Slashdot Mirror


Mandrakelinux 10 Now Available To All

EvilAlien writes "Mandrakelinux has released the ISOs for Mandrakelinux 10.0. Mandrakelinux 10 is one of the first commercially available Linux distributions to feature the 2.6 kernel by default. As always, you can download the release via FTP or Bittorrent. Remember, if you use Mandrakelinux, join the club or buy a box to support them."

81 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. Excellent Distro!!! by drsmack1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have upgraded from Mandrake 9.2 and I can say that this is the finest Linux distro made today. I bought Suse 9.1 and checked it out for a while; but went back to Mandrake. I am a club member and as such can easily install realplayer, flash, and Java right from pre-compiled rpms. URPMI keeps me coming back!

    1. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by nocomment · · Score: 4, Funny

      nooooo! I hadn't finished downloading it, great, there goes my downlaod speeds. Hey people! the swedish mirror is the fastest one! Go download from them, er I mean from here.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    2. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      apt-get install foo
      urpmi foo
      So it looks like the Mandrake way takes less time to type, and is therefore easier :-P

      Debian is superior in some ways, but for now I'm sticking with Mandrake and if you're going to shout the virtues of Debian I'd say you're best off sticking to things that Mandrake doesn't do in nearly the exact same way.
    3. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by nocomment · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With debian its even easier to install things with apt-get.

      how is it easier to type 'apt-get install gnome' (as an example) over 'urpmi gnome'? It's just as easy. A little less typing the urpmi way. The cool thing with urpmi is rpm's are already compatible with it. urpmi checks the dependencies and then downloads those also.

      I like debian, but it's no easier.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    4. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by Spetiam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...but does it have a Live CD sampler? I'd like to make sure Mandrakes inclusion of kernel 2.6 will work on my hardware before I go and download 3 CDs worth of data.

    5. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Use the torrents - lots of geeks on expensive synchronous connections are waiting to donate bandwidth to you :-)

    6. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by PReDiToR · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Use the torrents - lots of geeks on expensive synchronous connections are waiting to donate bandwidth to you :-)

      Are there any geeks on expensive synchronous connections that can keep a tracker up long enough for us to use the Torrents?

      I'm trying to grab them, but tracker down is the usual message.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    7. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 3, Interesting
      how is it easier to type 'apt-get install gnome' (as an example) over 'urpmi gnome'?

      Well typing-wise urpmi clearly wins (by about a second), but I'm afraid you picked somewhat poor example in Gnome since 1) Mandrake ships with Gnome so there's no need to go urpmi'ing it, and 2) I can not ever recall Mandrake releasing an upgrade for the Gnome they ship. My last info is that at Mandrake Gnome is still a one-man operation.

      Debian unstable/testing OTOH gets a lot of up-to-date Gnome pumped around the network... ;-)

      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    8. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 4, Informative

      The pclinuxonline folks have, IMHO, a really good Mandrake live CD put together. You can find it here. They are currently working on the next release which is due...anytime... (They had put an ISO out on the mirrors, but then yanked it right away.)

      --
      Have you Meta Moderated t
    9. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by wemgadge · · Score: 5, Informative
      urpmi.addmedia waschk http://wwwra.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~waschk/Man drake/10.0 with hdlist.cz

      to add Gnome 2.6 to Mandrakelinux 10

      http://www.thebrix.org.uk/

      is a site that lists all of the "nonofficial" RPM packager sites for Mandrakelinux

      --
      -- Cheers!
    10. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by jd142 · · Score: 3, Informative

      but does it have a Live CD sampler?

      Yes. Yes, it does. Mandrakemove is a cd distribution designed to specifically to run from a cd. Buy the boxed edition and it stores your settings on the included usb key.

      http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/mandrakemove/

    11. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by TwinkieStix · · Score: 5, Funny

      alias d='apt-get install'
      alias m='urpmi'

      There. Now they are the same length. Can't we all just get along?

    12. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by alienw · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you want a bleeding-edge, unsupported version of gnome, you can add a Cooker source and then you pretty much just do "urpmi gnome" to install the latest version of it.

    13. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by dementedWabbit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, this is slightly OT; but the last time I installed Mandrake (9.0 IIRC); it was too slow on the Celeron600 (only machine I have!), so I decided to reinstall Windows2000 (yes, yes, evil, wooooo, etc, etc) which (having been the previous OS) I found was a _hell_ of a lot faster than XFree. Yes, maybe my install was crap. Maybe I should disable this and that. [btw, the reinstallation totally fried the partitions - creating a gazillion partitions of about 1mb each. Got that fixed, but that's not what I wanted to make the point about]. The point I was wanting to make is that the installation (using defaults, mind) resulted in a very slow system, _very_ noticably slower than Windows2000. Is this version faster than 9.0?

    14. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, I've run several flavours of Mandrake on a 400MHz PII and they run just fine (better since I upgraded from 64MiB to 192MiB). And that's with a laptop's slow HD.

      So I'd say there's definitely something wrong with your setup. On anything faster than a 150MHz machine, pretty much any distribution should be very comfortable to use as long as it has enough memory.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    15. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by fuzzix · · Score: 2, Informative
      Use the torrents - lots of geeks on expensive synchronous connections are waiting to donate bandwidth to you :-)
      Remember to open ports on your firewalls/forwards ports on your NATs or you'll find your dl speed lacking:
      6881-6889 (one port is used for each instance of bt - this is merely a recommended range), 6969, 7070.

      Also, limit your upload speed *a little* to help the client make connections between hosts.
      IIRC:
      $ btdownloadedcurses.py --max_upload_rate [K/sec] [file.torrent]

      So, on 512/128 DSL You would set K/Sec to 10-11.
    16. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by kdriedge · · Score: 4, Funny

      What's this package 'foo' that everyone keeps talking about? I can't find it anywhere :!

    17. Re:Excellent Distro!!! by EvilAlien · · Score: 2, Informative
      I love urpmi. The suite of tools for package management in Mandrake impresses me far more than Debian. I still find myself occasionally trying to emerge something on my Mandrake box, though ;)

      For more urpmi goodness, check out Urpmi.org and the Easy Urpmi tool.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  2. Damn by Stevyn · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just spent two days downloading each file from FTP!

    Actually, I think the ftp install is more efficient. It allows you do skip the source RPMs and the contrib directory if you don't want it. You can also do a more unattended install because you don't have to keep switching out the cds. And...I'm pretty sure there was a script that made the ISOs for you. Damn, I just invalidated this whole story. Sorry slashdot.

    1. Re:Damn by Siniset · · Score: 5, Insightful
      10.0 is the first release I did the ftp install for and I'm really happy about it. I used gentoo for a while, and loved the fact that i could go to the command line, type emerge foobar and in a couple of minutes (or hours) have foobar on my computer. I loved my gentoo box, but found myself playing with it too much to get it to work just right, which is why I went back to Mandrake, because it's pretty amazing how much they are able to make work just by default. Also, their control center is the best one that I've used, better than fedoras, imo.

      Anyways, I recommend people using it if they are interested in begining on linux, because it gives the ease of use that a beginner needs, but its pretty powerful under the hood.

  3. /. Effect to the Extreme by bobhagopian · · Score: 3, Funny

    It becomes impossible to open a 100k HTML file once it gets slashdotted... god help that poor soul that is trying to download those huge ISO files right now.

    1. Re:/. Effect to the Extreme by jomas1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The /. effect should help the bittorent along greatly though. The more people who get http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/torrent/Mandrakelinux-1 0.0-Official-Download.torrent the faster it goes right?

    2. Re:/. Effect to the Extreme by Steve+Ballmer's+Fat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm getting 350k/sec down and 390k/sec upload speed with bittorrent right now... so, speed is not an issue at the moment! :D

    3. Re:/. Effect to the Extreme by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Informative

      The /. effect should help the bittorent along greatly though.

      In theory sure, but have you ever tried to download a hugely popular file that only has a few seeds?

      I have, it sucks.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  4. Community Edition by Xshare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been using the v.10 Community Edition on one of my older PCs for my little sister. It's easy enough for her, but powerful enough to run what I throw at it. I'll definately be upgrading to the Official Version now.

    1. Re:Community Edition by Croaker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh... reminds me of that deoderant commercial... "Mandrake: strong enough for a man, but made for a woman"

  5. SuSe 9.1 is on sale at their online store by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 3, Informative

    It comes with 2.6.4-54 (off the top of my head, so I may be wrong about the sub-revision)

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
    1. Re:SuSe 9.1 is on sale at their online store by Spetiam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you happen to know if Mandrake has a Live CD to test this out? The latest Knoppix with 2.6.?-?? doesn't work on my machine, and I'd like to test it out before downloading three CDs only to find it doesn't work.

    2. Re:SuSe 9.1 is on sale at their online store by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about Mandrake, but hasn't SuSe had their live version for a while now?

      Checking...

      Yes.

      LinuxISO's SuSe directory

      You can get the LiveEval for 9.1 (w/ 2.6.4...)

      --
      My mom says I'm cool.
    3. Re:SuSe 9.1 is on sale at their online store by SKPhoton · · Score: 4, Informative

      So you say you wanted to grab a copy of the Mandrake LiveCD?

    4. Re:SuSe 9.1 is on sale at their online store by nocomment · · Score: 4, Informative

      MandrakeMove is what you're looking for. You can even use a USB key to save files on. http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ftp.php3#move --Bryan

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
  6. Nice, Thanks, but no thanks. by osewa77 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I started learning Linux with Mandrake Linux and it really made things very easy. Then I moved to RedHat by accident (I lost my Mandrake CDs, couldn't get a replacement and thought, 'well, Mandrake is based on Redhat...'). After reading the previous slashdot stories about Mandrakesoft's financial challenges, I am happy to hear that things are progressing. However, I'm sticking to Fedora since most of my Linux work is server-side; Redhat and Debian happen to be the standards these days and lots of free online support (via google!)is available for them. I have written this personal stuff because I think there are many people in my shoes. 'We like them, but we really can't use them'
    _______
    by the way I Am A Fantasia Barrino fan

    1. Re:Nice, Thanks, but no thanks. by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      RedHat *was* the standard back in the day, but others have cought up, and they pretty much blew any other advantage off with their Fedora vs Enterprise debarkle. RedHat users faced the choice of a distro in continuous state of Beta, or paying large fees for updates. Not good. I've been through Debian, MkLinux, Mandrake, RedHat, SuSE, Adamantix, and a few others, and I'll say that these days Mandrake and SuSE are the real players. Mandrake has got the desktop figured out, and SuSE has got the Novell juggernaut behind them. Aside from "only RedHat supported" 3rd party apps, and maybe business folks who want the well-known name when first move to Linux, I just can't see much room for RedHat anymore... It's certainly been ousted from this office and replaced with alternatives.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  7. Big claps to Mandrake ... by nomad63 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is very heartwarming to see some major Linux vendor is interested in the individual home Linux user after RedHat dumped them like yesterday's trash.

    On a side note, I am wondering where they are getting their currency exchange rates. Wish I could buy Euros from this rate and trade on the free market :)

    [quote on]
    For comparison, the Mandrake Linux PowerPack contains more than 2300 high-quality applications including a complete Office Suite of programs, plus installation support, for approximately 75 Euros ($69 US); whereby the equivalent Microsoft Windows + MS Office costs approximately 750 Euros ($685 US) without any technical support.
    [quote off]

    --

    __________
    The more I know people, the more I love animals
    1. Re:Big claps to Mandrake ... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      It is very heartwarming to see some major Linux vendor is interested in the individual home Linux user after RedHat dumped them like yesterday's trash.

      What are you talking about?

    2. Re:Big claps to Mandrake ... by Limburgher · · Score: 4, Informative
      How is Fedora dumping the home user? It's fantastic! What's more, yum and apt are much better that up2date, and moving out from RedHat (the company) has allowed them to migrate.

      Please, try Fedora before you bash it. And, since when is the quality of a distro tied to the support of a corporation? Wouldn't that mean that Debian and Slackware suck? Odd, since they don't.

      --

      You are not the customer.

    3. Re:Big claps to Mandrake ... by harikiri · · Score: 4, Insightful
      He's probably referring to the fact that for a home user today, to get a well-integrated desktop Linux system (like what many of us used RedHat for), we have very, very limited options.

      Today, if you want a freely available desktop-oriented Linux distribution, you have to hunt far and wide. If you looked a week ago, you would have Fedora Core 2, which suffers from this major bug, Mandrake 10 Community - which is a pain to update. Knoppix is good but it's not really meant for installation though it can be done. A quick look on SuSe's downloads page shows that they do offer it free (minus commercial components), but it's either in LiveCD format or has to be installed via FTP.

      So, unfortunately today, we don't have the luxury we used to of being able to simply grab the 3 iso's for RedHat and installing them onto our system. Sure we could use Debian, or Gentoo, or even go out on a limb and try FreeBSD - but none of these are desktop-oriented, though you can achieve a nice desktop system if you work at it.

      I think that's what he's talking about. :)

      --
      Man watching 6 MSCE's around a sun box, looks alot like the opening scene's of 2001:space odyssey...
    4. Re:Big claps to Mandrake ... by Chris+Siegler · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How is Fedora dumping the home user? It's fantastic! What's more, yum and apt are much better that up2date, and moving out from RedHat (the company) has allowed them to migrate.

      fantastic? It trashes Windows partition maps, breaks NVIDIA drivers, screws up X configuration files, has missing popular packages (XCDroast), and NO firewire support! And that's just what I personally experienced! It's the biggest piece of horsesh*t distribution that has ever shown it's head and it's a RELEASE for goodness sake. I would rank it as the worst test release ever, never mind comparing it to something normal users are supposed to use. What's staggering is that they're blaming everybody but themselves for the problems, like people's time is free and they've got nothing better to do than learn about Grub and the fun details of recovering a partition map.

    5. Re:Big claps to Mandrake ... by marsu_k · · Score: 2, Informative
      Mandrake 10 Community - which is a pain to update

      I'm typing this on 10.0 Official (at least that's what it says when I boot), and I updated from Community simply by getting new urpmi sources for Official from Easy Urpmi and running urpmi --auto-select

      Now, I can't tell if I've installed just the right packages so they don't conflict or what, but so far I've had no problems with this setup. Actually, it's even better now - when running /etc/init.d/network (re)start it used fail on bringing up eth0 (it still worked though just fine). I've read some other people have had the same problem with MDK as well, and they remedied it by turning off network hotplugging; but this never worked for me. Now it just works.

    6. Re:Big claps to Mandrake ... by irix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It trashes Windows partition maps

      Before you open your piehole, you might want to notice that this problem is kernel 2.6 related and affects Mandrake 10 and SuSE 9.1 as well.

      breaks NVIDIA drivers

      New kernel version breaks closed-source kernel module. Film at 11! Want to place a wager on how long it takes NVIDIA to fix their problem anyway?

      has missing popular packages (XCDroast)

      You name one package, and it isn't even missing from FC2. Nice.

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  8. MandrakeMove by vigilology · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When will they release a MandrakeMove 10? I want to see if and how well Mandrake 10 will perform on a certain set-up, but can't without commiting to a full install.

  9. What's the diff? as they would say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can somebody inform me on which is the difference versus community and official releases?

    in soviet russia mandrake releases you!
    bad ok its long enough now ...

  10. The Good Ole Days by YodaToo · · Score: 5, Funny

    With BitTorrents of CD & DVD ISO's transporting data over all these fancy high speed lines, do you ever long for the good ole days of having to install distros like Slackware on 3.5 floppy or sending off in the mail for a Walnut Creek CD to load up linux via your fancy new 1x cartridge based CDROM?

    1. Re:The Good Ole Days by gphinch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope :P

      --
      in bed.
  11. 2.6 kernel by SKPhoton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "One of the first commercially available Linux distributions to feature the 2.6 kernel by default."

    Yep, SuSE 9.1 has already been released on CD/DVD, complete with kernel 2.6.4-54 I believe. However, Mandrake 10 is already available for download while SuSE isn't available for download until June 4th.

    Personally I prefer SuSE over Mandrake, but if you really really want a prebuilt 2.6 kernel based system NOW, you can go ahead and grab a copy from Mandrake.

  12. Already tried it. by bmo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Every so often, I pit one OS against another. I picked up a copy of Mandrake 10 from Linux Format. Of course it was the download version, but I saw it and I had to check it out.

    The French and the Germans battled it out yet again on my PC. As usual, the Maginot line crumbled instantly as the Germans, with their technical superority *from LAST OCTOBER* (SuSE 9.0), totally cleaned the floor with Mandrake 10.

    And thusly, I cleaned Mandrake off the drive.

    Hello SuSE 9.1

    This again proves that you should get your food from France, technology from Germany, and women from Poland.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Already tried it. by Cornelius+Chesterfie · · Score: 3, Funny

      It was about Canadians. The joke went something like:

      "The sad thing about Canada is that they could've gotten british culture, french cooking and american technology. Instead they got french technology, british cooking and american culture."

    2. Re:Already tried it. by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have to say I agree. I tried Mdk 10 for a fortnight. While it had plenty of great features and very good hardware support (even auto-detected and configured my HP laserjet 1000), it was just too unreliable for me to use it for work. SuSE 9.1 seems much more stable to me so far.

  13. Fedora Dual-Boot Bug? by astrosmash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does Mandrake 10 suffer from the same MBR corruption bug that currently plagues Red Hat Fedora? Apparently it's caused by some of the changes to the 2.6 kernel and is affecting other 2.6 distros.

    --
    ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
    1. Re:Fedora Dual-Boot Bug? by lokem · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think it still is according to this . But somehow the bug is marked as FIXED. More info here. Only a temp solution is provided :(

    2. Re:Fedora Dual-Boot Bug? by B5_geek · · Score: 2, Informative

      No.

      I have installed Drake v10 Official on 4 different PC's (3 laptop's and a desktop) and XP (NTFS & FAT32) and all dual-boot ok.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    3. Re:Fedora Dual-Boot Bug? by r_cerq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lucky you. I installed 3 FC2s, 2 dual-booting (to XP) laptops and one triple booting destkop (to XP and 2k3): all went OK. That doesn't mean the problem isn't there. (Lucky me, I guess). The fact that I always set the hard-drives to LBA (and the Windozes were installed that way, one of them nearly 2 years ago) might have something to do with it.

    4. Re:Fedora Dual-Boot Bug? by Nailer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes.

      See bugzilla bug.

      To make the problem apparent, you must partition whilst using kernel 2.6. Not upgrade an existing system to 2.6 after having already partitioned.

      Also, the bug only appears on particular drive geometries.

      But you can fix it with sfdisk, writing out a new partition table with a different geometry.

      See the parent posts link.

    5. Re:Fedora Dual-Boot Bug? by Mr_Silver · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But you can fix it with sfdisk, writing out a new partition table with a different geometry.

      *shudder* No thanks. I don't care how easy it is to do, I'll wait for them to produce a fix.

      I don't care whose fault it is, but speaking as an average joe user, if you want to crowbar that copy of Windows XP from me, then I want to be able to install Linux without having to faff around repairing/rebuilding stuff that I know very little about in the first place.

      When you're the underdog, or up against something which is established, in any industry, you have to accept that sometimes you may need to "fix" something that wasn't really your fault in the first place.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  14. Bittorrent... by Roguelazer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Get on that bittorrent people! I'm only getting 1KiB/s, so the Slashdot effect can't have hit the bittorrent. I know it's hard, but you can all use BT instead of the FTP download. It's inverse slashdot effect, really. The more of us there are, the faster the site is. So hop to!

  15. open proxy installed by default? by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Informative


    I'm running Mandrake 9.2 at work and home. In both cases, the default Apache config runs an open http proxy on port 80. This is a pretty bad security model. It also prevents you from posting to Slashdot. Is this a problem in Mandrake 10?

    Here's how you fix this.
  16. Nope by NineNine · · Score: 3, Informative

    That story was saying that the Official release was available to payign Mandrake Club members. Now it's freely available to anyone.

  17. WOW!!! by shaitand · · Score: 3, Funny

    Check out that features page, it says it includes ATI, NVIDIA and Matrox video cards. Just what I needed, a linux distro that comes with free video cards! woot!

  18. sure by mrsev · · Score: 5, Informative

    Community is like a final release candidate. They consider is stable enought to release but not to sell. All the bugfixes from community go into the official release. The official is the one in the boxes in the shops and is considered stable.

  19. Re:As much as I'd like to recommend Mandrake ... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 3, Informative

    Finding the download is elegantly simple, as I discovered. Google is your friend: search for "mandrake linux download." The first result is to their download page.

  20. Where is the CD #4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am a SuSE believer and thus I am not a Mandrake club member. I like however to play with other distributions and compare them with SuSE (SuSE is ALWAYS the best). I used Mandrake for a while in 98-99 ( v. 5.1,5.3, 6.0); back then it was just Red Hat+KDE.

    About one month ago I downloaded Mandrake 10 official by using a bootleg torrent. I got 4 CDs. The currrent official download Mandrake 10 edition has only three CDs. The md5 sums of the current isos are the same as the md5 sums of the first three bootleg isos I downloaded a month ago. The CD #4,

    1a85f42a5d25a8336ddb45fa8e8c50a3 Mandrakelinux10.0-Official-Download-CD4.i586.iso

    is missing, it is not even mentioned in the md5sum file! What happened with this fourth CD?

    1. Re:Where is the CD #4? by opkool · · Score: 3, Informative

      CD4 is only available for MDK Club members. If you are not a member, you will not have aces to the ISO.

      Although, don't worry. All the contents are accessible through urpmi/rpmdrake (Mandrake's YasT/apt-get/yum software installation rpogram) . Just add the "main" and "contrib" sources to urpmi from the Easy URPMI page here:

      http://www.urpmi.org/easyurpmi/

      See? All nice and easy.

      Peace

  21. Re:Yay Linux! by ChiaKemp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mandrake 10 Official plays just fine with a Windows partition. I've been using it for a while no with no issues booting to Windows. Also it was my understanding that it wasn't the 2.6 kernel that caused the issue but something to do with Fedora Core 2's installer.

  22. Re:CD4 by linzeal · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is on EMule, along with CD 5.

  23. Easy way out by dark-br · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just update mandrake-release-10.0-1mdk then:

    urpi.removemedia -a
    urpmi.addmedia --update updates ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrakelinux/o fficial/updates/10.0/RPMS with ../base/hdlist.cz
    urpmi.addmedia main ftp://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/m andrake/Mandrakelinux/official/10.0/i586/Mandrake/ RPMS with ../base/hdlist.cz
    urpmi.addmedia contrib ftp://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/m andrake/Mandrakelinux/official/10.0/contrib/i586 with ../../i586/Mandrake/base/hdlist2.cz

    and finaly

    urpi --update --auto-select

  24. Doesn't work for me by yamla · · Score: 2, Informative

    [sigh] All I get is complaints about QM_MODULES. None of my modules install which makes my system entirely useless. This is on a supposedly clean install, though I also tried an upgrade. I tried with kernel 2.4.x and 2.6.x, no go in any case.

    It's a shame. I paid $160 to Mandrake for this and it doesn't work. I was a happy Mandrake 9.2 customer but 10.0 just doesn't work.

    --

    Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
  25. There have been many, many variations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here's one:

    In Heaven: All the police are British, all the mechanics are German, all the lovers are French, all the chefs are Italian and everything is run by the Swiss.

    In Hell: All the police are German, all the mechanics are French, all the lovers are Swiss, all the chefs are British and everything is run by the Italians.

    (Fished from http://www.1jma.dk/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=607&whichpag e=6)

    The first time I heard a joke like this was in reference to European unification about 15 years ago. One guy says to another, something like, "My hope is that unification will mean all the police will be...". After which some other guy says something like, "Yes, but my fear is, all the police will be..."

  26. 10, 11, 12? by rattler14 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Slightly off-topic, but does anyone else wonder what software companies are going to do to compensate for version numbers that are already at version 10 and up? I know numbering is by far the easiest system for engineer types, but will people start to get annoyed or confused about the difference between mandrake 15 vs suse 12... do these releases actually warrant a whole new number?

    And frankly, can't we just call it something new and start from 1 again?

    just a thought

    --
    my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
    1. Re:10, 11, 12? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, Apple doesn't seem to be scrambling to come out with Mac OS XI. And it's common knowledge that they've had some subtantial upgrades in recent history (big enough to charge people a bunch of money for them, anyway)

      Really, they were just copping on the 'mystical X marketing thing.' Which Microsoft did a few years earlier with Active X.

      Actually, the only true X is the X Window System.

      Accept no substitutes or products that pimp on it's moniker.

      --
      resigned
  27. UTF-8 locales by egy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've tried Community Edition recently, and I wonder when will they make UTF-8 locales work right. While I'm using KOI8-R locale (I am from Ukraine) it's fine, but there is a lot of troubles with Unicode locales - complete mess in logs, broken fonts in mc (BTW, why doesn't it installs by default ?) and some other apps, to name a few. I mean Unicode is good , but in its current state it useless as for me.

    P.S. It seems like Mandrake CE is slightly slower than my Slackware - one more reason to stay with Slack :)
  28. I used to be a club member by vlad_petric · · Score: 4, Interesting
    For two years, as a matter of fact. I joined for three reasons - 1. I could give back to MDK without paying the 2. Duval's March call (2 years ago) 3. Subscription is the way to go for Linux, IMHO (because of the very rapid movement in the Opensource World)

    Once thing I was promised was my voice to be heard. Another one - to get some benefits.

    My voice was heard, but only by other members. I asked once - "are we gonna get a dvd iso as well ? (regarding 9.2)". Not a single answer from MDK. When 9.2 was released, Gold members were given an ISO download, but not bronze/silver (I can't really afford a Gold membership, I'm just a student). What I really disliked is that they didn't tell me anything. And nobody can really argue that they didn't notice my message, since the traffic on MDK club is very small.

    The benefits - well, the package system is reasonably good. Other than that ... it certainly doesn't feel like a subscription service. There are many products (like the x86-64 distro) that are not available for club members at all. For the main distro itself, it felt that I was paying to be a betatester more than a priviledged downloader.

    I think that the way to go for MDK is to convert the club into a true subscription model (not the very ambiguous hafl charity, half business thing that the club currently is). Until then I'll be happily using MDK on my laptops without being a member, but won't be too sorry if I have to switch to Debian.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:I used to be a club member by sasha328 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A couple of years ago, I purchased Mandrake (8 I think, just before they were about to go broke) from Mandrake's online store. I did not receive the package on the date it was supposed to be delivered. I waited a few more days, and then I contacted them. They did not reply to my emails.
      I had to send several emails, and the last one was a very angry email, asking them for a refund and really complaining about their lack of service. It was a really frustrating time, and from then on, I am not surprised that they have a problem with customer communications.

  29. Re: First by dmitrygr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hello, Mr. Gates. Welcome to slashdot, and thank you for your informative comment.

    --
    -------
    1. Enjoy your job
    2. Make lots of money
    3. Work within the law

    Choose any two.
  30. Re:How's the wireless support? by Akai · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just did a raw install of MDK 10 official last week (I'm a silver member) on my work laptop since I get so frustrated using windows I want to hit things.

    Anyways, I was at a conference and borrowed an Orinoco wireless card, slammed it in the side and powered up the laptop. It detected a new wireless card, asked me for SSID type stuff and came right up.

    Mandrake also supports hotplugging of network interfaces, so if there's no carrier on your built-in-ethernet it doesn't try to bring it up.

    As for the dlink card, you might want to check here and see if they list it.

    good luck

    --
    Please send all UCE to scally@devolution.com so I can f
  31. Re:AMD64? by ChiaKemp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mandrake 10 Official for AMD 64 was released on May 4th. Looks like it'll cost you about $129.00 (U.S.) unless your a club memeber then you get a discount or a pony or something.

  32. SpeedTouch modems by sparkz · · Score: 2, Informative
    And please remember that the Alcatel/Thomson SpeedTouch modem is not yet supported for this kernel version.

    Hassle the http://speedtouch.sourceforge.net/ team for this, not the http://speedtouchconf.sourceforge.net "team" (ie, me) for it.

    --
    Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
  33. a review of various distros by RouterSlayer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First of all, I've used just about every distro out there, and even some you've never heard of...

    Way back since the slackware days, even kernel 1.0 days and before that... Yes floppies were great.

    Mandrake has had its troubles, not the least of which has been the financial stuff that it's now finally out of...

    But even before Red Hat 7.0 it was a better distro. Its always had better package management.

    I see people whine that Debian is better JUST because of "apt get", well guess what? Mandrake has that too! so get a clue...

    and RPM? well it does that... and it does it all better. I have yet to see a better packager than URPMI... ever.

    also, through all my testing over the years, I have never, EVER seen a distro support all my hardware "out of the box", I mean, it JUST WORKS. On all the wierd laptops I've owned, it installs and runs like a charm, every time, supporting all the whacky devices without me having to do a thing. ever...

    wireless? yep, it was there, done and work, weird ass DSL setups, it worked. and it detected it all and set it up right, the first time... during install.

    Package support? it has soo many different packages, for desktops, for servers, for whatever you want, even if you want everything. Me, of course, I experiment, so I literally install EVERYTHING, and it still works!

    Today, for newbies I always point them at Mandrake, its dirt simple to install, and it gets it all correct, the first time, no weird questions, no BS, ever. it just works. period. and thats what people want.

    for the hardcore people, I still recommend it, for servers, I still recommend it. always.

    no matter what you are trying to do, it'll support it, no matter what your hardware, it'll work.

    if it doesn't, you did something wrong. I hate people who say "Well I just installed it and it doesn't work" well guess what, it is STILL possible to do "something wrong" even then.

    I watched friends do this, and they complain that whatever doesnt work afterwards, and I noticed during install they didnt select those packages... well, guess what? it wont work... duhhhh... and they even claim they selected "everything"... uh, no, I was watching bubba, you missed more than half of it. hello...

    if you have a specific use, need a specific package, and specifically DONT choose it during install, of course it wont be there... jeez, get a clue...

    I dont know of a better distro, I've been supporting them since way back when, and always will, I pay support, I buy extra stuff, you name it.

    right now on the market there aren't many choices...

    Debian - forget it.
    Fedora - this thing is a joke
    SUSE - I hate Yast with a passion
    slackware - they ruined it after 7.0
    nuff said.

  34. Pricing by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use Mandrake....9.2 with some cooker stuff added (newer postfix, mailman and a 2.6.6 kernel). Before that, I used 3 different versions of Caldera (3.0, 2.x and 1.3) before they became the evil SCOmpire.
    I used to support Caldera by buying a box set of whichever version it was. I could usually pick it up at my neighborhood Costco for under 30 bucks. It was a good deal for me and it put some money in Caldera's coffers. TANSTAAFL. Everyone was happy.

    rant
    With Mandrake, I want to do the same thing and I'm continually astounded by HOW FUCKING EXPENSIVE it is...$50USD for the 2 CD set (which gives less than the download) and $90 for the full-featured 8 CD set.
    So then I say, well, let me see what it costs to join the Mandrake Club: $66...and you don't seem to get anything other than the ability to download the ISOs earlier than anyone else for that level.
    I'm a Mac user. I'm used to paying for software, but this is ridiculous, especially since a distro is current for only ~6 months and support's for 2 years. /rant

  35. almost right by G�tz · · Score: 2, Funny
    Thanks for referring to my page, but the URL is wrong: right URL.

    Warning: these packages aren't updated anymore, they've been merged into Cooker, which will become 10.1.

    The university's admins must hate me for linking my page on /. :-)

  36. Re:do we still have to pay the ms tax? by Tepar · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want a laptop, go to http://www.powernotebooks.com. They sell OS-less laptops and laptops with Mandrake (and Xig's X server) preloaded.

  37. Re:Slackware - drink the nectar of the gods. by DMadCat · · Score: 2, Informative

    * Actually I take that back.. feel free to reply with what you think is good or not good with slack. There are bad things about Slackware? I wanted to learn linux about a year and half ago. The first distro I'd picked up (the one you heard most about) was Redhat. The install was easy enough and everything was very Windows-like which surprised me not knowing what to expect from this linux animal. Then after about a week my display suddenly went south. I logged in to find there was no gui in my gui.

    So after a bit of tooling around and a couple of reinstalls which always resulted in the same problem (fonts, buttons, toolbars all failing to show up) I gave up and tried Mandrake. It was nice and all but still way too much like Redhat and Windows for my liking. Besides that I wasn't learning anything about the infamous command-line everyone's so hyped about.

    At that point (about a month in) I ditched linux for a while and went with FreeBSD which worked really great! At the same time I still found a lot of programs that I couldn't use with it so I once again began a search for another distro.

    I found Slackware after reading an article about Linux in the workplace wherein the author got a new job and immediately ditched windows for his favorite linux distro, Slackware. Intrigued (ya gotta admit the name is cool) I sought it out and found out (by reading reviews) that it was difficult to install and had a steep learning curve which made it even more appealing to me.

    I have to say, Slackware was just as easy (if not easier) to install than any of the previous three OS's and the dreaded "steep learning curve" is really more of a gentle slope. Slack uses not only its own packaging system but also has an RPM installer as well as the ability to convert RPMs to TGZs. As for a gui, you can install Gnome with a minimum of fuss using Dropline Gnome.

    With the recent addition of Swaret to keep your distro current, Slackware really has the advantage of being an easy to use, EXTREMELY stable linux distro that is not only functional but also serves as a gentle introduction to the command line.

    You know what they say... once you go Slack, you never go back!