Slashdot Mirror


British Chicken-Warmed Nuke

darrellberry writes "During the Cold War, British researchers developed a nuclear landmine, kept operational during cold conditions by packing it full of live chickens. This story has appeared in a few UK media channels this morning. Probably an April Fools', but who knows? The bomb is supposedly on display at the National Archives in Kew, so if you live in London you can go and see for yourselves..." Also a BBC story and an older New Scientist blurb.

52 of 195 comments (clear)

  1. Not a prank by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Informative


    The BBC are running a separate 'this is true, honest' story, detailing other unlikely stories alongside... I like the fact that one of our railways cost more than a trip to the moon.

    Only in the UK...

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Not a prank by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

      I like the fact that one of our railways cost more than a trip to the moon.

      And takes just as long too

    2. Re:Not a prank by OECD · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm inclined to believe this one, if only because it seems to bizarre to be fabricated.

      Remember, this is the nation that gave us Supermarionation...

      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    3. Re:Not a prank by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, but they missed out on the story about newspaper editors being banned from reporting the results of school football matches if one team scores substantially higher than another team. In this case the score was 29-0 defeat.

    4. Re:Not a prank by spellraiser · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I just love this quote at the end of that story:

      Tom O'Leary, head of education and interpretation at the National Archives, told the paper: "It does seem like an April Fool but it most certainly is not. The Civil Service does not do jokes."

      Excellent point - I think this pretty much settles the 'April Fool or not' debate for this one.

      Or does it ??

      --
      I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    5. Re:Not a prank by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think this was Google's April Fool's joke this year. I think the 1 gig email story is more likely true (though the details may be wrong, who knows).

    6. Re:Not a prank by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But it makes no sense. The plutonium 239 alone should be enough to warm to device and keep it operational. If the PU-239 can't keep it warm, then the chickens are as good as refrigerator meat.

    7. Re:Not a prank by Fishstick · · Score: 3, Informative

      > bad harvest of the italian spaghetti crop

      Swiss, and it was a bumper crop, not a "bad harvest"

      it ranks #1 on the Top 100 April Fool's Day Hoaxes of All Time

      #1: The Swiss Spaghetti Harvest
      In 1957 the respected BBC news show Panorama announced that thanks to a very mild winter and the virtual elimination of the dreaded spaghetti weevil, Swiss farmers were enjoying a bumper spaghetti crop. It accompanied this announcement with footage of Swiss peasants pulling strands of spaghetti down from trees. Huge numbers of viewers were taken in, and many called up wanting to know how they could grow their own spaghetti trees. To this question, the BBC diplomatically replied that they should "place a sprig of spaghetti in a tin of tomato sauce and hope for the best." Check out the actual broadcast archived on the BBC's website (You need the RealVideo player installed to see it, and it usually loads very slowly).

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  2. The Times... by REBloomfield · · Score: 2, Informative

    (british broadsheet), is also doing an 'honest guv' type story: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1058550, 00.html

  3. Uh huh. by Jaywalk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Right up there with the spaghetti harvest.

    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
  4. from the chickens-is-there-anything-they're-not... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...good for dept?

    Uhm, yes. They don't make very good boomerangs.

    Or coffee filters. Or baseball gloves. (Although that one would be fun)

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  5. Not an April Fool! by CaptainBaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    This BBC story says that "Plans to fill a nuclear landmine with chickens to regulate its temperature were considered during the Cold War. Officials at the National Archives say it is coincidence the secret plan was revealed on 1 April."

    I, for one, welcome our nuclear chicken overlords...

    1. Re:Not an April Fool! by boisepunk · · Score: 2, Funny

      is this somewhat like that cs_italy counter-strike map? shoot the chicken and it explodes?

      --
      main(0)
  6. I can see the ChicFilet commercial now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I feel like chicken tonight....like radioactive chicken tonight....chicken tonight!

  7. Yay!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is the diffference between April Fool's Day and every other day on Slashdot?

    On April fools day, everyone knows slashdot will be full of useless information. Every other day, the editors aren't aware fo this fact.

  8. Not unusual by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Missing are the brilliant types of engineers who can find an answer to a problem around them without needing a bigger budget and stuff.

    My father worked (among the other 10,000) engineers in Oakridge, TN, during WWII and they frequently packed delicate nulcear instruments in popcorn (dry popped, no salt or butter) simply because it worked well and was easy to dispose of.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  9. Why today? by peterprior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The civil service has obviously had access to these documents for a while, so why do they have to "announce" these apparently real plans on April 1st and then get all irritable and have to deny repeatedly that its an april fools joke.
    Why didn't they release the story yesterday, or couldn't they have waited until tomorrow?

    1. Re:Why today? by wfberg · · Score: 4, Informative

      The civil service has obviously had access to these documents for a while, so why do they have to "announce" these apparently real plans on April 1st and then get all irritable and have to deny repeatedly that its an april fools joke.
      Why didn't they release the story yesterday, or couldn't they have waited until tomorrow?


      It was on BBC news yesterday.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  10. Can't take it! by geeber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Must
    Stop
    Reading
    Slashdot
    .
    Until
    .
    .
    Tom orrowwwww......

    1. Re:Can't take it! by Tenaka+Kahn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's already tomorrow here...

  11. April fool or foolish? by BJZQ8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't think that a terrified flock of irradiated chickens would produce more heat than something like a quantity of Pu-238 or Pu-240, the former of which is quoted as producing 1/2 watt of heat per gram...nor would they be as durable.

    1. Re:April fool or foolish? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because plutonium is quite expensive, quite rare and quite unstable. You wouldn't want to put plutonium anywhere near a nuclear device for fear of premature ejac^H^H^Hxplosions. HAL.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  12. Chickens by KillerHamster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Way off-topic, but who cares, its a holiday...

    "What if we celebrated Valentine's Day with chickens instead of hearts? Then we'd say, 'I love you, with all my chicken.'"
    - Sesame Street

    1. Re:Chickens by mr.capaneus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Most people on slashdot celebrate Valentine's Day by choking the chicken. Does that count?

    2. Re:Chickens by BgJonson79 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's all fun and games 'til Rosey Palms confesses she's pregnant... and it's not yours.

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

  13. Landmine? by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't the point of a landmine to explode right under a group of people? Why does it matter if the charge is a nuclear detonation. As long as the people you are trying to nuke are withing a mile of the explosion, you're probably going to get them. Why not just do a remote control or timed device and save yourself all the hassle?

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Landmine? by BenBenBen · · Score: 2, Informative
      "Landmine" is a bit of a misnomer - these devices were designed to be planted in the ground on the plains of Germany, and detonated by remote control if there ever came a time when the Sovs were in control of that area.

      Currently, Israel deploys nuclear landmines and I'd guess they're not alone. Shrub's apparent penchant for tactical nukes would suggest that there's going to be more random nuclear weapons in the future too.

      Personally, I want to see a nuclear Dambuster's bomb, in time for the next world stone skimming contest.

      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    2. Re:Landmine? by Scutter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read the article.

      The seven-ton weapon, codenamed Blue Peacock, was a state-of-the art munition to be buried on the plains of northern Germany during a British retreat and detonated by remote control or timer to destroy advancing Russian forces in the event of the Third World War.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  14. (OT -- I think) Does anyone else see... by kclittle · · Score: 5, Funny
    the deep irony of being given 5 moderator points to /. on April 1?

    --
    Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
    1. Re:(OT -- I think) Does anyone else see... by fritz1968 · · Score: 2, Funny

      the deep irony of being given 5 moderator points to /. on April 1?

      too bad that we can't get moderator points for the slashdot editors. They would pick their stories a little better. I can see it now:

      Wal-Mart Sells PCs Preloaded With Sun's Linux (Score: +3, informative)
      Book Reviews: The Power of Persuasion (Score: +2, Interesting)
      British Chicken-Warmed Nuke (Score:-1, Bad April fools day joke)
      Your Rights Online: IBM Files For Declaratory Judgement In SCO Case (Score: +5, Excellent!)
      Gates: Hardware, Not Software, Will Be Free (Score: +4, Funny)
      Your Rights Online: PanIP Drops E-commerce Patent Lawsuits (Score: -1, Boring)

      --
      It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
  15. Re:Not an April Fool by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of course, lack of registration makes it hard to see. Try this other site for the real story.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  16. Cluckzilla by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ah. I always wondered about the origin of Cluckzilla, who ravaged Leeds during the late 1960s.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  17. Uh, Oh! by b12arr0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I smell a PITA protest......

  18. Seymour Cray by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Funny


    Seymour Cray would've used oxen to warm his nuclear landmine.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  19. Are you suggesting nuclear bombs migrate? by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Are you suggesting nuclear bombs migrate?"

    "Not at all. They could be carried...."

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  20. Lovely! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Funny

    If this were true, I can already imagine Soviet army personel encountering this weapon:

    Soviet private: In the name of Lenin, what's that awful noise?
    Soviet sergeant: It sounds like... Oh no...
    Soviet private: Chickens? A whole bunch of chickens?
    Soviet sergeant: PULL BACK!!! Tell Dmitri to launch all ICBMs! Get me in contact with the Kremlin!
    Soviet private: What? They're going to peck us to death?
    Soviet sergeant: Silence, cappitalist pig! Those anglobastards witll suffer for their foul crime!
    1. Re:Lovely! by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course, it ought to have ended:

      Soviet sergeant: Silence, cappitalist pig! Those anglobastards witll suffer for their fowl crime!

      Simon :-)

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
  21. Not just for warming anymore. by cbiffle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think everyone's overlooking the very real possibility that these chickens were used for more than just heat.

    Like styrofoam in the H-bomb, this seemingly innocuous packing material (chickens) might be converted to plasma by radiation pressure, thereby dramatically increasing the explosive yield of the device.

    Just wait. I give it 20 years, and we'll see these docs declassified. Of course, then we'll have to worry about rogue states building C-bombs.

  22. Heard of this before. by AlecC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have heard of the nuclear landmines in a non-April 1st context before, so I think the underlying story is probably true. The idea is that there are some bottlenecks which an advancing Soviet force, particularly tanks, would have to pass through (bridges etc). Why send aircraft to bomb them at great risk when you could put the bomb in place at your lesiur. 10kt is not a particularly big nuke, anyway. I don't think the radiation part was intentional - it is the reason the idea got canned. If they had a "clean" bomb, they might still be there.

    It goes along with thinking at the time: they were also training troops go hide as the battlefromt passed over them, the re-emerge to harrass the enemy rear and lines of communication.

    The chickens, however, are probably someone's April Fool addition.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  23. Reason WHY its an april fool by mixtape5 · · Score: 2, Informative

    1)chickens are living organisms, how are they to survive while being barried underground? if they put the chickens down they would put them down at the same time as the bomb...and the chickens can survive through the winter?? They should try to survive any day before a winter day

    --
    WoW: Scheod 70 orc warlock on Shadowmoon
  24. US Landmines by Catmeat · · Score: 4, Interesting
    According to this. The US deployed nuclear landmines (the MADM system) from 1962 until 1986.

    The page also shows a SADM - the nuclear demolition charge intended for use by parachute dropped saboteurs. The SADM's W54 warhead was the smallest and lightest developed by the US and was also used in theDavey Crockett 'nuclear bazooka' and the AIM 26-A nuclear air-to-air missile.

  25. Dirty bomb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does all the included chicken poop make this a dirty bomb?

  26. Obvious flaws in this... by ChrisPaget · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1) Radioactive material tends to be self-heating. That's why you can run a power station off it.

    2) A solid steel container, buried underground for a week. How do you train a chicken to hold it's breath, and how long can it do so for?

    3) According to the NewScientist article, "If disturbed or damaged, they were primed to explode within 10 seconds". Surely chickens *inside* the thing would disturb it, and set it off?

    However, a quick office poll still reveals 50-50 support for the idea. Whatever happens, half the office will get laughed at tomorrow...:)

  27. This isn't a prank either by gowen · · Score: 2, Funny

    A 1944 design for a pigeon-guided missile, that was to be used to sink German battleships. Until the Navy decided it was a stupid idea.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  28. Re:Not unusual by wass · · Score: 2, Funny
    Missing are the brilliant types of engineers who can find an answer to a problem around them without needing a bigger budget and stuff.

    I took a grad-level physics-based electromagnetism class last year, and picked up some supplementary E&M books from the library. One of them was from an engineering slant, and actually described the following problem and it's solution.

    Farmers wanted a way to keep pigs warm in the winter. So they estimated the thickness of a layer of fat under the pig's skin, determined permittivities and permeabilities of the fat and the muscle-layers underneath the fat, and solved the boundary conditions of Maxwell's equations in the presence of RF radiation.

    The result was that they effectively made a low-cost 'microwave oven' tuned to the pig's fat layer, which would keep them warm and still be relatively cheap (ie, put the heater in the pen without worrying about walls, etc).

    Kind of cool, but disturbing in a way too.

    --

    make world, not war

  29. Re:from the chickens-is-there-anything-they're-not by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or baseball gloves. (Although that one would be fun)
    It depends on where you plan putting your hand...

    Then again, you might have a different idea of fun than me.

  30. This saves a lot of money by wllf · · Score: 2, Funny

    After winning the war using this weapon the Brits would not have to send in much help to the conquered survivors. Hot roasted chicken just falls out of the sky. And it is easy to find in the dark too.

  31. I've nuked a chicken by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but I don't think I ever chickened a nuke.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  32. Partly a Hoax, partly true! by timbos · · Score: 5, Informative
    Blue Peacock does/did exist. I have the dubious privilege of having touched the only remaining example, housed in the museum collection at AWE. The other is (and I quote the curator here) `lost'!

    It was a `landmine' designed to be set on a timer to ambush the Soviets as they advanced across Europe. It was based on the Blue Danube device that was the UK's first air-delivered nuclear weapon (essentially, they removed the fins).

    The device had up to an 8-day timer, but could also be set off locally --- either by booby trap, incase it was discovered, or a trigger. Amusingly there was a 10 second delay when you operated the trigger, just time to duck and cover :o) The chickens, though? That's clearly a hoax. Apart from anything else, the device was air and water tight.

  33. Re:Nukes are warm by LabRat007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    oK replying to my own post is kinda lame however.. I had a buddy in the Army that was of all things an MP. His job was to gaurd nuclear shells for long range artierly. Its the middle of winter and the other guards insist on sitting on the crates because they continually emit heat. My buddy opted out beacuse he didnt want glow in the dark cajones.

    --
    "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
  34. Of course they claim last example is in Russia: by Future+Shock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cause it gives you: CHICKEN KIEV!!! That, for me, suggests it's a hoax... Future Shock