Slashdot Mirror


Highest Human Elevation Using a Rocketbelt

Chris Gondek writes "Rocketman Eric Scott shot 46 metres into the air in London and promptly claimed a world record. Scott, 41, from Dallas, Texas, donned his red and white jumpsuit and zoomed into the north London sky in his bid to achieve the highest human elevation using a Rocketbelt. His feat, which saw him reach the equivalent height of a 12-storey building, lasted just 26 seconds but allowed enough time for a couple of pirouettes. The Rocketbelt was devised by the United States military in 1961 but has since been used for performances and displays around the world, including the 1984 Olympic Games in Los Angeles."

208 comments

  1. Unlikely! by thebra · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since then he has become a veteran of almost 500 flights and claims to be the world's only Rocketman.
    Obviously he hasn't seen Rocketeer.

    1. Re:Unlikely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Unlikely! by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Since then he has become a veteran of almost 500 flights and claims to be the world's only Rocketman. Obviously he hasn't seen Rocketeer.

      Or Elton John.

    3. Re:Unlikely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Elton John.

      Or William Hung.

    4. Re:Unlikely! by Lev13than · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just remember that the knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    5. Re:Unlikely! by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      OR William Shatner

    6. Re:Unlikely! by Dejitaru+Neko · · Score: 2

      Or Stewie Griffin.

      --
      Nyo nyo, the Neko Boy has spoken.
    7. Re:Unlikely! by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      Obviously he hasn't seen Rocketeer.

      Did anyone?

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    8. Re:Unlikely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blast!

    9. Re:Unlikely! by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 2, Funny

      On the other hand, if this guy didn't have a parachute at twelve stories, he did a good impression of Michael Jackson's career.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    10. Re:Unlikely! by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

      Isn't that, "Fall down and forget to hit the ground," as when you see, in an unexpected place, your long lost airline baggage?

    11. Re:Unlikely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OR that guy from the subway commercials....

    12. Re:Unlikely! by ksp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just remember that the knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.

      Isn't that how satelites work?

      --
      What is the sound of one hand clapping?
      cat /dev/null > /dev/audio
    13. Re:Unlikely! by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      Heh. Plus one informative.

    14. Re:Unlikely! by forgetful_ca · · Score: 1

      Up! Mod this up I say!

    15. Re:Unlikely! by grasshoppah · · Score: 0, Redundant

      or william shatner

    16. Re:Unlikely! by G-funk · · Score: 1

      It begins!...

      Tra la la lump a doo!

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  2. Why not do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...from the top of Everest?

    1. Re:Why not do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Air pressure is probably too low @ that elevation. Wanker.

    2. Re:Why not do this... by goatan · · Score: 0

      Anonoamous coward has a split personality there arguing with themselves

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

    3. Re:Why not do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus H. Krust! LEARN TO SPELL, you idiot.

    4. Re:Why not do this... by jim_b · · Score: 1

      ummm ... altitude sickness before you leave the launchpad?

      --

      - and small change got rained on with his own 38

    5. Re:Why not do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And considering he would use rockets, the air pressure wouldn't do much difference.

    6. Re:Why not do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right, because rockets don't work in low air pressure or in vacuum.

    7. Re:Why not do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To moderators: Don't mod up what is not meant to be modded up.

    8. Re:Why not do this... by mdrn28 · · Score: 1

      Would you want to carry a heavy rocket pack to the top of Everest?

    9. Re:Why not do this... by balbord · · Score: 1

      Laugh my socks out on your sig!

      --
      "If I have been able to see so far, It is because I went out and bought a damn binoculars" - Ze da Esquina
    10. Re:Why not do this... by goatan · · Score: 1

      I have dyslexia you insensitive clod

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

  3. Funnier... by Ploum · · Score: 4, Funny

    The highest human elevation using a Rocketbelt is funny.

    The dumbest human fall that follow this record is even funnier ;-)

  4. Come on by TexasDex · · Score: 2, Funny
    Is there anybody who wouldn't love to have one of these for getting to work?

    Of course they're probably even less fuel-efficient than cars. I'll bet the environmentalists won't be happy.

    --
    The Cheese Stands Alone.
    1. Re:Come on by Frequanaut · · Score: 1

      re: environmentalists, read the website.

    2. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speaking as an environmentalist, i would be delighted if every anti-environmentalist would don one of these and try to fly to work. it's EMT that won't be happy.

    3. Re:Come on by four12 · · Score: 1

      Speaking as an (ex-)paramedic, we'd LOVE it! A good, juicy trauma call is always fun...

    4. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might sound messy, but the birds'll get it.

    5. Re:Come on by agilen · · Score: 2, Informative

      I remember when I was in middle school or around there, the guy who was flying these at the time gave us a talk about them (not the same guy they talk about in that article). It was some rediculous 6 or 7 figure cost of fuel for the ~30 second flights they can take with those...while cool, probably the biggest waste of money I can imagine.

    6. Re:Come on by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      Of course they're probably even less fuel-efficient than cars. I'll bet the environmentalists won't be happy.

      If we spin it right, they'll be all over it like slinky on a weasel. It "burns" (really, decomposes) hydrogen peroxide, so the exhaust is just really hot steam. Of course, eventually someone will figure out how much energy it takes to make the H_2O_2....

      By the way, if anyone's interested, here's the National Air and Space Museum's page on the rocket belt.

    7. Re:Come on by wkitchen · · Score: 1

      Ugh. Was it really necessary to use the word "juicy"?

    8. Re:Come on by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      191.2KJ/mol, and the molar mass H2O2 is 34.04 g/mol

      However, that's assuming you're forming the H2O2 from H2 and O2 gas. Difficult, but that's thermodynamics for you.

    9. Re:Come on by four12 · · Score: 1

      But "juicy" sums it up oh-so-perfectly... :-)

      It's hard to remember sometimes not to get too graphic around "civilians", especially when there's a bunch of medics having a late dinner at Denny's talking about the 'floater' they just pulled out of the river. Amazing how quickly the booths around you empty out...

    10. Re:Come on by CharlesClarkson · · Score: 1
      Is there anybody who wouldn't love to have one of these for getting to work?

      I wouldn't. I walk about sixty feet to work. From my bedroom to my office. This thing would ruin my ceiling.

      --

      Charles K. Clarkson
      Many people truly want to help. Unfortunately, many people truly suck at it.
  5. next record... by ZipR · · Score: 3, Funny

    Stacking rocket men. 64 men, one atop the other, reaching to the heavens!

  6. Another Darwin Award Nominee by dpeltzm1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First off i work towers tall buildings so i know a little about danger This "rocketeer" has 3 kids and does this stuff with no safety equipment! anybody know the name of his insurance agent i want in on that policy. Hello Vegas here we come!!!

    1. Re:Another Darwin Award Nominee by Afrosheen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I wish you knew a little about sentence structure and grammar. Your opening sentence still has me puzzled. "First off i work towers tall buildings..." How do you work them?

  7. rocketing downwards by Silas+is+back · · Score: 1, Funny

    "owwwahh, look at this blonde down there. Gotta go a bit closeeeeeeeeeeee" rrroooooaaaaarrrrrr flatsch.

    --
    this sig is useless
  8. But where... by Suit_N_Tie · · Score: 3, Funny

    are the flying cars?

    1. Re:But where... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Street legal flying cars:

      http://www.moller.com/

    2. Re:But where... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right here.

    3. Re:But where... by BK425 · · Score: 1

      One of the flying cars is in the flight museum at Boeing aircrafts facility near King county airport in Washington USA.
      In a society that values safety over nearly everything, where people make headlines for spilling hot coffee in their laps, flying cars like the ones produced in the late 60s (it wasn't mass production but there were team build prduction lines for a company in Brittain and I think one in California US).
      Absolute safety just isn't compatible with independent airborne transportation. There was a time, perhaps in the 60's when America was innovating rocketpacks. In the days when risk was considered a controllable factor and not a danger to be wiped from the earth general aviation could provide small airplanes to anyone with a middle class income. And no, I'm not Grandpa Simpson typing about "back in my day" I wasn't around in 61.
      Oh, and not be be even more of a wet blanket but the previous poster is wrong. The Moller sky car is neither street nor air legal. (And again, it ain't problems with technology that are causing the holdups... it's societal).

  9. Quake Rocket Jump by davejenkins · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, it seems safer than the rocket jump we've all pulled a thousand times in order to get up to those sweet camping spots...

    1. Re:Quake Rocket Jump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it.

    2. Re:Quake Rocket Jump by Lazyhound · · Score: 1

      In the Quake series and a few other games, it's possible to jump higher than normal by firing a rocket launcher at the ground as you reach the top of your normal jump height.

    3. Re:Quake Rocket Jump by HisMother · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm, not quite, actually; you fire the rocket just as you're leaving the ground.

      --
      Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    4. Re:Quake Rocket Jump by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

      ... not to mention infinitely safer than the "Quad-rocket-grenade-BFG jump" that I enjoyed a few times. Sadly, neither the Quad nor the Invulnerability required to pull THAT off exist in real life.

      --
      Freedom: "I won't!"
    5. Re:Quake Rocket Jump by Ark42 · · Score: 1


      It seems you are claiming the BFG really does exist?

    6. Re:Quake Rocket Jump by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

      Sure, I believe it's called the "Airzooka" and you can buy one at Thinkgeek.com :-)

      --
      Freedom: "I won't!"
    7. Re:Quake Rocket Jump by RichardX · · Score: 1

      You can get even higher by getting a quad damage, firing a grenade, switching to rockets, standing over the granade, aiming down, jumping right as the grenade goes off and firing your rocket at the same time. Off into orbit you go (or your gibs, if you neglected to pick up invincibliity, too)

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    8. Re:Quake Rocket Jump by Bastian · · Score: 1

      This is the case in Quake, but in TFC I remember getting much better results firing the rocket at the peak of my jump.

    9. Re:Quake Rocket Jump by satanami69 · · Score: 1

      With TFC, using the demo man, you could lay the pipebombs and time the jump to take less damage.

      Another plus was to put a pipebomb where you were jumping to, as to clear away enemies.

      Good times.

      --
      I really hate Dan Patrick.
  10. got him beat by spangineer · · Score: 0

    in his bid to achieve the highest human elevation

    Please. I've gone way higher than 46 meters above London - it's called a 747 people, and it's way more powerful than some wimpy rocket belt.

    1. Re:got him beat by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Funny

      How lame. Even assuming an average of two meters per person, stacking 747 people is not even 1,500 meters. I've been way higher than that in an airplane.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:got him beat by ivan1011001 · · Score: 1

      Please. I've gone way higher than 46 metersabove London - it's called a 747 people

      Please. I've gone waaaay higher than a 747 could ever dream of going - It's called LSD people. :)

      --

      I was thinking of converting to paganism, but where the hell can you find sacrificial virgins these days?
    3. Re:got him beat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been way higher than that as well! Oh, height. :(

  11. "Down" button? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Down button? What do you mean there is NO down button?"

    "Cool your jets, Jetson (hehe). You'll come down when it runs out of fuel. That will happen soon enough, you'd better believe it."

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  12. In a completely related story... by digitalamish · · Score: 5, Funny
    The last surviving twin brother that founded the Guinness Book of World Records has died. He had held the record for longest surviving twin who founded the greatest book series ever.

    ---
    "There's no I in Team." - Reporter
    "Yeah, there ain't no we either." - Leon

    1. Re:In a completely related story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There's no I in Team." - Reporter
      "Yeah, there ain't no we either." - Leon

      That depends on whether it's a team of incontinent grannies or not, doesn't it?

    2. Re:In a completely related story... by leenoble_uk · · Score: 4, Funny

      What do you mean by modding this as funny. It's insightful.
      The Guinness book of Records is filled to bursting with pathetic 'qualified' records.
      So if you're never going to get the world record for the 100 metres maybe you can get in as the world's fastest at the hundred metres while holding a cup in your left hand.
      If you weren't the first person in the world to sail single handedly around the world then claim to be the first person to sail singlehandly around the world after setting out on a Tuesday.
      And most pathetic of all. Weren't the first person to climb Mount Everest? How about the first American? Ok the first Woman? Or the first American Woman, no the first British Woman, oh has that already gone. The first British Woman to climb Mount Everest starting out on a Tuesay whilst holding a cup in your left hand then.

    3. Re:In a completely related story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The handicapped olympics demonstrates your point perfectly. These people can't run very fast because they only have one leg so they have a "special" event just for them. The silliest sub-event is the 100m for people who are blind. Blind! How does that prevent from running the 100m in 10s?

      I've petitioned that there should be an event for people who are just crap at the 100m. Is that not a handicap too? I don't have the same genes as these other athletes therefore I'm handicapped.

      FWIW, I hate the Guiness Book of Records too, it always seemed vaguely Nazi to me.

    4. Re:In a completely related story... by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      How about - The fastest Londoner to eat 200 jacobs cream crackers... without a glass of water... with a toothpick... naked.

      I think that one IS in the 2003 book, page 734 if Im not mistaken!

    5. Re:In a completely related story... by Finuvir · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Damn right. Just make some events like the wheelchair races that no non-handicapped person is ever going to win. Don't have a 100m for people with one leg, have a 100m hopping race. One-legged people would win all the time. On the other hand the realm of tasteless jokes would be diminished if it wasn't for the special- and paralympics.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    6. Re:In a completely related story... by leenoble_uk · · Score: 1

      Just reminded me of this weekends London Marathon.

      You know why they're called wheelchairs.

      Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! is the sound you inevitably have to make when travelling downhill.
      Call that a sport?

      Yeah I know, karma.

    7. Re:In a completely related story... by Strigiform · · Score: 1

      A race for blind runners doesn't sound so silly when you consider that blind people have to be more careful that us sighted folk when moving - what you or I would take for granted is difficult for them to navigate. (Runners usually have a trainer with them at the start shouting a series of numbers - different for each runner - which tell them if they're on course, too far to the left or right.)

      IIRC, these games began after WW2

    8. Re:In a completely related story... by Skiron · · Score: 1

      LOL. vg, made my miserable day a bit happier :D

    9. Re:In a completely related story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to remember that the Guinness Book of World Records was published by the eponymous beer company, in order to settle drinking disputes. I think the backstory is somewhere in the first few pages. Now, knowing how inane arguments over this-or-that record among drinking buddies can get, you can understand why some of the records get included.

      The GBWR is not the official keeper of records for many of the more serious records. (As for the sillier ones, I doubt anyone else is keeping track but Guinness.) Various organizations (which usually only keep records as a side function of their other work) maintain the official records for land speed, altitude in a , duration, etc.

  13. Military Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Rocketbelt was devised by the United States military in 1961 but has since been used for performances and displays around the world, including the 1984 Olympic Games in Los Angeles.

    Sounds like another good use of military technology to me!

    1. Re:Military Technology by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The Rocketbelt was devised by the United States military in 1961 but has since been used for performances and displays around the world, including the 1984 Olympic Games in Los Angeles.

      Sounds like another good use of military technology to me!

      Compared to the uses to which military technology is more normally put, I'd say this is a really, really great use. Only one person is likely to get killed by this.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Military Technology by spectrokid · · Score: 3, Funny

      When used in an packed olympic stadium, he could fall on top of somebody else. Geesh, imagine him falling into the flamy thingie..

      --

      10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    3. Re:Military Technology by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      imagine him falling into the flamy thingie

      Hm I just did and I think it'd be pretty damn funny. "He went out with a bang!"

      "It's raining men", indeed.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  14. That's not a rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    He was happy to see me.

  15. man by bpland · · Score: 1, Funny

    That looks like a rocking good time.

  16. Coincidence by WwWonka · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...lasted just 26 seconds but allowed enough time for a couple of pirouettes.

    Interesting, I too accomplished this feat with my imaginary girlfriend over the weekend.

  17. A word from Ted Kennedy by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    "Oh. You said flying cahs! I thought you said.... oh neva mind."

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:A word from Ted Kennedy by kelzer · · Score: 1

      Boy, the Chappaquiddick jokes just never get old, even after 35 years.

      --

      ---------------------------------------------
      SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  18. He would have been able to go higher but. . . by BadluckShleprock · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The rocket pack holds enough fuel for about 1 minute (or less) of flight. He had to keep enough fuel to land with. THAT's why we see this military technology at air shows and not being shot at over Baghdad.

    --


    ------
    There's a fine line between cuddling and holding someone down so they can't get away.
    1. Re:He would have been able to go higher but. . . by micromoog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why doesn't he do it with a parachute? That way he could (theoretically) burn straight up for the full minute, going WAY higher, then parachute back down . . .

    2. Re:He would have been able to go higher but. . . by Coos · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, he ascended beside a tower, and landed on its roof, so presumably he didnt even have enough fuel to land again safely at the same level he took off from. He walked back down the staircase of the tower...

    3. Re:He would have been able to go higher but. . . by Coos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not much higher: the climb rate of these belts is very low. I doubt he'd get enough altitude to deploy a chute from...

    4. Re:He would have been able to go higher but. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch the fucking video people. He rockets up from the ground and lands on top of a tower.

    5. Re:He would have been able to go higher but. . . by negacao · · Score: 3, Informative

      He'd have to be higher for a parachute to help..

    6. Re:He would have been able to go higher but. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's not necessarily true. If he were freefalling downwards then whatever altitude he reached would be too late to deploy a chute to slow him down enough and stop him. But, if he deploys his chute at the top of the burn (assuming it unfurls very quickly), then his vertical speed would be near 0 upon deployment and the parachute would behave much like he had been dropping and had deployed it earlier.

      It would only be too low if by the time the chute completely unfurled he was heading downwards too fast (since it's not feasible to deploy the chute and let it unfurl and he's still travelling upwards.)

    7. Re:He would have been able to go higher but. . . by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      Actually you can use a parachute from as low as around 300' (I believe this is the military limit), and BASE (Buildings, Antenna, Structures, Earth) jumpers routinely parachute of bridges etc which are pretty low.

    8. Re:He would have been able to go higher but. . . by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      i thought it was span?

    9. Re:He would have been able to go higher but. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be ok at 200' if you deploy a MIRPS

    10. Re:He would have been able to go higher but. . . by BadluckShleprock · · Score: 1

      Oops. Didn't know that. The site had been /.ed and I didn't get to read the particulars

      --


      ------
      There's a fine line between cuddling and holding someone down so they can't get away.
  19. Maybe you're the real nominee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can he be a nominee if he has 3 kids?

    1. Re:Maybe you're the real nominee? by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      The best nominee risks himself, his offspring and as many of his close family members (up to third cousins) and still-fertile ancestors as possible. Remove all traces of his genes. A rocket explosion should do the trick.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    2. Re:Maybe you're the real nominee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) He probably doesn't keep the thing fueled up in his house.
      2) The "rocket" belt doesn't use rocket fuel, but rather a simple reaction involved hydrogen peroxide and silver. It's like having a really fizzy drink.

  20. Try http://www.local6.com/news/3022956/detail.html by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Informative
  21. 64 rocket men by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Stacking rocket men. 64 men, one atop the other, reaching to the heavens!"

    64 rocket men on the pad, 64 rocket men. Launch one up, notify next-of-kin, 63 rocket men on the pad.

    63 rocket men on the pad, 63 rocket men.....

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:64 rocket men by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I'd be worried about being one of the rocket men left behind. I don't know how hot that flame is.

      And stacking them? I'm not sure I can describe the aftermath.

  22. Also seen in Thunderball by gevmage · · Score: 3, Informative

    Also seen in a James Bond film, I forget which one. Googling "James Bond rocket pack" seems to indicate Thunderball.

    --
    Craig Steffen
    http://www.craigsteffen.net
    1. Re:Also seen in Thunderball by perly-king-69 · · Score: 1

      That's the one. Sean Connery escapes from a hospital complex before stowing the rocket pack in the back of the Aston. Connery wanted to do the stunt himself, but the producers said it was too risky, so it was left to (I think) an RAF test pilot.

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

    2. Re:Also seen in Thunderball by goon+america · · Score: 1
      Funny story about that... when they shot the long shots in that scene with stuntmen (yes, it was the real thing, no wires or anything) they had helmets on, but on the closeups of Connery ( not real) he didn't. They wanted to re-shoot the long shots without helmets, but they couldn't find a stuntman for any amount of money anywhere that was willing to fly that thing without a helmet. ... they ended up having to call Connery back and reshoot his closeup with a helmet on, at great expense...

      (Nowadays they would just remove the helmets digitally. Or just render the whole damn thing.)

    3. Re:Also seen in Thunderball by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I'd be easier to just paint the helmet to look like Connery's hair and face. Depending on the shots it might work, but for closeups, you gotta use good old fashioned matte work.

    4. Re:Also seen in Thunderball by JofCoRe · · Score: 2, Informative

      More information about the Thunderball appearance can be found here: www.rocketbelt.nl... click on the Thunderball link on the left.

      --

      Place sig here.
    5. Re:Also seen in Thunderball by tangent3 · · Score: 1

      Yup that's the one Bill Suitor was the stuntmen.

    6. Re:Also seen in Thunderball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Connery was proportioned like Charlie Brown that might work...

  23. Too Bad 20 sec limit by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    These would be great for getting around if it weren't for the 20 second time limitation.

    So if I have to compromise and give up on a having a rocket pack or flying car, can I get a MagLev skateboard instead?

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  24. Hi. I'm Troy McClure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hi. I'm Troy McClure. You might remember me from such rocketman documentaries as "Rocketeer 2: Electric Boogaloo" and "Splattered All Over Nebraska".

  25. H2O2+methanol by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The current rocket pack uses (IIRC) 99% hydrogen peroxide as a monopropellent fuel - the peroxide is broken down by a silver catalyst into water vapor, oxygen and LOTS of heat. This is a big part of why this rocketpack only works for tens of seconds at a time.

    I wonder if anybody has looked into using the 50% peroxide/50% methanol mix that John Carmack is using in his rocket - could this increase the flight time?

    1. Re:H2O2+methanol by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      Is this like the hydrogen peroxide you put on cold-sores and boo-boos...stored in your medicine cabinet?

      So just pouring this over a silver screen or something similar and you've got rocket power?

      Sounds kinda easy.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    2. Re:H2O2+methanol by grimace1969 · · Score: 1

      yes actually, it is the same hydrogen peroxide as in your medicine cabinet, except the one that is in your medicine cabinet is diluted heavily, check the bottle, its probably less than 1% hydrogen peroxide. Im pretty sure you wouldn't want to put pure hydrogen peroxide on an open wound.

      -G

      --
      "Immolation is the sincerest form of flattery."
    3. Re:H2O2+methanol by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Informative

      The peroxide you buy at the drugstore is 3% peroxide - if you pour that over silver you will get pretty much the same thing as you get by pouring it over a wound - some warm foam.

      I suppose you could make a "rocket" by putting peroxide in a 2 liter bottle, thowing some silver (or bleach) in, and corking it.

      But you would get the same result from baking soda and vinegar.

    4. Re:H2O2+methanol by tb3 · · Score: 1

      Not quite. The medicinal stuff is very weak, 1% I think. The rocket fuel is 75 - 100%, very volatile and very corrosive. Also hard to manufacture at that strength.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    5. Re:H2O2+methanol by TigerTime · · Score: 1

      In High School we'd get an empty liter bottle of coke poor some toilet bowl cleaner in it (forgot what brand and what active ingredient) and then put a few rolled up alluminum balls in it and put the top back on.

      After awhile it'd produce a pretty big bang. That's when we got the idea of trying it again and sticking the bottle in a mailbox. That was flat out spectacular. However, our parents didn't think so. :/

    6. Re:H2O2+methanol by Obfiscator · · Score: 1

      Any of the cleaners with HCl work for that.

      --
      "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
    7. Re:H2O2+methanol by Pooua · · Score: 1
      IIRC, pure hydrogen peroxide is "impossible." The strongest concentration generally offered is 70% (which is considered high-concentration), though there is also a specialty grade for the semiconductor industry that is even more concentrated.

      Wikipedia has an interesting article on hydrogen peroxide.

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  26. I thought they were made by ACME by scottennis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because Wile E. Coyote has gone way higher than this guy did. Unfortunately he bashed his head through an overhanging ledge, which then broke off and fell on him when he plummeted to the canyon floor below.

    1. Re:I thought they were made by ACME by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Didn't you read the submission blurb?

      "Rocketman Eric Scott shot 46 metres into the air in London and promptly claimed a world record. Scott, 41, from Dallas, Texas, donned his red and white jumpsuit and zoomed into the north London sky in his bid to achieve the highest human elevation using a Rocketbelt." (emphasis added)

      So Wile E.'s record still stands as the highest non-human elevation.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  27. What is up with London? by Astroboy! · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why does London seem to be the new haven for American crazies doing weird things?

    David Blaine sits in a box by the Thames.
    Rocketman out in north Londdon.

    What's next?

    Is there some kind of American law about being weird that Britain doesn't have?

    1. Re:What is up with London? by shadowcabbit · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it's just that in London, an American acting totally insane won't get noticed, since we all act that way anyway.

      (I kid, of course. There are some pretty weird Brits out there, too.)

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    2. Re:What is up with London? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      I expect the insurance is cheaper here in the UK, plus you're less likely to get sued if you accidentally squash or incinerate a bystander.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:What is up with London? by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's all down to the recent pro-rocketpack legislation.

      You see, thanks to Red Ken's conjestion charge, a whole industry has been created to find a way around it. One of the many classes of exempt vehicles is the rocket pack (because it causes no conjestion, and a lot of the waste is water). It's now a common sight to see businessmen commuting to work with a rocket pack, umberella, and reinforced crash-bowler. Anyway, because of the popularity of these, the government has made sure the requirements for using on are quite low, thus making it the idal city to try this in.

    4. Re:What is up with London? by spungo · · Score: 1

      It's 'cos the haggis are in season. (In high summer they're hard to spot against the heather, what with their natural camouflage).

    5. Re:What is up with London? by cosmo7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In England you can only be eccentric if you are middle or upper class. If you're working class then you're insane.

    6. Re:What is up with London? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      No, it's just that in London, an American acting totally insane won't get noticed

      Something tells me that, with people scaling the sheer cliffs of the local sidewalk, the Ministry of Silly Walks, Gumbies shouting, and other oddities, nothing anyone does in Britain would be viewed as "insane".

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    7. Re:What is up with London? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh...what the hell are you talking about? Haggis is Scottish, and London is in England.

    8. Re:What is up with London? by jazmataz23 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      QED - Quite Easily Done

      I don't think that's a fair statement. One of the most intellectually challenging benchmarks is mathematical rigor.

      Challenge: is the four-color map solution mathematically rigorous, and why or why not?

      jaz

      PS -- Moderators, please by all means mod me Offtopic. God knows we need to keep discussions about rocket pack world record attempts on track!

      --
      Death to Argument by Slogan!! (This post twice-encrypted with ROT-13. Replies not using same will be ignored)
    9. Re:What is up with London? by wowbagger · · Score: 1
      ...people scaling the sheer cliffs of the local sidewalk...


      Here in Kansas we have that beat.
    10. Re:What is up with London? by spungo · · Score: 1

      They migrate.

    11. Re:What is up with London? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It's not to be taken seriously. It was something a friend of mine used to write after proofs to annoy a lecturer.

    12. Re:What is up with London? by jazmataz23 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that'll annoy a lecturer all right. ;)

      --
      Death to Argument by Slogan!! (This post twice-encrypted with ROT-13. Replies not using same will be ignored)
  28. Re:Try http://www.local6.com/news/3022956/detail.h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlikely to /. smh.com.au a major .au newspaper.

  29. James Bond's Gadgets by WebGangsta · · Score: 1
    For some reason, TiVo thinks that I have a James Bond obsession. I don't deny this -- especially when TiVo finds programs like JAMES BOND'S GADGETS on The History Channel.

    While there are one or two other Bond-related shows on A&E / Discovery / History / etc, I believe it was this particular show that spent time with the guy who now owns the speedboat from one of Brosnan's outings, a history of the Rocketman pack and how it works (and what they're doing now), and one or two other "real world" items used in the films.

    Then again, TiVo also automatically recorded last week's "Secrets of the Human Cannonball" on TLC, so who knows?

    1. Re:James Bond's Gadgets by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      well if you WATCH them when it records them...................
      causality loop?

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  30. Coming up next by Wolfier · · Score: 3, Funny

    Largest area covered by bloody splat ever achieved by a falling human being

  31. Re:5 posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and you also need to learn how to spell.

  32. Sordid history of rocket belts by figa · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:Sordid history of rocket belts by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Yes. If you compare the info in your linked article with the article in the story, it is clear that they both describe the RB2000.

      Your story says all the intrigue happened in 1995, and it remained unsolved. Too bad your story doesn't have a date on it. I'm curious-like.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:Sordid history of rocket belts by John+Starks · · Score: 1

      Yeah, websites that fail to date their content are ridiculously obnoxious. Fortunately, you can tell from the URL that this is 10/10/2002. I wonder what happened as well.

  33. guzzle, HICK, Zooommm! by malia8888 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Looking at the caption of the photo in the article:A handout photograph shows stuntman Eric Scott of the US hovering in the sky over London using a jetpack

    Did anyone else notice that he is sponsored by Smirnoff Vodka? This is not a coincidence:P

    --
    Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
  34. By bye Branson by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    ...an American acting totally insane won't get noticed, since we all act that way anyway. (I kid, of course. There are some pretty weird Brits out there, too.)

    How long before Richard Branson gets the idea to try and try again to go 'round the world in a rocket belt?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  35. Worms Reference by RamboCalrissian · · Score: 1

    Wow, I thought that the rocketbelt only had 15 seconds of fuel.... and to think about it, he probably could have gotten where he wanted to go a lot faster with the ninja rope.

    1. Re:Worms Reference by katarac · · Score: 1

      I used to play Worms 2 with my friends a lot. I had no idea how awesome the ninja rope was until I got online and realized that that was the ONLY way that the pros get around. It looked like people were playing (old real-time worms game) Liero.

  36. An interesting by sucati · · Score: 2, Informative

    article about one rocket belt company.

  37. Highest Human Flight by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    but my squirrel rocket belt still holds the real record. The trick is finding a good squirrel. Most can't steer for shit.

  38. NO4 and monomethyl hydrazine by r00t · · Score: 0

    Sheesh, go with what NASA uses for attitude
    control rockets. The 99% H2O2 is already some
    wicked nasty stuff; you might as well go whole hog:

    NO4 and monomethyl hydrazine

    1. Re:NO4 and monomethyl hydrazine by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      I don't think you want to put people near that exhaust...

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:NO4 and monomethyl hydrazine by Bielenberg · · Score: 0

      Well it is a military development.

  39. Not a difficult 'Record' to beat! by d60b9y · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:
    There were no records before. I am the first one in the books for the record so it is neat.

    Basically, the story is "Man uses Rocketbelt and happens to measure how high he went."

    Hardly Rocket Science.... (BaDum Tish!)

  40. Sadly... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. he was scorned as a "Camping Faggot" when he went up with a railgun.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  41. Re:5 posts by goatan · · Score: 2, Funny
    Scott, who says his sons think he is Superman, works as a film stuntman and also builds custom homes.

    Yes custom houses with 3 floors but no stairs you have to rockpack your way up.

    --
    Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

  42. Pilotwings SNES game by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

    Back when I had a SNES I had a game called Pilotwings that had a segment with a rocketbelt in it. The trick was to fly around and touch a lot of floating colored balls and fly through moving hoops without falling into the water or touching the ground.

    It would have to be a pretty sophisticated belt in that game, though, as its fuel reserves kept the wearer aloft for a couple of minutes.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:Pilotwings SNES game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That game was so fun and so frustrating at the same time. I liked the fact that you could bounce off the little white bubble-looking things on the ground without a penalty, and doing so "popped" the bubble, leaving a charred hole. I actually managed to get a perfect score in one of the rocketman segments once, and I say that not to brag but to demonstrate that I played the game way too much.

  43. Not just the Olympics... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

    The first Super Bowl had this too. I'll bet those guys were happy not to have a "wardrobe malfunction"!

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  44. middle class = working class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "if you are middle or upper class. If you're working class then you're insane."

    Most upper-class and middle-class people are also working-class (because they work). There is not the exclusionary relationship that you imply. Perhaps you meant to say "lower-class". The lower-class, oddly enough, is the least working-class (as most of the unemployed, non-workers are in this group).

    1. Re:middle class = working class by cosmo7 · · Score: 1

      Most upper-class and middle-class people are also working-class (because they work). There is not the exclusionary relationship that you imply. Perhaps you meant to say "lower-class". The lower-class, oddly enough, is the least working-class (as most of the unemployed, non-workers are in this group).

      Your semantics are wrong. "Working class" may be a euphemism to avoid the condescension of "Lower class", but it is the class which is concerned with working, not it's members. Like a walking stick doesn't actually do any walking itself.

      I would say that class consciousness in England is extraordinarily exclusionary, not least in newly-gentrified Stoke Newington, where the rocket guy was blasting around. I wonder what the clientelle at the Shakespeare pub is like these days.

  45. Parachutes and Rockets by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for the base jumpers and the high power rocket builders to get together. Build a rocket to lift someone with the ability to eject cleanly and still recover the rocket too...

  46. Highest human elevation? by LouCifer · · Score: 0

    I beg to differ.

    Try doing some 'shroom and smoking some Columbian weed.

    Oh, wait. You said with a Rocket Belt..

    Nevermind..

    --
    Religion is for people afraid of going to hell.
  47. Next-of-kzin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Launch one up, notify next-of-kin, 63 rocket men on the pad"

    You'd be better off notifying next of Kzin. "Hey, ratcats! Fresh fried dinners coming your way!"

  48. Rocketeer by hummassa · · Score: 1

    I did not only saw the movie, I read the comics before, and I loved all of'em. You asked.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  49. Terrifying by (eternal_software) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When your helicopter engine quits, you autorotate to a landing. When your plane engine quits, you glide.

    With this, you have absolutely no chance of survival during a large portion of the flight if the thing quits on you.

    I'd imagine it's too low to use a parachute, but high enough to kill you.

    1. Re:Terrifying by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

      Well, you could have a rocket-deployed parachute like those ejection seats that are safe to use even at ground level. Of course, parachute = weight = even less flying time.

      --
      Freedom: "I won't!"
    2. Re:Terrifying by mog007 · · Score: 1

      The solution is a simple one. It doesn't work in an airplane or a helicopter because you're inside of a metallic tube. All you need to do is flap your arms REALLY fast and you'll glide down.

    3. Re:Terrifying by nlindstrom · · Score: 1

      If you have no chance of survival, do you still get to make your time?

  50. Video here by jago25_98 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let's track some video footage down eh?

    http://www.rocketmaninc.com/videogallery.html

    slashdot 'em for disabling rightclick to save!

    http://www.rocketbelt.nl/

    1. Re:Video here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this might help people if their right click is disabled, the bookmarklet works in moz/ffox/msie
      http://texturizer.net/firefox/tips.html#beh_contex tmenu

  51. Rip van Winkle by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Yeah, if I had slept in 1984 and woke up today, I would be pretty disappointed... Nowadays, I would be satisfied even by "Minority Report"-style car-levators.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  52. Old news... by SirPhreak · · Score: 1

    Old new for those who watch techtv, was on tech live a few days ago I believe, pretty interesting interview footage as well as seeing the guy covered in advertisements.

    I'm sure it will repeat this weekend if you want to see the video.

    --
    ------------------------------ SirPhreak - "It's Thinking..."
  53. That's nothing! by theendlessnow · · Score: 1
    "Rocketman Eric Scott shot 46 metres into the air in London..."

    I hear that Darl went 47 metres into the air after getting kicked by Baystar.

  54. a two-stage award! by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Funny

    One would think that "Highest Human Elevation Using a Rocketbelt" would be something one gets just before the Darwin Award.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:a two-stage award! by Animats · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Because the limitation on elevation is how high you can get before you don't have enough fuel to get down.

  55. As oppsoed to... by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    the millions of lives lost to things such as radar, jet engines, jeeps, sonar, kevlar, etc...

    Not all military stuff goes boom you know.

  56. Where's the Flying Cars? by sciop101 · · Score: 0

    All the predictions about flying cars and global prosperity. We have no flying cars and globalized poverty. NAFTA, the WTC and the Clintons did a real number on the USA.

    --
    The only thing new in this world is the history that you don't know.[Harry Truman]
  57. That's just a minor improvement by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 3, Informative
    There is a claim of only 140-150 sec of impulse for pure H2O2 here, so it shouldn't be hard to get 50% greater impulse by adding a fuel to consume the oxygen and increase the exhaust velocity. All things being equal, the flight time of a rocket belt is equivalent to the length of time it can hold its weight up against gravity (assuming you land at zero speed and have negligible drag effects) and is thus proportional to the specific impulse of the propellant.

    Adding fuel also increases the exhaust temperature, and if you're already in danger of cooking your legs with superheated steam this could be a problem. The system might require modifications to keep the pilot cool.

    Propellants containing N2O4 or N2H4 are right out; you'd presumably like to survive an impact which bends the plumbing, assuming that you live long enough to get the thing fuelled up and launched in the first place. Both substances are extremely poisonous.

    To really get long flight times you have to increase the performance well above what rocket propulsion can give you. You can go from rocket to venturi-assisted rocket, to rocket-driven turbofan, to straight turbofan, to helicopter. Each one represents an increase in lift*time per unit fuel, by moving more mass (in this case, air) at a lower velocity and thus decreasing the energy (proportional to v^2) per unit momentum (proportional to v). However, by the time you do this you're not really a "rocket man" any more, you're something else.

    1. Re:That's just a minor improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boooringggg!

      Moderators!!! Keep this icky technical stuff off Slashdot.

      (Actually, I've seen this thing in action, about thirty years ago. You wouldn't believe how quick, or how freaking NOISY it is.)

    2. Re:That's just a minor improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One problem with the regular helicopter:
      Conservation of Angular Momentum

  58. BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR! by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    Like the fabled, ever-promised Air Car, this would be great for getting around if you were the only person who had one.

    Stir in crowds and typical human behavior, and things turn rapidly nasty.

    Think about it. Say 10% of Long Island's tens of thousands of car-commuters buy air cars or rocket packs. Can you imagine the traffic control problems? No traffic signs, no colored lines, no stop signals. Unless you have automated governors that restrict you to certain flight paths, the skies at rush hour would look like a gnat swarm, only with random collisions and your occasional explosion.

    Manhattan airspace would probably be off limits. (Think suicide bombers able to take out corporate board meetings on the 75th floor of the Consolidated-Amalgamated tower.)

    And then there are recreational users. Can you imagine a troupe of teenagers with these things? People would start putting up chicken-wire domes over their back yards to prevent adrenelin-addled punks from snatching cats and lawn flamingos.

    We might have to carry umbrellas on Friday nights, because you just know what ideas a drunk rocket packer will come up with.

    So. Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it.

    Stefan

  59. I saw the rocketeer... by paroneayea · · Score: 1

    Don't be fooled! The nazis are behind this!

    --
    http://mediagoblin.org/
  60. Superman? by dawg+ball · · Score: 1

    Did this guy also wear his underwear as overwear?

  61. Re:Better than attacking Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Saddam Hussein, who never harmed anyone in his life and is a victim of a Zionist smear campaign"

    Oh you are sooooooooo stupid.

  62. because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as he said in the article, landing is "the most crucial part - it doesn't matter how good you flight, you have to land it!"

    That would be hard to do from the top of a mountain.

  63. confused by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would someone mind telling me how this guy avoids burning his legs off? It seems to me that a rocket powerful enough to lift all that weight would have to be pretty hot, and being that close to the human body....

    ~UP

    --
    Eat the Path.
    1. Re:confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hydrogen Peroxide fuel....if anything, he has the blondest calfs in the stuntman business

  64. Which Rocketbelt is it? by rootag · · Score: 1
    Acording to the ABC News article from 2002, there were 3 rocket belts. 2 owned by Howard Gibson and 1 that went missing after people killed and kidnapped for it.

    Is it the missing one? Is there a new rocketbelt maker involved?

    Am I the only one that feels that there is too much mystery shrouding a stupid flying backpack?

  65. video by edyavno · · Score: 2, Informative
  66. It's all fun n games by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

    ...till someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.

  67. Texas chili? by KevinDumpsCore · · Score: 1

    > Rocketman Eric Scott shot 46 metres into the air... Scott, 41, from Dallas, Texas

    Have we confirmed this wasn't the result of good old Texas chili?

  68. Hard Decision by g-san · · Score: 1

    Rocketbelt or Time Travel Delorean? I've been pretty bad this year so I can't ask Santa for both.

  69. Videos by johnny6vasquez · · Score: 1

    Here are the videos from the video gallery page.

    Rocketman-LAN.wmv
    trinidad-pov.wmv
    egypt.wmv
    MTV.wmv
    brazil.wmv
    bush.wmv
    olympics.wmv
    boystoys.wmv
    rocketeer.wmv
    extreme_machines.wmv
    beach.wmv
    knightrider.wmv
    superbowl.wmv
    media.wmv
    stadium.wmv
    Robocop.wmv


    [filler]Now I have to add some filler at the bottom if I want nice formatting. Too few characters per line? Why bother checking this? I think the moderators know pretty soon whether or not a post a legit. People like myself that just want to make a nicely formatted post have to put all kinds of junk into our posts as filler.[/filler]

  70. Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tip jets.

  71. What about Lawn Chair Baloon Guy? by bitusmeus · · Score: 1

    46 meters a record for human elevation? What about lawn chair balloon guy, who (allegedly) made 16,000 feet?

  72. There's no I in team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no I in team. There's no ME in team either. But that pesky little ME in manageMEnt is the root cause for the I in unIon.

  73. Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He just did it to look down Heidi Wall's shirt.

  74. Falling from uncomfortable heights. by Grendol · · Score: 1
    A guy fell 18 floors from a hotel in Cape Town, South Africa and survived. (CNN has an article on it at http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/africa/04/22/south.a frica.plunge.reut/index.html). But I agree, falling from uncomfortable heights does have its drawbacks.

    But, at 3 meters a floor; roughly, that makes 54 meters for 18 floors. The rocket pack wearing daredevil flew up to 46 meters, about 15 floors.

    Digging around on the web led me to this sight (http://www.fabulousrocketeers.com/Photo_See_Ya.ht m) where the page says that the US parachute associates has a minimum altitude for opening a parachute at 2,000 ft (609 m) for experienced skydivers. The sight says you can pack a chute to open within 200 ft (60 m) but, keep in mind you are probably falling at 115 mph (185 kph) in order to get it to open so fast. A chute probably wont open right if you are not falling fast enough. The site also said that chutes are often packed in such a way to slow the opening, to reduce the jolt, as a fast opening is a hard opening.

    Hangliders use a rocket assisted emergency parachute, and light aircraft can deploy a similar device that will land a whole plane (see http://brsparachutes.com/). A model for a rocketpack system may be a fairly easy solution, but, as seen before, properly deploying at low altitude remains a risk. In all events, these things try to prevent death and reduce injury, they probably are not a injury free event.

  75. Man from Glad by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    The range and endurance of the Rocketbelt are pretty pathetic, and the only good use I have seen this thing put to is landing on the lawn outside the kitchen of some young woman and instructing her on the use of polyethelyne film to wrap food leftovers.

  76. a coder and his rocket... by FaerieBoy · · Score: 1

    speaking of which, he has some nice tests up of the big engine. still looks like a ways to go, but it's nice to see progress. the sheer amount of parts issues he goes through is insane.... click the news for the video...woooo wouldnt i like to have one of those to play with. the site

    --
    All your preview button are belong to hello kitty.
  77. Already been done, at his behest, by someone else! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews /rocketbelt_021010.html
    That states that the newer, improved, state of the art rocketpack that the guy had formed a company to create went up to 150 feet and 70mph back in 1995, on its initial test flight by the guy who tested the first rocket belt.

    150ft~=46m ...