Slashdot Mirror


Hugo Nominations Announced

Embedded Geek writes "With the 2004 Nebula Awards being awarded this weekend, the Hugo nominations have been announced. As usual, the field is packed with lots of deserving entries, although I'm sure everyone has a favorite that was missed. I was particularly interested in the Short Form Drama, though, with Joss Wheadon getting three nominations for canceled shows (two Firefly, one Buffy) and Gollum's Acceptance Speech at the 2003 MTV Movie Awards getting a nod. Also of interest are the Retro Hugos, an effort to look back and recognize SF published before anyone thought to hand out awards for it. Retro nominees include such greats as Childhood's End, Fahrenheit 451, and Duck Dodgers in the 24 1/2 th Century (no, really!). You have until 31 July, 2004 to join Noreascon Four and vote for your favorites!"

225 comments

  1. Retro Nods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Duck Dodgers is a CURRENT show on Cartoon Network.

    1. Re:Retro Nods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there was a series of original cartoons released decades ago. Don't know all the details, and someone else has probably googled it and will respond to you better than I can.

    2. Re:Retro Nods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to be part of a retrospective awards section devoted to work created in 1953, so it's perfectly ok for it to be shown currently on the Cartoon Network.

      That said, I really think War of the World should win that category over Duck Dodgers - the 1953 film was way ahead of its time both in the way it tackled an adaptation of a book(*), and in its special effects.

      (*) yes, I'm well aware that the book and film differ greatly, but that was what I was getting at

    3. Re:Retro Nods? by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 4, Informative
      I nomination is for the original 1953 cartoon, not the current show.

      Although, it'd be interesting to see a show take nominations in both its retro and current incarnation. Or a novel and sequel, perhaps.

      Something that erhaps they didn't consider when making the retroes.

      --

      "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    4. Re:Retro Nods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. No sense of history. I'll forgive you as long as you don't nominate Battlestar Galactica as a classic.

    5. Re:Retro Nods? by idiosynchronic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why yes it is - but if you'd RTFA you'd realize that the retroNebulas nomination is specifically for the award-winning cartoon first done by Chuck Jones and Michael Maltese, two titans of humour.

      The current Duck Dodgers is nothing but Waner Brothers sliding down the same whorish slope Disney has blazed.

    6. Re:Retro Nods? by rkhalloran · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course, if you notice, Kelly Freas is nominated for Best Pro Artist both currently and in the Retro's...

    7. Re:Retro Nods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      having never seen or heard of the show before, does Duck have a Cold hence the name Duck Dodgers?

  2. Firefly Deserves It! by TheAntiCrust · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I really hope that firefly gets the awards it has been nominated for! I am so ticked off at Fox for cancelling such a great show. I want them to win not only to validate the work that the cast and crew of the show did, but also to give a little kick in the butt to the fox execs who stole Firefly from us.

    1. Re:Firefly Deserves It! by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know. It's competing with "Gollum's Acceptance Speech at the 2003 MTV Movie Awards".

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    2. Re:Firefly Deserves It! by chromaphobic · · Score: 1

      One of these days I'm really going to have to give Firefly a second chance. I was a huge fan of both Buffy and Angel, and the Fray comic Joss did, so it would stand to reason I *should* have liked Firefly.

      But I didn't.

      Mind you, I only saw the first three episodes (and I had to tape those since I'm pretty much never home on a Friday night,) but I really didn't care for what I saw. After the first three I just didn't bother to even try and tape them anymore.

      Ah well, maybe one day if I see the DVD set on sale...

  3. Firefly nominations by MattT · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's interesting that the two episodes from Firefly to be nominated are "The Message" and "Heart of Gold", both unbroadcast, and only seen in the DVD box set. IMHO, the strongest episode was the las one broadcast, "Objects in Space". I wonder if the nominating comittee disagreed, or if the broadcast eps. were otherwise ineligable for this years awards.

    -Matt

    --
    -MattT *** Not speaking for my employer, or any other sentient beings ***
    1. Re:Firefly nominations by soh10r · · Score: 5, Informative

      "The nominating comittee", in this case, is the worldcon membership--or rather, those members who sent in nominations. But yes, the previously unaired episodes were the only ones eligible, since only they came out in 2003 (the others aired in 2002).

      Also, "Serenity" was the last one broadcast. I guess "The last shall be first" and all that.

    2. Re:Firefly nominations by MattT · · Score: 0

      mumble mumble, DAMN FOX!, mumble mumble

      --
      -MattT *** Not speaking for my employer, or any other sentient beings ***
    3. Re:Firefly nominations by happypizzaguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Objects in Space was certainly one of the most unique things I've seen in a while (Whedon's commentary on the DVD really fleshes it out) but it was not the last broadcast episode. In Fox's infinite stupidity, the 2 hour episode written to be the true premier of the show was broadcast as the last episode.

      --
      "When all else fails, there's always delusion." -Conan O'Brien
    4. Re:Firefly nominations by portnoy · · Score: 1

      I think the broadcast episodes were ineligible -- for example, "Serenity" was nom'd for the 2003 Hugos.

      So, out of just 14 filmed episodes of Firefly, three have been nominated for Hugo awards. I think that says something, but I doubt Fox is listening. :-)

    5. Re:Firefly nominations by NovaChild · · Score: 1

      "Objects in Space," as well as the other most commonly praised episodes "Out of Gas" (my favorite) and "War Stories," were all aired in 2002 (very late 2002 for some), and were eligible for Hugo nominations LAST year (when only "Serenity," the pilot, was nominated). I guess the Hugo nominating committee, finally having seen the shows on the DVD in the order they were supposed to be aired realized how great the show was, and so nominated what episodes were legal to be nominated - those that didn't appear until the DVD set came out in 2003.

    6. Re:Firefly nominations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was a timing thing (year of release determining eligibility). I suppose you have to draw a line somewhere. Stupid, but awards kind of are.

      "Heart of Gold" is far from the best episode even among the three unaired though. "Trash" is much better (after "Our Mrs. Reynolds", also excellent). "The Message" is good but has a flawed ending.

      Agreed about "Objects in Space".

      It doesn't say great things about the state of SF Short Form Drama if they couldn't fill out the five nominee spots with anything other than two Firefly DVD eps. Surely one should suffice. Is there so little competition out there?

    7. Re:Firefly nominations by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      So, out of just 14 filmed episodes of Firefly, three have been nominated for Hugo awards. I think that says something, but I doubt Fox is listening. :-)

      It says that geeks liked the show, which everyone knew.

    8. Re:Firefly nominations by cfuse · · Score: 1
      It's interesting that the two episodes from Firefly to be nominated are "The Message" and "Heart of Gold", both unbroadcast, and only seen in the DVD box set.

      And all over the filesharing networks. I live in Australia, I never even heard about firefly until I downloaded some of the episodes. I will probably buy the DVD because of it.

      I don't watch TV any more, why bother?

  4. Personally.. by Metallic+Matty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was always a bit disappointed in the Fahrenheit 451 movie. I mean, the book is one of my favorites of all time, but I just don't think it did it justice. Same with Catch-22. I mean, they were good movies, but not the calibur of the books.

    I think a Fahrenheit 451 remake has a lot of potential too, with all the modern camera and computer technology today, they could really recreat the world of Guy Montag to such a degree. (And perhaps show all the parallels between it and our own which is ever growing closer IMO.)

    1. Re:Personally.. by flossie · · Score: 3, Informative
      I think a Fahrenheit 451 remake has a lot of potential too, with all the modern camera and computer technology today, they could really recreat the world of Guy Montag to such a degree.

      Have you seen "Equilibrium"? It's basically F451 with a bit of the Matrix and 1984 thrown in. It is emotion rather than books which are banned, but it makes little difference. Unfortunately, it isn't a particularly good film.

    2. Re:Personally.. by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Equilibrium - Unfortunately, it isn't a particularly good film.

      I thought it was a good film my friends all like it as well. The comparison I use is that it's a mix between F451 and Brave New World. Like it or not I think you'd have to admit the cleric's had fat rides though...

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    3. Re:Personally.. by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      They had phat guns too. Any idea what gun they used as the base for the props?

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    4. Re:Personally.. by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This post makes me think of my favorite book that was turned in to a movie that most say wasn't good. Dune. Sci-fi just redid the first two books and I think they are worse than the David Lynch version. So just because something can be done and has potential to be better doesn't mean it will turn out so. ... /cough cough Star Wars cough

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    5. Re:Personally.. by Bartgroks · · Score: 1

      Good point. The differences interest more then the parallels though. People read less and less text today but not because of legality, but because TV and Burgers are greater then Bread and Circuses. It is not necessary to destroy to the truth, you just have to come up with a more compelling lie and the masses will believe in it. Fahrenheit 451 was a decent cautionary tale but I dont know that I would watch a remake. The cautionary tale that screams at me "Remake me and show how I relate to 2004's culture" is Brazil.

    6. Re:Personally.. by Mex · · Score: 1

      I'd say "Equilibrium" with Christian Bale could loosely be based on Farenheit 451, except they added gunfights :)

    7. Re:Personally.. by anakin876 · · Score: 1

      Oh man, that David Lynch movie. I personally couldn't sit through the SciFi versions.....may have to try again in the future. There is lots to complain about in the David Lynch version, but the main thing that frustrated me was Toto and those damn 80's guitars. Every time there was a stirring moment, every time the movie seemed like it might save itself from the ridiculuous extravagances of David Lynch, Those 80's guitars (courtesy of the band Toto) would come in and ruin it!

    8. Re:Personally.. by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

      Beretta 92f

      http://www.freewebs.com/equilibrium-movie/index. ht m

      all the info you could ask for on this exceptional film.

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    9. Re:Personally.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, as Hollywood would market it, "Fahrenheit 452 - the books are back! And now they're even hotter!"

    10. Re:Personally.. by Ubergrendle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Farenheit 451 was Francois Truffaut's only english language film to my knowledge. I suspect he suffered from Hollywood-itis ... constant meddling by the producers, script re-writes ad nauseum, etc.

      Also remember that the movie was made in the late 1960s. Given the other sci-fi fare available at the time, such as The Omega Man, Fantastic Voyage, (exception: 2001) I think it holds up pretty well.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    11. Re:Personally.. by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 1

      It's certainly not a great film, but I found it to be a stylishly-executed if not very deep dystopia. Great set design and cinematography, and well-cast, but the script is mediocre.

      I had nothing against this movie until I made the mistake of buying it for my boyfriend and was subjected to it three times in a weekend. For the next month: "I wanna learn gun-kata!"

      -Carolyn

      --
      Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
    12. Re:Personally.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Lynch fucked it up... but he fucked it up massively. It was an enormous, bloated mess -- but it was an ambitious one. So many films are cautious or middle of the road. If you are going to fuck up, do it spectacularly, and the result is still worth watching even if it will never win any awards.

    13. Re:Personally.. by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      I made the mistake of buying it for my boyfriend and was subjected to it three times in a weekend.

      Just curious - what would I have to do to get a girlfriend who would buy me sci-fi movies and read Slashdot? If some sort of contract with the Devil is involved, let me know how I can get in touch with him.

    14. Re:Personally.. by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Yes! I'm glad to see someone else advancing this opinion. Coppola's Apocalypse Now was another glorious failure in that same tradition; it doesn't really work, but you can see what he's trying for, and there are still moments of greatness...

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  5. Oryx & Crake passed over again by moronga · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oryx & Crake, which I found out about through This Slashdot review has been overlooked again. (It didn't get nominated for the Nebula either.)

    I thought Oryx & Crake was fantastic. Are the other books on that list really that good? The only one I've read is Ilium, which just didn't do a whole lot for me.

    1. Re:Oryx & Crake passed over again by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      It's not trashy enough for Hugos and Nebulas which seem to be more slanted more towards pulp science fiction.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    2. Re:Oryx & Crake passed over again by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Oryx and Crake is a great book. It shows off Margaret Atwood's strengths, the most important IMO is her way of making the fantastic seem plausible. By incorporating all those memes that surround us.. and that we fail to pay attention to anymore.. she creates a nightmare you can imagine with uncomfortable ease. (Check out the "pop-up ads" on the Web site. Nice touch. Good for a sardonic chuckle or two.)

      In a way, I'm glad O&C could never be made into a movie (except maybe as animation). Hollywood could only fsck it up. (Hint to Ms. Atwood: talk to this guy before inking any movie deals. Please.)

      And whaddya know.. I just handed over my copy to my wife, who in turn has put Atwood's The Blind Assassin (Booker Prize winner) in my hands. Life is good..



      --
      --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
    3. Re:Oryx & Crake passed over again by bartash · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe because Margaret Atwood keeps trying to avoid her work being labelled as a Science Fiction.

      `Science fiction has monsters and spaceships; speculative fiction could really happen.' (Guardian interview, 26 April)

      --
      Read Epic the first RPG novel.
    4. Re:Oryx & Crake passed over again by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      Yup, if you snub the genre, the genre may well snub you.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
  6. SCO should be nominated by DeadBugs · · Score: 4, Funny

    Their claims against Linux are pure science fiction.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
    1. Re:SCO should be nominated by rknop · · Score: 4, Funny

      Their claims against Linux are pure science fiction.

      Ak! No, don't nominate SCO. That would raise the whole spectre of "should fantasy be included in the Hugo awards" that we dealt with during Harry Potter IV years.

      -Rob

    2. Re:SCO should be nominated by codegen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Their claims against Linux are pure science fiction.

      It may be pure science fiction, but is it good science fiction?

      I think not.

      --
      Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
    3. Re:SCO should be nominated by wafflemonger · · Score: 1

      >Their claims against Linux are pure science fiction.

      No it's just fiction.

    4. Re:SCO should be nominated by DeadBugs · · Score: 1

      Ak! No, don't nominate SCO. That would raise the whole spectre of "should fantasy be included in the Hugo awards" that we dealt with during Harry Potter IV years.

      Best Dramatic Presentation -- Long Form = The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King

      Looks like the debate is over.

      --
      http://www.kubuntu.org/
  7. Firefly wasn't watched by millahtime · · Score: 1, Informative

    Ok, I watched firefly. Personally I didn't like it. But, if it were popular Fox would have kept it. So, this leads me to believe that people didn't watch it. So, maybe I'm not alone in my opinion of the show.

    1. Re:Firefly wasn't watched by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Sadly, whether a show is popular or not usually has very little to do with whether it's groundbreaking or otherwise noteworthy.

      Granted, I never watched Firefly...I don't have TV.

    2. Re:Firefly wasn't watched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, maybe I'm not alone in my opinion of the show.

      You're not alone. I watched a couple episodes, and concluded that it was even more "wagon train to the stars" and "bonanza in space" than ST:TOS and ST:DS9. It wasn't sci-fi; it was a western with ray guns. And I've never cared for westerns.

    3. Re:Firefly wasn't watched by Daath · · Score: 1
      [...] if it were popular Fox would have kept it
      Then why didn't they keep Futurama? Even the DVDs sold/sells very well!
      Oh, there is a petition to revive Futurama ;)
      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    4. Re:Firefly wasn't watched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great review, that. It says more about your prejudices than the quality of the show.

    5. Re:Firefly wasn't watched by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if it were popular Fox would have kept it.

      Fox made damn sure it couldn't have the chance to become popular.
      They aired it at a random timeslot, not everyweek, and not at the time they said the night before that it would air.
      Some episodes played on fridays at 8, one played at 12:05 AM, another around 12:20 AM, they played out of order...

      I think Fox wanted Joss to make another teen-hit, but in space. And when he showed up with the best sci-fi show ever shown on TV, the execs freaked because that was not what they wanted. They didn't want innovative, or smart, they wanted bland and dumb, like them.

      The show wasn't watched, but not because it wasn't good, only because it was sabotaged by its cruel Fox masters.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:Firefly wasn't watched by kaladorn · · Score: 1

      ..when he showed up with the best sci-fi show ever shown on TV...

      Okay, I *like* Firefly. I find the characters grow on you as you watch it (the DVD series lets you get that in a way the Fox presentation never did), but let's be reasonable. Best sci-fi show ever? That's pretty much contestable on many fronts.

      It's a western with some spaceship trappings. It has a passing grasp of real science and the culture it portrays is probably unlikely in the extreme. Is it reasonable escapist entertainment? Undoubtedly. But the best sci-fi ever? One would have to have a very limited exposure to conclude that.

      One could easily trot out a number of other competitors, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. Let's not get carried away.... Firefly was good, I look forward to a movie and a revived series, but it wasn't the Garden of Eden, Shangrila, Utopia, and Heaven all rolled into one with a sci-fi theme.

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    7. Re:Firefly wasn't watched by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Best sci-fi show ever? That's pretty much contestable on many fronts.


      Well, I'd like to see your list of better shows. Better effects, better science, better costumes, writing, etc.

      It has a passing grasp of real science

      Well, there's FTL travel, but that's a sci-fi standard.
      Aside from that, no sound in space, and I can't remember one thing that was obviously wrong.

      One could easily trot out a number of other competitors, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. Let's not get carried away.

      Its a matter of taste. Of all the sci-fi I've watched, which is a lot, its IMO the best.

      I mean, remember SeaCrap DSV? Earth2? *groan*

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    8. Re:Firefly wasn't watched by KnightStalker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd have to agree. I can't remember any better SF television. Even Star Trek had as good or better writing on occasion, but nothing I've seen was as consistently good. You know, they should get Joss to write a few scripts for the new Doctor Who. That would be something...

      Are you sure there was FTL travel? The writing seemed a bit confused on whether they were in a solar system with a lot of large moons, or a whole galaxy, but the solar system seems to make more sense. It did take them several weeks to get from place to place. But they must have had some sort of "inertial dampener", the other physics-defying SF staple. ("We'll be out of the atmo in five minutes!" Let's see.. Unless I'm confused, that's at least 275 G's given 100 miles of atmosphere :-)

      The only (other) real science gaffe I can think of was from an apparent attempt to be realistic -- in "Our Mrs. Reynolds", which I just watched yesterday, they need to fire a rifle (apparently one using more or less 20th century tech) in vacuum. Jayne claims it needs oxygen to fire, but it probably wouldn't. Gunpowder and basically all explosives contain their own oxidizer & don't rely on atmospheric O2.

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
    9. Re:Firefly wasn't watched by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Are you sure there was FTL travel?

      Yes, they go from system to system.

      But they must have had some sort of "inertial dampener", the other physics-defying SF staple.

      They have artificial gravity/anti-gravity. I guess you could set it to accelerate the inside of the ship in the direction opposite to the inertia to compensate...

      The only (other) real science gaffe I can think of was from an apparent attempt to be realistic -- in "Our Mrs. Reynolds", which I just watched yesterday, they need to fire a rifle (apparently one using more or less 20th century tech) in vacuum. Jayne claims it needs oxygen to fire, but it probably wouldn't. Gunpowder and basically all explosives contain their own oxidizer & don't rely on atmospheric O2.

      I've posted about that before, but in short:
      That is debatable, its not been tested (they researched it and found arguments both ways with no conclusive evidence).
      Maybe his gun is a special kind that does need O2.
      And mostly: Does Jayne know that? Jayne isn't booksmart...his logic would be "its a firearm, and fire needs air", its not a scientists that says that the gun needs air, its a mercenary.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  8. OT - Hugo's Geneology by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1

    I don't know much about his history or career, but Hugo Nominations was the child of immigrant grapepickers Oscar Nominations and Emmy Nominations (madien name: Emmy Buzz). Perhaps another slashdotter can fill in the blanks?

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    1. Re:OT - Hugo's Geneology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know much about his history or career, but Hugo Nominations was the child of immigrant grapepickers Oscar Nominations and Emmy Nominations (madien name: Emmy Buzz). Perhaps another slashdotter can fill in the blanks?

      Noe Schitt. You learn something new every day.

      (moderators: say it out loud. yeah, you know it's funny.)

  9. It Came From Outer Space? by powera · · Score: 1

    I sure hope that isn't the MST3K film. Nothing from MST3K should be up for any award.

    1. Re:It Came From Outer Space? by Doverite · · Score: 1

      No ... I believe the MST3K Movie was "This Island Earth"

      --
      You can legislate morally you can't legislate morality
    2. Re:It Came From Outer Space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about MST3K itself?

    3. Re:It Came From Outer Space? by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, Ray Bradbury has the story credit for It Came from Outer Space.

      The same is true, of course, for The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms, another of the Best Dramatic Presentation nominees.

  10. firefly wasn't shown well by ed.han · · Score: 1, Interesting

    fox continually moved the show from one time-slot to another while airing episodes out of sequence, killing the dramatic tension that several moments ought to have had. and viewers can't watch a show if they don't know when it's on.

    viewing the episodes now in the sequence intended by joss whedon makes that point eloquently, IMHO.

    ed

    1. Re:firefly wasn't shown well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Did they do that while airing it for the first time?

      Because I live in Sweden and there's two channels owned by the same company, they switch series they air, sometimes they both show the same series, at different times, different seasons... but sometimes the same season. Sometimes when they start showing one of the series in one of the channels, they don't start with season 1, episode 1. Smallville, for example is one big mess now since apparently new episodes are on sundays, while older ones (noone knows what season anymore) are on weekdays. Similar with Seinfeld, Simpsons and any show they have.

    2. Re:firefly wasn't shown well by hornrimsylvia · · Score: 1

      they just did this with wonderfalls before axing it too. the last time it aired, it was up against the apprentice and CSI. grrr! pox on fox!

    3. Re:firefly wasn't shown well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they do that while airing it for the first time?

      Yes they did. A lot of shows (sci-fi especially) also suffer from the pre-emption by sporting events on American TV. Babylon 5, for instance, was aired in the middle of the night after losing its normal slot to a sporting event. The sporting event would end, then the nightly news would play, then some other show (perhaps an infomercial), then B5 would air. Many shows, like Firefly, B5, etc. face cancellation because nobody has any clue when they will be able to see the episode they expected to see airing in the timeslot they watched last week.

    4. Re:firefly wasn't shown well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't they do the same with that guy who takes obnoxiousness to a whole new level; Bill O'Reilly?

  11. OMG, Elron and the CO$ are represented! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out this entry for best related book:
    Master Storyteller: An Illustrated Tour of the Fiction of L. Ron Hubbard -- William J. Widder (Bridge, 2003)

    Bridge publications isn't just a CO$ front org... They're the publishers of all the Dianetics (tm, pat. pending, please don't sue me) materials.

    Dammit I thought that Fandom had gotten smarter than that.

    (posting anon, cuz these are a scary bunch of MFs to cross!)

    1. Re:OMG, Elron and the CO$ are represented! by zerochance · · Score: 1

      I saw someone say something like this earlier, but it does bear repeating here dispite my paraphrasing.

      Yes, of course ALL of his writings are pure science fiction. But the question is, are they GOOD science fiction?

      I think not.

    2. Re:OMG, Elron and the CO$ are represented! by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, Elron was a fairly prominent author back in the pulp SF era; many of his stories from back then -- Ole Doc Methuselah or Fear, for instance -- stand up pretty well. At the very least, they're generally considered to be superior to the stories he wrote after his death.

    3. Re:OMG, Elron and the CO$ are represented! by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Trying to buy a Hugo again eh? I thought they gave that up after the Brighton Worldcon. (I imagine they had hopes for the Battlefield Earth movie. They were calling it the next StarWars even before it was released. Hahaha!)

      Since Hubbard never won any serious award, I imagine that they'll really pull out the stops for this effort, including retro-history about how great a Golden-Age author he was. (He was never more than a B-list writer at best.)

      Not posted anonymously because they can kiss my shiny SP ass.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:OMG, Elron and the CO$ are represented! by DragonMagic · · Score: 1

      It's not the fandom that votes for Hugos and nominates them early. It's members of the WorldCons. Anyone who attended last year's or has a membership for this year may nominate. This means that there could have been enough people who think this book deserved it (or pressure from the Co$) to put it on the ballot.

      However, only members of this year's WorldCon can vote for the final winners. Better make people aware that they should vote No Winner in this category, rather than leaving it blank, to avoid a win (ballots lacking a vote in a category don't count toward the final award, but a no-vote is considered an actual vote, with no winner for that ballot).

      --

      Human nature is the same everywhere; the modes only are different. -- Earl of Chesterfield
    5. Re:OMG, Elron and the CO$ are represented! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Note that, I think, supporting (non-attending) memberships can also vote. Watch out for a tidal wave of sock-puppet memberships voting the Scientology ticket. This would be their style since they used to send members to buy Elron's books to boost reported Best Seller! sales at the stores. Then they'd turn the books in to be resold. Some stores reported getting boxes of books with other store's price stickers on them already.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:OMG, Elron and the CO$ are represented! by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Even at the time, he was considered a prominent practical exponent of Sturgeon's Law.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  12. Retro Awards... by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is a sci-fi award, dammit! Why don't give the "Forward awards" for the best SciFi stories and related work on 2054?

    1. Re:Retro Awards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Robert L. Forward might still be alive then, given some good clean healthy livin'.

    2. Re:Retro Awards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the 2003 books are put in context (Hugo nominees, Nebula nominees, Arthur C. Clarke Awards, Amazon Top10]
      at

      http://www.magicdragon.com/UltimateSF/timeline20 10 .html#10s2003Books

      and so are other works through 2000-2010 AD at:

      http://www.magicdragon.com/UltimateSF/timeline20 10 .html#joke

      That magicdragon.com site gets over 40,000 hits per day... and had the Hugo finalists listed 2 days ago. It's in the top 10 for "science fiction" according to Google, Yahoo, and Temoa.

    3. Re:Retro Awards... by krysith · · Score: 1

      Unlikely, unless we have some really sci-fi breakthroughs, considering he died almost 2 years ago:

      Bob Forward 1932-2002

      Requiescat in Pace, Bob.

      I wish he could have had a chance to see this paper published: Swimming in Spacetime (I'd post the original article, but you have to pay to see it)

      I think he would have found it most interesting.

  13. Gollum speech in a better format? by shrubya · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Anyone know where to find a copy of the Gollum speech in a real (i.e. not Real(tm)) format? MPG? MP2? MP4? OGG? Anything reasonably open (and not transcoded from VHS)?

    p.s. Damn annoying that the speech wasn't on the LOTR:TTT extended DVD. It really belonged there.

    1. Re:Gollum speech in a better format? by soh10r · · Score: 2, Informative
      It was on the extended DVD. It just wasn't documented as being on there.

      Unless you're in region 2; I vaguely recall that it wasn't put on the region 2 DVDs to keep its more kid-friendly rating.

    2. Re:Gollum speech in a better format? by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      It was hidden as an easter egg. IIRC it's in the same place as the bit with Sarah Michelle Gellar and Jack Black from the previous years MTV Movie Awards was on the FOTR DVD.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    3. Re:Gollum speech in a better format? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is. Scene Selection, last page, under the bottom entry.

    4. Re:Gollum speech in a better format? by bmsleight · · Score: 2, Informative
      At least the direct links (rtsp) :-

      Gollum

      Yoda

    5. Re:Gollum speech in a better format? by andersen · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      -Erik -- --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
  14. Catch-22 by sczimme · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Catch-22 is one of my favorite modern novels. I read it at least N times (where N is a pretty large number) before I found out it had been made into a movie. One afternoon I was channel surfing, and happened to catch the opening credits. I was happy about this for a minute, then reconsidered - and turned the TV off.

    I realized that through reading the book I had formed my own mental images of Pianosa, Yossarian, Hungry Joe, et al, and I did not want the director's interpretation to intrude on my own. I suspect at least a few of us on /. are like that (with science fiction and other genres).

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Catch-22 by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not quite... I remember when I first learned that Contact would be made into a movie. Excellent idea, I couldn't wait. And I wasn't disapointed at all, just left me wondering how it could've been done if the journey was the same as in the book etc. Other favourites in sci-fi literature is the Rama trilogy ("quadrology"?) and a year or two ago they said they were going to turn it into a movie, but now it's gone from imdb.com and I haven't heard any. Anyway... What I meant to say is that I would absolutely love a movie based on Rama, even though it would be different from my interpretation. Maybe I would get dissapointed, hard to tell.

  15. Woo! by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Duck Dodgers!?!?

    That'th Dithpicable!

    Honestly, I always preferred Daffy Duck before he became short-tempered like Donald Duck. What is it with ducks being angry characters?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Woo! by admiralh · · Score: 2, Funny

      All those hunters shooting at you, you would be angry, too!

      --
      Hopelessly pedantic since 1963.
    2. Re:Woo! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1, Funny

      What is it with ducks being angry characters?
      after so long they just quack up

  16. Ilium by bravehamster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the nominees for best novel, Ilium, I highly recommend. It's by the same author that did the Hyperion novels. Incredible blend of myth, science, religion, you name it. It's only part 1 of (2 part?) series and it just kicked 7 different kinds of ass. I won't spoil it by telling you any of the story. Just go read it already.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:Ilium by galtenberg · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think it's safe to add that if you were never able to get into Homer's Iliad, this is an excellent (although semi-fictional after awhile) ramp into that story. Names, faces, characters come to life thru modes the old classic never bothered with. I can still see them, six months after finishing the book, and they're still amazing.

      Ilium is worthy of study if for no other reason than Simmons illuminates some true character differences between ourselves and ancient Greeks. Hearing Odysseus speak on the notion of arete is likely superior to anything you've heard from a college professor. Exhilirating and highly recommended. Oh, and the best SciFi of the nominees.

    2. Re:Ilium by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      One of the nominees for best novel, Ilium, I highly recommend. It's by the same author that did the Hyperion novels.

      I'm worried that it's going to have the exact same problem as both pairs of the Hyperion novels. Simmons writes great first halves and shitty second halves. Hyperion is a masterpiece, and the follow-up was incredibly weak. To be fair, the second set of novels wasn't as bad in this respect, but the incoherencies of the first sequel were carried over (and the characters simply weren't as compelling). And I'm still not sure what the Shrike was.

      Ilium introduced so many different threads that don't fit together that there's good reason to fear that the conclusion will depend on some weird metaphysical explanation that only makes sense to the author. In fact, there was a brief half-explanation towards the end that already seemed to be headed in this direction. . .

      Still, a very well-written and exciting book, worth it just for the riffs on the Iliad.

  17. Buffy - Chosen by hng_rval · · Score: 1

    The episode "Chosen" of Buffy the Vampire Slayer was nominated.

    Does anyone know what that episode was about?

    --
    Thank you Mario! But our princess is in another castle!
    1. Re:Buffy - Chosen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rather like the Buffy series... Eliza is nice :)
      Love your sig btw... Seinfeld quote, right?

    2. Re:Buffy - Chosen by realmolo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      That was the final episode of the series.

      And it really kind of sucked. I'm suprised it got nominated.

    3. Re:Buffy - Chosen by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course, only the episodes broadcast in 2003 were eligible; "Conversations with Dead People," from early in Buffy's final season, won the Short Form Hugo last year.

  18. Um, it is ... by DikSeaCup · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's an Easter Egg. Though I thought it was DVD 2 and not 1. There's also an EEgg on the FotR Extended Edition in the same place.

  19. 1953 Retro Awards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Check out the nominees for best novel - 1953 was one hell of a year for SF.

    Oh, and for the current year, Lois McMaster Bujold got a Hugo AND Nebula nominee for novel - for two different books!

    Maybe it's time to consider a "Writer of the Year" for people who may not necessarily take a top prize for novel, short story, etc., but whose collected work for the year makes them worthy of recognition. (I'm not suggesting anything about McMaster-Bujold's books, since I haven't read either of them).

    1. Re:1953 Retro Awards by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 1

      I'm a big LMB fan and I was disappointed in her Paladin of Souls book. She should have written me another Vorkosigan book instead :P

    2. Re:1953 Retro Awards by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 1

      1953 was a pretty damned good year for short stories, as well. Those are five damned good stories. I'm pretty sure that "The Nine Billion Names of God" will win, because, well, it's the freakin' "Nine Billion Names of God," isn't it? And it has one of the most famous end lines in all of science fiction. But all of those stories are classics, just like all five novels.

      The novella category looks like a walkover for James Blish; and the novelette might go to Dick simply because "Second Variety" got made into a movie. Hard to say for sure, though.

    3. Re:1953 Retro Awards by KerrAvonsen · · Score: 1
      Check out the nominees for best novel - 1953 was one hell of a year for SF.

      You can say that again. I don't think I could choose between them, they're ALL classics. The first and best R. Daneel Olivaw novel; the book that made us count our books and start wondering how much we could remember of them if they were all taken away; speculation about the destiny of humanity; nifty aliens in an extreme but scientifically extrapolated environment, and then more extrapolation about what superhuman means...

      --
      -=- Say it with flowers. Send a Triffid. -=-
    4. Re:1953 Retro Awards by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      The novella category looks like a walkover for James Blish;

      That's nice to hear, but do you really think so? He got the Hugo for this same story a bit later. I have a feeling that'll temper the enthusiasm a bit.

      JB was inducted into the SF hall of fame in 2002. I'd like to see some additional Hugos go his way as well. Maybe people will finally stop associating him with "Star Trek" then... Nah. :)

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    5. Re:1953 Retro Awards by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 1

      Well, The Mule won a Retro-Hugo in 1996 despite the fact that the entire Foundation Trilogy had already won a special "Best All-Time Series" Hugo in 1966...

      Trivia Time: Speaking of 1966, in 1966 Jack Vance's The Last Castle was nominated for the Nebula Award as both a novella (it won) and a novel (it just missed the shortlist, in which Flowers for Algernon and Babel-17 tied, beating out The Moon is a Harsh Mistress).

  20. D'ho! by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1

    Thank you. I completely missed that. Good catch!

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  21. You people by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1, Interesting

    are a living joke. http://www.theonion.com/onion3604/doesnt_own_telev ision.html

    And no it is not a joke that you don't have a t.v.- but that you can't help telling everyone at the slightest opportunity (even if you have to invent the opportunity).

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:You people by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I saw that Onion item a while back, and I have to say it hit uncomfortably close to home... but stop and think about what you're saying for a minute. If The Onion wrote a story on Linux zealots, would you still be thinking "You people are a living joke"?

      The reason those of us who don't have TV and don't miss it tend to talk it up is that we've found it to be a better way to live. Sure, it probably gets annoying hearing about it, but that doesn't make the basic message wrong. TV is vapid crap used to brainwash people into mindless consumerism and follow-the-herd politics. Especially if you have children, the best thing you can do is get rid of the box.

      It's a pretty savvy crowd here on Slashdot, and I'm surprised by how many people seem to be obsessed by TV. Still, I'd bet real money that Slashdotters watch less TV than the average person, and that a higher than average proportion don't watch TV at all.

      We now return you to your regularly scheduled program. Cheers!

      --
      Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    2. Re:You people by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

      TV is vapid crap used to brainwash people into mindless consumerism and follow-the-herd politics.

      By your logic you should also not have internet access, because its full of the same mindless crap.

      TV is also a source of humour, educational documentaries, and the occasionnal morcel of wonder such as Firefly.
      Just because it has a high crap content doesn't mean its ALL crap.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:You people by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

      I agree that the net can be full of the same kind of crap, but at least with the net, you can filter pretty effectively. Also, the advertising isn't as invasive, maybe not even as stupid.

      And yeah, there can be good stuff on TV; every now and again, I'll go over to a friend's house if there's something I really want to see.

      Maybe part of the problem for me is that I grew up without TV. I never learned how to ignore the damned things, so I find that if there is one on when I'm around, it sucks me in. And yes, I fully realize that that's MY problem. ;-)

      Raising my kids without TV was great, though. I hear a lot of parents talk about the pressure they get from their kids - go to McDonalds, buy the latest plastic crap, etc. I didn't have to go through that, and when gift-giving time rolled around, my kids had some really interesting and inventive ideas as to what they wanted.

      Or maybe I've been living in granola-land too long; few of my friends watch TV at all, and I've probably become much too biased against it over the years. Cheers!

      --
      Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    4. Re:You people by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Maybe part of the problem for me is that I grew up without TV. I never learned how to ignore the damned things, so I find that if there is one on when I'm around, it sucks me in. And yes, I fully realize that that's MY problem. ;-)

      See, I have devellopped great ad-ignoring skills.
      I can watch ads and enjoy their creative content without ever knowing what product they advertise. I either mute it or change the channel right before they start naming the product/company/promotion. Or right-away if its stupid.

      Like ads that start with something like "do you have a mortgage?" I say "no" and mute/change it.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:You people by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1
      can watch ads and enjoy their creative content without ever knowing what product they advertise.

      Err.. ok... switching to tinfoil-hat-mode... Are you sure this isn't the way they intented their ads to work? Giving you those subtle subliminal cues... Is there any creative content in an ad that is separated from the product it is advertising? You receive those mental cues, those memes, and, even without realizing what product they are advertising, as soon as you see it, these cues kick back in, building up connections to the areas in your brain which identified the ad-content as creative, thereby marking it in a positive fashion, creating those needs, desires, and then... you start shelling out money?

      Or might it just be me being paranoid?

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    6. Re:You people by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Err.. ok... switching to tinfoil-hat-mode... Are you sure this isn't the way they intented their ads to work?

      Yes I am. The ad hooks you, and when they have your attention they blast the message (buy Soylent Green!).

      There's this ad for some credit card company, or bank, I'm not sure ;-) It plays like an animal documentary about the stork ("its role in nature: The bringer...of babies").
      I love that ad, its hilarious. No clue what they want me to buy, but I enjoyed it.

      creating those needs, desires, and then... you start shelling out money?

      I have fallen for some ads, I'm only human. There's a kind of chocolate bar I buy about once a year, when I see an ad for it. I sorta like it, but its not my favourite, so the ads push me over when its been long enough that I sorta remember enjoy it but I don't really remember what it tastes like...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    7. Re:You people by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1

      Ok, tinfoil-hat-mode aside - I get your point. But - the ad-producers are sure enough aware of that point too. You are an informed consumer, taking in their messages from a distanced, reflected point of view. You - and, for what it matters, me too, can separate creative content from the BUY-BUY-BUY message. But advertisment will adapt to that. This is the content of my paranoid rant in the grand-parent. How can we be sure that they haven't already adapted? We are amidst a fight between mental spammers - the advertisers - and our mental spam filters.

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    8. Re:You people by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      Odd... if he has almost perfect vision why is he wearing glasses in the picture?

      "I'm really lucky to have almost perfect vision. I'm guessing it's because I don't watch TV. In fact, I don't even own one."

      Personally, I've watched a crapload of TV, played a bajillion hours of video games, and stare at a computer monitor about half of every single day of my life on average. My eyes are 20/20 (so far).

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    9. Re:You people by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      "I agree that the net can be full of the same kind of crap, but at least with the net, you can filter pretty effectively. Also, the advertising isn't as invasive, maybe not even as stupid."

      Television without a PVR is absolutely the Dark Ages. With Tivo I don't watch ads, I never channel surf, and I never end up watching some P.O.S. show "because it's on".

      TV is full of crap. But buried amongst the crap is decent, entertaining, informative stuff. Just like the net, you have to filter it effectively. A remote is not an effective filter on its own!

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    10. Re:You people by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      You are an informed consumer, taking in their messages from a distanced, reflected point of view. You - and, for what it matters, me too, can separate creative content from the BUY-BUY-BUY message. But advertisment will adapt to that. This is the content of my paranoid rant in the grand-parent. How can we be sure that they haven't already adapted?

      Everytime I (a guy) see an ad for "feminine hygiene products", I know they haven't.

      I've noticed adaptations. Like having logos bigger and longer on screen so that people fast-forwarding still see an ad. You're fast-forwarding, looking attentively for signs that the show has started, and this big logo stays long enough for you to get a really good look at it. That's subtle.

      But they aren't looking to adapt to the few rare people who use their noggins, they still have plenty of low-brow people that are all too happy to suck up their advertisement and go spend spend spend.

      That's why TV land is turning into such a crap-fest. The shows are only there to get you to sit down and watch ads, so the shows that are shown are the ones for wich the public is susceptible to the ads. The reality-tv bunch are gullible (if they believe that that's real, they'll swallow anything), and so their shows are what advertisers like and finance.

      Lowest common denominators, the plague of all democracies.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    11. Re:You people by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1
      Everytime I (a guy) see an ad for "feminine hygiene products", I know they haven't.

      Point taken...

      I have to add that I am European, as far as I know from my occasional exposition to american TV, there seems to be a difference in advertising style, which is, though, slowly but steadily diminishing. But...

      Lowest common denominators

      ... is certainly a common theme across all cultures.

      On the other hand, facing people trying to manipulate you, paranoia is a necessity.

      --
      This comment does not exist.
  22. Nominations already? by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 1

    I have *so much* reading to do before September.

    And the Retros are going to be almost impossible, especially Best Novel. I had no idea 1953 was such a good year for SF novels.

    -Carolyn

    --
    Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
  23. Shol'va! Tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Once again, we see Stargate SG-1 ingnored by the parasite-infested dweebs of worldcon, whose real objection is that SG-SG1 always keeps Amanda Tapping covered up under BDUs. And O'Neill is so better than captain kirk.

    1. Re:Shol'va! Tree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it "kree"?

    2. Re:Shol'va! Tree! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      could it be the it sucks?

      exscpeali the non 'fantastic' science in the show.
      And I have no desire to see Amanda Tapping in nothing but clothes, thank you very much.

      And O'Niel is not Smarter then Kirk. They're both exactly as smart as the plot needs them to be.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Shol'va! Tree! by mbrother · · Score: 1

      So register for Worldcon and nominate/vote yourself! C'mon, it's fun.

      --
      Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  24. Why is Finding Nemo listed? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought these were Science Fiction awards.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Why is Finding Nemo listed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe it's another film, this time about a guy trying to find that Jules Verne book at the library.

    2. Re:Why is Finding Nemo listed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talking fish - there's the fiction part

      A dentist's office is featured - dentistry takes care of the science part.

    3. Re:Why is Finding Nemo listed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yeah and since when have you seen talking fish?

      Not to mention dope smoking turtles...

    4. Re:Why is Finding Nemo listed? by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So it's science fiction because that movie features obviously genetically engineered fish?

    5. Re:Why is Finding Nemo listed? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      That'd be a short story, since, as the Simpsons noted recently, libraries don't seem to _have_ books, anymore. Bleh.

    6. Re:Why is Finding Nemo listed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because it was computer-animated. Oooooh.

  25. Re:What!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True, true.

  26. Dramatic Tension by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 5, Funny
    fox continually moved the show... killing the dramatic tension that several moments ought to have had.

    I don't know. I thought it enhanced the drama: Will I be able to catch this week's episode? Will it stay in one timeslot long enough for me to program my VCR/Tivo? Will Fox cancel the show during one of the commercial breaks and replace it with When Gas company Meter Readers Attack VII?

    'Kept me on the edge of my seat.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    1. Re:Dramatic Tension by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      "Will it stay in one timeslot long enough for me to program my VCR/Tivo?"

      Minor nit: you tell your Tivo to record the show by name for a Season's Pass. Tivo does the right thing if the show changes timeslot.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    2. Re:Dramatic Tension by erpbridge · · Score: 1

      But not if it shanges names (ala Enterprise becoming "Star Trek: Enterprise" halfway through this season.)

      Wish that functionality would get programmed in, but don't know how.

    3. Re:Dramatic Tension by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
      Actually, I didn't have the courage to admit on /. that I'm still using a VCR. Fortunately, it will be a secret between the the two of us...

      Wait? This is a thread? D'ho!

      --

      "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  27. Re:What!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not hotter than HOT HOT GRITS

  28. 'calibur' is Arthur's sword minus its 'Ex' by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    If we're talking guns, on the other hand, I think you mean 'caliber' or 'calibre'.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  29. Re:What!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although I wouldn't mind having them both, at the same time.

  30. Ilium. by Visceral+Monkey · · Score: 0

    Best of the lot. One hell of a good read, do yourself a favor and pick it up.

    --
    *Fortitudo, aequitas, fidelitas.*
  31. What do you mean we're not in the running?

    www.nthzine.com is an excellent rag..err..mag. I should know, I write for it!

    (I know I know, I'm just grousing)

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  32. So much for the Hugo by doublem · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Best Dramatic Presentation -- Short Form (212 ballots) ...
    * "Rosetta" -- Smallville (Tollin/Robbins Productions/Warner Brothers). Directed by James Marshall; written by Al Gough & Miles Millar.


    OK, I understand things have been tight for decent Sci-Fi of late, seeing as all the good shows keep getting killed off, but Smallville????

    Smallville????

    What, because Christopher Reeve was in that one?????

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:So much for the Hugo by scotch · · Score: 1

      Agreed, Smallville is utter crap. If you think it's good, concentrate on the soundtrack for one episode. The soundtrack, like much of the plot, is lifted straight from daytime soap opera television.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    2. Re:So much for the Hugo by doublem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I did give the show a fair chance, but the whole "Freak of the Week" theme got old real fast, especially when Kryptonite became the universal widget to make strange things happen or be part of an evil technology.

      And when they weren't doing that, they were doing things that reminded me of the commercials for that Everwood show. It became pretty clear that Smallville is nothing but another WB teen angst show with a teen age Superman as the gimmick to keep it on the air.

      And the sad thing is, the premise they set up had a lot of promise. Lex Luthor starting off as a good guy living in Smallville (Even managed a decent explanation for that one, even if the mansion was way over the top) A young Superman still learning about his powers. His powers developing from the ground up. The episode where he first developed heat vision, while ultimately botched due to the absurd "B" plots, had a good start for dealing with a teenager who suddenly found heat rays streaming from his eyes.

      They even had some fun twists on the traditional tellings of the Superman saga, such as the changes they made in the motivations for Superman's biological Father selecting Earth as the destination for his son's space capsule.

      All told, the show had promise, but what hope there was was killed off by forcing the show to become just another WB melodrama. They should have hired some decent sci-fi / comic writers instead of the hacks they ended up using.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    3. Re:So much for the Hugo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the whole "Freak of the Week" theme got old real fast, especially when Kryptonite became the universal widget to make strange things happen or be part of an evil technology.

      I'm just waiting for somebody to bring about Armaggedon by reversing the polarity of a meteor rock.

  33. Are Hugo's and Nebulas collected? by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For someone who would love to catch up on all of the old best sci-fi writing, are there collections of the nominated novellas and short stories going all the way back?

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:Are Hugo's and Nebulas collected? by d00bers · · Score: 1

      I know of at least two collections of Hugo short story winners from the 50's and early 60's. They were called The Hugo Award Winners, Volumes I and II. They were edited by Isaac Asimov, so his name features prominently on the covers. The bad news is I'm sure they've been out of print for years. I found my copies at a local used bookstore, so you could try one of those or maybe Halfpricebooks.com

      --
      "Shared joy is increased and shared pain, lessened. Thus do we refute entropy" -Spider Robinson
    2. Re:Are Hugo's and Nebulas collected? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I have heard tales of strange archives of ancient knowledge that might have what he seeks. I believe they were called libraries. ;^P

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Are Hugo's and Nebulas collected? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Search your favorite online bookstore for "The Science Fiction Hall of Fame" (vol I, II, IIIa, IIIb, and IV).

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  34. I want a futuroHugo by blair1q · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can I get an award for my bestselling book, _Zen and the Art of Time Machine Maintenance_, to be written in 2024?

    No?

    What kind of fans are you?

  35. Don't think so... by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1

    Well, IMDB doesn't list it as MST3K at least. (Actual movie IMDB entry here).

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  36. Retro Awards - My Votes by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Novel - Childhood's End
    Hard to believe this was written in 1953. I give this one the nod for excellent writing as well as political content that is still current. Fahrenheit 451 is a close second; also relevant today. Of the other three, Mission of Gravity is my favorite. Excellent hard-sf writing from a guy who really knows his physics combined with memorable characters. Gotta love those Mesklinites.

    Novelette - The Wall Around the World
    Well written with a mathematical twist.

    Short Story - The Nine Billion Names of God
    Another strong category like the novel. My choice here is one of my all time favorite short stories, with the added benefit of the computer consultant factor.

    Dramatic Presentation - It Came From Outer Space
    Good early SF movie and runs counter to the xenophobia of the 50's.

    The nice thing is that anything still being considered fifty years later is pretty good stuff. You can't go wrong reading any of these.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  37. Re:What!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, she's much hotter than Natalie Boringman. Regardless of what you cover her in.

  38. Fox Broadcast exec Job Posting by eadint · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you think with your dick
    Are Even slightly complex plots hard for you to follow.
    is it necessary for the plot and what is going on to be repeated to you 20 times during the show.
    Do you suffer from ADD raging hormones, and gullibility syndrome.
    At fox we think these are wonderful qualities.
    If you are looking for a new job and your idea of employment is getting blow jobs by actresses, screwing off and generally canceling good shows. please send your resume. to
    hr@fox.com also please submit a certified IQ test
    noone with an IQ over 40 will be considered.

    Any network that cancels award winning and original shows deserves to be taken off the airwaves.

  39. Available online? by SiliconEntity · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anybody know where we can find any of these stories for download?

    1. Re:Available online? by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      check out Fictionwise, they frequently have huge discounts (sometimes even free) on hugo and nebula nominees.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    2. Re:Available online? by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure about the Retro nominees, but the regular Hugo niminees are almost always made available for free download at some time prior to the convention.

      At the moment, I know that Best Novelette nominee "The Empire of Ice Cream" is available on-line; also, Kage Baker's novella The Empress of Mars appears to be available for free from Fictionwise. Don't know about the others, although, like I said, I'm sure they'll turn up eventually.

    3. Re:Available online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think Harlan Ellison has them on his site.

    4. Re:Available online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all his stuff is available through AOL.

    5. Re:Available online? by jaylake · · Score: 1

      "Into the Gardens of Sweet Night", my story in the "Best Novelette" category will be available shortly on Fictionwise. Or if someone wants to read it now, email me at jlake@jlake.com and I'll be happy to send a .pdf.

      --
      www.jlake.com | jlake@jlake.com | jelakejr [AOL-IM]
  40. Both Dramatic Short and Retros are an error by btempleton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Dramatic Presentation Hugo is the most popular Hugo but by many of the standards that go into the award, the least important. It is one that used to be so bad that "No Award" was a serious contender and always the category where it does best. An award means there should be in every year many fine contenders, from which 5 nominees that are worthy can be chosen, of which one will be deemed excellent. Quite often the DP Hugo has not met this standard.

    Of all the Hugos, it was the one least in need of duplicating. It was a popular choice nonetheless (though still controversial) because people just like to give awards, and some people really enjoy their TV SF.

    The DP award was also notorious for being the one the recipient often cared nothing for, the nominees coming rarely if at all to get the award. In some years the winner was told in advance they won (in violation of the principles for all the other awards) just to get them to show up.

    Again, not what was needed to be duplicated. TV fans tend to be fans of series, and though this is an episode award, you can be sure voters will vote for their favourite series, even if another series had an episode better than the best episode of their series.

    The Retros were written in in the 90s and tried in 1996. Participation was low, and voting was clearly based in some cases on the historical reputation of the authors rather than the works, or simply who was alive to receive or who it would be cute to receive in one category. The later worldcons entitled to give retro hugos deemed them a mistake and didn't do them again, but they were not removed from the rules so this con did them. Doesn't alter it.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    1. Re:Both Dramatic Short and Retros are an error by mbrother · · Score: 1

      What you say is mostly true, but man, this Retro Hugo novel batch is super impressive. Can you remember a modern set of novels as great? Sure, there have been a few great ones in recent years, but this is a set where EVERY nominee is great.

      --
      Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  41. Re:Contact by shrubya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought the movie was better than the book.

    1: in the book, Palmer is a barely-tolerable annoyance, while Ellie and her beau are obvious avatars for Sagan & Druyan, horrendously sappy. Ellie & Palmer made the movie story better.

    2: in the book, there's a whole multinational team, but they're ALL pie-eyed scientists operating on the exact same wavelength, therefore all able to be discredited simultaneously. Also, they got to choose their own gear completely? And none of them had EM-proof recording equipment? The movie version was more plausible.

  42. Frightening by maysonl · · Score: 2, Insightful
    To realise that I've read {and remember) almost all of the retro fiction nominees, but only 1 (as far as I remember) of the 2003 nominees.

    I'd have to go with More Than Human for the retro novel award.

    1. Re:Frightening by arwel · · Score: 1

      To realise that I've read {and remember) almost all of the retro fiction nominees, but only 1 (as far as I remember) of the 2003 nominees.

      Well you've had an extra 50 years to find the time to read the retro nominees...

  43. Who the hell is Hugo by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

    and what makes him such a good judge of what is good Science Fiction?

  44. Buffy wasn't cancelled. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The show ended. It had a finale and everything, and nowhere left to go for a new season.

  45. Download the nominees! by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Informative
    Or were you hoping not to pay?
    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  46. Mission of Gravity by macguiguru · · Score: 0

    Yes indeed!! Fantastic novel! I've met Hal Clement (forget his real name) and he was a wonderful, funny man. Very humble and honest - which is reflected in his characters.

    1. Re:Mission of Gravity by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 1

      Harry Stubbs. Clement was his midle name.

      He died just last year, dammit.

    2. Re:Mission of Gravity by mbrother · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was at Milehicon in Denver, his last con. I thought I'd be on the Science Education panel with him, but they didn't put me on that one. He was lucid, and entertaining, and clever. And he died a few days later. Why haven't they fixed that yet?

      --
      Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  47. Bless you suh by macguiguru · · Score: 0

    (bows humbly) (watches download bar eagerly, muttering '....myyy preccciousss....')

  48. Hugo Gernsback Re:Who the hell is Hugo by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    He was the publisher of many early "pulp" SF magazines, and a big popularizer of the genre.

    He wrote a bit too.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Gernsback

    He doesn't judge a thing, being dead. The award was named in his honor.

  49. OT by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
    He doesn't judge a thing, being dead

    I've heard similar comments about the Supreme Court.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  50. Does anyone else... by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...find it a tad disturbing that pretty much all of the discussion in this thread is about movies and TV shows? People! The shite that Hollywood cranks out is not good SF! Read a good book. Sheesh.

    --
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    1. Re:Does anyone else... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      TV is just a medium. Firefly was good sci-fi.

      So=, what your are saying is that there are now crappy sci-fi books? no sci-fi books that are just drivel?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Does anyone else... by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

      Heheheh. No, I certainly believe in Sturgeon's Law. The problem with Hollywood is that it's even higher than Sturgeon's 90%. Like, 99.9% or something.

      I think what I was trying to say was that good written SF is much, much, MUCH better - and there's more of it - than the best Hollywood has ever done. SF (science fiction or speculative fiction) is the literature of the possible, and *can be* great brain food. Sci-fi seems to be a Hollywoodism for... well, bad SF. Cheers!

      --
      Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
  51. Fahrenheit 451 Remake in Progress by twootwoot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apparently, there is a Fahrenheit 451 movie remake by the guy who directed, The Shawshank Redemption.

  52. You had to go by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    and be reasonable- nice even. All right- living joke was too strong. Sorry about that.

    I don't watch much t.v.- though I did like Firefly and I own the DVD set.

    I must confess I've flirted with not having a t.v. - but it's a nice escape sometimes. I do enjoy sports and can't afford to go in person - and PBS does some good work where I really do learn. I don't have cable.

    I really limit how much my kids watch- and I just don't have time to watch much myself. Everything in moderation seems applicable.

    Sorry again- just remember- as excited as you are to share the wonder of a life free of the boob tube- sometimes the best form of evangelism is the indirect, 'soft' approach. Otherwise you just turn people off.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:You had to go by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

      Heheh. No problem, I'm not even the person you responded to in the first place. And hey, I'd be lying if I didn't admit to watching the odd hockey game at a friend's place.

      As I mentioned to the other fellow who replied to me, I grew up without TV, and it's kind of coloured my views on the subject. You're right about the soft approach, though - most of the time I actually avoid mentioning that I don't watch TV. Going on and on about it would be a bit too much like "reformed" smokers for my taste. Cheers!

      --
      Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    2. Re:You had to go by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I'd completely forgotten about that Onion article. And I wouldn't really advocate going without a TV.

      For me, I just find the interactive nature of the Internet much more entertaining. Especially Slashdot.

      I've been so consumed with Slashdot recently that all but about 3 of my 1103 comments were from after 10/24/03.

      (Nevermind the fact that I don't have an internet connection at home. heh. I write D&D tools in Perl instead.)

      As for the evangilism, I agree that the 'soft' approach is best. It's painful when people preach to me...I usually keep my religous views to myself out here in Real Life.

  53. Remake scheduled for summer 2005 by peter303 · · Score: 1

    IMDB.com doesnt list the cast yet, but I recall rumors Mel Gibson was being considered for Montag.

  54. door stop award for Dune #11? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    They should have an award for the most prolific scifi writer. The 10 sequels to Dune, five by Frank Herbert (father) and the others by Brian Herbert (son) must be close to toppling Ron Hubbard's Mission Earth series :-) This years entry Butlerian Jihad: The Machine Wars is OK but not great. Never fear, ther are six more sequels in the pipeline! (End of the BJ triology, Dune 7&8 fleshing out what happens after Heretics of Dune, A triology about Paul's Jihad.)

    1. Re:door stop award for Dune #11? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      I dunno how many Mission Earth books there are, but there will have to be a lot of them to beat out the Dumarest of Terra series, at 32 books.

    2. Re:door stop award for Dune #11? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't associate Frank Herbert's Dune books with those by his son (& co-writer(s)). The series ended with Chapterhouse.

      Sad when a literary legacy can be ruined by one's hack progeny cashing in.

  55. Stubbs by macguiguru · · Score: 0

    Ah... that's right. (now I remember). Sad that he died. He was a wonderful writer. 'The Gentle Giants of Ganymede' was also superb. I met Robert Forward once and when I commented on how the Cheela reminded me of the Mesklinites, he smiled broadly and said 'Harry taught me to think like and alien'. Forward's books aren't too bad, IMHO.

  56. change in sci-fi over time... by sdedeo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It is interesting to note the differences between 1953 and this year's crop.

    Two thing that stick out the most: how electronic media have grown up -- in some ways, overtaken -- the novel for sci fi, and how the "semi-pro" zines have become real powerhouses (I'm thinking in part of the NYRSF, which I'm most familiar with.)

    Sci fi in 1953, when taken seriously by adults, was really an offshoot of "ordinary" literature still, and the television and movie stuff was silly. Sci fi in 2004 has grown and splintered and now has its own conventions and genres quite set in stone. Yes, there were the space operas even back in the day, but now it seems sci fi has, for better or for worse, become something quite separate from "mainstream" literature. I think it's true that a lot of the most adventurous, genre-busting work has been in TV and film, which would have been unthinkable in 1953, even though the film medium could have been said to be "mature" by then.

    While 451 could be judged in the context of other work coming out at the time, it is only the cyberpunk novels (and the occasional Handmaiden's Tale type) that get examined in that way today.

    Good or bad? I like sci fi, and I like hard sci fi as well, although it is clear that the writing suffers quite a great deal. If SF was taken seriously by The Man, would it improve? Or would the attention from the book reviewers in mainstream magazines make it less adventurous?

    Final question: what about Ted Chaing? What's he been doing recently?

    --
    Protect your liberties. Donate to the ACLU
  57. Read one of the nominees by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Read one of the nominees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that the link in the parent is an incomplete version. Which is fair enough, since they want you to buy the magazine - but sheesh, warn people when you link to something like that. I have to know how it ends, now.

  58. Buffy wasn't canceled by cardshark2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As far as I know, Joss ended Buffy because he felt it had run its course. The network didn't cancel it. Am I wrong?

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
  59. Conspiracy '87 by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just so peope know what to expect, here's an account of the last time Scientology tried to buy a WorldCon and Hugo Awards: Strange Vibrations

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  60. awards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's an interesting blog entry about this over at Wil Wheatons blog

  61. can there be a tie? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Picking either Childhood's End or Fahrenheit 451 is really not possible, IMO - both are equally deserving of the award. Give it to both of them.

  62. You know by geekoid · · Score: 1

    we don't have TV, but my kids STILL want to drag me to McDonalds....blech.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  63. Retro-Hugo, 1953, Best Novel, illegitimate. by whitroth · · Score: 1

    As a Philadelphian expatriate, we *invented* the Hugos at the Philly Worldcon in 1953, and we gave Alfred Bester the Best Novel for "The Demolished Man".

    It's absolutely illegitimate for Boston to try to revoke or supercede that, and I've just emailed them to that effect.

    mark, Philadelphian expatriate, PSFS member, 21 years

    1. Re:Retro-Hugo, 1953, Best Novel, illegitimate. by arwel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that would have been for a 1952 publication, no? The 1954 Worldcon didn't award any Hugos, so 1953 is still there to be covered, and we've had Hugos awarded every year since 1955.

    2. Re:Retro-Hugo, 1953, Best Novel, illegitimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From http://www.fanac.org/fanzines/Retro_Hugos.html
      "A s is normal for the Hugo Awards, the Retro-Hugo Awards are selected from the best of the previous year for which they would have been awarded. Therefore, the awards will be work done in 1953." And as the awards were skipped in 1954, nothing for work done in 53 has had awards yet - and it was a great year.

      Of course I think the novel and novella nominations are strong this year too, and not jsut because one of my friends is on the list ;-)

  64. Stargate SG-1 by mdrn28 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Agreed, Stargate SG-1 is a great show that deserves recognition, despite the tendency to reuse just a few story templates, e.g.:

    Cast goes through the gate, gets captured/abducted/trapped.

    Cast brings something bad/evil/dangerous back to Earth.

    Cast goes offworld, befriends/irritates/vanquishes representative(s) of some ancient Earth culture or alien species.

  65. http://www.scifispace.com/html/ffepisodes.php by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Episode Guide of FIREFLY

    Set 500 years in the future, the drama centers on the shady crew of the transport ship Serenity as it conducts some not-so-legal runs across the Alliance-governed star system.

    The Train Job - Airdate: September 20, 2002

    A battle for control of the craft threatens to erupt after Capt. Reynolds and his sidekick Zoe become entangled in a botched mission to steal cargo from another ship.

    Summary: The episode opens in a dark, musky bar on Unification Day celebrating the day the Alliance took over the universe. Zoe and Mal are playing a game while Jayne watches. Of course there is a loud mouth who has to badmouth those who fought in the war against the Alliance (such as Mal and Zoe) and of course, a fight ensues. The bar brawl ends up outside with Wash bringing the Serenity over for a last minute rescue along the edge of a cliff.

    Looking for work, Mal, Zoe and Jayne meet a man named Niska with his resident henchman Crow. Niska has a job for them - a train job stealing the cargo from a passenger train. As it's supposedly Alliance goods, Mal has no problem. But then he finds out the 'goods' are actually medicine needed for the city's residents who are suffering from a degenerative malady the miners suffer due to living conditions. So Mal must decide whether he wants to get paid and possibly be responsible for the death of miners and their families, or return the cargo and face the wrath of Niska.

    Writers: Joss Whedon & Tim Minear
    Director: Joss Whedon

    Our Reaction: A little too heavy on the western parallels, but very interesting characters with a lot of promise. Look forward to seeing how things develop. Discuss it on the message board.

    Bushwhacked - Airdate: September 27, 2002

    A salvage mission goes from dreary to deadly after the crew members find their site ravaged by the cannibalistic Reavers and targeted by an Alliance ship that could do more damage than anyone imagined. The final scene of Wash describing Zoe was part ad lib.

    Writer & Director: Tim Minear

    Our Reaction: Better than the first episode with a better mix of action and character/universe information. No as many "wild west" references. Discuss it on the message board.

    Our Mrs. Reynolds - Airdate: October 4, 2002

    The discovery of a stowaway (Christina Hendricks) leads to an even more shocking find---she's actually Mal's payment for a past job. Meanwhile, the Alliance has its eye on the Serenity. Or at least someone aboard it.

    Joss considers this the best script he's ever written according to the official website.

    Guest Cast:
    o Christina Hendricks as Saffron

    Writer: Joss Whedon
    Director: Vondie Curtis Hall

    Our Reaction: The best episode so far. Some great character development (Wash actually does have a personality!) and several twists and turns that kept me surprised. Discuss it on the message board.

    Jaynestown - Airdate: October 18, 2002

    Jayne is a local hero of a town Serenity visits. The episode is said to include a song written by Ben Edlund "The Hero of Canton, the Man they call Jayne". This episode was moved up in the schedule as it was originally to air in November.

    Writer: Ben Edlund
    Director: Marita Grabiak

    Our Reaction: A fun episode, if not overly logical (why did Jayne have to go and then why did he stick around after he saw the statue???). Discuss it on the message board.

    Out of Gas - Airdate: October 25, 2002

    Includes more back story about how the characters got together, including a flash back of Mal showing Zoe around for the first time. Includes a scene of Kaylee showing off her expertise in the engine room.

    Writer: Tim Minear
    Director: David Solomon

    Our Reaction: The best episode so far. Includes flashbacks of Mal showing Zoe around

  66. "Best. Show. Ever." by Silverhammer · · Score: 1

    Blockquoth the poster:

    I think Fox wanted Joss to make another teen-hit, but in space. And when he showed up with the best sci-fi show ever shown on TV, the execs freaked because that was not what they wanted.

    C'mon now, hyperbole like that in a crowd like this can only lead to trouble. Sure, Firefly was witty and well-crafted, but a) it was still more western than sci-fi and b) there have been plenty of kick-ass "genre" shows in the past several years.

  67. Tivo by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

    I hadn't heard of this Tivo thing before I started hanging out here, and I'm still not entirely clear on what they do - their website doesn't really get into specifics. I assume it's some kind of programmable video recorder that can strip out advertising? That's pretty cool. How does it distinguish between program and ads?

    I'm still not sure it would make me want to watch TV, or have time for it even - but it's a step in the right direction. Cheers!

    --
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    1. Re:Tivo by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      Tivo doesn't remove commercials. It gives you convenient fast forward/rewind. You can fast forward at three different speeds or use a 30-second-skip button to jump commercials. Don't be tempted to compare PVR fast forward/rewind to a VCR. PVRs do it a thousand times better.

      Skipping commercials is just gravy, though. What you don't realize until you own a PVR is that YOU WILL NEVER CHANNEL SURF AGAIN. No matter what, once your PVR is properly set up you will always have a list of pre-records shows and movies that you personally like to watch. That's the killer.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    2. Re:Tivo by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

      Well, I've never been one to channel surf (nothing good on TV, so I'm going to look for more TV to watch?), but it might be nice to record shows I like and skip the ads. About the only thing I watch these days is live sporting events, though, and that doesn't seem like enough to justify the cost of cable. Or buying a TV.

      Mind you, I saw _Trailer Park Boys_ a couple of times, and that is one seriously funny show. There IS good stuff out there. Cheers, and thanks for the explanation!

      --
      Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    3. Re:Tivo by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      I could rant all day about how much I love Tivo. Other people prefer Replay, or HTPC, or you can even roll your own with some shareware type stuff I think.

      I'm a hard-core geek but I've done the "PC in the living room" thing and I came to the conclusion that I'm willing to spend money for a dedicated piece of hardware that's easier to maintain and operate (for the wife, etc.) than a PC. I don't archive TV shows so I don't need any fancy frills although Tivo is apparently going to allow Tivo->PC->CD sometime this year. (TV quality is shit. If I want to preserve something to watch it again I'll get the DVD, used when possible.)

      However, my advice for someone considering a PVR today is generally to consider a HTPC (home theatre PC). HDTV is coming, and the cost of a dedicated HD PVR is likely to be very close to the cost of an entry level HTPC. HD may, as a side effect, kill off the PVR makers simply because computers are so darn cheap and the MS home media center OS is actually pretty decent (or so I've been told).

      Enough ranting, I guess... :)

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
  68. Re:Contact by Shimmer · · Score: 1

    The movie ruined the theme of the book, tacking on a lame meme about science and religion both being based on faith.

    Moreover, the excellent twist at the end of the book is completely missing from the movie.

    I also thought the alien encounter in the book was much better than the movie. More meat.

    The only thing the movie did better was the machine and the trip through the wormhole -- excellent visuals.

    --
    The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
  69. And next year, "I, Robot" by nigelc · · Score: 1
    I wonder if the Will Smith action-adventure "I, Robot" will be nominated next year? After all, that's based on the collected works of Isaac Asimov but updated by the writer that brought us "Batman and Robin"

    This is a good year for fiction in Boston; we have Noreascon and the Democratic Convention! Man, all this and RMS too!

    --


    Cthulhu Barata Nikto
  70. Somewhat disturbing by portforward · · Score: 1

    I don't know, did anyone else find the 1953 nomination for Arthur C. Clarke - Childhood's End -- somewhat disturbing?

    1. Re:Somewhat disturbing by mbrother · · Score: 1

      Why, because he's still alive? Read it. It's a good book.

      --
      Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  71. SG-1 by Emperor+Tiberius · · Score: 1

    I was really kind of disappointed SG-1 didn't get put up for nomination for a Hugo. Long ago, Star Trek ran king amongst the Hugo awards; at least in the books. I was hoping the same for Stargate. Maybe, Atlantis will have a shot next time around the bend. If not the TV series at least the books.

    1. Re:SG-1 by mbrother · · Score: 1

      Star Trek NEVER "ran king amongst the Hugo awards, at least in the books." Name a single Star Trek novel that was ever even nominated for the Hugo award. You can't, can you? Dramatic presentation is a different matter, but get things at least remotely close to reality, OK?

      --
      Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  72. Re:Contact by shrubya · · Score: 1

    lame meme about science and religion

    Depending on your point of view. IMO, the theme of the book -- "everyone would be better off if they did everything that scientists like Ellie and me told them to do" -- isn't any better. I really like that theme in Sagan's NONfiction books (e.g. Demon-Haunted World) but it pushed Contact towards Mary-Sue territory.

    excellent twist at the end of the book

    Yeah, that would have been nice, and even fit with the science & religion theme.

    More meat

    Novels will always be better at detail than movies. It's the nature of the media.