Slashdot Mirror


Tales of the Future Past

atlacatl writes "One of the coolest sites I've been to: Tales of the Future Past - It tells the story (In pictures) of the predictions of the new millenium, early in the 20th century. I had forgotten the web was actually fun and interesting - use at your own risk."

221 comments

  1. Troubled future... by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 4, Funny

    I see a slashdot about to happen.

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:Troubled future... by machine+of+god · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come on grandpa. Everyone knows the slashdotting is now.

    2. Re:Troubled future... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      We are all Slashdot.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  2. Millennium by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not millenium.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    1. Re:Millennium by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 2, Funny

      Millennium!

      Doot-DOO-doo-doo-doo!

      Millennium!

      Doot-doo-doo-doo!

      (Etc., etc.)

    2. Re:Millennium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and I know better, but these insensitive clods don't -- http://www.new.york.the-hotels.com/millenium-hilto n.htm

    3. Re:Millennium by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Amid all this confusion
      We lose sight of the enemy
      Like evil gods of destruction
      They move through liquid transparency

      =P

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    4. Re:Millennium by ultramarweeni · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Front Line Assembly. I wondered a couple of secs why this is familiar to me. :)
      Anyway, I love Cyberpunk and Industrial.

    5. Re:Millennium by eric.t.f.bat · · Score: 1

      I use "millennium" and "millenium" for two different purposes when talking about the recent numerical irrelevances.

      The millennium (two Ns) ended on 31 December 2000, which was also the last day of the 20th century.

      The millenium (one N) ended a year earlier on 31 December 1999, when all the people who couldn't count (or were really really impressed by all those spooooky zeroes... or just liked Prince) thought the century was ending.

      For a year, the pedants of the world were trying to drag everyone else kicking and screaming into the twentieth century. Thank {$this->choose_religion()->get_deity()->get_name() } we're all over it now.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable .sig block which this margin is too small to conta
  3. The future by thebra · · Score: 4, Funny

    I predict that the website will in the near future not load but show an error. It will be known as the "slashdot effect". I also predict that some one will comment on the fact this is the second article about the future. I also see that in the near future I will be modded down...

    1. Re:The future by Throtex · · Score: 3, Funny

      The future, Conan?

      Let's look forward all the way to the year 2000!

    2. Re:The future by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny
      I also see that in the near future I will be modded down...

      But by knowing the future, you can change it! What's really going to bake you're noodle later on is, would you still have been modded up if you hadn't said that?

    3. Re:The future by Deflagro · · Score: 4, Funny

      *high pitched alto*

      "In the Year 2000!"

      --
      Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
    4. Re:The future by thebra · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "What's really going to bake you're noodle later on is, would you still have been modded up if you hadn't said that?"
      Woooh...my head is now spinning...I need to go lie down...

    5. Re:The future by iabervon · · Score: 1

      One out of three seems about an average success rate...

    6. Re:The future by Majik+Sznak · · Score: 1

      Had I the points, you'd be modded up too. :)

      --
      Karma: Chameleon (Mostly affected by the 1980s)
    7. Re:The future by Paladine97 · · Score: 2, Funny

      For me to poop on!

    8. Re:The future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean falsetto.

    9. Re:The future by Feztaa · · Score: 1
    10. Re:The future by nizo · · Score: 1
      I also see that in the near future I will be modded down...

      Sadly, because of the troll moderators, your prediction did come true after all.

  4. One thing they didn't predict by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thousands of people depressing a button, causing a small box far far away to burst into flames.

    1. Re:One thing they didn't predict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:One thing they didn't predict by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      Unpossible! Google Cache is slashdotted, although it did load after a couple of minutes.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    3. Re:One thing they didn't predict by k98sven · · Score: 1

      Well, they almost had it back in the 50's:

      I believe they were imagining the depressing of a small button causing thousands of people far far away to burst into flames.

    4. Re:One thing they didn't predict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the Google cache doesn't cache the images... which is the whole point of the site.

    5. Re:One thing they didn't predict by BACbKA · · Score: 1

      (can't help from responding to your sig) My mother in law got her PC brought down by the said worm, and as a result asked me to erase everyting and install Linux instead, which I promptly did :-) So it looks like your sig is correct...

      --

      VKh

  5. Can you say... by joemc91 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Frontpage?

  6. As I gaze into my crystal ball.... by Jedi1USA · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I see 3 posts and a melting server in 5...4...3....

    --
    My old sig was REALLY stoopid.
  7. *sigh* by macshune · · Score: 4, Funny

    STILL no flying cars...:(

    1. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > STILL no flying cars

      I dunno. Those SUVs get some pretty decent air when the roll over.

    2. Re:*sigh* by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      http://www.moller.com/skycar/

      well almost.

    3. Re:*sigh* by linzeal · · Score: 1

      All they need is the avionics that can make these millions of these things fly by wire in the same airspace. Good luck.

    4. Re:*sigh* by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
      > STILL no flying cars

      I dunno. Those SUVs get some pretty decent air when the roll over.

      I saw an econobox get pretty good air once when the driver locked up the brakes at 80. Had a cool time dilation effect as we whipped past his car spinning airborne on at least two axes. Amazingly, they kid was unhurt thanks to seatbelt, though the car had seen better days...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    5. Re:*sigh* by kashani · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn future. I want to be cruising for chicks in my flying car while chatting on my video phone in Esperanto. What the hell happened?

      kashani

      --
      - Why is the ninja... so deadly?
    6. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've seen you drive, and its a comfort having to only look in mostly one plane(xy) to watch out for you. i don't want to have to watch out for you in full 3d!

    7. Re:*sigh* by daeley · · Score: 1

      Metric system. All the plans were in the old Imperial units, and when they changed over in the 70s to metric... well they had to pretty much scrap everything. So blame Jimmy Carter. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    8. Re:*sigh* by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      Freely-rotating bodies spin on only one axis.

    9. Re:*sigh* by hasdikarlsam · · Score: 1

      That's a question of basis. You get the same problem - only worse - in quantum physics: There isn't any preferred basis for the axes, so you just have to pick one.

      Yes, you can pick an axis that would describe the car's rotation in a single number, but then you'd have to describe the axis. ;)

      And, well... it isn't entirely true, at that. Depends on your point of view.

    10. Re:*sigh* by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      What can I say, the future isn't what it used to be.

  8. Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had forgotten the web was fun and interesting

    Hanging out at /. will do that to you.

    1. Re:Of course by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Slashdot has totally changed my browsing habits since I started reading it a few years ago. I find that I don't "get out" as much as I used to and just surf around. When in doubt, reload the Slashdot main page and see if there's a new story. Nothing? Hmmm... Maybe there's a new comment in a story I've already read. Or maybe I'll read the comment thread under that boring story that I don't care about after all...

      Lately I've been browsing around at Wikipedia more. Just find an interesting page and open up a few internal links into new tabs as you go. It's easy to read half a dozen or more pages in one sitting, and you always learn something cool and interesting.

      Of course, I learned about Wikipedia from a Slashdot article...

    2. Re:Of course by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      I use the StumbleUpon toolbar for my web "channel surfing". It gives me a lot of stuff I've already seen, but also quite a bit of new/interesting stuff as well.

    3. Re:Of course by lommer · · Score: 1

      Wow, I have almost the exact same browsing habits and experience as you do. I've found actually that wikipedia has actually started to rival /. in terms of the time I spend there.

  9. another slashdotted website by lyolyo · · Score: 1, Funny

    Has anyone thought of using /. to perform DOS attacks?

    1. Re:another slashdotted website by karniv0re · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sshhh! Did you hear that? It was the sound of a troll scampering away.

    2. Re:another slashdotted website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like in a daily SCO story ?

    3. Re:another slashdotted website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I already thought that if one managed to put a link with some semi relevant false URL redirecting on an ip he would want to see slashdotted, could be done easily by posting it in early comments on an article. Now you can explain that the site might be not available due to slashdottage, which would make it maybe not badly moderated. If the guy has a monthly bandwidth limit, it might be killed pretty easily this way. Don't try this at home

    4. Re:another slashdotted website by Greventls · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wouldn't that make us all terrorists?

    5. Re:another slashdotted website by nytes · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that we're not performing DDOS attacks? :)

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  10. Hmmm... by Reorax · · Score: 5, Funny
    *checks website*

    "In the future, far too many people will make posts with jokes about the Slashdot Effect."

    --
    This sig is only here so people stop skipping the last lines of my posts.
  11. National Geographic by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is one of the great things about digging through old stacks of National Geo. Especially issues from the '50s and earlier. My Grandmother had tons of them and I would sit for hours looking at the diagrams of the moon base that was going to have been built by the '80s.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:National Geographic by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was built, it's just that you are not authorized to know about it.

    2. Re:National Geographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You and I both know you weren't looking at National Geographic for "moon base" pictures.

    3. Re:National Geographic by phutureboy · · Score: 1

      This is one of the great things about digging through old stacks of National Geo. Especially issues from the '50s and earlier.

      Yeah, you get the same effect just going through copies of Wired magazine from the last couple years.

  12. Obligatory: Spinal Tap by bludstone · · Score: 2, Funny

    We are the children who grew too fast
    We are the dust of a future past
    We raise our voices in the night
    Crying to heaven
    And will our voices be heard
    Or will they Break Like The Wind
    We are the footprints across the sands
    We are the thumb on a stranger's hand
    We made a promise in the night
    Swearing to heaven Is this a promise we keep
    Or one we Break Like The Wind
    Hey!
    We are the guests who have stayed too long
    We are the end of the endless song
    We send our hearts into the night
    Soaring to heaven
    And will out hearts still beat on
    Or will they Break Like The Wind
    Ooh, Break Like The Wind.

    --

    no .sig
    1. Re:Obligatory: Spinal Tap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen the Spinal Tap movie, but I immediately thought of the Simpsons episode where Spinal Tap plays this song in Springfield when I read the topic title.

      One day people will associate "The Raven" with the Treehouse of Horrors episode first instead of with Edgar Allen Poe.

  13. Fascinating predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of filling up the horseless carriage with petrolium distillate, nad re-vulcanizing the tires, POST-HASTE!

  14. spell check you web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, settle on you jetpack, hitch up you blaster, and tune in the videotron as we tour Future Past!

    Dig that futuristic spelling!

    1. Re:spell check you web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean grammar?

    2. Re:spell check you web site by Reorax · · Score: 1

      I am neither a jetpack or a blaster, you insensitive clod!

      --
      This sig is only here so people stop skipping the last lines of my posts.
    3. Re:spell check you web site by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      All you jetpack, all you blaster, are belong to us

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:spell check you web site by TerryAtWork · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a Eubonics web site...?

      --
      It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    5. Re:spell check you web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      videotron isnt in the future, its my ISP right now!

    6. Re:spell check you web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me axe you something... /Futurama

    7. Re:spell check you web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ran it through my spellchecker, no misspellings noted...

  15. Re:I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    it happened.... /.ed after 8 comments...
    tales of the future past...
    If somebody set-up a mirror we will have tales of the future paste....copy/paste that is...

  16. analyzing past predictions by pedantic+bore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's always interesting to analyze predictions of the future (made in the past) and see how reality differs. There's usually some assumption that seemed to make sense at the time, but turned out to be wrong over time. Then look at our current predictions about the future and ask whether we're still making those assumptions, or whether we're making different, newer assumptions that will turn out to be equally wrong. Excellent reality check.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:analyzing past predictions by nizo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your post hit it right on the head. We have so many theories, beliefs, etc. that we cling to for dear life that people in the future will just laugh at. Phrenology, ether, and many others at which we scoff; makes me wonder which ideas we hold near and dear that will be considered just so much crap later.

    2. Re:analyzing past predictions by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      For me, one assumption I think people will laugh at in the future is the assumption that a lack of evidence is indicitive of a lack of existance. This has been debunked a few times in the field of zoology (think Pandas, the coelecanth, and others) but has yet to hit in other fields of study.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:analyzing past predictions by Jason+R · · Score: 1

      Umm... how about free-trade and job stability?

    4. Re:analyzing past predictions by Fred+Foobar · · Score: 1

      I predict in the future all predictions of the future will be wrong, including this one.

      --
      It was a really good paper.
    5. Re:analyzing past predictions by _anomaly_ · · Score: 1
      I predict in the future all predictions of the future will be wrong, including this one.

      The predition you're making is in the present, so how can it be included in the future predictions, making it wrong?

      The below is True.

      The above is False.

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    6. Re:analyzing past predictions by Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good point.

      If you look back at history, you notice something about technologies. In most cases, there are five distinct stages:

      1) Conception - a person first comes up with the idea for a brand new category of technology. A wave of interest sweeps over it. (Weeks to years)
      2) Initial development - slow, tedious developent toward this field, with great sweeping prophecying of its capability (years to decades)
      3) Later development - slow, tedious development toward this field, with the many people disillusioned (decades to centuries)
      4) Realization - A critical threshold of technology is passed, and all of the sudden, the tech takes off and revolutionizes the world, combining with all sorts of other fields and giving them new life. The public again gives great sweeping prophecies of its capabilities for the future. (decades to centuries)
      5) Stagnation - While the technologies continue to advance, their rate falls off asymptoticly, and the most additional gains are only from new, unrelated fields combining with it. (ad infinitum)

      Apply this to every field that we've seen in recent history, from chemisty to antibiotics to munitions to steel framed construction to electric power, etc.

      Then apply it to techs which are still developing to get an idea of what to expect - AI, nanotechnology, computers, etc.

      Part of the problem is that when people see an idea first proposed, and when they see an idea first realized, they forget that revolutionary ideas can only go so far without either a lot of development time to resolve problems in the fomer case, and that there is a limit to how far you can take a tech without recombintion with new technologies in the latter case.

      --
      It's time for Operation Crazy Plan.
    7. Re:analyzing past predictions by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But there's a lot of people who think that a lack of existence is something that requires evidence, which is equally stupid, given that a lack of existence should be *expected* to leave behind to a lack of evidence. While it's true that a lack of evidence does not prove a lack of existence, it's also true that if you're looking for proof that nonexistant things are in fact nonexistant, then you're going about it all wrong in the first place.

      The *ONLY* way you can ever say that a thing is nonexistant, is as a default starting hypothesis. Proof cannot sway you to that point if it's right, but it could sway you away from it if it's wrong.

      Therefore it's a falsifiable hypothesis to state that a thing is assumed nonexistant by default until shown otherwise, and that's why it's a perfectly honest starting point to take nonexistence as the default hypothesis. In fact, it's the ONLY honest starting point.

      To say otherwise is to believe in leprechauns and santa claus - which are also impossible to find evidence to prove are nonexistant.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    8. Re:analyzing past predictions by jungd · · Score: 1

      How about: one currency for all occasions? or unemployment - wtf?

      --
      /..sig file not found - permission denied.
    9. Re:analyzing past predictions by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1


      I don't mind today's theories as much as they are so commonly touted as FACT, not theory. You need to take every freakin thing with a huge grain of salt these days.

    10. Re:analyzing past predictions by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      one assumption I think people will laugh at in the future is the assumption that a lack of evidence is indicitive of a lack of existance.

      Interesting. That fits in well with my argument about global warming.

    11. Re:analyzing past predictions by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      My favourite from the past : The prediction, popular in the late 40's / early 50's, that mankind in the future would be bald - because everybody wore hats, we wouldn't need hair to protect/warm the head!

      My favourite from the now : IP networking for everything. Face it kiddies, there's some things it just doesn't work well for...

      Forget the flying cars - I drive the roads every day, and see too many people that have trouble working in two dimensions!

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    12. Re:analyzing past predictions by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      The *ONLY* way you can ever say that a thing is nonexistant, is as a default starting hypothesis.

      Hello there! I've just installed a deadly shark-mounted laser-beam in your bathtub. Now don't try and tell me it doesn't exist...

      There is *NO WAY* you could prove that.

      To say otherwise is to believe in leprechauns and santa claus

      Wrong. Leprechauns and Santa Claus are in different categories. Santa Claus is scientifically disprovable. There are certain traits attached to Santa-Claus-ness that we can test for: primarily the annual appearance of unexplanable gifts.

      Failing to locate such evidence constitutes solid proof that either Santa Claus doesn't exist, or that our definition of Santa Claus is wrong (which is the same as non-existence).

      Leprechauns, however, are by definition willing and (supernaturally) able to conceal their existence. They can only be "disproved" by following Occam's Razor, as you suggest.

    13. Re:analyzing past predictions by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Admittedly, there are some things that can be proven non-existant, but to do it the search space has to be reasonably finite. The sharks with lasers in my bathtub are disprovable only because it is possible to make an exhaustive search of my bathtub, being that it is a reasonably finite search space. But now try proving that there are no shark-mounted lasers at all, anywhere in the universe...

      That's usually the kind of question the grandparent poster was talking about - questions about what exists, without narrowing the search space to specify *where*.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    14. Re:analyzing past predictions by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Yep- the clasical is God. The normal atheist claim is because he sees no evidence for God, God must not exist *anywhere*. Where a thinking believer such as myself would say, no, that just means God does not exist *for you*. All the evidence for God that I've ever seen is highly subjective; thus it's perfectly possible to be human and never see any evidence for God at all. But that doesn't mean that just because YOU have no subjective evidence doesn't mean that I don't have subjective evidence, or for that matter, some little green man on a planet halfway across the galaxy doesn't see any evidence. It's a big universe out there, and to say that ANY concept doesn't exist ANYWHERE gets downright ridiculous to prove rather quickly.

      OTOH- to take a rather small space and say that something doesn't exist there is quite doable- there are no leprechauns under my desk because I looked and they ain't there.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    15. Re:analyzing past predictions by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Yep- and that's exactly the attitude that is the major downfall of science today. Do no action until you have positive proof for something means that you'll never take any risks at all. Which leaves all the new discoveries to those willing to take the risk.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    16. Re:analyzing past predictions by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Sigh - this old thing again.

      Imagine someone is a hermit and has never heard of the concept of a God. Along comes someone to visit the hermit and describes his god to the hermit, and the hermit says, "I don't believe you". Did the hermit pick up a new belief by doing this? Or, did his worldview he pick up a new assertion beyond those he had before? No. He just didn't change his viewpoint from what it was beforehand. His worldview didn't include a god before, and it still doesn't now. This incurs NO BURDEN OF PROOF.

      The notion that an atheist has a burden of proof is based on the assumption that belief in god is an assumed default from birth, which it obviously isn't. Belief in god is a supposition you pick up during your lifetime, and therefore *it* is the neck-sticking-out assertion that needs a reason.

      I do agree that it is possible that you have experienced evidence that I have not. I do not agree that this makes it wrong for me to take the atheistic position.

      Your post appears to be based on the notion that atheism must be an active belief there is no god. This is not true. A lack of the active belief that there *is* a god is sufficient to fit the definition.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    17. Re:analyzing past predictions by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The notion that an atheist has a burden of proof is based on the assumption that belief in god is an assumed default from birth, which it obviously isn't.

      Not entirely correct- there's a reason we have the word after all, there seems to be a natural drive to seek divinity in the human soul. What we assign that divinity to, however- is the real question.

      Your post appears to be based on the notion that atheism must be an active belief there is no god. This is not true. A lack of the active belief that there *is* a god is sufficient to fit the definition.

      No, that's an agnostic. However, you've overstated my position a bit as well- my post is based on the notion that an active belief that there is no God, or as it's more routinely put, that faith is always false, is an intellectually dishonest position that requires faith to believe. That's all I'm saying: that a lack of evidence is not neccessarily a lack of existance, that this is a false premise to begin with.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    18. Re:analyzing past predictions by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      Not entirely correct- there's a reason we have the word after all, there seems to be a natural drive to seek divinity in the human soul. What we assign that divinity to, however- is the real question.

      Yawn. Our intelligence is based on an instinct to find patterns out of fuzzy confusing data. We're very good at it. Unfortunately we have such an instinctual emotional attachment to finding these patterns that we are uncomfortable admitting to ourselves when we can't do it. So we pretend to have found answers where we haven't yet. This is all that is required to explain why faith is so common. We don't like admitting to ourselves that a thing is unknown, so we make up an explanation and it makes us feel good to believe it.


      No, that's an agnostic.

      You are operating under the false premise that agnostic and atheist are mutually exclusive properties. They aren't. One is about what you think, and the other is a measure of your degree of certainty about it. In fact, someone could be both an agnostic and a Christian, even, if that person says "I know I don't have the actual knowlege that there's a god, and I know I don't have a reason to believe, but I believe anyway, because it just feels right." Such a person is common, and is in fact both an agnostic and a Christian, although he probably wouldn't realise it. The same can happen the other way around, and someone can be both agnostic and atheistic.


      or as it's more routinely put, that faith is always false

      That's a misrepresentation of the postion held by those you are arguing against. It's not that faith is always false - it's that the practice of belief without reason is always a bad idea, and if something you have faith in turns out to be true, it can only be so by pure, utter coincidnece.

      By the way, faith is not boolean. Everything has varying degrees of it. The faith that god exists is 100% faith, all the way over on one end of the sliding scale. The "faith" that it's a bad idea to believe based on faith alone, is maybe about 1 or 2% faith. It's a position based mostly on observation of how reliable such things have turned out to be in the past.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  17. Funny thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I just broke wind.

    1. Re:Funny thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I just Broke Like The wind.

    2. Re:Funny thing is... by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's an Astounding Coincidence! Do you think it's a sign, some sort of miraculous finger of God pointing you to a career as a washed up heavy metal guitarist?

      Deep man, really deep.


      Just an aside, your title is misleading. Your post is in no way funny. Now, a more accurate title would have been, "Boring thing is...".

      Meh.

      --
      Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
  18. Corner newsstands by mr_mischief · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the future, as the number of /.ers grows, it will be faster to publish a site on CD and distribute it worldwide to small outlets than for all the interested parties to load the page across the net. :-/

    1. Re:Corner newsstands by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      No not CDs, Carrier Pigions!

  19. I feel for the little guys, I do. by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a perfect example of the biggest problem with slashdot. The posting of this story seems to border on malicious intent towards the owner of that website. My advice is this: Do what I do, and read the "old news" section instead of the front page.

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    1. Re:I feel for the little guys, I do. by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      My advice is this: Do what I do, and read the "old news" section instead of the front page.

      The only difference would be that sites from older stories would get slashdotted instead of sites from newer stories.

    2. Re:I feel for the little guys, I do. by Jason1729 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do what I do, and read the "old news" section instead of the front page.

      That's a neat trick since this is still the most recent article and you've managed to post a comment on it long before it got to the old news section.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    3. Re:I feel for the little guys, I do. by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

      heh, true enough, but I honestly don't expect anyone to take my advice. I admit, it was very difficult to make the switch. (as you can see by my response to this article, I cheated and looked at the front page... sometimes I can't help it) For the time being at least, reading "yesterday's news" provides many more working links and in general is much less aggrivating.

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    4. Re:I feel for the little guys, I do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How'd you find this story if you were reading the "old news" page?

    5. Re:I feel for the little guys, I do. by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

      Indeed, you are right. On boring friday afternoons at work, I indulge myself. Seriously tho, give it a try.

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    6. Re:I feel for the little guys, I do. by DrJonesAC2 · · Score: 1

      Or do what I do and not read the articles ;)

    7. Re:I feel for the little guys, I do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean Do as I say and not as I do, in an effort to make everyone *else* read old stuff, allowing you to read new articles in peace?

    8. Re:I feel for the little guys, I do. by glsunder · · Score: 1

      Do what I do, and read the "old news" section instead of the front page.

      That's a neat trick since this is still the most recent article and you've managed to post a comment on it long before it got to the old news section.


      Yes, but the next article is about the invention of a webbased time machine.

    9. Re:I feel for the little guys, I do. by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      But thius is slashdot one doesn't need to read the article to post in the comments.

      one also doesn't need to spell check so if I spelled anything wrong don't bother telling me;)

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    10. Re:I feel for the little guys, I do. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I bet you'd complain big time when Slashdot stopped posting stories.

    11. Re:I feel for the little guys, I do. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      The OP is a typical "Do as I say, not as I do" type.

  20. Screw the Flying Car by meehawl · · Score: 1

    I am still waiting for my own personal airship that I can tether to tall buildings.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Screw the Flying Car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am still waiting for my own personal airship that I can tether to tall buildings.

      And a pilot named Cid to fly you around in it?

  21. Smithsonian Exhibit by ncg · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is actually a travelling smithsonian exhibit going across the country to smaller communities on this ery subject. You read read about it here, it is currently in Rexburg, Idaho.

    1. Re:Smithsonian Exhibit by xerxesVII · · Score: 0

      Whoburg, Where??? Small communities, indeed!

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
  22. Hey, here's a really cool site! by lifebouy · · Score: 1

    So lets all go and drop kick it into the next millenium! Very nice. This guy never even had a prayer. The inside of his server probably looks like the front row of a Gallager show.

    --
    Drop me a line at:
    Key ID: 0x54D1D809
  23. Excerpts... by iota · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's quite a lot posted there. Mostly referring to images, but here's a couple excerpts -- It was slashdotted while I was reading it...

    TALES OF FUTURE PAST
    It wasn't that long ago that we had a future. I mean, we have one now; the world isn't going to crash into the Sun or anything like that. What I mean is that we had a future that we could clearly imagine. The future wasn't tomorrow, next week, next year, or next century. It was a place with a form, a structure, a style. True, we didn't know exactly what the future would be like, but we knew that it had to be one of a few alternatives; some good, some very bad. The future was a world with a distinct architecture. It had its own way of speaking. It had its own technology. It was for all intents and purposes a different land where people dressed differently, talked differently, ate differently, and even thought differently. It was where scientists were wizards, where machines were magically effective and efficient, where tyrants were at least romantically evil rather than banal, and where the heavens were fairyland where dreams could literally come true.

    A few years ago, people talked about building a bridge to the 21st century. Now that we're there, the phrase seems as odd as building a causeway to five o'clock. As Midnight brought in the year 2000 (or 2001 if you prefer), something odd began to sink in. For people of my generation, who had lived through the tarnished promises of the Atomic Age, the Space Age, the Computer Age, and the This That and Another Age, the year 2001 was a gateway. We waited twenty, thirty, forty years and some longer to pass though that gate into a time when spaceships the size of ocean liners plied between colonised planets, where cities were colourful collections of brand new towers without a single old building or blade of grass, where people wore jumpsuits like they were the togas of a technocratic Rome, where robots were our powerful and obedient servants, and where jetpacks were as common as galoshes.

    Boy, were we off base. It isn't simply that the predictions were wrong. No one with half a brain really expected that sort of accuracy. And true, though some marvels did not come to pass, others that were and weren't predicted did. We certainly live very different lives from that of our fathers and grandfathers. That is not in dispute. But what did not happen is what many expected, though never talked about much. Assuming that we dodged the 1984, Brave New World bullet, our future was supposed to be a sort of technocratic, atomic-powered, computer-controlled, antiseptic, space-travelling Jerusalem that would at last free us from the curse of Eden and original sin. We expected some how, some way that we would be on the road to being freed from the human condition. We expected a sort of bloodless, benign French Revolution with Hugo Gernsback as our Voltaire and Carl Sagan as our Robespierre. And what did we get? The City of Man with Tivo. The fact is, science fiction and popular science had set the bar so high that only the Second Coming with ray guns would have satisfied.

    Still, there was a romantic innocence about the 20th century's view of the future. It was a sort of plastic Camelot; in both senses of the term. So, settle on you jetpack, hitch up you blaster, and tune in the videotron as we tour Future Past!


    FUTURE CITY
    This is Frank R. Paul's depiction of a city of the future and is pretty typical of such predictions. The city is a massive pile of steel, plastic and glass put together in a way that not only has no past, but actively rejects it. It is a place of heroic technology with skyscrapers the size of whole districts, Roof-top aerodromes, wide pedestrian boulevards, and metal roadways strangely devoid of traffic. There are even urban space launch pads where giant rockets are winched upright before blasting off to the heavens. Noise regulations, Smoise regulations.

    The iconic image of the future is the city

    1. Re:Excerpts... by 680x0 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Oh! There's text in that big black rectangle. Who knew?

      Whatever this guy did, it doesn't show up in Mozilla. Oh, this explains it:

      name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 5.0"
    2. Re:Excerpts... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Whatever this guy did, it doesn't show up in Mozilla.

      Perfectly visible in Mozilla 1.6, or Firefox 0.8

    3. Re:Excerpts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, It looks pretty good in Galeon 1.3.12 on Mandrake 10.0...

      Maybe you should not have your text set to black only, overriding the page settings?

  24. Hmph! by whiteranger99x · · Score: 2, Informative

    Blah, I'm still waiting on the crater-front property on the Moon that I signed up for :(

    --
    Join the TWIT army now!
  25. I predict by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny
    • people will continue to post comments that say "First Post"
    • Tinfoil hats will be all the rage
    • The next version of Windows will claim to "load faster and be more stable than ever! and will allow you to shut down a program without rebooting"
    • Linux will be on the verge of overtaking windows
    • slashdot will be a mainstream word
    • IANAL will initially be a mainstream word, but after Howard Stern uses it in a derrogatory way, it is banned by the FCC.
    1. Re:I predict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and Microsoft will *still* be evil.

    2. Re:I predict by Nspace13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      and hopefully goatse and tubgirl won't be mainstream words!

      --
      steal this sig
    3. Re:I predict by Nspace13 · · Score: 1

      and hopefully the GW years will be referred to as America's dark ages.

      --
      steal this sig
    4. Re:I predict by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean as opposed to back when people belived in manifest destiny, women and blacks couldn't vote, genocide was being practiced against Native Americans, etc.

      When Ghingis Khan rushed across Asia, are those known as the dark years of the Mongols?

      History has some strange criteria as far as what's good and what's bad.

      Perhaps it will just be remembered as the time during which the US spent all its money on millitary equipment, weakening the American economy. This eventually causes the gov. to raise taxes, at which time American Industry seeks a new home outside the industrial haven that was the United States.

      And the new "World Power" will remember this era as the time of their rising and will downplay Bush's actions in the same way that the success of American Industry after WWII is exalted, while people gloss over the fact that part of that boom was due to the fact that the other industrial nations had bombed their factories into rubble and the US had no real competition.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    5. Re:I predict by Nspace13 · · Score: 1

      okay you win, its all been a dark age so far

      --
      steal this sig
  26. Re:National Geographic, uh huh... by ashitaka · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pffft. "...looking at the diagrams of the moon base..."

    C'mon admit it, you were ogling the african girls in their native state of undress.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  27. On the "Flying Wing" magazine cover... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...David Sarnoff, RCA President, Predicts "Television will Carry the Mail".

    Actually he wasn't too far off, eh?

    1. Re:On the "Flying Wing" magazine cover... by k4_pacific · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, except he probably thought his company would bring it to you.

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    2. Re:On the "Flying Wing" magazine cover... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      LOL. Except the way it really worked is with e-mail, not the predicted negro family technician on an auto-teleprompter in the basement.

      Not trying to be crass, just a reflection on the times.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  28. Still not fun and interesting by crawdaddy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had forgotten the web was actually fun and interesting
    And thanks to the Slashdot effect, I can't be reminded of that fact, you insensitive clods!

  29. the futures here we just can afford it by genner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lets see what don't we have. Flying cars? Yup got those just need some obscene amount of cash + piolts lisecense to get one. http://www.moller.com/skycar/ Hover boards? Got those too,although their more surf board than skate board sized, and with a large engine hanging on the back. Still not cheap. http://www.futurehorizons.net/hoverboard.htm Thos cool screens that take up the whole wall. Got those too, provided you can afford it. http://www.superscreen.com/ Video phones. Got those, not too expensive but most people just don't care about them. Won't bother posting a link every knows about these. OK so where still missing our space elevator, can't have everything I guess.

    1. Re:the futures here we just can afford it by Bobman1235 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lets see what don't we have. Flying cars? Yup got those just need some obscene amount of cash + piolts lisecense to get one. http://www.moller.com/skycar/ Hover boards? Got those too,although their more surf board than skate board sized, and with a large engine hanging on the back. Still not cheap. http://www.futurehorizons.net/hoverboard.htm Thos cool screens that take up the whole wall. Got those too, provided you can afford it. http://www.superscreen.com/ Video phones. Got those, not too expensive but most people just don't care about them. Won't bother posting a link every knows about these. OK so where still missing our space elevator, can't have everything I guess.

      OK, I've been around Slashdot for a while now, and that is possibly the WORST grammatical post I have ever read with a +5 moderation. I mean, we all type fast and have a typo here and there, or decide to post the link text rather than an anchor that takes 4 more seconds to type, but Dear God! This had every element of badness I've ever seen!

      Try some punctuation. Or, how about some spelling? What is a lisecense? And of course the they're, their and there distinctions. Sentence fragments (yes I realize that "sentence fragment" is a sentence fragment... even Linguo made that mistake). I hope your first grade English teacher hunts you down and beats you.

    2. Re:the futures here we just can afford it by Ira-Waru · · Score: 1

      "The future has arrived; it's just not evenly distributed." - William Gibson

      --
      Such a price the gods exact for song: to become what we sing - Pythagoras
    3. Re:the futures here we just can afford it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why we have Bittorrent

    4. Re:the futures here we just can afford it by genner · · Score: 1

      Lol, you've obviously never read my other posts then. I've done much worse and got modded up for it. People mod me up for content not packaging.

    5. Re:the futures here we just can afford it by WazeD · · Score: 2

      Content is King on modding... Has it ever occured to you that he might not have english as his mother tongue?

    6. Re:the futures here we just can afford it by Bozdune · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points, I'd mod you down for being so proud of it. An effort at proper grammar and spelling isn't just fussy old-think, it's an attempt to be considerate to your readers.

  30. Shape of Things to Come by meehawl · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The 1936 movie of HG Wells' Shape of Things to Come is good for this sort of thing. Captures that 30s "futuristic" look perfectly.

    --

    Da Blog
  31. Currently ... by proudlyindian · · Score: 3, Funny

    this site only seems to have a past

  32. The Shape of Things to Come by meehawl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The 1936 movie of HG Wells' Shape of Things to Come is good for this sort of thing. Captures that 30s "futuristic" look perfectly.

    --

    Da Blog
  33. Site is Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The images are doctored/faked. Check out the ferris whell of death, the picture of the magazine cover it was printed on says more about it can be read on page 666. Too many other mistakes to mention, looks like someone was looking for some /. attention

    1. Re:Site is Fake by MrEd · · Score: 1
      Plus this one:


      http://leela.lasthome.net/www.davidszondy.com/futu re/city/suburbancopters.htm


      "Popular Mechanics Magazine: Written so you can understand it"...


      Then again, maybe they genuinely did print that... any old farts / magazine collectors know if this is fake?

      --

      Wah!

    2. Re:Site is Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So which is worse?

      'fake' internet site,

      -or-

      dork /. poster?

      The former made me smile, the later, well.....

    3. Re:Site is Fake by Poingggg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not neccessarily. I remember being subscribed to a magazine that numbered it's pages throughout the year. This meant page 1 was the first page of the first magazine that year and page (big number) was the last page of the december one. So you could easily have a pagenumber 250 somewhere in the middle of the year. My guess is that this magazine used the same system.

      --
      What person will donate an airborne act of love?
    4. Re:Site is Fake by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
      Check here

      Actually, one of the links on the second page is a story from ABC news about the past predictions of future innovations.

      BTW, I didn't read the article.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    5. Re:Site is Fake by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      And Slashdot attention they got.

    6. Re:Site is Fake by Comte · · Score: 1

      What a /dork you must be! Do you really think David (whom I happen to know, and his wife Lela, and their baby daughter Emma so - "ppphhhhhhttttt!" to you!) would spend hundreds of hours putting together this site just so that he could post fake photoshoped 80 year-old "Popular Mechanics" magazines?

      Eejit!

      --
      "Courage is the price that life exact for granting peace. The soul that knows it not knows no escape from little thin
    7. Re:Site is Fake by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bzzztt... old serials were exactly that, installments. The typical SF rag of that era started with the first page of the year's first issue as page 1... and the last page of the year's final issue as 392389 or however many pages were published in that year.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    8. Re:Site is Fake by chaotixx · · Score: 1

      Yeah he just wanted some attention. After all, who wouldn't want their little server ran into the ground by the Slashdot hordes?

    9. Re:Site is Fake by Swarfega · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lots of magazines are published in volumes (often 1 per year) and the pages in each issue of the volume are numberd from where the last left off. At the end of the year, the magazines can be rebound into a single "volume" with hard covers to sit on a shelf. That way, each volume is now sequentially numbered all the way through without having to work out which issue you're in. Many libraries do this to their journals to make it easier to keep track of the thousands of issues hanging around.

    10. Re:Site is Fake by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Do you think so? Check out the issue before, cover story begins on page 594, the following issue's on page 746. The conspiracy must be widespread.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  34. Mirror by Moonwick · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Only on slashdot can a posting be rated "Score -1, Insightful".
    1. Re:Mirror by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      Thanks, now we can all RTFM.

      I work for an Air Traffic Control, so This one is the best of a marvellous bunch.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    2. Re:Mirror by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      That link led me to stumble over this touching story of a boy and his car at Popular Mechanics.

      God bless America!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  35. A good comment on city architecture.... by tcopeland · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...from the "future city" pages:
    Unless a city is built from scratch in the wilderness at some insane pace, you will always be surrounded by the evidence of earlier times, which is a good thing. Otherwise you end up with something antiseptic, like Brasilia.
    More on Brasilia's depressing architecture here.
    1. Re:A good comment on city architecture.... by JAD+lifter · · Score: 1

      More on Brasilia's depressing architecture

      I actually think that Brasilia looks pretty damn cool.

    2. Re:A good comment on city architecture.... by nytes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Googie is the architecture of the future, dammit!

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  36. Name that tune... by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny
    "I can slashdot that website in ten posts..."
    "I can slashdot that webserver in nine posts..."
    "I can slashdot that site in eight posts!"

    "Slashdot that website!"

    Persons of a "certain age" will remember that game show. I sure don't!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  37. The next webite by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
    Tales of Slashdotting past....

    Since apparently i read the article too late and thus it was slashdotted

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  38. Let's make fun of all visionaries !!! by PHPhD2B · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The author seems to find great pleasure in mocking everything about past predictions of the future. Rather than taking the time to write a coherent comparison and analysis the author instead put up a bunch of magazine scans and straw men and pushed them all over.

    This could have been a great website, featuring what people thought the future would look like, comparing it to what it ended up looking like, and featuring some analysis as to why the discrepancies occured, or at the very least some surmises.

    It's not easy telling the future, and I doubt very many of the magazine scans and "future" products were meant to be authoritarian "this is what it WILL look like" presentations. Rather, they were "hey, wouldn't it be neat if we could have this in the future?" With that view this could actually have been an inspiration to help develop what we already don't have. Instead it was turned into a poorly written "ha ha, what stupid ideas"-fest.

    What's the use of even putting up this website when all it is doing is slam those who try to have some sort of vision?

    --
    --I am Sun Tzu of the Borg. Resistance is feudal.
    1. Re:Let's make fun of all visionaries !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I felt facination and humor when i read this site.

      I think if the artists and authors were alive today they'd get a chuckle out of their old work. They seemed to have a sense of humor.

    2. Re:Let's make fun of all visionaries !!! by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      True. You've gotta admit though, the guy's writing style is pretty funny. I wasted a whole day at work on this site!

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  39. William Gibson's "The Gernsback Continuum" by meehawl · · Score: 3, Insightful
    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:William Gibson's "The Gernsback Continuum" by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      caught the essence of the 19340s
      Futurists shouldn't really try to predict what things will be like 17 millenia from now. That is perhaps a bit of an overzelous attempt.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  40. Google Cache link by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Google Cache link by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 0

      Sry I'm stupid
      someone else has already posted the text from the home page
      and the images in google cache again point to the main site

      rm previousPost

  41. A Farewell to Kings...and "History" by beatleadam · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Only read this comment for humor (well relevance if you agree with me of course)...no Modding down for RUSH references :-) But this really made me think of the lyrics to "A Farewell to Kings"

    When they turn the pages of history/ When these days have passed long ago/ Will they read of us with sadness/ For the seeds that we let grow?/ We turned our gaze/ From the castles in the distance/ Eyes cast down/ On the path of least resistance/

    See what I mean?

    --
    I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. -- Hunter S. Thompson
  42. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  43. Google Cache by Jane_Dozey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here. Although that link seems a bit slow aswell... *sigh*

    --
    Silly rabbit
  44. Tale of the past by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 0

    Does anyone have pointers to any record of the first /. effect anywhere as googling for "first slashdot effect" doesn't turn up any results

    - 'Any'one

  45. Re:National Geographic, uh huh... by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

    The fact that I was most interested in the moon base and not so much the naked natives probably explains a lot now that I think about it.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  46. A Moody Blues fan? by ikewillis · · Score: 1

    Anyone else think this name is reminiscent of Days of Future Passed, the album on which Nights in White Satin appeared?

    1. Re:A Moody Blues fan? by th1ckasabr1ck · · Score: 1

      It's possible, but I prefer Tuesday Afternoon.

  47. Slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about posting bittorrents with a pdf of the web page in the future, instead of posting links to the actual page - spread bandwidth requirements.

    Is there any way to track the number of downloads in bt? The info could be forwarded to the originating website for tracking info.

    1. Re:Slashdotting by Greventls · · Score: 1

      That would be a great idea, except then slashdot would be hit harder, and there is the whole thing with copyright.... Except for the copyright problem, it would be a nice solution.

  48. The Undertakers Got it Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    While working with digital collections a university library, I unearthed a of turn of the century(19th to 20th) copy of The Emblamer's Gazette. One of the articles I found was a speculative look forward in the new century. The article devoted a lot of space to a discussion of an emerging technology, the automobile. Not only did the gazette predict the demise of the horse and carriage, but they predicted urban sprawl and the development of the modern city.

  49. RIP by Dark+Bard · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was a good and decent website who brought joy to many. With it's passing it shall be missed. Let us all join hands and pray for it's resurrection with the adding of bandwith or mirrors. Amen.

  50. Futurama by Zelxyb · · Score: 1

    Surely I'm not the only one that saw the opening Futurama sequence when I looked at those covers on that website.

  51. Re:Woo!!! FP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOu fool, those are LESBIANS...

  52. Flying Car by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This really begs the question...

    What would you do for a Flying Car?

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
  53. The bumperstick on my hovercar: by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    "Immantize the Gernsback continuum!"

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  54. The real problem: Physics has stalled. by TheNarrator · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Around the turn of the century there were fantastic advances in our understanding of physics, which led to us mastering electricity and atomic physics.

    Ask any person over the age of 90 what the greatest invention of their lifetime was and they will almost certainly say something that was made made possible by electricity, or our understanding ofatomic physics.

    In the late 19th century we developed the internal combustion engine. We developed airplanes at the beginning of the century. In the 1930s we developed chemical rockets. Since then what have we developed as far as propulsion or transportation technologies go?

    Not much. It's easy to imagine how much optimism there was after these initial advancements. Lately basic physics has branched out into such technologically unproductive pursuits as String theory. They are interesting to mathematicians but the technological fruits aren't there. In my opinion we have entered a technological slump that may last for quite a while.

    1. Re:The real problem: Physics has stalled. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But that could change soon.

      Go read Nick Cook's book The Hunt for Zero Point. And don't think Cook is a crackpot; he writes for the highly prestigious and influential Janes' Defence Weekly, perhaps the best-known periodical on military matters.

      If Cook's assertions are correct, we may be on the verge of a energy production revolution that could make fossil fuels and fission nuclear power obselete literally overnight. It appears that the Nazis during World War II may have been playing around with the idea of zero-point energy (ZPE), developing it to the point they could power a whole building with it! =:-O

      An important thing Cook mentions in the book is that Japanese companies (who have an even more vested interest in reducing the importation of oil than the USA does) may have quietly studied the potential of ZPE devices. This might just make it possible for a vehicle like the Toyota Prius (which uses a special drivetrain that is essentially an electric motor powered by a small gasoline engine and a large battery) be switched to one that uses a ZPE generator. If Toyota (one of the world's largest automobile manufacturers) does succeed watch the price of oil futures go from US$42 per barrel to under US$20 per barrel almost overnight. :-)

    2. Re:The real problem: Physics has stalled. by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Lately basic physics has branched out into such technologically unproductive pursuits as String theory. They are interesting to mathematicians but the technological fruits aren't there yet.

      You forget the operative word. Basic, fundamental investigation is where all the neato cool interesting stuff comes from. We have no idea what that stuff will be, but it will come, if we are prepared to let people continue their research.

      Just think what the world would be like if the Powers That Were had told Messrs. Shockley, Brattain and Bardeen to quit messing with those ridiculous bits of germanium, that crazy chemistry and that silly quantum theory (none of which has any application anyway, you know) and work with something real, like better tubes.

      ...laura

    3. Re:The real problem: Physics has stalled. by angryelephant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My great-grandmother was recently interviewed for her hundredth birthday. In the course of the interview she was asked this question. Her answer was: "Indoor plumbing". I'm not saying the answer of one woman invalidates your claim, but it does make you think; What is more important to you having non-gas lighting, a PC, microwave oven, mobile phone, etc.

      or not having to walk outside when you need to take a sh!t?

    4. Re:The real problem: Physics has stalled. by TheNarrator · · Score: 1

      Ah but without sewage treatment and the electric water pump this wouldn't have been possible.

  55. Future Perfect by olrik666 · · Score: 2, Informative


    A nice and cheap book about the future as imagined in the early 20th century :

    http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/3822815667/q id=1085778474/sr=1-3/ref=sr_1_1_3/701-0825104-1463 531

  56. Which version? by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The original or what got changed for syndication. IIRC the original last line was bart cutting in with "Quote the raven; Eat my shorts!", that line wasn't there last time i saw it on tv. They edit futurama on Adult Swim sometimes too, which is maddening... They cut the professors line "Sweet zombie Jesus!"...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Which version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They cut the professors line "Sweet zombie Jesus!"...

      The professor had quite a lot of quasi-blasphemous lines, like this one:
      "All videotapes were erased in the year 2500 due to the second coming of Christ."

  57. Ah the coelecanth.... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Flipping the bird at 400 million years of evolution.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  58. The common thread by rewt66 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Almost all of these predictions were based on bigger - more power, more steel, etc. The big (no pun intended) thing that the predictions missed was smaller and smarter - the transistor, the (micro) computer, embedded systems.

    But we may be making the same mistake. More power was the biggest deal until about 1970. Then smaller became the big deal. But this doesn't mean that smaller is going to rule forever. In particular, our predictions of nanotech and biotech may be just as naive as the predictions the site laughs at.

    So what will the future really be? I don't know. Maybe "more connected" is going to be the next big area.

  59. Re:National Geographic, uh huh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, the moon base was firm, those natives sag too much.

  60. Fun and Interesting? by Techmaniac · · Score: 1

    This poster is smoking future weed. The future sucks compared to the Jetson's vision of life in the future.

  61. Slashdotted.... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    So i havn't seen the images, but in the conception of futurama, i know they based a lot of the artwork and the technology within the show on predictions of the (our) near future from the '50s or so. Its really aparant, especially in the first season of futurama. The design of the planet express ship, the tubes everyone travels around in, all the traffic signals and streetlights hover, and all the other stuff like that.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  62. Networks, my boy, networks... by cr0sh · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Maybe "more connected" is going to be the next big area.

    You have likely hit the nail on the head - we are likely to see more and better applications of network theory (along with attendent refinement of the theory). It is becoming clear that just about every robust and fault-tolerant (note I did not say "faultless") system involves or is a network (or a network of networks, such as the human body). These discoveries and others are likely to shape a lot of the coming century.

    If you (or anyone else) are interested in this trend, you cannot go wrong by reading "Linked" by Albert-Laszlo Barabasi (ISBN 0-452-28439-2).

    Of course, this, like every other prediction, could be wrong. We are seeing the application of network theory in a number of areas currently (social networking tools like orkut and friendster are the ones in the spotlight) - whether it is simply a fad or whether it will truely yield new insights, though, is anyone's guess...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  63. "different lives" by DrCode · · Score: 1

    From the article: We certainly live very different lives from that of our fathers and grandfathers.

    I don't see this, even though I'm probably one of the older people here. In the 50's and 60's, my parents had cars, telephones, televisions, and most of the appliances we have today. The only really new things we have are computers.

    1. Re:"different lives" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but what about remote controls for the telly's, cordless phones, and cellphones?

  64. How about a collection of Y2K predictions? by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 1

    These images mostly come from quite some time back. It is funny to see the change in what a 1930s author predicted compared to a 1960s author compared to a 1990s author. More recent science fiction has tended toward a grittier look for cities and earth. No more of the sanitized, everybody happy and everything in its place images of the 1930s and 1940s (back when people though World War I was "the war to end all wars". This was a time when "clean cars" were pictured with white tires (or at least white walls).

    I think my favorite image of a futuristic city was in Fifth Element. Fifty years from now I'll have to travel to NY and see if that vision had any merit.

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    1. Re:How about a collection of Y2K predictions? by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      What about Coruscant?

      That'd be cool as hell...kilometers of city stacked upon itself...

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  65. Last And First Men by meehawl · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Futurists shouldn't really try to predict what things will be like 17 millenia from now. That is perhaps a bit of an overzelous attempt. :-)

    Some wild'n'crazy older scifi books that look several million years into the future:

    Olaf Stapledon's Last And First Men .
    Sun dying in Red Giant phase, humans try to evolve a group mind.

    William Hope Hodgson's The Nightland .
    Sun and all stars dead. Last humans living in nuclear-powered cities... their nuclear fuel is dwindling. Naive traveller explores a weird Earth now controlled by monsters of the dark.

    Brian Aldiss's Galaxies Like Grains Of Sand
    Deliberate "Stapeldonian" style. All stars dying. Naive galactic travellers explore a weird Galaxy, last humans meet their posthuman successors.

    Gene Wolfe's Book of the New Sun .
    Sun dying. Naive traveller explores a weird Earth.

    These books span a century of science fiction but all share a common theme: thermodynamic inevitability. It's been a common theme for far-futurists since the mid-19th century. Here's what the ever-cheery Wells had to say about the ultimate fate of mankind after the Sun's extinction in the Time Machine:
    A horror of this great darkness came on me. The cold, that smote to my marrow, and the pain I felt in breathing, overcame me. I shivered, and a deadly nausea seized me. Then like a red-hot bow in the sky appeared the edge of the sun. I got off the machine to recover myself. I felt giddy and incapable of facing the return journey. As I stood sick and confused I saw again the moving thing upon the shoal - there was no mistake now that it was a moving thing - against the red water of the sea. It was a round thing, the size of a football perhaps, or, it may be, bigger, and tentacles trailed down from it; it seemed black against the weltering blood-red water, and it was hopping fitfully about.
    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Last And First Men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Asimov's epic Empire and Foundation trilogy (but do forget the sequels).

  66. This wasn't the only view of the future by shoor · · Score: 1

    In the Gernsback inspired sci-fi magazines there may
    have been a lot of optimism for the future, but there was a lot of pessimism in the 30s too. Somewhere I read something that was supposed to be a comment by Freeman Dyson about how grim things looked in the 30s, and how much better things are than what people feared would happen at the time. Or consider books like '1984' (written in 1948) or 'Brave New World', written in the 30s. So far, things are better than what they predicted. It seems like we've dodged a lot of bullets (in this parallel universe at least), that doesn't mean we'll always dodge the bullet of course.

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  67. Magazine covers are likely not faked... by cr0sh · · Score: 3, Informative
    While I can't explain the page 666 reference on the "ferris wheel o' death" image, I can vouch that the images are likely accurate.

    I have many old Popular Mechanix and Popular Science (and a few old Popular Electronics, etc) from the 30's-60's - and the old issues most certainly had wacky imagery on the covers - I have one showing these huge planes (like, Spruce Goose size or larger!) getting a "boost" for launching by rolling down a very tall and big "ski jump"-type ramp, catupulting off it into the sky! I have another issue, which at least looks more real, but is scary in the image it portrays (Science and Mechanics, April 1963): "Wonderful Machine That Stops Parkinson's Disease" - shows this guy laying on the table with these probes in his head (no "halo" or anything like you would see in a real radiographic surgery today - don't twitch!) - the crazy thing is while this is an illustration, the inside article shows the real thing, and no halo there either! Supposedly developed at the "State University of Iowa Hospital", the equipment being developed by the "University of Illinois" - it supposedly worked via ultrasound. This is a real article, real pictures - enough information for you to follow it up if you so wished (makes you wonder if it worked?)...

    The image published of the "Ion Propelled Aircraft" (Popular Mechanics, Aug 1964) - that is a real issue, I am looking at it on my desk right now (cost me $5.00 to buy the issue, originally priced at 35 cents!). What is interesting about this article (if you read the actual article), you would see what was being demonstrated are actually what we /.'ers know as "Lifter" technology (I had to sneak in a JNL ref!) - do a google on "lifter", "jnl", and "Major de Seversky" for more info - all real stuff, he was demoing this long before the internet (but still no progress made toward a real craft) - the article is fun though - Seversky's crafts look no better or worse constructed than "modern" versions (likely he used nearly the same materials - balsa wood and tinfoil).

    Finally, yes, these magazines were dedicated to helping the common man learn about science and technology, and the impact they had on the normal joe's life. In most of them (the good ones), there were many "do-it-yourself" artciles on building all manner of devices and such, from simple barbeque grills, to more complex devices (answering machines, garage door openers, electric edgers, helicopters, small planes, small cars, both gas and electric, etc). At the time, people were more willing to build such devices (people also were less stupid - and less litigious - probably because TV wasn't as prevalent) - many items shown were either not available for the homeowner, or only at a great cost (many articles showed how to build things that could be bought for much more, out of stuff most people would throw away - for example, the electric sidewalk edger I mentioned used a discarded vacuum cleaner motor for power). All of this "do-it-yourself" stuff declined rapidly throughout the 70's-80's, and these magazines all dropped off, or changed radically from what they once were - leaving the husks of "Popular Science" and "Popular Mechanics" as they are today.

    Sad, really - and reflects an even sadder state for the people of today's society - who couldn't "DIY" to save their life, it seems...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  68. I don't know... by xerxesVII · · Score: 0

    Looking at the past's future, I can see where they broadly missed the mark. But who really thought we'd be launching rockets from the middle of downtown? Life in "THE FUTURE" doesn't seem all that different from back when. You can access your bank account from about anywhere, talk on the phone anywhere, and shoes have gotten crazier looking. Otherwise, I haven't had the opportunity to ride in a flying car, a robot doesn't do shit around my house, and girls are still batshit insane.

    --
    "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
  69. Hugo Gernsback by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    A frustrated inventor with over 80 patents to his name...

    80 patents doesn't sound very frustrated to me...

    And the giant buildings may still come to pass. That would be "arcologies" to you SimCity fans.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  70. labcoats at the ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome, to the World of Tomorrroooww!

    I wonder if that was too vague? Of course not, this is /.

  71. Radio by meehawl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ask any person over the age of 90 what the greatest invention of their lifetime was and they will almost certainly say something that was made made possible by electricity, or our understanding ofatomic physics.

    I actually had the opportunity to do just this a couple of years ago when I was having a conversation with some in-laws (a brother and a sister) who were in their late 90s and still totally alert. They were old enough to tell me of their travails of having to "score" liquor from dealers in dodgy neighbourhoods in the US during prohibition.

    Anyway, being young and naive of course I asked the "what was the greatest invention or discovery or change" in the 20th century? I was expecting, of course, something different from their unanimous answer: Radio. I responded with "What about TV?" Their answer? One of them said, moe or less, "TV was nothing special, just radio with pictures. We'd already got used to broadcasting". Sadly, both of these great people are now dead.

    Radio was magic stuff - binding together huge communities cheaply and effectively and "magically" without visible wires. People would huddle together and listen to words and music, exercising their imagination to create pictures within their heads that corresponded to the active narrative coming out of the little magic box.

    Remember in the 1920s that the science fiction genre got started within the pages of radio electronics magazines!

    Radio was the zeitgeist of the times. Just look through any magazine of the time and you see endless classifieds for radio operator/engineer classes, certifications, and so on. Radio in the 1920s was like the Internet in the 1990s - everyone wanted a piece of it, it was the new frontier of communications. In fact, without radio it's doubtful that the Nazis would so effectively have seized control and indoctrinated so many millions of people in Germany.

    I note in passing that radio continues to be a huge agent of social change, for good or ill. The genocide in Rwanda was orchestrated and performed using "talk radio" hosts to coordinate the decentralized death squads. In a country with little infrastructure or reputation for efficiency, the Tutsi butchers in Rwanda killed over a million people at a rate more than five times faster than the best extermination efforts of the stereotupically efficient Nazis during World War 2.

    --

    Da Blog
  72. Aaaaargh by meehawl · · Score: 1

    For Tutsi, read Hutu!

    --

    Da Blog
  73. Sprawl sucks by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    Looks are one thing, but to live in a place like that is quite another. An absence of vibrant city streets gives a feeling of isolation that just doesn't feel right in a city. A sprawl of freeways does not a community make. See my journal for more on this topic.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  74. Looks like the site has been /.ed by varuul · · Score: 1

    I did build a bridge to the future but I burned it too soon...

  75. Dark Info by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Funny

    We are only now stumbling across the phenomenon of "nemory": an event that never happened, that you don't remember. These nemories are our experiences of "dark info", apparently the vast majority of the info in the Universe. In the future, nemories will be exchanged so much that we won't even notice.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Dark Info by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      What about memories you do remember, but never happened? Like the US using a stratigic nuclear device on Tripoli, Libya in 1986? One of my test questions for propaganda is "How many nuclear weapons has the US used in warfare?".

      This leads us to the main problem here- that all evidence, ultimately, is subjective. Objective evidence is only subjective evidence that a large number of people agree on. It's not possible to incorporate truly objective evidence in our thinking- because as soon as it hits our auditory and optic nerves, it gets processed and compared to what we recognize, and in so doing, it becomes subjective.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  76. Ohhh, I can ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frontpage !

  77. Hidden humor by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

    There are funny jokes hidden behind the pictures. Run with images off to see them.

  78. Hey! (I would like to see it too!) by czephyr · · Score: 0

    Folks would like to see the topic of debate before it's /.'ed.

    Wow! give a server/administrator a warning and/or break before putting it thru the /. process folks!

    Any mirrors on this site?

    --
    Sincerely, Czephyr
  79. I'M STILL WAITING!!! by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

    Where, oh where, is my Maralyn Monrobot???

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  80. All I want... by Buckler · · Score: 1

    is my jet-belt, jumpsuit and food-pills. I want to go to the moonbase and eat algae-cakes. I deserve a flying car. When my robots are not busy cleaning my house, I want them to smite my enemies. I want a disintegrator gun. Dammit, they promised.

  81. Brings back memories by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1
    I have several books on the history of science fiction with many of these same pictures. This one for example.

    There are two robot dogs in that painting. Can you see them? No? Me neither :)

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  82. Future War by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    It appears to me that Tesla was really just fogotten, it seems that at one time his inventions (like his "death ray") were considered serious work.

    Glad to see it.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  83. Tales of the Future Past - for the 21st century. by cjellibebi · · Score: 1

    Having looked at the site and seen how all those early 20th century predictions of mammoth soul-less multi-level cities with swarms of flying cars failed to materialise, I notice that even though we're only 4 (or 3) years into the 21st century, one of the major predictions made at the turn of this century has failed to materialise - the success of the DotCom boom. So it looks like contemporary futurologists are a lot worse than their colleagues from 100 years ago.