Slashdot Mirror


Windows 98SE emulated on Pocket PC

David Horn writes "PocketGamer is carrying a story on the successful emulation of Windows 95 and Windows 98SE on the Pocket PC. This was made possible by a Pocket PC port of Bochs, a DOS emulator. If you're keen to try this yourself, you'll need a minimum of a 256MB memory card (or stream the image over a wireless network) and you'll need a program like Nyditot Virtual Display to increase your screen resolution. Oh, yes, and you'll also need the emulator. You can find more information and a selection of screenshots here. Following the porting of a full speed Playstation emulator and Pocket Quake, this really raises the bar for what the Pocket PC is capable of."

151 comments

  1. Limitations by Raindance · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a very cool project.

    Current limitations seem to include lack of DirectX support but, as Pocket Quake was ported, perhaps there's some OpenGL framework for the Pocket PC that wouldn't be too difficult to link up with this Windows 98 emulation.

    So, it's not perfect for 'playing any PC game' yet, but there's hope.

    RD

    1. Re:Limitations by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pocket Quake uses Quake's software renderer.

      However ATI did comission me to port GLQuake to Pocket PC to conform to OpenGL ES. However the source code is not available (as we have not distributed - only demoed - the binary).

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    2. Re:Limitations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it's released, there will be source with it, right? I was under the impression that Quake was under the GPL

    3. Re:Limitations by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well if your using your build for a small confined group, you dont need to release the source.

    4. Re:Limitations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dan East ROCKS! Go Pocket Gamer! and Pocket Matrix too.

      ok, mod me down now

    5. Re:Limitations by Salsaman · · Score: 1

      A windows machine running windows ? How is that cool ?

  2. The point? by redKrane · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I really dont understand the point in having old systems emulated on an old platform

    --
    that's my word, holla...
    1. Re:The point? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Especially considering that anyone can get a laptop to do all these things---much better!

      If you wanna run Windows (and play games), get a small laptop instead of an oversized and uncomfortable to use PDA.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    2. Re:The point? by RTCW_Monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The point is now I can play Star Control II, Wolfenstein and Scorched Earth on my pocket PC.

      balls

    3. Re:The point? by coljac · · Score: 1

      Star Control II rules forever. Finally, a use for technology I can get excited about - to make SCII more accessible.

      --
      Everyone knows that damage is done to the soul by bad motion pictures. -Pope Pius XI
    4. Re:The point? by redKrane · · Score: 0

      Star Control II? Wolfenstein? Thats all great, and those are some classic games, so I guess for people still playing old ass games there is a point to this PocketPC crzap.

      --
      that's my word, holla...
    5. Re:The point? by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      How is the pocket PC an old platform?

    6. Re:The point? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I really dont understand the point in having old systems emulated on an old platform "

      You don't understand the point of running a well supported OS on a handheld platform? Take out the inhibitor, man!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:The point? by Dunkelzahn · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://sc2.sourceforge.net/

      Its free as in speech (GPL), runs natively on Linux, Windows, BSD, and MacOSX now. :)

      Sure its based on the 3DO Port, but with --cscan=pc --menu=pc it plays like an enhanced PC version.

      --
      .
    8. Re:The point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOS is actually necessay to run Windows 98. Atleast for the initial boot. Having DOS being emulated, it would be possible to run on top of that.

    9. Re:The point? by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      DOS is actually necessay to run Windows 98. Atleast for the initial boot

      Only for the initial boot. Win 95 and 98 use DOS to boot and then take control of the system once it is booted.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    10. Re:The point? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Umm... they run on top of DOS. If DOS craps out, Windows craps out. It's just that the only app running (to DOS, anyway) is Windows, so DOS never craps out.

  3. Windows XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll stick to emulating Windows XP on my full size laptop, thanks.

  4. Usefull ? by Dozix007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is a Windows 95/98 port to the PocketPC a very usefull tool ? Win. 95/98 is designed to be usefull and (somewhat) functional for a desktop enviroment. The Pocket PC version of Windows is a far more usefull tool. It have features built in that PocketPCs are used for, and it does not drag down your resources nearly as much as 98/95.

    1. Re:Usefull ? by JeffHeatonDotCom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do this? Like so many of these very cool geek projects, they do it because they can.

      Jeff

    2. Re:Usefull ? by robslimo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm with you. Maybe my imagination is just failing me today, but I couldn't think of a reason, other than to say "Hey, look at this!" to do this.

      Beside, I'm pretty sure you can't buy a legal copy of 96/98/ME and, since a windows license is not transferable to another machine (I think), there may not be a legal way to run old Windows on a Pocket PC.

    3. Re:Usefull ? by Dan+East · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article contains several misleading statements. Bochs is not a Windows 98 emulator (nor is it a DOS emulator). It is an x86 emulator. Running Windows 98 within the emulator is just a way of showing off what it can do. Much better than boring VGA text mode screenshots of DOS, which would not have gotten mention here at SlashDot.

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    4. Re:Usefull ? by jpmkm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Jesus christ, dude. Is there a use to ANY hobby? Is there a use to collecting stamps? I sure can't think of any. Is there a purpose to playing miniature golf? People playing mini golf certainly are not helping to cure cancer or fight drug abuse. Why do people play miniature golf? BECAUSE THEY FUCKING WANT TO. God damn. Why fucking do anything? Just because you do not find something useful or entertaining or beneficial DOES NOT mean that it is not useful or entertaining or beneficial to everyone else. Grow up.

    5. Re:Usefull ? by jpmkm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you buy a full retail version of Windows then you can do whatever the hell you want with it. It is not tied to any particular machine. However, OEM versions of Windows that come installed on computers are usually tied to whatever computer it was originally installed on. Although Microsoft isn't directly producing and selling windows 95/98/ME anymore, I believe there are still places that have legal copies for sale. There are certainly many many copies that people bought back in the day but they are not using anymore. Also, what is wrong with doing something just to say, "Hey, look at this!"? This may also pave the way for other, more useful projects, so this project may not be entirely useless.

    6. Re:Usefull ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "People playing mini golf certainly are not helping to cure cancer or fight drug abuse."

      or people could live and let live; instead of imposing their vision of morality on others...what a crazy idea. Instead lets have a highly expensive, ineffective war on drugs that really is just a tool when you want to incarcerate certain parts of the population.

    7. Re:Usefull ? by jpmkm · · Score: 1

      My post was not an advocation of a drug war or telling people what to do. I simply chose two examples that people would recognize. Many people see right through the drug war and have lost faith in it. However, many people also realize that abuse of anything is rarely good for anyone. One could just as easily overdose on sugar as he could on cocaine. Once again, I am not advocating telling people what to do. It was simply an example to help people to understand my point.

    8. Re:Usefull ? by SoLoatWork · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do posts like this always come up when a neat hack is featured? How many times does it have to be said? Stuff like this isn't out there to be "useful", it's out there for people like me who think its just cool. Nothing more, nothing less.

    9. Re:Usefull ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry I misread your original post.

    10. Re:Usefull ? by zmooc · · Score: 1

      There is no legal basis for a windows license not being transferable to another computer whatsoever in most countries.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    11. Re:Usefull ? by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      While I might be similarly inclined to question the value of emulating Win9x on PocketPCs, I must admit that such an emulation is more useful than, oh, I don't know . . . installing Linux on a dead badger.

    12. Re:Usefull ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm with you. Maybe my imagination is just failing me today, but I couldn't think of a reason, other than to say "Hey, look at this!" to do this.

      Win9x has many more apps than WinCE. How about running an old version of Maple for example?

    13. Re:Usefull ? by bonch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      FUCK YEAH

    14. Re:Usefull ? by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Is a Windows 95/98 port to the PocketPC a very usefull tool ?"

      Not sure about the tool part, but I really would enjoy playing a bunch of my old DOS'ish games on it like the Space Quest series. Also, it'd be slick if I could run Photoshop on a handheld unit with a stylus. Though I ache for more pixels in the display.

      The question shouldn't be "is it useful", but rather, "how can it be useful". More interesting results that way.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    15. Re:Usefull ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said! Thanks dude !

    16. Re:Usefull ? by H09N0X10U5 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Spacker. Total and fucking utter karma whoring wanab33 733t spacker. With fucking knobs on.

      --
      The post anonymously option you are [not] attempting to use is one that isn't available to your user.
    17. Re:Usefull ? by H09N0X10U5 · · Score: 0, Troll
      Much better than boring VGA text mode screenshots of DOS, which would not have gotten mention here at SlashDot.
      Good point. SlashDot is like double monster selective about the stories it accepts. It would never publish a story about, for example, some jap who's made a model aeroplane shaped like the Starship Enterprise. Not even once, and certainly not twice. I mean, as if /. would ever post any story twice! ROFLMAO!
      --
      The post anonymously option you are [not] attempting to use is one that isn't available to your user.
    18. Re:Usefull ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may have been sincere, but it was also ignorant and short-sighted. You fucking dumb motherfucker.

    19. Re:Usefull ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's useful is that with sufficient storage and emulators, you can now run Linux, DOS, Win98, and possibly even MacOS on the PocketPC.

      Someone tell me this wouldn't be the world's most useful portable diagnostic tool.

    20. Re:Usefull ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever modded this as troll certainly is. As a fucking draught excluder, meybe.

  5. Slashspammed? by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 4, Funny
    There seems to have been a slight problem with the database.
    Please try again by pressing the refresh button in your browser.

    An E-Mail has been dispatched to our Technical Staff, who you can also contact if the problem persists.

    I feel sorry for the technical staff. I thought we were supposed to be against spamming?
    1. Re:Slashspammed? by lessthanjakejohn · · Score: 1

      gah.. its already down

    2. Re:Slashspammed? by gtjames · · Score: 1

      A link from slash dot = site crash ... that's just funny.

    3. Re:Slashspammed? by David+Horn · · Score: 1

      D'oh! I've got just over 11000 error emails in my Inbox.

      The server is still up and running - if you refresh it will load.

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    4. Re:Slashspammed? by ThomaMelas · · Score: 1

      You must be new.

    5. Re:Slashspammed? by pdbaby · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've never understood how the slashdot effect works: virtually nobody seems to rtfa, so the web traffic generated should be virtually null...

      Unless, of course, people open the site on general principle -- and then close it?

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    6. Re:Slashspammed? by ThomaMelas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well it's pretty simple. I've seen figures that put slashdot at 15 million or so readers at any given time. If 1% read the article, we're talking about 150,000 hits at one time. But I think the figure is closer to 4 or 5 % reading the articles. So that is three quarters of a million hits within 20 seconds. That's a pretty good DDOS attack. God help the site that has a story intresting enough for 50% of the readers to read the story.

    7. Re:Slashspammed? by H09N0X10U5 · · Score: 1
      Well it's pretty simple. I've seen figures that put slashdot at 15 million or so readers at any given time.
      Let me guess - you were an auditor at Enron, right?
      --
      The post anonymously option you are [not] attempting to use is one that isn't available to your user.
    8. Re:Slashspammed? by ThomaMelas · · Score: 1

      More like a bad guess on my part. I was looking at a paper on the slashdot effect and worked the math backwards. But I made a faulty guess at the percentage. I did some googling and I see some older numbers guessing that slashdot has between 700,000 to a million readers. So far more people read the stories then anyone is really willing to belive.

  6. What kinds of nerds are you guys?! by smr2x · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the point of this may be just because you can... Not every little hack has to have a purpose. I'm impressed just because it's cool to have been done.

    --
    .
    1. Re:What kinds of nerds are you guys?! by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly, today while watching the FA Cup final in England I mentally emulated a professional soccer player. In a dazzling 10 minute spell I scored a record six goals, 5 were wonder strikes and 1 was a simple tap in. Unfortuately my emulation ultimately proved to be worthless as the manc scum won 3-0 anyway.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:What kinds of nerds are you guys?! by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      manc scum? did you see dennis wise? cheating bastard.

      some of the fouls he did would get you arrested if you did that in the street.

  7. Bochs is not a DOS emulator! by Henrik+S.+Hansen · · Score: 5, Informative
    Bochs (link in article is wrong!) is not a DOS emulator!

    From the website:

    Bochs is a highly portable open source IA-32 (x86) PC emulator written in C++, that runs on most popular platforms. It includes emulation of the Intel x86 CPU, common I/O devices, and a custom BIOS.

    1. Re:Bochs is not a DOS emulator! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, thanks for pointing that out for me. I laughed aloud when I read that. I don't know I could've been as civil either.

  8. Bochs is not a DOS emulator by pesc · · Score: 2, Informative

    This was made possible by a Pocket PC port of Bochs, a DOS emulator.

    Not quite. Bochs is a IA-32 (x86) emulator that allows other architectures (such as ARM commonly used in handheld devices) to emulate a IA-32 chip.

    --

    )9TSS
    1. Re:Bochs is not a DOS emulator by bot24 · · Score: 1

      Yes, ARM as in GBA. The GBA has one of the slowest processors you can buy today and would be worthless if you had Windows on it.
      I used this on my PC(Athlon XP 2400+, 640MB of RAM) once. It took at least a day to install Windows 98.

  9. Welcome to the Bochs IA-32 Emulator Project by Curtman · · Score: 2, Informative
    Dos emulator?? Isn't that understating things a bit?

    Bochs homepage
    • Bochs is a highly portable open source IA-32 (x86) PC emulator written in C++, that runs on most popular platforms. It includes emulation of the Intel x86 CPU, common I/O devices, and a custom BIOS. Currently, Bochs can be compiled to emulate a 386, 486, Pentium, Pentium Pro or AMD64 CPU, including optional MMX, SSE, SSE2 and 3DNow instructions
  10. Ugh, Slashdotted... by ChaosWing · · Score: 1

    Go figure. I was just going to visit the site (I have it bookmarked), and that's what I see. I thought at first that the site was just down...then I see the "too many connections" part. You can guess where I went next. >_

    I haven't seen the post yet (for obvious reasons), but I wonder what the emulated processor speed is, and whether the system can be used to run plain old DOS (so I can play those old games that PocketDOS still seems to have issues with).

  11. nice tour de force by InternationalCow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But then I am using one OS I do not like to run another one that I do not like at all :) Seriously, I would have more use for a nice X windows client so I could remotely connect to my OSX and Solaris boxes at work. That would be really useful.

    --
    ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
    1. Re:nice tour de force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would this do? Lots of other great Unix util ports to Pocket PC by Rainer Keuchel on his site, as well. http://www.rainer-keuchel.de/wince/xfree-wince.htm l

    2. Re:nice tour de force by Bastian · · Score: 3, Informative

      What you're probably really looking for is an X Server (X clients are the applications that use X to display graphics).

      A google search for "X Server PocketPC" gives me this site, which lists a WinCE port of a XFree86.

      Alternatively, you could use a VNC, which would be more useful for OS X if you were wanting access to Aqua applications, too.

      (No clue how well either of these work; I'm a PalmOS guy.)

    3. Re:nice tour de force by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      I run a WinCE handheld (a damn old one too, HP Jornada 680) with a wifi connection and the TermServer client - runs pretty nice too. Win2003Server on a 640x240 touch screen is almost usable on a regular fashion, and the 75% sized real keyboard is good enough for interaction with the machine (sucks for touchtyping, but still better than nothing.) It is like having an instant on baby laptop with an 8 hour battery and a P4/2.4GHz CPU and a Gig of RAM and a tiny screen, fold up and fit in my lab coat pocket.

      I wonder if there is an X windows client for the old WinCE / Pocket PC handhelds.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    4. Re:nice tour de force by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Windows 98SE is the best of the Wintendo series. I emulate it in VirtualPC on my Powerbook to run some of the old DOS/Wintendo games I have lying around.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:nice tour de force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well *IF* it is bochs then run linux/xxxbsd if you feel like it. Bochs is just a x86 emu. Not a win98 emu. IF he got Bochs to run at any sort of reasonable speed. Thats when I will be impressed.

  12. 98 emulation is cool? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Windows 98 is one of the worst "operating systems" ever. Running it nativily is sure to get you beaten up by the /. Pogramm Action Committee. But emulating it is suddenly cool enough for a Slashdot headline?

    Of course, /. also posts every time someone gets Linux to do anything remotly approaching almost sorta but not quite entirely unlike working on anything that has electricity pluged into it, so...

    1. Re:98 emulation is cool? by LaBlueCow · · Score: 1

      What's a "Pogramm"? Just wondering...
      Anyhow, I think this project is interesting. Granted, I'm not going to run out and get a PocketPC just so I can run 98se, but the fullspeed PSX emu mentioned catches my eye...
      Pocket sized Final Fantasy? Better yet, pocket sized Symphony of the Night! NOW we're talking! Woo-hah!

      --
      [SQL Error ID 10-T: This sig. is above your current threshold.]
    2. Re:98 emulation is cool? by njchick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are missing the point. Bochs is free software. Running Bocks on another platform (PocketPC) is an achievement of free software. It's not so important what operating system runs in the emulator. Actually, the fact that Bochs is good enough to run an close source, buggy OS only underlines the quality of PC emulation in Bochs. I'm sure Bochs will easily run other OSes as well.

    3. Re:98 emulation is cool? by Betcour · · Score: 1

      I can see plenty of uses for a Windows 98 emulator. Pocket Civilization ! Now you can spend every free minute of your life playing just one more.

    4. Re:98 emulation is cool? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      A pogramm is a semi-organized act, or set of acts, of violence by one group directed at another group. For instance, this is the sort of thing that went on in the south-western Soviet satilites, directed at Jews, prior to WW2. "Christal Night" was a pogramm.

    5. Re:98 emulation is cool? by LaBlueCow · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean a pogrom ?

      --
      [SQL Error ID 10-T: This sig. is above your current threshold.]
    6. Re:98 emulation is cool? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      yes, that would be it. Thanks for the correction in spelling... it's actually rather helpful (unlike most of the corrections that get passed around here)

    7. Re:98 emulation is cool? by LaBlueCow · · Score: 1

      No problemo. Thank you for taking it better than I expected :)

      --
      [SQL Error ID 10-T: This sig. is above your current threshold.]
    8. Re:98 emulation is cool? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      I stopped expecting anything from Slashdot ages ago.

  13. What the pocketPC is capable of... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 2, Funny

    So you've got win98 running on it now? Wow, with the functionality you just added to your device, I've just got one word for you:

    PWN3D!!!1!

  14. Which begs the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not quite. Bochs is a IA-32 (x86) emulator that allows other architectures (such as ARM commonly used in handheld devices) to emulate a IA-32 chip.

    They say that snake tastes like chicken. Why not just eat chicken? It's cheaper, doesn't slither around on it's belly, and is probably better for you.

    So why not just get an IA-32 (x86) machine?

    1. Re:Which begs the question... by sploo22 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... you tell me. Maybe it's a little hard to fit a laptop in your shirt pocket, did you ever think of that?

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    2. Re:Which begs the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anyone want to put a laptop in their shirt pocket? Why not just get a pocket PC? Run Win98SE (for whatever reason) on your laptop and PalmOS or Wince or Linux on the pocket PC.

    3. Re:Which begs the question... by sploo22 · · Score: 1

      The whole point is, you can run the Win98 software on the Pocket PC instead of having to carry around a laptop. *sigh*

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    4. Re:Which begs the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... You can run an OS that was designed for the Pocket PC? Why not just run that? It will work better, no? I have no idea what Win98SE gives you on a Pocket PC that the Pocket PC don't already do with it's own OS?

  15. I can't wait to see.... by Prod_Deity · · Score: 5, Funny

    a mini Blue Screen Of Death.

    1. Re:I can't wait to see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That blue screen joke is older than yo mama, who is so old she farts dust.

  16. copy paste by Sarin · · Score: 1

    Thanks to Miracle and ceasar54 for writing in with the news that a member has got both Windows 95 and Windows 98 SE running on his Asus PPC.

    This was made possible by a Pocket PC port of Bochs, by Mamaich, who has also ported DosBox, a "program similar to Bochs but it's a lot faster and only emulates DOS". Sadly, the author tried and failed to get WarLords II working on both these versions, but I'm sure time will tell!

    If you're keen to try this on your own Pocket PC, you'll need a minimum of a 256MB memory card (or stream the image over a wireless network) and you'll need a program like Nyditot Virtual Display to increase your screen resolution. Oh, yes, and you'll also need the emulator.

    According to Miracle, what we really need now is for another developer to "pick this up and optimize it to get more speed, since Mamaich stated that he will not continue to work on this, but instead focus more on DosBox."

    Given that this shows that a Pocket PC is easily powerful enough to run Windows 95 and 98 in an emulator, do you think that attention might shift from developing new Pocket PC games to trying to get the original PC games to work in emulators? While I played a few games in Pocket DOS, the lack of decent controls made enjoying them nearly impossible. On the other hand, a predominantly mouse based game might run quite happily, and allow everyone to enjoy it on the move.

  17. its a great idea.. by sentientbeing · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..every time it BSODs its easier to throw across the room and stamp on than a dekstop..!

    --

    ------
    beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
  18. I think their web site ... by cpu_fusion · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... must be running on a PocketPC. (... notes MySQL error...)

  19. People did that on zaurus ages ago! :) by pangel83 · · Score: 5, Informative

    And here you go for screenshots: http://www.its.caltech.edu/~tzer-jen/zbochs/

    1. Re:People did that on zaurus ages ago! :) by armando_wall · · Score: 1

      Dude... thanks for the link, but it's better if others can click on it:

      http://www.its.caltech.edu/~tzer-jen/zbochs/.

      Oh, the laziness ;-)

  20. win98 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Win98 isn't that bad of an os, win98se is though. I'd go as far as saying win98se is just as bad as winME.

  21. Windows NOT emulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's the PC that was emulated - not the operating system.

  22. PocketGamer Site by Dugsmyname · · Score: 1

    Looks like the PocketGamer Site might be hosted on a Pocket PC as well... 38 Comments and it's already down!

  23. Zaurus already had this.... in 2002 by pantherace · · Score: 3, Informative
    And had quake running very rapidly after it was released.

    Bochs on Zaurus Software Index.

    I ran bochs (but not windows, not a large enough flash card at the time). It was slow (hey, no suprise there), & I wouldn't want to run windows, but it was possible, and didn't need some hack like increasing screen resolution (something sdl handled). Of course, with the new Zauruses, you wouldn't have to increase the resolution, either via OS hacks, or SDL scaling.

    1. Re:Zaurus already had this.... in 2002 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quake ran on PocketPC long before Zaurus was even released.

    2. Re:Zaurus already had this.... in 2002 by pantherace · · Score: 1
      I said "very rapidly after it was released". I should have specified it = Zaurus, so people didn't get confused, dispite the fact that when Quake was released (1996), the Zaurus didn't exist. Quake was quickly ported to the Zaurus after the Zaurus was released, while it had already been ported to Pocket PC (which was released well before anyone heard of the idea of the Zaurus)

      Happy now?

  24. SCREENSHOT MIRROR by peterprior · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mirror of the screenshots here

    They are actual size, due to small pocketpc screen I presume..

  25. Slashdotted... by DakotaK · · Score: 1

    "Please try again by pressing the refresh button in your browser." They're not making it any easier on themselves.

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  26. Limitations: Speed? by Turtlewind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The biggest limitation I can think of is the speed. I can't imagine that Win98 being run on an emulator could be anywhere near fast enough to play games, DirectX or otherwise.

    --
    --This is a self-referential sig--
    1. Re:Limitations: Speed? by homer_ca · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bochs is already painfully slow on an Athlon XP. I wouldn't want to imagine running it on a 400Mhz ARM.

    2. Re:Limitations: Speed? by jrockway · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes. However, someone should try running Windows98 under QEMU. QEMU can emulate an x86 host now (I installed Windows Server 2003 under QEMU and it worked fine; it was usuable in speed), and it runs on ARM machines. Bochs isn't really good for much anymore, QEMU beats it in everything.

      (In case you're wondering QEMU can emulate PREP and x86 hosts and run on ARM, PPC, x86, SPARC, and more. It can also translate (for example) Linux/x86 binaries to run on PPC so you can use wine on a PPC. As I said, it's really really cool. Take a look at their site or the OS Support Table. Have fun!)

      --
      My other car is first.
  27. Horrible site design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder the site died that fast.

    I got an error (unfortunately, I was too quick on the reload button and couldn't copy it) which showed that every included .php opened its own connection to the database (it went like, a single line saying "You can login or register" followed by two database connection errors and one different database error).

    This means that probably every page opens at least 3 connections to the same database, so every slashdotter is counting as three (by RIAA logic).

  28. uhhh by ShadowRage · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pocket PC port of Bochs, a DOS emulator.

    uhhh, dont you mean x86 emulator?
    bochs can handle more than just dos.

  29. what's the point? by grocer · · Score: 1

    I can't even get Bochs to run Win98 acceptably on a G3 900 iBook...it always hangs on boot...

    On the other hand, Bochs emulates the x86 so run whatever PC OS you want...the little Linux demo they include works great on my iBook although it's so stripped down, it doesn't do much other than ls and mkdir and stuff like that...

    1. Re:what's the point? by adzoox · · Score: 1

      Virtual PC runs Win 98 VERY well - it's dismal with Win XP though. In my experience VPC is 2x the speed of Bochs if using 98.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  30. As if Win98 didn't suck enough... by gearmonger · · Score: 1, Insightful
    ...on a full-sized display, now we get to use it in blazing 240x320 QVGA on a 200 MHz machine and no keyboard. Woohoo!

    "Because it can be done" is actually a great reason only about 4% of the time it gets used.

    1. Re:As if Win98 didn't suck enough... by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Actually most new PocketPC's have 400MHz Xscales. One of the newer Toshibas even has a 640x480 (ish) screen, although I don't think this emulator would support it. That would be something really damned cool to have.

    2. Re:As if Win98 didn't suck enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      How about the Casio Cassiopeia Fiva (MPC-501) PC Notebook?

      http://www.epinions.com/pr-Casio_Cassiopeia_Fiva_M PC-501_PC_Notebook/display_~full_specs

      6.7" TFT Active Matrix touchscreen at 800x600x16bpp (64K colors) and it came the with Microsoft Windows 98 OS back in the year 2000.

    3. Re:As if Win98 didn't suck enough... by night_flyer · · Score: 1

      Im sorry you couldnt figure out how to make win98 work for you, I run it on 3 machines and they are bulletproof

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  31. If its Bochs, you know the framerate is "awesome" by smchris · · Score: 1


    I can about play Links (ORIGINAL) on my 1.7 ghz machine. I successfully set up a Win95 virtual drive but why bother? I have some DOS stuff I run command line sometimes.

  32. Where is my personal digital hub? by copponex · · Score: 1

    Seriously.

    Cell phone with open hardware platform, 256MB RAM, 20GB HDD, Equiv to 500 Mhz PIII. External VGA Port, USB, and WiFi. As long as it would fit in my pocket, it could handle EVERY business function I'd need it for and I'd never be dependant on internet access for Word and Excel Docs. Get to work, plug in monitor and keyboard/mouse. Use the small screen out in the field.

    It's going to suck the first time I accidentally leave a computer in the wash, though.

  33. There's no such word as "Trialled". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "tried".

    Goddess save us from the victims of public skewl.

  34. Speaking as one of the PocketGamer webmasters... by Mike+Wagstaff · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... I really wish I'd cleaned that HTML up!

    --
    ___________
    PocketGamer.org - For Gamers on the Go..
  35. What about Linux..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't Bochs running on a Pocket PC also meen that you can run Linux on it!? I can't believe no one has said it before me...

  36. On the Linux issue by enterpriserx · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually you can already run Linux on your favourite Pocket PCs (if there is such a thing), the hp/compaq iPAQs, generally the older Compaq H3600, H3800 and H3900 series accept it.

    Unfortunately some of these (there are several) projects seem to be defunct, in any case I fail to see the reason to convert a perfectly normal PPC to a crippled handheld running linux with applications not designed for it. If you need linux, I'd go for the Sharp Zaurus, sweet machines albeit underpowered, and frankly, not NEARLY as polished.

    Windows 98 emulation on run-of-the-mill PPCs such as iPAQ 3950, Toshiba e740 or Dell Axim 3xi is a bit impractical however in my opinion, since
    1) low resolution
    2) low functionality
    3) too slow
    4) did I mention low functionality?
    5) expensive memory expansion (Secure Digital cards only for most iPAQs, and Compact flash for Toshiba/Dells)

    I applaud the technical level at which this experiment was taken, but like the linux hacks, this is a waste of time on a practical level, unless you need to run Solitaire desktop edition...

    To elaborate on speed, for those not familiar with the Pocket PC operating system (Windows Pocket PC 2002 and WMobile 2003), both are platforms based on Windows CE, 2003 being on CE.NET 4.2 and 2002 on CE 3.0; in short, 2003 is optimized for the Xscale CPUs, currently the top rated ARM-compatible cpus for handhelds, 2002 is not. Running Windows 98 in emulation mode would be a pain in 2003, much less in 2002, my 3950(PXA250, initial xscale cpu) can handle the TI-89 emulator, barely, so I'd hate to see what it would do with Windows. (gross generalization). Of course, there are faster models out there with better CPUs, PXA255 (Xscale with double membus), PXA262 (PXA255 with NAND mem 32mb) and PXA270 which hits up to 600mhz so far...In any case, to reiterate, praises to the developers

  37. Next step: run PearPC on that emulated Windows! by michaeldot · · Score: 1

    Okay, the heat death of the universe might occur before it loaded, but seeing the Mac OS X desktop appear on a palmtop would be way cool.

  38. Re:Next step: run PearPC on that emulated Windows! by enterpriserx · · Score: 1

    Eh, Bochs is a PC-targeted emulator, if you had taken care to read the posts above you'd know that Bochs emulates an x86 CPU.

    Macintosh machines run non x86 cpus, such as the G3, G4 or G5 PowerPCs (Motorola and IBM respectively), in any case the differing architectures prevent this from working on the Bochs emulator, on the other hand, any other such emulation would be out of reach because of the requirements for emulation, I mean old macs can't run OS X, much less a 400mhz PDA...

    You can always try PearPC (http://pearpc.sourceforge.net/). Maybe one day...

  39. Are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    You get the stability of Windows 98 combined with the speed and power of a Pocket PC... Sweet!!

  40. iPaq Quake by blakespot · · Score: 1
    --
    -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
    iPod Hacks.com
  41. "Bochs, a DOS emulator." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, right.

  42. Re:Next step: run PearPC on that emulated Windows! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to read his post! He said he wanted to use PPC Bochs to run PearPC, which would then run OS X. For those of you who are really dim:

    ARM-PPC2003 -> Bochs-x86-Windows 98 -> PearPC-OS X

  43. It's called the Slashdot Effect. by gd2shoe · · Score: 1


    And the other poster is right, we see it often enough. Comments often get modded up if they point to a mirror.

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  44. Nerd Factor +1 by GuineaPigMan · · Score: 1

    How about running OS X on PearPC in that 98 emluation? It could happen if you got a 4GB Multimedia Card...

    1. Re:Nerd Factor +1 by GuineaPigMan · · Score: 1

      Sorry, just realized the redundancy :(

  45. Bochs != DOS Emulator by rk87 · · Score: 1

    ...This was made possible by a Pocket PC port of Bochs, a DOS emulator...
    Sorry, but last I remember, wasn't Bochs an x86 emulator, not a DOS emulator?
    Not that you can't run DOS on Bochs, but just saying, that's not really what it is.

    --
    I'M NOT ANGRY!
  46. demonhold by demonhold · · Score: 1

    Greeeeat,

    I will be able to take the blue screen of death whenever I go... My pocket PC will never shut down properly and I will be able to read my paper in the WINDOWS 98 is CLOSING THE SYSTEM light...

    Sometimes, one should not read the Sunday morning news until the hang-over is gone...

    --
    ... y Dios vio que Linux era bueno... Genesis 99.666
  47. F@H! by n17ikh · · Score: 1

    Now I can use my PocketPC to run Folding@Home. Sure, it probably won't make deadlines but every little bit brings us one step closer to curing cancer, right? And it'll give me an excuse to mess with that damn useless thing again.

    --
    Hard work pays off tomorrow, but procrastination pays off NOW!
  48. Can I run Pocket PC on my laptop yet? by RoyalCheese · · Score: 1

    I remember looking at a friends pocket pc back in the late 90's and thinking.. "Wow" this is really cool, I can't seem to crash it, its seems reasonably speedy, its got real programs AND it fits on this tiny little thing!.. When can I buy this to run on my home computer? I sort of have a regret that MS didn't produce versions of Win95 Win98 without legacy support. Would have made it smaller/faster/more stable - Like Pocket PC?

  49. Bochs is not a DOS emulator... by TheBoostedBrain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a PC emulator.

    You cannot run Linux on DOS.

    --
    -- When did Ignorance Become a Point of View?
  50. Happy Mac by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    What would be really amusing (and cute too I might add) would be to see a Happy Mac boot-up icon on a Pocket PC (is everyone here too young to remember that PPC stands for Power PC? 15 and under?).

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  51. Why would anyone want to..... by tiger99 · · Score: 1

    ....emulate a piece of junk like any of the Win9x family on anything? That technology is best forgotten, it was a classic example of Sir Bill's gross incompetence that brought it into existence in the first place.

    1. Re:Why would anyone want to..... by smash · · Score: 1
      Why?

      Many reasons.

      For example, at work, we happen to have a piece of software that simply talks to a truck engine management computer. Very basic, all it has to do is read the serial port and list what is wrong with the truck.

      The code is proprietry, and requires windows of some description (98/2k/XP) to work.

      Now, I've had no use for a pocket PC before, but if they're reasonably inexpensive, and have some way of driving a serial port, it would be great to use for this purpose.

      At the moment, our maintenance guys are going through about 1 laptop per site every 2 months - simply getting destroyed - dropped/run over/covered in mining crap... 10 sites... thats a lot of money in notebooks.

      Something smaller and less unwieldy would be great. If its cheaper to replace, all the better.

      smash.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    2. Re:Why would anyone want to..... by tiger99 · · Score: 1
      Ah, the trap of proprietary software. In those instances, you may well have no choice, as I must agree. But if you had the choice, or the source, it would surely be better to use the native OS of whatever device you fancied using.

      But, in other circumstances, it makes little sense to do anything with an unsupported OS that never was any good anyway, although if it is all you have got, it may be slightly better than nothing.

      It sounds like your guys really need these ruggedised things the military used to use, IIRC Grid Compass was the brand, but I may be wrong as I have not seen one recently. Magnesium alloy casting, thick polycarbonate over the LCD (it was plasma the first time I saw one, with a Z80 running CP/M IIRC), you really could throw them around. It think they were made in the UK, I don't know if the manufacturer still exists. I have a very old, broken one at home somewhere, I think it might be a 286, with orange plasma screen, anyway the HDD or more likely the disc controller is faulty, last time I tried it would boot from floppy, but did not want to know about a replacement disk I tried. I think the controller chip is long obsolete, it probably was a semi-custom gate array anyway, so it is not worth fixing. But, mechanically it was as good as new.

      I wish they built the smaller stuff, all the way down to the smallest PDA, like that today, plastics are all very well but there is simply no substitute for metal, maybe with a soft plastic coating, when things might be dropped.

    3. Re:Why would anyone want to..... by smash · · Score: 1
      Yeah, unfortunately, in this case, there is NO CHOICE.

      The software is from Caterpillar, and plugs into their mining trucks, to tell the mechanic what is wrong with the truck.

      There apparently is a Java or WinCE version of the software in development, but at the moment a Win95/98 device is the lowest thing it will run on.

      In this case, Win98's deficiencies aren't a huge problem - no network connection, no support applications, etc.... its just a dumb serial application... couldn't give a shit if the OS is insecure, buggy, etc so long as it can drive a serial port for more than 5 minutes :D

      At the moment we're just using old laptops that aren't useful for anything else, but as I mentioned, they kill 1 or 2 off per month, and locating old laptops crappy enough to be sacrificed is getting difficult.

      Either we start throwing newer machines away... or find something less awkward to balance on the side of a mining truck :D

      smash.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    4. Re:Why would anyone want to..... by tiger99 · · Score: 1
      Ah, yes maybe you do have one place where Win98 is OK. No net connection, so no security problems..... In any case you have no choice for now.

      I can visualise there being a market for a versatile device which might be ideal here, something like a PC, with small screen and keyboard, all built into a yellow unbreakable case like they use for other testgear, with a nice big CF card, so it can be a PC, PDA or something else, according to which OS you load. It would want to hang on a belt, round your neck, or have a nice big magnet in the base so you could stick it on the truck. It would also need to float in water, just in case, and as it would contain a decent battery, it might also have a lamp built in, so you can connect it in the dark. Someone should make one. There must be many other uses.

  52. Re:Next step: run PearPC on that emulated Windows! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you read the title?
    NO YOU DID NOT YOU FUCKING THICK SHIT.

    Re:Next step: [b]run PearPC[/b] on that emulated Windows!

    And to the OP, don't be FUCKING STUPID. Boch will be giving you what, at most 1/25th of the speed of you native proc, and then PearPC will be giving you 1/50 of THAT.

  53. Streaming means nothing by th0mas.sixbit.org · · Score: 1

    If you're keen to try this yourself, you'll need a minimum of a 256MB memory card (or stream the image over a wireless network)

    You can stream an image of your computer doing _anything_ to your pocket PC (VNC server for example). I don't see how this is another way to prove you can now install windows 98 on it.

    --
    twitter.com/gravitronic
    1. Re:Streaming means nothing by JessLeah · · Score: 1

      They mean streaming the DISK image, methinks.

  54. Re:Win98se by H09N0X10U5 · · Score: 1
    Win98se.... this is good for... what reason?
    It sucks marginally less than plain old Win98? Marginally.
    --
    The post anonymously option you are [not] attempting to use is one that isn't available to your user.