Slashdot Mirror


Sneak Preview of VIA's next-gen mini-ITX mobo

An anonymous reader writes "VIA will preview its next-generation mini-ITX board for the consumer electronics market at next week's Computex 2004 in Taipei. The EPIA SP features a new graphics and memory controller hub (GMCH) supporting faster front-side bus (FSB), memory, and southbridge interconnect speeds. It also features a C3 processor clocked at 1.3GHz, integrated PadLock Hardware Security Suite, and MPEG-4 acceleration. Oh, and like the current top-end MII 12000 VIA board, the whole board probably draws under 20watts running flat out."

218 comments

  1. For anyone interested... by Mz6 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    These boards make for a great use in the car. I have used several of these boards to create a carputer for movies, music, and navigation inside my car.

    I have one myself and I love it :)

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:For anyone interested... by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      you run windows then. as there is no NAVIGATION software for linux available.

      Yes gpsdrive is a moving map display but it does not have any navigation capabilities... I.E. "turn left in 300 feet continue on E drive for 5000 feet and then merge left."

      I would LOVE to have some real linux navigation software.... but delorme will never make a native linux app and only their old version 5.0 will run under wine correctly.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:For anyone interested... by inkedmn · · Score: 1

      So *you're* the guy watching RotK in fully Dolby 5.1 in your rear-view mirror?

      --
      well, it's nothing one behind the ear wouldn't cure
    3. Re:For anyone interested... by legoburner · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Screw cars... think supercomputing cluster. VIA have been talking about a dual CPU mini-itx board with 2ghz (esther core) processors for a while now. I'll leave finding info about them up to you (mini-itx.com and via's site for starters)

      You can get 1U cases which let you put in 2 mini-itx boards (there are quite a few if you [g|fr]oogle.

      Here are some specs for a rack full of them...
      336GHz total power. 84GB RAM, up to 22.5 TB HDD space, total power usage < 15kW (60W per machine).

      Costs:
      fixed:
      42U rack: $150
      Cables/Power supplies: ~$100

      per-unit:
      case: $200
      mobo (guess): $200
      ram (512GB*2): $120
      HDD (300GB): $250

      ttl per machine: 200+2(200)+2(120)+2(250)=$1340
      42 machines=$56280
      + rack bits=$56530

      in GBP=30584 (I am British)

      that's a spicy-a meat-a-ball.. still 22TB and 336Ghz cluster... hmmmm... Might get 5fps on Doom 3!

      15kW/h
      To be extra geeky... cost per day to run in London, England (electricity only, excluding air conditioning)...
      15kW/h per hour * 24 = 360kW/h per day
      * 8p per unit + VAT = 2880 + 504
      = GBP 33.84 per day
      = GBP 12351.60 per year.... ouch, that's a new rack every 3 years if you leave it turned off though

      Damn I cant wait for the 2ghz dual cpu mini-itx boards... and a bunch of rich, obscure relatives to pass on and give me money >:)

      And since this is slashdot... cue the 50 posts to correct and nit pick this post since it contains (bad) maths.

    4. Re:For anyone interested... by Mz6 · · Score: 1
      True... One of the biggest reasons why I did this to my car was that I wanted to be able to incorporate MP3s and movies into it, but also have navigation as a MUST. Unfortunately, as you say, there is no linux software that supports navigation as accurate as say some of the Windows software out. Not to mention that most of the software developed especially for use inside a vehicle is all windows based anyhow.

      I bit the bullet and *gasp* run XP for it... Let the Microsoft flaming ensue...

      --
      Hmmm.
    5. Re:For anyone interested... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      VIA chips have crappy floating point performance compared to the competition, so this might affect cluster suitability.

      These little boards would make excellent web browsing machines, or little web and file servers.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    6. Re:For anyone interested... by Amgine007 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here are some specs for a rack full of them...

      A proof of your concept: the Mini-ITX Cluster

    7. Re:For anyone interested... by normal_guy · · Score: 1, Funny

      So when you finally _do_ get the money and buy the rack of your dreams, you can fulfill your dead relatives' wishes - the top SETI team.

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    8. Re:For anyone interested... by platos_beard · · Score: 1

      Do you really need a hard disk for each unit? Boot all those puppies from the lan and save your money for the electricity, which will still be high, but not as high.

      --
      What's a sig?
    9. Re:For anyone interested... by cushty · · Score: 1

      Check http://www.mini-itx.com/projects/cluster/ for a Mini-ITX based cluster.

    10. Re:For anyone interested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ram (512GB*2): $120

      Would you please provide a pointer to where I can buy a 512GB stick of ram for $60?

      Oh, and where I can find a mobo that will use it?

    11. Re:For anyone interested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a bunch of seedy online shops selling for < $60, check a price aggregator site for some. I did those numbers when I first read about the planned dual-cpu VIA mini-itx board, and RAM was a bit cheaper then so more reputable places were selling around the $60 mark. It is only PC2100 RAM.

    12. Re:For anyone interested... by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Probably not a very efficient cluster for actually doing calculations on but it'd be great for prototyping. I could see having the head node segmenting it off into a number of smaller clusters be a useful approach for teaching purposes.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    13. Re:For anyone interested... by smurf975 · · Score: 1

      I doubt your price estimates are correct as top of line VIA mini itx boards are cheaper then that what you quoted.

      From the mini itx site:
      Cheapest casing + CL10000 motherboard (at 1Ghz but has two LAN's) + 512MB (is max in this config) + 160 GB HD (you'd be better of with a third party sold HD here)
      ---+
      519.10 or 358.00

      However you can save a lot of money by buying your hd, ram and casing somewhere else. Please remember about the story about the first google servers. They don't need to look good just work. (The first google servers were build from Lego blocks)

      However I would think the first generation VIA mini itx boards (those at 500 Mhz) would be very useful for specific uses. Like for web hosting companies.

      A lot of websites/projects like those on geocities, Lycos, email accounts, and even source forge start with a great goal but at the end they only get maybe 5 hits a month and are updated once every 6 months, if they are at all.

      Well have them automagically moved to a cheapo VIA mini itx server. When the traffics gets hot then move "automagically" them to some high-end and energy hungry server. The total price would be for such a complete system (256MB, 80GB, Fanless, casing and other things) 329.15. However a $200 wallmart PC should be able to handle those sites also very well. But now energy consumption of a VIA vs $200 PC?!

      --
      -- I don't buy it, I grow it.
    14. Re:For anyone interested... by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

      What are you gasping for, you have simply decided to use the best tool for the job.

      I think that this is what we should all be pushing. If linux is a better system for the job, use it, don't use it because it is not Microsoft.

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    15. Re:For anyone interested... by garroo · · Score: 0

      Although I think Win2K would run a lot faster on that slow CPU.

      --
      Oh my gawd, they killed kenny's mod points!!!!
    16. Re:For anyone interested... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      So have we: http://www.dashpc.com. Ours, however, runs Linux.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    17. Re:For anyone interested... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Great write-up. I only wish they had included costs...

      I'm considering proposing a solution like this at work.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    18. Re:For anyone interested... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Other than "because we can", is there any real reason to do this?

      Sure you get lower power usage and lower temps than with normal PCs, but you sacrifice performance for those gains.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    19. Re:For anyone interested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope he wont be mad at me, but Glen who built this rack is Aegis` in #electronics on efnet. (irc)

      If you have questions (list costs, power, performance, whatever).

      Course, he WONT be mad at me, since I'll be making this post...anon.

  2. Yeah but... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    Where do you BUY this stuff from? I used to buy those VIA boards from New Egg but then they stopped carrying them. Anyone know why?

    I really liked those things!

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Yeah but... by Lispy · · Score: 1

      I get mine exclusivley from ebay. Just try to get a real new one with guarantee. Never had any issues. I really like the Epias and I'm still trying to convince my mom to let me build a sleak Epia based Linuxbox for her. Somehow she still thinks those things are expensive. Well, I can't blame her really, she never ever paid a single dime for a PC. All she ever uses is my last generation hardware. ;-)

    2. Re:Yeah but... by Kenja · · Score: 4, Informative
      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:Yeah but... by dknight · · Score: 1

      www.mini-itx.com

      Has all the mini-itx related stuff you could ever want, and has a handy store too ;)

    4. Re:Yeah but... by kunudo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Forget mini-itx, I want to know when Nano-ITX will be availible... I get the distinct feeling that it's a vaporvare promo trick... it's only 2/3 of the size of the mini-itx boards and 10x as useful/easy to put into things.... I want one :(

    5. Re:Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to buy those VIA boards from New Egg but then they stopped carrying them. Anyone know why?

      I posted that question ages ago and someone called Newegg to ask them. Apparently they were losing too much money on them. Lots of people returning them because VIA's hardware/drivers can be a bitch to get working properly (unless you know what you're doing).

      I don't care for VIA hardware myself. Too many issues and stuff that doesn't work right. I like Mini-ITX though, I wish there were more players on the field (imagine Intel Mini-ITX hardware; rock!).

    6. Re:Yeah but... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Bizarre, I had no problems getting my M10000 system working... except sound, which just needed the 2.6 kernel to be released with working ALSA. No driver issues at all.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    7. Re:Yeah but... by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Quite a few places. In Europe linitx.com. There are a few places in the US as well.

      In btw, I may be mistaken, but I have some questions about the reality of the article as well as the integrity of the journalist who wrote it. The picture looks suspiciously like MII, probably the 600MHz version with the heatsink taken off the Eden on it. It has PCMCIA and cardbus and is C3 based. It is not the C5 motherboard described in the article.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    8. Re:Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you're talking about a Linux system.. That does that take some skill to set up in the first place (needed 2.6 kernel, etc).

      Think of the average consumer setting up a VIA machine with Windows and not having a clue (eg. "Why the fuck doesn't the sound work right?!").

      A lot of VIA's stuff is just substandard. It's OK, but not great. And their drivers are not much better than the crap ATI turns out.

    9. Re:Yeah but... by jonasmit · · Score: 1

      FYI. I contacted newegg a few weeks ago and they are working on carrying them. Not sure when but...

    10. Re:Yeah but... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1, Funny

      VIA had them out in public at E3. I want one BAD.

      The only problem is they HAVE NO PCI SLOT! There is a miniPCI slot, but what's that good for? I want a miniPCI TV Tuner so I can make a tiny PVR. I found one here , but it looks like vapor.

      I can go USB, but USB tuners have a reputation for sucking.

      And now VIA is pushing a new Grace platform that is supposed to be even SMALLER than nano-itx...

    11. Re:Yeah but... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2

      Since I'm using an ATI TV Wonder VE in my current mini-itx Toolbox PVR (built into a $5.99 K-MART Toolbox), I decided to run Win2000 on it.

      I had NO PROBLEMS with getting the hardware to work. None. All the VIA stuff loaded and ran perfectly.

      Since I've committed the Sin of admitting M$ use, I will go so far as to admit records the season finale of Enterprise on it last night...

    12. Re:Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh that thing must record like shit. What resolution/bitrate do you record at?

      That VIA hardware ain't got much muscle. I could understand running a real PVR card in it, but software encoding?!

      I use MythTV, Linux, and a WinTV-PVR350. But I don't use that VIA crap (I won't even buy any motherboard that uses a VIA chipset). And yes, it recorded Enterprise last night.

    13. Re:Yeah but... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      The ATI card has an MPEG hardware encoder on board. It can record at VCD or DVD format with less than 1% of dropped frames.

      Due to a sale, rebate and 10% off coupon, I paid $9 for the card. And it works fine for cable TV recording. A good bit better than HQ VHS.

      And the mini-itx M10000 board has MPEG hardware decoding built into the video chipset.

    14. Re:Yeah but... by eviljav · · Score: 2, Informative
    15. Re:Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Openbrick.org
      Synertrontech.com

      Synertrontech has dual mini-itx in a 1U rackmount. All these units can boot from compact flash or micro hard drive in the motherboard.
      PXE and wakeonlan makes them great for X terminals.
      Lots of built-in ethernet and wireless lan ports.
      These mini-itx boards are actually smaller and more advanced than the mini-itx boards that everybody else sells. These are complete computers, not just motherboards. Great Prices, too.

    16. Re:Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the "VE" version does not have the hardware encoder?

    17. Re:Yeah but... by kunudo · · Score: 1

      Have you tried contacting that company? Say you're an OEM and that you want 10 sample boards, can't just ask for ome... and give me one too... :)

    18. Re:Yeah but... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      The VE just doesn't have the IR remote.

    19. Re:Yeah but... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they said it would be out in May...

    20. Re:Yeah but... by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Logic Supply has a good selection for a few bucks less, and IMHO their site design is a lot nicer.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    21. Re:Yeah but... by nawspac · · Score: 1

      tigerdirect.com or directron.com carry them

  3. 1.3ghz by zackeller · · Score: 2, Funny

    1.3ghz should be enough for anybody.

    1. Re:1.3ghz by Andy+Mitchell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1.3Ghz should be enough for anyone but....

      The VIA C3 had a rather poor floating point unit, so for apps that need it (e.g. 3D games) they do very badly.

      Of course for playing MP3 or WMA files and office apps the older 533MHz (Eden 5000) version was nippy enough :-)

      As far as I'm aware they havent improved the FPU yet. Someone let me know if I'm wrong. This armchair CPU designer would of liked to see them throw more silicon at this area.

      Simply increasing the clock speed always generates more heat, a more complex FPU would only generate more heat if your making use of the FPU.

      Controlling a fans RPM speed with CPU temperature is trivial so this makes a lot of sense.

    2. Re:1.3ghz by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      As far as I'm aware they havent improved the FPU yet. Someone let me know if I'm wrong. This armchair CPU designer would of liked to see them throw more silicon at this area.

      Simply increasing the clock speed always generates more heat, a more complex FPU would only generate more heat if your making use of the FPU.


      According to VIA's own benchmarks, you are correct, the FPU is still as terrible as in the old Cyrix chips. The emphasis seems to be on power consumption with these mini-ITX boards, and of course, there is always excess that ends up as radiated heat.

      I looked into a mini-ITX set-up to build small firewall/NAT/proxy boxes for people. So far, the performance of the C3 makes me uneasy, and the prices can only be offset by the fact that their smaller footprint makes them convenient.

      I figure that if a 200MHz K6-2 does the job for me at home (NAT only), I can get away with something on the lower end of the MHz scale. I'm still on the lookout for mITX boards that accept older mobile Pentiums, or perhaps AMD Durons if I need some horsepower.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    3. Re:1.3ghz by homer_ca · · Score: 3, Informative

      The FPU is a little better now. It runs at full CPU speed instead of half like the earlier C3's. It's still underpowered though. Sudhian has a review of the last generation MII 12000 here. The 1.2Ghz w/o hardware MPEG4 acceleration can't play 720x540 DIVX file smoothly. If the hardware MPEG4 works, 1.3Ghz should be fast enough for any home theater PC job except video encoding like recording TV. You'll need a TV tuner card with a hardware MPEG encoder.

    4. Re:1.3ghz by pc486 · · Score: 4, Informative

      While it is true that the FPU of the C3 still isn't up to speed with other processors, the C3 1Ghz can definatly play 720x540 MPEG4 back at full speed. I do it all the time with a CVS copy of MPlayer (DirectFB driver) on Slackware Linux. I can even play 720x460 WMV9 (windows binary DLL) with 80% cpu utilization. For comparison, libavcodec decodes 640x480 MPEG4 with only 32% CPU utilization, with 14% going to dealing with the framebuffer (not decoding, just frame copying or vsyncing).

    5. Re:1.3ghz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Sun SparcStation at 170 mhz running OpenBSD does snappy enough at NAT and proxy, a C3 should have zero trouble for a smallscale setup. I see no latency either. Go for it. :-)

  4. Froogle by Mz6 · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:Froogle by anethema · · Score: 2, Informative

      While Froogle is your friend indeed, a search for VIA wont turn up very good results.

      What you want to search for is EPIA, since all the mini-itx boards carry the epia name.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  5. oooh car by millahtime · · Score: 3, Funny

    makes my dreams of building KITT that much closer to reality.

    That is the Knight Industries Two Thousand

    1. Re:oooh car by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the car that tells you when you didn't bring enough flowers, because there are two girls in the house, instead of just the one you expected?

      That's the only episode I saw. I loved the NES game, though. I beat it, once.

  6. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    But does it run Windows for Workgroups 3.11?

    1. Re:Yes by Khakionion · · Score: 1, Funny

      Windows 3.11 is "old and busted."

      Windows 3.2 is the "new hotness."

      --
      OMG! Wau!
    2. Re:Yes by Lispy · · Score: 0

      Why would you? After all you could never imagine a Beowulf cluster of these things running Win3.11.

  7. I have one of the earlier mini-iTX boards by hattig · · Score: 2, Informative

    The EPIA-800 ... it is okay I suppose, it does what I'm using it for quite well (KDE on FreeBSD for work purposes, e-mail, light web browsing, SSH, etc). It suffers from being a first-gen product, the chipset is weak, and so on.

    A 1.3GHz CN400 based board will be a lot more powerful, and should be more than enough for media applications that these boards are ideally suited for.

    1. Re:I have one of the earlier mini-iTX boards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using a similar board, sporting a fanless 533 MHz, a passive power supply as well as an IDE to compact flash adapter.

      It's wonderful, makes no sound at all, and I have no speed issues at all (probably because it's used as a dumb terminal, it connects to a more powerful server through the LAN) even when watching movies.

      Now when the fanless version has been bumped to 1 GHz, and hardware encryption and random number generators have been addes, powerful silent computing without resorting to dumb terminals may finally be possible.

  8. Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by Amgine007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Nano-ITX board that they announced last year still seems to be the coolest thing around in terms of potential for off-the-shelf, single board computer projects.

    I mean, it's only 4.7 inches by 4.7 inches! Of course I've never seen a price, but sell this thing in the $100 range and I'll take 3...

    1. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by zackeller · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these things! Get together fifty or sixty and you might have close to a real computer!

    2. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by Smallpond · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you just want small size, use PC/104 at 3.6" x 3.8" (90mm x 96mm). You get limited CPU speed, but you can make a tiny stack of modules.

    3. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by nkh · · Score: 1

      Aha! Too late!! (it's been done with older cards but who cares?)

    4. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by Amgine007 · · Score: 1

      > If you just want small size, use PC/104 at 3.6" x 3.8" (90mm x 96mm).

      Yeah, PC/104 is definitely cool stuff, but the problem with it for me has always been expense -- it seems more of a 'specialized' (vs 'off-the-shelf') solution. If the nano-itx is priced near the mini-itx (probably with a small premium at first), it would win both in terms of price and availability.

      I bought an advantech SBC a few years ago, before there were any mini-itx boards readily available, and it set me back $500. A pure PC/104 solution is not much cheaper, last I checked, though they definitely have some neat modules.

    5. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by jdray · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember spotting a computer, probably a link off of LinuxDevices, that was the size of a credit card. It was mostly SMT solder-down components with a mini-PCI-like card connector at one end that was used to connect to a daughtercard full of ports and whatnot. I went looking for it yesterday, but couln't find it. Any ideas? I wanted to imagine a Beowulf cluster of them, but needed a visual reference for aid.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    6. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by ry0n · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by repoocaj · · Score: 1

      That sounds like one of the products that the company I work for sells. Is this it: http://www.logicpd.com/eps/

      --
      Jeff
    8. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You prolly mean techsol.ca

    9. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was a TINI?
      You can order them direct from Dallas Semiconductors or, if you live in Europe, it might be better to get one from Taylec

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    10. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by jdray · · Score: 1

      Um, no, but that's really cool.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    11. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by jdray · · Score: 1

      Very nifty. Not the thing I was thinking of, but essentially the same situation. Do you happen to know how much the development kits sell for?

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    12. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by kraut · · Score: 1

      Yes, but PC/104 cards are really really expensive, unless you want to buy hundreds of them. Whereas mini-itx is cheap, and we all hope nano-itx will be similarly priced.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    13. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by horza · · Score: 1

      Maybe the Gumstick, though it's far smaller than a credit card (more the size of a stick of gum, hence its name).

      Phillip.

  9. DRM? by Atario · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The latest C3 processor features an integrated AES encryption engine and two random number generators that work with the PadLock ACE software to perform user authentication, DRM, or other security operations in the background
    [Cue orchestra]: DUN DUN DUNNNNN!!
    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:DRM? by kunudo · · Score: 1

      Use linux, install or avoid installing drm drivers, it's your choice, at least for now...

  10. hard to find... but not that hard... by anthonyrcalgary · · Score: 2, Informative

    I thought about getting one of the older ones, and my local place can order them in if you ask... try this with your local store. It's not worth hunting around online for a better price when shipping will eat the advantage many times over. With more expensive parts, it can be worth it but these things are cheap.

    I imagine I'll get one when there's dual-NIC version. They're pretty tough to beat for firewalling. There's cheaper and lower power systems in existance, but you usually sacrifice quite a bit.

    --
    When someone might yell at me, it has to be OpenBSD.
    1. Re:hard to find... but not that hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is already:
      CL series

    2. Re:hard to find... but not that hard... by MoTec · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is an older dual-nic version, the
      VIA EPIA CL-Series. It's only 600mhz but that's lots faster than the old compaq deskpro that i'm currently using for a firewall. I'm planning on upgrading to one of these in this or a similar case.

      From what I've read, lots of people are using this motherboard for just this purpose.

    3. Re:hard to find... but not that hard... by darrylo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If you only want to create a low-power firewall, take a look at the Soekris boxes, which are designed to run FreeBSD, Linux, OpenBSD, and NetBSD. Some models have three (3) lan ports, as well as (optional) PCMCIA slots (for wireless LAN applications). Most versions boot from compact flash (or a microdrive), but there's a version that supports a 2.5" IDE laptop drive (however, note that the optional case for the IDE drive version supposedly has poor ventilation, and so the drive supposedly runs hot -- see the mailing list below). The processors are a tad slow (100-266MHz 486-class processors), but they're generally more than enough for firewall/access point purposes.

      There's a mailing list:

      http://cinematic.forko.com/pipermail/soekris-tech/

      There's also, "m0n0wall", a FreeBSD-based firewall originally designed for the soekris boards:

      http://www.m0n0.ch/wall/

      I'm in the process of upgrading my home firewall to soekris/m0n0wall, although I plan on using an EPIA VIA M 10000 board for an home fileserver.

    4. Re:hard to find... but not that hard... by anthonyrcalgary · · Score: 1

      not of the new one (slower, no SATA, etc)

      --
      When someone might yell at me, it has to be OpenBSD.
    5. Re:hard to find... but not that hard... by anthonyrcalgary · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Right, but I'd prefer the new one as it has SATA on board. It's also a bit faster, more memory bandwidth, etc. I'd be using it to host dynamic content and as a file server as well. When they get a dual NIC version of the new one, I'll be able to build the server I want with no PCI cards, which is what I'd prefer to do. I'm not going to replace my aging system now when I can wait a little bit longer and get a system that does everything I want without any upgrades.

      --
      When someone might yell at me, it has to be OpenBSD.
    6. Re:hard to find... but not that hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Synertrontech will sell you one with four ethernet ports, 1 of them will be gigabit, and with 2 wireless ethernet interfaces.

    7. Re:hard to find... but not that hard... by CMonk · · Score: 1

      I have a CL for my firewall, I love it.

      It's also available in a 1GHZ version but it has a CPU fan.

  11. Athlon XP via chipset kt880 nowhere to be seen by donfede · · Score: 3, Informative

    Interesting, VIA is announcing yet more new products... Yet, I've been looking for the past several weeks (and other posts on the Internet go as far back as Nov of 2003) for VIA's latest generation Athlon XP chipset KT880 via kt880... yet other than VIAs website, it's nowhere to be seen!!!

  12. C3 isn't that cool. by Lord+Graga · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've had a clean installation of Win98 on a C3 machine, and it crashes programs occasionally. Getting sound to work on the southbridge (VIA Eden 5000 mobo') is also hard, in Windows. I linux, there's no "neutral" kernel modules for the machine either. It's pissing me off.

    I guess they have fixed some problems on this new one though...

    1. Re:C3 isn't that cool. by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Try Win2000. Runs just fine on my M10000.

    2. Re:C3 isn't that cool. by XanC · · Score: 1
      funkdid writes "Italy has made transferring content via the wad pulling Internet without the permission of the screwing copyright holder a thrusting criminal offence.

      Wow.

  13. PVR? by dostert · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Has anyone tried setting up a nice small PVR with any of these? If you put like a Hauppauge 250 or another hardware encoding card in this, is there enough power for recording and watching TV at the same time? How about VIA's graphics? I assume I wouldn't be able to play FarCry... but will it be adequate to display DVDs on a non HDTV?

    1. Re:PVR? by vranash · · Score: 1

      Dunno about the TV, but I've got onna the M10K series chips/mobos and it runs DvDs pretty well if you don't have a lot of other programs running (at least in Linux, dunno about windows). Also, if you hunt around there's a new VIA-UNICHROME video driver out that does the mpeg2 acceleration I believe. Anyways, it seems faster to me using the 'experimental' drivers, and the version I have is relatively stable.

    2. Re:PVR? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use an ATI TV Wonder VE with my M10000 board. Works fine for recording/playback, but forget about pausing live tv.

      DVDs play fine, too. So does about every video codec I've thrown at it.

    3. Re:PVR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope nobody ever though of it.

      not the MythTv people nor the Freevo people...

      you are the first! Hurry! you had better patent it!

    4. Re:PVR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two epia-based pvr's. Works very well indeed.
      One has been running 24 hours a day for almost two years now (rebooted a couple of times though, due to updates).

    5. Re:PVR? by darkmuck · · Score: 1

      Actually I have one of the 1 Ghz VIA Nehemiah M10000 boards. It has the built in 5.1 channel surround sound and mpeg4 hardware decoding. I used a half-height Yaun MPG-600 off newegg.com (hard to find, they sell out quickly) which uses the same hardware (for the most part) as the happauge pvr-250. It works really nicely as a surround sound dvd player/tv/music player/etc. using the www.myhtpc.net (freeware) interface.

    6. Re:PVR? by Karrots · · Score: 1

      I have setup a PVR on a EPIA 800, 120Gig HD, WinTV PVR-350 from Hauppauge (TV-OUT/IN). I don't use the EPIA's built in TV-OUT. The PVR-350's TV out works alot better. I love my box.

    7. Re:PVR? by Hackeron · · Score: 1

      It is constantly used to pause live TV, and was proved to be more than powerful enough, even to record directly to mpeg4, but best not take your chances, use mpeg2.

  14. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    And you were too stupid to hit Window-L when the Boss came up to talk to you exactly why? Most of the time I feel for guys out of a job- but in your case, the wound is self inflicted.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  15. Question ? by Jim+Buzbee · · Score: 2, Funny

    the whole board probably draws under 20watts running flat out.

    For the ignorant among us, how does that compare to say the power consumed by a 20 watt night light? Is it the same?

    1. Re:Question ? by dago · · Score: 1

      It is pretty obvious from your post that your mind has been corrupted by the (ab)use of the imperial systems ;)

      (the answer is they are equivalent)

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    2. Re:Question ? by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      If running flat out continues, then it will draw exactly the same power as a 20 watt lightbulb. (1 kilowatt hour every 50 hours, about $0.08)

    3. Re:Question ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the ignorant among us, how does that compare to say the power consumed by a 20 watt night light? Is it the same?

      (the answer is they are equivalent)


      No, they're not.

      A 20W night light consumes 20W, plus or minus almost nothing. A computer's current draw, however, is variable. The difference in power consumption between suspend mode and 100% CPU/graphics/audio usage could be a factor of 10. So I think it's that strange metric unit in the article called the "flat out" which is so confusing to some of us :). How about Max/Normal/Suspend Mode power consumption numbers?

    4. Re:Question ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. A 20W light bulb doesn't use 20W. It uses no more than 20W. 20W is max power use, not the actually power use.

    5. Re:Question ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Watt is a Watt. A 60Watt bulb draws 60Watts of power ALL THE TIME. A computer power supply might be rated for 450Watts, but that only indicates the MOST it can draw. Depending on your motherboard, processor(s), and accessories (HD, CD, PCI & AGP cards, etc), it usually will draw a lot less, like in the 200-300 Watt range. A big power supply just gives you room for adding more accessories.

      A small (obvious) warning: if you have a 450 Watt power supply in your computer and are drawing > 400 Watts of power through it, get a second power supply and use it to power some of the hard drives and CD drives. It will lengthen the life of the power supply and drives (power supplies don't like running at close to max capacity for extended times, and when they start going flaking bad things can happen).

      Google for "kill a watt" (with quotes) to see how much power your computer(s) are actually drawing.

  16. Before you get your panties in a bunch... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...no, it's not Palladium/Trusted Computing etc. Basicly, what it has is an encryption accelerator, just like it has mpeg2, mpeg4 etc. acceleration. Why? Because the processor itself is a whimp.

    It doesn't do anything else than what a plain 3GHz machine could do. DRM is one *application*, since most DRM'd content is also encrypted ;). But it might just as well be used to run heavy SSH connections or your encrypted P2P net of choice.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Before you get your panties in a bunch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong.
      http://www.mini-itx.com/reviews/mii12000/? page=13

    2. Re:Before you get your panties in a bunch... by Hackeron · · Score: 1

      There is more I can do with this CPU than with any 3Ghz personally. Speed wise, it is really more than enough, but craves recompile with -Os because of its small cache size.

      Other than that, I can watch a movie, do some gimping, chat and browse the net at the same time with no slow-downs.

      And I have found some nice high end PCI graphics card that can allow you to play games like UT2004, but not something I care for personally.

      MPEG4 acceleration is nice, will save 20% cpu usage, but thats not the sole reason its there, it will add XV effects like brightness/gamma/contrast that are missing in cle266 for some reason.

      Also, you are comfused, that hardware encrypction is nothing more than a random number generator, same thing as /dev/urandom (/dev/hwrandom), but (maybe?) truly random.

      As for this CPU being a lot more practical than a 3Ghz:
      1) Tt doensnt require any maintenance: no broken fans, no dust.
      2) It saves quite a bit on the electricity bill (30W vs 350W)
      3) It allows me to keep the PC in my room as I cant tolerate noise during the night. (also, 3ghz really isnt enough for povray, compile farms, etc... so adding a few more huge 3ghz each rated at 30db? no thanks!
      4) It is highly expandable with a nice openmosix cluster.
      5) It takes virtually no space in some of the cases out there, and you can shove it in nearly anything you have around the house.
      6) It gives you everything you need onboard, not much missing for any type of use. (spdif, tv-out, onboard lan, available as 2 onboard lans, available with onboard compact flash and PCMCIA)

      here is a nice video for you: http://www.via.com.tw/en/Products/movie/blade.wmv

      Just have a look, in a u1 size case (just wider), you can fit 27, 1ghz epia machines. Thats 27Ghz in a case SMALLER than a typical 3ghz machine.

  17. VIA Sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but VIA is the last vendor I'd use to entrust my data. Any programmer would agree.

  18. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by Mz6 · · Score: 0

    What do you mean? Window-L does nothing.. I think you mean Window-M to minimize everything quickly.

    --
    Hmmm.
  19. still waiting for nano-itx motherboards.. by dcstimm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    its been like 8 months since they were announced but no one seems to have them!!

  20. you may want to check out by manWorkSucks · · Score: 1
    --
    NERDS!!!!
    1. Re:you may want to check out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or maybe one of these.

  21. microatx still better by xlyz · · Score: 3, Interesting


    unless you need a real compact design, microatx + mobile processor can deliver same low consumption and more power and expansion possibility

    look for an Athlon Northwood to undervolt and it will be d*mn cheaper as well

    1. Re:microatx still better by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      An athlon northwood?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:microatx still better by xlyz · · Score: 1

      An athlon northwood?

      DOH!

      P4 northwood
      need some sleep ;)

  22. Yes but by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, but would it fit in a 5.25" slot?
    Then I could have a beowulf cluser right there in my bigtower case.

    1. Re:Yes but by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Nano-ITX would, but it seems to be vaporware so far.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Yes but by Pantheraleo2k3 · · Score: 1

      I believe this is what you are looking for. Time to drag out the 12-bay server case from your basement!

    3. Re:Yes but by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      The last I heard from a VIA market-drone, they were supposed to ship in May. They better hurry their asses up!

      They supposedly had working models at E3.

    4. Re:Yes but by MattGWU · · Score: 1

      Wow, not bad. Little tall, though. Sumicom used to (or still) have VIA or P3-based machines that fit into a single 5.25" slot. No links unfortunately, because the one place I've ever seen them no longer carries them.

      --
      "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
  23. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by ophix · · Score: 0

    windowkey + l locks the console on windows xp and windows 2k3

    it is equivalent of hiting CAD then the enter key on windows 2k

  24. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by evdp · · Score: 0

    Well if you not smart enough to press windows+d when the boss walks up during your personal time... then perhaps you shouldn't be given a terminal at work.

  25. Only one catch.. by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I must agree with other posters: the VIA boards are most definitely the shit. And the older ones, like the V-8000A, are a steal. I currently have Fedora Core v1 + XMMS on mine; to make a long story short, lots of fun..

    HOWEVER, do note that some VIA processors will advertise themselves as "686-compliant", when in fact their instruction set is missing 1 vital MMX instruction (SSE, I think). So do make sure your binaries are built for the 586. You'll thank me in the morning.

    --
    --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
    1. Re:Only one catch.. by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Informative
      HOWEVER, do note that some VIA processors will advertise themselves as "686-compliant", when in fact their instruction set is missing 1 vital MMX instruction (SSE, I think). So do make sure your binaries are built for the 586. You'll thank me in the morning.

      MMX is a set of integer vector operations, SSE is the same for floating point. Neither of these implies 686; Pentium Pro was the first processor with i686 core, and it has neither of these instruction sets.

      To complicate matters further, GCC's idea of i686 seems a little different than the official spec (whatever that is). AFAIK, AMD's K6 processors are i686, but programs compiled with gcc for i686 won't run on it. I think it's about the CMOV instruction; please correct me if I'm wrong.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Only one catch.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily you can use the -march=C3 nowadays.

    3. Re:Only one catch.. by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Informative
      Luckily you can use the -march=C3 nowadays.

      But this won't work on C3-2, the Nehemiah. It has SSE instead of the original C3's 3DNow. Thus I use -march=pentium3, which is fine instruction-wise. Timing and cache issues are another matter though...

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    4. Re:Only one catch.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use -march=C3 -mno-3dnow instead. Still probably has different insn latencies.

    5. Re:Only one catch.. by Hackeron · · Score: 1

      thats' their CPUs from a few years ago. The nehemiah (c3-2) works on binaries compiled for pentium3, not just i686. The cache size is really low though, so if you want to get any performance, use -Os, then it seems faster than my AMD Athlon XP2500+ I certainly dont need anything faster other than to compile and povray, but thats what a cluster of these silent gods is for.

  26. Cool, but... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I really missed DVI or some other HDTV res output. I mean, what I want to use it for is a home theater kind of setup (with network disks, of course)... The Nanode + an LCD TV... now that would be cool.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  27. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No OK your wrong you arrogant prick I don't use Winblow$$ HexP unlike you lamer and YOUR going on THE LIST too buddy WHAT'S YOUR IP? i will kikc your ass too. I was on a break cant you read? Dont make excuses for Taco he aint done shit and NOW I'M OUT OF A JOB. Fuck this website and fuck his "free speach" which lets hatecrime fuckers post their bile so HONEST people loose their jobs.

    Self inflicted??? You arrogant prick, I bet you look at Slash at work you fuck and you don't help out with modding? I was 1)unlucky and any blame is on Taco and Gnaa I mailed Taco and he diodn't even reply. He doesn't fucking care about us, hes sold out whore. And you still lap it up. I put up my page with a picture of what you are here, so go look at it, pussy.

  28. MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe with the higher clock speed and built-in MPEG-4 acceleration, a VIA Mini-ITX may finally have enough power for MythTV. The Mini-ITX form factor is great to have as you can make a small custom case that looks good in the theater room and doesn't make much noise (not much heat).

    1. Re:MythTV by dmp123 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, if you think there are linux drivers for the MPEG accelerator, I suspect you are ALMOST CERTAINLY going to be disappointed..

      Linux drivers for these things are like hens' teeth :(

      David

    2. Re:MythTV by deque_alpha · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bah. FUD. Go here to see more info. Also, there is support for the decoder specifically built into MythTV and it works very well.

    3. Re:MythTV by glitchvern · · Score: 1

      For those who do not follow the link, a library to use the mpeg decoder is available as a binary only file for certain distributions. Some may find this acceptable, others may not. If you are considering purchasing one, you need to make your own decision on what you consider acceptable.

    4. Re:MythTV by poptones · · Score: 1
      VIA provides this shared library (libddmpeg.so) as a binary file for certain supported distributions. Although there are some attempts to reverse engineer the library, the source code is not available. So if you need to use this library you must use one of the supported distributions.

      (Editor's note: The source code is available to large OEM customers under NDA/licensing agreements. It is not available to end-users.)

      This is what I'm talking about. Linux users do NO ONE any favors when they adopt this sort of crap. Via is not the only maker of small motherboards. When they stop treating linux users like sewcond class citizens I'll happily go looking here - until then Via will get not one penny of my money. Not for one of these mini systems nor for any other motherboard or peripheral.

      Vote with your dollars. And be vocal about it.

    5. Re:MythTV by deque_alpha · · Score: 1

      This is what I'm talking about. Linux users do NO ONE any favors when they adopt this sort of crap. Via is not the only maker of small motherboards. When they stop treating linux users like sewcond class citizens I'll happily go looking here - until then Via will get not one penny of my money. Not for one of these mini systems nor for any other motherboard or peripheral.

      How are linux users being treated second class? What they are providing is very comparable to what they are providing under Windows: a binary library for supported other pieces of software. That's what the Windows users are getting. Demanding source code is asking for special treatment. I think it's commendable that they are supporting Linux as much as they are. Sure they could do better, but this is a step in the right direction. Not supporting a company like this is counterproductive if you want better Linux hardware support. When a company takes a risk and offers some support support for a non-mainstream system, they will likely continue to offer that level of support, or even expand it, if their initial experiment works out well. If it fails, they will bag it altogether. What would you rather have: partial support that lets you use the hardware, even if it's imperfect, or no support at all? Expecting a company to drop everything and bend over backwards for a market segment that is not neccesarily part of their core target, and is small, even if it is growing, is naive. They are trying to make money afterall. But even this is secondary to the real point:

      Vote with your dollars. And be vocal about it.

      Exactly. Vote with your dollars and support companies that provide Linux support, even if it's imperfect. Then say, "Hey, you know, I bought your product because I can use it with Linux, and I really like it. You know what would make it even better? If you would make an effort to support all of it's features in Linux, or release a spec or some driver source, so someone else in community can make full support happen. That would probably get you even more customers. I know I would be telling all my friends to buy your stuff, even the ones who use Windows, because then if they want to switch to Linux, it will be easier for them." Once a company hears that enough times, they will be more likely to provide improved support or release code. If they make a guesture to the community by providing partial support, and all they get back is, "Fah! That's not good enough!! You must release code or provide full support before we will buy!!!" they will just tell us all to bugger off and focus only on their core markets, while we sit out in the cold wishing we had even just a binary driver for our hardware MPEG decoders so we could watch our movies on our little set-top boxes...

      Get real man. Face the fact that as desktop Linux users, we are the equivalents of Internet age Hippies. We are a fringe group, but we've got some damn good ideas that will change the world. Everyone else just needs to catch up, and we need to have the patience to let them. Otherwise, things are not likely to work out the way we want them to.

    6. Re:MythTV by poptones · · Score: 1
      How are linux users being treated second class? What they are providing is very comparable to what they are providing under Windows: a binary library for supported other pieces of software. That's what the Windows users are getting.

      Good point. What I should have demanded in that post is not source code, but documentation. And if you think windows users don't have that either, well, good point again - but again I'll point out that the PC became what it did because it was well documented. If I just want proprietary hardware that "just works" and I don't give a shit how it does it or how well it's supported I'll buy a mac and be done with it.

      IOW I gave up ATI some time ago and don't look back. Looking forward I don't see any Via parts in my future either - if that means limiting myself to intel, amd or sis motherboards and graphics that's damn skippy with me - the system I have now plays high rez video just fine with a humble 1600xp cpu and if I want or need a feature added I can hack away at the driver (or pay someone else) until I get it.

      This is a trait that, aside from Ati, seems to be almost uniquely asian. If I want to work with some great uber intel or amd or motorola chip all I need do is contact the maker and request info. Aside from patented and trademarked stuff like dolby dsp source code they really don't give a shit who I am nor will they demand to see my wallet before accomodating them. Intel of late seems to be going back to that very arrogant model they adopted in the eighties and now are apparently witholding info on certain features of their cpu chips in regard to wireless networking - so perhaps I should even leave them out of this commentary (or mroe accurately, put them aside with via and the rest)

      What would you rather have: partial support that lets you use the hardware, even if it's imperfect, or no support at all? Hardware with no documentation is, essentially, no support at all. A pos driver that works with "some systems" (and most often not very well) is NOT an acceptable solution - not to me and not to most any home user who wants a computer that just works.

      If you want to reward a company with your business it should be the ones who provide accurate documentation on their chips that will allow others to make use of them and the community to support them. To buy into any other system is to accept a "license" on hardware itself - if that's your game you might as well just stick with windows or go get a mac because it's all the same. If linux continues to grow as it has makers like via et all will simply have no choice then but to catch up.. but giving them money now sets the very bad precedent of telling them "ok, here's the vaseline.. have at it, skippy."

      No thanks. I'll keep my money and my vaseline.

  29. Well... by Kjella · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...if you're an electrical engineer, no. The motherboard is probably reactive/inductive in some way, not purely resistive like a lightbulb. This means that the phase angle will be non-zero, and the true and apparent power of the circuit will be different.

    ...if you're talking about your electricity bill, then for all you could care, they're equal. 20W will be extremely close to 20W, regardless of what I said above. Personally I don't care much, since I live a place where most of the year have a space heater on...

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  30. Better Yet,--Where do you get cheap cases? by Nit+Picker · · Score: 1

    Whenever I have looked for a case specifically designed for a Mini-ITX, they have been much higher than mini-tower ATX cases.

  31. Re:mobo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats funny .. but old ford cars have FOMOCO stamped on parts ..

    Ford Motor Co..

  32. Question for you computer building hobbyist. by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    I have a few ideas for computer designs, one of which is for a mobile computer. I know you can get just about anything you need for a desktop system but, it there anything available that would allow someone to design and build his own, battery-powered, mobile computer "off-the-shelf"?

    Thanks,

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Question for you computer building hobbyist. by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

      Wonder if this one would make a good "Ask Slashdot"?...

      I've been wondering lately myself about this. Just how inexpensively can one put together a reasonably-useful yet reasonably-standard computer off-the-shelf? (As opposed to "go on E-bay and see if you can find X" or "if you can find THIS version of THIS hardware, you can hack it to put Linux in it" and so on...)

      It'd be nifty to have some good sources for very inexpensive new low-power general-purpose computer hardware. I know I'm not the only person here who's considered "Nerding Out" my car with a small multi-purpose computer...

    2. Re:Question for you computer building hobbyist. by guiscard · · Score: 1


      Go to the forums at mp3car.com. You'll find all the "nerd out your car info" you could ever want to know.

      On another note, has anyone seen the Hoojum case for the nano-itx? I thought it was pretty cool.

    3. Re:Question for you computer building hobbyist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be nifty to have some good sources for very inexpensive new low-power general-purpose computer hardware. I know I'm not the only person here who's considered "Nerding Out" my car with a small multi-purpose computer...

      When it comes to small-form factor, you can have:

      Small
      Speedy
      Inexpensive

      Pick two... (and sometimes you only get to pick one).

  33. Anyone have info on VIA's DRM support? by Linus+Sixpack · · Score: 1

    DRM support and control could be _the_ distinctive element between MOBO manufacturers. Most support and performance is similar enough that for good or bad Security/Corporate controls might be the biggest difference between mobo's.

    Even radical differences like processor type and mobo size matter less to me than having my own control over my own computer.

    ls

    1. Re:Anyone have info on VIA's DRM support? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      VIA doesn't have any DRM support.

    2. Re:Anyone have info on VIA's DRM support? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      At least read about DRM before you get all antsy about it. You don't have to use DRM even if your computer is DRM-compliant. You can turn it off whenever you want. Remember how the Pentium-ID was going to be the ultimate privacy-killer? Except you turn it off in the BIOS. Welcome to DRM - it's the same deal. Sheesh.

  34. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Haven't got any mod points- or I would help out on modding.

    The point is just about any operating system I know about has something that can be used as a boss key-Window M to minimize everything, Window-L to lock the workstation, even just CTRL-ALT-DEL to bring up the task manager, and that's just the Windows OS. Heck, pop up a full-screen CLI when the boss comes around. Even on a break- what you look at is your business, not your boss's. Never leave anything on screen when the boss comes around- it's always a bad idea EVEN WHEN YOU ARE LOOKING AT SOMETHING WORK RELATED.

    Definately a PEBCAK there...you can't blame Taco for your ex-bosses being pricks.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  35. EPIA mini-ITX boards by anakog · · Score: 5, Informative
    These are great. My home server is running on a fanless EPIA 5000 and I have never been happier about my choice. The whole machine cost me $300 (case, mobo, 256MB RAM, 120GB, extra NIC) over a year ago and has been sitting quietly under the table in my living room ever since.

    It is extremely quiet (only audible humming comes from two small fans on the case) which is important to me. It is also very low on energy consumption. I got an APC Back-UPS ES-350 (just a couple of days before the big black-out here, in North-East USA --- could not have been wiser :) The UPS is rated at 8 minutes under 100W load and 2 minutes under 200W but it lasts over 40 minutes powering my server and my DSL modem.

    Another thing I am really happy about is the fact that VIA seems to be doing a good job supporting Linux. Personally, I have never had trouble running Red Hat on mine (although, I hear FC2 had issues with it that were only recently fixed --- but that was FC2's problem).

    Overall, I feel that this has been a really great product and would wholeheartedly recommend it. I am also very happy to see that VIA has been constantly improving them. I am looking forward to seeing the upcoming nano-ITX boards.

    1. Re:EPIA mini-ITX boards by greystormcloud · · Score: 1

      Unplug those mini case fans and it still doesnt overheat - room temperature up to 30C). File Server - Internet Gateway and Firewall - Web Development Server. Current uptime for Linux Fedora Core 1 - 200+ days. :)

  36. HDTV? by jasno · · Score: 1
    The chip includes a "Chromotion Video Display Engine" with advanced video rendering functions such as "Video De-blocking" and "Adaptive De-interlacing," which add to the user's "Hi-Def visual experience," according to VIA. The board supports displays including all HDTV formats, and NTSC or PAL TVs.

    This sounds interesting. Possibly handling the motion vectors and a deblocking filter in hardware. I wonder if this is the extent of the 'MPEG-4' support, or if that refers to a separate MPEG-4 hardware decdoder. Regardless, the motion comp and deblocking should also be applicable to most other non-wavelet based codecs. Although that won't matter a bit unless they publish the specs so we can use it.

    I also wonder if 'all HDTV formats' means the card can handle interlacing. I've been trying to drive a 1080i only HDTV lately and had a heck of a time finding a card that would drive it out the DVI. The only ones I found were the Matrox G550 and the Radeon AiW 9800(component, haven't tried DVI).

    --

    http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
    1. Re:HDTV? by Temsi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, somehow I don't see this puny 1.3ghz processor playing any of my 1080i .TS files anytime soon... My 2.6 has no problem at all, but my old 1.7 chokes on them.
      Having used the 933mhz C3 VIA and seeing it drop frames on anything bigger than 320x240 Xvid, I have my doubts about this HDTV claim...
      Also, I don't see a DVI or CV output on this thing, so am I to assume they want us to buy the seriously flawed ATI HDTV adapter for HDTV output?

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
  37. Tech leadership? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Via was started in California, then moved to Taiwan, the notebook computer business HQ. Why hasn't any American (or Japanese, or German...) company threatened the Taiwanese lock on design leadership? Taiwan's economics might offer a longterm manufacturing edge in this industry, but what kind of competitive advantage do Taiwanese companies have in the innovation?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Tech leadership? by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      Much cheaper labor.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    2. Re:Tech leadership? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      How is the designer labor cheaper in Taiwan? Lower cost of living, subsidized by the cheaper local manual labor?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Tech leadership? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      Duh...companies like Intel, compaq, and others are the ones that BUILT that infrastructure!


      Via is an anomoly...they were cute when the big boy needed cheap chipsets to stick-it-to each other, but the took the profits and bought up the IP of the big guys loosers...now they are a serious theat in low-cost computing. Intel would love to stop them, but Via has bought enough of Intel's "victims" that intel had cross-licenses with that Via has some free-reign to do what they want!!!

    4. Re:Tech leadership? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I like the economics you describe. But how does that keep Via's costs lower?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Tech leadership? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      but what kind of competitive advantage do Taiwanese companies have in the innovation?

      An education system that works?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    6. Re:Tech leadership? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      A recent survey by an East Asian magazine found that 90 of the 100 best universities are in the USA. Can you be more specific?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:Tech leadership? by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      Lower cost of living, large taiwanese government subsidies and lower specialized and manual labor costs.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    8. Re:Tech leadership? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      They're IN Taiwan...and so are the bosses! They don't take home multi-million dollar salaries, and they don't make the 60%+ profit AMD and Intel do on their parts. They make decent parts at a fair price and make a nice [but not obscene] profit doing it...like a proper business should!

    9. Re:Tech leadership? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Oh, a survey by an east asian magazine... now that's what i'd use to deterimine the quality of education!

      You've certainly convinced me :D

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    10. Re:Tech leadership? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Their East Asian readership is the audience at issue. And their survey echoes the global consensus of the (relative) quality of American (higher) education. Do you have any actual evidence to refute that?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  38. To build with recent GCCs by Daath · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've got a nice VIA Epia board (C3 Nehemiah).
    The instruction in question is CMOV.
    To build for these machines with recent GCCs build with c3 as -march or -mcpu :) If you don't use a recent gcc compile with i586 instead - Mine supports MMX+SSE (it has two SSE pipes).

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
  39. are c3's on this board fast enough for regular use by mrgreenfur · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've always heard that these processor's are slow as balls. does this board make them fast enough to build a desktop system around (instead of say, a cheap athlon?)? Would my parents notice a performance hit if all they do is surf, email, and write docs in word?

    other than the random flash-heavy website, why shouldn't they use one of these?

    any benchmarks handy?

  40. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OR.......alt+F4 would've done the trick too..... read carefully, he knows "loads of shit, and will use it without mercy". There may be poetic justice in this.. someone that can't close a window lickety-split, and he is entertained by the stuff posted here?? Thats like a gay guy buying the swimsuit issue..

  41. Mini boards by LesPaul75 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As much as I dislike Via, I gotta admit that these mini boards are a home run -- the best thing to happen to PCs in a long time. I'm looking forward to Intel and/or AMD jumping on the bandwagon. And soon after that I hope to see even smaller stuff becoming popular, possibly even system-on-chip designs. How sweet would that be? Yeah, I know you can buy a single-chip system now, but I want one that's just (or almost) as powerful as my home PC. Integrated graphics, gigs of RAM, all running at several GHz. Forget laptops... put the whole thing in a PDA. :)

  42. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    XP/2003 Window L locks the workstation.

    Substitute for your favorite hotkey that clears the screen in whatever OS you're using.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  43. close, have a cigar by poptones · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's not the motherboard that's "inductive" (although everything does have inductance, capaitance, etc). What matters here is the power supply itself. Most every pc power supply (I would say every one of them, but there's probably one or two out there that would prove this wrong) uses switching circuitry to chop down a "bulk" supply of 70-200VDC into something the computer can use. This "bulk supply" was, in the beginning, created by simply rectifying the AC line directly and dumping into a fat capacitor. Most TV sets and CRT monitors still do this.

    But better power supplies don't simply use a cheap diode/cap bulk supply anymore because this puts a HUGE load on the AC line - especially when it's first turned on and that fat cap has to charge up. This capacitive load also causes non-ideal power factor alignment the entire time the system is on, which means your effective energy consumption (what it reads at the meter) may not actually reflect actual use in the system. Rsistive (neutral) to slightly inductive loads are generally favored by the power company and their meter equipment, and there are real benefits to optimizing power factor of euqipment (especially if you're in an office or hosting location with hundreds or thousands of computers). So, most of the better PC power supplies for PCs employ PFC, or power factor correction. Still, not all of them do.. it's something worth watching in the specifications when shopping for a supply (or a CRT monitor) for a new system.

  44. Re:are c3's on this board fast enough for regular by deque_alpha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    there are benchmarks all over, google for "via epia review" and you are sure to get some good ones. Anecdotally, they are plenty fast for basically everything but 3d games, multimedia creation, and viewing very highly compressed (mpeg4, high bitrate divx) video. This new board will hopefully change that. I've used one (an 800 mhz) as a desktop machine for a co-worker, and the only thing they commented on was how quiet and little it was compared to their old (p4) machine. They made no mention of a performance hit, and they work on the thing all day long. I've also used one (1 Ghz) as a firewall / server for my dad's business. And frankly, the poor thing is bored.

    Flash works fine, even those silly animated shorts and games. Remember that a "slow as balls" computer by todays standards will likely meet their (your parents) needs just fine. The biggest benefit over a cheap athlon is that these can be made small and quiet, making them unobstrusive. They also run cool enough that they don't affect the temperature of the room they are in noticably, unlike athlons / P4 which in a lot of ways are very expensive space heaters....

  45. Directron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just bought one last week for my daughter so she can build a tiny computer (she's pretty tiny as well, she's nine).

    Their site is www.directron.com.

  46. what good is the MPEG hardware going to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - can't use it with OSS here in the U.S. so we're SOL!

  47. Low Power PCs by tacocat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have two of the EPIA 533 fanless machines. One is my mail/web server for the internet, the other is my NFS/web server for my home use. These things are awesome at only a measured 32W power consumption with everything running (hard drive included). This 32W is using old 3.5 inch hard drives and a case fan. I expect to have done better if I went with the 2.5 inch lower power hard drives and external power supply.

    But what I find really amazing about all of this is that I got these little low power boxes and they are doing as much as many people dedicate on a 140W+ machine. There's really no need for that. If you find 533MHz too slow, then move up to a higher machine. But I was going for the silent/fanless models.

    I can't claim to have the fastest set up in the world, but for 99.9% of you with a home mail/web server, you really don't need to run it on that big of a box. And for 32W of power, it makes for a cool summer.

    In time, I think people will realize that the benefit of having a 3.2GHz mail server isn't that great. Sure, there might be exceptions and I might not survive a slashdot effect, but not many of us will.

    1. Re:Low Power PCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that 32W per machine, or for both? How did you measure the actual power usage?

    2. Re:Low Power PCs by tacocat · · Score: 1

      32W per machine. Measured with a 'kill-a-watt' meter that reads the actual power consumption in real time and the KWh over time. Peak Power was 40W during boot.

  48. Nano-itx = vapourware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't exist.

  49. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Window-L Window-M

    What do you mean by Window-L and Window-M? I don't see any window decoration in XP that looks like an L or an M, or any buttons that will minimize all windows. Where is this button?

  50. Re:are c3's on this board fast enough for regular by mercuryresearch · · Score: 3, Informative

    I agree, they're fast enough for most tasks. As an experiment I moved all my work to a VIA Epia 533 Fanless motherboard (with 1 GB of RAM, which helps a lot) for three months. This is the slowest motherboard VIA sells, and I think the slowest on the market that's still in active sales as opposed to used/inventory sales. I ran both XP and Slackware 9 on the box.

    CPU loading was idle most of the time. It was acceptable for email, web browsing, and word processing. There were a few places it bogged down: recalculating large spreadsheets, websites with Flash animated ads, printing, displaying PDFs (ghostview pretty much choked the system whenever it would run) and running compression (gzip tar backups would max out the load instantly.)

    I upgraded to a fanless Pentium M ITX box because I could, but still use the VIAs for web/mail service, which work fine -- one box's uptime reached 240+ days before I needed to take it down for hardware maintenance.

    They're not gaming systems or workstations, but otherwise completely acceptable for most uses -- and the fanless ones are pretty much silent (the loudest thing the VIA 533 PC was the hard disk seeking. Really.)

  51. Proved yourself wrong by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

    That article only reinforces Kjella's point: The VIA C3 has a crypto accelerator, which is neutral when it comes to DRM.

    1. Re:Proved yourself wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point I answered to was that the crypto
      accelerator was no better than a mere 3 Ghz
      processor. It is considerably faster.

  52. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Windows KEY on your KEYBOARD, ya MAROON!

    Unless you're one of those annoying buggers who refuse to touch anything but one of those noisy-ass IBM PS/2 model-M keyboards (which predate the Windows key), in which case, the key-combination is: Windows-Escape-L.

  53. Still too slow by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Mini-ITX is nice, but I think VIA needs to come out with something that can compete with other Mini-ITX vendors using Pentium4, Pentium-M or Athlon.

    1. Re:Still too slow by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      Mini-ITX is nice, but I think VIA needs to come out with something that can compete with other Mini-ITX vendors using Pentium4, Pentium-M or Athlon.

      First of all, VIA pretty much came up with the Mini-ITX idea, so it's the others that compete against VIA. The idea hinges on low power and ideally passive cooling; therefore putting a P4 or Athlon on such a mobo would be a dumb idea.

      I remember seeing one review of a P4 Mini-ITX board, and it had a number of problems because the CPU and cooling system took up most of the real estate.

      On the other hand, a Pentium M would be quite fit for Mini-ITX, and it's been done with passive cooling. It's more expensive though, because a P-M costs about the same as an entire EPIA, which includes the CPU.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  54. Linux Drivers by b1ng0 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this time they will release fully functional drivers for their MPEG4 hardware acceleration chip...

  55. Damn it, am I the only one who thinks this is gold by Hackeron · · Score: 1

    have you seen some of those u1 sized cases, that are just wider that host 27 Via EPIA machines?... thats 27Ghz each, each board (with cpu built in) being as cheap as $250 when you buy dozens and fits in any u1 rack.

    Here is a video http://www.via.com.tw/en/Products/movie/blade.wmv

    This is 27ghz, available passively cooled as well and take up about the same size as 3 u1 machines... so even if you get dual AMD 64 machines, each CPU being 2.2 ghz, you still get 8.8ghz in the same size, total power consumption as high as 900 watts....

    and in cluster usage, it will be slower than 9 epia machines each with their own ram, bus, doing number crunching and spreading the load. Now the for 9ghz, those epia machines will only take around 200 watts even with each having a separate bus, separate ram, etc...

    I'm no expert and its a bit late, so I may have not explained my views properly, but am I the only 1 to see the potential in this?

    ---- I mean hell, passively cooled, fast machines... I have a 1ghz epia that I use as my primary desktop, and it gives me everything I want. Doesn't play latest games, but I'm sure it can if you make use of the onboard pci slot.

    I compile 3 things, do some gimping, browse the net and watch a movie at the same time (got to love ion), without the movie slowing down.

  56. So umm.. about that MPEG-4 support... by Gldm · · Score: 1

    Is that decode only or encode/decode? I mean, is this Tivo/encoding farm material, or just another mildly interesting but ultimately impractical fad gadget?

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  57. Washable Mobo?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at the full size image. At the lower-right corner is a circular sticker with the words "Remove seal after washing" on it.

    Anyone care to give a sane explanation? Images of the "The Young Ones" video recorder episode flash by. . .

    1. Re:Washable Mobo?? by s-meister · · Score: 1

      Washing off crud from the manufacturing process, IIRC with lovely volatile solvents.

  58. Other mini-itx vendors? by debest · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that VIA is the *only* mini-itx vendor. Other motherboard manufacturers build smaller-than-ATX forms (micro-atx, flex-atx), I don't think anyone has built a Pentium or Athlon board in the same size.

    --
    Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    1. Re:Other mini-itx vendors? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Go to mini-itx.com there's several other vendors.

  59. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you mean Ctrl-Escape-L. Ctrl-Escape does the same thing as hitting the Windows key, and is most useful on keyboards with no Windows key.

  60. documentation by poptones · · Score: 1
    Better still, just document the damn hardware so we can use it.

    They're cool little machines, but we need to be putting more pressure on ALL these hardware companies to document their shit. Providing comprehensive documentation on the use of the hardwaer they spent so many man-years developing doesn't protect them from their competitors at all - it jsut lowers the value of their product. In this case, no matter how small it ain't worth it - I can get a (well supported linux compatible) matx card that's nearly as small and it will let me choose the cpu - including an underclocked athlon that would still smoke that underpowered C3.

  61. Epia PD + DiskOnModule = GREAT Firewall by Maavin · · Score: 1

    Epia PD Specs:

    Damn.. didn't see this thing before, it's damn great for building a nice firewall.
    It will even fit in my Raq2 case (damn MIPS :))

    --


    Crivens! I kicked meself in me own heid!
  62. Mod parent up! by los+furtive · · Score: 1

    Mod this guy up...that's cooler than the article itself!

    --

    I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  63. Re:microatx still better. Nope. by egghat · · Score: 1

    No, it isn't, at least energy wise.

    Problem No. 1: The VRM (voltage regulator module).

    Efficiency is low.

    Problem No. 2: The power supply unit.

    Efficiency is low. Especially if you have a 300 watt unit and a computer that only uses say 60 watts.

    German computer magazine c't has measured such a setup. I don't have the article handy, so I quote from memory.

    If you reduce the power consumption of your CPU by 40 watts, less than 20 watts will be saved due to the loss of the PSU and the VRM.

    So if you really want to build a low consumption PC, be sure you have a board that is desgned for this and a PSU that is designed for this.

    I wouldn't be that suprised if a Mini-ITX board with a 15 watt CPU and components uses 40 watts less than a normal PC with an ATX board and the same CPU running with a 300 watt PSU.

    (Yes, i was suprised by this article too as a run a undervolted Mobile Athlon in my board, but I never measured the power consumption myself).

    Bye egghat.

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  64. YOU KNOW I'M RIGHT MORANS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newegg is smart, they don't carry shit.

  65. Re:Damn it, am I the only one who thinks this is g by dave420 · · Score: 1
    "but I'm sure it can if you make use of the onboard pci slot"

    Like, to install a nic and copy the game to a computer that can play it? You need AGP graphics for the latest games, not PCI :-P

  66. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by dave420 · · Score: 1

    I feel for you, but you lost my support when you "set my threshold to -1". That's where you went wrong, buddy.

  67. Re:Damn it, am I the only one who thinks this is g by Hackeron · · Score: 1

    for your information it comes with 2 onboard nics, and newer boards come with 1gbit nics built in.

  68. YOU ARE AN IDIOT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pls fix thx.

  69. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're funny. And a psycho, so I'm posting anon.

    You were 1)dumb enough to browse /. at -1 in a workplace and any blame is on you. thanks for the trolling.

    I'm anon, but you can have my IP. It's 127.0.0.1

    my email server is 10.0.0.255

    bring it on

  70. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

    not on 98, it doesn't. Ctrl-Esc brings up the Start menu. Hitting a letter after that will either select a program or do nothing (if you don't have a selection that starts with that letter)

  71. Re:You GOTTA read this: WARNING!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Never leave anything on screen when the boss comes around- it's always a bad idea EVEN WHEN YOU ARE LOOKING AT SOMETHING WORK RELATED."

    What he said - absolutely, positively. Especially the last. Never EVER give away potentially powerful information. **EVER**

    Dude, I'm sorry for what happened to you. But damn it - you're dumb. :-/

  72. Re:Damn it, am I the only one who thinks this is g by dave420 · · Score: 1

    Which i read, however the poster was alluding to being able to use a PCI slot to connect a graphics card good enough to play modern games, which is impossible, as AGP is required for modern games.

  73. Re:Damn it, am I the only one who thinks this is g by Hackeron · · Score: 1

    Quick google search returns: http://uk.special.reserve.co.uk/q_GG3398_xfx_gefor ce_fx_520.html And I have talked to people successfuly playing UT2004 on lowest resolution at good FPS using a very cheap PCI graphics card. Its also more than enough for all strategy games, quake3, enemy territory, and best games out there infact. I havent updated my graphics card personally for over 3 years, and it still plays all the latest games at high resolution (I have gforce3 ti200, plays UT2004 on 1280x1024 at 40FPS), so I will bet you anything you can use this fanless god to play just about anything, even though that isnt its purpose.

  74. Re:Damn it, am I the only one who thinks this is g by Hackeron · · Score: 1

    oh, and look jackass: http://www.dabs.com/uk/Search2/Product+Details.htm ?quicklinx=3445&searchphrase=Quadro%20FX600 a high-end graphics card for PCI, 256Mb onboard memory, 3840 x 2400 resolution, 400 MHz ram clock speed, and great benchmarks all over the internet. Koodos to the fanless, mobile future :)

  75. Re:Damn it, am I the only one who thinks this is g by dave420 · · Score: 1

    All tied up with a nice little PCI bus to really grate that FPS. It's not exactly future-proof. Once games start requiring >256mb for their uncompressed textures, that card is going to run like a dog. That's why people don't buy PCI graphics adapters any more.

  76. Re:Damn it, am I the only one who thinks this is g by Hackeron · · Score: 1

    Well, PCI Extended is comming out since AGP is showing its aging, so that will replace it, and its backwards compatible with the older PCI. So PCI has theoretically a longer predicted life spam than AGP. Also, seems PCI Extended is 32bit compatible (or is it not?), so it whould be seen in mini-itx machines.