It has deep-rooted support for meta-programming and introspection. Namespaces are simple and straight forward. The re-occurring interfaces in Python shave down development time and encorage uniformity.
Using Python is actually a pleasure. Mind, it does have its flaws: Performance (which is about on par with PHP), populatity (not deployed as much as PHP), and some OOP querks (but still better than PHP's).
I am using Slashdot's Discussion2 and I accidentally modded you redundant. Just posting this reply to cancel the mod.
I find it very odd that there is no confirmation before a selected mod is applied. I think I'll submit that as a UI bug. Sorry for the inconvenience.
BTW, I meant to mod the parent as Interesting, because he raises a great question: Are these flaws of the PDF format? Or just Adobe's implementation (or extensions)?
America touts itself as the land of the free, but the number one freedom that you and I have is the freedom to enter into a subservient role in the workplace. Once you exercise this freedom you've lost all control over what you do, what is produced, and how it is produced. And in the end, the product doesn't belong to you. The only way you can avoid bosses and jobs is if you don't care about making a living. Which leads to the second freedom: the freedom to starve.
In windows: "...\Program Files\Mozilla Thunderbird\thunderbird.exe" -addressbook
In OSX:/Applications/Thunderbird.app/Contents/MacOS/thund erbird -addressbook
And you can actually do the same with Mozilla/Seamonkey.
Doesn't google allow a site to put a robots.txt fle in a directory? And that file can stop google from adding some of the sites file to its search. Maybe that's what is going on here.
Any real self respecting geek writes the html and css in the raw. It's the only way.
Not only that, but it makes for better pages. The code is not bloated, and the layout is more optimized. Hand-coding websites also gives you a chance to find new ways of doing things instead of the same old tricks.
My design process includes Fireworks, also by Macromedia. My first step is drawing the page layout with all the images and menus. It's the easiest way to play around and find what looks just right. My next step is re-creating the page using minimal images, css, and xhtml. After it looks like the original images, I optimize the code and make sure the layout works in ALL browsers. I might also add in a step that includes javascript or server-side code if its necessary. This design process has served me very well.
As for the question, I've used Dreamweaver, but never liked the extra features. I use it as a file manager and syntax highlighter when I'm on Windows, that about all (except FTP). I find the best way to manage your site is to have it manageable by design. Descriptive file names, good directory structure, and organization. That way you wont be locked into any specific solution.
A good site to check out is nonags. It has policy of only carying ad-free, money-free software for those who like to get something for nothing. There is always searching the web. But, I know. That takes effort.
Eh? Thats TWO years AND three months, if you leave it running 24h a day. Don't know about you, but even though I'm pretty lazy I usually manage to hit the off button on the remote when I leave the couch...:)
The whole point of scienctific research is to find new technologies and (maybe) a use for them. You never know how this research could effect the world. Wakeboarding and surfing come to mind, as well as applications with the slashdown of spacecraft. Who knows?
You're right, you're probably biased. The electric light bulb was nothing more than just making something we already did a bit faster, cheaper and easier.
The interweb has the potential to change everything, everywhere just as the lightbulb had. These four things have a lot in common with each other by way of importence to society. Except only on the interweb can someone rant on slashdot.
The internet actually has more potential than the lightbulb because it allows for so many other things to become a posibility, like open forums, easy to access information, inexpensive communication, and (of course) Slashdot! Sure the lightbulb opens up some doors, but the interweb opens up so many more.
An open source alternative can help keep the heat on TI to make a better product. Also, in the future, this OSS can even become a better alternative than the TI software. It also gives an oportunity for developers to enhance the O/S they use when the please.
When I bought a new computer (128MB RAM) a year ago, I managed to open the case without damaging the sticker. I popped some more memory in there, a CD-RW drive, and an old GeForce2 and closed it back up with the sticker still in place.
About a month later the computer crapped out (the power supply), so I took it to customer service because it was still under warantee and they said they'd fix it for free. When I came back the next day they had it fixed and didn't even notice the new hardware! I grabbed my box (the computer) and never looked back.
Although I don't look at the kernel source, I do look and modify things like the Kicker and Apache and PHP modules. That's why I like Open Source. If somthing makes me angry I have the code to change it or to give to someone who can change it.
If I had the Windows 98 source (and it was written in a language I care to learn) there would be many things I (and others) would change (like the Task Manager or the dependency on IE). Most of my efforts would be used to make WINE better.
Now it's your turn to pay up. I've just recieved the patent for:
Method for Specifying a Sequential Series of Steps in Electronic Format for Achieving Profitability for Use as a Business Plan Where the Step Immediately Prior to Profitability May Be Ambiguous, Omitted, Incomplete, Unclear, Stupid, Foolish, Humorous, or Otherwise Unlikely-to-Work-in-the-Real-World On The Internet
Slashdot Mirror
Python.
It has deep-rooted support for meta-programming and introspection. Namespaces are simple and straight forward. The re-occurring interfaces in Python shave down development time and encorage uniformity.
Using Python is actually a pleasure. Mind, it does have its flaws: Performance (which is about on par with PHP), populatity (not deployed as much as PHP), and some OOP querks (but still better than PHP's).
I am using Slashdot's Discussion2 and I accidentally modded you redundant. Just posting this reply to cancel the mod.
I find it very odd that there is no confirmation before a selected mod is applied. I think I'll submit that as a UI bug. Sorry for the inconvenience.
BTW, I meant to mod the parent as Interesting, because he raises a great question: Are these flaws of the PDF format? Or just Adobe's implementation (or extensions)?
McLaughlin Motors along with Buick formed General Motors in 1908. Wikipedia knows more.
In windows: "...\Program Files\Mozilla Thunderbird\thunderbird.exe" -addressbook
In OSX:
And you can actually do the same with Mozilla/Seamonkey.
Signature on my credit card (written in black marker):
CHECK MY ID
Sure, its a pain in my ass to have to flash my ID every time I use the card. But alomost every store clerk asks for it.
I thought Cross Site Scripting just got more secure.
Doesn't google allow a site to put a robots.txt fle in a directory? And that file can stop google from adding some of the sites file to its search. Maybe that's what is going on here.
Nevertheless, the irony would be enough to kill a medium-sized vulcan town.
Like this one?
Any real self respecting geek writes the html and css in the raw. It's the only way.
Not only that, but it makes for better pages. The code is not bloated, and the layout is more optimized. Hand-coding websites also gives you a chance to find new ways of doing things instead of the same old tricks.
My design process includes Fireworks, also by Macromedia. My first step is drawing the page layout with all the images and menus. It's the easiest way to play around and find what looks just right. My next step is re-creating the page using minimal images, css, and xhtml. After it looks like the original images, I optimize the code and make sure the layout works in ALL browsers. I might also add in a step that includes javascript or server-side code if its necessary. This design process has served me very well.
As for the question, I've used Dreamweaver, but never liked the extra features. I use it as a file manager and syntax highlighter when I'm on Windows, that about all (except FTP). I find the best way to manage your site is to have it manageable by design. Descriptive file names, good directory structure, and organization. That way you wont be locked into any specific solution.
...Microsoft.
Apple shouldn't be so arrogent when they are in the same position in a different field.
A good site to check out is nonags. It has policy of only carying ad-free, money-free software for those who like to get something for nothing. There is always searching the web. But, I know. That takes effort.
But how would you know who was behind the keyboard?
I can't really put my finger on just why that year sticks out, but it does.
Maybe because that's the year (perhaps) that Longhorn will be released?
Eh? Thats TWO years AND three months, if you leave it running 24h a day. Don't know about you, but even though I'm pretty lazy I usually manage to hit the off button on the remote when I leave the couch... :)
That's asuming you leave the couch.
The whole point of scienctific research is to find new technologies and (maybe) a use for them. You never know how this research could effect the world. Wakeboarding and surfing come to mind, as well as applications with the slashdown of spacecraft. Who knows?
Just because you can doesn't mean you will. I'm proud to have Konqueror as my user agent.
If that's true, Hollywood's plan will backfire. Nothing makes something more popular than telling people that they can't have it.
You're right, you're probably biased. The electric light bulb was nothing more than just making something we already did a bit faster, cheaper and easier.
The interweb has the potential to change everything, everywhere just as the lightbulb had. These four things have a lot in common with each other by way of importence to society. Except only on the interweb can someone rant on slashdot.
The internet actually has more potential than the lightbulb because it allows for so many other things to become a posibility, like open forums, easy to access information, inexpensive communication, and (of course) Slashdot! Sure the lightbulb opens up some doors, but the interweb opens up so many more.
An open source alternative can help keep the heat on TI to make a better product. Also, in the future, this OSS can even become a better alternative than the TI software. It also gives an oportunity for developers to enhance the O/S they use when the please.
When I bought a new computer (128MB RAM) a year ago, I managed to open the case without damaging the sticker. I popped some more memory in there, a CD-RW drive, and an old GeForce2 and closed it back up with the sticker still in place.
About a month later the computer crapped out (the power supply), so I took it to customer service because it was still under warantee and they said they'd fix it for free. When I came back the next day they had it fixed and didn't even notice the new hardware! I grabbed my box (the computer) and never looked back.
A Google Cache Link for the Microsoft-challenged. (Is it that HARD to offer a PDF version of a document?!)
Although I don't look at the kernel source, I do look and modify things like the Kicker and Apache and PHP modules. That's why I like Open Source. If somthing makes me angry I have the code to change it or to give to someone who can change it.
If I had the Windows 98 source (and it was written in a language I care to learn) there would be many things I (and others) would change (like the Task Manager or the dependency on IE). Most of my efforts would be used to make WINE better.
I've just recieved the patent for:
Read this to answer your subscription question. And learn HTML and post comments as HTML Formatted to get purdy links in your comments.