Slashdot Mirror


Skydiving Across the English Channel

loonix_gangsta writes "Felix Baumgartner, an Austrian, has become the first person to skydive 35 km (22 miles) across the English Channel. Wearing a jumpsuit with a large carbon fin strapped to his back he reached speeds of up to 360 km/h. The whole flight took approximately 14 minutes. The newsitem is being covered by the BBC, SkyNews and CNN."

44 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. Moneypenny by mao+che+minh · · Score: 4, Funny
    Man, that's something that you would expect to see in a Bond movie.

    You know, the plane is blowing up, Bond puts two in the bad guy and grabs a boogie board then straps it to his back. The music kicks in ("DAA DAA DOOOM DAA-DAA, DAA-DAA-DAA"), Bond grabs the gal, and whoosh, out the door.

    From the CNN article: "He said cloud cover meant he could not see where he was going and had to follow his two planes across the Channel.". I bet nobody believed the pilot of the 747 at first. "No really, was a guy, with a rocket pack or something, honest!".

    1. Re:Moneypenny by mjh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interestingly enough, something similar to this was in the latest Lara Croft flik. I haven't seen it, but this part was interesting. During one part of the movie Angelina Jolie and someone else were trying to escape and they went to the top of some building in Hong Kong. They had a special jumpsuit on with webbing between the arms & body and between the legs. Being chased, they simply lept off the edge and flew themselves to a boat waiting in Hong Kong's harbor - about 3 miles away.

      What's interesting about it is that the scene is *NOT* a special effect. It was really done by two people. Jolie is a skydiver herself, and wanted to do the actual stunt but the producers wouldn't let her for fear of the insurance costs.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    2. Re:Moneypenny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not a special effect?
      I am a skydiver with 900 jumps, and I have 60
      jumps on the Birdman wingsuit, which is used in the movie.

      1. There is no building on this planet tall enough
      to leap from and glide 3 miles with a wingsuit.

      2. In the movie you see them running across roof
      and then jumping, while wearing conventional
      suits. Then their suits "magically" sprout
      wings a moment after the jump. You CANNOT run
      wearing a wingsuit; You can only waddle.

      3. It is apparent from your post that you got your
      information from that USA Today article which
      has been the subject of much ridicule among
      skydivers on www.dropzone.com forums.
      Incidently, no one can verify that Jolie has
      ever made a jump, despite her claims.

    3. Re:Moneypenny by ShortedOut · · Score: 3, Funny

      Didn't Wile E Coyote do this in the 60's?

    4. Re:Moneypenny by CheeseMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a little thing called editing, my friend. Just because they didn't film the entire jump in one continuous segment, and no doubt highly exaggerated the length of the flight, that doesn't mean it was a special effect!

      I believe the parent poster just wanted to let everyone know there really are such things as wingsuits and that was real footage of two people flying in them. If you're already an expert on the subject, that's fine, you really didn't need to reply... of course, it's always a good idea to let everyone know how smart you are.

      --
      Nothing to see here.
    5. Re:Moneypenny by matt-fu · · Score: 4, Funny
      by Anonymous Coward on 09:52 AM July 31st, 2003 (#6580004)

      I am a skydiver with 900 jumps, and I have 60 jumps on the Birdman wingsuit, which is used in the movie.

      Incidently, no one can verify that Jolie has ever made a jump, despite her claims.


      Incidentally, the same could be said about you.

  2. Sooooo... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 3, Funny

    "jumpsuit with a large carbon fin strapped to his back "

    So, does he play 'Shark' when he gets into the water?

    --
  3. Nice one my son! by BigAlexK · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently his backpack was running Linux, that's how he stayed up for so long ;-)

    1. Re:Nice one my son! by Binestar · · Score: 3, Funny

      No way, 14 minutes of uptime surely mean WinME.

      You've seen WinME up for 14 minutes straight? Oh, you're counting boot up time...

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
  4. Skydiving. by haeger · · Score: 4, Funny

    The newsitem is being covered by the BBC, SkyNews and CNN.

    How appropriate.

    .haeger

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
  5. Skydiving? by jason.hall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can it still be called skydiving in this case? Looks more like he was just the external payload for a small glider! Still, looks like fun.

    1. Re:Skydiving? by mjh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Exactly! The BBC article mentioned that he was in "free fall"! I've got about 900 skydives, and if you've got wings attached to you, that ain't free fall... at least it wasn't when I was skydiving.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  6. Brings a whole new meaning to... by lewiz · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Is it..."
    "No, actually, it's Felix Baumgartner."
    "Oh."

    1. Re:Brings a whole new meaning to... by stu_coates · · Score: 5, Funny

      I saw this guy on TV and he looked more like Buzz Lightyear!

      To Calais... and beyond.... ;-)

  7. Hmm.. by Jonsey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He must have accelerated slowly.

    14 minutes is ~0.23 hours. 360km/h * .23h == 82.8km

    What interests me, is how he managed to accelerate up to the 360 kph mark, and slow back down, without the sharp sudden stop that I associate with skydiving. (C'mon you know you saw him bouncing along a field until he smacked into an old hardwood)

    --
    I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
    1. Re:Hmm.. by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He probably reached that speed towards the beginning of his flight/glide/dive, up in the much thinner (= less drag) air.

      As for slowing down, there are these devices called "parachutes" that skydivers, the succesful ones anyways, tend to favor.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    2. Re:Hmm.. by aziraphale · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think you've forgotten about the fact that skydivers usually wear parachutes.

      Normal behavior for a skydiver is to fall out of a plane, accellerate up to terminal velocity, maintain that speed for a while, then open your parachute, which slows you down to a lower terminal velocity, then hit the ground and (hopefully) stop.

      Adding horizontal displacement to the mix shouldn't change the nature of the problem too much....

    3. Re:Hmm.. by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 3, Funny


      Interesting. I have an idea. How about we steal all these "parachutes" from the whole world and ask for one trillion dollars yp return them? Without these "parachutes" all "skydivers" would die.
      </dr evil's voice>

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    4. Re:Hmm.. by Raindeer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Since your replies seem to suggest your sincere, I thought I'd give a reply.

      Jumping from the height this guy was on, means you have less drag, but the drag increases when you go lower, until he reaches the lower parts of the atmosphere where unpowered flight seems to be limited to about 220kph. Now would he have jumped out at 30km height, he would have broken the sound barrier and then, slowed down to 220kph.

      This ofcourse holds untill the density goes (quite abruptly) up to that of solid rock, at which point velocity goes down to zero.

    5. Re:Hmm.. by bakreule · · Score: 4, Informative
      Normal behavior for a skydiver is to fall out of a plane, accellerate up to terminal velocity, maintain that speed for a while, then open your parachute, which slows you down to a lower terminal velocity, then hit the ground and (hopefully) stop.

      If this is a troll, I'll bite, but since there are two comments in the same vein, I don't think it is. Unless the trolls are teaming up.. dear god..

      Speaking from skydiving experience, if you open your parachute at 360kph, the parachute will be ripped right off your back and probably break a few bones in the process.

      Even during a "normal" skydive the diver can accelerate to around 160mph (sorry for the sudden unit switch) by falling vertically. However, before deploying the parachute, the skydiver must slow themselves down by going into the "neutral" position: arched back, hands and legs out. This will slow the diver down to around 120mph, which is safe to deploy the canopy.

      --

      Buses stop at a bus station
      Trains stop at a train station
      On my desk there's a workstation....

    6. Re:Hmm.. by EReidJ · · Score: 4, Funny
      Normal behavior for a skydiver is to fall out of a plane, accellerate up to terminal velocity, maintain that speed for a while, then open your parachute, which slows you down to a lower terminal velocity, then hit the ground and (hopefully) stop.

      Um, no, there's no hopefully about it. When you hit the ground, you WILL stop, parachute or no parachute.

      The state of your body when you stop is open for debate...

  8. Oh my by Cirrius · · Score: 4, Funny

    "with a large carbon fin strapped to his back"

    This is a ricey-car reply waiting to happen

    1. Re:Oh my by goldspider · · Score: 4, Funny

      I bet he was wearing a yellow suit, and you KNOW there was a "Type-R" sticker somewhere!

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:Oh my by valkraider · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Powered by Gravity"

  9. Next Logical Step: by superdan2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Add a heat sheild.
    2. Add pressure suit.
    3. Increase altitude to 62 miles.
    4. Find X-Prize team loony enough to let someone jump out the door.
    ...
    6. Profit.

    (Seriously, as an occasional skydiver/former paratrooper, this sounds like a f--king blast.)

    --
    blog |
    1. Re:Next Logical Step: by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/history/coldwar/pe. htm

      "On the third and last jump in Excelsior III on August 16, 1960, Captain Kittinger jumped from a height of 102,800 feet, almost 20 miles above the earth. With only the small stabilizing chute deployed, Kittinger fell for 4 minutes, 36 seconds. He experienced temperatures as low as minus 94 degrees Fahrenheit and a maximum speed of 714 miles per hour, exceeding the speed of sound. The 28-foot main parachute did not open until Kittinger reached the much thicker atmosphere at 17,500 feet. Kittinger safely landed in the New Mexico desert after a 13 minute 45 second descent. Project Excelsior successfully proved the new parachute system would solve the problem of high altitude escape by crewmen."

      http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/eagles/kitt-3.jpg

  10. What Officer ? by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr Baumgartner had prepared for three years for this flight, with rigorous training including strapping himself on to the top of a speeding Porsche.

    Did the driver know ?

    "What Officer, a man strapped to the roof of the car as we went down the AutoBahn ?"
    "Yes sir"
    "I don't belive you, why isn't he there now"
    "He dropped off over the bridge and glided over the river"
    "Have you been drinking officer ?"

    Blow into the bag son, blow into the bag.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  11. Where was this guy in 1944? by HBI · · Score: 4, Funny

    We could have saved a lot of money and time with this methodology.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  12. Fin? by worst_name_ever · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the photos accompanying the article, it looks as if the thing strapped to his back was less of a "fin" and more of a small set of wings. If so, the message here is basically "Man puts on tiny hang glider and, after being air-dropped from high altitude, glides for a few miles."

    I forsee a day when humans will attach themselves to ever-larger winged contraptions and travel further and further with each passing year. Perhaps, some day in the far future, these "aero-planes" might be equipped with powerful "jet-engines" which would enable the intrepid pioneers of the sky to travel across the very oceans themselves. Perhaps pretzels could also be served on these voyages.

    --

    In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    1. Re:Fin? by McWilde · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pending the arrival of your ridiculous "aero-planes", me and a few friends of mine are working on building a trebuchet to sling people across the Channel. People will probably need to strap on one of these fins, or the initial velocity has to be above the speed of sound.

      --
      Maybe
  13. Speed reached ... ? by RayOfLight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's funny how both Sky News and BBC say the speed reached is 220 mph and how CNN says it's 200 km/h. Hmm... someone's obviously got it wrong. ;-)

    But then again, who (here) is to notice this discrepancy. ;-) It'd require READING ALL THREE ARTICLES.

  14. I've heard of people falling for France... by calags · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...but this takes the cake.

    --
    Never attribute to stupidity what can be construed as a monopoly preservation tactic.
  15. That wasn't the best scene in Tomb Raider by siskbc · · Score: 4, Funny
    Interestingly enough, something similar to this was in the latest Lara Croft flik. I haven't seen it, but this part was interesting. During one part of the movie Angelina Jolie and someone else were trying to escape and they went to the top of some building in Hong Kong. They had a special jumpsuit on with webbing between the arms & body and between the legs. Being chased, they simply lept off the edge and flew themselves to a boat waiting in Hong Kong's harbor - about 3 miles away.

    That was OK. I liked the scene where she was running better. "That's right....bounce for Daddy...ooooh"

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  16. Re:Terminal velocity by radja · · Score: 3, Insightful

    from the same page: However, by diving or "standing up" in free fall, any experienced skydiver can learn to reach speeds of over 160-180MPH. Speeds of over 200MPH require significant practice to achieve. The record free fall speed, done without any special equipment, is 321MPH. Obviously, it is desirable to slow back down to 110MPH before parachute opening."

    also note that air pressure is lower, which causes less friction. his position is very close to a dive or 'stand-up' free-fall. I'm guessing CNN got it wrong, especially since I've seen some more sources reporting this, and all reported speeds way in excess of 200 km/h

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  17. Neat related article. by attaboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While the photo on the BBC article shows a "backpack" with hard wings sticking out of it, the description (especially that of his legs getting tangled in the rear wings) sounds more like a "Birdman" type suit.

    Popular Science did a great article on gliding/sky diving with wings featuring the Birdman suits. Read it here.

    This article has some good info that helps answer comments made below about diving with wings not really being free-fall, but in fact being a form of gliding.

    --
    The facts have a liberal bias. --The Daily Show
  18. Re:What if they had these in the twin towers? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Turbulence in from the wind moving around the buildings would be a problem, that would probably make it as bad of an option as jumping.

    Plus a glass desktop cover is going to be heavy and it don't have an airfoil to it so it's going to drop like a piece of glass and get a flutter to it.

    http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/cameo/dr_al oh a/terrain/terrain.html

    "Even if air flow into New York City is relatively steady and the winds predictable, ALOHA's first assumption is not likely to be met within the city itself. Buildings may block and divert the wind. Air flowing past large obstructions such as buildings forms into turbulent eddies, just as eddies form immediately downstream of a boulder or bridge piling in a river. Air flowing across an urban landscape composed of many buildings breaks up into irregular patterns of eddies of various sizes, speeds, and strengths. Winds blowing through city streets can speed up, slow down, and markedly change direction. In fact, wind blowing past an obstruction such as a building sometimes can completely reverse direction. "

    "New York City contains many "street canyons" long, straight through streets bordered by tall buildings. A street canyon can funnel the wind at a speed and in a direction different from what a user may have entered into ALOHA. Similarly, it can act to channel a cloud. The cloud, prevented by the walls of buildings from dispersing in the crosswind direction, may travel much farther downwind than ALOHA would predict before diluting below the level of concern."

    That link is in relation to computer modeling of NBC weapons release in an urban setting, but it talks about the complexity of winds in a city.

    Velocity doesn't make something fly or glide, it's the lift provided from the wing. The basic idea is that a flow over a curved surface has lower pressure than the flow over a flat surface, so you curve the top of a wing and the lower pressure there allows the wing to create lift. The faster the flow is the more lift you get, which is why aircraft need engines to provide foreward movement.

    http://www.aa.washington.edu/faculty/eberhardt/l if t.htm

  19. Re:Leo Valentin FWIW by cyber_rigger · · Score: 3, Informative
  20. Possible real military application?? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really think what that Austrian skydiver demonstrated may have some real military applications.

    Imagine US Special Forces soldiers wearing these suits (which have been coated with radar-absorbing materials to reduce radar cross-section) and being launched from 32,000 feet on a C-17 cargo plane at night. They could glide 30 miles or more, which would allow these forces to be inserted far into enemy territory.

    (Come to think of it, the US Special Forces may already HAVE this capability.)

  21. I'll tell you what's remarkable about this... by Bertie · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Some Austrian guy threw himself headlong into France, caught them all by surprise with the audacity and speed of it... ...And there wasn't a white flag of surrender in sight.

  22. Someone made a mistake by luugi · · Score: 4, Informative
    CNN says

    "God of the Skies" covered a distance of 35 kilometers (20 miles) during his flight, reaching speeds of up to 200 kilometers an hour.


    BBC says:

    Mr Baumgartner said the plane was at 30,000 ft (9,000 m) when he jumped - and he initially reached speeds of 360 km (220 miles) per hour. For most of the freefall, he was travelling at about 220 km (135 miles) per hour, he said.
    .

    --
    Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.
  23. So what? by lelitsch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apart from the weird contraption that he strapped on his back, what is the big news here? My former army unit and special forces all across NATO have done HAHO (High Altitude High Opening) jumps that go more than 50km since the 80s. Usually with predecessors of the G9. The main problem is that it's extremly cold at 8-10,000 meters and that you have to jump with supplemental oxygen. Don't try this at home, people have gotten frostbite and even died in exercises.

  24. Not on Earth, he wouldn't. by MisterSquid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now would he have jumped out at 30km height, he would have broken the sound barrier and then, slowed down to 220kph.

    Mach I at 30 km (18.6 miles) is about 675 mph. He was travelling, at his fastest, at 360 kmh (200 mph), nowhere near the sound barrier at any altitude. The sound barrier increases and decreases even as altitude increases, but it never goes lower than about 660 mph. Here's a chart of Mach 1 at different altitudes.

    (On an entirely different note, has anyone besides me noticed that the quality of Slashdot moderation has degraded over the last year or so? I haven't been "assigned" mod points since the great move West, but I know I used to do a better job than what passes for moderation these days. The mod system needs something way much more effective than the current M2 system which does absolutely nothing. I mean, we're talking about something fundamental as the speed of sound.)

    --
    blog
    1. Re:Not on Earth, he wouldn't. by atomicdragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      I believe the post was referring to the jump made by US Air Force Captain Joseph Kittinger who jumped from roughly 30 km and nearly broke the sound barrier in 1960. His maximum speed was 614 mph, which is about mach 0.91. He probably could have gone faster than sound had he jumped a little higher and/or opened his chute later. Google his name and you will find more info.