Slashdot Mirror
Next-Gen Console Rumors Summarized, Discussed
Thanks to GameSpy for their article discussing available information and prospects for Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo's next generation of consoles. Regarding Sony's PlayStation 3, the piece notes: "May 2004's Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3) would seem an appropriate time for the PS3 unveiling, but it's unlikely that Sony will want to steal the thunder from its already-scheduled PlayStation Portable (PSP) unveiling", and also muses that "Nintendo's next-gen machine doesn't even have a good moniker yet, as it's unlikely that it'll want to name it after the underperforming GameCube." As for the alleged Xbox Next, the article suggests: "Jostling with Nintendo for the second-place spot worldwide, Microsoft has a bit more [motivation] than Sony to tip its hand early", and claims news of the device is "set to debut at the San Jose Game Developers Conference (GDC) in March 2004." But do those who unveil and launch their consoles first always get the advantage?
Sony's specialized parts ensured that Sony owned all of the rights. Sony's intimate knowledge of the parts and the manufacturing has allowed them to combine silicon, cutting down on overall size and costs. Likewise, the only profittaking is from Sony, and with fewer hands in the pot the margins can be shrunk. Unfortunately for Microsoft, using off-the-shelf parts from different manufacturers ensured that they needed the cooperation (and credits) from different companies. Nvidia, for example, gets a cut on the sales of the hardware, not from the software like ATI gets from Nintendo. Microsoft similarly needs to use faster hardware in their machines as they aren't exactly console-optimized. The 'Cube, again, can get away with running on much slower (read, cheaper) hardware, because it would be a terrible webserver. Say what you will about the XBox OS, it's hardware and interfaces were not originally developed with gaming in mind.
On the other hand, the success of the PS2 can probably be traced to GT3, GTA, Square, Metal Gear Solid 2, Onimusha, and a host of must-have games that were released before the Xbox hit its stride. People buy games and hardware to play those games, not hardware and games to play on that hardware.
Why must the media constantly downplay the gamecube? It is not exactly performing poorly and it is not for lack of good games. Is it because "edgy" titles such as GTA: Vice City and Manhunt are not released for it? Perhaps it is too "cute"?
As I just wrote in my journal today I predict that what Nintendo will anounce is a portable gamecube that uses the same media. Perfectly possible and it would give the PSP something serious to think about given that there is already a stack of GC software out there. Add in the Gameboy player and you're really cooking.
"I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
Systems that are first to launch are not always the winner. In reality, was PS2 really the first to launch? Yes... if you mean the first of the current systems still in production. But wasn't Dreamcast considered part of this generation? I believe it was a 128-bit system and its capabilities whipped the pants off of PS1 and N64. And look where it is now [in America, at least].
It's like sex, except I'm having it!
I think so. That is the only reason the PS2 has an advantage over the XBOX, is because it was released 1 1/2 years before the XBOX. Basically, the PS2 had many gamers already when the XBOX came out. The XBOX is a far superior console compared to the PS2, although it is battling for the number 2 spot with Nintendo's Gamecube. Timing is everything, and being established in the market. I think it is safe to say XBOX has now established itself, Sony already has along with Nintendo.
The only hard 'fact' in those 3 pages is that the PS3 will use 'CELL' technology. Other than that there's just speculation that the XBox 2 might not have a hard drive, some more Sony marketing hyperbole (PS3 will be 1000 times faster!), and the requisite Nintendo questioning.
There was absolutely nothing in that article to make it worth reading. Of course, it was on GameSpy, so that's not too surprising.
--Jeremy
Jesus was a liberal
It seems that the folks who are adamant about the GC and its games have always been big Nintendo fans. Many folks who are not on the GC bandwagon have many thoughts they claim as the reason (games too cutesy, not enough games, crappy hardware, etc.) It all reminds me of Apple using folks. They tend to be Apple users through out. Die hard even. Maybe there is a correlation between GC lovers and Apple lovers. hmmm.....
Sony's intimate knowledge of the parts and the manufacturing has allowed them to combine silicon, cutting down on overall size and costs. Likewise, the only profittaking is from Sony, and with fewer hands in the pot the margins can be shrunk. Unfortunately for Microsoft, using off-the-shelf parts from different manufacturers ensured that they needed the cooperation (and credits) from different companies. Nvidia, for example, gets a cut on the sales of the hardware, not from the software like ATI gets from Nintendo. Microsoft similarly needs to use faster hardware in their machines as they aren't exactly console-optimized. The 'Cube, again, can get away with running on much slower (read, cheaper) hardware, because it would be a terrible webserver. Say what you will about the XBox OS, it's hardware and interfaces were not originally developed with gaming in mind.
You're forgetting (or didn't know) a few things about the XBox hardware, though. The CPU, motherboard, video, and sound were modified and/or designed for the XBox. In fact, nVidia gets as big a cut of the XBox as it does because it designed the motherboard (a derivative of which became the nForce, which, oddly enough, was originally for AMD chips). The CPU was modified heavily in it's design not only to fit the specs for the chipset, but also to fit the needs of a console. All of this is why Microsoft has been able to reduce manufacturing costs on the console, but at the same time their payments to nVidia and Intel have not changed, thereby sticking them with a rather large percentage of the manufacturing cost going to those two companies. This is, as you hinted with statements about Sony, why MS announced that they are licensing technology from IBM, which should lead more people to believe they will be manufacturing the processors themselves (or outsourcing it) rather than having IBM produce processors for them as Intel does for the current XBox.
On the other hand, the success of the PS2 can probably be traced to GT3, GTA, Square, Metal Gear Solid 2, Onimusha, and a host of must-have games that were released before the Xbox hit its stride. People buy games and hardware to play those games, not hardware and games to play on that hardware.
Certainly for me it was a mix of Square, GT3, GTA3, and Tekken, not to mention backwards compatibility. That being said, I was not an early adopter of the PS2, and was disappointed with it's performance relative to the DreamCast which I had purchased shortly after release in 1999.
-PainKilleR-[CE]
I for one welcome our new videogame makers overlords! May their conglomerate business anger do not fall upon us!!
After the obligatory joke, I wish to say that is another reason (apart from excellent games) to support Nintendo. You don't want only one company owning all electronic media, be it a japanese (Sony) or American (Microsoft).
We want to play games.
Games aren't original; hardware is. PS2 games are largely the same games we've always played our whole lives. The fun of buying a console vs the emulator is the ability to play on that hardware, using neato controllers. I buy the hardware so I can play games on the hardware. Otherwise, I'd just wait another 5 or so years, get a PS2 emulator, and download ROMs like mad. But I don't want to play those games on my PC. I want to play them on my PS2 hardware.
There are definitely a few innovations, I admit, like GTA:VC, and the newish kinetic/rhythm genre i.e. Amplitude/Frequency/DDR/Eye Toy. But in the examples of DDR and the Eye Toy -- people buy hardware so that they can play a game on that hardware.
When I bought 2 forcefeedback steering wheels for my console, I didn't buy them "to play a game". I bought them to use the steering wheels. I didn't even have a game in mind. (Though, now, it is Burnout 2!)
So.. I have to disagree, for me personally at least.
-Clio
Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
Nintendo's next-gen machine doesn't even have a good moniker yet, as it's unlikely that it'll want to name it after the underperforming GameCube.
Except for the fact that the Xbox is "underperforming" just as much as the GC and MS will indeed name their next console after the Xbox, so I don't see how naming it after the Gamecube would be such a bad thing (though I'd like to see them name it the NES 5, personally).
Frankly, I think the next gen systems are going to be rather underwhelming. The transition from 64 to 128 bit for Sony took a bit of time, as plenty of good games were still released for the PS1, and the first genration for the PS2 was rather underwhelming. (For the most part. Sony got lucky I think).
Every new hardware generation needs a "Killer App.". From the 2600 to the NES, the Killer App was SMB/Mega Man/Side Scrollers. From the NES to the SNES/Genesis, the killer apps were the increased graphical prowness, SMW and Sonic. Then there was the turn at 32/64 bit. For the N64, it was 3d adventures. For the PS1, it was first the arcade ports. That never really caught on. The big killer app was Final Fantasy VII, of course.
When it jumped from PS1 to PS2, the Dreamcast, first, never really had anything to really vault itself. Soul Calibur was great, but the genre was already done on the PS1. It was technically brilliant, but didn't add too much.
My argument is that the killer app on the PS2 is actually a rather overlooked game.
Dynasty Warriors 2.
That really introduced the idea of being overwhelmed in an action game. Not for consumers, but for developers, I think it opened a lot of eyes towards what could be done on the hardware.
Until they have something to launch this on the new hardware, I think that the focus will be on the current generation.
My wife and I both enjoy playing the Mario Advance series on the GameCube GameBoy Player. Sure, we're still a bit under the average gamer age of 29, but there are a LOT of people our age who love Golden Sun, Final Fantasy Tactics Advance, Advance Wars, and other GBA games.
MORTAR COMBAT!
I am 25 years old, and I can't find any game funnier than Super Smash Bros Melee. And that game is full of furry small animals(pokemon) and ladies who are NOT showing their boobs, and yell like babies (Peach). There is no blood, altough the game is somewhat violent (a Professional Racers hits a dinosaur in the face with a BaseBall Bat repeteadly). Well, that's me, YMMV.
I guess that the average gamer age has not risen yet above 17, when blood and sex are cooler than solid gameplay. (Well, sex, at least the not-electronic kind, is still cooler than gameplay =)
Care to cite some evidence of the average gamer age? The fact may be that many companies find the 18-30 male demographic enticing to target but, assuming no 18-30 male wants to play any Nintendo games [I say that as a person in that target group who owns and enjoys a Gamecube], there is still a huge void that many companies simply don't hit. The fact is that I can enjoy both GTA 3 and a game like The Wind Waker. You might think because of the graphic style, the Wind Waker is designed for kids. People who think Mario and Zelda are just for the kiddies are missing out on enjoyable game experiences and probably are doing so because they have some strange need to have ultra-violence in all their games. I find this similar to the types of people who are constantly making jokes about others being gay in order to feel more like a man - a scared little girl deep inside there. And don't feel "bad" for inanimate objects. You can feel bad for the folks working at Nintendo [even though Nintendo is making plenty of profit - unlike the XBox division at MS] but not the Gamecube itself. Have a good day.
I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
Sega ships the Saturn before Sony ships the PS1 -- Sega gets dominated (despite the fact that the Saturn was a superior console in terms of hardware).
Sega then ships the Dreamcast a whole year before the PS2, and gets trounced once again.
I suppose it could be partly blamed on bad marketing, but the real problem was that Sega never had any real franchise titles on the Saturn or Dreamcast (despite the Sonic rehashes). Sony will dominate for years to come, simply because they have the best titles -- the FF and GTA series' alone will sell millions of PS3 boxes.
Basically the comments after each section boil down to "we hate nintendo" - I just don't get it. I don't hope any one company succeeds or fails, I will buy a product that appeals to me [unless it made by microsoft :)] I recently got a gmaecube (I haven't purchase any of this generation's consoles till now) and I did so because it beat the others on price, and on games. The games I want to play are on the GC and I think its because I want to play fun games, not games that throw in violence or sex so they can be 'mature'. (although my first few purchases have had some misteps, "Super Smash Bros. Melee" anyone ?)
I also think the GC joystick design blows away the competition and I hope nintendo sticks with it. But if their next system sucks I wont want it, even if everyone else does, and the same goes for sony.
I just don't get why all the press recently has been so anti-nintendo, it is sort-of like the anti-Howard Dean press, where is very obvious the Republicans are pushing the 'un-electable' angle as hard as they can so that it sticks before he even gets the nomination. Why are game writers so anti nintendo? the game cube is a nice little device and the games they put out are typiclly very high quality.
MS has already said that Xbox2 will NOT be backwards compatible.
While I only happen to own Nintendo consoles, I don't have much experience with backwards compatability (except for a few old gameboy puzzle games and Mario Tennis which I still play on the GBA), I do have experience with the "ultimate" backwards-compatible machine... the PC. I fire up Civ II, Warcraft II, old King's Quests and Lucasarts games at least once a year.
Backwards compatability rules. PS3 is already announced to be backwards compatible, and Iwata-San has already confirmed in an interview with Famatsu that N5 will backwards compatable too. Big mistake (IMO) Bill...
"Say what you will about the XBox OS, it's hardware and interfaces were not originally developed with gaming in mind."
Seeing as how the XBOX is much more impressive graphically than the PS2, it's hard to take the 'not originally developed with gaming in mind' comment too seriously.
"Derp de derp."
On the other hand, the success of the PS2 can probably be traced to GT3, GTA, Square, Metal Gear Solid 2, Onimusha, and a host of must-have games that were released before the Xbox hit its stride.
The PS2's success didn't have to do with big games. There really weren't any big games for the PS2 until about a year after the PS2's launch - about the same time as the GameCube and Xbox launched. By then, PS2 sales were already about what current Xbox and GameCube sales combined are.
Other than Halo, the Xbox has had very few games to really drive the system sales. Yes, it has some good games, but not standout games. You can get things like good racers for every system.
The GameCube's failure is due to Nintendo waiting until a year after launch to start bringing out their big names - Mario, Zelda, and Metroid. While Metroid came out far better than anyone expected, Mario and Zelda greatly underachieved. Mario Sunshine was very good, but it's rather short if you don't count the very tedious finding blue coins portion of the game. Zelda had the difficulty toned down way too much, and was also very linear (the non-linearity of past Zelda games was a huge factor in what made them so good).
For the 5020352303205th time, Nintendo has stated that the day they stop making systems is the day they get out of the video game business altogether.
(Well, sex, at least the not-electronic kind, is still cooler than gameplay =)
<gollum>Leave now, and never come back! </gollum>
Sigh... I like nintendo games, but I dont like their consoles thats all, yes I think wind waker is a great game, but if I need to buy a console which is sub standard (no DVD play back, no Hard drive and very little space in discs) and has 1 good title each 6 months I prefer not to play it. period.
Im glad they are doing ok, I know they are a lot of people who have gamecubes and love it. But I dont thats my opinion thats all.
And by the way, the reason the media is always small talking the cube is because is the number 3 (of 3) next gen console in sales in America. (number 2 in Japan) is the console with least sales. (but they do make a lot of profit)
Go ahead MOD my day!
More opinions here
The stuff the Sony marketroids hand out, no doubt.
When will you idiots learn that the PS2 is a 32-bit console, just like everyone other console out there right now (with the exception of the Jaguar and N64, and look where they are now)
I don't know how console gamers got the idea that more bits = better system: sure this was important back in the days of the 6502, the jump in bits (NES->SNES, Master System->Genesis) was a jump in generations.
The truth is nobody really needs more than a 32-bit integer these days. The systems have FAR less RAM than can be addressed as such. So we have two generations of systems now with the same number of bits per GP register in your CPUs.
No, sadly, the marketroids continuted to push this insane notion of doubling of bits = generation jump, and scrambled to find places inside the system ANYWHERE where a larger bit register could be found so they could say "AHA! Look, our system has more bits!!!"
In the case of the PS2, this would be the 128-bit wide support in the emotion engine. Never mind that no actual 128-bit operations occur in there, just dual 64 or quad 32 bit ops in parallel.
By this logic, my desktop PC with SSE2 extensions in the CPU is also 128-bit.
No, the PS2 has a lowly (480MHz!) 32-bit RISC-based (R3000?) CPU at it's heart. So pedestrian.
Hell Nintendo went BACKWARDS. They had an expensive MIPS R90 (real 64-bit) chip in the N64, and then went to the much faster G3 (32bit-PPC@400MHz) in the GameCube. One of these systems doesn't suffer from slowdown...
I think you're stretching the killer app idea. Most systems debut with a game that's clearly NOT possible on the previous hardware as a technology demo. A year of refinement in learning how to develop for the platform will reveal "deal-breakers" for people who hold out from buying it at first release.
For example:
Gamecube's "tech demo" would be Luigi's Mansion.
The deal breaker was Double Dash.
PS/2's "tech demo" would be Gran Tourismo A-Spec.
The deal breaker was GTA3.
X-Box's "tech demo" would be Halo.
X-Box's deal breaker was Halo.
Heh.
THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
I'm not saying that the original poster was correct in his statement. In fact, it sounds quite foolish to think that a video game console was designed with something other than gaming in mind. [And of course, the poster offers no evidence.] But your counter to that statement is weak, at best.
I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
In case you don't actually pay attention to FF news as devotedly as fanboys like me, whatever rift existed between Nintendo and Square has been healed, and new FF games (after XII, most likely, since it's already in development--but what do I know?) will probably come to Nintendo's consoles as well. Crystal Chronicle (not a numbered FF, but an FF, nonetheless) is already out for GC/GBA.
Of course, I'm sticking with my PS2, and 3 when it comes out, or more likely a year or 2 after :-)
Dan Aris
Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
"May 2004's Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3) would seem an appropriate time for the PS3 unveiling"
No, it wouldn't. That time would be 2005. The cycle between consoles otherwise is 5 years. When did they last have complete hardware to show in North America? At E3 2000. When did the PS2 release? Fall 2000.
--
Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
As for the 1 title every 6 months - I waited for the price drop/Zelda bundle and there are more than enough good games to keep me occupied, especially since I also own a PS2.
I have not noticed the media small talking the Gamecube, as you put it. Many people keep saying this but I read quite a few gaming sites and have a subscription to a gaming magazine [no need to give a plug to them here] and have found most coverage fairly balanced. Gaming sites and magazines review the games. They don't normally have fanboy discussions of which console is best so I don't know where all you people are finding this great media hatred for the Gamecube - please link to an example or two or ten, in order to assure me that there is a conspiracy.
I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
294MHz R4000 MIPS.
It's the GameCube with the 486MHz G3.
THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
[ob-bleat]
I was irked when reading digitaltaco's comments. he's constantly referring to the CURRENT generation of consoles as NEXT-GEN.
A lot of people do this and it's stupid.
[/ob-bleat]
However, the rest of the article was spot on. Amid the complaints and disbelief that the next Xbox will possibly ship without a hard drive, I think that it's a smart move.
First - what is the hard drive used for? (other than by people who hack it to put linux on it):
- saving games
- game updates via Xbox Live
- MP3s.
Game saves aren't that big. In fact, every single one of my games tells me I still have 50000+ blocks free.
I'm unsure how big Live updates for games are, but surely they wouldn't go over a few hundred megs per game over the lifetime of a game.
As for MP3s, I don't even know how this is done. Is it possible without hacking the Xbox? Can it be done while retaining a playable Xbox still usable with Live?
I think the best solution is memory cards. Either removable solid state drives, or flash cards. The capacity of Flash Cards and Memory Sticks these days will allow people to have a few of them usable with updatable Live games. The only problem is the cost of the cards.
Microsoft will have to weigh up the cost vs size/portability/weight of the console as a whole.
But that doesn't mean they can't put in a 3.5" drive with 5-10 gigs....They could even make the drives removable.
I like smaller, lighter consoles, but I'd hate to pay $200 per gig of memory cards, even if it did support full updates for 4-5 games, plus several other saves...
The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
" can compare an Atari 2600 to whatever modern computer you want and the graphics on the computer will be superior - even though that computer wasn't built with gaming in mind [we'll say it was assembled to be a web server.] You see the trouble with your rationale?"
No, not really. Don't get me wrong, I see what you're saying, but it doesn't prove my statement is 'weak at best'. If the result is that it does what people buy it to do, it's hard to take the "it's not designed with gaming in mind" very seriously. Games are about the result, not the journey getting there. XBOX's could be sold with vaccuum tubes in the hardware, if it still produces pleasing results, then why is that statement very relevant?
Just so you know, I *am* listening, so please don't feel the need to put me in my place. I'd much rather have a thoughtful discussion here than an argument.
"Derp de derp."
a lot of people are whining about backwards compatibility being important. but realistically, how many owners of PS2s are still buying PS1 games? A few, but not many. Once they see games on the PS2, they don't want blocky PS1 games...
How many Nintendo consoles have offered backwards compatibility? The Gameboys. Gamecube has a completely different type of media. Usually Nintendo have stuck to carts, but they're on proprietary CDs.
People are still buying their new games. People aren't complaining that they can't plug their N64 games and their SNES games into the cube...
Same for Xbox. New architecture will just mean a new box. Who gives a toss iff it can't play old Xbox games? Your old Xbox will do that.
If you don't have a current-gen Xbox when the next-gen is released, you're not going to go out and buy old Xbox games. They'll be too blocky, or too low-res.
You'll move on. And you'll accept that.
Don't impel the designers of the next-gen consoles to add backwards compatibility that you won't ACTUALLY use.
The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
Do you think I care whether or not I'm a software pirate? Or what others think? Because I have yet to hear of someone getting busted for installing Xbox games to their (upgraded) +100gb Xbox hard disk. Not only can I play bootlegged games, I can watch the latest movie rips.
He was referring to PC hardware in general. The x86 architecture... Of course the frame buffers used were created with games in mind, but the basic machine architecture was not.
This includes other things like hard drives, CD-ROMs, etc. Cartridges may have been designed with games in mind because of their quick load times, but HDs and CDs weren't. They're just cheap hardware utilised in a console - but they weren't developed with gaming in mind.
The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
Yes. Though I knew this already. I'm an anamoly in just about every area possible.
-Clio
Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
The big problem I had with Zelda were the long and tedious parts waiting for the boat to reach the next island you want to go to. Even when you could warp to areas you still often had to point the boat in the direction you wanted to go then sail for a minute to get there. :( Personally I'd have just liked to have seen the islands closer together to cut down on travel times.
People buy games and hardware to play those games, not hardware and games to play on that hardware.
:)
I must say, slightly offtopic, this is the first time I've caught someone quoting me in a public forum. You've just made my day.
- Chris Canfield
The ______ Agenda
The VU0/1 chips have 128-bit wide registers, but they aren't doing 128-bit ops. They do quad 32-bit integer/fp ops in parallel. The 4th core is the generic FPU which crunches 64-bit floats.
But the primary core, which does the integer and branching logic, controls all the other cores, schedules the DMA, etc. etc. is 32-bit through and through. Also, note all cores operate on 32-bit addresses.
If that makes it 128-bit (or even 64-bit), then the 387 coprocessor upgrade made the 1980's era 386SX 64-bit.
Which it didn't.
Which means you're WRONG. When will you accept that?
THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
How dare you point out logical flaws in my rant!
>_;;;
THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
It's funny the things people will use to make themselves appear superior to others. Violent video games are used alot for this it seems.
I'm 30 years old, and have been gaming for the majority of my life, and I still enjoy violence in video games (and sex does have it's role as well). Neither will sell me on a video game, it still has to be good for me to play it, no matter how much t&a or blood.
I consider myself a responsible adult, yet yes I do have a bit of immaturity about me, I'm still a kid at heart. I'm also not big on the cutesy cartoony graphics of alot of games... which is why I don't go for Nintendo stuff.
Of course, this makes me wonder, how do you figure that realistic violence in video games equates to a 17 year old mentality, when you're playing video games with cutesy bright colourful cartoony characters, which in just about every other aspect of media, be it movies, or television, or comics, is what is marketed to a VERY young audience.
I like realistic violence in video games and don't mind looking at some of the scantily clad cgi lasses for the same reason I like horror movies, scary books or sci-fi... I like the feelings it invokes in me... fear, adrenaline, etc.
I supposed it's all a matter of taste, yet it seems if you have different taste then someone, they think less of you.
Columbine anyone? (sorry, had to throw that in there:)
If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
I mean, look at this :
up to 1000 times as fast as the PS2. What that means in real-world terms remains to be seen. We suspect that backwards compatibility is unlikely.
With that much hyped power, I can't understand why gamespy couldn't even think about emulation.
Oh wait, I forgot...
Anyone believing something as stupid as "1000 times as powerfull as a playstation 2, and there will be 4 of them in the box" should be shot. If they made a joke about it, it'd be fine. But they just said it. I just wish they'd go bankrupt.
Since you're such a smarty pants... Why did they bother using 128-bit registers in the primary core to transfer to VU0... why not schedule it to R/W from the cache itself? Cut down on the duplicate memory controller logic?
It seems a round-about way of doing things unless you can also use it to read/write to each of the 4 quads.
THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
That was >_<;;;
I'll admit, I do look sexy with bandages. But that wasn't the intent.
THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
But do those who unveil and launch their consoles first always get the advantage?
No. For references, please see entries for Sega Saturn and Dreamcast. Next question.
"Why Subscribe?" Good question...
I hope Nintendo will call their next console the 'N5'. I think it's a pretty kick-ass name, it's like a testament of Nintendo's heritage, plus it's short and sweet.
I read this and realized the article has nothing interesting to say. The fact that PS3 isn't even confirmed for the CELL chip yet (which was the first spec released!) is proof enough that it is far from a "sure thing."
because most 3rd party developers have walked away from the GC.
simple as that.
3rd party developer interest is the key indicator into console health, and the GameCube doesn't have much, if any, left.
consider the dreamcast. it had some fantastic games. it wasn't too far behind the ps and n64 after a year or two of release - but it was still dead in the water because 3rd party developers didn't consider it worth the risk. it continued to have some really great games released for it - but the overall trend was what mattered.
nintendo's situation isn't quite as desperate, but it's certainly similar.
// "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
All of them support decent fillrates, with varying levels of support for vertex and/or texel ops to do any necessary special effects.
Not all of them are using ansiotropic texture filtering (I think only the XBox can), but that hasn't left an impression on me, especially since 99% of installations are with NTSC sets, so you can't tell anyway.
At this point, the quality of the graphics are in the hands of the game designers, and if it looks crappy, it's probably not a limitation of the system, but the designers inability to effectively use it.
Clearly the grandparent has only been playing games that were ported to the PS2, and not developed FOR it.
THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
This sentence does not parse correctly. What are you trying to say?
"I am just saying that it seems like Gamecube is not doing well in sales because their games are targeted for kids (they do not hold many M-rated games)."
First of all, the Gamecube is selling well enough to keep Nintendo in the black. Granted, the Gamecube is not number one worldwide but if you look at worldwide numbers, which I am assuming you haven't, you would know that the Gamecube and the XBox are pretty much event in sales. Of course, that blows your whole theory that M-rated games sell systems since the XBox has plenty of those. Third, why does a game have to be rated M in order to get targeted to adults? If a movie comes out and is rated PG, do you not see it on the grounds that it is for children? Do you need to have the word 'fuck' in a movie in order for your adult sense of entertainment to be satisfied? It's a rather shallow person who only buys M-rated games.
In actuality, I believe that Nintendo's lineup of games, coupled with better third party support, can keep a console quite well afloat. The Gamecube and XBox have not done as well as both Nintendo and MS would have liked because of the strong success of the PS2 and a lack of quality third party games. Both Nintendo and MS have released or bought companies and released excellent first party software that have given their respective consoles some great hits. But you obviously didn't read that article you linked to that closely. Do you think the average gamer over the age of 50 can find more games to play on the Gamecube, XBox, or PS2? I would guess that the less violent, more kid-targeted games [as you would call them] would appear to someone over 50. I think an older person would be more inclined to enjoy something like Pikmin than GTA or Halo. In conclusion, your analysis is trite and without depth. M-rated games are not the only games for adults. Did you know that there are E-rated games? Do you know what the E stands for? EVERYONE. That includes adults.
I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
Play Zelda 1. There's very little forced linearity to it.
You have to get the raft from level 3 to get to 4, and you have to get the ladder from level 4 to make it through the levels after it. And you have to get the flute from level 5 to get to level 7. You also have to beat 1 thru 8 before you can enter 9. That's all that's forced. For example, I just beat Zelda 1 again last week. I did the levels in the order 1, 3, 2, 4, 5, 8, 7, 6, 9.
Wind Waker was clearly designed to be non-linear. When you are told about the last 2 dungeons, you are given no indication you have to do them in order. And when you play through them, you'll realize that nothing in the levels requires them to be beat in order. But the guy who lets you into the second level won't show up until you beat the first. It could've been even better if they continued with the non-linearity - there were originally supposed to be more levels in the game, but they were cut due to time constraints. The most obvious cut is the level before talking to Jabun.
I'm not sure how linear Zelda 3 is; the only thing I'm certain of is that you can beat the level where you get the staff that creates blocks before you beat the ice level.
In Majora's Mask, the real game is the side quests, not the dungeons, and that stuff is very largely non-linear.
On the other hand, the success of the PS2 can probably be traced to GT3, GTA, Square, Metal Gear Solid 2, Onimusha, and a host of must-have games that were released before the Xbox hit its stride.
Personally, I have never liked Sony as a company, their practices, or their gaming consoles. I really don't understand why Microsoft doesn't just buy Rockstar and Square, and put an end to this once & for all.
Except that Microsoft, themselves, have pretty much said that the Xbox is a trojan, designed to get the Microsoft name into the living room. The Xbox is far more successful than their previous attempts at controlling the living room: Ultimate TV and WebTV (now MSN TV).
Look at the Xbox Music Mixer, which allows karoke use; file sharing of music and movie files from a PC and Xbox; etc. That's not meant for gaming in the least; but it is probably hoped to be the tojan that gets the Xbox into Japanese homes (where karoke is very popular).
But, the Xbox Music Mixer shows that Microsoft never intended the Xbox to be just a game machine, even though they originally said it was just a game machine. The Xbox is designed to be their gateway into controlling the 'Digital Entertainment Lifestyle' (hey, they coined the phrase, not me).
I fully expect the next Xbox to have Ultimate TV built in, as well as possibly MSN TV. Games will end up being the byproduct, not the main focus. The main focus will be in controlling the living room like they control the PC OS industry.
How can you feel bad for an inanimate object?
I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
It seems to come more from the non-gaming media than the gaming media.
Personally, I find this article from Time Magazine to be exceptionally funny. The first sentence of the second paragraph states: "But the company's latest console, the GameCube, has proved to be an unmitigated disaster, giving this holiday season the potential to become the Winter of Iwata's Discontent."
There's a few others here on Slashdot you can find, linking to the Washigton Post, and some others.
Gotta love people who don't have a clue about something writing about it...you know, like most posts on /.
So we have: Nintendo's problem is that they target kids... btw, have you noticed that they are targeting adults now?
Makes sense to me.
I'd rather be lucky than good.
I'm actually pretty patient, but I would not want to be waiting this long to be playing PS2 games. Most of the fun (for me) is playing vs other people, and people don't want to play 4-year-old games. Plus they'll have had more practice and whip my ass!
An emulator will outlive a console in general terms, but will require maintenance whereas a console generally wont.
A console gets instant results and lasts as long as the hardware lasts. But applications do not necessarily last as long as the hardware lasts.
(Example, I had to drop many of my favorite .EXE and .COM 1980s utilities when I upgraded to Win95, even though it was the same hardware, whereas a PS2 "utility" [ie the sharkport cd] will work forever. And my favorite screensaver ever, luminati.exe, will only run on dos boxes. Same hardware, diff OS, can't do it. Not saying that would happen to an emulator, but changing video cards and other various interruptions can fuck shit up badly. It's a function of computers. Consoles don't generally change hardware or install programs or do anything to upset their perfect equilibrium. That's why they sell.)
I am intrigued by the save-states though. That's the thing that pisses me off about consoles. The fascism.
Do the emulators handle 4-player games? Multitaps? Dance pads? Online? USB devices? Light guns (extra challenge: get light guns to work with TV-Out)? Steering wheels. I have all of these devices. I wouldn't want to take any time to figure it out, when I can just put a disc in my PS2.
O.K. I'm done rambling. No real point other than I disagree. For reference, the ONLY consoles I've ever owned: Atari 2600, original Nintendo, PS2. Though last summer I bought a ColecoVision and a C64 at a yardsale. (Incidentally, if you see a commodore monitor, GET IT, it's basically a TV without tuning capabilities, and people will end up selling you a TV for $5. It has sound and everything.) Damn I wi
-Clio
Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
I personally think that if Nintendo added some cheap flash memory to their next system to act as a place to save games (but not to replace memory cards, as people will want to carry saves to other places and carry GC saves over for the backwards compatibility) they could possibly get a jump on Sony and/or Microsoft. I don't remember off the top of my head exactly what the size of the GameCube's memory cards are (4 megabits for 59 and 16 megabits for 251? Is that right?), but since my 8MB PS2 card is very empty still after many games and my GC 251 memory card is 3/4 full with about 10 different games worth of data or so, a 16MB flash drive should be plenty for everyone in the next wave and relatively cheap to include.
When the Saturn came out and stumbled, any interview with anyone from Sega stated that the company was committed to remaining in the hardware game. Do you actually believe that it is in Nintendo's best interests to even hint at the possibility of them leaving the hardware business? What this would do is undermine their hardware sales because you create doubt in the minds of gamers about whether the Nintendo console is going to be supported. Yes, Nintendo has repeatedly said that they're going to stick to hardware until they go out of business. No, this is not a guarantee and if you believe that no market forces could come along and lead Nintendo to being a software only company, you're silly.
Here's a hint - companies say the right things for the time they say them. Companies sometimes change their 'minds.'
Don't be so naive.
I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
THere's a difference, though. Contrary to many fanboys' beliefs, Nintendo has no software division to fall back on. 5 wonderful games a year does not a software division make. Sega has a much larger one and as such was able to make the move it did. Nintendo is not.
I'm not saying it won't leave the business. I'm just saying it won't make the same move as Sega.
Now, in the future don't be so rude. The person you replied to is a frequent poster on games.slashdot.org and is sure to have heard the same quotes you have.
As for the possibility of Nintendo games showing up on a PS3, to which you dismiss the possibility. I'll grant you the assumption that their games division has too much overhead and so that switching to software only is feasible in its current state. Don't you think a company like Nintendo could modify their approach and become a much larger publishing house? Don't you think if they decided that they wanted out of the hardware business, they could reallocate resources and shift people around, perhaps temporarily shut down NOA and focus on the Japanese market where they can sell anything? You are trying to completely dismiss the possibility again based on Nintendo's word and Nintendo's current state. We're talking about the future where it's not only a possibility, it is a feasible option. Again, we all know that Nintendo management is committed to the hardware market and I don't think any of this will come to pass, but the possibility remains. Furthermore, if they needed start-up capital to expand their software division, Nintendo owns many, many licenses and can outsource games development along with the profit they generate from plush toys and such.
I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
This isn't true. I've finished the game twice now, and I completed the Earth Shrine first in the first game, and the Wind Shrine first in the second game. Nothing in the Earth Shrine requires you to use the Hookshot, and nothing in the Wind Shrine requires you to use the Mirror Shield. The fact that you didn't see the "guy" (I assume you mean the tree sprite) probably just meant that you already had the Rito with you - Once you've picked up one, you have to go with that one to completion. Can't have them both on the boat, nope nope nope.
Interesting. When I played it I got the Rito girl first. When a friend played it, he wanted to get the tree sprite first, but he simply wasn't there. I'm almost positive that he didn't talk to the Rito girl beforehand, but maybe he did. I haven't bothered to play thru the game again; maybe I will soon.