Slashdot Mirror


India Becoming a Major Hub for Western Job Seekers

MaximusTheGreat writes: "IHT and Financial Express report that many qualified Western professionals are moving to India for jobs. Two of the most common reasons mentioned are adding the Indian experience to the CV and search of better opportunities in a booming Indian economy. According to a Mumbai based head hunting firm, "A lot of the highly qualified talent has traditionally been mobile and attracted to centers of excellence globally. This was true of the US in the early 80s when top flight talent from India migrated in search of better opportunities. Today, the same is happening to economies such as India and China" This should also bust the myth that foreigners are not allowed work in India."

105 of 830 comments (clear)

  1. Outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The task of getting first post has been outsourced to India.

    1. Re:Outsourced by DickeyWayne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know, I know, first posts are ALWAYS moderated -1 offtopic, but this one was kinda funny!

  2. Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is why I got out of computer science to be an electrical engineer. My advisor always encouraged me to study abroad in India because that's where everything is shifting. I did not want to do this. I hope that this trend does not continue :(

    1. Re:Uh oh . . . by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope that this trend does not continue

      Just curious, is there any outcome to any situation that will not cause mass hysteria among the /. community?

      People come to the US looking for jobs..PANIC!!!! People leave the US looking for jobs...PANIC!!! President tries to solve this problem by trying to kill all those annoying foreigners...PANIC!!!

      Jeez, I feel for you people

    2. Re:Uh oh . . . by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just goes to show the /. community is no different than any other community. We're just as greedy and racist as the rest of the world. Generally speaking, of course. Pointing that out will get me modded down, but as we say, "Ni modo".

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Uh oh . . . by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Insightful
      probably almost as well off in many other contries working for $10 than $20 in the US. You don't have to pay 30% income tax

      1. 30% tax on $20/hr? even here in "socialist" canada it's more like 16%. i think you have a "fact problem"
      2. i assume you think that your taxes just evaporate or something. are you willing to live with reduced:
        1. police protection
        2. health care
        3. subsidized education
        4. general infrastructure
        5. unemployment and old age security
        6. public safety (ie fda inspections)
        7. price controls on inelastic commodities
        8. space program

      You can sleep well at night knowing if you are a crack addict the government will pay your way through rehab

      this is obviously a Bad Idea. it should be the goal of the government to ensure there are as many untreated crack heads roaming around the streets as possible.

      you are going to pay for society's drug problems one way or another. you can either pony up some tax to get crack heads off the street, into rehab and turn them into productive citizens... or you can ignore the problem and pay in lost economic productivity, increased policing costs and in one lump cash payment when that untreated crack head sticks you up for a fix.

      We keep throwing away American tax dollars at foreign nations only to be the most hated country in the world

      are you counting the cost of cluster bombs as a foreign aid expense?

      seriously. do you know who the single biggest recipient of us foreign aid is? israel. thirty per cent of foreign aid goes to that nation - and they are not you enemy.

      of course, the us doesn't hand out foreign aid for free. packages often come with spending restrictions that are geared towards ingratiating the recipient country to the donor and then there are saps - structural adjustment policies - whereby aid is conditional upon economic reforms in the recipient country that are beneficial to the us corporate sector.

      hint: learn something about how foreign aid works and what it does before commenting on it.

      They should raise their nations taxes by several billion a year and take over babbysiting the rest of the world then

      all the countries of the world that take part in un peacekeeping missions find your suggestion ludicrous and insulting.

    4. Re:Uh oh . . . by yiantsbro · · Score: 2

      "....30% tax on $20/hr? even here in "socialist" canada it's more like 16%. i think you have a "fact problem"..."

      Actually $20/hr is about $40K/year--30% is not far off for total tax here (state + federal + SS, etc). Your take home pay will be something like 70%-74% of your total pay.

      The thing I really can't stand is sales tax on top of that (currently 6% where I am and working toward 7%).

    5. Re:Uh oh . . . by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      well... i just got out my pay stub and a calculator and added up all my deductions: federal, proviincial, cpp, ei and my voluntary "extra deduction" (to ensure i don't get a bill at tax time) and it came to...

      26.3%

      which is more than 16 but still way less than 30... and i live in canada! where we have things like single payer health care and government subsidies for just about everything...

      nothing personal, but it sounds like you americans are getting ripped off! more tax, less service... sheesh.

    6. Re:Uh oh . . . by blue+trane · · Score: 2, Informative

      you are going to pay for society's drug problems one way or another. you can either pony up some tax to get crack heads off the street, into rehab and turn them into productive citizens... or you can ignore the problem and pay in lost economic productivity, increased policing costs and in one lump cash payment when that untreated crack head sticks you up for a fix.

      Just thought I'd mention (I probably shouldn't but what the hell, I ain't afraid): here in Seattle, the people who control the crack control a lot of things. There is so much money in crack, they can afford to buy up businesses and bribe public officials. One rumor I heard was that the governor of the state was involved. There is a "Family" here (crackheads on the street greet each other with the term of endearment "Fam"). It is very extensive. They have "managers" and such. They use technology very extensively and widely to spy on things, organize gangs quickly via cellphone, etc. It is very hard to believe at first. But they thrive on not being visible, on everyone being afraid to speak out and say what is obvious and what everyone knows anyway.

      Personally I say, legalize the fucking crack and take the power away from hardened criminals.

      (Read my journal if you want to know more. Thanks.)

    7. Re:Uh oh . . . by jadavis · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's been my theory that the U.S. government is particularly destructive to the economy because the population here is much more than, say, Canada.

      Americans are getting ripped off... 15% wage taxes go striaght to Washington, D.C., for Social Security and Medicare (and that's not even the other income taxes, yet!). They tell you that your employer pays half and you pay half, but that's just a political game and anyone who has read an Econ 101 book knows it.

      What are the chances that money actually comes back to the taxpayers in any meaningful way? With politicians so far removed from the people, and eveyone looking to the Federal government rather than the state government for all legislation, there is just no accountability any more.

      Different states don't really matter much any more. There's no way to hold the politicians in Washington D.C. accountable, and they are the ones with all the power. Do we really need laws about education at the national level? Labor laws at the national level? National minimum wage? Have the states all pass different laws and then see which are successful. When your state does something wrong, you just kick the old guy out and elect a movie star, no problem.

      Localize government! Move power from the feds to the state and from the state to the localities.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    8. Re:Uh oh . . . by Ryosen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Trust me, lad. You know not of what you speak.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    9. Re:Uh oh . . . by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hmm... just calculated mine... 38.5% (wow, I never realized it was this much).

      (this doesn't include 401K, etc., just federal, state, city, medicare, blah blah blah blah, and you end up with very little of the actual `money').

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    10. Re:Uh oh . . . by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reading your post made me think. Although we may have national minimum wage, the percentage of folks working for minimum wage varies greatly from state to state. Also employment rules are different in each state (look at Virginia for a sad example). Since there's a national minimum wage, Wal Mart doesn't get to exploit people any further than it already does. Setup a distribution center in the poorest part of Kentucky or wherever, charge a crap wage, and people will flock. If national minimum wage wasn't in effect, do you think any large company would feel compelled to pay people the same? Doubtful.

      Thank god that most states now have no state tax. Some of the worst states like Oklahoma still live off the fat of their constituents, but Texas does not. Oklahoma is thankfully in the minority when it comes to state income tax. You can live better in Texas with an Oklahoma wage than you can with that same money in OK.

      I do agree with your point about the federal government being too automatic now, but it's your fellow voter's fault. Voter apathy has led this government to where it now stands, and voter apathy will continue to let the fatcats in Washington do whatever they want. There's no accountability because nobody really cares. Plus you have media spin that makes issues magically disappear when a crisis erupts. Ultimately, we'll be worse than some Third World countries, corruption-wise.

      I'll leave you with something I told my wife sometime. She's from Thailand and asked a very succinct question one day. "Why isn't the government here corrupt (compared to Thailand)?" My answer? "It is, it's just better at keeping it quiet."

    11. Re:Uh oh . . . by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Insightful
      reduced... police protection -- we already are

      er. reduced from what? last year? last century? i am talking about police protection levels lower than they are currently - hence the word "reduced". you are talking about... i'm not sure what.

      subsidized education -- Subsidized by whom?

      it's been a long time since i've been to the states... do they have cover charges for high school now?

      general infrastructure -- The roads in SIlicon Valley are collapsing.

      the roads in silicon valley exist. were they created on the sixth day by god?

      unemployment and old age security -- Social Security is approaching insolvency.

      and paying less tax will help this... how? social security exists. is this another "sixth day" creation? nope. taxes, my lad.

      public safety (ie fda inspections) -- We had 9/11 and now mad cow. That's the kind of 'saftey' we get for our 50%.

      thanks for bringing up mad cow. thanks to your tax dollars, the infected beef was caught at the distribution level and prevented from ever getting to market. is less tax worth dying of vCJD?

      100% of all taxes collected in the U.S. go to pay the interest on the debt

      well, looking at the wikipedia page on the the us national debt, i notice that it says "47% of personal income taxes" go to servicing the debt. no corporate taxes, no sales taxes, no "sin" taxes - just personal income taxes, and less than half at that.

      now, that's still a huge debt-servicing cost, but it isn't, as you claim, "100% of all taxes collected in the U.S.".

      Ha ha. Man are you the one who is ignorant:

      back at you pal.

    12. Re:Uh oh . . . by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is exactly what my opinion has always been, wouldnt it be so much easier if they just legalised everything, made it only available from pharmacies (so the quality could be regulated) and put a BIG sticker on it saying something to the effect of "take this and it will KILL you". I think if high schools actually provided some education on the actual effects (both good and bad) of so-called illicit drugs on a persons body rather than just shouting "JUST SAY NO TO DRUGS" any time the issue is raised then there would be less of a problem. Take away the mystique and illicit nature of drugs and they loose their appeal pretty quickly once people are able to weigh up the pros and cons for themselves.

  3. Exciting by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hey, free movement of labor is required for fairness of free movement of capital.

    Depending on what sort of world you want, I guess.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:Exciting by MisterFancypants · · Score: 3, Funny
      The other part that makes it exciting is they might get nuked by the Pakistanis at any time.

      Livin' on the bleeding edge of technology!

    2. Re:Exciting by terraformer · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Depending on what sort of world you want, I guess.

      This is exactly the problem w/ free trade. Conservatives want it for obvious reasons and progressives want it since they mistakenly believe it will bring up the standards of living in the target countries. Although it does (bring up the std of living), it does so through achieving equilibrium. The problem with that is to achieve equilibrium, two sides need to meet in the middle and that means decrease in the std of living for the higher income group. To prevent this it requires a smart plan, one which is sorely lacking in this case. In the absence of this plan, the only people who benefit from free trade are the really rich as they income gap increases.

      The facts bear out the assertion that the rich are benefitting from this arrangement since both the US and Mexico have seen a shrinking of their middle class and a growth in the income gap between top and bottom. Also, in the absence of a smart plan for implementing free trade, it allows the corporations to continue to support corrupt regimes with total impunity, with no control by any authority.

      Welcome to the new world...

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    3. Re:Exciting by eraserewind · · Score: 2

      It doesn't necessarily have to mean that the people who started out rich will end up at a lower absolute level of standard of living. It only means that the relative standard of livings are supposed to become balanced. Trade is not a zero sum game.

      That's the theory anyway. As you point out, in practise it doesn't seem to be working out quite so neatly. The rich now control a greater % of the worlds absolute wealth than in the past, and this is only increasing. I have seen several times mentioned that the average "real" income for people in the US has been in decline since the 1970s.

    4. Re:Exciting by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Informative

      From ny experience, 20 years ago inflation in Mexico was running about 125% a year, but everything seemed to remain affordable. Now with NAFTA, inflation may be down, but the prices are almost as high as in the states, but the wages are nowhere near that. Prices still do climb, but wages appears stagnant. Gasoline, electricity, milk, toilet paper, etc. are actually more expensive than in the states. I don't know how the people tolerate it. But they do.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Exciting by xzap · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not likely seeing how the 'Father' of Pakistan's nuclear program has just been fired for illegally selling nuclear secrets to Libya and Iran.

    6. Re:Exciting by terraformer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have read it and if you read what I wrote, you will see I was talking about the execution of a specific trade policy, not about generic and ideal trade theory. There is no such thing as a perfect market since there is no such thing as perfect information. Ideal markets do not, and will never exist. So the focus has to be on the trade policy and how that policy has been implemented. My suggestion is that the execution of this specific trade policy has been set up to benefit one group over another.

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    7. Re:Exciting by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The point is, Germany went largely unchallenged for 5 years before the US got involved.

      Way to fucking rewrite history. Britain, Frace, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Norway and others were all actively at war with Germany way before the US got reluctantly dragged into the war in Europe. Britain, Australia and New Zealand also fought against Japan in Asia and the Pacific Rim.

      Please, pick up a book or something every once in a while. The world doesn't revolve around the US.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    8. Re:Exciting by ajagci · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with that is to achieve equilibrium, two sides need to meet in the middle and that means decrease in the std of living for the higher income group.

      I don't see a problem with that. Some people (us) have been getting more than their fair share for a while. We should consider ourselves lucky to have had such good fortune for so long. It's not our right.

      To prevent this it requires a smart plan, one which is sorely lacking in this case.

      No, it requires a very simple plan: improve the average standard of living of the globe quickly enough so that it compensates for the decrease resulting from equillibration. Anything else wouldn't be a "plan", it would be a fraud.

      Of course, free trade or not, the Western lifestyle will have to change: it simply isn't sustainable, and it can't be scaled up to the rest of the world. In particular, Americans will need to live in smaller, more energy-efficient houses, take public transportation, buy more energy efficient cars, recycle more, etc.

      The facts bear out the assertion that the rich are benefitting from this arrangement since both the US and Mexico have seen a shrinking of their middle class and a growth in the income gap between top and bottom. Also, in the absence of a smart plan for implementing free trade, it allows the corporations to continue to support corrupt regimes with total impunity, with no control by any authority.

      The US middle class has lots of serious, self-created problems; don't blame Mexico or free trade for that.

    9. Re:Exciting by Ed+Avis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A decrease in the standard of living for the American (or $COUNTRY_X) programmers, because they can no longer charge such high prices as before. But programmers and software companies are in a tiny minority compared to the users of software and business which need to pay for it. The people who benefit from free trade are not just the Indian (or $COUNTRY_Y) programmers, but the Western businesses who are able to get what they need more cheaply, and the consumers who (assuming decent competition) get lower prices.

      Free trade is just bringing together those who have something to sell - the Indian programmers - and those who want to buy - American firms needing software written. I don't see any reason for a third group to whine about this just because they were previously able to get away with charging more.

      This is especially hypocritical on a site such as Slashdot, where readers depend on a steady supply of computer hardware often built in countries with lower wages than the West. In stories about video cards or RAM I don't think I have _ever_ seen any complaint about free trade reducing the price of the hardware and the lost job opportunties for Americans caused by building it in the Far East. Or think of the constant RIAA stories - stop trying to get in the way of progress, stop trying to prop up a failing business model, you don't automatically have the right to keep on getting money just because you did in the past. I know this is partly the fallacy of assuming Slashdot readers speak with one voice, but it's still worth noting.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  4. India and Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I fear that OSS is soon going to force all programming jobs to move to India. Since OSS companies typically make far less profit than real commercial software companies do, they cannot afford to hire decent programmers. So they'll outsource to India, for 10 dollars an hour. Furthermore, by using underhanded tactics like "borrowing" Unix code, they'll beat their commercial competitors -- and the commercial companies will either be forced to open source, or go out of business. I'm not trying to say that OSS is bad, or it should be banned, but some kind of regulation should be put in place to ensure that the majority of software in use is still good old fashioned commercial software.

    1. Re:India and Open Source by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2, Funny

      There oughtta be a law!

      To stop bad laws.

      An antilaw if you will.

      They will come in card form.

      --

      What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  5. Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you ever wondered why all the IT jobs are being outsourced to India? Really, I find it hard to believe why people question this growing trend. Is it not obvious?

    Indians are by nature better programmers. For one, they never have to deal with type casting erros -- they never forget to caste!

  6. Isn't this what "mobile workforce" means? ;) by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...if the jobs can go to India, it would make sense that the workers can too.

    Someone told someone whose job was outsourced to "think outside the box", and look what happened. ;)

  7. Suprised. by bagel2ooo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems this would be something that would have been up and coming. With so many tech jobs being outsourced to India. Hopefully their booming economy will help give us a run for our money. Historically good things seem to happen when we have competition. At least I hope it will be friendlier and with at least as comparable results as the technology boosts during WWII and The Cold War. :)

    --
    ( o ) one could say I'm rather baked
  8. Re:the burning question is... by myowntrueself · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe Northern India, where its not so hot;
    but Southern India... where it gets up to 45'C...

    My brain, like any normal supercomputer, functions best at low temperature.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  9. Myth busting by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good to see that particular myth busted. The reality seems to be that India is simply embracing software development, and given the lower cost of living over there, are making huge gains in that sector - in the end software is just bits, and it's very easy to ship them anywhere in the world.

    If you don't fancy working in India, just pick somewhere else with a lower cost of living than the US, and set up shop there. You could try New Zealand or Australia - both fairly western countries with a notably lower cost of living (depending on where you go) than the US. Still not as low as India, but then it would provide less of a language barrier (depending on exactly how uninterpretable you consider the austrialian accent), which many here claim is a significant problem with Indian outsourcing.

    So, why not set up your own outsourcing company?

    Jedidiah

    1. Re:Myth busting by be-fan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes there is, if you've got a letter from an Indian company.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      New Zealand and Australia are extremely hard to get into for employment. Hell, last time I was in New Zealand was 1988 and it was hard to get in if you were black. *ahem*

      Canada requires more than US$30,000 in cash and you must be highly qualified in a professional field to move. Australia and New Zealand last I checked not only require that, but they require an existing job offer to enter--and you are forbidden from changing visa status without returning home. Not many people will be recruited ahead of time. Sure, you can enter as a university student to gain contacts, but how many unemployed computer programmers have enough to pay up front for a AU/NZ degree AND all their living expenses for three years PLUS two return air tickets and six more months living expense so you can go home while the residency visa is granted, at which point you will need a full years' contingency fund that will be checked on arrival or adios muchachos--assuming you haven't been found to break the employment restriction, which in the case of Australia will bar you from ever returning again? Oh, IT'S SOOOO BLOODY EASY. Right.

      The fact is, most countries are practically impossible to emmigrate to--especially commonwealth countries from anywhere but another commonwealth country and especially Australia when your departure country is the United States because too many of us have tried to change visa status while in Australia (read: illegal employment). If you're already out of work, the financial restrictions make it a complete fantasy. If you're not out of work, it's such an enormous gamble, why would you try unless you truly wanted to permanently move to the country in question for reasons other than immediate employment?

      The H1-B program in the United States was not exactly par for the international course. We let in well over 600,000 people on H1-B in five years. Once I see numbers like India granting over one million residency and employment visas PER YEAR (a roughly equal proportion), I'll buy this argument that the lack of reciprocity is a myth. The same goes for Indian academics. Bangalore University has TWO SEATS per department available for international students--and they have a quarter million students. My university had less than five thousand students and we had that many seats--just for Brazil.

      Myth my ass. I would _love_ to go work in a number of countries, not all of them on the economic level of Australia. However, in many countries it often isn't possible at any price--just try to get a work visa for South Africa, for instance. Oh sure, you can get a long-term residency permit if you've got $100,000 in the bank, but you won't be able to seek employment without risking deportation. Most countries are very protective of their labor markets and aren't about to dilute them with Americans who they see as not needing the work nearly as badly. This translates to a cynical lack of reciprocity that basically boils down to "you're American, ergo you're rich, ergo you don't need to take our jobs." Of course, the same voices seem to think we should give up our jobs for them when they show up at our doors.

    3. Re:Myth busting by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, IT'S SOOOO BLOODY EASY. Right.

      I didn't say it was easy - I said it was possible. I think you somewhat overrate the difficulty of emigrating to NZ or Australia - no, it is not trivial, but it is far from impossible, especially if you are skilled and have some cash reserves. It is FAR easier than emigrating to the US from NZ or Australia.

      The fact is, most countries are practically impossible to emmigrate to--especially commonwealth countries from anywhere but another commonwealth country and especially Australia when your departure country is the United States because too many of us have tried to change visa status while in Australia (read: illegal employment). If you're already out of work, the financial restrictions make it a complete fantasy. If you're not out of work, it's such an enormous gamble, why would you try unless you truly wanted to permanently move to the country in question for reasons other than immediate employment?

      Let's be honest, the US is generally regarded to be the most anally retentive country in the world when it comes to immigration. Consider all those people stuck in green card lotteries. Comparatively Commonwealth countries are reasonably easy going. They expect you to have work lined up, or a high liklehood of finding work, but that's not at all unreasonable. The plan is not to just try and move there - Start looking for work there, apply for every programming job going in your target country(ies), and once you have a job offer your odds of getting visas etc. skyrocket.

      I know several people who have successfully emigrated to NZ or Australia, it is nowhere near as difficult as you seem to imply (that is, you imply that it is effectively impossible - which it most definitely is NOT).

      Jedidiah.

    4. Re:Myth busting by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Informative

      The IT jobs market in Australia isn't much better than the US. Go compete with someone else ;)

    5. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anally retentive? More difficult?

      You can come to the United States without a long term visa, THEN find work, THEN get your visa status changed. That's pretty NON-anally retentive. Do that in Australia and not only will you find yourself back home, you can never return.

      It is the fact that we are so ridiculously permissive and the rest of the world still cries that we're "generally regarded to be the most anally retentive country in the world when it comes to immigration" that pisses us off because practically nowhere else is so open.

      Go try to get yourself German citizenship and get back to me on how restrictive the United States is.

    6. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We do that as well--it's called a fscking H1-B. We also grant EB-[1-5] visas ex post facto. You also don't have to be a highly skilled professional. You can be a dish washer.

      Immigration is difficult anywhere, but to claim that the United States is "the most anally retentive," especially compared to Australia and New Zealand, is just ridiculous. For Christ's sake, we've done blanket amnesties for illegal aliens. Sort of "right, lost track of all of you, can't be bothered, you're legal now." We're about to do it again this year. Oh, how anally retentive.

    7. Re:Myth busting by KavyBoy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry, you're wrong on almost all counts. I know because I've done it. I showed up in New Zealand on vacation and had a job offer two weeks later. I went to immigration and walked out with a two-year work visa. I don't even have an IT degree. My wife is here full-term on a work visa that allows her to stay as long as I'm here. A year into it and I'm sitting in my own house in NZ right now. I can apply for long-term residency and probably get it.
      Now, it wasn't a cake walk, but it was FAR from difficult. I work with a 20-year-old American that's here same as me, so it's not like I'm a special case. No huge sums of work experince and cash are required.

  10. Unnecessary hype by Freston+Youseff · · Score: 3, Informative

    It will all balance out in the end.

    --

    1. Re:Unnecessary hype by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      yes, when we all have to work 90 hour weeks, and live in hovels.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Can't Hurt by danaan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think anything that gets more people out of their own territories and out into a different part of the world where they have the opportunity to see what it's like in other places can only help in the long run. Sure, a fluid labor force is a "good thing", but people who have experienced different cultures, laws, religions, biases and viewpoints is even more valuable.

  12. HOW TO GET H1B FOR INDIA? by aspelling · · Score: 2

    What needs to be done to get job visa in India? Should I post my resume in Indian newspaper? Will my 10 years of experience in US count? Should I speak any Indian languages?

    1. Re:HOW TO GET H1B FOR INDIA? by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Should I speak any Indian languages?

      Yes. English. This could prove a significant barrier to Americans.

      KFG

    2. Re:HOW TO GET H1B FOR INDIA? by lahosken · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suppose they might haze the new guy by telling him to learn the Hindi for "foo".

      I know I would.

  13. India: Foreigner workers welcome* by rjamestaylor · · Score: 3, Informative

    *Foreigners desiring to work in India are welcome only if they locate in Andhra Pradesh .
    (Source: HotJobs.com)

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    1. Re:India: Foreigner workers welcome* by boaworm · · Score: 2

      Well, as far as I know, its not much different in the US. I live in Scandinavia, and the only way I could move to the US and work would be to get "sponsored" by a large company. I have to have some skill or competence that they cannot aquire otherwise. (Like CS skills AND language) I cannot just move to the US and start looking for jobs. Why should it be any different in India ? (or, well, why is it like this at all. It does not seem like "free movement of labor" to me).

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
  14. unlikely by ThoughtWorker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unless someone wants to move to India forever, it doesnt make financial sense. Indian software companies are not going to pay more for an American working in India just because he is American (or whatever country he comes from). And so people moving there will have to work at the going salaries of that market. And with those salaries, you cant retire very comfortably in the United States, for example. So, anyone interested in a permanent move?

    1. Re:unlikely by JanneM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, it _is_ better. When applying for a job in the US, will the employer rather have:

      a) A guy with extensive experience of Indian culture and business environment, has a working knowlwedge of Hindi (or other major Indian languages), and has shown the drive and independence to relocate to a differenct continent in the first place; or

      b) A guy who knows how to handle the deep fryer at McDonalds?

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:unlikely by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I used to hear stuff like that when I was younger. It's not really true; foreign experience might be useful in some jobs, but not that many. If your chosen profession is programming, or engineering, non-technical experiences aren't going to help much if any. If you're trying to get into some high-up executive position that involves a lot of foreign travel, meeting with people from around the globe, etc., then sure it'd be very helpful. But all the complaining about outsourcing isn't about managerial or executive positions, it's about the plain ol' programming jobs.

      Personally, I wouldn't want an executive type job anyway. I got into engineering because I like to tinker with technical things, not because I liked meeting with people. If I wanted to spend all my time talking to people, I would have gone to management school. Also, the higher up you go on the corporate ladder, the less of a personal life you get. Those CEOs don't get things like families, free time, etc. They're constantly working. They might have a wife and kids, but the kids never see them, and the wife probably has a lover to keep her company.

  15. Re:India is not for Me by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whatever you say, Mr. Eau de Rancid Big Mac.

    KFG

  16. EE Majors still worth anything? by boobsea · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm about to go onto college. I planned on majoring in CompSci, but I don't want to move aboard to get a job.

    Are Electrical Engineers having any similar problems with jobs being outsourced?

    Which degree should I get?

    1. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The difficulty in answering your question is that you have to be able to predict 4 years into the future.

      Perhaps you could visit a school you're interested in and see whether a lot of Indians and Chinese are in the program you're considering. If so, it's a good bet those countries are taking interest in the field. To me it seems that China, at least, is coming on strong in all technical fields, if a few years behind India in computer programming.

      As a datapoint, apparently Intel's Pentium-M chip (the best CPU for laptops at the moment) was done in Israel and was the first chip Intel ever finished on time.

    2. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by scrod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Major in what you would like to do--not what you think other people would like you to do. You'll have plenty of chances to explore different areas once you enter a university.

    3. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by hgh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Electrical engineering is a lot of physics whereas compsci is a lot discrete math. If you're not interested in physics, then don't go for an EE degree. For example, in EE you'll learn how semi-conductors work and such; in comp sci you'll learn ways to traverse graphs, etc. Though there's certainly overlap in the fields. EE's need to know what they're designing for, and a comp sci that know's what's going on under the hood is typically better off than one who doesn't when doing anything practical.

      If you pick a major based on future job prospects you'll probably end up choosing a degree that doesn't suit your particular interests and wasting a lot of time doing something you don't like, and, odds are, if you don't like something you won't excel at it.

      Rather, choose the degree that most enjoy and run with it. If you're a talented computer scientist you'll have no trouble finding a job no matter what the economy is like. Personally, I think the EE degree is more versatile than a compsci degree, but that's just me.

      The choice also depends on the school you're planning to attend; the quality of each major with respect to the other will vary significantly between each school. You could also consider computer engineering, which lies somewhere between EE and compsci.

      Good luck

    4. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by back_pages · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      Do not major in computer science at this time.

      First of all, a 4 year degree in Comp Sci is basically worthless in the USA right now. If you go for CS, understand that you will have to get a graduate degree unless you think PC Repair or telephone tech support is a great career for a college grad.

      Secondly, it's sort of an empty discipline. By that I mean that at the end of a very successful day, all you really achieve is a contribution to somebody else's geekiness; now they can make misogynist jokes and jerk off to internet porn. In rare circumstances, you really do make a substantial positive difference in someone else's life, but let's be serious. The world would be just fine without Mozilla, Winamp, Apache, Linux, Unix, IBM, Sun, and last but not least Microsoft. I'm not saying these are modern demons, but compare CS to disciplines like political science, diplomacy, theology, ethics, etc. where you are seriously working at improving someone's life, not their leisure. Even if you prove that NP = P, get over yourself. That's about the most goddamn geeky thing you could do with your life except maybe being the Magic: The Gathering grand champion.

      A computer science degree isn't the most portable thing in the world. Yes, you become an expert at algorithms and problem solving (IF you get a graduate degree) but other than that, you're pretty much an expert at reading technical documents and making instructions. That's not exactly the type of guy who gets hired for interdisciplinary management positions. Even if you do become an expert at problem solving, I haven't yet heard anyone say, "This is a serious [logistics/management/organizational/opportunity] problem, get me a COMPSCI GRAD!"

      I went into CS in 1998 and got my BS in 2002. Note the years: I chose CS 2 years before the .com bust and graduated 2 years later, give or take a few months. I didn't choose CS for the money but rather because I love the study and the process. It's like in the movie Good Will Hunting (not that I'm a super genius or anything) - I look at the stuff and it just makes sense to me in a way that no other subject ever has. Plus, it was a good career at the time.

      Now I'm basically a master of the Rubix cube and I'll have to move to a 3rd world country that may or may not have hostility toward my citizenship if I want to one day purchase a new economy car. I can't tell you whether or not EE is a better field, but for God's sake man, do not enter computer science at this time. If a genie gave me 1 wish in this life, I would go back to my freshman year of undergrad and choose a different field. I'd still be a computer geek, but you don't have to spend $150,000 on education to program, you go to Barnes & Noble and spend a couple hundred on books. It's far better to be an amateur hacker with a degree in business, in my humble but definitely qualified opinion.

    5. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Radical+Rad · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm basically a master of the Rubix cube

      It's Rubic's Cube. Rubic was the name of the man who invented it.

      Sorry about your misfortune. I had a similar one in the early nineties when the cold war ended just in time to eliminate almost all demand for my major in Aerospace Engineering. However I disagree with your recommendation that people don't enter EE or CS. If the current lack of demand causes this country to stop producing graduates in those programs then there could never ever be an upswing here in that industry. The manpower wouldn't exist to even try to compete with China and India.

      People should study whatever they are interested in and excel at. If that is CS then good for them. We will need them in the future. Keep in mind that all new technologies will intersect with computer technology. If someone invented a transporter or a holodeck tomorrow, you can be damn sure that it would be controlled by computers. Want to outsource those too?

      And cheer up, since the economy is starting to warm up again and the H1B visas have dropped back to their pre-2k levels, you may get a chance to use that fancy degree of yours before long.

    6. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Business.
      Learn all you can. Then learn plumbing. afer thet, start your own plumbing business. If you still want to program, do some work on OS.

      If I had been spending the last 10 years as a plumber, I would be making at least twice what I currently make as a software developer.
      The hour would be better, and I'd get to go to kick ass comventions in Vegas.
      Believe me, these conventions are far superiour then comdex. Unles you actully go to comdex to learn about what might just be the next trend(but probably isn't).

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This advice is terrible. Not paying attention to the job market when you're choosing an education is a recipe for unemployment. This doesn't mean to run after whatever currently "hot", but don't waste your time getting an education in something that has no future. I had a roommate once who got a Master's in Philosophy. What is he doing with it? I have no idea; probably working at Wal-Mart. An aerospace engineering degree isn't very helpful either; look at how our aerospace industy is doing. Similarly, a CS or EE degree isn't going to be very useful if most of the work is outsourced offshore.

      Sure, if you're "talented", you stand a better chance, but not everyone is the cream of the crop. It's good to be realistic and know your capabilities. Even if you are talented, if the market for your profession is poor, or heavily outsourced, that'll erode the salaries even for the top people.

      My advice? If you're really smart, go into something to do with medicine or biotech. Doctors are still making great salaries, are actually seen as a prestigious profession (engineering isn't), and aren't likely to be outsourced in the next century (even with remotely-operated robots, operations in this country have to be done by a doctor qualified to operate in this country, not some guy with a degree from the University of Panama or Guatemala). Anything involving biological research, pharmaceuticals, biotech, etc. will probably also be very strong in the US for quite some time.

    8. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This post seems to assume that people who aren't "talented" deserve to have high-end jobs in what's hot when they graduate?

      Look, if you have brains and dedication and confidence in your capabilities, study whatever you want. Get the philosophy degree, have fun, and make sure that you're keeping an eye on something to make money with too. There's plenty of opportunity for part-time work in fields that will make money, and by trying lots of them out you will probably find one that captures your interest about the time that the "educational" system manages to grind the last ounce of passion out of philosophy for you.

      If you don't have the brains and dedication, following the brass ring of what's hot now or in four years is a waste of everyone's time -- you're not going to make it through the interview, and if you do somehow get a job you'll still be the first one against the wall when times get tough. You might want to seek fulfillment in a less competitive arena.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    9. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by hgh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You seem to imply that a degree without a strong connection to a particular industry has no future, your example: philosophy. History, semiotics, etc. would also get lumped into this category of "useless" degrees. Sure, there isn't a huge market for "philosophers", but I imagine most philosophy majors don't expect to sit in an armchair and philosophize for a living. The critical thinking and writing skills can be easily transferred to law or business.

      I would argue that if you're not talented at something you shouldn't pursue and expect financial rewards like a good job. Furthermore, a lot of people are looking for more than just money. I would say job satisfaction is critical to a happy life. You spend the majority of your life working, so you better enjoy it. A history major that ends up curating a small town musuem might not make the big bucks, but in the end he/she lives a happy life because they spend all day doing something he or she enjoys.

      If you go into a field for the money, you'll end up living for your weekends and look back and realize you wasted a lot of time in pursuit of money, and, odds are you probably won't make big money anyway if you don't like what you do. Take the legions of people who went into computer science in the mid to late nineties because it was a supposedly an infinitely lucrative field: now they are working shitty jobs for much less money than they expected and hating it.

      Finally, you mention medicine and biotech as fields rich in jobs. Getting into medicine is a huge committment, definitely not something that can be decided on a whim. And then, when you become a doctor, it continues to be a lot of work. Competition is also fierce for a limited number of biotech related jobs; if you're not talented you're going to end up as a low-paid lab technician or not have a job directly in the field. The benefits of the genome project and proteomics aren't coming to fruition as quickly as hoped and there isn't going to be a huge boom because of it.

      If you want to just make money, consider taking up a trade. Tradespeople makes tonnes of cash, especially if you have any entreprenuerial sense to start your own business. Trades are going away any time soon.

  17. But is India WillingTo Have Them? by divvy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Perhpas people are even willing to move offshore than lose their respect and work at BKs or McDonalds. But is India really willing to take them in?

    Indian Culture is much different from the American one. Such migration might not help at all.. considering that the Americans will have tough time adjusting to the culture in the first place. Moreover, given India is such a big country, many companies would rather do with a talented Indian who understands the work culture and how businesses are run rather than a foreigner.

    1. Re:But is India WillingTo Have Them? by tealover · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would imagine they would be hiring Westerners for precisely the same reasons that American or European companies hire Chinese, Japanese or Indian people: To help them do business with Chinese, Japanese and Indian companies/countries.

      There would certainly be an advantage for an Indian company that does business with an American company to have Americans on the inside schooling them on how things work.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
  18. PR Puff piece. by MisterFancypants · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is pretty clearly a PR puff piece. An obvious part of the trend of the Indian IT lobby to stem the growing US backlash.

  19. Yeah but by carcosa30 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is just my opinion and all, but I don't think people from the US should have to go to India in order to chase jobs that emigrated from here.

    I know that's against the principles of free trade and all, but we invented this technology, we are the ones who built it, we supported it, and now the corporations we built it for are selling our jobs for pennies on the dollar to third world countries.

    What I'm doing is changing my field, after around 14 years, because the way technical people in this country have been treated is utterly reprehensible.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    1. Re:Yeah but by dev11 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      In some ways, we (meaning Americans) may actually have some responsibility in this. Creating the Internet, and more importantly, making it cheap and easy to get connected, makes anything that can be done at a distance, such as writing software, economically viable. In some sense, we may have done things too well and put ourselves out of a job.

      I do programming for a living, and quite honestly, most anyone with the proper training can do most common programming tasks. There certainly are those gifted, top 10 percent programmers (which I am not one, I freely admit), but most programming is not the glamour projects, and is often tedious and boring. It seems that a lot of the jobs that are being outsourced are of this type. Programming has become a commodity in a lot of respects, and is awarded to the lowest bidder.

      This is not something new. Many other industries that were American dominated at one time, such as steel, have had similar things happen. Software is just the latest. And why should the rest of the world be excluded if they can do the job more economically? Being an American doesn't make me any better a programmer, or any more deserving than anyone else.

  20. Slashdot commune in India? by stephenisu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who's with me?

    We start a hippie commune in India, we would be self sufficient in terms of agriculture and utlities, living by LGPL (we do need to be able to make a living) ideals, religion tolerant, and we could try and land a lot of the US outsoursed contracts...

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    1. Re:Slashdot commune in India? by LionKimbro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dude, I'm SO with you.

      No, seriously!

      A lot of my coder friends have actually expressed similar sentiment.

      Just don't know how to do it. That's all..!

  21. It's no H1B.. by psycho_tinman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, you may have a job. But you have to reconcile yourself to a lower quality of life in India. It may cost less to live there, but at the same time, there are a few things that are taken for granted in the West, which aren't as easy to get there. The standards for judging things are far different from life in the West.

    PhD and MSc workers are relatively thick on the ground there, especially in Engineering disciplines. The way things are in India, a lot of people (yes, I have many indian friends) want to move out due to competition from their peers, and difficulty in finding jobs. With this in mind, it's easy to understand why one article openly states that a main reason for hiring Europeans is to "represent their interests" in the home country.

    When you go work in India, you may save some cash, for sure.. but if you don't plan on living there for the rest of your life, when you come back to your own country, you will find that the savings don't necessarily translate to much in your local currency.

    Does all this sound like I am against people moving to India ? not at all. Just that, as the title of my post suggests, I doubt we're ever going to see a vast inrush of Europeans/Americans working in India at low level positions. Indian companies may be savvy enough to snap up a few qualified and experienced personnel, but for the greater majority of those out of work, India isn't the answer. There is a reason why there are STILL so many Indian workers in Silicon Valley and other technology hubs.

    1. Re:It's no H1B.. by radixvir · · Score: 2, Funny

      here are a few things that are taken for granted in the West, which aren't as easy to get there.

      like maybe having your parents ship you a burger in the mail once in a while

  22. Re:doubt it by Doomdark · · Score: 4, Informative
    People aren't leaving high paid jobs in the US to go work for peanuts in India. I'd rather work at Quiznos.

    Were you by any chance raised by wolves?

    You know, what they get paid in India is relatively speaking most likely very nice amount? Purchasing parity is nice; one can live like a king there... so in some ways they'll be better off there. One can not really afford servants with programmer salary in USA; but can most definitely do that in India. It's not like they go there to starve; quite the opposite. It's even possible that the salaries are getting closer to those of, say, southern Europe ones; and trend is likely to continue. In couple of years high quartile of programmers in India earn more than low quartile in, say, mid-west.

    Furthermore, the article did mention that it may be considered a good career move; working in India helps in managing teams in India, even if one works in USA (assuming there'll be managing jobs remaining in USA). So, it can also be thought of as sort of extreme internship. :-)

    --
    I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
  23. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by tealover · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What happens when you want to move back to the UK? You've spend a better part of your best wage-earning years making Indian wages. When you sell your Indian home and convert it to pounds, what kind of home can you buy when you move back to London?

    I can see people working in India for very short periods of time, but moving from a 1st world nation to a 2nd or 3rd world nation (at least in terms of wages) does not have the same benefits as the reverse situation does.

    For now, I take articles like this as anecdotal at best. Certainly it is not indicative of a viable trend for the majority of people.

    --
    -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
  24. not necessarily a good idea. by tloh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Won't argue with the job opportunities available in places like India and China, but careers aside, are those really suitable places to live for people who've grown up in western environments like the US?

    Last I heard India is still a developing country in many aspects. How may are prepared to share the road with not only automobiles and pedestrians but elephants, sacred bovines, and pack animals which all produce fair shares of manure? Depending on where in india one might relocate to, problems with roaming bands of monkeys and the ocassional wild tiger, rare as they are, would still be unsettling for one who only see beasts in zoos.

    Though China has come a long way from the 60s and 70's, My parents still carry lasting scars from the exesses of the Cultural Revolution. There are still many things that should/could not be addressed in public without considerable risks to the speaker and the listeners. Despite the incredable westernization/commercialization of the general population, China is still very ethnocentric in some regards. In short, American $$$$$ == good, dragonboats, home-grown rockets & national astronauts == better. I'm optimistic about the direction China is headed but I highly doubt it is a suitable place for a western job seeker unless (s)he is willing to make considerable lifestyle and mental adjustments.

    just my 2 cents.

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    1. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by g0qi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Developing country? Sure. But by no means do elephants and "pack animals" roam around and share the roads. Yes, we did make some progress in the last 2000 years. And no, we don't locate our programmers deep inside our jungles.

      And dude, China is communist. India is not. There's a big difference.

      Just my 2 rupees.

      --
      Yea. I know.
    2. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by MaximusTheGreat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You seem to be a chinese origin person, so whatever you say about china may be right, and I will not argue.

      But, puhleese, don't spout ignorant statements about India like roaming tigers on streets in cities.

      Another thing to remember is that India already is a mixed race society, with all shades of the color variations and features from north to south. So, being a puralistic democracy who does not suppress its citizens, are used to living with "different" looking people, free press etc. westereners will have a easier time adjusting.

    3. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by estergum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You would expect to move to another country and not make lifestyle and mental adjustments????

      The can be surprising cultural differences even between western countries.

      I was stunded by the number of beggers in the US when I worked there, in San Francisco at least.
      That and the feet police, in NZ its quite common to strop about in bearfeet. I all most got arrested in a mall because I wasn't wearing shoes.

    4. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by SonOfFlubber · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm....

      Bare feet.. New Zealand... Stropping about...

      Sir, are you, by any chance, a ..... Hobbit?

    5. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by pamri · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Unless you are trying to be another Jim Corbett, you are unlikely to come across even a monkey,forget an elephant or a tiger (???) if you are applying for an executive's job in any of the metro's or urban areas. Of course, cows are there, but nowadays found only in gully areas or residential areas. FYI, I am living in Bangalore for the present and I have contacts with a number of "foreigners", both within my organisation or those visiting it and have yet to find someone who finds the problems you mentioned a reason to leave their jobs here. The person heading the Organisation sharing our office premises has been in Bangalore for around 20+ years and is originally from UK and he not only is v.comfortable, but has mastered the local language quite well. And yes, I am yet to see a sparrow near my house/place of work and come across a cow, only when i take a walk near my house. And economic liberalisation has meant, most upper & middle class attitudes & lifestyles, around the world are more or less the same (ie., good education, a good house in a nice surrounding, good social life, having good spending power,etc.,)

      I am not saying, there won't be any problems in relocation, but rather that some of them may be due to stereotypes you have developed(in your case, seeing a wild tiger) and some could be ignored (seeing cows all around), if your job is challenging or satisfactory enough and you could manage to have a decent lifestyle.

      Some links:
      Myths about Indian Business women
      Outside execs who have succeeded in India

    6. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your last paragraph points out something very important. When you leave liberal societies, you are leaving your freedoms. That is the most important thing. Things like standard of living, etc can be adjusted. But freedoms are something else. Most countries, including India, offer few freedoms. India is nothing more than a kleptocracy, with Hindu fundamentalist tendancies. You are talking about a country where kissing on film (movies) is largely banned, all films are censored, etc. Some people have even been thrown in jail (for short periods of time) for releasing "controversial" films. You are also talking about a corrupt government. And so forth.

      If you are a conservative, or could care less about criticizing the government, then these governments are fine. But if you say something, watch out.

      Same thing with China, except multiply everything I said by 1000x.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  25. The Indian jobs are for managers by hcg50a · · Score: 4, Informative
    From the IHT article:

    "...top-level and middle-level executives from the United States and Britain exploring job opportunities in top technology firms. This is in addition to regular middle-level and top-level management positions held by foreigners in multinational companies that have large operations [in India]."

    It should be noted that the Indian jobs starting to be filled by foreigners are middle- and upper-level management jobs--not software or hardware engineers!
    --
    HCG 50a = 2MASX J11170638+5455016
    11h17m06.4s +54d55m02s
  26. The question to ask is. by composer777 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do we really want this?

    Do we want our lives to be traded as commodities to be moved and shuffled about at the whim of the free market? I'm just going to state a few opinions here. Markets should serve people, not the other way around. When freedom of choice (in this case, where to live), is superceded by the freedom of markets we have a problem. Markets are in theory, supposed to maximize freedom. I don't see how forcing a bunch of people to travel across the world just to eat is an example of "freedom". Instead, it's the commoditizing of humanity. I'd be curious, if we were to interview these travelling workers, what their response would be if they were given a choice between working that job over in India vs America. I'd imagine that they would choose to work closer to home. Imagine if we had a choice, any at all. Imagine if democracy (in other words, allowing those who are affected most by a decision, to make that decision) were placed above capitalism. Instead, what we have is the market being rigged to serve a priveledged few, at the expense of everyone else. There is nothing "free" about being forced to transplant oneself every few years just to eat. Freedom from means nothing without freedom to.

    1. Re:The question to ask is. by HBI · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Markets don't maximize freedom, they maximize productivity. If the market weren't driving people to DO, then everyone would sit on their ass and get a lot less accomplished. You'd have a situation reminiscent of the Soviet Union, where people had a hard time getting enough to eat, never mind other consumer goods.

      Freedom is a joke, do you think being a wage slave is freedom? It's the only way to extract reasonable amounts of effort from an apathetic public.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  27. Re:But wait! by Fookin · · Score: 2, Funny
    Ummm ...
    You decide to move back to the US, with your $2k in savings and... live in a cardboard box, with frequent bathroom trips to the sewer grate on the corner, and the food at the soup kitchen.
    Shouldn't you include something about living in a van down by the river?
  28. You can also try different places in the US by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Calafornia isn't the only place tech jobs are available, they it certianly is one of the most expensive. There are plenty of other states with tech industries, many on the rise, where cost of living is much lower. Now with this generally comes lower pay, but it tends to balance out.

  29. Hate to break up the party... by laigle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But isn't the current trend to move the offshore jobs from India to even crappier places in South America? It's not like the people in a lot of these jobs actually have to speak English, that's just a nicety. As long as a few local management are bilingual everything generally works out. Sure, India will keep the tech support jobs. Until computer voice recognition can run down the scripts then tell you it's someone else's fault.

    Top that with the cost of relocation, the fact that the Indian market already provides fairly ample amounts of trained labor, and the fact that as an American you are going to be at a significant disadvantage trying to work within the social framework there, and you've got a very unattractive option. Oh, and don't forget that you won't be earning enough to ever move back and not be pitifully poor.

    I think using my master's degree to shill cars for a living in the States sounds a tad better.

  30. Re:But wait! by WindowlessView · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With $40k you could live like a king for far longer than 2 years in most parts of India. In fact you can live damn well on that $8k salary.

    As for coming back in a couple of years, you will have more work experience in your profession combined with multicultural and foreign experience. Very healthy things to have on your resume.

    Finally, upon arriving back in the United States you will find that the standard of living will have only dropped further and the cost of living is less than when you left.

    Why do you think that only a year ago so many economists - not to mention Federal Reserve Governors - were sitting on a brick about "deflation". Why do you think US interest rates remain so low despite the fact that there is obvious inflation in some of the commodities? Answer: because there is NO bloody inflation in wages, nor has lower rates increased job creation, at least in the US.

    Remember, the whole point of this global trade is to even things out. That means the US drops and the developing world rises. Most westerners don't have a clue what is in store for them. They think outsourcing is something that happens to textile and call center workers.

    --
    Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
  31. Cost of living != Standard of living by jesterzog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, you may have a job. But you have to reconcile yourself to a lower quality of life in India. It may cost less to live there, but at the same time, there are a few things that are taken for granted in the West, which aren't as easy to get there.

    An economist could explain it better, but to me it seems that cost of living and standard of living aren't directly correlated. (I know it's not exactly what you're saying, but it's worth adding.) Lower quality of living may be true for India, but it isn't true everywhere. If it was, I might be able to travel from New Zealand to the US without paying twice as much for everything once I arrived.

    In short, we have a relatively western culture here. There's good employment doing information-sector types of work, good quality education (although there's now a student loan scheme to get people through higher education), relatively good health care (probably better than the US if what I hear is correct), and so on.

    It's expensive to travel away from here considering a good starting IT wage might be equivalent to about US$30,000, and IT wages are on the high side. It would have been much less than that a year ago, except US currency is doing so much worse on international markets at the moment. That starting amount will get you a reasonable quality of life here, though.

    The lower cost of living and higher quality of education and living is one of the big reasons that, for example, it was so economical for Newline to have the Lord of the Rings films made here, because it's cheap yet there's enough of a technical infrastructure to support it. The other big export industry is tourism, because it's comparitively so cheap for people from high cost-of-living countries to travel here.

    If concern about quality of life is more of an issue than saving up money to take back to the US, then there are other options around the world besides India.

  32. B1H instead of H1B by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nuf sed

  33. More propoganda! by ChilyWily · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Financial Express"?

    whois financialexpress.com displays:

    Registrant:
    The Indian Express Online Media Ltd (JYXCIDMQMD)
    Express Towers, 2nd Floor,
    Nariman Point
    Mumbai, Maharashtra 400021
    IN

    Domain Name: FINANCIALEXPRESS.COM

    Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
    The Indian Express Online Media Ltd (KYYHDIAZUO) hostmaster@bombaybiz.com
    Express Towers, 2nd Floor,
    Nariman Point
    Mumbai, Maharashtra 400021
    IN
    91-022-22884113 fax: 91-022-22044654

    Record expires on 03-Jan-2005.
    Record created on 02-Jan-1998.
    Database last updated on 31-Jan-2004 23:31:58 EST.

    Domain servers in listed order:

    NS1.RILINFO.NET 202.138.96.2
    NS2.RILINFO.NET 202.138.103.100

    surely their views must be impartial!

  34. The Rise of India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems like every second week there's a story on the rise of India in the global economy and its cost to us in the Western world. But I am worried that our thinking is being dominated by anecdotal evidence as opposed to solid data. I'm no expert but in the last hour I spent looking at the situation I've found some things that give me reason to be skeptical.

    For example, if one looks at the ISI Highly Cited website we see that researchers from Western economies still dominate research journals. Suggesting that these countries will countinue to lead the world in technological development in the near future. This of course probably means jobs for those in the industry of researching and developing technology. Just how great the desparity is, is illustrated with a few numbers:

    United States - 2830 highly cited researchers
    United Kingdom - 306 highly cited researchers
    Australia/New Zealand - 78 highly cited researchers
    Switzerland - 60 highly cited researchers
    India - 8 highly cited researchers
    China - 5 highly cited researchers

    Also if we look at the CIA World Fact Book we see Western Economies still appear to have a significantly greater GDP per capita which means there is more money to invest in industry:

    United States - $36,300
    Switzerland - $32,000
    Australia - $26,900
    United Kingdom - $25,500
    China - $4,700
    India - $2,600

    Indeed, I can't help but feel that we're overemphasizing India. That they are really the IT sweat-shops of the 21st century and while they may be master code-monkeys the chief beneficiaries of their work will be the Western world. Who will get cheap labor and services but still carry out most of the research, design, marketing and retail. This article mentions specifically significantly reduced operating costs and 500,000 jobs moving overseas, but the latter statistic is useless unless we know how many other jobs are (or are not) going to crop up to replace them and where. My post isn't really an informed opinion on the matter, but what I hope it will do is encourage others to think critically about the situation instead of getting tied up in the tsunami of pessimistic articles posted on Slashdot.

  35. "Stand on Zanzibar" by myowntrueself · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its a book.
    Remarkably prophetic in many ways.

    I'd recommend it in light of this thread.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  36. Re:India is not for Me by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Curry, much like garlic, comes out of the pores.
    There's a spice called fenugreek which is in english style curry powder and in a few different curries - it has a strong flavour and a strong smell. If you eat a lot of fenugreek the smell comes out through your skin for a few days - the usual curry won't do it, but if you grow it as sprouts you can eat a lot of the stuff because the flavour is milder (it tastes really good in a sandwich). It's a bit embarrassing smelling precisely like Keens Curry Powder for a couple of days, it's in your skin so it won't wash off.

    in close proximity to a billion people eating curry all day long
    Beats the smell of a grease trap behind KFC any day. If people can get used to living near hot springs in a few days, then different cooking smells shouldn't be a problem.
  37. It has to balance out eventually by MrMrBen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Think about it. Let's imagine that it gets to the point that there are so few good jobs in the U.S., that large numbers of Americans decide to emigate to India to get a call center job answering tech support questions for Dell customers in the U.S. Clearly that couldn't happen, because there wouldn't be anyone left in the U.S. who could afford a Dell at U.S. prices anymore. Before any significant number of worker emigrate to India for jobs, the U.S. economy would have to drop to India's level. If the only jobs in the U.S. were at McDonald's, then the U.S. would no longer be a rich country, and we wouldn't be able to afford to outsorce jobs to India anymore.

  38. India is creating jobs in the US by spanklin · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Check this article out. An Indian manufacturing company built a factory in Virginia.

    Apparently, the VA location beat out Mexico to land the factory. No joke.

  39. Good for recent college grads by zpiderz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I for one, know a few people (me included) that are open to jobs abroad after college. Right after college is a great time to do something new and interesting in a new environment. In a decade, having global experience will be a very valuable trait.

    As for the retirement aspect or moving back to the U.S. In a decade or two India's economy will grow big enough to match many of those around the world.

    Many people think India is 3rd world, but from what I've heard about their big cities, they're pretty much exactly like our metropolitan hubs. Yeah, the rest of the country needs to catch up, but don't you think Wyoming needs to catch up the rest of the U.S. too?

  40. Broaden your abilities by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With the current situation in the Tech industry, it is more important now than ever to broaden your field of expertise. Don't do just "programming", but get more training in a field that needs programmers and researchers. For example, I just graduated with my Comp Sci BA, and am now getting my Masters. Except now I'm specializing my degree in bioinformatics (a highly growing field). General programmers are a dime-a-dozen right now, so make yourself marketable.

  41. Who gives a fuck about IT jobs anymore? by MSBob · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I worked as developer in this industry for over eight years. But there is only so much humiliaton and abuse and disregard that one can endure in a career. What the fuck is a softwae developer's career worth anyway? We are always the bottom of the corporate totem pole, we are treated as nerds and misfits and now we don't even have a good paycheck or any sense of security. Fuck that I say. You can kiss my J2EE development ass.

    I'm switching careers to trades. It isn't that hard and most of us can work with our hands and will take twenty seconds instead of twenty minutes to calculate how much tile is needed for the bathroom walls. I've already done a few tiling projects on the side and now I'm getting my electrician's papers. Soon I'll be able to cover everything from finishing carpentry to wiring and plumbing. Pays just as well as the office job did at peak if you're willing to work hard. Last month I netted $5,000CAD (I live north of the border) which is a very healthy sum here especially that that's AFTER TAX money. And wehn was the last time you heard of a plumber being outsourced to India? That's right my friedns, when that pipe bursts in your CEO's house even the 20,000 Indians he's hired arent gonna be much use at 15,000 miles away.

    So my friends, next time you hear that your job is getting shipped to India tell your manager that she can kiss your ass goodbye because it's a great opportunity to give up your (most likely) shitty job and do something useful instead. You'll be surprised how rewarding trades can be compared to an office job.

    Oh and in the evening (that's right trade jobs run 9 to 5 not 8 to midnight, imagine that!) when you get home there is no reason not to fire up the computer and do some open source coding, for fun, without the stresss and aggravation of a PHB meddling with good things and making stupid suggestions. Write some great software and donate it to Open Source. Even Indians can't compete with that pricing model :-)

    So my friends this is our new reality we all have to face. We all love programming but it doesn't make us money anymore. It started out as a hobby (for most of us) and now is the time it went back to being a hobby. For a living however, we must do something more lucrative that can't be outsourced by the next bunch of stuffed shirts. Like trades.

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    1. Re:Who gives a fuck about IT jobs anymore? by vacuum_tuber · · Score: 5, Interesting

      MSBob wrote:

      "...You'll be surprised how rewarding trades can be compared to an office job."

      I agree. After 40 years of very serious software development (OS internals, languages, macro processors, protocols, device drivers, machine and peripheral emulators -- not JavaShit or Visual Barfic), I am changing careers because it seems no one wants actual, real software designers/developers anymore. So I say, "Screw 'em all!"

      I got a hint of what was to come in 1990 when I moved into this house and had cable hooked up. The installer seemed too bright, too articulate. We talked. He was a degreed electronic engineer who used to design the "sleds" that give those thigh-mounted data entry devices we see being used by inventory takers their specific functions and behaviors. He quit and became a cable TV installer because of low pay, long hours, abuse and PHBs. He never looked back. In his new job he had variety every day, was outside a lot in fresh air and sunshine, was never seriously put out, and never took his job home with him.

      I've never been ideologically anti-corporate, but it's now clear to me that corporate America is committing suicide. I no longer care. I'll donate the bullet or the razor or the match, however they want to put themselves out of their misery.

      --
      Look at the bright side: there's always seppuku.
  42. Re:doubt it by dj245 · · Score: 2, Funny
    "So, it can also be thought of as sort of extreme internship. :-)"

    Next on CBS Reality Thusday: Extreme Internships- India.
    Watch Jack edge out Ganaraj with his sharp mastery of the english language and superior problem-solving skills. Will Sharon become the next IT manager, or will Mahakanta beat her to it with her better memorization skills?

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  43. Re:doubt it by MSBob · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Lower purchasing parity blah, blah... Live lika a king in country X blah, blah... everything including a house costs under a thousand greenbacks blah, blah...

    Where the fuck do you guys get those stories from? I happen to have been born in a pretty inexpensive country (Eastern Europe). Yes some things are cheaper over there BUT my salary back home would have been an equivalent of $16,000US. A three bedroom house there costs $150,000. A new car costs $25,000. A meal in a restaurant runs up around $30. Yeah. so it's cheaper than the US. By about 20%. Except salaries (even for programmers) are about 70% lower. Stop daydreaming you are not going to live a lavish life if you move to an Indian IT sweatshop to be a code monkey for da man. However many rupees they'll pay you is definitely not going to make your life more comfortable than an average American can afford. There is a reason why US has the highest PER CAPITA Gross Domestic Product in the world.

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
  44. Re:How does 50%+ income tax rub ya? by vistic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm fine with high income tax if somethings done with it.

    In many of those countries the result is less of a divide between rich and poor... most people are distinctly middle class, which is almost the only class. And their government takes care of everyone nicely and provides for its citizens. It's big government without being overbearing and infringing on its citizens liberties. I personally think countries like Denmark are role models for the rest of the world these days.

  45. You still pay US taxes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nobody seems to be aware of the fact that you still have to pay US taxes if you work abroad. That is in addition to whatever taxes you pay in the host country.

  46. It's going to happen eventually by foo12 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My company just asked me to relocate to the Philippines for a 1-2 years (minimum) so they have someone on-site at all times. Now keep in mind my situation is different from most people in the tech industry --- I'm keeping my hourly wage, and the company is covering my housing expenses (I would have a 3-bedroom villa in a gated community, a maid, a security guard and a driver --- all that is costing them less than US$1000/month). So the deal is sweeter than moving to India, but the principles are the same.

    Right now I'm in the middle of my first trip to the Philippines and it's been... a trip to say the least. Everything about this experience has been positive, largely because Filipinos seem, as a whole, a happy, gregarious people.

    Everyone here speaks at least some English and anyone with an office job speaks exceptional English. The only place we ever stumble is on phrases and idioms. (Quite honestly English here is on average better than in the states --- McDonald's employees speak better English than they do in the US)

    Food is American friendly... if you absolutely must, there's McDonalds, KFC, PizzaHut, etc. but the local food is also quite good. Markets and grocery stores are fine, and you can certainly muster American fare from what you can find there. And everything is cheap --- I ate for about $3/day last week and, last night, splurged and bought a $10 meal at a resort restaraunt.

    After that I went out to one of the hottest clubs in the city and spent about $30 on cover charge, a couple drinks for myself, and a round for 15 of my coworkers. (When I say coworkers I mean "very intelligent, funny, cute, single women all under 30" we'll leave it at that.)

    My advice -- don't reject the idea of moving overseas outright. Regardless if you come back ahead or not, it's going to be a great life experience and be a nice item on your resume.

  47. Temperatures in India by PaneerParantha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For those who are considering moving to India.

    Temperatures in India range from -40 celsius to +50.

    In the Northern part of India, we have extreme climate, but in the southern, where Bangalore in located, we have equable type of climate.

    In the North, the mighty Himalayas and many hill stationsare relatively closer. You can go to these hill stations like the British used to do. Sometimes they had two capitals, one for summers and another for winter.

    There are several scenic spots in Southern India. I have never been there, but tourists' accounts say that it is greener and cleaner. Kerala is a very beautiful place. It is ruled by Communists though.

    Sports.
    India is crazy about cricket. It is like baseball except that you can hit the ball and choose not to run.

    If the temperature is a low 38 degrees in April and you don't feel like working, you can always go out and play cricket.

    Diet.
    Indian food is world renowned. However, lot of mixing (also known as adulteration) occurs. The net result is that you don't get to consume as much fat as you would in USA or Canada or UK. Therefore, you lose weight. Also, 365 days of sun per year ensures you become more tanned.

    Imagine the combined effect of this. Once you go back home after a stint in India, girls are going to make a beeline for you.

  48. Weird by Pedrito · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just saw a job posting on a website yesterday that specified that they were looking for people who were willing to work at "Indian Salary Levels" and then pointed to an Indian job web site as a reference to find out what "competitive" bids were.

    That definitely has me a bit concerned. I'm a programmer and I work out of Mexico, so while I can offer pretty competitive rates, I still expect to get paid well. Unfortunately the market is saturated by programmers, and I believe with time, that will change as programers continue to drop out because of job competition.

    Really, my take on it, at least in the States, is that a lot of people went into software to make money. I think now that it's harder to make good money at it, the ones that are going to stick around are going to generally be the ones who really love doing it. Hopefully that will level the market out a bit.

    The fact remains that some of us are quite skilled at what we do and that some people, no matter how hard they try, aren't going to be nearly as good as those of us who are in this field because we love the write software and have a natural ability with it. For the same reason, I'll never play guitar like Eddie Van Halen or paint like Van Gogh (and that's not to imply that I think I'm the Eddie Van Halen or Vincent Van Gogh of computer programming).

    For most of the time I've been in this field (the last 4 years notwithstanding), most of the programmers were people that really loved it and the ratio of really good programmers to mediocre programers was fairly high. That ratio has reversed in the past few years. When it returns, I suspect the pay will get closer to what we expect as well.

    Even here in Mexico, and granted, I live in one of the pricier towns in Mexico, living at Indian pay rates is simply out of the question.