Slashdot Mirror


Worm Developed for Nokia Series-60 Phones

Tuxedo Jack writes "It had to happen. The first worm designed specifically for cellular phones has been developed, and Cabir appears to be a way of effectively killing Nokia Series-60 cellular phones via shortening the battery life due to scanning for nearby Bluetooth devices and propagating itself. This still relies on a user to open it, so hopefully that won't be many, and those that do must use a file manager to find and kill the worm. At least it isn't a dialer!"

81 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. Dangerous Potential by CommanderData · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It had to happen sooner or later, with people predicting the cell phone will be your next computer.

    I guess Series 60 phone owners should be thankful that it just drains battery life. What if the worm sent 80,012 text messages to everyone in your contact list! Imagine the cell network congestion and billing chaos that would ensue... Lets hope cell phone manufacturers start tweaking their phone OSes to prevent that kind of disaster in the future!

    --
    Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    1. Re:Dangerous Potential by ePhil_One · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm just wondering how long it will be until they figure out how to use a cell phone as a spam relay...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    2. Re:Dangerous Potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess Series 60 phone owners should be thankful that it just drains battery life. What if the worm sent 80,012 [slashdot.org] text messages to everyone in your contact list!

      I think the last decade of viruses have shown us that this kind of behaviour is fairly rare. Worms that spread and spread well usually do some subtle task that rarely directly affects the user, but en-masse can do a great amount of work. Sending spams, harvesting email addresses, DDoSing companies. It's all activity that subtly gains someone else something. A purely descructive PC worm is a rare thing

      And these Cellphone ones will be no different, I'll guess. Perhaps they'll call some sex line to get the owners some extra calls. Once a week a $5 call... I know many cell owners who wouldn't notice that, but it's extra money in the operator's pocket.

    3. Re:Dangerous Potential by CommanderData · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would agree that silently spreading could work to it's advantage. If you combine the two concepts with a time-bomb that causes the code to execute at a certain future date it could be even more of a problem. Every cell tower everywhere overloaded with messaging and calls on April 1st, 2005 for example.

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    4. Re:Dangerous Potential by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess it won't be long till we see text message spam offering Norton/McAfee/etc... Anti-Virus software for phones.

      As you've said, the worm could be the first part of a more elaborate plan. As the anti-spam and anti-virus companies get more sophisticated, the spammers and virus writers keep ahead.

    5. Re:Dangerous Potential by dave1791 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about a worm that set the phone to silent mode or whatever they are calling the "beep just once, shut up and vibrate" mode these days? There would actually a worm with a noble purpose.

    6. Re:Dangerous Potential by mikael · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fortunately, people are discarding their old mobile phones, and buying new ones every six months. At least, users aren't able to save application programs in SIM card memory. I always wonder why thin client mobile phones (where everything is stored on a server, rather than on the phone itself) haven't taken off.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:Dangerous Potential by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My Mod points if I had'em

      I was thinking the same thing, as you enter the theater Bluetooth turns your phone to vibrate only, and as you leave it checks to see if it was turned off via Bluetooth and re-enables the previous setting.

      Great idea that probably won't ever take off due to security concerns.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    8. Re:Dangerous Potential by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With the capabilities of some phones, such malware could be used to send untraceable junk faxes, spam, dDoMS (multiple services), telemarketing to numbers on the donotcall list (and gathering unlisted cell phone numbers for marketing), defeating legal phone taps, even distributed wardialing to find that elusive number for Protovision.

      Whatever nefarious purpose which would require laundering your identity onto another unwitting victim could be done with a worm infecting cell phones, especially if it can spread quickly without user interaction and can establish a channel to listen to for orders (a hacked website). We're not there yet, but it won't be much longer.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    9. Re:Dangerous Potential by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well that way I couldn't play my games or look up numbers when I don't have service, which currently is a good portion of time.

    10. Re:Dangerous Potential by slittle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Simply have an option that will allow the ringer to simply be suppressed so long as the Bluetooth single is present.

      That saves the bother of turning anything on and off (and possibly missing it on the way out), as well as requiring script kiddies to actually follow you around rather than fire and forget.

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
  2. Site is down... by Mz6 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Well... I couldn't get the Symantec site to come up.. Is Anyone else having similar problems?

    After searching Google news and other sources I could not find a similar story anywhere besides this similar story posted on ZDnet Australia. The only problem is that it was dated back 10 February 2004. Not sure if it's the same story... or same worm but worth a read for those that cannot get out to Symantec.

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:Site is down... by donnyspi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, you type very well for a 4 month old :-)

  3. K.I.S.S. - simplicity is key by ack154 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd just like to say that this is why it's still nice to have a phone with relatively limited features - well, that and it's a Motorola (T720). I don't have to worry about the Bluetooth stuff, and I don't even have web access activated on it.

    Also, according to the SARC article linked - this worm will attack any bluetooth device that it finds in it's range - not just phones - SARC uses a printer as an example, but what about those nice bluetooth mice/keyboards and PDAs, etc?

    They have an image of the phone with the message displayed on it too.

    1. Re:K.I.S.S. - simplicity is key by boskone · · Score: 5, Informative

      umm, the t720 is a hugely complicated phone. It can browse the web, display pictures, play games. I would not classify it as "basic" even though newer phones do more.

      as an aside, does yours ever lock up so hard that you have to pop the battery out to reset it?

    2. Re:K.I.S.S. - simplicity is key by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 3, Funny
      but what about those nice bluetooth mice/keyboards and PDAs, etc? PDAs I would think so, but doesn't a device need some sort of OS to get infected?

      the again, maybe thats why my mouse will be in a different spot in the morning than where I left it the night before, plus I'm noticing more LCD droppings. maybe he has a Virus?

    3. Re:K.I.S.S. - simplicity is key by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 2, Funny

      yeah, my t720 came bundled with a virus

    4. Re:K.I.S.S. - simplicity is key by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had to take the battery out to get it up.

      One of us is one seriously sick bastard.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  4. Semantics by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 3, Informative
    If it cannot infect a system without the user's help, it isn't a worm. It's a virus.

    Sure, the difference isn't that big a deal, but to most people, there isn't any real difference between Linux and Unix...

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Semantics by shird · · Score: 4, Informative

      No.. that would make it a trojan.

      The definition of a worm isn't to do with whether or not it needs a user to run it - its just about whether it propgates via a network by itself rather than having users do the spreading.

      A virus hides itself in other executables and runs itself via proxy with the user not realising it. But it gernerally requires the user to do the distribution (generally without realising it).

      A trojan is simply a program which is malicous but pretends to be something else. If it happens to spread itself when run that doesn't make it a worm or a virus, but just a self spreading trojan. It would be closer to a trojan-slash-worm than a virus.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    2. Re:Semantics by Tranzig · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually the difference between viruses and worms is that worms are standalone programs while viruses need to infect other executables to be effective.

    3. Re:Semantics by earthforce_1 · · Score: 4, Funny


      > Sure, the difference isn't that big a deal, but to most people, there isn't any > real difference between Linux and Unix...

      Especially if you work for SCO!

      --
      My rights don't need management.
    4. Re:Semantics by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 3, Informative
      Urgh, this is what I get for posting before coffee. I had been relying on the /. blurb, since I couldn't reach Symantec (Akamai, perhaps?) Turns out the blurb wasn't entirely accurate, anyhow. From Symantec:

      The worm spreads as a .SIS file, which is automatically installed into the "APPS" directory when the receiver accepts the transmission. Upon execution, it will display a message then copy itself to a directory that is not visible by default. The worm runs from this directory whenever the phone is rebooted, so it continues to work even if the files are deleted from the APPS directory.

      ...so you're right--this is a classic trojan horse. As for the definition of 'worm', I prefer the Jargon File's version (if nothing else, it's most likely the oldest contextually-appropriate definition:)

      "[a worm is] A program that propagates itself over a network, reproducing itself as it goes."

      ...so according to TJF, it's not sufficient that it transmits itself--it must also reporoduce itself, which implies that the worm must be an autonomous program.

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  5. Simple Fix by Brain+Stew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bluetooth should be turned off out of the box. If an end-user is smart enough to know they want Bluetooth, they probably won't get hit with this attack.

    --
    "Here's a spoiler: You're will die alone."-Triumph the Insult Comic Dog
    1. Re:Simple Fix by ack154 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Hey what's this bluetooth thing? I guess I'll just activate it to find out... Oh, shit, it looks like I got a virus." Um, I'm thinking some people probably WILL get hit with this.

    2. Re:Simple Fix by cjellibebi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Anyone interested in the practice of Toothing ends up leaving their Bluetooth on. For more info on Toothing, see also here (Search for "toothing" in the page that appears - there's even a link to the Toothing forums).

    3. Re:Simple Fix by Sven+Tuerpe · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Bluetooth should be turned off out of the box.

      What really will happen is this: some day somebody develops a killer application based on Bluetooth, something that implies fun. Handset manufacturers will happily add it to their products. Their usability tests will yield that Bluetooth must be enabled out of the box, or most users won't even notice the new killer app. So they will not only enable Bluetooth by default, but also firmly believe they have to do it this way.

      --
      http://erichsieht.wordpress.com/category/english/
  6. Yes, but how long until there is a dialer? Or... by Dagny+Taggert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...better yet, a dialer that propagates itself and then sends out pre-recorded sales calls. This may sound crazy now, but will it sound crazy three years from now?

    --
    Don't be a looter...and yes, I know that it's spelled with an "A" instead of an "E".
  7. History by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This still relies on a user to open it, so hopefully that won't be many

    Those who fail to learn from history, are condemned to repeat it.

    1. Re: History by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > Those who fail to learn from history, are condemned to repeat it.

      Same with government and algebra.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:History by absurdist · · Score: 2

      "Those who fail to learn from history, are condemned to repeat it."

      And the rest of us are condemned to hearing that quote over and over and over...

  8. Oh those users... by cjellibebi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    >This still relies on a user to open it, so hopefully that won't be many.
    Famous last words...
    1. Re:Oh those users... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Famous last words...

      will probably be, "press 'select' to see if you are the WINNER of our 10,000 giveaway sweepstakes"

  9. Cross platform via bluetooth by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is a virus that spreads via phone to computer or vice versa possible?

    1. Re:Cross platform via bluetooth by Animats · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes. This virus will apparently attack Bluetooth-enabled printers. It's not clear how successful the attacks are. But there may be an attack route there.

      Printers are a great potential target for spammers. Visualize Viagra ads appearing on your printer.

  10. Re:Yes, but how long until there is a dialer? Or.. by Dagny+Taggert · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would love to see a simpler phone without features like Bluetooth. This would eliminate some of this out of the box. I may be in the minority, but all I need to do on my cell phone is make phone calls.

    --
    Don't be a looter...and yes, I know that it's spelled with an "A" instead of an "E".
  11. Uh, yeah. by dannyelfman · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Right, no one *EVER* opens attachments.

    ``Oh look, Johnny sent me a new ring tone''

    ZAP!

    Until software companies will devote serious time to making sure their products aren't vulnerable like this, we will continue to see these types of monkey business.

  12. And so it begins.... by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You network anything, it will be used by for shady purposes by unscrupulous folk. Think about that for a minute.

  13. 'toothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    So... This is the digital equivalent of an STD for 'toothers, right?

  14. Next Question will be..... by HighOrbit · · Score: 3, Funny

    How did these 1-900 charges get on my phone bill?

  15. Here we go. by ATAMAH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I imagine that because of the cellphone frenzy there soon will be as much advertising (spam) in that medium as there is on the internet. Its just too big and too attractive a market to miss. And as cellphones get more and more features crammed into them - there will be viruses, worms, dialers. And they will be just as common.

    1. Re:Here we go. by liquidsin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think it will get as bad for a long time. Here in Canada, most people don't pay for bandwidth by the mb, but they pay for cell service by the minute. Unlimited cell plans are pretty fucking expensive, from what I've seen. So people are less likely to raise a stink over email spam or web ads than they are over cell telemarketing or sms spam, since most of us still pay per message / minute. And it's a hell of a lot easier to track down the pig fuckers spamming you over a cell network.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    2. Re:Here we go. by frostman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The main reason SMS-spam is so rare is because you have to pay for every SMS you send. (One exception: the network provider you are currently connected to can send you SMS-s for "free" so of course you get the occasional spam from your provider or whoever you're roaming on.)

      The next biggest reason is that SMS *requires* identification.

      Now, imagine a bunch of infected phones...

      Free SMS-spam with meaningless (since vastly distributed and zombied) originating numbers.

      Uh-oh.....

      --

      This Like That - fun with words!

  16. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Remind me to bring an infected phone to the movie theater every time I go.

  17. Netcraft confirms : Bluetooth NOT dying?!!! by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So this is, like, the first real-world application of Bluetooth? A virus vector? You mean it's not just useless marketing hype-ware after all?!!! They are right, you learn something new every day!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  18. anti-virus software people jumping for joy by Nonillion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess now the anti-virus software people now have themselves a new market to penetrate. I guess windows boxes were not enough to maintain their business model.

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
  19. Anti Virus Software for Cell Phone by SolidCore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Damn just one more thing I have to purchase with my phone subscription. A monthly charge for cell phone virus definitions for my WAP NAV

  20. Looking better and better by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 3, Funny

    That old crank-operated phone on my parents' wall is looking better and better.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  21. Hello Drive by spamming!!! by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unscrupulous types will drive around the suburbs with bluetooth transmitters on the top of honda civics and old hiaces, broadcasting viagra apps into our phones while we eat.

    E-marketers will place transmitters everywhere, including bins, bus seats and on signs in the middle of the desert so our phones never stop telling us about products that improve our lives.

    We will all begin to recieve mysterious bills for calls we made to a premium rate talking clock number while we were asleep.

    Our phones will broadcast our every move and spoken word to marketing agencies, who will happily charge us for a map of the route we took to work that morning, or for telling how good our
    eloqution is.

    Bluetooth porn spam will being blaring out of everyones mobile the minute that slightly dazed looking yuppie walks into the room with his brand new phone that he uses for browsing on the net and email and chat and buying stuff and everything!!!

    This situation(commencing next week) will continue without pause, until, faced with users mass binning their mobiles, symbian forcefully create their own virus to patch the phone on the fly as no-one , apart from geeks, will have bothered to delete the patch.

    You doubt me!?! You doubt my powers of foresight?!!

    So do I, but I'm sticking with my series 40 phone just in case.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  22. Just One More Reason by Paulrothrock · · Score: 3, Interesting
    One more reason that cell phone manufacturers need to focus on the big three (battery life, signal strength, ease of use) instead of mindless feature-creep.

    Most people buy bluetooth phones and don't know what to use it for, just that it's another thing they have. (I have a Bluetooth phone, but only because my Powerbook also has bluetooth and can sync wirelessly. Otherwise I keep it turned off.)

    Most people really just want a phone that can hold contacts, get really great reception, and lasts a while between charges. (And, outside the US, send and recieve text messages easily.) Why not focus on these features? The same reason most car commercials are about performance and showing off instead of reliability and gas mileage; people are more convinced by flash than substance.

    Repeat after me: Something that has a lot of functions doesn't do any of those things as well as a dedicated piece of equipment. (PCs are a special case; software isn't.) Just like the only unitasker in your kitchen should be a fire extinguisher, the only multitasker in your geek lair should be your PC.

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    1. Re:Just One More Reason by darkfire5252 · · Score: 2, Informative

      One more reason that cell phone manufacturers need to focus on the big three (battery life, signal strength, ease of use) instead of mindless feature-creep.

      As much as I wish that's what they would focus on, they will continue to focus on the holy grail of business: Profit.

      I used to sell cell phones, and signal strength didn't sell a single phone for me. As a salesman, I have absolutely no clue what phones recieve better than the others. Sales reps aren't trained on reception, if they are lucky, a customer will let them know which ones they have had success with.

      In my experience, the biggest selling factors for phones were a color screen, whether or not it was a flip phone, size, and unique design. When T-Mobile released the phone that swivels around instead of flips down I didn't have a customer walk by without picking it up.

      If the customer is uninformed, they will continue to buy phones with buzzwords. Whether or not the sales reps are uninformed, they will continue to sell what makes them the most money. Conviniently enough, they usually know the most about that phone.

  23. We can do more.. are told to do less! by zijus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the symantec article (I could access it) it is suggested : "Turn off and remove unneeded services." I can't help laugh. Buy a blue-tooth enabled mobile phone, and turn off blue tooth stuff as soon as you have it out of the box... Or pay to have something removing the stuff you paid to get.

    Hum... may I suggest not ot get such a mobile phone ?
    By the way, turning off what I don't need, is something I do with my car, my house, my computer... That is why I have no viruses, no slow down, no whatever I don't want. It's a kind of brake-through: don't use what what you don't need, you'll have less problemes. Ho peoples, I am in great shape today !

  24. Do you hear that, Mr. Anderson? by pjkundert · · Score: 4, Funny

    That is the sound of inevitability...

    --
    -- -pjk Perry Kundert perry@kundert.ca http://kundert.2y.net
  25. WARNING!!! by Fuzzums · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do not answer calls from people you don't know. :D

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  26. Re:Yes, but how long until there is a dialer? Or.. by harrkev · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have you tried your local Goodwill or Salvation Army?

    Even garage sales have old phones...

    This post is half-funny, and half-sad. Phones are getting more feature-packed every year. Where I work, I am not allowed to have any sort of camera, for security reasons. When all phones have camreas, no phones will be allowed in my office. Sad, but true.

    --
    "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  27. That's it... by slashzero · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remind me when cybernetic implants come out, to not get one. The last thing I need is a worm infecting my cybernetic arm.

    1. Re:That's it... by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 2, Funny

      But you could have fun by bitch-slaping your mother in law and blaming it on a virus that infected your cybernetic arm.

  28. Re:Yes, but how long until there is a dialer? Or.. by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i still sit happily with my nokia 3210. IT makes phone calls, it texts. im not sure what else i need........

  29. what does it prove? by randomized · · Score: 5, Informative

    Really, this does not prove anything. It doesn't exploit any weakness in the system and very easy to avoid.

    I am not sure how many of people who have posted before actually OWN series 60 device, but let me assure you that it's not as simple as accepting somebody's bluetooth transfer.

    First of all, you must have bluetooth always on and your device available to all, which is really bad idea considering that it eats your battery much faster. Battery life of the series 60 devices is pretty small as is. Having bluetooth on is sure way to kill it further.

    Second, you will have to go through few steps of actually INSTALLING unsigned application. This is VERY intrusive.

    Third, this thing does not auto startup. So, when your device is drained off battery, it won't run by itself as far as I can see.

    All in all, very poor attempt to create a malware for Series 60. I am sure you can get much higher propagation by installing an autoexec worm inside of S60 warez releases.

    Other avenue to look into is malformed MMS message that does buffer overrun and allows to execute arbitrary code. Now this would be a real baddy because you will be infected as soon as you open a message.

    Nice try, but no cake.

    --
    -- shortcut - the longest distance between two points.
    1. Re:what does it prove? by De+Lemming · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good points, but...

      Third, this thing does not auto startup. So, when your device is drained off battery, it won't run by itself as far as I can see.

      From the report: "[...] then copy itself to a directory that is not visible by default. The worm runs from this directory whenever the phone is rebooted."

  30. Engineering practice by earthforce_1 · · Score: 4, Insightful


    It has to be assumed that any system open to the general public, can be expected to come under hostile attack from hackers/spammers/criminals/terrorists. All hardware and software deployed in the field needs to be examined carefully for this. It is even more critical when you have a "monoculture" of HW/SW, since one exploit compromises the whole system.

    History has shown time and time again, hackers will expend a great deal of effort to compromise any accessible system even if just for the heck of it.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  31. DNS problems by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Informative

    It may be related to this morning's Akamai DNS problems. Many large sites aren't easily accessible at the moment.

  32. Fake simplicity -- lockout by telco and vendors by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a T730 with Verizon and the phone isn't KISS at all, it's pretty complicated, capable of downloading and running software.

    What bothers me is the *fake* simplicity and lockout. Why can't I just hook this phone to my PC with the USB cable and access the filesystem, transfering programs, ringtones, images and so on to the phone? With the phone software I can get some address book sync (it's such a shitty package, I regret buying it).

    Of course, I know it's all about Verizon making money off of downloads, but its such bullshit selling a "closed" device with fake simplicity. Yes, I know I can get warez copies of Moto phone tools, but how much harder would it be to make the phone show up as a USB storage device? The addressbook as a CSV file? A directory each for tones and images?

  33. Blog Worm by darkain · · Score: 2, Informative

    we think we may have the very first blog worm this past weekend as well. after reports of a potential security exploit in LiveJournal, a small team went to work to create a "proof of concept" self-replicating javascript code designed specifically to post itself in a viewers journal.

    More information can be found here

    a basic example of self-generating javascript code can be found here

  34. Re:Yes, but how long until there is a dialer? Or.. by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    just code it like, right now.
    it's possible.

    however, for better results don't use bluetooth as the medium it transmits itself.. this now published 'worm'/trojan needs USER INTERACTION for it to spread so it is NOT REALLY EFFECTIVE. it's just shitload of hot air by some antivir companies at this point.

    however, for faster spreading to idiots just put the virus online with names like "porno-game.sis" "latest-ngage-warez.sis" and alike. some suckers will download it anyways.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  35. next generation worm by Errtu76 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Modern phones have infrared, right? So what if you combine the worm with this idea? >:)

  36. Proof of Concept? by SoopahMan · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From the Symantec site:

    EPOC.Cabir is a proof-of-concept worm that replicates on Nokia Series 60 phones.

    Uh, talk about coding your way to job security?
  37. hahahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    My cell is so old, it still has a monochromatic lcd screen.

    Keep on adding gadgets, whistles, and bells onto your pda/cellphone/sattelite phone/pager/mp3 player/tooth brush/microwave oven. I'll be over here with my "archaic" cell phone, bulletproof and grinning.

    "Aye sir, the more they overtake the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain."
    -- Scotty, Star Trek III

  38. Well so much for my success! by AviLazar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dammit, and I was just starting to get the hang of Toothing

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  39. Dialer by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This brings up an interesting question. Lets say it had been a dialer. Lets say it racks up a large amount of charges on your bill while draining your minutes. Would the cell phone companies refund your money/minutes? Would you have to do it through the credit card company by doing a chargeback?

    What legal recourse would there be?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  40. mimicking real life by hexstatik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i find this virus very interesting in that there is a need for physical proximity in order for the virus to propagate, similar to real-world viruses. in the future, will these type of virus infections be limited to certain geographical areas depending on the initial "ignition" point, or will the infection vectors be more like real-life virus outbreaks? (imaging starting an infection a new york subway versus smalltown, usa)

  41. Proof of Concept == NOT in the wild by ericspinder · · Score: 3, Informative
    # Number of infections: 0 - 49
    # Number of sites: 0 - 2
    # Geographical distribution: Low
    # Threat containment: Easy
    # Removal: Moderate
    Yes, proof of concepts are usually converted to full blown viruses/worms/trojans pretty quickly, but I see a number of mitigating factors for this kind of attack:
    • Bluetooth has a 30 ft range.
    • by shorting battery life users will be less likely to carry it to remote systems (a dead phone cannot transmit it).
    • Bluetooth connections must be accepted.
    • The file also must be accepted.
    It is very similar to a virus being spread by email attachments. Most likely the only fix for this would be a stronger warning on the phone when a file is being passed from a Bluetooth connection.
    --
    The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
  42. Not only Nokia series 60 are affected... by capmilk · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...but also other Symbain OS phones like Sony Ericsson P800/P900 and Motorola a920/a925.

  43. Re:Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    if their competitor's OS was plagued with viruses and not theirs

    yes but on a historical basis/precedent, it's not very likely, is it? :-)

  44. Telephone Virus? by 0zymandias · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps we should not have sent away all the telephone sanitizers.

    --
    "Danke daß Du mich gemolken hast" said the German cow.
  45. More info: by EvilCowzGoMoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is my original attempt to post this story, it got rejected, but now that someone else brought it up, I will post my version. Primarily because there are some cool links in it that should be seen:

    Yesterday InfoWorld reported a new first for viruses. Believed to be the work of international group 29a, Cabir is the first worm to infect mobile phones! Cabir is a proof of concept worm infecting Symbian mobile phone operating system by Symbian Ltd, used by Nokia. Cabir does not include a malicious payload.

  46. Re:Killer App by Sven+Tuerpe · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'd say the risks outweigh the gains here.

    Don't get me wrong, being a security researcher I fully agree with the proposal to have devices that are secure out of the box. However, I doubt those devices could gain any market share against devices that are fun out of the box before any major disaster occured. Security, as well as vulnerability, tends to be invisible unless it gets in your way. The majority of the users of cellphones has no idea how vulnerable their devices are, and how it might affect them. What they are aware of are all the funny new features in their next-generation phone that shouldn't be there at all from a security point of view. In such a market, I guess, we will achieve security only after disaster.

    --
    http://erichsieht.wordpress.com/category/english/
  47. Not the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I seem to recall that there was a rash of mobile malware in japan a couple years ago. Here's just one I found on a quick search on /.

  48. Only if the phone is running Windows. by NumbThumb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    no, seriously: if the phone is running WinCE, a VBS-Based Worm would have no problems moving from phones to computers and back. The platform-barrier would be gone.

    The same could be said about java-based phones, but i doubt a java-worm ould be very successful, because of the low-level security build into the VM.

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this 120 chars is too small to contain.
  49. Big potential for disaster. by gnarled · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What happens when the newest worm automatically dials 911. The system would be absolutely swamped, cops would be running around because when someone dials 911 and hangs up they still have to call, many people that actually had an emergency would never get through. It would be a serious disaster.

    --
    I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal, Clerks
  50. network attacks by neoThoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    could come from cell phones now. Or worse, your phone may start innocently distributing spam! Most of the blue tooth enabled phones have data services. I think a funnier worm would randomly dial people in your phonebook effectively letting friends and loved ones hear you bad mouth them.