Slashdot Mirror


Constructing A Low-Power 2U Wireless Rack-Box

adelayde writes "Recently we decided to build ourselves a custom rack-mountable box that we could use as a web and DNS caching proxy and which would offer flexible wireless networking facilities and have an uniterruptible power supply. The result was a 2U rack-box with dual wireless networks built upon a low-power Via EPIA MiniITX motherboard. The box has two wireless networks built in with external antenna connectors, locking switches on the front to avoid tampering, a battery to give at least 20 mins of autonomous operation, a low wattage power supply and most importantly lots of blue LEDs :)"

127 comments

  1. ooh, impressive =) by orangesquid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Sell these
    2. Profit

    No ??? needed!

    Seriously...

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    1. Re:ooh, impressive =) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      how the hell is this offopic?
      stupid mods. PAY MORE ATTENTION. thank you.

    2. Re:ooh, impressive =) by sr180 · · Score: 1

      And loose millions of dollars when some one sues you for violating their patent of "putting blue leds on the front of a device".

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
    3. Re:ooh, impressive =) by orangesquid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good point. They could label the front the "back," thought, and then it would just be a derivative idea, so it would probably be OK.

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    4. Re:ooh, impressive =) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THey could call the blue leds green, too. 1984+20 (Too stupid a post to sign, IMO)

  2. Yay LEDs by Wtcher · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yay LEDs, they're the wave of the future because they're all blue and such. It reminds me of those old Flash Gordon episodes where everything was polished chrome and looked like it could kill you if someone flicked a switch somewhere.

    Oh yeah, and I already can't reach the site. *laugh*

    --
    ----- Wtcher Dragon, UDIC
    1. Re:Yay LEDs by IamScared · · Score: 1, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, the LEDs light you!!! Wait, it's that way everywhere... Damn, lost my Funny. bua...

      --
      FreeBSD: Because Computers Can Be Fun... Again.
    2. Re:Yay LEDs by Big+Nothing · · Score: 3, Funny

      From article:

      "Lessons learned:
      Blue LEDs are strangely attractive to technical people"


      So true...

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
  3. Asking for a /. by KRYnosemg33 · · Score: 5, Funny
    With a domain name like flakey.info it almost makes me think they were expecting a slashdotting

    Let's see how long she lasts ...

    1. Re:Asking for a /. by IronBlade · · Score: 3, Informative

      So let's use this http://freecache.org/http://flakey.info/plinth/ link instead!

      --
      Important info:
      http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net
      http://dieoff.org/synopsis.htm
      http://www.peakoil.net
    2. Re:Asking for a /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freecache doesn't cache anything under 5megs.. It just forwards the request onto flakey.info. Thus, your link is useless.

    3. Re:Asking for a /. by batkiwi · · Score: 4, Informative

      AHEM:
      http://www.archive.org/web/freecache.php
      a nd
      http://www.archive.org/about/faqs.php

      Freecache only stores files > 5 megs, and ONLY stores what you tell it to. Linking freecache-style to an index page will only cache that index (IF it's >5megs), not the whole site.

      What is it with all the useless freecache links lately?

    4. Re:Asking for a /. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

      "What is it with all the useless freecache links lately?"

      Perhaps Freecache is unexpectedly useless.

      --
      Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  4. Ummm... Priorities? by pla · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...and most importantly lots of blue LEDs

    You may have meant that as a joke, but blue LEDs suck quite a lot more power than red or green ones.

    When you care about power consumption, rather than coolness, come back and ask again.

    1. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by adelayde · · Score: 4, Informative

      Please correct me if I'm wrong but as all the LEDs used had the same voltage and current ratings, it would mean that they draw the same power. Isn't the difference in the intensity? For example for the LEDs used in this project, they are:

      Red: 3700cd/m2
      Green: 40900cd/m2
      Yellow: 15500cd/m2
      White: 29650cd/m2
      Blue: 4480cd/m2

      Blue being quite a lot less bright, though somehow strangely alluring and the power consumption I think the same.

      In the end even if they do draw a little more, surely it's not that much compared with the draw of the other components? The wireless cards for example seem to draw quite a lot. As what we were looking for was autonomy in the event of a brown-out (or someone tripping over the extension cable), the battery did the job and I don't think having a blue LED or two adversly affected things.

      The comment was a bit of humour on as usual a rather dry subject.

    2. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Slashdot needs a "Grumpy Bitch" mod option for the above post.

    3. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 3, Funny

      Right, because the extra 200mw those LEDs use is really going to destroy the environment.

      Come on. The CPU draws 30+ times as much power as those blue LEDs.

    4. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Of course the luminous output isn't the whole story here, as the blue will look far brighter than it should, only because the human eye is especially sensitive to blue light.

    5. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by cbagley · · Score: 1

      All LEDs don't have the same voltage rating. Blue LEDs have a much higher voltage drop across them than the other colors.

    6. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf. the human eye is least sensitive to blue you dork.

    7. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by adelayde · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not true, the human eye is least sensitive to blue. It's most sensitive to light in the middle of the spectrum, i.e. green light. This is why in advertising they say black type on a blue background is bad, because it doesn't show up, catch the eye, enough.

    8. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For times like this, don't you wish we had a "-2 Incorrect" mod option.

      Ugh. Say anything incorrect and get modded up. If Congress is as naive as /. mods Ken Brown will succeed at outlawing linux.

    9. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by tap · · Score: 5, Informative
      This is doubly wrong.

      First of all, the human eye isn't the most sentitive to blue light, it much more sentitive to green. You can see the human eye's response curve here and a breakdown of color vs wavelength.

      Secondly, the lumen or candela rating already takes this into account. At the peak of photopic vision, 555 nm (green), there are 683 lumens per watt. If you had one watt of blue light, it would only be about 100 lumens, because the human eye is less sensitive to that wavelength.

      In other words, one watt of green light appears brighter than one watt of blue light, because humans are more sensitive to that color. One lumen of green light is just as bright as one lumen on blue light, because the lumen measurement takes this into account. That's the whole point of lumens, they are watts times luminous efficacy for human vision.

    10. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right. Just like how yellow type on a white background doesn't catch the eye?

    11. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by Ba3r · · Score: 1

      wow thanks for the info (and physics link). Always wondered why exactly blue lights were 'night lights' in the military.

    12. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Not true, the human eye is least sensitive to blue.
      The sensitivity to blue falls off less than green and red in low light (so in starlight, red looks black).
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30+ times?
      I would run my cpu from a 9 volt battery still
      well not for long, but even now you can't do that.

      No, those LEDs don't really consume 200mW. Is your 500 watt power supply consuming 500 watt or is it RATED for 500 watt.

    14. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by pappin · · Score: 2, Informative

      no fool... 200mw is quite a bit when runnig from batteries. As for 30+ time more power for the rest of the system sounds a little high... they are using a low power (and fanless) switching regulator. The HD is what... 200-500 mA, the network cards likely about the same so If I'm using up 30 mA on a single blue LED that a significant amount of current... Though how much current a LED draws is dependant on the dope and colour, it's the red that draw the least power... which is the point that the fellow above was trying to make.

    15. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by pla · · Score: 1

      Right, because the extra 200mw those LEDs use is really going to destroy the environment.

      Nope. But if one has the goal of the most energy-efficient system possible, using less than optimal parts for no reason other than "coolness" seems particularly unwise.

      For a comparison (and to demonstrate my point, since two responders called me just plain wrong), a typical red LED has a peak current draw of 30ma, with the minimum continuous activity draw of only 2-3ma. A typical blue LED peaks at 50ma (not that much higher), but has a minimum of 20ma. 10x higher.

      Now, compare that to home lighting. A typical incandescent bulb uses 80W. A typical compact fluorescent of similar brigtness draws 14W... only a sixth, rather than a tenth compared with the LEDs, and that one change can lower your electric bill by a third.

      So yes, my hair dryer uses 20x what my old incandescent light bulbs did, but that doesn't mean I upgraded to 100W bulbs just for the hell of it.

    16. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by Evil+MarNuke · · Score: 1

      Right on.

      --
      The journey is better then the end.
    17. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      But, with the fluorescents, I pay for the decreased electric bill with headaches from the 60hz flicker, and the piss poor lighting color that comes out of fluorescents.

      In other words, there are factors other than power consumption. The builder of the machine decided to use parts that suited his/her needs and desires. Why the hell do you care?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    18. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by pla · · Score: 1

      I pay for the decreased electric bill with headaches from the 60hz flicker

      Try getting the high frequency CFs... Regular fluorescents bother me as well, and the HF ones do not. But anyway...


      The builder of the machine decided to use parts that suited his needs and desires. Why the hell do you care?

      I coundn't care less if he wanted to use a live yak as the case to this machine (actually, that sounds like a neat idea, IMO). But the FP post has the title "Constructing A Low-Power 2U Wireless Rack-Box", which, to me, implies a goal of minimizing power consumption. If he prefers blue lights to an extra three seconds of battery life, cool, doesn't bother me. But I figured I might point out that such a choice does involve a tradeoff, however small, of coolness-for-battery-time.

    19. Re:Ummm... Priorities? by syukton · · Score: 1

      Blue/white/green LEDs tend to require a voltage around 3.5, while red/orange/yellow LEDs tend to require a voltage around 1.9. Finding a bunch of different colors that operate at the same voltage is generally quite difficult.

      The "cd" measurement is attuned to the spectral response of the human eye. If the output of the LEDs were radiometrically measured it would give a better inidication of how much overall emission is there. In general though, if you have three equally emissive light sources, one each of red, green and blue, the green one will appear the brightest because our eyes are most-sensitive to green light. (This is why the green LED has the highest cd rating)

      And I highly doubt anybody outside of a national laboratory has an LED producing 3700cd/m2. I'm pretty sure you meant mcd, which stands for millicandela. (cd = candela)

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  5. Damn Blue LEDs by josh3736 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Bah, I hate those damned blue LEDs anyways.

    (I was going to post a link to an article/long thread where a bunch of people bitched about blue LEDs, but I can't find it at the moment... Damn.)

  6. Mirror linked on page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://mirror.us.psand.net/plinth/

  7. insufficient! by ALLXSTHINGS · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "MCT7806CT 6V Regulator 1.5A Out ... Capacitor 25Vdc 2200uF 324-5212 0.93 each Capacitor 35Vdc, 0.1uF 221-8584 0.13 each Capacitor 35V, 1uF ... 2 x Resistor, 0.5W, 5%, 100" Anybody with a minor background in electrical engineering could tell you that the above equipment isn't about to get along well together. I hope they don't kill themselves.

    1. Re:insufficient! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Bullshit.

      Care to point out why you think that?

      The regulator might be strained initially, but apart from that, what?

    2. Re:insufficient! by mvdw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The regulator looks like it's there to power the "6V yellow led". Obviously these guys know nothing about electronics - the wireless bridge is powered from a "DC-DC converter" made from an LM317(!) - that's a linear supply, not a DC-DC converter. This supply is probably superfluous anyway - the wireless bridge it powers runs off a 7V supply, telling me it most likely has an internal regulator. They should have checked - might have saved themselves some work...

    3. Re:insufficient! by drclaw007 · · Score: 1

      LM317T. Note the T - "This is a basic adjustable voltage power supply using the popular three pin regulator, LM317T. You can select any voltage between 1.5V and 30V using a potentiometer. The LM317T is rated at 1.5A so you must use a larger heat sink when drawing high currents." Taken from http://www.web-tronics.com/powsupuslm.html

    4. Re:insufficient! by mvdw · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's still a linear supply. It is NOT a DC-DC supply, which was part (a) of my point, and part (b) of my point is that it is most likely not necessary because the wireless bridge it powers most likely already has a regulator on the input.

    5. Re:insufficient! by tap · · Score: 3, Informative

      They used both a DC-DC supply and a LM317 converter. The DC-DC supply was a pre-made thing that takes in something like 12V and supplies what you need for an ATX motherboard, 12V, 5V, 3.3V, -3.3V, etc. Lots of low-power and small form factor computers use them, as they dissipate less heat and are smaller than normal AC-DC switching supplies.

      Then they used a LM317 linear regulator to provide 7V from 12V for the wireless bridge. The bridge's power supply was rated for 1.4 amps. A 5V drop over 1.4 amps is 7 Watts wasted as heat. Not impressive in something that's supposed to be low power. With their 20 DegC/watt heatsink, that is a 140 deg C temp rise from ambient to the TO-220 case. Easily out of spec. The wireless bridge surely doesn't draw the full 1.4A in operation, that's what saves them from their regulator melting.

      They probably should have seen if their bridge would have run from the 5V line or if the bridge's power supply could handle 12V. They probably didn't even need the 7V regulator.

      If they did need one, it would have been much better to use a switching regulator that would be around 95% efficient instead of their 58% efficient linear regulator. TI powertrends makes integrated switching regulator modules that would work perfectly. I used one for to power a digital camera off a 12V deep cycle battery so it could take photos on a timer for several days straight.

      I also have to wonder why they used locking switches instead of just getting a case with a locking front panel. I've got a rack of such 2U cases at work, they're not hard to come by.

      The switch from the 2nd hard drive's power was unecessary too, you can turn the drive off with software.

    6. Re:insufficient! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You wrote that "They probably should have seen if their bridge would have run from the 5V line or if the bridge's power supply could handle 12V. They probably didn't even need the 7V regulator."

      While that can work for a while on the test bench, it only takes a modest power line ripple or age stress to make a system that is running that far off its designated voltage fail intermittently, or permanently. It's much safer to wire in the linear supply: also, in some cases, adding a bit of load on your primary power supply can help reduce its ripple or over-voltages quite a lot, so they may wind up better off doing this than you realize.

  8. Ey by techefnet · · Score: 0, Troll

    Whats wrong with wires? :)

    1. Re:Ey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      they always either get eaten by rabbits or stolen to use as bondage gear.

  9. small computers by wahsapa · · Score: 0, Redundant

    i 3 mini-itx

    1. Re:small computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn.. I was about to correct you when I realized its slashdot that won't let you put in the less-than-sign

    2. Re:small computers by pavon · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Sure it will, you just have to know html.
      I <3 character codes

  10. sexist computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    good thing it's not a chick that made this thing, or I could get in a lot of trouble for say this....
    "Hey, Nice Rack!!"

    1. Re:sexist computing by BhAaD · · Score: 0

      On the other hand...
      Now you can say 'Hey! Nice Rack!' and not get blamed for it :)

    2. Re:sexist computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      No. I think "chick" was enough.

  11. mini-itx performance by FrO · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do you actually get decent performance out of mini-itx computers?

    I've been toying with the idea of making a HTPC-ish box, but the performance questions stop me from buying anything.

    1. Re:mini-itx performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A lot of people have been use Mini-ITX for HTPCs. The one thing you're going to need to do though is get a hardware based capture card. Not a cheap ATI PCI-TV or anything like that.

      Also I believe the new VIA's have a special chip on them to help with the decoding, so you should be good there.

      If you can live with only 2 PCI cards, go for it (You can always use USB Tuners as well). They do make very quiet systems.

      A lot of people will use them as clients and have a server with the actual tuners in them though. Just another idea to toss out there.

    2. Re:mini-itx performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A lot of people will use them as clients and have a server with the actual tuners in them though. Just another idea to toss out there.

      Just an off-topic recommendation of MythTV w/Hauppauge PVR-250 cards on a PIII-500 or better backend system (not hard to find in a rubbish pile these days) and Minimyth distribution on the frontend Via EPIA M10000 system running diskless. Keeps the noisy hard drives and big system in the basement where it belongs and the quiet system in the living room.

    3. Re:mini-itx performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go the VIA route, be sure to get a Nehemiah series processor (or Esther, when those come out). They're much much better than the previous c3s (full-speed rather than half-speed FPU, finally a complete p6 instruction set with CMOV, SSE rather than 3dnow). That should ensure you get livable performance.

  12. Re:Asking for a /.? by Rufus211 · · Score: 3, Informative
  13. 2u = 2 much by moosesocks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Looking at the pics on the page, it looks like they could have easily built the thing inside a 1U chasis of they used the proper power supply and heatsink. All of the other parts should fit within 1U.

    That being said, they could have simply used an ultraportable laptop with the screen unplugged and unnecessary parts removed/disabled.

    You'd be amazed as to how little there really is inside a laptop. Think about it -- the drives and batteries take up about 75% of the chasis. Leave about another 10% for the power supply and heatsinking, and you've got a REALLY small PCB.

    If space, not power, was their main concern, they could have also used one of the Shuttle cube boxes. They pack an incredibly strong punch for their size, and are usually on par with their desktop equivilants. Hell... they've even got an opteron box. The performance on the EPIA boards is horrific. What were they thinking designing a processor without a FPU? That being said, they're pretty cool because they're small, low-power, and widely availible (which laptop MBs strangely aren't). Still, they're pretty expensive considering that you're getting a PC which would have been considered pretty slow 4 years ago.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:2u = 2 much by jjshoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. He should have purchased this single mini itx 1u or this dual mini itx 1u

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    2. Re:2u = 2 much by Ignignot · · Score: 1

      What exactly does a "Web cache and DNS server" need with an FPU? Which of those functions is floating point unit intensive? As far as I can tell, FP is only used for graphics and scientific applications, neither of which are part of the design goals. Also, with the disclaimer that I have never done it, it seems that hardware modding a laptop is a tricky business at best. Not to mention more expensive (if they didn't just use an "extra" one)

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
    3. Re:2u = 2 much by shplorb · · Score: 1

      If space, not power, was their main concern, they could have also used one of the Shuttle cube boxes. They pack an incredibly strong punch for their size, and are usually on par with their desktop equivilants. Hell... they've even got an opteron box. The performance on the EPIA boards is horrific. What were they thinking designing a processor without a FPU? That being said, they're pretty cool because they're small, low-power, and widely availible (which laptop MBs strangely aren't). Still, they're pretty expensive considering that you're getting a PC which would have been considered pretty slow 4 years ago.

      I should bitch-slap you. You're a moron. What the fuck do you need FP for in a network router-type thing? By the way, they do have a FPU... it runs at 1/2 the clock speed.

      Small, low-power systems cost $$$ because the volume isn't there.

      Those systems also pack more than enough power to do basic networking too. A 486 can easily saturate a 10mbps ethernet connection. Hell, my server was an old Cyrix 686 (now known as VIA Eden I believe) and it ran for zonks until the PSU blew up the other week... it's now a Mini-ITX system. Whilst it consumes less power than the old system, it's still way overpowered for what it does.

      If these guys could have afforded it, I'm sure they would have sprung for a soekris board or similar - they suck up almost no juice and have ample power.

    4. Re:2u = 2 much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh? I didn't the conversion, but it's nearly 1.7:1 pounds to US dollars, so you just linked to say a $250 1U case.

  14. Mirror by Novanix · · Score: 2, Informative

    Incase it is needed: http://fluky.org/slashdot/flakey.info/plinth/index .html Their site seems to be slowing quite fast:)

    1. Re:Mirror by Moocowsia · · Score: 1

      Slowing quite fast? Alert! Alert we have an oxymoron.

      --
      Moo!
    2. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Instead we have poor grammar, not to mention how they missed two spaces. The penalty for false oxymoron alerts is being cooked for steak. mmm, steaks

  15. Would you like to explain that?? by the_rajah · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a college degreed Electrical Engineer with over 30 years of experience, including teaching electronics at the college level for three years. That regulator circuit looks quite familiar. As long as the heatsink is sufficient for the heat dissipation in the LM317, there should be no problem. Since this is powering only the wireless bridge, the current drain at 7 volts should be modest and it only needs to drop 5 volts across the regulator IC. The total power dissipation spread across both of the 1/2 watt resistors is only 85 milliwatts so no trouble there either.

    If you are referring to the capacitor voltage ratings, the only requirement there is that the voltage rating of the cap be more than the voltage actually applied to it. For example a 35 volt cap is just fine with 6 volts across it. It could even be a 1,000 volt rated cap with no ill effects.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Would you like to explain that?? by pappin · · Score: 1

      Actually, that particular regulator likely doesn't even need the heat sink, if I remember correctly it can handle 1.5A, which shoulod be more than enough for a low power device like the router... however the heat sink can't hurt.

    2. Re:Would you like to explain that?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, at 7 I read a big electronic book, with no experience in electronics I knew that too.

  16. Nice but ... by mike_lynn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Personally, I found their antenna designs much more interesting.

    1. Re:Nice but ... by Technician · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With the 70 degree pattern of the bow-tie antenna, it would make an excelent feed for an old Dish Network antenna. It would beat a quarter wave feed many use. I have an old dish. When I get some time I think I'll make the bow-tie and use it with the dish and see how many open networks I can find. ;-)

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  17. My next purchase by Piranhaa · · Score: 1

    Actually, I've been planning on getting one of these little things for a a while now (the pcmcia model). I want it to replace my current PII 233 bulky router. The only drawback is the price of it I think. Size is really small, it's fast, and really quiet. The space where my servers are is very limited, and I'd rather not have it all used up by a router...

    1. Re:My next purchase by Kenja · · Score: 1

      You can get something like a Netscreen 5xp for a lot less then a Mini-ITX system. I just dont see the point in using these as routers/firewalls. That haveing been said, I do use one as a mail/web server.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  18. Hrmmm by Judg3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There has to be something special or unusual about this setup, but damn it all I can't see it.

    Sure, they integrated a wireless bridge into it, but with all that room, it doesn't look like anything special... So where's the nifty part that makes this thing "News For Nerds"?

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    1. Re:Hrmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It Runs Linux?

    2. Re:Hrmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There has to be something special or unusual about this post, but damn it all I can't see it.

      Sure, he integrated a comment about "News For Nerds" into it, but for such a short post, it doesn't look like anything special... So where's the nifty part that makes this thing "(Score:4, Interesting)"?

    3. Re:Hrmmm by Niet3sche · · Score: 1

      Ummmmm ... well, I guess they did build a neat breadboard for the power here.

      I actually found that to be the single most technical thing in here. The importance or uniqueness here is lost on me, too, I must admit. :-|

      I get the impression, too, that by the time all is said and done, they may well have actually saved some money in going with a BTO or COTS system instead of rolling their own. I know, that'd have not been nerdish enough for us, but still - to spend good money and come out with something that is not terribly different than something that is available out there for less must be: (1) embarassing. (2) financially painful.

      :-|
    4. Re:Hrmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'instant UPS' is a cute thought. Obviously you get the same thing from a laptop, but gel-cells are cheap, and hold a good amount of energy if you're not forcing an inverter into the mix. (So the actual cheapest way to do this would be 'laptop with dead battery and 12v input,' I guess. Wonder if you can keep a gel-cel topped up safely off the internal charging circuit designed for NiCds.)

  19. My 8 steps to building the same in less space. by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Go to ebay.
    2. Find and buy cheap notebook.
    3. Get into argument with seller over shipping.
    4. Wait for notebook to arive.
    5. Pick up hammer.
    6. Open notebook.
    7. Hit notebook screen with hammer until it comes off.
    8. Stick some WiFi cards in notebook and put it on shelf.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:My 8 steps to building the same in less space. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9. ???
      10. PROFIT!!!

      Sorry, i had to do it.

    2. Re:My 8 steps to building the same in less space. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9=resell on ebay at a higher price. OMG I AM TEH GEINUOUS

  20. Power and cost savings with Compact Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depending on what's required it would save a fair bit of power and boot time in the event of a reset to use solid state for the storage.

    If the device doesn't need more than say 512MB of storage which is plenty for a small copy of Linux there are some great Compact Flash cards out there for the cheap.

    Too boot and operate from these speedy low power little guys you can use an adaptor from http://www.acscontrol.com/

    It's a dirt cheap solution if you only need 128MB for small applications.

    Amazon always had great deals on CF cards and the adaptors are only $20 or so and their fully bootable.

  21. Mirror, and.. neat project! by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Mirror here - and this is kind of a neat looking project. Do they have any plans to make any more? From the looks of it, they want to be able to take these things out in public to create a WiFi network.

    Maybe they can hook up with the Huge Ass WiFi Backpack Guy from the other day?

  22. Soekris by N4DMX · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Soekris has an interesting board that is said to be optimized for use as a wireless router(Model net4526)
    I imagine it would fit in to a project such as this quite easily, and it has pretty low power consumption.
    But, at 133 Mhz and 128 Mbytes of RAM, it's not as powerful.

    Link: Soekris
    --
    42
    1. Re:Soekris by belial · · Score: 1

      Here are some kits based around the soekris net4526.

      http://metrix.net/

  23. "Low power"??? by darrylo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm curious as to what their definition of "low power" is. Low, compared to a power-sucking P4 or Athlon, maybe, but probably not very low by low power standards.

    I've just set up a similar system as an home file server (no wireless, though, and I've added a cheap DVDROM drive), and my box is sucking up around 55-60W, idle. That's measured via an actual wattmeter connected to the power cord, and not by multiplying V*A.

    On second thought, maybe a soekris board and a 2.5" disk drive might have been a better solution (less RAM and CPU, which would probably be fine for an home fileserver, but the power usage would probably be in the 10-20W range).

    1. Re:"Low power"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am running soekris board with a 2.5" HDD and it uses less than 10W.

      I'm trying to find an 3.3V ADSL PCI modem that will fit into the given space and have drivers for FreeBSD, so that I can eliminate the dedicated ADSL (ethernet) modem... no luck so far.

    2. Re:"Low power"??? by rbbs · · Score: 1

      What kind of server performance can you get with that?
      My ISP (http://www.aa.nu - amazing company...don't all run at once...) offers a racked EPIA 10000 with 250Gb storage and 512MB Ram on a 1Gb switch for ukp50 per month with service terms of a monthly 95th percentile of 1Mb/s per 1U. (I said DON'T all run at once...)
      You have to buy the hardware from them for ukp500 + VAT but that is pretty much the going rate anyway...

      I'm tempted as hell but i need to know if it will be able to cope with my Postfix/Amavisd-new/ClamAV/DSPAM without any problems... - I'm running on a 2 proc Powermac G4 with X Server at the moment, but on a DSL line, and i want more bandwidth...this seems a neat way to go and the G4 can become a workgroup server.

      So, any idea how much these things can cope with? I only host a few fairly anonymous websites and have a few thousand messages a week running through it so i'm assuming it will run fine, but I really have no idea how efficient these things are...for example when i turn myself into a 5000 office multinational will i just have to add some more RAM or will i be peeling the melted remains of the CPU off the shiny XServe racked below....?

    3. Re:"Low power"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you got ripped off. V*A is watts, and if your "wattmeter" is calibrated correctly, it will give you same reading as result of multiplication (provided you can multiply)

      ~omi

    4. Re:"Low power"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely false.

      V*A only yields watts in reference to a DC circuit or an AC circuit where current and voltage are in phase. A computer's power supply is a highly inductive load, and thus the voltage and current are not in phase. As a result there is a discrepancy between volt-amps and watts (called the "power factor", Google that for more info).

      Though this is going to cause watts, properly measured, to be a lower number than volt-amps.

  24. CPU by Detritus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How fast a CPU do you really need? Years ago I popped open a 3COM Ethernet bridge/router and found a Motorola 68020, running at 25 MHz if I remember correctly. It was fast enough to handle two fully loaded 10-megabit Ethernet segments.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:CPU by N4DMX · · Score: 1

      Ah, I fully agree with your point, I was just pointing out that the one they built in the article was faster.

      --
      42
  25. Lessons Well Learned by Agret · · Score: 0

    The most important lessons these guys learned from this project are: * Blue LEDs are strangely attractive to technical people and * Sticky-back plastic is cool.

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
  26. Smaller is not necessarily better by gorim · · Score: 4, Insightful


    He may have built this for remote locations
    or heat filled rooms/closets. In those cases
    you want decent space and decent airflow INSIDE
    the box.

    Laptops have neither, and tend to suffer heat
    related problems easily enough.

    Its good already that he went low power and
    low thermal, and put it in a good solid spacious
    chassis.

    If dollars were a concern, going down to 1U
    isn't bad, but no further for real applications.

  27. Stress testing? by This+Is+Ridiculous · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, he writes up some stuff about his new box, and then posts it on Slashdot to stress-test the thing? Clever, clever...

    --
    Hey, you try to find an open nick these days!
  28. Wrong... by dadman · · Score: 1

    The human eye is especially sensitive at wavelength of 550nm, that is Green light and that's why for the same power output (watt), the green LED appears much brighter and has a much higher luminous intensity (unit in cd or mcd) than blue or red LED.

  29. Re:As usual, the s/n ratio sucks by Sim9 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "To be fair, I saw 1 intelligent post."

    Too bad it wasn't yours.

    I know this is going to be modded as flamebait, and I'm not trying to be insulting, but maybe instead of criticizing things, you should help improve things by posting something truly worthy of "Insightful"?

  30. UPS battery naked ? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 3, Informative

    I find that UPS battery being too naked next to the powersupply... It rather be protected by itself in a cage because battery's can do strange things sometimes (I can tell :S)

    if that thing explodes in your rack you can throw away the hard drive, maybe the mainboard and wireless bridge ..

    so far for a rendundant/autonome system ...
    although a beowolf cluster of blue leds? hmmmmz...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    1. Re:UPS battery naked ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some modern Beowulf's already have blue LED's controlled by remote management software as a "locate me" light on the front panel. It beats having to log into them and mount/unmount the floppy drive to get *that* light to flash....

  31. No kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dunno what all the fuss is about wireless. Yeah I have it in my house so I can use the notebook in the kitchen or whatever but at work? Running cable isn't that hard and if your network is large enough to make running cable a pain then it's too large for wireless unless it's all spread out then it's too large physicaly. Bah WiFi has limited applications and most of them are stupid gee-wiz stuff. I think WiFi sells well because 1/2 the techs out there are too scared or stupid to crimp their own cables. Sure they can configure a gee wiz wifi routomadealy but they can't figure out where the GWA goes.

  32. not a good use of space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U can actually fit 2 of these boards + 2 hd in a 1 u box

  33. Re:2u = cheaper than 1U by anticypher · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looking at this page, and a bunch of their other pages, I think cost was their main concern. They found a 2U box for only GBP29, while the 1U box mentioned in another post by jjshoe runs GBP149. The wireless access bridge "was just laying around".

    Most of their projects are of the "cheap and green" variety. They have built pedal powered repeaters, solar powered satellite receivers and the like.

    I'm a bit appalled by their lack of engineering knowlege on some of their projects. But I do admire their "slap it together cheap" attitude. They are not building reliable, production level kit, they are tweaking items they found in the spare parts bin and making useful one-off projects.

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  34. Putting theory into practice by adelayde · · Score: 1

    For those of you interested in applying this sort of thing in the real world, we'll be taking this box out into the field along with the rest of our kit in a couple of weeks in an event taking place simultaneously in Tarifa, Spain and Tangiers, Morocco, as well as elsewhere in the world.

    Transacciones / Fadaiat

  35. Re:Very interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's partly insane government taxes, and partly reduced competition because a lot of companies either won't ship overseas or charge much higher rates. Plus currency differences make it easier for companies to play games with the prices. Plus an extra premium to pay for all the goods lost in transit to the pirates that plague the English Channel.

  36. Re:As usual, the s/n ratio sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm making another post that should never have been submitted. Sorry, but I'm a horrible person with nothing better to do.

  37. What OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What operating system is he running on it?

    1. Re:What OS? by adelayde · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Debian GNU/Linux Sid

  38. Shallow rack? by pr0nbot · · Score: 1

    I'm still looking for a mini-itx rack case that isn't so deep. Maybe 20cm or so. (For a musician's rack setup.)

    1. Re:Shallow rack? by pangloss · · Score: 1

      maybe you should look into blonde racks.

      thanks, i'll be here all week.

  39. Previous /. article on homemade racks.. by mqRakkis · · Score: 2, Interesting
  40. rack mount wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lets think this through, a rack is metal on all four sides, and both the top and bottom. this does not sound like the optimal location for radio emissions. slashdot delivers another grade A plan.

    1. Re:rack mount wireless by adelayde · · Score: 1

      that's why it's got two external antenna connectors on the back ;)

      read first, comment afterwards.

  41. What about just using a used/refurb Xserve by adzoox · · Score: 1

    * You can run linux on them
    * You can reduce the power consumption in the same way (hard drives etc)
    * They are quite powerful

    One thing I didn't understand ... although I understand status lights and the fact that the LED lights use VERY little power, why include them? Any power saved in a low power consumption setup is good

    For the $1250 that this thing cost to build you could have a much better tested and reliable system. The thing with "homebrews" is ... can you REALLY trust your own setup vs a commercially tested system?

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:What about just using a used/refurb Xserve by adelayde · · Score: 1

      It was a prototype, so the cost is justified I think. The advantages of building your own are that you get exactly what you want and you also learn more along the way. But yes, it does work out quite pricey really compared with something off the shelf, but we haven't found anything off the shelf that does what we want - save perhaps a laptop, which we were actually replacing.

      It's a shame that Bugs Bunny sold out to AOL.

  42. Heatsinking... by the_rajah · · Score: 2, Informative

    The milliamp rating of the part bears no direct relationship to the need for heatsinking. The heatsink requirements are related to the amount of power that the regulator IC needs to dissipate to stay within rated operating temperature limits. The power dissipation is given by Pd=(Vin-Vout)*I. Where I is the current drawn through the regulator. For example, in this case being discussed, the voltage drop is roughly 5 volts across the IC and if the current was 1 amp, then the power being dissipated would be 5 watts. Given, from the data sheet, that the junction to ambient thermal resistance is 50 degrees C per watt, the junction temp rise above ambient for 5 watts would be 250 degrees C which is far in excess of the junction maximum operating temp of 125 degrees C. So in that example a heatsink, which reduces the junction to ambient thermal resistance, is clearly a necessity. See LM317 data sheet

    Don't feel bad, though, it's a common misconception that has caused a lot of burned fingers. You are right that the heatsink can't hurt, even if not required, since lower temperatures are ralated to lower MTBF (Mean TIme Between Failures.)

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Heatsinking... by pappin · · Score: 1

      Yes, I see your point. Begs for a switching supply I think :) but thats a little tougher to hand build on a proto-board.

  43. nice but... by ameoba · · Score: 1

    This is all fine and dandy but wouldn't anyone who actually needs this complicated of a system to run wireless off of probably need more access points than the 2 this thing's going to hide back in the server room?

    --
    my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    1. Re:nice but... by adelayde · · Score: 1

      For a good idea of the sort of thing we do with this sort of thing, check out http://psand.net/itrike/.

      In short two wireless networks are normally adequate, we use other APs in different locations as repeaters etc. Also this is to mount in a flight case or mobile vehicle, not a server room.

  44. Switching is a lot easier today than back... by the_rajah · · Score: 2, Informative

    when I got a patent on them for my corporate employer in the 70's using all discrete parts - no IC's. It's pretty easy today to build a small one with relatively few parts, but you have to look out for the noise that they produce. Here's a link to an application note for one that would work in this case: LM2575 ap note (warning, 26 page pdf) I still like linear regulators for a lot of applications unless efficiency is paramount.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  45. Suggestions by ecloud · · Score: 1

    The hand nibbler tool from Radio Shack is great for cutting square holes, provided the sheet metal you are cutting is thin enough. (Surely must exist in the UK too) Or, an air-powered nibbler. That's the next toy I want to get.

    Also why use a switch for a hard drive? Just use hdparm to turn it on and off; I doubt the electronics on the drive take a lot of power in "sleep" mode. Besides, powering it on with a switch might be able to cause transient pulses that could be harmful to the IDE controller, maybe.

    FWIW don't forget that CF cards make wonderful "hard drives" for embedded systems, but you can't get 30 gig ones yet. Still not bad for a root filesystem, and just power-up and mount big media-storage filesystems when necessary.

  46. Flash instead of a hard drive by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

    Would using flash instead of a hard drive save power?

  47. MOD THIS UP by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

    This is not flamebait! Okay, the last statement could be rephrased, but I think it's a valid question.

  48. LMxxx by BillX · · Score: 1

    Whoever calls an LM78xx/LM317/etc. a linear supply, try leaving off the little 0.1u capacitor near the input terminals and move the larger, typically electrolytic filter cap some distance away. They may classify technically as "linear" because they don't involve a chopper/PWM driving a transformer, but there is still a current-hungry transistor at the input being switched rapidly on and off...

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.