Slashdot Mirror


Balloonists Attempt World Altitude Record

ACey writes "BBC News is reporting on the latest attempt to break the balloon altitude world record. Qinetiq 1 is scheduled to launch tomorrow, 2nd September 2003, from the coast of Cornwall, UK, and aims to reach 132,000 feet or 25 miles in a flight that could last 12 hours. The balloon is so big (1,250 feet tall) that it should be visible from most of the UK, Ireland and Western France as it climbs. Good luck to them!"

214 comments

  1. Obligatory by Malicious · · Score: 2, Funny
    This article is just a bunch of hot air.

    Note: I fully realize that to reach that altitude, they would have to use helium. Grow a sense of humor.

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:Obligatory by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Actually, I didn't see it in the article, but I'll bet they use hydrogen for it's greater lift. When your going for that kind of record, you need every bit of lift you can get.

    2. Re:Obligatory by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      oops, second article says the do in fact use helium. I'm surpised. It's safer, but won't get them as much altitiude.

    3. Re:Obligatory by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

      Um...sure it will. You can get every bit as much lift from helium as you can from hydrogen, just use a bigger envelope.

    4. Re:Obligatory by diersing · · Score: 1
      What is wrong with me? The only reason I'll follow this story is for the pending disaster that only comes with accomplishing a feat that is utterly useless. Balloon technology has peaked, there is nothing new to gain or explore, it's a meaningless record.

      I have that same feeling as I do during hunting season as I await news of the first hunter to be killed (usually by stray from hunting buddy but I always root for the deer sighting induced heart attack).

    5. Re:Obligatory by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Um...sure it will. You can get every bit as much lift from helium as you can from hydrogen, just use a bigger envelope.

      Sometimes it's difficult to make an envelope that is sufficiently strong, has four times the volume, and doesn't weigh any more...

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    6. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think good reasons for not using H2 have already been learnt..(the hard way)

    7. Re:Obligatory by Racine · · Score: 1

      Actually its not - its Helium. There isn't enough oxygen up there to burn fuel to make the air hot.

      --
      Tcl my Pico! There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
    8. Re:Obligatory by jerde · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it's difficult to make an envelope that is sufficiently strong, has four times the volume, and doesn't weigh any more...

      Better make that two times the volume: Hydrogen is diatomic, so the total atomic weight of the H2 molecule is 2. Helium is an atomic gas, with its atomic weight of 4.

      Round numbers, of course.

      Just a little bit more food for thought: the duterium isotope of hydrogen wieghs just as much as helium, in gas form.

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
  2. Holy schmidt! by JessLeah · · Score: 0

    A balloon the height of the Empire State Building!? Whoa!

  3. Naturally.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    The first transmission from the balloon will be "Can you hear me now? ... Good!"

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Naturally.. by griffjon · · Score: 0, Redundant

      baloon transmissions... ...could be a network... ...imagine a beowulf cluster of those!

      (sorry)

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    2. Re:Naturally.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or if they are using a mobile phone (loudly), "I am on the BALLOON"

    3. Re:Naturally.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the answer that you never hear on the other end is "What? I can't hear you".

  4. Remember, Canada did it first. by slackingme · · Score: 0

    In Canada they set altitude records all the time, but they don't use balloons. Obviously these fellows have merely started to import the Canadian ganja!

    1. Re:Remember, Canada did it first. by FedToTheDogs · · Score: 0

      Mod this guy up, goddamn half and half drinkers... 810a5bdaafc6dd30b1d9979215935871 you

  5. One question comes to my mind: by The+Old+Burke · · Score: 0
    Why?

    --
    Proud patriot and republican voter.
    1. Re:One question comes to my mind: by Gr33nNight · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because he can. Are you new here?

    2. Re:One question comes to my mind: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Why?"

      Isn't it obvious?

      "Proud patriot and republican voter."

      Oh, that explains it. You see some things in life aren't about profit, religon, or power. Sometimes they are about trying to overcome obsticles and sharing the wisdom with the rest of humankind.

    3. Re:One question comes to my mind: by djcapelis · · Score: 1

      Didn't you see his sig?

      --
      I touch computers in naughty places
    4. Re:One question comes to my mind: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      sharing the wisdom with the rest of humankind.

      Go get a job hippie. Where's the profit in that?

    5. Re:One question comes to my mind: by error502 · · Score: 1

      Go get a job hippie.

      This seems like a common response from republicans when arguing with democrats and liberals. Can they think of nothing else to say? Probably because they know we're right.

    6. Re:One question comes to my mind: by domninus.DDR · · Score: 1

      look at his UID!

    7. Re:One question comes to my mind: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because rich white men are bored with life.

    8. Re:One question comes to my mind: by bobbis.u · · Score: 1
      Actually I am slightly curious why Qinetiq is sponsoring this. Qinetiq is the commercial arm of what was DERA (Defence Evaluation and Research Agency) who were Britain's military research organisation. DERA was split up and part of it was privatised to form Qinetiq. Are we going to be invading Syria by helium balloon now? (Obviously there is also still a part which is not "open to the public".)

      Has no-one else noticed that the date is wrong on the BBC site? According to Qinetiq1 site itself, the launch date is 3rd September.

    9. Re:One question comes to my mind: by ray-auch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Launch date got put back 24hrs after the (BBC) article was posted - check the main bbc news site for a brief article on the delay.

      As well as the balloon record they are flying some remote controlled (from the gondola) drone which I expect is going to be a record height too.

      So we have very high altitude unmanned drone being tested - now that sounds like the military's cup of tea...

    10. Re:One question comes to my mind: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you see his sig?

      long before you came and plagiarized your comment from an AC.

    11. Re:One question comes to my mind: by djcapelis · · Score: 1

      The things I miss browsing at +2...

      --
      I touch computers in naughty places
    12. Re:One question comes to my mind: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't believe in love
      don't believe in hate
      don't believe in anything
      that you can't waste

    13. Re:One question comes to my mind: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This seems like a common response from republicans when arguing with democrats and liberals. Can they think of nothing else to say? Probably because they know we're right."

      They have another responce. It goes something like, "What are you, a commie?"

  6. xprize? by mikeee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hm. If they could launch it again in a suitable time window, would this be eligable for the X-Prize?

    1. Re:xprize? by mitomac · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, the xprize requirement is 65 miles -- another 40 miles more than the stated goal.

    2. Re:xprize? by Skyfire · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually its 100km. Get with the program.

      --
      Do not go gentle into that good night. Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
    3. Re:xprize? by ayjay29 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      X-Prize?
      They win an X-Box?

      --
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  7. Erm "Balloon" by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I knew if I wanted to conceal the departure of our ancient alien visitors I too would construct a 1,200 foot balloon and tell people it was trying to break an altitude record.

    This just prooves our alien overlords point - we deserve to get our brains eaten.

    1. Re:Erm "Balloon" by Wiz · · Score: 1

      On the top of our alien overlords....

      I, for one, welcome the stay of our brain eating alien overlords!

  8. Brits and balloons. by caluml · · Score: 1

    What is it with us Brits and balloons?
    Is it that Phileas Fogg thang?

    1. Re:Brits and balloons. by hachete · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.cameronballoons.co.uk/index.cfm

      "The worlds' largest balloon maker"

      based in Bristol in the westcountry where they have one of the worlds' largest balloon festivals every year.

      h

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    2. Re:Brits and balloons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it that Phileas Fogg thang?

      Or maybe Phineas Fogg.

    3. Re:Brits and balloons. by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      > Is it that Phileas Fogg thang?

      I doubt it. Balloons and tortilla chips probably don't mix. ;-)

  9. In another universe by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    People use units that arent derived from bodyparts or the lenght of 1000 steps....

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:In another universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that a mile is the length of 1000 steps?

    2. Re:In another universe by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      the word mile derives from "milum passum" (sorry, my latin died years ago), the lenght of 1000 double steps (meaning 1000 times the lenght from left foot down to left food down...)

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:In another universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      People use units that arent derived from bodyparts or the lenght of 1000 steps....

      Why don't you go there?

    4. Re:In another universe by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Hehe. Im already there. Theres some reason its called the internet, you know....

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    5. Re:In another universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that whole universe doesn't have enough economic impact to force the USA into changing over to metric.

    6. Re:In another universe by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      Really? And here I thought the mile was based on some sensible measurement, like 2/3 the distance one of the King's oxen could walk in one afternoon in clear weather.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    7. Re:In another universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a few dead astronauts and wasted billions of dollars from misdirected space probes can't do that, who am I to try?

    8. Re:In another universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they use sensible units based on the distance from the North Pole to the Equator passing through Paris.

  10. Obligatory Simpsons Reference: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sir, how would you like to get higher than you've ever been in your life?"

    (For the purists, I realize that The Simpsons is not the originator of the line, but the world seems to appreciate them more.)

  11. You'll shoot your eye out kid! by niko9 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hate to break it youy bud, but I got my Daisy Brand Red-Ryder BB rifle, and your'e not going anywhere!

    Sorry to burst your bubble. ;)

  12. Obligatory George Carlin Reference by thedogcow · · Score: 0

    See George Carlin "Complaints and Grievances"

    "I hope the next guy gets hits by lightning and flies around in little fart cycles *raspberry noises*"

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:Obligatory George Carlin Reference by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

      hehehehhe, I have that cd, that's the first line that came to mind when I saw that headline. "and then land in a sewage treatment pond and sink along with all the other turds" carlin is a classic. still, I'd like to see these people pull it off, and not end up in space.

  13. SI Units by GoneGaryT · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...40,000 metres (40 kilometres) up in a balloon 381 metres tall...

    1. Re:SI Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they did convert the height to "kilofeet", which is part way toward using the metric system.

  14. Heathens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use the metric system!

  15. UFOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if there will be an increased reporting of UFOs when this balloon goes up.

  16. Masochists, I tells ya. by JCCyC · · Score: 5, Funny

    See here.

    Selected quote:
    "The two men will not eat during their mission, and they are hoping they will not have to go to the toilet either. A special fibre-free diet will begin three days before the trip in the hope that waste will be kept to a minimum."

    All I can say is -- Holy crap!

    1. Re:Masochists, I tells ya. by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      yeah, 40km hight means around 1*e^-(40/4.5)bar pressure. They cant shit out of their basket because its near vaccum out there....

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:Masochists, I tells ya. by libnatel · · Score: 0

      yeah well take a s look at this quote, "the two men wil...eat... their... waste." now thats just sickening.

    3. Re:Masochists, I tells ya. by rf0 · · Score: 1

      Well planes release worse.. IT nice to have ablock of frozen urine come through your ceiling

      Rus

    4. Re:Masochists, I tells ya. by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      They should do ads for Metamucil when tehy're done with their flight and they attempt to return to a normal diet/gastrointestinal pattern.

    5. Re:Masochists, I tells ya. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      One good fart at that pressure and they'd come down ten miles off.

    6. Re:Masochists, I tells ya. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "and they are hoping they will not have to go to the toilet either."

      Yeah right. They aren't hoping for that. They're just as eager as anybody else would be to get a balloon up that high and then throw pennies off of it. And then realizing how cool it would be to urinate off of it.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    7. Re:Masochists, I tells ya. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you mean "holy no crap". Like "no tea", but a lot more pleasant to have around.

    8. Re:Masochists, I tells ya. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And hopefully also because it might put a significant downside on the public relations angle.

  17. are they going to jump too? by cdn-programmer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The manhigh project in the late 50's early 60's included a parachute jump from about 100,000 feet. This was about the height that the Challenger exploded and the jump shows that the crew of the Chalenger could have survived had the technology developed in the manhigh project been avilable to them.

    The guy who jumped reached a speed of over 700 miles per hour for part of the fall.

    1. Re:are they going to jump too? by benj_e · · Score: 3, Insightful

      um, I think you mean Columbia, and they weren't going 12,000 MPH in the manhigh program were they?

      --
      The Tao that can be spoken is not the one eternal Tao
    2. Re:are they going to jump too? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      The guy who jumped reached a speed of over 700 miles per hour for part of the fall.

      Thats interesting, since terminal velocity for a skydiver is supposed to be like about 120ish mph...

      not even a lead block would go 700Mph, I don't think. But EH, details.

    3. Re:are they going to jump too? by g_attrill · · Score: 1

      They would have to solve the problem of slowing down the person from the re-entry speed of 30,000mph without burning up. The shuttle needs thousands of ceramic tiles to do this, I'd like to see the equivalent suit!

      Gareth

    4. Re:are they going to jump too? by NoSoup4You · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's terminal velocity near sea level, at 100,000 feet the air resistance is much lower, therefore terminal velocity will be greatly increased.

    5. Re:are they going to jump too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Terminal velocity is dependent on the density of the atomosphere. One may max out at 120-200 mph while skydiving from 15,000 feet, but the atomosphere is a lot less dense 100,000 feet up, therefore the terminal velocity would be much faster.

    6. Re:are they going to jump too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Challenger blew on the way up, not the way down btw...

      --Jubedgy

    7. Re:are they going to jump too? by Otter · · Score: 1

      No, he means Challenger, which wasn't going 12,000 mph when it exploded.

    8. Re:are they going to jump too? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      very good point. I stand corrected.

      what is term velocity at 100k feet?

    9. Re:are they going to jump too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt - wrong. Terminal velocity of a skydiver is around 120mph at lower altitudes, but at higher altitudes there is much less atmosphere, so the terminal velocity will be much higher.

      As for the block of lead, I think it could easily go that fast, even at lower altitudes. But some physics type can correct me.

    10. Re:are they going to jump too? by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 3, Informative

      At higher altitudes, the air is thinner, drag resistance is less, so terminal velocity is much higher.

      In 1960, Colonel Joe Kittinger jumped from 102,800 feet, reputedly reaching speeds of 714mph.

    11. Re:are they going to jump too? by ramk13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This was about the height that the Challenger exploded and the jump shows that the crew of the Chalenger could have survived had the technology developed in the manhigh project been avilable to them.

      I think you are ignoring maybe a few hundred engineering/technical difficulties involved in exiting a spacecraft. It's not like they had ejection seats. Also, from a flight controller's perspective there was little to no warning, at the time, that a catastrophic event was about to happen.

      Save the 'could have' and 'should have' for a problem where people actually could have done something.

    12. Re:are they going to jump too? by fygment · · Score: 2, Informative

      The original was Captain Joseph Kittinger who freefell for some 4.5 minutes. He had serious thrill issues.

      --
      "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
    13. Re:are they going to jump too? by berniecase · · Score: 1

      When the air is thin, you can go 700mph. The 120mph terminal velocity applies to more dense air. Wired had covered this before.

    14. Re:are they going to jump too? by psych031337 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here is a quick rundown on the gist of the Kittinger/Excelsior story that should give you an overview... and more terms for googling the backgrounds:

      http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/history/coldwar/p e. htm

      --
      +++ath0
    15. Re:are they going to jump too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the Challenger passenger compartment which landed intact after the 1986 explosion. The astronauts died from the impact of hitting the water, not from the explosion. If they had a parachute they would have survived.

    16. Re:are they going to jump too? by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      Hey kiddo, you know, the world existed way before 1987.

    17. Re:are they going to jump too? by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Supposedly the Challenger astronauts survived the explosion and may have been killed only when the mostly-intact crew cabin hit the Atlantic Ocean.

    18. Re:are they going to jump too? by cybermage · · Score: 3, Informative

      um, I think you mean Columbia,

      Actually, I think he means Challenger. When the Challenger exploded during launch, it is believed that the cockpit portion of the shuttle remained intact until impacting the ocean. Had the crew had the ability to jump from altitude, who knows...

    19. Re:are they going to jump too? by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      Well first of all I think the Columbia was closer to about 200,000 or even 300,000 ft. but more importantly they were moving at around Mach 17 when the ship broke up. Its not exactly the same thing.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    20. Re:are they going to jump too? by aiyo · · Score: 1

      IIRC, early versions of the space shuttle did have ejection seats and a blow off top to escape. They were later removed (maybe even before the first flight of the shuttle).

    21. Re:are they going to jump too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey kiddo, you know, the world existed way before 1987

      What's your point? Columbia = 2003 , Challenger = 1987.

      Nobody's discussing Shuttle events before 1987, so what's your point?

    22. Re:are they going to jump too? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      what is term velocity at 100k feet?

      I think Kittinger reached it. It's near 700mph from reading the article.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    23. Re:are they going to jump too? by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Nobody's discussing Shuttle events before 1987, so what's your point?

      Challenger=1986, != 1987. We are talking about Shuttle events before 1987.

    24. Re:are they going to jump too? by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      If they had a parachute they would have survived.

      If they had _seven_ parachutes (one each)
      If they were still conscious (what were the Gs from the explosion ?)
      If they could get a hatch open
      If they could get out and clear without hitting orbiter / debris (remember the orbiter is now probably a little different in shape than it would have been in training)
      If they could survive till pickup after landing (in ocean ? must be suited up to survive at that height, do space suits float ?)

      If they'd had chutes they _might_ have survived (which, granted, is more chance than without).

    25. Re:are they going to jump too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just guessing your schools believe in grade inflation.

    26. Re:are they going to jump too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should make google your home page, not slashdot.

    27. Re:are they going to jump too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit.

    28. Re:are they going to jump too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was the OP suggesting individual chutes, or a reentry-style chute on the passenger compartment? Regardless of what the Manhigh program involved.

      I had thought they were killed near-instantly in the explosion. Sadder still if they were alive and possibly conscious for the fall to earth.

    29. Re:are they going to jump too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool. What's that dragline attached to him, or is it something else? Maybe oxygen?

    30. Re:are they going to jump too? by vrone · · Score: 1
      This story caught my attention since as a kid, I remember an old widow from down the street who would tell stories about her husband (Alfred W. Stevens) who set a balloon altitude record which stood for 2 decades. I did some digging and found a page about him and the manhigh project that you mentioned.

      Steven's 1935 record of 72,395 feet (22,066 meters) was broken again and again in the late 1950s and early 1960s when the US Navy and Air Force with their stratolab and manhigh projects vied for the top dog slot.

      While the Air Force gets top honors for parachuting back, their record setting 102,000 feet (31,090 meters) flight in 1960 was surpassed less than 8 months later by the Navy's current record holding 113,740 foot (34,668 meter) flight. (1961)

      So thanks to the space program, the high altitude ballooning thing isn't the big research attraction it used to be. The Navy record has stood for over 40 years, and now it just remains to be seen if they can break it.

    31. Re:are they going to jump too? by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      no, Challenger = 1986. I postulated the kid wasn't self-aware before 1987, for thinking the world of space shuttle crashes revolved around Columbia

    32. Re:are they going to jump too? by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      The first shuttle launches *did* have that technology - only 3 pilots with an option to eject/get out. It was dropped from subsequent missions..

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    33. Re:are they going to jump too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh... since when did lead objects fall faster than other objects with the same wind resistance.

    34. Re:are they going to jump too? by Tuna_Shooter · · Score: 1

      EXCEPT for the small fact that the crew of the Columbia was traveling at 12000 MPH ... and these guys (in the balloon) are like just sitting there i see no way a crossover of technolgies would have helped.

      --
      *--- Sometimes a majority only means that all the fools are on the same side. ---*
    35. Re:are they going to jump too? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      A plastic hammer will fall slower than a lead hammer in an atmosphere if accellerated to terminal velocity. Even if they are the same shape and have an identical coating interacting with the atmosphere.

      Terminal velocity is when frictional force balances gravitational force. Friction is unrelated to mass, but gravitation is. So if mass increases, the force of gravity increases.

      Picture it this way - you have an air-filled plastic cube a meter on each side. You have another one filled with lead. Have two volunteers hold them up. Even though both boxes have the same impediment to motion (friction), the one box will still manage to fall (much to the detriment of the hapless volunteer).

    36. Re:are they going to jump too? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      They were probably never present on Challenger. They were built on Columbia - as well as a host of other safety features. Remember - this was the first launch of a completely new space vehicle. I remember the first Columbia launch - the press made a big deal of all the safety features present. I believe they had an armored personnel carrier or something like that parked at the end of a big zip-line running down from the gantry in case they should find out the shuttle were about to blow on the launch pad. I'm pretty sure they said they had ejection seats as well, and they had plans for aborting launch at various phases. (Granted, the plans may have been desparate ones at some points.)

    37. Re:are they going to jump too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC ... when you fall at that height, you start to spin, because the air resistance is not sufficient to drag you into the highest drag position, assuming that you stay stable. The USAF had seen this at lower altitudes and when he jumped he took a drogue chute with him from the start to keep him from spinning until he blacked out. I will find a link ...

    38. Re:are they going to jump too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/escape/skydive.html

      and

      http://www.stratoquest.com/default.cfm?page=5

      and

      http://www.wonderquest.com/skydiving-ostrich.htm

  18. balooning seems kewl by selderrr · · Score: 2, Funny

    after seeing hot grits like this, I'm now convicing my wife that I should go high-altitude balooning asap. If only I could explain the mandatory difference in male and female costumes

    1. Re:balooning seems kewl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hot... grits? too much slashdot, my friend.

  19. comparing sizes by libnatel · · Score: 0

    is this ballon going to make it onto the chart with all the other space ships?

    http://mirror.wolffelaar.nl/zardalu.sytes.net/

  20. from the "newsroom" by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    sure, its available here

    but since that will get swamped, here's some cool details:

    British summer holds the key as QinetiQ 1 balloon pilots prepare to fly to the edge of space
    UK balloon pilots Andy Elson and Colin Prescot are now looking for an opportunity to launch their manned helium balloon, QinetiQ 1, on a clear calm day between end-July and mid-September 2003. In particular, the high winds of the jetstream need to be benign for a successful mission. The pilots aim to break the 40-year-old, US-held world altitude record for a manned balloon by ascending to 132,000ft (25 miles).

    Sponsored in their attempt by QinetiQ, Europe's leading science and technology research organisation, the pilots are working closely with the Met Office. They are monitoring mission-critical advanced metrological data, in particular stratospheric conditions, as wind direction is critical for the balloon's trajectory.

    Mission Control Director, Brian Jones commented: "The QinetiQ 1 team is set for launch and is now just waiting for the right weather to go. A sea launch is crucial to the success of the mission and North Cornwall offers us an ideal venue, with QinetiQ's own trimaran ship, RV Triton, providing the launch platform. The St Ives bay offers sheltered anchorage for RV Triton during the pre-flight preparations."

    When the conditions are suitable, the pilots will announce a 72-hour countdown to the launch of the world's largest manned balloon, setting off from the North Cornish coast on its journey to the edge of space.

    The QinetiQ 1 flight will last around 9-12 hours. The launch crew and pilots will start filling the balloon with helium in the early hours of launch day. The 1.6 tonnes of polyethylene material that make up the balloon's envelope takes about two hours to fill and, at launch, will stand upright at a massive height of 1,250 ft - seven times as tall as Nelson's Column, or the height of The Empire State Building. The balloon will rapidly ascend to 85,000 feet, after which it will slow down to a more gradual pace.

    People within a 600-mile diameter footprint beneath the flight, should get a glimpse of the enormous balloon rising up into the sky. This means that the UK and much of France should be able to view the flight with the naked eye, as well as being able to see live TV images from on board QinetiQ 1.

    At target altitude, the pilots will carry out a series of experiments and collect more information about an area of the stratosphere dubbed the 'Ignorosphere' due to the lack of recorded scientific data on the region.

    It is at this point that Zephyr 3, a revolutionary unmanned solar plane designed by QinetiQ scientists and controlled by the balloon pilots from onboard QinetiQ 1, will beam back the amazing pictures of the voyage to mission control. Once the flight data has been captured the pilots will begin their descent, which should take three to four hours, before controlled 'splashdown' into the Atlantic.

    1. Re:from the "newsroom" by frisket · · Score: 1

      I don't see any pointers anywhere to *when* they're going to launch it. A 72hr countdown, sure, but from *when*. I'm in Ireland and I have a telescope...

    2. Re:from the "newsroom" by kyrre · · Score: 1

      In about 8 hours. There is a countdown on their website. You are also not supposed to need a telescope due to the balloons size.

    3. Re:from the "newsroom" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you don't need a telescope to see Mars either, but it's much cooler if you have one. ;)

  21. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Experimental balloon, launched from an experimental boat, wearing experimental space-suits, followed by an experimental spy-plane.

    Paid for by.... a large anonymous donation? ;)

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes.

  22. Enough SCO stories already! by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 1

    World attitude records and unprecedented volumes of hot air. Sheesh. Enough is enough!

    Cleverly veiled as a science story though. Nice job, /. team.

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
  23. Balloons?! Still?! Again?! etc. by Helm�t · · Score: 1

    Seriously, who still CARES about balloon records anymore? Isn't this this just a hobby for embarrasingly rich and bored, but not-quite-old-enough-to-call-it-quits-yet retirees?

    I mean, is there some sort of practical application for a helium balloon larger than the frickin' Empire State Building? Please, enlighten me.

    1. Re:Balloons?! Still?! Again?! etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they're flying into the "ignorosphere" to run some experiments, so I reckon that's reason enough.

      Seriously though, the only thing that'll take you higher is a rocket, and that'll cost way more than a balloon flight. It's probably an underrated platform for (relatively) cheap experimentation in a lot of fields.

      We know a lot about lower altitudes, and a lot about space, but not much about the stratosphere in between.

      ACey.

    2. Re:Balloons?! Still?! Again?! etc. by rokzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/03/b allooning/html/glider.stm

      "The technology behind Zephyr could be used as a communications platform for mobile phones in remote areas, or disaster zones, or even by the military for surveillance."

      happy...?

    3. Re:Balloons?! Still?! Again?! etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and I have a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you.

    4. Re:Balloons?! Still?! Again?! etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not really. Zehpyr is not the name of the balloon. It's the solar powered plane that is going to take pictures of the balloon. The balloon itself is still pretty useless, although the pet side project might have potential.

    5. Re:Balloons?! Still?! Again?! etc. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "happy...?"

      O jesus. There's always ONE isn't there? Just because this giant ballon could be used by the military for surveillance does not mean the men in black are coming to get you. I'm as much of a privacy nut as the next guy, but for god sake.....I swear, if a story were posted dogs and how they have such a good sense of smell and the military uses them for surveillance, you would post something similar and build a cave out of tinfoil so they can't reach you.

      I'm not trolling, but for god sake....look out the window....there's no black van waiting for you......or maybe there IS!!!!

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    6. Re:Balloons?! Still?! Again?! etc. by glenebob · · Score: 1
      "The technology behind Zephyr could be used as a communications platform for mobile phones in remote areas, or disaster zones, or even by the military for surveillance."
      Zephyr is the little glider/solar powered plane (which is it, BTW?) that will take pictures of the balloon.

      Strike one. Got any other ideas how a balloon is useful?

  24. Think of the wardriving opportunities by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Funny

    With a good high-gain antenna, they should be able to access wireless LANs for quite a distance. Were I in the vicinty, I would be honored to have them posting their progress through my network.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Think of the wardriving opportunities by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " With a good high-gain antenna, they should be able to access wireless LANs for quite a distance. Were I in the vicinty, I would be honored to have them posting their progress through my network."

      That wouldn't be good. You would post your story to Slashdot where we will somehow manage to Slashdot their balloon and it will plummet in a giant ball of fire. And then we'll have another story posted the next day about SCO and all will be forgotten.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  25. That explains it by KFK+-+Wildcat · · Score: 1
    The two men will not eat during their mission, and they are hoping they will not have to go to the toilet either. A special fibre-free diet will begin three days before the trip in the hope that waste will be kept to a minimum.
    No wonder these guys look constipated...
  26. If these balloons get any bigger... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...they'll achieve altitude records without even leaving the ground.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    1. Re:If these balloons get any bigger... by EverDense · · Score: 1

      ...they'll achieve altitude records without even leaving the ground.

      Good point! are they measuring the altitude from
      the basket or the top of the balloon?

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
  27. Another metric hack by Phantasmo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, they could've used kilolight-nanoseconds (light travels about 30 centimetres in a nanosecond, which is close enough to a foot).

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
    1. Re:Another metric hack by bentini · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe you mean light-microseconds?

  28. OT: Orbit question by another_henry · · Score: 1

    If, hypothetically, a balloon were to ascend to the height of a geostationary orbit (36,000 miles?) would it stay there? Presumably it would have to be launched from the equator... (discounting the fact that a balloon couldn't possibly get that high because there's no damn air)

    --
    "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    1. Re:OT: Orbit question by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 1

      nope... satellites at any orbit have two elements that are needed, a balloon only has one. Height is the first, but you also have to get that balloon up to 21000 mph or so... But.... assuming you didn't need a true geo sat (stationary), yes it could 'float' at the altitude if you could get up there.

    2. Re:OT: Orbit question by Richard+Platt · · Score: 1

      > But.... assuming you didn't need a true geo sat (stationary), yes it could 'float' at the altitude if you could get up there.

      No, it would drop. The reason geostationary satellites don't is that they're travelling very fast, as you said.

      A satellite at that height doesn't have to be geostationary of course - it could be travelling at the appropriate speed but in the wrong direction.

    3. Re:OT: Orbit question by another_henry · · Score: 1

      But surely if it reached the same height and position as one of the current geostationary satellites, it would then stay in the same orbit? Or is it that just lifting it from a point on the Earth would not give it enough "sideways" velocity, i.e. by the time it got as high as geostationary would it no longer be in the same position above the Earth? (discounting air resistance etc)

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    4. Re:OT: Orbit question by jerde · · Score: 1

      It's the difference between being held up by a balloon (you still weigh the same and feel gravity) and being in orbit (you feel weightlessness since you're in freefall).

      The reason that an orbit works is that you're falling to the ground just as fast as the gravity is pulling you, but you're traveling forward so fast that "down" is now behind you. Your forward speed and the effect of gravity cancel each other out, and you stay at the same height above the surface.

      The key is that in an orbit, nothing is "holding you up", which is why you feel weightlessness.

      And, of course, it is actually impossible to use a balloon to get up to any orbital height -- by definition if there's enough atmosphere to keep a balloon afloat, there's enough to slow down any fast-moving object such that it falls out of orbit.

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    5. Re:OT: Orbit question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also have to remember that the atmosphere is not a solid object: it experiences wind currents and tides. A GEO satellite stays over a fixed longitude because of its velocity (~altitude) AND a lack of air drag. Even so, it still needs small thrusters to counter the perturbing affects of the Earth, Sun, and Moon.

      Further O.T.: What would be the sea-level air pressure if the balloon-able atmosphere reached 36000 km?

  29. Story by jester · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I submitted that story 2 hours earlier than the said individual and it was rejected, yet 2 hours later they accept it from someone else :-) well done Slashdot editors you really show your intelligence and consistency

    1. Re:Story by thirty2bit · · Score: 1

      Somebody finally decided it WAS indeed a slow day and accepted it...

    2. Re:Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, sorry!

      Maybe it was the crate of beer I sent with the story :)

      ACey.

    3. Re:Story by jester · · Score: 1

      I knew it ! I only sent that inflatable goat and thought it would be enough

  30. Would you believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that's the second largest balloon I've ever seen.

  31. Dear Ballon-nauts by WwWonka · · Score: 2, Funny

    I write this letter to you balloon pilots in hopes that when you are up there you will do me a favor.

    About a week ago I tied lil Sparky, our family Chiwwawwawa, to about ten helium balloons to see if they could lift him off the ground. Needless to say, it did. After ten minutes of riding my Green Machine through town following poor old Sparks I lost sight of him some where near the Rockies.

    So, if you happen to see Sparky some where up there in the great wild blue yonder during your travels will you fetch him for me? Don't know if this is possible cause the kid next door who is into h4ck1ng and Slashdot and all that other stuff keeps saying something about the decrease in atmospheric pressure at those heights and that either the balloons will pop or Sparky's large intenstines will explode. Either way bad news for Sparks. So PUH-LEASE keep on the lookout for a dog with ten balloons tied to his collar.

    Jimmy Smigerwitz

    PS. He will be the dog with the Red Power Rangers collar in case you see more dogs tied to balloons up there.

    1. Re:Dear Ballon-nauts by dagar17 · · Score: 1

      Actually as part of a contest on the Daily Planet on Discovery channel Canada they asked how many balloons would be required to lift the small dog they dog (dog mass .75kg I believe). I'm sorry to say but it was more like 200 helium party balloons required.

    2. Re:Dear Ballon-nauts by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      Maybe this guy can help you find your lost pet. Or maybe this guy.

  32. History&Freefall by the_pooh_experience · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Acording to NOVA, the standing record is 113,739.9 ft (~ 35 km) was set in 1961. Back then however these people were pretty hardcore, as it was too technical to pilot the balloons back down, they would jump (with a parachute).

    My grandfather and his brother were some of the balooning pioneers in the US, and I actually had the oppertunity (when I was much younger) to acompany my grandfater taken up in a balloon by Joe Kittinger (first altitude record of ~100,000 ft and the longest freefall to date-where he actually broke the sound-barrier unaided by propultion other than gravity). We didn't go to 100 kft but even back then (I think I may have been about 7) it was quite an experience.

    1. Re:History&Freefall by henrygb · · Score: 2, Informative
      it was too technical to pilot the balloons back down, they would jump (with a parachute).

      This was also true of Yuri Garagin in Vostock 1, who having orbited in 1961 at up to about 320 km (200 miles), ejected on the way down at about 7 km (23,000 feet). All by design.

    2. Re:History&Freefall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kittinger reached a maximum speed of 614 mph and did NOT break the speed limit. See...

      http://hypertextbook.com/physics/mechanics/falli ng /
      http://hypertextbook.com/facts/JianHuang.shtml

  33. scary part... by rokzy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Should the suits fail at 35,000 feet (10,668 metres) Andy and Colin would lose consciousness. At 80,000 feet (24,384 metres) the pilots would die within a matter of seconds, as the low pressure would make their blood boil almost immediately."

    ow...

  34. Idiot BBC journalists by panurge · · Score: 1

    The article says something like "It is hoped that [the tethered aircraft] will return to earth". It would be far more interesting if it didn't.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  35. Re:What a jerks by panurge · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually it was British jerks (the word behind the first initial in BBC does give away the plot a bit). But yes, I do agree with your elegantly stated request. Believe it or not, the British Army went metric in, I think, around 1948. The rest of the country will doubtless catch up with the rest of Europe shortly after Hell freezes over.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  36. On Hold! by derekb · · Score: 1

    I was part of the slashdot crowd that visited and saw the counter... but now it's on hold!

    Those crazy bastards! I know what they saw about a tear not having serious effects but having this big balloon streak across europe as it deflates is kinda a freaky mental image! (pbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbt there goes the balloon)

  37. Re:What a jerks by jerkychew · · Score: 1

    When you drop all the erroneous U's from your alphabet (colour, etc.).

    Oh, and drive on the correct side of the road, too!

  38. No Capsule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I found interesting from the BBC Radio, on the above, was that they will be wearing space suits in an open capsule....described as the type that you could reach out and touch something.

  39. weather looks good by weathergeek · · Score: 1

    The northerly winds over southwest England show a considerable decrease through tomorrow as high pressure builds over the area.

  40. Re:On Hold!, found a link by derekb · · Score: 1

    Gotta love google:

    here's a story

  41. Interesting glider, too by Software · · Score: 1
    I think the glider that will photograph the balloon is just as interesting as the balloon. 40 ft wingspan, 30 pound weight (that's about 13 m, 13.6 kg for you SI fans - and why is the BBC using non-SI units?).

    And I loved this quote:

    It is hoped Zephyr will return to Earth, although it is unlikely it will be recovered intact.
    Where else would it return to?
    1. Re:Interesting glider, too by __aaanwh8370 · · Score: 1

      Maybe its because the British use many of the same units we do...namely miles, pounds, rods, yards, etc...

      Its the french and other continentals that gave us SI (systeme internationale) units.

    2. Re:Interesting glider, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the British have used metric measurements for the last 20 years or so, and especially so in the last 10 when packaging/sales laws were changed. The only imperial measurements left in general use are miles for road distances and pints for beer. Generally speaking though, most of the population over 30 wouldn't know what a metre was if they were to trip over it (hence the BBC using primarily "old units")! Even though, with this mix of measuring systems in use, everyone seems to get on ok!

  42. Couldn`t Google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... have a function (a la Google calculator) to convert idiotic units like feet and miles, that not even England uses anymore to something of common usage like meters and kilometers?

    Useless units... Humpf!

    1. Re:Couldn`t Google... by edb0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      it does!
      type "100 feet in meters" into google and see what happens.

    2. Re:Couldn`t Google... by edb0 · · Score: 1

      see here for details

    3. Re:Couldn`t Google... by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 1

      that not even England uses anymore

      If you trully think that, I pray you never drive in Britain.

    4. Re:Couldn`t Google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, thank you for being helpful, I appreciate and all that, but my ignorance is about a way to apply this automagically to an entire page.

      Google calculator applies to a simple expression... I want to get a page "translate" from nonsense units to metric. My guess is this would be easier if done at Google.

      Gee, if the text was in Russian, I could understand it easier than English thru Google automatic translation (ok, there would be errors, but the units would be metric).

    5. Re:Couldn`t Google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was what English people said the other day we discussed this matter here at /., that these units were abolished, the system was not called "English", but rather "Imperial", it was outlawed, yada, yada etc.

      Maybe the English guys simply lied?

  43. Untrue by hughk · · Score: 1
    There has been a loss of pressure accident once in the Russian Space program (Soyuz 11). A valve stuck open and the cabin air was lost and the cosmonauts died. It seems they took many seconds to die (about half a minute) and it was just plain hypoxia that killed them - no boiling blood or whatever, that happened later after several minutes.

    It seems that AC Clark got things about right in "2001" when Dave Bowman goes from the pod into the emergency airlock the hard way. You can read more about it here.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:Untrue by tengwar · · Score: 1
      It seems that AC Clark got things about right in "2001" when Dave Bowman goes from the pod into the emergency airlock the hard way.

      No, it doesn't work. There have been studies of how long it takes you to lose consciousness, and in a vacuum it will only take 2-3 seconds, although it will take you longer to die. It's to do with the way that haemoglobin takes up or releases oxygen. If you graph percentage oxygen content against the partial pressure of oxygen, there's a S curve. Up to something like the partial pressure corresponding to 15000', haemogloblin is almost saturated with O2. At lower partial pressures (such as found in the blood vessels supplying working muscles), the oxygen is dumped straight back out, which is exactly what's needed for oxygen transport. Unfortunately if the partial pressure is low because you've blown a seal in your spacecraft, your entire blood supply dumps oxygen as gas, usually in the wrong places. Probably gives you a really nasty case of the bends for the short time you can register it.

    2. Re:Untrue by hughk · · Score: 2, Informative
      I don't know if you checked the link that I supplied, but you have about ten seconds to take emergency action before you pass out (assuming immediate depressurisation). The bends take some time to kick in because the blood is not directly exposed to vacuum.

      Loss of pressure has happened in one famous incident at NASA in the eighties when a space suit failed in a test chamber. The chamber was rapidly repressurized and the tester showed no ill effects (i.e., no bends). The bends take some time to happen. When diving, it may take some tens of minutes for the effects to become severe. Small N2 bubbles in the blood are nasty but until they become larger i.e., by aggregation, they are not major. With immediate recompression, the N2 will quickly dissolve again.

      The Soyuz 11 incident was also disclosed when the Russians started cooperating with NASA. In this case, the crew seemed to have about 30 seconds (the cabin took a little time to depressurize).

      There is even an idea that has been floating around about having an unpressurised space suit - i.e., just the helmet would be pressurized. The rest of the suit would be elasticated, which would provide counter-pressure to the skin, to prevent swelling.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  44. Record balloon bid postponed: Bad Weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The flight has been postponed due to bad weather. http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_815395.html

  45. *Theoretically* visible... by meowsqueak · · Score: 1

    > The balloon is so big (1,250 feet tall) that it
    > should be visible from most of the UK, Ireland and
    > Western France as it climbs.

    Does anyone else find that overly optimistic? I'm thinking purely about the weather...

    "Is it always foggy in Britain?"
    "No, only when it isn't raining"

  46. Blood boiling? Such melodrama! by titzandkunt · · Score: 3, Informative


    "Should the suits fail at 35,000 feet (10,668 metres) Andy and Colin would lose consciousness. At 80,000 feet (24,384 metres) the pilots would die within a matter of seconds, as the low pressure would make their blood boil almost immediately."

    All this gory talk makes good copy, but it ain't necessarily so: You would lose fluids as vapour from your airways, but this would be gradual. Images of blood boiling in your tortured veins is simply alarmist. Your blood pressure is high enough, and your veinous system is elastic and resilient enough to prevent bulk boiling occurring. More details are here , and essentially all over the web. The seminal publication is "Bioastronautics Data Book, Second edition, NASA SP-3006", which I can't find online, unfortunately. Them Rocket Scientists sure know lotsa stuff!

    T&K.

    --
    Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
  47. 3rd September by dapuk · · Score: 1

    According to http://www.qinetiq1.com/72hourclockframe.html - it is now planned to launch on 3rd september.... Not 2nd.

  48. cool by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

    Feet, miles... means nothing to me. I want to know what it is in *real* units, such as furlongs. :-D (seriously... get with the goddamn metric program already.)

  49. UPDATE: Launch delayed by hoggy · · Score: 1

    The launch of the balloon has been delayed until Wednesday due to the weather. They reckoned that they could have launched tomorrow, but that the weather on Wednesday will be perfect so they'd rather wait a day. Apparently tomorrow will be spent taking an astronaut refresher course with the Russian advisers.

    More at: UK balloon bid put back

  50. Feet are the unit of altitude. by yerricde · · Score: 1

    feet and miles, that not even England uses anymore

    I've read that air traffic controllers everywhere but a couple countries still use feet instead of meters as the basic unit of altitude.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Feet are the unit of altitude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not clear to me whether there any useful reason to keep using these units?

    2. Re:Feet are the unit of altitude. by yerricde · · Score: 1

      If one country switched to meters, pilots would be confused when flying over that country. If all countries switched to meters simultaneously, all pilots would be confused at the same time.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    3. Re:Feet are the unit of altitude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... to minimize the risk of confusing too many pilots at the same time, we should switch to altitudes in meters only plane at a time, and when the pilot reports that he (or she) is no longer confused by the new units, then start giving meter altitudes to the next plane etc... I suggest we proceed east to west, beginning with the easternmost plane in air in New Zealand.

    4. Re:Feet are the unit of altitude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep being funny and somebody will make a business out of translating from English with wacko units to English with sane units.

      But you can laugh while they make money...

  51. gaaaahhhh english article by Reez · · Score: 1

    At least the slashdot news should use metric units ...

    1. Re:gaaaahhhh english article by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      It could be worse - some countries still measure temperature in Fahrenheit!

      weather.com (American) has the option to display temperates in "English" units or Metric units even though in England we haven't used non-metric temperatures for ages (eg on TV) and Fahrenheit isn't an 'English' measurement anyway and the only place I've ever seen Fahenheit used on TV is in America. How stupid is that...

  52. Re:What a jerks by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 1

    Actually, I don't think the original request came from a Brit.

    Brits don't use SI either.

  53. Postponed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was postponed btw http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cornwall/319700 9.stm

  54. Riich guys in hot air balloons by hal9000 · · Score: 1

    "What is this, 1850? I hope they land in a sewage treatment plant and sink with the rest of the turds." -- George Carlin

    --
    Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
  55. Top or Bottom? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

    Will the 132,000 ft. be at the top or the bottom of the 1250 foot high ballon?

    So I didn't read the article. Sue me. After all, SCO and the RIAA will one of these days, so beat the rush!

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    1. Re:Top or Bottom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The height is measured from the bottom (I suppose to stop some smart alec from making a 140000ft tall but reeeaaalllllyyy thin balloon !).

  56. Re:What a jerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes we do

  57. It's as tall as the Empire State bldg... by Yahnz · · Score: 1

    ... and can comfortably take a 3 inch hole (with minimal loss of helium). And the capsule is space-grade. Good luck scratching the paint.

  58. Launch delayed until Wed the 3rd by Illserve · · Score: 1

    read the actual site and not the news article for an update.

  59. Nextel got you beat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The technology behind Zephyr could be used as a communications platform for mobile phones in remote areas, or disaster zones, or even by the military for surveillance."

    No, I don't see why they would try to do what Nextel did. In an effort to cover the entire USA with coast to coast wireless communications 2-way walkie talkie, they built that 400,000 foot radio tower. That covers a lot more area than these baloons that only go 132,000 feet. :p

    1. Re:Nextel got you beat by sane? · · Score: 1
      Really, a 75 mile high radio tower ?

      Must have missed the story about someone building a space elevator on the news.

  60. Re:Lord Dweomer is a Joey by rokzy · · Score: 1

    maybe you should actually read the thread, retard. the original poster was whinging there was no use for this so I pointed out one of the uses you'd see if you actually RTFA.

    nobody mentioned men in black or privacy but you. I don't know what your problem is but I suspect medication would be a good idea.

  61. Or maybe ... by OzPixel · · Score: 1

    Surely that'd be "Hey, I can see my house from here".

    David.

  62. PLS MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    informative

  63. MOD PARENT UP by TexVex · · Score: 1

    MOD PARENT UP

    Thank you.

    --
    Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, wait until you get your own moderator points! Screaming doesn't help anybody.

  64. maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  65. No Launch by anantaiyer · · Score: 1

    Wonder if anybody has noticed but the Launch has been delayed. Its will now take place on September the 3rd. "Like the other guys said its just a load of Hot Air"

    --
    The purpose of existance is to find the perfect sig
  66. I hope... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    They have good parachutes. Just in case. Some bottled oxygen probably houldn't hurt either.

    --
    C|N>K
  67. Launch On Hold by jea6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In case anybody is reading this far, the launch is on hold until 3-9 due to inclement weather.

    "Conditions were not suitable for the launch. All being well, it will happen as planned on Wednesday morning," said the spokesman.

    --

    sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
  68. SI Units (again) by bludger · · Score: 1

    The original altitude was given in feet, which is valid as that is the standard unit used in aviation worldwide, however when converting to units understandable by normal humans, they should have converted to miles and km so that more than ~10% of the world's population (ie. Britain and the US) can understand it. That there are always a lot of comments whenever someone posts in non-SI units is not because these people are anal-retentive and overly fussy, but rather that most people get fed up with journalistic laziness forcing them to constantly convert to something meaningful.

  69. UPDATE: postponed until 3rd by sciuro · · Score: 1

    They have postponed the flight until tomorrow (3rd) since there was to much cloud cover. The weather forecast for Wednesday is perfect, though...

    -duncan

  70. Attempt delayed by British weather! by adeyadey · · Score: 1
    As always.. sigh..

    balloon attempt on hold..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  71. Too bad by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

    that we have this seedy looking gray cloud clover over the whole country for the last few weeks. Can't see a building 1km away.

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  72. Re:What a jerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We already do. (the left)

    We weren't forced to change over by Napoleon to remind us that we were a conquered people.