Slashdot Mirror


New Linux-based PDA due September

Bill Kendrick writes "LinuxDevices.com has a preview of a new Linux-based PDA due out next month. Some of you might recognize the form-factor; it's from Softfield, the folks who ended up with the rights to the first commercial Linux-based PDA, the black-and-white, MIPs-based Agenda VR3. Softfield's new model, the MX-7, sports a 200MHz CPU, full-color 240x320 display, 32MB Flash and 64MB RAM, an SD card slot, and Trolltech's Qtopia environment. All for $299 USD."

182 comments

  1. wow by what+happen! · · Score: 0

    This device will be very useful and I intend to buy one as soon as it comes out. We could always use more of these.

    --
    Who are you?
  2. Hmm... by aftk2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They must not have gotten the memo.

    --
    concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    1. Re:Hmm... by njdj · · Score: 1

      They not only haven't read the memo, they can't have done any market research. A PDA that isn't also a mobile phone is dead before it ships, in today's marketplace. How can a company and its investors be so dumb?

    2. Re:Hmm... by cloudless.net · · Score: 1

      Integrated PDA mobile phone isn't always the best solutions, that's why it isn't very popular yet. The best PDA phones on the market right now are Handspring Treos and O2 (Pocket PC Phone Edition). However, they aren't taking off due to form factor, ease of use, and battery life. Some people want an integrated device that does everything, but many would prefer a simple, small phone that does the job well.

    3. Re:Hmm... by adelton · · Score: 1

      True. But releasing a product that doesn't have GSM/GPRS, Bluetooth nor WiFi? Do people still like to fiddle with cables?

  3. Not bad at $300 by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not bad at $300, but it sorely needs an MP3 player (native) and some good games. Otherwise, a Palm powered PDA would be a hell of a lot more useful.

    1. Re:Not bad at $300 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not bad at $300, but it sorely needs

      ...at $300, what this sorely needs is the required SCO license of $699. We wouldnt want to infringe on undisclosed IP now would we?

  4. What about Ogg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it doesn't run Ogg then can we actually say it will be useful? (tongue removed from cheek)

    1. Re:What about Ogg? by TheGreek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If it doesn't run Ogg then can we actually say it will be useful? (tongue removed from cheek)
      Your tongue, sir, should be removed from Emmett Plant's ass.

  5. Wondering by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Could linux based PDAs be the toe-in-the-door for some real commercial game development for linux? Or productivity and other such apps?

    I mean I see major commercial titles hitting Palms and WinCE, if some ported to linux based PDAs, it might snowball into linux, well (get ready to mod me down, zealots), doing something useful for me besides routing packets to my Windows machines and Xbox.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Wondering by Papa+Legba · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but linux already has the perfect PDA game. I think Nethack would run beautifully on this device. The only problem is that I would get even less done. Nethack on this PDA with a nice tileset may very well be a must have killer app.

      --
      Papa Legba come and open the gate
    2. Re:Wondering by jandrese · · Score: 1

      You can already get Rogue, Larn, and Moria for PalmOS. It doesn't look like Nethack is going to get ported anytime soon though. Bummer.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Wondering by Trelane · · Score: 2, Informative

      They have it on the Z. Check the zaurus.com feeds (docs.zaurus.com/feed) for qpe-nethack

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    4. Re:Wondering by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      ...but Nethack does run on WindowsCE and PocketPC.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    5. Re:Wondering by lcde · · Score: 1

      I mean I see major commercial titles hitting Palms and WinCE, if some ported to linux based PDAs, it might snowball into linux

      I always figured that was the reason they made the Linux/Java based PDA's. So that way it would recieve better acceptance and software companies would be more inclined to write a Java program that will work on a WinCE than just a Linux port.

      --
      :%s/teh/the/g
    6. Re:Wondering by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Are you NUTS? You couldn't make a move in Nethack more than every 30 seconds without a full keyboard. Just think of what a bitch it would be to engrave Elbereth and then write a scroll of teleportation with a stylus!

  6. no big deal now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a year ago, I would have creamed myself over this...

    but now with tapwave coming out, and the PSP sometime next year, there's nothing to be excited about...

    oh well

  7. New Linux PDA by larry2k · · Score: 1
    Damn!

    Powermac G5, now this!. My Sony Clie PEG-415 and Tungsten W are now on sale...

    I need to get back to work to make the big bucks...

    --

    The package said "Windows XP or better. Pentium Class Processor or better"... So I got a Mac with OS X

    1. Re:New Linux PDA by Goldfinger7400 · · Score: 1
      Eh, how is this better than the Palm Tungsten? I just got a Tungsten C, and it seems the greatest thing since swiss cheese.

      The only thing that seems good about this is that it's a bit on the inexpensive side. But it runs Linux, so it must be Great!

  8. The agenda was nice but the Zaurus is useful by SWroclawski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I had an Agenda and I have a Zarus.

    The key to the Zaurus are the two expansion slots, the keyboard, and the fact it runs OpenZaurus.

    It looks like the new Softfield PDA will have the SD slot (less useful than CompactFlash) and MAY in time be able to run OpenZaurs.

    If it does, it will be a useful device, but you can already pick up a Sharp Zaurus 5500 for less than $300 (I paid about $280 for mine)

    - Serge Wroclawski

    1. Re:The agenda was nice but the Zaurus is useful by RevAaron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Heck, I got my SL-5500 for $180.

      And sold it a month later for $170. The SL-5500 is pretty much crap compared to almost any other PDA. I'd rather have a mono Newton or Psion screen than the pitiful excuse for a color screen that is found on the SL-5500. Let's pray to any and all gods that the screen on this MX-7 isn't as bad...

      I now have a Zaurus C760- it's a great platform for running Squeak Smalltalk and Dynapad, especially with its 640x480 screen, but as a PDA, the entire Zaurus line is exteremely lacking.

      Anyone know how fast this particular CPU is compared to a 206 MHz StrongARM? If it's any slower than the 206 MHz StrongARM SA-1100 (or the 400 MHz PXA250 XScale, which is about the same speed), it'll suck to run Qtopia and its apps on it. Qtopia is *slow*, especially on PDAs with the 400 MHz PXA250 XScale (SL-5600, SL-C700) or 206 MHz StrongARM (SL-5000D, SL-5500), but it's still kind of sad on the fast 400 MHz XScale PXA255 CPUs in the SL-C750 and SL-C760. You'd think you were using OS X 10.1 on a 400 MHz G3 sometimes...

      Hey, read the article- CF (as well as bluetooth and a camera) will be an option. Yeah, more money spent, but at least there is the potential.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:The agenda was nice but the Zaurus is useful by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      I had an Agenda and I have a Zarus.


      It's slashdot. I thought everyone who posts here had an agenda.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    3. Re:The agenda was nice but the Zaurus is useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Agenda was nice - but for me it was absolutly useless, because of it's high battery drain. Even when disabled, batteries where empty within about 3 weeks. After some time i just had no longer fun reloading 'em so often and my Agenda is now busy collection dust.

    4. Re:The agenda was nice but the Zaurus is useful by SWroclawski · · Score: 1

      This is an issue with the Zaurus 5500 as well. It lasts a little more than 2 hours.

      Of course I power up an SD and CF card with it, but I consider that normal use.

      It's made me remember/realize the one feature new PDAs need and that's wireless networking.

      The Zaurus can use it's CF slot for that (and I do). It's too bad the new Agenda won't have one built-in

      - Serge Wroclawski

    5. Re:The agenda was nice but the Zaurus is useful by chrisl456 · · Score: 1

      Huh? Do you have the same Zaurus as I do? My 5500 has an excellent screen. I consider it to be one of the Z's strengths, not a weakness.

      I do agree with your statement about the SL-5500 being crap compared to almost any other PDA - I consider my Zaurus to be a handheld computer, not a PDA. I love being able to code PyQt apps on the Zaurus itself and test the code right there on the Z anytime & anywhere I want. You can also do C/C++, Perl, and Java development. IMO, the Zaurus is the ultimate PDA-sized development tool.

      --
      -chris
    6. Re:The agenda was nice but the Zaurus is useful by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Wow- you're the first person I've heard from who likes the 5500's screen. Let me guess- you've not owned a newer PDA with a color screen before? By that, I mean something above 240x320, the older 160x160 color POS devices exempt.

      Stop by in #zaurus on irc.freenode.net, plenty of people gripe about that screen... it is the same one throughout the 5000D, 5500, and 5600.

      It is kind of funnily sad- Sharp makes the screen in the Zaurus models, including the crappy 5500 screen. But, they also make screens for other PDAs, including that in the Dell Axim X5, which is incidentally the best 240x320 color screen I have ever seen in a PDA- *very* bright and crisp.

      The Axim's screen at the lowest brightness is just as bright as the SL-5500 at it's highest level.

      I got the 5500 wanting a powerful handheld computer, but was disapointed compared to the capabilities I already had on the WinCE-based Jornada 720. I was able to code on it in just about as mant languages as I have access to on the C760 or 5500. On WinCE though, more languages supprtes coding GUIs than on Linux/Qtopia. No PyQt development on WinCE, of course, but Tcl/Tk, Perl/Tk, and of course, Python/Tkinter, as well as support for codingthe native WinCE GUI.

      One thing to note is that there are many languages you can develop for WinCE on the device itself, but there is one big exception: the WinCE gcc port hasn't been maintained in a long time, and IIRC, doesn't support ARM.

      I've done probably around 50% or more of my coding over the last year on one PDA or another, mostly on the J720, which has a decent keyboard, something on which you can touchtype.

      These days though, I'm using a C760 along with a Pocketop keyboard. Just had to make the upgrade for the CPU speed... :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  9. Sweet! by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1

    Want want want...I've been lusting after a VR3 for a while, but I might have to hold off for this.

  10. My new plan by SirLantos · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmmmm....
    1. Find something non-Linux based
    2. Make a linux version.
    3. ???
    4. Profit


    SirLantos

    --
    The flying hamster of DOOM rains coconuts on your pitiful city.
    1. Re:My new plan by Craig+Ivey · · Score: 1

      3. Sell it to millions of Linux-dummies

      --


      We're here to give you an OS, not a religion.
    2. Re:My new plan by jargoone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More like:
      1. Find something non-Linux based.
      2. Make an overpriced Linux version.
      3. Watch everybody rave about it on /.
      4. ???
      5. Watch as established competitors outsell new Linux version.

      Sad but true, at least at the beginning. Any PDA costing over $200 has a color screen and an mp3 player these days.

    3. Re:My new plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! You've hit on the reason the Linux-based Sharp Zaurus isn't dead. I can't imagine Sharp makes much of that Step 4 shit, but if it weren't for those Linux-dummies buying them to show off VNC and SSH at LUG meetings (which you can do on PalmOS and WinCE as well), Sharp probably would have switched back to its proven proprietary Zaurus OS, which ran on all the models previous to the SL line.

    4. Re:My new plan by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

      1. Find something non-Linux based
      2. Make a linux version.
      3. ???
      ( = Charge a $100 Premium over the non-Linux version )
      4. Profit


      I'd much rather these porting efforts concentrated on providing ports of the OS to inexpensive existing PDA's rather than trying to build their own hardware and then effectively charging a premium to run a "free" OS. I'll pay $20 - $30 to run Linux on my PDA - I won't pay $100.

  11. syncing by net_bh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Of all the Linux PDAs out there has anybody been successful with syncing them to Linux apps and Windows apps without any pain?

    I own a Sharp Zaurus 5500, and I am not impressed with its syncing prowess. Luckily, I know enough to back up the whole PDA using 'scp', but that doesnt go for Joe and Jane.

    I hope Multisync does on to become the defacto tool for synchronizing all kinds of handhelds, mobiles with email, calendar, address books, etc.

    --
    There is no patch for stupidity

    Visit my blog

    1. Re:syncing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not using kitchensync (kaddressbook and evolution) or qtopiadesktop to sync it?

    2. Re:syncing by net_bh · · Score: 1
      Multisync IMHO has a better approach, since it lets us select the two devices/databases to be sync'ed. In the hopefully not too distant future, I envision being able to use it to sync with evolution for email and addresses, gnotes for todo notes, and maybe even to the KDE counterparts for the few times I use them.

      Qtopiadesktop is useless coz it only serves as a backup...i cant use the addressbook in it when composing email in evolution, or can i?

      --
      There is no patch for stupidity

      Visit my blog

  12. Needs two slots... by chill · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One for data storage expansion, one for peripherals.

    Think: camera & place to store pictures; WiFi card & place to store downloaded files.

    Other than that, seems like YALP (yet another Linux PDA). Not that we couldn't use more of them...

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Needs two slots... by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Okay, partial foot in mouth...

      It seems it has a 140-pin expansion slot for other peripherals, like a CF adaptor, etc. Sounds like the "jacket" option of some iPaq models.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:Needs two slots... by willjohnson · · Score: 1

      WMPCAATWOTWTFI? (Why must people create acronyms and then write out the words that form it?)

    3. Re:Needs two slots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you're supposed to do that the first time non-pervasive acronym is used in a document, then use just the acronym in the rest of the document.

      Have you never read a real estate or legal contract? This is typical.

    4. Re:Needs two slots... by willjohnson · · Score: 1

      If it is only used once then why bother making up an acronym at all?

    5. Re:Needs two slots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expect more Linux PDAs to follow in the future. I'm setting things up for then. :-)

  13. Wasting an opportunity for innovation by gearmonger · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It's too bad that Softfield is wasting this opportunity to do something actually *interesting*. QVGA screen? Please...how passe. Why not match up an innovative OS/UI with some innovative hardware? I mean, it's not like this current device is going to set the world on fire, so try something creative and maybe establish yourself as a credible player? Otherwise, you're just wasting everyone's time with this lame sub-incrementalist crap.

    1. Re:Wasting an opportunity for innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not match up an innovative OS/UI with some innovative hardware?

      What is innovative about Linux and Qtopia? Calling something innovative just because it runs Linux is just about as passe as a 240x320 screen. Linux and Qtopia is a step backwards if anything else, at least until it shapes up. OpenZaurus/OPIE isn't all that much better, but here's to hoping that TrollTech, Sharp, the OZ or Opie guys manage to see the light and actually move forward...

  14. As a recent pocket pc purchaser..... by clifgriffin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This thing would never have caught my eye when I was searching for a PDA.

    It looks atrocious (at this point) and doesn't have near the specs dell offers for the same price.

    The fact that it's "linux based" doesn't send me into "I want one!" orgasms.

    1. Re:As a recent pocket pc purchaser..... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude,

      Its Free.

      Free as in 300 bucks!

      People pay twice as much for half the machine if it runs OSX, why not transfer that to the PDA market?

      What you need is a blitz marketing campaign with testimonials from tech-savvy individuals like tony hawk and ellen feiss.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:As a recent pocket pc purchaser..... by ath3na · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to agree on the atrocious aspect. My Sony Clie looks better than that thing. And well, as a chick, I think PDA's should have function AND form.

      Hopefully, the next version is a little easier on the eyes.

      Which makes me wonder if PDA's will ever be "skinnable" like some cell phones are.

      -carolyn

    3. Re:As a recent pocket pc purchaser..... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      And- if you really want to run Linux, you'll be able to do that on the Dell Axim *very* soon. It works partially already, but it's only a matter of not-that-much time before the whole chebang works.

      The Axim is a pretty nice little device. Probably the best color 240x320 screen I've seen on a PDA and SD/CF expansion. Hell, if you're not feeling zealous, you can still do most of that weekend Unix User Group show off stuff on WindowsCE/PocketPC as well as on Linux. :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:As a recent pocket pc purchaser..... by RevAaron · · Score: 0, Troll

      Heh! I like this idea!

      Except, of course, it'd be kind of the polar opposite of Apple's campaign. Ellen Feiss wouldn't be talking about switching from the beeping computer that didn't work right to one that did... Instead, she'd be like

      "Well, so yeah, my dad bought this little computer... It think they call it like a pee dee aay. He says it means it is cool. So, I was like writing a paper for class in TextMaker, and I was going to save it to RTF and email it to my teacher and suddenly I was like- so Mr PDA, what is your deal? Why haven't you crashed? IS THAT ALL YOU GOT IN YOU? This sucks! Like, I totally like my computer to give me a little fight.

      So I realized then my life was incomplete. I tell my dad, HEY BUTTWAD, you gotta get me a Linux PDA! And then it was like WOW THIS IS SO COOL! And I took my new toy to school and I was like Hey GUYS!! I RULE! I am so much l33t, much more than j00!!!1 So I was like HEY! Look, I can SSH. And my girlfriend was like ''but what about useful apps?? My WinCE can SSH 2, so who cares ellen da felon?'' And i was liek fCUK j00! It runs Linux ! You know, the ULTIMATE KILLER APP!"

      And then, it pans out from Ellen's head, and the whole building burns down. I bet it'd be pretty cool.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    5. Re:As a recent pocket pc purchaser..... by penguin7of9 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It looks atrocious (at this point) and doesn't have near the specs dell offers for the same price.

      Actually, if it's similar to the old VR3, the hardware design is really nice: the rounded corners make it easy to carry around, the screen protector works great, and the device is quite small.

      Palm or PPC hardware looks flashier and more high-tech, but hardware like the VR3 is more usable.

    6. Re:As a recent pocket pc purchaser..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you turds just aren't any fun. :)

  15. Too expensive... by thefoobar · · Score: 5, Funny

    $299 + SCO license = Too expensive!

    --
    ------------------ D. A. Davenport: http://www.firebin.net
  16. Please please please by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... sync with iSync, and sync with something on Linux.

    I wonder if "Opie" will make an appearance in commercial hardware anytime soon... it started as a fork of the QTopia environment, and is coming along nicely. It would be really cool to have Opie become the standard palmtop environment.

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  17. Linux PDAs really needs GPS support by jacken · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The only killer app I have seen so far on PDAs except the basic PIM stuff is GPS navigation. Is there any navigation software available for linux PDA? And Im not talking about raster map software, but vector based maps.

    1. Re:Linux PDAs really needs GPS support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      two good ones, qpegps and zroadmap. (which is a zaurus port of roadmap) are very useful. no waypoints, or 6 MILES TO STARBUCKS sort of thing, but i can carry two states of maps in it, and zoom in enough to see myself change lanes on the interstate.
      and still be wardriving with kismet at the same time.

  18. Re:You dirty child molesting hippie potheads!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Hell's Angels, who detained Gordon for police, were not, the sources say, gentle with sensitive areas of the rock star's body.

    Sheeiteeee! If yer gonna molest a child, cant you pick a kid other than the daughter of the leader of the Hells Angels?

  19. FPU? by OutRigged · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can anyone tell me why none of these mobile ARM processors, such as the StrongARM, Xscale, etc, never seem to have floating point processing capabilities? Is it due to power contraints, or is it something else?

    --
    RaGe
    We're all just noise on the wires..
    1. Re:FPU? by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      Because there's been little need for it. The majority of mobile ARMs go into devices that use integer only maths - like network devices. And even the ARM's integer unit cannot divide - you have to do divides yourself the long way. Whether these missing features are a function of the RISC design of the chip, or for historical reasons, or some other reason entirely I'm not sure - no doubt an ARM expert will correct me.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    2. Re:FPU? by kyllikki · · Score: 3, Informative

      Historicaly when Acorn first created the ARM CPU even X86 had the 387, however as time went on and Acorn split off ARM they did develop a floating point co-processor (early ARMS had the co-processor bus exposed) the FPA10 and FPA11. Unfortunately these were not very popular and the emulated maths routines (done with unknown instruction aborts) were an adequate solution for most users.
      The only SOC device that *ever* had Floating point hardware was the 7500FE (99ukp dev board available from http://www.simtec.co.uk/products/EB7500ATX) this device can, even now, outstrip a 600Mhz XScale performing FPU operations.
      It would seem that the reason ARM CPUs do not usualy have a FPU is purely because of cost, emulating FP operations seems to be fast enough that most of the time the extra cost of the FPU simply is not justified.

  20. $299+ by cperciva · · Score: 2, Funny

    All for $299 USD

    Only if you believe the marketing. More likely, it will be somewhere around $299 (PDA) + $699 (SCO license) + $50 (shipping and handling) + 15% (taxes) = $1205.20

  21. New price by DingoBueno · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just for the record, the real price is $331. They must have forgot about the $32 SCO because-we-can fee.

    --
    ascii art
  22. Yeah, and IBM messed up with that too by PigeonGB · · Score: 1

    The IBM PC was not very innovative with its hardware either. Look where that got them today. What morons.

    --
    I have 3656.9 Bogomips. How many Bogomips do you have?
    1. Re:Yeah, and IBM messed up with that too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a poor argument. IBM was huge before the PC revolution that they were late in. Seriously, if you want to compare actual numbers of PC's, IBM gets their ass waxed every quarter by Dell and HP/Compaq. If their PC sales were as impressive as you say, I would probably be typing this in with OS/2. But I'm not.

  23. Qtopia doesn't cut it by penguin7of9 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a Sharp Zaurus, and I think Qtopia just doesn't cut it.

    Sure, it looks pretty nice and it has most of the functionality you might want in a PDA, but it is still significantly worse than either Palm or PPC. Some of the problems include badly thought out user interaction, wasteful use of the limited screen real estate (probably a result of being based on an adaptation of a desktop toolkit), and pretty excessive resource consumption by Qt/Embedded. And there is far less software available for Qtopia than for either Palm or PPC. If you want good PDA functionality, get a Palm.

    On the other hand, as a Linux PDA for vertical apps, Qtopia-based PDAs also fall short: you are limited to the Qt toolkit and all the graphics and UI code from existing Linux apps require complete rewrites. You can't use any of the open source GUI tools you are likely used to (Tcl/Tk, Python/Gtk+, etc.). And if you want to write commercial apps, it's going to cost you (you can do commercial Palm development for free).

    Linux PDAs will keep failing until their makers recognize that it is futile to compete with Palm and PPC head-on. Linux PDAs can thrive in the niche of providing portable little Linux machines, but that means not limiting the machines to running just a single GUI toolkit.

    1. Re:Qtopia doesn't cut it by toganet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Remember, though, that the Zaurus _is not_ and PDA -- it is a PMT, or "Personal Mobile Tool".

      Semantic distinction or SHARP marketing garbage? A little of both -- but indicative of SHARP's awareness of the problem you mentioned or taking on other PDA's in their own segment.

      I use my Zaurus as a mini-workstation and network troubleshooting tool. And to play games, browse the web, take notes, SSH into servers....

      For PDA stuff, I use a PDA

    2. Re:Qtopia doesn't cut it by RevAaron · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some of the problems include badly thought out user interaction, wasteful use of the limited screen real estate (probably a result of being based on an adaptation of a desktop toolkit), and pretty excessive resource consumption by Qt/Embedded.

      Indeed. This is true from both the user perspective as well as the developers- Qt/Embedded wasn't designed for use on PDAs, and it shows. I am talking about the API, not the way things look and feel, although that is certainly an issue as well. Qt/E was designed for a system with a mouse like its desktop counterpart, rather than for a stylus based system. This wouldn't be a big deal if TrollTech made the neccesary adaptations and changes to make for a system that worked well on both kinds of systems (there are Qt/E systems with mice and not touchscreens).

      For instance, Qtopia has a simple character recognition system in which you write in a little box, ala Graffiti 1 or the Character/Block Recognizer in PocketPC. Developers have wanted to create a new input method that allows one to write letters anywhere on the screen, perhaps using the same engine, but not making you write in a little box. But nope, it appears to be next to impossible within the confines of Qtopia and Qt/Embedded due to the way the event loop works. This is just one example, but these things add up, painting a picture of an embedded GUI toolkit that really doesn't make much sense on a PDA.

      And Qtopia/Linux does use an excessive amount of resources. For one, it's quite slow.

      I have a Zaurus SL-C760. I just did some timing tests for launching applications, here are my numbers:

      Calendar: 6 sec
      Opera 6: 6 sec
      Netfront 3: 4 sec
      Hancom Word: 3 sec
      Simple Calculator: 3 sec

      And for comparison, I launched analogous apps on an iPAQ 3650. Mind you, the iPAQ has half of the RAM and about half of the CPU power as the C760.

      Calendar, Word, PocketIE, Clock, Calculator: all > 1 sec

      One way to get around the slowness of app launching on the Zaurus is a feature called "fast load." Basically, the system loads the application into memory and keeps it resident, even when you quit it. When you tap the app it appears to open, and the icon shows up in the taskbar. If an app has "fast loading" turned on, launching time is pretty similar to the PocketPC. Of course, for each app you have "fast loading" turned on, it uses up a MB or more, depending on the app. Turning on fast loading for Calendar uses 1.2 MB of RAM.

      As far as memory requirements, the Linux+Qtopia combo uses up a pretty fair amount. On a fresh boot of my C760, with no applications in "Fast load" mode, 16 MB of RAM is used up. No application loaded. On a fresh boot on the iPAQ, WinCE is using up 3 MB.

      As far as vertical apps, you may not be able to run GTK+ or Tk apps within the world of Qtopia, you can run X11 and these apps if you want. It negates any advantage percieved for Qtopia, but it's still an option. Then again, you can also run Tcl/Tk, Perl/Tk, X11 and other apps on WinCE without having to go outside the WinCE environment, so it depends on what your needs are.

      The "Familiar" Linux distro and the Yopy PDA both use X11 and are thusly not limited to only one GUI toolkit. I myself would rather have one main GUI toolkit, but having options is always good. For me, consistency is more important, but even on WinCE/PocketPC- which is seen as a single toolkit environment can be host to other toolkits as long as someone does the port.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    3. Re:Qtopia doesn't cut it by joaorf · · Score: 2, Informative

      The latest version of Qtopia comes with significant performance improvements. Read more: http://www.trolltech.com/newsroom/announcements/00 000137.html

    4. Re:Qtopia doesn't cut it by pjdurai · · Score: 1

      Talking about fastloading..
      PocketPC doesnt close the applications either. When you close an application using the close button on the top right, it just closes the window and keeps the app open.
      May be that skewed your bench mark?

    5. Re:Qtopia doesn't cut it by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Short answer:
      Nope, that wasn't the case in my tests. PocketPC does close apps if you actually close the app rather than using the smart minimize button. Not only did I start the app from a complete no-run state, I also ran each of the apps fresh after a reboot, making sure there wasn't any substantial DLLs loaded by one app and used by the next.

      To further credit to PocketPC, I didn't do a full reboot on the Zaurus C760 for app timing, giving the Linux Zaurus a potential leg up, in the case that such library loading actually went on. I would've done the same on the Z, but it takes like 5 minutes for the bleeding thing to boot...

      Long answer: (or so was the intention...)
      PocketPC does close the application *if* you tell it to. The 'x' button you're talking about- the so-called 'smart minimize button'- does indeed only minimize the app, usually. It's a really bad aspect of the PocketPC UI, and was just introduced in PocketPC 2002.

      Before this, in PPC2k, as well as in PPC2k2, most OEMs shipped another utility for closong apps. On the iPAQ 3650, Compaq shipped a utility that, when you hit a hardware button, a menu pops up giving you options- close active app, close all apps, volume control, etc. PPC, without OEM additions, has no quick way of closing an app- you have to go into the freaking Memory control panel! Hmpf. sorry, excuse the venting. :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  24. why are people willing to use a proprietary gui? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i dont get it, why get a "linux" pda only to have a proprietary gui environment, this utterly missed the real power and freedom of linux. honestly, until these suckers run a nice free software gui i see no compelling reason to stop using palmos devices.

  25. Actually by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Linux is very nice for mobile devices in general, including/especially laptops. In desktops I think it tends to lag because of well, the games, and the whole mess around Wine, Hardware Acceleration, and proprietary/buggy 3d-accelerated hardware drivers. I *do* have it on my desktop at home, it just doesn't quite do everything my windows machine does (games, and the Nvidia driver craps out and locks if X gets shutdown in a way it doesn't like).

    Now, on my laptop, I've got an iceWM XP-styled desktop with: MozillaFirebird, Evolution, SSH in my terminal, OpenOffice, gMerlin (VCD, Mpeg), and XMMS (mp3). Does everything I could want it to do. General computing is more lightweight than windows, though I do admit some things lag up a bit more too. I have a small windows partition to go online when I need dialup (particular lucent winmodem not supported yet), but otherwise it's always 'nix.

    Now, on a PDA you may have games, but none of that 3d-accelerated high-end crap so you don't have to worry about weird drivers. A web-browser, organizer, and a bunch of open-source plugin software/games and I think it would do very nicely with linux.
    Linux may not be ready for the multimedia/game desktop, but it could most definately be ready for PDA's and portables.

    1. Re:Actually by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Linux certainly has the potential capability for just about anything- but just like desktop Linux doesn't have most of those new and fancy 3D games (of questionable worth, IMHO), PDA Linux doesn't have much in the way of ... good PDA applications. Qtopia is definately lacking in the way of decent PIM apps- nothing you can get for the Zaurus is anywhere near the builtin stuff for the Psion or Newton or the 3rd party stuff on PocketPC or PalmOS. Maybe someday Linux will make a good PDA platform, but maybe someday Linux will be the platform of choice for gamers everywhere...

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  26. Perhaps by PigeonGB · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But there is plenty available for Linux Game Development.

    garagegames.com provides the Torque Engine for only $100 a programmer. A number of quality games already exist for free or (more likely) as shareware at their site.

    There are different libraries like PLIB, which as I remember was used for Tux Kart and other games.

    Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be active websites for the community of GNU/Linux game developers. Usually the mailing lists are more active though. The websites look defunct which may make people think that nothing is happening.

    As for productivity, yes, it is possible that more Linux-based PDAs will make people want to work on GnuCash and other such projects that are needed for productivity. I think that it might be a catch-22 in that demand for such apps would fuel development but development requires demand...The difference here is that if the hardware developers would hire programmers to actually MAKE the software in the first place, it would solve the problem.

    Maybe not the most direct answer, but it is my $.02

    --
    I have 3656.9 Bogomips. How many Bogomips do you have?
    1. Re:Perhaps by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about homebrewed stuff and endless tetris clones, but real big-house published and polished games.

      So far we pretty much just have Carmacks work to play under linux. So just getting the tools into the hands of serious dev houses is at least a step in the right direction.

      Too bad the iDreama was just a wetDreama. A linux based commercial console could have been just the ticket to pave the way for professional desktop linux ports.

      Though, the way I see it, PC gaming is dying a slow death anyways, or at least diverging from console gaming in a big way. It used to be the machine on my desk (an Amiga) blew the doors off of the console on my TV (8 bit NES). Now its often the other way around.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Perhaps by Harbinjer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed,
      Agreed,
      Agreed,

      Wrong! PC gaming isn't dying! Have you seen counterstrike? Biggest online PC game out there. Biggest tournaments. How many people out there have won thousands of dollars on console games?

      Graphics don't make a game, but they make a good one better. And with Doom 3 and half-life 2, PC games will get a huge boost in graphics and environment soon.

      They may be diverging. Strategy games and 1st Person shooters are best on PC. As are flight sims. The only games that I think are completely better on consoles are fighers like Tekkan, and Dance Dance Revolution(but I have yet to check out pyDance for Linux). Otherwise PC's are equal or better I think.

    3. Re:Perhaps by killermal · · Score: 1

      With top of the range games like this one, how can you possibly complain?

  27. Re:sweet by Channard · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just imagine running, PDA in hand, from SCO's keystone cops style lawyers to the sound of the Benny Hill show tune.

  28. Can we say dork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And you thought you couldn't get laid when you showed of your "regular" PDA. Just wait until you flash your Linux PDA.

  29. Linux PDA? I don't get it by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Call me naive, but is there really a purpose in having a multi-tasking, Unix-like kernel ... in a PDA?

    Open source PDA operating system, OK I can see that. But why Linux? Seems to me somebody's just riding on buzzword cache without any regard to whether there's really any demand for a device like this.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Linux PDA? I don't get it by IvanCruz · · Score: 1

      Open source PDA operating system, OK I can see that. But why Linux?

      To develop aplications right in your desktop with the same compiler, API and libraries you will have in your PDA.

    2. Re:Linux PDA? I don't get it by fliplap · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I love my Zaurus because developing for it is free and easy. Plus I use it as a laptop replacement, many of the simple tasks I do through the day can be accomplished with the Z in my pocket instead of having to boot my laptop all the time. Yes, my use is a _very_ limited market.

      I'm very glad it exists but I do question the marketing dude's approval of such a device. Moreover I question the engineers since almost anyone that actually owns a zaurus will agree with the fact that it is not a consumer level device. Its very rough around the edges and lacks refinement in many aspects. But for the geek...hands down, we have a wiener.

    3. Re:Linux PDA? I don't get it by ploppy · · Score: 1
      Call me naive, but is there really a purpose in having a multi-tasking, Unix-like kernel ... in a PDA?

      This argument was won many years ago, as far as GUI based systems are concerned. Multi-threaded GUIs are much more responsive than old cooperative multi-tasking systems. Try going back to an old cooperative multitasking system, and you'll notice an immediate difference.

      Open source PDA operating system, OK I can see that. But why Linux?

      The same reason Linux is being used for more and more interactive embedded devices - like PVRs, set-top-boxes etc. Linux is a fully functional os which can be embedded and is free. All embedded devices have very very slim profit margins, and the royalty costs associated with other commercial oses, typically can make a major difference to the cost, or the device's features. A couple of dollars saved on the royalty gives a bigger flash memory or a cheaper price.

    4. Re:Linux PDA? I don't get it by iwrasahp · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with y... oh... DAMN! My iPAQ just locked and I didn't save... reset not working... have to pull the battery out... again.

    5. Re:Linux PDA? I don't get it by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Call me naive, but is there really a purpose in having a multi-tasking, Unix-like kernel ... in a PDA?

      I was looking into making a networked game for Palms. The OS just isn't designed for servers, or background tasks, or anything like that. A few simple tweaks would go a long way to providing that, but even then "it just isn't possible to write a robust server app using PalmOS".

      This doesn't just affect games. This kind of limitation means you can't write generic apps that let a Palm reliably serve any kind of information. (Imagine a PDA that could be queried for location on a building's WiFi net, or accept emails, or whatever.)

      WindowsCE and such can do this stuff, but it's not terribly efficient, and the Windows API is, IMHO, aesthetically displeasing. Linux is (or can be) small, robust, royalty-free, etc.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    6. Re:Linux PDA? I don't get it by owlstead · · Score: 1
      Call me naive, but is there really a purpose in having a multi-tasking, Unix-like kernel ... in a PDA?


      Yes there are definately reasons to want to have this.
      • Networking: These devices will be networked more and more. Linux has a great IP stack.
      • Music: You don't want to stop listening to your music while putting in appointments and stuff.
      • Background tasks: Like checking mail. Sure, you can do those things Win 3.11 like, but its way easier to implement (if you even need to) with a multitasking system


      I would imagine there are many more reasons to come up with, but I think I made my point.


      But unfortunately this does not compensate for an underpowered, underfeatured, underdesigned unknown palmtop device. I don't see any audience, not even too many linux freaks, going to get one of these.


      Warper


      C:\>mkdir nul
      C:\>cd nul
      The parameter is incorrect.

  30. this is why i dont yet want a linux pda... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they aren't really linux pda's as of yet, they are just replacing proprietary gui's from vendors like palm inc and microsoft with a lower quality one made by trolltech. i see no reason to switch from palmos until there is a free gui envirnment running on these things.

    1. Re:this is why i dont yet want a linux pda... by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

      hmm, free.. I seem to be able to put a free gui on my zaurus'. It's called Qtopia. There is also something called Opie.

      In fact, Qt is also free. I guess the gpl isn't free enough for you if it comes from Trolltech, eh?

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
  31. Re:why are people willing to use a proprietary gui by Progoth · · Score: 2, Informative

    honestly, until these suckers run a nice free software gui i see no compelling reason to stop using palmos devices.

    umm....ever heard of opie?

  32. I guess it doesn't matter.... by greymond · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but does anyone else find the design monsterously ugly. It seems like a decent device - although I'll stick with my Zaurus, but unlike any of the other PDA's on the market this one just LOOKS ugly. I know that this could seem like a troll post, but honestly i'm sure there is others like me who don't like using ugly things - similar to my complaint with the Xbox Giganta controller - which was quickly replaced with a smaller one.

  33. Re:You dirty child molesting hippie potheads!!! by Diotallevi · · Score: 1, Funny

    i guess that he can get a job as a eunuch programmer

    --
    Never underestimate the logical power of sarcasm
  34. changeable kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this all source available product where I can swap out the linux kernel for a BSD kernel? If so, I'd buy 2 on the spot!

  35. Not all that? by dezoe · · Score: 1

    Kinda cheap looking, huh? Not impressing specs (need a CF slot!) and it looks like the buttons and cover will fall off on arrival..

  36. Re:why are people willing to use a proprietary gui by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free as in whine, or free as in beer?

  37. Re:Answer me this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greeaaat. Now her fat face is spilling over into the forums.

    Michael - Why is your mom doing ads for ebay anyway? Is her pimp not paying her enough?

    I mean, is your dad really that greedy?

  38. A day late and a dollar short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What could they be thinking?

    My Tungsten C has a 320x320 screen. This "new" PDA has the "old" Zaurus screen.

    At least they could have used the Zaurus SL-C700 640x480 screen.

  39. Re:Circumcision is required in the US to be a citi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope.

    Read it again:

    "
    If you do NOT have a previous U.S. passport or a certified birth certificate, you will need:

    1. Letter of No Record Issued by the state with your name, date of birth, which years were searched for a birth record and that there is no birth certificate on file for you.

    2. AND as many of the following as possible:

    - Baptismal certificate
    - Hospital birth certificate
    - Census record
    - Certificate of circumcision
    - Early school record
    - Family bible record
    - Doctor's record of post-natal care
    "

    No where does it say that its required.

    In fact, the US is the only modern society that still practices this. And its something we, as men, need to put an end to.

    Would a woman put up with their daughters having their clits ripped from their bodies as babies?

  40. Re:why are people willing to use a proprietary gui by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Try Matchbox.

  41. The Real Question by rifter · · Score: 1

    Is this PDA going to actually come out, or is it more vapourware (like the original Agenda) or will it really, truly be available? It was a complete outrage what happened with the Agenda, when /. hyped the hell out of it, they took a bunch of orders and money and then did not deliver. I was going to buy one, and was glad I kept my money so they did not get it. So the question (beyond the unanswered question of what happened to everyone's money the first time) is will this "new company" actually deliver or just rip off the Linux community again?

    1. Re:The Real Question by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      The original Agenda came out. You could buy it for a while from the original Agenda Computing, and can still from Softfield the maker of this new MX-7. The Agenda may have been a piss-poor PDA that suffered many long delays, but it was released and it was for sale.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:The Real Question by rifter · · Score: 1

      The original Agenda came out. You could buy it for a while from the original Agenda Computing, and can still from Softfield the maker of this new MX-7. The Agenda may have been a piss-poor PDA that suffered many long delays, but it was released and it was for sale.

      The Delays IIRC were over a year, and a year after announcing it Slashdot announced that the company was no longer shipping to US customers (despite having a big backorder). Yes, some people got them, but I was left with the impression taht a lot of peopel never got theirs after ordering it. To me that does not constitute having something for sale. If it is really for sale then you get what you order after paying for it.

    3. Re:The Real Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they were delivered, and in fact, there was excess supply at the "end end". They finally ended up in the bargain bin at Frys electronics. As far as delays, yes there was a pretty massive delay. Marketing group took orders too early, and they decided to redesign all the plastics before final ship. (Management changed during that time, which was probably the main factor in the delay)

      Anyway, the company went south because the parent company went bankrupt. Sales were actually not too bad. It's only when they laid off the developers (myself included FYI) that the buyers dried up.

  42. ugly by krokodil · · Score: 1

    it is indeed cool that it runs linux, but look at the pictures: it is offence to good taste.

    1. Re:ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ. I own a VR3, the form is nice and comfy. It looks like this has the same form. Now if it only had a USB port for my keychain RamDrive...

  43. Where WiFi? by 23skiddoo · · Score: 1
    I am waiting patiently for the PDA that would ideally run Linux, play stereo MP3s/oggs, with built-in WiFi. Usual PIM apps too, of course.


    my $0.02

    --

    [ insert your own witty .sig here ]

    1. Re:Where WiFi? by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 1

      It's here already. I have one.
      HP5450 / HP5455.
      Just load up "Familiar Linux" on it. Do a google search on IPKG FIND to get some free software for it, too :-)

      It has built-in wireless - 802.11b.
      You can use a 512 MB SD Ram chip on it.
      An expansion sleeve can provide 1 or two slots, plus additional battery. Good enough for a Toshiba 5GIG PCMCIA drive card.

      If you want to save a few bucks, get a more basic Ipaq, and use one of the two expansion slots for a wireless card.

      Sam Nitzberg
      sam@iamsam.com
      http://www.iamsam.com

  44. Male Circumcision IS GOOD female circumcision BAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Would a woman put up with their daughters having their clits ripped from their bodies as babies?" Removing the clit is like removing the penis! You insensitive clod. Female circumcsion is MUTILATION and bad, while male circumcision is good because it prevents cancer in men and cervical cancer in women. It reduces AIDs rates and improves sensitivity and looks in the penis.

  45. hmmmm.... by BattleTroll · · Score: 1

    That has to be the ugliest PDA I've ever seen.

  46. Re:Answer me this... by gregarican · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Judy Branch is an attractive lady. Sincerely, Rosie O'Donnell

  47. Agreed by PigeonGB · · Score: 1

    Not a lot of big name commercial developers are developing for the *nix platform. Couple that with Carmack's statement on being able to ignore the platform without losing too much sleep, and you have a lot of people who just won't develop for Gnu/Linux.

    It is hard enough to make money on the Win32 platform. Publishers don't want to take a risk on Linux-based machines.

    On the other hand, there is more to shareware than "homebrewed" stuff. There are professional quality games that are shareware by choice. They do make money. Garagegames just happens to be one of those companies that provides a high quality engine for really cheap. Torque has been used in Tribes 2, and there are quite a few games being developed in it.

    Again, if it isn't id or Blizzard, people think it won't be good. Linux is different from Windows, and unfortunately, a lot of people think you can't play games on it. Publishers won't publish on Linux so it furthers the problem.

    Also PC gaming is still alive and well. They say that it will die every 5 years when the newest consoles are released. It always stays alive. The difference nowadays is that consoles and PC gaming tend to look more alike than before. Certain games run and feel better on a console than on a keyboard. Offtopic, but still. B-)

    --
    I have 3656.9 Bogomips. How many Bogomips do you have?
  48. Re:why are people willing to use a proprietary gui by Daemonik · · Score: 1

    Hrmm, you won't buy a Linux PDA because the GUI is proprietary although the underlying os is GPL, but you'll use a Palm PDA which is 100% proprietary.

    How free(speech) does it have to be before you'll support it, exactly?

  49. Does the price by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    include the $32 SCO embedded Linux license?

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  50. that's just my point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'd love the be able to have a free software palm, but they dont really exist, so i have no reason to switch from palmos yet. that's all.

  51. ID me. by LiberalApplication · · Score: 1
    Personally, I can't wait until Linux based devices have enough funding or enough wits about them to hire good industrial designers. It's all well and good if it screams tech savvy because of its underpinnings, but it's even better in terms of raising public awareness of alternatives and looking bad-ass in public if it screams with sex appeal. Imagine what it would do for Linux if a Linux-based PDA were to appear that looks as if it could have come from the studios at Apple?

    I mean, Sony's Clies, while not the bestest looking devices in the world, are still certainly snazzy looking enough to warrant inquiries from passers-by and non-technically fluent peoples. The same went for Handspring's sexy but not all that useful Visor Edge.

    Come on geeks, we can be smart, but we can be sexy too. Rinkydink textured ABS with ovoid buttons and felt-marker-script lettering doesn't do us any good. Go minimal. Go architectural. Go intelligent. That's what we represent, isn't it?

    1. Re:ID me. by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Hey, while we're at it, I personally can't wait until Linux-based PDAs have the funding or intelligence to hire good UI and application designers, good enough to provide a robust, consistent and feature-filled suite of built-in applications.

      PalmOS and PocketPC models certainly don't have the best suite of built-in software for PIM and other stuff, but it sure is good enough to fulfill the needs of most PDA users. With the Zaurus, since there really aren't any 3rd party options for a PIM replacement or supplement (beyond theKompany), a lot of users I've talked to give an excuse like "It's not a PDA... it's a PMT! [hahaha]" rather than write, track down, or gripe about the lack of decent software. Sharp, and to a lesser extent TrollTech really does *owe* us Zaurus users something a little better. We were willing to hedge our bets on the Zaurus, on Linux+Qtopia, and after almost 2 years, Sharp hasn't done all that much to improve the software experience of the Zaurus since the release of the SL-5000D...

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  52. Once bitten twice shy by CountDown · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Idunno. I have a VR3d. My second one(broke the first one). A lot of software was developed for the VR3 and things were going great, but the hardware just wasn't up to snuff. Broken screens, buttons, lids, and the occasional projectile stylus were more than the developer community could stand.

    This new one looks too much like the old one. A revamped power system, more memory, expandability, and the reduction of buttons are all improvements, but the biggest problem with the VR3 was the screen.I will not buy the newest linux-based PDA until I see improvements to the case. The days when I would buy a block of wood with a penguin on it have passed.

    I also have an IPAQ 3150(running Familiar Linux) and a Zaurus SL5000d. The Zaurus is my favorite. Native Linux, expandability, and durability seem to be its strong points.

  53. Opie seems like a dead end by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell, Opie is a dead end: being an open source fork of Qt, the only license under which it is available is the GPL. That makes Opie an impossible platform for many commercial applications.

    Areas where a Linux PDA could shine are gaming, inventory support, hospitals, instrument control, etc. But the developers of that kind of software simply are not going to make it open source, nor are their customers going to care whether it's open source or not. So, a GPL-only toolkit has no chance. But even the commercial version of Qt isn't all that attractive because if those people are going to throw in their lot with a commercial vendor, they might as well go with Microsoft and PPC: it's cheaper than Qt and more widely used.

    Now, Opie/X11 might have a chance because it reuses all that effort that went into Opie but also opens up the platform for commercial apps.

    Ultimately, GPL'ed or dual-licensed GUI toolkits just won't work in the long run--there are too many free or LGPL'ed alternatives to choose from.

    1. Re:Opie seems like a dead end by treke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The GPL licensing on the apps is probably going to stick around, but the plan is to replace the current libraries with LGPL replacements. You would still need to purchase a commercial license for QT if you are insterested in building a commercial PDA, but OPIE wont be preventing it.

    2. Re:Opie seems like a dead end by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      but the plan is to replace the current libraries with LGPL replacements.

      That would be great, but last time people tried that (Harmony), Troll Tech became pretty belligerent. Also, it doesn't address the other major problem with Qt/Embedded: everybody has to rewrite their apps.

      I think it would be easier just to ship Opie on top of X11. That way, it doesn't matter that Opie is GPL'ed because people can write commercial apps in other X11 toolkits.

    3. Re:Opie seems like a dead end by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

      hmm, how come the GPL is never good enough whenever someone speaks about Qt or Trolltech?

      The GPL allows for making money. The LGPL only seems reasonable, if you like proprietary software....

      I make money off of GPL software that I own the copyright for. Nothing is stopping me from linking to Opie, or Qtopia.

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
    4. Re:Opie seems like a dead end by treke · · Score: 1

      This isnt the same thing as Harmony. The goal of the new libraries is to do things properly, not to emulate libqpe. Whether or not there will be a compatiblity layer for qtopia apps is undecided. This is all quite a ways off in the future though.

      At first glance, X seems more convenient, but there are both signficant upsides and downsides. Font and screen handling are significantly better under X than in QT/embedded.

      Want to be able to rotate or resize your screen on the fly? X can do it, QT/embedded can do some of it with hacking. Want nice antialiased fonts? X can do it, Qt/embedded doesn't do it.

      On the other hand, Qt/embedded applications are usually a bit more responsive to user input. They make better use of available screen space ( Although themeable X toolkits take care of this). The biggest downside I've seen to X is the multiple toolkits.

      You can define you standard toolkit for the system, maybe QT, maybe GTK2, maybe fltk, and you will be able to write a basic system that is about the same size as a qtopia install, maybe a bit bigger for some toolkits. You flash that onto the units 16-48MB of Flash ROM and ship it out the door to the user. Now whenever the user decides they want to install an app, they have to worry about whether or not they have the space to install the toolkit depenencies. On a desktop this hasn't really been a problem for a while ( excluding the huge beasts that are GNOME and KDE ), but on a PDA the user is going to have at most 32MB of space to use for both data and programs in the default install. So companies have to either rewrite their application to support whatever the most common PDA environment uses, or increase the size of the application.

      Everyone is already going to have to significantly rework their applications for the PDA because of the size constraints of both storage and the display. An app designed for an 800x600 display usually doesnt scale well to 240x320. This may or may not be difficult depending on how tightly integrated your GUI is with the guts of the program. Gaim recently released a Qtopia front end for Gaim, but it took a signifcant amount of work to split out the workings of the protocols from the GUI. They only have to do that once, and now they can more easily write a native GUI for Windows, Mac OS, and whatever other platform they'd like.

      I don think TrollTech made a mistake with their licensing options though, most other PDA environments will let you develop closed source applications for them for free. TrollTech charges $195 per developer for a license for nonGPL use. In the long run, I think they'd do better making it cheaper to develop for the platform. With out the applications there is very little reason for an OEM to build a device based on your environment. Without a market, it won't be worth it to the people who write the hundreds of little 20 dollar applications that make people buy Palms.

    5. Re:Opie seems like a dead end by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      hmm, how come the GPL is never good enough whenever someone speaks about Qt or Trolltech?

      That's because Qt is pretty much the only GUI toolkit for Linux that is GPL'ed. Just about everybody else realizes that a GPL'ed toolkit is not good for Linux or free software.

      The LGPL only seems reasonable, if you like proprietary software....

      You say that as if the LGPL were some nefarious scheme hatched by opponents of free software. But, in fact, the LGPL (and the GPL-with-exemption, which is now preferred) was created by the FSF in order to advance free software. It was created because sometimes it is necessary to accomodate proprietary software in order to advance the cause of free software. Commodity or system libraries, like GUI toolkits, are exactly the kind of situation in which the LGPL makes a lot more sense than the GPL.

    6. Re:Opie seems like a dead end by treke · · Score: 1

      Nothing stops you because you write GPL software. What happens when you want to modify an APL or MPL application to run under OPIE? You can't do it without writing against trolltech release of Qtopia, and ignoring any of the OPIE specific functionality in libopie.

    7. Re:Opie seems like a dead end by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, Qt/embedded applications are usually a bit more responsive to user input [compared to X applications].

      I think that depends entirely on the toolkit; there is nothing in X11 that makes it intrinsically slower than Qt/Embedded.

      They make better use of available screen space ( Although themeable X toolkits take care of this). The biggest downside I've seen to X is the multiple toolkits.

      People keep making that argument, and I just don't think it holds. If there is a benefit to having a single toolkit, then people will start using only a single toolkit.

      In the real world, as soon as a platform becomes successful, most toolkits are ported to it anyway: Gtk+ on Windows, wxWindows on X11, OSX, and Windows, Fltk on pretty much everything, etc. If Qt/Embedded were to take off, all of those would get a Qt/Embedded back-end anyway. The fact that nobody has bothered so far is just a consequence of the fact that Linux PDAs just haven't taken off.

      Now whenever the user decides they want to install an app, they have to worry about whether or not they have the space to install the toolkit depenencies.

      Yes, and if the install is too big, they just won't use the software. The same is true if I decide, for example, to base some piece of handheld software on Java, Python, or Mono. You can give programmers the means of creating small applications by pre-packaging a "preferred" toolkit with the PDA, but you can't keep developers from screwing themselves or their users.

      Everyone is already going to have to significantly rework their applications for the PDA because of the size constraints of both storage and the display.

      Sure, but if the PDA runs the same toolkit I am already familiar with from my desktop development, I don't have to learn an entirely new toolkit. I can continue to use the same development and scripting tools (wxWindows, PyGtk, FltkLua, etc.). And often the trickiest part is performance critical low-level graphics code, which I can write to native X11 APIs independent of the toolkit or screen size, but have to completely rewrite for Qt/Embedded.

      Furthermore, there are lots of toolkit-independent pieces of functionality that X11 standardizes. For example, I can add a new handwriting recognizer or input method to an X11 server and use it with any toolkit. Work on anti-aliasing, pen input, hardware acceleration, video decoding, and other server functionality is also toolkit indepenent and benefits everybody. In contrast, with an approach like Qt/Embedded, everything has to be redone from scratch for every toolkit.

    8. Re:Opie seems like a dead end by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1
      what makes the LGPL different from the GPL, is the fact that non free software can link with it.

      SO, the LGPL really advances commercial, proprietary software in a free software environment. It does NOT advance 'free' software at all.

      You are still saying that the GPL still isn't good enough because Trolltech uses it.

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
    9. Re:Opie seems like a dead end by treke · · Score: 1


      I think that depends entirely on the toolkit; there is nothing in X11 that makes it intrinsically slower than Qt/Embedded.

      It does depend on the toolkit, some are better then others. By no means is speed a big problem, I think it's fast enough to be usable but the current implentations of X on a framebuffer with common toolkits it was a tiny bit slower.


      People keep making that argument, and I just don't think it holds. If there is a benefit to having a single toolkit, then people will start using only a single toolkit.

      They make the argument about this on desktops, where I dont consider it valid. On a desktop, storage is as close to a non issue as anything, on a PDA it is critical. The multiple toolkits make it easier for developers to write applications in whatever language/toolkit combination they way, but when you give them the chance to do it, they will.

      Users can decide not to install the application based on it dependencies, but they can't do that when it is their only option. I experienced exactly this in the early days of Linux on the iPaq. GTK was the standard toolkit most people used, but if you wanted any of the normal pim functionality you had either install python or fltk. This was on a device where the OS and data needed to both fit inside of 16MB of space. Using a single toolkit environment like Qtopia, people were able to get much more functionality in the same amount of space.

      Furthermore, there are lots of toolkit-independent pieces of functionality that X11 standardizes.

      This is one of the places where X does a whole lot better than Qt/embedded, mostly due to better planning by the original developers. One place this shows up is with trying to use QT/embedded to build an environment where the user does not run as root. As of 2.3.5, only one user could run apps at a time without modifying the source for QT/e. Under X this would be a complete non issue since it was thought of in advance.

      Saying that implementing something for X makes it work for every toolkit is only partially accurate though. Your extention will continue to be X specific, if a user wants to run a PicoGUI or DirectFB application it will have to be rewritten for those environments. The extention also may not be available automatically to all applications depending on how it was written. Writing a new handwriting recognition app could be done transparently, and already has been stone for stroke recognition ( see Xstroke . Screensaver support can also be automatically made available in X, while in QT/embedded each QWS server will need to add support for screensavers. In X the same situation occurs. Antialiasing support was implemented as an X extension, but applications did not automatically begin using it once it was written. Toolkit authors had to add support for using it and not all did. In OPIE the developers also had to implement antialiasing for their toolkit, and they did it using the same Freetype engine that X uses for its fonts.

    10. Re:Opie seems like a dead end by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      the current implentations of X on a framebuffer with common toolkits it was a tiny bit slower.

      Keep in mind that XFree86 is a fairly mediocre implementation and fails to take full advantage of acceleration on a lot of hardware. It's also tuned for desktop machines. Furthermore, many common toolkits for X11 these days (Qt, Gtk+, FLTK, wxWindows) are actually cross-platform toolkits and/or assume a GDI-like model, so they are far less efficient than a high-quality native X11 toolkit would be.

      Saying that implementing something for X makes it work for every toolkit is only partially accurate though. Your extention will continue to be X specific, if a user wants to run a PicoGUI or DirectFB application it will have to be rewritten for those environments.

      That's because PicoGUI and DirectFB are not toolkits (meaning X11 toolkits), they are entire window systems. Implementing something for X11 also won't give the capability to Windows or MacOS. But implementing something for X11 makes it available to all X11 toolkits, and it often transparently improves all X11 toolkits.

      The extention also may not be available automatically to all applications depending on how it was written.

      X11 has standard interfaces for everything I mentioned. If a toolkit or application doesn't use them, it's a problem with the toolkit or application. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dring.

      Antialiasing support was implemented as an X extension, but applications did not automatically begin using it once it was written.

      That was a deliberate choice: it is simply wrong to replace non-anti-aliased rendering with anti-aliased rendering.

      In OPIE the developers also had to implement antialiasing for their toolkit, and they did it using the same Freetype engine that X uses for its fonts.

      I think X11 kind of threw in the towel on antialiased fonts: I think the renderer should be on the server, not in the client. But between the fact that most users of this feature are Windows refugees who simply assume that fonts are client-side, that TrueType has some serious patent issues, and that Unicode can't get their act together, they didn't have much of a choice but do go this route for now. Still, even with the current implementation, acceleration for rendering is shared, and they can do it right in a few years when the dust has settled.

      However, you simply cannot transparently replace a non-anti-aliased system with an anti-aliased system, except for really trivial graphics. So, no matter what they did, clients and applications needed to change. But now that the protocols are in place, any client can take advantage of it on any X11 server implementation that supports it.

      The X11 standard clearly isn't perfect, and XFree86 is not the greatest implementation of it. But I think overall, a toolkit together with an X11 server is still the best option for getting a GUI onto almost any device.

      I think the biggest room for improvement would be in the toolkit area: the default toolkit for a PDA should probably be designed and implemented from scratch. It shouldn't try to have a cross-platform backend, and it shouldn't try to emulate a desktop API or look-and-feel. Small screens really are different. Using X11 for the back-end makes such efforts quite easy and allows a lot of reuse of coding effort from existing projects (acceleration, window management, rendering, etc.). And using X11 also allows the occasional oddball application to be ported more easily without a total rewrite of the GUI for those who need/want it.

  54. Tempting but... by badmammajamma · · Score: 0

    I'd buy it but I don't want to have to pay SCO the $2 license fee.

    --
    Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
  55. or GPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://gpe.handhelds.org/ looks slick

  56. Yes, but... by billyradcliffe · · Score: 0

    ...does it run Linux? Oh, wait...

  57. Linux PDAs Stink by gooru · · Score: 1

    As a former owner of a Zaurus, I just feel like I have to post my rant about it here. Essentially, I hate the Qtopia environment and really, really hope something better comes out. The PIM apps are plain unusable, e.g. when you make a repeating calendar entry, you can't edit only one of them; you have to edit them all! Palm OS doesn't have such restrictions. Sure, I can use another calendar app, but then it can't sync with my computer, and believe me, you really do want to sync when your PDA crashes, and you lose everything on it.

    Sharp and other companies are coming out with absolutely incredible PDAs hardware-wise. Unfortunately, they then install Qtopia on it. Ugh.

    1. Re:Linux PDAs Stink by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      gpe.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  58. if it is like the first in quality... by samantha · · Score: 2, Informative

    Definitely do not buy it. The first was utterly unusable due to extreme slowness and seeming lack of real multi-tasking. I was amazed they even bothered to put it out in such condition. The CPU is relatively slow in today's PD world. There is no support for standard cards for wifi and such, only memory, no room for a microdisk for instance. Extra hardware needed even for bluetooth? SIGH. I don't see anything at all compelling here.

    1. Re:if it is like the first in quality... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I absolutely agree, the first one came out unusable. However, there are now (WAY too late) romdisks for the VR3 that make it perform very well. There are even alternate GUI available. It is effectively a very small Linux box.

      Also, available about a year too late, is a "in-situ" charger. In other words, you can install rechargeables and it charges while connected via the sync cable.

      Software wise, about 2 years too late, is a mail client and web browser.

      Sync never worked tho. I use a script and rsync.

      I also agree the hardware sucks. My first one died immediately. Second one is still hanging in there, but the cover snapped off. The plastic they use is crap, and the ergonomics are way wrong.

      However, for $99, you really can't beat a VR3 right now. It is useful and fun.

  59. But by phorm · · Score: 1

    Linux *could* become a PDA platform now. Maybe Ximian should take a break from evolution and write some nice palm stuff, or another company in the area of productivity software.

    For games, part of the holdback is the lack of hardware-software integration (driver issues) for the games. Handheld/palm devices shouldn't experience such a setback, as 2D graphics have been good on 'nix for awhile (though X could use some support for hardward 2D primitive drawing).

  60. Dated? by pherris · · Score: 0

    The article is almost three years old. Didn't this thing get released, everyone bitched about the crappy screen and it faded away a month later?

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  61. my vapourware detector is off the charts... by sputnikid · · Score: 0

    99% (not a real calculation) of all linux-based appliances that have appeared on /. have never even hit the commercial markets.

    I will admit that there have been some neat ideas here... but for the most part they have copied (and poorly at that) something that already exists. I would be REALLY hesitant to buy something just because its LINUX BASED from some startup company. I would rather have hardware that has ties with the evil empire but have a warranty that actually means something.

    Anyone want to complile a list of Linux Based appliances that have gone mainstream (with the exception of webservers)

  62. very cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not that's what i'm talkin about

  63. ogg123 by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    Use the commandline you lazy troll!

    I'm more concerned about wifi. My agenda was a nice little pda, or would be if I could use ethernet instead of PPP.

    I'll be sticking with my zaurus until I find a pda with a usb host controller, everlasting power cell, or wifi range equivalent to my iBook's.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  64. WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Male circumcision is equal to removing the clitoral hood and frenulum. In the embryo, the clitoris and penis started out the same with the foreskin being equal in function to that of the clitoral hood.

  65. My question by aking137 · · Score: 1

    I've been considering buying a PDA for 2-3 years, and now have money set aside for one. But I've delayed because I still haven't found the answer (possibly through not looking hard enough) to this question:

    If I buy any normal FS/OSS based PDA (such as the Sharp Zaurus, or this one), can I *actually* wipe off everything that's on it, recompile all the software, and reinstall, in the same way as I could on a PC? To put it another way, if I want to add a progress indicator to GNU gzip, or make the error messages in BASH more offensive, or remove that annoying can I still do that on Linux/*BSD based PDA? Or is that Linux kernel somehow "locked on" there in some kind of ROM that can't be changed, or that can't be restored if it somehow gets lost, so that I have to live with the default configuration? More to the point, if a company distributes a GPL'd program locked into hardware in this way (even if what they claim is the source is provided separately, say, on a CD), are they violating the GPL?

    After dealing with closed source software on other people's machines day in, day out for the past few years, to me, buying a PDA where I don't have that freedom would be a big step backwards - I wouldn't do it. Also, if a company really did make a PDA where they not only made it possible but also made it easy to recompile/replace any or all of the software on it, and put together a community web site and so on, wouldn't that have some appeal among the techies? I'm sure it'd get a couple of articles on Slashdot - and obviously it would still ship with a default software configuration that's fine for people who don't want to mess with stuff.

    1. Re:My question by prostoalex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are differences between the full re-install process on PC and Zaurus, but to answer your question - yes. You will have to build your own image on PC first, check http://docs.zaurus.com/ for more details, then have the zImage and the filesystem in place, after which you "reflash" your Zaurus with the help of a CompactFlash card and a certin key combination. Everything in the image is pre-compiled on PC (gotta make sure you're compiling for ARM target) and then packed into the image.

      If you screw up your Zaurus badly, Sharp and OpenZaurus provide ready-to-go images. Sharp's is the official image that you get when you buy your Zaurus. Any data you created yourself would be lost after reflash, unless backed up.

  66. Finally by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    So one has developed a Linux PDA for under $499! They must have hired friggin' geniuses compared to many other companies. JAV

  67. How long will it be... by syberdave · · Score: 1

    until they get linux on it?
    Oh, wait. Nevermind.

  68. Bored with my Zaurus by Randy+Rathbun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a 5500. At first it was a major cool toy. I mean, it is so easy to impress your geek friends by running a webserver in your pocket. But then what?

    Once the gee-whiz factor wore off, I was left with just that. A gee-whiz toy. I have yet to actually do anything with it.

    When I had a Palm I used it daily. When I had a PocketPC, I got to reboot it every fifteen minutes and quickly dumped it. The Zaurus never has crashed on me, but I find myself leaving it at home more often than not.

    I am going to get rid of the Zaurus soon and go back to the Palm platform. I got a lot more use out of their stuff. Sure, it might crash at the drop of a hat (though nothing like PPC2002 does) but at least Palm thought out the thing from the start instead of trying to be like everyone else.

    Linux in a handheld is probably going to be very cool one day. Just not right now.

  69. Canopy Group and TrollTech... by jmors · · Score: 1
    Please someone, correct me if I am wrong but, isn't Trolltech owned to a large extent by the Canopy Group, the same litigation happy group who are orchestrating the SCO stock scam?

    I would be extreemly hesitant to adopt anything that relied even in part on technology even remotely controlled by this group of "litigation is a viable business model" buzzards!

    Just my own humble opinion!

    The Matrix is real... But I'm only visiting!

    --
    The Matrix is real... but I'm only visiting!
  70. Why this is different from a Zaurus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is different because it's more affordable, and it's much more pocketable than a Zaurus. I've got a Zaurus and a VR3 and it's the VR3 I carry about - because it doesn't hurt to actually put it in your pocket.

    The early VR3 were fragile but the latest ones (rev.12) are reasonably robust. I hope the MX-7 is built on lessons learned from the VR3.

    Softfield are a small company and pretty friendly to open-source developers. Sharp are OK but not so open.

    If you want to play music, buy an iPod. If you want to watch video, get a portable DVD player. If you want a general purpose PDA that runs linux, you now have a choice of a few models... that's good IMHO

    -Cam

  71. expensive by 10bt · · Score: 1

    you can buy pdas with 100 mhz more horsepower for $100 less here. you can also buy a brand new palm tungsten t1 with free veo camera for less ($199 last time i checked, direct from palm).

  72. gzip by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since gzip is stream based, unlike bzip, you really can't add a progress indicator - gzip never knows how far along it is!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  73. Skinnable PDA by cloudless.net · · Score: 1

    Most people put their PDA in a case anyway, so in a way they are already skinnable. By the way, is it really all that difficult to create a good-looking PDA? So far only SONY seems to get it right.

  74. Dot Net Compact Framework by cloudless.net · · Score: 1

    If you find the Windows API displeasing, you can choose to develop applications using the .Net Compact Framework. It has a completely new set of API, made specifically for mobile devices, and you have the option to use C# and VB.NET

  75. I have a question on PDA CPU speed. Anyone? by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

    Why is it that these PDA thingies always
    seem to have an approximately 200 Mhz CPU?
    Can't they get a faster CPU to work with
    these? I'll admit that although a computer
    junkie, I don't know much about PDA's. I
    just don't care for them. I just see reviews
    and the specs always seem to list the CPU
    as 200 or 206 Mhz, and I always think, wow
    that is slow. Anyway... thank you.

    1. Re:I have a question on PDA CPU speed. Anyone? by pcause · · Score: 1

      There are faster CPU's for PDA's then 200 MHz, but the thing to remember is that clock speed does not tell the whole story. Look at the Intel x86 chips. For a long time Intel said it was all clck speed. AMD came out with lower clocked chips and they benchmarked to be about the same speed as the Intel chips. Intel then came ot with the Pentium M line and now it says that a lower speed chip is faster than the an older and higher speed chip.

      The clocks are slower because, generally speaking, faster clocks mean more power consumption. And for handhelds, it is *all* about power consumption.

  76. NetHack by MulluskO · · Score: 1

    So can I get NetHack on it? I like my Visor Edge, I can play Robotfindskitten on it, but memory addressing limitations keep NetHack off PalmOS.

    --

    Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    1. Re:NetHack by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

      yes, there is a version of nethack working for qtopia, has worked for quite some time now, actually.

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
  77. Phone vs. PDA by K'tohg · · Score: 1

    Simply put: IMHO I don't like the integrated phone/PDA's they are horrible, bulky, and down right inconvenient.

    Now before anyone panics let me explain my otherwise irrational rational. When I think mobile ease of use I think a small hand held phone in my pocket as easy. However the display you see on the phone sucks. To be blunt, I cannot SSH from my phone. So the next best thing is a PDA.

    My idea of a good mobile setup is a PDA in the car clove box ready to read mail, surf the web, and SSH to my home computer all connected to the internet via my cell phone attached by a simple cord. Since I do the same thing for my laptop this makes perfect sense.

    Now I would not feel comfortable carrying a laptop on my back nor would I feel comfortable carrying a $400 mini computer on my hip. I would rather carry a sleek and sexy cell phone. Hence the division in functionality.

    A cell phone for phone calls, a cable and PDA for internet browsing. And when I sit down at a coffee shop I use my laptop. Easy. Simple. And useful. The K.I.S.S. Method!

    --
    > SELECT * FROM brain_cells WHERE synaptic_rate > 0
    0 row returned
  78. No D-pad or joystick? by Halloween+Jack · · Score: 1

    What a great PDA... for me to poop on!

    --
    I looked into the abyss, and the abyss looked into me--and we both winked.
  79. no, dumbfuck, qtopia is NOT free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is commercial, proprietary and krap, even worse than wince.