Slashdot Mirror


RFID Casino Chips

scubacuda writes "Could casinos be the next Gillette or Wal-Mart? New Scientist and others report that casinos could soon start using RFID tags to spot counterfeits and thefts, and also to monitor the behaviour of gamblers. Embedded RFID tags should make the chips much harder to counterfeit, and placing tag readers at staff exits could cut down on theft by employees. (With companies like Infosys helping clients identify and plan pilot RFID projects, we'll no doubt be seeing more and more companies dabbling in this area. Those interested in reading objections to RFID use should check out the position paper issued by CASPIAN, EPIC, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, Junkbusters, ACLU, Meyda Online, EFF, and PrivacyActivism.)"

271 comments

  1. Ouch for card counters... by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They can more easily monitor your swing of bet levels......

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not when I get my RFID reader and read the tags on the cards in blackjack ;)

      --
      --

      FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
    2. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Psx29 · · Score: 1

      There are many casinos where card counting is legal, just go there instead.

    3. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to put up with that if they would also track the cards so that I could be 100% certain the dealer wasn't dealing seconds.

    4. Re:Ouch for card counters... by goofballs · · Score: 4, Informative

      card counting is legal everywhere in the states. the casinos in nevada are allowed to not let you play if they suspect you're card counting, but it's not against the law. this has been tested in the courts.

    5. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Card counting is always legal, at least in the U.S.

      The difference in casinos is whether they have to let you play or not. In Vegas, they can ask you to leave at any time for any reason and charge you with trespassing if you come back.

      In Atlantic City (as far as I remember -- its been awhile), they have to let you play. But they can instruct their dealers to do a lot of things to make your life as a counter quite miserable. Like only work very shallow into the shoe, for starters.

    6. Re:Ouch for card counters... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Card counting is ALWAYS legal, as long as there is no mechanical assistance...

      :-)

      But, most casinos don't allow you to play BJ there is they think you are a counter. I've never heard of a casino being 'advantage' player friendly. If they did, I can only guess they'd have the worst possible game set up...as far as dealer stands, payoffs...shuffle after each deal.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:Ouch for card counters... by glorf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article talks mainly about being able to identify the chips as being authentic. I think that installing the equipment at each betting spot on the table to read the different IDs, lookup the dollar value in a central database and do the math to figure out total bet would be a little much. It would take some serious hardware to do real-time tracking of every chip in play. Considering that dealers, pit-bosses and the eye in the sky already are fairly good at catching counters (who can't take the casino for too much if they don't want to get banned), I don't think the ROI would be there for such a massive system.

      Having a few readers in the cage to verify authenticity before giving out cash in exchange, would be a much more efficient use of RFID.

    8. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Pave+Low · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I believe there's already technology that can constantly monitor bettings, though I'm not sure how widely its implemented. The eye in the sky can see that without RFID.

      Anyways, spotting a lone card counter really isn't that hard anyways. To be a really effective counter, your betting levels needs to swing wildely from 10-1 if you're using a hi-lo count, and pit bosses can see it a mile away.

      It's team play that is really hard for casinos to spot, like when a spotter can call other people in when a shoe is hot, and they can bet huge.

      --
      SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
    9. Re:Ouch for card counters... by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Couldn't you just take the chips home..and microwave them? I can't see them requiring the RFID working to prove they were their chips...

      Something that can fail isn't the customers fault...if it was proven otherwise to be genuine.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:Ouch for card counters... by B'Trey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even if that's true, which I'm not at all certain of, I don't see it as an issue. You have no right to card counting.

      In fact, I don't see this as an issue at all. The casino already knows how many chips I buy, they can keep track of how many I win, and I cash them in before I leave.

      The real issue with RFIDs is that they can be used to track people over time, and for purposes much different than their announced use. I'd have absolutely no problem with Wal-Mart (or whoever) using RFIDs to track inventory if they were somehow turned off when I purchased the merchandise, somewhat like the magnetic devices that are currently used for anti-theft measures.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    11. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Gunzour · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was at the Hard Rock Casino in Vegas two years ago (during Defcon), and the dealer there was showing us how to count cards while we played. This is the same Hard Rock that got taken for huge amounts of money by the MIT card counting crew. The dealer told us that they will usually let you count cards, even if they know you are doing it, unless you start winning a lot of money. The reason: Amateur card counters tend to make mistakes that benefit the house. Unless you are really good at card counting, you may be better off sticking with basic strategy.

      He had a good point, but the next year I went back and they had installed continuous card shufflers at most of their tables. You can't count cards against these machines since there is no beginning or end to the shoe.

    12. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you have the right to Card Count. There is nothing wrong about it. Unfortunately its the Casino's right to kick out who they want, when they want.
      Screw the casino if your smart enough. Why should you give up your money without doing everything you can to win.

    13. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      There was a story on this a few months ago. Some casinos are instituting computer systems using the cameras to track the cards.

    14. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Card counting is ALWAYS legal, as long as there is no mechanical assistance...

      Oooh, that gives me the best idea.

      RFIDs in the cards for blackjack. Then they can reshuffle only when the shoe is getting too friendly.

      Is it illegal for the casino to count cards?

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    15. Re:Ouch for card counters... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      For those who want to try card counting and have mastered the basic strategy, there is a simpler insurance count. You subtract 2 for each ten you see, and add one for each other card, then divide by the number of decks in the shoe, if your result is more than four, take insurance when offered.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    16. Re:Ouch for card counters... by leonardluen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      those continuous shufflers aren't allways as good as the casino wants them to be...you are correct that you can't count them, but i believe sometimes they can have patterns as to how they shuffle.

      some people are really good at tracking a shuffle of a normal dealer, i have seen it done before without use of anything but your own brain...you can use some of these same techniques on a continuous shuffler. it is a lot harder than counting though!

      and it is a good thing that not everyone counts(successfully) otherwise all the casinos would switch to these continuous shufflers.

    17. Re:Ouch for card counters... by B'Trey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sigh. A "right" has a specific meaning. Not to put too fine a point on it, but it doesn't mean that you CAN do something, it means no one can interfere with you doing it. Card counting isn't illegal but if the casino kicks you out for doing it, you have no recourse. You can't sue the casion for interfering with your right to card count.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    18. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would fall under "mechanical aids". Rules are the same for the casino as the player in that regard. A casino caught running a rigged game like that could stand to lose its gambling license.

    19. Re:Ouch for card counters... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Atlantic City (as far as I remember -- its been awhile), they have to let you play. But they can instruct their dealers to do a lot of things to make your life as a counter quite miserable. Like only work very shallow into the shoe, for starters.

      They can also force you to flat-bet (bet the same amount every hand during the shoe), which pretty much defeats the main purpose of card counting.

    20. Re:Ouch for card counters... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is it illegal for the casino to count cards?

      No, it's called preferential shuffling, and it's perfectly legal. However, if they used RFIDs in the cards, at the very least they'd have to tell you, in which case no one would play blackjack at that casino. Well, actually, some people probably would, but not as many.

      And this wouldn't be legal in Atlantic City, because all game rules in Atlantic City have to be approved by the government.

    21. Re:Ouch for card counters... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I think that installing the equipment at each betting spot on the table to read the different IDs, lookup the dollar value in a central database and do the math to figure out total bet would be a little much. It would take some serious hardware to do real-time tracking of every chip in play.

      Considering that the big casinos already have facial recognition and limited card tracking software/hardware, it wouldn't be that much of a stretch to add chip tracking.

    22. Re:Ouch for card counters... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Card counting isn't illegal but if the casino kicks you out for doing it, you have no recourse. You can't sue the casion for interfering with your right to card count.

      Not true in Atlantic City. The casinos in Atlantic City are so highly regulated that they are considered to be acting as part of the government, and therefore are not allowed to discriminate against card counters. Of course, they can require you to flat-bet, and disallow players entering in the middle of a shoe, which pretty much defeats the purpose of card counting.

    23. Re:Ouch for card counters... by geekee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I was in Reno some time ago, I noticed a lot of casinos advertising 1 deck blackjack. I'm guessing they think they can take money from people who think they can count cards, but especially after a few of the complimentary drinks, can't keep track as well as they thought.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    24. Re:Ouch for card counters... by bigbigbison · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You could do that to one or two chips and get away with it. But if you come in with a whole pocket full of them, they would probably kick you out and bar you.

      Casinos are all about trying to make the customer happy so they can take their money. The minute you go from someone they can make money from to someone they suspect is trying to unfairly take money from them they start playing hardball.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    25. Re:Ouch for card counters... by MC_Cancer_Pants · · Score: 2, Informative

      To validate the chips, which are worthless, for cash, which HAS worth, they would have to check the RFID. So: Microwaving them would kill the RF signal, yes, making the chips completely worthless, I don't see why this is a threat.

    26. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Mad+Browser · · Score: 1

      A lot of casinos are now offering one deck blackjack... The twist is that a blackjack pays 6:5 instead of 3:2, majorly bad for the player.

      --
      RateVegas.com - Vegas Reviews
    27. Re:Ouch for card counters... by OneFix+at+Work · · Score: 1

      Well, lets see...if they REALLY are their chips and the RFID really was bad, then all they would have to do is crack open the chips (I'm sure they will have a method for doing this) and confirm that the number on the RFID circutry matches a chip that has not been accounted for and they would give you the money...

      If the RFID is really bad, they wouldn't be able to use that specific chip anymore...So, obviously a chip that is owned by the casino could be essentially destroyed to confirm authenticity, if on the other hand, you were trying to pull a fast one, it's still no loss to them.

    28. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Best+ID+Ever! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The dealer told us that they will usually let you count cards, even if they know you are doing it, unless you start winning a lot of money.

      Even then, they usually won't kick you out. When I was counting cards once, they switched to a new dealer who wouldn't talk to me, and reshuffled after every hand. I got the message and made my exit.

    29. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Prong · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Casinos like to foster 2 myths about card counting. First, that it's illegal (it's not), and second that you'll be declared persona non grata if they "catch" you doing it. The truth is that casinos tolerate counters on a regular basis, for a number of reasons:
      • Card counting is damn hard. As an exercise, cut 20 random coupons out of the Sunday supplement, memorize the products and the discounts. Go to your local supermarket, buy a normal week's groceries, taking advantage of the coupons (without looking at them), and factoring in the "advantage buys". If you're single, buy 2 weeks, with an eye on the stuff you don't buy much (toilet paper, cleaning stuff). Keep a running total in your head. At checkout, if your total cost and total coupon savings are within 25 cents of the actuals, you may have a future as a card counter.
      • Given the fact that most people who try card counting are both bad and obvious, the casinos don't comp them, which cuts the cost of business. Overall, casinos understand shaving odds. After all, two single number bets on the roulette table shaves the house odds. Which brings me to the third point:
      • I know exactly zero card counting systems which push the player into postive odds. The really good systems cut the house advantage to .5% or slightly better, but the odds are still with the house in the long run. The counter is depending on a run to make his or her money, along with the right betting scheme (counters tend to be progressive bettors).

      That being said, an extremely good counter can bet on (excuse the pun) being blacklisted in Las Vegas, but that's a tiny, tiny percentage of players overall. An average card counter will simply be denied perks, and be viewed with some suspicion. If you play 250-500 hands a year, the comps more than offset the average counter's edge. If you play more that that, it depends on how good a counter you are.

      Now that I've vented, I'll get back on topic. RFIDs in casino chips bother me not. The privacy implications for someone who gambles are nil, and the advantage in more accurate play tracking so outweigh any privacy issues, it's not even funny. You don't take chips home (are you stupid? they have cash value only in the casino), the first thing you do when you sit at a table in Vegas is utter the words "I want to be rated", and _every casino wants to keep its player to itself. Hence their reluctance to sell their mailing lists.

      A Final Thought: If you find yourself up $75k at the $20 minimum table and a host offers you a suite and RFB, ask for show tickets, take the deal and walk away. And send me some money for my sage advice. :)

      -Prong
    30. Re:Ouch for card counters... by glorf · · Score: 1

      To be able to properly track individual chips in relation to particular players the range on the RFID would have to be very limited so your chips signal doesn't bleed over into the spot for the player next to you. They would have to add hardware RFID scanners to every betting spot (between 5 to 7 per table for blackjack). Then to be able to match the identifier sent by the chip to the denomination would require a lookup to a central database which means all your blackjack tables need a network drop. You could suggest wireless, but as security conscious as casinos are, I would guess they would be reluctant to allow any kind of wireless access to the in-house systems. And even the computer supported tables like Let-It-Ride and Carribean Stud aren't connected to the network. There is usually a printer sitting under the table for printing reports which are then re-entered somewhere else.

      Facial recognition and card tracking can be done remotely, all handled through the video cameras from the security center. And if they really wanted real-time chip tracking, they could do it the same way, remotely with the cameras. RFID is not the right answer for chip tracking.

    31. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tags on the cards? Who's talking about tags on the cards? We're talking about tags on betting chips. Wake up.

    32. Re:Ouch for card counters... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      To be able to properly track individual chips in relation to particular players the range on the RFID would have to be very limited so your chips signal doesn't bleed over into the spot for the player next to you.

      No it wouldn't. You could assume that all chips which arrive simultaneously are being carried by the same player. Also, you can give out chips in a manner such that they are grouped at the time they are given out. You could also use triangulation, either with three receivers per pit, or three per table. Combine in the tracking which is already being done via videocamera, and this could be extremely accurate.

      Then to be able to match the identifier sent by the chip to the denomination would require a lookup to a central database which means all your blackjack tables need a network drop.

      Or you could simply store the data for later processing.

      You could suggest wireless, but as security conscious as casinos are, I would guess they would be reluctant to allow any kind of wireless access to the in-house systems.

      You wouldn't want to connect this to the main computers, just into a separate network which only has one-way access anyway.

      And even the computer supported tables like Let-It-Ride and Carribean Stud aren't connected to the network.

      The cameras at those tables certainly are. No reason not to include RFID sensors.

      Facial recognition and card tracking can be done remotely, all handled through the video cameras from the security center.

      Same thing with RFID tracking.

      And if they really wanted real-time chip tracking, they could do it the same way, remotely with the cameras.

      Sure, but adding in RFIDs make this a whole lot easier. The cameras would have to get a face recognition of the person coming to the table, then make sure that s/he is recognized at every subsequent location. With RFIDs, you can simply watch the traffic as it comes and goes. It's not foolproof, but it's a lot more foolproof than trying to track all the chips through fixed cameras.

      RFID is not the right answer for chip tracking.

      It's not a full solution, but it helps.

    33. Re:Ouch for card counters... by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Most people think card counting is difficult.

      Most people have heard of "card counting" with regards to blackjack but have never looked into it... they have vague notions that those who do it are human calculators or supercomputers. Now.. certainly there is some room for that.. and I'm sure such people exist, however...

      The most common card counting techniques are extremely easy to use, all the require is a bit of practice so you can keep up to speed. Nevermind a pitboss, a good dealer will keep a count, and watch the bets being played.

      The problem with team play such as this is that you still have to have big swings... it doesn't really matter who is doing the actual counting. Spread it around a few players who play standard strategy, and spread out the swings, sure.. but now you are into a lot of manhours, for a small return.

    34. Re:Ouch for card counters... by goofballs · · Score: 1

      I know exactly zero card counting systems which push the player into postive odds. The really good systems cut the house advantage to .5% or slightly better, but the odds are still with the house in the long run. The counter is depending on a run to make his or her money, along with the right betting scheme (counters tend to be progressive bettors).

      that just means you're playing at the wrong tables! just using basic strategy, at a table with advantageous rules regarding doubling down, soft 17s, etc, and the right number of decks, even without card counting, the house has less than a .2% advantage.

    35. Re:Ouch for card counters... by pvt_medic · · Score: 1

      Well, I highly doubt that showing value of chips at the table is useful, when cashing out is different. Casinos are all about psychology: why are there no windows in a casino, no clocks, why do they give out free alcohol, why do you use chips, all sorts of things like that. If a person was fully aware of how much they were gambling in dollars they may be more reserved in betting. But at the same time since casinos often have point programs and using RFID you could even more effectively identify people and profile them.

      --
      30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
      Score:5, Troll
    36. Re:Ouch for card counters... by McNally · · Score: 1
      I think that installing the equipment at each betting spot on the table to read the different IDs, lookup the dollar value in a central database and do the math to figure out total bet would be a little much. ... Having a few readers in the cage to verify authenticity before giving out cash in exchange, would be a much more efficient use of RFID.


      Won't work. You need to have the RFIDs at every point of exchange for the scheme to be much good.

      Let me give an example:

      Imagine I've invented a way to make a very convincing-looking $500 chip, but have not successfully embedded a fake RFID. If I go to the craps table and start wagering my fake chips, one of two things is going to happen.

      I win my wager and am paid in genuine chips redeemable for cash at the cage. Big lose for the casino.. -or-
      I lose my wager and surrender my valueless chips and try again. Meantime, my valueless chips have worked their way into the table chip rack, where they will be used to pay out winning bets from other customers, some of whom will eventually take them to the cashier's cage where the casino will refuse to honor them. Smaller immediate loss for the casino, but a huge problem when the state gaming commissions start getting interested in why they're not paying out on bets the way they're supposed to. Eventually, also a major headache for the casinos.

      Chip verification probably needs to be done at (nearly?) every stage of the process to be an effective counterfeiting countermeasure.
    37. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1
      I think you may be wrong about the odds. I've read that basic strategy will put your odds at around -.05%, and with counting you can get just slightly over, to around +.02%. I'm pulling those numbers from memory so don't quote me on them, but the figure for card-counting was definitely into positive territory.


      My source is this site, which is a great site if you're interested in reading the mathematics behind blackjack from someone who isn't trying to sell you a system. Specifically a paper called "The Optimum Strategy In Blackjack," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol 51, 429 - 439 (1956) [PDF], although I think it may only deal with the percentages from traditional decks (most houses now use 6- or 8-deck progressively shuffled shoes.)

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    38. Re:Ouch for card counters... by glorf · · Score: 1

      No it wouldn't. You could assume that all chips which arrive simultaneously are being carried by the same player. Also, you can give out chips in a manner such that they are grouped at the time they are given out. You could also use triangulation, either with three receivers per pit, or three per table. Combine in the tracking which is already being done via videocamera, and this could be extremely accurate.

      Do you actually gamble? You can't count on chips "arriving at the same time". When making a bet, players will frequently put out some chips, then put out some more. And what about people who just let their winnings ride? They have doubled their bet without any action by themselves. Being able to tell the difference between a win or an increase in bet would be nearly impossible with RFID. If you are talking about when they get to the table, that isn't consistant either. Considering that some blackjack players will play standing back from the table and other hunched over their chips. You would have to define the play area too broadly because it would catch spectators, giving you all sorts of bogus data. And if you have ever seen a husband and wife gamble, chips may arrive at, or leave the table without the player moving. And as far as grouping, the same chip could belong to several different players over the course of just a few minutes. And there is no way that the tray could be kept organized based on ID. So anyone who buys in at the table would get chips from every player who lost at that table recently.

      And tracking the chips through the cameras is pretty accurate. Using some of the same principles of facial recognition (size shape and color) a stack of chips can be evaluated immidiately to figure out its worth with no centralized lookups.

      And triangulation probably isn't very feasible. RTLS usually uses battery operated tags, which are going to be too bulky for casino chips.

    39. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      insurance is allways a suckers bet

    40. Re:Ouch for card counters... by fred911 · · Score: 1

      Real "card counters" that work the casinos are usualy a "club". Club members NEVER play tables with other players. Players NEVER cash their chips (other members do this at 8k wacks). Most club members play the whole table with 200k-300k and play the clubs "system". Sometimes they win, sometimes they loose. Most club members are comped anything they want. Most club members don't use their real names.

      When/if recognized, casinos pack "club members" suit cases, place them at the front door, and have the pit boss politely escort the "club member" out.

      Club members tend to frequent casinos when it's real busy (fights..ect).

      Most importantly betters NEVER cash their chips.

      RFID will make a mess of clubs.

      (but what do I know)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    41. Re:Ouch for card counters... by wampus · · Score: 1

      Most casinos consider chips to be their property, so taking them home would be frowned upon.

    42. Re:Ouch for card counters... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Do you actually gamble? You can't count on chips "arriving at the same time".

      Not when they're in someone's pokcet!

    43. Re:Ouch for card counters... by brundlefly · · Score: 1

      This problem has already been solved with 100% effectiveness: A casino simply enacts a rule that says new players cannot enter play in the middle of a shoe. Team counters are finished.

    44. Re:Ouch for card counters... by brundlefly · · Score: 1

      Even if that's true, which I'm not at all certain of, I don't see it as an issue. You have no right to card counting.

      True! And what's more you don't even have a right to play. It's a privilege, and if they don't like the way you play (for reasons of card counting or otherwise) they are fully within their rights to ask you to leave the [private property] premises.

    45. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Then to be able to match the identifier sent by the chip to the denomination would require a lookup to a central database

      No it wouldn't. Different denominations will come from different ID series sequences. You think RFID tags come out of a big bin where they're all randomly numbered? Or do you think that casino chips are just in a big random pile where they pull them out one at a time to have an RFID tag inserted? Think about it, man.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    46. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe the number of people who don't find this just a bit disturbing. Each little bit of tracking and such that we let into our lives in the name of convience and laziness is a bit more power we give to those people who when they use the power we give them we cry foul and invasion of privacy.

      People willing to give up freedom for security deserve neither.

    47. Re:Ouch for card counters... by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      card counting is legal everywhere in the states. the casinos in nevada are allowed to not let you play if they suspect you're card counting, but it's not against the law. this has been tested in the courts.

      And casinos elsewhere, such as Atlantic City, are not allowed to ban you for card counting without mechanical assistance. If they find you counting cards, they will start switching dealers every few minutes, dry up your supply of comp drinks, shuffle more often, whatever it takes to make you want to leave...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    48. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Casinos have a way of imposing their will on card counters.

    49. Re:Ouch for card counters... by banjobear · · Score: 1

      Not when there are more tens in the deck than low cards.

  2. Well.. by Neophytus · · Score: 1

    Sure, RFID the chips for fraud and theft purposes, but don't link me to the damn things. There's enough trickery goes on behind the scenes already.

    1. Re:Well.. by goofballs · · Score: 2, Informative

      they'd have to add a *lot* more infrastructure to link you to the chips- eveytime you lost a bet, they'd need to checkin your chips, when you won, they'd need to checkout chips to you, etc. imagine that at someplace like a craps table. and of course, you'd need to sign up first just to be able to bet. ain't gonna happen.

    2. Re:Well.. by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      You can sign up now before you bet. You don't have to, but then you won't get rated or earn any comps, either.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    3. Re:Well.. by goofballs · · Score: 1

      yes, you *can* sign up, and they try to make a mental record of your bets (unless your playing the machines, which gets auto tracked), but the vast majority of bettors aren't in the player's clubs, and the casinos likely aren't going to force you to join a club before they'll take your money. =) and this doesn't even address the fiasco of trying to track everyone's chips at busy tables.

    4. Re:Well.. by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Sure, RFID the chips for fraud and theft purposes, but don't link me to the damn things. There's enough trickery goes on behind the scenes already.

      You mean like, the pit boss watching you lose $1000 on a single hand of poker, and then coming over to offer you a free room for the night? Trickery like that?

      You want to be well-known in a casino. If you play a lot, whether you win or lose, they'll kiss you ass and make your weekend. Haven't you heard of "comps?"

    5. Re:Well.. by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      I register at every casino I play at (so that means I have a STACK of cards).

      By simply presenting a card to the pit boss you're showing that:

      * You are most likely a return customer, or at least someone willing to spend time at the casino

      * You are giving them the ability to check your past betting behavior

      * You are setting yourself up to earn some comps.

      * You like free stuff! I went to Vegas (again) this year with my dad, brother and sister for my birthday. My sister made it a point to sign up for every slot club she could, even though she only played the penny slots. She made some money (a few dollars here and there) and won a free t-shirt, a wooden box for holding photos, some free dice, free cards, etc. just for signing up for meeting some minimum play-time requirement.

      At the very least I get to hear the pit boss say "Here your card, Mr. Jones, good luck!"

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    6. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually happened:

      I went to Vegas for one of the Defcon conventions with $2500 to gamble. I arrived on Wednesday,a nd was told the hotel only had a room for wed.thurs nights, and there were "no rooms available" for the weekend (Fri, Sat, Sun nights). I figured I'd find another hotel to stay in for those nights, so I took the room.

      I went down to the craps tables with my $500 budgeted for gambling that day, and after a couple of hours I was up to $1700. Some casino employee (pit boss?) touched me on the arm and asked if I was having my playing tracked. I commented that I wasn't, and it wouldn't matter anyway, as I was only going to be there those two nights. Long story short (too late!), he gave me my room FREE for the weekend. Funny how they didn't even have a room available at all, but somehow I got one for free.

    7. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is not unusual.

      The hotels all keep a number of rooms in reserve that are expressly used for awarding comps.

      Can you imagine a guy winning $50k, and the hotel telling them that if they were going to stay in the city for another couple days, that they'd have to room elsewhere (and have the casino run the risk of not getting a chance to win it's money back from the player)?

      That city was not built by paying out most people, most of the time. The longer you spend in the Casino, the better the chance of you ending up on the losing end of the equation.

  3. This actually seems like a good use of RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're in their casino, using their chips. It's not like they'll be tracking you with their chips at the grocery store. Why would anyone even take the chips out of the casino anyway?

    1. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by cb8100 · · Score: 1

      Good point. Cash your chips and leave. And it's not like the casino isn't already watching your with the umpteen million cameras in the ceiling.

      --
      My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
    2. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by introverted · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Why would anyone even take the chips out of the casino anyway?

      I doubt they care too much if you take the chips out of the casino. After all, chips that go away don't have to be converted back into cash -- it's just that much extra profit.

      What they don't want is for you to walk out the door with a stack of $1 chips and bring them back made to look like $100 chips. Presumably the RFID would also make it easier for them to detect fake chips that had never been in any casino before.

    3. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      "Why would anyone even take the chips out of the casino anyway?"

      Don't know. Some casinos used to let you use chips from other casinos.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Well, some people use casinos to launder money...they might get a little edgy with people walking in/out with thousands/millions of dollars in chips....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by OECD · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not like they'll be tracking you with their chips at the grocery store.

      No, they'll be tracking you at the tables. "Comps" are bestowed based on how much money you wager. If the chips are associated with you when they're sold, then they can track where and when you wagered it and comp you accordingly.

      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    6. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      I doubt they care too much if you take the chips out of the casino. After all, chips that go away don't have to be converted back into cash -- it's just that much extra profit

      Sort of, but thanks to the nightmare of "accounting for a gaming industry" it's actually more profitable to just hoover the money out of them - it's much less headache that way.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    7. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, if you cash out $10K or more at a time...you have to fill out forms for the IRS/US Gov....they really like to track things like that.

      So, say you have a really good night...you cash out $9999, walk out with the rest...cash it out in small doses over time so you stay under the $10K radar. That way, all cash.....hard to track that.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by Bad+Boy+Marty · · Score: 1

      If you play "hard" enough that you're in danger of winning $10k, you've definitely been noticed by at least 2 pit bosses, and they *will* hunt you down with those forms. Hell, my Mom regularly gets nailed when she swings over $1k (either up or down, surprisingly enough). I haven't been in a casino in many years now, but I'm lead to believe that you can't get away with nearly as much "money laundering" as was once the case (that's really what it is, especially if you manage to sneak out without paying Uncle Sam)....

      --
      RHCE; are you certified? Karma: ambiguous.
    9. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by fred911 · · Score: 1

      That makes no sence. Pit bosses don't hunt you down with *any* forms. As long as you have chips, they're still in the game (and know you can be a player). Casinos never want to intimidate players (remember the odds). The problem occurs when you want to become liquid above the 10k (prolly less now) range. Then the casino has a (federal) reason and obligation to intimidate. Until you threaten liquidity, they're in the ass-kissing mode. When you want to become liquid... then you gotta answer questions.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    10. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by Bad+Boy+Marty · · Score: 1

      Didn't mean to imply that the pit bosses themselves will hunt you down, but rather that representatives of the casino (or "embedded" IRS agents) will. And, at least according to my Mom, it doesn't necessarily happen when you try to cash out your winnings, but can happen, for instance, when you get up from a slot machine (and your total winnings to date exceed some federally imposed limit).

      --
      RHCE; are you certified? Karma: ambiguous.
  4. wont stem employee theft. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So they now have to stop in the kitchen to wrap that stack of $100.00 chips in tinfoil before they leave...

    rfid is not a theft prevention solution for small items.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:wont stem employee theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What they should do is require all the employees to enter through a "decontamination" room where they are stripped and body-cavity searched. Have fun trying to steal chips when Leroy has his arm elbow deep in your crannies.

    2. Re:wont stem employee theft. by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 5, Funny

      just outlaw tinfoil under the DMCA.. problem solved

    3. Re:wont stem employee theft. by dustmote · · Score: 3, Funny

      Something tells me that their hiring bonuses would cost more than employee theft is currently costing them, if they tried that little stunt. :) Still, it would make for some interesting want ads... "Do you want a fast-paced exciting job with great benefits? Do you not object to daily probing of your rectum? Have we got a job for you!!!" (I think they already have ads like this in Nevada...)

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    4. Re:wont stem employee theft. by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      What they should do is require all the employees to enter through a "decontamination" room

      The one I worked for was even "better", every square inch under multiangle video, well, except for the bathrooms of course. I worked in the back office and rarely made it into the actual casino but every nose scratch and testical itch made me self conscious... Maybe you get used to it.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    5. Re:wont stem employee theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do you want a fast-paced exciting job with great benefits? Do you not object to daily probing of your rectum? Have we got a job for you!!!" (I think they already have ads like this in Nevada...)

      I was going to say that 50% of Nevada's work force already works under those conditions, but hey, you win.

    6. Re:wont stem employee theft. by ftzdomino · · Score: 1

      UPS requires its employees to go through a metal detector when leaving but not entering the premises. This is to reduce theft.

    7. Re:wont stem employee theft. by pyros · · Score: 1
      Still, it would make for some interesting want ads... "Do you want a fast-paced exciting job with great benefits? Do you not object to daily probing of your rectum? Have we got a job for you!!!" (I think they already have ads like this in Nevada...)

      Indeed they do have such ads, I believe they're produced by the Velvet Jones Ad Agency.

    8. Re:wont stem employee theft. by ajrs · · Score: 2, Funny

      They can't have my hat until they pry it from my cold, dead fingers.

    9. Re:wont stem employee theft. by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      There are stories about the counting rooms at the Sands when Howard Hughes owned it, that you really did get strip searched going in or out of there. That's from an account by Jimmy Fratianno.

      Tony Soprano ain't got nuttin on Jimmy the Weasel.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    10. Re:wont stem employee theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you always have been a trouble maker anyways, the fewer tinfoil hats the better it is for us....

      but then we don't exists... neather does that snipper.

      Have a nice day!(tm)

    11. Re:wont stem employee theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had no idea vegas providers were so greek-friendly! What are rates like?

    12. Re:wont stem employee theft. by bigbigbison · · Score: 5, Interesting

      At the casino I worked at, employees who have acess to the kitchen are not the same ones that have access to enough chips to make it worthwhile. There are cameras everywhere in a casino, out on the floor as well as behind the scenes.

      I honestly can't think that employee theft of chips is really that huge of an issue since the ammount of money that each cashier has is counted at the end of shift and if you are off enough money to make stealing chips worth it, say $500+ then they will not let you work there long if you are off that much very often. They even went so far as to make us use clear cups with clear liquid in them in the cage so that we could drop things in them.

      Dealers are under a lot more scrutiny from the cameras than cashiers. There are dedicated cameras looking at the chips on the table.

      At the casino I worked at, chips in the chip bank, (in storage) are supposed to be counted and verified every shift so a theft there would be caught fairly easilly.

      When I worked in the cashier cage and was the banker in charge of the cashiers in the cage, it wasn't uncommon to call down to the vault and have half a million dollars in cash delivered. So with that kind of money floating around, if I was going to steal, i wouldn't have been chips. If, as an employee, you are going to steal from the casino, you need to go big becasue if you do it multiple times, you will get caught.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    13. Re:wont stem employee theft. by pclminion · · Score: 1
      just outlaw tinfoil under the DMCA.. problem solved

      But since what we commonly refer to as "tin foil" is actually made of aluminum, you'd have a pretty good argument in court that the material you were using isn't what they banned :-)

    14. Re:wont stem employee theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, I seriously doubt that Casino floor workers are allowed in the kitchen.

    15. Re:wont stem employee theft. by Jboy_24 · · Score: 1

      So you get the chips outside the casino....

      Now what? Take them to a bank?

    16. Re:wont stem employee theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does that reduce theft? The employee can just claim that had [whatever] with him when he came in. They'd have to scan you going in, too.

    17. Re:wont stem employee theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but then we don't exists... neather does that snipper.

      Yup. Better watch out for that guy. He snips.

    18. Re:wont stem employee theft. by UserGoogol · · Score: 2

      FOOL! You're supposed to keep your hat tightly on your head! If you have your hands around it to the point where they have to pry it off... it's too late. They have already gotten your... information.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  5. I'll let them RFID me... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...as long as they let me RFID their cards...

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:I'll let them RFID me... by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      Since when is RFID a verb? That doesn't even make sense.

  6. I wonder what took them so long... by aquarian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The real news here is that it took them so long! I sort of assumed they were doing this kind of thing already -- the fraud prevention stuff goes without saying, but I'm surprised they haven't been analyzing playing patterns with this technology too.

    1. Re:I wonder what took them so long... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      They analyze playing patterns with a positive feedback mechanism. It's called "comps." You voluntarily expose your play in return for perks from the hotel. Anything from free food to free meals to the show tickets that "nobody" gets.
      I just got 4th row tickets to see Elton John that way. Last season I got race tickets for pit row. All basically just for losing a couple hundred bucks playing craps :-)

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  7. Oh no,! They'll.. wait.. what does this add? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As soon as you walk into a casino you're already under the eye of man many cameras monitoring the place. What will this add? I mean Casinos are already Big Brother incarnate, All RFID chips will mean is that you can't cheat.

    1. Re:Oh no,! They'll.. wait.. what does this add? by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

      What will this add? ... All RFID chips will mean is that you can't cheat.

      If you are going to ask and answer your own questions what do you need us for?

  8. Link me to them... by tgd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a great use for RFID tags. Watch all the chips, watch where the move, and track which ones I have.

    I love to go to the casino and play card games like Blackjack or more importantly Craps. Accurate tracking of chips tagged to me would mean two things: accurate comping and the ability to have a technical solution to ensuring payouts are correct.

    Those of you who have played craps at a busy table will know what I mean -- the accuracy of your payouts when you win is always in the hands of the "dealer" working your half of the table. I've been payed wrong many times, sometimes in my favor, sometimes not. Sometimes money comes in from bets I forgot I had on the table, sometimes I wonder if I got missed on a payout.

    If this means that questioning a missed payout can be more accurate or means at a minimum the casino can see in aggregate when they have someone working the table who consistently makes payout errors, more power to them.

    This isn't a privacy issue. If you think you have one spec of anonymity or privacy in a casino, you're nuckin futs.

    1. Re:Link me to them... by cb8100 · · Score: 1

      I wish I'd saved some of my moderator points...this is the most intelligent post I've seen on Slashdot in quite a while.

      --
      My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
    2. Re:Link me to them... by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it is more to catch cheaters (placing late bets and stacking high value chips under the others after the hands are played) and more importantly watch card counters and their betting habbits.

    3. Re:Link me to them... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      When I'm playing craps...I know exactly how much I'm supposed to be paid. If they want to overpay me, that's fine, but, I'll call them on it everytime if they try to short me on what they owe me.

      You always have to watch out for yourself, especially as a busy craps table...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Link me to them... by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It shows that you really do play, thanks for posting tgd.

      People whose gambling experience consists of losing a roll of nickles in a slot machine, don't get it: You don't really want anonymity. You want the casino to know you're there, that you're playing, etc. You want to play in tourneys. You want comps. You want them to know you played, win or lose. If you're not picking up comps, you're missing half the strategy.

      You don't want anonymity, you want them to notice you and say "Hello mister TGF, can I get you anything?"

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    5. Re:Link me to them... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This isn't a privacy issue. If you think you have one spec of anonymity or privacy in a casino, you're nuckin futs.

      Excellent point that sums up the whole thing. After all, the entire point of a casino is to prey on peoples' willing suspension of disbelief.

      How can anyone who walks in and puts their cash on the table think that the casino companies aren't going to fleece them from the moment they enter? That those ridiculously overdone venues with their flashing neon lights just built themselves out of the Nevada desert?

      On the other side of the roulette wheel, you have people who *do* think they can beat the house... the people who buy lottery tickets at home in blissful ignorance of the laws of mathematics.

      Neither of these groups is going to care about RFID. One group knows that they're entering a fantasy world, and the other wouldn't believe you if you told them.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    6. Re:Link me to them... by mike_mgo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I doubt the chips would be tagged to individual betters. As another poster mentioned, everytime you won or lost a bet the indivivual chips would have to be logged onto and off of your comp card.

      The best that could be hoped for is to maybe see a flow of chips. What I mean is for example: maybe they see that poker players prefer to play craps and not blackjack while they wait for a poker table to open up. So then the casino could decide to shift some craps tables over near the poker room.

      I just don't see how this could help with missed payouts or monitoring bet size or things like that unless the chips were "checked in and out" to individuals as bets were won or lost. And I can't see casinos implementing something like this because it would slow the games down (and would slow down who quickly the casino would be winning money).

      So other than to prevent stealing and counterfeiting of chips I'm hard pressed to see too many other uses for this technology in a casino, either benefical or harmful to gamblers.

    7. Re:Link me to them... by ad0gg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thats why I play Poker when I gamble in vegas. Low limit tables ($2 $4) usuaully have beginners or drunks. Any person who has an average level of skills should easily break even if not win money even with high percentage casino rakes. Plus you get free drinks and comps.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    8. Re:Link me to them... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thats why I play Poker when I gamble in vegas. Low limit tables ($2 $4) usuaully have beginners or drunks.

      Good point... for all my ranting about mathematics, I still like to play the ponies on occasion, for the same reason. There is a large enough mass of people who play based on the horses' names, random numbers, or the color of the jockey's silks to overcome the house and state's cut.

      In fact, I could be accused of not having a dog in this fight... I've never been to a casino! The closest I've come was playing Video Poker in a Shreveport truck stop (put in two quarters, lost one hand, won two quarters on the next, cashed out). Who knows, I may go in, be seduced by das blinkenlichts, and join the other beginners at your table...

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    9. Re:Link me to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not entirely true...I want anonymity when I count cards or trick the slot machines :)

    10. Re:Link me to them... by Marillion · · Score: 1
      I'm normally a privacy nut and I have no use for those greedy, slimey casinos. For the most part, I don't have a problem with it. A casino chip is basically the same thing as currency in a casino. It's money. Our privacy expectations should be the same as money.

      Basically it's an anti-theft device. If I walk into Wal-mart and try to slip stolen, tagged merchandise past the doorway I expect to set off the alarms. I think people trying to slip casino chips out side doors is wrong. Since a chip is money, counterfeit protections are also good. It's wrong to mint a counterfeit chip and expect a casino to pay for them.

      I know people are worried that a casino will start tracking that a Customer Relations person gave a well-known married male High Roller $1000 chip number 87654321 which four hours later was cashed by a woman of "questionable employment." Is it fair that the casino now knows the "social habits" of that high roller? Probably not. Suppose the well-know high roller was a Senator.

      The real problem is that a chip is only good in one place - the casino. The gives the casino more power. And power currupts.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    11. Re:Link me to them... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      You could also get a receipt from the casino on the way out showing how much you lost. After the initial sting of failure, you can write that loss off on your income tax return.

      -B

    12. Re:Link me to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trick is to get more comps than us deserve. RFID ruins that game. Or maybe it just makes it more complex. Often people trust these technical things too much. I bet there are ways to confuse the table about who is losing how much money.

    13. Re:Link me to them... by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't want anonymity

      Yes, as long as you're interested in getting the comps. And, most casinos seem to respect their clients desire to be left alone, etc.

      I'm not sure how it works when you cash in large quantities of chips (my best craps win was only $500 - a single bet).

      But there is a threshhold where the cash transaction becomes reportable to tax authorities. In those instances it would be advantageous to cash-out incrementally to avoid the trigger threshhold.

      RFID chips might make this more difficult.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    14. Re:Link me to them... by curunir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're making the assumption that you lose money over time. In that case, you absolutely want them to know how large of a donation you're making so they can give you the appropriate tote bag. But for people who play in a manner in which the house does not have a statistical edge (read: card counters), this kind of tracking is a pain in the neck.

      Ever notice when you're sitting at a blackjack table and the pit boss comes over and asks the dealer how you're doing? If you think this is just about comps, you're fooling yourself. Casinos want to know whenever someone is up so they know who to watch for being a counter. Since there's nothing illegal about counting, the game is really about them identifying the counter before he takes too much of their money. It's that cat and mouse game that's where the real fun in Vegas lies for a lot of us.

      That's what these RFID's are about...they're upping the ante for more simply identifying card counters. If you can have a computer monitor whether a player is up or down, you drastically reduce the number of people you have to watch. Currently, if you feel the pit boss is taking note of you, you can just color out and move to a different table. With RFIDs, they'd much more easily be able to watch you by the security cameras. That and they'd be able to track you between tables unless you visit the cashier every time (a pain, especially when you hit that magic $10,000 mark.)

      They can talk about employee theft all they want, but as other posters have pointed out, security measures are already extremely tight and employee theft isn't really that big of an issue. The bigger issue is that blackjack has been broken statistically but is still makes very good profits because the vast majority of players are clueless. This seems like just another salvo in the war against the clued-in.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    15. Re:Link me to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you want it when you are talking out of your ass, like just now.

    16. Re:Link me to them... by Knetzar · · Score: 1

      So you want anonymity to do something illegal? If you make a ton of money at a casino just pay your taxes and be done with it.

      Arguments like that don't benifit those who want privacy for privacies sake.

    17. Re:Link me to them... by Jboy_24 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know people are worried that a casino will start tracking that a Customer Relations person gave a well-known married male High Roller $1000 chip number 87654321 which four hours later was cashed by a woman of "questionable employment." Is it fair that the casino now knows the "social habits" of that high roller? Probably not. Suppose the well-know high roller was a Senator.

      If casinos starting ratting out the actions of the high rollers, highrollers would just go somewhere else.

      I saw an interview with a guy who helps highrollers out (forget the "official name")....
      it was deffinatly suggested that not only do the Casinos know about the girls, booze and drugs, in some cases they faciliate it.

      In your example, if they found that the high rollers chips were getting spent by a women of questionable employment, they'd probably just check to make sure the high roller was happy with the "Services rendered" and make sure he wasn't robbed.

    18. Re:Link me to them... by kcornia · · Score: 1

      The real problem is that a chip is only good in one place - the casino. The gives the casino more power. And power currupts

      Many casinos will honor and cash other casino's chips.

    19. Re:Link me to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there is a threshhold where the cash transaction becomes reportable to tax authorities. In those instances it would be advantageous to cash-out incrementally to avoid the trigger threshhold.

      Yep...it's $10,000. Since they make you color out when you're done playing, it's hard to not cash it all in at once since you've got a single chip worth at least $10,000. They watch for people who cash in with a large chips and stay only long enough to lose a couple of bucks and cash out in smaller denominations. You've got to be smart and stop playing when you hit $9,500 or so (or start palming chips, but that can be risky.) It also works to have friend/so come by and beg you to spot them some money. color out $5,000 to give to them. But don't do this too often.

      RFID's could make this kind of thing a lot harder to pull off.

    20. Re:Link me to them... by Ancil · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Casinos regard high rollers as one step removed from Mohammed. These are people who stop by a few times a year and drop off $250,000. You think the casino's going to piss them off? There are a dozen tier-one casinos on the LV strip alone.

    21. Re:Link me to them... by wampus · · Score: 1

      Last time I was in Vegas someone hit a progressive slot jackpot near the table I was at. The pit boss told me that when they pay out somthing large enough to be reportable, they come out with the relevant IRS paperwork before they pay you. I imagine they would do something like this at the cage when cashing a large amount of chips.

    22. Re:Link me to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be going to a different casino than I go to (I frequent the Tahoe locale). Currently, the method is this: the tables are set up in a circular fashion, called "pits". Each pit has a pit-boss, a manager who oversees converting chips to cash, potential disputes, etc. One role of the pit-boss is to track betting. This is where you get to have a little fun.

      If you sit down at a $5 table, you want to stay and have fun (otherwise you'd be at the big-boys' tables). So you place $5 and $10 bets. When the pit-boss comes your way, ramp up the bets, to $20 and up (nothing too drastic so as to be obvious, and be sure to throw a big-bet in there when you know the pit-boss isn't looking, to keep the dealer honest). Do this enough times, and the pit-boss will see you as a moderate-to-high-roller, with betting occurring over a long period of time. When the average-bet data gets entered into the keypad (accompanying your card), the pit-boss will be sure to use what he/she has seen, as this is another function they're responsible for.

      I've done this and had rooms, meals, and entertainment comped. Of course, with the amount I've lost doing this I could have just paid for these outright (just about breaking even), but no one ever goes to a casino just for the shows.

      Oh, if you're feeling the burn-rate is too high, it's always nice to grab a beer and play some Keno with your friends.

  9. Wow by jjoyce · · Score: 4, Funny

    This really changes the scrupulous image that the casinos had going for them.

  10. It's a private business. by Ophidian+P.+Jones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As such, they are free to do whatever they like to stem losses, gain advantage over customers, etc.

    If you don't like it, you can go to another casino that doesn't use RFID chips. Ain't America grand?

    1. Re:It's a private business. by fishbowl · · Score: 1



      "As such, they are free to do whatever they like to stem losses, gain advantage over customers, etc."

      But they are NOT free to do whatever they like. The business is heavily regulated by the State, especially if you're talking about Nevada. RFID chips are A-Ok, I'm sure, but they are hardly free to do "whatever" they like.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:It's a private business. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since they are a private business, can they use the cameras in the casinos to their advantage? Like see the player's cards and inform the dealer etc. Even if it is not legal, what is preventing them from using it? Disclaimer: I havent played anything other than slot machines, so I done know about craps etc.

    3. Re:It's a private business. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't played blackjack in a casino... The way the game works, you might as well play your cards face up. The dealer doesn't care what you have, and knowing your cards won't change his play. The effect of keeping your hole card down just affects the way other people at the table perceive their odds. The house could care less.

    4. Re:It's a private business. by cableshaft · · Score: 1

      In fact, I've been to a few casinos where they do deal the cards face up to the players. At those casinos the players have a sense of collaboration and often give advice to each other on what they should do with a given hand. Not that they're always the most intelligent suggestions, mind you....

      --
      Creator of the popular web game Proximity
  11. Private property by El · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The chips are the private property of the Casino... don't they have a right to do anything they please with them? Granted, they should post a notice on the doors saying "Warning, chips protected by RFID", but if having your chips tracked bothers you, simply don't gamble there. RFID itself is not the problem; using fraud or coercion to trick or force people into being tracked against their will would be a problem.

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    1. Re:Private property by GetPFunky · · Score: 0

      Would you stop to look at the sign posted behind the plant by the door or are you already looking for the waitress for a drink?

    2. Re:Private property by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      Granted, they should post a notice on the doors saying "Warning, chips protected by RFID"...

      Uh... why should they? I'm serious, here. It's one thing to say that a house is protected by BS&S Security; that's a deterrent to thieves. It would be phenomenally stupid for a casino to post on its doors that they're using a technology that is widely disfavored for the sole reason you bring up in your post-- people will skip that casino and go down the strip.

      I'm looking at it on the other coast, actually-- Buffalo/Niagara. Three casinos in this area, but they're spread out in a 100-mile or so radius. (Casino Niagara, Seneca Niagara, and the new one they're building near me in Salamanca-- not to mention Turning Stone over near Syracuse.) Let's say Seneca Niagara (the one on the U.S. side) decides to put RFID tags in its chips. The smart thing to do would be to shut up and take the white man's money (to be racially insensitive about it), because the whole point of building the casino on the U.S. side was to keep U.S. money in the U.S. and not off to Canada (Casino Niagara). Posting the "We use RFID here" sign on the Seneca Niagara door means the smart people in Western and Upstate New York (can you say IBM?) go to Canada.

      Not that big of a deal, really. But Las Vegas is only a stone's throw away from Silicon Valley. How many smart people live there, do you think? And there are plenty of casinos on the strip-- or even in Reno-- who would be very willing to take your money and not tell you they're using a technology which, though its use may be very legal and actually (gasp!) beneficial to everyone involved, leaves a bad taste in your mouth.

      Personally, I like the idea, because I have this phobia about having stuff stolen from me. Granted, this means I realistically shouldn't even think of setting foot in a casino, but hey.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  12. Simple solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just don't gamble. :-)

    1. Re:Simple solution... by kfg · · Score: 1

      For every complex problem there is a simple solution that. . .

      Well, actually this one works like a charm, don't it?

      KFG

  13. Ouch for shitty dealers by kcornia · · Score: 1

    Come up on a streak as a dealer where you're paying out through the nose, Guido the pit boss will have you take the day off...

    1. Re:Ouch for shitty dealers by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      Come up on a streak as a dealer where you're paying out through the nose, Guido the pit boss will have you take the day off...

      Hell, that was trackable way before computers, let alone RFID tags...

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

  14. Unscrupulous employee's workaround: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrap the chips in RF-blocking metal foil.

  15. More power to 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's finally happened. The SlashThink phenomenon of "RFID is bad" has officially deteriorated into irrelevancy. This time, we're apparently supposed to think that RFID in casinos has something to do with our rights. It doesn't, and shouldn't. Nobody goes into a casino against their will, and nobody should be surprised that casinos exist for the sole purpose of tracking and taking money. For casinos to *not* use RFID to their advantage would be stupid and irresponsible.

    1. Re:More power to 'em by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Also, if anyone goes into a casino expecting privacy, there's something very, very wrong in their head. Casinos are probably the LEAST private places on earth.

    2. Re:More power to 'em by floppy+ears · · Score: 1

      I don't know. It sure seems to me like every high-rated comment about this story is saying something to the effect that in this case, RFID isn't actually so bad. Might even be good. Perhaps it is your assumption about the SlashThink phenomenon that is incorrect.

      --

      "If I could live to be several hundred
      I could take a walk and really wander, really wonder."
    3. Re:More power to 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak for yourself. I think Slasdot sould cover all RFID advances because it's cool. Sure it will be used for good and evil, but RFID is just plain cool to a nerd like me. It also give me more power. The average Joe doesn't understand RFID, so he loses far more than I do. Especially after I buy a reader. It's better than Wi-Fi!

    4. Re:More power to 'em by Mal-2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Exactly. After all, the chips are the property of the casino, only the money they are worth is yours. I don't have a problem with the casino tracking something they own. Want to break the tracking? Cash out, get new chips (there or somewhere else). It's that simple. I *really* have no problem with RFIDing chips that are not meant to move from table to table, such as roulette chips. You're required to cash out when you leave (assuming you have anything left, which a lot of people don't).

      As for card counting, I have done it quite openly. The fact is they don't care if you're counting cards at the $3 minimum/$25 maximum table. They'll just be more aggressive in providing the free drinks, both to get you drunk and to distract you from your count. I'm sure the story is different on the high-roller tables.

      The only game I'll drink while playing is roulette, and that only when I already have my favorable numbers sussed out. The main difficulty is finding a wheel that's out of true, and figuring out its tendencies. In my experience, 10-15% of the wheels out there are out of true enough to give YOU the advantage over the house. Once you've figured out what numbers to play (or more accurately, what segment of the wheel), you can drink all you like. All you have to do is remember what you've already figured out.

      I've openly admitted to pit bosses that I chose a particular table because the wheel is somewhat predictable. They let me keep on playing anyhow. I've even had them stand there and watch, rather than being called over every time the dealer has to pay me stacks in excess of $300. They know what I'm doing, but there's nothing illegal about it. If they don't want me to do it, they should pull the table out of service and replace it with one in better condition (which actually happened to me once in the Bahamas). It's not like I'm betting "under the radar" either -- if I find a "hot" wheel, it's not unusual to be throwing $80 a spin on the table ($10 x 8 numbers, all in sequence on the wheel).

      For those who go to Vegas, I'll tell you that the last time I was there I found nicely biased tables at both the Sahara and the Lady Luck. I took the Lady Luck for a hundred or so, which I spent somewhere else in the same casino (so I doubt they mind), but the Sahara I took for about $400 and only played half of that back. My winnings at roulette covered the entire cost of our trip, save for vehicle wear and tear.

      You do need a resonably large starting sum to pull this off. If you don't have enough money to survive 20 losses before hitting a winner (at 35:1), then don't play. $100 is generally a minimum starting sum, since most tables require $5 on every spin. And you COULD lose it all if you play the wrong table. I was $200 down from playing the wrong tables before I found the one I could predict, and won $600 in 30 minutes, leaving me up $400. So don't expect that it's a given that you will win. You may have to invest a few hundred bucks in acquiring the skill of reading an imbalanced wheel. It's well worth it though -- I leave Las Vegas with more money than I arrived with about 2/3 of the time. I'm sure anyone with the ability to do rough statistical modeling in their head can do the same.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  16. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a good use to me. Casino chips are easy to fake, can have high trade in value, and are very easy to sneak around. They're not supposed to leave the casino. You receive them from the casino, and trade them back in to the casino. No privacy concerns. It can prevent fraud. Sounds good to me.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They're not supposed to leave the casino"???
      Have you ever been to Reno or Vegas? You can leave the casino with them, you can even trade them in at other casinos most of the time. At least between the bigger casinos... Hell, if you want to buy $1000 worth of chips and leave with them and never come back, I'm sure the casino would love to have your money....

    2. Re:Good by cicadia · · Score: 1
      Exactly -- there have been stories of people who take chips home with them, to have a 'starting pot' for next time, only to find out when they return that the casino has changed their chip styles and no longer accepts the old ones

      Casino chips cost something like 0.25 to 0.30 each, and you buy them from the casino for $5 and up -- why would they care if you take them off the lot?

      --
      Living better through chemicals
  17. wireless RFID hacking? by rawbytes · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the term "war gambling" will be introduced.

    1. Re:wireless RFID hacking? by cens0r · · Score: 1

      Does this have anything to do with casio war? This might be one of the games wehre your odds are best.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  18. Re:That's too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and volva,

    did you mean voila?

  19. Yes, privacy in a casino is highly sought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    (Posting anonymously under fear of karma loss from that knee gently jerking back and forth in the Slashdot community. "Ahhhh! He's not agreeing with my anti-RFID stance! Heretic! Mod him down!")

    How does this even remotely relate to "your rights"? Casino chips are the equivalent of "disney cash" in theme parks, IE under normal circumstances they are only used within the casino itself. Preventing loss would make the casino more money, and they might even use that to raise your pay tables when you're gaming.

    The articles mention monitoring gamblers, but come on... you're in a casino! Your movements are tracked by a hundred cameras from the time you walk in to the time you walk out. Casino employees on the floor are designed to monitor your movement and habits and either 1) ask you to leave or 2) give you a free buffet coupon, depending on what you are doing. You have no privacy whatsoever and very little anonymosity in a casino. Sometimes that works out to your advantage.

    Yes, there are bad uses for RFID. I don't see this as being one of them. Next thing you know people will be crying out because a warehouse wants to use RFID on crates for inventory control.

    Oh, wait...

    1. Re:Yes, privacy in a casino is highly sought by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough in some places and times, they were considered cash. I heard a story about the local bookie in a small town who used to go around weekly to the local shops and buy back his chips, which were accepted by the local merchants.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:Yes, privacy in a casino is highly sought by ShavenGoat · · Score: 1

      Not to meantion, under Nevada law, a casino can do anything it wants to you if you are caught breaking house rules. Including putting you in "the room" and giving you a "talk" if they catch you cheating.

      RFID tags in Casinos are fine, as the poster said. You are on someone's private property, so I don't see how you are losing any rights.

    3. Re:Yes, privacy in a casino is highly sought by bugnuts · · Score: 2, Interesting

      RFID has already been proposed and, I believe, used by casinos in limited amounts for counting.

      Casinos do NOT lose money by people taking chips. In fact, they encourage it by making their chips flashy, and having periodic "souvenir" designs. Chips cost around $.55 IIRC in bulk (last time I checked many years ago) for a nice design.

      Chips often have markings on the edges that are machine-readable, generally used to prevent counterfeiting and for counting.

      Casinos are generally more interested in people bringing chips INTO the casino, not out. That could be indicative of a group of folks working together.

      I'm mostly concerned about RFID encoded into legal-tender, not so much casino chips. This may appear to be a salami attack on the country, but I don't think it will lead to that slippery slope.

    4. Re:Yes, privacy in a casino is highly sought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the point I was trying to make (rather poorly, looking back) was that the casinos are losing money because of the employees and chips. It's (comparitavely) easy for a dealer to discretely pocket a few $50 chips, walk out, and then give them to a 3rd party who would cash them in a couple days later. RFID scanners at the entrances would help with this somewhat.

  20. Great idea, needs help by Scalli0n · · Score: 1

    Great idea - but how will they change the data on the tag (i.e. owner of the chip) in-game when someone wins those chips?

    You have to have a quick, efficient way of transferring ownership of a chip if you're going to track successfully.

    --
    Sig & Below
    Yuck Fou
    1. Re:Great idea, needs help by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      you don't. you check the RFID in the chip to see if it's real or not.

  21. That's it then by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Funny
    Craps in Louie's garage from now on.

    No more Wayne Newton. No more free drinks (except a swig from that bottle of Thunderbird that Louie always has lying around). And not even a remotely comparable level of hookers.

    I'm going to go cry now.

  22. Hilarious by Pave+Low · · Score: 4, Insightful
    All this crowing about privacy in a private establishment that has cameras covering every square inch of the property, that use computer databases and face-scanning technology to track counters and scammers, that have security everywhere because millions of dollars are passed around everyday.

    And also watched by the government gaming commissions closely, lest their gambling license get taken away or worse.

    And you're worried about fucking RFID technology in their chips?

    Casinos are one of the few places you should absolutely stay away if you are so paranoid like that.

    --
    SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
  23. Tracking card counting teams by pixelgeek · · Score: 1

    This will also help in tracking profressional card counting teams as they frequently carry large numbers of chips.

    As well, if you can modify the ID in teh tags from time to time you could also "stale date" chips to stop pro-counters from storing chips for later use in a casino.

    This also helps track who is alundering chips by cashing them for teams as well

    1. Re:Tracking card counting teams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tracking yes, expiration no. Down on the strip, chips are practically interchangeable with cash. I think you would have a lot of non-gamblers (e.g. strippers) very upset if you routinely expired your chips.

      Surveillance is what casinos are made of. Interference is bad for business, though.

  24. Casinos will love this! by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This most likely will happen.

    I used to work doing data visualisation for casinos - nice pretty visualisations showing slot machine usage. It was a huge hit with the casinos that used it. Most casinos use customer cards you see - you earn bonus points for awards if you put your card in the reader of the slot machine while you play. That allows the the casino to track your slot machine spending. More importantly it allows you to create visualisations of slot activity broken down by demographics (of course they collect a few personal details when they assign you your awards card...) so that they can better direct promotions, reorganise the slots on the floor (knowing where to place a bank of new slot machines can be worth a few million dollars!) etc.

    The big problem was that while you could track turnover volume on the gaming tables, you just couldn't track the movement of players very well - there was just no information on that. With this they can have you swipe your awards card when you collect your chips, then watch those chips disperse about the tables. More importantly they can track the ebb and flow - movement vectors for the chips about the floor - that can be very useful information.

    This will be a huge boon to the casino industry, who are always lookign for that new way to fleece a few more dollars of the statistically ignorant.

    Jedidiah.

    1. Re:Casinos will love this! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      The big problem was that while you could track turnover volume on the gaming tables, you just couldn't track the movement of players very well - there was just no information on that. With this they can have you swipe your awards card when you collect your chips, then watch those chips disperse about the tables. More importantly they can track the ebb and flow - movement vectors for the chips about the floor - that can be very useful information.

      Combined with the facial recognition systems already in use, this will give the casino complete visability of the floor. They will know everything going on. Each table would have many readers, one for the dealer and one for each seat. Probably one for where the chips in play lie for each player as well. Data analysis of this would be pretty interesting, as well as very powerful. Do they track hands as well, when they are made visable?

      Of course, the consumer will be hurt as all this will be used to maximise their profits. But, it's their casino, you choose to play.

      However, tech isn't only helping the casinos, it's helping gamblers in someways. Most on-line casinos offer full hand-history, to prove they aren't cheating. Many players are using this to profile their opponents, and get the edge.

      BTW, IANAG (gambler) but I know a few... ;-)

  25. Take out by Deanasc · · Score: 1

    More importantly, they can monitor locals who leave the casino with a lot of chips that they plan on cashing in over time to avoid paying taxes on that one big hit.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    1. Re:Take out by WebGangsta · · Score: 1
      if you have "one big hit" in a casino, the suits show up and take your SSN information. This is for hand-pays of over $1200 at the slots (as opposed to payouts that come directly from the machine).

      I don't think that they care how many chips you cash in at one time (from a tax perspective), but for some reason the number $10,000 sticks out in my mind.

    2. Re:Take out by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I don't think that they care how many chips you cash in at one time (from a tax perspective), but for some reason the number $10,000 sticks out in my mind.

      Yep, if you transfer more than $10,000 in cash in one day you have to report the transfer to the government under the RICO statutes (it's supposed to make it harder to launder money).

    3. Re:Take out by Huogo · · Score: 1

      $10,000 might stick out in your mind, as this is the magic number in bank deposits and the IRS. If you deposit/withdrawl $10,000.01 to/from a bank on a single day, the bank is obligated to file a CTR (currency transaction report) on you, which gets sent to the IRS. FYI, its not just one person/one account. Person A and B can both deposit $6,000 into account C, and a CTR will be filed. Person A deposits $6,000 to account C and $6,000 to account D. CTR is still filed. Banks can also file a SAR (suspicious activity report) if they think that you're depositing your money specifically to avoid having a CTR filed on you.

  26. Missouri laws by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is illegal to "pass chips" at casinos in Missouri (ie, Kansas City "boats" as they are called). Presumably to track how much you bet. They also do macro-monitoring (if you call RFID tags micromonitoring) of chips. They fill a card out with your name and some other info when you first sit down at a table, after you give them your casino card, which is a credit card like card. this card also tracks your spending/winning and keeps track of "compensation" "awards" called "comps" by regulars i think.

    RFID tags won't be much different. Who cares really?

  27. RFIDs in cows! by UnderScan · · Score: 1

    RFIDs in cows & sheep. I wonder if this and helps with disease control.
    I count sheep for a living!

    Well actually I am a computer programmer, but the other day I found myself in the middle of a portuguese field counting 596 sheep. I work for the agricultural business, and my latest project involves sheep and cattle with RFID tags in their bellies. The system I work with reads signals from an antenna that detects when the animals pass.

    Quite a change from my previous job where I was making stock trading systems for a bank.

  28. Idea by r_j_prahad · · Score: 1

    I've a suggestion for companies like Infosys and others planning new RFID projects. If they want to track my shit, just make the chips edible.

    1. Re:Idea by mekkab · · Score: 1

      yeah, and have flavors, too!

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  29. Re:That's too stupid by Kenja · · Score: 1

    So your saying that having to do a bunch more stuff to coutnerfit the chips isn't making it harder?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  30. Casinos are already zero-privacy zones anyway by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

    What privacy are you attempting to salvage in a casino? Modern operations are among the most observed environments anywhere. As I tell my wife, this is the last place you are likely to get succesfully pickpocketed.

  31. Suck if the RFID broke on your $1000 chip... by TheBeck · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Sorry sir this is not our chip, I going to have to confencate it."

    1. Re:Suck if the RFID broke on your $1000 chip... by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      very interesting thought, actually. they've probably used heavier strong-arm tactics in the past if movies like "Casino" are even 2% representative of truth.

      however if it's not their chip, they have no right to confiscate it. if they do try to confiscate it, i'd have them call authorities (police, and not the RIAA "police"), file a police report acusing me of some crime and let the police take the chip as evidence of some crime they are acusing me of.

      i'm sure the chip would have been conveniently lost by this point though.

  32. Hacking Las Vegas by scubacuda · · Score: 1
    Think that these RFID tags could help bust the next group of people who try to outsmart Vegas?

    1. Re:Hacking Las Vegas by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

      What do you want to bet that they've already managed to figure out a way around any algorithm implemented by the house that relies on these chips? I remember reading that article; those guys are very good at what they do. I doubt these RFID chips will slow them down at all.

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    2. Re:Hacking Las Vegas by pla · · Score: 1

      Think that these RFID tags could help bust the next group of people who try to outsmart Vegas?

      No. More likely, they'll provide the next big way to outsmart Vegas.

      Technology like this makes people lazy. As a trivial (though unsustainable) example, once the casinos migrate to equipment that trusts chip values based on RFID, nickle-and-diming the casinos to death becomes no more complicated than reprogramming a batch of $5 chips to read as $10. No human would take them, but plop 'em in the slots, win back 90% of the fake value, and move on. By the time they notice the problem, a small group of people has left town a few million richer.

      And although they would quickly fix flaws like this, a million others will certainly pop up.

  33. I'd like to see them use RFID chips on by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    Congressmen-

    Find out where they *really* go during "work" hours.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  34. IMO not like Gillette or Wal-Mart. by pherris · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Casino chips are generally meant to stay in the casino while Gillette or Wal-Mart sell items that are meant to leave the store. In theory Wally World could embed a RFID in all the shoes they sell and then profit from the data gained by tracking you walking around their stores or places that would like to sell your RFID movement data. I don't see the same problem with casino chips. A business (or casino) has the right to watch you while you are on their property. I'll give them that but tracking me past that is unacceptable.

    RFIDs can be used for good. My Ford Focus ZTW has a RFID chip on the key. If the correct ID isn't there the car won't (and shouldn't atleast) start. Adding extra keys and programming them is a simple task too.

    IMO this shouldn't raise the same concern that the Wal-Mart problem does, which could be a real nightmare.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  35. Re:That's too stupid by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

    Ah, but if you get caught, then the casinos will undoubtedly try to bring the DMCA into this, especially if the IDs are encrypted somehow.

    --
    SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
  36. How dare they!!! by strictnein · · Score: 1

    Casinos have always been a BASTION of personal privacy!

  37. Just another way to track your play by WebGangsta · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Casinos are already tracking your play. Being able to track an individual chip enhances their information flow.

    Those gamblers smart enough to play with a players card (slot club) so that they can earn comps and get a slight percentage higher in returns know that they're being tracked. Of course, it's easier to do so at the slot machines where the computers can determine your exact coin-in and convert that to a specific number of points to throw into your club account.

    At the tables, the casinos still track an individual's play via the pit bosses. While it's now a fairly automated/computerized instant process, it used to be done all on paper and entered into a system later. Regardless, pit bosses would still evaluate what your average bet was, determine the approximate number of hands per hour that you were playing, and then give you a rating. I don't foresee this process changing, as this allows the casinos to use a bit of fudge factor to favor some guests more if they're tipping, friendly, and happy versus the mean grouchy players.

    What other benefits can the casino do by tracking individual chips? What about being able to monitor how a chip moves from game to game? Will it allow casinos to cut down the number of pit bosses? (probably not, for other reasons such as security) Are more chips moving from the blackjack tables to the pai gow poker tables? Would this affect gaming decisions that the casino makes regarding the blackjack rules, so it keeps players at the table longer? How about making the whole betting process more automated by being able to verify the total amount of money in a stack of chips? And, it's one more way to prevent cheaters from late-posting bets on the roulette table.

    As others have already said: casinos are one place where you can expect to be watched no matter where you go or what you do. You already sacrifice some amount of privacy just by entering a casino in the first place.

  38. Ah, the party line: by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    File-sharing: Sure there are illegitimate uses for the technology, but there are a few legit uses. DON'T BAN IT.

    RFID: Sure there are a few legit uses for the technology, but there are illegitimate uses. BAN IT!

    1. Re:Ah, the party line: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aite on to slashdot 102:Microsoft evil/linux good

  39. Casino's are instances of organized crime by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

    They work with probability in order to take your money, inotherwords, all games in a casino are in favor of the house winning as far as probability is conserned. Some people creat countermeasures and exploit the games and win millions from the casino's, and this is the reason why if you win too much too often or in any way show you're a little too lucky, you'll get banned from all casino's in las vegas and thrown onto their blacklist.

    So, am I suprised they'd use RFID? No, I'm frankly suprised they're still in buisness and people haven't smarted up.

  40. Tin Foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrap the casino chip/s ( RFID ) in tin foil ( aluminum foil, and they're invisible to the reader.

  41. This is creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thought the casino might actually be able to track what I bet is too creepy for words. What will they do next? Film all the betters? It might just get that bad some day.

    1. Re:This is creepy by ccarter · · Score: 1

      I hate to scare you but every bettor _is_ filmed and has been for years now.

      Part of the reason is for security (casino's are a rich target environment for pick pockets and petty thieves).

      Part is for integrity reasons (employees are caught cheating/scamming as often as patrons when you look at the numbers)

      Part is regulatory, most acutally. Firstly every jurisdication has standards concerning surveilence. Some of the ones that the company I work for operates in require that every gaming and money handling position have either a dedicated camera watching it, or in lieu of a dedicated camera it must be viewable from atleast 7 different camera positions. If something happens on our gaming floor and we don't have art work (pictures/video) to detail it the gaming comissions get rather irked and that usually results in an _after tax_ fine of some sort.

  42. Re:That's too stupid by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They'll almost certainly assign a unique ID to each chip. So, if you turn in a bunch of chips that all have the same id number, it would be like going into the bank and depositing $1000 in twenties all of which have identical serial numbers.

    If, as you seem to suggest, you compile a list of valid ID numbers, they can still get you because they could store data on where the chip is located. If the computer tells the cashier that half the chips you're turning in are supposed to be in the vault, you're busted.

  43. "Your Rights"? by gkuz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What rights do you have in a modern casino, exactly, other than the right to have them take your money from you? Cameras everywhere, those "bonus cards" or whatever they're called, plain-clothes security staff everywhere, your every move is watched fourteen different ways.

    I manage to avoid the surveillance problem and keep all my money by the simple expedient of not entering their establishment.

  44. GOOD for them!!! by swordgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, they're using RFID tags in their own property to at the very worst, track your behaviour while on their property.

    They're NOT putting these in items you buy, they're NOT using them to track you out the door, and they DO have a very real need to prevent counterfeits. There's increased security for them, and no invasion of privacy for their customers.

    Where's the problem here? Geez, between this and the "forged colour mars photos," it MUST be a slow news day.

    Oh, wait--both of these were posted by Michael. Interesting...

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:GOOD for them!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're NOT putting these in items you buy

      Yes they are. They're putting them on chips, which are items you buy.

      they're NOT using them to track you out the door

      How do you know?

      Basically, it's the same as the argument against Wal Mart or anyone else using RFID.

    2. Re:GOOD for them!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that they have the right to do this, but you may want to re-think you're "you don't buy them" assertion. When you go sit down at the table, assuming you don't take a marker, what do you have to hand them before they give you chips? (hint: they'll take prety much any denomination)

      They're essentially selling you the chips with an agreement (codified into state gambling laws, I belive) to buy them back for the agreed upon price. You have the right to take the chips with you and not cash them in. It's more similar to the Wal-Mart scenario than you think (Wal-Mart is also RFIDing their own property.) The only difference is this is intended to collect demographic info on gamblers and stop card counters instead.

    3. Re:GOOD for them!!! by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I think that if you look at the laws, you'll still find that the money is a specific-amount collateral for the chips. I'm pretty sure that they remain the property of the casino, even after handing them over to you.

      There's also the question of intent. Even if the chips are purchased outright, it's with the intent of using them on the premises, and then selling them back at face value. Not so with razor blades.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  45. Metonymy by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 0, Troll

    You might not have heard of metonymy but even the dumbest person understands it. Clearly you don't.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Metonymy by Atticu5 · · Score: 1

      You might not have heard of metonymy but even the dumbest person understands it. Clearly you don't.

      I was going to mod this up, but instead I'll reply for all those interested; as I was.

      Metonymy is defined by Merriam-Webster to be "a figure of speech consisting of the use of the name of one thing for that of another of which it is an attribute or with which it is associated (as "crown" in "lands belonging to the crown")".

      (Now, what I don't understand, is the parent's name. exp(pi*sqrt(163)) = ~ 2.62*10^17. Can anyone explain this?)

  46. Re:That's too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least he didn't say "vulva".

  47. PROFIT!!!! by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

    Instructions for casino employees;

    1. put $500 chip in anti-static bag
    2. leave building
    3. Profit!!!!!

  48. This has existed in casino chips for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://www.bourgogneetgrasset.fr/s551.html

    This French company controls both the Paul-Son and Bud Jones (the two largest US casino suppliers)

    Quote:

    "After more than five years of research, development and day to day practice, Bourgogne et Grasset(R) has mastered the mass production of gaming chips with Philips' exclusive "Vegas" Hitag transponder and has developed several data collection devices based on Philips' exclusive Vegas Hitag readers to be used by casinos to authenticate their chips and feed their computer system for efficient table operation management. Other applications are available or are to be developed."

  49. Halloween III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't all of this talk about chipping people and things remind anyone of Halloween III?

    Or am I the only person who actually watched it?

  50. Re:HEY SLASHDOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod down! This guy used to work at my company and slacked off all the time.

  51. Whaaaat? (Re:GOOD for them!!!) by phr1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What are you talking about, no invasion of privacy? If Wal-Mart wanted to put an RFID tag on your forehead when you go through the entrance, so they could track every item you looked at, would you not feel invaded as long as they took it off when you left?

    And why do you think you'll only be tracked while on the casino property? Most people who go to Vegas stay there for several days, and keep their chips with them when they leave the casino for the night, until it's time to go home. They don't cash out at the end of every session. Most casinos will in fact accept chips from other casinos. You can use Luxor chips at Caesars, and so forth. You can bet that the Caesars will install the equipment to install Luxor's and everyone else's. So you'll be tracked no matter what casino you go in. For that matter, every local restaurant may also install equipment to read the RFID's and they'll track you too.

    Worst of all, the local muggers may also get RFID equipment. Walk past one on the sidewalk on the way to a restaurant with $3000 in chips in your pocket, and the mugger will know the demonination, serial number, and issuing casino of every chip. It makes their target selection a lot more efficient. They could even give you an automatically printed receipt to file with your police report, but somehow I don't think they'll do that.

    Sheesh.

  52. Re:That's too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least he didn't say "vulva".

    wow. you must be old here.

  53. Appropriate use by peacefinder · · Score: 1

    This is a reasonable use of RFID. Just like for warehouse inventory control, it's a technical means to reduce "friction" in the system. In this case, it's without real harm to anyone. (Except card counters, I suppose.)

    Harm is only likely when the tags get out the door of a monitored facility while intact and operational. Unlike razor blades in a market, chips are not intended to leave the premises of the casino. Cash 'em in, and you're clean.

    As others have pointed out, it's not like a person has any privacy in a casino anyway.

    --
    With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
  54. I don't understand gambling by RLiegh · · Score: 1

    Basically, the casino has the advantages in ways that you probably can never imagine, and will never hear about; so why not just take your money and throw it off a bridge? Hey! You can 'gamble' that maybe the wind will blow it back to you with interest!

    1. Re:I don't understand gambling by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      casinos and gambling can be entertaining and fun. if you sit down at a blackjack table with $40, a few people you know, and spend three hours there chatting with folks and having fun, thats not entirely bad entertainment even if you lose all $40. if you walk away with all your money you've gotten a few hours of free entertainment. if you're a little lucky and a bit smart you can make some pocket change or coffee money for the week. there's always the possibility you walk away with a few hundred dollars, which ads to the entertainment value.

      always gamble responsibly though. the worst is people who get addicted and gamble away their family's food or rent money.

    2. Re:I don't understand gambling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      if you sit down at a blackjack table with $40, a few people you know, and spend three hours there chatting with folks and having fun, thats not entirely bad entertainment even if you lose all $40


      I don't get it. 3 Hours? What am I supposed to do for the 2:50 after I go bust?

  55. Re:HEY SLASHDOT by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

    How did this get a +5 Informative?

    w3rd.

    --
    SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
  56. Who'd have thunk it, a legit use by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Casino chips are not something that the casino sells to you. You borrow them as an alternate counting mechanism. Putting RFID tags on THEIR OWN PROPERTY that STAYS THEIR PROPERTY, and STAYS ON THEIR OWN PREMESIS to prevent theft is fine. I'd say the same about museums putting RFIDs on those portable audio players and headphones they give you to walk around exhbits with, or shopping carts at grocery stores. It's theirs, it stays theirs, it stays on premeisis, they have a right to protect themselves against theft.

    That is NOT the case if something is being actually sold to me. Ownership is changing hands at WalMart or wherever you shop, and I don't want something that is becoming MY property to come with auto-tracking mechanisms. If I want an auto-tracking system, I'll damn well install it myself.

    But at a casino, what is being sold is entertainment, not poker chips. The chips are on-premesis loaned use, and so tracking those against theft is perfectly legitimate. Ownership is not changing hands, so RFIDs are not infringing on my property or privacy rights.

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

    1. Re:Who'd have thunk it, a legit use by Ted+Williams'+Frozen · · Score: 1

      Casinos offer commemorative or souvenier chips for people to purchase. These are real gaming chips that can be used for playing games in that casino. My friend "bought" some last month in Laughlin at the Ramada Express (they were for a Rally race held there), they even sold him some hard plastic cases to protect the chips in. Also,the cashiers' cages are not anywhere near the entrances in Las Vegas and Laughlin casinos, and no one stops you from leaving to search for chips. Would not be surprised to find out that there are tens of millions of dollars worth of casino chips in peoples' homes across USA. No skin off the casinos back really. This looks like it is going to be used to prevent counterfiets and employee theft, for now anyway. (Designing my new tinfoil chip carrier.)

  57. stand somewhere in a casino w/o being on camera by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

    if you can find a single place to stand in a casino's floor without being captured on at least one security camera (realistically it'll be more than one) i'll give ya a free pull on the slot of your choice. Privacy inside a casino, aside from the hotel rooms, is a non-issue. You voluntarily enter a casino knowing you're going to be watched via camera and floor personnel. Granted, we're talking privacy from the casino itself, and not from the government. When you go into a casino to play games, you are surrendering a certain amount of privacy because of the nature of the place (hundreds of people walking around with money, and lots of it, out in the open). To their credit, a casino floor is one of the safest places you can be in respect to violent crime.

    The more I think about it, the only use for RFID chips to which i do not object to are in casino chips.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    1. Re:stand somewhere in a casino w/o being on camera by ccarter · · Score: 1

      Whether employee or guest there are only 2 places.

      Inside a restroom and inside your hotel room. Everywhere else you can possible be on the casino's property (inside or outside) you will be in view of a camera that is recording. And that's mostly dictated by regulation.

    2. Re:stand somewhere in a casino w/o being on camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Inside a restroom

      That's a relief! What with all the cameras in public washrooms these days.

    3. Re:stand somewhere in a casino w/o being on camera by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      like i said, "in a casino's floor...." I specifically said casino floor because if i said "in a casino" wise, but accurate, asses would point out that you can (hopefully, at least expectedly) be in your hotel room and a restroom without being on camera.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  58. Riiiight.... by ccarter · · Score: 1

    "The tags could also help casinos manage large-scale theft. If a large stash of chips goes missing after a table is overturned during an argument, for example casinos sometimes have to change their entire stock. This is unpopular with gamblers, since any chips that they have not cashed become worthless. RFID tags would allow the casinos to identify stolen chips without the expensive process of restocking."

    ----

    Have to make the "Bad example" call on this one. No casino is going to swap out it's entire stock of chips (they are not cheap to start with btw) just because a tables worth got snatched. Outside of high limits areas a typical table is going to have $25K-50K on it (50K-100K for a craps table). Why would I spend a million or two replacing my chip stock because $50K got stolen? Hell I'd burn $50K worth of man hours and another $50K in lawyer fees just filling out paper work that the gaming commissions are going to want for doing something as drastic as a chip swap out.

  59. There is a huge difference by RomulusNR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    between RFIDs in something I OWN AND PAID FOR, and RFIDs in something that I AM ONLY BORROWING.

    Now, if casinos sell souvenir (poker) chips... hopefully those wont have active (rfid) chips in them.

    Hell, they should put RFIDs in rental DVD/VHS cases, so they can track down the bastard who hasn't returned that one copy of THX1138.

    Actually, inventory departments of companies might do well to RFID their equipment, especially with a wireless network full of floating laptops...

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  60. why play if you can't win? hope it's fun... by rbird76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can't count cards, or attempt to use legitimate mean to gain information about cards to improve your bets. The odds for the games are set by the casinos and changed at their will. If you win too much you probably won't be allowed to play. Collecting RFID chip data on bettors in the casino is no worse than anything else the casinos do - it's another step to improve their bottom line at the expense of the people who (legally) are most likely to cost them money. There should be no expectation of fairness at the games in the casion - because there is none. The only sense of fairness is (to modify a Clancy quote) "Fair means I get all my money back, and f*** everything else." If you're going to a casino, you had better have fun, because the likelyhood of getting ahead of the casinos on a consistent basis is probably low.

    RFIDs in this case are reasonable because:

    1) information of the movements of their chips on their property is reasonable -as long as they don't track my movements elsewhere I'm OK with them.

    2) this is similar to data they already acquire and use (it is no worse than other things casinos already do).

    3) the chips have legitimate uses in thwarting people who cheat (by most people's definitions, not just the casinos) - they can stop people from increasing bets late, etc.

    The game is not much more rigged against you than it was before, and your freedoms outside the casinos haven't be eroded by this use of RFIDs in this context.

    I probably should have made this a reply to the topic rather than you in particular, but I agree with your sentiment for the most part. If I had fun at casinos or betting, I might go, but I don't, so there's no point. Playing a rigged game and expecting to get paid is transparently stupid - it's little like going to your local mob boss to be a better criminal. If you're no good, he'll take your money. If you are good, you won't get paid, other than maybe in concrete blocks and small lead weights.

    1. Re:why play if you can't win? hope it's fun... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I think the government should run it. I'm all in favour of taxes on the stupid.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:why play if you can't win? hope it's fun... by daveo0331 · · Score: 1
      --
      Remember the days when Republicans were the party of fiscal responsibility?
  61. If that's the way you're going to be.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meet me out in the desert at midnight, I've got a new project I want to show you.

  62. great idea, IMHO by the_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in a case like this, this is an excellent use for RFID. protecting your own property by tracking the stuff that's yours using tags that you put in your own stuff is a perfect way to cut down on theft. in a casino, this is especially important. and having an RFID detector when people cash in makes for a good way to make sure the proper amount of money is redeemed.

    i still don't want these things in my jeans.
    --
    grey wolf
    LET FORTRAN DIE!
  63. Tracking Of Chips & Ownership by goretexguy · · Score: 1

    There's no way in the world to accurately track chip ownership within the casino. With all those zillions of radio messages hopping around, how are they supposed to determine exactly which pile (or pocket) a chip is in? There's simply no way.

    However, I see this as a very good idea to (1) keep chips within the casino where they belong, and (2) help a casino verify that a given chip is actually one of theirs and not a counterfeit.

  64. outlaw tinfoil? by RowdyReptile · · Score: 1

    just outlaw tinfoil under the DMCA.. problem solved

    But that would make criminals out of people who foil their friend's apartments! ;)

    --

    You want a sig? I can get you a sig... Hell, I can get you a sig by 3 o'clock this afternoon... with nail polish.
    1. Re:outlaw tinfoil? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      When tinfoil is outlawed, only outlaws will foil their plans! er, um...

  65. Tracking in casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is already tracking going in in casinos by two methods.

    1) The slot club cards that you put in to the machine before you play to earn 'rewards' for your efforts to give all of your money to the casino.

    2) The tickets that print out. In most modern casinos, when you cash out of a slot machine, they don't give you cash anymore but a 'voucher' with a barcode on it. This voucher can be inserted into another slot machine or cashed in at the cage for real money. I think these vouchers are also used to discourage people from leaving with their winnings... when you print out your voucher you have to wait in line to get money, so you may be more likely to put it into another machine and spend all of your money then keeping some of the money you won in your pocket and only playing with another amount.

    adam

  66. one reason to take chips out of a casino.. by ruebarb · · Score: 1

    In Missouri, they only allow you to buy $500 worth of chips a day...(state law) or at least only every few hrs...

    for the high stakes poker games like at the Ameristar, ($30-60 and so forth) - that's barely 12 BB

    so I know of a few players there who will take their $2000 home in $100 chips, so that they can come to the table next time starting with $2000 -

    but having said that, anyone who thought they had privacy in a casino beforehand is a friggen moron...big deal...

    RB

    --

    ----------
    ah honey, we're all resplendent - Bill Mallonee
  67. they've been working on this stuff for years now. by chuckfee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mikohn Gaming was working on a similar
    concept called safejack (safe blackjack)
    since at least 1998. The idea there
    was that special chips would "announce"
    their value (1,5,25,100, etc.) to a
    computerized table so that the back of house
    systems knew how much was being bet.

    Assuming they have any brains at all, mikohn
    probably filed for a patent on this stuff
    years ago. The gaming equipment industry
    is one big bee's nest of predatory and
    defensive patent plays. (I wish I was the
    guy with the touch-screen gaming machine patent)

    Incidentally, I recall the system also
    had a mini-ccd camera under the shoe so it
    could also "see" the cards being dealt to
    each player.

    Seemed like a pretty interesting idea, but
    I don't think it ever caught on. Maybe it
    was too expensive, or just too far ahead
    of it's time?

    --chuck

  68. Yeah, you can't clone me by luekj · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Enuogh was said wihtin the title.

    You can't clone mE! I am invincible.

    Superheroes can always beat techno-bad things.

    RFID=Red Flying Interational peace Dart.

    So try to understand that one's deep meaning!

    --
    Many Thanks,

    Luke

  69. It'll make the mugger's lives easier by nickovs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If all the casino chips have microchips inside them then the pick-pockets and muggers along the strip will be able to tell from a distance who has chips in their pockets and be able to home in on them! You can stand by the exit of the casino with a pocket RFID reader and when your PDA lets you know someone just walked by with $10,000 in chips in their pocket you can signal to your heavies down the street!

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
  70. Fluffy version of story submission by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I submitted Gambling with RFID a day or so ago, but the accepted one is much better. Oddly enough, the company Chipco International makes no mention of RFID chips on their site. I wonder how unhackable those chips are?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  71. Vegas is not for criminals on the run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This discussion on RFID's in chips, and privacy concerns makes me think of a common mis-conception people have about Vegas. I've always thought it was funny that criminals on the run would flee to vegas. Especially criminals from LA. In less than half an hour every casino in town will have the criminal information and face. Then all the criminal has to do is walk into a casino, and bam! their caught. It happens quite a bit.

    I agree with quite a few people, casinos are businesses. They have everyright to track you once you do business with their establishment. I think one of the safest places to be in Vegas is in a casino, Just don't live in apartments here ...

  72. Re:HEY SLASHDOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you mean "slashdotted off all the time"?

  73. We have RFID Car-Park tokens by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    Drive into town & park your car and you used to get a slip of paper with the time printed on it. A man at the kiosk would look at the time and charge accordingly.

    Then they changed it to a piece of paper with magnetic strip and the machine did the reading.

    Both pretty wasteful.

    Nowadays you get a coin sized token with no markings which is read electronically by the machine.

    I'm all for removing the waste of paper but I've got to wonder if, even experimentally, that there aren't RFID readers placed in the mall to monitor my movements. Time to buy a lead wallet to keep them in ;)

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:We have RFID Car-Park tokens by Ted+Williams'+Frozen · · Score: 1


      Lead wallet? What? Are you new here? You want a tinfoil wallet!

      Damn kids!

    2. Re:We have RFID Car-Park tokens by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Nope, tin-foil isn't good enough.

      If you want to stop shop-tags and other radio sensitive items lead lining is the way to go. Great for getting cd's & dvd's out of HMV.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  74. Re:Whaaaat? (Re:GOOD for them!!!) by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    They could even give you an automatically printed receipt to file with your police report, but somehow I don't think they'll do that.

    Lord Vetinari will have .. words .. to say about that. :^P

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  75. Tax Implications by Mad+Browser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This could have interesting implications with the IRS.

    Right now casinos have to report you if you win $1200 or greater on a slot machine, hence the myriad of $1199 jackpots on slots.

    In table games they have no reporting requirement (save the $10,000 casino cage transaction report requirement), mostly due to the complexity of tracking wins vs. losses.

    If technology makes that simple, does that mean I'll now be taxed on my table game winnings? That the casino will be obligated to report them? Yikes.

    --
    RateVegas.com - Vegas Reviews
  76. Re:Don't try this by boristdog · · Score: 1

    you cash out $9999, walk out with the rest...cash it out in small doses over time so you stay under the $10K radar.

    This is known as "Structuring". Unfortunately the federal gov't takes a VERY dim view of this and can toss you in prison for quite a long stretch if they find you doing this.

  77. You hear that whooshing sound right by your head? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    That's sarcasm.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  78. Interesting Tangent from the 60's by serutan · · Score: 1

    In his book, Steal This Book, the late 60's activist Abbie Hoffman described a way to get a free Las Vegas vacation by taking advantage of promotional schemes offered by casinos. The casino would fly you free to Vegas and give you free room and meals, provided you bought a certain amount of casino chips. These were specially marked chips that could not be cashed in, assuring that you would gamble them away.

    Hoffman's counterscheme was simple. Two people go on this trip together. One person takes the special chips and the other person buys an equal amount of normal chips. They sit down at a roulette table and preceed to bet against each other, one betting on red, the other on black. Between them they will break even on every spin (except when the wheel comes up 00). The person with the special chips bets only those chips. Every win is paid off in normal chips. Every loss of a special chip is converted to a normal chip in the other person's pile. When all the special chips are gone the two people should have almost the same amount they started with (except for 00 spins). At that point they get up and cash in, and the trip costs them nothing.

    Theoretically one person could do this alone, because you should win almost 50% of the time, but in practice this is not always the outcome in the short term. Using two people makes it foolproof (assuming Guido doesn't follow you out to the alley).

    I'm not a Vegas kind of guy, but am fascinated with schemes like this and the ones in The Eudaemonic Pie. I wonder if casinos still offer this sort of deal, or if it is so simple to beat that they don't bother anymore?

  79. This would not bother me, if.... by UrGeek · · Score: 1

    ...the customers would remain anoumyous. I understand the casinos need to control the chips - they ain't a bank. But this will not happen, not today when no one has an itoa respect for anyone's privacy.

  80. Denial Of Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The main flaw with RFID that retails haven't worked out yet is a denial of service attack. Broadcast lots of RFID signals, at something more than minor power, and you can cause real problems.

    Blackmailers will love it

  81. the trick is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can you do it even after you've had 2 or 3 free drinks?

    To understand the statistics and best plays, read Michael Orkin's _Can You Win?_. It's published by Freeman Press/Scientific American.

    No, you can't win, but you can have a lot of fun for an entire evening and not lose more than $50. I like the blondes at the craps tables, myself.

    1. Re:the trick is by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, but if you can't master this simple count, you probably have no chance at a real count. The hard part isn't counting, it's counting in a loud, action packed place where if you make it obvious you get kicked out. If you take odds at the craps table, you are getting some of the best odds in the house.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  82. Finally... by qtp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a situation where I think RFID is the Right Way To Do It(tm). If the casinos are using RFID to verify that the chips are actually thier chips before payout, and to prevent employees from walking out with stolen chips, then that's thier right and this seems a reasonably innocuous measure.

    I'm sure that there's lots of people who are crying "invasoon of privacy", etc, but this is one situation where you truly decided to play by thier rules when you walked through that door, and keeping track of thier own property is in no way an invasion of thier employees or thier customers privacy.

    --
    Read, L
  83. Whats the big deal about RFID tags? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What is it with Americans freaking out over these RFID tags? Am I missing something here?

    It seems to me that if you have nothing to hide, you would not care if a company or government is tracking you. After all, you are doing nothing wrong!

    Maybe this is a cultural thing (I am not a US-ian, I am from France). For some reason, Americans are obsessed with "privacy". Seems kinda stupid.

    1. Re:Whats the big deal about RFID tags? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may be the most obvious attempt at a subtle troll I've ever seen.

      American troll: check
      Privacy troll: check
      French troll: check
      American troll, reinforced: check.

      My hat is off to you! This is complete. Just too obvious. Tone it down next time.

  84. Tech enforces honesty by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    Is it me or is the latest use for technology enforcing ethics where in the past it was left up to the individual to decide if he/she thought it was worth the risk to flout conventions in society? Anyone who already lives ethically isn't going to complain too much about this stuff but there has always been a segment of society that felt that some areas of ethics were a little more grey than the rest of us. It will be interesting to see how this really affects life as we know it. How many things in life have been dependent on activities that the ethical/just among us would rather not know about but which have been vital in maintaining our standard of living nontheless?

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  85. not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're only obligated to report $10k, IF that is an unusually large transfer for you.

    That is, if you regularly transfer $100K or 10 million 2 or 4 times a month, the feds don't care and don't want to know. Think replenishing the payroll checking accout.

    So if you're a drug dealer and come in 2 or 3 times a week with 25 thou in small bills, you won't hit the marquee, because this is a normal transaction for you.

    Really, there must be 10 or 20 million routine >10k transactions every hour, the feds just want to know when someone who doesn't normally do this has hit the big time.

  86. Re:That's too stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and volva..

    Next time you misspell it, please spell it vulva. Thanks.

  87. So why do we have gambleing in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has been showen to break up marrages and cause all sorts of problubms.

  88. Chips are not currency by mzungu · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, chips are not currency. If you leave a casino with uncashed chips, you may have a problem cashing them in later on.

    When I was in Vegas a couple of years ago, I never left without cashing in.

  89. I wish you weren't an AC... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
    so I could mark you as a friend. It is so rare to read something reasonable about RFID on /. Sure RFID can be used to take away your privacy, but that doesn't mean that every use of it will do that.

    Casinos SHOULD be using it. There are all sorts of applications. The most interesting to me are making sure that somebody doesn't sneak an extra chip in after the betting is closed and making sure that payouts are accurate in games such as craps and roulette.

    They will probably also use it to tune their games, catch card counters, and watch the flow of money more carefully. Stuff like seeing what happens to a bunch of chips when somebody wins big on a particular table. Where do those chips go? Does the location of the table matter? Does the game matter? This would aid them in making the layout of casinos even more mind-bending but isn't an invasion of privacy.

    1. Re:I wish you weren't an AC... by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be really neat to be the guy who got to program the big 2-D map that tracked all the chips?

      I think it'd be awesome just to watch the high-money chips in live motion move around from table to table. It would also be interesting to watch statistics on dealer-win to bet ratios, and players who think they're on a streak.

  90. What about the IRS? by Vlad2000 · · Score: 1

    Don't be worried about the Casino tracking your betting habits. With all the cameras and employees they have, the Casinos are already watching your every move.

    However, putting RFID's into every casino chip would make it very easy for the IRS to tracking your winnings or losses.

  91. Re:Why would anyone even take the chips out of the by shubert1966 · · Score: 1


    Alot of people forget about the chips that they did not use and just decide to take them home as souveniers. This is yet another revenue stream for casinos, and the casinos OFTEN post Expiration Notices in the classifieds' section of the newspapers outlining which Chips are now worthless. It's actually as tough a read as any Public Notices you'll find in River City.

    The real reason the RFID chips would be used is so that if you skip out on a bet, say for instance The "over" on the Reds @ Phillies game, they can send 'Uncle Guido' out with a GPS to break your legs.

    --
    Stuff that matters.
  92. Could they? Couldn't they? by m1kesm1th · · Score: 1

    The article is about the possibility for using RFID in casinos. Really, it give any reason for this than noting the possible uses. I saw the article originally on Ananova, then New Scientist, considered submitting it, but then decided against it. The reason for it, oooh it has the word RFID in it. The reason against, well there seems to be no clear facts about any casino implementing it or about to. Sure they could, but I could have RFID's inserted into my eyes.

    Casinos already keep a close eye on people who win at tables, thats what the security cameras and staff are there for.

  93. Indeed.... by raehl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was in Vegas last month for business. I had time to kill before a flight, so I sat at the bar and played video poker. I was up 40, down 10, and ended up even.

    On the game. I also made out with 4 beers.

    Of course, if I had lost $20, it wouldn't have been a big deal - same I would have paid for the beers had I not been gambling.

    Casinos make money off of people who GAMBLE. Those of us who bet the minimum can have a good time on the cheap. After all, even on games that only pay out 95%, if you bet $300/hr, you're still only out $15/hr. And the chicks are hot. ;)

  94. Re:Why would anyone even take the chips out of the by introverted · · Score: 1

    The real reason the RFID chips would be used is so that if you skip out on a bet, say for instance The "over" on the Reds @ Phillies game, they can send 'Uncle Guido' out with a GPS to break your legs.

    Assuming they want to go to the trouble of sweeping the entire town to find out where the chips are (remember, the range on those things is fairly limited), then I suppose Guido could break the chips' legs. :-) But since they don't really know who has the chips, that probably wouldn't be enough to track you personally. Of course, if they get someone with an RFID blow dart shooting patrons as they come in.... :-)

  95. Re:Ouch for card counters...moot point by bizitch · · Score: 1

    Card counting will soon be a thing of the past anyway.

    More and more casinos now use these perpetual shuffing thingys which continously shuffle a monster multideck shoe ...

    Every hand played has the same odds as every other one

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  96. Free Drinks? by Jebediah21 · · Score: 1

    Everybody knows that the big casinos give out free drinks so you loosen up and gamble more. So here's what you do:

    1. Get lots of chips in your pockets
    2. Secure said chips in such a way that you can't get them when you're drunk (maybe in a bag with a cable tie)
    3. Stand around and let the casino see how much you have to lose
    4. Get free drinks :)

    --

    Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
  97. That would have wreaked havoc by jmichaelg · · Score: 1
    Twenty years ago, I worked as part of a large team on an air defense project. There was one guy on the team whose job was "software enforcer." He was supposed to make sure we adhered to this new fangled idea called structured programming. His job was about as close to a sinecure as I've come across.

    He had so much free time (we already knew what was expected so we didn't really need his input) that he took to gambling. Card counting in blackjack was a new idea then so he spent most of his work time simulating various counting strategies. On the weekends, he'd fly to Vegas and test his various strategies. He got the house to fund his "research" by signing a chit for his chips. To cover what he was doing, he'd cash in his winnings for cash and then pay off his chit at the end of the month. As far as the casino was concerned, this guy was a goldmine because they didn't have a mechanism to see that he was taking cash out the door instead of settling his weekly bill. They just saw the money flow in at the end of the month when he settled. Net result was he got a lot of comped flights to Vegas. He didn't enjoy the gambling because it was monotonous but the positive cash flow was good enough to keep him going back for more.

    Had the casinos had rfid embedded chips, they would have been able to track the money flow better and realized what he was up to a lot sooner than they eventually did.

  98. Re:Whaaaat? (Re:GOOD for them!!!) by (mandos) · · Score: 1

    If people are so worried about being mugged because they are carrying around a few grand in their pockets they deserve to lose that money. In normal life, or even on most vactions, people don't walk around with $3000+ in cash on them. They commonly walk around with credit cards that can be used well over that amount though and don't worry about it. Why? Because there are safeguards in place for non-cash money systems. If you're that concerned about the chips in your pocket, cash them out when you leave and carry around a receipt that shows your money, not the money itself.

    Sheesh.

  99. Not just casinos. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1
    I once worked at a MediaPlay store, and all floor employees were either patted-down by the manager at the end of every shift or had to expose the tops of their shoes and belt-line to make sure they weren't smuggling any merchandise out of the store. I guess they had a problem with massive inventory 'shrinkage' at the time, and needed a stopgap until they could install WalMart-style saturation CCTV.


    Personally, it just got me thinking of new and different ways to smuggle merchandise, rather than sticking it down your pants on the way out the door. Didn't ever do any of them, and never had any intention of stealing in the first place, but the point is their searches are what motivated me to really consider how I'd go about stealing. In many ways a weak deterrent is worse than no deterrent at all.


    Now I suppose they just use RFID tags, never mind the pat-downs or CCTV.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  100. Re:Whaaaat? (Re:GOOD for them!!!) by phr1 · · Score: 1

    I don't think you've ever been to Vegas. Also, I don't walk around with 3 grand in cash in my pocket every day, but I've done it a number of times when I had occasion to. It's not a big deal, as long as you don't advertise it or look like you're carrying it, you're no less safe than if you don't have it. But if the cash is broadcasting radio signals saying "Steal me! Steal me!", that's a lot less safe.

  101. Faraday Cage is the answer by mrmeval · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Come on! It's simple to construct a faraday cage to thwart this.

    Now who will be the new up and coming entreprenure who sells 'chip holders' for all those big spenders who want some privacy?

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  102. That's not why you count cards.. by xtal · · Score: 1

    You count because eventually the odds will swing massively in your favor. You need to stay alive the the table until that happens, e.g. when the odds are horrible or medicore. You bet less then. You make it back when the odds are good.

    Card counting does not require you to be a genius. Can you count on your fingers? Because that's what it comes down to.

    Comps add another dimension to the puzzle.

    --
    ..don't panic
  103. Cool. More efficiency in mugging by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If people are walking around outside with casino chips, all a mugger will have to do is scan them to see which ones are worth the effort of a robbery. No more knocking over some old lady and just getting chump change.

  104. Re:Interesting Tangent from the 60's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those green zeros come up a lot more than you expect. If you actually tried Hoffman's system, you and your confederate would both end up losing.

  105. RFID casino tracking, yup by mbstone · · Score: 1

    (from Knowifi.com)

    "Knowifi's Casino Marketing Event Manager (cMEM) allows you to track the movement of guests throughout your property. Give your convention or event guest a promotional item with an embedded WiFi tag and find out where they travel on your property and how long they stay in each venue (casino, food & beverage outlets, entertainment, etc.). Now you can have accurate information about whether your promotional events drive customers to the casino.

    "Here's how the system works:

    "Event attendee information is entered or uploaded from the convention system, event listing, registration system or entertainment system into the cMEM database. Attendee information can be anonymous.

    "Event attendees are issued a promotional item (hat, key chain, comp, coupon, etc.) with an embedded WiFi tracking tag.

    "Either standalone or as part of an existing WiFi network, access points are positioned cover key zones throughout the property (e.g. casino, buffet, hotel, entertainment, etc.).

    "As guests move through the zones, the WiFi access points detect the guest and sends data about their movement to update the cMEM database.

    "At the conclusion of the event, the event manager prints out reports that analyze the movement of the guests for that event throughout the property.

    "Now property marketing managers can use actual data, instead of pro forma estimates, to determine whether their promotional events are driving casino traffic!"