Slashdot Mirror


Phatbot Author Arrested In Germany

Tacito writes "After arresting the author of Sasser, the German police claims having caught the author of Phatbot. To read the corresponding articles on Yahoo! News or Heise (use babelfish)." jm.one adds a link to an "awesome Google translation" of the Heise article.

190 comments

  1. Fucking Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Trying to revive the Reich by destroying Patriotic American Technology. All of Germany should be held responsible for the actions of these individuals.

    1. Re:Fucking Nazis by openmtl · · Score: 1
      Ha, and where did all the US missile know-how come from after the 2nd world war ?.

      Sounds like this guys got a job at Microsoft if he wants !.

      --

  2. Germany is Busy! by mfh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Germany is really cracking down today! Either that, or perhaps the Sasser writer gave up the Phatbot author? I'm guessing that one arrest lead to the other, considering Phatbot is a Sasser derivative.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Germany is Busy! by Jane_Dozey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'd give you 3 positive points for a good try and 3 negative points for being unoriginal.
      Also, -1 for being offtopic, but we're both guilty of that one.

      --
      Silly rabbit
    2. Re:Germany is Busy! by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, Phatbot (or Agobot, which seems to be the more correct name) is NOT a Sasser derivative. Recent Agobot version were extended for attacking Microsoft Windows machines using the same LSASS defect, but this doesn't make Agobot make a derivative of Sasser.

    3. Re:Germany is Busy! by henni16 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the connection;reading the articles on heise:

      (- AFAIK Phatbot uses Sasser backdoors as one of many spreading options and is not a real derivative)

      - according to German police the phatbot author was one of four people they were investigating because of hints they got from "US authorities"

      - the Sasser author was caught because of a phone call of (someone close to the author) to Microsoft:
      the caller was claiming to know the Sasser-author and offered some code snippets as "proof";
      then Microsoft contacted the authorities

      - both have been arrested yesterday evening, so there was not much time between the arrests

      - the arrests and investigations in both cases were made by different LKAs ("county police departments": Niedersachsen (Sasser) and Baden Wuerttemberg(Phatbot)

      - it was said by LKA Baden Wuerttemberg that there were no direct links known between both suspects, but both LKAs announced a close cooperation in further investigations

    4. Re:Germany is Busy! by syragon · · Score: 1

      or perhaps the Sasser writer gave up the Phatbot author

      According to that Heise article the LKA claims that there are "no signs of a direct connection" between the Sasser & Phatbot author yes ... but who knows?

  3. Hah by Bishop,+Martin · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, German Authorities claim they have caught the moth that got caught in the Mark II. News at 11.

    --
    Setec Astronomy
    1. Re:Hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amidst the Phatbot author's personal effects, they found the dismembered Beagle Mars rover...

    2. Re:Hah by lophophore · · Score: 1

      I guess it got loose from Grace's notebook, then.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
  4. When asked about the arrest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Police Sgt. Schultz said "I know NOTHING! NOTHING!!"

    1. Re:When asked about the arrest by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1, Troll

      To which the reporter said "Oh yeah? Vee have vays of making you talk!"

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    2. Re:When asked about the arrest by Eggz+Factor · · Score: 1

      most of which you will not like....

      "put that freakin sandwich down!"

      --
      blah, blah, blah...
  5. Rolled over by doormat · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I bet the sasser author rolled over on the phatbot author.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  6. Blah blah by Leffe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I must say that I find it very interesting that people are able to spread worms this fast nowadays. Back in the day it took weeks or months to see something, and most people had already patched the worms by then, but now it's crazy, a worm can propagate to the entire world in a day! Even faster than DNS :D Maybe something for the BIND developers to consider?

    1. Re:Blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must say that I find it very interesting that people are able to spread worms this fast nowadays.

      By the year 2015, all lawyers will be abolished. So the justice system will move quite swiftly as well.

    2. Re:Blah blah by fhic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I remember when we had to find a box, mail the deck of cards to the next guy, find an address of that guy at UICU to mail the last deck to....

    3. Re:Blah blah by pipingguy · · Score: 0, Funny


      Back in the day...

      Which specific day was that again?

    4. Re:Blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello? The Morris Unix worm took out the entire internet within a couple days.

    5. Re:Blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't the Morris worm spread quickly ?

    6. Re:Blah blah by Feanturi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I must say that I find it very interesting that people are able to spread worms this fast nowadays. Back in the day it took weeks or months to see something, and most people had already patched the worms by then, but now it's crazy, a worm can propagate to the entire world in a day!

      This should not be surprising. Back in the day, there were far fewer machines on the net, and therefore fewer opportunities for something to spread, particularly if it was attacking random IP's, most of which would have been unused. Now it's a different story. Pick a number, and there's a good chance you've got some kind of host there. A nice soft and juicy vulnerable host almost everywhere you stab. That was not the case back in the day.

    7. Re:Blah blah by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe something for the BIND developers to consider?

      Umm... no. It's a lot easier to propagate if you need no hierarchy. Imagine trying to tell the whole Internet about a DNS change with no plan. How many DNS updates do you think your box would get? And the overhead in the PKI system you would need to have to ensure they're real?

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:Blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      a worm can propagate to the entire world in a day!
      Try 10 minutes. Google for "warhol worm". Be afraid, be very very afraid. If a worm like that had a destructive payload (not just wiping HDDs, but think flashing BIOS, overdriving monitors etc.), the material and immaterial damages would be counted in billions or trillions of dollars.

      Disconnect from the network now, before it's too late.

    9. Re:Blah blah by _w00d_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This should not be surprising. Back in the day, there were far fewer machines on the net, and therefore fewer opportunities for something to spread, particularly if it was attacking random IP's, most of which would have been unused. Now it's a different story. Pick a number, and there's a good chance you've got some kind of host there. A nice soft and juicy vulnerable host almost everywhere you stab. That was not the case back in the day.

      Not only that but the people on the net back in the day were more technically savvy than the average Internet user today. Everyone and their brother has net access now including ignorant people who run anything people send them.

  7. Er, did this really need a new news item? by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 1

    This info was mentioned in the referenced slashdot story.

  8. Freaky... by robslimo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just heard this news on NPR and thought I'd submit it to /. but I was scooped. NPR said that he was a "student" and lived with his parents. They said he admitted to being the Sasser worm author but failed to mention the Phatbot connection.

    Here's an English language report that mentions a Microsoft connection.

    1. Re:Freaky... by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the article, there *is* no connection between the two. Phatbot was developed from Agobot.

      US Authorities aparently provided the tip-offs in catching both authors.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    2. Re:Freaky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "...he was a "student" and lived with his parents."

      I bet the profilers never expected THAT kind of character would release a virus.

      On a different note: is anyone interested in joining the Angry Loner's Rifle Association? Our motto: "Be a quiet man, and keep to yourself".

    3. Re:Freaky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it said intelligent.

    4. Re:Freaky... by icekillis · · Score: 0
      Germany? computer freak? alone? living with parents? --- armed with virus that can take anything from 12.4% of the worlds computers?
      NPR Breaking News: The world's biggest pr0n collection has also been discovered!
  9. he is also responsible for netsky by pinky99 · · Score: 2, Informative

    say some sources (www.heise.de).
    this is subject to a press conference to be held tomorrow.

    well that`s somehow impressive, which should not mean admirable ...

    1. Re:he is also responsible for netsky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sasser author is allegedly also responsible for the Netsky worm. The Phatbot (and Agobot) author(s) are not.

    2. Re:he is also responsible for netsky by JPriest · · Score: 3, Informative

      Can't you people get anything right? The Sasser author allegedly did Netsky.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    3. Re:he is also responsible for netsky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "well that`s somehow impressive, which should not mean admirable ..."

      be cautious, you almost committed a thought crime there...

  10. Okay Now by jchawk · · Score: 0

    Now let's take them both out into the street and tar and feather them... :-)

    1. Re:Okay Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't you mean tar and gzip them? :)

    2. Re:Okay Now by darkonc · · Score: 1

      I think that some people would rather use shred(1) .

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  11. In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got 'em as a result of interrogation. Just like Saddam.

  12. Put the... by Phidoux · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... phatbot author in a phat jail cell behind some phatbars, and that's only because he doesn't know how to spell FAT!

    1. Re:Put the... by Mononoke · · Score: 3, Funny
      Says Phidoux:
      ... phatbot author in a phat jail cell behind some phatbars, and that's only because he doesn't know how to spell FAT!
      Interesting, coming from someone who apparently can't spell Fido.

      ^_^

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    2. Re:Put the... by TheFairElf · · Score: 1

      This from someone who can't spell Fodo j/k

    3. Re:Put the... by squeedelyspooch · · Score: 1

      Phat is a word. It was added to the dictionary sometime during the 90's.

      Your vocabulary is out of date...

    4. Re:Put the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Phat" in "Phatbot" is short for "Pee Hat," so you see, it's possible that he does know how to spell "fat."

    5. Re:Put the... by daishin · · Score: 1

      Perhaps taking something phat up the...?

      --
      (\_/)
      (O.o) This is Bunny. Add Bunny to your signature
      (> <) to help him achieve world domination.
    6. Re:Put the... by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Who's going to play Colonel Klink?

  13. Got Evil? by grub · · Score: 3, Insightful


    I'm still waiting for the day that one of these things wipes out the infected host after X hours/days. Ebola spreads fast and kills the host, why not a virus/worm?

    I'll laugh when it happens.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Got Evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the ebola virus wasn't quite that bad:

      http://www.google.com.au/search?q=cache:GHkjYt3y hB kJ:securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/aut o/index/indexE.html++%22ebola%22+site:symantec.com &hl=en&ie=UTF-8

      But you have an interesting point: real viruses actually kill some (or sometimes, most) victims, those left alive having some immunity or just a naturally stronger constitution; the species improves. The same can't be said for computer viruses (ugly term, sorry), since the same machines are simply disinfected or re-installed, and just go on as before; I suppose the Chernobyl virus was an exception.

      Unfortunately, there is no mechanism that prevents people going out and buying operating systems that have little or no inherent immunity, nor is there a mechanism allowing diversity within a family of closed source operating system. Hmm, maybe I just advocated OSS...

    2. Re:Got Evil? by SpectreGadget · · Score: 1

      Unless it's your *nix box that's been wiped out. Just because Windows is the most wide-spread os, doesn't mean it couldn't happen to yours. Will you be laughing then?

      --
      Jim Harry
    3. Re:Got Evil? by ckuijjer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I always thought Ebola didn't spread really good because of it killing the host too quick. Maybe an analogy holds for computer viruses.

    4. Re:Got Evil? by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

      Happened to me a last month.... The critter that leveraged a weakness in a couple software firewalls would destroy random bits of disk. By the time I realized what had happened, my /WINNT/SYSTEM directory was pretty much hosed. Lets just say a reboot did not fix things.

      Agreed, however... Just a matter of time before someone sticks a destructive payload on a more common exploit.

    5. Re:Got Evil? by grub · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I never said it couldn't happen to me (in fact I'm writing this on my Win2K game box). Any system has holes but once wide spread carnage hits the Windows world only then will Ma & Pa Kettle give a serious look at other more robust systems with less holes. I don't support Windows for family & friends and rarely have to touch it at work so I really don't care. I think it's tantamount to having to smack a dog on the nose with a rolled up newspaper to train it not to keep shitting on the carpet.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    6. Re:Got Evil? by ites · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is an analysis of this by HeironymousCoward. Basically a 'hot' virus like Ebola destroys its hosts too quickly for it to spread. So viruses tend to become 'cooler' over time. The loophole for computer viruses is that a wide-spread cool virus can become a vector for a new hot virus. So while one single virus is unlikely to do significant damage, a series of viruses could do very great damage. And you probably will not laugh when it happens.

      --
      Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    7. Re:Got Evil? by ChuyMatt · · Score: 1

      no no.... It doesn't spread really good because (as the title of your post indicates) it is Evil. What you outlined is why it does not spread WELL.

    8. Re:Got Evil? by GrassMunk · · Score: 1

      The simple answer is that kiddies amass these huge botnets to use against corporations or other people. They dont want to destroy their hosts they want a symbiotic relationship.

      With that said one day there's going to be a kill switch in the bot and the kiddie will get bored and just destroy his hosts.

    9. Re:Got Evil? by mean+pun · · Score: 1
      I always thought Ebola didn't spread really good because of it killing the host too quick. Maybe an analogy holds for computer viruses.

      I don't know about Ebola, but yes, in general this is an important aspect of the virulence of both biological and computer viruses.

    10. Re:Got Evil? by dodobh · · Score: 1

      See the Witty worm. It didn't target Windows, but basically infected its target, slammed out at 20K more nodes, then destroyed its host

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    11. Re:Got Evil? by brienv · · Score: 1
      I'm still waiting for the day that one of these things wipes out the infected host after X hours/days. Ebola spreads fast and kills the host, why not a virus/worm?

      I'll laugh when it happens.

      I have a few questions, which you probably won't answer.

      Why will you laugh when that happens?

      What do you think that says about you?

      Will you laugh when it happens to you?

    12. Re:Got Evil? by grub · · Score: 1


      Why will you laugh when that happens?
      Because it will happen. It's just a matter of time. Unfortunately MS doesn't care abour security as much as they care about market share and stock value.

      What do you think that says about you?
      There are countless things I don't care about, how voicing my opinion makes me look is one of them. "You get what you see." :)

      Will you laugh when it happens to you?
      I don't use it for email (ssh to my mail server), I don't surf the web with IE on it, I run through a firewall and proxy... Anyhow, as I said in my original post, the only Windows machine I have is only for games: if it happens I'll have to reinstall all my games, c'est la vie.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    13. Re:Got Evil? by alptraum · · Score: 1

      You somehow think that as long as your own box isn't infected, it won't affect you. How about your credit card company being taken down, or your bank? Wouldn't be so funny if you couldn't access any of your funds.

    14. Re:Got Evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bank (and I do know what they run) uses OS2 and AIX for their banking. The Windows machines don't touch the mission critical stuff.gtb

    15. Re:Got Evil? by randombit · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for the day that one of these things wipes out the infected host after X hours/days.

      Actually there was one like this recently, that attacked some Windows personal firewall (the name escapes me). It would try to spread itself for a short while (some hours), and then killed the host.

      Ebola spreads fast and kills the host, why not a virus/worm?

      Ebola also burns itself out pretty fast. Too fast and you limit how well it can spread. Probably you'd want to maximize the total number of machines destroyed, which is a tradeoff between how many hosts it can infect (ie, how long it tries to infect other hosts before it kills it's host), and how long it has before the AV people/IT staff/etc notice + fix it. I would guess around 16-24 hours would be right; more if you released at some really bad time like Christmas Eve when 90% of staff will be on vacation in many countries.

    16. Re:Got Evil? by lgftsa · · Score: 1

      s/symbiotic/parasitic/

  14. what's up with these guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are they hacking from home or something? why aren't they using unsecured wifi or similar injection points?
    btw, it's trivial to get a system where you can change your ethernet MAC address and anything else that might be recorded
    not bragging about your exploits and working alone would help too, but that's a different matter altogether

  15. Phatbot capabilities by FooBarWidget · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Phatbot is insanely well-written. A while ago I read a web page about what Phatbot can do:
    - Exploits all kinds of vulnerabilities.
    - Sniffs network traffic for usernames and password.
    - Steal IRC operator passwords.
    - Can kill many other viruses and anti-virus software.
    - Can steal CD keys for popular games.
    - Can steal AOL passwords.
    - Can harvest emails for spam purposes.
    - And more.
    Whomever made Phatbot sure spent *a lot* of work into it.

    More details at: http://www.lurhq.com/phatbot.html
    Also contains instructions to manually remove it from an infected system.

    1. Re:Phatbot capabilities by glpierce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't it also possible that they just strung together code from a bunch of worms which did each of those things independently?

      --
      G
    2. Re:Phatbot capabilities by WilyCoder · · Score: 1

      Its pretty simple to Cut and Paste....

    3. Re:Phatbot capabilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another fine example of creature feap.

    4. Re:Phatbot capabilities by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Phatbot is insanely well-written. A while ago I read a web page about what Phatbot can do:

      Well written != capable. It's perfectly possible that this is just a bunch of exploits strung together, but that doesn't necessarily make it cohesive or "well written"..

      My $0.02 - well written or not, it's a nasty bugger.

      -Ben

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    5. Re:Phatbot capabilities by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 2, Informative

      More details at: http://www.lurhq.com/phatbot.html

      Note that Phatbot, as described on the page above, is mostly a failed experiment. That version uses WASTE to create the botnet, which is far less scalable than IRC. WASTE simply wasn't designed for the large number of clients typically in a single botnet.

      Apart from that, Agobot/Phatbot/Gaobot (or what's it called today) is fairly nasty. Some early reports from March quote numbers which suggest that between one and two million hosts have been compromised, and the bot still very active.

    6. Re:Phatbot capabilities by curator_thew · · Score: 1

      > Isn't it also possible that they just strung together code from a bunch of worms which did each of those things independently?

      Requiring a considerble effort of reverse engineering, reconstruction and then integration?

      Possible, and if so, then just as valid a reason for lauding it.

      (on technical grounds, not ethical)

    7. Re:Phatbot capabilities by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 3, Funny

      - Diagnoses network problems
      - Answers questions sent on AIM
      - Sets your minesweeper scores to 9 seconds
      - Makes hot chocolate

    8. Re:Phatbot capabilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kiddies share/trade(for other code or botnets)/steal(open source projects) source code and rarely give credit passed their group of friends.

    9. Re:Phatbot capabilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the source is just a souped up version of agobot. by the way, a lot of the phatbot source is gpl'd.

    10. Re:Phatbot capabilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't have to be wellwritten to do a lot of things. I've written a few programs that's a mishmash of code... they do a lot of things and quite well so, but they're not wellwritten by any definition of the word. Mostly because the damn specs keep changing all the time. Damn my boss.

  16. Real Justice by gizmonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    If convicted, they should force him to work end user tech support during his jailtime. Of course, I'm sure some treaty out there would deem that cruel and unusual punishment and recommend execution as a more humane alternative. :)

    --
    WWJD?
    JWRTFM!
    1. Re:Real Justice by Mudcathi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "If convicted, they should force him to work end user tech support during his jailtime."

      Yeah right! Convict tech support: I think we can help you with that problem, Mr. Customer, but first we'll need your user ID, password, and a valid credit card..."

      --

      "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

    2. Re:Real Justice by linzeal · · Score: 1
      I'll work end user support, pick me! I need a job in this damn small town doing somethign tech or I'll be some retail floor sales droid this summer.

    3. Re:Real Justice by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure there is any reason to deport him to India... bu dum CHING. Thank you I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your waitress.

    4. Re:Real Justice by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      If that is the case, then you could get all the CC#s you would ever want.

      Why are we cautious of giving our CC# on the internet but, we will give it to any min-wage employee?

      The "I can punch the bastard out" rationale doesn't apply.

    5. Re:Real Justice by nurbman · · Score: 1
      It would be a better punishment if he was restricted to supporting the following clientele:

      Male: Over 70, yells at kids to "get off the grass", drives wearing a hat, hard of hearing

      Female: Over 60, thinks everything is "lovely", collects pretty watercolors, has more than 2 cats

  17. Phatbot is not a derivative of Sasser by httptech · · Score: 4, Informative
    considering Phatbot is a Sasser derivative

    Who told you that? I've analyzed both, and there is no relation between them at all in terms of code. The source code to Phatbot is public, and the compiled binary is around 250-300K as opposed to Sasser's 15K. Maybe you're thinking about Phatbot being a derivative of Agobot.

    My writeups of both can be found here:
    http://www.lurhq.com/phatbot.html
    http://www.lurhq.com/sasser.html

  18. Send those twits to the US.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    so that they can find out what "exploiting a backdoor" is all about.

  19. English link by azav · · Score: 2

    http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/arch ive/2004/05/08/international1226EDT0513.DTL

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:English link by Bishop,+Martin · · Score: 1

      The link doesn't work

      --
      Setec Astronomy
    2. Re:English link by azav · · Score: 1

      Yoikes. Sorry about that.

      http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/ar ch ive/2004/05/08/international1226EDT0513.DTL

      Just tested this one.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    3. Re:English link by azav · · Score: 1

      CRAP! When I post the link to slashdot, a space is inserted in the URL. Remove the space and the link is fine.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    4. Re:English link by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's cuz Slash breaks it up to avoid the page widening trolls.

      Here's the link...

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    5. Re:English link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods..."

      It's called a slashdot.

    6. Re:English link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Please learn how to use links.
      <a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/new s/archive/2004/05/08/international1226EDT0513.DTL" >English link</a>
      yields: English link
  20. Assuming he is the right one (II) by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
    Sorry, no sympathy for this guy either...

    Previous Post

  21. tipped by Microsoft Reward programm ? by S3D · · Score: 2, Informative

    In google news: HANOVER, Germany (Reuters) - A tip from reward-seekers and information from Microsoft led to the arrest of an 18-year-old suspected of creating the "Sasser" computer worm, German police and the software giant said on Saturday. Spokesman Frank Federau for Lower Saxony police said police were certain they had the man behind one of the Internet's most costly outbreaks of sabotage. "We are absolutely certain that this really is the creator of the Internet worm because Microsoft experts were involved in the inquiry and confirmed our suspicions and because the suspect admitted to it," he said in an interview with Reuters Television. It was the lure of cash that proved the man's undoing. A group of individuals from Lower Saxony approached Microsoft (MSFT.O: Quote, Profile, Research) on Wednesday inquiring about reward money should they turn in the man. The U.S. software giant in the past has put bounties of up to $250,000 on the heads of other notorious virus writers. Microsoft general consul Brad Smith told reporters the company agreed to pay the informants if there is a conviction. "They did not stumble upon him through technical analysis. They were aware of who he was," Smith said, declining to elaborate on their relationship to the suspect and saying only the number of informants was less than five. The economic toll of Sasser may never be known, but it claimed some big scalps, including Germany's Deutsche Post (DPWGn.DE: Quote, Profile, Research) , Britain's coastguard stations and investment bank Goldman Sachs (GS.N: Quote, Profile, Research) . "COMPUTER FREAK" Federau said the man, who he described as a highly intelligent "computer freak" living with his parents, was arrested on Friday near the central German town of Rotenburg but was no longer in custody. Authorities and Microsoft said they suspect the man created all the versions of Sasser, adding he worked alone He is also believed to be a main person, if not the mastermind, behind the Netsky viruses that have been plaguing Internet users since February, Smith said. All the man's computers were confiscated by police, Federau said. Since appearing one week ago, Sasser has wreaked havoc on personal computers running on the ubiquitous Microsoft Windows 2000, NT and XP operating systems, but is expected to slow down as computer users download anti-virus patches. The computing underground responsible for hatching worms and viruses has proved a difficult ring to crack for law enforcement and security experts were surprised at the rapid arrest. (Additional reporting by Bernhard Warner in London and James Mackenzie in Hanover) © Reuters 2004. All Rights Reserved.

    1. Re:tipped by Microsoft Reward programm ? by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      NEWS: "HANOVER, Germany" soon to be renamed "HANDOVER, Germany"

  22. And people in germany are allways complaining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    about this country falling behind when it comes to technology. Rejoice, it doesnt seem to be that bad after all.

  23. Umlauts not required by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Funny


    When asked for a comment, one German prosecution authority said:

    Ich bein ein kickinassenviruswriter.

    1. Re:Umlauts not required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nah, he said "Ich bin ein phat Berliner"

  24. Manual Translation of Yahoo Article by LucidityZero · · Score: 5, Informative

    Please note, I am merely an American German Student. Any native German speakers are welcome to correct me:


    Stuttgart (AP) - The presumed programming of the computer worm "Phatbot" was apprehended this weekend: as the state criminal police agency in Stuttgart and the responsible public prosecutor's office communicated on Saturday, an unemployed 21 year old was arrested near Lörrach. He admitted to having programmed, with other hackers, the Trojan "Agobot", which was later renamed to "Phatbot". There is currently no known direct connection between him and the "Sasser" programmer arrested in Niedersachsen.

    The authorities searched for evidence on Friday, through the apartment of the suspect, as well as five possible accomplices in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Niedersachen, Hamburg and Bavaria. Numerous documents as well as computers and storage media were confiscated, and would have to be examined further. References from US Authorities helped provide evidence for the arrest of the suspect.

    The 21 year-old had already aimed attacks at US and Brittish companies in 2003. The companies concerned were offline for several days and suffered damages in the millions. Also in Germany it was indicated that the suspect penetrated company computers. Aside from just the criminal consequences, substantial compesnation demands may be made.

    The trojan mentioned is transferred to unsuspecting computers in order to take control of them. The initial evidence of the authorities of Baden-Württemberg points to the 21 year-old using the "Sasser" in order to develop the much more dangerous worm "Agobot/Phatbot".

    --
    Sig.i>
    1. Re:Manual Translation of Yahoo Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The presumed PROGRAMMING of the computer worm "Phatbot" was apprehended this weekend..."

      Obiously, English is also a second language. I smell fish (of the Babel variety).

    2. Re:Manual Translation of Yahoo Article by flyingdisc · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I had a similar interpretation of the article.

      What I don't understand however is how
      "There is currently no known direct connection between him and the "Sasser" programmer arrested in Niedersachsen."

      is consistent with
      "initial evidence of the authorities of Baden-Württemberg points to the 21 year-old using the "Sasser" in order to develop the much more dangerous worm "Agobot/Phatbot".

      any ideas? or am I missing something.

    3. Re:Manual Translation of Yahoo Article by jschrod · · Score: 3, Informative
      Quite good translation.

      One correction, though: The German article said that "Sasser" was used to spread "Phatbot", not to develop it.

      --

      Joachim

      People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

    4. Re:Manual Translation of Yahoo Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They mean that he somehow based some of the phatbot code on Sasser (although he didn't know the writer).

    5. Re:Manual Translation of Yahoo Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm just some german and therefore not an native english speaker some suggestions I have for the translation are:

      References from US Authorities helped provide evidence for the arrest of the suspect.

      References from US Authorities helped finding the suspect.

      The 21 year-old had already aimed attacks at US and Brittish companies in 2003.

      This sounds for me like it is already proven but in german it is more like, the prosecutor believe it was so. Otherwise he would have been charged in 2003.

      The last paragraph is more like a general explanation about trojans.
      So:
      A trojan is transferred to unsuspecting computers in order to take control of them.
      Would be better I believe.

      mfg

      X3K6A2

      me@x3k6a2.net

  25. roght transl of yahoo news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yahoo

    Stuttgart (AP) The assumedly programmer of the computer virus has been arrested this weekend. As federal police authorities and the public attorney's office told, a 21 year old umemployed has been arrested. He has confessed to programmed agobot together with other programmed, which was later renamed to phatbot.

    Until now there is no evidence for a connection between him and the sasser programmer, which has been arrested in "Niedersachsen" (a federal state of Germany)

    Authorities said, they searched the house of the suspect and those of 5 other hackers (from Baden-Würtemberg, Niedersachsen, Hamburg Bavaria) on friday, Several documents, computers and storage media has been secured. They told the suspects have been traced because of evidence from US-authorities.

    Evidence also indicate that 21 year old has been selective attacking companies from the US and Great Britain since 2003. Those companies have been offline for several days and the attacks caused damage worth millions(?) of dollars. PCs of german companies have been infiltrated, too. Besides the penal they will also be sued for high compensation.

    So called "trojans" have been used to infiltrate other computers in order to get control of them. According to the evidence of the authorities of Baden Würtemberg the 21 year old used the worm sasser to spread his self-developed and much more dangerous worm agobot/phatbot.

    a rought translation, sorry for the mistakes - english is not my native-language :-)

  26. Is there a connection between Phatbot and Sasser? by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Could the authors of both worms be part of some German Cyber Terrorist group?

    It seems most worms originate from other countries besides the USA. Could the worms be part of some Cyber Terrorist attack? If so, who is funding the development of these worms?

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  27. Stop disinformation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, the sasser author was a 18 year old german. Phatbot author is reported to be 21 years old. Do not mix these two.
    Phatbot author has not done anything that is truly illegal, atleast not publicly reported. All he has done is write source code. Source code is free speech, and the code even has a license.
    Sasser author on the other hand create a _worm_ and set it loose on the internet. Phatbot/Agobot is _NOT_ a worm, even though some AV's claim it is.

  28. In this guy's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Saddam Hussein or the 9/11 terrorists had written this worm, there would have been no accountability for it whatsoever.

  29. Re:Is there a connection between Phatbot and Sasse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who is funding the development of these worms?

    Mountain Dew, Mcdonalds, Krispy Kreme, Haggen daas

  30. ROBOT HOUSE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hehehe...phatbot

  31. YOU ARE WANTED BY GERMAN POLICE! by urbieta · · Score: 1

    or the riaa? anyways next time I pucblish a paper Ill make sure NOBODY is able to trace it back to me :)

  32. Re:Is there a connection between Phatbot and Sasse by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Amazing as it may seem, not everyone who is out to do damage is part of a terrorist group. No, seriously! Probably only 0.5% of your average doing-bad-things person is a member of a terrorist organisation. I was as shocked as you are, it's incredible! All these people running around causing trouble without having the decency to live in a country you can bomb. I've found that you can actually travel around huge areas of Europe without even running into a terrorist, even in France!&lt/sarcasm>

    Why exactly do they need to be funded? Ever thought that they might be doing it because they get some deranged kick out of it, or so thay can brag about it or simply because they're sodding mental?

  33. Re:Is there a connection between Phatbot and Sasse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They're members of the "Phatbin laden" terrorist group.

  34. So what is illegal about it? by hanssprudel · · Score: 3, Insightful


    From reading your description, it doesn't seem like Phatbot is a worm at all, but rather a trojan worse / remote administration tool. If all the guy did was write a trojan horse, and there is no evidence that he himself has been using it on other peoples machines, then he should not be under arrest. Source code is speech, right?

    Bets are, that on The New Slashdot (tm) - you know, the one where stories about DMCA attacks are full of attacks against the coders rather than the company (Apple!) - this story will be full of people commending a the arrest of this guy for nothing other than writing software...

    1. Re:So what is illegal about it? by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, if all he did was write it, and someone else let it loose on the net, then perhaps he shouldn't be under arrest.

      On the other hand, I'm having a hard time imagining what benign uses this thing could be put to. With DVD/e-book decrypters/rippers you can claim fair use, with port scanners you can claim that you're testing security of your own network, but with a worm? It's designed solely to infiltrate a host and spread - I can't think of any benign uses, let alone significant ones...

      If you knowingly create something that can only be used for ill, then I think that you should be held responsible for its use.

    2. Re:So what is illegal about it? by rtfm · · Score: 1

      agreed. take this for example... let's say i build a bomb, leave it in my garage, and a friend comes over and picks it up in his car. later, he blows something up using it and lots of people are injured. am i not partially responsible?

      people that do shit like this claiming "academic interest" are full of it. at the end of the day, you don't build someting like this unless you intend on using it.

      --
      "Here's 50 bucks, take this in case I get drunk and call you a bitch later." - Ricky (Vince Vaughn)Made (2001)
    3. Re:So what is illegal about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Source code is speech, right?

      Germany doesn't have a constitutional right to free speech in the same way as the US. There are some laws that address the subject, but they don't go nearly as far as their American equivalents.

      A good example of this is that, in Germany, denying the Holocaust is a criminal offence.

    4. Re:So what is illegal about it? by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Theoretically, if you were interested in writing something like this, you could create some form of protection to ensure its not run unless you tell it do so.

      Businessess build bombs all the time, but they don't generally let the public drive pick up trucks to the establishment.

      In any event, creating safeguards is a good CYA move, in the event something makes its way out.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    5. Re:So what is illegal about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it used various Windows exploits to spread. If a trojan has the capability to spread with no human input, it's a worm.

    6. Re:So what is illegal about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ah the age old technique of creating an inappropriate analogy to try and prove a point.

      If someone built a bomb and and knowingly let a friend take it then he would be an accomplice. If someone broke into his garage and stole it then he cannot be charged now can he. Same for the academics, if someone writes a virus and another person steals it (using whatever method you like)and releases it into the wild then the writer is not responsible for it infecting computers and causing damage.

      and yes, suprsisingly some peopel DO write this for academic interest, proof of concept programs, just seeing if you can do it etc etc.

      Just because you don't want to give something a try doens't mean no one else will, there ARE 6 billion different minds on this planet.

    7. Re:So what is illegal about it? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well, if you had actually read the description, you wouldn't have missed:
      [...]as it spreads from system to system.

      Can scan for and use the following exploits to spread itself to new victims[...]

      It's quite obviously a worm.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    8. Re:So what is illegal about it? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Actually, Germany does have a constitutional right to free speech, (Artikel 5 Grundgesetzbuch, the constition mandated in 1949 by the Western German government and the allied occupying forces) - it's just that Germany also has an article in the constitition dealing with getting rid of the remainder of the Nazis, obviously an important thing especially in 1949. What you're saying is basically right, anyway.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    9. Re:So what is illegal about it? by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      people that do shit like this claiming "academic interest" are full of it. at the end of the day, you don't build someting like this unless you intend on using it.

      If you'd ever know how many virus and worm related projects are written but not released "in the wild", you'd maybe talk different way. Self-replicating code is one of the more interesting areas of network-related programming. I remember writing code to defeat heuristics in virus scanners about a decade ago; it was a success (the essence was hooking timer interrupt and running a loop that was overwritten from the interrupt, and then couple more tricks) and was never released, nor intended to.

      If you never did anything for pure academic interest, I am sorry for you.

    10. Re:So what is illegal about it? by McSnarf · · Score: 1

      Code is NOT "free speech" - not in Germany. And Germany has laws against malware. I'd love to see the guy thrown in jail for some serious mental readjustment. Plus, of course, the companies sueing for damage...

    11. Re:So what is illegal about it? by jm.one · · Score: 0

      How likely is it that the code was "stolen"? Right. So just sit and wait until German police gives more details.

  35. Too many worms to be a coincidence by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Funny

    North Korea, for example, spends $3 Billion USD a year to have viruses developed. I wonder how many other countries have such a program?

    Hmmm, commit an act of Cyber Terrorism like release a worm into the wild, and just because you do not live in the middle-east, you are automatically not a terrorist?

    In the USA we have our own terrorists, perhaps you forgot about Oklahoma City?

    Terrorism knows no countries or races or religions, it is an equal opportunity employer.

    Yeah just a bunch of kids having fun.

    "Hey Gunthar, look at this worm I wrote, it takes 250K bytes of space."

    "That is nothing Wolfgang, my worm only takes 15K of code."

    "Ok Gunthar, let us release both of them onto the Internet and see which one wins!"

    "Ok, but afterwords let's brag about them on IRC."

    "Deal!"

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Too many worms to be a coincidence by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1
      Sorry that should have been $3 Million USD.


      North Korea is suspected of training hackers.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:Too many worms to be a coincidence by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Hmmm, commit an act of Cyber Terrorism like release a worm into the wild, and just because you do not live in the middle-east, you are automatically not a terrorist?


      Wrong! You're not a terrorist because releasing a worm isn't terrorism.

      Until the public starts to be actually terrified by computer worms, it's not terrorism. I thought that was obvious...

      In the USA we have our own terrorists, perhaps you forgot about Oklahoma City?

      Yes, and that was terrorism because, like many other terrorist actions, it featured sudden explosive death. No Windows Worm yet known can cause flaming bodyparts to rain from the sky.

    3. Re:Too many worms to be a coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No Windows Worm yet known can cause flaming bodyparts to rain from the sky.
      I thought Windows was capable of doing that all by itself...
  36. Re:Is there a connection between Phatbot and Sasse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that only a small part of the computers of the world reside in the USA there is nothing surpricing about the majoirity of software being written outside of said contry, regardless of style, application or authors intent.

  37. Aren't they... by Kjella · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...one and the same? Though I suppose it takes a little longer for the brain cells to die during tech support...

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  38. Liebe Deutschland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Liebe Deutschland,

    Der Autor hat gesassen!

    MfG,
    Letter

  39. 'awesome' google translation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it still looks like german to me!

  40. Re:Is there a connection between Phatbot and Sasse by 0racle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well thank you for falling into the rhetoric supplied by your government. You make a fine American, never questioning, always assuming that the evils your told that are ever looming are responsible for everything bad that happens. 15 or so years ago, you would have been wondering if it was a communist plot to take down America.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  41. Cuckoo's Egg by joel_archer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Clifford Stoll book "Cuckoo's Egg:Tracking a Spy Through the Maze of Computer Espionage" details his encounter with a german hacker in the 1980's. It was the book that inspired my interest and career in computers and eventually as a System Administrator. In 1990, Nova made a documentary about it called "The KGB, CIA, Computer and Me".

    What is so ironic is that at the time the FBI did not even consider hacking a crime because Berkley couldn't show a sufficient monetary loss. This is despite the fact that the hacker was after military research. How times have changed! In any event, Stoll's ability to use his scientific training as a astronomer, his basic knowledge of computers and programming mixed with a quantum of social engineering and a massive honey pot, he was able to trace this hacker back to a KGB agent in Germany.

    If I recall correctly, instead of being arrested, this hacker was found dead in his burnt out car in the middle of a forest somewhere in East or West Germany. It's a great read.

    1. Re:Cuckoo's Egg by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Informative
      The Cuckoo's Egg is one of my favorite books as well. It inspired me to interest in computer security via scientific method, just as it did you.

      I'd just note a couple things (I re-read the book a couple weeks ago):

      it took Stoll the better part of a year to catch the hacker in his book. It was really quite an amazing find, too, considering the number of dead-ends and various connection hops that the hacker took to get to Stoll's Berkley machine.

      The actual hacker was not the one that was found dead, it was his accomplice, who was heavily into drugs and more bent on the 'illegal' side of things. The hacker did his (relatively short, by today's standards) prison term, got out, and started a computer business, IIRC.

      It's interesting to note that, considering what the hacker did, he would be considered a terrorist by today's standards and swiftly brought to the US for a trial - if he gets that much. He was deep within military networks with material that is essentially classified now due to changing classifications. I'd argue that back then it was industrial/military espionage, but it doesn't seem to have been considered as such in the trial.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:Cuckoo's Egg by joel_archer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It was that combination of scientific method and social engineering that made Stoll's aproach so effective. That and his persistance and ability to use very basic tools to accomplish the near impossible, all the while accumulating enough evidence to allow a successful prosecution.

      If you haven't seen this interview with Stoll, be sure to read it. It captures that quirky geekiness of his that makes Cuckoo's Egg such a great read.

    3. Re:Cuckoo's Egg by dwave · · Score: 1

      I you liked the book "Cukoo' Egg'you might also enjoy the movie "23". The movie's plot is based on the true story of a group those hackers from Hannover. Karl Koch is one of the main characters and the story writers did a good job in depicting his fall into drug addiction and paranoia. This movie is fiction so the portrayal of technical details is not always historically correct but it recreates the atmosphere quite well.

  42. Virus/Worm authors by DrDebug · · Score: 1

    Just hang them all.

  43. Phatbot caught, but unfortunately... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the skinnybot slipped through the net.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  44. Interview With Clifford Stoll by joel_archer · · Score: 4, Informative

    After posting this thread, I found a great interview with Cliff.

    Some favorite excerpts:
    "The hacker. The speed of light. The beauty of constraints. What is about Clifford Stoll that arouses such a need for conversation? Cliff Stoll is a lunatic in the sanest sense of the word. He doesn't so much present an argument as digest it with his mouth open. It's not pretty but somehow it works."

    "The lab's computer chargeback system had blown up because it could not account for 75 cents of computer time. It took three years for Stoll to prove that a spy was using the computer as a launching pad through Internet to hack at hundreds of military, industrial, and academic computers in search of secrets for the KGB."

    "My friends accused me of being co-opted by the State. But I didn't exactly feel like a tool of the ruling class, unless imperialist running dog puppets breakfasted on stale granola. My guts told me that the CIA should know and I ought to tell them."

  45. Rushkoff by BlueJay465 · · Score: 1

    Your analogy seems sound. Here is some more food for thought:

    Think about the human host and how Ebola spreads itself around through the cardiovascular system. However, in the computer world, when you think about how the cardiovascular system more resembles the central nervous system in terms of speed, wouldn't the entire world be considered one host?

  46. Netsky author arrested in Germany... by Mengoxon · · Score: 1

    ...will probably be the headline in another couple of hours - once the Slashdot mods have finished translating the news from German.

  47. I think you mean Abu Ghraib... by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 1

    From what I gather there has been a great deal of "exploiting backdoors" going on there...

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
  48. Yes by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Because it won't happen. I have a firewall. If it's a vulnerablity that makes it through my firewall, I won't be laughing. But if all you needed to do was turn on iptables with some basic rules (or install a program from someone that's done the hard work for you already), you deserve to get you're computer trashed.

    I want these people to suffer something a little more than some network outages. Until there's some actual data/hardware damage, they're gonna go right on not giving a damn. They'll run their restore disk everytime it happens and go on with their lives. Meanwhile they're slowing the net to a crawl and infecting more of their unprotected breathren. Why are people stupid? Because they can be. I wanna see a virus that makes it so they can't.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Yes by incom · · Score: 1

      Acutally if hardware sales ever stall, I'm sure we'll see alot more hardware killing virii.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  49. post in HTML by darkonc · · Score: 1
    >click here</a>
    <P>

    It's actually pretty simple, and has the added bonus of giving people a hot-link.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  50. Re:Is there a connection between Phatbot and Sasse by ObiWonKanblomi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, thank you for being a total cynic, probably either A) from a country that was stupid enough to follow the US blindly up until about 15 years ago, or B) a person from the other side of the Iron curtain with a lot of tension that is still being released.

    "your government"! haha. What country are you from?

  51. it's a dupe by ejeetify · · Score: 1

    The n-tv article in the other Slashdot article already mentioned that the Phatbot author had been captured.

  52. ah .... by zangdesign · · Score: 1

    Robot Hoouuusssseeee!

    What can I say - I watch a lot of Futurama.

    --
    To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  53. Blame Microsoft by NSupremo · · Score: 0

    and the idiots that use and support them

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._Election_co ntroversies_and_irregularities
  54. Double Standard? by Dieppe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't it ironic, don't ya think, that on one hand everyone is "Free Mitnick!" yet on the other hand everyone is "Tar and feather these German virus writers!"

    Don't get me wrong, I'm in the "Free Mitnick" crowd and firmly in the "string up virus writers and spammers by the gonads" camp... but why is this?

    Perhaps because Kevin was just another one of "us" who learned and didn't really seem to have done harm, yet those of us who have had to deal personally with the hassle of servers being taken down by a virus/worm or of personally cleaning our machines or worse --- losing data or time that could be better spent getting girlfriends or boyfriends?

    Bah. So hang the bastards, hang 'em high, is what I say.

    1. Re:Double Standard? by poobie · · Score: 1

      Not a double standard at all. No one was arguing that mitnick wasn't a criminal, they were just upset with the way his rights were trampled on by the FBI and JD.

    2. Re:Double Standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the rights of the people Kevin trampled on? Do you know how he got his fake IDs?

    3. Re:Double Standard? by dwave · · Score: 1

      What do you complain about? The suspected author of Sasser is in custody and not in detention right now. He will face a trial after all pieces of evidence are gathered and puzzled together to charge him. Considering his age the "Jugendstrafrecht" (penology for adolescents) will apply. I think he will be sentenced to 2 years in a youth detention center, lot's of social service, probation and a huge financial damage to pay back which he can't. Even if he'll be guest in every talkshow there is.

    4. Re:Double Standard? by hwstar · · Score: 1

      Heh. Liberal Europeans! Extradite him to the US, there he'll get what he deserves: A system reboot package! (US $10E6 fine and 20 years in in the Marion federal prison).

  55. Re:Is there a connection between Phatbot and Sasse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Probably only 0.5% of your average doing-bad-things person is a member of a terrorist organisation.
    So like, only his left thumb?
  56. Apparently it is an ambigous term by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1
    Read the definition here.


    The worm had the potential to take power grids, etc offline.


    The worm disrupted stock trading systems, organizations' Intranets, government systems, home users' systems, etc. Resulting in a denial of service in order to clean the worm off. Yes it did do damage, and while it did not blow anything up (thank goodness), it did instill a bit of terror into those who potentially could be infected.


    While there was no apparent violence, there was damage to systems and a loss of service and more damage. There also was a spread of terror. Many people I knew were too afraid to even turn on their computers for fear that the Phatbot or Sasser worm would infect their systems.


    Apparently you support this type of action and think the authors of said worms should be regarded as heroes? Well I do not, and think they should be brought to justice and held accountable for the damage they caused.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Apparently it is an ambigous term by abirdman · · Score: 1

      There's so much wrong with your post, I won't even bother to address it point-by-point. I will say that just because some bad action has the potential to cause problems for the authorities / corporations / individuals, and this kind of disorder causes you or your clueless friends to be terrified does not make it terrorism (though it may define you as hopelessly neurotic). This distinction (is it a crime or is it terrorism?) has been co-opted by the current American justice department so they can use the "streamlined" definition of due-process supplied by the Patriot Act in the prosecution of "terrorists". You and your friends should calm down, take some deep breaths, and change the channel when the news starts talking about "terrorism." Consider installing and learning a secure operating system on your computer.

      And your subject, "ambigous term" (read it again, slowly) reminds me of the Roman in Monty Python's Life of Brian, named Bigous Dickus. Go ahead and laugh. It's just a typo, not terrorism.

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    2. Re:Apparently it is an ambigous term by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah, by your definition then, as long as there isn't any violence or bombs going off, it isn't terrorism.


      To quote "The Rock" "It does not matter what you think!"


      Viruses are a form of Cyber Terrorism.


      Cyber Terrorism can use Worms


      What you fail to recognize is that this is not just a US threat, it is a world threat. The worms released by Cyber Terrorists can just as easily infect systems throughout the world as they can US systems.


      The more you ignore the problem, or the more you say it isn't terrorism, the worse it gets.


      I have a Lindows system that is uneffected. I'd quit using Windows, but my college has software I need to run that requires Windows. Also the Online Library only works with IE. So I have no choice in those matters.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    3. Re:Apparently it is an ambigous term by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Incompetent system administration has the potential to take grids offline, ruin databases, expose personal data, etc.

      Does that mean that incompetent system administration is terrorism?

      The key word here is intent.

    4. Re:Apparently it is an ambigous term by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1
      abirdman is right... you are wrong in so many ways I can't list them all. Let's just do the most obvious:

      Read the definition here.

      Yes, why don't YOU go and read the definition of terrorism? Here, I'll copy it from that webpage to help you:
      • "The unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."
      • "Premeditated politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents"


      Those two definitions for "terrorism" both include violence and political motivation as critical factors. If the political motivation were missing, we'd just call it "murder". And if just the violence were missing, it'd be called "free speech".

      That webpage further goes on to define "Cyber-Terrrorism", which I don't agree with because they're making up their own words. But even if I did agree, these German teens wouldn't count, because they weren't "politcally motivated".

      Apparently you support this type of action and think the authors of said worms should be regarded as heroes?

      No, I think they should be regarded as teenage punks who threaten other people's property for random reasons. In magnitude, the crime is somewhat less severe than hurling a trash barrel through a window, and it should be punished appropriately.
  57. Re:Is there a connection between Phatbot and Sasse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most amusing thing is that the poster probably was aiming for a 'Score:5, Interesting'

  58. not only does it do all that... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    It even does Windows!

    1. Re:not only does it do all that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should change your name to TEH FUNNY

  59. Hah-Keystone Krackers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, I bet that the number of arrest of crackers goes up. And part of that will be because of arrogance on the crackers part. Everyone thinks that law enforcement are baffoons, but they are as technologically adept, as a lot of hackers, and they have the privliges of law to make it easier.

  60. Re:Is there a connection between Phatbot and Sasse by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Spammers maybe?? i would love for them to find a nice big list of spammers using his service so to speak.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  61. Don't forget diversity by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Back in the day, there were far fewer machines on the net, and therefore fewer opportunities for something to spread

    Back in the day, there were many more types of machines with many different software packages performing the same functions (such as email). Infections spread more rapidly in monocultures, in both biological and computer ecosystems.

  62. Author of AgoBot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at the source code of the AgoBot version dated 3/21/04, the email address "theago@gmx.net" is mentioned to be that of Ago. Of course, GMX is a German email provider, so it would make sense that he was the one in fact caught.

  63. Webcam Stoning by TheBillGates · · Score: 1

    Having had to fix several relatives' PCs that were infected with viruses, I say that judicial procedures are too lenient on these bastards.

    Just announce on a website that virus authors frequent to watch a particular webcam broadcast.

    In that the virus writer is led into a room followed by many computer support techs, and the viewers get to see the writer beaten to death for the thousands of hours he caused them due to his viruws/worm.

    A jail sentence is too lenient for these little shitheads. Beat them to death. I'm tired of dealing with the after affects of their irresponsibility. Now to get all my relatives switched over to macs and OSX....

    1. Re:Webcam Stoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bit of annoyance to a bunch of people, a bit of money lost... is worthy of someone being killed? Why do you value human life so little?

      Writing a worm is not worthy of death. Jailtime yes, but not death. In fact, I don't believe any crime is worthy of death -- I am against capital punishment, as are most civilised countries.

  64. 21 and unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He must be an OSS developer.

  65. tst by rozz · · Score: 0

    tsst

    --
    "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  66. Yes the key word is intent by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    it is that the system administrators did not do that sort of damage on purpose if it does indeed happen. The worm writers, on the other hand, knew what their worms would do and released them anyway. Unless, for some odd reason, the worms were not meant to be released and got released accidentally? I call that the "Morris Defense" after the Arpanet Worm.

    Sort of like the difference between manslaughter and muder. :)

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  67. Most of my posts are posted by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    in a humoris manner, it is a personality flaw of mine.

    Don't take everything I say too seriously, I am after all posting in character. That character being a Space Pirate from 4096AD who went back in the past to the late 20th and early 21st century and became a computer software developer who is now disabled and out of a job. So I know the future, and am posting based on that knowledge.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.