Slashdot Mirror


OO.org Selects Its Own Sea Bird

Elektroschock writes "A new mascot of the OO.org project was announced today: A crazy sea gull. I wonder whether it will help to convince office workers of Open Office. "Andrea [Maggioni]'s contribution is not only beautiful and effective but also illustrates the potential of young people to contribute importantly to real projects under the banner of Free and Open Source Software." Andrea, "whose cheerful drawing, of a fun-looking seagull holding a fish, plays on the "OOo" shorthand of OpenOffice.org"... ehemm, it's a crazy sea gull."

95 of 413 comments (clear)

  1. Pun on by ciroknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Migration? maybe?

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:Pun on by BarakMich · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well.. good thing it's not an african swallow...

    2. Re:Pun on by g0_p · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think its based on the birds (gulls?) that are a part of the OOo mascot. As someone else already pointed out this is the new mascot of the OOoEdu project and not the OOo project.

    3. Re:Pun on by jest3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ok the bird looks cross-eyed bloodshot stoned out of his mind .. munchies under one arm .. with a hairdoo to match .. a scarf that looks like something from queer-eye .. add one more finger to the hand gesture and he's calling us all a$*holes ..

      hopefully they give the gull an extreme makeover before they let him loose ..

    4. Re:Pun on by Spudley · · Score: 4, Funny

      You want puns?

      I'd say they just took a tern for the worst.

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    5. Re:Pun on by kaellinn18 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or a coconut...

      --

      --------
      This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
  2. See the Other Submissions by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'm glad people are getting a kick out of this. I really enjoyed orchestrating the competition (I do more than troll Slash, you know), and Andrea and the other candidates did a bang-up job. We couldn't be more proud.

    Voting is of course closed, but if you'd like to see the other students' submissions, our voting page is still displayed. You can click on the individual images for a larger view.

    Also, a minor point of clarification regarding Timothy and Elektroschock's write up -- this is not a mascot for OOo. This is a mascot for OooEdu, the new Schools Project of Open Office.org. Please, read the attached article to learn about what the OOoEdu aims to do, and how you can help. We're an active and devoted community, and there are things you can do to further OOo's acceptance in schools, even if you can't contribute a line of code!

    1. Re:See the Other Submissions by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The shading was reworked with Adobe Photoshop running under WINE because we wanted to show that professional quality could be accomplished using 100% free software.

      1) While it's true that the winner looks pretty solid compared to the competition (which mostly look like they were drawn by a demented seagull) "professional quality" may be overstating it a bit.

      2) Getting your copy of Photoshop off Kazaa doesn't make it "100% free software".

    2. Re:See the Other Submissions by Spyffe · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, the kids were of various ages. A ten-year-old that had spent some time with Illustrator could have done that. I don't think it's clear that a parent assised (aside from teaching the kid Illustrator, which IMO is fair game).

      I agree that this is head and shoulders over the others, partially because the use of a computer made it more easily integratable into electronic media. The kid clearly had a very good sense of what it takes to make a good logo (the image creates a relationship with the viewer, with the bird looking straight in the viewer's eye).

      Very nice, too, is how both the bird and the fish are smiling, which makes the image very cheerful and "childlike" (in the way adults define it).

      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
    3. Re:See the Other Submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    4. Re:See the Other Submissions by orkysoft · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Okay, so I sinned and did RTFA. Here's a quote from the last paragraph, which is ROTFLMAO, IMHO.

      Context: case study of OOo being burned to CD in a school project.

      One of the students has suggested we try to get individuals and local organisations to sponsor individual disks and this is something we'll definitely be considering - Chris is already working on a draft letter to Bill Gates!

      It'll be a cold day in hell when Bill Gates will sponsor OOo for schools! That would go straight against his business strategy in so many ways...

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    5. Re:See the Other Submissions by killjoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes but what's with the fish? Why is the seagul holding a fish and why is the fish smiling?

      Is the fish happy that he is about to become dinner? Does the fish symbolize something?

      Cute bird, the fish has to go.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    6. Re:See the Other Submissions by LDoggg_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Cool, I get to plug my new project and be on-topic.

      k12wincd is a CD image that includes open office as well as others. Similar to gnuwinCD.
      I should be burning 250-300 of these this summer to be handed out in the fall.

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
    7. Re:See the Other Submissions by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It'll be a cold day in hell when Bill Gates will sponsor OOo for schools!

      I think that back in the day, when MSIE 4 had already been released, Gates Foundation gave money to some big Finnish library or whatever. In the news clip, almost all of the library computers had Netscape Navigator 4 on the screen. Well, they did run that on Windows though, but still... And it also made me wonder for how long NN stayed there... =)

  3. Only for OOoEdu by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think I should point that that I believe this mascott is just for the OOoEdu project, not for the OpenOffice.org project as a whole.

    1. Re:Only for OOoEdu by shiftless · · Score: 4, Funny

      OOo, I see!

  4. Please note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please note that this is not a new general OpenOffice.org mascot, but one for "The recently established Schools Project of OpenOffice.org (OOoEdu)"

    1. Re:Please note by pvt_medic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      thats good to hear, because while it is a nice picture and all. I dont think this is the logo that will get them international respect as an alternative to microsoft office.

      However i do applaud them for involving school aged children into this project and their efforts to bring open office to schools. This will not only save schools hundreds of dollars (more like thousands) but also will having children involved with the development of such a product has countless educational value.

      I tip my hat to them

      --
      30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
      Score:5, Troll
  5. Around here, seagulls are called "shithawks". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gully says:

    "It looks like you're trying to run Microsoft Office via WINE. Would you like me to poop on it for you?"

  6. Why am I reminded of that scene... by Xpilot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...from "Finding Nemo", where that seagull picks up our fishy hero.

    Oh and there's only one 't' in 'mascot'.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  7. A few mistakes in the summary... by oldosadmin · · Score: 5, Informative

    1) This is just the mascot for OOOEdu, not OOo.

    2) It was a childs drawing, who won a competition.

    I think it's quite cute.

    --
    Jay | http://oldos.org
  8. Something wrong with the picture by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 4, Funny

    That fish looks just a little too happy to be held by a seagull. Doesn't it know that the seagull is going to eat him?

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:Something wrong with the picture by alexborges · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously you know nothing about non-verbal language.

      The bird is qualitatively meassuring an oriffice...

      --
      NO SIG
    2. Re:Something wrong with the picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      That fish looks just a little too happy to be held by a seagull. Doesn't it know that the seagull is going to eat him?
      They did say the seagull was crazy, you never know.
    3. Re:Something wrong with the picture by incom · · Score: 5, Funny

      True. Does the fish really recongnize it's own mortality, does a fish try to squirm away out of discomfort, instinct, or actual fear of death. Thanks for bringing up the quality of metaphysical discussion here at slashdot, although valid sometimes the paradoxi of soviet russia get a little worn out.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    4. Re:Something wrong with the picture by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      That fish looks just a little too happy to be held by a seagull.

      I don't know. The first thing that I thought was that that seagull looks totally stoned. It's got bloodshot eyes, messed up hair, a zoned out expression, and its fingers look just like they're holding a joint. It's pretty easy to mentally add an enormous smoldering doobie to the image.

      The fish has a huge smile on his face and is staring directly at the seagull's virtual joint. He may be anticipating that the seagull is going to be kind enough to give him a puff or two.

      Hopefully the seagull doesn't have the munchies.

  9. Oh well. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft's products all use formless colored figures as mascots. How come we don't get to use boring mascots like they do? All we get to use are high quality creative characters. That's not fair. I think all free/open source programs should adopt boring businesslike formless colored figures, so we can appear as boring as that crowd.

    1. Re:Oh well. by telstar · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "Microsoft's products all use formless colored figures as mascots. How come we don't get to use boring mascots like they do? "
      • For some reason when somebody thinks about using a word-processor, an icon with a pen on it comes to mind before a seagull grasping a fish. I know ... I know ... It doesn't make sense to me either.


  10. Not a good mascot for a project aimed at schools by syslog · · Score: 5, Funny
    I really hope that they limit this mascot to the EDU subproject.

    Quite frankly, the gull looks slightly... challenged. Not a good image for either open office or for a subprject aimed at schools :)

    -naeem

  11. The "OK" gesture is obscene in some countries by GringoGoiano · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In Brazil the mascot will look like a perverted psychopath with a thing for fish.

    1. Re:The "OK" gesture is obscene in some countries by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Brazil the mascot will look like a perverted psychopath with a thing for fish.

      Looks like it'll fit in in Brazil. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  12. Re:Well..... by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    I agree with this guy. I mean the penguin's one thing, but what is this? The people they're trying to attract over are the suits, not the geeks with a sense of humor. I like the logo and I think it's funny, but I think it's going to make it harder for the guy in IT who's trying to convince his bosses to switch to OO when the brochure he gives them has a crazy bird on it.

    Then again, that damn butterfly is starting to piss me off.

  13. Re:Not the OO.org mascot by DoraLives · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I have enough trouble trying to convince coworkers to adopt F/OS Software without having to deal with "cutesy" mascots

    Amen brother. What the hell is the deal with so much of the visual symbology for OSS being ... well ... retarded? We're trying to draw folks in here, not push them away, right?

    Proceed mods, I'll let the karma burn on this one.

    --
    Is it fascism yet?
  14. The "OK" sign the gull is making is obscene in EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "OK" sign is another way of referring to the female genetalia in some countries, and is considered obscene, which could be a bit of an impediment to OO use in some countries.

    Maybe they should have researched this a bit more...

  15. OOo means dead in UO by rexguo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the MMORPG Ultima Online, everytime someone mutters something like "OOo", it means they are dead... In fact, whatever the ghost says will get translated into strings of "OooOOOOoo" unless you have the Spirit Speak skill...

    --
    www.rexguo.com - Technologist + Designer
  16. Oh great by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Andrea receives a great prize of a web-hosting service for one year, 200 Mb of web space on a Linux server, with 50 IMAP/POP3 mailboxes (protected from virus and spam), unlimited aliases, one IP address, PHP/MySQL/PostGreSQL support, and the registration of an .it .com .net or .org domain name. The prize is donated by E4A, a Free Software based ISP that supports the OpenOffice.org community.

    That's a nice price, sure. But for a girl who's prolly still in high school or maybe even elementary school?

    1. Re:Oh great by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 4, Funny
      But for a girl who's prolly still in high school or maybe even elementary school?
      Why do you think we included PHP?
  17. Take a cue from towlie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously.

    That gull looks like it's itching to ask you:

    "So.... do you wanna get high?"

  18. What the hell is she going to do with that? by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Funny
    Andrea receives a great prize of a web-hosting service for one year, 200 Mb of web space on a Linux server, with 50 IMAP/POP3 mailboxes (protected from virus and spam), unlimited aliases, one IP address, PHP/MySQL/PostGreSQL support, and the registration of an .it .com .net or .org domain name.

    Uhhh.. she's 15. I guess we know why her sister's boyfriend talked her into contributing.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:What the hell is she going to do with that? by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 2, Informative

      She? Andrea is a masculine name in Italy.

  19. good point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is pretty much the same reason that Microsoft did away with their upraised middle finger logo.

    1. Re:good point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      they did?

  20. Cuter... by megabyte405 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://ryand.net/oss/abi/abiantgnomepencil.png
    AbiWord Word Processor


    (leave off the file name for more images of Abi the Ant)

    --
    I recognize people by their sigs. Is that a bad thing?
  21. Re:Any Open Source Marketing People? by Gropo · · Score: 3, Informative
    Well then it's a good thing the CEO isn't still in school.

    quote:

    The OpenOffice.org Schools Project has a new mascot, drawn by sixteen-year old Andrea Maggioni of Italy. Playing on our logo's seagulls and the shorthand of OpenOffice.org, OOo, the picture shows a happy seagull holding a fish.
    Yes, the blurb was misleading.
    --
    I hate Grammar Nazi's
  22. Re:That's just stupid by clandestine_nova · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know you probably don't need a reply, but if you had read, it's for the Educational project that OOo is running, and is therefore child targeted. Obviously, it isn't meant to be used in a corporate setting. Let me summarize: RTFA.

    --
    Discworld.
  23. branding by taj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now that open source is becomming more popular, this branding is inevitable. A sign of success. But I hope these efforts stay focused on their target audience.

    Maybe its just me. But I'm really getting tired of open source branding efforts. Go ahead and do this stuff but have developer.*.org with none of this. I dont care about branding. I'm interested in the code, the bugs and the developer discussion.

    At developer.*.org place the following one click away with no product branding:

    source tars
    cvs information
    bug reporting
    developer mail lists and archives.

    Fairly simple request. Nobody will go to developer.*.org for binaries.

    Consider developers a seperate 'branding' effort.
    Its my impression the branding efforts how their understand users but not developers. Keep them away.

    Cute bird. have fun.

  24. Re:Well..... by sholden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why would the mascot of the Schools Project of OOo have any effect on credibility in the business world?

    Having logo designed by school children for a school project is just so silly isn't it. The competition wouldn't raise awareness in the target market or anything, would it? And schools hate competitions.

    And school children love boring corporate logos.

    Surely you have to be able to read to be "in advertising", but obviously not...

  25. Re:Well..... by vondo · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Many other people have pointed out that this is for schools only, so it should appeal to children and young adults, not business people.

    But aside from that, can you honestly claim the seagull is any less professional than Clippy or the stupid Windows XP puppy?

  26. Re:Not the OO.org mascot by gujo-odori · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thank you (and could someone please explain to me why the parent was moderated redundant when three different people all wrote that this isn't the mascot for all of OOo and were all modded interesting?)!

    I don't see the need for mascots at all, and they are all so cutesy I could hurl. Tux, the BSD mascot, now this seagull which is the worst all all. Maybe the reason MS still owns the desktop and we don't is that they don't have a mascot, and the repulsive clippy is easily kept out of sight (in Japan, clippy is replaced by a Dolphin, which is less annoying but just as needless).

    No doubt we'll both be modded down for daring to criticize open-source maskets as the disgusting, cutesy things they are, but I not only have karma to burn, I have a well-grounded grasp of the real-world value of /. karma: nothing.

    OK, I know /. userids have been auctioned on eBay, but that doesn't prove karma has value, only that a low /. userid does. And that some people have way too much money and way too little clue.

  27. Is it... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A lesbian seagul?

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  28. Additional Photos by telstar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks to Google, I was able to dig up one more photo of the OO.org mascot.

    image1,

  29. What? by levin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hate to be critical, it's a great drawing, but why is the fish smiling?

    his ass is about to get eaten!

    --

    `which fortune`
    1. Re:What? by Bricklets · · Score: 2, Funny

      why is the fish smiling? his ass is about to get eaten!

      Tossing a seafood salad?

      --
      Little Bricklets
  30. This just in... by brian728s · · Score: 3, Funny

    This just in... Pixar sues OO.org for tracing a screenshot from "Finding Nemo".

  31. First the seagull mascot... by PrintError · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...then the new company motto:
    Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine!

    ignore the sig

  32. In my well paid opinion by aghorne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am a lecturer and tutor in Graphic Design at Monash University. Perhaps I can add some comments on why this winning entry does not communicate well: - Its complex. As a rule of thumb a logo or mascot should be legible when printed out at about 10mm square and run through a fax machine. - Its not cheerful. This bird looks dazed and confused like it has been drinking all weekend. - It devalues the OO.org brand by making it look amateurish not accessible. The quicker open source projects take a leaf out of Firefox's approach to branding and identity the better. If open-source projects are going to have any kind of influence on mainstream software usage (which OpenOffice indeed has the potential to) it really needs to get serious with the way it comes across. Please do judge books by their covers and applications by their icons and mascots. No mascot is better than a bad mascot.

    --
    *.02c
    1. Re:In my well paid opinion by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right as to the qualities one might want in a general-purpose OOo mascott, though perhaps there's a misunderstanding about what this image is for.

      Still, even for a kid's education program, the image suggests a goofy, amaturish feeling that implies OOo may be merely qualified as a children's application, i.e., not suitable for professional work

      It's worth noting, too, that despite what the article says, people are refering to this as *the* OOo mascott. An unfortunate bit of misinformation that may be hard to squash.

      (I also think that the doofy Tux penquin does not help the Linux image one bit, though apparently it hasn't hurt it much either.)

      --

      Java is the blue pill
      Choose the red pill
    2. Re:In my well paid opinion by starling · · Score: 4, Funny

      As somebody with eyes in my head, perhaps I can add some comments on why this winning entry does not communicate well - it's crap.

    3. Re:In my well paid opinion by FattMattP · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Good point. I'd like to add that this should be applied to program names as well. I have found through personal experience that it's extremely difficult to convince people to use The Gimp due to the name. It has a negative connotation associated with it and many people find it offensive. They look at me as if I said it was called The Retard or something to that effect. There are other folks who just see it as good free software and don't care about the name. But in my experience they are definitely in the minority. I've reached the point now where I always apologize before I tell them the name.

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    4. Re:In my well paid opinion by bob65 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well it's just a mascot - not like they have to use it everywhere. I assume the OO.org brand will still be identified by their logo. Goofy mascots? What about Tux, or the Greek olympic mascots, or the MSN butterfly guy?

    5. Re:In my well paid opinion by pla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've reached the point now where I always apologize before I tell them the name.

      Wimp.

      Take pride in the software you use.

      "I use The GIMP. Yeah, you heard me right, The GIMP! Don't like it? Run back to mama PhotoShop, ya pussy! In the meantime, I'll do laps around your pathetic filters and layers, and pay a few hundred less for the honor!"

      All in presentation. A "bad" name can seem like a liability, but if you make it "in your face" enough, it can help. Don't apologize - Confront! It takes quite a lot these days to snap the sheep out of their stupor, every little bit helps. With The GIMP, you have an advantage right away, if you don't get squeamish and throw it away as a liability.

    6. Re:In my well paid opinion by FattMattP · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Take pride in the software you use.
      Oh, don't get me wrong. I do. And I see where you are coming from. I think Gimp is kick ass and I say that as a user of PhotoShop since the 2.0 days. But out here in bizarro world (San Francisco bay area) you can't fart without offending someone. So many people out here are hyper-sensitive and focused on being politically correct. These are the same people who say waitperson instead of waitress. Sure there are a lot of people here who don't care. But when I deal with businesses, which I most often do, when I say "The Gimp" they look at me like I'm an alien.

      Although I'd love to help correct the politically correct problem out here, I don't feel this situation is the right place for me to do it. Getting people to use free software is a higher priority for me. Therefore, I apologize up front about the name and then do my best to convince people to try the software.

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    7. Re:In my well paid opinion by the+gnat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Take pride in the software you use.

      No thank you. Someday, I'd actually like to get laid.

      A "bad" name can seem like a liability, but if you make it "in your face" enough, it can help.

      "The GIMP" sounds like something that a really twisted 16-year-old kid wearing all black hacked together in his parents' basement. And most people I've mentioned it to have the same gut reaction, and they're all still addicted to Photoshop on Windows. Which is a pity, because it's an excellent program in its own right and perfectly suitable as a substitute for Photoshop for most users.

    8. Re:In my well paid opinion by Curtman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speaking of The GIMP, and logos... I wonder how your prudish friends would like this sucker.

      I say that seagull needs a big reefer too.

    9. Re:In my well paid opinion by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As far as graphic designers and marketers go (I'm a graphic designer, too, although I find that "salary" and "talent" are hardly synonymous), I think you're missing the point. Especially on the PR front.

      This was a PR ploy, and as such, was successful. Okay, so you're saying that the unschooled efforts of a 15-year-old are a poor reflection on a competition targeted at schools? Um. Yeah. As any good designer will tell you, the right design for the project.

      Secondly: opinions are subjective. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it didn't fulfill its purpose. Bad designers forget to target the average person and instead waste their time trying to impress other designers.

      Oh, and by the way: a mascot is not a logo, by any means; that's why we have two different names for them. Do you think the MGM lion, an easily recognizable and well-known mascot, would fulfill your criteria? No. Does that nullify the hitherto-successful history of MGM? No.

      A well-paid opinion does not make it a good opinion (although possibly a pompous one with an inferiority complex who takes pot shots at teenagers.) It just means that you're good at convincing other people with no artistic sensibilities that you know what you're doing.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    10. Re:In my well paid opinion by ShinmaWa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The mascot is simply amateurish.

      Maybe because it was done by a child... I dunno.

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    11. Re:In my well paid opinion by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The what?

      Guh-new Image Manipulation program?

      Guh-what?

      Guh-new, G.N.U.

      WTF?

      Guh-new's not Unix

      What's Unix?

      An Operating system, don't worry about it, it's the Guh-new Image Manipulation Program.

      That's stupid.

      No, it's great, check out www.gimp.org

      Haha. Nice try, that's a hardcore porn site right? I don't think I want to hang around with you anymore.

      I'm serious, it's a graphic program, it's great, it's written by free software devlopers. It's licensed under the GPL.

      The GPL?

      The Guh-new public license

      You're frightening me.

      Try the GIMP, it's not very good on Windows though, you should try it on Linux.

      I think I'll stick to Photoshop. There's a new version coming out. Check out this glossy book I picked up.

      I don't have to pay for my documentation.

      Where is it?

      www.gimp.org

      Ooooh Kaaay. I've got work to do now, please leave.

    12. Re:In my well paid opinion by Catbeller · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You beat me to it on the "GIMP" comment.

      Why, OH WHY, can't nerds come up with names for their projects that don't sound like overt attempts to make the straights grimace?

      Names matter.

      Ogg Vorbis? I get where the name comes from, being a rabid Pratchett fan, but what does it have to do with a sound file format? Why not .snd or .mus or .tun or .trx? OGG? How do you market that? It sounds like someone trying to cough up mucus! You're supposed to be marketing to people who like music! The name should be as cool as the tunes it's playing.

      No one gets the joke, even if there was a joke (or a bad pun). PRATCHETT people don't get it. A combination of the torturer priest inSmall Gods and the family name of the witch Gytha Ogg of Lancre? WTF??

      The GIMP? The name of some poor bastard imprisoned in a box, zipped up in filthy leather from head to toe, tortured for months until he loses his mind and identifies with his torturers? This is a name you want to drop at the art department at Cosmo when you're trying to convince them that it's better to use open source than Photoshop? You want to put up a name meaning ultimate degradation to people who want to deal with beauty? Are you TRYING to fail?

      Now a bloody seagull. Not just a seagull, but a freaked out, stoned seagull. For kids. And the office environment.

      ARRGGGHHHHH.

      Now I can hear the snorks and wheezing laughter out there as all the geeks cut loose. It is ultimate geek humor, I know, to make up a totally inappropriate name to describe a prosaic project. If the dumbasses out there can't take a joke, fuck 'em.

      Which is why geeks don't do marketing. They don't do GUI's either. Not much into making music. They don't identify with the common herd, so there it is: they torpedo their own projects in the real world.

      I mean, what else can I say? Ogg should have been OpenSound, GIMP should have been OpenDraw, and OpenOffice should have a more mainstream symbol.

  33. AWESOE!!! Here's why... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Interesting
    First, know that the "OK" sign in many countries is considered vulgar, and in a lot of Europe is a way to signify a pussy, vagina, female genitalia, in a vulgar regerence.

    Second, know that a fish, in the united states, is a non-direct however clear reference to the same. Pussy. Vagina. The odor of both is what has made the two a match in American vernacular.

    Now, look at the photo again, and you will see a hard-core, sex crazed bird with two big references to pussy. I am laughing so hard right now I can't breathe. Need... help... and a 15 year old girl created this?!?!? Arrg.... short of breath.... help... too... funny...

    1. Re:AWESOE!!! Here's why... by Rahga · · Score: 2, Informative

      On the first point, most people who would be offended by the "OK" sign are very well aware of its popular use in America and several other countries...

      The fish, however... No, I don't think they 'match in American vernacular'. I'd say smells in either would have more to do with bacteria (death in one, treatable conditions in the other) than anything else. When I think of "Long John Silver's", my gutterthoughts don't go any lower than "Silverfish Platter".

  34. As if they care? by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 2, Funny
    The "OK" sign is another way of referring to the female genetalia in some countries, and is considered obscene...

    Given all the European snickering about Americans complaining when Janet Jackson showed a tit on TV, I would think they wouldn't care about hand gestures. :-)

    1. Re:As if they care? by rsidd · · Score: 4, Funny
      At the same time they scold us for freaking over a nipple (hey, I'll agree to that extent), they would scold us for a stoned gull making an "obscene" gesture?

      Janet J wasn't using her tit to promote a free software office suite for educational use.

  35. Pretty rude gesture to be making by wardude · · Score: 2, Informative
    I think some cultures may be offended by the sign the bird is flashing with its free wing. Ranks up there with the raised middle finger for some.

    Before you pick a logo, or mascot, it is wise to consult with experts. Just wait until the Germans get online in a few hours.

  36. Re:That's just stupid by Bricklets · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People laughed at MS's attempts to have things like paperclips, and you go and find something worse?

    I don't think they hated the paperclip because it was too cute. It could have been a hot chick for all they care and they probably would have hated just as much.

    --
    Little Bricklets
  37. Oh, lord no! by brandonY · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, let's go with Phoenix's attempt at brand identity. I mean Firebird. Whoops, I mean Firefox.

  38. Logo for OOoEdu not OOorg by stateofmind · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm so tired of Slashdot not better proofing it's submissions. My first thought was, are they serious? So much for being taken serious.

    I don't read every single submission on Slashdot, but like to at least scan through the different headlines, etc. If CNN had this many errors, they would be a laughing stock.

  39. I don't know... by jellybear · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrgghh!!!!

  40. It's official by KnightStalker · · Score: 4, Funny

    open source mascots MUST EAT FISH. Seriously. Besides the obvious Tux, demons, gimps and gnomes certainly eat fish. Blowfish eat other fish. (I didn't look that up. I'm just assuming, for the sake of my argument, that they do.) A few members of Monty Python were in a movie where Kevin Kline ate live goldfish. Platypuses (the Darwin project) eat fish.

    There is nothing even remotely fish-related about the wildebeest. What does this mean for the GNU project?

    --
    * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
  41. WOW by drsmack1 · · Score: 2

    That is pretty much the most un-professional image I have ever seen. I really don't think that the path to acceptance will be eased by this sort of thing. Help us out here guys - we're trying to get you in but you gotta act right!

  42. Slashdotted... by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please accept this ascii art as a token of my appreciation to OO.org.

    \|||||/ This
    --| |-- is
    --{o} {o}-- not
    *bbbbbbbb*|||- an
    *bbbb*|||- offensive
    (|||) post.
    (|||)
    \/ / \ /\
    O|| / \-/|/
    | |
    \- |----/
    \-| |(o /
    \---( \
    | |----\
    | |
    / \
    -- -- Thank you, Andrea Maggioni

  43. We understand the qualifiers, but still... by roj3 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    >>1) This is just the mascot for OOOEdu, not OOo.
    >>2) It was a childs drawing, who won a competition.
    >>I think it's quite cute.

    The problem is, it doesn't matter if it's "just" the mascot for OOOedu -- it reflects on the entire OO.org brand. Unfortunately, it communicates "sloppy, stoned bird," rather than "whimsical kid-friendly software."

    The idea of using a kid's drawing is good, but as you see, the results leave you explaining it EVERY TIME ("see.. it was drawn by a kid.. see?). What about incorporating the feedback of kids? What about working with kids to come up with various themes? or having various schools vote on a selection of professional designs?

    Cute isn't going to win us (the open source software movement) any battles.

  44. This is stupid too by AvantLegion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    how do you expect to be taken seriously when that's your logo?

    Yeah. Because a penguin is not silly at all.

    Uhmm.....

  45. As a professional graphic designer... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a professional graphic designer, I'd have to disagree. Moreover, I image most of my colleagues would have opinions similar to the one I am about to voice.

    That seagull somewhat works as a mascot (which it is) but not a logo.

    Logos need to be simple color pallet . Moreover, logo's need to be scalable and preferably vector based. They should be recognizable at 3/4 squared as well as 4 feet squared. These factors allow one to easily apply a logo to a building, sign, letterhead, etc. Giant complicated bitmap logos are only going to give you problems.

    Moreover, simple logos are easier and faster for a human brain to retain. (psychology and sociology are fairly important subjects for graphic designers to understand) People are more likely to gain sense of familiarity and comfortability with a simple logo.

    But... anywho... I could go on and on.
    Suffice to say, I'm not a big fan of the seagull in it's current state. Mascots can get by with silly complicated forms since they are (usually) not logos. However simplifying their characterization usually increases there ability to gain acceptance.

    The seagull is a good start, but it could be cleaned up a bit.

    just my 2cents

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  46. That OK gesture by godblessthenet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So it's been brought up that the OK gesture is offensive in Europe, but has anyone noticed that this girl is FROM Europe? Italy, in particular: "A short interview with Andrea follows, translated from the Italian . . . ."

    "You know, when you are 15/16 years old you have several things on your mind other than work... ;-)"
    Apparently that's very true.

  47. I can't believe what I'm reading here by slipstick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess it's time to go back to proprietary software because the Free Software group has obviously lost their drive for just general fun. Sure that mascot looks a little crazy but for crying out loud this is "free" software. You want world domination go clone Napoleon or something.

    Damn people have some fun will you.

    --
    Sure information wants to be free, but how much are you willing to pay for the packaging?
  48. Andrea is a boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Andrea is a boy, he has 16 years old.
    In Italy Andrea is a boy name.

  49. Re:OK by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 3, Funny

    Didn't you know that there's a certain substance in meat that stimulates the production of a neurotransmitter known as "Sanitonin". Without sanitonin, you generally start to lose your mind. This is particularly a problem in eastern nations that don't eat a lot of meat and are therefore particularly open to exploit by crazy political systems.

    I've heard that asparagus actually contains a neurotoxin that completely defeats the effect of sanitonin. It's called insanitonin.

    I don't eat asparagus.

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  50. Target audience? by antic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who's the target here? If kids are making the decision to roll out OO in schools, then by all means go with the demented bird, but if you're trying to sway Principals or MS-happy IT staff, then you might want to choose something that suggests professionalism, reliability, and easy for kids to use.

    The retarded bird says unprofessional, flaky, and unattractive.

    The competition was surely a great idea to get awareness up amongst kids, but I wouldn't run around with that bird as a letterhead to managers of schools and boards representing schools.

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    1. Re:Target audience? by zCyl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      then you might want to choose something that suggests professionalism, reliability, and easy for kids to use.

      The retarded bird says unprofessional, flaky, and unattractive.


      You could just as well be making fun of Big Bird there. Principles are not the same as CEO's. Principles are generally aware that they're watching over children.

    2. Re:Target audience? by kotj.mf · · Score: 3, Funny
      Principles are not the same as CEO's.

      Got that right. Hell, you usually don't read about them in the same sentance, even.

      --
      hang brain.
  51. Re:Sea gull?? by ikewillis · · Score: 2, Funny
    They must have wanted an aquatic animal that will compete with a penguin for food!

    Speaking of which, the fish that seagull is holding looks a bit too happy for the situation he's in...

  52. So much for internationalisation by adrianbaugh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a shame - the "OK" gesture the bird is making is not universal in its meaning. In Brazil, Germany and Russia it indicates a certain private orifice and is an insult. In France, it is also an insult. It denotes the number zero or the concept of something being worthless.
    I believe in Japan it means something like "I want my change in coins" which, although not particularly insulting, is pretty irrelevant.

    Perhaps a "thumbs-up" gesture ought to be GIMPed over the top, at least as part of an i18n package for the countries affected.

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  53. Cracked out gull teaches a lesson by hassassin9 · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Okay, so I realize that this contest was for kids...but not only is the selection ridiculous looking, it's bordering on socially irresponsible:

    1) FIRST OF ALL, the seagull looks like it's on drugs (and loving it might i add) with his "Drugs are A OK" hand signal

    2) SECONDLY, he's holding a fish that everyone who saw it knows is gonna be devoured by this bird with a bad case of the munchies, and the fish's smile is disturbing (side note: if the fish looked more like Bill Gates, then you might be getting somewhere)

    3) THIRDLY, the gull and the fish look a hell of a lot like that little Disney movie, and the Disney Law trolls might come after you. And even if they didn't, with plagiarism running rampant in our school systems, promoting such a blatant rip-off is negligent at best.

    Okay, so let's recap...this mascot is endorsing drug usage, plagiarism...and savage consumption of your smiling prey...yep, sounds like an education program to me...OOooo...perfect.

    Visit www.DailyWireless.com for wireless industry news, research, insight, and analysis.

  54. Image problem with almost all free software by capn_buzzcut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The seagull mascot sucks. I know it's for educational use, but it still sucks. Too complex, too flippant, and just plain unprofessional. This is the same general problem with a lot of free software; image. It's not just the logo or mascot either, it's even the names. Case in point, "Windows Internet Explorer" with a clean 3D looking 'e' as it's logo. Compare to "Mozilla" with it's stupid dinosaur logo. Now, any idiot can guess what IE is and what it does simply by the name, and the logo is simple and translates cleanly even in black and white. Can the same be said for Mozilla? NO!! Same goes for The Gimp and host of other really great software. And don't even get me started on the KDE "Kandalf" help screen thing.

    This is the same problem with a whole bunch of free Linux based software; compared to their Windows counterparts, their names, logos, and general lack of polish make them look like something cooked up by a bunch of social misfits, hell-bent on being obtuse and cryptic just for the sake of being 133t.

    --
    "And now, Frank N. Furter, your time has come. Say 'goodbye' to all of this, and 'hello'... to oblivion!"
  55. Re:It was the best entry out of the bunch... by Stick_Fig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did. There's no reason NOT to expect quality for an educational sub-project. Just because it's for kids doesn't mean it has to look like crap. They are going to want to use it for a lot of things related to promotion of the sub-project. For all intensive purposes, YES, it is a logo. They want to identify their sub-project with it. Sounds like a logo to me. If MS were doing something similar for kids or education, it'd beat the snot out of this, hate to say it.

    Sorry, MS and Apple have the bar up HERE for marketing.










    A lot of open source stuff is down here. And they'll continue to be down here if the "aww jeez, it's good enough" crowd continues to chant their battle cry.

    --
    ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.