Slashdot Mirror


Turn Your Head Into Speakers

Roland Piquepaille writes "A small company based in Iowa has developed products made with a "smart" metal that can turn your walls or your head into speakers. "Last August, Etrema -- an innovative technology firm nestled in the cornfields of Ames, Iowa -- started selling those chrome discs for $1,500 a pair. Called Whispering Windows, they can turn any wall, window, or drab conference table into a speaker." The author tried the technology, and even if she needed a full bottle of Tylenol after usage, said "it's not every day that your head serves as a piece of stereo equipment." This overview tells you more about this "magic" metal, the Terfenol, which is a combination of terbium and dysprosium. The article also says that we can soon expect pirated versions of Terfenol coming from China."

167 comments

  1. The human stereo by Adam+Jenkins · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now if they can just wire the Discman inside your skull someplace too..

    1. Re:The human stereo by yerricde · · Score: 1

      This would be the perfect Digital Restrictions Management system for the record labels: pay per listen per person.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    2. Re:The human stereo by Nucleon500 · · Score: 4, Funny
      This is clearly the best technology ever developed, because it can close the analog hole. We can implant two speakers, one for each ear, just inside the skull. Each speaker will have a DAC and a decryptor chip, and a secure digital pathway leading out the ear canal. The pathway will block the ear canal to restrict unauthorized listening. The speakers will connect to a wearable Microsoft Music Center device, which will manage the user's listening rights. Later versions might include a microphone, so that the user can listen to sounds in the environment, after a short delay to ensure they aren't watermarked.

      Although some cyber-terrorists may consider this a drastic method, it's the only way to protect the content industries, which are vital to America's economy, from rampant piracy and theft. Therefore, I'm proposing legislation requiring these devices to be implanted in each child before they turn two. Please join my crusade of consumer protection and write your congressman today!

    3. Re:The human stereo by genecystal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is not funny. This is terrifyingly prophetic

    4. Re:The human stereo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, that's fucking ridiculous.

    5. Re:The human stereo by illogical_simby · · Score: 1

      I can see it now - "Be the life of the party with your new, musical Gonads". Where do I sign up?

      --
      Apparently my appendage goes here
    6. Re:The human stereo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if they can just wire the Discman inside your skull someplace too..

      Screw that, I want someone to wire me up to my Dreamcast. Put a game in that chicks love. And do YOU know where the joystick is? I'll bet you do.

    7. Re:The human stereo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One problem...

      You will still be able to share your music with your friends...

    8. Re:The human stereo by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The only problem I see with your plan is that two years is too early: the human skull hasn't finished forming yet and as the child grows the implant might cause physical problems. I recommend waiting for the age of 21: minors can listen for free but once you've come of age and are legally responsible for your actions you have to get "DRM'ed".

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:The human stereo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you may be a Troll. or a stupid person.

    10. Re:The human stereo by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > This is terrifyingly prophetic

      What's terrifying is that 2 people thought that was insightful and one, interesting. It's a flat-out troll and unless you really do wear a tinfoil hat, you're being stupid.

  2. Brain damage, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That can't be good...

  3. Who needs this... by hiyahiya · · Score: 0

    I already have a speaker, but its not in my head.

    1. Re:Who needs this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not? You're odd.

  4. Been done before? by MImeKillEr · · Score: 2, Redundant

    SoundBug.

    Ok, so you can't turn your head into a speaker, but you can with practically any smooth surface.

    And for a lot less than $1500.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    1. Re:Been done before? by machine+of+god · · Score: 0

      Yeah but it sounds like crap. It's only decent at medium-low volume and has no bass at all.

    2. Re:Been done before? by PaintyThePirate · · Score: 5, Informative
      Acually, the SoundBug uses Terfenol.
      Etrema is now trying to secure a major retailer to sell a $300 portable version called the Presenter, aimed at business travelers, that can plug into laptops and give any room a top-quality sound system for presentations. A toy version, the Soundbug, is available for $20 from Amazon and OfficeDepot.com. Despite the poorer sound quality, teenage boys seem to like it.
    3. Re:Been done before? by area-k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From the Article: "Etrema is now trying to secure a major retailer to sell a $300 portable version called the Presenter, aimed at business travelers, that can plug into laptops and give any room a top-quality sound system for presentations. A toy version, the Soundbug, is available for $20 from Amazon and OfficeDepot.com. Despite the poorer sound quality, teenage boys seem to like it" Have you ever heard the SoundBug? It sounds like the cheap plastic it is. I think there is a huge market for the ability to turn various items into a quality audio transmitter.

      --
      Be Alert, the world needs more Lerts!
    4. Re:Been done before? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I'd have to see an actual audio reviewer's impression of the quality, rather than a starstruck reporter -- I suspect that the quality is highly overstated. Certainly most any item can be resonated to become a speaker, and a large resonator plate would be such a method, but any item (like marble) has its own tonal qualities that are absolutely bound to seriously colour music - the idea of just slamming it against drywall or desks sounds like it might not yield the results hinted at here.

    5. Re:Been done before? by Begemot · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you can't turn your head into a speaker, but you can with practically any smooth surface.

      Anything smooth? It might explain the name of this subwoofer.

    6. Re:Been done before? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I just wonder why is this post marked: Interesting, when it is supposed to be Redundant? After all, sound bug is Etrema product.

      Maybe the problem is that the moderators also do not read the f. articles. There should be a system in place where the moderators are freaking forced to read the articles before they are allowed to moderate!

    7. Re:Been done before? by blincoln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think there is a huge market for the ability to turn various items into a quality audio transmitter.

      The problem is mostly with the concept of using things like walls and desks as speakers. The material they're made out of just isn't designed for it, and if you're like most people and have pictures hung on your walls and office supplies in your desk drawers or whatnot it's going to add even more distortion.

      It sounds like a better use for this metal would be making really high-quality speaker cones and "headphones" that sit on your skull instead of your ears, like they do to the article's author.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    8. Re:Been done before? by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because of the poorer sound quality, teenage boys seem to like it.

      If you haven't listens to todays music. Low quality speakers only help make it better.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    9. Re:Been done before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Acually, the SoundBug uses Terfenol.

      Actually, it uses the cheap knock off from China. Way to go!

    10. Re:Been done before? by jmichaelg · · Score: 1
      Hell, these ain't new. I modded my Mazda Rx-4 (yep, 4) in the 70's by turning the car roof into a speaker with a piezo transducer. You could get them at the old Heathkit stores.

      Problem then, and probably now, is though they were good at reproducing high frequency, the bass notes weren't so great. You still needed a big old fashioned bass driver if you wanted chest thumping bass.

    11. Re:Been done before? by brnsurgon1 · · Score: 1

      Actually you can turn your head into a speaker with a soundbug. I have a soundbug....I tried it (:

    12. Re:Been done before? by Monkelectric · · Score: 1, Informative
      You hit the nail on the head my good friend. These devices are called "surface transducers" and they've been around as long as anyone can remember, although the application of this metal does seem new.

      The reason we haven't been turning windows into speakers has nothing to do with the lack of a flexible alloy, its because windows SUCK as speakers. A good speaker needs to be strong *and* have a wide range of movement. Glass, and other surfaces hardly move at all and thus can really only reproduce high frequencies. If I'm talking out my ass and these guys have figured out all this stuff, then they'll be rich.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    13. Re:Been done before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't you hate it when you get moderated up. But there are no responses to your post.

      With a passion.

  5. This explains alot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...no wonder the voices in my head sound like the Rolling Stones.

    Now if they would only quit playing "Sympathy for the Devil".

    -mark

    1. Re:This explains alot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pleaded to meet you! Hope you guess my name?!

    2. Re:This explains alot... by FrankDrebin · · Score: 1

      Same problem here, only it's a whisper: "if you build it, they will come." Damned Iowans.

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
  6. thinkgeek? by keldog728 · · Score: 1

    and this is different from what they sell on thinkgeek how?

    1. Re:thinkgeek? by Aneurysm · · Score: 2, Informative

      It says in the article, that the Soundbug is the "toy version" of the product. Cheap, but not great sound quality.

  7. ThinkGeek by ajnlth · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Somethink like this perhaps?

    http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/electronic/5a15/

    except it's only $27

    1. Re:ThinkGeek by dirkdidit · · Score: 4, Informative

      Take it from somebody who shelled out the $30 for one of those things, they suck. Not just a little bit, but a lot. The thing rarely worked on the surfaces I'd put it on and on the surfaces it did work on, it still sounded like a dying cat. Not to mention that it is about the flimsiest thing I've ever used. It broke after only 2 weeks, though I can honestly say I wasn't heart broken.

      Sure the SoundBug is a cool gadget but I strongly doubt it's even close to the product quality of the $300 this company is selling.

  8. And to think.. by feveron · · Score: 1

    And to think, at first I thought the headline was referring to toilets.. now THAT would be cool!

    1. Re:And to think.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but would you want to hear anything that a toilet has to talk about?

  9. The same thing can be done by Pingular · · Score: 0, Redundant

    with almost any flat surface, with this litte device, and it's significantly cheaper, at $26.99

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
  10. My head already got a speaker! by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder...will god nullify their patent because of prior art? ;-)

  11. Enterprising Iowegians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't terbium and dysprosium supposed to keep the the spatial distortions of the Expanse from messing with the crew of the Enterprise? Too bad cute Vulcans are allergic....

  12. This sounds like Soundbug by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Redundant

    This product was already out in a device called SoundBug. back in 2002.

    I seem to recall that SoundBug had poor sound quality because most surfaces and structures have strange acoustic response patterns. But I'm sure that with a bit of clever processing (a microphone and a bit of FFT magic), one could estimate the transfer function of the speaker surface, create a inverse filter that corrects for its properties, and then apply the filter to the any sound for better output.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:This sounds like Soundbug by parkanoid · · Score: 1

      Please RTFA. The soundbug is a lower-end product by the same company. It's even listed on their site.

    2. Re:This sounds like Soundbug by tkw954 · · Score: 1

      I think you'd need a really clever bit of procession to capture the room dynamics. With the echos involved, it would certainly be more than just using an FFT to get a transfer function

  13. Voices by vcjim · · Score: 1

    I hear voices already. Who needs speakers? NO! They're coming!

  14. Matrix... by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 4, Funny

    If Mr. Anderson would have had that in Matrix, he could have really pissed of that agent in that questioning scene...

    Agent: "What good is a phone call...if you're unable to speak!"

    Neo turns on his head speakers

    Neo: "Wadda say?" ;-)

    1. Re:Matrix... by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

      Uhm, how exactly would he speak? He still doesn't have a mouth... throwing a pair of headphones on him wouldn't have helped any... why would this device do any good?

    2. Re:Matrix... by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 1

      It would not do any good. But I posted the comment before I read the article (bad boy!) and got a wrong impression from the headline ;-)

      Well, at least some guys thought it was funny ;)

  15. Soundbug by dimension6 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    How does compare to the much cheaper Soundbug?

    1. Re:Soundbug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soundbug is a toy. Unlike Soundbug, this technology is supposed to not "sound[] like a dying cat."

  16. Re:The human stereo - Monty Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And now for something completely different... a man with a tape recorder up his nose...

  17. but..... by xao+gypsie · · Score: 1

    my head is already a bunch of speakers....at least a bunch of ppl speaking...but thats kinda teh same thing..

    xao

    --


    xao
    http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
  18. Main site is windows by WindBourne · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The article also says that we can soon expect pirated versions of Terfenol coming from China.

    In spite of possibly losing their company due to running an insecure OS, they continue it. Though they did change the web server, but stay on the same OS. I do admire their tenacity and loyality.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Main site is windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In spite of possibly losing respect due to posting off-topic comments, you continue it. I do admire your lack of relevancy.

    2. Re:Main site is windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What difference does it make what OS their site is operated on? What poosible impact does that have on the story at hand, you ineffably lame-fuck, ass-monger? Take your trolling ways out to the bridge, you rectum. Thread hijacking makes you a major retard.

      MODS: why the fuck was this labeled as "Insightful"? More like flamebait or troll. Get a goddamn clue!

  19. SoundBug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason so many of you seem to think that Etrema's Whispering Windows product is so eerily similar to the SoundBug offered by ThinkGeek is because Etrema developed both of these products.

  20. who cares about this new fangled music technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    when you can listen to music that's in your mind here

    now all we need is RIAA serving discovery documents for pieces of your brain....

  21. even better by winston_pr · · Score: 1

    In other news the journal "Nature" has an article on a research team that has used nano devices in the bloodstream that syncronizes cell membrane oscillations, creating an immersed full body sensation of any sound you chose to input into the system. Dolby Corpus 10000.1 anybody ?

    --
    "6EQUJ5"
  22. Sound Cancel? by Davak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One wealthy businessman handed Etrema $1.5 million to stop the slight vibrations on his yacht when he hit top speeds. Terfenol did the trick, allowing him to dine at sea without having his meal shimmy off the plate. [And] a local church hired the firm to build a special pew so that a deaf person could hear the service.

    This interests me more than the original article. How does a speaker-like material stop vibrations? Sure sound is a vibration... but to cancel out another sound/vibration it would have play the inverse sound at exactly the same time to cancel it out.

    I'm assume the pew above just converted the sounds to either physical vibrations which the person could feel... or just adjusted the frequency to something that could be better heard/perceived.

    1. Re:Sound Cancel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      they probably tightened a few screws then charged mrStupid 1.5mill

    2. Re:Sound Cancel? by tjcoyle · · Score: 1

      Exactly, and this should work just like the active noise-canceling technology available in aviation headsets, as well as quite a few consumer-level headphones.

      Here's a doc which seems to have a little more than one might ever want to know about the technology:

      http://www.actel.com/documents/s06_07.pdf

      I've never had the opportunity to try a pair, but if you ask me, they should work on a pair that's effective with human voices and sell them as spouse-coping mechanisms implemented in the form of in-ear hearing aids.

      They sell like friggen' hotcakes!

    3. Re:Sound Cancel? by n0mad6 · · Score: 1

      Vibrations are simply waves...If you have two waves if the right frequency/amplitude you can cause destructive interference, i.e., cause them to cancel.

    4. Re:Sound Cancel? by Jonathan+Platt · · Score: 1

      I think it would be relatively simple, just apply a little logic.

      Have microphones placed in various spots arround the boat.

      Use a phase reversal (a function built into all high end sound consoles) and play the new sound through the Terfenol.

      The tricky part would be selecting the right amplitude and putting these systems in the right places arround the boat.

      --


      VENI, VIDI, VICI, DIXI
    5. Re:Sound Cancel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not entirely correct.

      When traveling at certain speeds in boats or cars, the effects of the various forces on the object can cause the vehicle to resonate by matching there natural frequency.

      The most famous example is the breaking of glass with a high pitched sound.

      This sound can often be avoid by disrupting or altering the natural resonance frequency of the vehicle even by a minute amount.

    6. Re:Sound Cancel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bose Quietcomfort noise cancelling headphones I own have brought me peace and quiet more times than I care to remember.

      The one thing that annoys me about them though is that there is no version that you can build into walls. If you had this kind of high-tech wallpaper that you could put on everything to turn a room into a silent zone, now THAT would be awesome.

    7. Re:Sound Cancel? by dozer · · Score: 1

      Vibrations are simply waves...If you have two waves if the right frequency/amplitude you can cause destructive interference, i.e., cause them to cancel.

      Right. And at the very same time you're getting two waves to interfere destructively, 1/2 wavelength away, the same two waves are CONSTRUCTIVELY interfering. I.e. the sound is twice as loud.

      With sound waves (depending on freq), that's usually a few inches or feet away. So, yes, you could theoretically cancel sound waves on a boat, but you'd better be alone and hold really damned still.

      Noise cancelling headphones work because the headphones know exactly where your eardrum is at all times. It's easy to place the node right there.

      AFAIK, nobody has gotten general-purpose active noise cancellation to work on anything larger than a set of headphones. Whoever does will make a fortune from homeowners living near highways and airports.

    8. Re:Sound Cancel? by rossifer · · Score: 1

      This isn't active noise cancellation, but active vibrational damping. Similar, but not the same. Usually, you're damping out lower frequency vibrations in structures, using multiple vibration inducers and a large pile of accelerometers which measure the magnitude of the unwanted vibrations all over the structure. These are tied together through a computer doing some matrix processing on the accelerometer inputs to generate outputs used by the inducers to create their own movements, which then counter the unwanted vibrations, leaving the structure appearing to damp out any vibrations very quickly.

      I would guess that in this case, there are vibrations induced by the engine/drivetrain/propellor into the hull when running at speed. You don't describe the effect of waves on a boat at "rattling the plates". Usually that's more like "bouncing me out of my seat", or, "making me not look at the plates".

      So anyway, these guys came up with a more effective way to isolate the engine/prop vibration from the rest of the hull. There is already passive damping in the engine mounts and the stuffing box, but I can easily see how a few strategically placed accelerometers and some high speed/high realiability vibrational inducers could almost completely eliminate those vibrations. Depending on some other details (insert an inducer into the propellor shaft) you could have a self-balancing drive shaft, or...

      Hmmm... That's actually a good idea. I wonder if that's what GM is working on...

      Regards,
      Ross

  23. anti-sound by cyber_rigger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wire this up to create a "noise canceling" device and you might have something.

    1. Re:anti-sound by spektr · · Score: 1

      Wire this up to create a "noise canceling" device and you might have something.

      Great idea! If they enhance the low spectrum, broaden the dynamic range and turn up the volume really really hard, it could even replace helmets and airbags...

    2. Re:anti-sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides not reading the article you failed to realise there is an advanced noise cancelling technology available at an affordable price. HMAP (Head Mounted Audio Protection) devices known more commonly as "ear muffs" are wide spread.

      Also "ear buds" utilising a form of foam are available taking their basic concept from the old school bee's wax Ulysses used to protect his homies from the sirens song.

    3. Re:anti-sound by Tmack · · Score: 1
      RTFA?? They did already. Some guy paid $1.5Mill to cancel vibrations on his Yacht:

      One wealthy businessman handed Etrema $1.5 million to stop the slight vibrations on his yacht when he hit top speeds. Terfenol did the trick, allowing him to dine at sea without having his meal shimmy off the plate.

      This is probably the least of this metal's capability. I foresee many things being made that utilize this stuff. The article mentions other things such as fuel injectors, tooth phone, church pew for deaf people, and electric razors. Anything dealing with audible-range frequency sound/vibrations will probably benifit from this.

      Tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  24. I tried it with some tape, my mpio, and those.. by cspring007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    inflatable speakers they have in sharper image. Bought them, blew them up, and made what can be described as headphones. The sound was insane, as were the looks on people's faces who saw me that day in the mall.

  25. Old news by AndroidCat · · Score: 1, Informative
    People with car stereos have been turning my neighbourhood into secondary speakers for years... (And they keep playing the "Whoompa-whoompa-whoompa!" song over and over.)

    But seriously, the "turn your wall into a speaker" idea seems to pop up every 10-15 years. Let's see if they can get it right this time.

    Does anyone still own a Bone-Fone radio? (Another idea that never quite worked.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Old news by steelframe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Absolutely! The first I read of this was in the '60s (Popular Science/Mechanics?). I wanted one to attach to the floor for earth shaking bass, but it seems that low end is the weak point in most of these iterations. I couldn't conceive at the time that all I would have to do was park my car in the living room.

  26. Innovative?!? by Caractacus+Potts · · Score: 1

    It's just an obvious use for magnetostrictive materials developed over decades using your tax dollars. Coming up with the new alloys is impressive, but applying it to audio applications is pretty obvious. Reminds me of the patent I read last week about companies patenting the use of tagatose (new sweetener) in breakfast cereals and beverages. Duh.

    1. Re:Innovative?!? by FerretOnMountDew · · Score: 1

      The innovation here isn't the applications (though the vibration free yacht at top speeds is an admitedly impressive feat), but the process by which the alloy is manufactured. Though they are reluctant to disclose how much or how fast they create the stuff, one could immagine that they've broken it down to a profitable system. I doubt it'd make much news otherwise.

      Anyone know how long Teflon was around before it was economically viable to produce? Now it's on everything from frying pans to submarines.

      If they manage to drive that price down a little bit, we'd all be set. Though $300 a pair for good quality mid-range speakers isn't too bad at all. (Wonder what the subs will be like)

      --
      Please, do not read this sig
  27. Been done before... by ThogScully · · Score: 3, Informative
    I don't know what particular metals are used in Bass Shakers, but I don't really care. They aren't Sound Bugs like everyone else has posted a link to and they work exceptionally well to create a speaker out of whatever you screw them into: car chassis, couch, wall, whatever.

    Specifically, they are intended for bass reproduction, but that's the only frequency domain where the material of the cone isn't having a dramatic effect on the sound quality, so I wouldn't necessarily want full range production from whatever random materials I can find.
    -N

    --
    I've nothing to say here...
  28. Similar to hippy technology by back_pages · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I was told by my highschool orchestra conductor that he once had a device that looked similar to a small lead apron worn during X-Rays at the dentist's office. It contained oscillators that used your collar bones as the speaker, and though it produced no audible sound, you could "hear" it through the vibrations it introduced to your skeletal system.

    It wasn't that popular. I think he said it was called something like a "Bonophone" or some combination of "bone" and "phone", but Googling for it this morning just comes up with a lot of links to naughty sites. Does anybody know if this really existed and what it was called?

    1. Re:Similar to hippy technology by wjsteele · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wow! I forgot about that thing. I had one. It was called the Bone Phone. It was a soft cloth covered device, about 18" long, 3" wide and 1" thick. You simply layed it around the back of your neck, with the two ends over your collar bones. The controls were at one end and batteries at the other. It did have speakers, but it didn't vibrate your collar bones... the speakers were positioned above the unit, right under your ears so you could hear it even with the volumn turned down low. This made it hard for others to hear.

      It was a cool radio, but the walkman idea was better, because you couldn't jog with the Bone Phone on, it would too easily fall off.

      Ah... thanks for the memories.

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    2. Re:Similar to hippy technology by ChrisLeif · · Score: 1

      It was called the "bonephone" and was retailed by Sharper Image.

    3. Re:Similar to hippy technology by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      as others said, it was called the bone phone.
      The bonophone, on the other hand, is a method of using a tree to cause a crashing sound inside your skull.

      --
      This space available.
  29. Walls as speakers in the military by MemoryAid · · Score: 4, Informative
    The military has transducers used on walls to prevent people from listening in on classified conversations. I've seen them installed in aircraft carrier ready rooms, where flight briefs take place. One can put an ear to the outside of the wall to try to listen, but can only hear the (usually lame) music in the wall.

    This system is not designed as a speaker, per se, but it is audible from near the wall. I have no idea what flavor of unobtanium is used for these, but I suspect they probably cost at least $1500, based on the military's track record.

    --
    Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    1. Re:Walls as speakers in the military by surprise_audit · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Many years ago I got a bunch of piezo-electric transducers for around 15 cents each. Just a brass disk with a slice of crystal on one side. The open face of the crystal is silver-plated. You carefully solder a fine wire to the centre of the silver and to the edge of the brass. It functions pretty well as a pickup, and moderately well as a speaker.

      To make a speaker out of one (or more), just fix them securely to any flat surface. The bigger and flatter the surface, the better, and better yet would be to have some kind of sounding box behind it.

      The pickup function works incredibly well - with one plugged into a normal guitar amp, you can shout at it as loud as you like and it barely registers, but hold it against your throat and speak normally and you get really good quality with absolutely no background noise... Excellent for phones, microphones, etc.

  30. Re:Dimensional Warp Generator Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear stranded Time traveler:

    We would send the item listed above, but security concerns have prevented anyone from sending out deliveries to that time frame. If you do manage to survive the holacaust, please get in contact with us and we will be happy to send off your dimensional warp generator.

    Sorry for any inconvienence, we hope you enjoy your stay.

  31. china by Potor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    But if scientists from China discover how to manufacture Terfenol -- Etrema's Snodgrass says that three Chinese companies have already started making pirated versions -- the metal's still-fragile reputation could be harmed by the cheaper, imported version.
    if china has the metals and the formula, why would their 'pirate' version be inferior to the american version, beyond its not being american? wouldn't market demand dictate the quality of the chinese ternenol? and surely pirated is the wrong word here. they are not bootlegging consumer goods, but manufacturing a material. unless, that is, they use it to make mickey mouse dolls and rolex watches.
    1. Re:china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that quote should clue you right into the fact they're woefully overcharging for this stuff. If they weren't so greedy, there would be no business case for the chinese to make the stuff and sell it in the US.

    2. Re:china by pocopoco · · Score: 1

      I think there's a very good chance the company that actually did the research will be able to turn out a superior product than one that stole or tried to do a quick catch up. If anything they will be forced to charge more than the Chinese since they have larger development costs to recoup and will need to make the product high quality to justify that price in the market.

    3. Re:china by joto · · Score: 1
      if china has the metals and the formula, why would their 'pirate' version be inferior to the american version, beyond its not being american?

      Yeah, bad choice of words. The only meaningful interpretation of "pirate" here, would be either the manufacturing process, or the application. The application is obvious, the manufacturing method should be patented, like any other chemical process.

    4. Re:china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is called industrial counter-espionage.

      The Japanese recently used it quite effectively against the Chinese. If you purchase a motherboard that used the wrong type of capacters a few months ago (18 or so), you would have had to replace the motherborad to during leaking capacitors caused by a bogon formula that was made available for "stealing"...

      Funny thing though, the bad motherboards poped up in Tiawan and not China. I guess Tiwan is just a rebel provence after all..

  32. Hearing for the deaf? by timefactor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    a local church hired the firm to build a special pew so that a deaf person could hear the service

    This is the most intriguing thing about this. Would a deaf person be able to "hear" using the "head-as-speaker" technique?

    1. Re:Hearing for the deaf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it did work, it would only be effective for those who lived a number of years before going deaf. Those born deaf (or those who went deaf before learning spoken language) would not be able to draw on previous experience to understand the speaker.

    2. Re:Hearing for the deaf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only for people who are mostly deaf and can hear noises when the volume is jacked to the max.

    3. Re:Hearing for the deaf? by cfradenburg · · Score: 2

      It depends on how deaf they are. It's the same thing with a cochlear implant. If the hairs in the inner ear that sense the vibrations are too damaged it wouldn't work. However, if they can still function but not to well then something like that would be able to help. What I am interested in is how this technology differs from what is currently used in cochlear implants. Would it work better?

    4. Re:Hearing for the deaf? by alhawkins · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends on the reason they are deaf. There are two kinds of hearing loss, conductive and sensory/neural. Conductive hearing loss is caused by destruction/loss of function of the mechanical portion of the ear - the ear drum (tympanic membrane) and the hearing 'bones' (stapes, incus, malleus). Sensory/neural hearing loss comes from the destruction of the nerve receptors in the cochlea or the auditory nerve itself. This system would help someone hear if they had conductive hearing loss, because it would bypass the middle ear sound conduction system and directly stimulate the sensory hearing receptors in the cochlea by bone conduction. It would be far less useful to people with sensory/neural hearing loss.

  33. Best use of their expensive material by owlstead · · Score: 1

    Ok, so they say on their website that they have to focus on the more promising uses of the metal.

    And they come up with a really expensive (5.1 * 7500 = 38250 dollars for a surround set) speaker system first. Which already exists.

  34. I don't understand ? by TenPin22 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Theres no such thing as pirating in China.

    1. Re:I don't understand ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what... the west pirated Gunpowder, silk and paper manufactoring, etc from China.

  35. Bone-Fone by kantai · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some information about the bone-fone and a picture can be found here: http://pocketcalculatorshow.com/magicalgadget/inde x3.html

  36. A tale of Chinese Piracy by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    I remember reading a story on Chinese piracy in a business publication some years back. It talked about how some of this piracy has tacit government support. One official was asked about pirated software, and when the subject of the holographic authenticity logos came up he deadpanned, "that's what our Reflective Materials Institute is for.

  37. I'll put the device on my dog's head... by armando_wall · · Score: 1

    ...and connect it to to a wireless mike, so I can scare my mother-in-law the hell out of my house!!!

    "Feed me, you sinner"

  38. Rare Earth Elements by Detritus · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Industrial Physicist has an interesting article (PDF file) on rare earth elements that mentions terbium and dysprosium. According to the article, 3.6 kg of dysprosium will set you back about $50,000 US.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  39. my bullshit meter is going of the scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    go and ask a real speaker manufacturer what they think of it, just stand back while they laugh at you as you talk to them about smart metals and the other bullshit this firm are dishing out

    1. Re:my bullshit meter is going of the scale by Jonathan+Platt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Playing off a table I would agree with you. But this technology could be improved and used with different surface materials to one day provide sound better than conventional speakers. I used to be a sound engineer, and there are some major problems with creating really large speakers. Which is why most companies now use line array systems instead, but even these have phase cancellation, and don't represent low frequencies accuratly. This could allow a new way of creating speakers, and I'm sure could be perfected. Also EAW and Turbo Sund specialise in concert speakers, not quite speakers an audiophile would use. Tannoy, Meyer, now they make speakers.

      --


      VENI, VIDI, VICI, DIXI
  40. Quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same company makes both products:

    http://www.etrema-usa.com/products/audio/

    1. Re:Quality? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Yup -- "market segmentation": They make one or more dirt cheap, low-quality products and one or more high-end, high-quality, expensive products -- and try not to advertise too hard that it's the same company making both (at least, when I bought a Sound Bug, I had no idea these were the folks involved).

      So: I wouldn't cast doubts on the quality of the high-end product based on the lack of quality of the low-end product, since said lack of quality is almost certainly intentional .

    2. Re:Quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lack of quality is almost certainly intentional.

      Um. Yeah. In the immortal words of Pee Wee Herman after any kind of fuck-up... "I meant to do that!" ;-)

    3. Re:Quality? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > lack of quality is almost certainly intentional.
      > Um. Yeah

      If it wasn't intentional, why build a bigger (more expensive) version? Because you have different customers. Of course the better one will cost more -- that's intentional.

  41. OMG the Video Games are becoming my life. by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    Terfenol, which is a combination of terbium and dysprosium.

    Now we will have to build harvesters, and tesla coils, and send thousands of dogs to the enemies base...

    -dw

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  42. america by axxackall · · Score: 1
    and surely pirated is the wrong word here.

    not only here, generally IP cannot be pirated. IP is a fact of discovery, not of posession.

    --

    Less is more !
  43. Yes, you don't understand... by axxackall · · Score: 1

    that there is not such thing as IP pirating. IP is a fact of discovery, not of posession.

    --

    Less is more !
    1. Re:Yes, you don't understand... by TenPin22 · · Score: 1

      You know that, I know that, but its still not the way the "Free World TM" works.

    2. Re:Yes, you don't understand... by aurum42 · · Score: 1

      Do you think repeating your inane mantra in several threads lends legitimacy to your argument? If the Chinese independently discovered the process to create this alloy, sure I'd agree that it would be unethical to claim that as theft. But if they infiltrated this company's network or otherwise obtained knowledge of this process from the company (read the article), they are stealing (yes "pirating") years of hard work.

      --
      "The slave who knows his master's will and does not get ready...will be be beaten with many blows."Luke 12:47-48
  44. Beastly thing to balance by Subcarrier · · Score: 1

    Damn! So how do you make your speakers stay put? Hobble the legs, or what?

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  45. Set to replace the previous tooth speaker by gracefool · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    "Barry Mersky, a dentist in Maryland, bought Terfenol in 1995 in hope of creating a "tooth phone," a small device placed on a tooth that allows people to communicate in high-noise environments. Mersky's six-person company, ESComms, based in Bethesda, Md., now receives funding from the Army and Navy, whose interest was piqued after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks showed that firefighters had trouble hearing radio communications inside the World Trade Center. The dentist is hoping to have a working prototype for the military to start using by next year."

    Looks like this may replace the tooth phone previously designed by researchers from MIT Media Lab Europe.

    With Terfenol, you don't need an implant, but merely a plate attached to a tooth. Though there is still the question of where to put the radio receiver.

    1. Re:Set to replace the previous tooth speaker by SirDaShadow · · Score: 1

      With Terfenol, you don't need an implant, but merely a plate attached to a tooth. Though there is still the question of where to put the radio receiver.

      Ahhhh...now I know why that odd wireless technology is called "bluetooth" :P

  46. look at skis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skis have piezo-electric daming systems now. Do they work? Well, I don't own a pair. But i can explain the principle.

    A piezo-electric material produce electricity when a force is applied to it (when it is bent, essentially). This is how the lighter works on a gas grill. You press a button which raps a piezo electric material, that produces electricity which produces a spark which lights the gas.

    On skis, the piezo is hooked to a device that will dissipate the electricity, typically a LED which turns it into light (looks cool) instead of a resistive load that would make it into heat.

    If you have a harmonic vibration, then a piezo material in the spot can turn vibrations that would otherwise propagate as waves into electricity and then remove it. That's how the skis work. If they do indeed work.

    So how does this appy? Well, some piezo materials also bend when electricity is applied. So perhaps this material is one of those?

    Honestly, these transducers are nothing new, if you attach a regular speaker to a window it will vibrate the window. And it likely has the same problem the previous systems have, which is that with no absolute reference to push against it cannot produce low-frequency sounds.

    1. Re:look at skis by Tmack · · Score: 1
      A piezo-electric material produce electricity when a force is applied to it (when it is bent, essentially). This is how the lighter works on a gas grill. You press a button which raps a piezo electric material, that produces electricity which produces a spark which lights the gas.

      The piezo material is normally quartz. The click you hear when pushing the button is a small hammer striking a quartz crystal. The causes the quartz to emit electricity, generating the spark.

      Well, some piezo materials also bend when electricity is applied. So perhaps this material is one of those?

      Piezo materials do both, they emit electricity when vibrated/impacted/bent/physically messed with, and when electricity is applied, they vibrate/bend/etc. Quartz clocks use this principal to drive the hands of the clock. A current is applied to the crystal, which vibrates at a known frequency. The mechanics inside the clock mechanism use these vibrations to move the arms.

      Honestly, these transducers are nothing new, if you attach a regular speaker to a window it will vibrate the window. And it likely has the same problem the previous systems have, which is that with no absolute reference to push against it cannot produce low-frequency sounds.

      Actually, these are a bit different from your average transducer. Traditional ones, like the ones I have mounted in the Sofas in front of my TV, are basically the same design as a speaker. The difference is the coil is stationary and the heavy magnet is driven rather than a cone. The changes in momentum of the magnet generate forces that are transmitted to whatever it is attached to. These new ones can actually generate vibrations on the surface of the device, and thus whatever it is attached to, as the metal itself is changing shape rapidly, rather than just moving a mass and relying on forces generated from momentum. Where traditional transduces need bigger coils and heavier magnets to output more power, these new devices need more surface area and more of the special metal. Actuall playback quality is still very dependant on what it is attached to (putting these on a wall of acustic foam is obviously going to produce verly little, if any, sound; whereas putting them on drywall, glass, or any other flat, rigid surface would probably be ideal).

      TM

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  47. Dickhead by Talisman · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    "if china has the metals and the formula, why would their 'pirate' version be inferior to the american version, beyond its not being american?"

    Where in the article did it indicate it would be inferior? They meant 'cheap' as in inexpensive, not low quality.

    "wouldn't market demand dictate the quality of the chinese ternenol?"

    Ummm... no? Market demand would determine the price. Product quality might sway consumer choice to the (presumably) more expensive American version (having to pay your non-Commie workers a living wage is a mother fucker on the bottom line) but since they STOLE (or are trying to steal) the process, the quality might be comparable.

    "and surely pirated is the wrong word here. they are not bootlegging consumer goods, but manufacturing a material."

    They are trying to mimic a patented process, and went so far as to hack into a company's network to steal the manufacturing details. If Americans had done the same to a start-up Chinese company, you and your ilk would be screaming about what greedy imperialists we are.

    "Two years ago the firm's computer system was hacked into, most likely by spies for the People's Republic of China, which, according to the Pentagon, is actively trying to steal the formula for Terfenol. Terbium and dysprosium are most commonly found in the Boutou region of northern China."

    What is confusing you? Just because they have the ingredients in their backyard doesn't mean they know wtf to do with them, nor does it mean they have eminent domain over any process that might incorporate those ingredients.

    Talisman

    --

    "Study your math, kids. Key to the universe." -The Archangel Gabriel
    1. Re:Dickhead by Potor · · Score: 1
      a) the article states that cheaper versions from china might harm the reputation of the material. this implies that the chinese version is inferior.

      b) the market will certainly determine the quality. the quality the market demands will be the quality supplied; price will be in part a function of this.

      c) i am not confused. as posted above, a material is a discovery. it cannot be pirated. i agree that this is not an argument but rather an axiom. i, however, am prepared to defend it.

      cheers, potor

    2. Re:Dickhead by Nucleon500 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The process to make this material is patented, right? If so, wouldn't hacking a network to steal the manufacturing details be superfluous? Couldn't they just look at the patent? The whole point of patents is that you get a temporary monopoly in return for not keeping secrets.

      Granted, making this material would be a violation of US patent law (and Chinese patent law, to the extent it exists), but you're making it sound like the patent has been obfuscated, which shouldn't be.

    3. Re:Dickhead by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree. It's a fact of life that the Chinese are always "stealing" good ideas of other countries and figuring out how to turn them into profit for themselves, by manufacturing comparable products at more attractive prices.

      Just recently, I was looking for some blue LEDs. All of the local stores (including electronics part suppliers in town) wanted prices from $1.75 to $3.50 *each* for them.

      I ended up finding an LED manufacturer out of Hong Kong, advertising on eBay, who was willing to ship me 50 blue LEDs *with* resistors (so you can use them on 12 volt power, like your computer's power supply or a car battery would provide), all for about $10.00.

      Were these LEDs inferior to the more costly counterparts? Possibly to some extent only measurable with instruments - but to me, they look and work great.

      Yes, there's a lot of "cheap junk" out of China too - but as a rule, that stuff only has a brief success (until a critical mass of buyers learn to avoid it), and then the Chinese have to up the quality - or lose the sales.

      I can't blame the Etrema folks for trying anything in their power to stop the Chinese from competing with them, but in the end - I think their smartest move is what they already admitted as an option: Try to partner up with them as suppliers.

    4. Re:Dickhead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, a material is a discovery if you discover it. If you manage to synthesize it, it's an invention. Penicillin was a discovery, Teflon was an invention. Baking a new recipie is not a discovery, why should baking a new metal be?

    5. Re:Dickhead by cyril3 · · Score: 1
      Maybe its a 'double secret patent'

      But seriously, maybe they didn't patent the actual combination of materials but the process involved (if that's possible) or parts thereof. Some trade secrets are protected by secrecy rather than patent and rely on either the difficulty in analysis or the first mover advantage to provide a competitive edge.

    6. Re:Dickhead by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1

      True, but I don't think that should be the case. Keeping secrets, exactly what patents are supposed to prevent, is bad enough - trade secret law is even uglier.

  48. This is awesome, and here's why... by writermike · · Score: 1

    I know you've all seen it!

    You pull up to a stop light and some guy next to you has his stereo so far up and his bass so deep that your very fillings shake inside of your teeth enamel!

    Well, just ONCE, I'd like this guy to turn his head into a speaker and do the same thing to himself that he's been doing to other drivers for years.

    m

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  49. Cool, but flames are more fun by camperslo · · Score: 1

    Let's hope no one starts attacking people in crowds with stick-on spam-radios. I can just see poor souls wandering around helplessly with their heads turned into speakers playing ads. I think I'll stick with something safer like a good ole' flame speaker... I ran across this Flame Speaker Project

  50. If you look deep in one of the links... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There's a discussion about how mechanical changes in the material (Terfenol-D) induce magnetic changes, which can then induce current. They mention that the same properties of the material that allow for electromagnetic-to-mechanical modulation (producing speakers) can be reversed, to allow for mechanical-to-electrical modulation (producing sensors). Thus, just as this technology can produce speakers, it can also produce sensors as well.

    So my guess is (although I am totally not an engineer or physicist of any sort) that one could make sound detectors as well as sound producers using the same technology, place them strategically someplace, and use them to monitor sound sources. The speakers would then correct for the vibrational patterns detected.

    They don't explicitly say that, but it's an interesting hypothesis.

    As an aside, they have the most ridiculous
    explanation ever as to how this technology works on a page about commercial advertising applications. I clicked on their link expecting some actual explanation of how the thing works, and instead of getting an explanation, I get a diagram of what it's doing. I hate this business-speak confusion of what and how sometimes.

  51. Old News by GOPWillC · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this talked about, like a few years ago or something? I swear I remember an article here, and on ZDnet about this a while ago.

  52. They blew it by argoff · · Score: 1


    IMHO this is just another sad story of a company who is going to sink because they don't understand that customers buy services, not patents. If they were smart, they would advertize the process to the whole world in a way that is unmistakable that they invented it, and they would license it in a way that is almost free - accept that they are not locked out of future innovations of the people who use it.

    Even if that failed, they could do an Ely Whitney strategy, who never made a penny from the cotton gyn, but made tons from other manufacturing contracts that were given to him specifically because of his reputation.

    By doing it this way, they will have neither. It is really sad to see people sink themselves like this. I guess the old axiom is true, the best way to ruin someone over is to tell them that they have rights that they don't really have (in this case, patents) and watch them destroy themselves persuing it.

  53. nice by sewagemaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    oh great, so now even the unknown old fat ugly lady on the other side of the phonesex line that sounds like a horse can sound like the unknown old fat ugly lady on the other side of the phonesex line that sounds like a hot pr0nstar!

  54. Naval Ordinance Lab by gessel · · Score: 3, Informative

    The ~NOLs are inventions of the Naval Ordinance Lab, curiously located out there in the corn fields; famously NiTiNOL and TerFeNOL, not exactly the the most overwhelmingly original names, they do sound techy.

    The "latest" material, terfenol, exploits the giant magnetostrictive effect, which sounds even more brand new, but it isn't, having been discovered in the 1840s.

    The high strain versions of this (and the thermally actuated "shape memory alloys") were developed in the 1940s for use in high powered sonar. They are generally used as replacements for voice coils and for the same reason. If you want to actuate your domestic structure, you can use a big one and keep it cool with LN2.

    These materials are far too old to be covered by existing patents, so they're fabricated all over the world. Indeed, chinese manufacturers are in production.

  55. Real Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop playing with yourself!

    God? It really is you...

  56. A full bottle (or even less) of tylenol WILL kill by dlakelan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Listen up. Overdoses on tylenol are fatal and there isn't much they can do about it. It destroys your liver.

    --
    ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) http://www.endpointcomputing.com a scientific approach to custom computing.
  57. Perfect example of why patents aren't all good by anagama · · Score: 2, Informative

    • " But that's not the biggest problem. For while Etrema currently holds a monopoly on the world's smartest metal, its executives predict that within about seven years competitors will have figured out a way to make Terfenol more cheaply--or worse, to manufacture an even smarter metal. (Etrema's scientists are already hard at work developing Terfenol's successor.)"
    Without any fear of competitors, the rate of research would slow down. But because there are wolves at the door, the company will be more productive and innovative. And while it might not be this company that ultimately scores the money jackpot, humans in general will likely be better off through the enhanced development speed (speakers aren't the only application - it appears to have important ones as well).

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  58. Re:A full bottle (or even less) of tylenol WILL ki by anagama · · Score: 1


    I don't know if it is true or not, but I heard once that the fatal dose of tylenol was around 15 capsules.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  59. I didn't read the article, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why would I pay $1500 for a pair?

    Get them here for $30 a piece.

  60. "It's not the as good for cheaper that bothers us" by po8 · · Score: 1

    But if scientists from China discover how to manufacture Terfenol -- Etrema's Snodgrass says that three Chinese companies have already started making pirated versions -- the metal's still-fragile reputation could be harmed by the cheaper, imported version.

    Heh, yeah, that's the big risk to the American manufacturer---the danger to "the metal's still-fragile reputation". Snodgrass is not at all concerned by the fact that they are about to be drastically undersold by companies with better access to the rare earth metals used, and less scruples about "intellectual property" laws. Honest.
  61. vibro blade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sound applications are neat, but...

    Maybe you could fashion a blade out of a composite and vibrate it to cut turkey (or turkeys) more easily? Maybe you could vibrate it with music to see which tunes do best on which materials. Cut n rock.

  62. So sue 'em by naxi · · Score: 1

    Was I the only one who read: Another option would be to use the courts to go after customers here in the U.S. that might soon try to buy Terfenol and its products from the Chinese. and thought "RIAA"?

    --

    He's dead, Jim. You get his tricorder, I'll get his wallet.
  63. Hmmmmm by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Make a babe's ass go "Boom chika boom chika boom boom boom"!

  64. As an Iowan, by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    ...just let me say that this is just another reason why we're actually a cool state, no matter what stereotypical ideas you might have about us. I mean, who else would do this sort of thing if not some nuts from the heartland?

    Now, on to making our heads into bongs...

  65. Or the Doors... by Ieshan · · Score: 1

    "Come on Come on Come on Now Touch me Babe" might be the excuse for a masturbation addiction?

  66. you bought the thing?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't see how anyone over the age of 16 would actually want a Soundbug, believing that it would produce decent sound.

    I mean, first, it costs about $20, which to me says "it's not *that* great, so we're giving it to you for cheap". And if the you were to go to the soundbug website, you'd see that it's so teen-pop-y and the tool/toy is being marketed as a "hey, if you buy this, you can impress your friends!" object.

    If you have the courage, take a look at the video clip they provide... {...shudder...}
    And to think I was considering getting one..

    1. Re:you bought the thing?? by dirkdidit · · Score: 1

      Here's the crazy thing, I was 15 when I bought it. It broke right around the time of my 16th birthday. It was kind of one of those "well let's see how good these things really are" purchases. Turns out they aren't that good at all. Live and learn;-)

  67. The song, Voices in my Head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Turning your head into a speaker? Couldn't that be kind of creepy???

    You know what I want you to do, I want you to go upstairs to that apartment where that guy keeps playing that Barry Medalo Copacabena over and over and over again, I want you ring the doorbell, and when he answers the door, I want you to stab him in the neck with a number two pencil over and over and over again because HE MUST PAY, chop him up and stuff him in the freezer and where you leave the apartment, light the place on fire!

    Voices in my head, these are the voices in my head.

    1. Re:The song, Voices in my Head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That song should have been released as a single not long after 'Asshole'.

  68. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the article. The site was broken into and the formula was possibly stolen. The DOD claims china.

    The real question is why do things like you exist? I have written AI programs that are smarter than some of the trolls, such as yourself.

  69. I hate an idea presented in this article by dwpro · · Score: 1

    After reading the article, the part that jumped out at me and made me want to punch it was the comfort that both the interviewer and interviewee had with the question: "Ok, now that you've developed this amazing technology, how are you going to make every facet of this amazing product proprietary so that no one else can possibly profit from or improve upon it?" Boo Capitalism...*ducks*

    --
    Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
  70. So the effect is more like a punch by cyril3 · · Score: 1
    than ever before. At least at present the skull vibration is a peripheral aspect of the sound perception. The skull actually protects the soft tissue freom the external vibrations.

    Now we are going to make the skull the primary source of some of this sound and directly hit the brain.

    Why do we think this is a good idea. I would be concerned about a punch-drunk generation degenerating into parkinsons dementia before they are 30 and on autopsy having brains that look like they had been in way too many fights..

  71. Kent? ..... KENT? by jd_esguerra · · Score: 1

    "This is Jesus, Kent..."

  72. Russian Components, American Components by dbIII · · Score: 1

    All made in Taiwan.

  73. The only "news" here... by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    ... is the particular alloy being used (and, I suppose, China's potential part in things).

    Conduction phones have been a part of audiology equipment for decades. They're for differentiating conduction deafness from nerve deafness.

    I first encountered a stereo-capable single contact (bridge of the nose) conduction transducer at the Lake County (Indiana) county fair around 1965. And many will probably recall the widely advertised "Bone Phone" from the 90's. Yes, the same technology could turn any surface into a speaker, although a free-floating surface (such as a panel suspended by wire) worked best.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  74. headlines that give one pause by ndinsil · · Score: 1

    Anything that starts with "Turn Your Head Into..." I'm outta there. Bad ideas surely follow.

  75. Wow, Thats original... by handmedowns · · Score: 1

    This is such an awesome concept. I hope they didn't do too much R&D though.. seeing that the soundbug has been around for a while doing the same thing based off the same concept..
    oh well..

    --
    The road between democracy and tyranny is paved with secrecy in the name of security.
  76. Re:A full bottle (or even less) of tylenol WILL ki by Freddy+Fantabulous · · Score: 1
    Yup... and it isn't a good way to go. From the alt.suicide.holiday faq:

    ==Paracetamol (aka acetaminopren / tylenol)
    Dosage: 15+ grammes, 20+ is better
    Time: 10 hours fatal damage, but 2 weeks to actually die
    Available: easy to get hold of
    Certainty: fairly reliable

    Notes: Once 10-12 hours is up, you've had it, but you still live for a week or two after that. Probably better to wait 15 hours just to make sure. Horrible side effects during this time (some of which are: acute toxic hepatitis, renal failure, cerebral oedema, intra-abdominal bleeding, aspiration pneumonia, haemophilia). Too small dose causes severe liver damage. Accidental deaths are very common. There are few if any side effects before the damage becomes fatal; occasionally vomitting and nausea.

  77. Teenage boys seem to like it... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...a $20 device that makes things vibrate in response to music...I'm surprised it isn't more popular with the girls...parents all over the country wondering why their daughters are suddenly "really into" flamico guitar music.
    .
    .
    . ...there might be a market here.
    .
    .
    .
    . ...[trying to slink away before anybody gets that]...

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Teenage boys seem to like it... by thynk · · Score: 1

      I think the sales of your new device would increase drastically if you also marketed a version for the males.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.