Slashdot Mirror


61-inch Wide Plasma Monitor

Mister.de writes "NEC Plasma Display Corporation today announced the launch of two 61-inch wide plasma monitors from the PlasmaSync(TM)61XM2+series (a grey bezel model, and a silver bezel model) that are equipped with "Enhanced Split Screen" ability - a high quality, high performance Double Picture function. Sales will commence on February 1st, 2004 to meet various uses mainly in multimedia presentation and public display applications with different release dates for each region. NEC Plasma Display Corporation is targeting 25% of the world commercial market share with its 11 model line up. See the source with picture or Read the Main Specifications." The 1365x768 resolution definitely means this is more TV than Monitor, but who wouldn't want it in their office?

238 comments

  1. Aw, MAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I just bought a new 57-inch plasma monitor!

    1. Re:Aw, MAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      61-inch wide Plasma monitor. What is it all about... is it good, or is it whack?

    2. Re:Aw, MAN! by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      When did you buy it? I believe that if you bought it within the past 10 days or so, you might be able to upgrade to the 61 inch for free.

    3. Re:Aw, MAN! by Walterk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, Samsung have released a 63" Plasma TV a while ago. Their frontpage displays their 80" Plasma TV with a resolution of 1920x1080. Yes. Eight Zero Inches.

    4. Re:Aw, MAN! by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 2, Informative
      80" Plasma TV with a resolution of 1920x1080

      That's what, 25dpi? each pixel is 1mm x 1mm large? that must look pretty from up close...

    5. Re:Aw, MAN! by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Except that you'll soon develop RSI in your neck from having to look from side to side if you are that close to it. ;)

    6. Re:Aw, MAN! by Walterk · · Score: 2, Informative

      The specs say 0.891x0.994mm.

      Have you ever walked up to a movie theatre projection screen? The image quality really sucks. Sometimes it isn't the DPI that maters, but the size. Who cares if it's big pixels if you can sit away a few meters (better for your eyes anyway) and have a TV that's friggin' bigger than you are!

    7. Re:Aw, MAN! by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 2, Funny
      Except that you'll soon develop RSI in your neck from having to look from side to side if you are that close to it. ;)

      Well, since your peripheral vision FOV is about 180degs, if the perspective correction is done right you only need to roll your eyeballs. ;)

    8. Re:Aw, MAN! by Threni · · Score: 1

      > And I just bought a new 57-inch plasma monitor!

      Be patient. The plasma screens which people were paying thousands of pounds/dollars for only 3 or 4 years ago are already starting to fail. Start saving up now and perhaps in 2006 you'll have a replacement.

    9. Re:Aw, MAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and have a TV that's friggin' bigger than you are!

      Only if you're shorter that 5'1"... and stand the TV up on its corner.

    10. Re:Aw, MAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If not, you can get it here for only $12,299.00 (regular price is $20k).

    11. Re:Aw, MAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you be interested in buying some rare United States heirlooms emblazened with the faces of past Presidents? ;)

    12. Re:Aw, MAN! by DJStealth · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If my 20" LCD monitor can do 1600x1200 why is it that a 61" can't do 4 times the resolution?

    13. Re:Aw, MAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, please just print out the following message and keep it somewhere until 2006:

      --

      Be patient. The plasma screens which people were paying thousands of pounds/dollars for only 3 or 4 years ago are already starting to fail. Start saving up now and perhaps in 2008 you'll have a replacement.

    14. Re:Aw, MAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be important to note that the TV in question was 80 inches. You are correct in stating that you must stand the TV on its corners. The new height of the person in question would then have to be over 6'8". I am sure that you taller than that, or the TV would have to be "friggin' biggger than you are!" ;)

    15. Re:Aw, MAN! by iainl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "If my 20" LCD monitor can do 1600x1200 why is it that a 61" can't do 4 times the resolution?"

      Because the difficulty with building a monitor, and number of duff ones they have to bin due to too many dead subpixels, goes up with the number of pixels rather than the size of the screen per se.

      1600x1200x4x4 (assuming you want 3 times res in each direction, to give the same dpi as you're used to) is over 92 million subpixels. So you need an error rate of around 10^-9 just to get a fully working screen. 1600x1200 monitors are scarily expensive as it is; ones with 16 times as many would just be obscene.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    16. Re:Aw, MAN! by Eon78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So don't look at it from that close :)

      We have some ship simulators. The largest has 360 deg. view generated by 10 pc's. Output resolution is 1280x1024 (per pc) which gets downscaled to something around 1024x768 by our Barco SIM6 projectors. That doesn't seem much but the image is more than 4.5m high, and you get to look at it from, say 5 to 6 metres away. Then it's still an impressive picture to look at :)

    17. Re:Aw, MAN! by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 1
      We have some ship simulators. The largest has 360 deg. view generated by 10 pc's.

      You mean ship bridge simulators, that simulate what you can see from the windows? Those are cool. :)

      Although I wonder, do people lose the instinct to perspective-adjust after a while? What I mean is, if I see something but can't make it out clearly, I would probably move my head to the side a bit to see it from a different angle and with a different LOS to separate objects in projection. Presumably you're just simulating the LOS to the centre of the bridge so that won't help (the view stays the same), but do people have to "un-learn" that habit first? Or does it not happen?

    18. Re:Aw, MAN! by greenhide · · Score: 1

      I don't think it used to be as much of a problem before everything went digital. Before, there weren't pixels, since it was analog. It might get blurrier the closer you were looking at the screen, but *not* pixellated.

      As a child, I used to watch movies from the front 3 rows all the time. Nowadays, I just can't do it, and it's not just because my eyes have changed over time. Movies look funny up close.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    19. Re:Aw, MAN! by djupedal · · Score: 1

      DLP....check it out...it does look pretty up close. I work in the lab :)

    20. Re:Aw, MAN! by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Some of these screens ARE 16x more expensive.... :(

    21. Re:Aw, MAN! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      So it's a good TV and a lousy monitor. Weren't we talking about monitors?

    22. Re:Aw, MAN! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Well before "digital" TVs (by this I assume you mean TFT and Plasma displays) you could certainly, quite clearly see the phosphor stripes/dots/rectangles (design dependent) on your lovely CRT display. Only monochromatic CRT do not have phosphor patch patterns, and they exhibit a slightly grainy texture when up close.

      It has to be said though, that this Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 930SB that I'm using here has an AG pitch so fine that my eyes can barely resolve it at minimum focus distance. You can't beat a GOOD CRT!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    23. Re:Aw, MAN! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      This is a PLASMA display - pixel density is nowhere near as high as a TFT can manage.

      Biggest TFT I saw was a 40 inch diagonal Samsung, the resolution was a fair bit better than this 60+ inch beast.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    24. Re:Aw, MAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1365x768 resolution definitely means this is more TV than Monitor, but who wouldn't want it in their office?

      What if I don't watch television, ya fuckin' retard? And, yes, this does make me smart than you!

    25. Re:Aw, MAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoops

      And, yes, this does make me smart than you!

    26. Re:Aw, MAN! by calyphus · · Score: 1

      It's probably best thought of as a board room presentation screen.

      --


      The potato it is uninformed.
    27. Re:Aw, MAN! by Eccles · · Score: 1

      The plasma cells are like hollow tubes, and thus manufactured by a dramatically different process than LCDs. These must be at least a certain size, which provides a lower limit on plasma "pixel" size.

      LCD panels could be made to higher resolution (and IBM makes one), although spec DVI bandwidth is hard-pressed to do 1600x1200 or so.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    28. Re:Aw, MAN! by CaseyB · · Score: 1

      Given that those simulators are typically for large cargo ships, which have to concern themselves with obstacles at distances measured in miles, it's probably not a big issue.

    29. Re:Aw, MAN! by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 1
      Given that those simulators are typically for large cargo ships, which have to concern themselves with obstacles at distances measured in miles, it's probably not a big issue.

      It is if you're manoeuvering into a harbour... (I think the sims are also used for the tugs that have that job, and they definitely need to know where they are to within a metre!)

    30. Re:Aw, MAN! by Eon78 · · Score: 1

      When you're on a tanker that's 200m long you don't worry about things that are very close to you; it has no point since you cannot avoid them anyway. And the LOS-problem does not occur with objects far away.

      Only for some tug or pilot operations could this become a problem but then most of these guys also rely on equipment such as gps and radar. Which compensates for the loss that you have in the outside view.

      And when needed we can place extra monitors on the bridge wing to generate additional views (such as looking down the side of the ship). This is needed for projects like Meyer Werft - these guys navigate a 150m passenger ship backwards through a very small river (sometimes less then a few inches spare on both sides of the ship). (btw: they do it backwards because of the propellers: the force they produce could drive the front of the ship into the ground, so they sail backwards to avoid that problem)

  2. Yeah, it's nice, but by KillerHamster · · Score: 4, Funny

    can you play Duck Hunt on it?

    1. Re:Yeah, it's nice, but by wimbor · · Score: 1

      I can imagine shooting at ducks with sizes that approach real-life (scale 1:1) on this plasma is fun, since no real animals are killed. But, wouldn't the blast from your gun damage the plasma? Or is it bullet-proof too?

  3. What is special? by SmilingBoy · · Score: 0

    What is so special about this? Is it the size? Is this the first 61-inch screen? Honestly - I don't know!

    1. Re:What is special? by lxt · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's not. Fujitsu make the PDS-6101 61" Plasmavision Slimscreen Monitor...why is this news?

    2. Re:What is special? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing special about it, Smiling Boy. This story is just an advertisement for NEC. This is NEC's first 61" plasma screen, but screens that large have been out for a while now.

    3. Re:What is special? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ever had a chance to view some recent high quality projectors? I've got one in my basement. It's actually a couple of years old and it's absolutely amazing. And 61-inches is small. My screen is TEN feet measured diagonally.

    4. Re:What is special? by mirko · · Score: 1

      It could be the weight :
      Me and my wife had some difficulties to fix our 42 inch screen to our wall : it indeed weights 45kgs.
      Now, I guess such a monitor would be at least 80 kgs, which'd made it require the help of a group specialists to fix it securely.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    5. Re:What is special? by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1

      This NEC weighs 61 kgs. So not really a feather :-)

    6. Re:What is special? by Squirrley · · Score: 0

      On their website, they say it only weighs 61kg... not like that's a big difference or anything

      --
      Go on, be afraid. Encourage the terrorists
    7. Re:What is special? by da3dAlus · · Score: 3, Funny

      "equipped with "Enhanced Split Screen"" ability"

      It's obvious, displaying games AND pr0n at the same time!
      Sheesh, think man!

      --

      Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
    8. Re:What is special? by mirko · · Score: 1

      OK, so we can say a plasma screen weights around 1kg/inch of diagonal.
      So I guess this will take one mroe column of screws in the wall to support it fully.
      Anyway, I doubt most slashdotter could fix it alone or with their SO, this not only needs to be carried gently but also precisely.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    9. Re:What is special? by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 1
      OK, so we can say a plasma screen weights around 1kg/inch of diagonal.

      Damn, I sure hope mobile phones with 2" screens don't weigh 2kg!

    10. Re:What is special? by mirko · · Score: 1

      My Godness !
      You've got a phone with a PLASMA screen ?
      Doesn'it it become to hot (the installation instructions say to put it on an heat-proof surface) ?

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    11. Re:What is special? by the_consumer · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're mixing English and Metric units. Don't try to watch this TV on Mars.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    12. Re:What is special? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 135 pounds for the metrically impaired.

    13. Re:What is special? by Johnnienumlock5 · · Score: 0

      I have to agree. How much is this going to cost. I am not going to refinance my apartment to buy a new monitor that won't fit. I know that people will buy it but is this really news. So come on give me a quality story.

      --
      http://www.users.muohio.edu/reamsjp/donate.html
    14. Re:What is special? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite...

      Your 42 inch weighs 45kg

      a*a + b*b = 42*42
      b = a*1.778 (assuming 16:9 ratio)
      so...
      a*a + (a*1.778)*(a*1.778) = 42*42
      which means...

      a is roughly 20.6", b is 36.6", the area of the display is roughly 754 sq inches or 0.06 kg per square inch. (Watches eyes roll as he mixes english and metric units.)

      A 61" monitor has an area of 30.2"x53.7" (assuming 16:9 again) or 1621 square inches. Assuming the same desnity per square inch as your old monitor gives us a value of 96kg or so.

      That's if both monitors are the same thickness and that weight truly scales with relation to the size of the diagonal.

    15. Re:What is special? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this special?...
      Because now you can watch TV outside of your basement.
      You can watch your movies without having to close the blackout curtains.
      And Finally you can stop carrying your tv dinners up and down the stairs and just enjoy them in the living room.

    16. Re:What is special? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your "Double Dash" times are going to go down the toilet!

    17. Re:What is special? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So what? My cock is MUCH bigger than yours.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    18. Re:What is special? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can use a playstation controller with only one hand, kudos to you.

    19. Re:What is special? by dave420 · · Score: 1
      I hear that. I've got a cheap projector in my lounge, and that's incredible. Plus, you can pick it up (handle included) and carry it to your bedroom. I know plasma screens are smaller than their CRT equivalents, but you can't do that with a plasma :)

      10-feet-wide PS2 is the future ;)

  4. No price listed? by badfrog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like if you have to ask, you can't afford it.

  5. whooop deee dooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    61" plasma screens are old news. Sure the new features are nice, but are they really worth a Slashdot story? This sounds like an advertisement for NEC.

    1. Re:whooop deee dooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you're new here, aren't you?

      slashdot is basically advertisements for hardware & linux projects, anti-advertisements for microsoft, and a bunch of made up stuff.

    2. Re:whooop deee dooo by The+Dobber · · Score: 1


      Dupes, don't forget the duplicate stories.

  6. In their office???! by jlewell · · Score: 1

    How about gaming! Imagine your favorite game on that pup! :0.. (me drooling).

    --
    Sig pending an original thought...
    1. Re:In their office???! by nick-less · · Score: 1

      How about gaming! Imagine your favorite game on that pup! :0.. (me drooling).

      On the other hand, imagine goatse.cx on that...

    2. Re:In their office???! by Igloodude · · Score: 1

      Goatse.cx is bad enough, but in bigger-than-real-life-sized? The mind boggles, even as the eyes reflexively slam shut.

      --
      We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread.
    3. Re:In their office???! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Especially multiplayer. I want to be able to scream "Eat hot plasma and die, dirt-bag!" and mean it.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:In their office???! by Igloodude · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The terrorist hunters are looking for moms buying FlightSim for their 10-yr-old when they should be hunting you down.

      --
      We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread.
    5. Re:In their office???! by Radius9 · · Score: 1

      For those of us in the video game industry, gaming is the office!

  7. I want one of these .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... but everytime I mention it to my gf, she keeps telling me that "size isn't important", it's what you _do_ with what you got. She encouraged me to simply do more with what I have. Sigh.

    1. Re:I want one of these .... by benlinkknilneb · · Score: 1

      She wants you to do *more*, and you're sighing?

      --
      It must be Thursday... I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    2. Re:I want one of these .... by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 1

      Tell her this is electronics. You can't compare the two! :)

    3. Re:I want one of these .... by 216pi · · Score: 1, Funny

      You have a GIRLFRIEND? You are new to slashdot, aren't you?

  8. its not the size its what you do with it.... by mainframemouse · · Score: 1, Redundant

    half life 2, would be a prime example!

  9. Getting closer to what I'm looking for... by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and what was featured in "Back to the Future" (II, I think)...

    What I want is a big screen monitor covering the wall that can be divided up into quadrants and can be used to watch multiple channels all at once, with a few quadrants for terminals and some Gnome programs! This brings us one step closer... ;)

    1. Re:Getting closer to what I'm looking for... by GuyinVA · · Score: 2, Funny

      [cartman]Shweeeet....[/cartman] Watching Monster Garage, while playing RTCW, playing with your favorite kernel, and while playing GT2 would be cool, but distracting, don't you think.

    2. Re:Getting closer to what I'm looking for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and what was featured in "Back to the Future" (II, I think)...

      Er, guy, in case you didn't get it, this device reveals what a *loser* *dork* the kid was when he ignores his dad to watch way too many channels.

      And if you were to get one, what it would say about you is that *you* are a... oh, never mind. Carry on.

    3. Re:Getting closer to what I'm looking for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever read Fahrenheit 454?

    4. Re:Getting closer to what I'm looking for... by pclminion · · Score: 1

      With the resolution this panel has, your "quadrants" wouldn't have much more resolution than VGA Mode 13h ;-)

    5. Re:Getting closer to what I'm looking for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Have you ever read Fahrenheit 454?

      Is that like the 4th in the series, after Fahrenheit 451, Fahrenheit 452: Electric Book Barbecue, and Fahrenheit 453: Reading is Terrorism?

  10. Nitpick by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 3, Informative
    ... 61-inch wide ...

    Actually 61" diagonal. Nice anyway. This would be great for presentations: beats a projector hands down.

    1. Re:Nitpick by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

      hmm i think they were aiming for 61" wide(screen) plasma TV but screqed it up....

      --
      Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
    2. Re:Nitpick by Squirrley · · Score: 0

      and, what's a Power code (3m)? does that mean that their's software for the ps?

      --
      Go on, be afraid. Encourage the terrorists
    3. Re:Nitpick by ultraw · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't beat the projector's protability (although that also depends on the model)...

    4. Re:Nitpick by tommck · · Score: 1
      not really just a nitpick... a really serious difference.
      If it were 61" wide, assuming it's a 16:9 ratio (no, I didn't RTFA... this is Slashdot!), it would be 34.3125" high. Pythagoras tells us:

      61^2 + 34.3125^2 = X^2

      3721 + 1177.34765625 = X^2
      4898.34765625 = X^2

      that this would make it a 69.98819654948968" diagonal screen...


      Now THAT's a Nitpick!

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    5. Re:Nitpick by Rew190 · · Score: 1

      Marantz has also had a 61" TV out for a few months now, it goes for 25 grand. Why is this news?

  11. WHere do I put it? by apoch2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A 61" screen is larger than my living room given that home builders think someone can actually survive in a 400sqft hole called 'upscale living condominiums'. Perhaps I can put it on the balcony and use it as a beacon

    1. Re:WHere do I put it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      400 sq. ft. is a 20 by 20 ft. Studio. You should be able to figure out how to put a 4 ft. wide TV in a 20 ft. wide room.

    2. Re:WHere do I put it? by doc_traig · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps I can put it on the balcony and use it as a beacon

      Set fire to it and I'll come help defend your condo.

      --
      So long, michael. Don't let the door hit you...
    3. Re:WHere do I put it? by haystor · · Score: 1

      Dude, with today's modern communications technology you can just use a DVD that displays a fireplace.

      --
      t
  12. Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by rigolo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You hear all this buzz about HDTV screens, being Plasma or LCD etc etc. But when you look at the specifications they are never True 1080P ready. I want a widescreen display that can do 1920x1080 at 30". The closet thing is the samsung 240T (24" 1920x1200) but it is already a few years old. All the screens that came after always had a lower resolution. When you check the LCD screen manufacturers you will also not find screens that size, so .. where are they?

    1. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by gr8_phk · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "But when you look at the specifications they are never True 1080P"

      Yea, and the sales people always say "oh yes, it displays all the HDTV resolutions". So then I point to the Samsung DLP set that says everything is converted to 720P (most don't even give a screen resolution) and it clicks for them that receiving and displaying are two different things. I asked a guy at best buy if they are trained to avoid that topic, and we were done talking soon. Deliberate deception?

    2. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by mattACK · · Score: 5, Informative

      First read this. Then check out this puppy. Droolworthy.

      --


      "My God, this must be a truly remarkable corn chip, to be so widely and confidently touted."
    3. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by thparker · · Score: 1
      But when you look at the specifications they are never True 1080P ready. I want a widescreen display that can do 1920x1080 at 30". The closet thing is the samsung 240T (24" 1920x1200)

      Why 30"? What's wrong with this (although it supports HDCP) or this.

    4. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by Walterk · · Score: 1

      What about 1920x1080 at 80"?

    5. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by trinitishwar · · Score: 1

      Here [PC Mag] is a blurb about 1080p screens that Samsung is coming out with. 57" LCD at the bottom.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced culture would leave almost no trace of it's existence when it was gone.....
    6. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by Duncan3 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      First read this.

      That the most beautiful planned-to-break I've ever seen. 3 months before it's 1/2 as bright, and it's dead in 3 years. You'll have to buy a new one before you every watch a single 1080p HDTV program. Capitalism to the ultimate level.

      American consumers truely are the stupidest form of life in the universe.

      I'll stick to my "normal" TV that should last basically forever.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    7. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by hugzz · · Score: 1
      First read this. Then check out this puppy. Droolworthy.

      That must be one of the most biased comparisons I've ever read! But LCD TVs do look interesting.

    8. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy one of these, and display your hdtv in a small window. Not really that huge at 22", but you can just move alittle closer, i'd say.
      http://www.viewsonic.com/products/lcd_vp2290 b.htm

    9. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by Greger47 · · Score: 1

      Eh? Thats TWO years AND three months, if you leave it running 24h a day. Don't know about you, but even though I'm pretty lazy I usually manage to hit the off button on the remote when I leave the couch... :)

      /greger

    10. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      3 months before it's 1/2 as bright, and it's dead in 3 years.

      I think you misread the article. It says:

      "Typical plasma TVs have a life span of 20,000 to 30,000 hours, which equates to at least two years, three months of 24/7 usage before the TV fades to half the original brightness."

      So first, it lasts 2 years and 3 months (27 months), and that's with it in use all of the time. 20,000 hours is ten thousand movies worth of viewing, which isn't bad. It's still less durable than I'd be interested in buying at the current price, but it's not the throwaway toy you made it out to be.

      As for CRT TVs, my last one burned up on me (literally) while I was using it, so they don't last forever either.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    11. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by Greger47 · · Score: 1

      I concur. One thing they happily forget to mention is that LCD TVs have uneven brightness since the backlights are placed att the edges. The LCD TVs I have checked out havn't been as bad as regular computer LCD monitors but it's still noticable, especially on dark scenes...

      Kinda spoils horror movie night. :)

      /greger

    12. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by Mynister · · Score: 1

      Another good site to check out is http://www.lcd-tv-reviews.com It is starting to collect some good info on LCD tv's. So you can play Duck Hunt with out having to worry about burn in.

      --
      Dr. Retarded Check out what they have done now.
    13. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by mattACK · · Score: 1

      I prefer DLP to the lot of them. But plasma DOES wear out. And that company sells both, so I can't see the advantage to being biases either way.

      In addition, plasma TVs look like they dither colors to me.

      In conclusion, meh.

      --


      "My God, this must be a truly remarkable corn chip, to be so widely and confidently touted."
    14. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by netrage_is_bad · · Score: 1

      Out of all the "HD" Tv's at Best Buy, The Aquos Series did look the best even though they are LCD Displays

    15. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      First read this.

      "In the "real world" situations, LCD TVs are 4 times brighter than plasma TVs."

      "LCD TVs contrast ratios measured in real world situations double typical plasma TVs."

      Looking at LCDs and Plasmas side by side in a showroom (ie in the "real world"), my experience is that LCD TVs are not double the contrast and 4 times the brightness so I doubt the whole article. Anyone got anything to back this comparison up with?
    16. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by itsari · · Score: 1

      Eh? Thats TWO years AND three months, if you leave it running 24h a day. Don't know about you, but even though I'm pretty lazy I usually manage to hit the off button on the remote when I leave the couch... :)

      That's asuming you leave the couch.

    17. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by Rew190 · · Score: 1

      No, they're just not trained well. If you want true 1080p, check out Hitachi's Ultravision RPs.

    18. Re:Where are the "True 1080P" HDTV screens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plasmas suck. Look again. Sexy != good tech.

  13. Evil Plot by mphase · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've noticed an evil plot involving Plasma and LCD tv's. Architects are purposely designing living rooms where it is impossible to place an old style back projection big screen tv.

    1. Re:Evil Plot by Camarones · · Score: 1

      As an architect, I find your comment unedumacated and hurtful!

      In reality, its not the architect to be blamed, its the greedy developers who wish to cram as many people into as little space as possible, so as to maximize profit.

      Architects don't like to design unusable spaces, but are often required to by clients with other goals.

    2. Re:Evil Plot by mphase · · Score: 1

      That's a damn good point. I should be blaming those insane developers and their lackies the "interior designers".

  14. Re:no way.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, that is so airbrushed it's a damn cartoon. do you jack off to cartoons?

  15. Too pricey for most folks. =( by wongqc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Although it's nice, guess it will be roughly 3-5 years before the price comes down to a level where the common public can afford. Most of us don't have that deep pockets....... :(

    Hey Santa...I know it's a bit early...but I don't mind one of these babies for coming Xmas :P

    1. Re:Too pricey for most folks. =( by The_Systech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With the life expectancy of the current plasma screen technology, I'm sure that you'll be able to buy one of the screens manufactured today for a little bit of nothing in 3-5 years. Of course it'll be dead by then, but hey you'll have a great 61" diagonal paperweight.

      --
      To err is human, but to really foul things up requires a computer
  16. DLP is better... by dane23 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know why everyone has a hardon for plasma. Sure it's thin but it suffers from burn in and it runs fairly hot and the colors fade after a few years. DLP doesn't suffer from burn in at all, so you can play all the computer/pc games on it you want without fear of ruining your multi thousand dollar investment. Plus when the DLP light board goes out in 3-4 years just buy a new one for a few hundred and drop it in.

    --


    Warning! Keep Out of Eyes! Wash Out with Water! Don't Drink Soap! Dilute! Dilute!
    1. Re:DLP is better... by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree. It really annoys me when people brag about their bigscreen tvs, plasma or worse yet rear projectors. I think to myself, you know if you had a DLP your whole freaking wall would be a screen.

      So if anyone can explain what are advantages of big-screen displays over DLPs for home viewing, please enlighten me.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    2. Re:DLP is better... by earplug · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, DLP is a projector right?

    3. Re:DLP is better... by mr.capaneus · · Score: 1

      DLP is a rear projection TV.

    4. Re:DLP is better... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 4, Informative
      No, DLP (Digital Light Processing) is used for BOTH rear and forward projection. The original poster is erroneously thinking it's for forward projection only, and you are mistaking it for rear projection only. The technology can be (and is) used for either.

      Http://www.dlp.com

    5. Re:DLP is better... by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      yes, i believe it stands for digital light projector, and it displays the image on any white/gray surface. they're similar to the LCD projectors you see used for conferences and in classrooms.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    6. Re:DLP is better... by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      not quite.

      rear projection TVs project an image on a mirror-like surface which then bounces the image on a screen of set size.

      a DLP is just a projector which outputs the picture on any surface.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    7. Re:DLP is better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      digital light processing, and it is a damn cool technology (from TI). put simply, it uses a shitload of tiny oscillating reflectors on a chip to switch the pixels. very cool. dlp projectors have been on the market for several years now.

    8. Re:DLP is better... by dane23 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the original poster - me - owns a *rear projection* 43" Samsung DLP HDTV monitor and knows that the tech works for both rear and forward projection. Thanks for pointing that out though. One more benefit of DLP over Plasma.

      --


      Warning! Keep Out of Eyes! Wash Out with Water! Don't Drink Soap! Dilute! Dilute!
    9. Re:DLP is better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some DLPs have been plagued with early burnouts of the lighting component (within the first first year). On top of that, the longevity of the DLP rotating mirror array has never really been tested either.

      I just wish that manufacturers offered a 5 or 10 year warranty on their TVs. For what we're paying for the new technologies, it'd make sense (plus get that early-adopter signed on to the brand). In the following years, as the price drops, lowering the warranty period would seem like a good business move (further justifying the price drop, and signing on more early adopters on the next round of products).

    10. Re:DLP is better... by Eccles · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So if anyone can explain what are advantages of big-screen displays over DLPs for home viewing, please enlighten me.

      Brightness is generally an issue with projectors; you need a dark room for them. A plasma or LCD display will look decent in interior light.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    11. Re:DLP is better... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      As a guy who just had his DLP burn out on him, the rotating mirror array is a BAD design. Any amount of crud/dust in the unit, and crap starts accumulating in the bearings. Sooner or later instability/wobble ends up developing and a cascade effect of degradation destroys your projector. I'd rather go back to the 3LCD monoblock design. :-/

      Moving parts in a digital projector? Who's the crackhead who thought that up?

    12. Re:DLP is better... by Rew190 · · Score: 1

      It seems to work roughly like this.

      You get a CRT (likely projection) if you want the best picture (in both light AND dark conditions) for the best value, or you don't care about the ~22" depth.

      You get a plasma if
      A) You're very rich and want the "cool" technology
      B) You require a flat panel display due to space constraints.
      C) You're uneducated about the techs and assumed that plasma is the "best" because it's expensive.

      The reality is that plasmas do NOT give you a better quality picture, eat a large amount of power, are prone to burning in, and do have a set lifespan (30,000 hours or so).

      LCD is still expensive, but it has a better lifespan, power consumption, and picture than plasma. It looks amazing when you're watching a bright picture. Downside is potential dead pixels, price, and poor black levels (space in a sci-fi movie looks grey, not black).

      DLP is an insanely sharp picture and isn't affected by burn-in. Bad stuff: there are those that can see the rainbow effect, and for these people it's too annoying to watch the set. The rainbow effect is more easily visible when there's a lot of movement on the screen.

      That's a huge generalization, but really there's no best overall technology. It's wholey on preference.

      But seriously, stay away from Plasma and don't be suckered by the "cool" factor.

  17. Projector by donnyspi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems to me that at this size of over 5 feet, maybe a nice projector would be better.

    1. Re:Projector by Radius9 · · Score: 1

      This site has the problem most projector sales sites have. These are computer projectors more than they are TV projectors. 1024x768 isn't a standard TV or HD resolution, which means you end up with interpolated pixels, even at high resolution, resulting in a blurry picture. I'm looking for a site that sells projectors that are intended for TV rather than ones that are intended for data projection. I haven't found many that sell these sorts of projectors, which means I have to directly buy from the manufacturer or from specialty stores, resulting in a higher price.

    2. Re:Projector by donutello · · Score: 1

      Try Projector Central. Review the list of highly recommended home theater projectors and then search for someone who sells them on google.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  18. how many... by VEGx · · Score: 3, Funny

    how many pr0n sites could you have open then at the same time? [inches? what's that? translate it to something I understand]

    1. Re:how many... by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Errr, it's enough to display about .000004% of a Library of Congress?

      (Based on a LOC of 105,000,000 MiB (number pulled from here, MiB for my convenience), and a resolution of 1365x768 at 32 bits. Of course, any 1365x768 display is enough to display .000004% of an LOC.)

    2. Re:how many... by MarkoNo5 · · Score: 1

      An inch is 1/10 of the penis size claimed in your spam.

    3. Re:how many... by medscaper · · Score: 1
      translate it to something I understand

      It's about .4 Volkswagen Beetles, diagonally.

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  19. Specifications by earplug · · Score: 5, Interesting

    >> Current Rating A:6.7A(Max) G:8.0A(Max)

    Am I reading this correctly? 6.7-8.0 amps? To protect the investment, is it possible to get a surge protector that can handle that kind of current for a decent price?

    Furthermore, don't many houses run on 15-20 amp circuits? That just seems like a lot of power!

    >> Speakers 9W+9W (6)

    Where does the surround sound hook up at? Does it typically connect to the TV, or is it supposed to connect upstream somewhere like at the DSS dish, or DVD player?

    1. Re:Specifications by gricholson75 · · Score: 1

      You are reading this correctly, plasmas use a silly amount of power. I you put you hand up to one, you can feel the heat radiating off it. I am concerned about the wiring in my old house running a plasma, and therefore will probably get an LCD.

    2. Re:Specifications by Grey_14 · · Score: 0

      Usually, you run things through a receiver, for example, the DVD, DSS dish, VCR (god forbid), Dreamcast, Record Player, Whatever, plug into the back of a receiver, then the receiver plugs into the TV, this lets you switch inputs, while having everything go through your surround sound system, it's kind of a waste for this TV to even have speakers, as if those who buy a 61" plasma, wont have a 7.1 or better surround sound system :P, but yeah, in my experience, once you have a decent sound system, you dont even plug any kind of audio into the TV, just video.

    3. Re:Specifications by IcePop456 · · Score: 1

      If you are worried about the power consumption, price of a surge protector, and/or your electric bill increase, I think a plasma TV is slightly out of your budget.

    4. Re:Specifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you think twice about running a 1kW bar heater?

    5. Re:Specifications by anethema · · Score: 1

      Yes, houses run on 15 amp circuits. But, remember thats per breaker. It also might even scale the voltage down before using it or something and thus draw a lot of current, but at a lower voltage.

      A more usefull number would have been the power comsumption.

      8A at 120V is 960 Watts.

      If you are running this tv with an entertainment system, you dont have a lot of room for other stuff, but you do have some. (electrically:))

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    6. Re:Specifications by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Its not just the power bill. 1000W heat emission can change a "nice" room into a "i need air conditioning" room....

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    7. Re:Specifications by cmich · · Score: 1


      The main breaker in a house is usually 100 (older) or 200 (newer) amps. Individual breakers are around 15-20. A single appliance drawing 8 amps is nothing unusual. In fact, your average hair drier pulls more current than that. So it's not that unreasonably.

  20. Too late.... by edwardd · · Score: 2, Funny

    So why does this come out AFTER christmas??

    1. Re:Too late.... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about, you have 11.5 months to save up for it! :)

  21. Seems kind of heavy by ThomK · · Score: 1

    Weight 61kg/134.5lbs

    134 pounds? Are they sure its a plasma?

    --

    TK

    1. Re:Seems kind of heavy by GuyinVA · · Score: 1

      134# sounds right. They are heavy. the 42" model I looked at for my home was about 60#. You need some serious wall anchors to mount them...

    2. Re:Seems kind of heavy by iainl · · Score: 1

      This certainly matches what I've heard, yes. A friend was going to get a 50" cheap from work to wall mount, until they saw the 9" bolts that had to go through breezeblock to hold it, and didn't dare try with a partition wall.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  22. Yes! by b0r0din · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll finally have a large enough screen TV to make my evil supervillain's lair with my computer console that has way too many buttons.

  23. can you get a sun tan from that much monitor? by freejamesbrown · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    ??
    m.

    1. Re:can you get a sun tan from that much monitor? by MichaelGCD · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, you geeks and your all-in-one gadgets. If you need a tan that badly, just go outside .

      --
      hate titty pee colon slash slash
  24. Nothing at all - here's 80 inch by swordboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    LG thought that they were going to steal the show at CES with their puny 65" model but then Samsung dropped the bomb with an 80 incher... 1920x1080p... Wow...

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Nothing at all - here's 80 inch by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      No, LG presented their 74" model. It was posted in three-foot letters on the South building.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    2. Re:Nothing at all - here's 80 inch by shaitand · · Score: 1

      ok, this is a MONITOR, that is a TV.

    3. Re:Nothing at all - here's 80 inch by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Though I was most impressed by their 55" LCD screen.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  25. Huh? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    with different release dates for each region

    Why do companies insist on doing that? Surly they'd make more money with a single release date? Would make advertising a lot simpler.

    1. Re:Huh? by bn557 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well, this way they don't have to commit to a huge production of the product before they're assured that:

      A. the product is actually going to sell
      B. the product isn't going to require a major recall.

      if they produced 10,000 of these, distributed them to 39 countries, then found out that they have to recall them, replace them all, and have a PR nightmare, they're easily going to be out whatever extra they made from the mass distribution.

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
    2. Re:Huh? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Good point! For expensive products like this that is understandable.

      Thanks!

  26. Marketing snafu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    making it appropriate for ... bowling alley score display systems.

    So the Marketing guys come up with this plan, and put it in the product literature, but wonder why sales are slow. Could it be that the salespeople read the literature and then have to go home and change clothes, having soiled themselves, what with the wet dream of selling 48 of them (on commission) at once?

    Not that I'm suggesting the price of the units might be high or anything....

  27. And in 3years ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    its just going to be a very expensive pinboard

    isnt the inherant fault in plasma screens is they lose 50% of their brightness in 3years ?

    doesnt anyone make *anything* that will fsking last more than 3years thesedays

    1. Re:And in 3years ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're presuming there's a whole lot of 'brightness' on television to begin with.

  28. It's not the size that counts! by Stevyn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's not the size that counts, it's how you use it!

    And by that, I mean what operating system you have it displaying.

  29. Where's the source though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't know of a single 1080 signal source. Its all well and good to have that capability, but nobody is broadcasting that way, so what's the fuss?

    I'm just surprised that most of the plasmas are only EDTV capable.

  30. Re:MooCoro ino Moocais! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this? Some sort of troll language?

  31. Its not that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rear projection TV's are HUGE, and their viewing angle is poor. If you buy one, you buy it knowing those considerable cons.

    I can't imaging taking up 1/3 of a room just to fit in a TV set. I have never seen a TV show worth that much trouble.

  32. Re:DLP is better...than nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not a bad choice, but the brightness is poor, and you can't watch in the daytime.

    Each has their advantages, but if money is no object, you choose Plasma in a runaway. Its clearly the best picture. Nice and bright, good viewing angles.

    Of course, if money is an object, what the hell are you doing spending $2,500 on a TV set anyway?

  33. About the right size... by Halloween+Jack · · Score: 1

    ...for the bridge of my starship. Now all I need is the split keyboard for the arms of my chair, and I'm good to go.

    --
    I looked into the abyss, and the abyss looked into me--and we both winked.
  34. "who wouldn't want it in their office?" by mwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

    *yawn* I can wait. If I'm gonna have a monitor five feet wide, wake me when they get the resolution up to about 10240x7680. 100x as much detail is worth some serious money to me; bigger pixels are not.

    What would I do with all that real estate? How about a couple dozen windows, none overlapping, each more detailed than what I have now? (Then I need to figure out how to touch-type with VR gloves....) There's a lot of low-level event detectors in the human visual pathway that are being wasted by our tendency to view computing processes through the tiny peepholes we call displays.

    (Think about the mural display rooms in the opening chapter of Hogan's _The Genesis Machine_, or the Prime Radiant in Asimov's _Second Foundation_. Now, those are some *real* display hardware!)

    1. Re:"who wouldn't want it in their office?" by Orion442 · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that the people that would get the best use out of this are CGI creators & other graphic artists and AutoCAD (and other CAD programs) users such as myself.

  35. While big is nice... by ennerseed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really at this point anything under 1080p is kinda half*ssed for a high resolution TV. -I would guess this mind frame would follow in the newest, fastest, best /. crowd- And yes, something that big with that low of resolution, would have pixels too largs to look at 24" from you face. It would look like those 17" lcd monitors that Dell ships out at 640 x 480... how many time have you gone to help a friend out on their computer and have to talk them into bumping up their resolution.... god why!

    --
    "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:While big is nice... by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      Why? I think that Dell gets a lot of support calls about "not bein' able to see none of them whatyacallit... i-cons". All of the large CRTs come with a sticker that says in large numbers '1024x768' when they are capable of 1600x1200. The LCDs that I've bought have stickers with the native resolution of the panel on them, though.

      I called the notebook support line and there was a special section for 'things appearing too small on the screen'.

  36. Hmm... by JediDan · · Score: 1
    "Enhanced Split Screen" eh? Now for the price of 3 inferior SMALL TVs, you can go head to head with one friend on ONE SUPER-WIDE SCREEN!

    :\

    --
    - Dan
  37. Slahdot's new ad revenue model, ads as stories... by divisionbyzero · · Score: 1

    61", that's great... but there are bigger... 63" from Samsung... So, what's the big deal?

  38. Doesn't make sense by thparker · · Score: 1
    These things get bigger and bigger. I guess they make sense for commercial uses, where money may be less important than fitting into the available space. If you have a very specific need -- I bought my plasma because my living room was very narrow -- then consider a plasma. But if you have the space, why would you pay $10,000 when you could pay $4,000 and get a better picture?

    Then again, why not go DLP front projector and get a 10 foot picture for a fraction of the giant plasma price?

  39. Lifespan of Plasma Displays by Dracolytch · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hey gang,
    Just so you know, the estimated average quality lifespan of a plasma display is about 3 and a half years.

    I, for one, am going to stick with other technologies until they can drastically improve the lifespan of such an investment.

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  40. aha! my new desk! by jantheman · · Score: 1

    & I'll be able to fry eggs on it too!

    --
    -- Mod me down. I am not a karma tart. ffs,gag
  41. Forget Duck Hunt by kinnell · · Score: 1

    Imagine how big you could make a Minesweeper board on this baby!

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  42. Technically Valid '?' by radoni · · Score: 1

    parent post should be modded up for interesting. anyone care to comment on whether or not an IR-based "gun" game controller works with televisions other than CRT technology?

    --
    SIGERR: laziness exceeds quota
    1. Re:Technically Valid '?' by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 3, Informative

      I saw on CNN Headline News during one of their tech segments, they were displaying the game on a large plasma display, but the player was having to shoot at a very small (10" or so) color monitor because, as they said, the gun does not work on the plasma display.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    2. Re:Technically Valid '?' by Eccles · · Score: 1

      anyone care to comment on whether or not an IR-based "gun" game controller works with televisions other than CRT technology?

      Generally these systems work based on looking for a bright spot, which is created at a given pixel when the CRT beam sweep hits it. AFAIK, none of the other display technologies (maybe DLP?) have this peak brightness.

      Speaking of which, anyone know if any non-CRT display technologies have a hope of a high-enough transition rate to support stereo via shutter glasses?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    3. Re:Technically Valid '?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the case of duck hunt, a rectangle block of pixels is lit up where the bird is for a fraction of a second, while the rest of the screen is black.

    4. Re:Technically Valid '?' by owlstead · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well yeah, you could not play duck hunt on a plasma screen, because the gun does not shoot. Instead it receives the light emited by the screen on a photo-detector. Since it is synchonized with the horizontal and vertical frequency it knows where it is aiming (it sees the electron beam).

      Since LCD and Plasma screens do not do horizontal and vertical refresh, it is impossible to use this technique. Using radio would be a better idea. I think some 3D mice (also called owls) used this technique.

      So now you also know why you could hit the duck while aiming much to the left and right of the duck, while aiming above or below would not get you a decent meal - err, score. The horizontal frequency is much higher.

    5. Re:Technically Valid '?' by Firehawke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You've got the gun technology right-- that's how modern lightguns work, but Duck Hunt and all NES gun games used a slightly different trick that MAY or MAY NOT work on plasma/LCD televisions. I haven't tried, but most likely it won't work.

      Basically, there's still just a photosensor in the barrel of the gun but the sensor is calibrated to detect only white. When you press the trigger, the screen blacks out for a brief period and replaces targets with white blocks during the blackout. If a white block is detected by the photosensor, you hit a target. Games that have more than one target onscreen use slightly longer blackout periods with the white blocks staggered so as to detect which target had been hit.

      I don't believe the NES gun used sync at all to detect hit location; it was pretty inaccurate as a result and prone to cheating.

      I should know about the cheating-- I once played Duck Hunt on a black and white TV with the contrast turned all the way up. I couldn't miss-- at all.

  43. just in time for east coast cold spell by peter303 · · Score: 1

    At eight amps, that should keep any room warm.

  44. Re:Just to clarify... by radoni · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...DLP is a type of sandwhich. they are leaving out the mystery sauce ingredient, like so:

    1) D
    2) L
    3) ???
    4) P!

    i'm sure you can come up with the true recipie for ingredient number three.

    --
    SIGERR: laziness exceeds quota
  45. My solutions for more monitor space. by Raven42rac · · Score: 1
    --
    I hate sigs.
  46. Who wouldn't want one? by confused+one · · Score: 1
    Me. I'd be happy if I could have a dual head 18-19" display... Right now I"m working with a slightly fuzzy 17" that's begging to have a soda poored, *ummm* I mean, accidentally spilled into it.

    1. Re:Who wouldn't want one? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Whiner. I was stuck on an old fuzzy Gateway 2000 14" SVGA for far much, much longer than I should have been... the torture! :)
      Then I bought a Samsung 950p (19" goodness). And my current roommate has a NEC MultiSync 1765 (17" flat, stylish, and good-looking).
      Forget 61" TVs, I just want a 38" LCD monitor at >= 72dpi and I'll be good. :)

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:Who wouldn't want one? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      I have a right to whine, and a reasonable expectation for better quality: I'm not a student, That's the computer I'm using at work...

    3. Re:Who wouldn't want one? by ChopsMIDI · · Score: 1

      ...my head I'd be scratchin' while my thoughts were busy hatchin' If I only had a brain...

      Damn you. Every time I read your sig, I get that song stuck in my head.

      --

      How could I say to men: "Speak louder, shout! For I am deaf!"? -Ludwig van Beethoven
    4. Re:Who wouldn't want one? by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1
      And my current roommate has a NEC MultiSync 1765 (17" flat, stylish, and good-looking).
      Your roommate is stylish and good looking?

      Sorry..poor attempt a humor... :-P
      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    5. Re:Who wouldn't want one? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh, my evil plan reaches fruition. Finally!

  47. I just don't get plasma... by UrGeek · · Score: 1

    ...and maybe I have just not see the good ones yet, but none of the ones that I have seen are as good as a good CRT direct view. And I can't stand dead pixels, even one will drive me crazy. For the money, you can get soo much more, *if* you have the space.

  48. No way by Orion442 · · Score: 2, Funny

    No thanks, I spend way too much on paper towels as it is.

  49. Gray and silver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I might consider it if they sold it in beech or birch.

  50. Just in time.... by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

    So why does this come out AFTER christmas??

    So you can save up for it for NEXT Christmas.

    --

    - - - - - - - - - - -
    I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
  51. Re:I've got a fever... and the only prescription.. by strictnein · · Score: 1

    I've got a fever... and the only prescription... is more cowbell.

    Just watched that SNL skit last night. It's on Will Ferrell's greatest hits (or whatever) DVD.

    Damn funny stuff.

  52. 61 inches? by YeOldeGnurd · · Score: 2, Funny
    Lucky Bastards!


    I have an understanding of plasma dispays. And soon I will have understanding of videocassette recorders and car telephones. And when I have understanding of them, I shall have understanding of computers. And when I have understanding of computers, I shall be the Supreme Being! God isn't interested in technology. He knows nothing of the potential of the microchip or the silicon revolution. Look how he spends his time: forty-three species of parrots! Nipples for men!

    --
    ...Nothing interesting here. Just move along...
  53. 1365x768?!?! by Versalis · · Score: 1

    1365x768 on a 61" display?!? I wouldn't pay for a 19" display that couldn't do better than that. At 61" the pixel pitch must be, what? 11.5mm?

    I hope it only does 16 colours. I mean, why go half-way on bad displays? At least with a low colour depth it would have some nostalgia value. Remember your Vic-20? Nice big, chunky-style pixels in primary colours. Mmm-hmm.

    1. Re:1365x768?!?! by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      1365x768 on a 61" display?!? I wouldn't pay for a 19" display that couldn't do better than that. At 61" the pixel pitch must be, what? 11.5mm?

      And yet you probably happily paid for a television which has around one quarter that resolution.

      I have a 50" plasma that I use as a TV, and if it weren't for the problem of burn-in, I would already have bought a 42" to use as a computer monitor. Until you've seen your desktop stretching across FOUR FEET, you cannot possibly understand how cool this is.

      I've also used a computer hooked up to a 110" front projector. Now that was nice.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    2. Re:1365x768?!?! by iantri · · Score: 1

      On a mostly unrelated note, colour resolution is a function of your video card; I can drive my crappy old VGA monitor to 640x480x60hz, 16.7 million colours.

  54. This is great news..... by CompWerks · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is something worth watching.

    --
    If you can read this sig - the bitch fell off.
  55. Hefty power bill by livingdots · · Score: 1

    Notice that they haven't revealed the power consumption? A plasma screen is brighter than a regular LCD, and need stronger fans, so they use up much more power then a CRT. This sucker would probably need 1000 W -- as much power as an industrial vacuum cleaner. Imagine having that running in your home four hours every day!

  56. Plasma screen, bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When are they going to come out with plasma rifles!?

    1. Re:Plasma screen, bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phased. In a forty watt range.

  57. 80"? Get that instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  58. Paperless Office by sbowles · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I've always thought that the "Paperless Office" would never be a reality until I could get a monitor that was the size of a desk.

    This way I could have files spread all over it, each with a font size that didn't hurt my eyes.

    --
    You sly dog: you got me monologuing! - Syndrome
    1. Re:Paperless Office by owlstead · · Score: 1

      I see more in high res LCD/OLED screens (for the real work), coupled with (very) high resolution e-ink 2x A4 sized books. You could just "Print" to the e-ink book and use that for documentation.

      Later on, these e-ink books could be upgraded to color and touch screens to make annotations. The other screens could also use touch screens and - indeed - become part of the desk.

      The books would obviously be portable and use wireless technology. With even small bateries these monitors could last really long.

      Plasma screens are not really interesting for these kinda applications. Actually, I would prefer a high res / high lumen projector to a plasma screen right now. Beware for Plasma screens burning in as well, or having fans, or using a lot of energy...Wouldn't mind getting one though :)

    2. Re:Paperless Office by erice · · Score: 1

      This way I could have files spread all over it, each with a font size that didn't hurt my eye

      The typeface on a typical printed documment is *smaller* than most high rez zellots use on their screen.

      It's not the size, it's the resolution. Printed documents are 300dpi, worst case. I want that on the screen.

  59. It's already here. (Sort of.) by Jonathan+Quince · · Score: 1
    What I want is a big screen monitor covering the wall that can be divided up into quadrants and can be used to watch multiple channels all at once, with a few quadrants for terminals and some Gnome programs!

    The software side is called a "windowing interface", and solutions are already available for *nix, Macintosh, and (of course) Microsoft platforms.

    The real problem is user control. Wireless keyboards and mice pretty much suck, and old-fashioned remotes are already growing too many fiddly buttons for their own good. Every once in awhile, I see a new piece of human interface hardware that looks really snazzy but probably isn't all that practical; he who finds the real solution to this problem will be inventing the next mouse, so to speak.

    --
    Microsoft Windows is, fittingly, the official Desktop OS of Olig
  60. In their office? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't. Given that a reasonable sized office is maybe 6 metres across, at 61 inches and about 1300 by 768 this would be pixel-o-rama. I'll wait for the 4000x6000 version :-)

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  61. Because it's hard to do by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

    The more pixles you want to pack onto something, at any size, the harder it is. Plus it's not like most people care so it's a waste of money.

    Like you can beat your 20" LCD easily. Viewsonic makes a 22" LCD that does 3840x2400. That's 2x max HDTV in each direction. So it's only 2 inches bigger than yours yet has over double the resolution.

    So what gives? why doesn't you're have a similar resolution? Well because it's expensive as hell, that's why. That's like a $4000 monitor. Plus I'm betting you don't really care. I mean barring engineering uses, there isn't much use for pixels that small.

    Similar with TVs. You don't sit nearly so close to them, so pixels can be larger. What's more, you are limited by your input. You are basically not going to find anything that's over 1920x1080 (the HDTV max) so there's little point to making above that.

    Finally, plasma screens are a bit different technology than LCDs. What applies to one in terms of resolution feasability does not necessiarly apply to the other.

    1. Re:Because it's hard to do by calyphus · · Score: 1
      there isn't much use for pixels that small

      I can think of one good use: graphic design. Having very small type, e.g., 5pt, and 1/2pt hairline rules displayed accurately makes on-screen proofing much more reliable.

      --


      The potato it is uninformed.
  62. Plasmas are not good computer monitors by twenex · · Score: 2, Informative

    Primarily because they suffer from burn-in. How would you like a permanent "Start" button in the lower left or a permanent menu bar from your mac?

    On another subject, it's interesting, but the Sony XBR-950 series of Plasma monitors run Linux in their media box (which is a video switch + runs media from a memory stick).

    And no, I would not like a beowulf cluster of these, thank you very much.

  63. Office!! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
    You have an office?!!?!! I am *so* offended!

    Realistically, can you think of anything else that could be so little used by normal people but be a big status symbol for the CxO set? I think that this will be a big seller to the 7-figure high-tech exec crowd. It's pretty clear that NEC has a winner on its hands here (BTW, do I get extra karma for using it's and its right?).

    --
    That is all.
    1. Re:Office!! by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      (BTW, do I get extra karma for using it's and its right?).

      No, not even if you got the remaining grammar in your sentence correct.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  64. this is hardley news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zenith has had a 60 inch out for well over a year with split screen capabilities.

  65. rotflmao! by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    That's rich man. The offtopic mod was unwarranted. Still, you could have lied and said all 15 screens were arranged into one big 3x3 or something to demo some Matrox cards... heh. Plasma's got nothing on that.

    CompUSA - run by idiots, all machines hooked up to the public internet so you can comparison shop IN THE STORE!

    Idiots. :-)

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  66. [ot] Did you write imagedupe? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  67. Re:HDTV jitter by Strudelkugel · · Score: 1

    It would look like those 17" lcd monitors that Dell ships out at 640 x 480... how many time have you gone to help a friend out on their computer and have to talk them into bumping up their resolution Way too many times!

    On a similar note, is it just me, or have others noticed a nasty jitter in HDTV fast moving images? I used to think it was something unique to plasma/LCD monitors, but then I noticed it on a Pioneer Elite rear projection set. The thing about the big screens is that the effect becomes even more pronounced. Now I'm wondering if it has something to do with HD cameras.

    If you really want to see this, try to find a store playing the Philips demo tape that shows the girl running by the sea. She runs past a few milestone markers that zig-zag past.

    --
    Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
  68. so to be ontopic i'd have to...? by freejamesbrown · · Score: 1

    a. comment how big that monitor is.
    b. comment about how much light that must output.
    c. comment on how close most of us sit to monitors.
    d. ...?

    sorry, i've been wearing my tinfoil hat.... but monitor emissions scare me. i thought that was on topic. response noted.
    m.

  69. Why? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1

    Plasma is good if you need to hang it on a wall, but others are catching up. InFocus was showing a 61" DLP rear-projection set that is thin enough to hang on a wall at CES, for example.

  70. Nice by Particle010 · · Score: 1
    Coolness. Now All I have to do is come up with the $4.7 million I'll need to buy it and I'll be all set...

    --
    "Not the Earth!!! That's where I keep all my stuff!!!" - The Tick
  71. in other words... by tsunamifirestorm · · Score: 1

    the blue screen of death never looked better

  72. 3 Years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3 year life on a plasma display (ie. before pixels start to die)? - I think i'll catch the next technology thanks.

    AC

  73. So Much Porn! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    So little space!

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  74. hi-res screens useless, now by bran6don · · Score: 1

    It's great to see all this new big monitor tech from CES, etc...
    However, all these large screens get increasingly cumbersome
    as their resolution grows, because graphics get so small. Right
    now I'm using a 1920x1200 UWXGA screen on my laptop
    and the only way to read webpages is to increase the font size,
    which screws all the formatting.
    I'm hoping for a good vector-scale-type format for text/graphics.
    (that's still small enough to be suitable for the web).

  75. Great article... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    As they get bigger, TVs are usurping functions of other devices, particularly computers and printers.

    Yeah, because I can use my new TV to read Usenet, play Warcraft and burn CDs.

    You'd think a tech writer would know the difference between a computer and a computer monitor.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  76. TV or monitor? by Alomex · · Score: 1


    I heard somebody say that some large plasma monitors cannot be used for TV since you would notice a flicker from changing images. Is there any truth to this?

  77. Re:HDTV jitter by gordyf · · Score: 1

    I was watching a DirectTV HD feed in a store, and noticed compression artifacts from fast-action scenes or quick scene changes. It looked beautiful as long as there wasn't too much movement, otherwise it got all blocky.

  78. "beats a projector hands down" by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    My projector (middle range Epson EMP-710) is said to achieve 21 FEET diagonal... I would like to see this 61" (" as in for INCHES) beat this, even hands up 8p Yours, faithfully, A Projector owner .... ROFL....

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  79. Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you watch 8 hours of TV every day, then your plasma will probably die in 10 years. It'll go in 3-5 years if you leave it on constantly, which is ridiculous.

  80. it can finally do 1080i natively by cwerdna · · Score: 1

    It's not the dpi that matters. It's that finally it can do 1080i HDTV natively. You wouldn't wanna sit up close to any plasma. None have had very high res until now. Yes, I saw the 80" Samsung at CES. I also saw the 76" plasma at LG's booth at CES. They were claiming that their 76" was the largest... LOL. Oops!