Slashdot Mirror


Single-atom Laser Built at Caltech

hweimer writes "A research group at Caltech has successfully constructed a laser consisting of only one caesium atom. The emitted light is very weak but highly ordered, so such a device may be used to control a quantum computer. More on this can be found at PhysicsWeb."

232 comments

  1. Begging the question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How big are the sharks?

    1. Re:Begging the question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could anyone please explain what sharks have to do with this?

    2. Re:Begging the question: by SheldonYoung · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's a reference to the movie Austin Powers: Goldmember. Scottie gives his dad, Dr. Evil, "sharks with frickin' laser beams on their heads" in an attempt to win his affection.

    3. Re:Begging the question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      austin powers 1 was where that joke started, not austin powers 3.

    4. Re:Begging the question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Did 3 start any new jokes?

    5. Re:Begging the question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there was the part where Austin and Nigel Powers "speak English" and the British rhyming slang is subtitled for Americans.

    6. Re:Begging the question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also made fun of the Dutch a lot. Wasn't much of that in the first two.

    7. Re:Begging the question: by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > austin powers 1 was where that joke started, not austin powers 3.

      Yes, but the sharks didn't actually APPEAR until 3, correct? Therefore, there would have been no sharks of any size for these "atomic" lasers (wow, what a horrible name I've just come up with -- maybe it'll stick).

    8. Re:Begging the question: by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Did 3 start any new jokes?"

      The one about the anonymous henchman who didn't watch what was going on therefore he was completely oblivious to information everybody else was clued in on was pretty amusing. Thanks for reminding me of it.

    9. Re:Begging the question: by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Wow, where's the standard flamebait reply about how that's not what "begging the question" means (even if it is)? :)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    10. Re:Begging the question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite large in comparison, because, you see, the lasers are so much smaller.

  2. Standby by Brahmastra · · Score: 2, Funny

    for all the ray-gun and light-sabre posts

    1. Re:Standby by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1

      It's sad to say, but the first thing that crossed my mind was "What does this mean for developing a light sabre?!"

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    2. Re:Standby by MysticGlyph · · Score: 1

      or this old one, ...How many scientists does it take to screw in a new atom...?

      --
      Try my new smokable Sig, ...Sig-erette.
  3. Wow by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hooray

    Quantum computers, sure. I bet they'll even run Duke Nuk'Em Forever lan parties over IPv6.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't laugh... I actually spoke to a couple members of the DNF team, and they seemed to believe that quantum computing was just around the corner.

    2. Re:Wow by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

      Even the SUMMARY said what this will be used for - creating a Quantum computer. Keep up, please! :)

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something tells me we'll be using IPv8 by then!

    4. Re:Wow by CaptBubba · · Score: 1

      Yes, but saying what you plan to use it for and getting it to work are two different things.

    5. Re:Wow by whopis · · Score: 1

      Agreed. After all, how useful can it be until they develop a single atom laser capable of emitting a beam of pure anti-matter?

    6. Re:Wow by EulerX07 · · Score: 5, Funny

      SCIENTIST : With this you could create a Quantum computer.

      ENGINEER : Uhhm, it's not that simple...

      SLASHDOTTER : Yes it is! Keep up please!

    7. Re:Wow by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Since I've had two replies that basically say the same thing, I'll reply to myself to answer:

      1. Of course it isn't easy; and
      2. This is a tool that quantum computer researchers have pretty much been requesting - a laser to more easily manipulate the devices they currently are using.

      Point is, this isn't some obscure, not so useful (yet) tool - it has immediate applications, and can be put to immediate use.

    8. Re:Wow by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Quantum computers, sure. I bet they'll even run Duke Nuk'Em Forever lan parties over IPv6.

      They might, they might not...

    9. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny as hell. Thanks!

    10. Re:Wow by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Quantum computers can compile the non existant Duke Nukem Forever source code faster than you can press the button to start it. I've given up on DNF, I'm filing it along with all my SCO rumors about linux.

    11. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it had immediate applications, then they'd be using it to build a quantum computer right now, then wouldn't they?

    12. Re:Wow by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      No, not if building a quantum computer isn't in the set of immediate applications.

    13. Re:Wow by killthiskid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or they could both be running and not running the game at the same time!

      No one will know until they open up the door to the room where the lan party may or may not be taking place.

    14. Re:Wow by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Is this the "Schroedinger's Boss" theorem?

    15. Re:Wow by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you could use this technique for nanite lidar. I assume it would also have some applications in optical switching.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Wow by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okay, damn. Thought the average reader kept up with technology news. THEY ARE, AND HAVE, BUILT "QUANTUM COMPUTERS". They don't work well, and are very simplistic at this point, but they do seem to work, and they need something, like this laser, to bring them to the next level (like, for example, being useful). Here's a link: IBM's computer (one of many)

    17. Re:Wow by SlipJig · · Score: 1

      The only problem is that opening the door may cause the game to start/stop ;)

      --
      Read my keyboard review.
    18. Re:Wow by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " Hooray Quantum computers, sure."

      I know you were joking. But it is very interesting to watch this large convergence of technologies. What might have taken centuries is now being sped up by the ability to transfer information as rapidly as we do today. Now we get to watch in more of a real-time version how massive new technologies are born.

      Every now and then I see a new piece of the puzzle being made that will work hand in hand with some other technology to bring us even closer to something which was thought only probable not more than a few years ago. We are as priveledged as those who lived during the renaissance for we get to see some of the most rapid advances made in history.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    19. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is amazing to see this come together, but it will be so sad to see it get chewed up and spit out. The staggering possiblities for good will be perverted into massive storage for porn and a REALLY small cell phone.

  4. So when do we get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...the single-atom Mini Me to hump it?

  5. But the bigger question is.. by inteller · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will this incinerate ants better than my trusty magnifying glass?

    1. Re:But the bigger question is.. by fruey · · Score: 1

      Try a gas lighter wand : more efficient, and can also be used to light log-fires!

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    2. Re:But the bigger question is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, the question should be, does it run lin *whack*

  6. Here we go again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Tell you what, I don't want to hear anymore about quantum computers or cold fusion until someone actually ships a quantum computer powered by cold fusion. A laptop form factor would be preferred but, is not required.

    Mk?

    1. Re:Here we go again. by TheBeardIsRed · · Score: 1

      My first thought to that reply...

      Why in the hell would you want such a terrible web development language used on a quantum computer? ;)

    2. Re:Here we go again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....yea....flamebait....

    3. Re:Here we go again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, Strat's got so much pent-up Apple hatred, you'd think Steve Jobs molested him as a child...

      It's ok, Strat. show us on the Intel bunnyman doll exactly where the bad Apple man touched you.

  7. Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    why does every science experiment have to throw in buzzwords such as "may be use in quantum computers" or "may help a cure for cancer"

    until any of this is a reality or someone actually builds it, its all bullshit, maybe im fed up of scinetific experiments with no purpose until they throw in the critical
    "nanotubes" "space elevators" "quantum computers" "cure for cancer"

    1. Re:Rubbish by mikehilly · · Score: 1

      Agreed! Aything *MAY* be used with anything else. Why do they always put it in there?

      This just in: This post MAY be modded up/down.

    2. Re:Rubbish by canajin56 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      why does every science experiment have to throw in buzzwords such as "may be use in quantum computers" or "may help a cure for cancer"
      Because "it's nifty" doesn't get you grant money.
      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    3. Re:Rubbish by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


      why does every science experiment have to throw in buzzwords such as "may be use in quantum computers" or "may help a cure for cancer"

      A 12 gauge shotgun could be used in cancer treatments. Of course making sure you only blast out the cancer cells is the really hard part.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:Rubbish by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Because the usual question asked by Slashdot bores is "What's the point".

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RE: >

      maybe that wanted to catch a buzz :)

    6. Re:Rubbish by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      why does every science experiment have to throw in buzzwords such as "may be use in quantum computers" or "may help a cure for cancer"

      because the buzzwords, "may be used in the porn industry" or "may help find a cure for Genital herpies" just is not what the public want's to hear yet coming out of the physics research labs...

      Silly, I know.... but true!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Rubbish by KDan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Easy. Just mount a low-intensity x-ray (or similar hard radiation) laser on each shotgun pellet, arrange them in a nice spherical shell around the patient, all pointing towards the centre, and make sure the tumour is right at the centre of the shell. All the low, harmless intensities will add up to some real stuff in the middle et voila! Radiation therapy with a shotgun!

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    8. Re:Rubbish by weeboo0104 · · Score: 1

      maybe im fed up of scinetific experiments with no purpose until they throw in the critical
      "nanotubes" "space elevators" "quantum computers" "cure for cancer"


      As opposed to any /. posting with the critical "Natalie Portman", "Hot Grits", "In Soviet Russia...", "Beowulf Cluster", or "You insensitive clod!",

      --
      It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
    9. Re:Rubbish by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Uh...they did build it. I'm real glad you weren't around when they built the first (lightbulb sized) transistor.

      Anyway, this kind of thing is much more interesting when thinking of optical computing. That's the next step anyway...quantum computing is just too far off at the moment.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    10. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Because the usual question asked by Slashdot bores is "What's the point".

      No, The usual question asked by /. is "Will it run Linux?"

    11. Re:Rubbish by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > > maybe im fed up of scinetific experiments with no purpose until they throw in the critical "nanotubes" "space elevators" "quantum computers" "cure for cancer"
      >
      > As opposed to any /. posting with the critical "Natalie Portman", "Hot Grits", "In Soviet Russia...", "Beowulf Cluster", or "You insensitive clod!",

      Sure, in Soviet Russia, a beowulf cluster imagines Natalie Portman naked, but what really petrifies my hot grits is that we can talk about a single-atom cesium laser for 140 posts, without even one mention alt.cesium, you insensitive clods!

    12. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!

    13. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that or "this is old news" dick-waving to prove who has the longer beard.

    14. Re:Rubbish by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "why does every science experiment have to throw in buzzwords such as "may be use in quantum computers" or "may help a cure for cancer"

      So are they supposed to build the quantum computer, and then build the lasers that would control it?

      Baby steps.

    15. Re:Rubbish by dopamine · · Score: 1

      The only way to cure cancer completely and forever is to get rid of life itself.

  8. Wow by CaptBubba · · Score: 5, Funny
    This is simply amazing. I'm trying to picture all the machinery and people that went into getting that one atom to light up.

    And now the physicists hand the engineers the huge task: "Ok, we got it to work, you get it to do something usefull"

  9. GoogleNews by Leffe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a handy link with all the articles on GoogleNews:

    http://news.google.com/news?q=single+atom+laser

    1. Re:GoogleNews by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With any luck, the editors would start putting links like this into the articles themselves.

      *SMACK*

      That is, when they're not too busy submitting dupes without checking for messy details like facts, grammer, spelling, etc.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:GoogleNews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I might as well harvest some cheap karma.

    3. Re:GoogleNews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      messy details like facts, gramm a r, spelling, etc.

      How about you learn to spell yourself, before you complain about others.
    4. Re:GoogleNews by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      see... exactly my point! The editors should be on top such things...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    5. Re:GoogleNews by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      That's the first thing he'll do once he becomes a Slashdot editor.

    6. Re:GoogleNews by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      That is, when they're not too busy submitting dupes without checking for messy details like facts, grammer, spelling, etc.

      Here's an idea. Why don't the story submitters get the google cache links when they submit the story? Why is it that the slashdot editors are held up as solely responsible for this problem, and the submitters who fail to provide such links are not held up as well? For that matter, we'd have to trickle the effect down to every person who clicks on the link and causes the server to become overloaded. And in this day and age, individual responsibility is something studied in History but is no longer in current practice.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    7. Re:GoogleNews by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      What I am suggesting is that these links become a standard element in an article - such standards would naturally be maintained by the editors...

      The editors are the ones who determine what the articles look like when they show up on the site, so in that sense, they are the responsible party. That's what being an editor means (at least in the real world).

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  10. Not big enough. by caluml · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want a laser that can burn a 200 metre-wide hole through the moon from Earth.
    What's that you say? Why? What do you mean, why?

    1. Re:Not big enough. by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Informative
      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:Not big enough. by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny
      I want a laser that can burn a 200 metre-wide hole through the moon from Earth.

      Or at least criss-cross campus leading co-eds to the sign it's lighting proclaiming one BITCHIN' pool party.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Not big enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of Real Genius, why doesn't the laser weapon kill Kent when he remains in the house? Previously, the weapon punched a hole through the wall of the laboratory, a statue, and a sign over a pretty good distance. Obviously the airborne laser was fired from even further away, but the attenuation wasn't that great. It should have punched through the wall and then destroyed him.

    4. Re:Not big enough. by DaggerWare · · Score: 1

      If you watch carefully earlier in the movie, when they are setting up the house ahead of time, they put some sort of optical device in the window, which presumedly spreads the beam out to non-lethal but still popcorn-making intensity

      It's kind of hand-waving at the problem, but the movie-makers did think about the issue, at least.

    5. Re:Not big enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The little cube-shaped thing? I had forgotten all about it. Good call.

    6. Re:Not big enough. by hardcnxn · · Score: 0

      little cube-shaped thing
      It appeared to me to be three square mirrors, glued together in a "half-cube" formation, with perhaps a hole at the point all 3 met....and now we're cha-cha-ing.

    7. Re:Not big enough. by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

      If we had that, we would not have to worry about asteroids anymore. That would be great.

    8. Re:Not big enough. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I got the distinct impression that it was just for them to bounce the laser off of. My question is, assuming that was a front-surface mirror, wouldn't it get dust and/or bugshit on it, and end up burning the surface off?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Not big enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is when the thinkgeek ads prove their utility :P

    10. Re:Not big enough. by hardcnxn · · Score: 0

      No, the mirror went from God to Gerry to Kent to the cleaners, so it was spotless. Kent even enjoyed taking it in.

    11. Re:Not big enough. by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Or at least criss-cross campus leading co-eds to the sign it's lighting proclaiming one BITCHIN' pool party.

      What, and give all the nerds the only chance they may ever have to have sex? The last thing society needs is sexually-satisfied nerds. There goes all our technological progress....

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    12. Re:Not big enough. by David+Gould · · Score: 1


      No, no, no, no, no.

      You're probably right about the thing on the window, the foil on the popcorn tub, etc., being carefully designed to make everyhting work right, but that's nowhere close to the whole answer.

      When they snuck onto the base and reprogrammed the system, they didn't just change the target coordinates to the Doc's house. They also changed the firing parameters from a short, high-intensity pulse to a longer, much-lower-intensity burst, just right for popcorn. That's why the Air Force folks were freaking out, pounding their consoles, and shouting "It's not shutting off!", "Well, shut if OFF!", "I can't!", etc., for a few seconds.

      Also, it took me a few viewings to realize why, after it was done, Lazslo looked at the house and said "I think we used too much". It's not what I first though, that he was squeamish about having caused so much damage. Just the opposite: he meant it was a shame that the house had burst because he was picturing a different result that would have been even better. I thought what happened was exactly what they intended until, when I heard that line again, it occurred to me that if the popcorn had filled the house but not spilled out at all, then the Doc would have come home not knowing what had happened, and opened the front door...

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
  11. Nope. Sorry. by FreeLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    But, it may prove useful in surgery on ants and may even be used for tatoo removal on ants. This is especially important for those ants who now regret the indiscretions of their teenage years.

    1. Re:Nope. Sorry. by KDan · · Score: 1

      ROFLMAO haha you bastard... you made me chuckle out loud... now all my colleagues are going to think I'm reading slashdot or something...

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    2. Re:Nope. Sorry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get back to work!

  12. Friggin parameciums by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 5, Funny

    with frigin lazers on their heads.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Friggin parameciums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be frickin paramecium, with frickin lasers on their foreheads.

  13. Hm. It spins, right? by kulakovich · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or would this make one hell of a gyroscope?

  14. So... by e_lehman · · Score: 3, Funny

    How do you put an "on" switch on a cesium atom?

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You keep hitting it with photons.

    2. Re:So... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      More importantly, how do you put those yellow "don't look into the laser nitwit" stickers on a single atom?

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:So... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter, as soon as you turn it on, you don't know if it IS on...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  15. Finally, I have the weapon I need ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Funny
    to conquer the Nanobot world. I WILL rule in Nanobotia. Benevolently, but firmly.

    But should even one of those Nanobots cross me, ZZAPP!

    1. Re:Finally, I have the weapon I need ... by digitalamish · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new microscopic overlord...

    2. Re:Finally, I have the weapon I need ... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I can imagine a sporting event in the near future, where tiny little nanowarriors duke it out under microscopes, waging miniature wars with their miniature lasers........ah one can dream can't they?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  16. Ah yes.. by adeyadey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...so such a device may be used to control a quantum computer..

    Ah, that would be the quantum computer on board the manned space expedition to Mars, power by a fission-reactor ion-drive. Back home we can watch it via our ubiquetous videophones, or our Linux powered desktops, which can run applications with true Artificial Intelligence. All our homes will be supplied by nuclear electricity that is too cheap to meter. There will be peace in Isreal.. etc..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:Ah yes.. by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      Exactly, apart from the Linux powered desktops that is :-)

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:Ah yes.. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      You forgot the flying cars. We were promised flying cars.

      Apologies to IBM and Avery Brooks.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Ah yes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we can watch it via our ubiquetous videophones

      While they aren't yet ubiquitous, they are pretty common over here in the UK.

      our Linux powered desktops

      I'm using one to type this.

      All our homes will be supplied by nuclear electricity

      That's not new.

    4. Re:Ah yes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's unfortunate that there isn't a "-1: Being an asshole" moderation.

    5. Re:Ah yes.. by Scarblac · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ah, that would be the quantum computer on board the manned space expedition to Mars, power by a fission-reactor ion-drive. Back home we can watch it via our ubiquetous videophones, or our Linux powered desktops, which can run applications with true Artificial Intelligence. All our homes will be supplied by nuclear electricity that is too cheap to meter. There will be peace in Isreal.. etc..

      We live in such interesting times that everyone is taking everything for granted. The idea of a quantum computer was born in 1982 (history of Quantum computing). Now, just over twenty years later, we already have brought bits of the idea into practice - that is stunningly fast, compared with history. Quantum computers are an extremely advanced idea.

      Charles Babbage got the idea of a general computer around 1812 (Babbage), but one wasn't built until World War II.

      So after only 20 years we already have done some tiny, extremely simple calculations involving a few qubits. Very far from being useful, and still totally amazing that we've come so far. Most ideas take twenty years to become widely known before they're looked at seriously.

      So Slashdot readers compare it to Duke Nukem and flying cars, and laugh. These times are so interesting that everyone is jaded.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    6. Re:Ah yes.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      we can watch it via our ubiquetous videophones

      While they aren't yet ubiquitous, they are pretty common over here in the UK.

      So do I, er, common? Mind you I do live in Royston Vasey.. :-)

      our Linux powered desktops

      I'm using one to type this.

      Tubs insists we stick to our ZX81.

      All our homes will be supplied by nuclear electricity

      That's not new.

      Although hardly likely to be "too cheap to meter"..

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    7. Re:Ah yes.. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      It is strange that we live in a time where in the west anyway anyone can pretty much find out about anything.
      We do have bandwidth that seems to cheap to meter right now. I am still waiting for the manned trip to mars or even back to the moon.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Ah yes.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      Various forms of quantum computing have been toted for a long time now - as has affordable fission power (or any form of safe&cheap nuclear). True AI is a long way off still, despite being thought to be closer for a long time.. And we might have reasonably expected manned space exploration to be further than it is now, after Apollo..

      I wasnt being entirely serious in my original post, but I suppose if I was I would say it is probably not too suprising that quantum computing and AI are taking time to happen, whereas the others are more of a mystery. Add to that non-petrol powered clean cars too, and non-fossil based power supplies..

      It is amazing what we have achieved, but also what has not happened is amazing too..

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    9. Re:Ah yes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can we have UBIQUITOUS multilingual spelling checkers, too?

    10. Re:Ah yes.. by agilen · · Score: 1

      Well, a "fission-reactor ion-drive" is really not that outlandish at all -- though there isn't much reason for the fission reactor when there is plenty of light energy floating around in our solar system to power the ion drive. Deep Space 1 uses an ion drive...more info here

      And I don't know why you want a quantum computer on your mission to mars....doesn't seem like you'll really need to be factoring large numbers out there. Plus, I can watch videos from space on my Linux desktop.

      Then that is where I lose you...true AI? A power company who doesn't charge you through the nose? These things that will never happen...

    11. Re:Ah yes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > These times are so interesting that everyone is jaded.

      In the future people will regard that comment as what's quaint, back when people who claimed to be scientifically-minded were allowed to make catch-all statements such as "everyone is jaded."

      In the future people will speak as "I," sharing their experience with truth and confidence, and the lesser "we" attempts to bind everyone into a singular worldview based on one's own private agenda will be banished from the world forever.

      And in the future people will obtain the requisite sense of irony to see the parts of the above that ring true and the parts which merely mock the recipient of my irony.

    12. Re:Ah yes.. by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Now, just over twenty years later, we already have brought bits of the idea into practice - that is stunningly fast, compared with history.

      No, it's not.

      All evolutionary progress, including technology, has always increased exponentially. Once you understand this -- and I mean really understand -- then the naturally increasing rate of change is no longer so shocking.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  17. Wow! by Teahouse · · Score: 1

    All I can think to say is wow! This is pretty awesome when you consider the ramifications. QM just took an interesting step forward.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean QC (computing)...

  18. Cesium in quantum computers... by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cesium in your computer, huh?

    Now there's a good reason not to spill coffee at your desk...

    -- Dr. Eldarion --

    1. Re:Cesium in quantum computers... by halo8 · · Score: 1

      i dont get it?

      like spilling your coffea (tea) is never a good thing.. but whats the cesium have to do with it?

      frankly.. i dont get a lot of american humor

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    2. Re:Cesium in quantum computers... by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Informative

      The elements on the far left side of the periodic table of elements are reactive with water. The farther down you go, the more reactive you get. For example, pure sodium produces a relatively mild reaction. Cesium, on the other hand, creates an absolutely HUGE reaction (BOOM!).

      It's a chemistry joke.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    3. Re:Cesium in quantum computers... by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Yes, but one atom of cesium isn't going to produce a noticeable reaction.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    4. Re:Cesium in quantum computers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I realize that. Just trying to make a joke...

  19. How does this fit with Quantum computing by fruey · · Score: 5, Informative

    (Blatantly stolen from link on the right of the article)

    A system with one or more individual atoms at rest and strongly coupled to a single mode of the electromagnetic field is ideal for testing fundamental concepts of quantum computing and quantum information processing (see Physics World 1998 March). Indeed, Scott Parkins, now at the University of Auckland, and collaborators at the JILA Laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, and Caltech first proposed this system as a highly efficient quantum interface in 1993. Using the strong coupling of an atom to a single photon, it should be possible to map a quantum bit at rest from an atomic medium onto a propagating light field, and vice versa. In other words, this scheme could allow quantum information to be sent from one place to another. The first experimental results in this direction were obtained very recently by Markus Hennrich and co-workers at the MPQ. Moreover, two atoms in the cavity should make it possible to realize a "controlled NOT gate", the elementary building block of a quantum computer.

    But it does answer the question I was asking myself...

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  20. "Caesium"? by Cecil · · Score: 1

    I learned it spelled as Cesium, and everything I've ever seen spells it that way. Is this just some over-spelling, or is it something like the Aluminum vs. Aluminium spelling/pronunciation conflict?

    1. Re:"Caesium"? by fruey · · Score: 1
      It's probably from Caesar, the Roman, or something.

      It's actually in the spelling, as Csium, I expect.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    2. Re:"Caesium"? by fruey · · Score: 1

      & a e l i g ; doesn't get rendered by Slashcode, sorry. You know what I mean.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    3. Re:"Caesium"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it's similar to the Aluminum / Aluminium thing - I learnt it as caesium...

    4. Re:"Caesium"? by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Caesium in the UK, Cesium in the US. Casium in German. Cesium in French. Cesio in Italian and Spanish. Cesio in Portugese.

      Originally, the ae was that single symbol which is now so rarely used that Slashdot won't let me use it. But it was named after the latin word 'caesius', which meant bluish-grey.

    5. Re:"Caesium"? by patman600 · · Score: 1

      was the ae symbol also used in encyclopedia? I used to see it a lot as encyclopaedia, and was never really sure of the correct spelling.

    6. Re:"Caesium"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Casio in cheap electronic keyboards.

      *rimshot*

    7. Re:"Caesium"? by Razor+Blades+are+Not · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that really mean it should be pronounced Kaisium ?
      (Since Roman C's are hard, and ae is sort of an aye sound = which is the origin of the Germanic Kaiser, the phonetic pronounciation of Caesar, IIRC)
      But I could be wrong :)

    8. Re:"Caesium"? by Razor+Blades+are+Not · · Score: 1

      Well, at least, I would be right if I were pronouncing this before 500 AD. :)

  21. I believe that should be ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 0

    friggin' sharks.

    1. Re:I believe that should be ... by Damn_Canuck · · Score: 0

      With frigging laser beams on their heads!

      --
      Given that God is infinite, and the Universe is also infinite, would you like some toast?
    2. Re:I believe that should be ... by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

      With frigging laser beams on their frigging heads.

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
  22. Imagine? by Slicebo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can you imagine what you could make with a Beowulf cluster of these?

    A FLASHLIGHT!

    1. Re:Imagine? by zanderredux · · Score: 1
      Add some more kW and you'll get...

      A LIGHTSABER!

    2. Re:Imagine? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Can you imagine what you could make with a Beowulf cluster of these?"

      A laser-guided kitten!

    3. Re:Imagine? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " Can you imagine what you could make with a Beowulf cluster of these?"

      A laserpointer?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  23. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is way too small to be an effective weapon. The future is in larger chemical lasers.

  24. I don't know by panurge · · Score: 3, Funny
    Some of the ruby rods we were getting in the early 80s were such poor quality, I wouldn't be surprised if they were single atom lasers. Pity we didn't know it would one day be leading edge research.

    I know, I know, I actually read the article. I can remember when lasers were interesting, before they were just cheap modern replacements for phonograph needles.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  25. Re:laser by Ayaress · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, because we all know how much the army needs to blow up those goddamn hydrogen nucleii.

  26. At home with the amoeba by Channard · · Score: 5, Funny
    A 12 gauge shotgun could be used in cancer treatments. Of course making sure you only blast out the cancer cells is the really hard part.

    Well, that's where the nano-rednecks come in.

    1. Re:At home with the amoeba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Them's good eatin'!

    2. Re:At home with the amoeba by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Well, that's where the nano-rednecks come in.

      I realize this is funny and was modded so, but why did I get chills running up my spine when I read it?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    3. Re:At home with the amoeba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /me has a mental image of nano-rednecks with working nano-TVs on top of non working nano-TVs.

  27. construction by colinleroy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if the term "constructed" is really relevant, considering they used a single atom ;-)

    --
    blah
    1. Re:construction by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      The cesium atom is just like the ruby from a ruby laser. There are other components, including, according to the article, at least two OTHER laseres, presumably of the multi-atom variety. So that begs the question: Is it really an accomplishment when you use two lasers to make a WEAKER laser?

    2. Re:construction by topquark46 · · Score: 1

      it's called "addition through subtraction."

    3. Re:construction by mpe · · Score: 4, Informative

      The cesium atom is just like the ruby from a ruby laser.

      Except that active part of a ruby laser are chromium ions.

      There are other components, including, according to the article, at least two OTHER laseres, presumably of the multi-atom variety. So that begs the question: Is it really an accomplishment when you use two lasers to make a WEAKER laser?

      The monochromatic light from a laser is the result of an electron moving to a lower energy state. In order for this to happen it first needs to have been moved to a higher energy state. This is presumably what the other 2 lasers are doing.

  28. Like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    /--------\
    Cesium atom ---- Internet ---> quantum computing
    \--------/

    Obviously you've never written a business proposal before.

    1. Re:Like this by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

      > /--------\
      > Cesium atom ---- Internet ---> quantum computing
      > \--------/

      > Obviously you've never written a business proposal
      > before.

      No, obviously YOU have not. The proper proposal looks like this:

      /--------\
      Collect underpants ---> Cesium atom ---- Internet ---> ??? ---> quantum computing
      \--------/

    2. Re:Like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "collect underpants" part is assumed, and the "???" part is synonymous with quantum computing. Now I just got to peddle this business plan to a VC. Did I mention that the cesium atom was synergistic and had a high stickiness eyeball factor? This is way beyond clicks and bricks.

    3. Re:Like this by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      That is a totally outrageous paradigm. Add wifi and we'll take 100,000,000.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. I'll put you in touch with my Chief Laser Evangelist.

    5. Re:Like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Both wrong!

      Here is the appropriate business plan.

      1. Cesium Atom laser
      2. ???
      3. PROFIT!

    6. Re:Like this by Canadian_Daemon · · Score: 1

      This is SCO (formerly the Underpants Gnomes corp)
      and were suing you for using our copyrighted business plan

      Please pay us $799 for every Cesium atom that you use

      --
      This sig is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
  29. Re:"Caesium"? (Quick test) by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

    Let's see if Slashcode supports Unicode: "Caesium".

    --
    'Sensible' is a curse word.
  30. Re:"Caesium"? (Quick test) by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

    Guess not, though it seems to degrade well.

    --
    'Sensible' is a curse word.
  31. I love you, dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Answer me, you cheating bastard. It's HER again, isn't it?

  32. Chip Manufacturers by Bruha · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm sure Intel and others are probably going to be highly interested in this.

  33. Yay! by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 2, Funny
    The emitted light is very weak but highly ordered

    Does this mean it's not yet bright enough to point at my Keynote slides?

  34. Finally! by JWhitlock · · Score: 2, Funny
    The emitted light is very weak but highly ordered, so such a device may be used to control a quantum computer.

    I, for one, can now overthrow our quantum computer masters!

  35. Shut up and welcome your new paramecium overlords. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    Well spell it however we want.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  36. Indians spell it as "maize" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not the Java job stealing ones - the real ones.

  37. Quantum computers exist already by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 4, Informative
    We already have quantum computers. They've been used to factor the number 15! Woo!

    Well, you've got to start from somewhere...

    1. Re:Quantum computers exist already by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Wow! Since not even a quantum computer has broken anything more than a 4 bit crypto, I think I'll use a 6 bit value for my future encryptions! Ha! Hmm, I wonder if those have export restrictions on them though.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Quantum computers exist already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who can't be bothered reading the link, they discovered that its prime factors are 3 and 5.

    3. Re:Quantum computers exist already by dpcgriffin · · Score: 1

      Actually, they used quite a lot of equipment to make the laser. I read up on it in Science News, ans they used a whole table of equipment to make the laser

      --
      Step away from the idiocy. Now. But first, a word from your sponsors!
  38. Can Cesium atom laser bring me back to 1999? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When we were all rich like Stewart on the Ameritrade ads?

  39. Thanks a lot by arnie_apesacrappin · · Score: 5, Funny
    QM just took an interesting step forward.

    Now that you've told us where QM is, we'll never know how fast it's progressing.

    --

    Still, with a plan, you only get the best you can imagine. I'd always hoped for something better than that. -CP

    1. Re:Thanks a lot by Teahouse · · Score: 1

      Now that you've told us where QM is, we'll never know how fast it's progressing.

      42!....:)

      --
      "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  40. Not Enough IP's by stfvon007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    the 2,979,683,891 IP addesses that each person in the world would have with IPv8 are not enough. Go with IPv10 so I can have 193,753,945,031,922 IP addesses, that way each of my atoms can have its own IP address. :)

    --
    All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    1. Re:Not Enough IP's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so would each of your atoms having an ip address make you a bewoulf cluster?

    2. Re:Not Enough IP's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How will the subatomic particles identify each other?

  41. Re:every speck of light counts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the spirit of the interweb incarnate posting on slashdot.

  42. Next Step: by show+me · · Score: 2, Funny

    2 atoms!

  43. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these! by rbook · · Score: 1

    Sorry, couldn't resist. ;-)

    1. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Sorry, couldn't resist.

      Sure you could have. But try harder next time, m'kay? 'kay.

  44. CALTECH ROCKS! by siskbc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Go Beavers!

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:CALTECH ROCKS! by MajikGuru · · Score: 1

      Save a tree, eat a beaver ;-)

  45. 2 words: Audio Quality. by kaoshin · · Score: 1, Troll

    All I think when I hear the words "1 atom laser". Extra high resolution CDs that allow the space neccessary for crazy good sample rates that could one day make a worthy replacement for vinyl. Then the record companies can have something we'd actually buy so they don't have to steal to survive.

  46. When you do that.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

    Be careful not to hit one of the laser reflectors left by the Apollo astronauts..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  47. It's implied. by zabieru · · Score: 1

    by posting on /.

  48. Re:2 words: Audio Quality. by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The data density of CDs depends on just the wavelength of photons, and not that much on the other properties of the laser. The new laser has interesting implications for novel things like quantum computing, but not for CDs or similar 'classical' technologies.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  49. Nightmare finding the replacement parts ... by Spectre · · Score: 5, Funny
    Given the state of my desk, I'll never be able to find the hot-swap spare atom ...

    --
    "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
    1. Re:Nightmare finding the replacement parts ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had any Cs on your desk, you'd know where it was.

  50. usefulness in quantum computing? by sluke · · Score: 5, Informative

    Off the top of my head I can think of two areas where this could be useful for quantum computing. The first would be as a way to comvert flying qubits (photons) in to stationary qubits. If this could be done, than technology such as quantum repeaters would be possible, therefore allowing for long distance quantum cryptography. The second would be as a single photon source, which would have big applications in optical quantum computing.

    The article, however, was very light on specifics. It says that the light exhibits antibunching, yet calls it a laser. My understanding of coherent states was that the probability of sending out two photons was high enough that it causes problems with quantum cryptography (Eve can simply observe one of the flying qubits and let the other one go). So do they envision using this as a single photon source? I haven't had a chance to read the journal article yet, so if someone who has a little more info could clarify I would be quite appreciative.

    1. Re:usefulness in quantum computing? by cluckshot · · Score: 1

      The production here has many potentials not all of which involve computing. This technology will allow the dicrete pumping of any atom to any excitation state desired using simple controls and simple electrical processes. This means for those out there who don't understand this more technical description that NUCLEAR REACTIONS will shortly become as easily done and as common place as are CHEMICAL REACTIONS now. All sorts of matter/energy fun can now start.

      WARNING: devices only amplify the intentions and wisdom of their Users! The higher the amplification the more the Morals and Ethics and Wisdom of the user of the device becomes. This is a VERY HIGH amplification technology. It is orders of magnitude above any such amplification we have seen before.

      The potential here is for extraordinary Good or Bad.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
  51. Thinkgeek.com by Fubar411 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How long until ThinkGeek puts up a banner ad for single atom green lasers?

    1. Re:Thinkgeek.com by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 3, Funny

      You think that's bad, this morning already I've had 4 popup ads for the X10 Single-Atom Laser.

    2. Re:Thinkgeek.com by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      he's using Internet Explorer!

      BURN THE HERETIC!

  52. Naaahhh... by tomzyk · · Score: 1
    I want a laser that can burn a 200 metre-wide hole through the moon from Earth.
    I wouldn't opt for the hole. I'd prefer carving my name into the surface moon because I'm "tired of the world disrespecing and shunning" me.
    --
    Karma: NaN
    1. Re:Naaahhh... by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 0

      Doh! I was going to go for this in the other direction. I was going to say I would finish removing the H and the A off the moon and see if anyone else would get the reference. Congratulations on beating me to it.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  53. Here's a nice little sci fi excerpt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The year is 2275. Mankind has extended its reach to the distant corners of the solar system. Mighty mining ships skim the distances to the Oort cloud while wondrous orbiting hotels and resorts skim the surface of Jupiter.

    And this newfangled single-atom laser still has not made it to mass production.

    1. Re:Here's a nice little sci fi excerpt by Gleng · · Score: 1

      ...But Duke Nukem Forever will be out *real soon*!

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  54. Re:Like this--the last step by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 0

    How could you forget the last step?
    ---> Profit!!

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  55. Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The canonical question is : "Will it run Lunix?"!!!

    (And the answerer doesn't get full credit unless they show the full emulation chain neccessary to do so!)

  56. Re:2 words: Audio Quality. by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    In my limited understanding, they are currently using technology to make the marks smaller, and that they having been coming up with optical technology to read these smaller marks and make them appear larger (not sure on the terminology). I would figure having a more directional and precise laser would make this technology more possible?

  57. [nt] http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligature by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

    http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligature

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    1. Re:[nt] http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligature by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  58. Re:2 words: Audio Quality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lasers are already directional and precise. They're lasers. All lasers are. The width of the laser beam is dependent upon the frequency of the light, so having a smaller laser doesn't do you much except you can put it in smaller places.

    We can always make a small laser by taking a big laser and putting a pinhole in front of it. Size of the laser is not a limiting factor.

  59. Random useless knowledge by tomzyk · · Score: 2, Funny
    This is especially important for those ants who now regret the indiscretions of their teenage years.
    Perhaps "teenage weeks" or "teenage months", but certainly not years.
    Yes, I understand your post was quite witty; ya never know when a random [worthless] piece of knowledge might come in handy though. :-)
    --
    Karma: NaN
  60. Re:2 words: Audio Quality. by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    Thanks anonymous.

  61. let's be serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just want to know when I can buy a real life Star Trek phaser or Babylon 5 PPG to have as my very own. Why use bullets when you can cause wounds that cauterize themselves?

    1. Re:let's be serious by BravoFourEcho · · Score: 1

      Because it's more fun if you can let your enemies bleed to death?

      --

      What good is a double standard if you can't enforce it?
  62. OT:Rubbish by jdray · · Score: 1

    I get this kind of mail all the time:

    "You may be qualified for a loan of up to $53,236.44 OR MORE!!!"

    Um... right. They've just spent some ridiculous amount of money to put together a slick envelope containing a piece of paper with a randomly generated number on it (quite possibly using a quantum computer, though not likely) to alert me that I MIGHT be qualified for a loan.

    What's this got to do with single-atom lasers? About as much as Duke Nukem Forever, which is to say, little.

    --
    The Spoon
    Updated 6/28/2011
  63. Sandpaper by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 4, Funny

    Having an exoskeleton simplifies tattoo removal. You just need an extremely small piece of fine-grained sandpaper...

    1. Re:Sandpaper by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1

      ...or a magnifying glass and a bright summer day.

  64. Re:construction x1488 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that you have no idea how much work it takes to get that one atom inside the optical cavity, and coupled to it. You've got to shoot other lasers at it to cool it (MOT) and use steep magnetic fields to trap it. I know a graduate student (at Caltech) who's been spending the last 5 years "constructing" this.

  65. Just one atom? by sdack · · Score: 1

    I have developed a laser which uses billions of atoms and you can control a billion quantum computers with it!

    I just won't let you use it! Besides, you are violating my rights.

    Super Clever Organisation

  66. Picture of the experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I know this is a joke, but I wonder if people realize just how hard these experiments are. I work in the same research group on another experiment. To give you an idea of what these things look like, here is a picture I took this morning of the single atom laser apparatus. In the middle of the picture is a table crammed full of lasers and optics, with electronics (much of it we built ourselves) under and over the table and filling racks against all of the walls (I couldn't fit it all in the picture ). There is a single atom at the heart of this, but the apparatus it takes to run this laser is by no means nano-sized.

    Incidentally, I think this is the first time we've been slashdotted. Some of the other grad students and I have been reading and enjoying the comments. We'll get straight to work on the sharks to go with the frickin lasers, um, as soon as we stop reading Slashdot. I'll see if I can get the authors of the paper to post a comment later about the workings of the experiment.

  67. Re:2 words: Audio Quality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The limiting factor is the scratches that the a$$holes put on the DVD just before you get to hire it.

  68. Re:Shut up and welcome your new paramecium overlor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's "We'll spell it however we want."

    And what does the Z stand for in your version? "ztimulated"?

  69. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome our new Caesium Overlords

  70. Why bother? by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

    With one atom of gain medium, you can pump it with one pboton to your high energy level, and dump it with another photon. The two photons do leave the gain "medium" (all one atom of it) coherently, but so what?

    --
    The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
  71. Two slits? by reconn · · Score: 1

    Will this offer any opportunity for new double slit experiments? Or were they already using single atoms? (wasn't that the whole point? ergo, didn't someone already make single atom lasers?) Anyone want to refresh me?

    --
    Everything that was once directly lived has receded into a representation. -debord
  72. Been done by Phronesis · · Score: 1
    Dieter Meschede and Herbert Walther made the first single-atom laser in 1985.

    This experiment is new only in that the atom is nearly at rest in the cavity.