accounting for the drag of the 1MHz system bus speed -- remember, the IIgs had no processor cache.

      Second, as always when comparing two different architectures, as when comparing 65xxx to xxx86, you have to take some of the measurements with a grain of salt. The 4X figure was drawn from the time it took to load a register from memory; the xxx86 processors took 4X longer than the 65xxx processors to do this operation. Obviously, there is far more to the operation of a computer than simply loading memory into a register.

    12. Re:Why, you ask? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was Microsoft's code, licensed and then modified by Apple.

      Check the Apple II History before you post stuff on the Apple II. Here's what you're looking for.

      If you need exact quotes, here goes:

      The names of the lo-res graphics commands were very different from those that existed in Integer BASIC (and in the later versions of Applesoft). The commands were:

      PLTG = Go to lo-res graphics mode
      TEX = Go to text mode
      PLTC N = Set color to N (0-15)
      PLTP X,Y = Plot square at X,Y
      PLTH X1,X2,Y = Plot horizontal line from X1 to X2 at Y
      PLTV Y1,Y2,X = Plot vertical line from Y1 to Y2 at X


      In spring 1978, Randy Wigginton and some others at Apple made some needed revisions to Applesoft. Using a cross-assembler running on a North Star Horizon (Z-80) microcomputer, they fixed the known bugs and added other commands to control features unique to the Apple II. These commands included the ones needed to draw and manipulate hi-res graphics. Also, the lo-res graphics commands were renamed to be more consistent with the equivalent commands in Integer BASIC (GR, HLIN, VLIN, etc.) This version was called "Applesoft II", and eventually it was available in five forms: Cassette RAM and Diskette RAM (which loaded to the same memory locations that interfered with hi-res graphics as did Applesoft I), Firmware card ROM, Language card RAM, and finally main board ROM (in the Apple II Plus).

      When Applesoft II was started up from cassette or diskette versions, the display screen now showed a copyright date of 1978 by Apple Computer, Inc., and 1976 by Microsoft (which may be either their copyright date for the original Microsoft BASIC, or possibly for Microsoft's first 6502 version).[6]

      Apple put a copyright on it, which must mean Apple did something.

      <flame type="obligatory" target="microsoft">Did you see that there were many bugs that needed to be fixed, and the code they recieved was almost identical to the Altair 8800 BASIC done by MS?</flame>

    13. Re:Why, you ask? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Umm, no. The 65xxx could do 4 operations per cycle, the 80x86 could only do one. Why can a 33MHz PSone outstrip a 66MHz 486DX2? Same reason a 2.5/2.8/2.whatever MHz IIgs can outstrip a 4.77 MHz 8088. That's what I've heard, anyway. So, the "100MHz IIgs" that everyone was talking about probably only clocked at 25MHz, not too hard there. Besides, I think it had a hacked-in CPU cache...

  16. Stack hardware accelerators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody here tell me if this is all compatible with the hardware TCP/IP accelerators I've been reading about recently?

    Gettin' this processin' off the tcp/ip stack on each machine would be heaven

  17. how wonderfully useless by SuperBanana · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is both interesting and a terrible shame. It's interesting, because the people involved obviously have some talent. It's a shame, because they're devoting such talent to utterly useless projects.

    There's NOTHING you couldn't do better, easier, cheaper, for less power/heat, in a smaller package, and faster(all by dozens of orders of magnitude)...with something more modern.

    Even the 8-bit uC sitting on my desk right now runs at 50mhz, fully supports C or an easy to learn assembly language- it's got seperate data+IO busses, 5-6 serial ports(SPI, IrDA, RS232, RS485 are all supported), dozens of IO lines for bitwise or parallel IO...builtin ethernet with a VERY thorough royalty-free TCP/IP stack w/large set of utility routines, two forms of realtime operations(one is the uCOSII). Oh yes, and it costs about $50 in single-unit quantities including ethenet magnetics etc...with very aggressive quantity pricing. Oh, and it's based off the Z80 family, so if you know the Z80, you'll find this baby pretty familiar(if you hadn't guessed already, this is the Rabbit3000 core module.)

    ...and it's just ONE of hundreds of uC's available.

    1. Re:how wonderfully useless by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, and it costs about $50 in single-unit quantities

      Ouch! That's pricey. The Rabbit is one of those potted-in-epoxy modules, isn't it?

      Some of us like our micros less integrated, and, say, more in the $2-6 range. I'll graft on ethernet where I need it.

    2. Re:how wonderfully useless by runderwo · · Score: 1
      This is both interesting and a terrible shame. It's interesting, because the people involved obviously have some talent. It's a shame, because they're devoting such talent to utterly useless projects.
      I'm glad someone appointed you the official arbitrator of usefulness. Yes, these people obviously don't have enough perspective on their own lives; when will they realize that they should do only things that others find useful, instead of the things that they want to do?

      It's a shame that so many people today waste time on frivolous things like "having an idea and pursuing it" and "learning by doing". They should be doing their duty and filling up empty slots in The Machine instead!

    3. Re:how wonderfully useless by cerberusss · · Score: 1
      It's a shame, because they're devoting such talent to utterly useless projects.
      If you ask me, I think you should spend that time on slashdot on a more useful project, appointed by me.
      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    4. Re:how wonderfully useless by luzrek · · Score: 1
      Not to say anything about the IIgs, but old(er) software has a tendancy to work extremely well when ported to newer machines (if it can be, typically this is only for *NIX software). For instance, something developed for a 1979 computer will have just about no software bloat, so when run on an Athlon 2200+, it flies, and takes up a trivial amount of RAM. Developing software for very limited systems is actually useful, because it teaches how to write efficient code, which seems to be a lost art.

      Completely offtopic, but high end analog equiptment can be very nice, and even better than digital equiptment. Unfortunately, it is ussually much, much more expensive to buy and maintain. Scientific research electronics are frequently analog, and very, very expensive.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    5. Re:how wonderfully useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I NEVER said you shouldn't have an idea and pursue it. But there's no sense in working on something that is DEAD, when there's something more modern available that's better in ALL ways.

      Shouldn't this be on the *BSD mailing list?

  18. Let's not rehash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The TRS-80/Apple II flamewars. We'll just call it a draw, ok?

  19. Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by rice_web · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple Computer Announces The IIgs
    RetroSoft's Exclusive Look

    A motor-horse 2800KHz, 1MHz FSB and 8192KB RAM, all topped off with a beautiful, crisp, 2-bit (4-bit supported!), 640x480 monitor.

    Apple really hit the mark with this beast, even including audiophiles that needed state-of-the-art mono sound output, capable of digital sound processing (line-in will be included in future models). When we listened to the latest hits in MIDI, they sounded remarkably better than our IBM-Compatible BEEP in QBasic.

    Finally, the IIgs comes with a built-in floppy drive to store all your files, games, and, "most importantly music, " according to Steve Jobs.

    "Now you can take all your music with you anywhere, over 1,000 digital music files in your pocket. The new floppy has no moving parts, meaning a better overall product for our users. We've got a real hit with the IIgs."

    --
    The Political Programmer
    1. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by arekusu · · Score: 1

      Re: audiophiles,

      The Ensoniq 5503 DOC was actually quite sophisticated for 1986: 32 sampling voices (8 bit) with independent playback rate, volume and looping control, and programmable interrupt rates. It not only supported stereo in and out (not included by Apple) but _eight_ channel output.

      Granted there was only 64k of sample RAM, but people eventually figured out how to trigger dynamic sample swapping via interrupts.

    2. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by CordMeyer · · Score: 1

      Could you please tell me which type of sound output is less state-of-the-art than mono?

    3. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 bit square wave FM. Otherwise known as the PC speaker.

    4. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by Surak · · Score: 1

      The Ensoniq chip in the IIgs was the same one found in the Mirage music synthesizers from the period. It wasn't bad, and *did* support stereo in/out, it just wasn't provided by Apple.

      Also, before you mock the IIgs for its floppy storage, remember that thing supported SCSI, so you could hook a *hard drive* and a *CD-ROM* drive to thing. Apple sold each of these as options. Not bad for 1986, considering CD-ROMs didn't start appearing as standard equipment in higher-end PCs until around 1990 or so.

      And not to nitpick, but the early IIgs's came standard with 256K, and later they bumped that to 512K and 1 mb.

    5. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but thats still mono.

    6. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by blakespot · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Ensoniq DOC (Digital Osciallator Chip) used in the GS, coupled to 64K of audio RAM, was the father of the Forte audio processor in the GUS (Gravis UltraSound) which was so popular back in the PC demo scene. I have framed my old, red GUS and having it hanging on a wall in my computer room. :-)

      And here's my GS:
      juicy inside pic
      outside pic

      blakespot

      --
      -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
      iPod Hacks.com
    7. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      so you could hook a *hard drive* and a *CD-ROM* drive to thing. Apple sold each of these as options. Not bad for 1986, considering CD-ROMs didn't start appearing as standard equipment in higher-end PCs until around 1990 or so.

      A CD-ROM never appeared as standard equipment on a IIgs. It was always just an option. Just like it was an option on any PC going back to 1986.

    8. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by Surak · · Score: 1

      A CD-ROM never appeared as standard equipment on a IIgs. It was always just an option. Just like it was an option on any PC going back to 1986.

      True, that's what I said. But not every PC had a CD-ROM as an option available from the manufacturer in 1986. Sure you could plop a SCSI board (which were *very* expensive in 1986) into a IBM PC and run a SCSI CD-ROM drive (which was also *very* expensive in 1986) but my point was that SCSI was *standard* on the IIgs, whereas on most (non-Apple) computers it was still an option.

    9. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1
      but my point was that SCSI was *standard* on the IIgs, whereas on most (non-Apple) computers it was still an option.


      No, it wasn't. You had to add either an Apple High Speed SCSI card or a RAMFast. SCSI was standard on the Mac SE which came out at roughty the same time.

    10. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      You're confusing the SmartPort drive connector with SCSI. The IIgs could take 5.25" and 3.5" drives out of the box without an interface card. It was not a SCSI interface.

      Apple has made non-SCSI hard drives though. I have a manual for one which included such laughs as: If you consider losing even one tenth of this (20 MB) drive's capacity, you would back up often! (Not an exact quote, but exact figures.) I wouldn't be surprised if they made one that was SmartPort-compatible. Still doesn't make it a SCSI drive though.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    11. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by Surak · · Score: 1

      Right. SmartPort, not SCSI. Grrr... I'm getting too old to remember this stuff!

    12. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Not to be overly critical, but I want to know where these mysterious 1986 CDROM drives are? Enough that it did NOT have a scsi port, but most computers in 1992 didn't have a cdrom drive, no less in 1986. To my best recollection, they did not exist in mass in 1986, and it was several years later before it was a reasonable option for any computer, closer to 1990, and until Windows 95 came out before virtually ALL computers had them. After all, Windows 3.11 was only 7 or 8 floppies to install, DOS 6.x was 3.

      After doing some googling, I find one site saying the first scsi cdrom was in 1987, a Philips CM110, after its big brother, the CM100 which used a proprietary interface. The CD110 converted the scsi signal to the proprietary as well.

      You young whipper snappers forget how it was before CDROMs, back when it took forever to fill up a 20mb drive ;)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    13. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by Surak · · Score: 1

      Ummmm...I can *show* you the A+ Magazine review article for the IIgs from back in 1986. CD-ROM drives were *indeed* an option, but they were expensive. I still have it.

    14. Re:Apple Computer Announces The IIgs by rhombic · · Score: 1

      Mono that just goes "beep"?

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
  20. Re:Bah humbug by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You'd have to be crazy to waste that much time on a woefully obsolete machine instead of using the modern one you've already got for the same purpose.

    Except the beautiful thing about the Apple ]['s were the learning one could get out of them. My Apple ][+ at least shipped with full schematics to the computer including all wiring and chip ID's. It was a fantastic opportunity for a then 11 year old back in 1981 or so, and some would argue that even modern adults can learn quite a bit from such an old architecture that is extensible enough to still function with much more modern technologies.

    The other thing to consider is that this machine (Apple ][+) was essentially designed from scratch by one person. Steve Wozniak. Thank you Steve.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  21. A "cheapest and slowest network" contest, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You'd be ripped off if you bought IIgs-es at a dime a dozen. A linksys router is about 1500x faster than the IIgs. So, um, unless you're just really looking to win the "slowest, cheapest network" contest, I'm wondering what practical use this is.

    Checked my calendar-- its not Apr. 1 anymore.

  22. GNO's Not Orca by jsanfroop · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, what's this.. looks like someone has stumbled across some 7 year old webpages!

    One should note that the GNO/ME distribution does not include GS/TCP. Indeed try Marinetti if you want to play around with TCP/IP on your GS.

    GNO/ME stands for GNO's Not Orca.. named after the Orca shell in which you could use their compiler tools..

    Not really worth checking out, unless it brings back that special nostalgia if you're one of the few who actually used this software 10 years ago.

    I don't think I saw a link to www.gno.org so there it is, go grab your GNO! You can find download links if you like..

  23. Re:Please don't rely on Slashdot for this info by Endareth · · Score: 2, Informative

    However, instead of simply stopping sales of GNO and letting the software wander into oblivion, I am placing GNO into "freeware" status, and I am also making available all source code to the 2.0.4 version to the public and the development community.

    If I understand this correctly, the owner of the source code has fully released it to the community, thereby making this 100% freeware, no conditions. As this doesn't appear to be derived from any other flavour of *NIX, I don't think there's anything stopping anyone doing whatever they choose with it.

    --
    Disclaimer: The above comment was made while under the influence of too much coding and not enough sleep.
  24. Coolness! by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 2, Funny


    Now I can setup that anonymous ftp server for my 1 pirated mp3 for people to download! When will someone port KaZaA for me?

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  25. Eh? by brsmith4 · · Score: 1, Funny

    GNOME on an apple II? You must think we're fscking stupid or something. No way in hell.

    1. Re:Eh? by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
      > GNOME on an apple II? You must think we're fscking stupid or something. No way in hell.

      GNOME's Not GNO/ME. GNO/ME's Not GNOME. GNO/ME's Not Orca. GNOME's Not Orca either. GNOME's Not GNO/ME's not Orc*** STACK OVERFLOW ***

  26. Re:very slow by rice_web · · Score: 1
    --
    The Political Programmer
  27. Re:Please don't rely on Slashdot for this info by usotsuki · · Score: 1

    AFAICT you are right, but I do recall seeing a GPL disclaimer. (At this time, I can't find it.)

    -uso.

    --
    Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
  28. GNO/ME is a BSD by usotsuki · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the
    FAQ:

    GNO contains components that originate with a variety of flavors of UNIX. These include 4.3BSD, XINU, and SYSV. It is mostly BSD. As of GNO v2.0.6, GNO has become closer to 4.4BSD. Work is in progress to make it as compliant as possible to POSIX 1003.1 and POSIX 1003.2.

    -uso.

    --
    Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    1. Re:GNO/ME is a BSD by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      components from SYSV...?

      I bet they'll get a letter from SCO soon!

    2. Re:GNO/ME is a BSD by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 1

      I guess we can expect SCO to try and file a lawsuit against me if I install GNO on my IIGS?

  29. I'm sorry... by ayjay29 · · Score: 1, Troll

    "you can use GS/TCP to implement a standard BSD socket interface, allowing you to connect via SLIP, MacIP, and soon PPP on a GNO/ME (GNO Multitasking Environment) UNIX system for the IIgs"

    Sorry, but I have no idea what any of that means. Either I'm loosing my touch with IT issue, or there is another level of extreme geekdom that I have never before encountered. Is this kind of stuff relevant in today's IT industry, or is it mealy the electronic masturbation of the great un-shaved?

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    1. Re:I'm sorry... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      We're sorry. There's no button at buy.com you can click that will help you understand any of the above.

    2. Re:I'm sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is this kind of stuff relevant in today's IT industry


      EVERYTHING is relevent in todays IT industry.... and if you dont understand:

      "you can use GS/TCP to implement a standard BSD socket interface, allowing you to connect via SLIP, MacIP, and soon PPP on a GNO/ME (GNO Multitasking Environment) UNIX system for the IIgs"

      that, then it scares me that you are in the IT industry. Im guessing you have only experienced microsoft in your career...
    3. Re:I'm sorry... by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Ya your right, PPP has absolutly no use in IT, i mean, who wants to connect to a remote system anyway.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  30. Apple IIGS Scene by feisar.de · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "In case you wanted to do something cool with your fancy little Apple IIgs in the back room"

    Well, in that case, I'd rather go to Ninjaforce, download some demos, sit back and enjoy!

    By the way, there is an IRC client, too.

    1. Re:Apple IIGS Scene by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      Ninjaforce? Ye gads, didn't they do the sound for Wolfenstein 3-D GS?

      Ghod, I love that game. *g*

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    2. Re:Apple IIGS Scene by jesseblue · · Score: 1

      Yes, that was us. :)
      Many greetings,

      Jesse Blue

  31. I don't hack for profit, I hack for FUN by leereyno · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If someone were proposing that this continue to be developed as part of a commerical enterprise I'd tell them to take the needle out of their arm.

    The point of projects like this one is to have fun and learn skills that can be used for endeavors that have a more practical use.

    What better way to learn the ins and outs of a TCP/IP stack than to implement one? What better way to learn about an OS than to write one, even if it is on hardware thats somewhere between having a Bar Mitzvah and being old enough to vote?

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:I don't hack for profit, I hack for FUN by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      There's no point in starting with older technology, since nobody uses it anymore.

      Yikes. Unfound claim number one.

      Please explain what useful skills you can learn working on a IIGS that are practical today.

      Assembly language programming on any platform gives you the 'chops' to move over to any other platform fairly easily.

      When you walked into any electronics supply house or opened any electronics catalog, you wouldn't be able to find what you needed to "mess around for fun".

      You'd be amazed at all the cool vintage parts that are available on eBay.

      I can buy a complete functioning uC with onboard ethernet, digital and analog IO, etc for less than a single tube.

      I can buy a whole tube (20 or so) of Z80 processors for what you pay for one of your 'module' processors. Furthermore, when my design is complete, I can get the PC board made and populate 20 of them fully for what you will pay for two or three of your 'modules.'

      The parts to do lower-level fiddling around and programming are virtually Free these days. Every part you need, you can find on an old motherboard somebody is begging you to haul away for free.

      Granted, it doesn't pay for the display ads in Circuit Cellar INK if we all stick to using old parts.

    2. Re:I don't hack for profit, I hack for FUN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no point in starting with older technology, since nobody uses it anymore.

      Yikes. Unfound claim number one.

      People still use swords, bows and arrows as well. It's doesn't mean they're used by any modern army. The same applies to the IIgs. Hence "nobody uses it anymore" is perfectly valid. Personally I perfer to compare people who still use IIgs to people who read plumpers magazines. Sure it happens....

      When you walked into any electronics supply house or opened any electronics catalog, you wouldn't be able to find what you needed to "mess around for fun".

      You'd be amazed at all the cool vintage parts that are available on eBay.

      And why can you find them on Ebay? Because the owners don't want them any more.

      Personally I would rather learn something new than something old.

    3. Re:I don't hack for profit, I hack for FUN by bninja_penguin · · Score: 1

      Personally I would rather learn something new than something old.

      Yeah, you're anonymous, so it's silly to reply, but did you stop to maybe consider that learning something new rather than something old needs several qualifications. I mean, I don't know how to brew my own beer, so if I learned how, then I will have learned something new, even though the art of brewing beer is something old.

      As for your comment:
      People still use swords, bows and arrows as well. It's doesn't mean they're used by any modern army. The same applies to the IIgs. Hence "nobody uses it anymore" is perfectly valid.
      Well, people still play with steam engines, but they're not used by modern trains. However, you can't say "nobody uses it any more", Simply because, while no one really uses steam directly, there are probably millions of people around the world who get electricity from steam power.

      --
      For those who describe their systems as 'boxen', do you order multiple 'boxen' of corn flakes also?
  32. But... by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

    Can your uC play Oregon Trail?

    I bet it comes with a free TCP/IP stack too!

  33. KEGS by metatruk · · Score: 5, Informative

    For all you kids at home with nothing to do and no Apple IIgs I recommend this fine emulator available at:
    http://kegs.sourceforge.net/

  34. Is there really a reason? by 222 · · Score: 0

    Seriously, is there really a need for something like this to happen? At the risk of frowning on something that some guy did "just because he could", does anyone actually use these computers anymore? I deal with alot of users, and the OLDEST machine ive seen in years still being used as an internet capable machine is a 486/66DX. Those are few and far between. Im all for hobbys, (i recently spend a week learning how to program atari games) but is this really front page material? Arent there more pressing issues at hand ?

  35. Great introduction to Computational Complexity... by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My earliest programming memories were on Apple II systems writing looping code in Logo or BASIC. In college, I concentrated on theoretical computer science, possibly because the general limits of computational machinery were made obvious to me through those early years on the apple.

    Write some code in Visual Basic.NET and the first thing you notice is that you need a 4GB dual Xeon box just to boot the IDE! In a more efficient environment like VS6 or GCC+Emacs you have to write some complex code before you begin to notice performance limitations of the host machine.

    I suppose this is analogous to hopping up 1960's muscle cars versus today's ricecars. The muscle cars were simple enough that owners could make meaningful performance upgrades. Modern cars benefit somewhat from a new chip, but most owners just change the bodywork and add lots of wings.

    That having been said, I like my TiBook at least as much as I like my old Apple ][.

  36. What this brings to mind is.... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Why isn't everything for the IIGS freeware? With the exception of schools that didn't get the trillions of dollars that Bush put into education, who's actually using a GS on a day to day basis?

    I *have* a GS, and I don't use it. I emulate one on my PB 5300 (another limping animal that should be put down ;) with Bernie to the Rescue.

    With the exception of the pain in the ass of making and managing floppy images (which is infinitely better than trying to nab them off a IIe) it works great. I'm glad that this software is free, but this just illustrates the BS of copyright laws. Unmaintained or un-updated software should lose copyright protection after 10 years AT MOST. This allows dumbasses like me to emulate, or actually *use* the hardware I own.

    Like I'm going to go out and buy Karateka any time soon (Don't try to hit the princess, she will smoke your ass like a looter in a riot!).

    Seriously, If the publishers need $$$ that bad, keep the trademarks (so someone can release Rescue Raiders II ((Rockstar Games??!)), and dump the software to freeware so assholes like me can play a classic, learn basic, explore and compare the limits of software and hardware of yesteryear and today, and so I can finally find out what I put on the back of those 5.25 floppies.

    Oh, and not have to try and explain why Gemstone Warrior was so frickin' creepy-scary, and why the Beagle Brothers kicked ass.

    Remember, all the software you use *right now* will still be copyrighted long after you're dead, Apple makes the G69 with OSeX (things will be looser that way, I'm sure) and Bill Gates will either be hooked up to a machine, or *be* a machine (let's hope it runs on Windows either way.

    Good example - Cinemaware. Releasing all their old ROMs and images. *FREE* Defender of the Crown anyone?
    Re-releasing the games for a new market: Phones, GBA, PDA etc.

    Do more of that, or so help me, I'll grab Locksmith 6.0, and Copy II+ 7 and 9 and I'll do it for you, you publish-whores! Put that on a bun and eat it!

    1. Re:What this brings to mind is.... by twocents · · Score: 1

      Beagle Brothers...

      I almost made it through to the end of your post before nostalgia hit me so hard I just had to make a post.

      Damn, I remember using that tool on the II+.

    2. Re:What this brings to mind is.... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      who's actually using a GS on a day to day basis?

      It's not on every day, but I used mine to write the software that controls my beer fridge (that software is currently running on a IIe with 1 meg of RAM and LocalTalk, but was written to run on something as minimal as a 64K II+). More recently, it's seeing use as a Morse-code trainer (decided to take another stab at that after reading this article). Could I do this with a more modern system (like the dual Athlon MP 2100+ parked next to it)? Yes. I already have some software for the IIGS that I downloaded & installed years ago, though, so it saves me the bother of searching for something newer.

      The Apple IIGS might well be 1986 technology...but it's good 1986 technology! Plenty of other machines have come and gone, but this machine's been parked on my desk since 1985 (it started as a IIe and was upgraded in 1993) and it isn't going anywhere any time soon.

      Oh, and not have to try and explain why Gemstone Warrior was so frickin' creepy-scary, and why the Beagle Brothers kicked ass.

      Beagle Bros kicked loose most of its stuff as freeware (as in beer) years ago. I think the TimeOut add-ons for AppleWorks and some other newer apps are the only ones that are still in abandonware limbo (and even a handful of those are free).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  37. It's Dying by agent+dero · · Score: 0, Troll

    Apple IIgs is dying!

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
  38. "Freeware" means nothing legally. Pick a license. by jbn-o · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If I understand this correctly, the owner of the source code has fully released it to the community, thereby making this 100% freeware, no conditions.

    Then the copyright holder should have said this software is in the public domain. That would have meaning (as would licensing under the remarkably liberal new BSD and MIT X11 licenses). The term "freeware" has no legal meaning and is not a license, therefore it cannot be considered free software or open source. The FSF warns against using the word freeware to mean "free software". As things are, it is unclear exactly what the copyright holder(s) were trying to convey which means the software should be regarded as non-free and therefore it would be wise to avoid the software. Here's hoping the copyright holder(s) pick a free software license.

  39. Just How Slow by Effugas · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I don't think people grasp just how slow the Apple IIgs was.

    I, of course, didn't. Middle school for me was defined by the l'il bugger, minus about six months of its power supply choking if I did something excessive like use the floppy drive (800K, and _no_ hard drive).

    I have fond memories of flaming people for using ZIP when an obviously superior format, SHK(Shrinkit), was common for the IIgs.

    Yeah -- my 2.2mhz speedster had a better algorithm than a PC *giggles*. Right.

    Seriously, though -- graphical web browser? For IIgs? GIFS TOOK AN HOUR APIECE TO RENDER, line by godforsaken line...

    That being said, did that machine have a bad ass sound synth or what...took like five years for PCs to even come close with the GUS, and a while longer before SB Live became common enough to surpass the synth capabilities of the trusty IIgs...

    80's music? You mean MODs?

    Oh yeah, ProTERM made for a great Unix dumb terminal...

    --Dan
    www.doxpara.com

  40. Oh nooooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let the IIGS die.. it was a good machine for it time.

  41. obligatory assembler code... by nacturation · · Score: 1
    ] call -151
    * 300: ad 30 c0 20 ed fd 4c 00 03
    * 300g
    Enjoy!
    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:obligatory assembler code... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      This bit of code is more fun...feed it and a WAV to your II and it'll play the WAV.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:obligatory assembler code... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Slightly more modern entry, less obfuscated, to see if I'm remembering it right:

      ]mtr
      *!
      !300: lda c030
      ! jsr fded
      ! jmp 300
      !
      *q
      ]call 768

      Gotta love that miniassembler. Someday I plan to port SABOTAGE to IIgs graphics, with clouds, storms, and day/night effects. And more colorful detail on the graphics. I've got a full disassembly of the 8-bit version in a text file somewhere. If only I had a 65c816 crossassembler to run under Mac OS X.

      My favorite shape table:

      e8: 0 3
      300: 1 0 4 0 4 0

      That and a few lines of BASIC code, instant graphics program using cursor keys to move the pixel and space bar to toggle plot/noplot.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:obligatory assembler code... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Slightly more modern entry, less obfuscated, to see if I'm remembering it right:

      ]mtr
      *!
      !300: lda c030
      ! jsr fded
      ! jmp 300
      !
      *q
      ]call 768


      Yes, that's it. The LDA $C030 is the location for toggling the speaker which, incidentally, loads the A register with a random value. Then it jumps to the subroutine at $FDED which prints out the character to the screen containing the ASCII value stored in the A register. And, of course, rinse and repeat. So it fills up the screen continually with random characters, all the while clicking the speaker. Good for cheap thrills. :)

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:obligatory assembler code... by drwho · · Score: 1

      What's sad is, I knew what this code did immediately upon reading it. And didn't even have to consult my Beagle Brothers Peeks, Pokes, and Pointers chart.

      I am not rich enough to have a IIgs, but I do have several ][e and ][+s. I even have the original flopy drive I got with my first ][+ in 1981!

    5. Re:obligatory assembler code... by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

      Unless you're using ProDOS, and it spits out ^D

    6. Re:obligatory assembler code... by nacturation · · Score: 1
      Unless you're using ProDOS, and it spits out ^D

      Err... wrong. Try it. It'll run forever. It's in assembly which isn't interpreted by the ProDOS runtime.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:obligatory assembler code... by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're right. I remember now that ProDOS ensures it came from a BASIC print statement.

  42. Re:Great introduction to Computational Complexity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a more efficient environment like VS6 or GCC+Emacs..

    Come again? I think you've confused Emacs with a usable text editor.

  43. Re:Great introduction to Computational Complexity. by ThePeeWeeMan · · Score: 1

    So, in other words, I have a 4GB dual Xeon laptop right here. Gee, thanks! I wonder what I can do with it? =)

    [It's actually a P4-1.6 with 512MB RAM)

  44. Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok I owned a IIgs and I was one of the early users of a GNO/ME. The Byteworks made great compilers and 360 made great tools. But that was '86. Now, who f-ing cares. I can pick up a cheap box for under $100 that will kick the butt of my souped up 14 MHz IIgs and runs Linux/[Free|Open|Net]BSD.

    Hell a SparcStation IPX is smaller and has a 40 MHz processor. I can get 5 or 10 of them for $100.

    I have to agree, this is useless. And I used to be a big IIgs fan, I guess that is what growing up is about - I threw out all my broken toys and bought new ones

  45. Re:Acronyms... with slashes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The G in Gnome already is for GNU

  46. Re:What people consider 'High Tech' by aldousd666 · · Score: 1, Funny
    What do you expect from a generation of people who think that Pert Plus was high tech with it's new 'Patented Wash-n-Go Technology' (a la. "Gee, What'll they think of next?")

    I have a IIGs, and I'm actually excited about this. It has been collecting dust, and now, I'm going to fire up my 2400 baud adb port modem and 'fly' online in textual 'happy apple' style. Now all we need is a networked multi-player version of Oregon Trail, and I'm happy for the next year!

    --
    Speak for yourself.
  47. Ahh... the IIGS! by BobWeiner · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see the IIGS mentioned on Slashdot. As for many others, I'm sure, it was my first introduction to computers -- heck, it WAS my first computer.

    I used it quite a lot, from 1987 - 1996. I'm glad to see that development is still continuing. I only wish I could find a nice crisp RGB monitor (as my original one became blurry after years of use) to go with the computer. It's very cool to see that TCP/IP support is now available for these machines. On that note...

    Anyone still actively using their IIGS for development/productive work?

    --
    The PC Weenies: 11 Years of Online Tech 'Too
  48. Is That Really Necessary? by reallocate · · Score: 1

    Relax, not everything needs to be useful. (Like reading Slashdot...heh.)

    Sometime people do things because it geves them pleasure. You remember, fun.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  49. IIgs Gallery by 32bitwonder · · Score: 1

    This project has been around for a while, and every once in a while I think about implimenting it myself just for kicks. The idea of getting my IIgs on the internet with a graphical browser is just too geeky to ignore. I would require some upgrades like a hard disk, more memory and a means of actually connecting it to the internet but it's entirely doable. Donations anyone?

    In the mean time I've decided to feature my IIgs itself as the focus for a mini photography project. Come on, it's a beautiful design!
    You can find it in the gallery section of my website www.32bitwonder.org

    If you can help with putting it on the web, please leave feedback on the site.

    -Brad

    1. Re:IIgs Gallery by BobWeiner · · Score: 1

      Hi Brad,

      Tried to access your page, but it wouldn't load. Hopefully it wasn't slashdotted already. ;)

      --
      The PC Weenies: 11 Years of Online Tech 'Too
    2. Re:IIgs Gallery by 32bitwonder · · Score: 1

      Odd, I can access it just fine. (public machine)
      Please try again. :-)

  50. An SUV filled with DVDs... by Entropy248 · · Score: 1

    This is definately faster!

  51. Interesting business plan by Imperator · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly, what these people are trying to do by developing for antiquaited hardware is drive the value up so they can sell theirs on eBay. But I'm on to their underwear-stealing ways!

    --

    Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
  52. Re:WARNING - ASCII GOATSE RESULTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Beep + Garbage on the screen.


    - L.

  53. Re:Great introduction to Computational Complexity. by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

    Compared to vi Emacs is bloatware. But VS.Net developers hold Emacs up as a model of simplicity and efficiency...

  54. Re:Please don't rely on Slashdot for this info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I understand this correctly, the owner of the source code has fully released it to the community, thereby making this 100% freeware, no conditions.

    You don't know for sure that the person who did that actually own the unrestricted rights to all the code.

    Remember Tilly?

  55. Re:Bah humbug by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

    The argument has also been put forth that Apple ][ boot times far exceed that of computers today... I know that Appleworks (the word processing / spreadsheet / etc. program) boots on an Apple ][ in a matter of seconds, whereas modern computers take at least a minute before you can load a word processor and start typing. My dad still uses Appleworks on an Apple ][ mainly for that reason (even though I have a much newer PC in the house for the family).

  56. Marinetti and interrupts by Linknoid · · Score: 1
    I used my IIGS pretty exclusively while I was in college (1996-2001), and the biggest problem I had with doing stuff over the serial line was dropped characters because certain things would block interrupts long enough to lose characters, such as the system beep.

    I also spent many, many hours trying to get Marinetti to work. Our campus was wired with both 10baseT and for those without computers, dumb terminals connected via serial cables to the local HP/UX mail server. I had a friend set up PPP on his Linux machine and tried to get Marinetti to work over a telnet session over the serial line, but every time I tried to connect, I got a bouncing apple lockup (equivalent to a blue screen of death). I wanted to write an application or two for it (in assembly), and maybe try to port Lynx to GNO/ME, but I never did succeed in getting Marinetti working. Oh well.

    1. Re:Marinetti and interrupts by The+Blue+Meanie · · Score: 1
      Yes, early versions of Marinetti (1.0,1.1) had their issues, like any software under active development. But I was able to use Marinetti 2.0 just fine via 56k dial-up PPP and null-modem PPP directly wired to a Solaris machine acting as proxy/router with no issues. 2.0 is reasonably stable, and is still readily available for folks who still have their IIgs's up and running.

      MOSP - the Marinetti Open Source Project - was still developing on it last I heard, and they were shooting for a 3.0 version. They've cured a number of bugs, and I believe they've even got a working MacIP layer. Of course, it's been quite a while since I checked in on the code....

      --
      "I feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." -- Tom Lehrer
    2. Re:Marinetti and interrupts by Linknoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, 1.1 just plain didn't work for me, but it was 2.0 that was giving me bouncing apple crashes, I believe.

    3. Re:Marinetti and interrupts by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 1

      I believe now that with the advent of a NIC (yes a RJ45 type NIC) for the IIGS and enhanced //e, you can with the latest version of Marinetti get quite a bit done. With a Transwarp at 14 Mhz (yes expensive, but doable) the platform now has loads of options, FlashCard hard drives, IDEcard (Focus) Hard Drives, and much much more. Too few slots ,and too many options. It is a fun 'resurrection' platform now being brought into the more recent world. Not totally abandoned. Check out http://www.callapple.org, the BBS is active, and so are alot of people working on ideas for making a portable IIGS. Oh, and finally, there is a Kfest.org with a world wide Festival each year in Kansas featuring this years KeyNote of Steve Wozniak! http://www.kfest.org

  57. Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn! I wish I had that much time to waste.

  58. Re:What people consider 'High Tech' by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is a networked multi-player version of Oregon Trail, and I'm happy for the next year!

    Why stop there? Wolf 3D was ported to the IIgs.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  59. Wooo000o!!!!1 by jjeffries · · Score: 1

    FINALLY! I've been waiting for this since 1993 or so!

    I'm going to have to drag my //gs out of the closet--it's ZIPchipped to a blazing 16Mhz, with 16 phat megabytes of 256x4 DRAMs!

    GNO/ME was a replacement for the UNIX system that I always wanted back then but couldn't afford (or something like that.) My GS will now take a proud (but kind of slow) place next to my 14 linux machines.

  60. Apple IIGS was ahead of its time by Senor+Wences · · Score: 3, Informative

    I recently picked up a IIGS ROM 3 because the computer was so ahead of its time (and so I could play again the games on my old 5.25 inch floppies from my ][+). I continue to be amazed by the IIGS and its operating System GS/OS version 6.0.1.

    To give you an example of how ahead of its time this computer was: I am actually netbooting the computer from a Mac Plus running AppleShare File Server 3.0. No disks needed: the IIGS starts up over the network and runs its operating system from the Mac's hard drive. It's certainly not the fastest, but it gives me a 500 MB hard drive for my IIGS.

    Information on setting up a netboot network for a IIGS ROM 3 can be found here:

    http://www.mandrake.demon.co.uk/Apple/ltalk/iigs _r b.html

    Truly geeky stuff.

    --
    End of Line
  61. SLASHDOT JANITORS CLUELESS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The gnome 2.0 freeware announcement was made years ago, and gstcp preceded it.


    However, gstcp was never released (it was a demonstration for a masters degree, and once the degree was granted, the project was dropped without being released).


    Marinetti (search sf.net for it) was a clean-room tcp implementation written from RFCs because the programmer (Richard Bennett) was tired of waiting for gstcp. It was first released in summer of 1997, IIRC.


    I think the dates on the gnome announcement and gstcp homepage should have been an indication to the slashdot janitors. If they had bothered to check them.

  62. Re:Were Ladan & Laleh Bijani Virgins? tsarkon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are very offensive and not funny at all.
    Picking on 2 people who are *dead* and who endured a more painful life than imaginable is beyond comprehension. I bet you thought you were pretty cute while you hid behind your keyboard and typed something clever. I'd like to beat the shit out of you you racist bastard.

    The reason many Arab people hate America is because of low life losers like you - you slanderous bigot.

    If anyone finds this persons comments amusing they need to question their sense of morality.

  63. Re:"Freeware" means nothing legally. Pick a licens by bazyar · · Score: 1

    When I released the GNO/ME sources, my intention was to allow people to do anything they wanted with it, except sell it. I maintain copyright on the software, so it is not public domain.

    I will never license anything under the GNU Public Virus.

    Some of the components of GNO/ME are actually borrowed from BSD and licensed under the BSD license. This is primarily BSD API .h interface files, and a number of the standalone utilities.

  64. Re:Stallman going at it again? by bazyar · · Score: 1

    No, GNO/ME stands for: GNO's Not ORCA / Multitasking Environment The /ME was key because this was the first and only pre-emptive multitasking software for a IIgs.

  65. Good Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey.. way to go Apple. You finally got Tcp/IP!!!! Boy O' Boy... the future is unlimited now eh?

  66. Re:Bah humbug by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Interesting
    > Except the beautiful thing about the Apple ]['s were the learning one could get out of them. My Apple ][+ at least shipped with full schematics to the computer including all wiring and chip ID's. It was a fantastic opportunity for a then 11 year old back in 1981 or so,

    ...and best of all, a complete, FULLY COMMENTED DISASSEMBLY of the monitor ROM!

    Today, the same kid gets a EULA that forbids him to even make a hex dump :(

  67. Re:Were Ladan & Laleh Bijani Virgins? tsarkon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    People like the grandparent poster (and myself) make light of life's absurdity by making morbid, horrific jokes.

    I can't speak for the grandparent, but in my case my online humor and attitude bear little resemblance to my offline relationship to the world community.

    Contrast our approach to that of holding all of one's fear and anger and hostility inside and ultimately blowing yourself up figuratively or literally.

  68. and who ever said computer geeks used jargon by stuph · · Score: 1
    --
    --Less Thinkin', More Drinkin'...
  69. Re:Bah humbug by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think it was a re-creation of the monitor ROM assembly code. I know they lost the original source before they could print it, so you could always try implementing that on a EPROM and seat that sucker on the IIs mobo and get a bugfix or two...

  70. Re:Please don't rely on Slashdot for this info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jeez people, it was a freakin' joke. Who would use a 20 year old computer running a odd flavor of unix to host a mission critical app?

  71. Why oh why!? (People! agree with me here!) by voxel · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is so lame. Why oh why do people spend countless hours performing stupid mundane projects just so they can get praise from their super-geeky friends?

    This is so sad. I for one am sick and tired of Slashdot posting stupid-a$$ articles about projects NOBODY cares about except for maybe 30 year old virgin adults with 3" thick glasses that live in their parents basement still.

    Oh wait! I take it all back! I forgot CmdrTaco was in this group!!! :-P

    ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H

    Stop wasting news space!

    - Voxel

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  72. Re:"Freeware" means nothing legally. Pick a licens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do software-type people like the GPL so much? It's just gonna put us all out of business if it takes over!!!

  73. 4 words by pagercam2 · · Score: 1

    Too Much Free Time

  74. Uh... And? by reverendslappy · · Score: 1

    Ability to use TCP/IP on 17 year old computer: Done.

    Linux Desktop Market share: What, 3%? 4%?

    Cure for cancer: Not found.

    Reasons anyone should care about this story: 0

    Possible value of other things the talent required to do this took: Priceless.

    I'd like to know how much time and talent was wasted on this. Are there really THAT many talented-but-unemployed IT professionals out there?

  75. I was browsing the web with the IIGS in 1992 by danieleran · · Score: 1

    I downloaded the NCSA Mosaic browser and had a wizzy 14.4 modem connection to the net via Delphi or GEnie. In anycase, it was before Compuserve or AOL had a real internet gateway for even email. At the time I thought, "this bandwidth problem is gonna have to change to make this www thing work out." I was graduating high school. GS/OS, maxxed out at 8 MB or RAM (the realworld limit, it had 24 bit addressing). And yes while 640x200 only supported 4 bit color (everything was dithered; it printed out half height, so you didn't get what you saw on screen using AppleWorks GS.) there was a more useful 420x200 that supported hi bit color. You could trick it into doing a 4096 color palate per scan line, and effectivly have photographic images. It was pretty much only good for demos tho. I played Defender of the Crown until my floppies wore out. Then after it was like 8 years old I sold it to some dumb schmuck for $800. It was signed by WOZ. I had an accellerator card that amped it up to something like 6 or 8 Mhz, which made it approach the level of the Mac SE, but in color. You could buy a $50 sound card and have it output stereo 16 voice polyphonic sound from the Ensonic sound chip and input for recording. Plus Apple finially released their Genlock for the apple II, so you could export any video you could gnerate on top of a video signal (it had composite video out built in.) The IIGS was also the first machine from apple to have the platinum color scheme (rather than beige/brown IIe/Macs and the white IIc.) and had the first ADB keyboard/mouse. The SE and Mac II came out the next year with them.

  76. I can`t wait by zanderredux · · Score: 1

    ...till the US government imposes export restrictions on that powerful piece of hardware genius, the Apple ][, now that it will be able to do TCP/IP, and now might be seriously considered by vicious terrorists....

  77. News for Nerds? Maybe. by vex24 · · Score: 1

    Stuff that matters? Definitely Not.

    --

    People shape laws. Not the other way around.

  78. Re:A "cheapest and slowest network" contest, anyon by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

    Feeding an AC troll, perhaps, but I am compelled by the ridiculous current (1,informative) score: there is no practical use! That's the point.

    We use old computers because they remind us of when we were young. I learned 6502 assembly language on an Apple IIe when I was 13 and had one of my programs published in the November 1988 issue of Nybble (one/two-liner contest). _Those_ were the days when we did things because they were fun, not necessarily practical! Nowadays we must suffer with not-so-fun programming to earn a paycheck, and so we enjoy these moments of nostalgia. It may not matter, but it's news for nerds.

  79. Re:A "cheapest and slowest network" contest, anyon by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 1

    There is little to no practical use for a IIGS unless you are working to teach someone low level or even high level programming. There are numerous OS alternatives for the IIGS hardware, there are many compilers and also tools for it, as well it is a great fun entertaining system with loads of software. Yes, there are emulators, and a few are EXCEPTIONAL (sweet16 http://www.sheppyware.net and Bernie II the Rescue) that are really fun and useful. However, to address another angle, the IIGS is highly collectable, not due to some real intrinsic value, but a value that comes with memories and yes some irrational justifications for payment. Yet, for instance, it isn't stupid to buy IIGS at a dime a dozen or so, since the last time I did that I got about 2500 USD worth of resellable cards from them. So, with a return on investment after my gas, time and energy, I saw about a 10000% return on my money. Now, in todays stock markets, where can you say that is easy to do, or can be done legally? And a third irrational point, one that comes with experience of writing drivers for the II when I was a kid. The GOOD OLD DAYS OF COMPUTING are lost, and it is fun and great times to visit back to them, when things were a LOT more simple, shucksters were less abundant (at least obvious and sinisterly overt about it) and getting down to write a FORTH interpreter for the 65x02 systems was doable in a matter of days or weeks. Yes, the IIGS would make a likely poor choice for a router, and a linksys 5 port hub/router can be had for 49 dollars. But honestly, what can or do you really learn from a linksys other than a 192.168.1.1 HTML interface for configuration? Get a IIGS doing the job, and I understand the nuts and bolts of routing pretty well. It is just what your goals are, practicality or actually expanding your understanding of things. The call is yours, I choose to mess around with IIGS hardware and have a blast doing it!