Slashdot Mirror


Galileo, Consumed by Jupiter

Conceived in 1977, launched in 1989, the spacecraft Galileo ends its 34th orbit exactly one hour from now, hitting the atmosphere at 48 kilometers a second. In its long history, it taught us much, despite the failure of its main antenna that left only its tiny backup to send data, but its enduring legacy will always be the discovery that Europa's icy crust hides a planetary saltwater ocean. That ocean's potential for alien life is why the craft will self-vaporize: to avoid possible terrestrial contamination. The JPL's webcast starts roughly now, and should last about two hours (light delay). Don't miss the view from the prow and impact animations. If you're into these spacecraft and the people who build them, read Journey Beyond Selene. And while we grieve for Galileo today, remember, orbital insertion for Cassini-Huygens is only 283 days away!

We ran stories about Galileo's impending incineration earlier this month and last November when the plan was decided.

Here is a typical passage from Journey Beyond Selene, about the worst glitch in Galileo's mission, and the beginnings of how it would be worked around. Failures and the engineers who salvage them are the recurring tragic, triumphant story of our missions into space. Reproduced without permission:

With such triply redundant hardware built into their spacecraft, mission planners could feel confident that they had designed a communications system that was almost completely resistant to failure, and for the first eighteen months after Galileo's 1989 launch, there was no reason to assume anything would fail. Finally, on April 11, 1991, when the ship's trajectory had spiraled out as far as the edge of the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, JPL planners decided it was at last probably safe to unlock the high-gain antenna and spread its ribs. It was only then that they'd learn if triply redundant was redundant enough.

Though the deployment of the high-gain system was not a complicated exercise, it was a critical one, and for that reason the chieftans of the Galileo project made sure they were there to watch it happen. On hand at the flight director's console that afternoon were mission director Neal Ausman, deputy mission director Matt Landanow, and project manager Bill O'Neil. O'Neil and Ausman were far and away the higher ranking of the three men, but Landanow, they all knew, was far and away the most knowledgeable. As chief engineer during the Galileo design phase, he had familiarized himself with every strut, nut and rivet of the ship, and could practically describe their placement and purpose from memory alone. If anything went wrong this afternoon, Landanow would likely be the first person to recognize it -- and the first person to come up with a way to fix it.

For the first forty minutes or so after the deployment command went up, O'Neil, Ausman and Landanow had little to do. Like so many other JPL controllers before them, they knew they would have to tolerate the nonnegotiable limits of light speed, waiting twenty minutes as their signal traveled from Pasadena to the spacecraft and then another twenty minutes as it traveled back again. For that entire time their screens told them nothing, flickering merely with the self-evident information that their command had indeed been sent. Finally, after just over the anticipated forty minutes had elapsed, a column of numbers began to blink on the glass. Landanow gave the figures a quick scan and immediately noticed something amiss. He read them again -- a bit more closely -- and this time started to feel downright queasy. The antenna, from all indications, was pulling what the engineers called stall current. The motor was drawing power, the deployment gears were engaged, but the ribs of the umbrella appeared to be going nowhere at all.

"We're stuck," Landanow said flatly.

"How can you tell?" O'Neil asked.

"The current is saturated, something is jammed," Landanow said. "In any event, the antenna's not budging."

Ausman gave the numbers on the screen a read of his own, confirmed what Landanow was saying, and immediately called out to his flight controllers, instructing them to send a second deployment command up to the ship. The engineers complied, and forty minutes later another stall signal came down. A third command yielded a third signal, and a fourth a fourth. With each new report Landanow winced. If he knew this ship -- and he surely did -- he could all but guarantee that whatever was hanging up the antenna was not much: a single too-tight fitting, perhaps, a single protruding bolt, one that was situated in just such a way that it managed to jam all eighteen ribs. If it were somehow possible to transport the Galileo spacecraft to a hangar in Pasadena, Landanow knew he could probably roll over a stepladder, climb up to the antenna, and spring it free with his hands alone. But Galileo was not in a hangar in Pasadena; it was tens of millions of miles away, at the edge of the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, and more elaborate measures would be necessary.

256 comments

  1. transcript from last time this happened in 1995 by andy666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Time Event
    ________ _____
    11:04 a.m. Coast timer initiates probe operation
    12:46 p.m. Orbiter flyby of Io (~1000 km) (No imaging or spectral data collected)
    2:04 p.m. Energetic Particles Investigation (EPI) begins measuring trapped radiation in a region previously unexplored.
    5:04 p.m. Probe entry and data relay
    5:05:52 p.m. Pilot parachute deployed
    5:05:54 p.m. Main Parachute deployed
    5:06:02 p.m. Deceleration module jettisoned
    5:06:06 p.m. Direct scientific measurements begin
    5:06:15 p.m. Radio transmission to orbiter begins
    ~5:08 p.m. Visible cloud tops of Jupiter reached
    5:12 p.m. Atmospheric pressure the same as Earth's sea-level pressure
    5:17 p.m. Second major cloud deck is encountered (uncertain)
    5:28 p.m. Water clouds entered (uncertain)
    5:34 p.m. Atmospheric temperature equal to room temperature on Earth
    5:46 p.m. Probe enters twilight
    6:04 p.m. End of baseline mission. Probe may cease to operate due to lack of battery power, attenuation of signal due to atmosphere, or being crushed.
    6:19 p.m. Orbiter ceases to receive probe data (if still transmitting)
    7:27 p.m. Ignition of Galileo main engine (49 minute duration) to insert into Jovian orbit

  2. Goodbye by c_oflynn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well it has served well - long past how long it was supposed to.

    It's history has been plagued with problems, ones it has overcame.

    If any spacecraft would show the history and power of space travel, I think this probe is one of them.

    1. Re:Goodbye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Don't forget Pioneer 10!
      Pioneer 11 is also somewhere though scientist do not know if 11 is still transmitting signal. After 4 million years(!) it will reach constellation of Aquila.

    2. Re:Goodbye by urbazewski · · Score: 1
      it has served well - long past how long it was supposed to.

      It's history has been plagued with problems, ones it has overcome

      the human adventure is only beginning...

      --
      foldplay your photos won't know what hit them.
  3. Wrong tense by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Galileo, Consumed by Jupiter

    Conceived in 1977, launched in 1989, the spacecraft Galileo ends its 34th orbit exactly one hour from now

    Little early for the past tense 'consumed' don't you think?

    (I can already see the 'not any more' post below this one in an hour)

    1. Re:Wrong tense by born_to_live_forever · · Score: 1

      Call me premature:
      "Not any more".

      48 minutes and counting...

      --

      - Peter Ravn Rasmussen

    2. Re:Wrong tense by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      Little early for the past tense 'consumed' don't you think?

      Well, Jim, it sure as hell ain't going anywhere else... As good as consumed, I'd say.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    3. Re:Wrong tense by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Funny
      Little early for the past tense 'consumed' don't you think?

      By the time this ungodly slashdotting ends and I will finally be able to see NASA's pages on the topic, Galileo will already be consumed by Jupiter... so in a way, it's probably correct.

    4. Re:Wrong tense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Little early for the past tense 'consumed' don't you
      > think?

      lall not any more!!!

    5. Re:Wrong tense by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      He might be a subscriber :P

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    6. Re:Wrong tense by p3d0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you notice the comma? It's not "Galileo consumed by Jupiter", which is past tense. It's "Galileo, consumed by Jupiter" which has no tense.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    7. Re:Wrong tense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to the original poster, who had pretense.

  4. Wow, I was worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I heard on the radio that there was a chance the plutonium in the probe was going to ignite Jupiter into a second star, and it would kill/sterilize most humans on Earth! Glad that didn't happen.

    1. Re:Wow, I was worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not due to crash for another hour. It'll not be until about 3.40EDT that we'll know if the world is going to end or not.

    2. Re:Wow, I was worried by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently there was also a possibility that Mission Control would be trampled to rubble by a herd of stegosaurs. Glad that didn't happen, either...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:Wow, I was worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Here's a little snack for the troll ... if you heard it on the radio, it probably wasn't a reputable source. See http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/jupiter_galil eo.html

    4. Re:Wow, I was worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you calling George Noory of Coast to Coast AM a bad source?! I am SHOCKED, and OUTRAGED by this. Sure, he's no Art Bell, but he's on nearly 500 radio stations, and that many people can't be wrong.

    5. Re:Wow, I was worried by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I heard on the radio that there was a chance the plutonium in the probe was going to ignite Jupiter into a second star, and it would kill/sterilize most humans on Earth! Glad that didn't happen.

      I heard that you can't get radio reception in a room lined with tinfoil.

    6. Re:Wow, I was worried by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      herd of stegosaurs

      stegosauri?

    7. Re:Wow, I was worried by thatgun · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. According to my Astronomy class that i took a little over a year ago, Jupiter would have to be 85 times (!) larger in order for the possibility of any sustainable fusion to take place

    8. Re:Wow, I was worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the extra paranoid remember to ground the tinfoil (worked for the insides of my electric guitar.. 60hz hum is evil)

    9. Re:Wow, I was worried by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

      As ou say, nonsense. It's almost big enough already. Doubling it's size would do the trick. It doesn't need to be 85 times larger.

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
    10. Re:Wow, I was worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 1/80th the size needed...look it up.

    11. Re:Wow, I was worried by Noren · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nonsense. Apparently you missed all the other quotes on this thread, or didn't believe them. Just in case it'll help, here is the math. Note that Jupiter is not even close to half of the mass required for sustained fusion.

    12. Re:Wow, I was worried by eljasbo · · Score: 1

      I read this same silly theory in 'Behold a Pale Horse' by William Cooper (a complete cult evil government conspiracy theorist bible) several years ago. According to him, this was designed to cause a widespread panic and make people think the end was coming to bring in the 'new world order' of Orwellian government. The star was already named 'Lucifer'. According to him though, the probe was origionally supposed to go down in the atmosphere in Dec. 1999 i believe.

    13. Re:Wow, I was worried by tuba_dude · · Score: 1

      Ah, Coast to Coast. Who doesn't like hearing paranoid delusions as they try to get to sleep?

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    14. Re:Wow, I was worried by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Sure, he's no Art Bell

      Actually, it was Art Bell.
      He's back, working weekends on Coast to Coast AM.
      No, I only listen as practice in spotting the good science and the unwitting comedy.

    15. Re:Wow, I was worried by hayden · · Score: 1
      I heard on the radio that there was a chance the plutonium in the probe was going to ignite Jupiter into a second star, and it would kill/sterilize most humans on Earth! Glad that didn't happen.
      You don't happen to write SEC repports for a living do you?
      --
      Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    16. Re:Wow, I was worried by SEWilco · · Score: 5, Informative
      That was obviously from the "Radioactive things will explode easily" believers with a sense of "If I haven't seen it before, it is something new" for history.

      • The plutonium is too little for a bomb, and arranged to only warm a device which converts heat to electricity.
      • There is plutonium in those cinder blocks around your basement, and in the lawn and rock garden. BOOM!
      • Someone forgot those big comet pieces which hit Jupiter a few years ago. If a fireball was going to ignite Jupiter we would have seen it happen then.
      • No matter how much hydrogen is in Jupiter's atmosphere, it won't catch fire or explode. Not enough oxygen.
      • A fire, even on a planetary scale, won't give off enough heat or light to bother our planet.
      • Even amateur astronomers know that Jupiter is well known for affecting asteroid orbits, and undoubtedly has been hit by many asteroids. Even a small metallic asteroid has many more fissionable elements than have been mined or that we can reach to mine them. So huge amounts of radioactives have already hit Jupiter.
      • Those asteroids also created fireballs bigger than Texas. The little heat is less than nothing.
      • Life is dangerous. Jupiter isn't a threat. A few days ago we got blasted by a star far across the Milky Way with more power than the Sun hits us with. If a nova or another magnetar like that one nearby hits us, then we either have something to worry about or we won't have anything to worry about ever. All our eggs are in this one basket.
    17. Re:Wow, I was worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original guest was earlier in the week with George. Art just repeated it.

    18. Re:Wow, I was worried by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      I heard that you can't get radio reception in a room lined with tinfoil.

      Shhh. As long as he doesn't realize that, our bugs can still transmit to us.

    19. Re:Wow, I was worried by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Confirmation of the exact amount of additional mass needed is left as an experiment for the reader.

    20. Re:Wow, I was worried by Spencerian · · Score: 1

      Give mod points to this man for his excellent facts and insight.

      --
      Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    21. Re:Wow, I was worried by aled · · Score: 1

      Yes and you can start a thermonuclear explosion with a lighters if you ignite a few atoms of hidrogen. Now that you know please don't ever light a fire again.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    22. Re:Wow, I was worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is plutonium in those cinder blocks around your basement, and in the lawn and rock garden. BOOM!

      There is not.

      Plutonium, radioactivity aside, is perhaps the most toxic substance there is. Less than half a microgram inhaled will cause death.

    23. Re:Wow, I was worried by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Yes, there is plutonium there. Even more uranium and thorium.

      Notice that cinder blocks may include...cinders. Ash from coal. Concentrated minerals.

    24. Re:Wow, I was worried by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      While there may be plutonium in cinderblocks - there would be VERY little of it - just whatever got dispersed into nature over the last 50 years from bomb tests and leaks. If we're talking about whether there is so much as an atom of it, then you may technically be correct.

      Plutonium is NOT a naturally-occurring element.

      Uranium, on the other hand, is.

      Otherwise, the grandparent post was right on...

    25. Re:Wow, I was worried by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
      Of course nothing could possibly make Jupiter turn into a star other than self replicating gray rectangles from Europa.

      Having said that, I wonder how long it would take the reactor to get from Jupiter's outer atmosphere to somewhere near the core.

      Another Idea: Suppose Jupiter were made of mostly Deuterium instead of Regular Olde Hydrogen. Would it be big enough to fuse then? Probably the heaviest elements of Jupiter are somewhere near the center of the planet, but might there be a layer of heavy hydrogen below the regular atmosphere? I doubt it since there are heavier things than hydrogen in the upper atmosphere, and because there are tons of storms to mix things up..

      Also since the probe vaporized on hitting the atmosphere, there'd be nothing left of it.

      I wonder if there is enough pressure, or how deep you would have to go into Jupiter to compress the reactor enough to make it go supercritical and explode like a nuke. I realize that the isotope used in the reactor is not the same one used by weapons. ( they use a less radioactive Pu isotope in bombz so that the Pu doesn't blow itself apart before it can fission completely ), but since Jupiter is a pretty big planet, there must be some huge pressures in there, maybe enough to make Pu 238, or is it Pu239, I can never remember explode.

      Not that it would matter. Shoemaker Levy hardly made a spot on Jupiter, what would a measily Nuke do?

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    26. Re:Wow, I was worried by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Uranium on the surface or in the air (i.e., coal plant fly ash) can get hit by cosmic rays and be changed to plutonium. That's in the links above.

  5. We PWN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we've guaranteed NOBODY can watch the webcast. Way to go /.

  6. Outstanding achievement by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was reading this article earlier and I was thinking what a sickening feeling it must have been when they realised that the main antennae was not going to deploy properly leaving them up the creek so to speak. I think its a brilliant achievent that they managed to recover from this huge setback, reprogram the vehicle, retask the mission to focus on the Jovian moons and still get so much useful information. A very cool piece of engineering improvisation.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Outstanding achievement by s20451 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The quest to get usable data out of Galileo has driven some of the world's most advanced communication and signal processing algorithms over the past few years. AS a result they were able to achieve a better than ten fold increase in data rate from 10 bps to a maximum of 120 bps, a pretty spectacular achievement that saved the mission. You can read the technical details here

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    2. Re:Outstanding achievement by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it really was quite a feat. Although it's not that shocking: the folks at JPL have recovered missions from so many engineering SNAFUs that they deserve canonization. (The Cassini-Huyegens problem also springs to mind, along with Apollo 13, NEAR/Shoemaker, and others.)

      Still, NASA doesn't often point this out, but we did lose out on a lot of data. In particular, the cloud observations were pretty much scrapped altogether. (Rather than look at the clouds during much of its Jovian orbit, Galileo had to spend that time reading back data from the recorder and beaming it back ever-so-slowly.)

      But my real regret is that we'll never be able to retriever Galileo to take its worthy place in a museum. She was a fine ship and served us well.

    3. Re:Outstanding achievement by danila · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It must have been at least five times higher (600bps) in order to get the 30Gb they mention in the articles. And since it probably started transmitting lots of valuable info only halfway into the mission, it might have been as high as 1200bps on average, which means something like 2400bps (my first modem!) or even higher occasionally.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  7. Watching online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    FYI, NASA TV has a live webcast here. UATV is another place to watch as they are rebroadcasting the NASA channel...

    1. Re:Watching online by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cheers, didn't know which was going down faster... Galileo or the NASA webcast...

    2. Re:Watching online by jd · · Score: 2, Informative
      There a a billion (or so) CU-SeeMe repeaters of NASA Select, and they also broadcast on the Multibone.


      The CU-SeeMe transmissions are B/W and fairly small image, but update much faster than the webcast.


      The multicast version is in full color, and appears to be 1/2 NTSC image size. (It pixellates slightly at larger sizes.)


      If you've access to the MBone, I strongly recommend getting SDR, VIC and RAT from the MICE project, over at UCL. There should be links to these projects from Freshmeat. There are binaries for most Unixes and Windows. The quality is vastly superior to the other forms.


      If you're stuck on a regular system, CU-SeeMe is still miles better than the webcast, as it's served from many many more sites. The result is that each site isn't hammered bandwidth-wise. Besides, web-based updates tend to be in seconds (cos refresh is lousy). CU-SeeMe broadcasts from NASA tend to be in the order of 7-15 frames per second, depending on the time of day and net usage.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Watching online by c_oflynn · · Score: 1

      Damn... both servers reached their capacity for streams.

    4. Re:Watching online by john_uy · · Score: 1

      The site of NASA is running Speedera. I doubt the video file could have slowed down the site (unless the service of Speedera is not good, which I doubt.)

      --
      Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  8. It's probes like this... by kevinatilusa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    that show that "faster, better, cheaper" shouldn't mean cutting as many corners as possible while earthside. Galileo was probably one of the top few probes ever on a measure of information learned per dollar spent NOT because we saved money while building it, but because it was built so well that it just kept on transmitting when by all rights it should have gone quiet a long time ago.

  9. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only an hour and a half left for me to panic!

  10. Live webcast? by Chicane-UK · · Score: 4, Funny

    The JPL's webcast starts roughly now, and should last about two hours (light delay).

    Hehe.. and just so that it doesn't feel left out, that JPL webserver is currently experiencing what its like to get smashed into Jupiter at 48km/s :)

    Good old Slashdot.

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    1. Re:Live webcast? by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 2, Funny

      for the non metricaly inclined, the JPL server is travelling at 29.82 miles per second, or 107,000 miles per hour.
      If you are thinking "what about significant figures?" then no one loves you.

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
  11. As something else conceived in 1977 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet launched much earlier, I must bid my brother farewall!

    1. Re:As something else conceived in 1977 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you born prior to your conception? Are you Merlin or something?

    2. Re:As something else conceived in 1977 by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1

      In a copulatory sort of way, you could say he was "launched" about ten months earlier...

    3. Re:As something else conceived in 1977 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I meant conceived at the same time, yet I was launched prior to Gallileo. See, I was born about 9 months after conception, rather than a decade later.

  12. More History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    A more indepth look at the history of Galileo can be found here. It's interesting how the didn't even originally plan for the observation of Jupiter.

  13. HOW DID YOU FIND OUT! by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Funny

    How did you find out my master plan!!!

    PINKY! Here, NOW!

  14. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are discussing it. See here.

    1. Re:Wrong by kfort · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I wouldn't call that a discussion. Log in coward.

  15. Re:a new Sun? by WTFmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny
    Maybe it will turn jupiter into a mini-sun, and the ice on Europa will start to melt, and the moon (now a planet) would slowly become habitable, and we'd discover that life (which was already there, but not very advanced) would start to evolve faster, and finally be able to come out of the oceans...

    Man, that would make a great book.

  16. The suspense is unimaginable! by Dan+Weaver · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been looking forward to Galileo's collision with Jupiter for weeks. I can't wait to see which one wins!

    1. Re:The suspense is unimaginable! by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

      The planet was found to be using an illegal hold, and disqualified.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:The suspense is unimaginable! by Gamasta · · Score: 1

      I can't wait to see which one wins!

      You may find it obvious, but make a google fight to be sure. Google fight link here

      Ok, Jupiter really wins.

      --
      reason defies logic
  17. Galelio for nobel prize by civilengineer · · Score: 1

    And while we grieve for Galileo today, remember, orbital insertion for Cassini-Huygens is only 283 days away!

    I am grieving that the satellite exploring jupiter is dieing. How should I be happy with a satellite that is exploring saturn? I nominate Galelio for nobel prize in science.

    --

    New year Resolution: Don't change sig this year
    1. Re:Galelio for nobel prize by 7759-60784-1-E · · Score: 1
      I am grieving that the satellite exploring jupiter is dieing. How should I be happy with a satellite that is exploring saturn? I nominate Galelio for nobel prize in science.

      You will understand if Galileo is unable to make it to the ceremony, I hope.

    2. Re:Galelio for nobel prize by tc · · Score: 1
      The Galileo team might be able to make it of course...

      Galileo itself is ineligble; Nobel prizes are never awarded posthumously.

    3. Re:Galelio for nobel prize by Webmoth · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... the phrase "orbital insertion" would be more appropriate if the craft was approaching Uranus.

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    4. Re:Galelio for nobel prize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thou art not funhney, Webmouth strikes agina.

  18. Alternate feeds of NASA TV by deglr6328 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since Jamie rather thoughtlessly posted a direct link to the JPL real stream and now none of us can see it; please visit NASA's website listing all the alternate feeds for NASA TV and use one of these instead.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  19. Re:a new Sun? by jandrese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, good thing the didn't try to land it on Pluto and set the whole planet on fire. You might want to take some nuclear physics at some point as well, it is quite enlightening to learn what being nuclear really means. Hint: It doesn't involve the magical ability to blow up everything it touches.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  20. Slashdot saves Galileo! by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    NASA Press Release: Due to an unprecedented amount of web traffic on the announcement of the Galileo space probe's imminent plunge into the Jovian atmosphere, the Galileo comms computing center was brought to its knees. NASA engineers showed their ingenuity once more, as the flood of internet traffic was directed to the Galileo probe itself, heating Transistor QB-2542a, allowing the main antenna to unfold and allow the original planned communication range, in addition to acting as a miniature solar sail to push Galileo on a recovery arc around Jupiter. NASA Galileo Command would like to extend appreciation to Slashdot and its readers for allowing the unqualified successes of the Galileo mission to continue.

    --
    ...
  21. RealBad by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

    The JPL's webcast starts roughly now

    Crap. All NASA offers is RealPlayer.

    Miss seeing Galileo crash into Jupiter
    or
    Spend thirty minutes clicking half a dozen hidden, misleadingly named submenu checkboxes to retain my privacy. And then spend three days un-doing RealPlayer's attempt to take over my entire system and all file extensions.

    Screw it. I won't download any insertions into bodies no matter how heavenly if it's in RealPlayer format. Definitely not gonna start with something's that not porn. I'll catch the 2 minute recap on the news.

    1. Re:RealBad by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 2, Informative

      nope, two streams are in windows media format. Though I'm not sure if that's better or worse.

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    2. Re:RealBad by Nexzus · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the links.

      The Windows Media stream is a lot clearer. I'm getting it at 232k a second, as opposed to the 34k from Real.

      --
      Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
    3. Re:RealBad by Basehart · · Score: 1

      I'll catch the 2 minute recap on the news.
      More like 2 seconds. Ben and J-Lo are bigger news than spacecraft crashing into Jupiter on this planet!

    4. Re:RealBad by DeKO · · Score: 1

      You can always use Real Alternative

    5. Re:RealBad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in other news, some fucking nerds broke their toy or something.

    6. Re:RealBad by CvD · · Score: 1

      Or boot into Linux and watch it with MPlayer. :-)

      Cheers,

      Costyn.

  22. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People have been talking about it on slashdot for over a year and a half. In short, NASA probably wants the explosion to happen.

  23. interesting? by smoondog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Heh, historically jupiter has been hit by rocky objects that could have been mistaken for planets. The article you link to is awful, and should be modded as funny. Particularly the first sentence of the conclusion, "Let's all keep in mind that NASA has lost two shuttle crews because of its own internal political problems." It is pretty pathetic that the best they can come up with is this.

    -Sean

  24. Re:a new Sun? by orthogonal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe it will turn jupiter into a mini-sun, and the ice on Europa will start to melt, and the moon (now a planet) would slowly become habitable

    I'm sorry, haven't you heard that Europa is forever off-limits to us?

  25. Re:a new Sun? by kfort · · Score: 1

    an ac above posted this link. I'm still not quite convinced, as their main argument seems to be that form of plutonium is *impossible* to fission.

    Well we are talking about a lot of material under pressures (within jupiter) that I'm pretty sure havn't been tested at that level on earth. Perhaps 238 just needs more material/pressure than we have tested it at, but when it does go off the reaction could be gigantic.

  26. Re:a new Sun? by Jerf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Plunging into ever increasing pressure, no one knows for sure if this will cause a chain reaction, but the potential energy and temperatures are enormous.

    Are you fucking nuts? Talk about "argument from ignorance"! "I don't understand the first bit of what I'm talking about, but I'm going to babble on anyhow!"

    I will personally guarentee you that vast quantities of plutonium, and for that matter every other known element, already exist in Jupiter. Just because it's a "gas planet" doesn't mean it's made entirely of gas.

    Moreover, if anything was going to "set Jupiter off" it would have been set off already! Remember Shoemaker-Levy 9 smacking in Jupiter? That's huge quantities of energy, large enough to roil up clouds larger then Earth itself! And that's nothing compared to what even Earth has seen in its history, let alone the King of Planets. (There's no way to know but personally I'd bet at least one moon-sized impact has hit Jupiter in the past. Your choice of "Jovian moon-sized" or "Earth moon-sized".)

    The only "danger" from forty pounds of plutonium several light minutes away are the quantities of hot air it can still generate here back on earth. Get over your pathetic 1950's-era nuclear fears already. It's just matter, not black magic!

  27. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It hit both of us almost at the same time, basically the circles started appearing the moment the Galileo mission headed on a one way trip to Jupiter back in 1989. It may be a coincidence, but it is an uncanny one for sure. A logical approach could be: if you were quietly watching and studying a seemingly intelligent and self-aware alien life form doing something this stupid to its environment, would you tell them? The answer to that may very well be lying in the crop fields around the world.
    uh huh...
  28. Hmmm... by tds67 · · Score: 1
    Galileo, Consumed by Jupiter

    Great...let's make the gas giant even gassier...

    1. Re:Hmmm... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      This is the recovery pill after Shoemaker-Levy 9 left it with a monster of a hangover. lol

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  29. Re:a new Sun? by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1
    So kfort sez:

    "Noone seems to be talking about the danger that there are 40 pounds of Plutonium-238 (the most volatile form) on board this craft. Plunging into ever increasing pressure, no one knows for sure if this will cause a chain reaction, but the potential energy and temperatures are enormous."

    You are an idiot. Please die. NOW!

    Wipe the drool from your slack lips and have someone click HERE for you and read the facts.

    Oh, and don't forget to please die, NOW!

    Thank you kindly.

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  30. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You gotta do more to plutonium than kick it to cause a critical mass. Even a hot pile would go up with kilotons, not megatons.

    We couldn't "ignite" jupiter any more than we could move it.

  31. Re:a new Sun? by Dan+Weaver · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi, no offense, but this is the most laughable thing I have ever heard.

    a) The main fissionable form of plutonium is Pu-239, not Pu-238.

    b) Even if this was Pu-239 on board, forty pounds thereof is a borderline critical mass. You would need tampers to make it a good bomb.

    c) Even if this was Pu-239 on board and there was enough of it for a critical mass, it is not arranged in a critical geometry that will produce good fission under a Jovian pressure crush.

    d) Even if this was Pu-239 in a critical mass in a critical geometry, Galileo lacks the tritium primer required to kickstart a fusion reaction from a fission reaction.

    e) Even if Galileo had a working thermonuclear weapon on board, a thermonuclear detonation on Jupiter would not blow up Jupiter, because there isn't enough of an oxygen fraction in the Jovian atmosphere to set the hydrogen afire. Think about it. Jupiter has collided with large asteroids and comets before now. These collisions give off heat considerably in excess of any nuclear detonation. The huge pressures at Jupiter's interior produce heat considerably in excess of any nuclear detonation. If Jupiter could have turned into a star (it cannot) it would have done so by now.

    f) Learn more about physics.

  32. Re:a new Sun? by Niksie3 · · Score: 1
    I call bullshit. quoted from http://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/nineplanets/nineplanet s/jupiter.html
    The chance that such a small quantity of plutonium would cause the whole damned planet to blow up is pretty small to say the least.
    Jupiter radiates more energy into space than it receives from the Sun. The interior of Jupiter is hot: the core is probably about 20,000 K. The heat is generated by the Kelvin-Helmholtz mechanism, the slow gravitational compression of the planet. (Jupiter does NOT produce energy by nuclear fusion as in the Sun; it is much too small and hence its interior is too cool to ignite nuclear reactions.) This interior heat probably causes convection deep within Jupiter's liquid layers and is probably responsible for the complex motions we see in the cloud tops. Saturn and Neptune are similar to Jupiter in this respect, but oddly, Uranus is not.
    --
    Sig you!
  33. Re:a new Sun? by Avian+visitor · · Score: 1

    Probably no one is talking about that because everyone knows that a comet exploded in the Jovian atmosphere. The energy released there was way beyond anything those pounds of Pu could do.

    The article you are linking tells how the jovian atmosphere could compress that pile of Pu like the explosives in the nuclear bomb. It is not that simple.

    To achieve a chain reaction that would cause an explosion you need to compress plutonium in a fraction of a second.

    The plutonium battery that is falling through the atmosphere would be only slowly squeezed (if it manages to stay in one piece in the first place). If it achieves the right pressure it could become above critical but that does not automatically mean an explosion. It just means that the pile will slowly heat up. The temperatures at the depth this would occur are way higher than those that would be caused by the (slow) chain reaction in the Galileo's battery.

  34. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BULLSHIT. The whole reason why it doesn't start a chain reaction is because when it decays it produces bits that aren't unstable, and doesn't produce and neutrons. The only plausible way it could go critical would be if it had been capturing neutrons and most of it was 239 by now (which produces a neutron in decay)

  35. Re:a new Sun? by zaffir · · Score: 1

    238 is NOT that volatile. I'll say that right now. For the rest of your education, read this.

    --
    "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
  36. Scientists == bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you expect from arrogant scientists. These are the same people who designed nuclear bombs and are regularly funded by the Pentagon. They're probably eager to see something like that happen to Jupiter.

  37. BONK! by Tablizer · · Score: 0

    In one of the animations, it shows a moon coming around from the left side of Jupiter just as the spacecraft is heading into Jupiter. If their aim is off a bit, it seems to me that it could possibly hit that moon instead of jupiter, defeating the purpose of the maneuver to begin with.

    Then again, that moon's orbit looks a little close to be Europa's. It might be Io, in which case it would probably boil the probe and spit its dust out in a volcano in a few million years or the like.

    1. Re:BONK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, moderators, I don't understand your complaint.

  38. Re:a new Sun? by theycallmeB · · Score: 5, Informative

    Short version: There is absolutely nothing to worry about. Read on for the long version.

    That is because throwing 48 pounds of Pu-238 (which is useless as weapons grade material, Pu-239 is much better for sustaining fission chain reactions) into Jupiter is like tossing a salt shaker into the ocean. Jupiter already has massive radition belts generated by its interactions with the solar wind. It has surely ingested more than 48 pounds of the various isotopes of Uranium from the thousands or millions of meteorite strikes Jupiter has sustained. And the total energy that could be released by complete fission of all of that plutonium into stable elements would insignificant next to the gravitational-potential energy released by the steady contraction of Jupiter's gas clouds that results from the planet's massive gravitational pull. Because of this contraction, Jupiter already releases significantly more energy back into space that it absorbs from the sun.

    Finally, with a total mass that is about 0.0001 times that of the Sun, Jupiter is too small to support fusion reactions in its core by about two (2) orders of magnitude. The smallest stars are about 0.08 times the Sun's mass.

  39. Re:a new Sun? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    haha.

    thank you for the best laugh of the day.

    "While it is a giant catcher, it is also the largest pressure cooker of our solar system and it could crush Galileo's 48 pounds of Plutonium. The result could be a Jovian Nagasaki with dire consequences for humankind." in the article and this masterpiece next to it as advertisement "Now that we're past the Nibiru fear mongering, is this ancient planet still orbiting our Sun? Yes, and right now we have the luxury of time to prepare ourselves mentally and spiritually for its next flyby. When it happens, the unprepared will become dumbfounded fate fodder, wishing desperately for luck. Meanwhile, the mentally prepared will already know how to make their own luck."

    hahah ooo boy... yourowncrackpots.com

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  40. Re:a new Sun? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    No... Pu-238 cannot generate a run-away fission reaction because, as the article states, "the products of this fission ... just don't have the right characteristics to create a chain reaction".

    You see, for a fission reaction to runaway, when an atom of material splits (which is triggered by, say, bombardment by neutrons), the reaction emits various forms of energy. In a run-away fission reaction, the splitting of one atom generates enough neutrons to cause other atoms to split, and so on. From the article text, as well as the linked document on various Pu isotopes, you see that Pu-238 cannot do this! Why? Because the split of a Pu-238 atom does not generate the necessary products (ie, neutrons in sufficient number) to sustain a chain-reaction.

  41. Sad News by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

    I heard on the radio that there was a chance the plutonium in the probe was going to ignite Jupiter into a second star, and it would kill/sterilize most humans on Earth!

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - NASA probe Galileo was incinerated in Jupiter's atmosphere this afternoon. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss it - even if you didn't enjoy its transmissions, there's no denying its contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

  42. This is quite cool by UltraWide · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This spacecraft has been in a very hostile environment for a long time now and to kill it they have to plunge it into the biggest planet in our solarsystem. That is what I call engineering.

    The strange thing though is that their site (Nasa) cannot hold up on the preasure from slashdot.

    --
    I really HAD another userid .. I promise!
  43. MOD PARENT TROLL!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a moron. It isn't even funny. See above posters.

  44. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asking people to die doesn't seem terribly useful. Perhaps you're not as intelligent as you'd like us to believe.

  45. Cassini-Huygens & the Olsen twins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    orbital insertion for Cassini-Huygens is only 283 days away!

    Hey, the Olsen twins will be legal before then (265 days). Not that I'm watching or anything.

  46. Re:a new Sun? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
    It's the wrong configuration. We're not even talking straight plutonium in Galileo, it's Plutonium Oxide, in lots of little containers. Getting that to critical mass, which when done deliberately requires a carefully machined perfect sphere of pure plutonium, of the right isotope, surrounded by carefully positioned explosives that are charged to all go off at exactly the same time, strikes me as pretty much impossible.

    (Far be it for me to engage in ad-hominems, but my BS-meter also goes off on the basis of who's promoting this theory and who's ridiculing it. The main supporters seem to be crop circle theorests, such as those at YOWUSA, and Illuminati-conspiracy enthusiasts. Meanwhile nobody at NASA seems to believe it's going to happen. I feel safe.)

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  47. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps 238 just needs more material/pressure than we have tested it at.... the reaction could be gigantic.

    Jesus. And if your mother had wheels she "could be" a truck. Please realize that we have progressed beyond the 13th century. Science is not a process of trying things out and seeing what happens. We understand a good deal about HOW and WHY these things work, due to brilliant theoretical work by generations of scientists. And we have tested and refind our theoretical understanding of physics through countless experiments.

    We may have a long (infinite) way to go before we understand EVERYTHING but we know a lot about how Pu238 works, and it won't frigging explode.

  48. Relativity, Light cones, and cats by isorox · · Score: 1

    This is what I dont get about light cones and relativity. We know that the probe will hit jupiter at ~ 19:00GMT, however we cant see it happen until nearly an hour later. Does this mean it doesnt happen until nearer 20:00GMT? Is it something to do with Scrodinger's cat? Because theres no way for us to know its not hit the planet does it mean it hasn't?

    1. Re:Relativity, Light cones, and cats by sonoluminescence · · Score: 1

      It's this sort of thinking which is giving science a bad name ;)

      At 19.00 we can definitively say that, from out rest frame, the probe had, one hour ago, a high probability of hitting jupiter, however at 20.00 it can be said that by far the most probable outcome occurred, (an hour ago) it hit. If we don't look inbetween it can be said that the probe occupies some combination of all possible probable states.

      confused?

      So am I.

      God does not play dice.

      --
      Karma: Bad. Calmer, good.
    2. Re:Relativity, Light cones, and cats by Dan+Weaver · · Score: 1

      Cool answer: NASA has FTL communications. Real answer: NASA isn't actually seeing it plunge or losing radio comms, but they know when it's going to hit 'cause they did the math. :)

    3. Re:Relativity, Light cones, and cats by MSBob · · Score: 1
      You're getting into trouble because you're assuming that time is constant. In practice time is a function of velocity. There is no absolute 19:00GMT.

      If you board a hypothetical spacecraft right which can travel at say, 0.9c so you'll get to jupiter in time to watch the event. If you take your stopwatch with you you'll see that only a few minutses went by since you boarded the spacecraft. However for the rest of us an hour will have passed since you left. It doesn't quite make sense to say that the crash will happen at 19:00GMT. For us it will happen then, but we will find out about it an hour later (20:00GMT) because that's when the light wil l get to us. For you, the hypothetical astronaut the event will have occured at 19:10GMT.

      Relativity is fun, innit?

      There is no constant in the universe but c.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    4. Re:Relativity, Light cones, and cats by isorox · · Score: 1

      Relativity is fun, innit?

      No

    5. Re:Relativity, Light cones, and cats by isorox · · Score: 1

      The clock on galileo is pretty much the same as the clock on earth isn't it - after all it was only traveling at 0.00004c. If I flew out there in my fast space ship, I know my clock will change, but I can reset it to "Earth time" when I get to galeleo as

      1) I can see the time on earth (big telescope), and know how far in light seconds I am away
      2) I can see the time on galileo which is the time on earth give or take a nanosecond.

      However, why am I flying towards galileo? Time goes slow for me because I'm moving from galileo's POV, but from my POV galileo is flying towards me. Yeah I know its the twins paradox, but I never understood the resolving of it

    6. Re:Relativity, Light cones, and cats by RobinH · · Score: 1

      However, why am I flying towards galileo? Time goes slow for me because I'm moving from galileo's POV, but from my POV galileo is flying towards me. Yeah I know its the twins paradox, but I never understood the resolving of it

      You are basically saying, if you get in a spaceship, and blast off towards Jupiter, is it you moving or Jupiter. It seems obvious, but how do we know??? Well, you were the one who accelerated... you turned some potential energy into kinetic energy with your rocket (increasing your mass by the equation E=mc^2), so you did the accelerating, so time on Jupiter will pass faster than in your spaceship... I think.

      Here's a good one for you... the solar system is already moving through the galaxy in some direction, so if I blast off and head backwards from Sol's heading, wouldn't that make time pass faster for me, not slower? Would I be going slower relative to the galaxy's speed? Would that mean my mass would decrease? I really never figured that one out. Perhaps the sun and our solar system only accelerated due to gravity, and that doesn't count... oh, my head hurts...

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    7. Re:Relativity, Light cones, and cats by isorox · · Score: 1

      Yes. Or If I'm on the spacecraft and someone on earth sees me at 0.9c, and I launch another clock back to earth at the same speed, that clock is accelerating away from me, so should be going slower then me (who is already slower then earth). However it is not moving relative to earth, so should be going at the same speed of earth? Shouldnt it?

    8. Re:Relativity, Light cones, and cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is no constant in the universe but c.
      Well, there's zero. That appears a lot.
    9. Re:Relativity, Light cones, and cats by MSBob · · Score: 1

      Velocity is always relative. There is no single "middle of the universe" so every speed is relative. If the second spacecraft is stationary relative to earth, then its clock will run at the same speed as a terrestial clock.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    10. Re:Relativity, Light cones, and cats by isorox · · Score: 1

      But it accelerated away from the first space craft, who's clock was going slower then earths (from an observer outside the solar system). Surely by accelerating away from the spacecraft your clock will be slow relative to that spacecraft.

    11. Re:Relativity, Light cones, and cats by MSBob · · Score: 1
      OK. I'm off my rocker here. However, I've found this explanation which to my (untrained) eye looks like a very plausible theory. It argues that upon reunion no time shift will have ocurred between the travellers.

      Obviously this is the twins paradox with a twist. I know that the prevailing notion has to do with the shrinkage of space but I find the explanation in the link above much more compelling.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
  49. No oxygen? lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there isn't enough of an oxygen fraction in the Jovian atmosphere to set the hydrogen afire

    Hydrogen fusion doesn't require oxygen, just look at the sun.

    Learn more about physics.

    Sounds like a good idea.

  50. Unexpected last transmition from Galileo.... by arcite · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave. I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I've watched C beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time like tears in rain. Time to die." .... Sounds like he needed some love. ::sniff:::

    1. Re:Unexpected last transmition from Galileo.... by chronoso · · Score: 1

      "My god, it's full of stars" ...had to be said

    2. Re:Unexpected last transmition from Galileo.... by Salsaman · · Score: 1
      Even more appropriate:

      All these worlds are yours except Europa. Attempt no landings there.

    3. Re:Unexpected last transmition from Galileo.... by datan · · Score: 1

      private property - trespassers keep out

    4. Re:Unexpected last transmition from Galileo.... by hplasm · · Score: 1

      "Dave, my butt is burning. I can feel it."

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    5. Re:Unexpected last transmition from Galileo.... by unixfan · · Score: 1

      Hmm, sounds a lot of what I remember the android (replicant) in Blade Runner telling Harrison Ford as he was waiting to die, sitting in the rain on the roof.

      Sean Young was the prettiest thing you had ever seen too...

  51. Why? by Enonu · · Score: 1

    Could somebody tell me the logic of why we destroy probes after their useful life is over? I'm sure my great-great-great grandchildren would get a kick of being able to fly to Jupiter and retrieve the probes themselves. It's an important piece of history, and I don't see why we need to initiate its own destruction.

    1. Re:Why? by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 1

      We don't want Galileo to crash into Europa, as it looks like it support life-as-we-know-it.
      If it were to land (or crash) there, and we later found life there, we wouldn't be sure that the life hadn't come from microbes hiding in the probe.
      (Since we will probably just find microorganisms)

      By crashing it into Jupiter (which is rather hostile to earth-life), we can be sure that any life on Europa grew there on it's own, not seeded from a dirty probe.

    2. Re:Why? by applemasker · · Score: 5, Informative
      Because of Galileo's extemely elliptical orbit -- think of a comet around the sun -- (required because it's mission was to visit most of Jupiter's moons), it's constantly in need of tweaking in the form of thruster firings to keep it from blundering into something (besides Jupiter) while still keeping its antennae pointed towards Earth.

      The maneuvering fuel is nearly gone, and the spacecraft components have sustained many tens of times their design tolerances of radiation. Taken together, it's entirely possible that Galileo would soon become uncontrollable and crash somewhere like Eurpoa, where we may one day send probes to search for life. Because Galileo was not sterilized before launch, it would contaminate wherever it ended up, and could cast doubt of any future test results from expeditions there.

      (As a testimony to the hardiness of life, microbes on a camera lens or something were brought to and back from the moon, it wasn't until later that they realized someone sneezed on the lens or some nonsense and the damn bugs survived the whole round trip).

      While it would be nostalgic to have left Galileo in orbital purgatory around Jupiter, it's not possible to do this with any assurance that it won't later be a hazard. It is fitting, in a way, that Galileo will become part of Jupiter, the target of so much of its (and his) focus. If only NASA would bring the success of this mission into the public spotlight as a way to raise awareness as to its more successful programs.

      Coming soon to Saturn - Cassini, July 4, 2004. (Alas, the last of the "great explorer" probes.)

      --
      Bush Lies On the Record.
    3. Re:Why? by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      We usually don't, but as there is a good(by comparison) chance Europa has life, we don't want to risk Galileo crashing there.

    4. Re:Why? by Jeff+Fohl · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Cassini was loaded with plutonium, or some other highly radioactive substance. If the same tactic is used for Cassini when it has finished its work with Saturn, is there reason to be concerned about dropping it into that planet?

    5. Re:Why? by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 2, Informative

      The amount of radiation in Galileo's plutonium decay generator is insignificant compared to the radiation the Jovian moons get from Jupiter's magnetosphere and background levels of cosmic rays - it'd be a bit like a needle made of hay in a haystack.

      Any bacteria on the craft would probably be killed by the radiation as well, but it isn't really worth taking that chance (life is amazingly tenacious).

      But more thanjust the "safety" aspect, there are real reasons why Galileo had to go down - JPL wanted ot use the starfinder camera to observe some rocks near Amalthea that may have been magnetically lifted off the surface of the moon, and they wanted to use it's final minutes to observe parts of the exosphere.

    6. Re:Why? by Peter+Greenwood · · Score: 1

      Life, as lots of others have said. However ... ISTR Jupiter itself being rated as the most likely place in the Solar System to find life, bar none (even Earth). I know that was before the discovery of the ocean on Europa, but still I would have thought they'd try to avoid contaminating Jupiter too.

      --
      freedom, n. Allowing people you don't like to do things you disapprove of.
    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      By crashing it into Jupiter (which is rather hostile to earth-life), we can be sure that any life on Europa grew there on it's own, not seeded from a dirty probe.

      No!!!!!!!!!! Haven't we learned anything from b rated video games

      They're coming....

    8. Re:Why? by tasidar · · Score: 1
      No!!!!!!!!!! Haven't we learned anything from b rated video games

      Offtopic, but your post doesn't make sense unless you include the plot

      From the link, "The plot of the game is simple: aliens from Jupiter want to wipe out the humans because a human Jupiter probe killed a good number of aliens."

    9. Re:Why? by Izmunuti · · Score: 1

      "Cassini was loaded with plutonium... is there reason to be concerned about dropping it into that planet?"

      Yes. The plutonium will, in all likelihood cause Saturn to collapse into a small, unstable star. This will last a few months and then it will explode. The shockwave will cause Jupiter to similarly collapse. Being larger, the small star Jupiter forms will last a bit longer but it will also explode, more violently. This shockwave will destroy the Earth. Basically, you have 500 days to live so you should sell everything and transfer the proceeds to my paypal account. Izmunuti@bigliar.com.

      In truth, worrying about Cassini having any effect on Saturn is like worrying about ill effects from the nitrogen atoms in the air bumping into your skin. About the only thing that could be dropped into Saturn that would make a difference would be a black hole.

      Iz

    10. Re:Why? by frankie · · Score: 1

      Jupiter is so insanely freaking huge, contaminants from Galileo really wouldn't matter. If there's life in Jupiter it's floating in the storms and 100x more populous than all total life on Earth.

    11. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, but what if the unsanitary probe introduces something that can thrive there and compete or overwhelm the native life.
      I dont want pissed off aliens from a high gravity world coming to kick our asses.

  52. Hehe by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bet they miss!!

  53. Act of War - Interplanetary Terrorism by digitalgimpus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The United States government is flying a spacecraft into another Planet.

    Sound familiar?

    1. Re:Act of War - Interplanetary Terrorism by fenix+down · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry, the Jovians will probably just pass a bunch of opressive legislation to demoralize their population and then destabalize their economy to pay for blasting Mercury into the sun. We'll be fine.

  54. Thanks Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There I was watching the webcast and then about a minute left to go the webcast gets slashdotted... sigh

  55. from a telemetry station in JPL... by lone_marauder · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hey, look we finally got the antenna open.. oh, wait, never mind."

    --
    who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
  56. not just slashdot by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    This is mentioned on all the major news sites.

    --

    -

    1. Re:not just slashdot by UltraWide · · Score: 1

      Well ... what I meant was the "slashdot effect" ;-)

      One thought of this effect:

      I live in Sweden and when Anna Lindh was murdered all of the major newssites as well as the TV sites and the government sites went down.

      The Internet is becoming one of the major places for information on what happens in the world. And I think it is time to think about this. I mean I use the Internet to look up information about practically everything. It is becoming an intergral part of the society, at least in the "western world".

      I think that the leading information sites need to fix this issue being "slashdotted" when critical information needs to be spread to people.

      We still have TV and radio, but for how long?

      --
      I really HAD another userid .. I promise!
  57. Last post! by clovis · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's gone. Nothing to see here folks, just move along.

  58. picture of the last minute... by joeldg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here is an image of my browser which managed to make it to the webserver in the last minute before Galileo crashed into Jupiter.

    http://lucifer.intercosmos.net/g.jpg

    It is kind of sad..
    and I don't know why.

    1. Re:picture of the last minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trying to convince everyone that you don't use windows?

    2. Re:picture of the last minute... by EverDense · · Score: 3, Funny

      That picture is all brown, I guess Gallileo landed in the shit.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
  59. Memorial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The COSMAC ELF website has a memorial up. On the the message board someone pointed out that at an impact velocity of 108,000 miles per hour, this makes the old 1802 quite a bit faster than a Pentium.

  60. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you get your news from some place that has an advert for Godschild Covenant: Return of Nibiru, then I think you have worse worries than whether the 40 pounds of Plutonium will light up the Jovian atmosphere.

    I mean, it's not as if this stuff is... well, wait. It is rocket science. These folks have spent the better part of 3 decades using planets as slingshots and solving problems of instrument damage due to radiation by pushing current through the circut, thus annealing it and fixing it. I think that at least a few of them have degrees in physics. I think that at least a few of them have fellow academics that they could ask that have degrees in physics. (sarcasm) If tossing it into Jove was the solution for not contaminating Europa, I'd say it was highly likely that the issue seeding it as a sun was discarded long ago.

  61. Re:a new Sun? by Dan+Weaver · · Score: 1

    Good point - sorry about that! Of course oxidative combustion has nothing to do with turning into a sun. I should have been more clear in saying that the detonation would neither set Jupiter on fire nor kick-start nuclear fusion.

  62. Yes, but what about Nitrogen? by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    While we're screaming wildly and flapping our arms, I want us to remember that there is continual concern over at my club, that the next nuclear test could set off a Nitrogen-chain-reaction, thereby blowing up the whole world. We've been very fortunate that this hasn't happened yet.

    Now, I know that there isn't much Oxygen on Jupiter, but does that mean that there is no Nitrogen on Jupiter? It does not. Therefore I have proven that...

    friend pulls tin hat down around ears, then down to chin

    mph fph mumph fffhp...

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  63. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can a post like this have score higher than zero?

    Seriously!

  64. Journey Beyond Selene? by VampireByte · · Score: 1

    Selene Dionne builds spacecraft also? Wow, she is truly amazing.

    --

    Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

    1. Re:Journey Beyond Selene? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I think you've slightly misquoted that one - they are gonna send Celene Dion and other "major stars" on a tour of the galaxy :)

      unfortunately what they dont know is its a one way mission ending up smashing into Jupiter.

      The upshot of this - even if they miss and crash into Europa, they can still say theres no intelligent life out there

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  65. Wait a minute... by SixDimensionalArray · · Score: 1

    Was I the only one listening to the original Star Trek theme song at the exact spacecraft time of impact??

    That would be a shame. Please Slashdot tell me that we all proudly showed our respect in true Trekkie style! LOL ;)

  66. Life on Jupiter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there is intelligent floating gas bag life-forms on jupiter the are going to be pretty pissed at us for dumping all that radioactive waste on them.

  67. Seems like a good time to expand on my usual .sig by SYFer · · Score: 1

    "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness of human genius are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and that the whole temple of man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruins."

    --Bertrand Russell
    (from "A Free Man's Worship")

    --
    "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
  68. Re:a new Sun? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

    Someone's definitely been watching too many movies. What's the maximum yeild possible for that much Plutonium? Ivy King, to my knowledge the largest fission bomb ever detonated, had a core of about 60 kilos of highly enriched uranium and produced an explosive yeild of about half a megaton.

    Comet SL9 fragment G hit Jupiter with an estimated force of 6 MILLION megatons.

    If it was that easy to cause a fusion reaction in atmospheric hydrogen, we'd all have fusion reactors in our basements by now.

  69. Re:a new Sun? by Saeger · · Score: 1
    Hmm. You seem to know a little too much about nuke-u-lar bombmaking ... I'm going to have to report you to General Asscroft for suspicious anti-idiot behavour.

    Ignorance is strength! Go USA! Woo woo woo.

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  70. Relative to ...? by carambola5 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    48 kilometers a second

    So, that's 48 km/s relative to what? If it's correct to assume the writer meant "relative to Jupiter," then that is ridiculously fast. IIRC, typical orbits around Earth manage only ~8-10km/s.

    Yes, I realize Jupiter is larger than Earth, but still...
    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
    1. Re:Relative to ...? by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Informative

      Jupiter is not "larger" than Earth, it's a whole hell of a lot larger than Earth. According to Google:

      mass of Jupiter / mass of Earth = 317.816611

      So Jupiter has 317 times the mass of Earth. That's why the orbit is faster.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:Relative to ...? by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, why is that ridiculous again?

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    3. Re:Relative to ...? by imnoteddy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So, that's 48 km/s relative to what? If it's correct to assume the writer meant "relative to Jupiter," then that is ridiculously fast. IIRC, typical orbits around Earth manage only ~8-10km/s.

      Metis [MEE-tis] is the innermost known satellite of Jupiter. According to this page Metis orbits at a mean distance of 127,969 km with a Mean orbital velocity of 31.57 km/sec. So 48 km/sec is not so ridiculous.

      --
      No electrons were harmed creating this post, though some may have been subjected to electrical and/or magnetic fields.
  71. Do we have a second Sun yet? by gilh · · Score: 1

    According to this we should have a second Sun in order heavens by now. Break out the tanning lotion!

    1. Re:Do we have a second Sun yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes ! I see two Sun...
      No wait a minute is just to much Tequila !

  72. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No comet fragment can reach Jupiter's core. The only way to reach the core is by sinking slowly, but then by definition you don't have kinetic energy. If the plutonium inside Galileo explodes, it won't compare with SL9 in terms of megatons, but it will be the first time an explosion occurs so deep inside Jupiter. I hope you can see the qualitative difference.

  73. Adios by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

    It was a great time! I Salute you, Galalaeo! ps, nominate galalaeo for TIME person of the year!

    --
    Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
  74. What if by MSBob · · Score: 1

    What if it finds a monolith there? What then? Has anyone thought about this?

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
  75. Re:a new Sun? by shokk · · Score: 1

    Yet we know for sure that you are a friggin moron. Stop wallowing in your ignorance and read something that will actually educate you. There is more to the Internet besides the Black Helicopters newsletter.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  76. Just great, another 'lost' planetary probe. by dzurn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yah, sure, they crashed this one *on purpose*. They forgot Jupiter was so big is my guess.

    Tell me another story, Grampa.

    I ain't buyin' it. NASA just screwed up again and arranged the phony paper trail on their website, complete with press releases, as a massive coverup. Hey, if they can make up a Moon Shot (Capricorn One? Galileo 2003? Sure!) then they can definitely cover up a screwup like this one.

    1. Re:Just great, another 'lost' planetary probe. by BadluckShleprock · · Score: 0

      Actually, Capricorn one was a Mars shot, not a Moon shot, but it is used by conspiracy theorists as a "based on actual events" type movie regarding faked moon landings.

      --


      ------
      There's a fine line between cuddling and holding someone down so they can't get away.
  77. Re:a new Sun? by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 0, Troll

    "a new Sun? (Score:-1, Troll)
    by kfort (1132) on 2003.09.21 14:10 (#7018761)"

    Ha-HA!

    I bet YOU feel like an Inamate Carbon Rod right now.

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  78. Re:a new Sun? by jonabbey · · Score: 1

    Jupiter's already on continuous fire, most likely.. the only reason Earth has a high-fraction oxygen atmospher is because we have living systems cracking carbon dioxide and producing more oxygen all the time. In other places without life (like Mars), whatever oxygen might have been present chemically burns against other elements.. that's why Mars is so red, all the rust is iron burned with oxygen.

    Chemical burning of that sort is going on here on Earth, of course, but life is faster and more energetic at producing oxygen than chemical burning is at getting rid of it.

  79. Re:a new Sun? by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

    "Re:a new Sun? (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on 2003.09.21 14:47 (#7018985)

    Asking people to die doesn't seem terribly useful. Perhaps you're not as intelligent as you'd like us to believe."

    Stupid people need to die. There's too many of them as it is, and despite how stupid they are, far too many of them eventuially breed and the result is even MORE stupid people.

    It's gotten to the point where Darwinian selection needs all the help it can get.

    If one stupid person actually DOES die because of my encouragement, then the collective I.Q. of the Earth enjoys a collective increase. And if they die before they breed, so much the better.

    So many idiots, no where NEAR enough opportunities for them to kill themselves.

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  80. USA Attacks Jupiter!?!?! by ferrellcat · · Score: 4, Funny

    First, Afganistan, then Iraq, and now JUPITER!!!

    When will this administration stop?!?!?!?

    1. Re:USA Attacks Jupiter!?!?! by BTWR · · Score: 1

      First, Afganistan, then Iraq, and now JUPITER!!!

      When will this administration stop?!?!?!?


      Wow! You're hysterical! Even more hysterical is that "this administration" that was around when Galileo was conceived was the Nobel Peace Prize winning 38th President of the USA, Jimmy Carter.

    2. Re:USA Attacks Jupiter!?!?! by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, we didn't start this war! Remember September 11th, 2001? And recently, British Intelligence has learned that Jupiter tried to buy uranium from Venus.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:USA Attacks Jupiter!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And recently, British Intelligence has learned that Jupiter tried to buy uranium from Venus.

      Uranium, surely, is from Uranus?

  81. Requiescat 1802 by panurge · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Some of my earliest development work for embedded systems was done on the old 1802 processor. The intended environments were transportation related and pretty hostile. It's nice to know that we made such a good choice, and that an 1802 holds the record for the longest traveled microprocessor ever built.

    You may not have had a proper subroutine mechanism, you may have had a bizarre instruction set (with a SEX instruction no less), but you were the first processor for which I ever wrote a set of floating point routines. Rest in peace, old friend.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Requiescat 1802 by CelloJake · · Score: 1

      "an 1802 holds the record for the longest traveled microprocessor ever built"

      hmm.. how far has the earth traveled since the first microchips were built? I assume we are talking about motion relative to the sun, since that is the most relevant when comparing the motion of this probe to other microprocessors.

      It seems like the processor in my Apple II has traveled along way since it was built. But I would be interesting to see what the difference in heliocentric distance traveled by Galileo and an object on the surface of the earth would be.

      BTW, I am not even a hobbiest astronomer, so don't flame be too bad if I said something stupid. I am just curious.

  82. Re:Why? Life (?) at risk! by Frodo420024 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Could somebody tell me the logic of why we destroy probes after their useful life is over?

    Briefly, it's because it might otherwise crash into Europe (the moon, not the continent). It has itself discovered that conditions (water) exists on Europe that might habour life (however primitive), and crashing a sattelite from Earth with possible bacteria might contaminate Europe (the moon) with lethal bacteria.

    It might sound like far-fetched science fiction - it ain't. It's the official reason for the Jupiter crash.

    --
    I'm in a Unix state of mind.
  83. Re:a new Sun? by RayBender · · Score: 4, Informative
    No comet fragment can reach Jupiter's core. The only way to reach the core is by sinking slowly, but then by definition you don't have kinetic energy. If the plutonium inside Galileo explodes, it won't compare with SL9 in terms of megatons, but it will be the first time an explosion occurs so deep inside Jupiter. I hope you can see the qualitative difference.

    Bzzt. You fail physics. 1) the probe will likely be vaporized into a 1000-km trail of dust by the impact with the atmosphere at 48 km/s. It won't slow down intact and then sink into the core of Jupiter. 2) The temperature reaches the melting point of metal a few thousand kms down into Jupiter. Even if the probe was intact by the time it sank that far, it would melt/dissolve long before it reached the core. 3) The RTG's contain Pu-238, which as has been stated repeatedly, is not suitable as a nuclear explosive. 4) Even if there was an explosion, it is so incredibly miniscule compared to the mass/size of Jupiter that it simply would not matter. 5) Jupiter CANNOT sustain nuclear fusion - it simply lacks the mass. The pressure in the core is far too low to overcome Coulomb repulsion between protons so that they can fuse. The minimum mass of a star that can sustain fusion is approximately 75 Jupiter masses. That is very, very well-understood physics (look up the astronomical tem "brown dwarf").

    --
    Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
  84. Re:Relativity, Light cats, and cones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God does not play dice.
    Yes I do!

  85. Nobody asked me by jmichaelg · · Score: 1
    If JPL had just asked, I would have suggested sending Galileo down the center of the polar eye.

    Cassini sent the movie of Jupiter's pole as it flew by on its way to Saturn. Given the enormous winds on Jupiter, the eye could extend a dive into the atmosphere a lot further than going in anywhere else as the pressure has got to be substantially lower inside the eye. Getting a signal out of there would be tricky but just try and imagine what's at the bottom of the eye.

    1. Re:Nobody asked me by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Florida?

  86. Alien Life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jupiter's oceans has no demonstrable potential for "alien life."

  87. Noooooo I missed it! by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    Anybody got an copy of it? (yes you can save Real Steams)

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  88. Well... by mike3k · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least it didn't get stuck in Uranus.

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, we have decided to change that name to end this stupid joke once and for all. It's now called Urectum.

  89. the saddest part... by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the saddest part is that the craft went on the blind side of jupiter before it went down. So, we didn't get to see its final transmition. Did some scientist at NASA do that on purpose, to let it die with dignity?
    What it also means is we don't actually know for certain that it crashed. I mean, maybe on the blind side it pulled back up, was rescued by a spacecraft, or...who knows! Wasn't ther ean old original Star Trek that went along those lines? An old space probe that went nuts, and spawned a civilization?

    1. Re:the saddest part... by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      Wasn't ther ean old original Star Trek that went along those lines? An old space probe that went nuts, and spawned a civilization?

      Yes.

  90. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try to land it on Pluto and set the whole planet on fire.

    World of Ptavvs, anyone?

  91. Re:Why? Life (?) at risk! by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    or, infect it-- if europa is sterile, this could have been a leg up

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  92. Fox news by rodionpunk · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think my favorite commentary on it was from Fox news here last night, which noted that if the plutonium core exploded, then "it would disrupt the entire galaxy." This, after a perfectly fine report on Galileo. It was the last sentence of their blurb -- something to give you warm fuzzies, I guess.

    I was wondering what level of disturbance would be required before the entire galaxy was "disrupted" -- simply being visible across the entire galaxy, a tremor like an earthquake, or something more sinister? Perhaps Fox needs a galactic Richter scale to better scare the masses. "It's a 0.00009 on the Asimov scale, which doesn't seem like much and we won't feel any effects; but if you were there, you'd be killed, alright!"

  93. Re:a new Sun? by Jediman1138 · · Score: 1

    Well, it's nearing 5 PM Eastern here in Indiana. No new sun yet....It's alright, though.../sarcasm/We all know that those fission reactions take some time to start up.../sarcasm/

    You guys give me a buzz when the unthinkable happens, I'll be getting my cans of Ensure ready ;-)

    --

    nothing.can.stop.me.now

  94. Jupiter's Escape Velocity is 56 km/sec by localroger · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's just that much bigger than Earth. The figure startled me at first, too.

    It's amazing that the atmosphere probe, which entered at 47 km/sec, managed a controlled deceleration and survived.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  95. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nowhere is one word.

    retard.

  96. What makes you so sure? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    There is no constant in the universe but c.

    Bet? (-:

    Or if you prefer something less radical, consider that there are a number of other constants tied to c; in other words, they are as constant as c is.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  97. The noonday brightness of human genius... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...also built the defunct high-gain antenna. (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  98. Re:a new Sun? by Xenothaulus · · Score: 1
    The only "danger" from forty pounds of plutonium several light minutes away are the quantities of hot air it can still generate here back on earth.

    I know I'll get modded redundant for this, but that has to be the best retort I've ever read. Kudos.
  99. This is gunna sound very when-I-were-a-lad, but... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...because it's /. I naturally feel compelled to say it anyway. If the accretion theory is true (and there's lots to say that, like so many other astronomical theories, it's largely imaginitis), Jupiter has been hit by many objects larger than the Moon. Jupiter is many objects larger than the Moon.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  100. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    f) Learn more about physics.

    Although I think it's a bit silly to run in a circle flapping arms about mysterious nuclear explosion that might set Jupiter on fire...

    Why do people always assume that something they read in a book MUST be true? And then use that to fuel their own arrogance? Everything you THINK you know about Physics MIGHT be wrong.

  101. The save-the-Darwinism fund? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    It's gotten to the point where Darwinian selection needs all the help it can get.

    Well, there's always Neo-Darwinism or the New Synthesis, and when that starts looking too silly there'll be some variant of Punctuated Equilibrium raised, you can be sure. Darwinism is important to a lot of people - their religion is based upon it, <irony weight=crushing>so they won't let it die off naturally, as it should</irony>. (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  102. Re:Why? Life (?) at risk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Briefly, it's because it might otherwise crash into Europe (the moon, not the continent).

    The name of the moon you're thinking of is Europa, although there is a much less interesting Jovian moon named Europe.

  103. A Faraday cage around the transmitter... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...seems more appropriate.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  104. This is terrorism!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There should be a law about crashing spaceships against alien planets during September !!!

  105. Only two years late... by ThePatrioticFuck · · Score: 1
    Look at the prow view now, shades of 2001 :)

    "My god, it's full of stars..."

    TPF

  106. Re:This is gunna sound very when-I-were-a-lad, but by Jerf · · Score: 1

    Jupiter is many objects larger than the Moon.

    Touche. ;-) (With the proper accent which I'm not sure how to type in this environment.)

    Something I now wish I had posted: "There aren't any cosmic bombs waiting to go off, because on the Cosmic scale, the universe is always throwing sparks at things. If Jupiter didn't blow up during accretion, it's not going to. Every planet is constantly bombarded by high-energy cosmic rays, and constantly bombarded with high-energy kinetic impacts. Anything that can be lit off has been."

    Oh well, can't get it all.

  107. Antenna is spelled a-n-t-e-n-n-a. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It ends with an "a."

  108. Slashdot behind the times by mpsmps · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure why this story is being posted now. "Galileo consumed by Jupiter" happened in around 1610. Galileo's consuming obsession with Jupiter ultimately led to his condemnation for heresy in 1633. This is a totally appropriate subject for Slashdot's righteous indignation, but is kind of late in coming, especially since he was exonerated (sort of, John Paul II waffled a bit) in 1992.

    Don't forget, this is Slashdot, no need for me to RTFA.

  109. Ah, so you /like/ big sparks? (-: by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    on the Cosmic scale, the universe is always throwing sparks at things

    Like this one. Flat bottom, paired damage, steep sides, right-angled crossings, almost ignores surrounding terrain... doesn't fit anything except arc machining. A good one to watch from a long way off. Notice also the paired craters scattered all about.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  110. Re:a new Sun? by dynoman7 · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, haven't you heard that Europa is forever off-limits to us?

    No. No. That's Myanus, not Europa.

    --
    Blarf.
  111. Re:a new Sun? by AlienRelics · · Score: 1

    How is that insightful? The author obviously didn't get a humorous reference to 2001: A Space Odyssey.

  112. Remember to support JIMO by tjstork · · Score: 1


    NASA is working on a really, super exciting project called Jupitor Icey Moons Orbitor. This project, should it be allowed to proceed with full funding, would:

    a) Create a space based nuclear reactor
    b) Use that reactor to power an ion engine
    c) Use that ion engine to not only get to Jupiter in record time, but also to explore all of the major moons and for months at a time.
    d) The power from the nuclear plant would be used to do a deep penetrating radar scan of Europe and the other icey moons. This will allow for the detection and analysis of oceans out in all of the major Jovian moons that might have them.

    JIMO is the most dynamic, most new, most novel, most daring and ambitious of all NASA space projects to date. If it means cutting manned space flight, if it means cutting a fricking aircraft carrier, JIMO MUST be allowed to launch.

    If you can build an unmanned ship with a nuclear powered ion engine, you can build a manned ship with one too. Sending robots to jupiter will help us send people --really--- into space.

    Whatever your political affiliation, urge your congressman to support JIMO. Or, let's just all take up a collection and write JPL a check for the thing!

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Remember to support JIMO by MeatMan · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe they should work on getting everyone all home intact rather than in itsy bitsy pieces first. If a piece of friggin' foam no bigger than your head can incinerate a billion dollar Space Plane and they're too st00pid out the gate to realize that, I sure as hell don't want nuclear reactors and ION engines raining down on me.

    2. Re:Remember to support JIMO by rleibman · · Score: 1

      Whatever your political affiliation, urge your congressman to support JIMO. Or, let's just all take up a collection and write JPL a check for the thing!

      Unless, of course, you are a Libertarian and believe that there's a)much, much better things to do with our research money and b) much cheaper ways of getting the same things done if all of this was privatized.

    3. Re:Remember to support JIMO by applemasker · · Score: 1
      Lost in the post-Columbia ducking-and-cover was the unveiling of its nuclear propulsion initiative, perhaps ironically titled "Project Prometheus."

      Appears to be a follow-on to the Project Orion (nuclear launch to interplanetary travel idea) of the '50s, without the atmospheric hydrogenbomb vs. pusher-plate. Ion propulsion is good and clean, but probably too slow for manned interplanerary flight (in terms of other consumables that would have to be carried) unless there is a real habitiability breakthrough. Plus, by the time you reached max. accelleration, you'd have to pitch around and start braking so you can maneuver into a capture orbit. Might be intriguing for trans-Jupiter flights, but gravity assists are pretty standard now.

      At some point, an Europa Orbiter / Lander / Submersible was proposed (Icepick was the name, I think), it got axed in one of the budget fights.

      --
      Bush Lies On the Record.
  113. we grieve for Galileo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we grieve for Galileo?

    It's just a disposable probe. I no more grieve for Galileo than I do my broken toaster.

  114. Re:Why? Life (?) at risk! by Frodo420024 · · Score: 1
    The name of the moon you're thinking of is Europa.

    Sorry :)

    That's how we spell Europe in Denmark - should've stuck with that...

    --
    I'm in a Unix state of mind.
  115. This is what happened.... by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If he knew this ship -- and he surely did -- he could all but guarantee that whatever was hanging up the antenna was not much: a single too-tight fitting, perhaps, a single protruding bolt, one that was situated in just such a way that it managed to jam all eighteen ribs.

    "Glorkie, are you sticking gum into Earth probes again? How many times have I told you not to do that. *Sigh* Come here child. Please stay by my side."

  116. Plane change burn would have been needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cant be arsed making a sign up name, but

    You would need a HUGEEEEE plane change burn to be able to change the inclination enough to go into it. there would have been no chance.

    Mark

  117. What about contamination of Jupiter? by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    While I agree that Europa looks promising as a potential well of life, are we so sure that Jupiter is sterile? Some SF writers have suggested that bouyant lifeforms could live at some appropriately warm and dense level of the Jupiter's atmosphere. If creatures on Earth can thrive on the chemical energy in our planet's relatively weak geothermal hot spots, who knows what might exist in the roiling depths of the Jovian atmosphere.

    I am really not that worried. Between the years in a hard vacuum, bazillion Rads of radiation, and reentry, I doubt any terrestrial organism would survive, let alone find edible/infectible biomass on Jupiter. But you never know....

    I hope Jupiter's Jellyfish don't get E. coli.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  118. Re:Why? Life (?) at risk! by fataugie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't Europe already contaminated with life?

    Damn Europeans...

    (Take it easy, just a little US-centric humor)

    --

    WTF? Over?

  119. What about it? by Royster · · Score: 1

    The heat of entry will burn up and melt Galileo and any bacteria which may have hitched a ride..

    If you're really concerned, think about the plutonium we'll be dumping into Jupiter from the 'reactor' on board. Well, don't worry about that either because it will get dispersed over a huge volume.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  120. I'll take that deal. by tjstork · · Score: 1


    I would be perfectly willing to eliminate all private investment from government if you are willing to make enforcement of contract terms something not enforceable by any law. After all, why should government interfere with the business of contracts? :-)

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:I'll take that deal. by rleibman · · Score: 1

      Complicated political Rant, and off-topic. But... Why should government interfere with the business of contracts?
      Because (in Libertopia) we as individuals deletage to our government our rights to use non-emergency retaliatory force. I'm all for contracts naming arbitrating organizations other than government, which would work perfectly well as well, but then, in perfect regression somebody needs to enforce the contract with the arbitration agency if they should fail to work correctly.
      Contract insurance (and enforcement) is a nice alternative, VOLUNTARY, way to fund government.

  121. did Galileo ever pick up any signals from.... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    ...from that cylinder shaped object that a Russian probe detected back in the early/mid 90s that was orbiting the planet [Jupiter] nearby? Supposedly the object measured out to 25km in length (which would be the size of the fictional Super Star Destroyer Executor, aka "Darth Vader's Star Destroyer"). When the Russian scientists sent the command to the probe to take a closer look, they then lost contact with the probe. Now back then, a lot of people laughed at Soviet/Russian technology as being backward to Western tech, but we know now that Russian aerospace equipment was/is pretty tough and reliable. I'm also open to the possibility that Fox's *Sightings* program made the whole incident up, but I'd love to have more info either way...

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  122. But there is an intellectual flaw in that... by tjstork · · Score: 1


    A chained set of contracts will result in the same sort of unfree society as a government bureacracy.

    --
    This is my sig.
  123. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least he didn't spell it "Know wear" ;)

  124. seven years early by doubleyou · · Score: 1

    "All these worlds are yours except Europa. Attempt no landing there..."

    So, Galileo died of consumption?

  125. Re:a new Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we try to land on Pluto it will probably upset some Spathi.