Slashdot Mirror


Where Is Spam When You Want It?

Sean writes "In a complete twist to what everybody else is trying to do these days, I need to attract spam to an e-mail address for a research survey I am conducting. I have submitted a few articles to a handful of Usenet groups, and I have signed up to some general mailing lists but so far I have nothing to show for it. How come by personal account gets 100+ spam each day yet when I try to find it I get nothing? Where should I post my address so that it attracts spam?"

52 of 580 comments (clear)

  1. Outlook... by krray · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I ran an experiment to do just this... Originally USENET (a decade ago I did that one), web pages, etc... Hundreds of trap address' across many of the domains in my control -- harvest and block 'em early has been my general method... :)

    I recently took 1 Windows 2K box (SP2) and put it directly online in the DMZ type zone. Do NOT patch it and add no virus software. Load some trap address' (never used before) into the Outlook address book.

    It took twelve (12) minutes from plugging it in to getting many, many infections, to the final spam. Typical time is 3-4 hours usually and I've seen the test go for as long as 8 hours.

    How many people do you know that use Outlook and may have your email in their address book? The bitch of the matter? No Windows here anywhere, well, except for VirtualPC which makes such tests so damn easy -- too bad Microsoft had to buy them up too...

    1. Re:Outlook... by dboyles · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you do this, are you willing to be responsible if someone hijacks the machine and uses it to commit illegal/unethical acts? I know, it's unlikely that this would happen, but knowingly putting an open machine online with the intention of having it compromised is asking for trouble. It's one thing to not know any better, but it's another to be apathetic to the situation.

      --
      -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
    2. Re:Outlook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've done it a half a dozen times now -- and yes, it was monitored and some-what controlled. At the routing level outbound traffic to obvious ports (21,22,23,25,53,80,110,143,443,etc) was throttled or blocked. Unfortunately some infections use mail or web ports to call home...

      A full tcpdump was also in progress (just watching :), logged, and looked through various ways. Honey-pot anyone?

    3. Re:Outlook... by KrispyKringle · · Score: 3, Informative

      Isn't this (more or less) the point of a honeypot? Granted, the owners would presumably step in if they saw anything extremely dangerous going on, but this is fairly common,tried-and-true practice. Ever read _The Cuckoo's Egg_?

    4. Re:Outlook... by dboyles · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't think I'm calling for honeypot operators to be arrested for setting out some bait. I think it's fine. In fact, I think it's a good addition to a security infrastructure. But dropping something insecure out in the open with full knowledge that it will probably be compromised and then likely used for undesireable activities isn't responsible.

      Perhaps I should have made that point more clear initially.

      --
      -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
    5. Re:Outlook... by dboyles · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you leave a box of goodies outside your house, you may be asking for trouble, but you're not accepting responsibility for someone stealing it.

      Okay, let's talk about the box of goodies. Let's say you leave a box of weapons outside with full knowledge that a neighborhood kid will probably find it and will likely use the contents for something illegal. If that happens, do you think you are partially responsible for whatever happens?

      Before you jump all over me for such a hyperbole of an analogy, no, I don't equate running an insecure machine with handing out a small arsenal to the neighborhood kids. But I think you might be able to see my point given so many peoples' reactions of "What kind of parent leaves a gun where a kid can get it?" seemingly whenever a video game violence article is posted.

      Take note of the bold text in the first paragraph. It's key to my point. If that box of weapons was in a place that you could reasonably assume wouldn't be accessible by the hypothetical gunman, I wouldn't place any blame on you, the owner.

      So no, you're not responsible for other's actions, they are, don't be stupid.

      You're exactly right - you aren't responsible for others' actions. In this case, you'd be liable for your irresponsible action.

      --
      -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
    6. Re:Outlook... by dboyles · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ethics and law are two entirely different (and sometimes diametrically opposed) things.

      Very true.

      It is not illegal to set out a machine to be compromised.

      Perhaps not criminally illegal, but I believe the owner could certainly be held liable for damages. Imagine if a virus writer put a destructive virus on a stack of floppies and left them precariously around a public computer lab. When the program on one of those disks gets run by some curious person, don't you feel that the virus writer is at least somewhat liable, even though he didn't "pull the trigger"?

      --
      -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
    7. Re:Outlook... by kd5ujz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, assuming there is no labeling, and with the legal system what it is, you could definitely be held liable. Ever wonder why there are warnings to not light fireworks while they are in your hand/mouth? In this day and age, you have to assume everyone is an idiot. If your server does not have a legal disclaimer, you may very well be liable.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    8. Re:Outlook... by circusnews · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I was about to use one of my mod points in this thread, when I came to this post.
      Okay, let's talk about the box of goodies. Let's say you leave a box of weapons outside with full knowledge that a neighborhood kid will probably find it and will likely use the contents for something illegal. If that happens, do you think you are partially responsible for whatever happens?
      dboyles goes on to make the point that does not equate running an insecure machine with handing out a small arsenal, and that you aren't responsible for others' actions, you are only liable for your irresponsible action. These are both points I agree with, but the analagy used still bothers me.

      Gun's are designed to kill. Computers are not designed for cracking/spaming/etc. If you leave a chain saw out in your back yard, knowing that the kid down the block is (1) a bit whacked, (2) could be a potential danger, and (3) should not be on your property, are you partially responcible for when he kills some one with that chain saw? Now, what if it is the kid on the next block that could be the danger? Or the next city, county state of country? At what point is it no longer reasonable to expect that the public to know something is a threat?

      It used to be enough to run a virus scanner every so often. Now you have to start by patching your systems regularly, then move on to running regularly updated virus scanners, installing and updating firewalls for the network, scanning for spyware, installing and updating desktop firewalls, updating spam filters, chasing drivers, updating applications (add more from the endless list here), all to keep a system going. So I ask again, at what point is it no longer reasonable to expect that the public will know something is or could be a threat?

      And at what point does the public feel that it is no longer reasonable to expect them to know something is or could be a threat when it comes to that "harmless little box on the desk"?

    9. Re:Outlook... by digidave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Knowlingly install a system from the manufacturer's CD and running it on the Internet? The horror! The horror!

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    10. Re:Outlook... by racermd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if it's a honeypot, it is probably monitored at least somewhat regularly. If it ever does become a problem, someone would be able to pull the plug on the machine, both logically and physically, in pretty short order. Yes, 10 minutes is enough time for someone to do some serious damage with and/or to a compromised system. But a close eye on things should keep the damage to minimum.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    11. Re:Outlook... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you are entirely wrong in your suggestion that honeypots are irresponsible. Honeypots provide a way to track and monitor the latest exploits and hackers. In fact if a hacker uses a honeypot in his activites he is much more likely to be tracked and caught because he hacked a logged and monitored machine.

    12. Re:Outlook... by ^Case^ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Isn't this (more or less) the point of a honeypot?

      More or less yes. The major difference is that with a honeypot you make sure that there's only a way in -- you make it impossible for the offender to use the honeypot to carry on attacks from the honeypot. And that does not seem to be the case in this example.

  2. Hotmail. by pi_rules · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sign up for an account there, forward the spam to your new mailbox and start following links to advertisements and such. If they ask for your email address, give it to them. Won't take long.

    1. Re:Hotmail. by norsk_hedensk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      yeah but if they ask for you email address and you give it to them, it is not spam anymore. spam is unsolicited. you giving them your email says that they can email you. unless they say they WONT send spam, but yeah, thats gonna happen.

    2. Re:Hotmail. by caferace · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe your girlfriend is pretty serious about you getting a penis enlargement and some viagra. Ever think about that, smart guy?

  3. Some options... by mgcsinc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Register with every "reputable" company with a "privacy policy" you can find, and make purchases with them. Register a domain with the addy. Put the addy on tons of those little fill out cards that you have to mail in from magazines for free this, free that. Buy subscriptions to tons of Pr0n sites with the addy. Instead of usenet, post on several pay or exclusive product-support forums, where spam-runners can be assured of sure-fire hits. Damn! It's expensive to acquire SPAM!

  4. Domain registry by jhines · · Score: 4, Informative

    I get spam from my domain registry, which has an email associated with it. I get the Nigerian stuff this way.

    1. Re:Domain registry by dboyles · · Score: 5, Funny

      Amazing. Even after you made your millions from underground African money transfers, you still find time to post to Slashdot. What character! I can see why Igwe Emanuel thought you good enough to do business with.

      I, on the other hand, will be out of here as soon as the transaction is complete. So long, suckers!

      --
      -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
  5. Why not by Alystair · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You want spam? You should have put in your email address into the submitted article...

  6. Murphy's Law part2... by Jonin893 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    We all know that the Spam won't show up if you want it. That's against the very nature of spam.

    All annoying things always happen every time except for the one time you try and prove the phenomenon to a non-beliver. Well known fact.

    Good luck at finding the spam (wow, I never thought I'd have say that.)

  7. Ebay by NetDrain · · Score: 5, Informative

    Make an ebay account with your email address in it and just start bidding. This is an excellent way to ruin an otherwise perfectly good email address. I was doing all right on the spam front until I did this. Big whoops. *hits head on desk* Yeah, stupid me.

    You'll quickly become inundated with "How-tos" to Ebay, "official" emails from Ubid by people attempting to fraudulently gain access to your personal information, more tips-and-tricks, more offers from uBid, and of course a plethora of marvelous online drugstore advertisements.

    Enjoy.

    1. Re:Ebay by Izago909 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      About 3 or 4 years ago I started buying things on ebay. As a student, I spent much of my day on campus. Many times, if I needed to get on the internet, a workstation wasn't always available or convenient to get to. The school did have many old 386 and 486 linux boxes that did nothing more than ssh into PINE for email. These things were all over the place. So sometimes I need to be notified of bidding while I was out. Without thinking, I had these sent to my school account. Nobody outside of friends, family, or school related people ever got my address besides ebay. In one year's time, I was getting so much spam that my account (60M quota) would overflow up to 3 times a week. I found myself logging on between classes to delete 30-50 messages. Eventually, I paid the school $25 to give me a new name on the network. This time, I still have only given my address to friends, family, and school related people... but no ebay this tame. 2 years later I still have to get one piece. It should be noted that my school has promised to NEVER use any sort of filtering. They cite censorship concerns, but I have some thought otherwise.

  8. Free porn sites? by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems like there's more than a few people suggesting signing up with free porn sites to get spam.

    Personal experience?

  9. use online greeting card companies by Indy1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    also try porn sites, gambling sites, and more importantly, paste it on slashdot. My spam trap address here gets hit ALL the time, usually several times a day, which has helped me greatly in tuning my firewall.

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  10. If you want to be scientific, don't by gunner800 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you deliberately bait spam, your research will only be about spam as it effects bait e-mail accounts. Your conclusions won't be applicable to normal e-mail use habits.

    Want to survey spam as it effects a normal, real-life, daily-use e-mail address? Get a new address and starting using it as your primary account. Anything less will be irrelevant statistics.

  11. a sure method by Alpha_Nerd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Give it to some of your friends and relatives, soon you'll recieve 20 or so joke chain letters every day...

    1. Re: a sure method by EinarH · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am only recieving wicked screensavers from my friends you insensitive clod!

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

  12. 'Unsubscribe' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    In your own inbox, get a couple of hundreds of spam.

    Take the urls (DO NOT CLICK ON THEM) and strip them of the stuff after the '?' .....

    Go to each of those 'unsibscribe' pages and put the test account in the email to be removed box.

    Its the best way to get spam. The spammers will generally use it as confirmation that your address does indeed exist, and theyll happily put you in their alive list, where you are shure to get everything they are selling.

    1. Re:'Unsubscribe' by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I actually tested that not too long ago. I made a hotmail account, did not use it, or publish the address anywhere. After two months, I found I was getting 10-15 spams a day. So, I started using the 'unsubscribe' links in all of them. In two weeks, I was down to 1-2 spams a day.

      Finally, after another two months, it was back up to 8-12 a day. So unsubscribing did seem to work, rather than hurt.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  13. http://www.spamarchive.org/ by foonf · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was in the exact same situation, actually, and found spamarchive.org to be very helpful. Any one of the files on their ftp site should have enough spam to keep you busy for a while.

    --

    "(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
    1. Re:http://www.spamarchive.org/ by whizkid042 · · Score: 3, Informative

      spamarchive.org is nice, however if you take a look at their stuff you will notice that all of the headers are messed up (because folks forward the spams to spamarchive). I was looking for a large collection of SPAM to train spamassassin with and found spamarchive.org to be unacceptable because the email headers were tampered with.

  14. Re:same problem by Oestergaard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Write a HOWTO and put your real e-mail address in there.

    Worked for me ;)

  15. A few thoughts by rdean400 · · Score: 4, Informative

    - Post a comment on Slashdot with the e-mail address visible
    - If on a popular e-mail provider such as AOL, Hotmail, or Yahoo, put up a profile and go to a chat room.
    - Allow your e-mail address to be listed on any of the directories.
    - Put your e-mail on a Geocities website.

  16. Change your thesis. by CGP314 · · Score: 5, Funny

    New research shows spam no longer a problem!

  17. It's easy. by NerveGas · · Score: 4, Informative

    Put it on a web page which gets any moderate amount of traffic. I did that with some spam-bait addresses, and it's amazing how much they generate. In a few months, they've identified over 22,000 unique servers sending spam.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  18. Research Survey by becktabs · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Research Survey" = getting back at evil ex-girlfriend.

  19. Look at my email addy... by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 3, Informative

    I made up a semi-bogus email addy, it's real in that mail sent to it gets to me, but when I'm done, I'll flush it down the tubes.

    I used it to attract spam so that I could train spamassassin for my use and for a few friends and family.

    I went and dropped it all over usenet in the pr0n groups, went to every viagra site I could find, clicked on every banner add I saw.

    It took a few weeks but I finally got the desired results. You'll have to put up with some extremely offensive email for awhile so make sure the wife and kids can't get to it during this phase.

    After doing this for a few weeks I was getting 50+ spams a day. Now that I have spamassassin all tuned up I just don't check mail on that account. Once I feel that I no longer have the need to tweak SA, I'll just dump the account..

    Too bad this doesn't work for TV commercials...
    HEY! How about an app that, er, nevermind...

  20. worked for me by pretzel_logic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Buy a throw-away domain name and post an index page with a email address. you could also use the method where you record the IP address of the spider by generating the email address on the fly. with [IP of spider]@domain.com and then set up a catch all email box. then you are monitoring the spiders ips and the mail servers ips. this idea was posted on /. a few months back but I couldnt find the link.

    --

    pretzel_logic
  21. Or in other words... by chimpo13 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hi, I'm pissed off at someone and would love to get them bombarded with spam. No, I don't think that'll work on slashdot. Better say "research" instead of "pissed off". Yeah, that should work.

  22. Ask Slashdot by roystgnr · · Score: 5, Funny

    "My deadbeat roommate has pissed me off once too often. On a completely unrelated note, I'm looking for ways to attract lots of spam to an email address for... er... research. Yes, research sounds plausible."

  23. try this one by SHEENmaster · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  24. That depends by dmiller · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you deliberately bait spam, your research will only be about spam as it effects bait e-mail accounts. Your conclusions won't be applicable to normal e-mail use habits.

    The relevance of a baited addres depends on how one does the baiting. I'd say that a handful of usenet posts, pasting it to a couple of web pages, use of it to create accounts on websites (e.g. here), etc would be very representative of common patterns of address disclosure.

  25. Use a control group by Kehl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Create Several Email Addresses - Be scientific ...

    Address 1 - (Control Address) Post No Where and read no messages until the testing time is over

    Address 2 - Post On Usenet (Deja.com)

    Address 3 - Post In Public ICQ program

    Address 4 - Porn Sites

    Address 5 - IRC

    etc .....

  26. My Spam corpus by orthogonal · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have an address I used for about three months on usenet, only in the comp.lang hierarchy.

    I may have used it for a few web sites, but the only one I recall is a local political organization which I doubt would have sold, or had the expertise to sell, its list. Still, the data is tainted, and I can't say it all comes from usenet.

    According to DejaGoogle, I last used it 18 April 2002, and it was last referenced in a follow-up message 5 May 2002. I first used it 15 February 2002.

    For a while I had my ISP forward mail to that address to "nothing" until I worried it might be piling up on the server somewhere (I don't know what forwarding to "nothing" means in the ISP's web control panel). So there are no messages for most of the month of May 2003.

    Disregarding the emails from the political organization, there are 1733 emails; the earliest is dated 16 July 2002, the lastest today 21 Sep 2003. (There are probably earlier emails to this address which have been archived.)

    So that's a span of 432 days, not subtracting the period when I wasn't having the email forwarded. Again not subtracting the un-forwarded days, that's ~4 per day.

    Note that this is only spam to this particular "sacrificial" address; it does not count the large amount of spam that, thanks to having some idiots as "friends", hits my "real" address.

    I have not been subject to any dictionary attacks on my domain name, but I have gotten about 105 spams to admin@mydomain in the same time period. This pushes the daily average to ~4.25/day.

    Since I started getting a lot of spam, I've made a practice of assigning each commerical contact or mailing list a different address (theirdomain.tld@mydomain.tld generally); surprisingly, these get very little spam, despite getting large volumes of legitimate mail each day.

  27. Wait. by MisterFancypants · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think you have to wait, as from what I understand most of the people who spam actually buy spam lists from other people. The spam lists seem to be compiled like phone books, so they send out batches of addresses like every month or so. I'm sure your mailbox will be stuffed to the breaking point about two months from now.

  28. Who you use as an ISP is important by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Is the account you want spammed provided by the same ISP as your personal account? It sounds like the ISP you are using for the research account might be doing a really good job killing off the spam before it ever gets to you. In order for the research to be uncorrupted you need to verify that your ISP passes all e-mails through to you, rather than spam filtering.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  29. Why isn't Microsoft responsible? by dcavanaugh · · Score: 3, Insightful
    After all, it's their product that set the stage for all of this.

  30. Re:Change your thesis - Decode the encryption. by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Funny

    That isn't any sort of encrypted text. It is simply a (pathetic) attempt of evading filters...

    You insensitive clod!

    You've ruined the poor boy's dream!

    Just think of the hours of fun he could have had "cracking" the "code".

    Just think of the elaborate code -- and equally elaborate conspiracy behind it -- he might have created in a desperate obsession to make his data fit his theory!

    It could have been a new formularization to rival the Illuminati, Ancient Astronauts, secret codes in the Bible, or some other tortuous, contrived theory! Why, he might even have constructed the ultimate conspirarcy theory, a religion!

    But no! You had to cruelly disillusion him. And rob us of the fruit(iness) of his labors.

    For shame!

  31. SpamCop's list of websites == Game Over by Nat3d066y · · Score: 5, Informative

    So you want a lot of spam, do ya?

    http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=inprogress&typ e= www

    That's Spamcop's list of spam-vertised web sites. All of those sites have submission forms; just put the email address in there and you'll be rockin' and rollin' within a few hours. I got into a 'spam war' with one of my roommates back in college, and with that Spamcop list I was able to render his email account COMPLETELY useless within a couple of hours (If you're reading this, sorry 'bout that Brian... )

    Speaking of spam, on a random side note, I've recently started checking all of my email accounts with Shadango.com. Anybody else tried that yet? Shadango allows you to have advanced filtering applied to ALL of your existing accounts (both POP and IMAP). It's frickin' great. So now I don't get any more spam, plus I can check all 5 of my email accounts from one place. They've also got file storage, a calendar, etc. It's money. Check it out.

    -Nate

  32. Geeks are inquisitve... by 4mn0t1337 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Heh... you put a label like that on something and the first thing I think of is

    hmmmm... this must do something really interesting to the computer or disk to have a warning like that...

    Next step would be to see if I could induce what the intent behind the restriction would be. If I couldn't reason it out, then I might be tempted to try to dupe the disc and put it in another computer (*Always* mount a scratch monkey.)

    In fact, putting an admonition involving tech in front of a geek is like putting something bright and shinny in front of some people.

    but on the other hand you just found a way to physically "tar pit" a geek for a better part of an hour....

    --

    ______
    Once: you're a philosopher. Twice: a pervert.

  33. Got Spam? by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 3, Informative

    "In a complete twist to what everybody else is trying to do these days, I need to attract spam to an e-mail address...


    Much harder than it seems. A spam trap address can take months or even years to get up to the same levels of spam as other addresses.

    Some techniques;
    Unsubscribe the address.
    Apart from proving that some spammers actually do harvest from unsubscribes, this method isn't very effective, because some spammers actually do remove you from their lists.
    (of course, if you only unsubscribe addresses that don't get any spam, it can't get worse.)

    Dictionary attacks. If you run a mail server, you will occasionally be attacked. Either pick easy to guess names, or accept any name that fits a rule. It's a good idea to always reject the first name (unless it's already in your lists) since some spammers start with a 'test' name.
    Also, there will be plenty of names tried, so there's no need to accept a suspiciously high percentage. Choose a simple rule that rejects a fair percentage of the names.
    For example, accept any name which has a '5b' as the last hex character when hashed.
    If your server has any extra delays after a bad name, remove them.

    Buy expired domains.
    Some of my best trap addresses are from previously owned domains.

    Posting to usenet.
    I've not had much luck with this.

    Posting to mailing lists.
    This also seems fairly hit or miss.

    Posting to websites.
    Works eventually, but it can take a long time.

    Setting them in Ineternet Explorer.
    Some web sites have javascript that can grab your email address from your browser.
    (bonus points if you write this up in a proposal)


    When you get spam...

    Read the web pages. Once you actually get spam, either read it in a browser, or download all the links with wget. Some spammers are paying attention, in particular it seems, the ones who sell addresses to other spammers.

    Respond. When you get one of those weird messages like "Are you the same noc-staff I went to school with?" Respond with a simple "sorry, wrong guy."

    -- this is not a .sig