Slashdot Mirror


NetGear Also Has Remote Access Wide Open

Glenn Fleishman writes "On the heels of Linksys's WRT54G problem of not allowing remote access to be disabled in certain cases and firmware, BugTraq published this report that NetGear's WG602 access point has a hidden password that provides remote and local administrative control. Unlike Linksys's, where turning the firewall on (which is on by default, but a researcher found new units in which it was off when taken out of the box), the NetGear hole cannot be disabled. The backdoor seems to have been created by the vendor that packaged the device for NetGear."

215 comments

  1. huh? by schroet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you can turn off the external web interface on those things right? I guess that doesn't help if you're worried about crackers on your LAN but still, it may not be as bad as it sounds.

    Undocumented = bad though,

    1. Re:huh? by RidiculousPie · · Score: 4, Informative
      This vulnerability can be exploited by any person which is able to reach the webinterface of the device with a webbrowser.
      It would appear that if the webinterface is disabled, the device cannot be compromised.
      --
      ah, mod points ... now where is my crack?
    2. Re:huh? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >you can turn off the external web interface on those things right?

      Besides which, the network diagram on NETGEAR's support page tells you to put a firewall box between the WG602 and the Internet. (On the other hand the user manual shows a direct connection).

  2. Don't you mean.. by Sadiq · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The backdoor seems to have been created by the vendor that used to package devices for NetGear"

    --
    SysWear - Geek T-shirts (UK/Europe)
    1. Re:Don't you mean.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Yeah, really. What kind of morons would put something like this in a security product? I guess this is what happens when you contract programming out to the lowest-priced bidder--you'll end up with idiot programmers in third-world countries with no common sense and who are so brain-dead they have to hard-code a password into the product because they can't remember the one they are testing it with.

      You get what you pay for.

      Unbelievable. Seriously f'in unbelievable.

  3. Fixed in new firmware, available here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://kbserver.netgear.com/support_details.asp?dn ldID=735

    1. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by abscondment · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's all nice and well, but the average user isn't going to upgrade at all. A good deal of them never even set the admin password in the first place.

      Take the guy in my apartment, for instance. I'm using his wireless. His AP is totally open--default SSID and all. I know he doesn't care, but what if he were a business? There's no way he's going to upgrade firmware if he can't even set a simple password.

    2. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2, Informative
      Helps if the URL doesnt have a space in it. Hmm.. slashdot seems to be mangling it. Note: there should be no space in the following URL.
      http://kbserver.netgear.com/support_details.asp?dn ldID=735
      "WG602 Firmware Version 1.7.14

      Bug Fixes

      Fixed: Lost connections during heavy traffic
      Improved system reliability under heavy traffic
      Fixed illegal user access the WEB configuration utility.
      Known Bugs and Feature Limitations

      WPA is not supported.
      Wireless Bridging and repeating functions are not supported. "
    3. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thanks, just downloaded and upgraded.

      (Off topic: was anyone else disappointed that the "super" login didn't make the web control panel reveal easter eggs? I mean, you just had to try it while you were upgrading, right?)

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    4. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by criordan · · Score: 0
      --
      http://www.aaplblog.com/ - News about Apple Inc.
    5. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by eggboard · · Score: 1

      That update has disappeared -- the URL redirects to the main support site, and looking for upgrades for this model provides only one that's six weeks old.

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
    6. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by platypussrex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fixed illegal user access the WEB configuration utility.

      Now if they only had a grammar checker!

    7. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's just generous and left it that way on purpose?

      Or maybe he's doing it so when he gets busted by the RIAA/FBI/TLA he can use the "hey, there were 13 other people that used this connection" excuse.

    8. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by miketang16 · · Score: 1

      its due to the space issue mentioned above

      --
      -------
      "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
      -- George Orwell
    9. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2, Funny
      Helps if the URL doesnt have a space in it. Hmm.. slashdot seems to be mangling it.

      How To Make a Clickable URL
      1. Type <a href = "">
      2. Insert the URL between the quotation marks.
      3. To the right of the closing angle bracket, type the text you'd like the link to say.
      4. Finish with </a>

      Done.

      P.S. No ...Profit!!! jokes, please.

    10. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      5. ???
      6. No profit.

      Your "no profit" joke delivered as requested.

    11. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by Chucky+B.+Bear · · Score: 5, Informative
      I've just upgraded to the latest firmware. It is NOT FIXED!!!! They have simply gone and changed the username and password to something else. There is STILL a default superuser account with password.

      (You can find it yourselve by just taking similiar steps as in the securityfoces article.)

    12. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can use the backdoor password to upgrade the firmware remotely.

    13. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The change that bugs me is:
      The Telnet interface has been disabled to prevent hackers from getting in to the unit.
      on version 1.5.67

      You need the admin username/password to log in to telnet on mine, and "super" doesn't work there. And it's not like I can telnet in and turn it back on... (or better yet, install an sshd)

      Ah well. At least the wireless security prevents anyone without physical access from using this backdoor, so I don't have to worry about upgrading.

    14. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by Lardmonster · · Score: 1

      It's true.

      The bloody fools.

      (I wonder if I could change it?)

      --
      The more advanced the technology, the more open it is to primitive attack
    15. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by russotto · · Score: 1

      If he hasn't changed the regular password, it hardly matters if there's a backdoor, does it?

    16. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here: by __aafkqj3628 · · Score: 1

      I've done that before, except they didn't put a password on it (and it was an Apple Airport).

  4. One wonders what the internal policies are ... by xmas2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think everyone can agree that backdoor passwords are a BAD idea - makes one wonder what the internal policies are at these companies - and what happens when they do a source code audit after these are found and track down the programmers who put 'em in.

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    1. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      Not to mention this one appears to be hard-coded.

    2. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by djsmiley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they are normally there for the company to protect them selfs.

      Stupid user messes up the router.

      They phone tech support "i can't get onto my routers access page, i changed and lost the password"...

      "two seconds sir, prove this is your ip"

      they run some tests to check its whos on the phone..

      "there you go sir, your new password is ******, you may now change the settings again"....

      You ever tried to talk to a noob thru flashing the firmware on their router over the phone?

      --
      - http://www.milkme.co.uk
    3. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's a backdoor in the software auditing software. The programmer is safe.

    4. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by BigHungryJoe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Everyone but the vendors knows it's a bad idea. Cisco recently made the same mistake.

    5. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by AntiOrganic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is absolutely idiotic. All routers have a default username/password combination that is restored when using the firmware reset button typically hidden on the back of the router. There is no reason to create an administrative backdoor for this purpose when there's a readily-accessible password reset feature built into the device.

    6. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .what happens when they do a source code audit after these are found and track down the programmers who put 'em in.

      I believe that's "give them a bonus and a company car."

      These back doors are not trojans installed by disgruntled employees, but there by company policy.

      KFG

    7. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is no reason to create an administrative backdoor for this purpose when there's a readily-accessible password reset feature built into the device.

      Sure there is. The reset button will nuke the configuration, the logs, and whatever else state is there, thus confounding debugging by the tech support. A single password is stupid, though. What's needed is something that requires the router s/n, the router's idea of the date, and a passcode generator from cisco. Give the aforementioned info to cisco TS and they can generate a 1 or 2 hour passcode for your router. You could also add a switch to enable this feature on the router itself, but that may not be practical.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    8. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by John+Starks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Confounding debugging by tech support? First of all, we're talking about a consumer product here. Tech support is not going to be logging in to see why RADIUS authentication is not working or to troubleshoot some advanced routing issues. In fact, when users call in having forgot their password, I suspect tech support will just tell them to use the reset feature; it's far easier than trying to find out a consumer's IP address.

      No, you cannot justify this. Even if there was some kind of two-hour password, it would be a huge security problem. For example, if I'm using one of these to protect my network, and you have a couple thousand bucks lying around, I'm sure you could convince someone at Netgear to give you a two-hour password without a problem. A single password is even more heinous.

      Yes, I will no longer be buying Netgear products.

    9. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by dsanfte · · Score: 1

      IF you can lift it off the desk, you should have access to it. The router's password should be it's S/N, period. No fancy measures or bells and whistles.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    10. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by caino59 · · Score: 1

      still no need for a backdoor.

      you should have saved your config somewhere else.

    11. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by jtheory · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure there is. The reset button will nuke the configuration, the logs, and whatever else state is there, thus confounding debugging by the tech support. A single password is stupid, though. What's needed is something that requires the router s/n, the router's idea of the date, and a passcode generator from cisco. Give the aforementioned info to cisco TS and they can generate a 1 or 2 hour passcode for your router. You could also add a switch to enable this feature on the router itself, but that may not be practical.

      I'm not convinced. This is only a concern in cases where you're having technical problems, AND you somehow forgot your password. The danger of having a backdoor easily outweighs the potential benefits. Even with a special password generator from NetGear -- you're still talking security through obscurity. I want to set up my router, make sure it's secure, and forget about it! I don't want to keep checking online to see if you can download N3tg34r_PwG3n.exe yet... and you know it's going to show up eventually.

      Half the time you have any technical issues, the tech support is just going to tell you to do a hard reset anyway....

      Even if they gave you one of those paperclip-hole style buttons that would reset all your passwords to your device's serial number (or to enable some other backdoor), this would still be dangerous in a lot of situations. Suppose you're running an internet cafe -- you can't always trust the people sitting around your router!

      Either way, I don't think this backdoor was installed for tech support reasons -- it doesn't even seem to have been installed by NetGear themselves. Hopefully some more details will come out soon... and hopefully some heads will roll.

      It's funny; I just read that new story by the AdTI guy explaining how Linux wasn't safe to use because it depended on "trust". Hah! How nice for the corporate world to step forward and show that *they* can be trusted.

      --
      There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
    12. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Why not just a physical (non toggle) button that enables a unit-specific password for two hours? You might have a big sticker next to the button with that machine's login info. Gain physical access to the device, and you gain access to the router. Have the machine send an e-mail out the the administrators whenever this happens. You would have to trust your employees, but if you can't trust them you are doing something very wrong.

      Physical access generally means security access. Why not build this into the router itself?

    13. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      . . .what happens when they do a source code audit after these are found and track down the programmers who put 'em in.

      I believe that's "give them a bonus and a company car."
      These back doors are not trojans installed by disgruntled employees, but there by company policy.

      I'm always astounded when others are astounded by the existence of back doors in things. Pretty much anything that takes a password has a backdoor in it. Phone systems, voicemail systems, even those telephone entry systems on apartment buildings; all got back doors. Tech support is hard enough already without having to deal with unknown passwords. Some are better than others, though. Sentex telephone entry systems have back door passwords that are a hash of the unit's serial number, and only Sentex tech support has access to the program that generates them. Not that one usually needs the backdoor; most Sentex units I see still use the factory password "000000"...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, how about having to use a real Key to reset or gain admin access to the router !

    15. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by Ifni · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are actually not that bad an idea IF implemented properly. It is a fact of tech support that some hapless user will lock themselves out of their own box.

      I think the best solution I've seen is from Intel for their 530T/535T series switches, where you can download a software utility that will generate a default password for your switch when you enter in the MAC address of the switch's management module. This password ONLY works from the console (requiring physical access to the switch, or root access to a console sharing device attatched to it).

      I was thinking that if they upped this to also be time dependant, it would increase the security even more, but this is wrong for two reasons - a) if the switch is hosed, there's no telling what time it thinks it is, and b) anyone capable of generating a password the first time would be able to generate it again a second time for another x minute "safety window".

      Of course, this begs the question - what is the difference between using a tool like this and just not requiring a password when logging in from the console?

      --

      Oh, was that my outside voice?

    16. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by Rinikusu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If your router is out in the open, you're still fucked.

      Personally, all of this makes it MORE COMPLEX than it has to be. Assume physical "control" of the device and ensure that only people with physical access can trigger the pinhole reset or whatever. Why? Because if someone has physical control of your router/box, you've got more serious problems at hand. The problem with the grandparent is that there's TOO MUCH FUCKING COMPLEXITY. You think tech support is hell now? Wait until you have to call support to get your temporary passcode, after being on hold for a couple hours and then explaining your problem to some outsourced tech whose accent is so strong you can't even understand them, having to call back when you fuck something else up unintentionally in the process, etc etc.

      Again, if you're a coffee house, keep your damn routers in the back, out of customer's (and your) way. Maybe someone could do brisk business selling router "safes" that only have a couple holes for cabling in the back, but require a key to open up to access.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    17. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      The reset button will nuke the configuration, the logs, and whatever else state is there, thus confounding debugging by the tech support.

      The standard solution to this problem is to provide a hardware "soft reset" that enables a default password for the next 15 minutes or so.

    18. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Even with a special password generator from NetGear -- you're still talking security through obscurity.

      If it were done right, it would not be security through obscurity. For example, if you used SSH public key authentication for the back door login access control, the entire protocol and process could be completely public, but only NetGear support personnel with access to the private key could get in.

      That said, once I buy the router it's mine, not NetGear's, and I see no reason why they should have access to it. Back doors are not a good idea.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    19. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by julesh · · Score: 1

      . Maybe someone could do brisk business selling router "safes" that only have a couple holes for cabling in the back, but require a key to open up to access.

      That'll work for wireless access points. :)

    20. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except that it's serial number is it's mac address, which it broadcasts over the internet and over the local network.

    21. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      except that it's serial number is it's mac address

      Maybe with some vendors, but this isn't true with both Netgear and Linksys. There is a separate MAC address and serial number on the bottom of the unit, and one is not based on the other.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    22. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by ejeetify · · Score: 1

      Software auditing software? Alan Turing would like to have a word with you.

    23. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      IF you can lift it off the desk, you should have access to it. The router's password should be it's S/N, period. No fancy measures or bells and whistles.

      That would never fly as then every unit would have to be materially different., vs. just having a different sticker on its case and on the box. Plus, the extra money to make sure all 3 jibe....

    24. Re:One wonders what the internal policies are ... by flacco · · Score: 1
      Tech support is hard enough already without having to deal with unknown passwords.

      i don't give a shit about some company's opinions on "tech support" hassles. That's NO EXCUSE for putting a hidden back door into a product without the buyer's knowledge!

      i think this should be grounds for class-action lawsuits. sue some of these fuckers into bankruptcy and we'll see how quickly the others get the message.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  5. How very timely... by Atrax · · Score: 1, Informative

    I was going to buy a Netgear wireless access point/router this week.

    I initially went for it because my experience with their wired products has been good. A swift rethink would seem to be required.

    --
    Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    1. Re:How very timely... by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      New firmware was released a day after the information was disclosed.

    2. Re:How very timely... by Atrax · · Score: 1

      Well, that's something, I guess.

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    3. Re:How very timely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to buy a Netgear wireless access point/router this week.

      I can see why this might deter you, but I'm still pretty happy with my WGR614. It does both 802.11b and g and has some RJ-45 ports so it does all the routing for my wired network, too. All in all, worth every penny (and more) of the $80 I dropped on it a year ago.

      (And no, the backdoor password doesn't work on it.)

    4. Re:How very timely... by Homology · · Score: 3, Informative
      I was going to buy a Netgear wireless access point/router this week.

      If 11Mbps is sufficient for your needs, you could by a 802.11b wireless card that uses the Prism 2.5 chipset. This chipset can function in hostAP mode. At home I use Netgear MA311 in an older Dell functioning as my wireless access point, internet gateway and firewall. Instead of WEP, I use IPSec, and only authorized IPSec traffic is allowed (and thus no leaching from my Kazaa loving neighbour).

      You might need to flash the firmware, though, which you can find here.

      If you want a secure, easy and hassle free gateway, just install OpenBSD.

    5. Re:How very timely... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      I'd second that recommendation for Netgear. My MR814 (802.11b) wireless router has been great. It replaced a dead D-Link DWL-1000AP access point and since then I've had MUCH higher signals throughout the house with it in the exact same location. It's the best $30 after rebate I've ever spent on wireless. :-) I suppose soon I should consider upgrading to 802.11g, but my iBook's airport card only supports 802.11b so it's kind of pointless until I get a Powerbook.

    6. Re:How very timely... by MrFrank · · Score: 1

      So what. They waited until after the information was disclosed. How can you trust that they didn't put some other, more obscure backdoor in?

      I wouldn't trust them any more.

    7. Re:How very timely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got an MR814v2. When you get one that works properly it's excellent for the price, very strong signal and decent administration. But they've had serious quality control issues. The tech support line has a button on the menu dedicated to this model, and there's a ton of defective ones floating around (even if you buy brand new), so be prepared to return it until they send you a good one.

    8. Re:How very timely... by theora55 · · Score: 1

      Support from Netgear has been poor. I had to replace my Netgear wireless access point when the old one was stolen. Having a hard time configuring a Netgear USB NIC to see it. Netgear won't support it because the NIC is over 90 days old. I used to like their products, but I won't be buying Netgear again.

  6. Just another reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why outsourcing(esp. when security should be a key component of your product) can be a bad idea. The article states that the password is the phone # of the place in Taiwan that develops and manufactures the device.
    They never thought to check this before distributing it, and now they suffer because of poor quality control. Is the outsourcer going to suffer? Maybe, or maybe they will just move on to the next contract. We shall see.

    1. Re:Just another reason by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This isn't outsourcing in the sense that IBM outsources its programing and support staff. It's oursourcing in the sense that your Raleigh bicycle is actually a Giant with a Raleigh sticker on.

      It isn't even really outsourcing in the sense that Dell oursources its video cards to ATI, its cpus to Intel and its CD drives to LG, which is all perfectly legitimate. Would you really expect Dell to make its cpus and capacitors?

      You buy stuff and market it.

      z-com is the actual manufacturer and they sell their products to marketers. Netgear just buys the stuff and resells it.

      Just like you could go to z-com and have them slap some stickers on stuff for you to resell. Or Giant. Or whoever makes Levis and Calvin Klien jeans in China. Or. . .

      This isn't about "outsourcing." This about a marketing firm getting stuck with some bad product.

      KFG

    2. Re:Just another reason by crazy+blade · · Score: 1

      They'll probably (and in my opinion must) sue. Otherwise this simply makes NetGear look bad three-fold:

      1. It is THEIR product that is delivered to consumers faulty. I hold THEM responsible.
      2. They don't take who they work with seriously and therefore people they work with are not serious about it.
      3. They'd rather not give much press to the fact to not make them look bad instead of making sure others think twice before heading down this road.
      --
      To err is human, but to forgive is beyond the scope of the Operating System...
    3. Re:Just another reason by crazy+blade · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You hve a point. But I still wouldn't take them off the hook so fast. This seems to indicate that NetGear should require a "no backdoors inside" guarantee on such contracts.

      --
      To err is human, but to forgive is beyond the scope of the Operating System...
    4. Re:Just another reason by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I still wouldn't take them off the hook so fast.

      Who said anything about taking them off the hook? As the marketer it is Netgear that is directly responsible to their customers.

      As the manufacturer it is z-com that is responsible to its customers, in this case, Netgear. There is a hierarchy of customers here in which Netgear in in the middle. The man in the middle is often the one to get squashed.

      This seems to indicate that NetGear should require a "no backdoors inside" guarantee on such contracts.

      Yes, it would, wouldn't it? And I'm sure in future it will, at least in essence, but is it not always the case that you find out what your contract should have said after it goes bad on you somehow?

      But look at it this way. What if you were going into the white box business about the time of release for the Pentium II chip, would your "contract" with Intel have a "no floating point calculation errors" clause, or would it more likely be a simple receipt for the deliver of and payment for 1000 cpus?

      And when the bug hit the public and people demanded a fix from you wouldn't you have considered it Intel's error and Intel's problem?

      And what would you put into your "contract" with Intel on your next cpu purchase to protect you from the next, and currently unknown, issue?

      When you buy your next car will you demand a "won't blow up on me" clause to your contract, or do you simply consider that issue part of the already extant express and implied guaruntee that attaches to the car? The latter is certainly the way the courts view it.

      You buy stuff. You get a receipt.That stuff has certain express and implied guaruntees attached to it just like anything else. You resell it with express and implied guaruntees. If the stuff turns out to be bad in some way your customers bitch to you and you have to make good. You are also a customer, of your supplier, so you bitch to them and they have to make good.

      That's just the way the buying and selling business works.

      KFG

    5. Re:Just another reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But isn't this what various spook-friendly companies have been doing for ages? Example case: Crypto AG.

  7. The problem of convinience by luvirini · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is a general problem when you buy ready made solutions in the form of "boxes" , you cannot be fully sure of anything inside so it is basically a question of trust.

    For example firewalls:

    Question 1: how do you know the box firewall you bought is secure and no backdoors?

    Answer: normally you do not.

    Question 2: Why do majority ofpeople buy those instead of making their own?

    Answer: Because it is a lot more convinient

    So instead of spending time to build something, most people want to just get something that works and thus have to just trust the vendors, as they do not have the skill/time/inclanation/will etc to do it themselves.

    1. Re:The problem of convinience by Temporal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Question 1: How do you know the CPU you bought is secure and has no code-modifying backdoors?

      Answer: Normally you do not.

      Question 2: Why do the majority of people buy those instead of manufacturing their own?

      Answer: Because it is a lot more convenient.

      Any piece of hardware can have a backdoor in it, really. If anything, you're probably safer buying the system all in one piece, because:

      1) A packaged system built by a respected company is likely to be far better reviewed and tested than something you assemble/install yourself.

      2) If it has a hole, you know exactly whom to blame (and perhaps sue for damages, if exploited).

    2. Re:The problem of convinience by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Question 2: Why do majority ofpeople buy those instead of making their own?

      Answer: Because it is a lot more convinient

      I have a better answer... Because 99.9% don't realize there could be a security problem with it. I don't worry about security when I buy a washing machine or a TV, and that's about how most people view "box" devices.

      Also, I would add that it's more than convience, since most people wouldn't be able to configure a computer to be a firewall if their life depended upon it. Maybe a custom OpenBSD distro is in order... One that will configure a firewall on it's own, and use good defaults for everything, so it needs no configuration for most people. But then again, you don't really know that software isn't back-doored either... You've got to trust somebody...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:The problem of convinience by Jay9333 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Question 1: how do you know the box firewall you bought is secure and no backdoors?

      Answer: normally you do not.

      Question 2: Why do majority ofpeople buy those instead of making their own?

      Answer: Because it is a lot more convinient

      So instead of spending time to build something, most people want to just get something that works and thus have to just trust the vendors, as they do not have the skill/time/inclanation/will etc to do it themselves.

      No one has the time to examine every line of every piece of software (or hardware/firmware) they use that could potentially contain a vulnerability. It is impossible. That is why you only use software that has been in the community (open-source or closed) long enough to where it is generally trusted by experts and laymen alike. That is no guarantee, but that is the best one possible. Shit happens.

    4. Re:The problem of convinience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Question 1: how do you know the box firewall you bought is secure and no backdoors?

      Answer: normally you do not.


      That is true. You have no absolute assurances of anything. But, with the well known, reputable firewall products, there is a lot of independant review done. These include customer's test labs, where some people go to surprising lengths to test security and performance. There are researchers that specialize in finding flaws and holes in security systems. They beat on them with all kinds of odd scenarios. And, even the government performs analyses for security approvals.

      This is all on top of the hundreds of developers, QA testers, support staff, and SE's banging on it day to day. While this doesn't mean it's flawless, it does mean that bugs get found, and backdoors and gaping holes like in the original story would be found immediately.

      As we've seen from previous stories here about the various open source VPN options, people often assume to much about the security and review of these products.

      Question 2: Why do majority ofpeople buy those instead of making their own?

      Answer: Because it is a lot more convinient

      So instead of spending time to build something, most people want to just get something that works and thus have to just trust the vendors, as they do not have the skill/time/inclanation/will etc to do it themselves.


      Convenvience is a big factor. Not just for setting up, but also administration and ongoing security analyses. Commercial firewalls have management, logging, and analysis features that blow away the free options. They are also way ahead in terms of features, the depth of the security analysis is much greater, and integration among firewall/VPN/IDS/URL filtering/Anti Virus is tighter.

      I used to work for a commercial firewall vendor. At home, I use a Linux firewall for my realtively simple needs. For consulting gigs, I always recommend commercial firewalls - you can't assume that they have someone capable of managing and understanding a unix firewall. If they do have someone, you can't assume that he/she will be there for long. With a commercial firewall, they have training classes widely available to bring new people up to speed.

    5. Re:The problem of convinience by Harodotus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Smoothwall is exactly that, a custom Linux distro with boot-from-cd install that only requires you to hit "enter" a couple dozen times to turn any old 2 nic pc into a pre-configured modern firewall with internal NAT and DHCP.


      I use it and find it very handy (lots of old PC hardware about)

      --
      Its not users who are broken, it's systems not taking account their likely behaviour and fixing it technically.
    6. Re:The problem of convinience by unixbugs · · Score: 1

      Good point but I have to disagree. Just because a big company made it doesn't mean the product is secure (did we RTFA?), and it sure as hell doesn't mean you can hold them responsible. How many morons do you think would buy a Microsoft Router? TONS im sure. 65355 ways to exploit the fucker and nobody to blame but yourself per the EULA you cant read until youve voided the warranty.

      --
      You are about to give someone a piece of your mind, something which you can ill afford...
  8. taiwan, eh? by abscondment · · Score: 5, Funny

    A search on Google revealed that "5777364" is actually the phonenumber of z-com Taiwan which develops and offers WLAN equipment for its OEM customers.

    This number, surprisingly enough, is also the total amount of wooden furniture shipped from Malaysia to Bahrain in 1998. Conpsiracy! Conspiracy!

    1. Re:taiwan, eh? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      It's also the patent numer (by IBM!) for a 'graded channel field effect transistor'

      Conspiracy indeed!

    2. Re:taiwan, eh? by AbbyNormal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also my luggage combination....MUha ha ha ha ha.

      Oh, nevermind.

      --
      Sig it.
    3. Re:taiwan, eh? by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 1

      Google returns a result for "5777364 john kerry", but none for "5777364 george bush".

      Hmmm......

      --
      Stop the world; I need to get off.
  9. Possibilities. by alexatrit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's possible that that this goes on a whole lot more than we'd like to admit. Just yesterday I was talking to a friend who called Dell technical support about her BIOS password on an Inspiron 5000. She had forgotten it, and couldn't access her settings. Unlike the old days where you'd crack open the box and to the BIOS jumper switch, Dell provided her with a 6 character BIOS password that magically unlocked her system.

    --

    Nothing but the finest in meaningless drivel
    1. Re:Possibilities. by Hangtime · · Score: 1, Informative

      With the automation Dell has in terms of its manufacturing process, I would not be surprised if that password is unique to the Dell Tag number itself instead of just a wide open tag for anyone to use.

    2. Re:Possibilities. by TarlCabbot · · Score: 0

      That is true, it is based on the tag number

    3. Re:Possibilities. by alexatrit · · Score: 5, Informative

      I stand corrected, here.

      "The only way to clear the BIOS password is with a Master Reset Password provided by Dell for that Model No. and they will not give you the master unless you can give them the name. address and telephone of the registered owner. However the password is universal for all laps with the same model no., so if you know someone who is a registered owner, you can call Dell and get the master."

      Reference here. That being said, the master for an Inspiron 5000 is BLVJCH. Booyah!

      --

      Nothing but the finest in meaningless drivel
    4. Re:Possibilities. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I had a motherboard with AMI bios that had a backdoor password... Three letters, guess what? :)

    5. Re:Possibilities. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a between half and one inch thick stack of fanfold printout with the bios override passwords for various motherboards, computer brands, etc on it, one per line, 8 point single spaced font, minimal margins.

      And it's only current to the age of P2-500's.

      This is not new (or surprising to me) at all.

    6. Re:Possibilities. by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not good, but it's far better than the other extreme. IBM claims there is no way to clear a BIO password on their laptops, so lots of people on ebay or other sites are buying expensive IBM paperweights. Now, I know for a fact that the password can be recovered and/or resetted easily with some basic equipment, but IBM continues to insist that only a motherboard replacement will due, and they charge you the full-price of a mobo just because of a stupid BIOS password. One has to wonder if they are charging you, then resetting the password on your original mobo and selling it again to someone else...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Possibilities. by 87C751 · · Score: 1
      So what happens when you buy a used unit from the local 'Two Guys and a Roomful of Computers' place and it has a locked BIOS? Neither guy has a clue of the original owner. They bought a lot from some lease return outfit.

      (asking because I have a Latitude CPi in exactly that situation)

      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    8. Re:Possibilities. by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Ugh, the lame thing about experts-exchange.com is that Google has a lot of their pages highly ranked, and yet when you land on their page you have to "Sign up to see the solution!"

      So, in the spirit of making that site almost as useful as the open Google groups, here's some no-hassle username/passwords to bypass it.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    9. Re:Possibilities. by alexatrit · · Score: 1

      I viewed the answers without having to sign up. You just have to scroll down past all the ads to where the comments/accepted solutions are.

      --

      Nothing but the finest in meaningless drivel
    10. Re:Possibilities. by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      Now, I know for a fact that the password can be recovered and/or resetted easily with some basic equipment, but IBM continues to insist that only a motherboard replacement will due, and they charge you the full-price of a mobo just because of a stupid BIOS password.

      As a prank I once set someone's computer to require a typed in password to turn on, which is an option in some BIOSes. The problem was, you'd type it in, and nothing. It would not turn on.

      He took it in to get serviced and they replaced the motherboard! Ah well. He deserved it.

    11. Re:Possibilities. by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Has it always been like that? I swear it didn't used to be - else I was so turned off by the flood of vertical ads that I just assumed the rest of the page was more of the same. Anyway, no ads with the passwd.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    12. Re:Possibilities. by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Like, wow, damn.
      Go dell. /sigh

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    13. Re:Possibilities. by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, a Dell Latitude CPi series laptop has a long (typically blue) battery just beneath the keyboard, after you take it apart. You can disconnect this backup battery and as long as the main battery is also detached (which I guess it would have to be, to properly disassemble the thing), that should make it forget any saved BIOS password.

    14. Re:Possibilities. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Ah, the good old days...

      Keyboard Locked. Enter Password.

      WTF?!
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    15. Re:Possibilities. by 87C751 · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. A long and mostly fruitless Google session strongly suggests that the Latitude (and it seems, all Dell laptops) stores the BIOS passwords in non-removable EEPROM. Though I might give it a try anyway.

      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    16. Re:Possibilities. by HexRei · · Score: 1

      The average desktop BIOS is not meant to be secure. If I have console access and the ability to reboot, chances are good I have floppy access and probably access to the case as well. And if you can manipulate the motherboard or boot from a floppy, you don't need a BIOS password.

    17. Re:Possibilities. by alexatrit · · Score: 1

      Set boot options to hard drive first, hence no floppy so long as the drive doesn't get corrupted. BIOS password. Master padlock on the case, to prevent fiddling. Cheaply/effectively kept us out of lots of lab computers over the years.

      --

      Nothing but the finest in meaningless drivel
    18. Re:Possibilities. by HexRei · · Score: 1

      oOoOoOh a lock? Oh teh noes!
      I'm sure it kept the students out quite well. Thankfully, I have access to a pair of bolt cutters and some liquid oxygen.
      Oops! Was that battery storing your CMOS settings?

  10. No, please, don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Please, trolls, pretty please...
    Don't show us just HOW wide open the hole is.

    1. Re:No, please, don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoa! apparently people don't understand a joke when one's presented...

  11. So who wants to make fun of my cheap SMC box now?... (When the hole is discovered, it will be posted here too, right?)

    1. Re:Ha! by Bin_jammin · · Score: 1

      Not me brother, my barricade is such a flaming piece of garbage, only another willing to admit to owning one can honestly feel such pain. Mac filtering based on based on who you want to block? Bah!

  12. remove space in URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to use link

    1. Re:remove space in URL by gumpish · · Score: 0

      How about just taking the extra 10 seconds to type in a proper link?

      Comments with plain text URLs should be modded Overrated.

    2. Re:remove space in URL by eyeye · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah, plain text urls not wrapped in other tags should be converted to html links.
      Its surprising that slashdot hasnt already added this basic feature.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    3. Re:remove space in URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not suprising.

      With all of the dumb motherfuckers that can't type a proper href--that alone weeds about half of the links that go to tub girl, goatse, penis bird, or worse.

      I, for one, am glad that this feature exists.

      We're all supposed to be geeks here. 10 extra fucking keystrokes. Big Fucking Deal

  13. Micro$oft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was the vendor Micro$oft?

  14. Vendor will soon have legal problems. by cemaco · · Score: 0

    "The backdoor seems to have been created by the vendor that packaged the device for NetGear" If the above quote is correct, and NetGear did not approve it...

    1. Re:Vendor will soon have legal problems. by MrMr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't worry, the vendor is probably a few thouasnd miles outside US jurisdiction.
      If I were a cynical bastard I might add that Netgear benefits twice from outsourcing its production...

    2. Re:Vendor will soon have legal problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, the vendor is probably a few thouasnd miles outside US jurisdiction.
      If I were a cynical bastard I might add that Netgear benefits twice from outsourcing its production...


      Yeah. Because not getting a huge settlement/judgement check is a tremendous benefit.

      Jackass.

  15. I have a Netgear router. by Cytlid · · Score: 0

    But I figured out a little while back that it comes from Sercomm. Hmmm...
    glad I didn't go out and jump on the wireless G bandwagon just yet!

    --
    FLR
    1. Re:I have a Netgear router. by spacefight · · Score: 1

      Happy Birthday :-)

    2. Re:I have a Netgear router. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have an MR814v2 that I cracked open the other night. Here's a hardware inventory of the chips on the board:
      • Marvell 88E6060-RCJ: This is the ethernet controller for the wired switch ports.
      • AMD AM29LV800BT: This is flash. I believe it's 8MB.
      • (quantity 2) Winbond W981616BH-7: 16MB 143MHz SDRAM
      • Marvell 88W8500-BAN: This is the wireless controller, which also has an integrated ARM946 CPU. Other features include hardware WEP/AES decryption and encryption, 802.1x, etc.
      • Marvell 88W8000: This is the partner chip to the 88W8500-BAN. It contains the RF transciever. If you look at the mainboard you won't actually see this chip--it's covered by a metal jacket, presumably for interference prevention.


      As for running Linux on these, I'd assume it's quite doable. From a press release on Marvell's website:

      "Reference designs will include uCLinux software for Access Point functionality and simple network functions."
  16. My Router by dicepackage · · Score: 0

    Thank god I bought a D-Link. I was thinking about getting a Netgear or Lynksis wireless router but the D-Link just looked like it outperformed each one.

    1. Re:My Router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes...thank you Lord for this bit of good fortune. Just think what would have happened if you'd bought a WRT54G and flashed it with a custom Linux rev rendering it one of the most secure and functional WiFi routers on the planet. Shew...that was a close one.

    2. Re:My Router by dicepackage · · Score: 1

      I don't like flashing my firmware with unsupported third party firmware. Is that really that big of a crime on Slashdot. Linux is great don't get me wrong but is there even any need for a lot of the features on this.

  17. Re:No backdoors with BSD! by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

    best line i could think of was "why do you come back and try my new kernal on...

    You should try my pick-up line: Excuse me miss, but does this rag smell like chloroform?

    Works every time.

  18. Packaged network boxes by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've used a couple of the Netgear FVS318 firewall/vpn boxes; they're cheap, sturdily constructed, easy to configure and pretty reliable, but I'm always a little hinky about the unconfigurable software options as much as I am about the backdoors.

    My FVS318 does NTP to a hard-coded destination, and there's no way to turn this off or change the NTP sync server that I've found. I've always kind of wondered what else it does or was capable of doing.

    1. Re:Packaged network boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sorry for the AC reply...

      You can change your NTP Server setting on this router with some of the more up to date firmwares. I'm using A2.4 and there is an option to set the NTP server of your choice under the "Schedule" Menu.

    2. Re:Packaged network boxes by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Windows XP does that too, doesn't it?

  19. Makes those old 486 machines running Linux.. by the_rajah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    routers look better all the time. At least you have some control over it....if you're a geek anyway.

    Which ones of the consumer products are safe? I'm running a D-Link wireless right now.Yes the encryption is on.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Makes those old 486 machines running Linux.. by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

      Well, except for the fact that configuring your own Linux router is a pain in the ass if you don't know exactly what you're doing. Plus, it'll probably come out being more expensive than your average consumer router since you have to buy multi port NICs and a wireless card.

      Personally, I think the Linksys WRT54G is the best value. It's cheap ($100) and it runs Linux on it AND you can get a shell on the box and install whatever software you want.

    2. Re:Makes those old 486 machines running Linux.. by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      Well, except for the fact that configuring your own Linux router is a pain in the ass if you don't know exactly what you're doing. Plus, it'll probably come out being more expensive than your average consumer router since you have to buy multi port NICs and a wireless card.

      It's also a waste of electricity. For the geek, you're better off buying either a mini-ITX system or a hackable router (ie, WRT54G).

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    3. Re:Makes those old 486 machines running Linux.. by hearingaid · · Score: 1
      None of them are safe.

      WEP's been broken. Long time ago. You really ought to have a firewall on the other side of any 802.11 device, perhaps (as you say) a 486 running Linux or *BSD. Personally, I'd suggest restricting access from the WLAN to port 22 on the firewall box, and then requiring PKI to login to the firewall. Use port-forwarding in SSH to access everything.

      But I'm paranoid :)

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  20. Netgear WG302 by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well. at least this username/password doesn't work with a WG302 with firmware 1.5.

  21. Awesome! by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Funny
    Fixed in new firmware, available here:

    Super! Now I just have to downlo
    [CONNECTION DROPPED, REMOTE SIDE 0WN3D]

    1. Re:Awesome! by ch33kyMonkee · · Score: 1

      Ummm... WRONG! Account name and password changed with new firmware.

      http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/365230

      Account name got changed to superman with a new password and yes, my AP is vulnerable to this new account. Which leads to question, why the account in the first place?

  22. linked properly for the lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:linked properly for the lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WARNING! parent is a goatse redirect, do not click!!

  23. WGR614 by Rinisari · · Score: 3, Informative

    NetGear WGR614 is not affected by this bug. I'm going to try to get its firmware and follow the same procedure listed in that Bugtraq report to see what I can find.

    1. Re:WGR614 by Rinisari · · Score: 1
      After downloading the newest firmware, resetting my router, forgetting the default password, freaking out because I didn't have Internet access, calling friends who were still asleep, realizing that the WGR614 can connect to Adelphia without configuration, getting the default password from NetGear's website, reconfiguring my router, going back to the Bugtraq page to see the procedure, and executing the procedure, I was met with this:
      zcat: wgr614v2v3_V2_15rc4_1_0_2.chk: not in gzip format
      Dammit.
  24. Too easy by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Funny

    All your basestation are belong to us?

    Man, takes all the fun out of these jokes when it's so easy.

    1. Re:Too easy by evilviper · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Man, takes all the fun out of these jokes when it's so easy.

      No, that's not what took the fun out of it, I'm sure of that...

      More like the billions of times it was repeated over the course of 2 months, and the fact that absolutely no thought is put into all the infinite different variations.

      It's about as funny as "first post", and "imagine a beowulf cluster of these". It's about as funny as seeing someone peeing into the pool you're swimming in... Why they still get moderated up, I just don't know. I suppose /. still gets new users regularly, and it's still new to a couple of them..

      At least a little bit of thought has to be put into the "1,2,3 Profit" jokes, although it seems to be less and less thought lately... Step 1 used to always be a full sentence or paragraph, now people are just whoring and putting 3 words with no humor to them at all.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Too easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's about as funny as "first post", and "imagine a beowulf cluster of these"."

      All of your beowulf cluster of first posts belong to us!

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !

      Hee hee.

      MOD ME UP, BOYS.

  25. It's a feature, not a bug. by gumpish · · Score: 5, Informative

    The URL is "mangled" for people browsing with mobile devices. The space is added so tiny displays can word wrap the text. (And also so crapflooders can't make your horizontal scroll bar appear.)

    Personally I think the number of people using such browsers is probably so small that there is no justification for this "feature", but since Slashdot isn't likely to change, URLs should be submitted as proper links and not just plan text.

    1. Re:It's a feature, not a bug. by Trigun · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a justification for this feature. Put an eicar test signature into a comment, and watch some realtime virus scanners go nuts.

    2. Re:It's a feature, not a bug. by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      Whenever del c:\*.* is mentioned in a file it is picked up as a "quickformat virus".

    3. Re:It's a feature, not a bug. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, it's not just foy tiny displays. Trolls also like to see if they can discover new ways to push the screen width ultra-wide by putting thousands of characters and codes in a row.

    4. Re:It's a feature, not a bug. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Widening is easy. Just set your home page (in user settings) to a very long url. Unlike urls in comments, it won't get broken up with a space. F'ing annoying and I hope they fix it soon.

    5. Re:It's a feature, not a bug. by josh3736 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A thought occurs!

      Instead of "&nbsp;" why don't they put in a "<wbr>"???

      This way, it would still wrap long text but wouldn't put those ugly spaces in when it doesn't need to wrap!

      (Grabs patent application...)

  26. Take my advice by Q2Serpent · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know this is a huge problem for the general public, but for those of us with a linux machine, do what I do and save yourself some trouble: put two network cards in the linux machine. Connect one to the internet and the other to your wireless router's normal ethernet ports (don't use the port that is supposed to be for the internet). Then, just set up your linux firewall/NAT, and you get all the benefits of wireless and a wired hub on the inside, with a linux machine doing the routing/firewalling for security from the outside. Since the router isn't on the net, no one can even touch it.

    1. Re:Take my advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one can even touch it? Anyone nearby with a wireless card can touch it!!

    2. Re:Take my advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No one can even touch it? Anyone nearby with a wireless card can touch it!!

      If you live in a normal house that isn't really an issue. My access point isn't even reachable from my front doorstep so you'll need to be in my house.

    3. Re:Take my advice by Zugot · · Score: 1

      News for Nerds... not News for Linux Dorks....

      So where do I install this linux on my xp?

      --
      -- Bryan
    4. Re:Take my advice by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      put two network cards in the linux machine

      This is why I bought a seperate firewall and access point. The problem with using a full fledged computer for a firewall is electricity costs. A computer costs maybe $100-150 per year to run 24/7, while a firewall appliance $5.

  27. Good grief... by zoloto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I tried this recently on my own unit. Works like a charm. Now that I'm really pissed, it looks like I'll might have to really complain through the courts by filing a motion with the intent to sue. Not only that, but get that old 500mhz p3 out of the closet and turn it into a router/NFS/SAMBA server and sell the POS netgear router on eBay.

    That was the last straw. No more firmware based routers unless I make them myself, or use exsisting ones as wireless switch and really try to lock it down or use third party firmware. /end_rant

    learning how to make a linux router / NFS will be handy anyhow

    1. Re:Good grief... by Peyna · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What are you going to sue about? The maybe $50 you spent on the router? You haven't incurred any loss or harm yet, just the potential for it.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Good grief... by zoloto · · Score: 1

      negligence, possibly willful.
      a motion with intent to file claim is just to let the defendant know, or for lack of a better term, Get their attention on the matter.

      I didn't realize there was an update at the time of my origional post. Either way, a /rant is a /rant

    3. Re:Good grief... by evilviper · · Score: 1, Troll

      Well, I'm sure he could sue on some sort of false advertising, or some other of the billions of vague premises that corporations often like to use to get their way against individuals.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Good grief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suing is probably not an appropriate action. Instead, he should complain to his local trading standards authority on two counts:

      1. The product is not "fit for purpose". Letting absolutely anybody mess with your settings is unacceptable.

      2. Netgear are falsely advertising. Netgear claim "you can rest assured that your wireless network communications are private" on their website *. When absolutely anybody can mess with your router, you have no reasonable expectation that anything available to that router is private.

      * They claim it here. Stupid crappy popups that make me hunt for the URL...

    5. Re:Good grief... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 3, Informative

      Look into Smoothwall. I'm using it on an old PPro 200 as a firewall/router. It supports 3 networks at the moment (red/external, Green/internal, Orange/restricted (wlan for instance). I have an older netgear router that I keep as a spare (the old PPro 200 has to die sometime...), but even with that, the Smoothwall config can be dumped to floppy and moved to a completely different machine easily.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    6. Re:Good grief... by AbbyNormal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I second that! I've been using Smoothwall for about a year, what's nice about it, is that you can EASILY add addon's/plugins developed by others, to your system. Also, if you feel so inclined, its mostly a perl based system, so you can write your own custom scripts.

      The installation is a snap and the default installation is good enough for 99% of "normal" internet users.

      --
      Sig it.
    7. Re:Good grief... by Peyna · · Score: 1

      The only thing you get out of a false advertising suit is a cease and desist order.

      --
      What?
    8. Re:Good grief... by tbuskey · · Score: 1

      If you really want a firewall, don't put anything on it besides a firewall.

      A 486 makes a nice firewall for a home user. Just about any cast off PC will do. That P3 500MHz is more then enough for a business's T1 with complicated FW rules and VPNs.

  28. Well, at least it's only an access point by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These things usually sit behind a firewall, so you aren't in quite as bad shape as if it offering it's private parts to the general internet like the Linksys.

    1. Re:Well, at least it's only an access point by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      So nobody could get on your network if they are nearby?

      --
      Sig it.
    2. Re:Well, at least it's only an access point by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      So nobody could get on your network if they are nearby?

      They would have to be quite near, unlike with the Linksys which is open to both near and far.

  29. Can't they then access it via radio? /nt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oops, /nt doesn't work here.

  30. they published the password? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Gadzooks, could they have made it any easier for script kiddies to exploit this? Might as well just power down your netgear box until a new firmware patch comes out (assuming the firmware can be patched).

    I don't believe in security through obscurity, but I also don't believe in publishing backdoor passwords. It's not like it has any educational value (unlike looking at some exploits, which helps programmers learn how to write code that's not vulnerable).

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:they published the password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I don't believe in security through obscurity, but I also don't believe in publishing backdoor passwords.
      I own a NetGear WAP. I'm glad they published it. One, it's good, useful information for me as an owner of the device, and two, it allows me to test if I'm vulnerable.
    2. Re:they published the password? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1
      One, it's good, useful information for me as an owner of the device.

      Fine, they could mail it to you if you send in your registration card or something. They didn't just tell you, they told everyone.

      I'm curious what you will do with this information -- what can you do that you couldn't do before? Perhaps I am overlooking something.

      The purpose of a password is to limit access. If everyone knows the password, it might as well not exist.

      Two, it allows me to test if I'm vulnerable.

      If you've got that version of the firmware, then you're vulnerable.

      --
      Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    3. Re:they published the password? by Rex+Code · · Score: 1

      I don't believe in security through obscurity, but I also don't believe in publishing backdoor passwords.

      Considering how many vendors will have a bug reporter the run-around until they finally disclose the problem, you pretty much have to believe in one or the other. On the basis of what you say above, my opinion is that you do believe in security through obscurity, but you are continuing to fool yourself into believing otherwise.

    4. Re:they published the password? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1
      Don't obscure the algorithms. That would be security through obscurity.

      Do obscure the passwords. They're the part of the system that's supposed to be a secret. It doesn't matter what kind of lock you put on the door if you stupidly leave the key on the front porch.

      --
      Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    5. Re:they published the password? by Spinality · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm curious what you will do with this information -- what can you do that you couldn't do before?

      Well, I used it to verify whether I was vulnerable. I was. I'm glad to observe it. I've downloaded the new firmware and hope to be safe. They couldn't contact me via registration card because I NEVER send in those things. They're just marketing gimmicks used as an opt-in.

      Moreover, the script kiddies will manage to get this information whether or not it's publicly posted. This way, I have it as well as them.

      Just my view.

      --
      -- We all have enough strength to endure the misfortunes of other people. La Rochefoucauld
  31. Can you believe it? by cccemper · · Score: 2

    I am amazed.... I just wonder how many DOS or DDOS attacks were made based on this wonderful backdoor... and btw: shall all the NetGear Users now dump their devices ?!? no way... if this thing is really un-patchable, then I suspect this leak to be open for many years from now, as the device is one of the most current ones... wow - just before I bought it :-)

  32. WG602v2 with firmware 2.0rc5 by thewiz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just checked my WG602v2 and the factory firmware upgrade 2.0rc5 and they do not have the backdoor.

    Whew!

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    1. Re:WG602v2 with firmware 2.0rc5 by Chazmati · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. Just checked mine and that backdoor seems to have been removed.

  33. Man... by 222 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ok, this is bad... but what i see as a far worse problem is that most oems dont bother setting passwords on windows xp installs.
    i've even seen this happen on a thinkpad, and i would have thought ibm of all people to know better. i've seen this on a few venders before but i cant remember exactly which ones, has anyone else seem this happen before?

    1. Re:Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP without a password by default disables network access to the system.

  34. Provides convenient excuse for content access by noidentity · · Score: 3, Funny

    Come on! These backdoors provide a convenient excuse when you're charged with breaking the law by accessing illegal content over your connection. If the vendor told you of their presence, you wouldn't be able to use them as a defense. Er wait, if you didn't know of them... hmmm...

  35. All Your AP Bases Are Belong to Us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Your AP Bases Are Belong to Us.

  36. Good grief... INDEED! by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful
    99.99999% of the "deadenders" who sputter and spew "I... I'm gonna SUE!!!!" will not, and really have no clue about what it would tak or even if they have any real legal basis to "SUE!!!!"

    It's cheap consumer electronics. Return it and get one that does not have this issue, then resume your life. No story here, move along.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Good grief... INDEED! by julesh · · Score: 1

      It's cheap consumer electronics. Return it and get one that does not have this issue, then resume your life. No story here, move along.

      Yes & no. We're not talking about a faulty piece of equipment. We're talking about a problem that:

      1. should have been easily found by the vendor exercising the slightest competence
      2. could actually cost somebody serious money (either due to unauthorised access to their LAN, or through unauthorised use of their internet connection)

      If 2 *actually* happened to you, you probably have a case. Even if it didn't, you *might* be able to make a strong enough case for exemplary damages (or equivalent in your local jurisdiction, if it has one), purely on the basis that 2 *could* have happened.

  37. funny mods != karma by SuperBanana · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    More like the billions of times it was repeated over the course of 2 months, and the fact that absolutely no thought is put into all the infinite different variations.

    That was actually exactly my point. How ironic that it was lost on you.

    Step 1 used to always be a full sentence or paragraph, now people are just whoring and putting 3 words with no humor to them at all.

    I was under the impression that funny mods resulted in no karma points. If I've been earning karma points for my funny posts, at least I've been clueless about it.

    Personally, i think you're just pissed off because I get modded up more than you do. Of course, you post 5 times as much as I do, at least.

    1. Re:funny mods != karma by evilviper · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      That was actually exactly my point. How ironic that it was lost on you.

      No, I got it, I was just ranting...

      I was under the impression that funny mods resulted in no karma points.

      True, but wasn't really my point. Whore has plenty of definitions, and they don't have a thing to do with Karma...

      Personally, i think you're just pissed off because I get modded up more than you do.

      Not possible, I didn't notice your username, and I didn't check your comment history. I still haven't, in fact.

      I'm just "pissed" because I'm tired of bad mods. It's quite annoying seeing the same thing over and over again at +5. If you want to understand, just imagine if all the "First Post" comments always got modded up to +5, then you'd understand how irritated I am.

      Incidentally, I get modded-up plenty... There are times when my posts get showered with them, and there lulls. I mainly have a lot of comments with no mods done to them because almost everything I post tends to be replies, where few people see them. Not that it matters though; my karma's been maxed out for many years now.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  38. Easter Eggs by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1

    On a similar note, many developers leave easter eggs in software they write for fun or for whatever reason...Imagine Windows Server 2003 easter eggs allowing admin level login!
    I was shocked when I heard of easter eggs in my Handspring/PalmOne Treo 600 phone! Characters suddenly start appearing on the phone display by pressing a combination of keys...

    1. Re:Easter Eggs by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Imagine Windows Server 2003 easter eggs allowing admin level login!

      That's not an easter egg, that's a backdoor :-)
      There is a difference ya know.

      (ObMicrosoftBash)
      Though microsoft'd probably say it's an "Enhanced End-User Experience"
      (/ObMicrosoftBash)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    2. Re:Easter Eggs by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1

      That's not an easter egg, that's a backdoor :-)
      There is a difference ya know.


      Agreed...but both are basically undocumented *features* of the software... Just different names based on the feature!

  39. The Linksys problem was a false report by lseltzer · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:The Linksys problem was a false report by LoadWB · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hrmmmm. I like it when others tell me what I said.

      No, I did not issue a statement admitting it was a false report. I said that a critical element did not show up in testing of newly purchased equipment.

      And I am not sure how I feel about Mr. Seltzer's article. Especially his statement about trust. It is obvious that we should trust him over others because he is the author of the "Official" book on LinkSys. I do not, however, think that we should dismiss, or not trust, anything anyone has to say about security, regardless of stature. True, my announcement was not confirmed, and the more responsible in the Internet news community did indeed hold off on their reports while responses and discussions continued. Bravo.

      LinkSys has "told" us by proxy of Mr. Seltzer that the units I got with the odd behaviors were customer returns. Well, I cannot speak for what LinkSys says -- they certainly did not say that to me. I do say that is pure conjecture, on both my and LinkSys' part, but it does make for a reasonable assumption concerning the three units used in later testing.

      Just for information, there is no comment from LinkSys on this issue on its press release page http://www.linksys.com/press/press.asp , nor from Cisco http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/index.html

      Even so, I still stand firmly by my original findings. Two older units *did* do this, even after a factory reset. Bad hardware? Pre-release firmware? Who knows. I saw what I saw. But it does go to prove one very important point: we should not be complacent about our perception of security. If you install Internet-facing equipment for clients, you are providing a great service to everyone if you port-scan the device. When you purchase Internet equipment, check the configurations and make sure it matches up to what you expect. Do not take your security for granted.

      As an aside, Larry Seltzer, regardless of his credibility, is another journalist who has never contacted me for clarification or expanded information.

  40. robbIE's pateNTdead PostBlock censorship devise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is STILL broken?

    score another won for the little guise? &, as always, lookout bullow.

    from a post meant to be titled:

    unprecedented evile nearly disempowered, forever?
    (score: mynuts won:-) PostBlock material reposted)

    by a disorganized rag-tag team of a few billion near nobodys, using what was available to them, which was almost nothing?

    & just who are some of unprecedented evile's local representative(s)?:

    The contract was awarded to Accenture, formerly Andersen Consulting, over two competing contractors, Lockheed Martin and Computer Sciences (a veritas (cess)pool of evile stock markp FraUDsters). Several industry executives and analysts said that the award surprised them and that Accenture had widely been considered the outside candidate.

    The award also brought controversy. Accenture is incorporated in Bermuda, and some critics attacked the idea of awarding a contract so valuable and important to national security to a company with its headquarters outside the United States.

    After Accenture was named, Representative Lloyd Doggett, a Texas Democrat, suggested the company took advantage of an uneven playing field to win the contract over Lockheed Martin and Computer Sciences.

    "If companies truly want to contribute to our nation's security, they can pay their fair share of taxes. If they want a slice of the American pie, they had better help bake it," he said in a statement.

    A spokesman for Accenture said that the company paid United States taxes.

    Representative Richard E. Neal, a Massachusetts Democrat and a senior member of the House Ways and Means Committee, also questioned the award.

    "This decision is outrageous," he said, in a statement. "The Bush administration has awarded the largest homeland security contract in history to a company that has given up its U.S. citizenship and moved to Bermuda. The inconsistency is breathtaking."

    the stock markup FraUD/softwar gangster payper liesense hostage grab 'business plan' is looking a little hapless now?

    fauxking billyonerrors. sheesh.

    lookout bullow. tell 'em robbIE?

    all is not lost.

    consult with/trust in yOUR creators.... the returns are immeasurable/infinite.

    see you there?

    Due to excessive bad posting from this IP or Subnet, anonymous comment posting has temporarily (forever, if we had some ept) been disabled. You can still login to post. However, if bad posting continues from your IP or Subnet that privilege could be revoked as well. If it's you, consider this a chance to sit in the timeout corner or login and improve your posting . If it's someone else, this is a chance to hunt them down (like with fuddles' phonIE bouNTy hunter scam). If you think this is unfair, we just don't care.

  41. No, it wasn't... by Otto · · Score: 2, Informative

    The problem still exists. If you disable the firewall and disable remote admin, you can still get the remote admin page over the WAN. That, to me, is a bug. Okay, it may be a weird config as they stated, but it's a bug nevertheless.

    They also have beta firmware up on that link you posted to fix the problem.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  42. Customer return..... by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    Lets think for a minute here people, this Linksys firewall turned off by default stuff is more then likely a customer return or someones idea of a joke. I haven't seen anyone but this "researcher" report this issue.

  43. WG602v2 also reported to be exempt by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    It's just the plain WG602 with no suffix, apparently.

  44. WAP54G also had SNMP issues in 1.08 by David+M.+Andersen · · Score: 2, Informative
    I was able to change NVRAM parameters using snmpset regardless of the community strings as long as SNMP was enabled on the WAP54G.
    dma@laureate:~$ snmpwalk 192.168.1.254 -O n -v 1 -c froqegftoeqgteqg
    enterprise
    .1.3.6.1.4.1.3955.1. 1.0 = STRING: "v1.08, Aug 05, 2003"
    ...
    .1.3.6.1.4.1.3955.2.1.8.0 = IpAddress: 192.168.1.254
    .1.3.6.1.4.1.3955.2.1.9.0 = IpAddress: 255.255.255.0
    ...

    dma@laureate:~$ snmpset -c wghwgqgqerc -v 2c 192.168.1.254
    .1.3.6.1.4.1.3955.2.1.8.0 a "10.0.0.1"
    SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3955.2.1.8.0 = IpAddress: 10.0.0.1
    The changes took effect when the device was reset or power cycled. I didn't really investigate further. I reported this to Linksys. Not sure if they did anything about it.
  45. at least the linksys... by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    at least the linksys one can be patched with a non-official firmware to improve functionality as well as fill in some of those "holes"

  46. Physical access should NOT mean access by jtheory · · Score: 1

    Why not just a physical (non toggle) button that enables a unit-specific password for two hours? You might have a big sticker next to the button with that machine's login info. Gain physical access to the device, and you gain access to the router. Have the machine send an e-mail out the the administrators whenever this happens. You would have to trust your employees, but if you can't trust them you are doing something very wrong.

    You're making some big assumptions here, for one that "employees" are the only ones who are going to be near your routers.

    Wireless access is becoming more and more pervasive -- you see routers in homes, coffeeshops, libraries, bookshops, airports, etc. etc..

    Do you want to require librarians to keep a constant watch over their routers, protecting them from teenagers with paperclips?

    It's not as dangerous to have a full reset button, because it's hard to do a hard reset on a router without people noticing. But a single click that enables a full admin account, with no effect on other users? No, thanks. Even the email idea is no good; the emailing functions require setup that most users don't bother with (I didn't, at least -- I don't have time for reading logs).

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
    1. Re:Physical access should NOT mean access by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      Do you want to require librarians to keep a constant watch over their routers, protecting them from teenagers with paperclips?

      Do they lock their fusebox?? Routers should be locked away to, if they're in a public area. As newer buildings are built that account for networking, this should be less of a problem. For now, just stick it in the ceiling is often an effective solution.

      But I do agree that a button that only resets the password is asking for trouble. Hell, any time I change ANY setting on my router it resets. Although it's usually not all that noticeable.

    2. Re:Physical access should NOT mean access by pqdave · · Score: 1

      It's not as dangerous to have a full reset button, because it's hard to do a hard reset on a router without people noticing. But a single click that enables a full admin account, with no effect on other users? No, thanks. Even the email idea is no good; the emailing functions require setup that most users don't bother with (I didn't, at least -- I don't have time for reading logs).

      How quickly do you think someone will notice, especially where they leave the router in a public space? There will be a brief interruption of internet access, but since it will come back on it's own in 30-60 seconds, nobody is going to investigate much.

  47. it's called metamoderation by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    I'm just "pissed" because I'm tired of bad mods

    Then metamoderate...

    1. Re:it's called metamoderation by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I do, all the time...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  48. I know the password. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    I know the password, and I'd tell you what it is, but I can't describe it. Ooooooooh well.

  49. Grammar! by slavemowgli · · Score: 0

    "Unlike Linksys's, where turning the firewall on, the NetGear hole cannot be disabled." That no english sentence, guys! :)

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  50. Can we say patriot act? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    I think this stuff is or will become more common. Hell, ms for years has had it. Others have, too.

    What I like is that people are finding out and warning others about which products to avoid. This will probably break some "chain of custody" and inconvenience some agencies that want the actual bits and logs, but....oh whell.

    What I fear is that, since the electronics industry has been in bed with the various "intelligence" agencies, it will only be a matter of time before reporting these findings becomes a violation of national security.

    But, to counter that, let's consider a rumor I heard: The US routes ALL electronics communications through the UK, through MI something, thru Echelon, where certain onerous US privacy laws don't have any bearing on electronic eavesdropping.

    So, I guess we should all just go about our normal routines and generate all the suspicious or annoying conversations we normally do. I am not saying elevate yourself to the the top of the shitlist by using obsure, supposedly-secret or restricted key words. Not that it is supposedly akin to yelling "fire" in a crowed theater. And not that it supposedly helps the bad guys by "masking them" in a sea of superfluous, deliberate obfuscatory traffic, either.

    I wanted once to set up an internet cafe, but was concerned that the patriot axe would force me to submit my hardware to wiretapping, keystroking and such INSIDE the demarc. I cannot go for that. The spooks can intercept ALL the shit they want, OUTSIDE the demarc. That's what they have optical, microwave, and acoustic techniques for. But to actually TOUCH my machines and forbid my telling the customers... screw that.

    If I ever do open an internet cafe, each and every machine will have on it a placard stating:

    "Be on your best behavior. Pretend that you have been told this machine is under surveillance from inside, and that by law, if I were ordered by the various police or intel agencies to submit my gear to their wizardry, I'd also be forbidden to tell you it happened. So, in advance, I preempt the risk by telling you now: You can be bugged/monitored ANYwhere, even in your home. Not patronizing me won't increase your privacy, but by my being honest, I have elevated your awareness and possibly increase your discomfort."

    I also would reserve the right to survey, salvage or scuttle, at will, any time, ANY of my business equipment, without any courtesy notice. I'd likely be such a pain in the ass they'll go back to sitting in their Ironside panel wagons and point a microwave at the wall. I'd deal with that by installing community/neighborhod watch oriented cameras that have motion detection to monitor and report "suspicious" vehicles to the police, along with license plates and VIN numbers, if zoomable, since VINs, by most state's vehicle codes, cannot be obscured, since obscuring them could interfere with the duties of meter checkers who issue tickets based on make, model, year, color, type, and plate, plate tag, and VIN (Vehicle ID Number, the plate bracketed to the dashboard, under the space usually clear/see-through, despite tinted windscreens (if coming from the manufacturer, direct.)...

    I guess, tho, they'd accuse me of maintaining an unauthorized database that could compromise privacy. Privacy of whom? Agents on snoop jobs? It would be a hollow argument, such as that when privacy issues were raised about the Sony See-Thru Cameras of late 1997/early 1998, where each and every one purchased by electronic means was retreived, by LAW. No, it wasn't to keep wayward peeping toms from identifying bras, chastity belts and nipples. It most likely was to prevent the exposure and identification of body guards of dignitaries and others such as mayors. After all, while some important persons with an entourage of body guards have them close-up, some others surely have to be at some stand-off distance to monitor and possibly intercept or deter would-be assailants.

    Maybe such camers could have been used in airports to identify diplomats

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    1. Re:Can we say patriot act? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a little extra info. All wireless carriers have their systems routed through the NSA, so when the NSA wants to run a tap, they just turn it on. Easy as pie...and from what i Understand, this is fact.

    2. Re:Can we say patriot act? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Well then, that should relieve the mom and pop coffee shops and even many down-line ISPs who are just resellers from having to put up with the bs patriot act paragraphs that demand compliance of small fry and forbid evasion or discussion.

      If suddenly enough people just sanitize their traffice, the nsa, fbi, cia, and other mysterious orgs the names of which we have yet to hear might actually have to lay off some analysts...

      DS

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    3. Re:Can we say patriot act? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your tin foil is falling off. Here, let me... help you with that.

  51. A second option by IncohereD · · Score: 1

    Any piece of hardware can have a backdoor in it, really. If anything, you're probably safer buying the system all in one piece

    Alternately, always buy the fastest hardware available. Because if they're locked in a neck and neck battle for speed (think Intel versus AMD), they're not going to waste cycles or transistor real estate on backdoors.

  52. confirmation, I (was) affected by this by Thanster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My home network has a wireless point that is provided by this very router, I checked, and the backdoor worked. :( The updated firmware available on netgears site fixed this :) I used to really like netgear stuff, now less so! Thanks for bringing this to my attention slashdot!

  53. Stuff! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Cool Programmer to Matthew Broderick: Whenever I develop a system, I always put in a back door.

    Ultranerd: You're telling him all our best stuff!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  54. Who is OEM? by dmitriy · · Score: 1

    So z-com designed the software. Did they design the board? If they did, then Netgear box is just a rebadged z-com.

    Would it be more correct to describe Netgear as OEM, and z-com as designers?

  55. The tag by gumpish · · Score: 1

    Nifty, I hadn't encountered that before.

    Why aren't they doing this?

  56. NOT fixed in new firmware! by Rex+Code · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to a recent BugTraq by Jaco Swart, all the new firmware does is change the backdoor username from "super" to "superman" and the password to "21241036".

    Does Netgear really think the security community is that stupid? They should be ashamed.

  57. NOT A PROBLEM by $ASANY · · Score: 2, Informative
    I just ran this against my WG602 running firmware 1.5.7, and the account doesn't exist. So if you perform the absolute minimal step of checking for software upgrades before you put this into service, you won't run into any problem.

    If you don't immediately check for upgrades when you open a box and haven't with this hardware, though, perhaps you deserve to get 0wn3d?

    1. Re:NOT A PROBLEM by tokul · · Score: 1
      I just ran this against my WG602 running firmware 1.5.7, and the account doesn't exist.

      :) Can you also check other phone numbers? Entire phone book :). If that account does not exists, it just means that backdoor does not use that account.

  58. Re:The tag by josh3736 · · Score: 1
    Actually, I just pasted in a block of unspaced text, and after looking at the HTML that came back, I have to wonder what they were smoking when they designed the filter. Its "?<wbr></nobr> " where ? is some letter from your posting.

    What the hell!?!? The <nobr> completely invalidates the <wbr>, then after all that work it just puts in a space anyways!

    Bah... I submitted a request to the Slash SF project, but who knows if that'll do any good. Oh well, the lazyasses just need to learn to use <a> tags I guess.

  59. <wbr> by RKBA · · Score: 1

    I wish I had some mod points so I could mod the parent up. Using "" is a great idea!

  60. Same problem on Buffalo WBR2-G54? by pervert · · Score: 1

    I contacted Buffalo's tech support yesterday concerning the fact that the "WEB configuration" seems to be wide open on the WAN interface. Even writing a packet filter for the WAN IP on the Airstation doesn't seem to close the interface.

    Has anybody else noticed this? nmap found out a few other interesting ports on the Buffalo as well...

  61. Ummm, it's still vulnerable folks... by ch33kyMonkee · · Score: 1

    Not sure if anyone has read the updated news about this little vulnerability.

    It still exists, albeit in a different account and password that I have verified on my WG602v1.

    http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/365230

  62. I once used by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    I once used, "So you're the one who stole my mouse."

    It worked.

  63. Re:Fixed in new firmware, available here - NOT by Karl+Prince · · Score: 1

    I sure someone must have posted this, but here goes anyway

    Shame this firmware also has a backdoor also, all they did was change the account to superman and the password to 21241036

    --

    mailto:EatSpamAndDie@princeweb.com
  64. The problem of too little life. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Question 2: Why do majority ofpeople buy those instead of making their own?

    Answer: Because it is a lot more convinient


    Alternate answer: Because there's too little life.

    It takes an ENORMOUS amount of material to form the basis of doing ANYTHING. If you try to make all your tools in order to be sure of their quality, you have no time left to USE them.

    So people trying to be productive at their specialty try to throw as much as possible of their time at it - obtaining as many of their tools as possible from others for whom making tools is THEIR specialty, and making only those that can't be obtained any other way.

    It's called "Division of Effort".

    Would you rather your heart surgeon spent ten hours each week working on his personal firewll, software configuration, and recovering from the latest worm attack? Or would you rather he spent it studying the latest research on surgical technique?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  65. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I wish I had some mod points so I could mod the parent up.

    Guess we're even, then. I was thinking this was deserving a "-1 offtopic".

  66. Slightly OT... by sploxx · · Score: 1

    .. but is it possible to run linux on that device?
    They're selling cheaply, therefore I'm interested.