Slashdot Mirror


Sony PC/DVR Incorporates 7 Tuners & 1TB HD

GFD writes "TechJapan has an article on the 'Type X' Viao PC/DVR that will have 1TB and 7 tuners - allowing the recording of 7 shows at the same time. It also has a very cool look."

75 of 341 comments (clear)

  1. "...very cool look" by Beatbyte · · Score: 4, Funny

    It looks like a black box with "VAIO" on it.

    Damnit man lets give them an award!

    1. Re:"...very cool look" by ZaMoose · · Score: 4, Funny

      The picture also gives no sense of scale. For all I know, it could be the size of an S/390 (errrm, zSeries, rather) and sit in the middle of my living room like one of those 2001 monoliths.

      I'm just sayin'...

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    2. Re:"...very cool look" by akadruid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not too bad, you have to compare it to some of the other ugly stuff people have sitting next to their TVs. The 7 tuners is just a gimmick though. I can only get 5 channels anyway, including the satallite as one. Bet it costs a lot for a a 1TB PVR though. Bear in mind 4x250GB ATA is only 300 these days.

      The web page is just saying 'Internal Server Error: Process limit exceeded for uid 11363' at the moment. Cue some joke about them running the webserver on the PVR.

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
    3. Re:"...very cool look" by jsinnema · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some pictures for scaling purposes:

      here

    4. Re:"...very cool look" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, it looks more like a light grey box with "Process limit exceeded for uid 11363." on it.

    5. Re:"...very cool look" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      My God...it's full of stars *ducks*

    6. Re:"...very cool look" by PeekabooCaribou · · Score: 5, Funny

      Keep in mind that the woman in the picture is six inches tall.

      --
      "I'll say it again for the logic-impaired." -- Larry Wall.
    7. Re:"...very cool look" by frankmu · · Score: 2, Funny

      So that's what happened to the Mothra Girls!

      --
      Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  2. Sure, it has seven tuners... by Snowspinner · · Score: 5, Informative

    But they're all analog... you can optionally buy a single digital tuner. But, really... why? How is someone ever going to find seven shows they want to watch at once in general, little yet if they're limited to the analog band?

    And, obviously, no HD capabilities either.

    1. Re:Sure, it has seven tuners... by mjpaci · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Olympics will be broadcast on plenty of GE/NBC/Universal's stations simultaneously.

      NBC, CNBC, MSNBC, USA

      That leaves only three tuners for PORN.

    2. Re:Sure, it has seven tuners... by stephenisu · · Score: 2, Funny

      SPICE(multiple), Playboy(multiple), HBO, SHOWTIME, TECHTV, and Adult Swim, oh and the F1 race.

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    3. Re:Sure, it has seven tuners... by blixel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is someone ever going to find seven shows they want to watch at once in general

      Sometimes there probably are actually seven things on at the same time that I want to see. Fox News, Discovery, TLC, TechTV, Sci-Fi and/or Comedy Central, local news, and the Discovery Science channel .... but the real problem is finding the time to actually go back and watch all those shows.

      I only have 2 tuners on my PVR that I have now and I find myself going through and deleting unwatched shows a couple of times per week.

    4. Re:Sure, it has seven tuners... by Suidae · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd have to agree. Before I buy a PVR its going to have to be able to handle at least two digital streams at once, preferably by directly storing the compressed video data without reencoding, ala DirecTivo.

      Frankly, I'd prefer if the cable company would just store all this stuff at THEIR end, dump all the broadcast channels, and use the bandwidth to feed the cable modem system so I can watch anything I want, whenever I want, without having to make copies at my end. I'll even pay extra so I don't have to watch commercials, and I'll be happy to tell the networks which shows I watch, when I watch them, and if I thought they sucked or not.

      They can even set up 'suggested lineups' for different viewing preferences so it works kind of like regular TV where shows come on at regular times, but they can talior the steams for more groups. This would let them take advantage of multicast capabilities and let them hit viewers with highly directed programming (ie, I want the sci-fi and technology stream, no chick flicks, and no horror-pretending-to-be-sci-fi, but my wife might want the cooking, home-improvement, and drama stream).

      It would be nice to still have the stream cached locally so I can pause whatever I'm watching, but I don't really want to have to keep a terrabyte system sitting around so I can watch older stuff, that should be provided by the cable company.

      Come on networks, use your imagination, this stuff shouldn't be too hard! I've already got purchase on demand, streaming, pause-able, rewindable digital movies, start doing it with regular TV too!

    5. Re:Sure, it has seven tuners... by Le+Marteau · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Before I buy a PVR its going to have to be able to handle at least two digital streams at once...

      Whatever. I figured, at about $300 for my Tivo, if it lasted two years, that's .50 cents a day for the privilige of never needing to sit through another commercial again. It was, and is WELL, WELL worth the price, and I just can't concieve having to deal with those inane, insulting, idiotic commercials again.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    6. Re:Sure, it has seven tuners... by mjh · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Frankly, I'd prefer if the cable company would just store all this stuff at THEIR end, dump all the broadcast channels, and use the bandwidth to feed the cable modem system so I can watch anything I want, whenever I want, without having to make copies at my end.
      Not me. I prefer to have the DVR at my house. Mainly because it allows me complete control. DVRs are a distributed problem; everyone has their own set of preferences that don't necessarily align with anyone elses. Consequently, distributed preference implies distributed control. So it makes sense to me that the solution also be distributed:
      • I can manage my own data space without having to rely on the cable company's shared data space.
      • I can decide that I want to keep a program for 7 months instead of relying on the cable co. to automatically delete everything after 7 days.
      • I can decide which shows I want to record instead of relying on the cable co. to decide for me.
      • I don't have to deal with latency associated with sending the command to do something accross the internet, and then be responded to by a machine that's trying to handle a gazillion of these types of requests simultaneously.

      IMHO, DVR is a distributed problem. In the long run a distributed solution works better for everyone.

      $.02

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    7. Re:Sure, it has seven tuners... by foidulus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whatever. I figured, at about $300 for my Tivo, if it lasted two years, that's .50 cents a day for the privilige of never needing to sit through another commercial again. It was, and is WELL, WELL worth the price, and I just can't concieve having to deal with those inane, insulting, idiotic commercials again.
      Which is why pay-per-view tv(I mean being able to watch anything pay per view, not just porn) will be the real future. Advertisers are not going to pay for tv programming if nobody watches the commercials, so the smart tv execs should just skip the middleman and go right to the source, consumers. Imagine being able to watch only what you want to watch. The only reason I have cable is for The Daily Show, and instead of having to pay the cable company, I would gladly pay .50 a show for it, but it's not an option right now.

    8. Re:Sure, it has seven tuners... by mjh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let me know if I understand what you're saying. You're asking for television programming to change its distribution model to be closer to the way that the WWW is distributed - all content on demand. And you want to take advantage of the huge data pipe that exists between your home and the cableco to do this.

      I suspect that the medium that is currently best suited to do that is the Internet. Essentially, you need something that does for TV programming what iTunes does for music distribution; iTunes allows people another choice for selecting music other than just listening to the radio. You want the same thing for TV programming.

      The reason I think that the internet is the better medium for this is that iTunes doesn't preclude people who still prefer to listen to music on the radio from listening to the radio. But if your suggestion were implemented it would require most folks to change. And people don't like change, much less change that is forced upon them. This adversity to change would result in cableco's losing huge numbers of subscribers to satellite, which would provide the thing closest to what they're used to.

      Personally, I'd love to see what you're talking about come into reality. But even if you get past the technical problems (bandwidth requirements) and the sociological requirements (people don't like change) you still have to get past the legal problems (copyright). If you can't get past the last one on the internet, I don't think that changing the medium (from the internet to the cableco's infrastructure) would make much of a difference.

      $.02

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  3. umm.... by King-Raz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this overkill? What consumer would honsestly need this! When have there ever been seven TV programs worth watching on at the same time?

    --
    ~c
    1. Re:umm.... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given the bad habit of broadcasters to have unusual starting and ending times nowadays for their programming, you'll be surprised how many people want PVR's with multiple tuners.

    2. Re:umm.... by jonjohnson · · Score: 5, Informative

      I want to record Law and Order, Simpsons, South Park, and the Daily Show. However, if I try to setup a schedule to do this, I'll have conflicts left and right, because I can only record 2 streams right now. While 7 may be overboard, I can see a need for 4 streams today.

    3. Re:umm.... by therblig · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not that this happens all the time, but I would have liked more tuners on my DVR when we had a hostage situation at work, just to see what each station's take on the situation was.

      Of course, "worth watching" is in the eye of the beholder. I HATE local news - they shouldn't need more than ten minutes.

      --

      I struggled for days and days and all I got was this lousy sig.

    4. Re:umm.... by Seahawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well - it would make et possible to look at 6 channels at once to find the one not showing commercials.

      7 tuners isnt just for recording 7 shows at a time - it is for recording 2 or 3, and then use the rest of the tuners for PiP stuff.

      And besides - if the price difference for 7 tuners instead of 2 is minor - why not add them - this is definately not a product where those extra $50(or whatever) will matter

    5. Re:umm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "1TB stored and nothing's on."

    6. Re:umm.... by kabocox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When have there ever been seven TV programs worth watching on at the same time?

      I'm going to call this one. There have been times that 3 or more shows have been on in the same time block that I'd have liked to watch. I agree that TV generally has gone down hill. The thing Cable has special interest shows.

      If I was a sports person, I might want to record 3-4 games and a sitcom. If I was a homesitter, I'd likely record 4-5 stations worth of daytime soaps.
      When I was a teenager, there was a time block of 3:00-4:00 that all the really good after school cartoons came on. Here is another thought though. Maybe this isn't might all for me. Maybe it is so that I can record my 2 shows, while my wife can get her 2 shows, and my 2 kids can each have some options. I may be interested in entirely different things than my kids, but it would be nice if we had one center media server that did all. In my parents house we started off with 1 VCR. Over the years each individual either bought or recieved a VCR for a gift. PVRs are alot more powerful and personal than VCRs. IF I had the $3-4K that this will likely cost, I'd buy it. I don't have that kinda of money. If it was $500-$1500, I could maybe get it by the wife though.

  4. Slashdotted by stanmann · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, not complaining, I really just wanted to know how much the thing will cost and when I can get me one... Oh and of course, will it be cheaper than any other 1TB HD device for offline storage.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  5. Sweet, baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny


    Now you can record 7 different Star Trek episodes at once!

  6. Now, if they do one for DirecTV.... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ....I'll buy it in no time flat, even if it costs US$2,200. :-) But we really don't need that many tuners built into the box--maybe three to four at most.

    You have to wonder if Sony is using licensed TiVo technology for this box.

    1. Re:Now, if they do one for DirecTV.... by nosphalot · · Score: 2, Informative

      And you must not realize that is nothing more than the changes they made to Linux. The real meat of the system all lives in userland, and is closed source.

  7. Price by jbfaninmo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, all for the low price of your arm, leg and first born.

    There isn't even enough decent crap to justify 7 tuners. Or more importantly, enough crap for me to want to pay for 7 tuners. And I don't think they make a TB of decent TV a year anyway.

  8. 7 tuners? by chubbymidget · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So does that mean I need 7 boxes from my SAT or cable company? Do they offer some kind of bulk discount for that?

  9. A terabyte of storage? by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's enough for anyone to record pretty much whatever they want to for enough viewing for a few weeks... or all the fansubbed anime on Animesuki.com for a few days.

    Question, though - what manner of hookups are we talking about here? How many RF, A/V, S-video, and optical links must be necessary for this many recorders?

    You'd think that the cabling alone would be prohibitive.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
  10. Here's the text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    Just in case you want to record 7 channels at the same time for a week, Sony has just the product. Well it's a PC too so I guess it's not a complete ripoff. Ripoff? Sony hasn't even presented the price yet. I'll take a guess though, and say...$9000? Just a guess.

    Sony held a meeting in Tokyo on the 10th to present their new "VAIO" products. Among them was the "type X," a HD recorder on a PC base.

    The device features 7 above ground analog TV tuners, as well as more than 1TB of HD space, and a maximum of 7 channels can be recorded at the same time. one can store about one week's worth of programming from seven different channels, and Sony has said that it is "to keep in touch with past and present programs like a time machine, one can choose their favorite program and watch it."

    Sony plans on releasing the machine before the end of 2004, and since it is currently under planning/development, concrete specifications have not yet been finalized.

    The device has been placed in the "next generation recorder with a PC base" category, and unifies AV and PC functions. It can also be used as a normal PC with a wireless keyboard/mouse and remote controller. Also, using the D4 output, it can output to flat panel TVs such as the "Wega" series.

    Furthermore, Sony also plans on selling an optional terrestrial/BS/110 CS digital tuner. There is currently no PC supporting digital transmissions besides NEC's "VALUESTAR TX/TZ." The VALUESTAR also has limitations such as only being able to output up to 480p, so much attention is being paid to what the type X will support, since the current specifications are not final.

    At the announcement event, there was also a demonstration from Sony's IT & Mobile Solutions Network Company NC President, Keiji Kimura, involving the type X and a portable video player currently in development. He introduced the company's next generation AV concept by wirelessly outputting video to a Wega from the video player, whose video data was transferred from the type X.

    From May 14th until the 16, there will be reference models of the "type X" on display at Sony's Mediage in Odaiba, in the "Do VAIO World 2004" event.

  11. That's some impressive bandwidth there by Stopmotioncleaverman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Recording 7 channels simultaneously for a week solid to a single drive has gotta take one seriously impressive bus. What are the data flow rates going to be for that? Something slightly ridiculous is my bet. And the hard drive write speed? Since it's unlikely to be a single terabyte-sized drive, I wonder how many drives are in this thing. One for each channel? And is it going to cost the earth? Probably...

    1. Re:That's some impressive bandwidth there by Jarnis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You honestly think it has a single 1TB drive? For even a moment?

      Largest drives right now are in the 400GB range, and they are still bit expensive.

      I personally expect it to contain 4-8 drives. Possibly with even a raid5 setup.

    2. Re:That's some impressive bandwidth there by Mannerism · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not the straight IO bandwidth that'd worry me; it'd be the seeks. I'd almost want to assign each stream its own disk. Maybe two write streams per disk if you had to. If a disk ran out of space, or if there were a request to read from a disk currently assigned to a writing stream, then assign a new disk to the writing stream. Idle disks defragment. Interesting exercise in filesystem design.

  12. wtf by millahtime · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait, hold up. We at /. are complaining about overkill on a cool new tech toy.

    And when has it been said you need all that you buy it for. We buy SUVs and only like 1% of people can use them for what they are for. Overkill has bragging rights.

    1. Re:wtf by haystor · · Score: 3, Funny

      What if a game were broadcast with 7 camera angles:
      press booth
      sideline
      overhead
      downfield
      quarterback helmet
      referee
      cheerleaders

      --
      t
    2. Re:wtf by Malc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I thought they were meant for wasting money, guzzling fuel, polluting, creating false feelings of security and safety, increasing the feeling of separation from the dirty real world and giving people an excuse to drive badly. Thus 99% of people use them properly!

    3. Re:wtf by markt4 · · Score: 2, Funny

      We buy SUVs and only like 1% of people can use them for what they are for.

      You mean like driving a family around while not looking like you're driving a station wagon.

      What? That's not what SUVs are for? Right....

    4. Re:wtf by Eccles · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Yeah, never mind the fact that I routinely have to carry a large amount of stuff that can't get wet.

      Minivans typically have more interior room than all but the largest SUVs. If you're towing a large trailer, a Suburban or the like is often justified, but typically SUVs are built with overly heavy components designed for physical use and abuse they'll never encounter. Most of the Hummers I see are unladen and driven by a single commuter.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    5. Re:wtf by trentblase · · Score: 2, Funny
      Wait, hold up. We at /. are complaining about overkill on a cool new tech toy.

      I agree. We shouldn't be complaining that 7 tuners is too many. We should be complaining that it's not even a power of 2. I want 8 tuners. Or 16. Or how about just one spectrum analyzer and I can decode thousands of channels at once in software. The Pentium M can do that, right?

  13. If it's from Sony... by CaVi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it will look sexy, but will be crippled by some DRM, I'm afraid.

    The article is slashdotted already, but what DRM will it have? Sony has too much to protect (Sony Music) to allow people to enjoy their hardware fully.

    I've had a Sony MD, you could transfer from your PC to the MD with the USB cable, but what you recorded on the MD (even if recorded with an analog device, you couldn't transfer it back to your PC...)

    I hope they haven't done the same kind of mistake: making a great hardware, with functionalities crippled by some DRM.

    --
    -- No signature yet.
  14. 7 Tuners? by telstar · · Score: 3, Interesting
    7 Tuners ... allowing the recording of 7 shows at the same time.
    • Except that means since I live in a part of the country where virtually every channel is scrambled without a box, I'd need 7 cable-boxes. While it's great that this box would allow me to catch all of the episodes of Law & Order airing at the same time ... something tells me there's not enough content, nor hours in the day to watch recorded content, to justify the extra $50 in cable-box rental fees.
  15. Well... by SavedLinuXgeeK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In a non-home setting, this device could work really well as a video surveilance setup. I mean B&W vid @ low res, you could channel 7-sources into it, and keep a great deal of informatio stored. Now I am sure thats not the purpose of this, but that is the only thing I can think of, for seven tuners at one time. Unless you really want to watch every station's take on a presidential message, im sure the slight camera angles make all the difference in the world ;)

    --
    je suis parce que j'aime
    1. Re:Well... by zapp · · Score: 2, Funny

      im sure the slight camera angles make all the difference in the world ;)

      Reminds me of an experiment I tried a couple years back. Hook up 2 webcams to your PC, place the cams about eye-distance apart, and then position the windows on your screen so they're side by side, and play with the horizontal gap between them. How cross your eyes, ala Magic Eye, and you get to see your head in 3d.

      I wonder if it would be possible to find 2 tv networks whose cameras are just the right distance apart, put 2 tvs side by side and see the president in 3d :)

      --
      no comment
  16. Redundant in 5 years by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 3, Funny

    thanks to gvision.google.com!

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:Redundant in 5 years by N3Z · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ok, how many of you tried http://gvision.google.com ?

      --
      .signature not found
    2. Re:Redundant in 5 years by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only on Slashdot can you take a bogus URL thrown out there as a joke, wrap HTML around it to make it clickable, and get moderated "informative" for it.

      --

      I write in my journal
  17. Technical question by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With 1TB disk, would it be most likely to have some kind of high-speed RAID configuration? I mean, what's the peak bitrate for recording one channel? And what will the peak bitrate for 7 channels be?

    --

    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

  18. Re:1 TB ? by TheGavster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm thinking that the 1TB of space is constructed from some kind of RAID array; a single 1TB drive would be incredibly expensive to make at the present time. 120GB hard drives can be had for a (somewhat) reasonable price. Tied together in SATA RAID, I think that you could get something near the transfer rate you'd need. They also don't mention the quality of the recordings; when you have 7 channels piped at once it might start dropping frames and reducing resolution.

    --
    "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
  19. Useless. by Jarnis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Analog = RIP. And dedicated separate digital tuners/descramblers = teh suck for timeshifting etc.

    What I need is a 1TB box with 2-3 *digital* (DVB-C or DVB-T for us euros) tuners, and with a Conax descrambler smartcard support. So I could record at least one channel while watching another (or maybe 2 channels while watching third). In full digital glory. HDTV support would be a bonus, but that is not happening in europe at such a fast rate - I think broadcasters first want to move to digital, and then its easier to reuse the spare frequencies for HDTV signals once analog is dead and buried.

    But no. Sony is designing an obsolete analog tuner box with a ridiculous pricetag... :(

    1. Re:Useless. by MrNemesis · · Score: 2, Informative

      What you do need is a (consumer level?) product like MythTV. It works over a network of computers, which can have as many tuners as you can fit in. It can all hang offof on massive RAID array on a master backend.

      I have a setup like this, and Myth handles it beautifully. There's and analogue tuner (BBC1 through Channel 5) in the lounge and a digital DVB-T card in my workstation. If I'm recording with the DVB-T card but want to watch BBC1, Myth is clever and turns on the analogue card in the lounge and pipes the input over to my workstation. Very sweet.

      Only problem is it's a bitch to set up (don't even get started with getting the tuners to work!) but the market is crying out for a product like MythTV. As far as I know, it's the only PVR software with anything like this functionality.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  20. Copy Protection by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1TB and 7 tuners - allowing the recording of 7 shows at the same time. It also has a very cool look."

    Even so, who wan't to bet on some for of copy protection for things like new releases, and popular series. Sure you can record Kill Bill Volume 10, but I bet you cant transfer the file to your comp and burn a DVD.

    So then your stuck with a bunch of video on your DVR, which must be erased in order to add new content. I have a DVR, and really like it, but beyond recording a show or two to watch a couple of hours or days later, that's it. If I had a terabyte of video, by the time I got around to watching it, I would have recorded over or could care less about the majority of it.

    Now if I could burn it, thast would be outstanding

  21. 7 buffers at once by BugMaster+ChuckyD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One of the great things about tiVo is how it buffers the show you're watching so you can pause rewind and skip commercials. When you change channels the buffer is gone and you can't rewind the new channel etc.

    With this device you could (presumably) set it up to buffer your favorite channels as well as the one you're watching. You could watch one show and then jump over to CNN (or whatever) and rewind to watch the start of the news broadcast, then jump over to ESPN and watch the baseball game etc.

  22. Pass the pretzels and change the channel, please. by malia8888 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The device features 7 above ground analog TV tuners, as well as more than 1TB of HD space, and a maximum of 7 channels can be recorded at the same time. one can store about one week's worth of programming from seven different channels, and Sony has said that it is "to keep in touch with past and present programs like a time machine, one can choose their favorite program and watch it."

    After reading this I was struck by the fact that we spend so much time watching and so little time doing. That is probably why humans are becoming a rather chubby lot. One doesn't see a pride of lions watching another pride of lions on a glass screen doing lion-like things.

    It makes me very sad that we have become life voyeurs. Now we have a device that can rivet our buttocks even deeper into our recliners. I think we need to go for a walk, talk to friends, and turn the T.V. off.

    --
    Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
  23. More Info and Pictures by doctor_no · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those of you interested about the user interface:
    Here& Here

    More picture of "Type X":
    Link
    Link 2

    Thing also seems to have a DVD-burner: Pictured Here

    More links (in Japanese)
    Watch Impress Japan

  24. 7 shows at once by Woogiemonger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, while 7 shows at once might initially seem like overkill, what if you're a talk show host or a journalist and you have to do your research on something going on in the news, or perhaps keep track of different sports games, and yeah, I think the Olympics got mentioned here already which is an easy example.

  25. I'll tell you why it has 7 tuners... by WillAJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because you don't have to worry about which shows you record. You set it up to record your favorite channels, let it run constantly, and time-shift everything. You can then watch what you want, when you want. According to the article, it will hold a weeks worth of programming from seven channels.

  26. What good is 7 tuners by Monoman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What good is 7 tuners if I have digital cable or sattelite?

    They need to come up with a standardized way to interface tuner cards in TVs or generic set top boxes.

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
  27. 7 Tuners? by Cyno01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Still not enough to record every episode of Law and Order thats on at any given time...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  28. Sony's translated announcement - by MisterMoney · · Score: 2, Funny

    from http://www.vaio.sony.co.jp/

    Guides "type X" advanced technology as a personal computer in the base, is the product which is advancing development anew the higher-order origin AV video recording/playback function is actualized as a model "of the next generation AV recorder" concept, this time as information of development.

    Maximum of 7 TV tuners, it loaded the hard disk drive which exceeds 1 tera- byte, maximum of videotaped channel 7 simultaneously, it saw without being conscious of the presently past to be, choosing program, it can view. Furthermore, it is the schedule which has high-level AV efficiency e.g., with combination with the terrestrial BS 110 degree CS digital broadcast corresponding unit, it corresponds to also the video recording of digital hi-vision broadcast.


    favorite quote from that - "it saw without being conscious of the presently past to be, choosing program, it can view."

    i don't even know wtf that's supposed to mean, but it makes me laugh.

  29. So he was right... by *weasel · · Score: 3, Funny

    It is one of the monoliths from 2001.

    Which explains why I have this sudden urge to wield my remote as a weapon...

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:So he was right... by ziggy_zero · · Score: 2, Funny

      psssst.....it's surrounded by Japanese people.

      --
      I belong to the ______ generation.
  30. Time Shifting! by WushuJim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an owner of a ReplayTV, I can think of one great use for 7 tuners. Time shifting! Buffer the last seven watched channels or however many tuners available. That way if you switch to a channel and see something you want to go back and watch, it is buffered.

  31. Re: I'll even pay extra by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'll even pay extra so I don't have to watch commercials, and I'll be happy to tell the networks which shows I watch, when I watch them, and if I thought they sucked or not.

    If you're not watching any commercials, why would they give a shit which shows you watched or what you thought about them?

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  32. Re: I'll even pay extra by at_kernel_99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're not watching any commercials, why would they give a shit which shows you watched or what you thought about them?

    A little something called Product Placement

  33. Please stop modding this up by System.out.println() · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "TV BAD! DOING THINGS GOOD! LOLOL"
    There are so many downmods that suit this it's not even funny.

    1) Offtopic - this crap has little to do with the actual PVR.
    2) Redundant - It's been said on every /. thread that has anything to do with TV
    3) Troll - The poster is likely just wanting a response from anyone who still likes TV.
    4) Overrated - granted this one's subjective, but it seems to fit.

    But despite all these perfectly suitable mods, you give this rehashed, regurgitated crap Insightful? /me sighs and crawls back into his hole.

  34. 7 Tuner Whiners by flithm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To all those people complaining that 7 tuners is too many, I suppose 640K was too much for you too.

    Have some forsight. Maybe you only use 2-4 at once now, but one day when there's 3 of your favorite shows, a newscast, 2 movies, and the video feed from your backyard flying home maintenance robot that you want to capture all at once... I bet you'll be pretty pleased.

  35. Re: I'll even pay extra by mjh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    HBO, Showtime, Cinemax, (et al) all care about which shows people watch and whether or not people like them. And in exchange for people paying extra, there are no commercials.

    The type of programming that the OP was talking about exists today in the premium channel systems.

    --
    Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  36. Doing the math by azadrozny · · Score: 4, Interesting
    My "small" 40GB Tivo can record about 35hrs of programming. Thats about 1.15GB/hr. Base on that figure a 1TB (1024GB) DVR would be able to record for about 890hrs. That's a shade more than 37 days of continuous programming. That's what I call a couch potato.

    Now that may sound like a lot, but what if in addition to the 7 input tuners, it had multiple outputs. If you could tie it into some kind of distribution system for your house, throw in Tivo's ability to predict what your family likes, you have a very cool system. Every member of your family could be watching a different program at one time. $9k is a bit pricey, but the price is bound to come down.

  37. Re: I'll even pay extra by billtom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not exactly. The key point to remember is that people watch shows *not* networks/channels. I watch The Sopranos, I don't watch HBO. I watch The West Wing, I don't watch NBC. Etc.

    What the grandparent was getting at is that we currently have the technology to completely eliminate channels and simply offer shows. The current setup where shows are offered on channels is technologically obsolete.

    We want to change from the model where networks broadcast shows on channels to one where the network-type companies are more like movie production companies. Where they finance the production of new shows and then send them to the distributor (probably the cable/satellite companies) who stores them for purchase by the viewer (then the shows are streamed/downloaded).

    Of course, networks are going to fight this all the way. But the continued evolution of tivo-like devices makes it technologically inevitable.

  38. 7 tuners is great, but more are needed! 50 tuners by JGski · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The folks pooh-pooh-ing 7 tuners don't get the use model. Imagine a combo of channel surfing, instant record PVR and pictures-in-picture. I really miss picture-in-picture with my DirecTV Tivo, and even then having only 2 tuners on my TV in the pre-Tivo days was *way too few*. I'd want to be able to mark a set of "surfable channels" as PiP with PVR available to be running on them while I'm surfing on the others.

    The other serious flaw with most set-tops and tv channel UIs (Tivo almost gets it right) is not having dynamic filtering and style sheets for the schedule and channels attached to the up/down channel buttons. E.g. there are some channels I absolutely never want: fine I lock them out now. But then there is the gray area which is content dependent: I'm not a big basketball fan so I should be able to make channels disappear completely during the time that basketball is on - if I up-channel through it, it just skips and if I chose it's even gone from the schedule. When other "desired" programming is on those channels re-appear again.

    Now combine that kind of "editing/filtering" to 50 tuners with PVR and PiP: now you have television usability!!

    A serious, serious bone-head UI gaffe on the DirecTV Tivo: you ascend channels up-screen with the channel up/down buttons but the program guide the channels ascend down-screen! Who was the moron...?! Oh yeah, Huge Air Crash idiots own DirecTV.

  39. When do you have the time? by caldroun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a Tivo, which is great and all with 2 tuners. However, all that time that I am doing other things while the Tivo is working cuts into my time that I start watching the tube. Then I have a lot of 'whatever' to watch. I think that 7 shows at once is a little too much...and my 100g drive that came in my Tivo is plenty. (Atleast for me)

    --
    "If you have done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways" -- hhgg
  40. More granted by maroberts · · Score: 2, Informative

    Go build a Myth TV device and stick as many PVR cards in as it can handle. If you're missing any features, crack your nuckles, break out the keyboard and get coding....

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  41. How about both? by sevinkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd love to have a system where the cabel companies feed stuff to us from their PVR dump, and then we store it on our harddrives with full control. Then I wouldn't have to wait for a certain time for a show to come on, and I can watch the news whenever I feel like it instead of only when a show isn't recording...

    I know I know, buy the two tuner version :)