Slashdot Mirror


Gimp Hits 2.0

jf writes "Gimp 2.0 released! From gimp.org: "This release is a major event, marking the end of a three year development cycle by a group of volunteers and enthusiasts who have made this the most professional release of the GIMP ever. It is the first stable release that is officially supported not only on Unix-based operating systems, but also on Microsoft Windows and Macintosh OS X." Get it from ftp.gimp.org or from the mirror sites."

69 of 637 comments (clear)

  1. Sweet! by SillySnake · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now maybe I can figure out how to use the thing.

    1. Re:Sweet! by frs_rbl · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now maybe I can figure out how to use the thing.

      In Soviet Russia... nevermind

      --
      This is not my opinion. Actually, it's not even an opinion. And I'm nowhere to be seen near it
    2. Re:Sweet! by Deusy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Now maybe I can figure out how to use the thing.

      It's not difficult - you can find some good tutorials at gug.sunsite.dk.

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

  2. Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it's officially supported - where's the Windows binary then? :-?

    1. Re:Windows? by houseofmore · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where's the nice little .zip with a setup.exe?

      Right beside your colouring book and lunchbox!

    2. Re:Windows? by Chupa · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here are windows binaries in a nice installer. 2.0pre4 is the newest release available at the moment, but it is working fine for me right now.

    3. Re:Windows? by 13Echo · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can just hit "Prt Scr" (Print Screen) and paste it into GIMP as a new image.

    4. Re:Windows? by houseofmore · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dear no... I would never suggest a windows user compile anything!!!

      http://www.gimp.org/windows/

      "This site, www.gimp.org, only distributes the source code to the GIMP (the building blocks). You can however download executable versions from the following sites:

      Jernej Simoncic provides an installer program that automates the installation process. This is the most convenient way to install the GIMP for Windows.


      http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/gimp/

    5. Re:Windows? by tempest303 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ok, that was cold, harsh, and probably just another brick in the wall to mainstream Linux adoption, due to elitism. It was also really damn funny. Have a sense of humor, people!

    6. Re:Windows? by eggsome · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Look I detest stupid users as much as the next person, but come on! If you want Graphic artists to use this and make it popular you have to make it easy for them. Not because they are dumb, but because they have a different speciality to you.
      (I'd like to see you create a stylish piece of artwork in Quark/Illistrator/Photoshop, it's a real skill - that's why they get paid decent amounts of money).

      --
      If they made a movie of your life, would anybody buy a ticket?
    7. Re:Windows? by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You nailed it with "I can tell you that when your customer is an artist, quite often it absolutely is more important how something looks than what it does". While I agree with the sentiment of targeting your audience with an appropriate design, they aren't my "customer" - I am.

      These artists who are moaning about The Gimp are complaining about a free app they won't invest the time to learn. If they were paying me a few hundred dollars then fine, I'll worry about it and bust a nut trying to make it aesthetically pleasing for them. But they're not, so I'll make it functional to get the job done. If it's too ugly, these graphic artists are more than welcome to whip up a screen shot or concept of what they actually want. Maybe then some clueless programming like me can provide something that has both the functionality and mad stylz to keep everyone happy. Unfortunately, most of them seem more interested in prima-donna bitchings about how nasty and un-Photoshop-like The Gimp's UI is. I've heard similar moans when faced with PhotoPaint, PaintShop Pro and Photogenics too.

      I should also point out that some of The Gimp users (and developers) are rather well respected graphic artists in their own right and produce some very nice artwork indeed, some of which lands in open source projects. The UI not withstanding.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  3. Excellent by Caedar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm glad that this release improves the accessability to normal enthusiasts. A person pointed me to the Gimp once about half a year ago, and I couldn't stand to use it because of the god-awful interface that I encountered. I'll definitely give it a try.

    1. Re:Excellent by vandan · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've been using a pre-release version ( compiled via Gentoo's portage system ) and I'm very impressed with it indeed.

      The text tool has undergone a MAJOR overhaul and is far more powerful than in the old Gimp-1.3. When you add text, it creates a layer of it's own instead of being dumped onto the current layer, and you can go back and edit the text and font etc after you've added it. This saves me a lot of time, because I often add text, add some effects, do something else, adn then come back and think ... 'maybe I should have done *this* with the text instead'. The text tool is cool try it out.

      Also there are a lot of scripts and plugins ( at least in the Gentoo build ) that do some powerful stuff - bevelling & 3d outlining and all sorts of things.

      While the addition of the menus at the top are merely cosmetic, it will at least shut up all the users who can't get the hang of the right-click menu system.

      Win32 support is also interesting, as it means that GTK2 under Windows shouldn't be too far off. Personally, I'd LOVE to be able to write Perl / GTK2 apps that run under Windows, and it looks like I might be able to soon :)

    2. Re:Excellent by zerblat · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Sodipodi is a vector-based drawing program. GIMP is a raster image manipulation program. They have different purposes and can't really be compared.

      If you really can't figure out how to draw a rectangle in the GIMP, I'm guessing you've never used Photoshop or any other similar image manipulation program. You probably want to read up a bit, there's plenty of books, online tutorials etc.

      Anyway, the answer to your question: 1. Make a selection with the desired shape. 2. Fill the selection with the desired color.

      --
      Please alter my pants as fashion dictates.
    3. Re:Excellent by lunartech · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've been using the beta version of 2.0 for a few weeks now and I think the user interface is a vast improvement. I've used The Gimp on a regular basis previously because it's great for the majority of graphics stuff. But I used to get a bit sick of right-clicking the image to get a menu in the old version. Simply adding a menu bar above the image has made a huge difference for me, not to mention the new docking features to reduce onscreen clutter etc. Top work guys !

  4. Gimp Hits 2.0? by KodaK · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is that on K-tel records?

    Do I get one free if I order Mr. Microphone?

    --
    --J(K) DOS is like Unix in exactly the same way that a pinto is like an aircraft carrier.
    1. Re:Gimp Hits 2.0? by Diamon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey good lookin' I'll be back to pick you up later!

  5. Who's unix-based? by Whosawhatsis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Last time I checked, MacOS X was at least as "Unix-Based" (darwin) as Linux, if not more...

    --
    I was offered a penny for my thoughts, so I gave my two cents... I got ripped off!
  6. Fantastic! by thesupraman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, I've been using the betas under both linux and windows for a month or so now, and I must say that this is a FANTASTIC improvement, which goes much deeper than just the improved UI.

    Before this I used to use photoshop for much of my work, and Gimp for areas where I either needed the software on a machine that did not warrant a photoshop license, or to deal with alpha layers properly (which photoshop is terrible for). Photoshop is great for printing based people, but has some major miss-features for computer graphics use.

    Gimp 2.0 however is much better than photoshop IMHO for many many jobs, although it is still just a bit lacking in the automation-of-tasks area.

    Congratulations and Thanks to all the people involved in this fantastic piece of software!

    1. Re:Fantastic! by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Informative
      Photoshop is great for printing based people, but has some major miss-features for computer graphics use.

      You obviously haven't used a recent version. Photoshop CS(8.0) works very nicely for computer graphics, including stuff Gimp doesn't do, like channel/layer based JPEG compression control, which is invaluable for web designers. Adobe has been improving the integration between all their apps, and I'm a big fan; I've posted about it before.

      Photoshop also supports color management through and through- GIMP never has out of the box and never will, because there's no such thing as color management under linux; it's not builtin to X, there are zero calibration devices for linux, etc. Even gamma is something of a mess under Linux.

      Last but not least, Photoshop CS includes a RAW decoder for most of the pro digital cameras and many prosumer units. It is nothing short of amazing and almost worth the price tag alone; you gain quite a bit more color depth with RAW images(depends on the camera- without getting into digital medium/large format backs, the best you can get right now is 12 bit per channel) and the plugin lets you tweak many, many parameters- with nearly instant preview. Nothing compares, even on the Macintosh or PC side...only Capture One could be considered better. dcraw is a joke...

    2. Re:Fantastic! by irokitt · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Gimp? Photoshop? Automation of tasks? Bah.

      REAL nerds use a hex editor. Using a Dvorak keyboard!

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    3. Re:Fantastic! by Deusy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      [Photoshop does stuff] like channel/layer based JPEG compression control, which is invaluable for web designers.

      Um, I'm a web designer. How is that invaluable?

      I think you're eating too much of the hamburger that Adobe is feeding you with buzzwords like that.

      Gimp creates jpegs just fine. If you require ultimate fine-grained control over image creation then I'd wager:
      1. You're using too many images in your website. Learn CSS.
      2. You're wasting your time when you could be doing more productive things which would help you create your websites more quickly instead of worrying about 1k or so in a jpeg. It's ok, we have broadband (or 56k modems at the very worst).
      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    4. Re:Fantastic! by DVega · · Score: 4, Informative
      "Photoshop also supports color management through and through- GIMP never has out of the box and never will, because there's no such thing as color management under linux; it's not builtin to X, there are zero calibration devices for linux, etc. Even gamma is something of a mess under Linux."

      You mean color managemnt like this ?

      --
      MOD THE CHILD UP!
  7. Newsforge Article by amigoro · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here is the Newsforge Article about the new GIMP that appeared a couple of weeks ago.

    The screenshots look simply awsome.

    Going to install that now.

    Moderate this comment
    Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
    Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

    --


    Nothing to see here
  8. mac binary... by millahtime · · Score: 3, Informative

    the mac binary gimp.app is still prerelease 3. it isn't updated yet.

  9. Free of Floating Window by ospirata · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, I will finally get to know how to use it eaither. These floating window schema was the dummiest thing ever. Well, actually now there is Sun LookingGlass... DIA could do the same,

    1. Re:Free of Floating Window by Squareball · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I thought the same thing until I got a mac. Photoshop works exactly like the Gimp does in regards to the floating windows. After working with Photoshop like this, I have come to get used to it and don't mind it at all. But it is a bit of shock when you come from Win32 Photoshop to this crazy set of floating windows.

    2. Re:Free of Floating Window by ibbey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I disagree. I prefer it. I think the "window within a window" style that microsoft often employs is cumbersome. I want to be able to put a window anywhere on the screen that I want to put it. It's much more managable. I guess when using windows it could get confusing if you have multiple apps open, and the gimp windows are scattered around. With Linux though I keep my apps spread out over multiple virtual workspaces so it's not an issue.

      This shouldn't be an issue for anyone. All they really need to do is change the app so that if any GIMP window is brought to the front, then they all are. It's a nusicance to have to manually move three (or more) seperate windows to the front everytime you want to switch apps. The Mac uses a similar windowing style, except for this key difference. On the Mac, toolbox windows are not considered first-class windows. They only get focus when their parent app is active, and then they automatically become active. If GIMP handled things this way, no one would complain. But instead, each window is managed completely indepently, so you must manually activate each window.

      Sure, you can move GIMP to a seperate desktop, but there are numerous reasons that people may not want to do so. For example, new users won't know how. In my case, I don't like switching desktops since it's considerably slower then just switching apps (at least on my system).

    3. Re:Free of Floating Window by ibbey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My problem with GIMP is that I lose the main toolbar window. It gets lost behind various images, layer windows, tool property windows, etc.. When I need to change tools I have to go hunting for the right window.

      That's exactly what I'm talking about. If they would just automatically bring that window to the front when your image window is focused, it would eliminate about 90% of the complaints that I have heard.

  10. Re:Photoshop still rocks it by phoenix.bam! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Photoshop is definitely much better and more mature than the Gimp, but it comes with a $600 pricetag. The Gimp starts to become more of an option when you don't have to use some of the more intensive photoshop filters. (So people actually do pay for photoshop, enough-so that Adobe had some good earnings this quarter).

    no reason to knock the gimp. It has an amazing cost to ability ratio.

  11. Since the mirror list will be slashdotted... by Troy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a formatting-free, cut-and-paste, hack job.

    mmmmm.....karma...

    Africa
    ftp://ftp.is.co.za/applications/gimp/
    Australia
    ftp://ftp.planetmirror.com/pub/gimp/
    http://ftp.planetmirror.com/pub/gimp/ (web access)
    ftp://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/gimp/
    http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/gimp/ (web access)
    ftp://gimp.zeta.org.au/
    Austria
    ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/graphics/gimp/
    Denmark
    ftp://ftp.jaquet.dk/pub/gimp/
    Finland
    ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/graphics/packages/gimp/
    France
    ftp://ftp.minet.net/pub/gimp/
    http://ftp.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/pub/gimp/ (web access)
    Germany
    ftp://ftp.fh-heilbronn.de/pub/mirrors/ftp.gimp.org /
    ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/misc/grafik/gimp/
    http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/misc/grafik/gimp/ (web access)
    Greece
    ftp://sunsite.ics.forth.gr/sunsite/pub/gimp/
    Irel and
    ftp://ftp.esat.net/mirrors/ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/
    http://ftp.esat.net/mirrors/ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/ (web access)
    Japan
    ftp://SunSITE.sut.ac.jp/pub/archives/packages/gimp /
    ftp://ftp.u-aizu.ac.jp/pub/graphics/tools/gimp/
    ftp://ftp.ring.gr.jp/pub/graphics/gimp/
    http://www.ring.gr.jp/pub/graphics/gimp/ (web access)
    http://mirror.nucba.ac.jp/mirror/gimp/ (web access)
    ftp://mirror.nucba.ac.jp/mirror/gimp/
    Korea
    ftp://ftp.kreonet.re.kr/pub/tools/X11/ftp.gimp.org /
    Netherlands
    ftp://gnu.kookel.org/pub/gimp/
    http://gnu.kookel.org/ftp/gimp/ (web access)
    ftp://ftp.snt.utwente.nl/pub/software/gimp/gimp/
    http://ftp.snt.utwente.nl/pub/software/gimp/gimp/ (web access)
    Norway
    ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/gimp/
    Poland
    ftp://ftp.tuniv.szczecin.pl/pub/Linux/gimp/
    ftp://sunsite.icm.edu.pl/pub/graphics/gimp/
    Roman ia
    ftp://ftp.kappa.ro/pub/mirrors/ftp.gimp.org/
    ftp://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/pub/mirrors/ftp.gimp.org/
    http://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.gimp.org/ (web access)
    Russia
    ftp://ftp.sai.msu.su/pub/unix/graphics/gimp/mirror /
    http://gimp.tsuren.net/mirror/gimp/ (web access)
    Spain
    http://sunsite.rediris.es/mirror/gimp/ (web access)
    ftp://ftp.rediris.es/mirror/gimp/
    Sweden
    ftp://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gimp/
    ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/gnu/gimp/
    http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/gnu/gimp/ (web access)
    Turkey
    ftp://ftp.hun.edu.tr/pub/linux/gimp/
    United Kingdom
    ftp://ftp.flirble.org/pub/X/gimp/gimp/
    ftp://unix.hensa.ac.uk/mirrors/ftp.gimp.org/pub/gi mp/
    United States
    ftp://ftp.cs.umn.edu/pub/gimp/

    1. Re:Since the mirror list will be slashdotted... by FrostedWheat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most of these mirrors don't have it yet, but the Australian one (Planet Mirror) and the UK one (flirble.org) have it.

    2. Re:Since the mirror list will be slashdotted... by BigSven · · Score: 3, Informative

      This one (in Sweden) has the tarballs mirrored as well: http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gimp/gimp/v2.0/

  12. I had a dream by N8F8 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had a dream that I woke up surrounded by windows floating around before my eyes. I knew what I wanted was in one of the windows -answer just on the tip of my tongue. As each window passed by, confusing icons flashed symbols -almost helping me figure it out.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:I had a dream by mvdw · · Score: 4, Funny

      You wrote:

      I had a dream that I woke up surrounded by windows floating around before my eyes. I knew what I wanted was in one of the windows -answer just on the tip of my tongue. As each window passed by, confusing icons flashed symbols -almost helping me figure it out.

      Then your sig states:

      Real programmers don't comment! It was hard to write, It should be hard to read!

      There's some irony in there, somewhere...

  13. It's pretty good! by gilesjuk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I did a usability study of GIMP 1.3 running on Windows and most people who had Photoshop experience soon got the hang of it.

    Finally they've added a menu onto each project window, but it is still lacking in one way, the number of entries on the window bar. Each tool dock creates its own entry which causes clutter. It should be possible to have one entry but who knows, maybe this isn't possible with current versions of GTK? Photoshop does this by having the dock windows within a container window.

    Other minor niggles, the icons are much improved over v1.2 but I still find them a bit unclear. The knife icon for cropping resembles a brush and I don't really see how a drop of water represents Blur/Sharpen?

    While I do like the new dock and the tabs, it's unusable if you resize the toolbox window into a very narrow strip. Meaning at the resolution I run at (1152x864) it takes up around a fifth of the screen width.

    But it's much better than 1.2 anyway!!!

    1. Re:It's pretty good! by evilviper · · Score: 3, Funny
      I don't really see how a drop of water represents Blur/Sharpen?

      Good point... What would you recomend? Perhaps an icon of a few beers to represent blur?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  14. Re:Got CMYK? by thesupraman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And does photoshop still have broken alpha, there it tried to use a non-standard tiff layer to represent what 100% of other software places in a standardised alpha layer?

    I'll keep my Gimp thank!

    And yes, I use this professionally, very porfessionally, I produce live television graphics systems. Photoshop has the most broken alpha support of anything out there!

    Photoshop was designed for prepress use, and is broken for most other purposes.

    Gimp 2.0, which I have been using in beta for some time, does everything better than photoshop, other than CMYK support (not an issue for anyone but prepress) and automation, which is a little more clunky. It more than makes up for these things in it's fineness of control for basic functions, and speed.

  15. Re:Gentoo by S.+Traaken · · Score: 5, Informative

    mkdir -p /etc/portage && echo '=media-gfx/gimp*' >> /etc/portage/package.unmask

    and never edit profiles/package.mask again.

  16. Re:What about simple drawing functionality ? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Informative

    You could always draw straight lines with a minimum of trouble.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  17. Re:What about simple drawing functionality ? by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Is it, at last, possible to simply draw lines or arcs ? It is pretty useful, so why do they snub such functionalities?"

    For the same reason it dosn't serve web pages. It is not a drawing tool, it is an Image Manipulation Program. Not that I would mind if they addedd better drawing functionality.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  18. Installer for Windows by yivi · · Score: 5, Informative
  19. Re:What about simple drawing functionality ? by prockcore · · Score: 4, Informative

    is it, at last, possible to simply draw lines or arcs ? It is pretty useful, so why do they snub such functionalities ?

    This has always been possible. To draw a line, select a paintbrush or a pencil. Click on the start of the line, shift-click on the end of the line.

    To draw a circle, use the circle selection tool, and then go to edit->stroke. To draw an arc, just draw the circle on a new layer, and erase the part you don't want.

  20. Re:Photoshop! by gilesjuk · · Score: 4, Informative

    CinePaint (formerly known as FilmGimp) has been used in quite a few well known films and was forked from Gimp 1.x.

    Link to CinePaint

  21. Re:This sounds like a good time for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a graphic artist and I use gimp and photoshop, along with opencanvas, illustrator and painter. They are all essential parts of my work. Gimp may not be as good as photoshop, but I use it for small effects because I like the look it achieves. It's kind of like using a ballpoint pen instead of a pencil. Sure, graphite pencils or quality brush pens are better, but the look of ballpoint can't be duplicated by anything else.

    Really though, you probably don't really understand why photoshop is better than gimp to begin with. You probably like it because of the crappy filters and effects that come with it, but those are a total joke to anyone slightly professional. Everyone who is serious uses his own custom brushes and textures, and I use photoshop the most because of the power it has over brush controls (especially with my wacom tablet). Gimp still has it's place though, and it's an important one.

    It's not just me, either. There are several other artists in my studio who use gimp all the time, too.

  22. Re:The biggest changes... by Wakkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I have no graphics experience whatsoever."

    That's probably a good thing.. That way you're not stuck thinking, "hmph.. that's not how photoshop does it."

  23. Re:Got CMYK? by Lalakis · · Score: 3, Informative

    BTW, if you really need CMYK support in gimp now, you may look at http://www.blackfiveservices.co.uk/separate.shtml . It is a really nice plugin and gimp won't match its functionality for a long time (full CMYK support in gimp is planned to be complete sometime in spring 2005...).

  24. Website is much improved. by Chilliwilli · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow love the new website! If you've not seen how bad (out of date) the old one was then give it a look. The website has finally updated to reflect the quality of the software.. now if only Glade's website would do the same my two favourite apps would have made themselves presentable to others.

    --
    Cure cancer.. and stuff! www.team45.info
  25. Re:EXIF. by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 5, Informative
    According to page 7 of this release document,

    Data stored in EXIF tags by digital cameras are now handled in read and write mode for JPEG files.

  26. Re:Got CMYK? by stubear · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Photoshop is not broken but if you want to play the part of the drama queen, don't let me stop you. Here's a discussion about how and why Photoshop handles alphas and transparency. Here's a small hint, they're actually two seperate concepts. Chris Cox, by the way, is one of the Photoshop developers so he knows what he's talking about.

  27. Re:Missing the point of CMYK? by El · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you can't code, then go to rentacoder or simular sites and pay somebody to add the features you think you need... chances are it will still be cheaper than paying for an equivalent commercial product. What part of "It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness" are you not quite clear on?

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  28. Re:Got CMYK? by MooseByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "You need CMYK? CODE it or PAY someone to do it for you."

    But isn't that what he's doing by paying for a commerical application (Photoshop in this case)?

    "Open source is not about getting stuff for free, but giving and receiving."

    At the risk of being called flamebait, that won't do spit of good toward a true Desktop Linux end-user solution. Those of us developing software can give as well as take. But Joe End-User just wants to get their job done. Take take take. The mantra of the end-user.

    And that's exactly what desktop linux is going to have to address, heck embrace.

  29. Gimp for Windows (version 2.0pre4) by lent · · Score: 4, Informative
    From: http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/gimp/development.ht ml
    GIMP for Windows
    FAQ | Stable version | Development version | Source code | ] Installers for GIMP for Windows Development version download

    This is the development version of The Gimp. It will open a console (MS-DOS) window when it's run to display debugging messages. Do not close this window.

    It is highly recommended to update GTK2 to the newest version before installing Gimp 2.0pre4, as some bugs have been fixed since the last release.

    Note: The Gimp binary available from this page was compiled for Pentium MMX or better CPUs.

    GTK+ 2 for Windows (version 2.2.4-20040124) 3619 kB GTK+ 2 runtime environment. This package is required by The Gimp 2.0.
    MirrorFTPHTTPProvided by ftp.arnes.si Download - Academic and research network Of Slovenia ftp.flamingtext.com Download - FlamingText --> files.akl.lt Download Download Atviras kodas Lietuvai ftp.freenet.de Download Download freenet.de --> The Gimp for Windows (version 2.0pre4) 6807 kB Gimp 2.0pre4 for Windows.
    MirrorFTPHTTPProvided by ftp.arnes.si Download - Academic and research network Of Slovenia ftp.flamingtext.com Download - FlamingText * --> files.akl.lt Download Download Atviras kodas Lietuvai ftp.freenet.de Download Download freenet.de --> Additional plug-ins for The Gimp 742 kB This package contains Gimp-FreeType (CVS 20040202) and Gimp Animation Package (1.3.25) plug-ins for Gimp 2.0pre2.
    Warning: both these plug-ins are considered unstable.
    Note: Due to a problem with the GTK+ installer, the FreeType plug-in will not work, unless you copy the file freetype-6.dll to freetype6.dll in C:\Program Files\Common Files\GTK\2.0\bin\ folder.
    MirrorFTPHTTPProvided by ftp.arnes.si Download - Academic and research network Of Slovenia -->

    If you wish to compile plug-ins for use with this Gimp version, you can get the development files here.

    Development version download This is the development v

  30. Re:This piece of crap crashes on Windws for no rea by Scutter · · Score: 5, Funny

    This piece of crap crashes on Windows for no reason
    Tried it, blew it off. Highly unrecommended.


    Yeah, Windows has that tendency. Glad to see you've decided to switch to another OS. ;-)

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  31. Re:isn't this what bittorrent was created for? by lart2150 · · Score: 5, Informative

    ya and that's why I made a torrent :-) now let's watch my tracker/web server die http://engert.us/gimp-2.0.0.tar.bz2.torrent

  32. Mac OS X IS a Unix-based operating system... by chaoskitty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is the first stable release that is officially supported not only on Unix-based operating systems, but also on Microsoft Windows and Macintosh OS X.

    That's like saying that it's supported not only on Windows, but on Windows 98. Mac OS X IS a Unix based operating system.

    1. Re:Mac OS X IS a Unix-based operating system... by fdobbie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, except that the GIMP runs in Mac OS X's X11 environment. This is basically XFree86, so it has exactly the same API as it does on every other platform.

  33. What about color calibration? by MrScience · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does it support ICC profiles? This is something that's really important to me. My old version of Adobe has a tendancy to crash when printing >100MB images, so I've resorted to tweaking in photoshop and printing in Gimp... but it'd be nice to do it all in Gimp.

    --

    You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

    1. Re:What about color calibration? by Lalakis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's coming! From a really recent post of Sven Neumann to gimp-user list:
      "GIMP 2.0 comes with a color proof display filter that uses ICC color profiles to simulate a proof on your monitor. Support for such filters is new in 2.0 and for the future it is planned to integrate display filter modules better into the workflow."

  34. Re:Photoshop still rocks it by MooseByte · · Score: 4, Funny

    Photoshop still rocks it ... but can you edit your last night's girl picture [...]?

    No doubt to mask the pronounced adam's apple and large knuckles that didn't seem nearly as apparent when s/he approached after the third beer.

  35. Re:Photoshop still rocks it by myklgrant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd like to point out that for the price of Photshop (which is a very good program) you can get Photoshop+Gimp. So why put down the GIMP?

  36. Re:This sounds like a good time for you by shadowbearer · · Score: 3, Insightful


    I'll agree with that.

    Every time that there is a post about a gimp upgrade on slashdot, the posts degenerate into photoshop vs. gimp debates.

    Seriously, who cares? Some of us don't run windows, and every version of Photoshop after 8 or so doesn't run worth a crap in Wine; so we use what works best in Linux, which is Gimp. Windows users can use Photoshop. Sure, it's better in a lot of ways - I won't argue that - but you use the best tool you have. Personally I will never have another windows installation on my systems, for many reasons. So.... Gimp for me. It works for what I do (texture creation for 3d models).

    I'd like to see a post on /. where it didn't degenerate into the "this or that is better" arguements but where Gimp users shared their tips and tricks more.

    So much to ask?

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  37. web designers...siiigh. by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Informative
    Um, I'm a web designer. How is that invaluable?

    You're wasting your time when you could be doing more productive things which would help you create your websites more quickly instead of worrying about 1k or so in a jpeg

    Variable compression(controlled by a mask) allows you to crank up the compression on low detail areas and use much finer compression at important parts, such as the edges of UI elements where compression artifacts would be noticed immediately. It can yield enormous savings, much greater than 1kB, and solves the #1 problem with JPEG- it's not dynamic and does NOT handle edges well.

    Furthermore, even 1kB can have substantial cost savings for a client. If they get 1 million hits a day, they most certainly care about 1kB, because that's roughly $2-3/day in bandwidth charges. That's a thousand bucks a year, which pays for a whole lot of time for a graphics designer to squeek every last kilobyte out of an entire site's worth of images. Why do you think people install mod_gzip on servers to compress HTML? Why do you think many sites strip down the headers Apache sends in requests?

    It's ok, we have broadband (or 56k modems at the very worst).

    a)most people do NOT have broadband, b)56k modems typically get around 33.6kbps at best(22kbps is not uncommon for some folks out in the middle of nowhere), which works out to around 4.2kB/sec. If I knock 5kB off an image, you'll see it a second faster.

    1. Re:web designers...siiigh. by whitegold · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As another web designer, I feel I should make a point. First of all, I don't know what mask thingy compression stuff is. Except what the earlier post told me. I don't use Photoshop CS, I still use 7, and it does fine for me. I have to say, though, $2-$3 is NOT all that much money. But bear one thing in mind. That's PER IMAGE. If you have 10 images like that, that's $20 - $30 a day, which is starting to add up.

      Better compression is ALWAYS good. If you run a site that uses a lot of images (Gallery, porn site, whatever) then the cost saving in better compression could be HUGE, and if it doesn't take any longer (or much longer) to do, then it's basically free money.

      Also, on the 1 second thing... yeah, one second is not long, but once again, that's one second PER IMAGE. It all adds up.

      Oh, and just so I get to put forth my opinion. The release of any new software like Gimp is always good. I'm a Photoshop guy and have neither reason nor inclination to change, but Gimp provides particularly programmers, and low end designers a free way to achieve the simple tasks they require. Its not worth a $600 photoshop license to make buttons. Sure, it's not Photoshop, but it doesn't have to be.

  38. Physically Challenged Hits 2.0 by AvantLegion · · Score: 4, Funny
    What's that supposed to mean? Or are my content filters messing with stuff again?

  39. Re:Gentoo by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Funny


    What has the world come to when you have "Professional Linux Installer" on your business card?


    There's a snide remark about "MCSE" to be had here, but I'm not going to touch it. :P
  40. Great Accomplishment! by firewrought · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Why all the flamewars b/t Adobe fans and Gimp fans? The news here is that the Gimp team has delivered us a significant upgrade that addresses many long-standing problems of the software (especially in terms of usability). Congratulations!! That's awesome!

    If you prefer Adobe to Gimp, that's great too... buy it and use it. Judge the tradeoffs in cost and functionality for yourself and choose the best tool for you.

    --
    -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
  41. Troll by bogie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So basically you have no insight here or have even used Gimp 2.0. You just felt like being a troll?

    I swear Adobe users are some of the biggest Trolls I've met on the Net. Everywhere I go where someone dares to mention an alternative, the Adobe trolls freak out and show up in massive numbers to diss anything non-Adobe. If it wasn't cmyk it would just be some other thing.

    Why can't you Photoshop snobs just accept the fact that Gimp is a decent image editor that differs from Photoshop and leave it at that. Why are you so freaking insulted that non-Adobe products are available? You have stock in Adobe or something?

    Gimp is certainly the best Free image editor available and for home users it will do anything you could possibly want, especially when it comes to digital photography.

    But then again I guess I'm just wasting my breath.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  42. Click and learn how to use gimp... by lent · · Score: 4, Informative
    OK, click and learn :-)

    Note: Number 9 below is especially cool if you have an investment in Photoshop-plugins.

    From:http://members.home.nl/m.weisbeek/gimp/

    Annoyances about The GIMP

    While The GIMP is such a powerful application, doesn't it have any drawbacks ?!? - Oh, yes, it has...

    I [Martijn Weisbeek] am writing this article just to show you some of these. I hope that it will make you're life with The GIMP more easy. This article is the result of about one year of experience with using the Windows-version of The GIMP (almost on a daily basis). Just remember that The GIMP clearly focuses on functionality (which is good) instead of user-friendlyness. Therefore some things just aren't that obvious, just until you get the hang of it... So just take your time to read through this article and you'll make yourself an immediate GIMP-crack.

    [...snip...]

    For your convenience I created a list with pointers to the items in this article:

    1. How do I edit an image ?

    2. I hate going through this rightclick-menu each time !!!

    3. Doesn't The GIMP support GIF's ?!?

    4. Lots of GIMP-functions do not seem to be available !!!

    5. But how do I know on what type of image a plugin works ?

    6. How do I make parts of the image transparent ?

    7. How do I remove the Alpha-channel (transparency-information) afterwards ?

    8. How do I change the size of my image ?

    9. Extend The GIMP's functionality with Photoshop-plugins

    [...snip...]