Slashdot Mirror


MandrakeSoft Exits Bankruptcy

joestar writes "It's official now: the Court has approved Mandrakesoft's exit plan from the Chapter 11-like protection status. This seems to be the result of the recently announced profitability of the company, and means that Mandrakesoft is now fully back to normal activities. Great news for the Open Source community and Mandrake Linux users! All details are available in an online PR."

233 comments

  1. Good by rokzy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't think Mandrake is anywhere near as good as SUSE, but wouldn't like to see them go down.

    1. Re:Good by ScottGant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm glad they survived also. I'm a Gentoo guy through and through...but we all need to help each other out. I donated a few sheckles here and there to Mandrake when they were going through their hardships.

      Hey, we all need to stick together, right? Giving back to the community, even if it's in some small way. Every little bit helps.

      This is great news.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    2. Re:Good by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh, check the wording of the story, then check the wording of your post.

      Mandrake is profitable and is coming out of Chapter 11. That means that they're producing enough of what people want in order to stay in business.

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


      Hey, we all need to stick together, right? Giving back to the community...

      The Community...The Community...The Community...

      One of us...One of us...One of us...

      Play the game, Wesley.

    4. Re:Good by jdray · · Score: 1
      I don't think Mandrake is anywhere near as good as SUSE...

      Nor as well funded.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    5. Re:Good by Captain+Freedom · · Score: 1

      It might be nice if a lot of people would buy Mandrake 10.0 when it's ready in may. It looks like it's going to be a nice one.

    6. Re:Good by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nice in may? Shit, it's pretty sweet now. Yeah, at first it was clunky, but once easy urpmi [http://urpmi.org/easyurpmi/index.php] updated, I was in business. I use redhat at work and mandrake for my daughter's and I's desktop and am very impressed. I especially love the "what to do menu" so my 8 yr old can just go there, see the choices, and run the app. I KNOW redhat, so it is great for using as a server where all you need is remote access, but mandrake is simply sweet when it comes to setting up a desktop. Anyone out here bashing Mandrake hasn't given it a try. I have everything I need on install (aside from apollon & giFT, which I simply `urpmi apollon' `urpmi giFT' and it's installed) No messing with fstab for my fat32 media partition, k3b is ready to go without jumping through hoops - in my opinion simply the best version of desktop linux. I will confess I haven't installed SUSE, so I may not be able to compare completely. The real confirmation is when I burned about 10 copies for the engineers at work, let 'em at it, and they came back with smiles. The only thing I have seen that was a minor annoyance was having to boot to disk 2 on install, then switch to disk 1 - but that isn't for every cdrom drive. Good for Mandrake.

      --
      ymmv
    7. Re:Good by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Even if MandrakeLinux is a "looked down upon" distro of Linux, it's still Linux! Even though I don't run it, I love MandrakeLinux! It's very user-friendly -- a lot of my friends are starting to use it.

      And besides... MandrakeLinux+WineX > Windows.

      I'm glad they got out of it. It probably had something to do with new corporate HP computers using their software though! =)

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    8. Re:Good by mandark1967 · · Score: 0

      Us vs. Them? I thought it was Red vs. Blue...

      --
      Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
    9. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kernel 2.6.x has poor pcmcia support

    10. Re:Good by Captain+Freedom · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know it is very good right now because I'm using Mandrake 9.2. I meant that there are big updates in the next version, like kernel 2.6 and kde 3.2 etc. I am currently using the download version but I consider buying Mandrake 10 when it's ready.

    11. Re:Good by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      You know, I've found that SUSE sucked ass... I had a laptop with SuSE 8.2, and half the stuff INCLUDED WITH SuSE didn't work right (YaST printing, some programs on the SuSE FTP server for my version), and many RPMs and source packages didn't run, needed some other packages that I already had, or (in the case of source packages) didn't compile because it said I didn't have something I needed, but I did... Mandrake 9.2 didn't give me that crap one bit on my old box (except for one nagging little problem - it would refuse to connect to a Samba server that had a username, but no password on that username).

    12. Re:Good by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      But point was - I am using 10 right now - with the 2.6 kernel and KDE 3.2.

      --
      ymmv
    13. Re:Good by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

      Ok Sorry
      Crap was the wrong word.


      FETID!! (is more appropriate)


      Funny isn't it anyone can call Windowse Crapose .. but SUSE?? (Nein! Nein! )

      A system that is expensive and breaks, and doesn't provide support for Sound (which Lo! And Behold! - doesn't work properly anyway)
      .. and want your $$$ for helping you out having a try with the Desktop (given the install on the laptop fail and the desktop install failed even more miserably) is ...
      In My Most Humble Opinion ...

      F E T I D !!

      ---
      Dunno About Mandrake 10, I tried it didn't work as well. So will wait for the "real" version.
      Nevertheless am Happy here with 9.2 .. Bliss!

  2. Just more proof... by The_Mystic_For_Real · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that open source software truly is a profitable industry!

    --

    _____

    Thank you.

    1. Re:Just more proof... by Knight+Thrasher · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Zing! This is so very true though. The software might be free... but you can bet your sweet wallet the support is not! (But since when is that news for the software world?)

    2. Re:Just more proof... by DrLZRDMN · · Score: 0

      Well you have to have in order to lose and they must have done pretty well to get out.

    3. Re:Just more proof... by Maegashira · · Score: 0

      hell yeah! i mean i don't want the linux distribution to die where my pr0n server is running on. and also my desktop, but thats unimportant.

    4. Re:Just more proof... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As one of my relatives used to always say:

      Speak not of what you know not

      And it's clear you know not, or know nothing of bankruptcy.

      Mandrake was under re-organization bankruptcy. They will be paying all their debts. They had to submit plans for payments at least once (I don't know the system in France), either when declaring, or when exiting -- They could not get out of bankruptcy status without having a plan approved by the court and all their creditors for paying off their creditors.

      A large percentage of my clients are bankruptcy and consumer advocacy lawyers. There's a lot more to it than you, in your need to be a smart ass, make it out to be.

    5. Re:Just more proof... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Just more proof that crack addiction truly is a profitable industry!

      It is for the dealer...no?

      --
      What?
    6. Re:Just more proof... by globalar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't have to maintain a business model around open source software to take Mandrakesoft as an example. Mandrake has taken time to develope a community of loyal users, who have good reason to be loyal. Their distribution is nice and improves Linix for the enduser (IMO). Businesses should learn the power of user-based community.

      The fact that this community can get as involved as they can (this being open source software), is critical of course.

    7. Re:Just more proof... by 13Echo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More proof that people will pay to sustain the things that they believe in. They will pay to keep it alive, even if they can have it for free. Any daily user of a good Linux distribution can see the value in sustaining its maintainers.

      Open source is a still a pretty new concept to many. I think that it was just a matter of time before traditional "brick and mortar" rules stopped applying. It took some time, but the system is starting to catch on. You don't need to go to the store to support your favorite Linux distro. Mandrake club and online payment systems have proven that.

    8. Re:Just more proof... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no, you still don't get it.

      They weren't exactly paid on time, but they were paid in full, with a little bit less interest in the end.

      That's the risk you take when you're a creditor (which, I'm sorry, but are far more often theives than their creditees)

      SO STFU. *raspberry*

    9. Re:Just more proof... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I won't bother with most of what you say, since it's (as Shakespeare said), "..full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." (And yes, I'm implying that the first part of that line, which I didn't quote, applies to you.)

      If you've been keeping up with the story and if you knew as much as you want everyone to think you know, then you would have read the article that was on /. a while back where a Mandrake employee talked about the repayment plans and how it would take them years to repay everyone they owe.

      Stopping payments is what they do going into bankruptcy. Then they get protection, so they can reorganize, then, if they can come back, they do better, their creditors get paid after all, and everyone is better off.

      Otherwise they can not file, get no protection, get sued by everyone, go out of business, and they lose, their creditors get screwed, and their customers are left without a product.

      But that's not the point here. You're more interested in bitching and trolling than in participating in an intelligent discussion.

    10. Re:Just more proof... by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

      Actually, not all the software is free. May I point you to the ever-popular WineX? That software is still profitable.

      Not everything under Linux is free, and sometimes it just shouldn't be if you're to make a profit.

      --

      ---
      Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
    11. Re:Just more proof... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the one concerned with ostentatious displays of alleged intelligence, yet you still don't get it. You are the idiot telling a very tall tale here, while beating around the bush to do so.

      It's better than complete liquidation, but they didn't pay what they originally owed people. They might have paid off the principal (eventually), but they had to renegotiate because they couldn't pay what they agreed to originally. I'm typing very slowly so that you can understand. The renegotiation was to pay less, more slowly (and effectively less money), or less interest (again, less money). So where does that leave them? Paying LESS than they owed. Lenders charge interest, and that's real money that gets eaten away when they file for "protection." You don't seem to understand that that's sort of the whole idea behind businesses lending people money. You try buying a car and paying them only principal, and make your payments late.

      They didn't pay what they originally owed. Period. They didn't consolidate and refinance at a lower interest rate through someone else to make their agreed-to payments. Now, you could have argued that this may be a humane out for a struggling business that still has an opportunity to pay off some of the money they owe, mutually beneficial to them and their creditors, but you can't say they paid what they owed. Well, I guess you could, but then you'd be an idiot (or just a liar).

    12. Re:Just more proof... by Angry+Pixie · · Score: 1

      Stopping payments is what they do going into bankruptcy. Then they get protection, so they can reorganize, then, if they can come back, they do better, their creditors get paid after all, and everyone is better off.

      Technically, Mandrake's creditors may only get some of what they are originally owed unless the exit plan involves full repayment of the original debt, albiet over an extended period of time. I'd have to look up the details to be sure. It could be that Mandrake will only be paying $0.80 off the dollar, which still would be helpful. If Mandrake will be paying back the original debt in total over a longer period, then essentially Mandrake will actually be paying more than the original debt. This is all good though. It's better than the huge loss to the market that a company in default creates.

      I don't think Mandrake had any problems that would cause investors and consumers to lose faith in the company. Mandrake isn't MCI WorldCom :) So, Mandrake will likely continue to be profitable. Looks like the Linux community, at least on Slashdot, will warmly embrace the Mandrake comeback if it isn't a favorite distro. This is a great statement about the community. Does anyone know whether other commercial Linux companies are helping out Mandrake?

    13. Re:Just more proof... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      Gee, I guess I'm wrong.

      You're right. They're not paying back every cent they owed, so they're theives. It would be much better if they just went out of business and paid NONE of what they owed.

      How could I have been so wrong and not seen the light when it was explained by someone with such anger and frustration as you put in your messages.

      (No wonder you don't want to take responsibility for what you say.)

    14. Re:Just more proof... by Stepping+Razor · · Score: 1

      The first post was a comment about "open source" software, not software in general.

    15. Re:Just more proof... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. They're not paying back every cent they owed, so they're theives. It would be much better if they just went out of business and paid NONE of what they owed.

      Yeah, that's what I was arguing for. I went out of my way to specifically point out that it's better than completely defaulting, and this is the response I get? Moron.

      Clever way to admit you're wrong and try to make yourself look better. Attack me for supposedly being angry and frustrated (while arguing with a deceptive, stubborn, admitted liar? Naaaah!), and fabricate a cartoonish exaggeration of what I actually said. And who could possibly be telling the truth if they're posting AC?

      You could have intelligently argued for "this is better than full default" to begin with, but you dissented when I said they didn't pay their debts. Take your half-truths and deceptions to your clients and their customers.

      Ever thought about running for office? You already have a keen taste for the blood of straw men, and a way with words that make your lies seem compassionate and excusable.

    16. Re:Just more proof... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "(I don't know the system in France), "
      Since they are in the French System, take your own advice and:

      Speak not of what you know not

    17. Re:Just more proof... by evil_one666 · · Score: 1
      They had to submit plans for payments at least once (I don't know the system in France)
      Speak not of what you know not
    18. Re:Just more proof... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      Actually, a few of my clients, who are lawyers, have told me a lot (way more than I wanted to know) about this.

  3. Who cares if they're Frencch? by wardomon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They put together a better distro than you complainers do...

    --

    - - - If the sun is a star, why can't I see it at night?
    1. Re:Who cares if they're Frencch? by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Good question, only you so far as I see. Did you see the word "French" in the write up? Who is complaining? Nope, you are just a pre-emptive prick. As far as a better distro that is up for debate.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  4. Re:Sigh by tachin · · Score: 0, Funny

    An "open sauce comapany" is news to me

  5. Good news but not enough.... by tktk · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm waiting to hear that SCO has entered bankruptcy.

    1. Re:Good news but not enough.... by dwave · · Score: 1

      They can't just go into bankruptcy. I hope that their case will be settled first. Otherweise there may be another company that buys them just to spread more, bigger and better FUD.

      Today there was a Q&Q^HA with SCO's VC Gregory Blepp and their contracted PR company here called each us (up to two times) just to convince us that I'd be rewarding and interesting to attend this sort of inofficial press conference. But no none would go and the marketing guy sounded a bit troubled. But what can _the_ most-despised IT-company expect? The'll have to hire the former Iraqi information minister to get more attention by the media.

    2. Re:Good news but not enough.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting to hear that SCO has exited bankruptcy : from the other end

  6. Significant by FortKnox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is quite significant. Its difficult for some major companies to dig themselves out of bankruptcy (see KMart), but for an open source/linux company to do it... it really proves that open source can survive in a capitalist economy.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Significant by emtboy9 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not sure I would look at it that way... although I do very readily admit it is difficult to get out of bankruptcy without A: folding, or B: being bought out/liquidated.

      I tend to view OSS companies more like the farmer's market. In small towns and country settings you have the farmer's market. All the farmers come there to sell their produce, eggs, honey, etc. they all pretty much have the same things (tomatoes, beets, lettuce, eggs, etc) and so all are basically in competetion with each other. HOWEVER, listen in when the farmers are talking to each other, and you will find that they very readily help each other out with tips, advice, and even labor. Even though they are technically competing with each other, they share what they know amongst themselves to assist their neighbors.

      Open Source is a lot like that. Red Hat may be in direct competition with Mandrake and SuSE/now Novell, but at the same time, work done on Red Hat linux ends up in each of the others to some degree, and vice versa.

      The proprietary world is more like a pack of wild dogs... they run in packs together until they find prey, then its every dog for himself, and the weakest is killed/devoured by the pack, or left behind to die alone and be picked apart by scavengers.

      Now the true test is when the Farmer competes against the wild dogs. Farmer usually wins in the end, because the farmers all band together, track the pack of wild dogs, and remove them from the equation. Thus ALL the farmers livestock is safe.

      Not a big fan of Mandrake, personally, but cheers to them for getting back on their feet. The more OSS companies there are at the farmers market, the more endangered the pack of dogs becomes.

      --
      "Our funds have never taken part in toxic or death spiral convertible financings of any sort" -BayStar's managing partne
    2. Re:Significant by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to thank HP!

    3. Re:Significant by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      That's an awesome description. You make us sound civilized.

      Perhaps we'll see that logic in future papers promoting OSS.

    4. Re:Significant by Obyron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now the true test is when the Farmer competes against the wild dogs. Farmer usually wins in the end, because the farmers all band together, track the pack of wild dogs, and remove them from the equation.

      Does this give anyone else the mental image of Linus and RMS hunting Darl & Co. through the woods with automatic weaponry?

      --
      --Obyron
    5. Re:Significant by emtboy9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, that image did come to mind when I wrote that... although I am not sure if the image of Linus in over-alls, sitting on a hay bale in the back of a 65 Ford 4x4, with a shotgun in one hand, and a 6-pack in the other screamin' "Yee Haw!" is funny, or scary... ;-)

      --
      "Our funds have never taken part in toxic or death spiral convertible financings of any sort" -BayStar's managing partne
    6. Re:Significant by 0racle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Simply being capitalist does not preclude being open and sharing to solve common problems, it just often works out that way when the capitalist becomes short sighted and greedy. If being capitalist was exclusive of being helpful to the community or industry in which they compete, companies would not fund research in public institutions, and they would aggressively fight all published standards, and before you say Microsoft, they do not fight all open standards.

      On the other hand, being open does not mean sharing everything. There are portions of RHEL that can not be freely and openly exchanged, and until recently YAST was also closed.

      It is often short sighted to group things together into groups based on extremely simple criteria just because you like one side and not the other. Your analogy, while appropriate in some regards, boils down to people that do things I like are like farmers and those that don't are just savage animals.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    7. Re:Significant by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Open software will probably beat propritary software but it is not comparable with the relation wild dogs and farmers have.

      Wild dogs chase animals to eat. Farmers make food to sell. Why would the dogs and the farmers fight? They are on a completely different market.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    8. Re:Significant by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

      speaking of kmart and sco...
      kmart's price checkers use embedded sco unix,
      wonder how long until sco sues them

      but yeah, it's good to see mandrake getting out of the pits, as much as people hate them, they're the gateway to linux for the average user. redhat's the gateway for the server admin, etc.

    9. Re:Significant by emtboy9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other hand, being open does not mean sharing everything. There are portions of RHEL that can not be freely and openly exchanged, and until recently YAST was also closed.

      I never said anything like that...I said the Farmers shared SOME things. Of course the farmer with the prize winning 200 pound head of lettuce is NOT going to give away his secret, but he WILL at least help others out who cant get anything to grow at all... That was the analogy.

      Your analogy, while appropriate in some regards, boils down to people that do things I like are like farmers and those that don't are just savage animals.

      Oddly enough, the "Dog Eat Dog World" idea sprang, IIRC from corporate culture in the past few decades. Farmers didnt come up with the idea of fierce competetion, and decimating the competitor. Corporations did. Hence VHS v, BetaMax, and other ideas. Personally, the way many large corporations act, I think it is highly appropos. Besides, it was an analogy, and the way business is conducted is somewhat savage when you get down to it.

      Look at Oracle and PeopleSoft. Oracle lost again and again in the US, and are now trying to talk the EU into getting behind a takeover that PeopleSoft does not want, nor their shareholders. Tell me that is civilised?

      The wars may not always be fought with rifle and sword, some of the most important and telling battles are fought with the pen and mouth.

      Besides, its an analogy, a simile, not a metaphor.

      simile == like or as (he smelled like a tuna)
      metaphor == direct comparison (he was a tuna)

      Cheers

      --
      "Our funds have never taken part in toxic or death spiral convertible financings of any sort" -BayStar's managing partne
    10. Re:Significant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why SCO wants to get license fee from Linux? Aren't they in different markets?

    11. Re:Significant by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      You don't understand what I'm saying.

      Read again...

      I only say the analogy is wrong.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    12. Re:Significant by berj · · Score: 1
      Wild dogs chase animals to eat. Farmers make food to sell. Why would the dogs and the farmers fight? They are on a completely different market.
      Actually, the dogs and the farmers are in *indirect* competition. For example: what happens when the dogs want to eat all of the chickens?

      I'd say that this is analagous (loosely) to closed software makers patenting the bejeebus out of everything they can get their hands on.

      Free Algos == chickens
      Patented Algos == dead chickens

      Gotta protect the coop.

    13. Re:Significant by 0racle · · Score: 1
      I never said anything like that...
      I never said you did ;) that was there more as I felt that it needed to be added to what I said.

      While were having fun with the dictionary though, one definition of an analogy is: A form of logical inference or an instance of it, based on the assumption that if two things are known to be alike in some respects, then they must be alike in other respects. Therefore using your tuna example, He smelled like a tuna, therefore he must be a tuna. Isn't english fun, and yes I know its a logical fallacy.
      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    14. Re:Significant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure didn't come up with it on my own. You've officially made my day a little brighter.

    15. Re:Significant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Does this give anyone else the mental image of Linus and RMS hunting Darl & Co. through the woods with automatic weaponry?"

      No, but where ever Guns and Open Source are Together you can bet ESR is there. Stallman thinks free code means free coders; Eric thinks Freedom to own and use guns means free people. Stallman is nuts about code; Eric is nuts about guns. (Linus is nuts about his kids; what a whacko).

    16. Re:Significant by jesterzog · · Score: 1

      All the farmers come there to sell their produce, eggs, honey, etc. they all pretty much have the same things (tomatoes, beets, lettuce, eggs, etc) and so all are basically in competetion with each other. HOWEVER, listen in when the farmers are talking to each other, and you will find that they very readily help each other out with tips, advice, and even labor.

      It's an interesting analogy, but I'm not convinced that it describes things perfectly. Farmers who sell produce are in a different type of market from software. The former is very general with lots of small players. The latter is quite specialist, with several very big players who have a lot of influence as well as lots of smaller players who often have to follow.

      Although farmers may often sell the same things in the same locations at the same time, they're not automatically in direct competition with each other. The simple reason is that on their own, one farmer can't supply enough goods to meet all of the demand. One farmer can almost never set the market price, and as long as s/he is selling at the market price a farmer is likely to sell all of the goods... with the occasional exception in different circumstances.

      With the occasional exception, sales for one farmer aren't lost because another farmer has more to sell. And because there are so many small players in the market who are selling the same goods, any one farmer doesn't have much influence over the price, anyway. All the goods will probably be sold at the price set by the market. (Exceptions may be in small markets where there are only a couple of farmers and nobody else anywhere selling the same thing.)

    17. Re:Significant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Now the true test is when the Farmer competes
      >against the wild dogs. Farmer usually wins in
      >the end, because the farmers all band together,
      >track the pack of wild dogs, and remove them
      >from the equation. Thus ALL the farmers
      >livestock is safe.

      Hmmm... all farmers bands together to track
      down wild dogs...

      are you from Oz Down Under ;)?

    18. Re:Significant by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      I really like the comparisation of open developers with farmers and propritary developers with wild dogs.

      They, each, are analogous right.

      But when put together it just doesn't make sense.

      --

      However you could say that the chickens are the people that might use your software.

      This would mean that when the wild dogs have eaten the chickens the farmers could never get those chickens back. It works only one way then.

      This is, ofcourse, wrong.

      I'm sorry but I can't agree with you.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  7. the drake by maxbang · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mandrake was my first taste of Linux and I'm glad to have learned much from them and their community. I hope these guys stick around - while Slack/Debian/Gentoo/etc. are great, it's always important to have distros like this available to those interested in making the switch. I haven't paid them anything since 2002 - maybe I need to throw them some bucks in gratitude. Seems a far better option than the windows tax (pirates be exempt from this doubloon taxation, me knows. arrr!)

    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
    1. Re:the drake by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...it's always important to have distros like this available to those interested in making the switch.

      I'm making a new computer for my Dad, and I explained that he would have to buy an OS. He can use a computer, but he won't be using a command line. I offered to install Mandrake as a free test before buying windows. It was really nice to have the option for someone like my Dad, who might enjoy Linux, but not on a power-user level.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    2. Re:the drake by RaymondR · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They were my first distro, too. I started with 8.0, and then got more serious with 8.1 (I purchased the software from a store). Since then I have moved on to a different distro, but if it wasn't for Mandrake, I wouldn't be where I'm at now. It's always nice to see a company that works with Linux become profitable.

    3. Re:the drake by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      No, it's important to have distros like knoppix around for people like your Dad whom you want to try to have test-drive Linux.

      I'm sure mandrake is a very nice OS (I haven't tried it), but when I think of what I'd use to introduce someone to Linux, I always think of Knoppix.

  8. That was close... by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I still have my distro preferences more towards the RH side of things (though it is drifting towards SuSE more and mroe), and the Franco-American antipathy over Iraq may cloud the political arena darkly...

    However, Mandrake is one of the absolute best newbie/intro distros of all time, IMHO, and it's damned good to see them come back from the dead.
    No matter what US folks may think of French things, and no matter how disdainful one may be, when it comes to Linux at least, we're all family.

    Cheers,

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:That was close... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      While knowing that Mandrake Linux was 'borne' in France, I've never made the mistake of confusing a Linux distro as being any one country's origins - except for maybe Finland.

    2. Re:That was close... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      However, Mandrake is one of the absolute best newbie/intro distros of all time, IMHO, and it's damned good to see them come back from the dead.

      I'm curious--what makes something a newbie distro vs. anything else? By virtue of the fact that things Just Work? You don't need to fire up an xterm and remember 311k arcane commands to do common administrative tasks, that there are GUI front ends? That you don't have to build it from scratch (hello, Gentoo)?
      If that's the case, call me a newbie.

    3. Re:That was close... by pr0c · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know what his definition is... My definition is a distro suitable for newbies to install and maintain. Mandrake is, xandros is, gentoo isn't, slack isn't. Newbie distro means that a newbie is the minimum target.

      Now of course someone will come along and say well gentoo is easy to install, slackware is easy to install... and that is of course their opinion. The more instructions a product needs the worst it is for a newbie.

    4. Re:That was close... by el-spectre · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nah, it's mostly presentation. For example, some distros list every app by name in huge menus. Instead of seeing a link to Konq/Mozilla/Opera/Lynx (heh) in the menu, a Mandrake user will see "Use The Web" or something similar. Likewise, a call to OOo Writer is "Make a text document", etc.

      Plus it uses a Fisher Price style that makes XP look professional... but eye candy is popular.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    5. Re:That was close... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1
      Actually, el-spectre covered one aspect, that being presentation. OTOH, there is also the goodies that help a newbie along, like HardDrake.

      For example, mdk had one of the earliest setups that let you change monitor resolution without having to shut X off, go digging around in XF86Config, then crossing your fingers and hoping the modelines were put in correctly.

      Yep, SuSE has YaST (and Sax before that), but it wasn't anywhere near as easy or as intuitive (IMHO) for a newbie who was too used to Windows and how MSFT did things. HTH explain things a bit better,

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:That was close... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt many Linux users equate a distro with its country of origin on anything but the most superficial level. I think the only way Mandrake could be affected by Franco-American hostilities is if they release a new version called the Mandrake "We Were Right And You Were Wrong; You Were Just Making Shit Up About WMDs And You Haven't Even Apologized Yet" Edition.

      Then again, with a name like that, I'd buy 20 copies...

    7. Re:That was close... by haeger · · Score: 2, Informative
      I don't agree (surprise surprise).
      Mandrake is not "mostly presentation". Mandrake is true to the GPL and all work that they do are licensed under the GPL in a true OpenSource manner. They also focus on usability.
      Most people that _use_ computers want something that "just works".

      I wouldn't call myself a newbie and MDK is still my flavour of choice when it comes to my work-machine. Easy upgrades, nice interface, everything just works. It's just what I want it on one machine.

      This is not to say that others don't have the same benefits, but I haven't found another distro that combines the above things. True_to_GPL+Simplicity+Good_UI+User_friendly+Power = MDK


      Also, I think they are the only big one left to focus on users. All others seems to have gone "Enterprise" now.
      Perhaps MKD will be the Windows of Linux, Gates et al didn't try to go "Enterprise" until they had the home users... *hmmmmm....*

      .haeger

      --
      You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    8. Re:That was close... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slack is as easy to install as anything else. Debian on the other hand...

    9. Re:That was close... by peter_gzowski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My definition is a distro suitable for newbies to install and maintain

      That sounds like a good definition to me. I would add that this does not mean it's unsuitable for non-newbies. I started off on Slackware, and had good guru friends around to teach me how to write bash scripts and hack at config files in vi, but now that I'm comfortable with that stuff, I just want a Linux that I can work with with a minimum of fuss. That's why I use Mandrake, and if I click some drop-down boxes, and hit Apply, and my X server doesn't boot, well then I'll crack open my XF86Config-4 file and have at it.

      I can't think of anything that I did with Slackware that I can't do with Mandrake. In fact, I do more with Mandrake thanks to urpmi (I know, Slackware recently got a comparable package management system, and these are all just poor substitutes for apt-get, but I like it). I want to recommend Linux to my friends, and I can't recommend something that I don't think they can use, and I can't recommend something that I don't use myself. I'm glad to see Mandrake is back on track

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    10. Re:That was close... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      I don't know what his definition is... My definition is a distro suitable for newbies to install and maintain. Mandrake is, xandros is, gentoo isn't, slack isn't. Newbie distro means that a newbie is the minimum target.

      Now of course someone will come along and say well gentoo is easy to install, slackware is easy to install... and that is of course their opinion. The more instructions a product needs the worst it is for a newbie.


      I'll buy that, but there's also the segment of us who don't want to screw around with modelines, XF86 configs, fdisk, etc, etc.
      I mostly live in the Mac World Where Everything Just Works(tm), and my linux box is a tool; I don't want to make a career of screwing with it. I moved to Mandrake from years of Caldera use (yeah, yeah, I know...), but to me the ease of use is a plus that a lot of people seem to sneer at (not you; you're just the guy I'm replying to). As far as I'm concerned, that attitude is an impediment to getting a widespread adoption of linux on the desktop.

    11. Re:That was close... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Eh, anyone who prefers the simplified "Use the Web" is unlikely to give a rats ass about the GPL. Not everyone takes it as holy writ.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    12. Re:That was close... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

    13. Re:That was close... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and the Franco-American antipathy over Iraq may cloud the political arena darkly... "

      Oh really???

      Are you suggesting that when French people buy Dell computers they are supporting George W. Bush?

      What do you have to say to the French tourists who are spending their vacations and money in US now because the dollar is so cheap? Are they republicans?

      Get over it!!!

    14. Re:That was close... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the Franco-American antipathy over Iraq may cloud the political arena darkly...

      No matter what US folks may think of French things

      I have a difficult time believing this could be a factor in the slightest. If I am wrong and that is somehow a factor, well, that's just seriously pathetic. Even more disappointing than, I dunno, believing Bush's reasons to go to war there in the first place...

      My experience w/ Mandrake is 100% positive, when I ran it I was not a noob. Great experience, loved it, I guess they've had their issues, but I've thought about switching back many times (I switched away in favor of source-based distros ala "Source Mage").

    15. Re:That was close... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Eh, anyone who prefers the simplified "Use the Web" is unlikely to give a rats ass about the GPL. Not everyone takes it as holy writ.

      Eh? Not so. Just because you don't want to have to make a decision over which browser you're going to use every time you go surf the web does *not* mean you're unlikely to give a rats ass about the GPL. Lots of people want their computer to "just work", and don't want some evil monopolistic company to dictate what they can and can't do with their computers.

      I desire simplicity in maintaining my computer, and I prefer not to even think about certain things from time to time (like which browser I'm using when the stupid web developer is telling me I need to use one of their "approved" browsers). But I still want source code for the browser I'm using, and everything else. I'm unlikely to ever even look at 99.999999999999% of the source code I have for the programs I use.

      But since I have the source code, no evil monopolistic company will dictate to me what I can and can't do with my computer.

      And a lot of people want that. A *lot*. I haven't yet met one single person (with the exception of my idiot father) who thought that open source was bad or unnecessary. Quite the contrary, everyone I talk to likes the idea and wants to help, they were just unaware of the choice available to them.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    16. Re:That was close... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Thanks for proving my point.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  9. Great news! by Steve+Ballmer's+Fat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is great. As a complete noob to Linux (GUI only person), Mandrake is/was the easiest to set up and use... and it works flawlessly. Keep up the good work Mandrake!

    1. Re:Great news! by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      Take a look at Mac and Windows, they built their success on ease of use..

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    2. Re:Great news! by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      True, but the "strong following" is relatively small, relative to something like Redhat. This isn't an insult to any particular distro... most are targeted at a specific need. But most regular users aren't interested in the machine being absolutely efficient, just working well.

      I like Fedora... good support, and I rarely have to install from source (No speako C++, so not a lot of benefits doing so). I suspect a lot of users are like me... more interested in working than setting the machine up.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    3. Re:Great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dude, you're fucking retarded .

    4. Re:Great news! by zoloto · · Score: 1

      Off topic I know, but hear me out..

      Just your nickname alone "Steve Ballmer`s Fat" is enough to make me cringe, but your comment:

      As a complete noob to Linux (GUI only person), Mandrake is/was the easiest to set up and use...

      Sure is true to it's name. /LAUGH!

      (note to mods, I'm poking fun at the relation to his name and comment. be careful how you mod)

    5. Re:Great news! by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Is it "Steve Ballmer's Fat" as in Steve Baller is fat or fat of Steve Ballmer?

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    6. Re:Great news! by Steve+Ballmer's+Fat · · Score: 1

      Actually it was supposed to be Steve Ballmer's Fat Ass, but Slashdot cut the name off and I kinda liked it. ;)

    7. Re:Great news! by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      That happened to my name, too. I was pretty upset that Slashdot just cuts it off and creates your account anyway without warning you that you've used to many characters. I would have liked a chance to choose something else instead.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  10. No Suprise by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I'm not suprised they started making money. Have you seen their download page?

    If you download the ISO's you MUST pay us. Swear on everything precious to you that you will pay if you download. You are a leach if you don't pay. Please pay us. We can offer these ISO's free because you have to pay us.

    Click here to download (and don't forget to pay)

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:No Suprise by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Why do people mark these comments flamebait, at least the post is speaking some level of truth.

      Damn you mod player haters.

    2. Re:No Suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Damn you mod player haters.

      Especially those who hate ModPlug

    3. Re:No Suprise by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why do people mark these comments flamebait, at least the post is speaking some level of truth.

      Thanks for having my back. I'm not trashing Mandrake. I have it on one of my machines and happen to think they are excellent in several UI areas.

      But they do REALLY push you send them a check. Here's the link:

      http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ftp.php3

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    4. Re:No Suprise by rokzy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      flamebait isn't about being untrue, but being inflammatory.

    5. Re:No Suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its about disagreeing with the moderator's opinion. Or at least that's how it is most commonly used.

    6. Re:No Suprise by cpn2000 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Whats wrong with that? Would you rather they make you pay before you download?

      For starters they are not insisting that you use their distro, and last I checked Open Source Software is Free as in speech, not free as in beer. Surely you agree that they deserve to be paid for all the efforts that they put into making such a great distro.

      Honestly, I think we should be happy in that they let you try their distro before they ask to be paid. I tried the distro one time, but I decided to go with RH instead, hence I did not buy the club membership, but it was good to know that I did not have to buy a membership to find that out.

      If you think this is bad you should see the stunts Real uses when you try to download their free player. This is really really tame in comparison.

      --
      All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be ... Dark side of the moon
    7. Re:No Suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When is "inflammatory" stuff about Microsoft or SCO ever moderated as Flamebait? It's a purely a censor mod.

    8. Re:No Suprise by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

      I agree with the above poster. And I happen to use Mandrake-- I'm using it right now!

      I'm glad to see they are making money, too.

      --

      ---
      Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
    9. Re:No Suprise by kilgortrout · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mandrake had nearly the same message before, during and now after the bankruptcy filing so what's your point? And before the bankruptcy they used to have these pathetic public pleas in the press for contributions from the community or they would go under. At least now they've figured out how to have a positive cash flow and a profitable business.

    10. Re:No Suprise by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      But they do REALLY push you send them a check. Here's the link:

      Yeah, sucks that a for-profit company would actually try to get you to pay for your free download. We've got to put a stop to this shit.

      Or you could go back to Windows, where you have stupid nag-screens, ads popping up when you're not even browsing the web, shareware (need I elaborate on that?), product activation requiring a phone call, boy the list really goes on.

      Compared to Mandrake, which gives you all the same benefits of windows without all the crazy drawbacks, and you have to click through *one* extra page asking you for money. (And again in the First-Time wizard, which you can skip if you want) Mandrake, which doesn't just shut itself off after 30 days if you don't pay them any money.

      *sniff* I love Mandrake! ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    11. Re:No Suprise by mikechant · · Score: 1

      If you need real player and version 8 is good enough, you can get this easily enough on the real website via 'services and support', 'downloads', 'legacy software archive'.

  11. Mandrakesoft by zephc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mandrakesoft just hired old accountants from Arthur Andersen.

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  12. Woohoo! by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Glad to see that these guys are still going to be around for some time. Now if they can just deal with that infernal copyright problem....

    --
    This sig no verb.
  13. French Administrations? by xarak · · Score: 5, Interesting


    This is most excellent news. I think that with French administrations (esp education, research and military) moving towards Linux, Mandrake might be able to secure a few core customers on their home ground.

    Most of all, it's encouraging and a releif for all the contributors - Mandrake has a great record of quality tools given back to the community.

    --
    Atheism is a non-prophet organisation
    1. Re:French Administrations? by xarak · · Score: 1


      For those who want to know, a releif is a small furry animal which snuggles up to campers.

      --
      Atheism is a non-prophet organisation
  14. They may be out of bankruptcy, BUT by ModernGeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    they have debt to pay off for the next 9 YEARS. That is almost as long as Linux has been around. Who knows what it will be like in 9 years since it is so far away in computer time. The french chapter 11 is a lot differnet than filing bankruptcy in America when you just don't have to pay your bills after you are done with it.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:They may be out of bankruptcy, BUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The french chapter 11 is a lot differnet than filing bankruptcy in America when you just don't have to pay your bills after you are done with it.

      We wish.

    2. Re:They may be out of bankruptcy, BUT by Joe5678 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Chapter 11 in the US is reorganization; essentially protection from the debtors until you can get your act together, you still have to pay them though.

      Chapter 7 is liquidation, pretty much a free for all of your assets by the debtors.

    3. Re:They may be out of bankruptcy, BUT by imr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bankruptcy is a legal phase.
      They are out of this phase where they didnt have to pay their debts. The judge found them worth of continuing to exist (first phase), and now he ruled that they don't need this protection (not paying debts) anymore because they are profitable. (around 7% of those who go bankrupt reach that stage, at most).
      But on the other he must also protects those with whom mandrakein in debts, without putting this process of revival at risk (which would also goes against everybody's interests).
      So there is this plan which is based on mandrake's good health, where they continue to live AND SLOWLY pay their debts.
      But on the business side, they now can do a lot more than in the precedent phase (prettymuch everything, i have heard, but I'm not sure on this point), which was one of the reason of them being so low profile lately. For example, until now, they werent allowed to make deal with governmental entities. Right now, they can sign such big deals again.

      disclaimer: Of course, ianal, so i dont know what i'm talking about, and french, so i could be bullshitting you with no shame.

    4. Re:They may be out of bankruptcy, BUT by SlipJig · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but isn't it protection from creditors?

      --
      Read my keyboard review.
    5. Re:They may be out of bankruptcy, BUT by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      Newsflash: It's not that easy in America either. Sure, you don't have to pay the bills you had. However, that stays on your record for 7 YEARS and it's murder trying to get credit after that. Want to buy a house? To bad. Want a credit card? Not without some cash to back it up and a 25% interest rate. Filing for bankruptcy in America isn't exactly as peachy as you make it out to be.

  15. Ready to pay 699$ by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

    Why do I get the feeling that, somewhere in some corner of the wolrd, Darl has a very very evil grin on his face.

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    1. Re:Ready to pay 699$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $699 for linux distro ??? i knew Chirac taxed the crap out of his people, but didnt know it was this bad!

  16. netcraft confirms it ..... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0, Redundant
    .... mandrake is NOT dieing.

    1. Re:netcraft confirms it ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dieing

      No, but proper spelling is.

  17. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well just wait for SCO to sue their pants off.

    1. Re:Sad by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      Yep, that'd be just the kind of evil, below the belt tactic i've come to expect from McBride lord of the Sith.

      nick ...

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  18. Re:Sigh by mopslik · · Score: 4, Funny

    An "open sauce comapany" is news to me

    Here you go.

  19. Congrats by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great news from Paris, and to celebrate, I'll continue doing what I've been doing for quite a while:

    Recommending Mandrake to all my friends (who usually download it) and to all the companies I consult for (who usually get powerpacks).

    --
    Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
  20. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Homer Simpson: MMMmmm...open sauce company.

  21. It is now official by MukiMuki · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It is now official - Netcraft has confirmed: Mandrake is not dying Yet another crippling bombshell failed to hit the beleaguered Mandrake community when recently The Court confirmed that Mandrake accounts for less than a fraction of 1 percent of all exit plans. Coming on the heels of the latest Netcraft survey which plainly states that Mandrake has gained more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Mandrake isn?t collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by not failing dead last [samag.com] in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test. You don't need to be a Kreskin [amazingkreskin.com] to predict Mandrake's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Mandrake faces a promising future. In fact, there won't be any failure at all for Mandrake because Mandrake is not dying. Things are looking very good for Mandrake. As many of us are already aware, Mandrake continues to gain market share. Gold ink flows like a river of honey. Mandrake PPC is the most successful of them all, having regained 93% of its core developers. Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers. Suse leader Seibt states that there are a whole lot of users of Mandrake. How many users of Mandarke PPC are there? Let's see. The number of Mandrake versus Mandrake PPC posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about a whole lot/5 = a lot of Mandrake PPC users. Debian/Gentoo posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of Mandrake posts. Therefore there are about a few users of Debian/Gentoo. A recent article put Mandrake PPC at about a chunk of the Mandrake market. Therefore there are [beyond here lie dragons / 4i] = [woah, Nelly] Mandrake PPC users. This is consistent with the number of Mandrake PPC Usenet posts. Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, Mandrake PPC didn?t go out of business and wasn?t taken over by Red Hat who sell another fledging OS. Now Red Hat is also prospering, its profits turned over to yet another charnel house. All major surveys show that Mandrake has steadily inclined in market share. Mandrake is very healthy and its long term survival prospects are very bright. If Mandrake is to prosper well it will be among large enterprises. Mandrake continues to grow. Nothing short of a miracle could stop it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Mandrake is alive. Fact: Mandrake is alive

    1. Re:It is now official by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netcraft has confirmed: YOU FAIL IT

    2. Re:It is now official by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netcraft confirms that you are a fucking failure and a disgrace to the slashdot Troll community, you didn't even clean up the [brackets] when you copied and pasted your troll from elsewhere I suspect you will be kicked out of whichever troll clan you belong to and banished, not a troll bridge in the land will accept you and you will die of exposure in the fierce winter

  22. Im not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't want SCO to be protected by chapter eleven. I want to see them down, see their stock price below the 2 digits (I'm talking about cents here), see them being bought by somebody else who will take all their assets and sell them to the best bidder. Then I want to see Darl being sued by former SCO stockholders and thrown in Jail.

    I don't want to see being protected by Chapter 11. I want to see it burn.

    1. Re:Im not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (scene opens with Darl sitting in jail, looking somewhat lonely)

      Jailor: "Hey, Darl, you're lucky, we found you a buddy."
      Darl: "Really? Thanks guys."
      Jailor: "Apparently he was jailed for stealing your company's IP or something." (to other jailor) "Ok, Jim, bring in his sodomizer."
      Darl: "... wait, what was that? You said 'cell-mate,' right?"
      Jailor: (laughing) "Yeah. Have fun."

    2. Re:Im not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      *In walks an 8' tall Emperor penguin, with genitals so massive he's carrying 'em over his shoulder.* //wake up!

  23. Thank you Mandrake Club members, Deno by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 4, Informative
    A key to keep Mandrake afloat in the real hard times was the club, an initiative by former Mandrake employee Deno, and followed up by thousands of enthusiasts who decided to support their favorite distro. Great work to all.

    I hope to see more and more features and advantages for club members in the future, to encourage not only nice people who want to say "thank you", but also many other people to join ...

    1. Re:Thank you Mandrake Club members, Deno by Lane.exe · · Score: 3, Informative
      When I was first learning to use Linux (back in the Mandrake 7.2 days) the club was indispensible to me; even though I no longer use Linux as my main platform (OS X), I still keep my Mandrake box around and updated regularly. The club is still the best place to get support for Linux-related issues IMO. Plus, their club-only FTP and package directories are great ways for using urpmi to manage the packages on a system.

      --
      IAALS.
  24. Back In Black? by Eberlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Couldn't resist the AC/DC reference, sorry.

    Mandrakesoft seems to have plugged its way back up to profitability and that's extremely commendable. There have been a lot of people who wish for that "One Distro To Rule Them All" and a great deal of those people were going to crown RedHat king. I was one of them.

    However, I've changed my tune in the last few days or so. Mandrake was one of those distros that focused on desktop linux very early on. When folks at RedHat were reluctant to jump on the other side of the server, Mandrake went in, both feet. At the very least, that's commendable.

    The sad part of the story is that Mandrake isn't as big as RedHat nor does it have the backing of a Novell the way SuSe does. One can only hope that Mandrake's survival (and profitability) ensures end-users a great desktop distro from all the competition.

  25. It's now official by MukiMuki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is now official - Netcraft has confirmed: Mandrake is not dying

    Yet another crippling bombshell failed to hit the beleaguered Mandrake community when recently The Court confirmed that Mandrake accounts for less than a fraction of 1 percent of all exit plans. Coming on the heels of the latest Netcraft survey, which plainly states that Mandrake has gained more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Mandrake isn?t collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by not failing dead last [samag.com] in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin [amazingkreskin.com] to predict Mandrake's future. The handwriting is on the wall: Mandrake faces a promising future. In fact, there won't be any failure at all for Mandrake because Mandrake is not dying. Things are looking very good for Mandrake. As many of us are already aware, Mandrake continues to gain market share. Gold ink flows like a river of honey. Mandrake PPC is the most successful of them all, having regained 93% of its core developers.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    SUSE leader Seibt states that there are a whole lot of users of Mandrake. How many users of Mandarke PPC are there? Let's see. The number of Mandrake versus Mandrake PPC posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about a whole lot/5 = a lot of Mandrake PPC users. Debian/Gentoo posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of Mandrake posts. Therefore there are about a few users of Debian/Gentoo. A recent article put Mandrake PPC at about a chunk of the Mandrake market. Therefore there are [beyond here lie dragons / 4i] = [woah, Nelly] Mandrake PPC users.

    This is consistent with the number of Mandrake PPC Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, Mandrake PPC didn?t go out of business and wasn?t taken over by Red Hat who sell another fledging OS. Now Red Hat is also prospering, its profits turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that Mandrake has steadily inclined in market share. Mandrake is very healthy and its long-term survival prospects are very bright. If Mandrake is to prosper well it will be among large enterprises. Mandrake continues to grow. Nothing short of a miracle could stop it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Mandrake is alive.

    Fact: Mandrake is alive

    (note : I originally forgot the bloody plain old text option. crap.)

  26. Mandrake is my favorite OS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I haven't put any money into Mandrake though. I'm feeling guilty. I've used and abused it extensively. I'll buy a t-shirt and join the club for awhile.

  27. Re:Sigh by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    so where's their recipie? (If it's open sauce). If the recipie's a secret it's closed sauce.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  28. As a new user of Linux, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... allow me to be the first to say: STFU n00b!

    (this is said in jest, of course =)

    1. Re:As a new user of Linux, by RPoet · · Score: 1

      What he's really trying to say is: please, for your own sake, stop using the 14-year-old counter-strike player language. It's ok to say "newbie" or "someone new to Linux" or whatever.

      --
      "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
  29. Mandrake and Hardware by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    It looks like a vendor is starting to sell blade servers like IBM's with Mandrake Linux installed exclusivly. http://www.mandrakesoft.com Looks like mandrake is really starting to broaden their horizon too.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  30. "the club?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this some sort of cult? Didn't the members commit mass suicide when the bankrupcy statement was issued?

  31. Sorry wrong link by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    That is http://www.mandrakeworks.com/ looks like stuff for enterprise business done through a third party or somthing. Anyone else hear of MandrakeWorks?

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  32. Do we see a pattern here? by David+Hume · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They were my first distro, too.


    I wonder, do we see a pattern here? Could this be why Mandrake wound up in "Chapter 11-like protection status?" Could it be an indication that it might again wind up in said status?

    It appears that Mandrake is a great distro for newbies (I know, I started with it myself) who then do not stick around (yep, me again). The result is a relatively high cost of sales, and a relatively small continuing income stream. Can a distro survive if it is everybody's first distro, and nobody's second?

    1. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can a distro survive if it is everybody's first distro, and nobody's second?

      Slackware was my first, and Mandrake will be my second. Why? Because now Linux will be very serious for my PC time, and I don't wanna mess with as much stuff manually.

    2. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by greg_barton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder, do we see a pattern here?

      Possibly, but there are other patterns. For instance, I started off with Mandrake, strayed to redhat and SUSE for a while, but ended up as a paying customer for Mandrake. (Silver club member) I want a distro that's easy to use and just works. Mandrake provides that.

    3. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 4, Informative

      A handful of samples != overwhelming evidence. You'd see a very different picture if you were on a Mandrake-specific list, where loyalty is high and the majority of people seem to be coming from Red Hat and SuSE rather than Windows.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    4. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by TimeZone · · Score: 1

      Mandrake's great for more than just newbies. I happened to do things opposite of most people - I started with slack, then went to RedHat (only for two releases or so), and have been pretty faithful to MDK for the past few years. I learned a lot in slack (enough to fix, or muddle through, the occasional MDK GUI tool hiccups) and now I just want a Linux desktop that works right without much hassle. And that's Mandrake.
      TZ

    5. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I agree, I am myself an experienced GNU/Linux/*nix user and I choose Mandrake. I guess the point is, some people think that because Mandrake is easy to use for newbies, it is not appropriate for experienced users. This is not necessarilly true in general, and certainly not true in what respects to Mandrake.

      As a power user, Mandrake gives me:

      • An extremely easy to administer distro. Adding/installing services is a breeze.
      • Most hardware is autodetected.
      • Sweet software management (urpmi et al). I never reinstall from scratch, just upgrade from CDs or network.
      • Standards compliance (LSB certified)
      • A huge software selection. Add Mandrake/contrib to your urpmi media and you are golden.

      My Unix path has been: Solaris & Slack -> Redhat -> Mandrake. I will change again if I find something more suitable for my needs, this is a not a religion. But getting back to the point, Mandrake is a fabulous general purpose distro for general audience. Not just a migration toy for home users/newbies.

    6. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >It appears that Mandrake is a great distro for newbies (I know, I started with it myself) who then do not stick around (yep, me again).

      This got me thinking in the context of the current article on migration to Linux and the Ask Slashdot on installing packages vs. compiling source. While many of us love to tweak and play with the OS, most computer users are just that: users. They want to boot the sucker, load a program or two and use it to do work, communicate, and/or play games.

      To say that Mandrake is a great distro for newbies, may be saying it has a bright future. The vast majority of computer users are lifelong newbies, and that's OK. If you want to make money selling a computer OS, that's one of your markets, whether you like it or not.

      I started off with Storm Linux and Red Hat. I am now a Mandrake customer, because it works great for what I do. With my first Mandrake version, I had to recompile the kernel to get pcmcia support on my laptop. Trust me, my wife is not up to that.
      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    7. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I might do something similar. Though I've installed Slackware on my last 3 machines, I'm having serious trouble getting it working on my latest, and I'm planning to try a distro with better hardware detection. Suse's my first choice, but I haven't ruled out Mandrake.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    8. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Mandrake 9.1 was my third distro, the first being RedHat 7.0 and the second being SuSE 8.0. I'm experienced enough to compile my own kernel, manually set up services, install source packages, etc, but that doesn't mean I don't appreciate urpmi and the Mandrake Control Center to easily administer my boxen.

    9. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by eddy+the+lip · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't know that I would call it a pattern. My first (succesfully installed) distro was RH 5.2. Debian was the first I tried, and I went back to it very briefly after I'd learned my way around this linux thing a bit. 7.0 was my first Mandrake and I've stuck with it since.

      It's not a matter of not liking the command line (although I've only got four terminals open as I'm typing this, and only one instance of vim - it's an admin day), or not liking to tweak things. Linux is my primary workstation. I depend on it to get stuff done, so I don't have the time to fuss with it that I might like. Mandrake Just Working makes it newbie friendly, but it also makes it a dependable working environment. I'm not planning on changing anytime soon.

      I think there's a definite market for distributions that are easy to use, easy to maintain, and don't require you to spend a lot of time compiling from source or editing config files. That I can do all that if I want or need to is the icing.

      --

      This is the voice of World Control. I bring you Peace.

    10. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by Angry+Pixie · · Score: 1

      This could be true. I'd argue that the platform you start out on will definitely shape your upgrade path, but at the same time, as you engage in computing you gradually develop dependencies on the system you work with. For example, it was hard for me to go from UNIX to Windows, but now I am running Windows completely, and I'm having a hell of a time going back to UNIX - even going back to Slackware is hard for me, and I can't afford to consider the Mac as an option.

      I have found that I don't like these newbie-branded distributions because I have expectations for what my UNIX experience should be like. I know I'm being unfair here. If all these distros pretty much work the same, why would someone switch from Mandrake to another distro? For me, getting my printers working under Slackware was hard, and both Red Hat and SuSe offered some nice printer config utilities. I can understand a vertical shift from Linux to FreeBSD or UNIX.

    11. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      Why did you not stay with them? Im curious, Im a long time Debian user (after slackware) and Im almost thinking about installing mandrake lately but I want to know wh y you jumped ship.

    12. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by madpuppy · · Score: 1

      I agree, I can configure things on my own but, I don't want to have to. autodetection is a wonderful thing. give me a distro that sets up allmost everything before I even boot into it the first time. updated and ready to go.

      that's Mandrake.

    13. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by CanadianCrackPot · · Score: 0

      Actually I remember when Mandrake was the distro that would have made or broken my linux usage. I originally tried out Mandrake 6.0 which I obtained from Maximum Linux awhile back (great mag in the first issue they discussed how to rebuild the kernel). Between Mandrake 6.0 and Caldera 2.4 I have never had so much trouble failing to get dual-boot to run. Mandrake would run without anything else installed, but Caldera that was the biggest POS I've ever seen (nice installer but I want to run linux again AFTER bootup damnit).

      The turning point came when a friend of mine gave me Red Hat 7.0. Finally I got to test the Linux waters. It was alright but I still didn't completely like it.

      Then one fateful day a friend of mine gave me Mandrake 8.1. What a god send, I was able to spend as much time coding as I needed, stability, it felt right, and I only had to go through obscure config files if I WANTED to, not because someone demanded I do it to change my config.

      Now I'm on 9.2 getting ready to switch to 10.0 community (and I'll join the Mandrake Club soon too I WANT Mandrake to last, no its not a power distro to start but I'm gonna change that soon ahh the beauties of linux.) But the biggest decision that kept me with Mandrake was the cool factor, and that I could spend more time doing the coding needed for my classes than spending it babying my system back to health (like in MS or Red Hat).

      --
      Good programmers drink beer to relieve job stress.
      Great programmers drink hard liquor and work best hungover.
    14. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I have found that I don't like these newbie-branded distributions because I have expectations for what my UNIX experience should be like.
      >For me, getting my printers working under Slackware was hard, and both Red Hat and SuSe offered some nice printer config utilities.

      See, that's a perfect example of your point. If I were to use CUPS I'd go freaking insane. I added a Laserjet 5si last night. Was lazy and used pico. A few ^K's, a few ^U's, a change here and there, make a directory, and done. I doubt it took more than 30 seconds...

      I love printcap + lprng.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    15. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by Angry+Pixie · · Score: 1

      CUPS... I was pulling my hair out. I have a Samsung ML series laser printer at work. It's a great little PCL language printer that comes with Linux drivers to include a bash installation script, and some profile files meant for use with CUPS. The problem was that I either had the wrong version of CUPS or no CUPS at all based on which distro I tried, so I simply gave up trying. I understand that talking to a printer is no simple feat. Windows makes it look easy. Right now, I've got an HP Deskjet 3620 that I'll need to test out.

      I'm sure since then someone somewhere figured out how to get it working well. Maybe there's a master database somewhere containing user submissions on success stories with various hardware - sort of like WINE's app database, but I've not looked lately. I've got a Linux Format DVD containing a slew of products including Mandrake 9.0, which I'll gladly give a whirl when time permits. I was looking at the contents listing on the back of the DVD just today when I thought back to the last time I saw a CD collection of software. I was rummaging through the computer software bin at Borders in Chicago when I found a 2-disc Windows 95 shareware/freeware CDROM from Walnut Creek (the CD was basically a mirror of the Windows95.com shareware site) and a 4-disc FreeBSD collection. I don't think I've seen anything like that today for Windows or any other platform with the exception of the free magazine inserts and those ultra cheap game collections that still contain shareware versions of Hexen v 1.0... ah memories.

    16. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't consider myself a newbie any longer. I went MS free (except for working on my sister's office network) almost 6 years ago. I started with Redhat ( 4 something), bought a Caldera and a Turbo Linux version then found Mandrake 7 something, have used almost every version since then and never looked back. The installs have everything I need, the admin tools are great and the default KDE looks great. I switched my brother over from MS and even he, a complete newbie has taken to bad mouthing MS. His psu died and e has been loaned a Win 2K system. 2 viruses in the first hour!

    17. Re:Do we see a pattern here? by vnguyen6 · · Score: 1

      And it doesn't hurt to see Mandrake eye candy either.

  33. Bah by Lakedemon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Americans, french, israeli, palestinian are all human people...
    We all eat, drink, sleep
    We all like children
    We all love Women (men/dogs/cats/sheeps...)

    Having the same tastes, we could all be friends (Bah...).

    Well, there are these that bad bad things called "Hate" and "Politics" that make/made people do awfull things this century and the last one...

    Personnaly, I'm french and I love americans (the american girls).
    So, you see... The antagonism between france-us isn't so bad.... ^_^
    Lakedemon
    ps : go go go Mandrake !

    1. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personnaly, I'm french and I love americans (the american girls).

      And what do you have to trade? French women? I'm sorry, please try again with a less hairy offer... =P

    2. Re:Bah by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Personnaly, I'm french

      Is that why you have that crazy accent? ;)

      I'm thinking that the antagonism between France and the US is mostly made up, or exists solely in the government. I have not met a single American who really thought France was evil, they just disagreed with you guys' politics. Nor have I met anyone that really acts/feels antagonistic towards the French.

      For the most part, we've all agreed to disagree, because that's what it takes to keep our own disparate cultures in the US from killing each other (and it doesn't always stop that anyway).

      Besides, when you're the country that gets to dictate who has nukes and who doesn't by virtue of the fact that you're also the country with the biggest nukes, well, you know how that goes. And it's probably about time for us to field our own Napolean.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    3. Re:Bah by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      Hey nothing wrong with a woman showing her natural side

      /can't speak french anyways

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    4. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are all humans.
      We have some things in common.

      But those are certainly not morals in regard to animals:

      * Europeans and Americans sell/eat cows.
      * In India, the cow is a Holy creature.

      * In Europe and America we have cats and dogs as pets.
      * Koreans, Taiwanese and possibly other Asian countries sell/eat these animals.

      Obviously, norms & morals aren't the same in this example. We assign different value for the same issue, based on our culture.

      Another example:
      * Hunks fuck girls
      * Nerds don't

      If your dad is a nerd, go figure where you're from.

  34. Re:Sigh by DrNibbler · · Score: 1

    You see it's not open like source it's open like beer.

    --
    Sean.OutaHere()
  35. Sweet! by feidaykin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This post is brought to you by Fire($current_name) and Mandrake 10.0! Just got it installed on this box today, actually. Busy building stuff right now.

    In fact I'm having a bit of trouble with GTK+, it's yelling about lib/cpp failing sanity check. As far as I know it shouldn't even be using that instead of GCC, but whatever...

    I've always loved Mandrake. Anyone can complain that Linux isn't user-friendly, but it takes very brilliant people to actually get up and DO something about it. And that's exactly what the Mandrake distro is: Linux as user-friendly as it gets. From the install to the first time you start X, anyone who has even used a computer will feel right at home.

    Granted, to get the most out of any Linux distro, it helps to be a propeller-head, but it's great to know that, once installed, you could teach a granny how to use Mandrake for Web/email/office apps.

    I'd just like to sum up my thoughts about why you should give Mandrake money in a quote I saw years ago: "Support those that enrich the world, not those that use the world to get rich."

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  36. yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that would be *BSD.

  37. Do we see a Linux Desktop here? by shadowcabbit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can a distro survive if it is everybody's first distro, and nobody's second?

    Yes, absolutely. Because it will never be "nobody's second"-- people naturally resist change. If enough people are convinced to switch from Windows and wind up using Mandrake as their desktop-- and it's my opinion that Mandrake is well suited to that task-- then the lower-tier users (ie people who just plain want to use the computer for email, web, etc.) will stay with Mandrake. Hell, we've got people who're resisting the change from Windows 95. When something works, Random User will not risk it by upgrading unless there's a damn good reason. Random Geeks (like us) will always progress to the Next Big Distro, and in the case of Mandrake, it won't be that.

    If you want to make a Linux Desktop a reality, make it simple to use and get into. Mandrake gets that pretty close to right. It was my first distro, and I trashed my hard drive twice before I finally got it right; Mandrake's installers made things pretty easy, but not infallible. And besides, how many Random Users are going to worry about installing it more than once?

    (Wow, my first Linux-zealot post. How'd I do? ^_^)

    --
    "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    1. Re:Do we see a Linux Desktop here? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Random Geeks (like us) will always progress to the Next Big Distro, and in the case of Mandrake, it won't be that.

      Actually, at this point I don't anticipate ever getting off Mandrake. It's too easy. ;) Just because I *can* spend my time wondering around config files and crap and making my system do exactly what I want doesn't mean that I *want* to spend my time doing that. Mandrake gets it 90% of the way there, and the remaining 10% I think hard about how badly I want it, or if I can just settle with what Mandrake gave me.

      More and more, I'm settling with what Mandrake gave me, because more and more it's closer to what I want, and the differences become negligible.

      I'm not saying Mandrake is the be-all end-all Linux distribution, but it suits my needs perfectly, when you get right down to it. I sat my daughter down and gave her a brief rundown on how to use KDE so she could play Frozen Bubble and LBreakout. When she can finally read fairly consistently, I'll give her a username & password for the machine. When I finally get her her own computer, I'm going to burn off some Mandrake CDs and tell her to build it. :) There's not another distribution I feel confident enough to just give to my 5-year-old like that, and I sure in the fuck wouldn't try Windows on her like that. (Of course, she'll probably be 6, close to 7, before I do that)

      It's a machine my wife can administer, if it's really needed from time to time. So I don't have to answer the call "Daddy come fix this computer!". I can just say "Fix it yourself". If it's not my computer, I'll give them the root password and let them trash it. And that's fine, 'cause they have to rebuild it if necessary. In the meantime, Mandrake has made it very simple for me to mount up everybody's home directory from a central machine, and parts of /usr as well, so I can make sure the stuff everybody *needs* is installed properly and working, and when they do thrash their systems, they won't have any loss of *important* functionality.

      Naturally, I'm happy about this news. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  38. Magic! by BSDKaffee · · Score: 1

    It's magic!

  39. I am by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not chapter 11, but chapter 7 (dissolution of the corporation.)

  40. Better than saying by Azureflare · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It's better than saying: Hey! Come on over and download whatever you want, it's free! Don't bother to reward us for our hard work!

    SOMEbody needs to support them if they're going to be really successful. And that's me ($120 Silver Club Member).

    Also, in addition to paying for the club, you get the powerpack for download, and commercial/contrib packages on the mandrakeclub rpm section. (If you're a silver member).

    Actually, what really drove me to go from $60 to $120 was the fact that I could download the Mandrake Move! CD with USB Key functionality... Man that thing rocks!

    So I figure I'm getting enough out of it to justify the price of $120 for a year... Others may not feel the same way. Others may subscribe to online games... I choose to support Mandrake. Everyone has to make that individual choice, but Mandrake can help people realize that it's important to support Mandrake.

    Don't you think they have a right to ask people to support them? Isn't that the whole spirit of the OSS community?

    1. Re:Better than saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't you think they have a right to ask people to support them? Isn't that the whole spirit of the OSS community?"

      No. OSS spirit is giving; not asking others to give what they have to your causes (which is begging not giving).

      Asking OTHERS to give is SELFISH. Giving yourself is not. Asking others to MATCH your giving is pragmatic and useful (but neither noble nor altruistic).

  41. Bankruptcy 101 by chicagothad · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok,

    Just as an FYI, most companies are profitable *under* Chapter 11. During 11, the company has all of it's debt (aside from secured) debt stayed and does not pay interest. So, it would be make all the top line $$$$ and not having to pay what drove you into barkruptcy in the first place!

    I am rooting for these guys...but let's see what the profitability looks like over the next 2 quarters...

  42. Mandrake was my third! by dallaylaen · · Score: 1

    Second to use on a regular basis. And I feel like stick with it, even make it better maybe...

    I'm too lazy to WORK with all that command line... It's good when I program/learn/toy around, but Mandrake made me typing commands into "execute" window (BTW, did it get autocopletion since 9.0?)

    The thing I'm wishing for is also packages compiled with the oldest fitting library, not the bleeding edge ones. It's pain to upgrade every prog installed...

    --
    WYSIWIG, but what you see might not be what you need
  43. good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now can they tell me why PCMCIA stopped working for no reason, but works well in windows?

  44. Bright Future for Mandrake and Linux by stealth.c · · Score: 4, Informative

    With even more positive press, I hope more people decide Mandrake is worth a subscription or two. I used to be a SUSE guy, but Mandrake was my first taste of Linux, and I've at last returned to Mandrake, for a few very important reasons.

    It's a great distro because you can get your hands as dirty as you could with Debian, and yet its glossy and friendly enough for a newbie. And that's good for me, because I don't ALWAYS want to pretend I'm running Gentoo. That, and Mandrake doesn't seem to lean so heavily on one desktop environment that they ignore the other. I can use GNOME or KDE (or install XFCE4) and not feel like I'm running in some secondary mode. SUSE was like this with GNOME and RedHat & Debian seems to treat KDE that way.

    Mandrake has always been concentrating on desktop use, and has been doing it for years, so I think it's a lot more mature than Lindows (can't speak on Xandros). As soon as I can afford it, I'm purchasing 10.0 Final on DVD. God knows I've been using their distro for long enough.

  45. Re:Sigh by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    Obviously, the parent poster is from Boston.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  46. As long as they... by dark-br · · Score: 1

    ...do not hire the previously unemployed Ohio power plant operator who's now the unemployed NY 911 system operator, they should be fine.

  47. profitable by... not refunding money by apoupc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I ordered Mandrake from them in November and after a few weeks of them not shipping, I cancelled the order. They kept on saying they would refund the money, but never did. Then they just stopped replying to my emails. If this is how they are dealing with coming out of Chapter 11, that is a sad way to go.

  48. Re:Don't Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    nice to see al franken cruises /. better go practice up for your brief radio stint.

  49. PR = Public Relations by antic · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to point something out -- PR most commonly denotes "Public Relations" rather than "Press Release" as this submitter has implied.

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    1. Re:PR = Public Relations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless it refers to Proportional Representation... or Pedantic Readership!

  50. BEND OVER!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corporate Amerika is gonna make a delivery RIGHT UP YOUR ASS!!

  51. Re:Don't Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    flip dismissals are weak. Rebut with facts. You are dumber than my ass hole.

  52. Re:Hey, guess what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be in Soviet Russia then.

  53. Good News by BCW2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Mandrake has always had a very nice distro, so I wish them well. Hopefully we will see the competition at least get back to two for the main desktop. RH could have made it three but they caved. Some people don't like Suse for some reason. I have used and like all three, each new version just gets better no matter who's name is on the box or the website.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  54. Mandrake has graduated by gosand · · Score: 1
    they have debt to pay off for the next 9 YEARS.


    What, they just graduated college?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  55. It's not hard to be profitable... by generalpf · · Score: 1

    ...when you cheat your creditors out of what you owe them.

  56. Re:Don't Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And which country has vetoed more UN resolutions in the past 40 years or so then all the other UN security countil members put together?

    And if George Dubya was so sure the motion would pass, why was it not put to a vote? Because the majority of UN Security Council members were going to vote against it, thats why.

    Stop watching Fox and start learning about the outside world. How quickly you forget that without French help you would have lost your precious war of independence.

    But of course, do not let history get in the way of your big ego.

  57. Out of Bankruptcy by zemoo · · Score: 1

    Mandrake isn't dying at all!
    It's #! at distrowatch.com

    The reason it was in Chapter-11 was dot-COM style expansion by a new management team that has since been relieved of its duties.

    Their whole education push a few years back guzzled their profits -- and the debts carved away at their earnings

  58. Re:Don't Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Dude, you got trolled. Chill out, most Americans don't actually believe that, and I don't really think the guy who posted it did either. He was just trying to get a rise out of somebody and he succeeded with you.


    Next time, don't get so bothered over a 12 year old kid who gets off on pissing off people on Slashdot.

  59. Not really by zakharin · · Score: 1

    Funny, I went through Slackware -> Debian -> Mandrake. I think it had to do with how much work I wanted to get done _on_ the OS (setting it up, that is) vs _in_ it. Plus Slackware was the distribution of choice back when I first installed it. Downloaded all the packages over a not-really-56k modem too.

  60. Bummer, was Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I still find this to be an atrocious distribution. Twice burned, thrice shy? Anyway, I personally think their biz plan should have been to sell their installation/partitioning software for all popular distros, say $10 a pop, and give up on the bastardization of RedHat's core work. The rest is a waste now that SUSE and Gentoo are more "complete" and Fedora continues to be the baseline distro.

  61. Re:Don't Forget by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    How quickly you forget that without French help you would have lost your precious war of independence.

    Consider that debt paid in full upon the closing of the second world war.

    But of course, do not let history get in the way of your big ego.

    But of course.

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  62. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice ad hominem attacks, Mr. Hermit. Damned Anomalous Cow Herds.

    1. Re:Wow! by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      Actually, if I really wanted to get into ad hominem, I'd go much more into it. This person has shown quite a bit of anger and shown us quite a bit about himself (or herself) that he is quite unaware he has shown. ...Kind of like walking downtown without any pants on and not realizing it -- and then, if you do realize it, are shocked by how much everyone has seen that you thought they couldn't see.

    2. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for not going much more into any ad hominems. And fucking cussing too fucking much is shitty, and I'm fucking glad you didn't pull that shit. That's fucked up, you know?

      So what did (s)he reveal besides a much firmer grasp on the concept of bankruptcy than you? Care to take a years late, smaller paycheck for your work from your clients? As long as they eventually pay you some of the money, they've paid their debt in full, and you have no reason to complain.

  63. Re:Don't Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude - if the brits/yanks didn't do it the Russians would have :P

    Do svidanya kapiltalist! ;)

  64. A bit disingenuous by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1

    Just more proof that open source software truly is a profitable industry!

    Ooh... they just made half a mil or so of profit!! Microsoft has individual customers who pay more than Mandrakesoft's entire revenue stream. Hell, SCO has customers that pay more than that.

    Open source will not "truly be a profitable industry" while /. is still celebrating pocket change.

    -a

    1. Re:A bit disingenuous by bdeclerc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let me see : Mandrake are putting out a software package that contains more software then Microsoft's entire product portfolio, they're doing it at a much, much lower price then Microsoft, *and* they're making a profit doing so...

      MS couldn't produce Notepad for the cost Mandrake has producing MDK-linux, can you say "commoditisation"? Then you might realise why Microsoft is running shit-scared of Linux...

      Open Source is, for Mandrake, truly a profitable industry, because they are making a (small, but real) profit, the big profits in this case go to the purchasers of Linux, who don't have to shell out oodles of cash again and again for what is, in essence, a non-core expense for anybody not directly in the software-business. The profits aren't gone, they're just elsewhere...

    2. Re:A bit disingenuous by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      OMG, that is priceless!! If I were the CEO of Enron or Worldcom, I would definitely use that one.

      "Sir, in your tenure, you drove a profitable company right into bankruptcy..."
      "The profits aren't gone, they're just elsewhere."

      -a

    3. Re:A bit disingenuous by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Mandrake's ability to generate a profit on an operating system can't be compared to Microsoft. Remember Micrsoft had the oppurtunity to grow and expand when the competition in operating systems was very limited and if not for IBM's and Xerox's mistakes I strongly doubt that would have made it. Mandrake is doing it the hard way against a monopolist who uses FUD, distorted OEM contracts, blocking of driver software, lawyers, political chicanery, manipulation of the finnacial markets, basically anything it can do whether legal or illegal that it feels it can get away with (looks like some of it's less than honest activities are going to come back and haunt them - damn penguinistas are impossible to silence /). Not only that it has to compete against other Linux distributions (which is the really hard part), they should be congratulated, they deserve it.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:A bit disingenuous by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1

      Not only that it has to compete against other Linux distributions (which is the really hard part)

      No kidding. Regardless, you're just making excuses for them. The OP's reports about Mandrake's profit potential are still exaggerated.

      -a

  65. BeOS forever! by CyberdogOSX · · Score: 1

    just wanted to see what you'd say:-)

  66. Re:Don't Forget by boisepunk · · Score: 0

    causing more death and genocide in the process

    Russians are good people, but their governments suck.

    --
    main(0)
  67. Mandrake Dist. or How I Learned to stop Worrying.. by groot · · Score: 1

    ...about my Windows partition and Learned to Love Linux.

    In between school and my work (computers, on other platforms ;) I play/learn/expand my knowledge of Linux,etc. I also started with Slackware, then RH and now Mandrake. I will probably try Gentoo, next when I can afford a few seconds of my time.

    Mandrake is a great distribution for Newbies, just ask my teenage daughter who has stopped asking me when I was going to restore the XP partition on the home system. She is amazed at how fast it runs (at least Mozilla). She has even asked me to install Windowmaker on it so she can try some 'goth' theme. Who knew!

    --
    "Just remember, it takes a village idiot." -- The Motley Fool.
  68. Re:That's just what I want to do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes workers, unite because middle management is full of stool stains like the above fellow. A word of advice to the poster, stop siring children with relatives and the kids will stop having such huge overbites!!!

  69. Re:Don't Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judging by the grammar and logic I would say you are a child so I'll go easy on you.

    France is hated throughout the world
    Wrong. France isn't hated throughout the world. Only in the minds of rednecks too young or mentally feeble to recognise war propaganda.

    there's 14 countries that took part, more than you named that didn't take part
    It's much easier to name the 14 countries who did support than to individually name the 180 or so who didn't.

  70. It's not there for the French, anyway by ianscot · · Score: 1
    Just got back from a week in Paris with my ten-year-old kids. (Man, what a city. Unbelievable, culturally, architecturally, and so much more liveable and just plain beautiful than a New York or Washington, DC. In general I'm proud of the American idea not to place our political capitals in the largest commercial cities, but Paris is amazing. You couldn't see everything that city has to offer in a lifetime.)

    Met with nothing but unflagging friendliness from everyone there -- the only exceptions being averted eyes when a group of American teenagers staying in the hotel with us behaved exceptionally boorishly, and then it was just a sort of wince. Teenagers. Loud American teenagers. I related. The people of Paris to be polite -- and helpful when you showed any signs at all of needing help.

    I came back, though, and the guy a cube across went on for some time -- days now -- about various awful things I surely hated there. Could I drink the water in that third world country? Aren't they all a bunch of communists? And so on. The picture he has of France right now is a sort of funhouse mirror of his own political leanings. And it's not pretty. No surprises there.

    Sad to say, our culture war heroes are on the wrong side of a completely stupid argument here, and they're just plain petulant about that. They were wrong at the time -- the UN Security Council arguments about whether Bush had valid grounds for his war will show you just how right Villepain was at the time -- and now they're PO'ed about it. Typical behavior toward any dissenting opinion that questions their questionable thinking.

    They resent questions. It's as simple as that. And that feeling's still there for some of the people on this side of the Atlantic. Pathetically.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.