Slashdot Mirror


Newest iPod vs. the Nomad Zen NX?

flyingember asks: "I am considering purchasing an iPod, since they are so cool looking. I then came across the new Nomad Zen NX. Size isn't an issue, my current MP3 player being a MP3-CD player. The big thing is price. In the US the 30GB Zen costs $300, the 30GB iPod costs $500. Or you can get a 10GB iPod for $300 or a 20GB Zen for $250 on the low end. Has the iPod got better design and layout of controls to make the price difference worth it?"

160 comments

  1. iPod by sporty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The iPod is just more asthetically usable. I don't know how to explain it. My friend got a zen recently. It has a jog dial on the right somewhere, but the interface is just weird. It feels like the type of interface I'd expect on my receiver.

    I like devices that have interfaces that match their use. Take palm and its OS. I thought grafitii is great. It makes sense for really quick input. The fact you don't have a start menu and just use the "applications" menu to get to stuff was also great. It even use(d) a low power cpu. It's the opposite reason why I really hate windows ce. I just can' get used to the idea of having a start menu and apps that take up so much screen space.

    --

    Other reason I don't like the zen? Same friend, can't download the drivers from creative, and to use the drivers, he has to install the base software. But the software he prefers to use for syncin' needs the drivers. So to use one software, he's forced to use another.

    --

    iTunes works really well w/ the ipod. Hopefully, the win version will be just as good.

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    1. Re:iPod by straterpatrick · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      iTunes works really well w/ the ipod. Hopefully, the win version will be just as good.

      I hope that was a joke. I don't think there will ever be a windows version of iTunes. ...or any other iApp for that matter.

    2. Re:iPod by sporty · · Score: 1

      There is the iTunes store. Maybe, they will make it a general music software, you never know.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    3. Re:iPod by CanSpice · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple has publicly stated that they're working on getting the iTMS working for Windows users (by the end of the year (macobserver story)), and as of the end of April Apple had a job opening on their website for a developer of iTunes for Windows (macrumors story).

      So yes, there will be a Windows version of iTunes.

    4. Re:iPod by __aafkqj3628 · · Score: 1

      I hope that was a joke. I don't think there will ever be a windows version of iTunes. ...or any other iApp for that matter.

      Good! If apple keeps the good software on it's platform (well, partially theirs) then it's more of a hook for the marketplace.

    5. Re:iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Receiver's are cool, you're a Mac weenie.

      (Nothing like your daily dose of trolling on /.)

    6. Re:iPod by YE · · Score: 0, Troll

      Same friend, can't download the drivers from creative, and to use the drivers, he has to install the base software. But the software he prefers to use for syncin' needs the drivers. So to use one software, he's forced to use another.

      Like, on the iPod, you can even dream about using *another* software besides iTunes? But, oh, I forgot, Apple software is perfect, no one would ever want to use an alternative.

      And I'm sure your strong, argumented, educated opinion on Windows CE is right-on-spot relevant to the Nomad Zen vs. iPod discussion.

    7. Re:iPod by Silicon+Avatar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I might be feeding a troll here ...

      He does compare the user interface of the ipod to the user interface of the zen, comparing it to palmos and wince. I am right there with him/her on this comparison.

      And with the ipod, you'd be amazed to discover there are other software solutions for it. While I can't speak for the mac side of the house (and everyone I've talked to about itunes has been fairly happy with it), I know for certain on the PC side, there's EphPod and Media Jukebokx, both of which I've used. Granted, I believe both use the base driver that apple provides ... but that driver seems to work perfectly fine for me.

      I've owned a number of creative's portable mp3 products (zen, nomad, etc). I must say, this ipod and its interface have them all beat, hands down (so long as you skirt the cost issue =)

    8. Re:iPod by gooru · · Score: 2, Informative

      The iPod is just more asthetically usable. I don't know how to explain it. My friend got a zen recently. It has a jog dial on the right somewhere, but the interface is just weird.

      I unfortunately have to say the same about the iPod. The one giant wheel is very awkward to use for certain things such as playing Solitaire. However, after a couple days, I was very used to it.

      The iPod is also just plain better designed. There are practically no moving parts, and I can't imagine anything other than the hard drive dying.

      Plus, it's just the coolest little device. This might not matter to you much, but it's very, very aesthetically pleasing and is an attention grabber. I decided to shell out for Creature Speakers and a NaviPod remove, and I'm using the iPod as a stereo when I'm not walking around with it. It is just the coolest looking device ever. I even cleared out the dresser that it's all sitting on just so it'd be the only thing sitting there.

      I've gone through a lot of different MP3 players ranging from the original Rio to MP3 CD players to the Archos Jukebox Multimedia 20, and I have to say the iPod has been the best deal so far. It may seem really expensive, but once you get it and experience the quality that goes into it, you won't feel like you got ripped off.

      Obsessive? Perhaps, but it's just a hell of a good machine.

    9. Re:iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Like, on the iPod, you can even dream about using *another* software besides iTunes? But, oh, I forgot, Apple software is perfect, no one would ever want to use an alternative."

      You don't need to use iTunes to use an iPod.

    10. Re:iPod by hmallett · · Score: 1

      On WinXP at least, you don't need to install the Apple software if you're using EphPod. WinXP recognises the iPod as a FireWire disk, and EphPod prompts you when you first start it up which disk is the iPod. Simple as that. EphPod is simple and effective, like software should be. In fact, I never installed the Apple software.

  2. Size matters! by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

    so does price.

    Of course, you could indulge in simple style,
    but too the real techies, who would know
    that either you're using smaller files,
    or you paid more and got less to go.

    --
    Words to men, as air to birds.
  3. iPod is sexier by PeteyG · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Nomad is cool and all. And I'd be proud to own one. And it is kinda cheaper. I would recommend it to others! And even myself perhaps if I didn't already own a 3rd gen iPod.

    But iPod is smaller, lighter
    It's way more stylish (aka chicks dig it)
    It's got a slick interface with a really nice screen
    You can play solitaire on it gosh darn it!!!

    Okay, I'm just trying to defend my impulse 400 (USD) purchase.

    --
    no thanks
    1. Re:iPod is sexier by zaad · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's way more stylish (aka chicks dig it)

      *shaking head* You'd have better luck spending the extra $200 you saved on hookers if that's what's important to you.

    2. Re:iPod is sexier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you know that a chick digging you is different from fucking a prostitute?

    3. Re:iPod is sexier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Totally untrue.

      $200 spent on a prostitute is a one shot deal, once it's spent, it's gone.

      $200 invested in something that girls, for whatever stupid reason, will sleep with you for, or be more likely to sleep with you, will pay dividends for at least 6 months. 6 months is how long it will take for that item to be deemed out of style by women's magazines, to be replaced by something more expensive.

      It is expensive, no doubt, to keep up, but if you're smart, it's way cheaper than hookers. And who knows, you might discover a girl with a brain under all that status and resource seeking instinct.

      Don't even try to tell me that a) you're female on /. b) you're male but uninterested in getting chicks to fuck/dig you c) you're male, but married and thus totally satisfied d) you're male but would trade a sex life for a really economical and functional music player.

    4. Re:iPod is sexier by demonic-halo · · Score: 1

      I agree. The iPod is sexier. When buying personal gagets, you need to consider, "How will I look with this one?" The iPod just screams trendyness and likes to be admired. Get the ones with the custome engravings on the back, it'll make you look like a million bucks.

    5. Re:iPod is sexier by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Don't even try to tell me that... you're male but would trade a sex life for a really economical and functional music player."

      Perhaps you have forgotten that this is slashdot...

    6. Re:iPod is sexier by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      you're male but would trade a sex life for a really economical and functional music player

      Not sure - I need to know what a sex life is and what I can do with it before deciding...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    7. Re:iPod is sexier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a lot of misogyny spewing from that post. You're an ugly person.

  4. For questions like these by prostoalex · · Score: 5, Informative
    Epinions are pretty good:

    Nomad Zen reviews

    iPod reviews

    Of course, Epinions are not too helpful when the product is brand new. I usually go through a couple of five-star reviews and several one-stars (if such exist) to see what people are generally complaining about.

  5. Short answer by poity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No.

    Doesn't the Nomad have features that the iPod doesn't have?

    Like FM tuner and recording?

    [and there's also the anti-yuppie factor :) ]

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    1. Re:Short answer by Mr+D.+Logan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you buy the remote, which is an extra $60 if you are lucky enough to find it (there were problems back a few months where no one was receiving theirs). And from what I hear, the recording quality is not so great.

    2. Re:Short answer by ksheff · · Score: 1

      I got my remote a few days ago. I ordered it straight from Creative's site and it only took about a week to get it. I'm not sure about the Zen, but with the Jukebox3, it can be used to record FM or mono to 64Kbps MP3s. I mainly use it record from the line-in/optical port.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  6. Yes!!! by ae0nflx · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a 2nd generation ipod and now a new 3rd generation ipod, both 10 gigs, (i got the second one as part of an apple store rebate and only paid 70bucks for it). The layout and design is really really worth it. Even if you just get the 10 gig, it's worth it.

    The cool factor really throws it in my opinion, unless you are on a super tight budget, but seeing as you are even considering buying one, you probably aren't. It's a great piece of equipment and my only complaint is the battery life blows. If that and the price are significant issues, then you can side with the Nomad, but otherwise, the iPod is your best bet.

    1. Re:Yes!!! by paradesign · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Only 10 gigs!?!

      im still using my 5gig 1st gen that ive had since a month after release and it is amazing still. The only time the size is an issue is when i use it in firewire disk mode. i even think that its better smaller. it makes me choose my playlists for it more carefully. its noit like i need the entirity of my library on it at any given time. in fact i usually leave about a gig open, JIC theres a file i need to throw on it.

      what i really want is an uber-cheap uber-small 3-5gig model, id be in hog heaven.

      and to be on topic, the interface is the best part of the ipod, it is the essence of good design. the second you put the ipod in your hand you know how to use it.

      --
      I want 2D games back.
    2. Re:Yes!!! by tackaberry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I opted for the new 15gig iPod. Price wasn't an issue, but size was. Even though there isn't that much of a difference (30 gig is 10% heavier and nearly 1/8 inch thicker), I still wanted the thinner/lighter version.

      By comparison, the Zen weighs 9.5oz to the 5.6oz/6.2oz iPods.

      Capacity wasn't too much of a concern either. I've had a hard enough time finding 15 gigs of music to listen to, let alone 30 or 60 gigs.

      I cannot really compare the iPod to the Zen, because the iPod was the only one I considered.

      In terms of navigation, I find the solid state scroll wheel easy to use, as well as the remote control.

      One short-coming with the iPod is that I had hoped that they would have redesigned the remote to include a small text display. I also wish there was a way to integrate my iPod with my car's navigation/steering wheel controls. I also wish there was a way to save your on-the-fly playlists (although there probably is some Apple script to accomodate this).

      The headphones are adequate - I don't mind the white earbuds, as I always get a kick out of seeing other people walking down the street sporting an iPod (it's almost like you're part of a secret club - although not quite as cool as when you spot a car with an Apple sticker on it - especially a rainbow one!), although I've been eyeballing the Bang + Olufsen Earphones. I haven't found a pair of in-earphones that are actually comfortable to wear.

      In either case, see if you can "borrow" someone elses, and see which one appeals to you.

    3. Re:Yes!!! by li99sh79 · · Score: 1

      I bought a 10Gb second-gen back in February and it is possibly the finest purchase I have made all year. I find I get sort of close to the 10 hour mark with the battery, somewhere between nine to ten hours but i haven't timed it out exactly. I use it at work on a daily basis. I don't even bother with playlists, I just set it to random, hit play and let it go all day long. My only regret is that I did not buy a better case sooner; there's a faint scratch on the screen. I briefly toyed with getting a Nomad, or an Archos, but in the end I had to get the iPod.

      If you're looking for a good pair of in-ear headphones I recommend looking up the etymonic line. Quite pricey, but apparently worth the money.

      -sam
      --
      I was just here, where did I go?
    4. Re:Yes!!! by xenocytekron · · Score: 1
      My only regret is that I did not buy a better case sooner; there's a faint scratch on the screen.

      Try Brasso (the metal polish), it works wonders on ipods, both the metal part AND especially the screen.

      Source: iPod Lounge. And yes, I have and do use it on my ipod successfully.

      --
      This is my .sig, if you don't like it, it will eat you.
    5. Re:Yes!!! by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      Only 10 gigs!?! im still using my 5gig 1st gen that ive had since a month after release and it is amazing still. The only time the size is an issue is when i use it in firewire disk mode. i even think that its better smaller. it makes me choose my playlists for it more carefully. its noit like i need the entirity of my library on it at any given time. in fact i usually leave about a gig open, JIC theres a file i need to throw on it. what i really want is an uber-cheap uber-small 3-5gig model, id be in hog heaven. and to be on topic, the interface is the best part of the ipod, it is the essence of good design. the second you put the ipod in your hand you know how to use it.
      I've got a 5gb iPod which, in comparison with the 75ish gb mp3/audio collection seems pretty small. Until, that is, one realizes that it's the _perfect_ audio book device and I've usually got ~ 60 hours worth of books and another 20hrs or so of fav tunes. This is generally good for about 3.5gb. Coupled with the fast transfer, what do i really need a larger device for?
      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
  7. Archos by szyzyg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just picked up a Jukebox Multimedia for $300 - 20 gigs + support for recording and low end DivX movies. Spent a lot of time interviewing people with it at Defcon, not great quality but a versatile little box.

  8. function and form by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 4, Informative

    The ipod isn't just an MP3 player. It also can store your contacts, and appointments, as well as functioning as a portable harddrive as well (the zen can most likely do this too.) So it does a little more in a better package with a better interface. I'd say ipod.

    1. Re:function and form by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1
      ...functioning as a portable harddrive as well (the zen can most likely do this too.)

      I'm not sure if things have changed with the NX, but the original Zen can not be mounted by the operating system as a removable HD, at least not with Creative's drivers. You have to go through a special Nomad Explorer app to transfer files. iPod, OTOH, mounts directly.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
  9. Qaulity vs. Price by sunbane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a 20GB 2nd series ipod (now my wifes) and a 30GB 3rd series. The big difference I found was the quality. Borrow somebodies ipod and just listen to the sound - it is fantastic. The headphones alone would be $75 as they contain neobydium magnets and are great quality - ever notice when you see somebody with an ipod they are using the included headphones?

    The next thing is simplicity - the menu system on the ipod I find much more navigable and easier to use... granted I have only played w/ a zen in the store but the ipod just makes sense.

    You also say you are not too worried about size, but just going from the series 2 to the series 3 is awesome (and the series 2 was smaller). You can slip it into your shirt pocket and never know it is there. It really does make a difference... granted, either is night and day for you right now, but down the road do you really want to suddenly be envious of a friends tight little package? (he he...)

    I can honestly say these have been some of the best purchases I have ever made, have used them w/ both windows and on my wife's ibook. They work fabulous. And don't forget that iTunes and the Apple Music Store are coming to windows... you'll need something to play those nice songs on and slickly hook into what I think is the best mp3 player out there! (Yup, I'm jealous of my wife... come on economy - get rolling so I can get me a G5!!!)

    You could always just buy you a volkwagen bug and get an ipod for free!!! :)

    1. Re:Qaulity vs. Price by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Now if they could make it record to mp3 or wav files like the Nomade Jukebox3, I'd certainly be willing to buy an iPod. It would make recording shows to put on furthurnet less cumbersome.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    2. Re:Qaulity vs. Price by sharlskdy · · Score: 1

      It's the earbuds that bother me... I must be one of the few people who's ears can't take the earbuds... the shape of my ears doesn't give the bud anywhere to hold in place and they always fall out.

    3. Re:Qaulity vs. Price by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      You may want to try using the "in ear canal" type earbuds, as opposed to the "outer ear" type of earbuds. They have foam or silicon molds which you squeeze into your ear, which help prevent them from falling out.

      You can see a list of a few of the higher end ones here

    4. Re:Qaulity vs. Price by hmallett · · Score: 1
      The headphones alone would be $75...
      That'd be the headphones Apple sell for $39 including the remote control....
      Mine are still in the packaging....
    5. Re:Qaulity vs. Price by Ophelan · · Score: 1

      I'll second that suggestion. Both my girlfriend and I each have a set of Etymotic ER-6 headphones, available from the above link. The sound quality is much better than most headphones. The benefit/disadvantage (depending on your perspective) is that you can't hear anything else when using them. Great on a plane, not so great if you need to hear your environment. I still love 'em.

  10. The path is clear by zaad · · Score: 3, Informative

    Size isn't an issue, my current MP3 player being a MP3-CD player. The big thing is price. In the US the 30GB Zen costs $300, the 30GB iPod costs $500.

    So the difference is $200 give or take. The Zen NX isn't quite as small as the new iPod, but it's much smaller than the original Zen.

    One of the coolest things about the Nomad's is Notmad Explorer, or more specifically, the Notweb Explorer. It's a cool web interface to your mp3 player. You can browse it, search it, download or stream your mp3's. Very cool.

    The battery life is significantly longer on the Zen NX (and the battery is user removable). Also very cool.

  11. And much more than a music player by kherr · · Score: 1

    FireWire is a faster/better way to transfer files because of the sustained I/O involved (don't be fooled by the USB 2.0 FUD). The iPod is also a bootable FireWire HD, so you get dual-use out of the extra cost.

    The iPod plays AAC which may not seem like a big deal but it is the successor to MP3 so I suspect you'll be seeing more and more content that way, DRM issues aside. There is also audible.com support if you like that sort of thing. You can also do contacts and calendaring on the iPod. Sounds kind of useless but it turns out to be handy, particularly if you're always carring around your portable music.

    I'd take points off of the Nomad simply because it has Microsoft's proprietary WMA in it. Ish, don't encourage them.

    1. Re:And much more than a music player by yasth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The iPod plays AAC which may not seem like a big deal but it is the successor to MP3 so I suspect you'll be seeing more and more content that way

      Ummm says who?

      Don't be a stupid fanboy. The successor to the MP3 format seems to be the MP3 format, as size is becoming a non-issue. Microsoft also has the very nice WMA format if you want DRM. The installed base of players still skews strongly toward WMA, and right now more players are being shipped supporting WMA then AAC. That doesn't mean the AAC format is doomed just that it wil probably never become quite as important as WMA. It doesn't really matter though look at a place like AllOfMp3 they allow you to choose what format you want your music in, and the bitrate you want it at. So AAC will probably be around for a long time, but is almost certainly not the succesor to MP3

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    2. Re:And much more than a music player by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I'd take points off of the Nomad simply because it has Microsoft's proprietary WMA in it. Ish, don't encourage them."

      Yeah. These things should support less digital formats.

    3. Re:And much more than a music player by More+Karma+Than+God · · Score: 1

      Heh. There's also Ogg Vorbis out there somewhere, provided that someone finds a reason to replace MP3.

      --
      Go here to create your own Slashdot dis
    4. Re:And much more than a music player by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      How about if the makers of MP3 (Frauenhofer I believe) decided to make good on their threats of even more licensing? that's supposedly going to give a good reason to kill MP3.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    5. Re:And much more than a music player by andrewski · · Score: 1

      DOn't kid yourself. For every WMA track out there there are a hundred MP3's. More. Inevitably, when somebody finds out that they've been ripping their tunes into WMA, they realize their grave error and start over.

      For me, AAC 96 seems to do it just fine on my klipsch monitors, ns10's, and various headphones.

    6. Re:And much more than a music player by op00to · · Score: 1

      USB 2.0 FUD?

      What FUD?

      I'd take points off of the Nomad simply because it has Microsoft's proprietary WMA in it. Ish, don't encourage them.

      Honestly, are you transferring large amounts of mp3s back and forth all the time -- enough to warrant the 35% speed increase (and price increase too!)?

    7. Re:And much more than a music player by ericdano · · Score: 1

      96? wow. I have been ripping all my stuff at 160. Sounds really really good to me.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    8. Re:And much more than a music player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to burst your bubble, but you might wanna visit hydrogen audio. They kinda know more about it then you or I. They do alot of extensive testing and many developpers of LAME/Ogg Vorbis/mpc/aac/speex/flac and others are there. They also tune codecs to optimize them. I wanna keep the post short so I''ll stick with this conclusions that the folks over there have: (My apologies if I make a mistake) MP3 is the old genertion. It's quite good if you use LAME, --alt-preset standard (average bitrate with this setting is 180-220 K) is transparent on most samples. But the next generation codecs are AAC and MPC, of which AAC is endorsed by many big companies while mpc is more of a personal hackkerthing made by enthousiasts. They perform much better then MP3 and lossy audio compression to the limits. Downside of AAC is that it's still young, which is actually an upside as this technology may surpass MPC, the current overall king, when it is matured. There is an encoder race going on. Ogg Vorbis is also new and next gen but unlike mpc/aac it isn't optimized for high bitrate's and it possibly will never surpass AAC/MPC at the high end.

    9. Re:And much more than a music player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ummm says who?"

      Err, the MPEG. You know, the people that defined the MPEG Audio Layer 3 standard in the first place. They consider MPEG-4 to be the future, and MPEG-4 AAC to be the audio format of choice.

      Basically everyone supports the MPEG-4 standard except for Microsoft (who have a vested interest in tying people into Windows Media codecs). Hell, even the open-source world is moving towards MPEG-4, with things like XviD.

      A little side-note: The most successful online music store so far uses MPEG-4 AAC. The most successful portable digital audio player supports MPEG-4 AAC.

    10. Re:And much more than a music player by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      The MOVING PICTURE Experts Group has declared that the next codec to be "borrowed" from their digital video standard and used to make easily swappable encodings of CD audio is MPEG-4 AAC?

      The future audio format of choice will be whatever people end up encoding their audio in, not what some standards body considers "the future audio format of choice"... I'd be willing to bet nothing replaces MP3 for quite a while.

    11. Re:And much more than a music player by Damon+Campagna · · Score: 1

      It's not that AAC allows me to save smaller files at equal quality, but that I can have higher quality without taking up any more drive space. Since a 4meg AAC sounds noticibly better than a 4meg MP3, I just rip everything as AACs now.

    12. Re:And much more than a music player by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Yeah, AAC 96 with the Quicktime encoder is brilliant. I ripped a group of CDs at 320, 192, 160, 128, 112, 96, 64, 40, and 16 and the sound stayed together remarkably well even at 64. Below 80 there was a definite quality drop, but you have to be kind of anal about audio to hear it at 80. 64 sounds like FM radio.

      I just wanted to find the threshold at which it still sounded like the CD. For my setups 96 held great. Again, this is with iTunes and the QT AAC encoder, YMMV, IANAL, etc.

    13. Re:And much more than a music player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HydrogenAudio might know a lot about varying quality of music compresion formats. But they don't seem to really be about the topic at hand, which is whether the future is AAC. Improved total quality is nice, but there is a limit as to what can be reproduced, and what is meaningful to humans. Improved efficency is also nice, but the ever increasing ammount of space offered by HD based players makes that less of a value. Against this you have a high ammount of inertia because to switch standards will cause some trouble. Since there are relatively few benefits and a relatively high cost(lots of existing MP3 playes don't play the new formats), people won't switch. Thus the future remains MP3. DRM enabled stuff is more flexible as there isn't a clear winner(and since the cost of adding more support is relatively minor, everyone will do it)

  12. Support? by W33dz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Creative is horrible at support. Have you ever tried to DL a driver pack from them? Usually you get 4 or 5 TSR proggies that will crash your system. I lived in Singapore and actually had to go to their HQ three times to get my Geforce II replaced. Bad news.
    Apple? I own an IPOD, and notwithstanding that you have to install MusicMatch, their package is quite good. I had very few software problems and absolutely no hardware issues. The IPOD is top notch stuff and it makes the subway commute into work everyday much more enjoyable.

    --
    We are Pentium of Borg. Division is futile. You will be approximated.
    1. Re:Support? by CaptainStormfield · · Score: 1

      Actually, you don't have to use MusicMatch (which sucks as an iPod interface, IMHO). I've been using the free ephpod package with my new 30 gig iPod, and I'm very happy with it. MUCH easier to use than MusicMatch, with lots of great features.

      --
      "The dinosaurs died because they didn't have a space program." - Niven
    2. Re:Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also EOL their products pretty quickly, and don't support them terribly long after EOL. The iPod, on the other hand, will probably have software available for years after it's officially EOLed.

    3. Re:Support? by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      > Actually, you don't have to use MusicMatch (which sucks as an iPod interface, IMHO). I've been using the free ephpod package with my new 30 gig iPod, and I'm very happy with it. MUCH easier to use than MusicMatch, with lots of great features.
      I'll put in another vote for ephpod - it's is great. I actually bought a 5gb mac iPod, all the was available locally, and so never had any 'retail' windows software, but the alternatives have been excellent. Having used creative devices before I've found the availibility of 3rd party apps to be refreshing.

      The decision between the 5gb iPod & a 20gb nomad was made largely on the failures of creative labs rather then the strengths of each product. I really don't need to buy another piece of poorly supported crap with nonfunctional drivers and a 'mail in X' where X != rebate. Ever.

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
  13. vorbis! by austad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where the hell is the vorbis support?!?!?!??!?

    Dammit, all I want is something as cool as the ipod, but with vorbis.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:vorbis! by Enry · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the Neuros. It's a bit bigger than the ipod, but it's backpack based. I have a 128M flash backpack I can use while exercising, while using the 20G backpack while in the car. It plays Vorbis and MP3 files quite nicely and will also broadcast over FM to a variety of channels (YMMV outside the US).

      Linux friendly (there are 3 apps to sync over Linux) as well. Much of the Linux and Vorbis work are being done by Xiph.

    2. Re:vorbis! by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1
      Technically the iPod DOES have vorbis support (as well as any other format that you'd want to implement). In fact, I'm surprised I hadn't read this in any other comments yet.

      This IS slashdot, afterall...

      You can install Linux on your iPod.......

      That feature should make it worth the extra cash all by itself.

      Although, I wasn't able to get that working, myself...

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    3. Re:vorbis! by squarefish · · Score: 1

      ogg support is now available for quicktime and itunes. So I'd assume that someone will do the natural thing and get it into the ipod soon.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  14. iPod, for sure. by falcon203e · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wouldn't give up my 10 GB iPod for anyone else's machine, regardless of its capacity. The iPod is unbeatable when it comes to ease of use, putting CD players to shame. It's also got one feature that I've never seen on any other player, on-the-go playlists. If you don't know what I mean look on Apple's iPod site. Add to that the fact that you can charge it straight from the FireWire port, can grab a phone number or email address without having to pause the music and whip out the Palm, and will soon be able to record from it as well (you can do it already through a special developers mode, and Apple will supposedly release a firmware update in the near future integrating this function into the real interface), and I think the Zen has been soundly smacked. The iPod more than makes up for the price difference in its quality. It's also a rock. I don't know about the Zen, but I've never carried my 3rd gen iPod in a case for fear that it might get jumbled, scratched or crushed. The no-moving-parts philosophy probably has something to do with this. And if you're worried about vorbis support, just switch to AAC. The difference is amazing. And if you're really REALLY worried about vorbis support, the iPod will most likely support it once QuickTime does, which can't be too long. Oh yeah, and it won't drag your pants down if you put it in your pocket. Nice touch. I'm all about maintaining my pants-edness.

    --
    ----- "All right. It was a miracle. Can we go now?"
    1. Re:iPod, for sure. by lpp · · Score: 1

      I've been eyeing iPods for awhile now and have been avoiding the purchase simply because of a lack of recording capabilities. Can you direct me to the rumor site (or Apple announcement if its official) regarding being able to record?

      Thanks,

      Lynn

    2. Re:iPod, for sure. by andrewl6097 · · Score: 1
      I don't know about the Zen, but I've never carried my 3rd gen iPod in a case for fear that it might get jumbled, scratched or crushed.
      That's funny, because I carry my mp3 player in a case because I fear it getting jumbled, scratched, or crushed.
      The no-moving-parts philosophy probably has something to do with this.
      Say what? Both of these players have hard drives in them.
  15. Hold out for the Rio Karma / Pearl by beerboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    20 and 40 gig versions, supports Ogg Vorbis and shipping in October (allegedly)

    Details:
    http://www.gizmodo.com/archives/007993 .php

    http://gear.ign.com/articles/382/382161p1.html?f ro mint=1&submit.x=39&submit.y=24

    http://msg.mp3.com/hardware/liststory/?position= 10 &month=200301&topic_id=8707

    http://www.gizmodo.com/archives/008007.php

    http://empeg.comms.net/files/133662-ipodcompare. jp g

    1. Re:Hold out for the Rio Karma / Pearl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      shipping in October

      Yeah, along with Duke Nukem Forever, and Doom 3 on the Indrema. You can buy an ipod NOW.

    2. Re:Hold out for the Rio Karma / Pearl by fm6 · · Score: 1
      I have one of those weird Rio MP3 gadgets, the ones that used a speparate "backpack" to hold memory and battery (?). Overengineered, poor physical design, way too many wiz bang features.

      On top of this, you say the new Rio product will have OV, a feature that nobody except a few anti-patent zealots care about. Too clever for me.

    3. Re:Hold out for the Rio Karma / Pearl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, that backpack takes a regular AAA rechargable battery. Of course Rio would never tell you that :)

    4. Re:Hold out for the Rio Karma / Pearl by skidv · · Score: 1

      What about the

      Archos

      product?

    5. Re:Hold out for the Rio Karma / Pearl by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I managed to figure it out when the battery fell out. Not that it matters. What does matter is that their complicated feature-ripe recharging system has a MTBF of about 5 minutes.

  16. Rio Karma by vincent99 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You probably wouldn't have heard of this yet unless you have an Empeg, but wait for the upcoming Rio Karma before deciding.

    --
    -- V
  17. Depends on your OS of choice by ottothecow · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I would really say if all you want is music, ipod for mac(acc=itunes music store), zen for win(wma support=windows based music stores) and either for linux.

    I own a jukebox 3 (20gb) and it has great sound quality (creative does have a BIT more experiance in sound than apple) and has dual line out ports (attatch to 4+speaker systems) in addition to the headphone jack. The feature that an iPod doesnt even come close to is line/mic/optical(and FM with additional hardware) recording to many different formats. Im not sure if the zenNX has these as creatives website isnt loading for me but these features definately made me pick creative over the ipod even though the jukebox is kinda big and ugly (doesnt matter if you keep it in a bag, pocket, or slide it into an empty slot above your car stereo :) )

    --
    Bottles.
    1. Re:Depends on your OS of choice by Mr+D.+Logan · · Score: 1

      No, there is not a line-out or optical-out or anything out except a line to the headphones on a Zen, which is a major point against it (but mostly just when comparing it to the a jukebox 3) when, say, you want to hook it up to a fm-transmitter or your car.

  18. Re:Quality vs. Price by no_such_user · · Score: 1

    Are the headphones *really* that amazing? I have a pair with my iPod, but I haven't even broken them out of the packaging yet, primarily because I don't want those blindingly bright white things advertising that I'm using the iPod to everyone around me (on the subway). I'm using a pair of Sony buds now, and though I'm not totally happy with them, I always though it was the iPod at fault, not the Sony buds (which I was very happy with using with minidisc).

    I'm considering selling the iPod buds and buying a nice pair of someone elses. Tips under $40?

  19. Everything zen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think so...

  20. If you rule out the size factor... by Incongruity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You cut out one of the biggest wins of the iPod and you also cut out one of the biggest reasons for the price difference. In electronics, if you want it smaller, you pay more. So, what should you do? I can't answer that for you because you've already shown that you don't think like me (I'm not saying that's bad or good, just different)...you've ignored the thing that I think makes the iPod worth the extra money... but, that's just my opinion...so I suppose, if it doesn't matter to you (size that is) go for the Zen...if you like how it sounds, as that's the second big win of the iPod and most important thing (to me) is cost...and that's where the Zen wins...so go for it.

    1. Re:If you rule out the size factor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and even if size isn't an issue now, it will be within a few days after you buy your MP3 player. That is because you'll start wanting to take it places you hadn't even thought of taking your CD/MP3 player before. If you buy the Nomad, you'll be happy, but I guarantee you'll end up wishing you'd gone with something smaller and lighter. And the iPod is a lot smaller and lighter.

      I should know. I bought a Zen last week.

      Hope this helps.

      - thekoolaidguy

  21. iPod supports Audible. I don't think Nomad does. by bons · · Score: 3, Informative

    Audible handles my audiobook addiction. I wouldn't be able to stand a player that didn't handle that format.

  22. iTunes Music Store by plsuh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One point in favor of the iPod is the iTunes Music Store. Intuitive interface, non-intrusive DRM, great selection and getting better all the time. And it will soon be available for Windows. Do you really want to use BuyMusic.com instead?

    --Paul

    1. Re:iTunes Music Store by axxackall · · Score: 1
      And it will soon be available for Windows

      More important - when it will be available outside of USA?

      --

      Less is more !
  23. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Nomad == made by Creative == also has restrictive DRM in place (on the device - hint: don't try to copy files from the device back to your hard drive)

  24. Re:Quality vs. Price by btlzu2 · · Score: 1

    No, they are DEFINITELY not that good. I think they suck IMHO. First off, the sound is distorted on both the low & high ends. Secondly, ear buds stink. Thirdly, I bought a pair of Seinnheisers and that made all the difference. They sound 100 times better than the iPod's headphones and they're more comfortable for only about $40.
    I recommend using anything but the iPod headphones myself.

    --
    Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead.
  25. Replaceable battery, etc. by FrenZon · · Score: 3, Interesting
    A few other things I've found (I'm in the same situation) that the ZenNX has over the iPod:
    • Removable/replaceable battery (although whether Creative will actually sell them further down the line is another issue).
    • Low signal/noise ratio - Apple don't have (in my limited searching) specs for SNR for the iPod listed anywhere, so I can't compare, but from what I hear, the ZenNX has it there.
    • 4-band equaliser - the iPod just has presets.
    • On-the-fly cross-song volume normalisation - probably be handy for when your entire collection was been ripped before you knew anything about volume control. *ahem*
    Err, that's it. I would recommend that you check the accuracy of my statements; some of my comparisons may be to the older iPod.
    1. Re:Replaceable battery, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ipod does have normailzation of audio... on the 3rd gen iPods.

    2. Re:Replaceable battery, etc. by justinkim · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can get an external battery pack for the current generation iPods. That should provide some insurance against running low on juice/battery degradation. I have an earlier generation machine, so I don't know how good the pack is, but it is available.

    3. Re:Replaceable battery, etc. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have the original 5GB iPod, and it supports iTunes 'sound check' feature, which is volume normalization. Not sure if the Windows has it.

      For those on the fence: it didn't have that feature when I bought it (or a calendar, address book, album shuffle, battery extender, etc.)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Replaceable battery, etc. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Removable/replaceable battery (although whether Creative will actually sell them further down the line is another issue).

      Like this?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:Replaceable battery, etc. by KevetS · · Score: 1

      Please note:
      The iPods do support the "sound check" feature from iTunes, but that does not == on-the-fly normalization (if that's in fact what the Zen does). To use the sound check feature in iTunes, you have to first set the preference and then let it go through your music library applying the sound check tags (or however it's done) so that way the iPod will simply read the settings when the sound check setting is enabled.

      Not exactly on-the-fly, though..

      --
      This is my United States of whatever.
    6. Re:Replaceable battery, etc. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Not exactly on-the-fly, though..

      Exactly right, but the result is the same and you don't have to spend CPU cycles (read battery life) on the portable unit by doing it on the host computer. Though less high-tech, it may be a better implementation.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Replaceable battery, etc. by op00to · · Score: 1

      What the hell is the point of an external battery pack for your oh-so-small, oh-so-light, oh-so-cool iPods? People get an iPod because they want to look cool, as well as get the smallest, lightest player around. What's the point of an iPod if you're just going to make it bigger and heavier? Seems to me I'd save paying the Apple luxury tax, and pick up something that isn't supposed to make you cooler just by buying it.

    8. Re:Replaceable battery, etc. by benzapp · · Score: 1

      I never have heard any software program which can "normalize" the volume without losing intentional dynamics in a song. With most modern music this isn't an issue as the there aren't really dynamics, its all just loud.

      It really makes a difference with classical music and jazz however. Normalizing is in most cases, a bad thing.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    9. Re:Replaceable battery, etc. by mph · · Score: 1
      Low signal/noise ratio - Apple don't have (in my limited searching) specs for SNR for the iPod listed anywhere, so I can't compare, but from what I hear, the ZenNX has it there.
      Uh, a low signal-to-noise ratio is considered an advantage these days?
  26. In defense of the Zen by Mr+D.+Logan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since most comments here have been about the iPod and its features and nothing has really been said about the Zen, I'll take a shot.

    First off, I love my Zen, but then I would probably love whatever mp3 hard drive player I had (sweet, sweet 60 gig of musicy goodness). The biggest point for the Zen versus an iPod (at least in my clumsy opinion/experience) is that the Zen uses a standard notebook hard drive, which means that if you buy the 20 gig version now (or perhaps you, uh, drop and kill your Zen) and later want to go to a 60 gig, you can replace it fairly easily.

    Second -- the Zen sounds great, but I can't compare it to an iPod since I have never heard one.

    There are drawbacks to the Zen, however -- you need drivers for it (and, for a while, when transferring by firewire the music would be randomly corrupted with parts of the song being mixed up and transposed everywhere) which means no just plugging in and using it as a external hard drive; the Playcenter software that comes with it is just utter shit which makes it necessary to buy Notmad Explorer (and then something like Mp3/Tag Studio to tag all your files so they show up right on the Zen) and while that is a nice little piece of software, it is an extra $30 you have to spend that should have been fixed by making it a USB storage device like the Archos; the lack of any input/output jacks other than headphone-out kind of sucks meaning that I have to use the headphone-out with the fm-transmitter and line-in on the car and no recording without shelling out another $60 for the fm/mic remote; the battery is non-replaceable without sending it back to Creative and is supposedly only good for 300-500 charges (although the NX's battery is replaceable).

    While it may sound like I am coming down hard on the Zen, I do still dearly love mine -- having it full of 60 gigs of music means having my entire music collection in my pocket and being able to listen to anything on a whim or showing up at a party and having pretty much anything anyone else wants to hear.

    And as for size? Eh, I wear pants with big pockets. I've already got the camera, flash cards, and phone in there, what more is another big toy?

    1. Re:In defense of the Zen by hopey · · Score: 1

      the lack of any input/output jacks other than headphone-out kind of sucks meaning that I have to use the headphone-out with the fm-transmitter and line-in on the car and no recording without shelling out another $60 for the fm/mic remote;

      nomad jukebox 3 has:

      - Analog/Optical Line-In for direct recording from external audio devices

      - Headphone-out + 2 line outs.

      and I'm using it with linux with latest libnjb and gnomad2:

      libnjb

      njb3 is also cheaper than zen.

      hopey

  27. Re:Quality vs. Price by Methuseus · · Score: 1

    I've *never* seen anyone using an iPod with the bundled headphones. I also don't know anyone that likes those shitty earbuds anyways, they all use regular headphones, albeit smaller ones. I think the sound quality of headphones os about 50 times better than any earbud out there, because I find sound is distorted in my ear with any buds.

    --
    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  28. Ipods Interface Sucks by cualexander · · Score: 1

    It may just be me, but after using an Ipod in the store, I found the Nomad's interface much better. I like the fact that on the Nomad you can browse around and add files to the active queue quite easily and make playlists(multiple playlists and name them) on the fly. The only thing the 3rd gen Ipod has is 1 On The Go Playlist and I thought it was more of a pain to create and manage. I don't like using premade playlists. I listen to random songs and like the option of adding, deleting and skipping around my Now Playing List. I couldn't find a way on the Ipod to actually change the Now Playing list on the fly, like you can on the Nomad.

  29. battery life? by fr0dicus · · Score: 4, Informative

    My 2nd gen iPod does the advertised 10 hours. For the size, this is by far the best battery life I've ever had on a portable player. Way better than my old solid state mp3 players (2-3 hours), and only eclipsed by my sony CD walkman, which had plenty of room for larger batteries (ie. barely portable, certainly not pocketable). I can't really argue against either of these players, unless you have a mac, in which case the iPod is a no brainer.

  30. The software by larien · · Score: 3, Informative
    Dunno about the Zen, but I got an iPod a couple of weeks ago.

    I don't know if it's my setup (about 12GB of MP3s on a Samba share), but the software was diabolically bad at cataloging my collection & copying it to the iPod. Musicmatch locked up completely several times, leaving it "Not Responding" according to Task Manager under XP. It took about 2-3 hours to do the cataloging of the collection (I'm not sure as I had to keep restarting it and actually ended up leaving it running through the day while I was at work). Also, it seemed to be incredably slow at copying tracks to the iPod (about 15 minutes for 4 songs!).

    In the end, I downloaded EphPod and used that to copy files to the iPod. Worked a heck of a lot better, getting a full list of MP3s in about 10-20 seconds (about the same as Winamp). Copying wasn't as fast as I'd hoped (about 1.5MB/sec; I'd have hoped for nearer 8, the limit of the 100Mbit/sec ethernet) but still OK.

    However, the iPod itself is great; the lack of moving parts is a comfort as it prevents dust entering the system anywhere. The sound is excellent and the controls are good. The hold button is a fantastic idea, preventing the unit starting up when you don't want it and the headset controls are pretty good.

    1. Re:The software by op00to · · Score: 0

      Lack of moving parts? Ignoring the fact that it's got a hard drive as its main storage component, there are buttons and what appears to be a knob. What moving parts does the Zen have? Oh, I must have forgotten about the elaborate pulley system you use to select what song to play.

    2. Re:The software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "what appears to be a knob" -- keep your mouth shut until you actually have the facts, fucknut. have you ever handled either device?

      as if you couldn't just look up the details on apple's site, or googled it for christ's sake, the ipod's controls are touch-sensitive -- they don't move. dust and dirt can't enter and gunk up the contacts over time. the nomad's controls are "normal" buttons and switches, which, after being carried around in your pocket, backpack, and cupholder in your car, WILL get dirt and other shit jammed inside.

    3. Re:The software by foo12 · · Score: 1

      The buttons and knob you refer to are all touch sensitive pads (just like a trackpad).

    4. Re:The software by RunningFerreT · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what happened with you, but with my 3G iPod(10gb) things couldn't have gone smoother. The software installed without a hitch. I've had zero problems with MusicMatch. It rips MP3's from my CD's well, and has no problems speed-wise copying them to my iPod, about 3 or 4 seconds per song, which I think is amazingly fast. Maybe you just had something wrong with your install? All in all, I'd take an iPod anyday. It's just a super high-quality product that I'm continually blown away with.

      --
      "So I says to Mable, "Hey, those are MY ferrets!"
    5. Re:The software by SpookyFish · · Score: 1
      I had the same problem, and it turned out to be a corrupt ID3 tag that caused Musicmatch to use a gig of swap whenever it tried to do anything with the song (add to playlist, copy to iPod, etc).

      I narrowed down which track was causing the problem, used the mp3-info extension (mp3ext) to fix it, and now it works great. I recently added about 300 songs, and it took ~5 minutes to sync.

    6. Re:The software by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1

      Have you tried XPlay? I've found it very easy to use compared to EphPod. Even though it costs some money, its worth it.

    7. Re:The software by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      The buttons and the knob are touch sensitive like a laptop trackpad as the other reply states.

      The only moving part on the outside of the iPod case is the hold switch, which needs to be mechanical by its design. A touch sensitive hold switch wouldn't be very effective would it?

      The only mechanical part inside is the hard drive, which is cradled in a big shock-damping assembly.

    8. Re:The software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't figure out how to use ephpod, you shouldn't be using computers at all. Ephpod has the most features of any iPod program and works the best.

      Xplay is garbage for idiots.

  31. Re:Quality vs. Price by jht · · Score: 1

    I love the quality of the sound the buds put out on my (2nd generation, 10GB) iPod. Unfortunately, most earbuds have a nasty habit of falling out of my ear at inopportune moments (basically, anytime I move), so I never use them.

    The only earbuds that I've used that stick OK are a set of Koss ones I have (I forget the model) that use compressible foam to mold into the ear. They stick OK. Usually, I use a set of conventional walkman-style Sony headphones that fold up. Sound from both of those is worse than it is from the Apple earbuds, but at least they stay attached.

    I mainly use my iPod in the car, though, where I plug in an iTrip to use it as a travel jukebox. To simplify switching channels, I have a playlist that only has about a dozen stations that I know should have a free frequency pretty much all throughout the Northeast, and then I plugged those presets into my car stereo.

    Earbuds aren't quite as good for car usage :-)

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  32. Re:Quality vs. Price by hymie3 · · Score: 1

    Are the headphones *really* that amazing?
    For buds, they're the best in the $100 price range. The bass really sucks and the treble *can* be tinny. I use Stanton Dynaphase 60's (old studio headphones you can get on ebay for $20). Using my studio headphones, the sound out of the iPod really is *amazing*. It's made me go back and re-record my entire CD collection using the --extreme preset in lame.

    I *really can* tell the difference in sound quality using these headphones and the ipod. Using a Nomad, I can't tell the difference between a 128 and a 320.

  33. The car analogy by csoto · · Score: 0

    You should choose based on how you want people to think about you.

    The iPod is like the VW Beetle. You will be perceived as the Yuppie scum that listens to ELO, even though you were 3 when they made their last album. Hell, even VeeDub has a "Pods Unite" campaign right now.

    The Nomad is like the Nissan Xterra. It's a piece of crap toy masquerading as a useful tool. Oh, and it's bright yellow. Chick car. People will think you have a cell phone jammed up your ass at all times.

    Which of these people would you rather put a bullet into? Right. Get the iPod.

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  34. Archos Multimedia by upplepop · · Score: 1

    I can't believe this product (or any other ones by Archos) aren't being discussed. With the Archos AV models, you can record and play back movies (the AV320 has a 3.8" color screen), listen to the radio, capture and view photos. It can support Compact flash, smartmedia, and memory stick. And, oh yeah, listen and record mp3's. They have 20GB and 40GB models.

    Archos can do much more than the iPod and costs much less. Go check it out people! (archos.com)

    1. Re:Archos Multimedia by Krypto420 · · Score: 1

      I had a Jukebox MM 20GB and was very impressed with it until the battery cover kept popping off, the screen started flashing intermittently and the unit melted on itself (really). I tried to get some help from customer support, but they said I would have to send it to them for repairs that start at $60 not including parts and labor. This was obviously a result of poor QA or a poorly designed product. Considering all of the problems it had I figured that I could probably get another MP3 player, but not anything from Archos.

    2. Re:Archos Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just returned my Archos Jukebox Recorder. It was easy to use under Linux, cheap ($230 for 20GB) & Rockbox (rockbox.haxx.se) is a nice interface. However, the sound quality blows. There was a constant low volume whine in the headphones, not to mention just awful interference whenever the disk spun or the backlight came on. Ick.

    3. Re:Archos Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble with Archos MP3 players is that they often have crap sound quality. Also, I have one of the earlier Archos products and have taken it apart to replace the HD. I was less than impressed with the engineering design and build quality of the unit.

      In other words, yeah, they're cheap, but they're cheap because Archos cuts corners. If you can live with the hum and/or static on the headphone outputs and the high probability of the unit failing (the one I took apart had at least one design element that IMO guarantees it will fail sooner or later), then Archos products are a good buy.

  35. ipod shortcomings by sahala · · Score: 1
    I love my ipod, but I feel like people hype it a little too much. I've found a few shortcomings (at least with my 2nd series 20gb).

    Battery life. It's not bad but not exactly great. The advertised battery life is 10 hours, but I've only found it to be 3 or 4. Still not bad, but this gets to be a pain when travelling. Also using the EQ presets, the backlight, and playing large mp3 files causes the battery life to be shorter.

    Pauses between songs. This is very obvious when I'm listening to a DJ mix spanned across multiple tracks. One solution is to put all the tracks into one big mp3 file, but this a) reduces battery life and b) is a pain in the ass in general.

    Artist/Track/Album indexing. The UI and information architecture is generally very good, but it doesn't handle compilation CDs or DJ mixes very well. You'll have to use the ipod to see the exact problem, but the net effect is that in order to listen to a DJ mix or compilation you'll have to do a lookup by Album, not Artist. So to listen to Sasha and Digweed's Northern Exposure I have to look up Northern Exposure because looking up Sasha or Digweed gives me the few odd tracks that they produced, not their actual mixes. I realize this is a bit of a corner case but I wish that the Browse hierarchy was a little bit more customizable, that's all.

    1. Re:ipod shortcomings by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't putting "Various Artists" in the Artist: field of your ID3 tag and "Artist / Song Title" in the Title: field fix that? Then you could search by artist for Various Artists, then through the album/compilation titles.

      I hope that will work ok, as I'm about to buy an iPod and I've already got my .mp3 collection organized that way.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    2. Re:ipod shortcomings by sahala · · Score: 1
      Good idea. You are a great human being for putting the appropriate meta-data in your ID3 tags. I, on the other hand, don't have that discipline :)

      On that topic, do you know of any tools for editing ID3 tags, especially across groups of files, etc.?

    3. Re:ipod shortcomings by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Actually yes, ID3X. I just installed it yesterday, in fact. It won't do you much good unless you're running OS X though :)

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    4. Re:ipod shortcomings by Doc+Scratchnsniff · · Score: 1

      As far as that goes, if you're already using OSX, iTunes does a more than adequate job of changing entire albums' tags to "Various Artists." Just select the album(s), choose File->Info, change the Artist.

    5. Re:ipod shortcomings by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      But can I also batch-change genres, album titles, etc?

      Additionally, I avoid using iTunes whenever possible due to it's completely stupid way of creating "music libraries" instead of just letting me browse the local and network filesystems, where I already have everything organized the way I want it (I have the same problem with iPhoto as well).

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    6. Re:ipod shortcomings by Doc+Scratchnsniff · · Score: 1

      Yes, it will allow you to change all of those things, in batches.

  36. I decided! by flyingember · · Score: 1

    I finally decided. two factors. One, you can't find the NX in stores yet. Two, the ipod is so much cooler. So I got the ipod. I'm setting it up on my XP machine right now.

  37. Re:epinions vs slashdot. by skidv · · Score: 1

    The problem with epinions is that the user base is not the same as Slashdot. As a result, the reviews there are less likely to reflect the concerns I would share with other Slashdot geeks.

    Also, few of those reviews reflect the give and take of a comparison - claim/ counter claim - that is so abundant on slashdot.

  38. Re:Quality vs. Price by robocord · · Score: 1

    If you want some truly comfortable ear buds that sound very good and don't cost too much, check out the Sony Fontopias. They're a little weak on the bass, as you'd expect from such tiny drivers, but they're unblievably comfy, and they don't feel like they're going to fall out of your ears all the time. They also do a damned fine job of shutting out ambient noise.

  39. Essential difference by chemix · · Score: 1

    The big, obvious difference between the Nomad Zen NX and the iPod comes down to two subjects: listening time and aesthetics. The Zen NX Has longer battery life (14 hours on a full charge, compared to the iPod's 8 hours) and more room for your money (30gb for $300, compared to the iPod's $500 price tag for comparable room). Coupled with Zen NX's removable battery (though there aren't extra ones on sale as of yet), this amounts to much more listening time between recharges than the iPod. With the iPod, though, you get a much much much better interface. It is said that the bulk of the iPod's price tag is due to its OS. It's much easier to use than the the Zens. The controls are also much easier to use.

  40. Its beautiful by mannionh · · Score: 1

    My dad's ipod arrived yesterday, I haven't listened to any music on it yet but I am blown away by its beauty. Its an incredible looking piece of equipment, clearly a lot of effort was put into the design of not only the unit itself but also the headphones, dock, etc. Its a work of art.

  41. The iriver iHP-100 by D4MO · · Score: 1

    And to make matters more confusing, any opinions on this beauty from iRiver? http://www.iriverjapan.com/product.php?product=iHP -100

    --

    Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    1. Re:The iriver iHP-100 by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

      If iRiver put the same quality, GUI and controls in it as the IFP-390T that will be a iPOD killer! Have the 390 ( 256mb Flash memory ) and its the most easy to use player I have ever seen. The new firmware just released allows it to be uses the 390 as a pen drive. I asume the 100 will also have that feature.

      The 100 has Optical/Copper in and out! And the FM works as well as any portable FM receiver out there!

  42. Re:The iriver iHP-100 (with link) by D4MO · · Score: 1
    --

    Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
  43. MP3s aren't gapless by waaka! · · Score: 1

    MP3 encoding (with blocks of samples) makes it difficult, if not impossible, to encode tracks to separate MP3s and not have gaps in between. Granted, some gaps are bigger than others depending on the player, but you'll have to look to other formats if you want truly gapless playback.

    1. Re:MP3s aren't gapless by sahala · · Score: 1
      MP3 encoding (with blocks of samples) makes it difficult, if not impossible.

      This probably states my ignorance of how mp3 compression works, but in one of the versions of Winamp on windows there's a No-gaps setting on the audio out. I'm assuming that the program then does some processing to figure out where the end/start times are. It was close enough for listening purposes and I wish that Apple implemented this in the ipod.

    2. Re:MP3s aren't gapless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. They've got it in iTunes, and I could've sworn it did it on my iPod. Did you try setting it in iTunes and then resynching?

  44. Direct Mounting by dakryx · · Score: 1

    Can you mount a nx directly without special drivers/software like you can with the ipod?

  45. OT: Question by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    I've read that you can't move recorded music *off* the Zen. For example, if I visit a friend of mine that has a great LP collection and I rip some tracks using his turntable/receiver into the device - does the Zen have some sort of DRM that prevents me from copying the tracks to my PC when I get home?

    Or does the iPod do that as well?

    That would be one of my considerations for choosing a player, and I've been very close to just what-the-heck dropping $500 or whatever on the iPod...

    I've tried to Google it but I find reviews that say "easy to share music among friends" right next to "I can't get my music off the thing".

    1. Re:OT: Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In theory, you're not supposed to be able to get any music off the iPod. However, it's all stored in a hidden directory on the hard disk, and there's software that will let you access it.

  46. Archos by Robowally · · Score: 1

    Try this : www.archos.com and the open source version... http://rockbox.haxx.se/

    --
    Karma? Sorry, i don't believe in superstition. http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz
  47. What you get for that extra $200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • Superior interface and usability
    • Smaller
    • Lighter
    • Clean, elegant interactivity with Macs (via iTunes)
    • Firewire
    • AAC rather than WMV. Therefore: iTunes Music Store (!!)
    • AAC rather than WMV. Therefore: far nicer DRM
    Creative claims longer battery life (14 hours vs. 8) though.

    Is this enough? I dunno. Since the iPod 10Meg is the same price as the Zen NX 30Meg, another interesting question is whether the features above are worth 20 megs. For me, that second answer would be yes, but different people have different needs.

  48. Archos Jukebox + RockBox Firmware by RedLeg · · Score: 1
    No Kidding!

    The Archos Jukebox Recorder 20 just kicks iPod (and all others) Ass. Lessee:

    • HD known to be upgradeable to 60G (voids 90 day warranty, no biggie)
    • 3d party, OPEN, kickass firmware (RockBox)
    • Cost ~$280 US
    • Uses replaceable, upgradeable AA NiMh Cells
    • Kicks ASS
    • Did I mention you get the source to RockBox?
    • Fast disk operations via USB 2.0
    • Workee fine w/ Linux
    • Records as well as plays back
    • Digital and analog input and output

  49. repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the ipod can recharge its batteries over firewire"
    Can USB do that?

    1. Re:repeat after me by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      If the guy doesn't have a Mac (and I assume he doesn't otherwise he would have already bought the iPod) this doesn't do him much good. Almost all PC firewire ports I've seen are of the 4-pin variety, so no power.

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  50. Try the Shure E2c headphones... by EverLurking · · Score: 1
    I ordered a pair of these from Shure (originally designed as in-ear monitors for musicians to wear on stage) and they sound amazing considering they are just $99 (apparently some have found them for as cheap as $70).

    Alot cheaper than the Etymotics ($150-700 price range depending on model?). Probably not as good as the Etymotics, but they sound pretty darned good to me. Slightly less bass but much better midrange and treble response and much cleaner than the Sony Fontopia MDR-EX71SL Headphones.

    The advantages of the in-ear designs: increased bass response, more precise sound reproduction, greater driver efficiency, and greater sound isolation from ambient noise (ie. great for airplane use) that results in your not needing to turn your music up nearly as much thus preserving your hearing. The downside is that you shouldn't really use them in situations where you would need to be able to hear some of what is going on around you (ie. jogging outdoors, cycling, driving, skiing, etc). The rattling of the very stout cables does transmit some noise to your ears if you're doing something very active (like running/jogging) so I like these less for when I'm doing cardio, but they are just fine for other less impact/jarring activities at the gym.

    Review at Extreme Tech.

    DaveC

    --
    There are no stupid questions...just stupid people.
  51. Re:Earbuds by EverLurking · · Score: 1

    Sure E2c's, best performance for the $$ IMHO. Full post about them. DaveC

    --
    There are no stupid questions...just stupid people.
  52. FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    "USB 2.0 FUD?"
    What FUD?

    USB 2.0 is 480Mb/s peak. FireWire 400 is 400Mb/s sustained.

    The FUD is companies claiming that USB 2.0 is faster than FireWire 400.

    (And USB 2.0 can't even compare to the newer FireWire 800...)
  53. iPod Recording... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Can you direct me to the rumor site (or Apple announcement if its official) regarding being able to record?"

    How To Record Right Now With New iPod.

  54. Equal formats, just different. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had to choose between the player that supported MPEG-4 AAC (an industry standard that already has Free encoders, such as FAAD already available) or WMA (Microsoft's proprietory audio format, designed by them to take control of digital audio), I know which one I'd pick.

  55. What about the Neuros??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just take a look at the Neuros - it stacks up against, and IMHO beats, all the others out there. I haven't bought one yet, but as soon as I can scrap the cash together I will. There are too many reasons why this is the best jukebox for me to list here. Have a look...

    http://www.neurosaudio.com/

  56. iPod - No Question by pyite · · Score: 1

    You will only question getting an iPod until you get one. That statement makes sense, I promise ;-). In other words, you will rarely get an iPod user who will say "it sucks," but you will meet Creative owners who will say "don't buy one." I used to (still have, except it broke) have a Creative Jukebox (1st gen) and it was the most clumsy, counter-intuitive thing in the world. I just got a 15 gig iPod along with my TiBook (they give a $200 rebate to students for that combo). I absolutely adore my iPod. I don't run OS X on my laptop, I run Linux and gtkpod is an awesome application. It does everything I need it to do for the iPod. Two friends of mine have bought iPods since I got mine. They were *that* impressed with mine.

    --

    "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  57. It's funny cos it's true by darnok · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please, Apple, build in Vorbis support for your iPod. I have 30Gb of my own (i.e. not downloaded) Vorbis files, and am putting off buying a portable player in the hope that you'll come through.

    Think of it: no licence fees, and *one* extra sale guaranteed!

  58. using the ipod by touch only by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

    All my CD and mp3 players in the past have let me change tracks and adjust volume, even turn them off, just by touch through my jacket pocket. Will the ipod do these things as well if I get used to the feel of how much to slide along the non-moving dial? Or will I have to look at the display to see what I'm doing?

  59. Re:Quality vs. Price by paiste404 · · Score: 1

    The included apple bud headphones dont suck. In fact they're pretty good for bud style headphones. But let's face it, to get the best sound out of the ipod you need better headphones. I see plenty of people using the blindingly white buds and wonder why they havent bothered to think about better headphones. Ripped mp3's will never have quite the same sound as a real cd, but you can still ramp up your sound quality (and i dont want to hear some crap about how a higher bitrate is just as good as cd quality, no one wants to rip at 392 kHz).

    With my gen 2 10 gig ipod i use a pair of Grado SR60 headphones. Probably the best set of phones you can use with out an amp for less then $100. I highly reccommend them for any portable player. You will never want to go back to anything made by Sony (very overrated in the headphone market IMHO). Theres no point in going with an expensive set of headphones since in the end you're listening to mp3's.

    If you need buds like a crack addition for some reason then shell out the $330 for Entymotic ER-4P http://www.headphone.com/layout.php?topicID=13&sub TopicID=64&productID=0020100005 [headphone.com]. You'll never know they're buds. Of course you could probably buy groceries for a month with that money but who needs food when you have an ipod?

  60. Save $ by digtl88 · · Score: 1

    If they do the same thing than just save your money. There is not point in getting the more popular one if you can get the same qualities in a cheaper one.

  61. Re:Quality vs. Price by hmallett · · Score: 1

    When out and about, I use a pair of Sony MDR-EX70s (now replaced by MDR-EX71s. They sound OK, a little heavy on the bass, but they effectively block out outside noise, and you don't annoy others with leaked noise. At home I use Grado SR60s. I doubt you'll get those within your budget though.

  62. Re:iPod supports Audible. I don't think Nomad does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't stand that Audible only supports their own player and the iPod on OS X. I've got a Tungsten T, which would be GREAT for audio books (there is a player for it too), but Audible don't allow you to use the Tungsten player if you use OS X.

  63. It is the little things that make the ipod lame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got the second generation ipod, the one just before the docking version. You can not make an on the fly playlist, you have to just select an album. Not too big of a deal, untill you notice that the "new" ipod has this "new product enhancment". The problem being that it is not an enhancment, it belongs in all of the ipods. The ipod uses firmware, apple SHOULD distribute an update... but they would rather ram you in the ass for $500 to get one stupid feature that should be in ipod #1.

    I hate apple, the end.