Slashdot Mirror


Sun and Microsoft Make Nice

DrLudicrous writes "Sun Microsystems and Microsoft have reached some kind of settlement (NYTimes, registration required) with regards to patent issues and Sun's antitrust suit against Microsoft. Microsoft is apparently going to pay Sun about 1.6 billion US dollars, join into a ten-year pact of cooperation, and resolve a set of patent disputes. This has been in the works for about a year, starting as a series of phone calls between Scott McNealy and Steve Ballmer. You can also catch the story here." update oh well, it's a duplicate. Nothing else interesting happening today :)

152 comments

  1. Damn deja vu. Where's that cat ? by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... because I could have sworn that 'Sun and Microsoft Settled Litigation' yesterday...

    Looks like it loses 400 million dollars a day though, so pretty soon Sun'll be paying a huge wad of cash over to Bill...

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Damn deja vu. Where's that cat ? by Serapth · · Score: 1

      Phew... im glad to see im not the only one having deja vu!

      Phew... im glad to see im no the only one having deja vu!

    2. Re:Damn deja vu. Where's that cat ? by Osrin · · Score: 1

      So has Microsoft paid $3.2bn now?

    3. Re:Damn deja vu. Where's that cat ? by mindstormpt · · Score: 1

      Ditto...

      I was kinda thinking slashdot was a bit late on this, then I remembered it wasn't :)

    4. Re:Damn deja vu. Where's that cat ? by kev0153 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Looks like they have changed something in the Matrix.

    5. Re:Damn deja vu. Where's that cat ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the big question remains; is the JVM (the REAL one, not MS's brain-dead one) going to be pre-installed?

    6. Re:Damn deja vu. Where's that cat ? by pballsim · · Score: 1

      Actually it was always 1.6 billion. The article yesterday posted it wrong.

    7. Re:Damn deja vu. Where's that cat ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting but slashdot is a big loser in this news, since it will make slashdot more and more boring. The duplicate post is a good indication where slashdot is heading. Without Microsoft's troubles and the stupid hope of winning against Microsoft, many slashdot monkeys will turn to their boring day to day work, probably doing some perl stuff here and there, installing systems etc...

      Apple section may still do business though, but my guess is that some editors will be laid off, like michael.

  2. Old News. by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 2, Funny

    And i think we already went over how it gives Microsoft a "foot in the door" for interoperability with Unix via java and .NET.

    First they ignored, then laughed and are now assimilating.

  3. What effect will this have on Java? by James+A.+M.+Joyce · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope Microsoft doesn't apply any pressure on Sun to get rid of Java or screw it up. They're probably acutely aware that this money will make it easier for them to destroy the highly portable and competitive language. It's a veritable C# killer!

    1. Re:What effect will this have on Java? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      or perhaps its a J# killer?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:What effect will this have on Java? by pballsim · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No effect at all. If anything it will actually help Java out.

      Don't see how conspiry theory's are marked interesting.

      Java is to big to be killed, and it's the source for a lot of money for Sun. This will actually help both C# and Java because you can write in either language and compile into either Java Byte Code or MSIL (Microsoft's Byte Code). This will also help the Mono project out and make Eric Raymond's group's job a lot easier.

      Java will also get more support on Windows.

    3. Re:What effect will this have on Java? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Is java a money maker for Sun? No question that it's a money maker for a lot of little guys but I couldn't tell you if Sun is getting anything out of it other than name recognition.


      Now java is a big beast, but Sun never let it go. IBM has fully invested in Java and Sun could burn the java house down just to screw IBM. I don't know that you could kill java but you could severely damage it and give it that "bridge to nowhere" look. That's what MS did with OS/2, they simply out spent IBM and made it look like OS/2, while it was good and technically sound, would never go anywhere long term. Even IBM fell for it after a while.


      SOmething else, MS has far more tallented people at this stuff. I've never seen them lose in this kind of agreement. I've seen plenty of their "business partners" walk away in disgust. Sun will just be the next, MS can take more from Sun than Sun will ever get from MS. You think MS is going to concede to UNIX in server space? You think they are going to just give it up to Solaris? Watch, MS will try to harvest any "server technology" they can from Sun, implement it in Windows, try to get Sun to look away from java and then walk away; sun will be poor, broke and with no competitive edge and then get bought by Apple or HP or something like that.


      I'll eat my hat if MS embraces Java over C#.

    4. Re:What effect will this have on Java? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft usually puts its arm around your shoulder
      so they can more easily stab you in the back.

      This aint good for Java. The camel's nose is in
      the tent.

      SUN: PLEASE just sell Java to IBM and take all your
      money and go to the beach.

    5. Re:What effect will this have on Java? by rshimizu12 · · Score: 1

      I think Sun will work on more interoperability with .NET via standards. Sun will keep Java alive it has too much invested now.

  4. Pigs cleared for take off and landing by windowsSucks · · Score: 0

    Beware of low flying pigs, after an agreement was signed between arch rivals microsoft and sun

  5. Sun + MS + SCO == Friends forever and ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can live in denial, or you can just accept that MS and Sun is going to turn on linux and Free Software in general.

    Brought together by a common enemy.

    Sure, MS will dispose of Sun sooner or later, but after they've done how much damage?

    1. Re:Sun + MS + SCO == Friends forever and ever. by Cynikal · · Score: 1

      no...

      SCO + Sun + MS = SCuMS

    2. Re:Sun + MS + SCO == Friends forever and ever. by Old+Uncle+Bill · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. Sun is going out of business anyway, at least the hardware business. Their servers suck on a grand scale compared to IBM and HP these days. They spent too much time resting on their laurels during the dot bomb and now they have the slowest gear on the market. They should just stick to software, which is where they do best.

      --
      Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial.
    3. Re:Sun + MS + SCO == Friends forever and ever. by Reverend+Olle · · Score: 0

      It's worth thinking about, yes.
      However, MS are getting a lot of negative publicity lately with having to pay SCO and also the european monopoly suit.
      Meanwhile, the number of Linux users seems to be increasing so hopefully things will turn out for the best eventually...

      --

      [ Ooh, the Jedis are gonna feel this one... ]
    4. Re:Sun + MS + SCO == Friends forever and ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "SCuMS" - Nice. good name for it.

      Friends, because they're the only three left (well, maybe Wind River too) who depend on OS's being expensive and proprietary.

      Micor$0ft & 5un paying each other royaltys on task schedulers and memory menagers in an OS = is a far bigger threat to Linux that SCO ever was.

    5. Re:Sun + MS + SCO == Friends forever and ever. by zuesse · · Score: 1

      So far... Not much. Are butterflies part of the penguin diet?

      --


      What great fortune for rulers that men do not think.
    6. Re:Sun + MS + SCO == Friends forever and ever. by Hacker_John_MD · · Score: 1

      Sun are still pretty much the same people, despite this settlement.

      I would be surprised if they suddenly turn on Open Source after all these years of support and development.

      Linux does compete with Solaris, but not so much at the top end. The nice cuddly chaps at Sun have been more than happy to promote open source on the Desktop. In fact Open Office is and has been crucial to Open Source being competitive at all on the desktop.

      This settlement was necessary for Sun because they were loosing money, and Microsoft were going to outlast them, but it is a surrender.

      It's not good for Open Source, but it's certainly not good for Sun, and I can't see the people who brought you open office, the phrase "evil empire", and been generally supportive of the Linux community (here in Australia anyway ... I assume its been policy), suddenly turning Microsoft pawn.

      There will be more than one Sun employee lamenting the necessity to throw in the towel, (and so should we).

  6. Microsoft needs to keep Sun alive by mr_majestyk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's in Microsoft's interest for Sun to survive because it weakens the monopoly case against it (the same way Intel keeps AMD alive). The more healthy Sun is, the more MS can point to them as a viable competitor in the server market. Indeed, this is a little reminiscient of Microsoft's investment in Apple a few years ago, which preserved that company as a nominal competitor in the desktop market. This might be called "managed competition".

    1. Re:Microsoft needs to keep Sun alive by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      I'd rather think they would use it in their 'war on linux'. How will Sun's attitude towards linux evolve during the folowing months? Will they continue to sell linux? Maybe 1.6 billion dollar is enough money to make them drop it..

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    2. Re:Microsoft needs to keep Sun alive by filekutter · · Score: 0

      I don't see microsoft worried about monopoly litigation at all. But, I do see them opening up their code to Sun and making their Linux the ONLY distro capable of running M$ code; ie making Sun VERY attractive and possibly changing the entire Linux landscape . That would be a monopoly, but easily defended by saying they're giving to the Linux community exactly what they've been asking for .

      --
      I call computer-illiteracy job security
    3. Re:Microsoft needs to keep Sun alive by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Sun hasn't ever really done much selling of Linux. They've thumbed their nose at Linux almost since the beginning. They've near-deliberately crippled it by witholding full native Java support. Even in the time period when it would have been very damaging to Microsoft for there to be full and robust Java support on Linux, Sun held back.

      --
      ---
    4. Re:Microsoft needs to keep Sun alive by espressojim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's funny you should say Intel is keeping AMD alive. Who has the faster processors? Who's now copying who's instruction set? Who's later on the 64 bit architecture?

      Someone better start holding AMD under a little harder, before they lose the whole market.

    5. Re:Microsoft needs to keep Sun alive by Xenographic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      True.

      I fear that Microsoft is just trying to keep some token competitors around for the sole purpose of avoiding antitrust claims, while at the same time making sure that their "competitors" cannot actually threaten their entrenched monopoly position.

      E.G. they get to rake in all the cash benefits of being a monopoly, while still being able to point to "competitors" which cannot actually threaten their monopoly position any longer and which simply protect them from antitrust complaints...

      All the while, while faced with anemic "competitors," they could then claim that they do have competition but that they remain in their position because their products are "better."

      In spite of deals like the one with AOL/Time Warner to use IE instead of Netscape/Mozilla, when IE is a total piece of crap (it has the worst security record of any web browser, period). Hell, I still remember being scandalized the first few times I heard about holes in IE that could lead to total compromise of a system. The worst I remember for any other browser offhand is the possibility of leaking cookies or weaknesses in their cryptography and such, none of which are even remotely comparable...

      Oh well. There's not a damned thing I can do about any of this monopoly business, but ever since I started teaching basic internet courses to the community here, I've been able to at least tell them where and how to get Mozilla, and why they should never, ever use the piece of crap that is IE :]

    6. Re:Microsoft needs to keep Sun alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. The grandparent's example is a terrible one. Intel has lost major $$ over AMD. Remember when the PII was the only processor of its class on the market - Intel made a killing. Then came AMD and intel had to drop its prices to 1/10. PII's were several thousand dollars!

    7. Re:Microsoft needs to keep Sun alive by ron_ivi · · Score: 1
      Who is making more money.

      Intel isn't in this for "Art for Art's sake". They don't mind if AMD makes processors as 1337 as the old Alpha chip, so long as people spend most of their money on Intel.

    8. Re:Microsoft needs to keep Sun alive by MoronGames · · Score: 1

      Microsoft did NOT save Apple as a competitor. Steve Jobs saved Apple. Apple still had a few billion dollars in a cash pile at the time.

      --
      hey!
    9. Re:Microsoft needs to keep Sun alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, why use a cheap copy when you've got the real thing?

    10. Re:Microsoft needs to keep Sun alive by denobug · · Score: 1

      Intel cannot kill AMD without being anti-competitive. I'm sure they watch MS and learn from the lesson. They do have the resource to squeez AMD out,but it'll prob take quite a bit of Intel's effort to do so as well.

      Apple was practically dying before MS step in with their investment. This is different from AMD's case.

  7. Re:Is this a Dup or is Slashdot now just behind by diesel66 · · Score: 1

    Yup, it's a dup

    Slow day guys?

    --



    eleven plus two / twelve plus one
  8. Sunset by pholower · · Score: 1

    A joint operation between mirosoft and sun? Sun is the backbone of internet operations. I suppose this means the end of quality products, design, and innovation from sun. I have a feeling they only did this for the money, as they have been falling on hard times lately.

    --
    -- johntracy.com, because everybody else is wrong.
    1. Re:Sunset by ron_ivi · · Score: 1
      This means more that that. It means the backbone of internet operations will legally be able to communicate with the edge of the internet (people's home PC's) because the royalty is paid up.

      Linux clients won't be able to talk to the Sun backbone and Linux servers won't be able to talk to the Windows clients.

      Microsoft and Sun decided to carve up the pie among the two of them, leaving IBM/Linux out.

  9. A little behind by phpm0nkey · · Score: 1

    This story and the Simpsons one are old news. I guess the Slashdot editors were too busy with their April Fools shenanigans to post anything that really happened in the past few days.

  10. Money, money, money... by NickeB · · Score: 1

    Microsoft pays EU big bag of cash.
    Microsoft pays SUN big bag of cash.
    What's next?

    1. Re:Money, money, money... by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft pays EU big bag of cash.
      Microsoft pays SUN big bag of cash.
      What's next?


      Phase three: Profit!

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    2. Re:Money, money, money... by veldstra · · Score: 1
      • Microsoft pays EU big bag of cash.
        Microsoft pays SUN big bag of cash.
        What's next?

      Me, I hope. But reality tells me I shouldn't get my hopes up too high
    3. Re:Money, money, money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't deal with seeing your .sig so awfull misspelled and gramatically wrong.

      It's not "imagining"... whatever the hell that means... it's "imagine"!!! You know, like the John Lennon song?

      "Imagine needing to download a .torrent to get the .torrent..." Ahh.. much better.

    4. Re:Money, money, money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Real Networks?

      Real Networks has a $1 Billion USD lawsuit against MicroSoft and it's Windows Media Player having an unfair advantage against RealPlayer.

      As of April 2, 2004, RealNetworks market capitalization (the company's public net worth) was $1.08 Billion USD.

      Why doesn't M$ simply make a billion dollar buyout of Real?

      1.) M$ would then own all of Real's technology. They already pretty much own Sun's as part of the $1.6 billion settlement with them.

      2.) The lawsuit would be gone.

      3.) Microsoft, after the $1.6 billion to Sun, $600+ million to the EU, and a potential $1 billion to RealNetworks, would still have more $50 billion on hand.

      Then, to quote Seinfeld's Soup Nazi .... "NEXT!"

    5. Re:Money, money, money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gawsh, deoz gramhar and spoellt wortds realy bug yous thart much?

  11. They made me think of a bit of Shakespeare by alumshubby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "...Like two spent swimmers that do cling together/And thus choke their art..."

    Not that Microsoft is in danger of going down the tubes anytime soon, but this has been a real pain in the neck for them and they're better off not having to combat the .Net/Java thing. Let Java be Java, and let .Net be, uh, well, let it be.

    It's sad to see what kind of shape Sun is in lately, but maybe they'll be able to focus on being a business instead of a party to a cancerous lawsuit.

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
  12. New "Patent Regime" is a threat to open source by Captain+Kirk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I watched the video of Ballmer and McNealy boasting about their new patent regime.

    I wonder what open source project will suffer first as they enforce these patents? Mono? JBoss?

    1. Re:New "Patent Regime" is a threat to open source by pballsim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The reason Micrsoft patents everything is to protect them from frivalous lawsuits (e.g. Eolas). Microsoft only pulled it's muscle on a few patent cases (e.g. Lindows).

      Microsoft has patents on stuff that Open Source uses, has patents on stuff Sun is using, etc. And the other way around.

      The cost of lawsuits is too expensive, esp for little details like an icon or what not. But companies (Eolas for having a page get information from another server?!) are created just to create items that Microsoft has not patented and sue them. Just look at Eolas - it's one guy and he was asking for 500 million for something that has been around for at least 10 years.

    2. Re:New "Patent Regime" is a threat to open source by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Lindows? That's a trademark dispute and one that favors Lindows. MS should have never been awarded Windows as a trademark.

    3. Re:New "Patent Regime" is a threat to open source by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I wonder what open source project will suffer first as they enforce these patents? .
      I would be really surprised if this isn't Microsoft's new way to take on open source projects that threaten their business. Sure, Mono, but also Linux in general. Their sponsorship of SCO was just the beginning.

      MS has found that sometimes, they cannot win from open source projects on their products' merits alone. FUD isn't working as well as it used to either. And their monopoly position and the use they make of it is turning against them as well: people and even companies choose alternatives over Microsoft products, not because of the products themselves, but because they dislike MS. Hell, MS can't even buy or assimilate threatening open-source products because there's no owning entity to buy.

      So what's left to them? That's right, you work to outlaw the competition, or at least its products. And if there's no way to sue the producers of software infringing on your intellectual property, you sue the users! What better deterrent can you think of? SCO has shown MS the light and the way.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:New "Patent Regime" is a threat to open source by urbanRealist · · Score: 1

      That's not even true. Sun is the real loser in the marketplace. Sun servers are being replaced not with just Linux servers, but with Microsoft servers as well. I learned this on a recent interview for a company that does a lot of business with banks, mutual funds, etc. They're replacing Sun with Microsoft at customers' requests.

      --
      I've seen a lot of things, but I've never been a witness.
  13. Yay! Pocket Lint! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay! Sun shareholders will be pleased to get some pocket lint from Microsoft before their firm is extinguished by ... Microsoft! Microsoft shareholders may be annoyed at paying out 9 weeks worth of income until they dig around in the other pocket and realize that there is enough under the pocket lint there to replace it right now and get back to the task of using a disposable enemy (Sun) to wipe out another enemy (OSS)!

  14. Re:Mplayer on AMD64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to elaborate: I've got 1400 MHz Opteron and it's humiliating that a 2.8 GHz P-IV with sse2 enabled packs video twice as fast as my opteron (with no extensions).

  15. According to Maureen O'Gara by jg21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    writing at JDJ's online site, McNealy said he was pressured to try glasnost by his customers, who have mixed environments and wanted the companies to "stop the noise" and "get it together." Ballmer said there was "nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing" in the agreement, which was barely sketched, that "would not delight" both sets of customers.

  16. Interesting... by unts · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From The Register, a quote from Steve Ballmer:

    This agreement recognizes that cutting edge R&D and intellectual property protection are the foundation for the growth and success of our industry.

    This can be read: "MS loves SCO's thinking."

  17. Why? by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Microsoft had nothing to fear from Sun or their litigation. Sun is a company that is slowly dying, largely due to McNealey's failure to forecast the changing OS climate over that past 10 years (and partially due only his ignorance of Linux and his stout refusal to utilize - especially in saving his low and medium end business). Sun had every oppurtunity between 1998 and 2001 to do exactly what IBM and Novell did, but McNealey's ignorance damned them.

    Microsoft could have just waited Sun out.

    1. Re:Why? by jg21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ever heard of the Java Desktop System...enough Linux for you there? Mcnealy is late to the party, but at least he's now there - largely thanks to new his newly-anointed COO, J Schwartz

    2. Re:Why? by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      Microsoft had nothing to fear from Sun or their litigation.

      wanna bet??? Sun had saved stuff from the shredder and had the real dirt on them... what's the bet's this settlement also involves Sun quitely destroying the real evidence that Microsoft would definitely not want seen dragged into open court...

      I just wonder if IBM will be putting in a court order to rescue them from Sun's shredder...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  18. Heh by Omega1045 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The next Slashdot duplicate story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

  19. Oh goody! by null+etc. · · Score: 1

    Nothing else interesting is happening today, so a story gets duped? Cool! Now I know that I have a 0.0000001% chance of getting a story posted to SlashDot, if only I could post on a day in which nothing interesting is happened.

  20. Come on, people! by ilikejam · · Score: 1

    What is going on at /. these days?
    It seems to me that about 25% of the front page articles are either reposts or just plain wrong.
    Have there been some changes to the editorial staff?

    --
    C-x C-s C-x k
  21. maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe we're not looking at this

  22. In other recent news . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just heard about this Linux thing. I really think it has potential. You should check it out.

  23. Use Windows XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use XP for your desktop. You can pay games and have access to tons of working software. Keep Linux on the server where it belongs.

    1. Re:Use Windows XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ripping DVDs on Windows is a pain in the ass.

      You've got to find a cracked DivX codec, use some ripper to rip the VOB, use another program to get the audio track and use one more program to encode the video and dub the audio track.

      MPlayer does it all and I can rip entire discs (=multiple episodes) with a script overnight.

  24. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Licensing Linux on a desktop, after renaming it so they don't have to admit it openly, wow. That is some real initiative there. Novell is profitable again and IBM is making 10 billion extra a year. Moron.

  25. For 1.6 Billion... by Qbertino · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...even I would make nice with Microsoft.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  26. heh by segfault7375 · · Score: 1, Funny


    update: oh well, it's a duplicate.

    The first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem.

    CmdrTaco: Hello, My name is CmdrTaco, and I am a duplicate addict.
    All: Hi CmdrTaco!

    :-)

  27. As long as you're reading a dup.. by dd · · Score: 1
    Why not head over to the register and read another of their editorials: Why Sun threw in the towel in Mankind vs. Microsoft

    It's worth a gander.

  28. A repeat of the M$ and Apple deal? by SailfishMac · · Score: 0

    Fought like hell, settled, played nice with each other for 5 years, just to find out each really didn't like each other after all.

  29. OOo by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft pays Sun a large amount of money. So really, a lot of the hard work that went into the free Office suite I use is being paid for by the sheep who bought Microsoft Office. Nice :-)

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. shoulda bought sunw stock last week by dankelley · · Score: 1
    cuz it went up 25% in a flash.

    Then again, everytime I've bought the stock, I've watched it halve in value.

    Seriously, though, if I could use ms-office docs on a Sun, then I might go back to having a Sun on my desk. (No, staroffice isn't there yet. Close enough for hand grenades, but not for effective collaboration with ms-office users.)

  32. Scary by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is kind of scary. We all know that Sun's relationship with Linux is somewhat schizophrenic. Over the last month or two they've been fairly reasonable (Opteron-based servers and decent Linux support) but we all know that McNealy the Big Mouth Bass still thinks that Solaris is the way to go. He still thinks Sun can "win" in the marketplace with SPARC and Solaris, beating out commodity stuff in even the small installations where SPARC and Solaris don't have an advantage.

    If McNealy thinks that getting in bed with Microsoft is going to give Sun a leg up over Linux, then there are going to be some very annoying times ahead.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  33. SMC can only blame itself by n3bulous · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But for Sun, which had rose through the ranks of a dozens similar workstation manufacturers through foresight, engineering skill and hard competition, Microsoft's mediocrity is an affront.

    While Sun has had decent hardware, it wasn't better than SGI or HP. They were stagnant on the user side of innovation. There is no reason why Sun couldn't have developed a KDE or Gnome type UI (although I was mostly happy with Openlook...) They had years of warning in advance of MS who didn't really have a network interface until 1995ish and they failed to exploit it.

    On the server side, they may have been the last *nix company to start bundling commonly installed GNU/OSS software in their distro like perl and bash.

    In the 90s, McNeally is on record as saying if he had been Bill Gates, he'd have done the same stuff, referring to the business practices of MS.

    The workstation manufacturers like SGI and Sun blew their chances because they used expensive, custom hardware and charged by the pound and were very slow to innovate from a user perspective. They targetted science, research, and graphics shops that could afford their hardware, because at the time it was the best performing. As soon as Intel and AMD caught up in hardware, and Linux and MS with the OS, their advantage disappeared quickly.

    Sun will be remembered no differently than Netscape or Real, who blew their chances by stagnating. Don't get me wrong, MS's business practices are shameful, if not illegal, but the real problem is that MS was allowed the opportunity to catch up.

    --
    "The area of penetration will no doubt be sensitive." ~ Spock
  34. enemy of my enemy is my friend by ambar1073 · · Score: 1

    Don't make this complicated -- Microsoft sees this in a very easy way. The enemy (Sun) of my enemy (Linux) is my friend. Microsoft and Sun are both waging a battle against Linux. This helps both of them in that war.

  35. three envelopes by rifftide · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Lou Gerstner was playing a round of golf with Steve Jobs and Scott McNealy. Gerstner, as it turns out, was a weak golfer, but the other two CEOs acknowledged being impressed with how he was turning around IBM. "What's your secret with dealing with Gates?" They kept badgering him, so later Gerstner had one of his secretaries mail each of them a package with three envelopes.

    The first envelope was marked: "Open after a weak quarter". Inside was a slip of paper that said, "Bash Microsoft at every opportunity. Sue them for antitrust violations, write memorandum to the DOJ and EU, badmouth their products and strategy, hire joke writers to come up with nasty bits about how awful they are." The second was marked "Open only when your job is in serious jeopardy" and it said: "Settle with Microsoft. Get a nice piece of their monopoly profits to tide you over, do platform cross-licensing, appear on stage with Bill and Steve and talk about partnership and interoperability for the benefit of customers." And the last was "When the board is meeting to discuss your job." Inside was a paper that said only "Prepare three envelopes."

  36. Auto Karma maker.... by tonywestonuk · · Score: 2, Funny

    DECLARE CURSOR C1 FOR
    SELECT commentTitle, commentText FROM comments WHERE Storytitle="Sun and Microsoft Settle Litigation" AND moderation = +5

    OPEN C1
    FETCH NEXT from C1 into :Title, :Text

    While (SQLCOD==0){
    postNewComment(Title,Text);

    FETCH NEXT from C1 into :Title, :Text
    }

    CLOSE C1

  37. Try to think positive, sigh. by bstarrfield · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh, well. MS wins again. First Apple, the DOJ, now Sun. The EU case doesn't have any real effect on MS from a business perspective. On the positive side, at least an infusion of cash will keep Sun from falling into the same sad state as SGI. Look, Apple dealt with the devil and went on to produce some great stuff. We can hope the same occurs with Sun. On the whole Java vs. C#, I honestly wish Sun would have made some of the same semantic improvements that MS came up with.

    --
    /* Dang, I can't type that well. */
  38. Re:HEY TACO by lazuli42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's weird. If you're a customer (implying that you're PAYING for this site), why isn't there a star next to your name?

    I see your low /. number, but that doesn't entitle you to any special bitching rights.

    But that's just like my opinion man.

    --

    "There's companies that are just so cool that you just can't even deal with it," - Bill Gates, about Google

  39. Re:Carrier Command love fest by mrsev · · Score: 1

    Microsoft pays EU big bag of cash.
    Microsoft pays SUN big bag of cash.
    What's next? ...........Microsoft pays mrsev big bag of cash?

  40. doom sayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I can say officially is (in accordance to doomsayers on slashdot and elsewhere):

    "DOOOOOM! DOOOOOOM!"
    "BEWARE THE GROOOOOOOVE"
    and
    "WHERE'S MAH MONAY!"

  41. Not 100% a dupe, we have more info today. by ron_ivi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It may be a dupe, but there has been a lot more coverage in the major press, so we do have more information today vs. yesterday.

    For example:

    Interviews where they explicitly say that they wouldn't have done the deal except that it puts pressor on IBM.

    That "Where we use their intellectual property, there will be a royalty stream. Where they use ours, there will be a royalty stream back."

    that Forrester somehow thinks this is good for Sun - I bet he thinks the SCO/MSFT partnership's good for SCO too. It's sad to see Sun turn into just another SCO. Can I get a "+1 Sad" mod?

  42. I guess were in for an eclipse.. by josepha48 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    of the sun...

    Any company that has partnered with MS seems to have been either bought by, or hindered by things like this. EG: Netscape -> gone for all intents and purpses, and while mozilla lives on, the market share is small. Real.com -> While they are still around, who uses real over windows media player or quicktime? Corel -> yeah they are still around, but didn't MS dump its stock in them? Mac -> MS owns part of Mac, or at least last time I checked they did.

    My guess is that Sun and MS would play real nice in Windows services for UNIX, of course I just use cygwin and don't pay for more MS licenses.

    Just my 2 cents.... I know Sun is in trouble and they are probably doing this as a last resort, to save money.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

    1. Re:I guess were in for an eclipse.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      MS owns part of Mac, or at least last time I checked they did.

      By "Mac" I'll guess that you mean "Apple". "Apple" is a computer company, "Mac" is a nickname for the "Macintosh" computer line, manufactured by "Apple".

      Microsoft does not now, nor has it ever, owned part of Apple. For a relatively brief period of time starting in August 1997, Microsoft owned a block of preferred, non-voting shares in Apple in exchange for giving Apple roughly US$200,000,000 and agreeing to continue to produce Microsoft application software for the Mac; Apple, for its part, agreed to drop its remaining copyright violation claims against Microsoft as part of a "cross-technology licensing agreement". Microsoft sold those Apple shares shortly after the minimum "hold" time elapsed (three years) for a profit.
    2. Re:I guess were in for an eclipse.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmm...you could use Cygwin or you could use Windows Services for UNIX 3.5, both of which are free.

      But you make a good point - this Sun/Microsoft marriage is interesting. :-)

  43. This is garbage news by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the corporate/business world even when companies are partnering up, they are still always under consideration to be a competitor.

    They are going up fight in the sales trenches just as they were before. Only difference would be the CEOs talking less trash.

  44. Billions and Billions... by lysander · · Score: 1

    So does Microsoft just write them a big check? That'd be awesome!

    --
    GET YOUR WEAPONS READY! --DR.LIGHT
  45. I can see it now... by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cats and dogs living together, the lamb and the lion sleeping together... mass hysteria.

    What is the world coming to. Next thing you know, someone will tell me Microsoft is selling Linux ;-)

    --
    Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    1. Re:I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft selling Linux? www.smoothwall.org dumped linux for win xp... but only on April Fool's Day.

      Could Sun be having an April Fool's hangover?

  46. What does this mean for: by Asprin · · Score: 1


    What does this mean for Sun Java Desktop Linux?

    What about Sun StarOffice, or even OpenOffice for that matter? I know it's officially OSS, but OpenOffice1.1 now has the Sun logo on the startup banner, so it's there for a reason, right?

    Something about this gives me the jumblies.

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  47. *This* could be a dupe? by Quixote · · Score: 1
    I can understand (somewhat) when obscure stories get duplicated; but this, folks, is about SUN kissing Micro$oft. Sun, Microsoft and Linux are probably the 3 most well-known names on Slashdot. How is it possible that the editor(s) didn't know that this story was a dupe? It just boggles the mind.

  48. IE 6 for unix???? by grsiepka · · Score: 1

    maybe MS will update IE for *nix platforms now.. big babies...

  49. I'm sorry, but ... by Vanieter · · Score: 1

    you must be new here.

    1. Re:I'm sorry, but ... by ilikejam · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Good point - well made.
      Seriously, though; the amount of dupes seems to have suddenly shot up recently.
      You get what you pay for I suppose....

      --
      C-x C-s C-x k
  50. good luck dreamers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is to those who think Microsoft will dissapear anytime soon......

  51. Sun Also cuts 9% of it's work force by DocUi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some articles Like this one Talk about how Sun is also cutting 3 300 jobs. Sucky.

  52. Not open sourcing Java a part of the agreement ? by VitaminB52 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just being curious, but couldn't Sun's refusal to open source Java be a part of this Sun-MS agreement?

    Getting rid of an open sourced Java opponent is i.m.h.o. more valuable to MS than the 1.6 G$ settlement fee.

    Just my 0.02 $....

  53. 10 years? by chriseh · · Score: 1

    Does anyone actually believe that Sun will still be here in 10 years. As I said before, I doubt it very much.

  54. This article is ridiculous by hr0efn · · Score: 1

    Sun is not selling a version of it's "Java software" to compete with Microsoft Windows, it is selling Suse Linux to compete with Microsoft. Sun sells both RedHat and Suse and has invested a LOT of money in the past two years in embracing and adding to Linux. JDS, which has sold millions of copies, is Suse Linux, bundled with StarOffice, Mozilla, Evolution, and a little gui that lets you globally set your JDK home. Sun is one of the top distributers of Linux now, if not THE top distributer after the Ireland gov deal. It is certainly NOT "at war" with it. These analysts who say that Sun and Microsoft are bonding against Linux are idiots. Sun is simply becoming another IBM GS, and will sell you whatever you want; Suse, RedHat, Solaris, or Microsoft, running on Sparc, Intel, or AMD. And this is because it has to change or die. It took a couple years longer than it should have for the execs to figure it out, but they did. Read the marketing info on Sun's web site. Their goal is to corner the heterogenous data center market with software that works on everything, including Windows. Why do you think they got rights to networking protocols? They are going to make Java work better on MS systems. And yes, MS could have totally ignored Sun for years without settling. All this means is that Scott will have to find someone else to abuse in public for next 10 years, and that will probably be IBM.

  55. Re:"they settle, now take on Linux" by Bozdune · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They can do what they like, patent-wise, but they can't kill Linux. The genie is out of the bottle. The Chinese, the Indians, the Russians, and the rest of the world (with the possible exception of the EU) will never bend over for any wacky patent or copyright claims from McNealy and Gates.

    I can see the Chinese giggling right now. They've been copying MS disks for years and distributing them for free, despite government lip service RE shutting the counterfeiters down. Now the West is going to step on its own dick by restricting intellectual ideas? Great, say the Chinese, let us know how else we can eat your lunch, you stupid motherfuckers.

    Linux development will continue unchecked. If Linux is stopped in the US and EU, so what. The rest of the world will continue merrily on. So fuck you, Bill, and fuck you, Scott. Enjoy the cash while you can, because the end of the story is being written, and you won't make it to the last chapter.

  56. Sun and Microsoft: what it means for open source by LibrePensador · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We already know that Sun and Microsoft are scared out of their wits by Linux, so the settlement between is not a surprise, particularly if we
    consider that both Sun and Microsoft are SCO supporters, I mean, licensees.

    The real news is that SUN is bleeding money incessantly. If you read their published quarterly results and know a bit about accounting, you will realize that rather than use the settlement money as a one-time payment to offset current losses, they plan to spread it out over a number of quarters to pad future potential loses. This shows that Sun has very little faith in its own future.

    From a cnet.com article on the same subject:

    "For its fiscal third quarter, which ended Sunday, Sun expects revenue of $2.65 billion and a net loss of $710 million to $810 million, or 23
    cents to 25 cents per share. The loss includes charges of about $350 million for an increase in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and about $200 million to restructure its work force and real estate, Sun said.

    Excluding the charges, the loss would have been $200 million to $260 million, or 6 to 8 cents per share. The average estimate of analysts surveyed by Thompson First Call was less pessimistic: a loss of 3 cents per share on revenue of $2.85 billion.

    The company says it has more than 35,000 employees worldwide, so the layoffs account for about 9 percent of its work force. The job cuts will affect all divisions and geographic areas, McGowan said. The majority of cuts will take place by the end of September, he added. Sun already had cut 8,500 employees in two major layoffs in 2001 and 2002."

    I give Sun about 5 more years before it's bought out. Only saving grace would be if everyone got fiberoptic lines to their homes in the next few
    years and they could rent you app space in their sun-rays servers for a few dollars a month. Somehow I don't see that happening...

    And Java won't save them unless they turn it into the defacto language for desktop apps, which just isn't likely to happen. .NEt seems to be winning the battle for mind-share already. Real shame as I happen to like Java and believe that it could really make a huge difference to our computing if it was in a better steward's hands, those of the open source community.

    For further reference on the Sun-SCO relationship, read this piece by David Berlind.

    http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/m ai n/Could_Sun_hold_...

    For SUN's initial SCO FUD, read this among many of the articles that they put out:

    http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/0,20000617 33 ,20276755,00.htm

    It is obvious to anyone that cares to look that Sun is between a rock and a hard place.

    The reason they called the Java Desktop System (JDS) by that name is so that they can switch from Linux to Solaris and continue to call it by
    the same name, which is what they intend to do.

    People really need to understand that Sun ain't no friend of ours. They opensource StarOffice to spite Microsoft and the community around Openoffice has built something that would have taken Sun years with more than 40 supported languages, more than Office, and another 35 in the works. SUN began to offer Linux servers because customers demanded it, simply because they did not want to be tied into a proprietary OS with proprietary hardware.

    If SUN's management had some brains, they would focus on hardware, placed their bets on Linux and put Solaris in maintenance mode for those
    that really want to run it. I still believe that Solaris is a very good OS for some very limited scenarios, but how will it compare to Linux
    one, two, three, four and five years down the road?

    On the long haul, Sun will be wasting a ton of resources that they could be using to build services higher-up-the-Linux stack. They could also improve their hardware and face the other real challenge that they are going to have a hard time facing: Inte

    --
    Pragmatism as an ideology is not particularly pragmatic in the long term. Keep it in mind when you dismiss Free Software
  57. Here's a non dupe you can use by zogger · · Score: 1

    Hope the url is OK. New japanese electric motor, super efficient. A LOT of implications here. I submitted it right before 4-1, my bad.

    http://www.japan.com/technology/index.php

    TECHNOLOGY
    The Techno Maestro's Amazing Machine
    Kohei Minato and the Japan Magnetic Fan Company

    A maverick inventor's breakthrough electric motor uses permanent magnets to make power -- and has investors salivating

    More at the site, it's quite interesting. Note: permanent magnet motors aren't new, his has a different twist to them, and it apparently works. I was thinking for electric vehicles and for wind power generation for starters...

    1. Re:Here's a non dupe you can use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this looks hopeful:

      So potentially we can reduce the power consumed by the USA by 55 * .8 = 44%

      That's stupendous!

      Woudn't that eliminate our dependency on foreign oil?

      Also it should make for a really cool escooter :)

    2. Re:Here's a non dupe you can use by zogger · · Score: 1

      I thought so! I was thinking this was the kick in the gas electric vehicles needed, super efficient wind generators, and on and on. Battery tech is what has slowed adoption of electrics, now, useable range could be almost doubled,power increased, GVW made more useful by dropping motor weight, using off the shelf everything else, just new designed motors. I'm looking around the old adobe here, washing machine, window fans, electric vacuum cleaner, fridge compressor, freezer compressor, well pump outside and 300 feet down--all could be made mucho-mo-bettah. computers quieter, too, the cooling fans. Just in wind gennys alone, this could theoretically drop them to burning coal cost, ie, highly competitive. Imagine a few million model A new generation wind gennys going up all over the place. It's an amazing thing methinks, if true and this isn't any sort of hoax. It *seems* real, the website doesn't look like any sort of scam or parody place.

      who knows though, read it around april first, so who knows... hope it gets picked up on the front page, I want some EEs here to look at this for the final say.

  58. Wishful thinking by tonygeek · · Score: 1

    Perhaps whole .NET will be discarded into the thrashcan and we will be left with a few great programming languages C,C++ and Java do do some real work instead of creating wrapppers and infrastrusture for the junk produced by the confused corporate managers and their programmers.

  59. Microsoft is selling linux!!! by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

    Click here to see pure EVIL!!!

    1. Re:Microsoft is selling linux!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Microsoft is selling linux!!!

      It's called WinXP [Extra Poop]

  60. Department by MisterBad · · Score: 1

    ITYM "more-expensive-THAN-...", not "more-expensive-THEN-...".

    --
    Evan Prodromou | evan@prodromou.name | http://evan.prodromou.name/
  61. So what are the chances of Sun moving to Windows? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    They are a company who's whole existance is to make money. So is Microsoft.

    If sun can make expensive and highly specialized Windows servers that no other maker can make, no longer be an enemy of MS, and kill java they could win.

    Remember Microsoft made WindowsNT portable on purpose in an order to kill Unix and attract the vendoers. The first version of WindowsNT was made on an SGI workstation for the mips processor.

    Sun has the most fault tollerant systems besides IBM mainframes. They could keep their nitch and MS wont eat them for breakfast.

    MS in return can count on java being dead, .net and MS being the key master for every app, a change to knock out the . in com. Solaris is the defacto Unix besides a few versions of AIX and HP-UX.

    It will seriously hurt CIO's decision to go with a unix platform it will be dying. Unix vendors with a third of their market gone might start porting or switching their applications to Windows/sparc or Windows/x86.

  62. The road to Redmond goes through Mountain view by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Sun was getting pecked apart by Penguins. Microsoft so far has not lost any of it's core business to the rising tide of Penguinistas. But Microsoft sees the threat. Microsoft fears Open Source.

    Microsoft would rather have the battle on Sun's turf- even if that means keeping Sun alive! I think the two will fight open source with patents.

    Sun and Microsoft could have partitioned the 1.6 Billion in any way they saw fit. They put the bulk of into into Licensing patents. Not so much for damages from violating anti trust law. They are saying this: We think IP is important, antiTrust law is not important.

    --

    Religion is the main cause of atheism.

  63. Yep, add Sun Microsystems ... by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 1

    to the list of entities that don't learn from others mistakes and strike a deal with Microsoft. Time to get out the burn cream and the finger-tip band aids.

  64. Ooohh Interesting Possibility... .NET on Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean Microsoft will port .NET Framework to Solaris? Maybe this is why McNealy will not Open Source Java.

    If Microsoft ports .Net it could kill Java, but it may actually be beneficial to Sun as it would open Solaris .Net developers.

    Windows on the desktops and Sun running Java and .Net web apps.

  65. What free office suite? by RLiegh · · Score: 1

    You mean that one that is going to be shut down in the next 6mos?

    1. Re:What free office suite? by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      I didn't see anything about them shutting down on their website. Where did you get that info from?

  66. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  67. Re:Steve needs to keep Scott alive, yesss by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft needs to keep Sun alive, kill him, Steve needs to keep Scott alive, twist his head off, mustn't kill Scott, kill him kill him, no no Steve must be nice..." Steve Ballmer was heard to say throughout the press conference.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  68. Good old Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah rant away about linux, OSS, complex hard-to-remember CLI stuff yeah right
    yeah it was Billy Boy man, Billy boy! He had TTF he had a two button mouse!
    Man that stuff shiped and worked on hardware less than your cellphone, less than your cellphone!
    4MB of RAM was like WOW, but WfW 3.11 plodded on...crazy days, word 6 users cope with 4MB and the bossman had 16MB never used more than minesweep...crazy days
    Oh hang on was this about how IE was intrinsict to the OS yet ran on OS X HP-Unix etc ..?
    Or was it about how SCO and NOT SUN made false IP claims in the courts ...
    NOT SUN who stole BSD, no sir anyone who said that would be...
    thinking about OS X, yes thats right, OS X

  69. Sun finally faces the truth they've been denying by pcause · · Score: 1

    Scott McNealy's company is in ig trouble, and this announcement was a diversion. Notice thaat at the same time he announced this deal, which received front page press, he was laying off 3300 people and announcing a 700-800 million dollar loss.

    Sun was arrogant and just refused to see that the commodity hardware was going to catch them and destroy their server business. The 64 bit x86 chips spell the end of SPARC. McNealy never built a services business or a software business that wasn't tied to his platform. With Linux becoming the OS and x86 the hardware, what doe he have left?

    McNealy needs to reposition to become a software and services company and he will probably need to ship Windows on his hardware and ship his software on Windows. He may hate the thought, but those are the facts. This announcement is nothing short of full surrender and an admission that Sun is no longer a driver in the computer business. They are surrendering and repositioning.

  70. Re:Mplayer on AMD64 by steveoc · · Score: 1

    umm .. I have an AMD64 3200+, running gentoo in 64bit mode.

    I got it to emerge mplayer cleanly in 64bit mode this week, and it is reporting that sse2 is being used, so no problemo.

    Try it again soon - I suggest building from source (but it sounds like you are doing that anyway). Which distro are you on ?

  71. Errrr....that's not Java it's Linux.... by wukie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sun also has been pushing a version of its Java software as an alternative to the Windows operating system for personal computers.

    I'm certain the author in the Washington Post article is refering to "Java Desktop System" which is the name of a Linux distribution.

    The earlier comment the author makes:
    Linux-based systems, marketed by IBM and others, have made strong inroads in the corporate-systems market. So far, Sun has been the primary victim, but Linux has provided more competition for Microsoft than has any software in years.

    Leads me to believe that he doesn't realize Sun are also involved in Linux as an OS (not just providing applications such as the StarOffice suite).

  72. The Truth Is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The fact that Sun would rather partner with Microsoft of all people, instead of "the community", serves as perfect proof of who is actually more despicable.

    Is this post Flamebait or Troll? No, just the truth, like I promised. You can either except it, or live your life in denial. Or maybe you're just not smart enough to even get it, in the first place.

  73. Haiku poem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deal with the devil
    Welcome the killer's kiss
    Another SGI

  74. Python+WebWare+Cheetah vs. .NET and Java? by flacco · · Score: 1
    i've been looking around for awhile now for a replacement for java servlets and velocity templates. i think i may have found it:

    python replaces java
    webware replaces servlets
    cheetah replaces velocity

    i've just started using python, haven't even cracked open webware or cheetah yet - but conceptually, at least, these seem quite similar to their counterparts.

    i suspect the java-based stuff is faster, scales a lot better, has more libraries, and is more mature - but the P+W+C might grow to fill that void, using completely free software.

    has anyone used both of these sets of technology? what are your opinions?

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  75. Re:"they settle, now take on Linux" by Sunda666 · · Score: 1

    dude, all it takes is common sense... even in this country (Brazil), which has a long history of sucking uncle Sam's dick, some minister had the balls to declare that ridiculous drug patents void, and then a bunch of labs started making "generic" drugs, which cost a fraction of the price... Lives get saved this way, so, it can't be bad. I wonder why that kind of patents are allowed/respected anywhere... It is like putting corporate interests of some rich fat fucks in the other side of the globe above the lives of your people... ikes...

    cheers.

    --


    ``If a program can't rewrite its own code, what good is it?'' - Mel
  76. World War III by MicroshaftSucks · · Score: 1

    Well, here's my prediction: If America's legal system is too corrupt and dysfunctional to hold Bill Gates accountable (and most citizens, including even many open source fans, don't even give a damn), then the international community will do the job for us. I believe the European Union's recent fine marked the beginning of a high-tech Cold War. Japan's government cited the EU's action in relation to its raid on a Microsoft outpost. Of course, many nations are pursuing Linux as an alternative to Microsoft. I do not believe that an eventual Linux victory over Microsoft in the U.S. is inevitable. I think Bill Gates and his partner in crime, George W. Bush, are powerful, corrupt and sneaky enough to beat all comers. But the international scene is different. If a U.S. court declared that SCO and George Bush own the legal rights to every open source software program except GIMP, I think other nations would give them the middle finger. They would flat out refuse to surrender their rights to use open source software any way they see fit. Thus, I look to Europe, Eastern Asia and the Third World for deliverance from Microsoft. Personally, I hope Bill Gates falls soon, and I hope he falls hard. Real hard.

    --
    Webmaster of http://www.freedomware.us/ Candidate for Public Office - http://www.edrevolt.org/
  77. CmdrTaco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a genius.

    Just kidding.

  78. HA! HA! by maysonl · · Score: 1

    Ha, Ha!

  79. Work on your history by photon317 · · Score: 1

    Your OS/2 comment shows a lack of understanding. How easily we forget that OS/2 was originally a joint project between IBM and Microsoft.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  80. EU, ONE OF THE MOST CORRUPT BODIES ON THE PLANET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MicroshaftSucks: "If America's legal system is too corrupt and dysfunctional to hold Bill Gates accountable (and most citizens, including even many open source fans, don't even give a damn), then the international community will do the job for us"

    Yeah?
    Like the European Union which is SO CORRUPT that every single EU commissioner (including Monti) was FORCED to resign because of massive corrption, bribery, nepotism, wanton stealing of tax payers' money and every kind of malefesance known to man, only 3 years ago?

    Or the UN which is easily one of the most corrupt entities on the entire planet, with UN officials, including Kofi Anan's son, Kojo, stealing to the tune if BILLIONS of dollars from the oil for food program that was supposed to be used to feed starving Iraqi children?

    I'd take the DOJ in America any day over a bunch of corrupt frog earters from Europe or the UN anyday!!

  81. Sun microsoftsystems by dimitrios · · Score: 1

    no comment