Slashdot Mirror


Hackers: Under The Hood

jyre writes "ZDNet Australia has a special report that profiles and interviews five hackers over the next five days. Day 1: Raven Alder's page is up now (inludes photos). Day 2 will be Attrion.org creator, Jericho. Day 3: Adrian Lamo. Day 4: Kevin Mitnick and Day 5: L0phtCrack creator, Mudge."

280 comments

  1. Ah, Attrion. by FlyingJesus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love attrion.org! It's the best way to start my day, opening the old browser and surfing on over to attrion! First on my list of things to do in the morning!

    Mods don't hurt me :)

    1. Re:Ah, Attrion. by stdcallsign · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that the url, attrion.org, works just fine.

      ahh.. the joys of getting to your misspelled urls before the squatters do.

      stdcallsign

    2. Re:Ah, Attrion. by JayJay.br · · Score: 1

      Yes, but does it "inlude" photos?

    3. Re:Ah, Attrion. by kundor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Today in Internet Kindergarten we learn that what a link says and where the link goes are NOT THE SAME THING.

  2. Who? by blair1q · · Score: 3, Funny

    The total amount I care about self-proclaimed "H4xx04s?"

    0.

    1. Re:Who? by pantycrickets · · Score: 1

      And at least two of those mentioned are self-proclaimed, and only that. Poor ZDNet.

  3. Prominent (and "notorious") hackers by Incognitius · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Remember that many of these "hackers" are reformed, and thus attempting to sell their services. They aren't really "notorious" hackers and are often out of touch with the hacker community.

    This is to be expected from a mainstream publication that intends to present "hacking" in a mainstream light. I say, read at your own risk.

    1. Re:Prominent (and "notorious") hackers by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yup, that would be the same L0pht Heavy Industries that sold out and became @stake, Inc. I mean, FFS, they could have at least called themselves @st4k3, 1nc.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    2. Re:Prominent (and "notorious") hackers by rodgster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe presenting some reformed hackers as semi-normal people will help change the public preception of "hackers" in general.

      Maybe even a few people in the general public will become enlighted to some of the issues involving computer security: Microsoft's lip service to security, public bashing of Linux, the dangers of a monoculture and the magnitude of un-patched end user's systems to name just a few.

      We can only hope.

      The simple fact that it is from ZDnet.com.au speaks volumes as to the bias here in America.

      --
      Who will guard the guards?
    3. Re:Prominent (and "notorious") hackers by pantycrickets · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe presenting some reformed hackers as semi-normal people will help change the public preception of "hackers" in general.

      Or maybe presenting some never-weres, as "reformed" anythings, when they are only media whores, will just confuse the public into thinking that all hackers are idiots, and thus harmless.

    4. Re:Prominent (and "notorious") hackers by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Be specific if you're going to make a claim like that (or at least, if you insist on getting modded +insightful for it). Each of those people is certainly influential enough in recent hacker history, whether or not they are "reformed" or "out of touch."

  4. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by nadda · · Score: 5, Funny

    dude, that's her first grade photo.

  5. Definition by the_enigma_1983 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But are they going to define hacker? Are people going to see this as a bunch of articles about some scum who break into computers, or are they going to see a bunch of articles about people who have an intimate knowledge of computers? Either the meaning of the word hacker needs to change, or another word for the computer savvy needs to be found.

    1. Re:Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some words have .... ummm .... two meanings ?

      Or more.

    2. Re:Definition by Maneki+Neko · · Score: 1

      And she's ru-u-nning a port scan... on Heaven.

      --

      . . .
      Proverbs for Paranoids #4: *You* hide, They seek.

    3. Re:Definition by 91degrees · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The definition of Hacker has changed. It means someone who breaks into computers to absolutely everyone, except for a few self proclaimed "hackers" who think that everyone else in the world gets the term wrong.

    4. Re:Definition by raven_alder · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, if it was a "scum" definition, I would think that I wouldn't have qualified to be interviewed. Behold the angelic halo. [grin]

      I've had this argument with journalists before; it's one of the reasons that I tend to avoid being interviewed.

      "Tell me about your secret blackhat teenage years!"
      "Uh, I never had a secret blackhat teenage phase."
      "Oh, come on, you can tell me."
      "No, really, I didn't."

      Repeat ad nauseum.

    5. Re:Definition by byolinux · · Score: 1

      How do you define 'hacker'?

      (oh and tell me about your secret blackhat teenage years! ;))

    6. Re:Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever I hear of a "self-proclaimed hacker", I think "script kiddie black hat scum of the Earth".

      A true hacker will /always/, by definition, be one who is fighting black hats, in order to defend the original meaning of the term, as opposed to the media interpretation.

      A "self-proclaimed hacker", on the other hand, has failed to earn the name the honorable (legal) way and is thus trying to "earn" it by sheer brute force and fear, and by twisting the meaning of the word. Unfortunately, the bad guys have been winning that battle (over the name) ever since Wargames.

      O'Reilly is really doing a good job of putting the original meaning back into use, but alas, as long as the general populace aren't reading tech books, they're going to be fooled by the scriptkiddies forever, for reasons obvious.

    7. Re:Definition by 91degrees · · Score: 0

      Whatever. Perhaps I should refer to myself as "Gay" and then get angry whenever people assume that I'm homosexual rather than merely happy.

    8. Re:Definition by el'gwato · · Score: 1

      but I thought?

      anyway..
      the homosexuals are having the same sort of argument on gaydot.org... seems they're unhappy with the now negative connotation attached to the "ghay" word and they'd like to see the meaning returned to its original intensions.

      does anyone really have time to worry about what the media or general public thinks the term "hacker" means?

      Clearly I do... I just lost 47.2 seconds writing this post.

      --
      All speling, factual, tact, and/or grametical errers be the result of netwerk interpherance or# transmition ererrs.
    9. Re:Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you be both?

    10. Re:Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's typical ignorance of the difference between a cracker and a hacker.

    11. Re:Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the word 'gay' really does have two meanings, and you can be both those meanings at the same time.

      Not so with 'hacker', where the original meaning has been lost to the world through manipluation by the united forces of crackerdom and scriptkiddies and thus has been distorted and twisted beyond recognition (and presumably beyond repair).

      Either you are a hacker, or you are a cracker/script kiddie/black hat. There is no in-between (well, gray hats, but they're still hackers). If a hacker goes bad, qualifiers should be used as in 'dark side hacker' or 'black hat hacker'. Not just the word 'hacker', as it reflects badly on the general hardworking lawful programmer populace.

      As for a better word, I'd go for 'geek' - it's a word even your average user could get the meaning of from context, and so is the self-reference of choice at work.

  6. Perhaps we'll see by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    more high profile 'hackers' explaining their driving influences. Raven Alder bashing script kiddies and suggesting that users learn how to use their toys is a good way to start. I wouldn't argue for a second with a girl that is as cute as Bjork and could audit my security.

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar
    1. Re:Perhaps we'll see by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      All is full of security holes, you'll be given patches.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:Perhaps we'll see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cute? She looks like a tramp.

      Ah yes. The truth. It hurts.

    3. Re:Perhaps we'll see by krumms · · Score: 1

      Bjork's not cute. She's just darn well creepy.

    4. Re:Perhaps we'll see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She'd be much cuter if she didn't dye her hair black. Still, I wouldn't mind giving her an audit and checking under her hood.

    5. Re:Perhaps we'll see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say it like it's a bad thing.

    6. Re:Perhaps we'll see by pommaq · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, she could "audit" my "security" any day

    7. Re:Perhaps we'll see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are wrong, simple as that.

  7. L0pht crack by solid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mmmmm... L0pht password cracker. *urgh!* "Me use brute force!" *urgh!*

    1. Re:L0pht crack by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Didn't the L0pht's website run off an old Mac SE for a long time?

    2. Re:L0pht crack by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Was that an orgasm?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  8. It's the stories that are always masked by stigma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I find it fascinating to look at the lives or hackers just as you would the lives of movie stars or politicians. There is such stigma attached to these pseudo-celebrities that people often don't get so interested in their stories. I thought tonight's article was a much better article than the recent nytimesmagazine article on script kiddies.

    I'm actually surprised there have not been more television biographies on hackers. It seems A&E Biographies, Discovery Channel, Learning Channel etc. would want to tell these stories.

    www.reeddavid.com

  9. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1 Perv

  10. It would be nice if they could spell... by Xenographic · · Score: 4, Informative

    You like looking at the IE error page? Weirdo ;P

    Everyone should know that it is ATTRITION.org, anyhow (and, at least, the link is correct).

    1. Re:It would be nice if they could spell... by Ziviyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      You use IE?

      <voice impersonate="southpark:wendy"> Ewww, gross! </voice>

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:It would be nice if they could spell... by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Heh, no, but I figured the OP might ;P

  11. These stories kind of annoy me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Self-styled 1337 h4x0rs aren't particularly skilled with computers. They just do stupid shit that other more mature computer users won't waste their time on.

    If I was a loser I could burgle houses if I chose to. It's not exactly difficult. Even the rich neighborhoods would be easy pickings. I'm sure I could break into many places before I got caught. But I'd still be a loser.

    So why are the computerland equivalent of dirty little sneak thieves constantly being feted as heroes and geniuses all the damn time?

    I hate movies like 'Hackers' which give zit-faced teenage virgins the idea that they'll get to screw Angelina Jolie if only they could be 1337...

    1. Re:These stories kind of annoy me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate movies like 'Hackers' which give zit-faced teenage virgins the idea that they'll get to screw Angelina Jolie

      Yeah, that must have been a real let down for you. I know it's only a fortnight, but you'll get over it.

    2. Re:These stories kind of annoy me. by Laebshade · · Score: 1

      Angelina Jolie is ugly. Hackers was an entertaining movie, but as with all entertainment, I did not associate it with reality.

    3. Re:These stories kind of annoy me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hackers 2 wasn't so bad though, and it almost showed how hacking/cracking (choose preferred word) actually is (ie you can't break into something after 10 years away from computers in 1 minute while getting a blowjob).

    4. Re:These stories kind of annoy me. by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

      Hackers 2 has no relation to the original Hackers. For some reason people in bootleg circles started calling it 'Hackers 2: Takedown' instead of its real title, simply 'Takedown'.

      --
      I belong to the ______ generation.
    5. Re:These stories kind of annoy me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure with some of them it's like that, but the better ones (and the ones you'll never hear about) it's more like breaking into the head office of a megacorp, through multiple security doors and many guards, and leaving that PostIt note on the CEOs folder saying "PWNED". Or keeping low and quietly leaving with a few photocopies of useful information. Maybe they're both losers, but there's a subtle difference between house burglar and international spy. And FWIW, yeh, Ange was OK.

    6. Re:These stories kind of annoy me. by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They make great stories. Americans in particular are particular fascinated by the stories of criminals; I imagine it is the same in Australia if not more so given its history. From Billy the Kid to gangsta rap there's often glorification of the criminal's stories in popular culture, so it's no surprise to see computer criminals occupy a similar space. Though, the cowboys and gangsta rappers get way more chicks, Angelina Jolie aside....

    7. Re:These stories kind of annoy me. by hutkey · · Score: 1

      >Angelina Jolie is ugly. i have nothing to say , this shows ur taste

    8. Re:These stories kind of annoy me. by antic · · Score: 1

      It's the same in Australia. The Bushrangers of times past are reasonably well known (Ned Kelly being one) criminals in Australia.

      A friend of mine was busted by detectives for tricking some guy on IRC into accepting an EXE and running it. He then got his ISP login and that to various porn sites the guy was a member to. He was eventually busted sponging off the guy's net account.

      When it made the newspaper (small story) he was clearly portrayed as basically a smart kid looking for a challenge. Nothing overly negative.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    9. Re:These stories kind of annoy me. by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      Angelina Jolie is ugly.

      i have nothing to say , this shows ur taste


      Speaking of media and what it tries to convince people of, Angelina is IMO one of the most 'pushed on the public' model types that I have ever seen.

      I know many people who otherwise find women of that fame beautiful, yet find her to be extremely unattractive.

      Myself included. That goes for Ms. Spears also. Just because they are proclaimed to be beautiful doesn't mean much to me.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    10. Re:These stories kind of annoy me. by br3itain · · Score: 1
      Um...did you even bother to click on the link to the story? If you did, you would've noticed that neither of the two individuals featured so far even remotely fit the profile of the "self-styled 1337 h4x0r". It seems like you spouted off the ever-popular "I am a responsible computer user. Down with crackers and script kiddies!" mantra just to pat yourself on the back, but all it did was prove that you didn't read the article and posted a knee-jerk reponse.

      Also, hating the movie Hackers is like, so 9 years ago. There are *lots* of poorly-made computer-movies-rife-with-technical-errors that you can hate now. :)

    11. Re:These stories kind of annoy me. by hode · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I don't think many people took Hackers seriously. I imagine the 3D OS had something to do with it...

  12. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Da+w00t · · Score: 4, Funny

    Raven's my coworker. Quite techincally, she rocks. and oh, that tit size comment? ... (a direct quote)

    "Fuck you ".

    And yes, she's talking about You

    --

    da w00t. mtfnpy?
  13. Uhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's nothing at attrion.org. Unless you typo'd the typo back to attrition.org, which is what it's supposed to be...

  14. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by jhunsake · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    She looks halfway decent at least

    Halfway decent at best, with a few pints of vodka in your stomach.

  15. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 2, Funny

    You obviously haven't ever met any really ugly women. Trust me, they get a lot worse than that. Think Jean Teasdale from The Onion.

  16. Perfect Ad by Jade+E.+2 · · Score: 5, Funny
    That's got to be the most perfect ad-to-article match ever. The interview contains these paragraphs:
    "The root problem that the security industry has is ... unscrupulous people selling to an uninformed market. The managers buying security products don't understand security at all, and so they trust the vendors to tell them what is best," Alder argued. "And somehow, conveniently, what is best has a great overlap with whatever that particular vendor happens to be selling."

    ...

    "[Companies] have the latest and greatest firewall that nobody has ever bothered to configure, or a very expensive intrusion detection system (IDS) that nobody has the understanding to tune."

    And the ad on the page says "Today's threats require a lot more than a firewall. This is a lot more than a firewall. Symantec Gateway Security 5400 series" (Ad here.)

    That's about the most perfect example of what she's talking about anybody could have come up with...

    1. Re:Perfect Ad by raven_alder · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I thought it was nicely ironic myself. I didn't have anything to do with choosing the ads, of course, but if I had I couldn't have done better. [grin]

  17. Attrition!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah alright, they had a defacement archive back in the day, they're dried out now. What have they done since then and really what good was the defacement archive? All it really did was encourage defacements.

    The other guys have either shown skill, or created something. And lets shut up about "cracker v.s hacker" BS. Hacking is a SKILL SET, you can define black hat, grey hat, white hat from there if you want. Just because someone breaks the law doesn't mean they aren't a good "hacker" and are suddenly a "cracker".

    Also remember not all intruders are "dumb kiddies" there takes skill in a real intrusion even if you are using pre-canned exploits. There is a hacking mindset to getting into places. Its the same mindset used in writing unique code, among other things. Its not all dotslash. Thats like saying U.S Special Forces are 'kiddies' since all they do is a pull a trigger. Wrong.

    So tired of these people ranting and raving about 'cracking'. Get your head out of your asses and get off the bandwagon.

    1. Re:Attrition!? by grepistan · · Score: 1

      Look, there is a difference between hacking and cracking... there has to be! By using exploits to access systems belonging to other people, you are breaking and entering, regardless of how clever your exploit is or how benign your activities are. However, you are correct in saying that the mere presence of cracking skills does not negate hacking ability. I'm just tired of telling people that I like to hack and hearing all the standard crackers/viruses/scammers paranoia.

      --
      Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
      -- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather
    2. Re:Attrition!? by maxpublic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also remember not all intruders are "dumb kiddies" there takes skill in a real intrusion even if you are using pre-canned exploits.

      Script kiddies are called that for a reason. Often young and not terribly bright, they take programs written by others, programs they don't understand and can barely use, and launch attacks against the systems of others with them. Script kiddies, by definition, couldn't successfully modify or improve the code of the programs they employ if their lives depended on it.

      From my own experience I'd guess that perhaps only one in twenty so-called 'hackers' has the first damned clue what they're doing. Of this subset perhaps one in twenty could actually write an intrusion program of minimal value. And of this subset, perhaps one in twenty is actually skilled enough to call themselves 'hackers' and be recognized as such by expert coders.

      The actual number of hackers, or folks I'd deign to give the title, is minimal. The number of script kiddies is legion. This is actually a good thing, as you'd rather your average petty criminal was a fucking idiot than a genius any day of the week. It's easy to defend yourself against an moron who can't respond to a change in defensive strategy because they're incapable of modifying the code of their tools or coming up with a creative way to launch an attack; it's much more difficult to match yourself against someone with real talent who's spent years honing their skills in intrusion.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    3. Re:Attrition!? by Salamander · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Looks like someone's fragile little ego got stepped on. "What have they done since then" and "there takes skill in a real intrusion" are the tipoffs that we're probably dealing with a 16-year-old who think computing began with him - yeah, almost inevitably him, sorry but that's the way it is in that community and I had to pick a pronoun. Here's a clue for you, kid. Cracking might not take zero skill, but it's still absolutely nothing compared to the difficulty of actually creating the systems you crack, or the tools you use on either side of the security fence. Reality puts up a lot more obstacles than any number of white hats, black hats, or any other color hats. Raven - who can obviously take care of herself and doesn't need my help defending her or other female hackers - offers some excellent advice that I can only second:

      To aspiring hackers, Alder has this piece of advice: "Learn TCP/IP or the internals of your operating system of choice. Ideally, learn both. Don't just be a script-kiddie who downloads an attack program off the Internet and think that's cool.

      "Understanding what you're doing is more cool. Having the know-how to develop a new and innovative attack or to develop a creative defence is a lot more impressive than 'dude, I sniffed your Hotmail password'."
      --
      Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
    4. Re:Attrition!? by bccomm · · Score: 1

      MOD parent up!

      What's even more sad is the people who call themselves (and I quote) ``133t h4x0r5.'' I take a networking class at my highschool and literally everyone does this, except me of course. What crap. All they do is (on WinBlows no less) play MUD, while I sit in the corner quitely hacking away on my NetBSD box and actually getting some work done in the mean time (I might even be the only one passing right now...yeah, it's that bad). Yet just because they picked up some (IMHO useless) leetspeak, they think they're more experienced. I don't usually say anything---I'm the only (and first) freshman in that class, surrounded by juniors and seniors who don't have a friggin' clue.

      See also my sig---my Journal's worth a look too, but almost completely OT.
      -Bruce
      -----------
      |\|3+85D: f0r t3h r3a1 133t h4x0r5!!!!!!1 Those who know will attest! They will agree! They already use it! They will not use annoying hacker-esque stereotypes!

    5. Re:Attrition!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'm a security administrator who works on an enterprise network running mutiple OS's, and topologies. (Including the network being very complex with mutiple sites, vlans, VPNs etc.)

      Have you ever worked on an enterprise network? Or just sit home on your windows LAN?

      I am not talking about just running an exploit on an exposed webserver. I am talking about really securing or intruding on an enterprise level network and not getting caught. It's not that easy. There is skill involved. YES there are plenty of "16 year old script kiddies" I am not saying there isn't, it's just moronic to assume every intruder/security guy is. It's also very ignorant.

      Whats the quote with "raven" have to do with anything? A real hacker would know those. But you dont have to be a programmer or a linux kernel developer to be a "hacker". And all intrusion/security is not "cracking".

    6. Re:Attrition!? by Salamander · · Score: 1
      Have you ever worked on an enterprise network? Or just sit home on your windows LAN?

      If you were really that bright, you wouldn't be asking. What I do is right on my website, which is linked from here. You, on the other hand, hide behind the cloak of anonymous cowardice, from which any idiot can claim any credentials (and often does) without fear of contradiction. Not only have I worked on enterprise networks, but I'm currently active in defining and implementing new functionality for storage networks which are, if anything, more challenging than the IP kind. What can you prove that you have done? The phrase "diddly squat" comes to mind. You disrespect Jericho et al by asking "what have they done since then" but your own visible contributions are even less.

      Go away, troll. You're bothering the people who build your toys.

      --
      Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
  18. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by dotslasher_sri · · Score: 1

    Theres one more below it

  19. I agree. They aren't interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you aren't computer-ignorant. But the media are computer-ignorant, and are happy to stay that way.

    A few years ago a major New Zealand ISP was "hacked" -- or so the media said. The biggest talkshow host of the time interviewed the alleged "h4x0r" live, and proclaimed him to be a "computer genius". We were all in deadly and imminent danger of being hacked by guys like him he said.

    The "hacker" in question was a 13 year old whose friend's older brother worked for the ISP. The older brother had stupidly given his staff login and password to his kid brother, who had, naturally, shared it with his friend, the "genius hacker". This friend then logged in and deleted a bunch of hosted websites. Pretty frikken 1337, huh?

    Take the little assholes out and beat them with wet towels, then make them parade naked through the streets. A fit punishment for such computer Uber-Gurus.

  20. geek soap opera warning!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, this stuff sucks you in like that TV reality crap, doesn't it? Yet strangely, they both leave me with that feeling of "really dont give a rat's ass".

    Isnt that blog venting phase already passé?

    zack

  21. Friends? by skitzoid+(moomoo) · · Score: 0, Troll

    In her spare time, she downs chai while arguing philosophy with friends. Sorry am I the only one who read this? Hackers don't have friends. Burn her at the stake, she is not one of us!

    1. Re:Friends? by freeJustin · · Score: 1
      PHILOSOPHY!?

      CHAI TEA!?

  22. Fight back against shock site trolls by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 0, Informative

    As you should expect for a -1 moderated comment, the parent's link leads to a shock site (lastmeasure in case you're wondering).

    When you click on the link, your information gets added to this page where I guess the trolls get to see who's visited their site.

    Now then... surely someone on here can find some interesting and creative things to add to this table. Hint: whatever's on your clipboard when you click on their link ends up in the table. Ditto for referrer links and other information.

    --
    Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    1. Re:Fight back against shock site trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice!

      I am the owner of this mirror of Last Measure and some nice person clipboarded a Javascript snippet to forward me back to the main mirror! I just got HARDCORE OWN3D!

    2. Re:Fight back against shock site trolls by siliconoddity · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I forgot to log in before replying to you :) I do not post my site in replys to anything, because I'm an ethical troll. And the stats page IS public for a reason.

    3. Re:Fight back against shock site trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re:Fight back against shock site trolls (Score:0)
      by siliconoddity (731372) on Tuesday April 20, @06:27PM (#8924380)
      (http://www.peoplesprimary.com/)
      Sorr y, I forgot to log in before replying to you :) I do not post my site in replys to anything, because I'm an ethical troll. And the stats page IS public for a reason.

      Uh huh. Right.

    4. Re:Fight back against shock site trolls by siliconoddity · · Score: 0

      I did not post that. I entered it as my URL. It was automatically posted to the page by the backend of the /. site.

    5. Re:Fight back against shock site trolls by siliconoddity · · Score: 0

      wow i hardcore own3d that guy

  23. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by raven_alder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hi. It's really nice to know that whatever I can do technically, that it's my cup size that really matters. I'm 28. I do backbone security, incident response, vulnerability assessment, and pen-testing. I work in varying capacities with Nessus, Snort, and the Open Source Vulnerability Database. And fuck you. http://www.oneeyedcrow.net/securitygeekfemme.html

  24. Not that 1337 by Magickcat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they were really oh so 1337, nobody would have ever heard of them, and they wouldn't be talking about their escapades either.

    --

    Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

    1. Re:Not that 1337 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless their so "1337" that they don't have to worry about being caught and found out clever ways to make lots of money off of their skills in the proccess.

      Or maybe they are just smart enough to realise that instead of being sneaky and having to do things illegally, they can get paid to do what they like OUT IN THE OPEN.

      What? Don't you realise that it's much easier to break into systems then to secure them against unknown attacks?

      Duh. In order to exercise your skills you would naturally gravitate towards the more difficult tasks of protecting computer systems from attack, then attacking them yourself.

      Then you also have systems you can crack LEGALLY, and get paid thousands of dollars for the pleasure.

      Don't you realise that computers and the internet is one big semi-scam by intellegent geeks to put themselves in positions of power by convincing everyone else that computers and the internet are some how important? Don't you realise that we have governments and mega corporations creating multi-million dollar networks just so people can play DOOM against each other and download all the free porn/programs/music/movies we want?

      Jeezz, when people talk about "1337", most of the time they don't understand what truly "1337"-ness is. Open your eyes.

    2. Re:Not that 1337 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      script kiddies

    3. Re:Not that 1337 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they aren't talking about systems they've broken into, they're talking about their love for technology and coding, at least mudge will be i'm sure.

    4. Re:Not that 1337 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard of all of them. You've never heard of them, moron. You've seriously never heard of l0pht?

    5. Re:Not that 1337 by kmactane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe that might apply to Mitnick. But Mudge/L0pht, Lamo, and Jericho/Attrition.org all publicized their own works. The L0pht folks said, "Hey, world, here's some software." Should they still be secret after that? Attrition.org was a public web site, fercrissake.

      And Raven Alder is 100-percent pure white-hat. She's interested in finding and publicizing vulns (and other security problems), rather than secretly exploiting them. Why in the world is that something that nobody should "have ever heard of"?

      When you're a black hat, publicity means you screwed up. But when you're a white hat, it means you found something that nobody else did/could. That's the camp Raven's in.

    6. Re:Not that 1337 by Magickcat · · Score: 1

      Some of the most 1337 things I've ever seen done or heard about will never be made public I guess. That impresses me more than the "I've been caught with a lot of media publicity around me and now I'm forming a security company since I'm out" type.

      Some of the stuff that went down in the 80s - now that was 1337. I respect Raven's efforts and whitehat hackers, but there is infact an underworld and to me that's hardcore 1337. I must be a too much of a romantic.

      --

      Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

  25. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well, you're kinda old, but it's been a pretty dry spell. Sweet, I could use it, if you're serious :-)

  26. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by L0stb0Y · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least they didn't regress to the "nice boots" comment you're likely to get at the local g0th club-

    LosT

    --
    "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams."
  27. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't piss her off or else she'll hack your ass haha

  28. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by freeJustin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Compaired to the girls you see at your local 2600 shes pretty fly for a white chick, SNORT rocks(no pun).

  29. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by jhunsake · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I have, but I don't consider them women. More like walking vomit.

  30. Re:THOSE FUCKS ARE NOT HACKERS !!! by mirko · · Score: 1

    The above is not specially a troll :
    I remember a Slashdot story featuring a list of hackers including Richard Stallman, Eric Raymond, Woz, etc.

    According to rms, a Hacker is a "bidouilleur", now, the ones which you mention in this very story are more on "the dark side" (like it or not, Mitnick was convicted because of criminal activities).

    So, would you mind specifying which kind of hackers you refer to ?
    (Otherwise you'll let people get confused whether a hacker is good or not)

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  31. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by xlogicalxendx · · Score: 0

    It's rather sad that 90% of the comments to have come through so far, are about her looks rather than her accomplishments. There's really no easy way to stop sexism is there? The moderators could at least mod these people down.

  32. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by shepd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Feel free to be a self-admitted feminist, but realise that the likes of that group are responsible for banned books in Canada.

    Through its decision in the Butler vs. Her Majesty case, the Supreme Court of Canada adopted Catherine MacKinnon's definition of obscenity nearly word for word into Canadian law. This 1992 court decision -- which was vigorously championed by most feminists in Canada and the US -- allows Canadian customs to seize what it judges to be pornography at the border as the material is being imported. In reaching the Butler decision, the Supreme Court acknowledged that it was violating freedom of speech, but it deemed the possible harm that pornography could inflict on women to be of greater legal significance.

    Unlike others I generally prefer to keep my opinions of a woman's body to myself. However, I definately can't support any set of ideals that requires mass censorship. I believe that makes me anti-feminist, but moderate.

    You, on the other hand, may not be a feminist at all, at least according to that article, although you choose to identify with them.

    Pardon me if I came on a bit strong there, but when a select minority-by-choice of people can, at a whim, introduce sweeping censorship laws I get really pissed off.

    If you are asking for a change from society's old views of yourself, you might want to avoid clothing yourself in a devil's cloak. In short: Choose a better term than "feminist". I don't believe you are one, and the term carries far too much misandrist baggage for you to be taken seriously.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  33. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by freeJustin · · Score: 1
    Did you not read my SNORT rocks comment, and why would all of the malenerds here admit that they were "beaten" by a girl?

    In addition to that I dont think that you understand the meaning of sexism, slashdotters will bash both men and woman alike did you see the fat guy in the TRON costume!?

  34. An open letter to the anti-trolls. by rjh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, in the spirit of full disclosure: I know Raven. I know her well enough to be thoroughly impressed by her and her competency. By "thoroughly impressed" I mean "vaguely intimidated", too, and you know, that's not a bad thing to feel. Gives me an incentive to work that much harder. Competition is good.

    Reading this thread so far has led me to dismay. What thread dominates? Something that's so crude that it ought to be beneath our dignity to respond, even to condemn it. A few people have jumped on the trolls, modding them down into oblivion or responding to them.

    Here's a question: why? All it's doing is giving the trolls publicity. All it's doing is making people think that gender is an issue, because if it wasn't an issue, why would such a firestorm exist? If it wasn't an issue, why wouldn't the trolls just get modded into oblivion and go ignored, like the GNAA trolls?

    If you want to make a statement, if you want to condemn the immature and third-grade behavior of the trolls, if you want to say "look, I for one welcome competent people and I don't give a damn what plumbing they've got", the best response is not to jump on the troll bandwagon and respond to them.

    Mod them into oblivion, and let them be forgotten.

    They are nothing. For nothing, let there be nothing.

    If you want to make a statement, if you want to make a stand, if you want to say "look, I have no clue who this woman is, but frankly I'm appalled by some of the behavior here"... well, hey. Respond to this thread. Mod up responses in this thread. Let's take the publicity away from the trolls and put it to productive use. Let's see if we can't get a few dozen Slashdotters to make a positive stand instead of going around and giving the trolls what they want--furor.

    1. Re:An open letter to the anti-trolls. by b0j3 · · Score: 1

      Well finaly a post in this thread I can totaly agree with.

    2. Re:An open letter to the anti-trolls. by twenty-exty-six · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More importantly, lets think of ways to stop this kind of behavior outside of slashdot discussions, where you can't just mod someone down until they disappear into oblivion.

    3. Re:An open letter to the anti-trolls. by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you up, but I'll get modded down.

      Plus, now that I've responded, I can't mod.

      Catch-22.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    4. Re:An open letter to the anti-trolls. by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      Here's a question: why? All it's doing is giving the trolls publicity. All it's doing is making people think that gender is an issue, because if it wasn't an issue, why would such a firestorm exist? If it wasn't an issue, why wouldn't the trolls just get modded into oblivion and go ignored, like the GNAA trolls?


      Are you complaining because you think gender isn't an issue, or because you really wish it wasn't? Obviously it is an issue for some people, otherwise people would do exactly what you're saying. Does anyone respond to the idiots posting about Stephen King being dead? Asking people to not to even respond ignores that fact that it's somewhat a contentious issue.

      Personally I think it's a _boring_ issue. Then again most posts on slashdot that are of a non-technical nature are usually uninteresting.

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:An open letter to the anti-trolls. by twenty-exty-six · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you up too if I hadn't just responded.

    6. Re:An open letter to the anti-trolls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you just caused furor....

      YHBT, YHL, HAND

    7. Re:An open letter to the anti-trolls. by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The stereotype of the male geek being a mysogynistic prick isn't entirely off-base. Just try free-lancing for awhile, work with the IT departments of corporations large and small; you'll run into women-hating twits on a regular basis, far out of proportion to other departments within said corporations.

      Better yet, try working with those IT departments when you have a woman partner. When the geeks aren't hitting on her they spend their time muttering about what a 'frigid bitch' she is because she won't hop up on the desk of some sweaty, overweight little shit and spread her legs for him.

      YMMV, of course. But I found IT departments to typically be bastions of women-hating sleazeballs when I was freelancing, something along the lines of "can't you read the sign?! It says 'no girls allowed' on the tree fort!"

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    8. Re:An open letter to the anti-trolls. by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I, for one, welcome competent people but I do give a damn what plumbing they've got...but it doesn't affect my opinion of their competence.

      When people make hurtful personal remarks, sure, that's immature, and shouldn't enter into a discussion on what is basically a profile of a person as a hacker. I'm equally offended when people make fun of RMSs beard or Tron dude's camel toe..

      I find girls more attractive than guys. I don't think she's a better hacker (well..maybe a better social-engineer:o) just because I think she's attractive. Likewise, I don't think RMS is any less of a hacker just because I don't find him attractive(I'm sure he'll be upset:o)

      But people do notice these things, and in an environment where anonymity is so readily available, you can't expect them not to pass comment.

    9. Re:An open letter to the anti-trolls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, that PA comic. Personally, I am gentlemanly when playing UT, neither a sore winner nor a sore loser. But I definitely see a lot of complaining and accusations of cheating come from the losing team or even gloating coming from the least-active players on the winning team. Damn kids. ;)

  35. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by IvyMike · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's really nice to know that whatever I can do technically, that it's my cup size that really matters.

    You're getting shocked by immature comments on slashdot? Is this your first time here?

    by raven_alder (772810)

    Oh...I guess it is.

    P.S. Proud to be unfairly discriminating on the basis of userid, not cup size.

  36. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by L0stb0Y · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like a bad chapter from the Acro-nomicon: The Book of the Semantic...

    The semantics arguments are just as tired...

    LosT

    --
    "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams."
  37. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by raven_alder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All feminists don't necessarily agree... just like "hacker" can have a whole bunch of different connotations, so can "feminist". And, like many other minority groups, we are often known by our extremists. I think that makes it all the more important for those of us who *aren't* extremists to use the term rather than abandon it.

    For clarity's sake, I am a feminist in the "I believe in equal rights" way, not the "I believe in special treatment" way. I do not believe in or condone banning books. (Indeed, my car has a "Read banned books" sticker on it.) And you can see my take on feminism and porn, as relevant to your linked Foucaultian debate, right on my site. [grin] So, I suspect that we largely agree. Thanks for a thoughtful and intelligent comment. It's refreshing.

  38. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by L0stb0Y · · Score: 1

    Amen, if the labels that are all to often used don't have some sort of built in personal-recursional-definition, we will eventually run out of labels/words/titles all together, for fear of misuse/misunderstanding...

    The use of *isms isn't static, it's dynamic- more of a guideline title than a means of defining one's self...I've never met two feminists with even 80% matching world views/belief systems...

    LosT

    --
    "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams."
  39. Re:THOSE FUCKS ARE NOT HACKERS !!! by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1, Redundant
    You can find the real defintion of the words hackers and crackers at the jargon dictionary. Here's an excerpt for those who need to brush up on the meanin g of this word:

    hacker n. [originally, someone who makes furniture with an axe] 1. A person who enjoys exploring the details of programmable systems and how to stretch their capabilities, as opposed to most users, who prefer to learn only the minimum necessary. 2. One who programs enthusiastically (even obsessively) or who enjoys programming rather than just theorizing about programming. 3. A person capable of appreciating hack value. 4. A person who is good at programming quickly. 5. An expert at a particular program, or one who frequently does work using it or on it; as in `a Unix hacker'. (Definitions 1 through 5 are correlated, and people who fit them congregate.) 6. An expert or enthusiast of any kind. One might be an astronomy hacker, for example. 7. One who enjoys the intellectual challenge of creatively overcoming or circumventing limitations. 8. [deprecated] A malicious meddler who tries to discover sensitive information by poking around. Hence `password hacker', `network hacker'. The correct term for this sense is cracker.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  40. Second profile is already up by prat393 · · Score: 4, Informative

    and available here

  41. Don't Care Who You Work With. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And don't care what gender the person is. A wannabe guru "h4x0r" is a total fruitbag luser. It's that simple. If he/she was truly skilled, he/she wouldn't be hoping to get publicity from the sucker-media. He/she would be EARNING it with true ability. Hacking is easy. Another poster has already pointed out that hacking/cracking/whateverthefuck is like breaking into houses: any scumbag can do it, but it doesn't change the fact that you are still just a scumbag, no matter how good you are at it, because ANYBODY can break into shit with the help of some cracking-by-numbers VB toolkit.

  42. Is it really about "skillz"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Supposing I'm the best car thief on the planet. Maybe there's not a vehicle security system in creation that I can't evade. Maybe no car anywhere is safe from me. I'm 1337.

    So what? I'M STILL JUST A FUCKING CAR THIEF! A dirty little goodfornothing deadbeat criminal. I have no use to, or value within, society. And somebody who deliberately compromises the security of others is no different. Simple.

    Might as well be the most efficient rapist, or the most skilled child-molester, for all that.

    1. Re:Is it really about "skillz"? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you know how to break into a room, you can help people to shut the door. Most security folk are ex-hackers. It seems like Raven is in that catagory. Not that I know much about her outside of the article.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    2. Re:Is it really about "skillz"? by rjh · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Most security folk are ex-hackers
      I work in the security industry (okay, so right now I'm on hiatus from the security industry while I finish my Master's, focusing in security) and I've yet to meet one single reputable ex-cracker. I know plenty of people who have cracker skills (myself included): but we develop those skills by penetrating boxes we control. Realistically, this is a far better way to learn how to penetrate systems than to attack some random box on the 'Net. Some random box on the 'Net is probably running an unpatched and old Win98. But in an environment you set up, you can scale the adversary arbitrarily high. (Trusted Solaris, anyone?)

      Reading the article, I found absolutely nothing to indicate Raven's past is anything less than aboveboard. She has pretty much the same skillset I do (albeit she's better than me in a few areas). I came by my skillset via purely ethical means, so until and unless I get evidence otherwise, I'm going to assume the same holds true for how she got her skills.
    3. Re:Is it really about "skillz"? by Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Are you really that dense?

      Who do you think tests the security of things like car alarms and bank computers to try to make them better and more secure?

      People who are really good at breaking past existing security systems.

      People like Raven.

      You have to think like a car-thief in order to make a better car security system, but that doesn't make you one.

    4. Re:Is it really about "skillz"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ, here we go again with that bullshit "you have to be a thief to catch a thief" garbage.

      Here's another cliche for you, and it's more of a truism than your own: "Once a thief, always a thief."

      Oh, and before you go off on another "h4x0rs r 4w3s0m3!!!!" rave again, I'll say that you can also think like a thief quite easily: just disable most of your active braincells.

    5. Re:Is it really about "skillz"? by Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I never said you had to be a thief. Many computer security professionals (like Raven, for example) were never blackhats.

      But you do have to be able to think a lot more creatively and deviously than a normal programmer if you're going to be good at this stuff. There's a lot more to computer security than brute-force or kiddy-scripts.

      I think you're getting hung up on the "hacker" term. How about "computer security researcher" instead?

    6. Re:Is it really about "skillz"? by CaptainBaz · · Score: 1
      Most security folk are ex-hackers
      Argh!

      I think you mean ex-crackers. Don't make me sic RMS on you...
    7. Re:Is it really about "skillz"? by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Watch the film Gone In 60 Seconds, with Nicholas Cage. It actually deals with the analogy you raise here. On the one hand you have Memphis, a highly skilled car thief with a passion for cars. There are practically no cars that he can't steal, and he steals them because he just loves cars and driving them (during the timeframe of the film he is stealing them to save his kid brother).

      On the other hand you have your dumb car thief. In the actual film someone pulls a gun on the big black guy (character name escapes me) who is driving with the window open. He sums it up with the words 'Anyone can pull a gun on somebody' (after he takes out the wannabe carjacker).

      Stealing cars is legally and morally wrong, in both of the situations above. It's just that at least Nick Cage put in the time and effort to steal something because it meant something to him. Transfer this analogy to the computer world - script kiddies versus 'skilled hackers'.

      I wouldn't want someone to break into my house, but if i had the choice between coming home to find a window smashed, glass all over the floor,graffiti on the wall and all my stuff gone compared to finding the Chubb bolt has been surgically removed from the door and a note saying 'Thanks for the Ming Vase', there'd be at least a slither of admiration for the 'skilled criminal', even though I'd want him arrested and that at the end of the day he's still a thief. People who are good at what they do, whether it's for good or for evil, will always be more respected than the crude, lazy fuckers who try and copy them. A lot of people think of Hitler as a good leader (come on, he was), even though he committed such atrocities.

      Note that I'm not actually disagreeing with you, in a perfect world we'd not have to choose the lesser of two evils :)

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    8. Re:Is it really about "skillz"? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Actually Security professional is the new catch phrase for hacker. It can't be twisted into meaning criminal because these individuals learn, practice and use their skillset on closed systems or on systems they are paid to penetrate.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    9. Re:Is it really about "skillz"? by stanmann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But if you lose your keys and you don't have a backup set stashed anywhere, your next step will be to call a professional thief^H^H^H^H^HLocksmith to break into your house and re-key those locks for you.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    10. Re:Is it really about "skillz"? by WyrdOne · · Score: 0

      I also know Raven quiet well. (Having been part of the crowd of freaks she hung out with during college.)

      To my knowledge she hasn't compromised any system that she wasn't invited to do so as part of her job.

      To futher definitions: Cracker is someone who compromises systems/programs/etc.
      Hacker is someing who security audits systems and either finds ways through said security or ways to work around said security.

    11. Re:Is it really about "skillz"? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I work in the security industry (okay, so right now I'm on hiatus from the security industry while I finish my Master's, focusing in security) and I've yet to meet one single reputable ex-cracker.

      I highly doubt that.

      Perhaps you only know one person who admits to doing enough that you would call them a cracker, but I bet you know of a few more people that have at least done something akin to cracking, and probably a whole bunch more who've decided it would be better to never mention anything like that in their past, despite having done it.

      Reading the article, I found absolutely nothing to indicate Raven's past is anything less than aboveboard.

      I certainly wouldn't claim to know any specfic person's past , but who DIDN'T have a trick or two up their sleeve in college?

      I'm not saying something as serious as changing their grades, but little things that they knew they weren't supposed to be doing, but did anyways.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    12. Re:Is it really about "skillz"? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      What's he gonna do. Hack me? :p

      Hackers ... crackers... backpackers... words mean what I want them to. *grin*

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    13. Re:Is it really about "skillz"? by rjh · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Perhaps you only know one person who admits to doing enough that you would call them a cracker
      I didn't say I didn't know any people in the industry who have cracker backgrounds. I said I had yet to meet one single reputable ex-cracker.

      Part of the problem is how the term "cracker" gets defined. Do I know people who've cracked systems? Yep. Do I know people who've cracked systems they didn't own and didn't have permission to crack? Yep. Did these people always have solid ethical reasons for it? Yep. For instance, RMS has cracked systems several times, and each time with solid ethical reasons for it. I wouldn't call RMS a cracker.

      But people who've done these things for less than ethical reasons? No, I haven't met one single person in the industry with that sort of background who's taken in any way seriously.

      Admittedly, I don't know the entire backgrounds of every single person I've met. But all the reputable people I've met have been unanimous in this opinion: if in the past someone's decided to disregard all social law and ethical concerns, there's absolutely no reason to suspect that they're now walking the straight and narrow.

      The security field runs on integrity. If you don't have integrity, you've got absolutely nothing. Anyone who hires a security geek whose integrity is blemished is making critical gambles with their essential infrastructure.
  43. Question for Raven, since I noticed you're reading by thrice+rocks! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I noticed that in the article you gave some suggestions for what people should learn about.. I'm not nearly advanced enough to delve into any of that, though. I'm not as interested right now in security (just because I don't have the knowledge to approach it at the moment) but I am interested in learning more in general.

    I tried studying CS at my university and found it didn't interest me as much as it did when I studied it on my own (hence my becoming a sociology major ;) - perhaps because I'm much better with projects than tests, and the classes I took were centered mostly around tests. I'm still interested in learning more about programming and "how things work" in general, however.

    Do you have any suggestions for studying on my own? Would it be best to learn one programming language very well and then apply it to others, or is there a better approach? (One of the things I found frustrating in classes was learning a new language in every class I took, when I don't know any language well at all.) What advice can you give someone who would like to learn more, but doesn't do as well in a traditional CS/EECS/etc academic environment - books, good websites, anything? You also said that you were studying "an unrelated field," so I was curious as to how you went about learning more..

    (Personally, I know little bits of C, C++, Python, Perl, and Java, but not enough to do anything significant in any of those.. I also have written a few little shell scripts that don't do much. Otherwise, I'm pretty clueless - but I'd really like to increase my knowledge.)

    Thank you in advance to Raven and/or anyone else who gives me some advice.

  44. calm down, chill out. It's 4/20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No need for this hate. I'm kinda tired of all the racism that goes on on Slashdot. We never go more than 45 minutes without a racial slur like this. Chill out.

    1. Re:calm down, chill out. It's 4/20 by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 1

      They are children. They just do it to get attention. Don't waste your time.

  45. Hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RMS gets ridiculed for his appearance all the time. So what youre saying is that ridiculing a male for his appearance is not sexist, but it is if you laugh at a females appearance.

    One word - hypocrite (the same with all feminists)

    1. Re:Hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RMS shouldn't be ridiculed for his appearance, either. At least not in over 50% of comments to a story (as it stands for this story right now). Do you ridicule men for having an abnormally sized or shaped penis? I haven't seen that on /. ever.

      In ALL cases, one should be looking at the intelligence of the person and the quality of their work. Not their appearance. Especially since so many of us here are not exactly the hottest people around.

      Anyone who disses anyone else based on appearance is likely insecure with their own skills or qualifications. I agree with Raven. She--like all people--is more than something to look at.

      I'm a feminist, so I'm sure you'll automatically brand me a hypocrite, but I still believe that focusing on one's appearance as opposed to their knowledge or skill set is wrong, regardless of whether they are male or female.

    2. Re:Hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Ill admit I went over the top a bit (intentionally - but its always fun baiting feminists, as it is baiting anyone with more "extreme" views - and yes many worked up feminists are sexy ;) ). From my experience - women in the office have no problems at all looking at a new guy walking in, and evaluating his appearance. Yet if the guys do the same thing, the women get all worked up and its straight away sexism. What has annoyed a lot of guys is probably the minority of feminists - especially the older ones - who seem to just hate whatever men do .

      Btw...if someone had an abnormally shaped penis and /. knew about it, I can guarantee that it WOULD be brought up as a subject.

      Its this victims role that feminists love playing. No, most men do not hate women. No, most men do not think men are somehow superior. Yes a lot of men are getting pissed off by the fact that no matter what they do, there will be some woman who will bitch and complain about it and call it sexism.

      Just my take on it as a male.

    3. Re:Hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point taken.

      I often hesitate to describe myself as a feminist because of the minority man-haters, some of whom I've unfortunately met.

      I don't think it's so wrong to judge people initially on appearance in any way--honestly, you have to start somewhere--but once other information becomes available that shows the substance of the person, one might consider focusing more on that than exclusively on appearance.

      It's pretty easy to get into a debate about when comments become harassment, and what exactly constitues harassment, but Slashdot isn't really the place for that...

    4. Re:Hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak for yourself, dude. I got 8.3 on hotornot.com :-P

    5. Re:Hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which is why I said "so many" and definitely NOT most or all. *g*

  46. Raven definitely knows her shit. by Kelvin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Admittedly, my only experience working with her was spending three days on the same team as her during last year's capture-the-flag contest at defcon, but it was pretty clear that she's very good at what she does.

    The kind of stuff she does is far above and beyond the sort of "easy pickings" you're imagining.

    Don't project your own script-kiddyness onto people actually have skills.

  47. Re:It's the stories that are always masked by stig by dastuff · · Score: 1
    Well in the very least, you would have expected Tech Tv to have done a "Hack Week" by now...

    Seems like it would have gotten some attention, seeing how hackers are held in a very polar light, depending on the viewer.

  48. That was awsome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why I read at -1. lol.

  49. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FFS. It's not "sad", it's just representative of the fact that most 'hackers' aren't girls. So fucking what? What do you expect? This ain't some new form of human behaviour that's only just been discovered. Most people on /. are wankers with nothing better to do with their time. Again, so fucking what? WHAT DO YOU FUCKING EXPECT.

    And just for the record - no, she isn't good looking at all. Again, so fucking what? I'd say the same about you (most likely) if I ever saw your picture. Girls, listen up: just because there aren't many of you in your chosen field, doesn't make you special. Most people are idiots. It shouldn't affect you. I mean come on. This girl in particular has gone to the trouble of putting up a website just to try to compete with and make fun of the 'script kiddies' she keeps ranting about. Sounds like attention or sympathy seeking to me.

    If you want respect 'Raven', try doing what you do without making such a scene out of it. I mean what level is she really on. I thought she'd be better than that. Oh and also lose the name Raven (assuming that's a nickname). Is there something wrong or disturbing or embarrasing about your *shock* real name?

    This isn't sexism. It's a bunch of /. losers making retard jokes about a girl they've never met. Wow. Amazing.

  50. She Must Be 1337! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's dressed all in black, with really cool boots! Everybody knows that only the coolest and most 1337 dress like that! Even if your actual skillz totally suck, if you dress all in black then you must be 1337!

  51. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    If it's any help, that'd probably be defined as 'liberal feminist' if it helps, though you probably knew that if you know foucault... went to school with a bunch of women's studies majors. By the end of college, we had what was called the 'western accent' (we were in the Western College Program at MU). People in the Western program... spoke... with... great ...deliberation... because... every ... word... had ... meaning. *gah*

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  52. Goodness Me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's really nice to know that whatever I can do technically, that it's my cup size that really matters.

    I sympathise, knowing as I do that women never joke about male bodyparts.

    I'm 28.

    I'm 38. That doesn't matter either.

    I do backbone security, incident response, vulnerability assessment, and pen-testing. I work in varying capacities with Nessus, Snort, and the Open Source Vulnerability Database.

    Whoopee. You must be so proud. The rest of us are scratching our heads, and wondering how to open the box our Packard-Bell was just delivered in.

    Honey, if you have to tell people how great you are, you're not great.

    And fuck you.

    No thanks, I married somebody much classier than you. But hey, thanks for the offer!

    1. Re:Goodness Me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually an insightful reply to her post.

      People deserve respect because they're people, not because they're a man or a woman or a security guru or what have you. The comment was inappropriate, but it would have been similarly inappropriate if said to a Denny's cashier (not that there's anything wrong with that job).

      Unfortunately, this won't ever get modded up very far because it somewhat contradicts her oh-so bold response to the trolls on Slashdot. Not that any person should care what the trolls here say anyway. The correct response is always to ignore trolls, because they're just trying to get a reaction (which she played right into). You don't see people defending Natalie Portman's honor in the dredges of every story, because who gives a shit? You're either too sensitive or too insecure if you have to recite your resume to every asshat who insults you, especially if you want to be a pseudo-public figure (the more famous you are, the more criticism you attract).

      I also like how all her posts are modded +5, especially this one the content of which is, "I agree." +5 interesting!

      "[grin]"

    2. Re:Goodness Me! by Shturmovik · · Score: 1

      I'm happy to accept that she is competent, but there does seem to be rather a lot of attention being paid to her soley on the basis of her gender. Is she the only woman in IT? Regarding the moderation of her posts, and those of her fan club, I also suspect there is something not quite kosher going on. But then this IS slashdot, and it's all part of the fun! :-)

  53. Re:Question for Raven, since I noticed you're read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried studying CS at my university and found it didn't interest me as much as it did when I studied it on my own (hence my becoming a sociology major ;) - perhaps because I'm much better with projects than tests, and the classes I took were centered mostly around tests. I'm still interested in learning more about programming and "how things work" in general, however.

    Well I tutor in CS subjects at my university, and write a lot of software for my own research into biology and complex systems in general. I was never the best at CS subjects as an undergrad (though I did Ok). It wasn't until I found some applications for what I was learning that it all made sense, and became a lot more fun. I suggest you find something you find interesting (a problem in sociology?) and pick the best language for the job, and learn that language and also the fundamentals (data structures, conditions, parameter passing, software design) as you go. The fundamentals are really the key to switching languages easily, and learning paradigms from other languages (Haskell, Fortran, Prolog, etc) really feeds back into a deeper understanding of the fundamentals.

  54. learning to code by grepistan · · Score: 1

    books, books, books! At least, that's the way I like to learn these things. I found 'Unix Shell Programming' by Kochan & Wood was both a good way to learn shell scripting and programming techniques more generally.

    I should point out that I'm in a similar boat, poking my way through programming at my own slow pace, and that I have a very, very long way to go. Nevertheless, I've found that working in one easy(ish) language at a time based on books like the one above or even O'Reilly's 'Learning $Language' series has been very effective. Stick with python is my advice, it's simple, object-oriented (if you want it to be!) and very powerful.

    --
    Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
    -- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather
  55. Re:Question for Raven, since I noticed you're read by grepistan · · Score: 1

    Very true! Application is the key. A widely acknowledged idea in linguistics is that motivation is the key to learning a new (natural, ie human) language; I suspect that a very similar process goes on with computer languages. Fair enough too, there's only so much 'foo' and 'wibble' that anyone can take. Although, if it's Python, at least the Flying Circus references can keep you amused for a while...

    Personally, I found that playing with computational linguistics, natural language processing and the like were the keys to really understanding 'the fundamentals', as it allowed me to connect my degree in linguistics with my self-taught computer skills.

    Also, try reading "Goedel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid", by Douglas Hofstadter. It's mind-expanding in many ways.

    --
    Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
    -- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather
  56. Amen Bro, Amen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you'll be feeling the wrath shortly. The price we pay...

  57. What really disgusts me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    is dorks like you who always jump at the chance to come to the defense of any female geek in hopes of getting laid.

    From this page:

    I got seventeen requests for a date, two marriage proposals, three offers for various sexual acts, and a request for naked pictures of me. I also got ten real comments about the technical contents of my post. Et tu, Bugtraq? This asinine refusal to treat female geeks as geeks first is incredibly offputting.
    There you have it, pal. She's a female nerd who doesn't want to be treated like a female, only like a nerd. She wants to be one of the guys. Let me spell it out for you: She's probably a lesbian.
    1. Re:What really disgusts me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ha ha ha, even better:
      As much as I enjoy sex with another woman who's comfortable with herself and who she is, there's no way that it's the only acceptable alternative. (If it were, we'd have a lot of unhappy straight women out there!) Ditto for the female-dominant scenario -- not every woman wants to be in charge of the bedroom all the time, or even some of the time.
      She's a butch, man-hating dyke.
    2. Re:What really disgusts me by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 1

      She's a butch, man-hating dyke.

      Then you didn't read it very carefully.

      First, I'll confess that the only reason I decided to read the Slashdot comments (which, frankly, are an incredible waste of time) was the entertainment value in reading all of the stupid/clueless "Dude, she's a babe!" / "Nah, she's not a babe, but she's do-able" nonsense. I don't know why I get such a kick out of that. Maybe because stupidity really, truly IS funny. I think it's even funnier that she is serving you guys for lunch.

      I grok her as one of the extremely rare people who not only has a very high IQ and thinks for zirself, but has also been able to shed the shame-based human-sexuality baggage with which most of us are saddled.

      This is a person who has my utmost respect and admiration. This is the kind of person I like to have in my social circle. Unfortunately, they are all too rare. Fortunately, I have found a few. Very few. Unfortunately, the world is still full of clueless morons who reduce us to a one-dimensional target of shame-based name-calling because they just don't have the IQ to think in any other terms.

      Oh well. Her geographic area isn't exactly an intellectual backwater. It's not very likely that her social circle leaves her feeling intellectually deprived.

      Eat your hearts out.

      --
      In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
    3. Re:What really disgusts me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think it's even funnier that she is serving you guys for lunch.
      "You guys?" I didn't say she was do-able or a babe. I think she's incredibly ugly, inside and out. She's terribly elitist and has battered-woman syndrome.
      This is a person who has my utmost respect and admiration. This is the kind of person I like to have in my social circle.
      I don't want lesbian feminist pagans in my "social circle". I don't even want them in my neighborhood.
      I grok her as one of the extremely rare people who not only has a very high IQ
      How do you know what her IQ is? From the article, it seems like after she got her degree (when she was 5, or whatever), she stopped pursuing her education entirely. That puts her on the same level as any other graduate.
      and thinks for zirself, but has also been able to shed the shame-based human-sexuality baggage with which most of us are saddled.
      Look at her website, buddy - her life REVOLVES around her amped-up "human-sexuality" baggage.

      You'd be hard pressed to find ANY homosexual who doesn't have "shame-based human-sexuality baggage." And for good reason.

  58. Re:Question for Raven, since I noticed you're read by raven_alder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, so you don't want to specialize at the moment. Fair enough. I am assuming that your wanting to understand "how things work" is programming in general and not security programming/code audit?

    In short, find something that you are interested in and take it apart. [grin] You don't necessarily have to follow a structured academic program to become proficient in a field, whether your intent is to make it your hobby or to make it your profession. My academic background is entirely not in CS, and though I have many friends in CS academia, what they do can be very different indeed from what I do day to day. I learned mostly by experimentation and research on things that I was interested in.

    So, find something that you like. Look at the source code, if it's available. Try to figure out what does what. Change things around, and see if you can make it better. One of the best ways to learn for many people is by doing. If you don't know what needs doing, volunteer for a project that is already established and is looking for people. Open Source is so helpful this way -- it feeds your resume *and* helps the community.

    My first programming language was Perl. I was told by many geeks that this was a bad choice -- it would give me bad habits if I ever wanted to move to a language with a more rigorous structure. They were right, but it was both a good and bad thing. When I started doing C, and in particular when I started poking at kernel code, I had a lot of extra learning to do. But Perl was still a good way for me to start, because when I started programming I wanted to do quick scripting, not kernel hacking, and the flexibility of Perl was great for me.

  59. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by zoeblade · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're getting shocked by immature comments on slashdot? Is this your first time here?

    Did you actually read the article that Raven wrote and linked to? It was quite insightful...

  60. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jericho and Kevin are the only remotely interesting subjects in this list.

    Mudge is a fraud, but great at PR and self-promotion.

    Mudge and his cronies portrayed themselves (to the U.S. Congress no less) as expert hackers who could crash the internet in 5 minutes if they 'wanted to'. If this statement had any validity (it doesn't) he would be remembered for inventing something better than a hash brute forcing tool (L0phtCrack) that any semi-decent college educated programmer could turn out in less than a day.

    His bullshitting didn't go unrewarded. The company L0pht founded got big VC funding during the dot-com stupidity. Stupid reporters like the ZDNet one just perpetuate the myth that these people have any clue at all.

    -Signed Angry Old Security Man

  61. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by mikehuntstinks · · Score: 0, Troll

    Jeez lady, learn how to take a compliment. If I ever read on slashdot how 1337 my H4X0r|n is in the AND how big my chocholate salty balls are(and they are) I'll die a happy freaking mad 1337 H4X0R.(which I obviously is) I think your pretty much a sure thing in the next anual Miss /. pagent.

    So anyway, watcha up to this weekend, I know this great sushi bar. And since your a feminist I'll even let you pay.

  62. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by raven_alder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Far from my first time here, but the first time I bothered to get a login, yes. [grin] I knew someone was going to bust my chops for that.

    And no, I wasn't shocked by the immature comments, but I gave the trolls one reply. Why? I'm not interested in an extensive flamewar, but a lot of women just shut up and look uncomfortable when stupid sexist bullshit happens. So, that was my token protest. I'm not intending on feeding them any more, and I doubt I changed any of their minds, but I probably made a few lurking women feel better.

  63. "Raven Alder"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is she a furry or something?

    1. Re:"Raven Alder"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

  64. oooooohhhh...DUDE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So ok that was good, and it makes me sad I have no mod points left! The packard bell crack made me laugh but the "classy" thing? D*U*D*E*! talk about spit! karma my man, karma!

  65. Re:It's the stories that are always masked by stig by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

    What and miss out on the current hair style that david beckham has ???? or the fact that he has (or has not) been doing his pa.

  66. Ok this bizzarre by Fnord · · Score: 1

    I remember, back when I lived in the DC area several years ago, I went to the wedding of an aquaintence of mine (a friend of my friend Cat). She was this girl who was just learning C and invited me to be part of her CCNA study group. Being in the middle of one the most antisocial periods of my life, I just kind of dropped off the face of the earth (and eventually moved to Seattle). Now I see articles about her on slashdot. Raven, if you remember this long haired, antisocial, larval stage techie named Joe, drop me a message.

  67. Not now ... by Compact+Dick · · Score: 1
    ... women never joke about male bodyparts
    Please. I'm still recovering from the last time.
  68. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's actually kinda spooky - I glanced over the article, saw the picture and thought, "Hey! She looks exactly like my ex-girlfriend!"...
    So, I then read the article properly and she sounds almost exactly like my ex... if it weren't for the fact that she's a couple of years older, certainly doesn't sound like she's got a complex about other people potentially being better coders than her (which is why my ex is my ex) and obviously has a different name, I'd almost hazard that she was the same person...

    To all those who make comments about tit size and general appearance - a hint... when I was with my ex and people asked how I could "have such a gorgeous chick when I'm a geek" the simple answer is that it's BECAUSE I don't just view her as a "gorgeous chick" - when a woman's got geekish tendencies, there's far more things I find interesting about them than their breast size.

    (Posted AC since I post less than once a year so never bothered making one)

  69. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummmmm..nothing personal but you see this all the time. Online gaming, IRC, ICQ, anything "comp-geeky"....

    Look, 99.9% of all the people here are guys yeah? Chicks *generally* don't dig computers or Half-Life so when one does it's a novelty!

    Seeing as a hell of a lot of "computer" chix look like they took a tumble out of the Ugly Tree and hit every branch on the way down, then when one appears that is strangely attractive the the feeding frenzy is on for young and old.

    I don't mean to rain on your parade but if you didn't have those tits then no-one would give a sh*t what you thought.

    Nothing personal.

    cheers!

  70. crackers != hackers by nickos · · Score: 0

    Just thought I'd point out the obvious - people who attempt to access computer systems without unauthorisation are crackers, not hackers.

    1. Re:crackers != hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But not that obvious it seems - I should have said "people who attempt to access computer systems without authorisation are crackers, not hackers."

    2. Re:crackers != hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I don't know if you've heard of it, but there is a special book, it's called a dictionary, and it defines words. A hacker is described as:

      "One who uses programming skills to gain illegal access to a computer network or file."

      So please think before you post more of ESR's inane pathetic mumbling, thankyou.

    3. Re:crackers != hackers by nickos · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I can rememeber people using the words crack, cracking and cracker 15 years ago, long before I'd ever heard of ESR. To hack a piece of code is also an old term for coding. Perhaps you should get your facts straight.

    4. Re:crackers != hackers by grepistan · · Score: 1

      wow, so words are in fact defined by the dictionary, rather than the speech community that uses them? Wow, your magnificant insights are going to revolutionize the field of linguistics...

      --
      Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
      -- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather
    5. Re:crackers != hackers by abb3w · · Score: 1

      wow, so words are in fact defined by the dictionary, rather than the speech community that uses them?

      The problem here is that there are in fact two communities using these terms: there are the professional cybergeek types, who actually know something about the field, and there are the unwashed masses of the general public, who are blissfully ignorant. The Geeks distinguish between hacking and cracking; the great unwashed, however, could care less about the subtle-or-not distinction, and use one term for both.

      The term "hacker" started out in the computer community a LONG time back-- I recall reading history pieces that date the term to the 60s. It predates the Google USENET archive, anyway. However, the semantic distinction between hacker and cracker within the Geek community clearly does not predate that great repository of asbestos suppositories.

      The earliest post archived at Google using both the terms "hacker" and "cracker" was on September 15, 1983. This was apparently in response to a news piece on CBS news on roughly Wednesday the 14th, although there is evidence of at least something being earlier. While I do not remember the CBS news piece, it was most likely prompted by a Hollywood turkey released around then.

      When the news media presented this little petri-dish culture to the great Unwashed, they made one mistake. They heard, "someone who breaks into systems is a hacker", and reported "a hacker is someone who breaks into systems". It's a category error fallacy, or perhaps a definition fallacy, but who expects logical thought from a reporter?

      Anyway, my point is: the hacker community did not make a clear semantic distinction of "cracking" until after the term "hacking" was exposed to the public, and that at the time "hacking" was still a correct term describing the activity, albeit one that included many other different activities as well.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  71. I'm just going to say this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She has a page with pictures of herself in best (and most cliched) goth-girl poses.

    She does nothing that many, many others don't or can't also do.

    So why all this attention?

    Because she's female?

    We should worship the very ground her big, black boots tread, simply because she does tech stuff and is a woman?

    Don't give me any of that 'men are sexist pigs' shit.

    She might as well have just posed naked with a laptop.

    1. Re:I'm just going to say this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think it's funny that she's getting so uppity about all of the attention she's receiving on Slashdot.

      Her website is filled to the brim with rants bashing men, religion, and anything else it's cool to hate these days, but especially men.

      She's obviously a very confused little girl. On one hand, she wants all of the attention and special perks that go with being a woman in a male-dominated industry, but on the other hand, she's a lesbian and doesn't want to "play the game" to get ahead.

  72. Raven Alder is cute? by Ath · · Score: 0, Troll

    She is one of those girls you see from behind and think she is cute but when she turns around you have to look away really quick.

  73. Non-issues by zoeblade · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the article: Gender is a non-issue... If there's one thing [Raven] hates, it's being type-cast as a "chick hacker".

    What a fantastic way to start off an interview: with something the interviewee doesn't consider in any way important! Do these people actually objectively read what they write?

    Obligatory Python reference: "And did you write this music in the sheds?"

    1. Re:Non-issues by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Read any furthur and you subject yourself to the license in the paragraph at the bottom of this post. This does not apply if you only read the first and last paragraphs to this post.

      The problem is that this has become the reverse of a non-issue. It's an issue because she hates people making it an issue. As for putting it first in the article, sounds fine to me.

      Raven, if you ever read this...

      I'm going to pretend I'm in your situation. I'm going to pretend, just for a moment, that I'm a man who's into some field without a lot of men in it -- say, sewing, ballet (as a ballerina), or maybe even a secretary or receptionist.

      In each of these roles, of course, I'd hate women laughing at me over it, I'd hate men laughing at me over it, but not too much. I'd probably be more humorous about it. "You know you love the macho seamstress" or "If you don't like it, you can kiss my tutu." I wouldn't pretend I was a woman, or even ignore the entire issue and pretend that it's normal for men to be in those jobs.

      In fact, for the most part, I'd follow the same philosophy I do now. I ignore the names people call me, and try to be neither condescending nor outraged when they misjudge me. For the most part, I ignore context, sarcasm, and lots of other things and just respond as I would if it was a single line of flat text:

      person: Going home to play Linux?
      me: No, I'm going for a walk first.
      person: Linux sucks, and you suck for using it!
      me: That's not what IBM thinks, and I get paid to use it.
      person: Can you hack the grading computer for me, and fix my Student Etiquette grade?
      me: No. They keep it offline and they keep a physical paper trail. Or, in other words, how much will you pay me?

      I fit some hacker/geek steriotypes. I wore a black fleece, black T-shirt, and black cargo pants to prom (I'm a Junior), I don't do much with my free time but hack (in the GNU sense), play games, and am altogether too paranoid (I will probably eventually live with a PGP key and a Freenet site as my only identity, I use cryptoloop for all but /boot on my laptop, I use 4096-bit RSA keys). And I wear crooked glasses.

      I do dislike being classified as a geek sometimes. I get plenty of exercise and can arm-wrestle my peers well enough, while other geeks I know don't have enough coordination to play catch. I'm not addicted to caffine, and the only reason I'm not in bed yet is I'm still adjusting my schedule back from prom, which was two weeks ago. And according to people who saw me at prom, I can dance.

      But I don't worry about it. I live without any assumptions, least of all that I am smarter than anyone. I live without anger and annoyance, except when my parents bother me to go to bed (and that problem will go away when I get enough sleep). I never censor (or think too hard) about anything I say or write, I just usually don't have anything vicious to say.

      Someday, I may collect all the ideas that I post in slashdot comments into a series of papers. Or maybe I'll just start writing more things down in the first place. If I had my slashdot posts and verbal rants organized, I might be all ready to cut&paste them together into Senior Thesis next year...

      Disclaimer: If I've offended anyone with this post or any other that I disclaim, it was not my intention, and it's probably your imagination.

      License: You are free to read this, but all other rights are reserved. If you reply to this calling me a homosexual verbatim or in any easily recognizable slang or euphamism (subject to my subjective opinion), you transfer ownership of every post you've ever made to slashdot to me, as well as anything you've written, ever. Any other licenses than this one are null and void unless this one is, due to the fact that I'm not a lawyer. If you don't see this for the satire that it is, you hereby transfer ownership of all your hardware to me. I will expect a root password delivered to me, via email, within 24 hours.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  74. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's any consolation (and I'm sure it won't be) he wasn't thinking about whether he should hire you. So no, I'm guessing that your technical skills weren't especially relevant to his thought process.

  75. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently she's bisexual. And she has a temper.
    So yes, she probably does give good head. But not to you.

  76. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's really nice to know that whatever I can do technically, that it's my cup size that really matters.

    Actually for me, its whether you give head or go all the way. Cup size doesn't mean much to me. Being a security geek doesn't give me a boner either...

  77. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by KingJoshi · · Score: 1

    I don't get why someone that's intelligent would reply to such a post. The article mentioned you're sensitive on the "chick hacker" topic, but is it such a reflex to respond to trolls and ignorant people when there are things more worth your time?

    Since you talk about this on your webpage, I'll write my opinions here. It's greatly unfortunate the chauvinism in computer science/engineering and the world in general. And while I'm sure that has impact on women entering the field, I think that's minor compared to other cultural factors.

    Rates in grad school are probably a little different from undergrad and this is only one case, but let's look at my school. In the CSE department, only 26 out of 146 students are female (18%). Most statistics I've seen hover around 20% (for graduate and undergraduate engineering in general). Here, 65% of the grad students are foreign. While the US men hold at 38%, only 19% of the female are from the US. While China and India "only" account for 53% of the men, they account for 69% of the women. While China and India's percentages of women are still low (31% and 23%, respectively), it's much better than the rest (10%).

    So either many women aren't finding this intersting, they find it too difficult, or there are cultural issues involved (or mixtures). So is the government (and society in general) not taking steps we should be? If so, what are they? The same can be said regarding male teachers.

    Kids are already being told to fear math and science and find it difficult and boring, what other social factors need to be addressed to change what's being told to the girls? While chauvinism is a factor (and should be addressed just because it's wrong), I think there are many other issues (many of which I don't know) that need to be addressed before we can see any dent in the percentages. I mean, recent statistics (going on memory from 60 Minutes report) show girls getting better grades than boys in high schools and the majority of students at MSU are girls. So it's beyond just stressing education.

    Generalities and stereotypes can be used very negatively, but at the same time, they are often indicative of something and they should be studied and learned from. Some believe they already know or don't care, however, too many people consider the issues too sensitive to even discuss. It's generally accepted that physically, top female athletes in many sports cannot compete with the top men. Our physiologies are different enough that men have the advantage and we know enough to explain much of that.

    But what are the reasons for male to female ratios in top chess players and other mental/educational disciplines? Why do certain racial and ethnic groups score much higher than others in SAT and other standardized tests? How come Jews around the world (with a smaller population than my home country of Nepal, around 13 million to 26 million) hold more wealth, influence and power despite being persecuted almost everywhere they go?

    However, the main people really "thinking" about these issues are male chauvinists, extreme feminists, racist bigots and anti-semitists/Islamic fundamentalists. That's not a good sign...

    Anyhow, good job in the interview and I thought your answers were well said. Good luck on improving computer security and raising awareness of security. And good luck on changing the atmosphere of chauvinism (of course I'll do my part).

    --
    In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
  78. ***Anyone got spare Mod points for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta be at least +4 Insightful!

  79. There are no hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just alot of "Security Specialists"

  80. Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe knowing that she will always be the first promoted, praised and/or publicized simply because she is a woman in "a man's world", and therefore a darling of HR (which is itself the penultimate "woman's world").

    I work with women in IT. Some are great. But many are like a lot of the men: mediocre at best. But they are always the ones on the HR and Management radar.

    I put ability first. I don't want to work with or for an incompetent, and I don't care if they are male or female, nor do I care how they look.

    In today's slash-n-burn corporate attitude towards staffing costs, I can't afford to waste time on flirting any more than I can afford to waste time with clueless co-workers.

    If she's good at her job, she's good; if she's not, she gets no consideration from me whatsoever.

    1. Re:Or... by 0racle · · Score: 1

      This really shouldn't be modded down so far. It is unfortuanatly true. Women in a technicall field will have a higher chance of being promoted, to a point of course, because too many feel the need to give the apperence of being an open, politically correct environment.

      Its too bad too, it only hurts everyone, anyone sees a woman bing promoted and its always assumed its only because shes a woman or she earned it on her back, and on the other hand it gives fuel to the argument that all men are pigs.

      It would be nice if abilty was the only qualifying factor, but I dont see that happening any time soon.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  81. Re:Question for Raven, since I noticed you're read by Fizzl · · Score: 1

    Just to give a specific place to start if one is interested about network hacking, or whatever you want to call it:
    First, know what is a bit, byte, word, doubleword. What is big-endian and little-endian. What is a stack. How does a processor work in general.
    Then, buy "TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 2". Read it through once.
    Write a simple pcap based IDS to detect normal half-open portscan (syn-scan).
    Now, write improve on your IDS to give no false positives on a server with undefined amount of undefined services.
    Use the book you bought as a reference.

    At this point, you should understand networks enough not to write bad networking code yourself, and perhaps detect such mistakes from source code.
    Most likely you now know more about your chosen programming language too.

    And as Raven said. Take stuff apart. Get a disassembler. If you'r on windows, I recommend IDA Pro. It ain't free, but damn its good.

    Ps. I have never written any 'sploits nor disclosed vulnerabilities. I see potentially vulnerable code daily, but I have too short attention span myself to actually prove it.

  82. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by drewlake2000 · · Score: 1

    When did women become a minority? Deserve equal rights - yes. Deserve right to be seen for who you are and not what you are - yes. Last I read 51% of the population was female - some minority.

  83. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by shic · · Score: 1

    Dudette, never under estimate the importance of allure. A bloke might be involved in technically challenging work too, but seldom is he also appreciated for the size of his saggy-man-breasts.

  84. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    Didn't she just say she objected to comments about her...oh..."boots"...nm.

  85. What a load of crap.. by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    We all know hackers are physically unfit males aged 13-19 with pasty faces and no social skills. :o)

  86. Wow.. by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    Hopefully this whole series will give the "mainstream" a kick in the sternum by challenging their pre-conceptions about 'hackers'. They've certainly picked a great opener.

  87. I think the word you are looking for is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nerd ;o)

    1. Re:I think the word you are looking for is.... by el'gwato · · Score: 1

      A much underrated term for these hacker, computer savvy, geek types!

      -nerd

      --
      All speling, factual, tact, and/or grametical errers be the result of netwerk interpherance or# transmition ererrs.
    2. Re:I think the word you are looking for is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about 'geek'?

  88. Bah...... by WanderingFighter · · Score: 1

    She looks like an older version of Drew Barrymore.

    I wanna see what there gonna write about Lamo and Mitnick.

    --
    $>man woman
    $>Segmentation fault (core dumped)
    1. Re:Bah...... by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      No she doesn't, she looks like Sue Woodward, Director of Programming for Granada TV, who is running Liverpool's European Capital of Culture programme, when she was around that age.

      (Probably totally meaningless to non-UK people. but WTF)

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
  89. Programmers: Under The Hood? by harumscarum · · Score: 3, Insightful


    So when do we get to see some articles on the people that really do matter? :)

    Why is it that programmers get no love? What about the programmers who have changed/influenced culture within the last decade in gaming, corporate, or home use.

    *tear* all people want to do is tear our software down and praise the people that do it *tear*

    1. Re:Programmers: Under The Hood? by el'gwato · · Score: 1

      yeah!

      like bill G.

      --
      All speling, factual, tact, and/or grametical errers be the result of netwerk interpherance or# transmition ererrs.
  90. OT: broken resume link by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    Resume link in the menu of http://www.oneeyedcrow.net/ is broken, but the one in the body of your About Me page is just dandy. :o)

  91. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone got any raven nude jpegs?

  92. Who says they are 1337? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article's author? Who told him they were 1337? Some guy in the street? The Wall St Journal? His subjects? I know which one I'm going with.

    In my experience, the less skilled you are, the more you compensate by trying to prove otherwise. And if you really are skill-challenged, the only way to make others think you aren't is to tell them otherwise. And if you tell enough people, the few who know better are lost amidst the hordes who will take you at your word.

    None of these people is better than the vast majority of those in the same field, and I suspect they are worse than most. But slap up a website and dazzle a credulous and clueless journalist in search of a story with a good line of hackneyed 1337-sp34k, and you will be proclaimed a Guru.

  93. Interview Mel Kaye! Then you'll care! (-: by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Interview who?

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  94. Re:raven asking for stereotype by MissionControl · · Score: 3, Funny
    she rants about how she dislikes being stereotyped. i dunno, by the look of her picture, big goth boots and all, she's just asking to be stereotyped...
    So in other words, "She rants about how she dislikes being stereotyped. I dunno, I'm great at stereotyping people."
  95. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by WyrdOne · · Score: 0

    They might have gotten a better responce that way.

  96. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by WyrdOne · · Score: 0

    Again with the stereotypes. Not all CS/Hacker/Technophile women are ugly. I've found it's usually the other way around and that most of them are damn nice looking.

    Another example of a "CS/Hacker/techophile" chick:

    And her Resume: http://www.plur.net/~rachel/resume/rachel-warren-r esume.html

  97. Whacked Mac - Was: Re:L0pht crack by spacerog · · Score: 1
    Didn't the L0pht's website run off an old Mac SE for a long time?

    Ummm, No. You are confused. The Whacked Mac Archives which was run by the L0pht was run on a Mac SE for a short time. The actuall L0pht website started out on a Sun box originally (Sparc5 I think) before it was moved to a generic Pentium box with a clock crystal from a video card making it run at something like 137.5MHz with OpenBSD.

    When the WMA was on an MacSE everything went through a 128K dialup ISDN line. Needless to say the computer was not the bottleneck. The WMA eventually moved to a Mac IIci and then to a Quadra 610 and finally resided on a 6100.

    If your looking for a trip down memory lane you can still visit the mothballed WMA just without the files. Two risky to host the files these days not to mention bandwidth costs.

    - Space Rogue

    1. Re:Whacked Mac - Was: Re:L0pht crack by norkakn · · Score: 1

      Wow, I'm remembering getting into L0pht and MWA on my old LCII

      I thought the site was fast back then, but that was just because you didn't have bloody pictures everywhere, and those too forever to load. That little 68030 really wasn't meant to go online, but it was a lot of fun (-:

      This topic is making me nostalgic because I remember reading through all these people's sites back before spam and pop-up ads. I wish I would have emailed some of them when the net was smaller. (and had kept my origional /. number.. I can't remember how low it was, but it would probably be impressive now)

  98. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by WyrdOne · · Score: 0

    Damn image didn't link.

    http://www.plur.net/~rachel/pictures/2003/rachel -v isits-boston/rachel-smiling.jpg

  99. There is no such thing as a "hacker"...Maybe. by Mitleid · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I remember getting into it with a friend of mine back in high school about the fact that there weren't any "real" hackers. His argument (though not so eloquently spoken at the time) was that the term "hacker" was essentially a media creation, and something only used to get ratings. In other words, whenever someone was brought out into the media as a hacker, they instantly and graciously accepted all the attention, therefore making themselves quite the celebrity. At the time of the argument, I disagreed with him. But now, it doesn't seem to be anything less than the truth. I mean, you gotta think of where these people come from. All this attention is what they crave; getting caught to them is all part of the fun. They might profess themselves to be "liberators of information" or whatever the hell they want, but when it comes down to it they love having their face in the spotlight. It's been my belief that the "hackers" are the ones that NEVER get caught; they know sure as hell what they're doing is illegal and they DO NOT want to get nailed for it. The real "hackers" are the ones we'll never hear about. These folks, on the other hand, just see like people dying for attention. They rely on the uniformed, computer un-savy media and viewing public to place them on pedestals as computer geniuses, when in fact all they are doing is exploiting a few security flaws here and there.

    --

    --
    Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
  100. Re:Question for Raven, since I noticed you're read by SuperDuG · · Score: 1

    "Excuse me, miss Alder, its the 90's on the phone, and they'd like they're [grin] tags back."

    Now, I have a question that is partly in jest and partly in which I would really like to know the answer. If you started programming in Perl, how on earth did you ever stay interested in programming? I'm a "learn by example" when it comes to new languages, but unless I'm sitting next to an O'Reilly book, there isn't an example in the world that makes sense to me.

    Did you ever find the "new" slogan for perl - "There's more than one way to do it, but they're all wrong." ??

    You don't have to reply, its all good.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  101. Yes it did. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's into scat. Nothing like being jacked off to brown lube....

  102. I appreciate it by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 1

    But that doesn't make it any less a losing battle. Arguing on the Internet, Special Olympics, driving a point through the thick layer of bone shielding the miniscule forebrain, etc.

    But your boots are unspeakably awesome.

    -Carolyn

    --
    Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
  103. Do you even know who she is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She took college classes at age twelve and graduated before normal people even finish high school. She knows OS internals and TCP/IP inside out. She's a clever girl.

    Just because some people are script kiddies doesn't mean everyone has to be.

  104. Ummm Raven by mustangsal66 · · Score: 1

    I don't know about any of you... but an intelligent, hot chick, who can kick my ass while drinking chai... that's my kind of woman.

    --
    Why worry? Each of us is wearing an unlicensed "nucular" accelerator on his back.
    Sig changed for readability by G.W.
  105. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by zoeblade · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh and also lose the name Raven (assuming that's a nickname). Is there something wrong or disturbing or embarrasing about your *shock* real name?

    That's a very good point, Anonymous.

  106. flat by Jagaast · · Score: 1

    lame article. flat. non-inspired. they talk about exactly the things she doesn't like people to talk about. and "in her spare time, she downs chai while arguing philosophy with friends." i mean, i guess all of our lives are like this, but why trivialize? anyway, i could've done much better.

  107. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

    All feminists don't necessarily agree... just like "hacker" can have a whole bunch of different connotations, so can "feminist".

    Yep. I believe in "equal rights" but I would never call myself a feminist.
    I think egalitarian is a much better term to use, and much less likely to come back to haunt you.

    The term feminist, is irrevocably assosciated with a social movement that has not always displayed the best behavior.
    "A woman reading Playboy feels a little like a Jew reading a Nazi manual." -Gloria Steinem


    And, like many other minority groups, we are often known by our extremists.
    It's also worth noting that women are NOT a minority group.

    I think that makes it all the more important for those of us who *aren't* extremists to use the term rather than abandon it.

    I think it would be more important to examine the beliefs of those who created and defined the term and decide if you agree with them. Even the less extreme feminists, like Steinem have opinions that you might not agree with. Like this tidbit:
    "I've yet to be on a campus where most women weren't worrying about some aspect of combining marriage, children, and a career. I've yet to find one where many men were worrying about the same thing." -Gloria Steinem
    Forgive me if I actually respect a mother who raises her own child.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  108. My Attrition story... by Samrobb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My wife and I were in Butler, PA about 2-3 years ago to consult a doctor. We arrived early, and decided to wander around a bit and grab a bite to eat.

    So, we walked by a storefront with a sign on it that said "Attrition". I glanced in the windows, saw a bunch of hardware, and took a few more steps before I realized "Hey... I *know* who that is!" I went back and poped in with my daughter, just to say hi. Gist of the conversation:

    Attrition guy: Can I help you?
    Me: Are you the guys that run attrition.org?
    AG: Yes, that's us.
    Me: Wow. I had no idea that you were in Butler.
    AG: Um... yeah.
    Me: OK, just wanted to say hi. Later!

    What really registered with me was that here was a fairly well-known web site, being run out of Butler, of all places. No need to live in NY, LA, Chicago, Boston, or any of those other urban sprawls... just find a nice town, get yourself a net connection, and you're in business.

    --
    "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    1. Re:My Attrition story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erm, attrition.org was never run out of some shop in PA that I know of. Wonder who those people are ! heh.

  109. Raven's comments on pre-packaged attacks by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Raven commented on "attack programs". I don't know if she ment pre-written code to exploit known vulnerabilities or not but that is what I am interested in.

    Last month I had the privelage of watching a small hacking competition as part of a larger defense contractors conference. (Southeastern Software Engineering Conference). The had a small network set up to simulate a corporate network and teams attempting to attack it. The team that did the best was a red team from Northropp Grumman (which someone said won the Defcon capture-the-flag competition though I never looked it up).

    The thing is, their strategy seemed to be to map the network, then run pre-packaged attacks appropriate for the specific device, then install a backdoor and repeat launching off of the machine they'd taken. Security experts in all their interviews repeatedly state that it is undesirable to do this, (ie, use previously written code for the bulk of their pen testing/attacks). Is there a disconnect between what security experts say and what they actually do?

    (I do want to add that the team that won was very impressive, taking about a box an hour through the 6ish hours the contest was run. There was a very small time frame which might have necessitated the canned attacks. But the network was representative with at least 1 dedicated firewall, IDS, and honeypot and computers running windows, linux, and solaris. All with reasonable patching.)

    --
    I do security
  110. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  111. Re:Question for Raven, since I noticed you're read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perl is great for hackers, or for anyone who can use their brain.
    For everyone else, there's always Java and VB...

  112. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have to post this as AC since I moderated another post. Just food for thought...

    I used to spend some time teaching science to kids in camps. One of my regular little demonstrations was using electrolysis to seperate water into hydrogen and oxygen. The lead in to it all was to go through the old debate as to whether a substance could be infinitely divided, or were they eventually get divided down into an indivisible unit.

    These kids were about 13-14 years old and from very poor negihborhoods. One day a girl pointed out that the problem with infinite division was that when you reassembled an infinite number of pieces you would end up with infinitey. I complimented her on that insight and could kick myself to this day for singling her out -- she looked very embarassed, the boys got on her for being a brainiac, and she never returned.

    Very depressing to see peer pressure exerting itself in such a negative way.

  113. This makes you a hacker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    For Adrian Lamo, the so-called "homeless hacker", there was no turning back after discovering how to make both sides of a 5.25in floppy disk writable at the tender age of eight.

    Uh... Who didn't figure that one out the second they saw the notch cut into one side of the floppy? After all "double-sided" is a dead giveaway. It's a pretty logical conclusion to come to, especially since mini-casette record-protect tabs work on the same principle. I guess this makes me and all my friends "hackers", because not only did we figure this out, but we already had modded hardware and programs for breaking copy-protection and copying disks by that age.

    1. Re:This makes you a hacker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... have you guys ever seen or read about floppy drives? 5 1/4" drives and 3 1/2" drives both have a pair of heads: one for each side of the disk.

      Both sides are already writable and are always used in that mode (hence, "double-sided").

  114. For someone who doesn't wanna be "typecast"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you sure go out of your way to fit into a type. Goth dress, elitist techno-pretentiousness, gee if that doesn't fit the classic mold of "rebellious teen", then I don't know what is.

    Oh, you're 28, not eighteen?

    Oh, by the way, women are not a "minority". And you're white, so get off your downtrodden high horse.

  115. Re: calling by radio at 2400 HZ AM ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    radioctl setfreq 2400
    radioctl recv /var/log/radioctl.log
    radioctl send /dev/urandom

    I'm waiting to launch an illegal nuclear missile.

    By Kevin Mitnick :P

  116. Re:Question for Raven, since I noticed you're read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't really intend this as a flame, but in my experience people who need to ask this question generally are missing the boat.

    However, I can make some suggestions that may help. Many people are put off by the rigidity and overhead of compiled languages. You can do some really neat stuff with shell scripts or a language like perl and yes even *gasp* VBScript, regardless of whether or not you use windows or linux.
    For some, web languages also do the trick, usually in accordance w/ PHP/ASP and javascript. Open Source programs may also be able to get you interested. Download some small, narrowly focused programs (IE dont start w/ larger programs like KDE or emacs even though they are 'sexier') and check out their source.

    If you are not self motivated just out of curiousity, which judging from the fact that you had to post the question I dont think you are, I think you should find an itch to scratch, or do some small easy projects you find interesting. Ive played with XMMS a bit, for example.

  117. Virginia Tech by kyoko21 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Raven went to Virginia Tech :-) Let's go Hokies! Even castrated turkies can be hackers, too. *gobble gooble*

  118. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, a couple disclaimers:

    1. Although I am a techie guy, I am not going to ask out, harass or bother you in any way, now, later, or at any time in the future.

    2. I know nothing about your appearance or "cup size" or any other such thing, so this post isn't about any of those subjects.

    Now, the question:

    I've read your rant online, and some of the posts about you, and I totally understand where you're coming from. If someone was making off-color sexual comments about me, I'd be pretty furious too. ESPECIALLY in a technical forum. It's completely inappropriate, and well, a little bizarre besides. I mean, it's not what you would expect to see among professionals.

    However, I do have a question: setting aside the insane harassing comments, do you get pissed off when someone asks you out in a tasteful way (I AM NOT ABOUT TO ASK YOU OUT, I DON'T LIVE ANYWHERE NEAR YOU ANYWAY, THIS IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY)?

    Because, and this is only presented as a techie geek's point of view, as a geek, well, most women hate virtually everything I do. They think it's, well, GEEKY. And since everything I do is technical (I'm pretty obsessed) I don't really relate to non-technical women either (the disinterest is mutual).

    So, if I were to meet a technically savvy woman, it wouldn't be about her appearance or cup size, I'd be smitten by the fact that she's LIKE ME. And, it would be very hard for me to NOT ask her out.

    Herein is the conundrum. The only place I would meet a technical girl would be at a technical event. But if I read your articles correctly, so much as asking "Hey, your ideas are kinda cool, wanna get some dinner" would result in a swift kick in the balls, which would kinda ruin the rest of the conference.

    So, my question is, is the hostility I'm perceiving reserved for the people who are assholes about it? Or is it directed at any guy who dares take an interest? Seriously.

  119. My Sincerest Apology by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Hi. It's really nice to know that whatever I can do technically, that it's my cup size that really matters.

    I would like to sincerely apologize in the name of the entire Slashdot community, most of which sadly consists of people not only utterly infantile but also insultingly unintelligent, as I am sure you have already noticed. I can assure you that even though I personally find you very attractive, I will avoid commenting your undoubtedly exceptional beauty nonetheless, for I am myself hardly sexiest by any stretch of imagination. Let us therefore go straight to the meritum and talk about one thing that really matters, i.e. software.

    I'm 28. I do backbone security, incident response, vulnerability assessment, and pen-testing. I work in varying capacities with Nessus, Snort, and the Open Source Vulnerability Database.

    That is very impressive indeed. It is certainly inspiring to hear that someone of your intelligence, skills and experience chooses to work with free software tools. I would be very interested what is your operating system of choice and what do you think about Debian GNU/Hurd, Keykos, EROS and OpenBSD, as a general operating system design as well as the security implications thereof. I look forward to read more of your texts on Slashdot from now on.

    And fuck you.

    Please don't lower your high standards to match those poor simpletons (or "trolls" if you will) who seem to enjoy shamefully insulting any woman which is much smarter than them. They just sicken me. You will see that surprisingly high percentage of Slashdot users could be described as nothing more but a room-temperature IQ crowd. In fact, it is surprising that those illiterate imbeciles can even write.

    The idea that Slashdot is an "elite" of any kind is simply laughable in its naïvete. I can only suggest you to ignore all of those foolish morons, for they don't deserve any of your attention whatsoever. Clicking on the circle next to the username you can mark any user as a friend or foe, and set positive bonus for friends and negative for foes in the People Modifier section of your Comments Preferences page.

    Going back on topic, I have one more question: Could you tell us how did you do it that all of your posts are rated as Score:5, Insightful or at least Score:5, Interesting? I find it very intriguing. Have you found a vulnerabilty in the Slashcode itself? Will you disclose it?

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  120. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by shepd · · Score: 1

    >Thanks for a thoughtful and intelligent comment. It's refreshing.

    Always happy to provide, and I can see your position on this. :-)

    Glad to see you're not the book-burning type, rather quite the opposite.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  121. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

    The main problem is that feminism has become synonymous with "gender feminism". The idea that men and women are identical in everything except anatomy is pretty fundamentally flawed, and is an unfortunate side-product of blank-slatist thinking. Which leads to thoughtless man-bashing a la Steinem.

    --
    Ita erat quando hic adveni.
  122. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by g1zmo · · Score: 1
    Far from my first time here, but the first time I bothered to get a login, yes. [grin] I knew someone was going to bust my chops for that.

    And you've already racked up more karma than I've gotten in 3 years of lurking with the occasional post.
    --
    I have found there are just two ways to go.
    It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
    -REK, Jr.
  123. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...Oh and also lose the name Raven (assuming that's a nickname). Is there something wrong or disturbing or embarrasing about your *shock* real name?

    This would be a lot more persuasive if you had posted under YOUR real name, you hypocrite.

  124. She won't fuck you no-matter how much you crawl. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She won't reply to your e-mailed entreaties, the flowers you send to her office, or the poetry you dedicate to her on your website. Some here have decided that licking her boots might do the trick, but don't count on it. She's just like every other chick who gets her picture on a page someplace: if you ain't rich, you don't have a chance.

  125. Re:Raven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, 'Raven' would probably try to have sex with her.

  126. Re:Raven... by m1chael · · Score: 0

    Half of my post was interesting, and the other half was humourous. It's unfortunate that you couldn't determine which was which.

    --
    I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  127. Not Rich? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    She won't reply to your e-mailed entreaties, the flowers you send to her office, or the poetry you dedicate to her on your website. Some here have decided that licking her boots might do the trick, but don't count on it. She's just like every other chick who gets her picture on a page someplace: if you ain't rich, you don't have a chance.

    How do you know about my poetry? And who said I am not rich?

    Wait a minute, is that some kind of a joke? Quite a distasteful one if so...

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  128. 'feminist' tag considered harmful by solferino · · Score: 1

    For clarity's sake, I am a feminist in the "I believe in equal rights" way, not the "I believe in special treatment" way.

    So what does a man who believes in equal rights call himself then? The feminist tag is problematic in itself, as it creates a divide between the genders rather than uniting all people (male, female, transgender) who believe in equal rights regardless of gender.


  129. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Anyone got any raven nude jpegs?

    No. Strangely images.google.com/images?q=Raven+Alder don't give any pictures of her, nude or otherwise. I call bulshit. What is her real name?

  130. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by General+Wesc · · Score: 1
    It's also worth noting that women are NOT a minority group.
    We're talking about feminists, not women. They're different things: I'm a femenist (by raven_alder's definition [and my own]), but not a woman.
  131. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a better photo, of her at defcon 8, with some nerds.

  132. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

    Oh god, she's fucking hideous. Damn I need glasses.

  133. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, these female hackers always look like men when you get close up. They try to cheat by gothing themselves up so much that you can't tell, but you can if you look closely.

  134. Typo? by rixstep · · Score: 1

    Day 2 will be Attrion.org creator, Jericho

    Jeriho was at Attrition. Muge was at l0pt.

  135. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, you ugly goth whore.

    I'm sure you're just an AOL n00b that goes into BBW chatrooms and pretends to know about Open Sores (Lunix, not herpes).

    You're a fat fucking unattractive cow. I hope you have fun bashing the "conformists" with your goth friends as you smoke cloves and drink absinthe while dancing by yourself at 3am with the rest of the "conformists".

    You fucking fat fucking whore. I hope you die and get AIDS you fucking STD ridden twat.

    Please, do the real goth thing and go kill yourself.

    You make me sick, fuck you, fuck you cow fucking whore fat bitch

  136. Re:She looks halfway decent at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're going into a field traditionally occupied by a bunch of social defectives. Are you surprised?

    (I do not exclude myself from being socially retarded, but I like to think I don't run around verbally grabbing asses.)