Slashdot Mirror


Morpheus Infiltrates Other P2P Networks

An anonymous reader writes "Morpheus was the number one post-Napster P2P app until Sharman Networks took over KaZaa and got them bumped off the FastTrack network. Now Morpheus is back on FastTrack, according to MP3NewsWire, tapping into it and the other leading networks through a beta of the NEOnet technology in the just-released version 4. Thomas Mennecke over at Slyck speaks more about it with Michael Weiss, CEO of StreamCast Networks." prostoalex also points to a ZDNet article discussing this new version of Morpheus, and notes the Download.com warning that: "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."

300 comments

  1. good... by mr_tommy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doesn't this mean now that the RIAA only has to download one program when they want to find file swappers and what not?
    Morpheus always seemed to look a bit dated aswell..

  2. So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Morpheus got back in the Matrix? Any word on Neo?

    1. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      It is from here that we broadcast our pirate signal, and hack into Kazaa.

    2. Re:So.... by AmericaHater · · Score: 1
      Morpheus got back in the Matrix? Any word on Neo?>/i>

      yea Agents got him. RIAA agents.

    3. Re:So.... by AntiOrganic · · Score: 3, Funny

      RTFA, it discusses the NEOnet technology.

    4. Re:So.... by zzen · · Score: 1

      Actually, Neo was in the Matrix all along.

    5. Re:So.... by Jacer · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he's fucking DEAD.

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    6. Re:So.... by fallen1 · · Score: 1

      What?!?! They used a net to catch Neo? WTF did he do ? Reincarnate as a butterfly?

      --

      Dream as if you'll live forever.
      Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
      ~Anonymous~

    7. Re:So.... by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nobody suspects the butterfly. Muhuwahahahahaha.

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
  3. Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Morpheus wants to capture a big share of the product market and really make a stand, it should do two things which I believe are critical:

    A successful 3rd generation P2P program should;

    a) Either have no spy-ware or, if necessary, do it out in the open. List each program that is in use, what it is recording, and remove it on an uninstall. It's one thing to have advertising and tracking information: its another to pull a Sherman and hide it all (and then !deny all when they get caught)

    b) Have some sort of way to filter out the fake files put out by record companies and the RIAA. Check files, particularly MP3s, for filler, or repetitions of strings (the usual cause of noise on fake MP3s). Make users able to chose the actual content that they are after. Perhaps also blacklisting of unreliable users from a user level?

    Put in these two features and your program can be competitive on any server (particularly ALL servers)

    1. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes,,,and it should also have a Linux "clone". Limewire [http://www.limewire.com] is a good one, but seems to take up too much resources on Linux. Anyone know a good Linux P2P client?

    2. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dctc. it's a direct connect client, I've downloaded ofer 100GB of mp3's with it.

    3. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by bano+(O_o) · · Score: 3, Funny

      i'll add a "porn tag" on files, so you can find/avoid it.. I'm tired of these : [ 1] Donkey Rugrats en Paris - DVD [ 2] Donkey Rugrats a Paris - DVD Rip x [ 3] Donkey Paris Hilton (Full and Real).mpg [ 4] Donkey Paris Hilton (Full and Real).mpg [ 5] Donkey Rugrats_Paris.avi [ 6] Donkey Rugrats en Paris - DVD Rip x ... Rugrats, rugrats everywhere!!! The world has gone crazy!

    4. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      b) Have some sort of way to filter out the fake files put out by record companies and the RIAA. Check files, particularly MP3s, for filler, or repetitions of strings (the usual cause of noise on fake MP3s). Make users able to chose the actual content that they are after. Perhaps also blacklisting of unreliable users from a user level?

      In other words, make it as simple as possible for you to infringe on someone else's copyright.

      I tell you what, why don't you write such an app with such a filter and see how long it takes for RIAA and the courts to come down on you like a ton of bricks for deliberately designing a tool that a) stops them from posting their own material, whilst, b) helping people infringe on their copyrights as easily as possible.

      Writing a P2P application isn't against the law, but I bet designing a P2P application that uses such measures to intentionally block RIAA (or any other copyright holder) from trying to track down individuals that are wantonly infringing on their copyrights will be severely frowned upon by the courts.

      Contrary to what you might believe, you don't have a right to infringe on copyrights. And the Napster, etc court decisions decided you can't use the "unlimited friends" defence to protect your ass. If you want the latest Britney Spears/Eminem/Outkast/whoever CD then you can pay for it.

      Now watch me get flamed to hell and back by half of Slashdot nation. Like I care about karma: if I did I wouldn't be writing this post, would I?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    5. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Bob9000 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Would you mind answering a few questions for this nice man from the RIAA?

      (how many these confessions does slashdot have logged...jesus people...)

      --
      Those whose signatures threaten negative moderation will be modded down.
    6. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't live in Soviet USia. It's not illegal to download where I live.

    7. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "In other words, make it as simple as possible for you to infringe on someone else's copyright."

      Actually, no. This makes it even easier to prevent copyright infringement, its all about who controls the blacklists. Really though, these features are just useful, just like a gun is useful. Whether its used for 'good' or for 'bad' is all perspective, but either way its got use.

      "Like I care about karma: if I did I wouldn't be writing this post, would I?" As someone who hit the karma cap with 'goatse.cx' in their name, I can tell you this is the typical counterculture troll that gets modded insightful by the same people that listen to Limp Bizkit. (this now being the counter-counter-culture troll that gets +3 informative, but then -4 for this amendment.)

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    8. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by dabadab · · Score: 1

      MLDonkey.
      You can use www.sharereactor.com to search for known good (and probably widely shared) files and check for fakes.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    9. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by the+bluebrain · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dunno ... I think it'd be funny to see a subpoena for one "Mr. Coward, Anonymous"

      ...or does /. log IPs?

      --
      yes, we have no bananas
    10. Re: Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


      > Have some sort of way to filter out the fake files put out by record companies and the RIAA.

      You mean, the stuff they try to pass off as music these days?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    11. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Bob9000 · · Score: 0

      Lucky bastard.

      --
      Those whose signatures threaten negative moderation will be modded down.
    12. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

      I'm building an OS with P2P built in, it has blacklisting of users by voting on reputation and it could check for filler by playing the file.

      --
      - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
    13. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by MrSpiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so basically emule?

      a) it's opensource.

      b) it generates checksums for files, making it easy for sites such as sharereactor.com and shareconnector.com to offer quality-assured releases.

    14. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by neoform · · Score: 1

      b) Have some sort of way to filter out the fake files put out by record companies and the RIAA. Check files, particularly MP3s, for filler, or repetitions of strings (the usual cause of noise on fake MP3s). Make users able to chose the actual content that they are after. Perhaps also blacklisting of unreliable users from a user level?

      Err, i'm guessing you've never listened to any electronic music, maybe a little progressive house?

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    15. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Either have no spy-ware or, if necessary, do it out in the open. List each program that is in use, what it is recording, and remove it on an uninstall.

      This may be the case for the slashdot readership, but judging from the populairity of plain old kazaa (the non light flavour) I would say that most users dont know what spyware is but still manage to make kazaa the most populair client on the most populair network.

      Have some sort of way to filter out the fake files put out by record companies and the RIAA. Check files, particularly MP3s, for filler, or repetitions of strings (the usual cause of noise on fake MP3s). Make users able to chose the actual content that they are after. Perhaps also blacklisting of unreliable users from a user level?

      Sure fake`s are no fun especially to "avarage" users who dont have the bandwith and diskspace for them. I think the most populair method of avaiding them isn`t in automated detection which simple doesn`t work if the fakers take the time to avoid it. That is if you could even pull it off with the lossfull compressed files with high entropy filled with repetitive garbage music we are talking about. Blacklisting seems like a nogo too as the riaa/mpaa`s of the world tend to hire others to do their messy work, collecting their Ip`s would be a dounting task, and it would be an arms race. I think the current practice of having sites link to stuff inside peertopeer networks would be the most succesfull method of getting populair. Judging by the visitor figures of these sites (better not link to them) they already have a great influence on the choice of network for piracy.

      Also I dont think the riaa and the companies they hire to do their internet "detective" work are as succesfull at faking as the malware coders who put trojans in their fakes. Comparing the populairity of clients that already do real blacklisting of hosts to kazaa I dont think its that much of a killer feature.

      I would say they key to an succesfull consumer p2p app may actually be in it being opensource. Think about all the features you can borrow from the clients out there. I am willing to bet the mldonkey/gift people are going over this client with a toothcomb trying to find their code. Seeing how their reverse engineering work would be the cheapest way to get a client into the fasttrack network. They seem to be the only ones to have enough info on the network all implemented in opensource code. (ofcourse there are sherman networks and the original kazaa authors who do peercache but they would want to see cash for their specs`s). Morpheus was already basicly ripped of gnucleus (gpl, but then with addes spyware, consumers/avarage users knew the brand and went for morpheus). Now if the morpheus people can keep "borrowing" features from their opensource competitors they may just get the name recognition/feutures/"content amount" combination for the most populair client.... which I think would be a shame for the mldonkey and gnucleus people.

    16. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by SlashDread · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Writing a P2P application isn't against the law, but I bet designing a P2P application that uses such measures to intentionally block RIAA (or any other copyright holder) from trying to track down individuals that are wantonly infringing on their copyrights will be severely frowned upon by the courts."

      So you want to be flamed to hell? Well, I wont bite.

      Ill just rip your argument to bits.

      You are basically saying it is legal for a "copyright holder" to null the privacy of "non copyright holders".

      Im glad to inform you: privacy is NOT designed for exclusive use by "copyright holders"

      And some other newsflash for you: Not all downloading infringes copyright. Under Dutch law Im am totally legally able to download music WHICH I ALREADY OWN A LEGAL COPY OFF.

      Please, get of your high-moral horse, and start paying attention to the REAL issues (fair use, privacy, and IMHO overly long copyright terms.)

      peace

      "/Dread"

    17. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Flingles · · Score: 1

      option in Kazaa lite : "block bad IP ranges eg. RIAA"

      --
      Karma: -2^0.5 . Mainly due to the imbibing of dihydrogen monoxide
    18. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Mukaikubo · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't an eBay like feedback system work for P2P apps? If someone shares tons of incomplete files, or is the host for a dozen RIAA plants, then make it known to the world.

    19. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Well RIAA's not interested in you if you're in the Netherlands, is it? And they can find out that much from your IP address, so tell me why what I've said offends you?

      I've not suggested for a second that copyright holders have the automatic right to null the privacy of non-copyright holders; that's something for the courts to decide.

      What I have said, is that if you were to write a P2P application that bent over backwards to thwart any and every effort made by RIAA (and others) to limit the infringement of its copyrights then you as the writer of said application would probably find yourself with RIAA breathing down your neck and taking you to court, and that the courts probably (note, probably) wouldn't be too quick to take your side when RIAA (or whoever) provides a point-by-point analysis of the extra features you've intentionally implemented to deliberately hinder them whilst helping infringers.

      (It'd be hard to argue that you've developed a P2P application for legitimate use when you've done so much to help illegal downloading. To use an everyday analogy, you might not be the one "providing" or "stealing" the goods, but you'd be the one helping to "launder" or "fence" them.)

      In short, just like Napster, you as the author of the application would become RIAA's biggest target. Now, why would you want that?

      I am all for fair use, privacy and the limitation of copyright terms. I've been vocal on those issues in the past, and I'll continue to be vocal on them in the future. But downloading 20 albums a week as soon as they are released without ever buying an actual CD isn't the way to address those issues. Remember, it's not like you have to own a piece of music: we're talking about a luxury here, not a necessity like food or water. And it's not like you can't find other music not managed by RIAA that you can download freely with the copyright holder's consent.

      And, just as you correctly state that privacy isn't designed for the exclusive use of copyright holders, I?ll say this: being able to use a P2P application doesn't give you the automatic right not to be pursued by copyright holders when you flagrantly infringe on their property.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    20. Re: Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Music?

      I have a radio-alarmclock to wake me up in the morning so I'm exposed to
      the latest batch of Pink, Kylie, Eminem & Co for about 30 minutes every day.

      It's a good way to drive me out of bed but the sheer crudity and primitiveness (is there some hidden agenda that prevents them from putting more than ~4 accords into one song?) of these mainstream products makes me normally (with very rare exceptions) switch it off as soon as I get to the button...

      I guess there is only so much you can do with music when your main goal is to appeal >90% of the "target audience" and your sound engineers are instructed to make it "safe for cheap radio speakers".

      Let me know when there is something worth buying from them. Until then lets just keep on spreading their crap to those who care about it until that superficial "music monopoly" is out of money and goes away. No loss, no tears.

    21. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      The *IAA would probably pick up the list of "5 stars"-traders for their next batch of c&d blackmail...

    22. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by illuvata · · Score: 2

      ...or does /. log IPs?
      yes, and it doesn't matter if you post as AC or not.

      then again, i guess the average /.er is supposed to know about proxies

    23. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "In other words, make it as simple as possible for you to infringe on someone else's copyright."

      Yes.

      Any further questions?

    24. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Kosi · · Score: 1

      - open source would be nice, but at least it should be ad-, syp- and malwarefree.

      - use weblinks (like edonkey)

      - encrypt the swapped data and let it go through one or two other clients to conceal from whom the data comes originally (anonymizer)

      - include ratio and credit system (like edonkey/mule)

      - use a protocol similar to overnet which means serverless

    25. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have some sort of way to filter out the fake files put out by record companies and the RIAA. Check files, particularly MP3s, for filler, or repetitions of strings (the usual cause of noise on fake MP3s). Make users able to chose the actual content that they are after. Perhaps also blacklisting of unreliable users from a user level?

      I'm not sure how Morpheus or Kazaa does it, but when I specify in LimeWire my download directory, that directory gets automatically shared by the software. I have to manually unshare it, 'cus I want to be able to check the quality first before sharing the files. If everyone did this, it might be more difficult for corrupt mp3s to propagate. (although since I don't look for the most popular songs, I haven't yet met these fake files people are talking about.)

    26. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by rjelks · · Score: 1

      What about Canooks? I thought it was perfectly legal for Canadians to download, but not upload, copywritten material. It's easy to get in the mindframe, but remember that the internet doesn't stop for lines on a map.

      -

    27. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, make it as simple as possible for you to infringe on someone else's copyright

      no, make it as simple as possible for the user to retrieve the material (legal or otherwise) that they were actually intending to retrieve.

      It's the hallmark of a working application, not necessarily a criminal one - imagine if every time you opened a file in your word processor there was a diminishing percentage chance (as other forces flooded your materials store with bogus data) that you actually got the file that you wanted.

      The legality of the material in question has nothing to do with the legality of the feature in the application (other than by those who want to point and cry foul - IANAL but I don't think the courts would buy it).

    28. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by mpickut · · Score: 1

      As someone who has made money off copywrited material, I just want to point out that piracy is not a victimless crime. You may not like the riaa (I don't) but the fact is that you are taking something that belongs to someone else and not paying for it.

      The fact that its expensive or that you really want it, or that its intellectual rather than physical is no excuse (you have no constitutional right to grovey music). If you really admire and like these artists, why are you stealing from them (they obviously get no royalities at all from p2p)?

      If that's how you treat people you like and admire, do me a favor and flame me!

      --
      Sigs are for losers.
    29. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by rjelks · · Score: 1

      If the RIAA peeps are watching, I'd like to propose an Ask Slashdot with Cary Sherman. If I missed one of those than just ignore me.

      -

    30. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      >>"In other words, make it as simple as possible
      >>for you to infringe on someone else's
      >>copyright."

      I'm in Canada and the current understanding of the law here is that while sharing is forbidden, we do have the right to download. Until this goes to court, it has been widely by radio, print, and tv media organizations that this is acceptable, and even more importantly deemed legal by Canadian copyright regulators.

      It may have something to do with the fee we pay on blank CD-Rs and some other media, it may not. Thats not my concern, my concern is that what I'm doing is legal, and under our law it is legal.

      It will still probably go to court, and no matter if its a win or loss, when person X goes to court and says 'I thought it was legal to download, please don't punish me as much', he can point to news and copyright regulator decisions that prove he made an informed choice when he choose to download songs.

    31. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Under Dutch law Im am totally legally able to download music WHICH I ALREADY OWN A LEGAL COPY OFF

      No you are not.
      What Dutch law does allow is that you make a copy of a copyrighted material on for example CD (or any other medium on which levy has been payed) for your own private use.

      What source you use for that is at the moment a hrey area, and as such, downloading music and movies is not prosecuted, claiming it is legal however is oen step too far, esp. considering that the government is of the opinion that 'it would be preferable if such sources are themselves legal'.

    32. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only electronic music. Your average pop junk contains quite a big deal of digital repetitions as well... With N'Sync and Co the best chorus is pasted all over the song...

    33. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Quantum-Sci · · Score: 1

      Deal with it. Boycott or abstain, but overpricing doesn't give you any legal or moral right to steal.

      "Moral"? Are you sure you want to talk about 'moral'? When the record industry throughout its history has raped and left in poverty, artists like Muddy Waters, Sonny Boy, Johnny Winter, and most other true originals? These people are artists, not brokers. They had to trust their managers to bring fair recompense for their contributions. And their managers/labels never failed to rob them blind.

      This is not to mention the court finding of the Industry's price fixing of CDs. Since the beginning of CDs, customers have been overcharged 30%.

      So Sony and AOL are upset that they'll have less cocaine and fewer cigars? Let me explain something: what we're witnessing is economics. So much pressure has built up in unfairness, that the more technical people will find ways to balance it. This will be the case from now on, where there's inequity.

      As far as I'm concerned, we should cut out the labels altogether, in favor of direct purchase from artists or music pools.

      --
      Campaign finance reform is national security.
    34. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by pyros · · Score: 1
      As far as I'm concerned, we should cut out the labels altogether, in favor of direct purchase from artists or music pools.

      Cutting out the labels should mean you just don't buy music produced and/or distributed by them. If there is an artist you like who is on such a label, go to their concert and buy a CD there. Buy a used copy of their CD (although that doesn't get money to the artist). Try to contact the artist to find out if they have any suggestions for how you can support them and not the label.

    35. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they filter based on repetitive strings, then how can I get the new Britney Spears album?

    36. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      Dude,

      "No You are not"

      Then you proceed to ask ME what law ENABLES me to do this.

      As you seem to want me to provide evidence for YOUR claims, Ill try to be humorous here, but do you happen to work for SCO? ;-)

      The answer is simple: there is NO law forbidding me to do so. And, unlike -some- countries, -I- live in the free world...

      It gets even better, there is COURT precendence that DOWNLOADING copyrighted songs, is NOT copyright infringement AT ALL. Even if you DO NOT own ANY copy of it legally.

      Its the sharer who is legally infringing here.

      Ill give the spirit of the law some benefit thou; You -should- own a legal copy.

      I agree with that alleged comment from "the DUTCH goverment" apparently, but please DO provide a source? It hint salso that downloading is legal, however ;-)

      "/Dread"

    37. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      Of course the RIAA is of our interest, that US is still a pwetty big example for the rest of the world. And we have some silly outfit called the breain foundation. Essentially the same thing. Lamers. Ours forbode the webcast of a concert series, whilst the ARTISTS had already given permission.

      The original poster said:

      "Have some sort of way to filter out the fake files"

      This is basic error correcting, nothing more nothing less. You get all moral on the poor sob for the next bit:

      "put out by record companies and the RIAA."

      May I add "and general assholes" to that list? Shurely you would agree that it is ok, to use whatever means possible to prevent general assholes polluting information?

      IT IS ERROR correction! Thats what it is!

      If you are all for "fair use etc." it offends me even more deeply that you have lost the battle with your intellect.

      If -I- write software, than I damn well decide what it does. There is just one small exception: It cannot be written SOLELY for illegal things. ALL software can potentially be used for illegality, its just those things that are designed exclusively for illegality that can be forbidden on their existance alone.

      Lastly, I DO totally agree with you last sentence, being able to pee, does not either.
      Nor does it give the RIAA, Foundation Brain, or any other dinasour industry the right to forbid me to error correct, or to encrypt.

      On THIS planet, we have innocence until prooven guilty, we have the right for privacy, we have the right to encrypt.

      The thing that offends me is NOT you. The thing that offends me is the likes of you are giving in to bullshit like "bendover backwards to thwart the RIAA" or to "deliberatly hinder" them or "20 albums a week never paying" sjeebes, even the Bush spinmeisters can learn something from the RIAA it seems, if the likes of you are swallowing this nonsense. Again, NOTHING forces me to "bendover forewards" for the RIAA. NOTHING forces me to "assist them in earning money" and I OWN 400 CD's dammit.

      peace

      "Dread"

    38. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by scrytch · · Score: 1

      Shareaza has no spyware, and supports blacklists of sources and names that can be shared, downloaded, and installed. The only thing missing is an easy interface to the first and third parts (first seems to be hand-editing XML, the third needs a separate dialog). Ratings are ok, but the hash isn't fuzzy so all they have to do is tweak a byte.

      It has its own protocol (shamelessly and irritatingly called Gnutella2, even though it isn't related at all to gnutella), and also supports gnutella, edonkey/overnet, and torrent. Unfortunately ... no fasttrack.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    39. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are basically saying it is legal for a "copyright holder" to null the privacy of "non copyright holders".

      What does blocking file downloads from the RIAA have to do with privacy?

      Under Dutch law Im am totally legally able to download music WHICH I ALREADY OWN A LEGAL COPY OFF.


      First, he's not talking about using the software. He's talking about intentionally creating software to enable millions of people to very easily infringe upon copyrighted intellectual property, and increasing the overall quality of pirated music.

      Second, if the dutch law allows you to intentionally violate laws in other countries and help millions of others do the same, then go ahead and release the software. Although, in many countries, this would get you in deep shit.



      What I really don't understand is, if you already own a legal copy of the music. Then why not just stick it in your cd-rom drive and make your own complete high quality MP3/OGG/WMA/etc. You get a higher bitrate, no errors, the correct format and not wmas renamed to mp3s, the correct song, no static, etc.

      If people are so worried about backing up CDs that they legally own, then perhaps they should do something about the RIAA purposely damaging their CDs to prevent them from being played in expensive audio equipment or computers, instead of spending all of their time worrying about sharing problematic rips via P2P.
    40. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      If the original poster had talked about error correction in a wider context, as you and some others have, rather than only in the context of letting him download as many songs as he wanted without any hassle then perhaps I wouldn't have replied to his post.

      I'm confused why you think that my support of fair use, etc means that I can't appreciate RIAA's position with regards to major P2P fileswappers, a significant percentage (perhaps even a majority) of whom infringe on their copyrights in violation of local laws, etc.

      I don't believe that RIAA's taken the long view on this: if I were them, I wouldn't be suing 12 year-olds or grandparents who weren't aware of what their grandkids were doing, as it's nothing but bad publicity. I believe that given enough rope they could quite easily hang themself with that strategy once public awareness of issues such as fair use, DRM, etc became more widespread.

      But in the meantime, I think that the worst thing P2P application developers could do is write an app that focused solely on making filesharing of copyrighted materials as easy as possible, which is what the original poster said they should do? Why? Because it gives RIAA (and others) the ammunition that they need, in the papers and in the courts, to label P2P as nothing but piracy on the grandest scale.

      As to whether RIAA should be deliberately hindered, or whether downloaders should have an unequivocable right to privacy, here's are some (perhaps crude) analogies for you:

      1. If I rob a bank, do the bank (via the police) have a right to come after me? Don't I have the right to just run into a crowd and escape freely? If I they don't catch me red-handed by the end of the day, shouldn't I have the right to never be prosecuted for the crime?
      2. If my rifle can be used for legitimate purposes, such as hunting, why do I need to be transparent in its use? Why do I have to have a license or, one day, perhaps even have to prove it wasn't used in a crime?

      Similarly:

      1. Do P2P fileswappers who do nothing but knowingly infringe on copyrights have a right to do whatever they please with no regards for the law? Do they have a total and unequivocable right to copyright infringement on a mass scale using a system that makes them impossible to track? (And what happens when it's paedophiles swapping kiddie porn? Do they deserve the same protection?)
      2. Why doesn't RIAA have any right to investigate P2P fileswapping? If everyone doing it is doing so legitimately then where's the problem? As others have said before, I'd rather they went after the fileswappers than went after P2P as a concept.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    41. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      "What I really don't understand is, if you already own a legal copy of the music."

      I was promised an indefinatly keepable medium, the Compact Disk. They Lied. The things scratch. Im quickly loosing thousends of Euro worth of investment by their crappy products and lies.

      For those that I cannot flawlessly rip myself, I download.

      "/Dread"

    42. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by w00t_sargasso · · Score: 1

      Who's to say that the measures implemented were to block the RIAA? What about all those porn freaks that fill their filenames with repetetive strings??... :D

      Everything has more than one side...

    43. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      1. No. Of course not. And for THE LAST BLOODY time: NOT all p2p is "knowingly copyright infringing on a mass scale"

      2. The RIAA has ALL the right to do whatever they damn well please as long as it is NOT illegal.
      Ah, the peado argument, the last straw of a desperate man. The answer is YES even "peado's" have a right to privacy.
      Newsflash: please surf to the latimes.com, and read on why Sharman (kazaa) will be suing RIAA for "unligitemate use" of THEIR software.

      You seem to believe it is OK, to give up privacy, because it will only hurt those that do illegal things.

      The THING is, if you want to catch smart fileswappers, or smart peado's, you will HAVE to break their privacy. The essential liberty, temporary safety US presidential quote comes to mind...

      In a similar case: can I check you for bodily hidden cocaine, next time you enter The Netherlands? You would not mind, because you are not hiding anything "up there" eh?

      peace

      "/Dread"

    44. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      1. I never said all P2P traffic is made up of people who are "knowingly copyright infringing on a mass scale". But you have to admit that a significant element of P2P traffic does fall into this category. Last time I checked, RIAA wasn't focusing on people downloading Linux ISOs, just as Microsoft/Adobe/whoever don't focus their attention on people who aren't breaching their copyrights.

      2. 100 percent guaranteed anonimity isn't always a good thing. I gave the paedophile because it's a relevant one. There is growing evidence that paedophiles are relying more and more upon technology to share images, movies and tactics. What percentage of P2P traffic they make up is anyone's guess. And let's not forget terrorists or organised crime: 100 percent guaranteed anonimity, whether granted by P2P or some other application would be their dream.

      Why is asking the same question about anonimity in the context of paedophiles, terrorists or organised criminals "the last straw of a desperate man"? I'm comparing apples to apples, which is something with which you're clearly not comfortable. Why is that?

      I'm confused. You acknowledge that we don't have the right to do what we want regardless of the law yet you seem fixated on making those people that use P2P for illegal purposes untraceable. Since when did privacy and anonimity become the same thing?

      I fail to see how seeing which IP addresses downloaded the latest Britney Spears album can be equated to an internal body search.

      In the former case, intellectual property has been transfered without the copyright holder's consent which, depending on your location (determinable by your IP address) may be against the law. Surely that's reasonable grounds for further investigation? A court would almost certainly think so.

      In the latter case, you're talking about a search without providing a context. Am I known drug courier? Have I been under observation that has shown that I've associated with known traffickers? Have I been seen accepting dodgy packages? Is there reasonable evidence to believe that I'm trafficking right now? Those are the criteria in question when customs officers approach a court to request an internal body search on a suspect?

      (That's your best analogy? Tracking down fileswappers is like giving someone an internal body search? And you attack me for bringing up how giving anonimity to P2P fileswappers who trade in music would also give anonimity to P2P fileswappers that trade in kiddie porn? At least I wasn't trying to compare apples and oranges.)

      Evidence of wrong-doing > further investigation > possible action if evidence is strong enough and corroborated.

      That's how it works in most countries. Isn't that what RIAA's doing now? If it can trace specific files to a given IP address right now, what's wrong with RIAA doing that - going after the people actually breaking the law rather than going after everyone - to protect their copyrights?

      If RIAA shouldn't be allowed to do it then who should? The police? So we can spend public money tracking down fileswappers? Nobody? So P2P becomes one big free-for-all where you can take anything you want?

      Three words for you: ain't gonna happen.

      I live in the real world. I value my privacy. But I don't think for a second that my privacy gives me the right to do anything I want regardless of the consequences to others. I don't have a right to break the law without fear of prosecution.

      Similarly recording artists (and others) have the right to be paid for their works. There's a system for obtaining music. If you don't like it (the music or the system) then you don't have to buy it. But if you don't like it then it doesn't give you the right to take it for free.

      I'm not for RIAA. Like I said, I think that it'll hang itself by its own rope. But I'm not for taking something without ever intending to pay for it either and, like it or not, that's what a lot of P2P traffic is about.

      (Note that during this entire dialogue I've refrained from calling downloaders as leeches, thieves or pirates. If I was as obsessed about screwing P2P users as you seem to think I am then I wouldn't show such restraint.)

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  4. Hrmm by acehole · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder what the size of the profit they reap from spyware?

    "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your eating habits, deliver doomsday predictions, collect the neighbours paper, or may leave an unpleasant taste in your mouth."

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
    1. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get about $0.05 - $0.20 per download for bundling third party software.
      In case of Morpheus with about 12,000,000 downloads last year that would be enough to hire real software developers and not just people who surf the net looking for yet another piece of open-source to bundle with their crapware.

      I mean, mldonkey, anyone here ever looked at the source code? It's disgusting! No wonder all the people complain about its bugs bogging down almost every network it connects to (except for edonkey2000 maybe).

  5. Re:Virtual machine by kfg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Have ya ever noticed that Windows can't see your Linux partitions?

    KFG

  6. Unsafe Client? by Mork29 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."

    Doesn't Kazaa do these things anyway?

  7. "Third-party applications" my ass... by kcbrown · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."

    Why would anybody ever download something bundled with the crap referred to here, much less install it? Such "third-party applications" make the main product worse than useless.

    I'm surprised there isn't a completely open-source, distributed P2P filesharing application widely available to people. Such a thing, when advertised as been spyware/adware-free, would likely be a huge hit. But I guess the "distributed" problem is a tough one, and it's the only way to avoid having to host some sort of master server (which would be expensive).

    BitTorrent is probably the closest thing we have so far, but it doesn't provide an index or anything along those lines...

    --
    Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    1. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Direct Connect has several open source clients. CD++ and oDC for windows, DCTC for linux.

    2. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by plumby · · Score: 1

      Kazaa Lite doesn't (as far as I'm aware) include any spyware. Can't remember whether it's Open Source or not, and unfortunately I can't check at work as I'll hit our web filter if I head to their site.

    3. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by ameoba · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hrmm... if only such a thing existed and was compatable with another major client's network.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    4. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by CrystalChronicles · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's not. and it's been shut down by the makers of Kazaa using the evil DMCA.

    5. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why would anybody ever download something bundled with the crap referred to here, much less install it? Such "third-party applications" make the main product worse than useless.

      Because they don't know it ?
      It works like this : "Someone at the last party told me he got the music (that we were listening at the moment) with {insert your favorite crappy P2P client here}". So off the guy goes downloading the client, and since there is available material with it (case in point : the previous party), at the next party he'll advertise it.
      While we geeks keep making statements on Slashdot, instead of going at the next party (and try to get laid by the way).
      I'm surprised there isn't a completely pen-source, distributed P2P filesharing application widely available to people.

      Ok, you obviously don't know mldonkey, so forget my first comment, you're probably trying to get laid.
    6. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by Kosgrove · · Score: 1

      I don't believe Kazaa Lite is open source - I believe it's just a "packaged" modification of Kazaa to remove the ads. The steps to create your very own Kazaa Lite were listed on in Slashot comments (and elsewhere) years ago, IIRC.

      Not only has Kazaa Lite been shut down by Sharman, but if you google for it, there's a note at the bottom of the results page that some search results have been omitted as part of the DMCA. Does anyone know any ways around this? (Yes, I know that you can read the complaint to see what sites Sharman wanted removed - I'm asking for curiosity's sake.) Access Google from a non-US proxy?

      "In response to a complaint we received under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 3 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint for these removed results."

      I really like how the link goes to a site called "chillingeffects.org." A very well-done, subtle shot.

    7. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      But that's it. At least Shareaza handles bittorrents, edonkey and gnutella 1 & 2 networks all at once... and it's muy fast :)

    8. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by muzzmac · · Score: 1

      Funny thing the way Morpheous used to claim it was ad free. Sadly the once only email address I used (Thanks to sneakemail.com) for morpheous mysteriously started collecting spam after Morpheous got booted.

      Seems they needed some revenue huh? Nice mail list sales?

    9. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by frission · · Score: 1

      a pretty good open source project was gnucleus...until Shareaza came along with Gnutella 2 . it can now connect to Gnutella, Gnutella 2, edonkey, and serve as a bittorrent client! www.shareaza.com it's free, not spy ware, no anything, however, not OS either...

    10. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why would anybody ever download something bundled with the crap referred to here, much less install it?

      Ignorance, of course. Trick me once, shame on you. Trick me twice, shame on me.

    11. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by dyte · · Score: 1

      I've not seen the google link to chillingeffects.org, but I think it is awsome!

      Kazaa: we will use the courts to bury you if you don't do what we want.
      Google (to kazaa): We comply completly
      Google (to users): Here is a list of sites that you can not have links to.
      Google (to criminals): These are the sites that you want.

    12. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by asv108 · · Score: 1

      Gnutella 2 is just Sharezea and is not an official gnutella spec.

    13. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      MLDonkey is free software and offers access to the EDonkey network, Overnet, Fast-track, Gnutella, Bit torrent, Direct Connect and Soulseek.

      It is on Savannah, but they haven't put the binaries back up since Savannah was compromised.

      giFT is also free software, and offers access to the Open-FT network, the Fast-track network and the Gnutella network. You can find it on sourceforge. The PLF provides binaries for Mandrake, and I believe Debian binaries are available in unstable, otherwise you can compile from source.

      There are plenty of others, like emule/lmule/xmule/amule, bittorrent and various gnutella clients.

    14. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Bittorrent is pretty nice. There is a great bittorrent client called Azureus that runs on Linux, MS Windows and Mac. It is written in Java using the same toolkit as Eclipse so it uses the native toolkit for your platform. Azureus is light on resources and fast, it starts up in 3 seconds on my humble laptop. Azureus manages multiple torrents and makes creating your own torrents a snap. Here is a good site to find bittorent links. IMO, Suprnova is by far the best. Oh, if you do use Azureus, be sure to also grab the SafePeer plugin. This will grab a list of RIAA/MPAA/etc IP's to block each time you start Azureus.

      There is a cool open source app called GiFT. It has clients for Linux, Mac and MS Windows. It can connect to OpenFT, Gnutella and FastTrack. It can be a replacement for Kazza.

      I cannot understand why ANYONE would use Kazaa or some other closed source app to do their p2p activities. Not only is the spyware/adware crap, but you can NEVER trust the code or WHO puts out the code.

      Anyone that does p2p should go to PeerGuardian. They put out a list of RIAA/MPAA and other IP addresses and IP ranges to block them from getting to your PC/Mac. The site can spit out the list for many software products like iptables, Shorewall, ZoneAlarm, Kerio Personal firewall, and other. USE THIS LIST.

      One other point. If you DO uses any p2p app, make sure that you can disable browsing. That will stop the RIAA/MPAA and thier goons from checking out all your shares and making a nice list to sue you with. The average user that was or is being sued by the RIAA shared about 800 titles. The RIAA got that list by doing a search and browsing your shares. They then save that list of shares with your IP and wham, next thing you know you are bing sued. SO TURN OFF SHARE BROWSING.

      Disclaimer:
      I do not condone trading copyrighted material for which you do not have the permissions to do so. I personally listen to the same old CD's I have had for years since I cannot stand the crap comming out today. Bittorrent is great to grab missed episodes of the Simpsons and XFiles. Oh, and purchase music from MagnaTune.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    15. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1
  8. Hmmhmm... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Informative
    "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."

    Who cares?

    1. Re:Hmmhmm... by Dreadlord · · Score: 1
      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    2. Re:Hmmhmm... by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1
      applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information,
      and may do numerous other things, including (but not limited to):
      • sleeping with your little sister
      • sleeping with your mother
      • drinking all your beer
      • making your milk turn
      • signing yuo up for jazz mags, to be delivered to your workplace
      ...
    3. Re:Hmmhmm... by Liselle · · Score: 1

      With KaZaa, at least, the program won't run if you strip out some of the core spyware. There are alternatives, of course, but the point stands: sometimes using Ad-Aware can piss off the program you're trying to use, and make it refuse to function.

      --
      Auto-reply to ACs: "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."
    4. Re:Hmmhmm... by puck01 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that's the answer anymore. In my experience over the last few months, I've noticed AdAware isn't always getting the job done when I've tried to clean other people computers for them. In one instance, I physcially disconnected the machine from any other network, came back in two weeks with the latest Adaware updates, and still one of the programs still seemed to work its way back into existance. Anyone else noticed this type of behavior?

      I certainly use Adaware when I have to, but I'd never install anything with a hint of spyware thinking Adaware will get it every time.

      puck

  9. What spyware ? by DennisZeMenace · · Score: 4, Interesting
    'Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings.'

    The answer to spyware ? Two words: "Reverse Snapshot".


    Long live VMWare.


    DZM

  10. legal? by Dreadlord · · Score: 5, Informative

    TFA starts:

    Morpheus 4 is Here and Legal

    Morpheus 4 is here and legal - "the only American file-sharing software ruled legal by a U.S. federal court," its owner StreamCast Networks boasts.


    But never says why and how, further more, how is it legal and supports FastTrack network at the same time?

    Anyway, FastTrack isn't the network it used to be, the quality of its files is getting worse and worse, many times you'll download something to find out that it was something else but renamed, I've switched to eDonkey long time ago, much better file quality, yes it's slower, but that is just fine with me as long as the file quality is OK.

    It's much harder to share fake files in eDonkey anyway, because of the file hashing and voting system.

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
    1. Re:legal? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Anyway, FastTrack isn't the network it used to be, the quality of its files is getting worse and worse, many times you'll download something to find out that it was something else but renamed, I've switched to eDonkey long time ago, much better file quality, yes it's slower, but that is just fine with me as long as the file quality is OK.

      I've always felt that this has very little to do with the FastTrack network it self but rather companies who work under the authorization of the MPAA to try to make the network unuseable by releasing bogus misnamed, corrput, or just damned empty files. If what I suspect is true, then any other popular system of file exchange will suffer the same issue of bogus crap.

      Now... I've always wondered if you were to download let's say "lord of the rings" and you got something like "ass master" instead. Is it legit if the MPAA approved it's use for the fast track network to discourage file downloads?

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    2. Re:legal? by julesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      how is it legal and supports FastTrack network at the same time?

      It is perfectly legal to use the FastTrack network without authorisation from Sharman... they don't own the computers that constitute the network, they just own the software that is usually used to run it.

      If you write your own re-implementation by reverse engineering KaZaA to determine how it works, that is perfectly legal. For the same reason that, for instance, Wine is a perfectly legal piece of software.

      So, basically, Morpheus has a re-implementation of FastTrack from scratch.

      What is possibly a little concerning is that it appears to be a download-only implementation...

    3. Re:legal? by Dreadlord · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know much about how files are identified over FastRack, but I think that the way files are hashed and identified over eDonkey works just fine, and the voting system of Kazaa is weird, you are able to vote only for your own files as excellent/average/poor, so those who share fake files will tag them as excellent anyway.

      In eDonkey clients, your vote for the file is based on the hash value, so when you download a file flagged as non-fake, you can be sure that it's not fake, otherwise you can simply vote for fake and so everyone else knows so.

      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    4. Re:legal? by Dreadlord · · Score: 1


      It is perfectly legal to use the FastTrack network without authorisation from Sharman...


      hmm, why then was kazaalite shut down? (not flaming or anything just asking)
      Is it because it used a similar interface to kazaa?

      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    5. Re:legal? by julesh · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that Kazaalite used code that was directly copied from Kazaa, and was not a re-implementation from scracth.

    6. Re:legal? by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC, KazaaLite *WAS* the Kazaa software, it just replaced the Malware DLL files with "Dummy" DLLs that contained (what were effectively) noops instead of the spying code. It wasn't rewritten, it was just patched and redistributed (effectively Warez)

    7. Re:legal? by TehHustler · · Score: 1
      If you write your own re-implementation by reverse engineering KaZaA to determine how it works, that is perfectly legal. For the same reason that, for instance, Wine is a perfectly legal piece of software.

      Don't many applications include a "you must not reverse engineer this software" clause in the EULA?

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    8. Re:legal? by julesh · · Score: 1

      Reverse engineering is a practice which you have a right to perform in many jurisdictions, including all of Europe and many (most? all? I'm not sure) U.S. states.

      And all that's happened there anyway is that somebody has violated the EULA to do the reverse engineering. If Sharman could prove (a) who had done it, (b) that that person actually agreed to the EULA in the first place, and (c) it happened in a jurisdiction where reverse engineering is not legally protected, they might have a case to sue that person for damages. My understanding is that they couldn't demand any software produced with knowledge gained by that reverse engineering be withdrawn ... the only way you can enforce license restrictions on knowledge is through a patent.

      It doesn't matter what the EULA states, that just ain't enforceable.

      Of course, I ain't a lawyer, so don't take this as actually reliable or anything...

    9. Re:legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, basically, Morpheus has a re-implementation of FastTrack from scratch.

      Seeing how morpheus is basicly gnucleus (a GPL gnutella client) with spyware, I would not be surprised if there was code in the from the mldonkey of gift team who do fasttrack in GPL code for their project.

      Ofcourse they could licence the protocol from sharman (or the orginal authors who are making peercache). I wouldn`t put it past them to get information from the orginal russian coders who were hired to make the first kazaa. I really don`t think these people would do their own reverse engineering.

    10. Re:legal? by lxt · · Score: 1

      Coming out with "The only American file-sharing software ruled legal" send out completely the wrong message - it implies to the average joe that it's in fact perfectly OK to infringe on copyright.

    11. Re:legal? by ajs · · Score: 1

      Just use Gnutella. gtk-gnutella's recent version includes most of the modern features of all of these commercial apps while a) being open source b) not including spyware c) running under Linux and other free-as-in-whathaveyou operating systems.

      There are also other good clients for POSIX-like systems running X, but gtk-gnutella is the one I've been using and the last few versions are great. I pulled down the isos for Fedora Core 1.0 in a fraction of the time the ftp servers were choking it up to me....

    12. Re:legal? by julesh · · Score: 1

      Whilst I'm usually a supporter of gnutella, I can understand the desire to support FastTrack. The network has something like 20 times as many users and a much wider variety of files available.

      The plus side is that as Morpheus leeches all these files from FT, they'll become available to those of us who do use gnutella.

    13. Re:legal? by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Do we all know about giFT, a p2p thingy which can do gnutella, Fastrack and OpenFT (whatever that is...) on your Linux system, and Apollon, a nice KDE front end for it? There's a gtk+2 frontend too, somewhere.

    14. Re:legal? by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      They re-distributed the Kazaa software in a modified form.

      However, new K-Lite 2.6 does not, and merely requires the original Kazaa 2.6 install file on your desktop.

      It's pretty nice - do a search for it.

    15. Re:legal? by ajs · · Score: 1

      And long-term I think it's best that P2P networks be based on open standards. Fast Track is anything but, from what I can tell.

  11. Re:Virtual machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I'm sure he does. thats why he said 'who cares' if yu get a virus. its not gonna mes up your ext partitions. copy your data over from windows to linux when youre done, close vmware or whatever virtual software you're using and the spywares gone when you restart vmware + windows. if you want to keep whatever spywares on, just close the ports they use and it wont be able to leak stuff over the web.

  12. Is FastTrack network same as the old Linux KaZaa? by toogreen · · Score: 1

    Ok, I don't know anything about FastTrack etc, but would this means that we can now finally use the old KaZaa "kza" linux version app again to go and search the same files as Morpheus users? I really liked it back when the old Linux kza app allowed me to search and download files on the Kazaa network straight from the Linux console.. That'd be great if I could use it again... *sigh*

  13. Increased network traffic? by boer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some 70 to 80 per cent of Internet traffic is already P2P related. I wonder if a sizable portion of this is pure query traffic. I would assume that applications such this one that support multiple networks would be cause for increased query traffic all around. Therefore in my opinion it's hard to say if this development is a good thing at all.

    --
    (This sig intentionally left blank)
    1. Re:Increased network traffic? by McDutchie · · Score: 2, Funny
      Some 70 to 80 per cent of Internet traffic is already P2P related.
      In other news, some 90 to 100 per cent of statistics are made up on the spot.
  14. MUTE 0.2.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    January 21 MUTE 0.2.1 was released.

    http://mute-net.sourceforge.net/

    Jan 7 slashdot posting about MUTE 0.2

    Changes includes mention of a time out problem in win32 version fixed. I hope that also reduces the tendency for MUTE to abort downloads.

    It may be a bit wobbley in these early stages, but it's anonymous and doesn't install spyware and crap. Worth supporting if only by running it so there are more active nodes.

    1. Re:MUTE 0.2.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what networks does it use? I couldnt find it on their site.

    2. Re:MUTE 0.2.1 by MrSpiff · · Score: 1

      im pretty sure it's gnutella.

    3. Re:MUTE 0.2.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think it's completely anonymous p2p, not tapping into any pre-established networks. It would be great if it could AND maintain anonymity... Not sure how that could be done without a few sacrificial lambs.

      That's another reason it's important it get more users. I think in the Jan 7 article in slashdot someone commented that they searched for Led Zepplin and only got two results. It really does need more users. Perhaps the RIAA will scare some users MUTE's way.

      Actually, I wasn't that interested at all in p2p prior to their coercive campaign. I guess I'm just ornery. They really piss me off. And I was so disappointed with those articles that came out suggesting that their coercive tactics were working.

    4. Re:MUTE 0.2.1 by afree87 · · Score: 1

      MUTE uses its own anonymous network. It is very similar to the secret W**ny filesharing network used in Japan, which is impossible to arrest someone for using because of the Freenet-like nature of the network. More information can be found on the MUTE website.

  15. it's not spyware, honest guv! by Arathrael · · Score: 4, Informative

    The user comments at download.com have more mention of the apparent spyware - to quote one comment:'The claim by the program vendor that this software is free of Spyware is utterly ridiculus. I installed it on a fresh install of Windows XP Pro. It installed "Websavings by Ebates" without the option to opt out.' But then, maybe that's just intrusive adware and not technically spyware - not being familiar with this ebates doobrey I wouldn't know.

    On the RIAA comment, the download.com blurb states that 'Morpheus protects your privacy with integrated access to public proxy networks.' But I'm a bit skeptical about that myself.

  16. Re:the referenced zdnet article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It WILL happen.

  17. Re:Virtual machine by Bob9000 · · Score: 0

    Just include a small fs driver in the virus...

    --
    Those whose signatures threaten negative moderation will be modded down.
  18. Re:Virtual machine by tr0llb4rt0 · · Score: 1

    samba

    --
    Worst .sig ever!
  19. OMG TEH FUNNY LOOK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In A.D. 1999
    War was beginning

    RIAA Captain: What happen?
    RIAA Operator: Somebody set up us the bomb.
    RIAA Operator: We get signal.
    RIAA Captain: What!
    RIAA Operator: Main screen turn on.
    RIAA Captain: It's You!!
    Napster: How are you gentlemen!!
    Napster: All your base are belong to us.
    Napster: You are on the way to destruction.
    RIAA Captain: What you say!!
    Napster: You have no chance to survive make your time.
    Napster: Ha Ha Ha Ha ....
    RIAA Captain: Take off every "lawsuit."
    RIAA Captain: You know what you doing.
    RIAA Captain: Move "lawsuit".
    RIAA Captain: For great justice.

  20. Please spy on me... by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's always been a mystory to me how to actually become a participant in the Nielsen ratings system. If 3rd generation p2p apps with spyware actually fed back information as to what I was downloading and watching... I would think that would be most spiffy, well except for that whole MPAA RIAA thing, but ignore that for a moment.

    I for one would be perfectly willing to submit what I watched in the hopes that it would improve its ratings, so long as the process didn't lag down my system. I would also be perfectly willing to live with comercial content if it paid for the media.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:Please spy on me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a friend that occasionally gets to do this sort of thing. In his family's case, it entailed keeping a log on paper for a month of what they watched.

      No cumbersome equipment. The drawback is that part of the reason channels feel the need to doctor their broadcasts with those tags in the corner is so that these families can more easily remember what channel they're watching.

      I don't know how one becomes a Nielsen family. Maybe start a family first?

    2. Re:Please spy on me... by back_pages · · Score: 1
      But that's not what spyware does.

      Spyware companies take money from one company and use their spy system to redirect your web surfing to that company's content rather than their competitors. For (completely fictitious) example, Sony pays Gator a lot of money, and when you go shopping online for an X-Box, you are bombarded with popups for Sony Playstations. Your email account will also be plagued with advertisements for Sony products. You might think, "Hey, I was just thinking about buying a game console, and now I'm spammed with ads for one!"

      Of course, this is rarely done with a legitimate company like Sony, and more often with sleazy companies that shill products more akin to snake oil than well designed electronics. No offense to Sony intended by my example.

      Spyware will also scan your hard drive and grab any email address it can find. If they're in your address book and the spyware can send it back to the home company, that is bankable profit. Even if THEY don't use those addresses, there is an extremely high chance that those addresses are legitimate and therefore valuable to spammers. What's more is that the spyware company can say, "Yeah, and we KNOW that this guy does a lot of online shopping and fits the demographic of 45+ year old non-techie, the perfect target for you to try to scam."

      Nielsen ratings are, by comparison, a fortress of legitimacy. If you want to get involved with that, do some research or send them a letter - I really don't know. Spyware is NOT your answer. It does NOT help you - it helps the distributors.

      Spyware profits by exploiting a back door in your personal privacy, not just your computer's security or efficiency. It is scum and it serves no one but those who distribute it.

    3. Re:Please spy on me... by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1
      It's always been a mystory to me how to actually become a participant in the Nielsen ratings system.
      "You don't call us, we'll call you." (Insert soviet Russia Nielsen joke here...)

      Last year, I got an envelope in the mail. Inside the envelope was a booklet with 24 hours worth of time slots for a week's worth of days. The envelope also contained 5 crisp $1 bills, along with a request that I write down what I was watching on TV in the appropriate time slots, and send the booklet back in the enclosed pre-paid envelope.

      Yes, Nielsen, the almighty ratings mystery machine, randomly carpet-bombs America with envelopes containing $5 cash, and relies upon the recipients of those envelopes to a) accurately log their television habits and b) bother to send back the booklet. There is no secret gizmo that you have to remember to disconnect from your TV before you order the PPV porn, you don't become a "Nielsen home" for life, etc. You just get a packet in the mail with 5 free dollars, and you're so surprised that you figure you might as well participate for a week.

      Contrary to the AC reply, you don't need to start a family first. The envelope appeared at my apartment, at which I was the sole resident. And yes, I did fill out the log book and send it back. Of course, I imagine it was easier for me (at most I watch MSNBC for awhile, or the local news from 10-10:30 PM) than for the typical household...
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    4. Re:Please spy on me... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      But that's not what spyware does.

      That's what spy where should do if it was part of a media player.

      Nielsen ratings are, by comparison, a fortress of legitimacy. If you want to get involved with that, do some research or send them a letter - I really don't know. Spyware is NOT your answer. It does NOT help you - it helps the distributors.

      Nielsen near as I can tell is a "don't call us we'll call you" system. As far as researching the issue, it seems most difficult as any Nielson family who says they are one will be booted out of the program.

      I have tried actually being part of an exclusive viewing of upcomming telivision in the hopes that I might see something good and beable to vote on it as being good. I was stuck for a couple of hours watching really bad sit-coms and decided it wasn't worth the wait.

      I would not object if for example my cable box reported back what I watched (taped) during prime time... esp when cases like "Farscape". I could care less if my television habbits were spied upon. I only wish the folks at SCI-FI for example would see me activly switching the channel when ever they have their cheezy horror in favor of the preview channel (or other null vote channel).

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    5. Re:Please spy on me... by back_pages · · Score: 1
      That's what spy where should do if it was part of a media player.

      Yeah, but come on. Email software shouldn't propagate worms, internet browsers shouldn't comprimise total system security, and crap like WeatherBug shouldn't even exist.

      I can't even fathom how one would go about reforming the spyware trade. For programs like Winamp, I usually leave the "report anonymous usage statistics" option checked so long as I don't notice anything untoward happening on my system. They provide a great program and I'll do them a favor as well. The difference is that if Winamp's usage statistics were shown to include email addresses culled from my hard drive, I'm pretty sure that the online community would hold them accountable (to whatever degree) and Nullsoft's popularity would plummet. And perhaps that's got to be the pivot around which spyware reform functions - you'll never get anything respectable out of a company that doesn't have their good name at stake. Gator/GMT/GAIN is never, ever going to be able to associate their name with ANYTHING that stands on its own as a useful or desirable application.

      Your VCR/TV/TIVO reporting usage statistics is very different from spyware on your computer. Your VCR/TV/TIVO doesn't have access to your email address book, financial records, shopping habits, lifestyle preferences, reading lists, term papers, political writings, etc. etc. etc. If computer spyware were installed on "dumb" devices that weren't incorporated into every aspect of my private life, they would be little more than an annoyance in the worst possible scenario.

      As the situation stands, I can't even consider my own computer a private venue unless I take the initiative to prevent and remove spyware or sniff my own network traffic. I know, I know, I'm slightly wearing a tinfoil hat, but let's be honest. Spyware isn't ethical, it isn't truthful, it's taking data ON me and taking MY data, and I really have no clue nor guarantee where they draw the line. Stealing email addresses is obviously fine with them, but will they say, "No, we don't need to gather racial/religious/political data." It's absurd to think not! It's all potential marketing data - to corporations - but it's also more sinister depending on who is buying that data. To say that spyware can be reformed is like saying that totally unregulated border crossers can be trusted to provide a particular service, but they're far too nice to smuggle drugs. It's complete self-deception to think that spyware can be transformed into something benign and useful.

      Anonymous usage statistics are fine if they can be trusted. Spyware is a crime for which the law unfortunately hasn't yet been written, in my opinion. I don't believe the practice can be or should be reformed.

  21. The Matrix has spyware! by Bega · · Score: 1

    I know that I don't have anything (at least shared) that the RIAA/MPAA would be interested in. All of the music that I listen to, have more or less been first introduced to through P2P downloads, have been bought - understandable, since I want to support the people that do good stuff. Most of the music is free, though (there's alot of the matter that can be put here, but I'm not going to make it more off-topic).

    But to the point.

    It seems like a good idea to get some competition out in the "mainstream" P2P-area. Competition's always been more or less to the positive end of the deal - BUT - where at least my principles collide, is with the tracking subject. I don't think that a normal user even knows over these features, even if it's mentioned someplace. Even less if it's in the EULA. And I don't think that Joe O'Normal would appreciate it either.

    What I believe is the same thing as AC posted previously - a spy/ad/bloatware -free piece of software.

    But we can all raise questions about that, again.
    It wouldn't be either a) profitable, nor b) profitable. Mentioned twice, because first of things, the creators'll earn a "buck" with the advertising, and second, is with the info they gather. And I don't think they're gathering the information "just because it's fun and we can do it ^______^" - that info IS worth something.

    Also, to refer to Dreadlord's post, there are alot better networks to go on.

    Morpheus doesn't offer quality, either - who cares what the network carries, as long as they'll get their share of the profit.

    --

    THIS IS THE INTERNET. PLEASE PICK UP YOUR SERIOUS BUSINESS SUIT AT THE FRONT COUNTER.
    1. Re:The Matrix has spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The future of P2P may be weird. For some reason, I imagine the future may include some extremely popular networks with millions of users, but I expect more smaller networks that have less users. Programmers and dev teams will come up with various P2P schemes, some to minimize bandwith usage, others to protect privacy. Some will have medium popularity with tens of thousands of users, possibly up to about 100,000. Others will have a small user base, only a few hundred or a thousand at most. If the RIAA or any other group start sniffing around, the users will just switch to a new network, making it harder to defeat any one P2P network.

  22. RIAA by ArbiterOne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just face it... P2P isn't going away. P2P clients are like Whack-A-Mole: As soon as you smack (sue, crash, buy out, whatever) one, three more pop up.
    So, RIAA, do like the government strategy : If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.
    I'm waiting for the RIAA 'official' P2P network that allows record labels to profit from the spyware ads on a user's machine. Not like I'd use it, but... it's a better (and more profitable) idea than suing 15-year-olds. And it makes the RIAA look like the good guy!

  23. Morpheus Lite? by Barbarian · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wonder if there will be a Morpheus Lite, just like Kazaa Lite.

    1. Re:Morpheus Lite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one of the funniest sigs I've ever seen.

    2. Re:Morpheus Lite? by ClarifyAmbiguity · · Score: 1

      I concur.

    3. Re:Morpheus Lite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't a question, son.

  24. Integrity checking is needed. :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I agree with you that copyright infringement is a bad thing in general, etc etc -- but integrity checking, just like P2P software, is just a tool.

    I only use P2P networking software to download Linux ISO CD images so that I don't put unneccecary strain on the FTP sites -- but I recently downloaded what was advertised as being Linux kernel 2.6.3 -- only to find it to be a 10 MB tarball full of the man from the late goatse.cx!

    For this reason, I second the grandparent poster's assertion that integrity checking is required -- after all, who knows how many potential Linux users have been scared off because they can't figure out what weird and vaguely pornographic images are doing in a supposedly state-of-the-art operating system kernel... :-)

    1. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by ymgve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Soo...let me see if I get this right. You attempted to download an operating system kernel from an untrusted p2p source? You should just be glad you didn't get another kind of backdoor action...

    2. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by tmark · · Score: 1

      Umm, wouldn't YOU rather check the validity/authenticity of your Linux ISO rather than trust the P2P service to do so ? For exactly this reason, I would expect NO P2P service to try and check the ultimate validity/authenticity for you - it just exposes them to more liability. (Note that I mean something different than validating that the file is identical to the file the peer was sending you)

    3. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by Geheimagent · · Score: 2, Informative
      Soo...let me see if I get this right. You attempted to download an operating system kernel from an untrusted p2p source? You should just be glad you didn't get another kind of backdoor action...

      If you have the md5 or sha1 hash of the file/iso from the original source (validated by a gpg signature) that's perfectly save and helpes saving bandwidth on the original servers.

    4. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by Geheimagent · · Score: 1

      Just get the md5 or sha1 hash from the original server and compare.

    5. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by lokedhs · · Score: 1

      Care to share a link? To my knowledge this is very difficult to do. Until you provide us with some references I'm going to consider the parent post as a troll.

    6. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by offpath3 · · Score: 1

      Yup, that's why you want to rely on a cryptographic hash, not just a lousy checksum.

    7. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by jacoplane · · Score: 1

      As long as the p2p network uses cryptographic hashing (bittorrent, edonkey etc) I don't really see the problem. This incidentally also removes the need for special quality filters to be built into the p2p software, as users can easily create communities that do this filtering process.

    8. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by Compunerd · · Score: 1

      "There are MANY tools out there where you simply enter the md5 hash you want, and it calculates the padding for you."

      Point me to _one_ that works, and I'll beleive you

      --
      Computers are like air conditioners.
      - They stop working when you open Windows.
    9. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Full ack.
      If you are worried about what you're downloading you'd better get a PGP-signature or at least md5/sha-hash from a trusted source and compare.

    10. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by Curien · · Score: 1

      Full ack.

      Heh... I first read that as "Fuck all."

      --
      It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
    11. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by Fjornir · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sir, your accusation (as opposed to a friendly request for information) makes you look like the troll in this case -- especially given that this is quite trivial.

      But if you check ftp.kernel.org -- or any mirror you happen to trust -- you will find .sign files corresponding to each tarball. If you want to pull a tarball from a potentially untrusted source one needs to simply get that .sign file, and then run

      gpg --verify [signature] [tarball]

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    12. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      No biggie, when talking about the *IAA these terms tend to be exchangable. ;-)

    13. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by lokedhs · · Score: 1
      Did you read the grandparent post? He said it was easy to create a new file that had the same MD5 sum as some other file.

      I claimed it wasn't easy, and asked him to provide a link to one of the "many" tools that could be used for this.

      I still doubt one exist that works.

    14. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by Fjornir · · Score: 1

      Well! I'll be buggered with a baseball bat. My apologies, sir, and my thanks as well: you just found a bug in my slashdot plugin for firebird -- posts below the initial threshhold aren't getting proper parent relationships when the threshhold is changed.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  25. Re:Virtual machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even a virtual virus could do you a lot harm. Running applications using virtual machines is getting quite casual nowdays with the dotnet-technology exploding.

  26. DIES AT THE END [nt] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    1. Re:DIES AT THE END [nt] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hands up all the people that didn't know that yet. Try spoiling a movie that's still in theatres.

    2. Re:DIES AT THE END [nt] by Examancer2 · · Score: 1

      he doesn't really die. at the end they show him glowing like the f'cking sun, and i don't know too many dead people that do that. The only thing you can really be sure of is that he was unconcious after defeating smith, but there really isn't much evidence beyond that besides the glowing factor, which would suggest he's not dead.

  27. Re: Virtual machine by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    > It really is time to just run *everything* inside a virtual machine. Got a virus? Who cares. It's just a virtual virus - all your data is backed up to a safe, real partition which you don't boot from.

    What if you need to transfer your data one way or the nother over the internet?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  28. Re:Is FastTrack network same as the old Linux KaZa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The old kza will not work because it does not have the new encryption layers. Instead you can use giFT, giFT-FastTrack and giFTcurs.
    It looks alot better than kza and it's guaranteed to be free of spyware (it's free software). It's all in Debian, except for gift-fasttrack which you can get here:
    deb ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/gift-fasttrack unstable main

  29. Morpheus doesn't actually have spyware by Swiss_Cheeseman · · Score: 1

    Well, at least not to the extent that Kazaa does. Originally Morpheus had no spyware whatsoever, but now you are forced to install 4 peices of software which are comparitively quite harmless. You just have to make sure that as soon as you install Morpheus, you uninstall these 4 programs. These programs do not have to be installed in order for Morpheus to run, unlike Kazaa which checks to see if they are installed. It may be annoying, but Kazaa is a hell of a lot worse, and theres nothing that will cause permanent damage.

  30. Re:Virtual machine by Deusy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't run Linux. I get paid to write Windows apps, I play and write DirectX stuff in my spare time, and when I'm not doing that I'm making music using Windows sequencers. Let me know when I can write and play decent games, use cubase and make a living from writing code under Linux and I'll take another look at tedious hard disk issues.

    Dude, it's now 2004 not 1994. Where have you been all these years?

    --

    Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

  31. P2P App recommendations? by CdBee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I recently saw "Poisoned" being used on a Mac OSX box and it brought home to me the generally sucky nature of P2P on Windows I had been using KaZaA + DietK but switched to a recent build of KaZaAliteK++ which is much leaner and more friendly, but can't match Poisoned's multinetwork, spyware-and-adware-free smoothness Which P2P apps would /.ers recommend for the Windows platform?

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:P2P App recommendations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just install Linux and free software, instead of violating IP laws on those networks.

    2. Re:P2P App recommendations? by Calydor · · Score: 1, Informative

      eDonkey has everything you'll ever need, especially if you go browsing at ShareReactor

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:P2P App recommendations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      eDonkey has everything you'll ever need, especially if you go browsing at ShareReactor

      Or you could try eMule which is free, open-source, and doesn't contain any adware or spyware.

    4. Re:P2P App recommendations? by kid-noodle · · Score: 1

      How about shareaza, which is free, has no ads, and connects to G2, G1 AND ed2k, with support for BT as well?

      --
      fortune -o
    5. Re:P2P App recommendations? by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Shareaza - bittorrent/edonkey/gnutella1&2. Super fast. I was downloading a couple of films just now at over 250KB/s. They downloaded within a couple of hours of clicking the links on suprnova.

      I've used a lot of P2P stuff, and this is the hands-down winner.

    6. Re:P2P App recommendations? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I should state they were copyright-free films. Of course. :)

    7. Re:P2P App recommendations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poisoned is actually just a frontend (although a very good one) for giFT. There are Windows versions available too, such as KCeasy. But until giFT gets ed2k support, Shareaza is still the way to go.

    8. Re:P2P App recommendations? by Darth23 · · Score: 1
      QWirc or Mirc (full albums, movies, music videos), emule (obscure tv shows, obscure movies) BitTorrent (movies, some full albums, & comics(!), K++ (popular, widely distributed single songs) ......

      . ....and patience.

      --

      -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

    9. Re:P2P App recommendations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also use Shareaza, but after performance problems with every recent release I have disabled edonkey2000 network support. That single action has sped up downloads, made searches more relevant, and allowed Shareaza to run without hogging all system resources.

      My favourite part is Bittorrent support. There's nothing as fast and easy as getting some big files via BT. :)

    10. Re:P2P App recommendations? by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      Very simple.

      Download the experimental Bittorrent client.

      Go to Suprnova.org and check out what's new, or use Nova Search to look for something specific.

      The advantages of Bittorent: swarmed downloads (if a lot of people are downloading something, the speeds increase); auto-verify downloaded pieces against a hash (no more fakes or poisoned files).

      The disadvantages: easy as piss for other clients to get your IP (if you're worried about that sort of thing).

    11. Re:P2P App recommendations? by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      Emule Plus for big files, and SoulSeek for music.

  32. Re:Virtual machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found me a sequencer to compete with Cubase, Logic, even Cakewalk? How many VST instruments can I play with? Soft synths? Reason?

    Do you have a clue yet?

  33. Re:Virtual machine by kfg · · Score: 1

    Let me know when I can write and play decent games, use cubase and make a living from writing code under Linux and I'll take another look at tedious hard disk issues.

    Whoooooooooooooosh!

    KFG

  34. Re:Virtual machine (offtopic) by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

    Actually, I'm making an OS with the base as a VM.
    You can boot off a CD or DVD, then use your HD for data.
    And it definately has anonymous browsing built in.

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  35. Contrary to what you might believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you don't have the right to buy tea without paying a 100%+ 'tax' to people who had no hand in its brewing or transport, even though those people have exerted significant power to create a situation where they are the only ones you are allowed to buy tea from.

    If you want to buy fresh tea, you can pay (triple the accepted market value) for it.

    ===

    Go back to England asshole (historical figure of speech - no offense intended to our 'Brothers across the Pond').

    1. Re:Contrary to what you might believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brothers across the Pond

      Er, that's 'cousins' actually :

      Who'd want to clain that close a relationship? (We share common grandparentage maybe, but our nations' historical direct parentage has been different for too long now.)

      If we're going for sibling status, Britannia would be Uncle Sam's sister

    2. Re:Contrary to what you might believe... by ex-songwriter · · Score: 1

      Good analogy. Except (and I assume you are referring to the RIAA or its member companies) they did have a hand in its brewing (they financed it), and they are FAR from the only ones you can buy tea from (major label releases make up just over 50% of worldwide music releases--the rest are truly independent). In other words, I can hear the wind whistling through the holes in your argument from here. And I have my sound off.

  36. so what? by trotzki · · Score: 5, Informative

    Discussion is already up on the MLdonkey Lists about possible infringement of the MLDonkey GPL License.

    MLdonkey connects to all kinds of Networks, as Edonkey, Overnet , Bittorrent , Gnutella, Gnutella2 and Fasttrack and that seems where the Morpheus NEOWhateverTech (insert your favourite marketing-droid-speak here) code comes from.
    BTW, apart from being GPL and from being written for linux originally, MLdonkey gives you a nifty web-interface which lets you search and download (at home) all sorts of stuff while hanging out at the office :-)

    1. Re:so what? by Lukey+Boy · · Score: 1
      MLDonkey is written in OCaml, and Morpheus in Visual C++. I doubt they copied any of code (since it obviously wouldn't compile or anything). They may have referenced MLDonkey, but that's an entirely different (and probably legal) situation.

      Besides, many programs are doing the multi-network thing lately. Shareaza pops to mind as well.

    2. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a strange mlnet.exe file on the new morpheus... =)

      Try to compile from the CVS of mldonkey and tell me what is the strange mlnet file you got...

    3. Re:so what? by Lukey+Boy · · Score: 1

      Whoah, nice find. I'm too scared to install Morpheus myself :-)

    4. Re:so what? by Gumshoe · · Score: 1
      MLDonkey is written in OCaml, and Morpheus in Visual C++. I doubt they copied any of code (since it obviously wouldn't compile or anything).


      Some of the fasttrack code in mldonkey is originally from GiFT, written in C and is GPL'd.

      I doubt they copied any of code (since it obviously wouldn't compile or anything). They may have referenced MLDonkey, but that's an entirely different (and probably legal) situation.


      From the FAQ

      Q. How does Morpheus connect to FastTrack and Edonkey?

      A. Morpheus intergrated the MLDonkey Projects' mlnet daemon to utilize it's implementation of FastTrack.
    5. Re:so what? by Lukey+Boy · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. Although another reply implies that they're actually bundling the binary and interfacing with it. Hmmm.

    6. Re:so what? by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

      and also hasn't (really, they've been working on the next version but nothing's really come out) been updated for months. And is quite buggy. And franky just doesn't download as fast as most other clients. That said I use it all the time because it's nice to run in the background getting rare stuff.

    7. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to be sure, with the new morpheus running, try to telnet to port 4000 (this is the mldonkey default port for the telnet interface)...

  37. there is no emoticon for what i'm feeling! by halofourteen731 · · Score: 2, Informative

    i actually dled and installed it cause access to a bunch of nws sounded good and i figured i could just remove any spyware. plus here is an actual quote from the beginning of the licence agreement: "Morpheus values your anonymity and privacy. Morpheus does not contain or bundle malicious spyware." THE FUCK IT DOES. In addition to the My Search bar, Ebates, and BroadcastPC it admits to installing it has 3 or 4 other progs plus an ad window and popup ad thingy built into the gui. most of this shit runs in the backround and doesn't show up in the processes or services lists. thank god for adaware and spybot sd and fuck morheus. i'm sticking with Azureus (a BT client)

  38. Living amongst the pirates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Does anyone else think that all these references to the Matrix movie are just some lame attempt at getting attention by wanna-be-popular 15 year olds? How about all the people who got +5 funny for mentioning the Matrix and didn't get that they were admitting that they didn't get the joke but thought that it was clever? Sigh.

    And Next on Slashdot, 3l3T3_h4k3r_20x6 releases his newest P2P app: Trinity.</kidding>

    P2P was a neat concept way back when it was called a bulletin board. I guess it still is a neat concept, now that we have IM for sharing snapshots and web-camera streams. The truth, however, is that it isn't nearly as effective in pushing around bits as administering a cheap Linux box with 200GB of HD off a cable modem with a bunch of college frat buddies.

    Moreover, it isn't nearly as good as having a private server with 500+GB of storage on a college LAN... I lost count after the 5th HD was added to my frat's file server. Dues in a frat house go to the 60"HDTV, game systems, parties (It's all about the Super Bowl), and the file server "as needed". As long as you meter/throttle the bandwidth so that the file sharing outbound network doesn't spike the University's network admin's attention (or better yet, have a student network admin in your frat), bandwidth consumption looks just like a massive Quake (or other FPS) game. Match that to the right port for Quake, etc, and even the best sysadmins are fooled.

    Lest you think that this is too paranoid, I have a colleague who only traded audio or video on his private 10/100 ethernet switch which was behind a Linksys NAT/firewall from his dorm room's connection (he graduated recently). In these days of IPods and USB2 devices, a portable 200GB HD can be filled up pretty quick. They cost less than $200 for a USB2 200GB drive.

    Another friend started using NetFlix recently, and copying the DVDs to DVD-Rs (they are even cheaper at $1 per 4.5GB in bulk).

    A recent alum halfway around the world shares popular series like Farscape or Carnivale in DivX. One of our friends likes to encode the director's comments and such when he rips DVDs. Others go for the make-it-fit-in-700MB VCD. These are all private networks with strong encryption. Having a "P2P network" of geeky college aged friends with a central file store provides orders and orders of magnitude the bandwidth and security from being caught.

    I'm not saying that I don't purchase media (now that I live on my own, I do have a cable subscription). But when I go back to the house on the weekend, there's a good selection of media.

    Let me just say that DRM doesn't work, and neither does software activation. People don't rip crappy stuff. All my friends buy content (CDs, MP3s, DVDs, etc) when it suits them. Busting all my friends would be nice for the MPAA, RIAA, or BSA, but lets just face it, that's not going to happen, because this content is on private devices. The wire taps required to even discover the shared content aren't legal, and aren't practical (go ahead and try to wire tap my dorm's P2P WEP protected 802.11g WiFi network). The answer is to provide the content at high quality on demand over that broadband channel. TV does this, with the exception of the on-demand part. At 3AM, though, if I want to watch Farscape season 2 episode 4, that's what I want to watch with no commercials at DVD or DivX quality.

    It's a good thing we live next to a guy with an open WiFi network. I might be afraid to post something like this from my home network logged in with my user name... You can trace this message off a few bounces into some poor guy's closet, and if you get the IP address, then it may or may not have been changed since his network seems to be going down regularly (see related thread on RIAA lawsuits).

    1. Re:Living amongst the pirates... by djtack · · Score: 1

      go ahead and try to wire tap my dorm's P2P WEP protected 802.11g WiFi network

      You do know that WEP can be easily cracked, right? I realize that some access point vendors have tweaked their firmware to not send weak IVs, but as I understand it the attack is still possible (especially if you have a way of injecting extra traffic into the network).

    2. Re:Living amongst the pirates... by NSash · · Score: 1
      It's a good thing we live next to a guy with an open WiFi network. I might be afraid to post something like this from my home network logged in with my user name...

      Wouldn't it be funny if the poster actually had a WiFi network?

      I wouldn't put it past someone so paranoid.

    3. Re:Living amongst the pirates... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Dues in a frat house go to the 60"HDTV, game systems, parties (It's all about the Super Bowl), and the file server "as needed".

      No shit? So much for the notions that fraternities promote public service and academic excellence...

    4. Re:Living amongst the pirates... by afree87 · · Score: 1

      You figured that out just now?

      FYI, Santa Claus doesn't exist either.

  39. Direct Connect by harmonica · · Score: 1

    DC is great for what it is - creating relatively small, closed communities. But if you are looking for something rare the huge p2p networks are just unbeatable with their gigantic amounts of shared data.

    1. Re:Direct Connect by stealth.c · · Score: 1

      DirectConnect rocks. The more you share, the more you get! But then, its primary function appears to be software piracy. If it is actually used for more legitimate things, I'd like to hear what they are.

    2. Re:Direct Connect by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "DirectConnect rocks. The more you share, the more you get! But then, its primary function appears to be software piracy. If it is actually used for more legitimate things, I'd like to hear what they are."
      As if DC is more used for "software piracy" than any other P2P network... DC can be used for the exact same legitimate things as all other ways to transfer files. And like all other ways to transfer files, it can be used for illegal activities as well.

      So your point is moot.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    3. Re:Direct Connect by stealth.c · · Score: 1

      Heh. Good point. I had found it useful for grabbing Linux ISOs--it seemed faster than most mirrors. I also found some really cool informational documents there. And I _do_ like its method of sorting based on amount of disk space shared.

  40. This is good... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    For some things, the fastrack network is still ok, but since Kazaa Lite killed themselves when they decicded to try to start charging, a new client is a good thing. The original Morpheus was the first p2p ap i used, and it was great back then. I'm kind of dissapointed now, because originally it was touted as a spy/adware free version or Kazaa. Just my thoughts, i think i'll stick with the last version of K++.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  41. Command line by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Whats the best UNIX command line based p2p application out there? In an ideal world if there was a web interface for it too then that would be much better.

    I can't run a windows or a Linux GUI application, hence the question.

    Can anyone suggest anything?

    Many thanks

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if it is the "best" but try mldonkey (which Morpheus uses too). mldonkey has a telnet interface & IMHO excellent web interface. This is a good starting place for mldonkey info: MLDonkey World

    2. Re:Command line by Xpilot · · Score: 1

      mldonkey comes to mind...

      You can use it on a console and has a web interface and a GTK interface.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    3. Re:Command line by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      mldonkey comes to mind...

      Really cool. The problem I have now is that the code runs on a port and my firewall won't allow access to it.

      Is there any way you can have a port 80 based script that will act as a proxy so that requests are passed from my browser to it and then onto the program?

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    4. Re:Command line by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I personally use giFT. It is plugin-driven and with the plugins, I'm accessing gnutella, FastTrack, and OpenTrack(?) custom network. It'd be cool to get BT support in there eventually. It runs as a daemon and you access the daemon using client programs. I use giFTcurs, curses-based console client. Works like a charm! HTH

    5. Re:Command line by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      giFT, I think. Consists of a server (can connect to OpenFT, Gnutella, Fasttrack, Soulseek, etc, at varying success rate) that does the downloading, and a client that can be on remote host as well if desired. The best client for it just happens to be giFTcurs, a console app...

    6. Re:Command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mutella is another option.

  42. The Key to being Insightful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whine at the end of your post about how you're about to get flamed and how you're too noble to care.

    Just for once I'd like to see one of these assclowns get what they're expecting.

  43. Theft by troon · · Score: 1

    Actually, no. This makes it even easier to prevent copyright infringement, its all about who controls the blacklists.

    Actually, either - and you know perfectly well which way it will go. The amount of thievery that goes on and is actively encouraged makes me sick.

    "Oh, but CDs/DVDs are so expensive, they're just a rip-off!" (not a quote from the parent comment)

    Deal with it. Boycott or abstain, but overpricing doesn't give you any legal or moral right to steal.

    Have a nice day.

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    1. Re:Theft by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      "but overpricing doesn't give you any legal or moral right to steal."

      It does, depending on the overpricing. The levy on cd-rs enforced by the RIAA justifies music downloading ("If I have to pay for it anyways, I'm getting screwed if I don't do it" logic).

      Personally, I'm not even for piracy on P2P, I'd love for P2P to either go away, or be filled with only rare/indy tracks that are hard to get elsewhere. When piracy was just a bunch of the smart people with exclusive access to FTPs and everyone else trading files with friends, everyone was better off. The record/movie companies wern't really losing profit (these are the REAL people that wouldnt of bought it anyways, not the ones that just say that) and the scale is so much smaller that it doesn't matter anyways (think the nerdy kid in your class, not your entire class), the end users wern't stuck with DRM and crazy laws, etc.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    2. Re:Theft by mikechant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK I'll bite. Copyright violation *is not theft*. Find me a piece of legislation (not an RIAA press release) that says it is and I'll buy you a large virtual drink... Morally speaking, in your universe it may be theft. But not in most people's. Try asking a random selection of 1000 people the following question: "Am I a thief if I make a tape of a friend's (copyrighted) CD?" (this is a form of copyright violation most people, even not computer literate, can understand and relate to). If you can honestly say that more than a small percentage will agree that you're a thief, then I think you're deluded. So: If you do it, then you *are* morally a thief since you believe yourself to be. The rest of us aren't.

    3. Re:Theft by Kosi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The amount of thievery...right to steal.

      Hey, this is an article about filesharing! Who do you think steals (=takes away, so someone does not have something he had before) what from whom and how does it relate to the article?

    4. Re:Theft by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Deal with it. Boycott or abstain, but overpricing doesn't give you any legal or moral right to steal.

      Moral rights are determined by self.

    5. Re:Theft by TCaptain · · Score: 1

      Where I am, there is a large levy on every blank CD I purchase. It doesn't matter whether I "infringe copyrights" or "pirate IP" with it...I have to pay my due to the music industry whether or not I want to buy their crappy product. Guilty until proven innocent.

      I'm glad the Canadian govmnt made it clear that downloading an MP3 or burning a CD for personal use was NOT copyright infringement...so if I have to pay anyway...I'm going to make it worth my while. Not that I want any of the commercial crap that the RIAA puts out anyway.

      Give me a choice on whether my money goes to them when I buy a CD for backup purposes, then maybe I won't download. Make a quality product for a fair price, then I WILL buy it. Otherwise, fuck you RIAA.

      --
      "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
    6. Re:Theft by pyros · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Try asking a random selection of 1000 people the following question: "Am I a thief if I make a tape of a friend's (copyrighted) CD?" (this is a form of copyright violation most people, even not computer literate, can understand and relate to).

      That isn't copyright violation in the U.S.. It's called Fair Use and is protected by law. It's why recordable [audio] CDs and tapes have a levy on them which goes to the R.I.A.A.. The difference between doing that and downloading over the internet is that there is a limit imposed due to physical proximity which is only overcome by paying to ship the media to your friend. You must also pay for the media. Downloading over the internet removes these two key points which led the courts to declare such usage legal in the first place.


      So now that I've given an analysis on the differences between the two (physical sharing vs. online sharing) with respect to how the courts view them, please stop trying to justify online infringement by citing Fair Use.

    7. Re:Theft by pyros · · Score: 1
      It does, depending on the overpricing. The levy on cd-rs enforced by the RIAA justifies music downloading ("If I have to pay for it anyways, I'm getting screwed if I don't do it" logic).

      Nobody is forcing you to buy the $10 audio CDR. Just buy the $1 data CDR. Then you're not paying the levy and thus aren't being screwed.

    8. Re:Theft by revery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Moral rights are determined by self.

      Then you'd better hope that you don't run into someone who thinks murder is ok...

      --
      Was it the sheep climbing onto the altar, or the cattle lowing to be slain,
      or the Son of God hanging dead and bloodied on a cross that told me this was a world condemned, but loved and bought with blood.

    9. Re:Theft by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      But they are charing it. You can't get compensated for losses with a levy then go ahead and look for even more compensation elsewhere, I remember a lawsuit against them for this about a year back, anyone feel like hunting down the url?

      Back to our original topic: I'd really love to see someone add those features and use them to block all comercial songs so people can have a free place to trade their indy/live/etc songs. It would be too much of a pain to force people to sort their collections and choose which to share, so sharing a blacklisted song shouldn't punish it(just not list it). Maybe do simple substring searches adn warn users, but not block them (Nothing was more pathetic than the last days of napster where you had to download m3ta11kuh mp3s).

      The problem with indy tracks is the signal:noise ratio sucks, as is true with big names, but with big names there is publicity so its easier to tell whats worth downloading and whats not. if there wer an entire network of legal tracks, stuff might actually become popular,and you'd get a nice community feel for it. This is something mp3.com should of done if they didnt push their luck with that locker thing forcing them to get sued until selling themselfs.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    10. Re:Theft by pyros · · Score: 1
      But they are charing it. You can't get compensated for losses with a levy then go ahead and look for even more compensation elsewhere, I remember a lawsuit against them for this about a year back, anyone feel like hunting down the url?

      Unfortunately I don't understand wht you're trying to say here. My point was that you said they are overcharging and we are being forced to pay a levy on blank CDRs. So we should be allowed to download because of that levy. I was saying we aren't being forced. You have to choose to buy the levied audio CDR. If you did, however, then by all means make use of it. I was just trying to say that the existence of a levy on some CDRs does not justify downloading music. If you don't want to pay the tax, buy data CDRs, but then don't download infringing music. If you want to download the infringing music, spend the extra dough for an audio cd.

      Back to our original topic: I'd really love to see someone add those features and use them to block all comercial songs so people can have a free place to trade their indy/live/etc songs. It would be too much of a pain to force people to sort their collections and choose which to share, so sharing a blacklisted song shouldn't punish it(just not list it). Maybe do simple substring searches adn warn users, but not block them (Nothing was more pathetic than the last days of napster where you had to download m3ta11kuh mp3s).

      That does sound pretty cool. I've been checking out a bunch of new stuff on internet radio, only to find out half of it is produced/distributed by RIAA studios. Fortunately most of it is foreing stuff, so i could potentially just buy the import version.

    11. Re:Theft by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      "Unfortunately I don't understand wht you're trying to say here. My point was that you said they are overcharging and we are being forced to pay a levy on blank CDRs. "
      Yeah, I'm running on pure coffee right now while trying to get an ircd setup, my mind is slightly more than fried. I now remember it a little more clearly, some people from canada were tired of paying the levy AND getting DRM cds. The argument was something like you can't charge a levy to compensate for copying a disk, and then prevent copying (or some such). Not really the same, but again I'm running on coffee.

      I'd recommend SoulSeek(slsk.org), It has a linux client and plenty of good unknown/indy/forign stuff (but a good amount of RIAA stuff to). Doesnt have that community feel, but you can atleast find that one rare track you heard on a shoutcast stream

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    12. Re:Theft by pyros · · Score: 1

      Ah. I was speaking strictly of the U.S. situation, where you have a choice to pay the levy or not.

    13. Re:Theft by aoteoroa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Try asking a random selection of 1000 people the following question: "Am I a thief if I make a tape of a friend's (copyrighted) CD?" (this is a form of copyright violation most people, even not computer literate, can understand and relate to). If you can honestly say that more than a small percentage will agree that you're a thief, then I think you're deluded.

      Let me tell you what I believe. Firstly: I believe that the majority is not always right. They are living in a dreamworld so to speak. So you can not prove whether copyright violation is theft simply by asking people if it is.

      Therefore let me present another example of copyright violation, and you can tell me whether or not it is theft.

      Imagine that you own an engineering firm that designs heavy haul trucks. One of your engineers has resigned and taken a job elsewhere. Before he leaves he uploads your AutoCad drawings (like source code to the manufacturing business) to his server at home.

      If I understand your point of view correctly he has not taken any physical item of worth from your company. He has only copied your designs. Therefore no theft has occurred.

      I believe that copying, a copyrighted work is theft and it applies to all sorts of intellectual property such as proprietary software, AutoCad schematics, music, and art.

    14. Re:Theft by edrain · · Score: 1

      It's called Fair Use and is protected by law.

      My understanding is that making a copy of your own [tape|CD] for your own use (archival or whatever) is fair use. Making a copy of someone else's (or having them make one for you) is unauthorized distribution and copyright violation. Granted, I'm no big city lawyer, but that's what I've always understood. And, to answer the g-parent's question, I believe it is morally wrong on some level to distribute copyrighted media. Thanksfully, I am able to discard that moral concern fairly easily.

    15. Re:Theft by grung0r · · Score: 1
      From:reference.com
      theft
      \Theft\, n. [OE. thefte, AS. [thorn]i['e]f[eth]e, [thorn][=y]f[eth]e, [thorn]e['o]f[eth]e. See Thief.] 1. (Law) The act of stealing; specifically, the felonious taking and removing of personal property, with an intent to deprive the rightful owner of the same; larceny.

      Note: To constitute theft there must be a taking without the owner's consent, and it must be unlawful or felonious; every part of the property stolen must be removed, however slightly, from its former position; and it must be, at least momentarily, in the complete possession of the thief. See Larceny.

      Your definition of theft is a bit off. You have the right to believe that copyright infringement is the most heinous of crimes if you wish, but theft it just ain't. To constitute theft, someone has to be deprived of property. With Copyright infringement, that clearly does not take place. That's really all there is to it. Coyright infringement is not theft by definition, so get ov

    16. Re:Theft by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be a man's moral right to kill a man he finds in bed with his wife. Still, that offers no salvation from the legal system.

      Fear of punishment should keep them in line. That's separate from morality.

    17. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay then. So what you are saying is if, and only if I make a direct copy off of a friend's CD onto an Audio CD-R, then it is fair use. Also, you state that if I made a copy and shipped it to my friend on the other side of the continent, this would also be fair use since I am paying shipping charges. But downloading for use on a computer is not fair use because I don't pay a charge for shipping. ISPs charge a hell of a lot more than it costs to ship out CDs, especially if I were doing it on a mass scale.

      And as for media, at this point I'd gladly pay an extra $1 or $10 RIAA tax per hard drive, just to shut them up! I know it sounds like giving in to the bastards, but they are like a whiny baby that wont fucking shut up until it gets its bottle. I would be inclined to propose a small tax on hard drives, since we all know most people store media on them. But this wouldn't suffice to the RIAA, they would just want more and more and more and more of our money. Money that I am not willing to give them, whether or not I get their shoddy product.

      And my final point on physical proximity: back in the 80's when the RIAA was soiling their shorts over double-cassette decks, it wasn't too hard to find someone who had a particular album or song if you wanted to copy it. Even if it meant listening to the radio to record some catchy pop crap. But in the end, you got it nonetheless. Speeding up the process != lost sales.

      This holds true, if the product has quality, replay value, and isn't 90 per cent filler, I buy it. If it's crap, I dont. Period.

    18. Re:Theft by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I don't understand wht you're trying to say here. My point was that you said they are overcharging and we are being forced to pay a levy on blank CDRs. So we should be allowed to download because of that levy. I was saying we aren't being forced. You have to choose to buy the levied audio CDR. If you did, however, then by all means make use of it. I was just trying to say that the existence of a levy on some CDRs does not justify downloading music. If you don't want to pay the tax, buy data CDRs, but then don't download infringing music. If you want to download the infringing music, spend the extra dough for an audio cd.

      Correct me if I am wrong, but I think the point is that in Canada all CD-R's are levied.

      In addition, when they do these lawsuits here in the US, there has not been any reported information on people who download and use strictly levied audio cd-r's.

      Would that even work as a defense? I burned all these songs to levied cd-r's, therefore I should be allowed to burn?

      Would you get sued for the ones that weren't burned but are only on your hard drive because you don't have blank audio cd's?

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    19. Re:Theft by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Try asking a random selection of 1000 people the following question: "Am I a thief if I make a tape of a friend's (copyrighted) CD?" (this is a form of copyright violation most people, even not computer literate, can understand and relate to).

      That isn't copyright violation in the U.S.. It's called Fair Use and is protected by law.


      If this is fair use, would a Kazaa linked with Friendster that only allows users in the personal circle be a legal p2p? How hard would an implementation of who is whose friends and only allow sharing on friends, maybe friends of friends. Would that make a legal p2p? I would see this as a direct translation to the internet of something we are all accustomed to.

      Would you agree?

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    20. Re:Theft by Zleeper · · Score: 1

      So software that is not installed is theft? Maybe potential theft but not kinetic theft.

    21. Re:Theft by Zleeper · · Score: 1

      If I allow a canadian to remotely control my computer and p2p some mp3s to his computer through a network share, am I in violation? It woul dbe my IP ni the log, but the file would be no where to be found. Ergo, why can't one just claim that some malware/adware program is the culprit to my IP being logged at "comesharemymp3s.com." ANd who is to know it is not so?

    22. Re:Theft by spike+hay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then you'd better hope that you don't run into someone who thinks murder is ok...

      Indeed, but the grandparent poster is still correct. We are socialized into certain morals. Some morals, such as murder being wrong, are held almost universally. Yet, there have been cultures such as the Romans with their gladiators that have somewhat trumped this moral law. Morals help glue society together, but they are never absolute, and are ultimately determined by the individual.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    23. Re:Theft by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      that's slsknet.org, you heathen! the above url is for a spyware clone of soulseek! but do try soulseek people, it hearkens back to the olden days of napster.

    24. Re:Theft by revery · · Score: 1

      An individual determines which morals he believes in, yes, but whether he believes in absolutes or not, would not change them, if they exist.

      I have always found it interesting that most people believe that there are physical absolutes, but to assume that the laws that govern the universe (the "God" of the universe if you will) could extend beyond the physical to concepts such as right and wrong is frequently scoffed at.

      We believe that we created right and wrong instead of discovering them, and even more importantly, we may very well call evil, good and good, evil.

      --
      Was it the sheep climbing onto the altar, or the cattle lowing to be slain,
      or the Son of God hanging dead and bloodied on a cross that told me this was a world condemned, but loved and bought with blood.

    25. Re:Theft by Examancer2 · · Score: 1

      you can not prove whether copyright violation is theft simply by asking people if it is actually, in a democratic society you can. Regulators and judges base their decisions on majority concensous, and the entire government body is supposed to be indicitive of the will of the people. Imagine that you own an engineering firm that designs heavy haul trucks. One of your engineers has resigned and taken a job elsewhere. Before he leaves he uploads your AutoCad drawings (like source code to the manufacturing business) to his server at home. The fact is that is not theft by itself, and you will find no court cases saying otherwise. The point at which that scenario would turn to theft is if he turned around and sold or made profit from that intellectual property, and that would only be if this was copyrighted really. It is not a crime to keep a copy of things that that he worked on or helped worked on, or any information prevy to him as an employee. The only exception to this would be if he signed a non-discolsure agreement, and in that case the issue would be breach of contract... not theft or copyright infringment. No, the majority is not always right, but you sir do not have your facts straight. The fact is that a couple court cases are not the end all be all of the P2P battle. There is a little bit of precedence the RIAA has to work with, but there is no law that states P2P application are illegal. This is only the current interpretation of current laws, and the battle over these interpretations and the laws themselves are still being heavily fought. Personally, I think any reproduction should be fair use, so long as it does not result in any sort of commercial use/promotion/profit or other use that would allow someone besides the creator from profiting (this would not include claims for lack of compensation... they have to prove someone else profited, not that they didn't profit because of something). I think you're being a little too black and white. This is one issue where there are more than 2 sides. Anti-copyright people would probably be easily quieted if their request for comprehensive fair use was answered. Copyrights are basically a compromise between creators and consumers, and the fact is that this compromise is no longer balanced and needs some heavy adjustmnet towards the consumer.

  44. Illegal item breaks in illegally by redhawk1044 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't funny how an application that distributes mp3 illegally is now breaking into other applications that do the same thing, which instead of doing only one illegal action it is now doing two

    1. Re:Illegal item breaks in illegally by thegnu · · Score: 0

      I never RTFA, and you may have this time. But RTF Part of the article where he says he's trying to force their hand and block them out, ruining their case that they have no control over their network.

      I think it's sneaky, underhanded, and brilliant.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
  45. Re:Is FastTrack network same as the old Linux KaZa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mldonkey does also support the fasttracker network

  46. Uhm, so? by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

    Now Morpheus is back on FastTrack

    and

    Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings.

    Which is why I'm glad I still have a copy of KazaaLite. Sure, it's been shut down but you can still download the client via FileMirrors.com, and it doesn't have any of spyware/malware shit.

    Morpheus was great before it got kicked off FastTrack, then it changed and sucked. Just because it's back on FastTrack doesn't mean it sucks any less.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    1. Re:Uhm, so? by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Insightful
      AFAIK Kazaa Lite will also be kicked off FastTrack following the latest Kazaa upgrade, which KL can't follow because the lawyers have shut it down.

      These things go in fashions - Napster lost it and Kazaa probably will too. People will use whatever is easiest, safest and has the most files, and if the major pirates^H^H^H^H^H^H^H sharers hated spyware and were using KL, they'll up sticks and move to eDonkey or whatever when KL gets switched off. The effort of doing so is negligible.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    2. Re:Uhm, so? by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      AFAIK Kazaa Lite will also be kicked off FastTrack following the latest Kazaa upgrade, which KL can't follow because the lawyers have shut it down.

      There are at least 3 new Lite versions of Kazaa 2.6 already (do a search).

      The best one is even legal.

    3. Re:Uhm, so? by cynicalmoose · · Score: 1

      KLite's been off some time now, so you would have thought that Sharman would shut them out. If Sharman has realised that the major sharers use KLite they might realise they need to keep them on FastTrack.

      --
      Exercise your right not to vote. thinkoutside.org
  47. Re:Virtual machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er.....yes. Does that mean you've found me a development platform to match DirectX and pro quality audio software such as Cubase? Or are you just some Linux fanboy who doesn't know what he's talking about.

    Don't answer that. Just give me a link to reviews of the above for Linux.

  48. Re:Virtual machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Even a virtual virus could do you a lot harm.

    No it can't. Remember - i'm booting into a clean install of windows and my apps. It's always the first session as far as the OS is concerned. Only the data - stored outside the session, such as on another pc attached to a local network - is shared between sessions. Zero virus risk.

  49. You can! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    The giFT Project has a FastTrack plugin, and it works really well. Plus it runs as a daemon, so you don't even have to be logged in. get giFTcurs or one of the other console-based clients, and you're ready to rock.

  50. Obligatory spyware rant... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

    Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings.

    When you translate this for a cellphone it would sound like this:

    Device may record your shopping habits (GPS), deliver advertising (screensaver?), collect private information (record phone calls/destinations) or modify your system settings (Remove/block phone numbers/addresses/notes related to competitor?).

    It's beyond me why anyone in their right mind would only consider using a software/device that shamelessly admits to do all these things. IMHO Legislation should take care of these gnats ASAP.

  51. Re:Is FastTrack network same as the old Linux KaZa by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

    Not sure if the kza is able to connect - IIRC they changed the protocol.

    Not sure how well giFT-FastTrack works...

  52. There are other reasons by paragon_au · · Score: 1

    I tell you what, why don't you write such an app with such a filter and see how long it takes for RIAA and the courts to come down on you like a ton of bricks for deliberately designing a tool that a) stops them from posting their own material, whilst, b) helping people infringe on their copyrights as easily as possible

    It could also stop people renaming virsus/trojan's and putting it as legit software. (I.E a game patch).

  53. I understand why you have your sound off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's probably for the same reasons that I do: if you listen to the radio in the U.S., or if you are a band looking to have CDs distributed in the U.S., you are the defacto bitch of the RIAA.

    Or are you telling me that the RIAA/major record labels/etc. do not do their best to restrict the music available to us in order to make money off of 'superpackaged' 'superbands'?

    No one has yet managed to explain to me how CDs are 2x + more expensive than when they first came out despite the fact(s) that music production is cheaper, CD production is cheaper, and bands make almost no $$$ until they sell a few million alblums.

    Are you saying that the RIAA and the major record labels are not guilty of 'extremely scummy' business practices? Are you an ex-songwriter who is now a music industry lawyer?

  54. Re:Is FastTrack network same as the old Linux KaZa by neko9 · · Score: 2, Informative

    MLdonkey is open source and supports not only donkey but fasttrack, bittorent, soulseek, dc, gnutella, gnutella2, overnet, opennap networks too. u can use it with many guis and from console.

  55. People don't know what it means/does by paragon_au · · Score: 1

    Why would anybody ever download something bundled with the crap referred to here, much less install it? Such "third-party applications" make the main product worse than useless.

    My younger brother is an example, he has his own computer, I have explained to him (and installed for him Kazaalite and BT) about adware and spyware. But he doesn't really understand (Admittedly his is 10, but he has someone who knows what he is talking about helping him out.) and countinues to download stuff that has adware and spyware.
    He doesn't care about spyware, and he only cares about adware when it gets in his way.

    There are plently of people out there who have no idea what adware and spyware is. And often have it installed, think its annoying, but have no idea what it is, or how to remove it.
    So they continue downloading things that have warning, totally oblivous to the implications.

  56. People still use P2P? by localghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wasn't aware of anything you couldn't get over BitTorrent. Why would you mess with spyware-ridden software and risk getting subpoenaed by the RIAA for slow download rates and fake files?

    1. Re:People still use P2P? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about more obscure indy music? Last time I checked SuprNova, it was a whole hell of a lot of AC/DC albums...

  57. The right to infringe exists by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
    Contrary to what you might believe, you don't have a right to infringe on copyrights.

    Framed in a sheerly legal way, the above statement is correct. Framed in a moral/ethical way, the above statement has as many differing opinions as slavery and women's rights had in their heyday.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  58. poisoned by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    nothing compares to poisoned for OSX. gnutella, fastrack, gift all in one search

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  59. Always strait to business by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    Eh, Morpheus?

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  60. tomorrows news:... by whitekolovrat · · Score: 0

    ..."Morpheus Is Banned From Other P2P Networks"

    1. Re:tomorrows news:... by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      Morpheus is actually using code from gnucleus, the author of which consistently implements fair network behavior. If you want to connect to gnutella and gnutella2, without the spyware, Gnucleus uses the same code as morpheus. Download and more info at www.gnucleus.com Oh yeah, it's gpl'ed too, and development is active.

  61. I used to love Morpheus until... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...I found IRC. Of course now that many of the IRC operators have banned file xfers, it's a lot harder to find the things I liked (mostly recorded TV shows that I missed like Sliders, Enterprise, Voyager, etc...).

    Now this?
    "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."

    When the average person ELECTS to use something even after reading this warning, you can be assured that the Internet has really and truly become McNet. (McDonald's reference for those of you unfamiliar with it) Hmmm... now that I think about it, it sounds like the Microsoft EULA, and plenty of people accept that every day. ;P

    A sad day indeed. A sad, sad day...

    1. Re:I used to love Morpheus until... by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...I found IRC.

      IRC has been around much longer than any modern p2p network. IRC was ancient when I started using it in 1999, when napster came out. IRC was what people used to suppliment their ftp downloading.

      Of course now that many of the IRC operators have banned file xfers, it's a lot harder to find the things I liked

      IRC ops can't ban file transfers, as far as I know. File transfers with clients such as mirc are direct client to client (DCC, also could be called p2p). That's why all the kiddie pr0n stuff is on IRC - it's sick, but no one stops it because no files ever actually transfer across an IRC network. The only thing IRC networks transfer is text.

      Now, I know you're trolling, but at least be more subtle about it.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    2. Re:I used to love Morpheus until... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      Not trolling. Actually, I was well aware of IRC as I used to use it in college in the 80s. But... it got really boring until about 2000 when people were actually shipping things with DCC that I was interested in (above mentioned TV shows).

      As far as the banning of file transfers, it's pretty much policy everywhere now. Before they just used to have a "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Personally, I abide by policy, laws, rules, etc... That's why I don't pirate software, music or movies. I buy everything I'm interested in or use a free alternative. (I'm a Linux guy here) I was a big fan of DALNet until they suspended all of the TV related channels. I used to hang out in #qlc and #sliderseps a lot. Particularly frustrating is that I had almost the entire series of Sliders and did an fdisk on the wrong drive. Bye bye Sliders. Oh well. Maybe they will eventually come out with that DBD they've been promising. For the time being I'm trying to record them from SciFi channel. But you can never trust them to play a complete series if they only produced a few seasons. Bastards.

      As far as my being a troll... Not really. I always have to clear this up because very few people get the humor in my name.

    3. Re:I used to love Morpheus until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I found IRC. Of course now that many of the IRC operators have banned file xfers, it's a lot harder to find the things I liked (mostly recorded TV shows that I missed like Sliders, Enterprise, Voyager, etc...).


      There are a bunch of things like this running software found here that you may be looking for!

    4. Re:I used to love Morpheus until... by valkraider · · Score: 1

      That's why I don't pirate software, music or movies.

      But you'll pirate TV shows. Nice... ;)

    5. Re:I used to love Morpheus until... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      You know... I saw a statement by a network executive once about how using a PVR to filter out commercials was a violation of the "contract" that we, as consumers, agreed to. Since I've never seen that contract or the requirements within, I can't say I agree with him. That's why I don't have any problem with grabbing TV shows off of IRC. Of course, if the show is available on DVD or VHS, I'll buy it first since it is likely to be a better quality copy. For example, as soon as the episodes of Voyager came out on DVD that I wanted, I deleted the files that were capped from TV and bought the discs. IF Sliders ever comes out, I'll buy that too.

      Now on the other hand... you could have just been kidding about the piracy thing... ;P

    6. Re:I used to love Morpheus until... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      Even though they don't have Sliders there... I have to say thank you to the AC who posted this. It's kind of what I've been looking for. :)

  62. Re:Virtual machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course if you were really serious about music, you'd be using PT on a Mac ;)

  63. cite..please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    80% of all internet traffic is p2p?
    I don't think so..
    porn maybe, and some of that is p2p..

    do you have a basis for that claim?

    1. Re:cite..please by boer · · Score: 1

      My quit Google search produced many second hand sources, but I also witnessed numbers of this sort myself when working for an ISP.

      --
      (This sig intentionally left blank)
  64. Impressions.. by pangel83 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had installed it in my desktop two days ago and I can't say that I was impressed. ----I know that it is still beta----, put it has a lot of way to go! -It uses the mldonkey fasttrack plugin in order to connect to the kazaa network... Hmmm... doesn't this mean that they should provide source or something? Correct me if I am wrong -User interface is awful!! Big ugly graphic buttons and I have the impression that I didn't see any proper menu bar. Of course, there is a ad-box in an uncomortable position taking up a whole strip of the screen just in order to display an ad in the middle. At least kazaa ads to not take up a whole row (There are the play-stop-etc buttons next to them) - There is no way to see the peers you are connecting to (At least that was my impression after the 20min. period that it had the honour of being installed in my machine) -UI was slow on my P4 3ghz, 1gb ram (!) -It crashed.

  65. MorpheusLite by etherlad · · Score: 1

    MorpheusLite available in 3... 2... 1...

    --
    Soylens viridis homines es
  66. What about OpenFT by Assassin_for_Atari · · Score: 3, Informative

    In all this talk about a "open" protocol and client that doesn't have spyware, Im suprised that I never hear /.'ers talk about OpenFT/giFT client. I had been using it regularly but constant changes to the protocol and server updates made me look else where. Even though this was a problem I'm supprised there isn't a bigger community pushing giFT and there efforts to help make it a solid product. I noticed they have more clients and one that works with windows now (cross plat is good). Like I said its been awhile since I used it but at the time I loved it. After reading this post I revisted their site and it looks like they are making progress so Im assuming that they have a some what more stable protocol that doesn't get changed all the time. I think ./'ers should either take a look at it or give it another try like I AM!

  67. Re:Virtual machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it matter? All your going to do is make shit that nobody wants to hear.

  68. WinMX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using it for years, in version 3.3 now, very stable. Downloads aren't always available (ie you might have to wait in line), but you can connect to OpenNet networks in addition to the WinMX default network.

    The real reason I like it is because it's low-key, doesn't recieve any media attention (and hence RIAA/MPAA attention), no spy/ad/bloatware installed, very lightweight and fast. I highly recommend it.

  69. Re: One Solution by Quantum-Sci · · Score: 1

    Seems like, if you get a dummy file, you could just re-post it, adding to the name "(is a dummy file)". Wouldn't others then get the warning?

    --
    Campaign finance reform is national security.
  70. This is getting ridiculous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't keep track of which P2P networks exist, how popular they are, what clients there are for each, and which features they support.

    Would somebody care to enlighten me, or at least point to a good resource? (or both)

    P.S. If there were no legal issues with any P2P content, wouldn't we have one (major) network, like we do with NNTP?

    1. Re:This is getting ridiculous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.slyck.com is a good resource on all the leading filesharing networks and apps.

  71. Vmware. hehe. woot! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."

    And my third party software (VMWare) inside which I run your little programs on a dedicated image with nothing on it but P2P programs doesn't really care. Spy away.

  72. Re:poisoned smoisoned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing compares to iSwipe on OS X. Gnutella, Fastrack, Gift, Carracho, Hotline, OpenNap, OpenFT, eDonkey, and Bittorrent downloads in one search/app. Not to mention that it is the only OS X app I know of that will continue to search all servers until the song is found downloaded via its autosearch function.

  73. Sounds good to me. by glrotate · · Score: 1

    Most people would find it to be a vast improvement without NSync/electronic repetetive and uninteresting garbage.

  74. Re:Virtual machine by Kethinov · · Score: 1
    Have ya ever noticed that Windows can't see your Linux partitions?
    They got this great thing called Explore2fs along with this great thing called EXT2IFS along with this great thing called Samba.
    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
  75. Re: Virtual machine by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

    Most emulators provide some way of moving data back and forth from the emulated environment to the "real world" and back again. If you need to transfer something, just verify that it isn't a virus, move it to your production environment (via shared folders or, in VPC's case, simple drag-and-drop), and you're done. Happy sending!

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  76. Shareaza is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want "infiltration" of other P2P networks, what about Shareaza (Windows only).

    It supports Gnutella 2 (& file swarming), Gnutella 1, EDonkey 2k networks, has BitTorrent support - plus it understands "magnet://" and "ed2k://" web links to P2P content (more about those standards here). It contains absolutely no spyware and is one of the best-written apps I've ever used.

    For file sharing, you don't need anything else.

  77. FastTrack vs. Gnutella by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is FastTrack more popular than the Gnutella network? Gnutella is an open network, while the only way to get on the FastTrack network is by installing dog shit spyware programs. It is my understanding that they have the same overall decentralized infrastructure and are both equally effecient. Also, when the first batch of lawsuits from the RIAA came out, 99% of them were against FastTrack users. That could be reason enough to use Gnutella.

  78. Open source alternative KCeasy by havaloc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    KCeasy available at www.kceasy.com also taps into the Kazaa network, is open source, and spyware free. Check it out.

  79. Re:Virtual machine by kfg · · Score: 1

    Why the hell would I want to do all of that when my original post advocated using Windows?

    KFG

  80. Spyware... one more reason by generationxyu · · Score: 2, Informative

    to use giFT.

    --
    I mod down pyramid schemes in sigs.
  81. Re:Virtual machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love you.

  82. Re:Virtual machine by kfg · · Score: 1

    Does the spyware associated with Morpheus, when installed in Windows, use these programs I have not intentionallly installed myself to go looking for a Linux partition?

    They're getting to be clever bastards then, but even in that case it leaves them with trying to figure out what's important personal information and what isn't, since Linux systems aren't quite as standardized as a Windows box. For instance, my address book file is named Thomas.Selfridge. It would be a clever bit of software that figured that out, let alone that and the format I keep the file in as well.

    I really don't see a future when spyware assumes a Linux partition must be around somewhere when it's installed in Windows.

    KFG

  83. Re:Virtual machine by Kethinov · · Score: 1

    Not being an authority on Morpheus, I can't really answer that question, but in the case of EXT2IFS and Samba, the data is mounted just like your every day drive C: or D:, so it's logical to assume that the spyware associated with Morpheus could read and in some cases write to them.

    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
  84. Re:Virtual machine (offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How's that Kaos project coming along? Still no code I see, nor will there ever be I suspect. You might want to quit bragging about it until you have actually done something.

  85. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there documentation on accessing these networks? I would like to write my own client and be free from all the ****ing popups.

    Where can I find out about whatever protocol I need to use?

  86. January version of MUTE ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the Morpheus jokes. Bring on the Winter-Mute jokes!

    (Neuromancer, you young whipper-snappers).

  87. These guys are gonna get sued. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    By Sharman and then the makers of the Matrix trilogy.

    Morpheus is back on FastTrack, according to MP3NewsWire, tapping into it and the other leading networks through a beta of the NEOnet technology in the just-released version 4.

    DOH!

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  88. BitTorrent index by AmVidia+HQ · · Score: 1

    Read my sig ;)

    --
    VIVA1023.com | Political Fashion.
  89. Re:Virtual machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever heard of hobbies? Some people prefer to do things that are productive, instead of installing the latest software to make themselves look "cool".

    Now when you actually take advantage of linux, that's another story. Although there are too many wannabes out there who are addicted to linux simply because it's the "thing to do". They're no better than Windows users, and they're often even much worse. Especially when they're completely ignorant to the fact that Linux is actually a different operating system with different software, and it isn't a practical alternative in many situations.

    Sure, it's an open source operating system. But what could be so good about it that a user would actually go through the trouble of learning how to program from scratch, then writing decent alternatives to several windows programs that they use on a regular basis. Not to mention the trouble of using a dual-boot system so that they could still get work done while they're in the development phase of their applications.

  90. Re:Get on with it and just... by Zleeper · · Score: 1

    place a levy of like $5 on every computer sold and $10 on evey MP3 player sold, and pay the morons off. Period done final.

  91. Time to drag the sig out. by nasim · · Score: 1

    ahem.

    --

    For great justice take off every sig.

  92. nostalga... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...funny.
    DCC (Direct Client-to-Client) transferrs, expediated via IRC (and fly-by-night FTP servers advertised via 'bot's) was the way to go, back in the early-mid '90-s.
    ahh...
    One still remembers the ack: "... NO BOTS!!!/nNO BOTS!!!/nNO BOTS!!!"
    'course, writin' those 'bot's (some of us called ours "borgs", since we could control them, remotely, via DDE) gave a bunch of script-kiddies access to the knowledge which has lead to all of these VBscript[ed] viruses. ("floodin'" someone offline (now, known as a [D]DOS attack, or a "booter") required the use of 'bot's to keep from "flooding" oneself offline, in the process ...)
    ahhh... progress.

  93. MUTE scores lots of files! by webwide · · Score: 0

    I just tested this out. By the time I connected to 3-4 other nodes I was getting dozens of hits for Metallica, Led Zeppelin, etc. Yeah, it's a pretty bare-bones interface at this point, but since it is truly anonymous via encryption (and you can set the key bits quite high!) the link between your random 'virtual address' and your actual IP address will never be discoverable, not to mention the data packets themselves traveling over the net in encrypted form. Quick, someone develop a user-friendly GUI for this thing!

    --
    Glenn Dixon http://vagabondians.com
  94. Re:Virtual machine by Deusy · · Score: 1

    Well, I just had a quick look on Freshmeat and found:

    RoseGarden
    Sweep
    Ardour
    Audacity
    Protux
    DAP
    ReZound
    GLAME

    --

    Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary