Slashdot Mirror


Theora I Bistream Format Frozen

p80 writes "The Xiph foundation announced today that the 'Theora I bistream format is now frozen,' even though Beta 1 is not out yet and encourage people to try it as 'there's no reason to delay adopting a free alternative any more!' Mplayer and Xine both support Theora. For Windows users, Directshow filters for Ogg Vorbis, Speex, Theora and FLAC are available here. You can get test cases here and transcode Quicktime movies to theora on that page." This freeze, as an anonymous reader puts it, "means that all future versions will support the format as it is now. It will be interesting to see if there is as much uptake for this as there was for the Vorbis sound format."

329 comments

  1. Ogg isn't a format by p24t · · Score: 1, Informative

    the format for audio is Vorbis. Ogg is just the name of everything, like Ogg Theora

    1. Re:Ogg isn't a format by Tranzig · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ogg is a format. Vorbis is the name of the audio codec, and Theora is the name of the video codec. Ogg is the container, just like avi.

  2. Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by markv242 · · Score: 5, Funny
    "It will be interesting to see if there is as much uptake for this as there was for the Ogg sound format"
    You mean, almost no uptake at all outside of the Linux community?
    1. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by cowbud · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, I agree with you also. Especially since Microsoft will not allow the codec to be included in installs ever. However, there is still some acceptance take for example UT2004. All the music score is done in ogg vorbis now that is cool! If only all hardware players could play it.

    2. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Alan · · Score: 1

      That's why the Rio Karma 20G mp3 player supports OGG and FLAC as well as mp3 and wma right?

    3. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      that's why the crappy finnish music store uses ogg (vorbis in vorbis, i believe)?

      (It's dumped under a LOT of drm crap though, only their crappy player & etc)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's why the crappy finnish music store uses ogg (vorbis in vorbis, i believe)?

      We have a music store which sells music in ogg format here?

      ps. go to sleep it's 2:30

    5. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or rather, almost no uptake outside and very little inside of the Linux community... I see a lot of people talking about it, wishing for stuff and so on, but very few that actually use it even inside of said community.

      And oh, whoever moderated the parent funny, that should have been "Insightful". =)

    6. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      That is actually awesome, but in a way I'm sad that they don't use mod music in Unreal anymore. That was like, mod music's last stand. Or something. :-/

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    7. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      *We have a music store which sells music in ogg format here?*

      biisi.fi's songs are oggs.. buried in crap drm so it doesn't make much of a difference except that they sound pretty good.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up.

    9. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      One thing I noticed, in the PC version of Microsoft's Halo, in the base install directory there is

      ogg.dll

      vorbis.dll

      vorbisfile.dll and

      xiph_license.txt
      So even MS seems to be using vorbis.
      (Note: my version of Halo is a warez version and someone may have just included those files themselves)

    10. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, the reason Microsoft includes codecs for download on their site is that the codec producer paid them to do so. They're not giving away bandwidth just because it's cool.

      If you want to get DivX, Theora, Ogg or WHATEVER in WMP, you'd have to pay the same price Intel does. It's not impossible, and if it's important to the community to do so, have a project manager get in touch with Microsoft and we'll start a collection.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    11. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Can tracked music support some of the more expressive things that can be done with an instrument, such as muting a trumpet with a slightly randomized LFO? Can it efficiently support vocal trackss?

    12. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Not really, no. But if it could, the cool factor would only increase. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    13. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Auriam · · Score: 1
      Hey, the Modarchive is still standing.. and I've been using it since I was in high school back in the mid-90s.. as it says on the site:

      "Now featuring over 11.69GB in more than 29851 compressed music files. There's a lot of good stuff on there, too. Mods will always be around; they're more flexible and extensible than MIDI, and less CPU-intensive and time-consuming to edit than wavefiles or MP3s.

    14. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, one reason I love them is you can play them on a GameBoy Advance if you have a flashcart. Portable music which doesn't take up a massive amount of space like MP3 still does. Although with MP3 I could just fit a whole album at low quality on my GBA. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    15. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, I converted all 3,000 of my mp3s to ogg sometime in 2003.

      Don't bother replying about the degradation in quality; I didn't notice it, and I prefer the oggs anyway for other reasons.

    16. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by EpsCylonB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recently ripped all my cd's and used vorbis instead of mp3. Admitedly the vast majority of my digital music collection is still mp3 but I think it is inaccuarate to say that no one is using vorbis.

    17. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What a load of rubbish. I switched to Ogg years ago, and I know I'm not the only one. Almost all rippers E.g gRip default to Ogg output and even the venerable cdrtools includes cdda2ogg. I'd personally say it's easier to rip to Ogg than it is MP3 these days.

    18. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, do you want to avoid using an MP3 decoder to avoid possible patent entaglement? I know there are issues with encoding, but I didn't think anyone was concerned about decoding with mpg123/XMMS.

    19. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's the tags. id3 is terrible, ogg's metadata got it right.

    20. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      I wonder how hard it would be to just put existing MP3 streams into Oggs to avoid transcoding.

  3. Fighting a losing battle by The_reformant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I realise that free (as in speech) sound and video formats are a good thing but it seems that certain formats, particularly mp3 are now more or less ubiqoutous (sp??). I mean how many people pick up their 128meg solid state ogg player in the morning??

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    1. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >ubiqoutous (sp??)

      you're connected to one of the largest repositories of human knowledge ever created and you're unable to correctly spell a word?

    2. Re:Fighting a losing battle by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      The sad fact is Im too lazy not unable.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    3. Re:Fighting a losing battle by forkazoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The fact that you don't start the battle as a winner is no reason not to fight it.

      Many people create their own content. I consider it much more entertaining than just being a consumer of content, even if my content isn't as flashy as the Matrix or Britney Spears. Because of this, the ability to have free tools to work with is a big deal. I don't care if we never see a movieflix.com movie download site from the MPAA with exclusively Theora content. That isn't the point.

      As long as I have access to tools that aren't encumbered by patents, and I can do whatever the fuck I want with them. As long as Fraunhoffer or MS controls things, it means I can't be certain about what happens to my content tomarrow.

      Oh, and the guys who are interested in video compression have an interesting toy to hack. That's one step geekier than I currently am, but guys decided to make something cool, and they have done it. Isn't that enough? Why does it have to be a battle. Minix wasn't a battle. Fighting wasn't why it was written. But, because it was more open, and assorted Fins could gain access to the source code to see how things worked, they were able to make some sort of Leenoooks clone with help from the tooth fairy. It doesn't matter than minix didn't win!

    4. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Tranzig · · Score: 1

      Here you can find an article about iPod vs Ogg Vorbis.

    5. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Because of this, the ability to have free tools to work with is a big deal.

      QuickTime is already free. Anybody who wants to can use it to create their media, using any number of high-quality industry-standard codecs.

      Whatsa problem again?

      As long as I have access to tools that aren't encumbered by patents, and I can do whatever the fuck I want with them. As long as Fraunhoffer or MS controls things, it means I can't be certain about what happens to my content tomarrow.

      Yeah... except no. You've got the encoder. You've got the decoder. You're safe, I swear.

      Fucking idiot.

      --

      I write in my journal
    6. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I just ripped a few favorite CD's to .ogg(vorbis) with Grip (very easy, totally Free), and my wife is going to pick up her 256MB solid state ogg player in the morning to listen to them.

      Why are some people so negative?

    7. Re:Fighting a losing battle by node+3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I mean how many people pick up their 128meg solid state ogg player in the morning??

      More than there would have been had the ogg/vorbis/theora folks decided the task was just too daunting and given up.

      Changing the world for the better happens a little at a time.

    8. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Spaceman40 · · Score: 1

      I do: Neuros all the way, man - the $250 I spent on it could have bought me a stinkin 4 GB iPod, but instead, I have 20 GB of Vorbis awesomeness.

      --
      I [may] disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
    9. Re:Fighting a losing battle by BRSloth · · Score: 5, Funny

      you're connected to one of the largest repositories of human knowledge ever created

      This is Slashdot. You must be new here.

      Oh, you mean the internet! Yeah, there is knowledge there...

    10. Re:Fighting a losing battle by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      youve forgotten how annoying having x-billion formats is though. I hate having to codec hunt to find everything..why not standardize?

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    11. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Talez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Especially when the Vorbis download page for Windows doesn't have a link to the damn (unofficial) Directshow codec on it.

      Hint to the Vorbis guys: People are more likely to adopt a format when they don't have to change their media player. Start giving people easy links to useful binaries god dammit.

      Hell. If I was a webmaster for Vorbis there would be a big "DOWNLOAD FOR WINDOWS" button on the front page which is linked to a Directshow codec.

    12. Re:Fighting a losing battle by sploo22 · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked, the Sorenson video codec was patented. Sure, the software won't evaporate overnight, but what do you do if Apple starts charging 10% royalties on everything you create?

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    13. Re:Fighting a losing battle by The_reformant · · Score: 3, Interesting

      meh, im tired of these..ive got such and such which plays ogg. Your missing the point. Most people dont know what the hell ogg is.

      Your "Ogg player" is described thusly on the product webpage :- "The first MP3 digital audio computer built to manage, broadcast, and expand your digital music world. With Neuros, your digital music experience keeps evolving"

      Why? Because only a hand full of people use ogg, its part of the mental snobbery and one upmanship that is ridiculously prevalent in this so called "Community". Why dont you guys quite being such dorks and join the real world? When you hand over that wicked track on cdr to your mate down the pub theyre not gonna think "Wow! this guys smart, he's using a free (as in speech) audio format, what a swell guy!" Rather theyre gonna think, "oh crap i hate it when that guy whinges on about that younixks thingy i'll just smile and bin the cdr without bothering to find out how to play it"

      Wow that was a long rant!

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    14. Re:Fighting a losing battle by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 15, @04:10PM (#943628)

      you're connected to one of the largest repositories of human knowledge ever created and you're unable to correctly spell a word?"


      I wouldn't take that from somebody who doesn't even know how to register a nickname.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    15. Re:Fighting a losing battle by The_reformant · · Score: 4, Funny

      No you fool!!! they can succeed just on free operating systems. And only people clever enough to compile from the source are allowed to use it anyway. Oh yeah and windows media player sucks so anyone which uses that isnt allowed to have it either.

      In fact me and my friend keith are just going to keep it for ourselves. Keith had a girlfriend once

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    16. Re:Fighting a losing battle by zurab · · Score: 5, Informative
      I realise that free (as in speech) sound and video formats are a good thing but it seems that certain formats, particularly mp3 are now more or less ubiqoutous (sp??).

      I'm not sure that's the case with video. As far as products (not technologies), there's Quicktime/Sorenson and WMV which definitely are not ubiquitous; both are proprietary and somewhat expensive to license. Then there's MPEG-4 which is even more absurd at licensing. Real's format does not really fall into the same category. If anything was "ubiquitous" I would say MPEG-2, but that does not count in the same category either as it does not serve the same purpose as MPEG-4 (MPEG-2 is nearly useless at low bitrates).

      Yes, there are free divx/xvid implementations but those are useless in commercial offerings as they are not properly licensed. So as late as Theora would be getting to the market, IMO, the field is still wide open. Not only has the consumer market not been saturated with any single low bitrate high quality video compression technology, but video "sharing" itself has not reached a maturity level of audio streams when Vorbis first beta was released and standard frozen.
    17. Re:Fighting a losing battle by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      Sure, the QuickTime container format is free. But, seriously, are you going to use 'Video' for all your content? How About Planar RGB? Those codecs aren't very good, frankly. Sorenson certainly isn't free. And, so what if I've got the decoder. What about the guy using BeOS? Yeah, that guy... Okay, maybe that's a bit of a Chewbacca defense. But, still, using something like WMV just gives me the willies. Without having a Free standard, MS can ultimately declare WMV dead, and stop shipping decoders with Windows. Sure, it is unlikely, but it has basically happened with RealVideo formats. Nobody uses Real anymore, and the player isn't worth the bother, so the existing content in the format is as dead as VAX tapes or Video Disc.

      With Theora being an open format some guy will eventually write a video editor in PHP, and then we shall have nirvana, for we will know it can never die.

    18. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I wouldn't take that from somebody who doesn't even know how to register a nickname.

      I have a registered nickname; my ID is half of yours. I don't browse /. logged in and ofttimes don't feel like logging in to post.

    19. Re:Fighting a losing battle by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "I have a registered nickname; my ID is half of yours."

      Suuuuuuuuure.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    20. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Mister+Black · · Score: 1

      >>"I have a registered nickname; my ID is half of yours."
      >Suuuuuuuuure.

      Happy?

      --

      You are standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door. There is a small mailbox here.
    21. Re:Fighting a losing battle by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Happy? Heh, well I was just teasing. :)

      I'm sorry, I wasn't trying to be that annoying.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    22. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my fault, the humor and sarcasm wasn't coming through for me

    23. Re:Fighting a losing battle by randyest · · Score: 1

      Hey "Defunkt" (wink wink!) -- it's been a while since I heard from you! How's that new uber-low /.-id treating you? Listen, I emailed you about the problem with your paypal transfer, but I haven't heard back from you. We really need to talk. Email me or I'll have to give you bad feedback on ebay. You wouldn't want that, so I'm sure you'll get in touch :)

      You know, it's funny; I thought I'd miss the "prestige" of the low-id, but no one seems to give a shit. Go figure.

      --
      everything in moderation
    24. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, the Sorenson video codec was patented.

      So? Last time I checked, a vendor can't go back and retroactively charge fees for the use of something that's already been used.

      You're trying to make it sound like patent-holders are (1) evil and (2) all-powerful. You're not fooling anybody.

      --

      I write in my journal
    25. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Sorenson certainly isn't free.

      No, it costs $29.95.

      What about the guy using BeOS?

      You're joking, right?

      Without having a Free standard, MS can ultimately declare WMV dead

      There you go. Don't bother constructing a valid or persusive argument. Just bail out of the whole discussion with a "MS SUCKS!" Good job.

      Nobody uses Real anymore

      Tons of people use Real. The BBC, NPR, and C-SPAN all use Real.

      the existing content in the format is as dead as VAX tapes or Video Disc

      I keep a Real stream of C-SPAN open on my desktop pretty much all the time.

      With Theora being an open format some guy will eventually write a video editor in PHP

      Yes, we've seen how well that's worked for OGG.

      --

      I write in my journal
    26. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      both are proprietary and somewhat expensive to license

      Bullshit.

      Wanna create Sorenson 3 content? It's $29.95 for QuickTime Pro. Wanna stream it? Darwin Streaming Server runs on OS X, Solaris, Red Hat 9, and Windows Server, and it's free. Free to download, free to run, and free of per-stream license fees. Oh, it's also open source.

      Honest to god, I don't know where these bullshit rumors get started. Sorenson 3 is NOT expensive. Neither is MPEG-4. Neither are any of the other QuickTime codecs. You can encode for nothing or for $29.95 depending on the codec, and you can stream them FOR FREE.

      --

      I write in my journal
    27. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you miss the .gif mess?

    28. Re:Fighting a losing battle by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Excellent post Twirlip of the Mists!

      I will never understand the mentality that figures it is better off using a halfassed product offered for free by amateurs with no support TODAY than using a full featured product offered for free from a multi million dollar software company that's been around for thirty years but MIGHT not be here in another ten.

      I mean, why deal with SHITTY NOW when something that is good MIGHT be SHITTY LATER? Do you go to a restaurant and ask for a raw steak because, if you cooked it, it might go bad in a few weeks, and with the raw steak YOU can be sure that it's kept properly refrigerated and you can cook it exactly how you like? I'm sorry, but I'm not that good a chef. I like my software well done.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    29. Re:Fighting a losing battle by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      I am reminded of a demotivational slogan. "It is true that winners never quit, and that quitters never win. But he who never quit and never wins is an idiot."

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    30. Re:Fighting a losing battle by flacco · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Fucking idiot.

      short-sighted moron.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    31. Re:Fighting a losing battle by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Not a bad post, but try to tone up the sarcasm a little. You were a little too realistic for my comfort...the girlfriend poke was a nice touch, but realize that if Keith was any kind of geek, he would have asked her to marry him the same week he met her so they could "do" it.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    32. Re:Fighting a losing battle by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      What about the guy using BeOS?

      You're joking, right?


      Well, mostly. I mean, there is still the one guy, but he isn't gonna watch the movie, anyway.



      Nobody uses Real anymore

      Tons of people use Real. The BBC, NPR, and C-SPAN all use Real.



      Well, that's rather my point. Tons of Real content is available, but a lot of people hate the player enough not to watch it. I mean, I dig Sarah Vowell as much as the next guy. Actually, I'm completely infatuated with her. She is, in fact, the hottest woman on radio. (She's on NPR, for those who haven't heard This American Life). Even so, I haven't bothered to install RealPlayer on any of my boxes. It's a damned hassle.

    33. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Xenophobe · · Score: 1

      Um, you do realize that MP3 began being used in 1995, but Fraunhofer waited until September 1998 to contact MP3 software developers to tell them they need a license, right?

      Wikipedia entry for MP3

      Here are the relevant sections:

      From the "History" section:
      Beginning in the first half of 1995, MP3 files, file representations of MPEG-1 Audio Layer III data, began flourishing on the Internet. Its popularity created such companies and software packages as Nullsoft's Winamp, mpg123 and the now Roxio-owned Napster.

      From the "Licensing and patent issues" section:
      In September 1998, the Fraunhofer Institute sent a letter to several developers of MP3 software stating that a license was required to "distribute and/or sell decoders and/or encoders". The letter claimed that unlicensed products "infringe the patent rights of Fraunhofer and THOMSON. To make, sell and/or distribute products using the [MPEG Layer-3] standard and thus our patents, you need to obtain a license under these patents from us."

    34. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Um, you do realize that MP3 began being used in 1995, but Fraunhofer waited until September 1998 to contact MP3 software developers to tell them they need a license, right?

      Yes, and it's a damn shame they did, because now there are no free MP3 encoders or players out there. What a tragic loss.

      Oh, wait.

      Dial the hysteria back to a 7 or 8, please. Running around with your spazostat set to 11 isn't helping anybody.

      --

      I write in my journal
    35. Re:Fighting a losing battle by steveha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah... except no. You've got the encoder. You've got the decoder. You're safe, I swear.

      If all else were equal, why not use the tool that isn't patent-encumbered?

      And... just as AMD forced Intel to stop charging too much for CPUs, Ogg keeps Frauhofer from getting too greedy with MP3. Even if not that many people use Ogg, it's still keeping us safe.

      And... imagine someone puts together a whole collection of stuff on the web in a patent-encumbered format such as MP3. The patent owners can literally tell that person "we control the patent, so you have to pay us or take your site down." Free formats mean no one can tell you what to do with your own stuff.

      No one is seriously suggesting that jackbooted thugs will kick in your door and erase your QuickTime files from your hard disk. But that doesn't mean that there is no benefit to a free format.

      And finally, Linux distributions such as Debian, who are really careful about IP, are free to include all Ogg players, encoders, and utilities. They can't include IP-encumbered stuff. I love being able to burn and give away CDs (such as Gnoppix) that can do all sorts of cool stuff, but are still legal for me to give away. I'm sure you are comfortable with restricting yourself to whatever tools get approved by the owners of the various patents, or whatever tools you personally pay for, but there is no need to be rude to those of us who are interested in the freedom aspects of free software.

      Fucking idiot.

      Rude troll.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    36. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      If all else were equal, why not use the tool that isn't patent-encumbered?

      All else is not equal. All else has never been equal, and there's no sign that all else will be equal any time soon.

      OGG isn't as good as AAC. I don't know about this new thing, but I find it hard to believe that it's as good as MPEG-4 at high bit rates or Sorenson at low bit rates.

      But that's not the big deal. The big deal is the tool set. It's a pain in the ass to use a nonstandard codec, so why bother?

      And... just as AMD forced Intel to stop charging too much for CPUs, Ogg keeps Frauhofer from getting too greedy with MP3.

      Dumbass. Fraunhofer's own business plan keeps them from "getting too greedy." Besides, the very fact that you'd consider a company's pursuit of profit through licensing of patented technology to be "getting too greedy" makes me laugh at you derisively. Ha-ha.

      And... imagine someone puts together a whole collection of stuff on the web in a patent-encumbered format such as MP3. The patent owners can literally tell that person "we control the patent, so you have to pay us or take your site down."

      No, they cannot. There's absolutely no interpretation of patent law that would result in that interpretation. Which makes sense, given that your ignorance of patent law is matched only by your paranoia.

      And finally, Linux distributions such as Debian, who are really careful about IP...

      are irrelevant to any serious discussion. We're talking about the real world here, not the lunatic fringe.

      Rude troll.

      Blow me.

      --

      I write in my journal
    37. Re:Fighting a losing battle by tepples · · Score: 1

      Many people create their own content. I consider it much more entertaining than just being a consumer of content

      You seem to imply through context that you create your own sound recordings. From whom do you license the underlying musical works? If you claim to write your own songs, how do you ensure that your songs are in fact original?

      I would write music, but I don't feel very safe without some sort of contingency plan should some songwriter I've never heard of take me to court, claiming that a song that I wrote is "strikingly similar" to some song I don't remember having heard. Heck, it could even happen by accident.

    38. Re:Fighting a losing battle by zurab · · Score: 1
      Wanna create Sorenson 3 content? It's $29.95 for QuickTime Pro. ...
      Honest to god, I don't know where these bullshit rumors get started. Sorenson 3 is NOT expensive.

      This is not a bullshit rumor - read the discussion thread more carefully. If video creation and sharing is to become popular, then yes - that price is expensive. By this I mean the price will prevent the format from becoming "ubiquitous" as I was discussing in my parent reply. It's almost like the tools themselves have to be free or very close to it to really catch on - like MP3 licensing was (and still is) virtually ignored.

      Imagine, if every MP3 encoder cost that much few years ago, MP3 would not have been a format of choice for many. Unless, of course, groups of developers create free unlicensed sorenson encoders and Apple and Sorenson choose not to pursue anything legally about it. But I don't think either is likely to happen.

      Again, and as I said before, the market for video messaging or sharing or streaming has not reached the level of maturity that audio counterparts have - so all this is up in the air as far as which way not only the technology, but also its uses, will go.

      Neither is MPEG-4.

      Quote from the MPEG-LA licensing Q&A page:

      Q: What are the royalties for the MPEG-4 Systems Patent Portfolio License (excluding those patents that are essential to the MPEG-J portion of the MPEG-4 Systems standard)?

      A: For the right to manufacture, sell and use, one-time royalties to be paid by the manufacturer are US $0.15 per decoder and US $0.25 per encoder (except Stored Data encoders), but (a) only one royalty is payable on a single decoder product or a single encoder product that is licensed across one or more business categories and (b) decoders and encoders are each subject to a total annual cap of $100,000 per legal entity (Sections 3.1.1 - 3.1.9 and 3.3)

      For the right to make, sell and use Stored Data encoders, royalties to be paid by the encoder or transmitter are (a) $0.001 per 30 minutes or part to a maximum of $0.004 per movie for each copy; (b) $0.0005 per 30 minutes or part thereof to a maximum of $0.002 per movie for each copy where the content of the Stored Video is 5 years or older, and (c) $0.0002 for each copy of Stored Video that is 12 minutes or less (Section 3.1.10).


      Granted, this most likely refers to streaming content and movies, but they do charge royalties per content you make and its length. This is what I was referring to as being "absurd" in the original reply.
    39. Re:Fighting a losing battle by steveha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OGG isn't as good as AAC.

      Actually, they are close enough that this is arguable. In any event, Ogg passes the "Good Enough" test. So does AAC, of course.

      I don't know about this new thing, but I find it hard to believe that it's as good as MPEG-4 at high bit rates or Sorenson at low bit rates.

      It's my understanding that Theora isn't as good as MPEG4 at equivalent bit rates. Not sure about Sorenson. Theora should actually be better than MPEG2, and for many applications MPEG2 passes the "Good Enough" test.

      Of course, over time, as people come up with clever tricks, the encoders get better. It happened with MPEG and MPEG2, and Theora still has plenty of room to improve.

      But if Theora isn't suitable for your application, you can always license MPEG4 or Sorenson or something. I'm certainly not saying that Theora is the all-purpose answer to everything.

      It's a pain in the ass to use a nonstandard codec, so why bother?

      Actually, because I am a Debian user, it's more of a pain for me to use IP-encumbered tools. So why should I bother?

      And I'm not asking you to use Theora. I'm just telling you that you shouldn't say abusive rude things about the folks who are interested in it.

      Fraunhofer's own business plan keeps them from "getting too greedy."

      Can you count on that? How do you know that pointy-haired idiots won't make dumb decisions? It would be dumb to pick several of your customers and sue them, and drive away all possible future customers, but SCO did that.

      Besides, the very fact that you'd consider a company's pursuit of profit through licensing of patented technology to be "getting too greedy" makes me laugh at you derisively. Ha-ha.

      Go back and read what I wrote. I haven't argued that patent holders shouldn't be allowed to charge royalties; I pointed out that if you don't use IP-encumbered formats, no one can force you to pay royalties.

      There's absolutely no interpretation of patent law that would result in that interpretation.

      Um... how about the ability of patent owners to decide under what terms, and for what fees, they license the patent? If you are using patented technology, you have to comply with the terms of your patent license, don't you?

      They can't tell you "AND by the way you also owe us big royalties for last year." They can't change the deal retroactively. But as long as they own the patent, they could set a license fee and license terms that you would need to honor in the future, unless you have some sort of signed agreement with them that took precedence.

      Frauhofer let everyone use MP3 for free for a few years, then changed the deal and started charging. Are you saying that could never happen again?

      [free software distributions like Debian...] are irrelevant to any serious discussion. We're talking about the real world here, not the lunatic fringe.

      You really are a rude troll. No doubt you are laughing at me for taking the time to talk to you. Well, I won't make that mistake anymore.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    40. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very free, right... You pay for it when you buy your wunderdoll^H^H^H^Hmac.

    41. Re:Fighting a losing battle by runderwo · · Score: 1
      Fraunhofer's own business plan keeps them from "getting too greedy." Besides, the very fact that you'd consider a company's pursuit of profit through licensing of patented technology to be "getting too greedy" makes me laugh at you derisively. Ha-ha.
      I'd have to conjecture that he meant it in the sense that Vorbis provides competition to MP3 to keep Fraunhofer on its toes and innovating if it expects to reap profits from MP3 licensing, as opposed to the "GREEDY EV1L CAPALITISM!!!@@" interpretation.

    42. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OGG isn't as good as AAC

      well you are right. it isn't as good. it is better
      and i would not doubt about the second one either, that much. but there should be yet tests to prove that. so hold on.
      /cheers ;-)

    43. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Sunnan · · Score: 1

      Would you please provide links to free (as in -dom) high-quality industry-standard encoders for QuickTime?

    44. Re:Fighting a losing battle by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 1

      More to the point, I could jut tell him to use Winamp. It's been supporting ogg for a good while now. So your example stinks. Not to say that if a guy would treat me like a leper as you suggest I would most certainly not call him my friend. And since when is a codec so important? I use what I use, you use what you want, if you borrow me something and I can't play it i'll ask you for the codec too. Damn, is it really such a big deal?

    45. Re:Fighting a losing battle by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      We are standardizing. Theora is the new standard.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    46. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tons of Real content is available, but a lot of people hate the player enough not to watch it.

      Only those who are ignorant, stupid or hysterical. Which is why we hear so much about the "evil" Real Player on Slashdot.

    47. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      By this I mean the price will prevent the format from becoming "ubiquitous" as I was discussing in my parent reply.

      Those formats are already ubiquitous. They're everywhere.

      Granted, this most likely refers to streaming content and movies, but they do charge royalties per content you make and its length.

      You're misreading. Go download Darwin Streaming Server and start streaming MPEG-4 content for free, and see how wrong you are.

      --

      I write in my journal
    48. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are close enough that this is arguable.

      Nope.

      But if Theora isn't suitable for your application, you can always license MPEG4 or Sorenson or something.

      There are no licensing fees to decode either of those formats. They're free, bundled with QuickTime. And the licensing fee to encode is $29.95 per seat, unlimited, no per-clip costs.

      Actually, because I am a Debian user...

      You don't count then. Again: actual mainstream users, not the lunatic fringe.

      Can you count on that?

      Yes. That's how economics works. Dumbass.

      Um... how about the ability of patent owners to decide under what terms, and for what fees, they license the patent?

      Retroactively? Wrong, dumbass.

      Frauhofer let everyone use MP3 for free for a few years, then changed the deal and started charging.

      No, they didn't. Their MP3 encoder is still available for free to anybody who wants it, via QuickTime.

      You really are a rude troll.

      Attention shit-for-brains: "troll" does not mean "person who disagrees with you." If you've got nothing to add other than conspiracy theories and name-calling, kindly fuck off.

      --

      I write in my journal
    49. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Happily, my dear friend.

      (Sorry, I think you made a typo in your post. You wrote "(as in -dom)" and that doesn't make any sense.)

      --

      I write in my journal
    50. Re:Fighting a losing battle by MuMart · · Score: 1
      ubiqoutous (sp??)

      Yes.

    51. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Free as in freedom. I don't think apple counts. Play again

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    52. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Where can I get Quick time Pro for my Linux box? Thanks in advance for the link

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    53. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Sunnan · · Score: 1

      Thank you, but as you may have inferred from the sibling post, I meant something a bit less restricted. At the very least, source code and redistribution rights.

    54. Re:Fighting a losing battle by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      I'm shamefully uninformed (RTFA? What?), but I'm guessing Vorbis is to Theora as mp3 is to MPEG. What will be interesting to see is if Theora adoption will drive Vorbis adoption.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    55. Re:Fighting a losing battle by steveha · · Score: 1

      Retroactively?

      Are you actually stupid, or just pretending to be to troll me better? I wrote "They can't change the deal retroactively", and you want to know whether I mean they can change the deal retroactively?

      Their MP3 encoder is still available for free to anybody who wants it, via QuickTime.

      Are you actually this clueless, or just pretending to be to troll me better? Apple cut a deal that lets them distribute as part of their software, and users don't have to pay for many purposes. Frauhofer still owns the patent, and still charges under some circumstances. For example: set up a web site that sells music, and if you make any decent money at all, you will have to pay additional money straight to Frauhofer for use of their patent. I know that MPEG4 also has license provisions that kick in when you make enough money. Not sure about Sorenson.

      Of course you could use Ogg, and pay nothing to anyone, but I've heard that only the lunatic fringe does that.

      "troll" does not mean "person who disagrees with you."

      So, you aren't just saying all these things to watch people waste their time by responding to you? You really are this rude and abrasive?

      Okay, you aren't a rude troll. You're just rude. My mistake.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    56. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's rather my point. Tons of Real content is available, but a lot of people hate the player enough not to watch it.

      Twirlip uses a Mac, that's why he doesn't mind Real. Mac Real is not bad at all.

    57. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so you want one that sucks and doesn't come with support?

    58. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Jonner · · Score: 1

      You really shouldn't waste any more time responding, since Twirlip clearly is not interested in a reasonable discussion. You've been extremely patient and well-resoned (especially for Slashdot). By the way, I use Gentoo, which may be less lunatic fringe these days than Debian, but I used to use Debian and I may again in the future.

    59. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Jonner · · Score: 1

      I meant to write "well-reasoned."

    60. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      No problem. First go here, and then go here. Sorry it's a two-step process, but that's the price you pay for starting out so far behind the curve.

      --

      I write in my journal
    61. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are close enough that this is arguable.

      Nope.

      You are right ogg vorbis is the better one: Result of double-blind listening test.

      On second though: You are just full of shit, and properbly dont know it.

    62. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      The best, most rigorous listening test in the world results in the conclusion that the results are within the margin of error.

      The tie-breaker is the fact that AAC is available and supported, while OGG is not.

      AAC is superior.

      --

      I write in my journal
    63. Re:Fighting a losing battle by zurab · · Score: 1
      Those formats are already ubiquitous. They're everywhere.

      Nope, they are not. In fact, it's safe to say that most people do not encode video on a PC. Compare this to audio market with CD mixes and portable players - you see the difference. The video market is not as mature.

      You're misreading.

      No, I am not. You are not reading or not understanding - I even gave you a pasted content and a link for reference.

      Go download Darwin Streaming Server and start streaming MPEG-4 content for free, and see how wrong you are.

      Unfortunately, downloading Darwin Streaming Server does not grant you MPEG-4 patent licenses. Even if it magically did, this is not what I was talking about since Darwin Streaming Server is not intended to be used by average computer users.

      OK, unless you have something new, it's going to be:

      10 PRINT "HELLO "
      20 PRINT "WORLD "
      30 GOTO 10

      Good luck!
    64. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In fact, it's safe to say that most people do not encode video on a PC.

      Most people don't do anything on a PC. Most people don't own PC's. What's your point?

      Compare this to audio market with CD mixes and portable players - you see the difference.

      Nope. I think you're confused about some things. MP3 is the thing that people like you (i.e., shitwits) are complaining about, claiming that it's "encumbered" by patents. And it's the self-same thing you point to as an example of ubiquity. Take a step back and use that great big brain of yours for a minute, you warthog-faced buffoon.

      You are not reading or not understanding - I even gave you a pasted content and a link for reference.

      Which I read and understood. You, evidently, did not.

      Unfortunately, downloading Darwin Streaming Server does not grant you MPEG-4 patent licenses.

      That's right. That's because none are required to either encode or broadcast. Go read, for chrissakes.

      Even if it magically did, this is not what I was talking about since Darwin Streaming Server is not intended to be used by average computer users.

      Darwin Streaming Server is the free version of QuickTime Streaming Server, which is intended to be used by average computer users.

      --

      I write in my journal
    65. Re:Fighting a losing battle by steveha · · Score: 1

      Just because some guy calls Debian the "lunatic fringe" doesn't mean I agree. Debian is really hard-core about licenses, and that's a good thing, because it means I don't have to be. I know I will always be able to give away Gnoppix CDs legally, because the Debian guys are so careful.

      I hear good things about Gentoo, but I've been so happy with Debian I haven't really taken the time to look into it. If it's working for you, that's cool.

      Thanks for the kind words.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    66. Re:Fighting a losing battle by steveha · · Score: 1

      The best, most rigorous listening test in the world results in the conclusion that the results are within the margin of error.

      So, it would be fair to say then, that it is arguable whether AAC is really better than Ogg?

      The tie-breaker is the fact that AAC is available and supported, while OGG is not.

      That's funny, Ogg seems to be available for every computer platform I care about. There are many portable music players that don't support it, but there are a few now that do. My PDA plays Ogg files just fine, too.

      It's interesting that you seem to interpret "AAC meets my needs better" as "AAC is better". AAC doesn't meet my needs better than Ogg, so for me Ogg is better.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    67. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, it would be fair to say then, that it is arguable whether AAC is really better than Ogg?

      Stop reading in the middle and you end up drawing erroneous conclusions, putz.

      That's funny, Ogg seems to be available for every computer platform I care about.

      Yawn.

      There are many portable music players that don't support it

      End of discussion.

      AAC doesn't meet my needs better than Ogg, so for me Ogg is better.

      Yes, it does. You're just perversely misrepresenting your own needs, either out of sheer ignorance or wrongheadedness.

      Hell, I wouldn't even trust you to be able to elaborate on what your needs are.

      --

      I write in my journal
    68. Re:Fighting a losing battle by steveha · · Score: 1

      Whatever. Have a nice life.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    69. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      You actually took the time to call up your web browser, log in, track down my reply, and post that non-response?

      Wow. You fucking suck.

      --

      I write in my journal
    70. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Jonner · · Score: 1

      It was tongue-in-cheek when I said "lunatic fringe." Maybe I should have put a ";)" since the written word lacks the subtleties of vocal speech.

      I care a lot about freedom too and that's one of the main reasons I respect Debian more than many distributions. It's not as much of a priority in the Gentoo world, but every package specifies the license in a standard way. I don't think it exists yet, but it should be hard to implement the equivalent of Debian's VRMS.

    71. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had to vote for my favorite between old twirlip and new twirlip, new twirlip wins hands down. And that is significant because old twirlip kicked ass.

    72. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, I'm going to sift through Neuros' site:

      The following is required to navigate this site properly:

      * Windows: You must use at least Internet Explorer 4.0 or Netscape 4.0
      * Mac: You must use at least Internet Explorer 5.0 or Netscape 4.0
      * Cookies must be enabled
      * Javascript must be enabled

      I'm 0/4 on their requirements :P
    73. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Ok, my suspicion that you are an idiot, gathered by reading the postings to this story, is confirmed now.
      You assume that I don't need Linux, which is wrong.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    74. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You assume that I don't need Linux, which is wrong.

      Nobody needs Linux. Linux doesn't do anything that another operating system doesn't do better. The only virtue Linux has is that it's cheap.

      If you think you need Linux, you're deluding yourself.

      --

      I write in my journal
    75. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      QED

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  4. On-Duty Editor must be asleep. by OverlordQ · · Score: 0

    It will be interesting to see if there is as much uptake for this as there was for the Ogg sound format.

    That should read:

    It will be interesting to see if there is as much uptake for this as there was for the Vorbis sound format.

    Vorbis and Theora are both part of the Ogg project.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:On-Duty Editor must be asleep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haw, he caved and fixed it.

    2. Re:On-Duty Editor must be asleep. by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Yes, he caved to me :)

      overlord_q:

      Thanks for noting that, fixed. (Though of course approximately
      everyone still calls them ogg files, in this case especially the
      distinction should be made ;) )

      Cheers,

      Tim

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    3. Re:On-Duty Editor must be asleep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like vorbis is the ogg sound format.

  5. YANFF by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do we really need yet another format? i know the mantra of "choice is good," but then having to track down all the little things i need to decode every random video or audio file i come across is sort of the opposite of good. it's bloody obnoxiouse, honestly. i still don't know what an asf is (mostly because i am too lazy to look it up).

    1. Re:YANFF by n0d3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      having all these codecs around might be annoying yes, however howmany open codecs do you have besides the ogg suite?

      Some people prefer their pc's with all open software. Open standars, and even open src.

      this is where ogg comes in. now we have video and audio for free. For some of us, including myself, this is great, as mp3 is isn't an open format, nor is divx (and it's brethern) or mpeg for that matter.

    2. Re:YANFF by grumbel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't Theora the first OpenSource and non-'Patent-poisned' Codec that we have that is also (at least more or less) up to todays standard? Xvid and so are all fine and nice, but rather useless if I am not allowed to use them due to patents.

    3. Re:YANFF by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      what you are "allowed" to do, and what you DO do are too different things.
      Besides, a lot of good it's going to do you when nothing is in theodora or whatever because all the people putting out South Park episodes use RM and all the pornographers are into AVI and MPEG.
      Then of course, there is the reverse: when no one can watch our propaganda because they've never heard of whatever this is, and they say "why should i download yet another media player!," or when they attempt to open it and Windows Media Player says "cannot find software needed to decode this file!"
      like it or not, mpeg and mp3 are more or less de facto standards. the big players arn't going to just go and include this willy-nilly to make an angry hoard of geeks happy (it'd take many, many slashdots to bring down microsoft.com, i am sure). it is easier for the angry geeks to shell out the dough in contributions to XMMS or whatever so as to buy the licensing fees. Why? becuase everyone knows what MP3 is -- even tards who slipped on the ice and hit their head on the pavement.

    4. Re:YANFF by Jardine · · Score: 1

      mp3 is isn't an open format, nor is divx (and it's brethern) or mpeg for that matter.

      divx isn't but xvid is. xvid is also used more often partly for that reason.

    5. Re:YANFF by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      You're right. Some people do prefer to have PCs designed with all open software.

      The rest of us like to, you know, get some work done.

      And I'm ouuuuuuut...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    6. Re:YANFF by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
      "but then having to track down all the little things i need to decode every random video or audio file i come across is sort of the opposite of good. it's bloody obnoxiouse, honestly."

      I don't consider myself a big downloader, but every time I run across video the Windows player can't handle (doens't have a codec for) I use VLC and it just works. I suspect the next version of VLC will support Theora out of the box which will not be true of the next MS product. There are 2 reasons you have codec support problems: 1) proprietary codecs and 2) proprietary software. Neither of these have your personal convenience or freedom as a top priority and apparently it shows.

  6. Have questions about this codec? by saskboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's where to look for the FAQ.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  7. .ogg? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

    Great... They've chosen to give the theora video files the same .ogg extension as their audio format?

    --
    "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

    - Charles Darwin
    1. Re:.ogg? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure... "Ogg" is the actual format of the file, which is simply a container for the content encoded within.

      I'd like to see ".ogv" start popping up to signify Ogg video.

    2. Re:.ogg? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1, Informative

      .ogg is just like .wav, as it's a container. There can be different types of data inside the container.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    3. Re:.ogg? by n0d3 · · Score: 1

      does this matter? as people noted below, it's only a container. and a descent player will not determin it's content by the extension.

      e.g. double clicking in windows should open winamp and play the thing for example. wether it's video or audio. or wmp if that rocks your boat.

      i suppose you are somewhat limited to opening the ogg audio and ogg video seperatly with different apps ... guess you can always rename them to ogv and oga if needed to have seperate applications to open them.

    4. Re:.ogg? by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see ".ogv" start popping up to signify Ogg video

      That would still be really confusing, ".ogv" could just as easily stand for ogg vorbis as ogg video.

    5. Re:.ogg? by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      how about .video.ogg?

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    6. Re:.ogg? by lspd · · Score: 1

      it's only a container. and a descent player will not determin it's content by the extension.

      But.......my file manager (and sometimes my browser) is launching the player based on the file extension. Using the same file extension will force me into telling my file manager to always open ogg files in a theora capable player. This might sound trivial if you're already playing all of your mp3s and oggs in xine or mplayer, but I'd much rather use an audio player (xmms) for audio files and a video player (xine) for video files.

      A good video player UI is generally a bad audio player UI and vice-versa.

    7. Re:.ogg? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      That suggests an even better model. ".ogv" for Vorbis, and ".ogt" for Theora. As an aside, ".ogf" would be for FLAC.

    8. Re:.ogg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .ogm (Ogg movie) is already a popular unofficial extension for Ogg video (usually Xvid/Vorbis in an Ogg container).

    9. Re:.ogg? by big+tex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But.......my file manager (and sometimes my browser) is launching the player based on the file extension.

      What the hell do you use?

      MIME-types, baby.
      Extensions are for suckers. I mean, even Windows gets it now.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    10. Re:.ogg? by iabervon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, all of the file extensions people use are dumb. The file extension only really matters in any deep way to the user; the computer can determine trivially what's in it. The user never cares what container the file uses, and rarely cares what codec it uses. The user cares how the file behaves when played: Does it make noise? Does it look like anything? Does it have text? Does it change over time?

      In order to be sensible, .png, .gif, and .jpg should be .img; .mng and some .mpg and .wmv should be .vid; .wav, .ogg, and .mp3 should be .aud; and most .mpg and .wmv and now some .ogg should be .av; given that the situation is already hopeless, it doesn't really matter that they're using .ogg for both.

      If the people who chose file extensions ran a supermarket, it would sell "cardboard boxes", "jars", "cans", and "plastic bags".

    11. Re:.ogg? by Shinglor · · Score: 1

      I think we shoud abandon file extentions altogether and use content-types instead which IIRC is what Mac OS X does.

    12. Re:.ogg? by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Actually, the standard for web browsers, mail reader, etc., is to use content types rather than file extensions, and programs tend to use magic numbers to be sure they know what they're doing. (For example, konqueror will happily display a PNG file called "foo.gif"). Older versions of Mac OS used stored content types, which really only caused problems with getting files from other places, because then the content type could be wrong. I'm not sure what OS X does.

      All modern file formats have distinctive structures which let programs tell from the first few bytes exactly what's in them. External information, whether in the file name or sent with the file only serves to cause problems. Users benefit from having the filenames mean something to them, and extensions could actually help with this.

    13. Re:.ogg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just do it the way people do with avi, ie, codec.container? flac.ogg, vorbis.ogg, theora.ogg, etc. What's with this "extensions must be three letters" thing?

    14. Re:.ogg? by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 1

      That would annoy Windows users no end, as Explorer doesn't recognized "daisy-chained" extensions (i.e., it makes no distinction between "*.tar.gz" and "*.gz"). It's one of the more annoying things about Windows I've been wishing they would address since the Windows 95 days, and am fully expecting them to completely ignore forever....

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
    15. Re:.ogg? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      But...but they have the same mime type, no? Application/Ogg?

      I sure as shit don't want to open audio files in my video player, or vica versa. Which is why I'm glad some folks are releasing Theora videos with an OGM extension, just to make it obvious I don't want to download them.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    16. Re:.ogg? by big+tex · · Score: 1

      F'in-A.

      You sir, are correct.

      I spoke without looking, figuring that somewhere in the gajillion mime types that show up, ogg could get at least two.
      Seems that we need a few more mime types.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    17. Re:.ogg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but I have no troble with WAV, since i can tell Winamp to open that as opposed to my video player.

    18. Re:.ogg? by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      I thought .WAV was an audio format - specifically a RIFF header describing parameters for a PCM stream immediately after.

  8. Can Someone Explain What this is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hi Slashdot... I know what Vorbis is... But what in god's name is all that other stuff???


    1. Re:Can Someone Explain What this is? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Informative

      Vorbis is an audio codec...but you knew that.

      Theora is a video codec.

      Ogg is the transport layer that both are stored in, so a video file will be Theora-encoded data inside an Ogg file, while audio is normally Vorbis-encoded data inside an ogg file.

      Ogg can/is used for other audio codecs, too, like FLAC.

  9. Flamebait maybe... by ifwm · · Score: 1

    You're still right though.

  10. Kewl... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    ...I use Vorbis whenever I rip my audio CDs. If I did video, I'd certainly try Theora.

  11. Re:sigh. by Azrael+Newtype · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While this is true, it's always possible that we'll come up with something a bit better in the file size/quality ratio. I mean, look at XviD vs DivX. But, that doesn't mean we all have to jump every time a new codec hits, but considering the success of the Vorbis codec for audio, it's a bit sad to see another ogg bite it.

    --
    I'm always right and I can prove it, because to the best of my knowledge, I've never been wrong.
  12. This is about patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Encode MPEG-4 at your peril. You probably won't get a bill in the post, but still.

    Theora finally offers us a good patent-unencumbered encoder/decoder. It's a good thing.

  13. My God! by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 3, Funny

    I always thought Theora was kind of cool... But frozen? My God! They must really kick arse!

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:My God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "What's cooler than being cool?"

    2. Re:My God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I give up. What's that?

  14. What is with the compression ratio? by xiphy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Will Theora codecs ever be as good as MPEG-4 ones? Or we have to wait for wavelet based codecs to have a patent free good format?
    IIRC the MPlayer lead developer (Alex) said that he reckons Theora will never get close to MPEG-4.

    1. Re:What is with the compression ratio? by sploo22 · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell it's actually better already, especially at low bitrates.

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    2. Re:What is with the compression ratio? by Tranzig · · Score: 1

      I haven't tried Theora yet, but I tried On2's VP3 codec (on which Theora is based), and it performed very well against the MPEG-4 codecs, I really liked it.

    3. Re:What is with the compression ratio? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      VP3 is BETTER for low bitrates and low resolutions. It was one of the big improvements added to the PocketMVP player before I sold my PocketPC and stopped caring.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  15. Think this is likely to have better uptake by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the OGG video stuff will have an easier go of it than OGG the music format.

    OGG audio had a few problems - at the start, not as many people knew about it so it was slow to adopt to different players and rippers that people liked to use. The worse problem was that even now it's in almost no hardware, so it made little sense to encode to OGG if you might have wanted to use a portable.

    But with video the whole field is still wide open. Getting a Quicktime or Windows media file to my TV is equally hard, so I might as well store my video in OGG as anything - and I am more likley to be able to build a box I am happy hooking to my TV for video than I would have been trying to construct an audio device I would like. And I have a lot more motivation with every consumer video device being generally locked down in very annoying ways.

    The other thing that will help is that consumer device makers will have little reason not to adopt this video format since it can be another item on a checkbox and is free to implement. Also the processing power is going to be there in whatever device is created - with OGG audio, for a while there was no good example code for playing OGG files on devices without floating point support (as I remember it).

    So, good luck Ogg Theora! I plan to start using it as soon as I can and see how it fares.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Think this is likely to have better uptake by zoeblade · · Score: 1

      I think the OGG video stuff will have an easier go of it than OGG the music format.

      When it comes to preserving old camcorder footage then yes, this probably has more of a chance than Ogg Vorbis had of preserving any speeches/songs/whatever you made.

      But when it comes to backing up media you've bought, copying CDs to Ogg Vorbis format doesn't involve transcoding, whereas backing up DVDs, VideoCDs, D-VHS or any other digital video format already available does. I don't know how much that affects the final quality of the Theora file, but it can't help. Then again, backing up old VHS, Betamax and LaserDisc videos should be OK.

      At any rate, I really hope this and (one day) Tarkin take off.

  16. Ogg is the name of the project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and so the name of the container. Vorbis is the audio format, Theora is the name of the video format. Those .OGG files you've come across are audio/video interleaved files missing a video stream.

  17. Great... by OS24Ever · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...so now we'll have 'xxx releases new xxx player' with a hundred responses of 'Does it do ogg' followed by another few hundred responses of 'Ogg is not the format, theora is the encoder'

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    1. Re:Great... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      It'll still make sense, though.

      For audio players, ogg will obviously mean vorbis. For video players, it'll mean both.

  18. Remember... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Just because you can, doesn't mean you shuold.

    Yes, I did mean it just like that.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  19. Mod points to burn. by Talinom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone's gonna mod me down for trolling because I don't echo the Slashdot groupspeak on this. Oh well.

    Who honestly cares about or uses Ogg? Really. I have yet to even contemplate it. Sure I have the codec on my machine, but I haven't used it. Nothing is out there in the format that I am interested in or have even ran across accidently. I like portability of my music so I use MP3. (I can't very well install the codec on my machine at work.) I have no intention of recording anything into the format, so it would be a poor choice for me to use it. How many people is it a good choice for? Why?

    What about Theora? Probably the same thing, at least for me. Most people already are happy with using DivX, XviD, MPEG-1/2/4, WMV, or whatever. Adding another into the mix, while giveing people more choices, probably won't sway one person over. Ogg just didn't do it for me. Theora may not, either.

    The only place that I can envision Theora being used is by developers needing royalty free in-game movies.

    Or am I completely off base here and it will take the world by storm by sheer ease of use, compatability, support, file size, file quality, consumer knowledge, and/or consumer acceptance?

    Clue me up.

    --
    "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    1. Re:Mod points to burn. by sloanster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someone's gonna mod me down for trolling because I don't echo the Slashdot groupspeak on this. Oh well.

      Ah, but that is the slashdot groupspeak - you're just one of the crowd, saying "so what, i got my windoze media player, who cares?"

      On the other hand, folks like me love the idea of having more choices...

    2. Re:Mod points to burn. by Josh+Booth · · Score: 1

      I would think that the main users for Ogg Theora would be computer game makers, just like they are the main ones who support Ogg Vorbis. IIRC, UT2004 uses Ogg Vorbis due to it being royalty free and smaller than straight PCM. I have most of my music in Ogg Vorbis but am thinking that I will switch to MP3 because I want to eventually buy a portable jukebox. So who else will use Ogg Theora? Beats me! I guess we'll see.

    3. Re:Mod points to burn. by Talinom · · Score: 1

      you're just one of the crowd, saying "so what, i got my windoze media player, who cares?"

      No, I do care about choice. I wonder about saturation in the market preventing adoption. If a free codec came out a few years ago it might have more acceptance. Time will tell with Vorbis and Theora. With the currently used codecs firmly entrenched switching people over may be difficult. I have no use right now for ogg. People who use Linux (I used to be one) will love it. This means that probably 98% of the userbase out there will neither hear about nor use either Ogg format.

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    4. Re:Mod points to burn. by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Audio is often used in a portable sense and the market was saturated by MP3 files way before Vorbis came along - it didn't just have to be good, it had to be so much better that it could kill the competitor and motivate hardware purchases of compatible players, and to be fair it is good but not _that_ good. It is comforting to know that there is a high quality, open and unencumbered format there - trusting a market where there is no incentive to keep your patented codecs free (as in beer) is dangerous but a free (as in speech) codec deters patent issues since people can make the switch if using MP3 is made too inconvenient. In that capacity the existance of vorbis comforts me, but I won't use it until it runs on my iPod. Having said that, most games seem to use vorbis audio for their in-game sounds so it's got more marketshare than many people think.

      In terms of video there is not a real portable market (meaning no hardware replacement needed) nor is there a codec to which there is 'no competition' in terms of uptake like MP3 for audio. This gives theora a much better chance of taking off - all it needs is a little download, no selling on your iPod for an ogg compatible hardware player. The video market is a much more level playing field giving theora a chance to stand up on its merits rather than desparately clawing at the heels of an established standard, and even if it does not gain dominance what I said about providing an incentive to stay free and a possibility to switch is comforting - if DRM becomes too bad or divx goes paid there will always be something I can switch to.

    5. Re:Mod points to burn. by BRSloth · · Score: 1

      Who honestly cares about or uses Ogg?

      Well, I care and I use it. To me, ogg sounds a lot better than mp3. And it is also smaller. And I also get a patent-free coded!

    6. Re:Mod points to burn. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Who honestly cares about or uses Ogg?"

      For fitting more music on a 128 megabyte card, it's fairly cool. Otherwise, I agree, it seems to be just another hot topic here to gain karma. For some reason, preferring OGG/Vorbis has been a status symbol of sorts.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Mod points to burn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who honestly cares about or uses Ogg?

      I do. My main method of listening to music is to simply dump it to hard-disk when I buy the CD, and use my computer as a jukebox as I work.

      Sure I have the codec on my machine, but I haven't used it.

      Which codec? Are you talking about Vorbis? Because I was talking about Ogg FLAC. Why would I go with a lossy codec like MP3 when storage space is cheap and the non-lossy, open-source codec Ogg FLAC is available? Then again, Ogg Vorbis sounds better than MP3, so I guess that would still come out ahead for me.

      I have no intention of recording anything into the format, so it would be a poor choice for me to use it. How many people is it a good choice for?

      So it doesn't suit your purposes. Fine. It suits mine, so I'll use it. Support in hardware and software is growing for the Ogg family of codecs, so the issues you have will not be there forever. But the reasons for me using Ogg FLAC over MP3 aren't going to go away.

    8. Re:Mod points to burn. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Who honestly cares about or uses Ogg?

      Video game designers. They can release their audio in vorbis and their video in theora and not have to pay anyone for that aspect of their game. Which means if you're a game player, you've probably already used vorbis.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    9. Re:Mod points to burn. by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      IIRC, UT2004 uses Ogg Vorbis due to it being royalty free and smaller than straight PCM.

      The game, City of Heroes, uses Ogg V for audio.

    10. Re:Mod points to burn. by glwtta · · Score: 1
      Someone's gonna mod me down for trolling because I don't echo the Slashdot groupspeak on this. Oh well.

      Why do people insist on this idiotic preface - it's the only part of your post that makes me want to mod it down.

      To answer your question: I rip my CDs exclusively to vorbis. Even I can notice the difference in quality with MP3 (and I am certainly not paying for MP3 Pro). I am quite a fan of the whole software libre thing as well. I can't think of a single advantage to encoding my own stuff in MP3, so it's kind of a no brainer.

      As for portability, my Karma plays it beautifully and since it never (ever!) leaves my side, I don't really know where else I'd play it.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    11. Re:Mod points to burn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a game developer, and use ogg for all my commercial projects due to its filesize/quality ratio, and its ability to loop properly.

    12. Re:Mod points to burn. by imroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You seem to think that Ogg Vorbis and/or Theora must have massive mainstream success (like MP3) or it is worthless. They're not commercial products. As long as people are maintaining the code base and using the software, then it has "worth". I don't think we'll see mainstream success, at least not for a while. And we shouldn't depend on success in that one market, or the lack of it, to measure the general success of Ogg Vorbis or Theora.

      As others have pointed out, Ogg Vorbis is being used by a number of games for the packaged music. I think we'll see the Ogg codecs (Vorbis, Flac, Speex, and Theora) showing up in more embedded packages/devices. Really anywhere there is the need to handle audio and/or video in an application. The application is responsible for playing (and encoding too perhaps) the material. All the user does is install the application and uses it like any other app. It could be VOIP, a training/teaching program, a demo, cutscenes for a game, a TiVO/MythTV/Freevo-like set-top box, etc. You get the idea.

    13. Re:Mod points to burn. by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      Lot's of people are already using the OGG container for video, even if they aren't using Theora for the video. If you haven't seen it on newsgroups, it's a growing trend to see the OGG container.

      I also use FLAC (which is part of the OGG project now) for all of my music library.

      I use Ogg/Vorbis for all of my lossy compression files.

      If Ogg/Thera is as good or better than the DIVX files you currently use, then why wouldn't you use it? What have you got to lose if you've got the codec installed?

      Having a patent/royalty-free video codec is a GOOD thing.

    14. Re:Mod points to burn. by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      To add to my post... I just tested the codec with some sample videos I've found, and I must say that the quality is VERY impressive for the size of the files. My only complaint is in the CPU load that is produced while decoding. The high-res samples on theora.org produced about 50-60% CPU load on my Athlon XP 2400+ through MPlayer. The quality certainly looked as about good as any DVDs I've been watching.

    15. Re:Mod points to burn. by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      Someone's gonna mod me down for trolling because I don't echo the Slashdot groupspeak on this. Oh well.
      If I was modding today you'd get modded down just for saying this.
      Who honestly cares about or uses Ogg? Really. I have yet to even contemplate it.
      Why are you reading, let alone commenting on, a story about something you have no interest in?
    16. Re:Mod points to burn. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      Video game designers care because they've already been burned by patented codecs that the manufacturer refuses to port to another platform...like mac OSX or linux. Bioware got bit several ways with Neverwinter nights...the installer people refused to let them even access the cab files without paying TWICE for the privilage. The Blink video people didn't want to waste time with porting their software either...So Bioware has "their" part of neverwinter ported to Linux quite nicely...except that you can't install it from the CD..or watch the movies on Linux because those rights holders don't want to be "hassled" [and here we thought they were out to sell something?]

      Several others have learned from that experience [it's widely published] so they're all supporting the format that ALREADY works on any platform they might want to have their game run on! Nothing pushed people to OSS faster than the stuck-up A$$ hats who's idea of customer service & support is "Cash or charge"!

    17. Re:Mod points to burn. by zoeblade · · Score: 1

      How many people is [Ogg Vorbis] a good choice for? Why?

      I encode the music that I write and buy exclusively in Ogg Vorbis and FLAC now. I chose the format for political reasons: it's free (libre). The fact that it sounds much better to my ears at low bitrates doesn't hurt: I used to encode mp3s at 256kbps as that was about as low as I could go before the hi-hats sounded wrong, but now I encode at Ogg Vorbis quality 3, which is usually around 112kbps, meaning I can fit many more songs into the same amount of space.

      And as soon as a solid state player comes out that can support Vorbis (assuming I can afford it), I'll be able to listen to it anywhere - but until then I stick with MiniDiscs because ATRAC also sounds a lot better than mp3 to my ears.

    18. Re:Mod points to burn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For instance, Vorbis was designed so that a lower bitrate file is just a higher bitrate file with the trailing ends cut off the audio frames. Cut the trailing edges off mp3 audio frames (or any other audio format AFAIK) and you get garbage.

      Vorbis is much better in cases where you may want to re-encode at a lower bitrate on the fly. For instance, if you are doing a live web radio and want to encode streams at (average bitrates of) 160 kbps, 128 kbps, and 32 kbps. With other streaming codecs, you do about the same amount of work for each bitrate you encode. With vorbis, you encode once at the highest bitrate and then trivially chop down the frames in the stream to get the lower bitrate streams "for free". This means that you can much more easily adjust each user's stream to maximize their bandwidth.

      Also, Vorbis sounds much better than mp3 at low bitrates that are sometimes necessary for webcast listeners on dialup or when server bandwidth is nearly maxed-out.

    19. Re:Mod points to burn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone's gonna mod me down for trolling because I don't echo the Slashdot groupspeak on this

      You mean you're going to talk _in favor_ of Linux/Freedom/Choice ? Great !

    20. Re:Mod points to burn. by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Who honestly cares about or uses Ogg? Really. I have yet to even contemplate it. Sure I have the codec on my machine, but I haven't used it.

      So why the long rant? If you don't use it that is.

    21. Re:Mod points to burn. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Nothing is out there in the format that I am interested in or have even ran across accidently.

      There are plenty of Ogg files on the net, surely many of them are something you are interested in, but are too busy looking for MP3s to notice.

      It's not all that likely you'll come across an Ogg by accident, especially when you keep searching for MP3s.

      How many people is it a good choice for?

      I'd say a large majority of the population.

      Why?

      Because most people aren't limited by a hardware MP3 player (99% of people still use CDs exclusively, remember those flat round things?), and Vorbis give better quality at smaller sizes, all the while being unencumbered with license issues, and having more tools freely available for it for that reason.

      Most people already are happy with using DivX, XviD, MPEG-1/2/4, WMV, or whatever.

      Yeah, and most people were happy using MPEG-2 before MPEG-4 came out. I guess they shouldn't have introduced it then, right?

      Ogg just didn't do it for me. Theora may not, either.

      You've shown that you are a follower, not a leader. You don't care that one codec gives better quality, is smaller, or patent-free, so you don't really matter. You will be on the tail-end of all developments. Never touching a codec until it's integrated into a piece of hardware that you own, and immense ammounts of content are available in that format.

      Meanwhile, for those that matter, and aren't stuck in the rut that you are, there are plenty of reasons to use Vorbis, and Plenty of reasons to use Theora. In my experince, Vorbis is more popular than RealAudio, and WMA, and I have no doubt it's continuing to increase in popularity all the time. Theora is in an even better situation, because the video codec world is a more bleak place than the audio codec world, and it already has a good-sized installed base of VP3 videos.

      Also, consider that you don't see MPEG-4 streaming anywhere, which is a good application for Theora. VP3/Theora video is also better quality than MPEG-4 in my opinion, all while not having the limitations of MPEG-4.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    22. Re:Mod points to burn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an autist?

      There are clear positive and negative sides on both OGG Vorbis and MPEG 1 layer 3. Some people prefer the former, some the latter.

      From my point of view these are the following (when compared):

      OGG Vorbis:
      * Royalty-free.
      * Better quality or smaller files (or a mix of both)
      * From a FLOSS org.

      MPEG 1 layer 3:
      * Popular defacto standard. Even less technical inclined netizens know about it.
      * Since it is popular it is also portable on loads of hardware (more than OGG Vorbis).
      * When music is downloaded on the Internet it is almost always MPEG 1 Layer 3 because of its popularity. It'll work in about any media player on any about OS (more than OGG Vorbis as of yet).

      Even if you do not see the benefits of one over another, you could at least see the popular opinions on why one would chose it. Right? You named royalty-free already. The performance benchmarks are all over the 'net, for example on Xiph.org's website; with lil' energy you'd be able to have found it.

      My opinion is that the advantages of OGG Vorbis, and my usage of it, are improvements over MPEG 1 Layer 3 and if i use MPEG 1 Layer 3 and ewveryone will do so, better competitors with better advantages -especially some which i find important- will never become more popular. Hence by supporting MPEG 1 Layer 3, i support the self-fullfilling prophecy which i do not wish to.

      If MPEG 1 Layer 3 didn't had it's extreme popularity and piracy, OGG Vorbis would have become the defacto standard already. If OGG Vorbis was around in '97 when MPEG 1 Layer 3 florished and before all the "hardware" players, then it would have won. Now if we would start about Real + marketing, Linux + GUIism, or Microsoft + failed marketing we'd have a discussion where my points would be similar...

  20. A reason to delay ... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... there's no reason to delay adopting a free alternative any more!

    Hmm. Thinking.... Thinking.... There must be SOME reason... This is tough. Oh, wait! I know! I've got one!!!

    Beta 1 is not out yet ...

    Yeah! There we go. See, I knew I could come up with something.

    1. Re:A reason to delay ... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, the point is that video encoded with the current (alpha) version (which works) will be compatible with playback software conforming to the Theora 1 standard (which was frozen).

  21. Why anyone would care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There will be umpteen posts to the effect, "So what? [Insert preferred video codec] is ubiquitous and gets the job done." It's the same broken record that gets played whenever there's an Ogg Vorbis/MP3 discussion.

    And those folks are right. There is no reason to switch to or adopt Vorbis or Theora. Yet.

    I hope someone releases some content in ONLY these formats that is truly killer. Something that pushes people to try these formats. Because I don't want to be locked in to proprietary formats that force me to use players and clients that plain suck. The announcement that WMV9 is being considered for HD-DVD sent chills up my spine.

    Hooray for being an idealist...

  22. Standards? where? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    tcp/ip and http seem to be the only standards that people actually adhere to anymore...
    but wait!! i can't look at finegael.ie and see the news ticker unless i am using IE. BS! and that is just one example.

  23. What's the point? by Zarxrax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's already an excellant open-source codec out there in xvid. Honestly, no one is even going to consider using this Theora codec. And Theora is based on VP3?? HELLO?! There is already a VP6!! And as far as containers go, theres Matroska, which is a far better open-source container than OGM (If you can really count OGM as a container, its really just a hack).

    1. Re:What's the point? by cheide · · Score: 1

      XviD is based upon MPEG-4 though, which uses various patents and has license fees associated with it. They might not have cracked down on XviD or any of the others yet, but there's always that doubt...

    2. Re:What's the point? by pldms · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's already an excellant open-source codec out there in xvid.

      For which you may, alas, have to pay a licence fee to MPEG-LA (depending on you usage). I agree that xvid is excellent, but it comes with strings. Theora does not -- probably (nobody can be sure given the current state of the patent system in certain locales).

      --
      Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
      me a number based on the order in which I joined
    3. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While Xvid is opensource is it patent encumbered. Thus distro makers who are pure open source plays like Red Hat and Debian won't be shipping with Xvid anytime soon as part of the core distro. Now the linux desktop and the OSS world has a solid video codec to go along with a solid audio codec that can be shipped with every distro out there. That is the point. If you don't see the value in that then stick with Xvid and mp3 or whatever.

  24. Uses for Theora by SeanTobin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reading the posts, it seems that people are missing a major use for Theora and even Vorbis.

    You know all those games you have that use MP3 for music? They had to pay a fee to do so. You know all those games you have that use bink video for cutscenes? They had to pay a fee to do so.

    Now they don't. If there is a free alternative of comperable quality, the developers will use it instead of paying a $25k technology licensing fee. And the companies that don't will end up priced out of the market.

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    1. Re:Uses for Theora by pslam · · Score: 1
      You know all those games you have that use MP3 for music? They had to pay a fee to do so. You know all those games you have that use bink video for cutscenes? They had to pay a fee to do so.

      Now they don't.

      They probably still pay a fee anyway. There's still the nasty matter of those (stupid) MP3 patents, which Thomson and friends reckon covers all lossy audio codecs. A good reason to use a "free" codec despite that is the access to source code, which you usually don't get with a non-free one.

    2. Re:Uses for Theora by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      Ogg vorbis uses an entirely different compression scheme that is not covered by any patents.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    3. Re:Uses for Theora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no Vorbis or Theora patent license available. Buying MP3 licenses and then using Vorbis wouldn't afford you any patent protection (the licenses explicitly exclude any use not specifically stated, ie MPEG audio layer III), so you're basically just saying "They're probably lying" which makes no sense.

      The MP3 license includes sample source code, so once again you've disappeared off into your own personal conspiracy theory.

      Game designers use Vorbis, and will use Theora because there are no patent license costs. VoIP people use Speex because there are no patent license costs. Future video conference services will probably use a low-bitrate Theora once agian because, there are no license fees.

    4. Re:Uses for Theora by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      ...and other games that use Ogg Vorbis: Operation Flashpoint. This great game had support for Vorbis even before Vorbis 1.0 - music files from the game say Vendor: Xiphophorus libVorbis I 20010225 (1.0 beta 4)...

      I've also been told that Serious Sam series use it (at least since The Second Encounter).

    5. Re:Uses for Theora by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      The PC version of Halo uses Ogg Vorbis for all its audio - and it's published by a certain company called 'Microsoft'...

      The data's all squirrelled away in one big file (sounds.map, I think - I'm not at my PC right now) and opening it with a hex editor will reveal loads of appropriate Ogg and Vorbis headers.

      One huge bonus of Ogg Vorbis as used in games is the ability to store sounds of arbitrary length. In MP3, the sample length has to be a whole number of frames, which each containing a fair number of sampled values when uncompressed - in Ogg Vorbis, you can have a precise number of sampled values. This makes looping sounds possible, as you won't have a nasty 'jump' or 'click' when it reaches the dead sound at the end of a partially silent frame, as you would with MP3.

      I gather recent versions of libvorbis have the ability for looping with blending together the last few samples at the beginning and end of a sound, to get rid of any tiny compression artifacts which might cause a tiny 'click'.

      I wrote a rubbish script for extracting some of the Vorbis files from Halo, and I discovered that the music is split up into many short segments (again of arbitrary length) - something like that would be horrible to do with MP3.

      The complete absence of licensing fees, combined with full source code and mature libraries, make it a pretty compelling option for games use.

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  25. 2 weeks ago by millette · · Score: 2, Insightful
  26. Finally... by Fooby · · Score: 3, Funny

    A format that can be used by the free-as-in-speech porn community.

    1. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you say Free Porn?

    2. Re:Finally... by mindfucker · · Score: 1
      I think the quickest way to get this format onto non-nerd computers would be for some webmasters to build a nice ogg only collection of free beer porn.

      People will download just about anything if they might get some porn out of it.

    3. Re:Finally... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's open source, so it's mostly fat bearded guys jerking off while reading the GPL.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  27. Don't you mean Bitstream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As I recalled, Bitstream only does fonts, not audio codecs.

    1. Re:Don't you mean Bitstream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, Bistream has been around since 1981! I still have some of the earlier Bitstream vector->raster font programs. Those font renderers were even used by Quattro Pro, Wordstar, and Lotus 1-2-3.

  28. Classic betamax tale by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Producing a better product isn't good enough. You need a SIGNIFICANTLY better product. For me, ripping even a small ~50 CD collection to ogg isn't worth the marginal benefit, even if it is free. Perhaps if oggs were particularly small, say 10-20% the size of the standard mp3, you would probably see more people flocking to it.
    But in the age of $1/gig hard drives, space isn't such a huge issue.

    --

    Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
    1. Re:Classic betamax tale by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      precisely, since there are ample free as in beers encoders/decoders around any competing standard needs to offer something pretty special in order to negate the advantage of an ENORMOUS userbase.

      I would imagine that there are less people who have heard of ogg vorbis than have heard of slashdot. All people do by using this format is irritate the people they exchange files with.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    2. Re:Classic betamax tale by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Firstly, I store my music in MP3 format, mostly because my car player doesn't do Vorbis. Second, I think you're right that all things being equal, without a significantly better format, MP3 will remain top dog. However, I fully understand that the MP3 format is patent encumbered and as such it's not free, as in mine to do with as I please. What that means is that Thompson is free to change the rules of the game at any time. They could turn around tomorrow and say that there's now a fee for *playing* an MP3 or even that there's a monthly fee for simply *having* an MP3 file in your possession. Yes it's extremely unlikely to happen and it would be even harder to police. However, if it did, the "significantly better" argument is out the window since significantly *cheaper*, the Classic VHS tale, would almost certainly win in the long run.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    3. Re:Classic betamax tale by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Well there's no point if you already have the music encoded anyway. But if you didn't have it encoded already, you had a choice between Ogg and MP3, and you weren't one of those iPod fanboys, you'd surely choose Ogg over MP3, right? I mean all decent media players play both formats with the same degree of ease.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    4. Re:Classic betamax tale by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      The size of the installed userbase isn't as much of a problem with portable players. On my PDA with flash memory, I recode to a lower bitrate anyway to fit more music. With a 2Ghz CPU it's practical to recode the bitrate while you copy. A 96Kbit/s audio file can sound crappy, but it's passable for portable use, and 96K vorbis sounds a little better than 96K MP3 to my untrained ear. To me it's a disposable file. I wouldn't bother exchanging it with anybody.

      Multi GB hard disk players don't have the file size constraints of flash players, but aren't built for exchanging files either. Easy to copy songs to them, but hard to copy songs off them.

    5. Re:Classic betamax tale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FLAC is worth it for ripping. It's a well-supported lossless compression format that is free (as in speech), and encouraged by Xiph.org. With a 250GB hard drive for $180 at reputable stores, most people can rip their entire CD collection ~750CDs into a lossless format that will last. With FLAC, you only need to rip once.

    6. Re:Classic betamax tale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the point in ripping everything in MP3 format then?

      Ogg is better, but it's not THAT much better is the reason you still use MP3's?

      Why do you still use MP3's?

      Ogg is better and plays better on every peice of software and hardware that I use, so I use Ogg.

      I have a bunch of old crap in MP3's, so I use that for some stuff. There is no reason why I can't use both. But anything new I make will always be Ogg vs MP3's.

      Why is it some huge measurement of success to have Ogg type stuff universally accepted? There are a lot more obscure formats out their that are better but nobody uses them because of the crappy ass restrictions their creators put on them.

      Need I point out MP3pro?

    7. Re:Classic betamax tale by Teach · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps if oggs were particularly small, say 10-20% the size of the standard mp3, you would probably see more people flocking to it. But in the age of $1/gig hard drives, space isn't such a huge issue.

      It's all about your situation. I run Linux at home, so mp3 vs. vorbis is a toss-up in terms of "support". (Actually, since mp3 support isn't shipped with RedHat/Fedora by default, Ogg Vorbis is actually *more* supported....) At work, I wrote my own music player software for my computer lab, and I found it easier to just modify the source to ogg123 than to try to get something else working. So Ogg Vorbis had the advantage. Not to mention I've got 24 client machines in my lab which I can get working on ripping and encoding all at once, giving me a net total throughput of about 4 minutes per CD (counting my walking around to physically swap out CDs).

      As far as portables go, I'm almost certainly about to get a Sony CLIÉ, whose audio player supports Ogg Vorbis. And 128MB memory sticks can be had for around $33, and each hold right at four hours of music encoded at 64kbps, so I can buy a handful and have several preloaded "mixes" for long car trips.

      I don't know if you've done a listening test with Ogg Vorbis at 64kbps (a.k.a. quality 0) vs. standard mp3 at that bitrate, but I'll give you a hint: one is quite listenable, the other isn't. And AFAIK I don't have access to wma or mp3pro encoders under Linux, so if I want listenable music at 64 kbps, it's going to have to be Ogg Vorbis.

      Now, I wouldn't want to listen to 64 kbps compressed audio sitting in my living room on my $150 headphones, but for my noisy car over my factory speakers, it's as good or better than the radio or a tape deck, I'd say.

      And speaking of space not being such a huge issue, on Thursday I should receive my new 160 GB hard drive from NewEgg. Then I should finally have enough hard drive space to rip my ~250 albums to FLAC and leave them there, so I shouldn't have to rip ever again, since I can just write a shell script to convert from FLAC to whatever format I like. (And in fact, I already have a couple scripts to do just that.)

      Anyway, the beauty of the open market is that consumers can choose the option that suits them best. For me, that's Ogg Vorbis, and I like that it's a format I could potentially use for the rest of my life.

      --
      Graham "Teach" Mitchell, computer science teacher, Leander HS
    8. Re:Classic betamax tale by Malc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But OGGs *are* that much smaller. I found that -q5 (~160kbs) were as good as 192kbs VBR MP3s. I ripped 80 CDs and found that the OGGs took 4.52GB vs 5.76GB for the MP3s. I have 20GB on my iHP-120, so to fill it with 20GB of MP3s will be only 15.7GB of OGGs... or alternatively, I can fit 70-80 more CDs encoded as OGG. Unfortunately it's not that simple as OGGs at this bitrate run the battery down in 11-12 hours, whereas MP3s last 16 or more.

    9. Re:Classic betamax tale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Size still counts with portable devices, where Vorbis is ahead of mp3. The main problem is, that most music is in mp3 format right now, and a transition to Vorbis makes it sound ugly.

    10. Re:Classic betamax tale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All people do by using this format is irritate the people they exchange files with.

      The poor little chickens, being annoyed by us big nasty Ogg using brutes!

    11. Re:Classic betamax tale by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Producing a better product isn't good enough. You need a SIGNIFICANTLY better product.

      I can legally use it, modify it, and distribute it without owing a penny to anyone. Since the sound quality and compression are at least as good as MP3, that makes chosing Vorbis a no-brainer for me.

      "Significantly better" doesn't even begin to explain the utility gap between the two; since MP3 is legally encumbered and I don't have an explicit license to use it, and I'm reasonably certain that my MP3-encoder-of-choice vendor hasn't paid the required royalties to the Fraunhofer Institute, I have no clear legal right to even make MP3 files. Since MP3 has a usefuless of zero for me, and Vorbis has a usefulness greater than zero, I leave it to the reader to decide how many percent better "x" is than nothing.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  29. I think they mean BITSTREAM by BigAl_nz · · Score: 4, Informative

    They've refered to it as "bistream" in the title of the post on theora.org, and in the body of that post. But elsewhere they call it "bitstream", and that makes more sense to me at least. The term "bistream" is also not in their FAQ.

    Google returns Results 1 - 8 of about 17 for bistream theora for me, which is few enough for me to consider it a typo. Is it a typo, or does it mean a dual stream of some kind ?

    --
    --- There isn't any problem that can't be solved by a small, low yield nuclear device, is there??
    1. Re:I think they mean BITSTREAM by Ignignot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Man, you put wayyy too much work into decyphering a typo. ;-) Slow day at work?

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
    2. Re:I think they mean BITSTREAM by rillian · · Score: 1

      It's a typo. Now fixed. Thanks for pointing it out!

    3. Re:I think they mean BITSTREAM by BigAl_nz · · Score: 1

      Man, you put wayyy too much work into decyphering a typo. ;-) Slow day at work?

      Not too bad, thanks for asking. :)

      I wasn't sure if it was, hence asking. It could have been referring to a dual channel stream of some kind, which would be interesting to me, if that was the case. Since no one's said that's the case, I'm going with typo.

      --
      --- There isn't any problem that can't be solved by a small, low yield nuclear device, is there??
  30. Disagree on the video to TV there... by Animaether · · Score: 0

    The industry appears to have already 'settled' on :
    - MPEG 2 (DVD)
    - MPEG 4 (official specs)
    - DiVX

    Though a few may offer other formats, AVI / Quicktime / Realplayer (hah.) are not among them, neither more obscure-ish fileformats (say, 3ivx, WMF)

    So I'm not sure whether the industry will pick up on Ogg Theora any more than the industry picked up on Ogg Vorbis.

    That said, I recently played the Breed b-1 demo, and it uses Ogg Vorbis for both music and sound effects for a good portion :)
    Sadly, it was also my first and thusfar only encounter with Off Vorbis files, period.

    1. Re:Disagree on the video to TV there... by JamieF · · Score: 1

      So if folks are using DiVX but not AVI, what encapsulation are they using to keep their DiVX encoded movies in? Are you even aware that AVI and Quicktime are file formats rather than codecs?

      Also I strongly disagree that "the industry" has settled on DiVX. "The industry", meaning the folks who actually have movies to sell legally, settled on MPEG 2 in the form of DVDs. I haven't seen any remotely successful online digital movie ventures, so it's hard to say what The Industry has or has not settled on.

      If you expand "the industry" to mean "the other industry" that sells lots and lots of videos and images online, then please be explicit. (They certainly are.)

    2. Re:Disagree on the video to TV there... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Uh...DivX, 3ivX, XViD, QT MPEG-4...they're all basically different approaches to the same thing, which is the VAST and complicated MPEG-4 video standard. You can play all of these using the codec from any of the others, so long as the codec understands the method of encoding used (there are TONS of them which can be used interchangably for different results, hence the different approaches). I use FFMPEG (technically, VideoLan Client, which call ffmpeg) and it will read pretty much all of the formats because it ignores the container they're in entirely and tries to stream them through itself...if I understand it correctly.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  31. Why another format? by node+3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because it's better, it's free, and it's open.

    It's not ubiquitous, so what? Do you have to commit to using just one format, and no other?

    If you prefer better, free, and open, when you see an ogg in the list of downloads, choose it over the WMP/QuickTime/Real file. If you don't, then pick the one you prefer.

    If you're worried about the web becoming more complex, don't. MS, Apple and Real will just have to work to make things easier than ogg--they have to in order to keep the money flowing in.

    If you're bothered that there's some people out there whose idealism you find disconcerting, just remember, you made a pragmatic choice (you gave up a little money and control in exchange for ease-of-use), these ogg (vorbis, theora, flac, etc) people are working to make it so that you won't have to make that pragmatic choice. They're trying to make the world how you'd really like it to be if you had the choice (unless you are all about acquiring money by controlling access to technology, in which case they are your worst enemy, and you are right to fear them--they will ultimately win).

    1. Re:Why another format? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Free, open, yes.

      Better, not yet. Unless you just assume free and open means better. Myself, the term "better" implies there's some technical aspect that could be demonstrably improved over competition.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Why another format? by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Unless you just assume free and open means better.

      I don't just assume it. In the case of the ogg/theora folks, I have reason to believe in their ability to deliver (and so does the BBC, for example). If the project was "two guys who just finished a Halo session and decided to put up a web page about how they plan to write a new video format", being open and free isn't enough.

      Myself, the term "better" implies there's some technical aspect that could be demonstrably improved over competition.

      In this case, being open and free is a demonstrable technical improvement (or if you prefer, a means by which to achieve demonstrable technical superiority) over the competition. Of course, the theora folks could screw it up. Being open, anyone with knowledge on the subject can provide improvements (that's how vorbis was so well-tuned that it beat out mp3 and aac on a recent 128k test). Being free provides the incentive for people to help out (would you really be inclined to put a lot of effort to help make WMV better if you still had to pay to play it, pay to produce it, and pay to distribute it? Some people would, but not nearly as many.).

      I don't mean to say that theora is the superior format today and that we should all rush out and use it immediately. What I am saying is that open source/free software will inevitably win out in large sections of the software industry, both on objective quality and subjective values. When (if) theora reaches that point, I merely suggest that people don't shy away from it because it's yet another format (like many people seem to do with vorbis). That's all.

    3. Re:Why another format? by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't tried the codec then... It's pretty impressive from a quality standpoint, especially for the file sizes.

      My only complaint is in the amount of power it takes to decode really high quality files. It certainly puts a heavy load on the machine. Less than 1 GHz may be too slow to play the samples on the Theora page, but of course - it's in an Alpha state and they'll work the kinks out.

      This announcement seems to indicate that the format has stablized, even if the reference codecs haven't.

  32. I do by Adam9 · · Score: 1

    I pick up my 128mb solid state ogg player that I bought from Neuros Audio. It plays Ogg along with several other formats just fine. Once you tell people you can fit twice the number of songs on your "mp3" player without losing much quality by using Ogg Vorbis, they start listening.

    The Neuros, Rio Karma, and iRiver all support Ogg Vorbis.

    1. Re:I do by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      double? i can fit 7 cd's worth of music on my neuros flash backpack Q0 may not sound perfect, but it's fine for when i'm out on my bike using headphones

    2. Re:I do by akb · · Score: 1

      ... when i'm out on my bike using headphones

      That's dangerous.

    3. Re:I do by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      so is driving and i only use them away from major roads

    4. Re:I do by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      I usually use my Neuros in my car, but I probably wouldn't be able to tell the difference between Q0 and Q5. I don't want to keep different versions of the same song for my car and desktop. Hopefully some day we can have bitrate peeling.. some day..

  33. Why I used ogg for audio. by twitter · · Score: 3, Informative
    I like portability of my music so I use MP3. (I can't very well install the codec on my machine at work.) ... How many people is it a good choice for? Why?

    I used ogg audio to encode my music collection because I didn't have an mp3 encoder and I consider it a lucky break. It was easier to use krecord, audacity and abcde in Debian Woody than it was to get any kind of mp3 encoder. The files turned out to be smaller but of comparable quality to downloaded mp3's. I did it mostly so I would not have to worry about my dying phonograph player and saved out wav files before encoding. abcde worked great for my CDs and the collection, as you know, is much more convenient on a hard drive.

    As for devices, having ogg forced me to get a Zaurus as a portable player. My handspring visor, though still useful, needed upgrading. Zaurus plays both ogg and mp3 from CF or MMC and does so without the annoying DRM problems most players have. So, my $250 investment in Zaurus served more than one function, though it might not be as nice and surely is not as rugged as dedicated players that now cater to ogg. Sharp promisses you can sync Zaurus to outlook as well as read Word Docs.

    I'm not qualified to talk about video formats yet, but I have a feeling that I'm going to like theora.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  34. XviD isn't free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It may be open source, but MPEG-4 is patented up to the hilt. You could, in fact, be prosecuted for using it. Not likely, but possible.

    We're not talking OGM. OGG is a container itself. OGM was a hack to add extra functionality. Functionality which OggFile2 will supercede. Currently though, the OGG container is plenty powerful enough for the short-term.

    VP3 is a base to work from. MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 are MPEG-1 with tweaks and improvements. VP6 and VP3's code are probably a lot closer than you think. Don't be too suprised when Theora II comes out and matches its rivals. You're right though, Theora isn't as good as VP6, but it is as good as MPEG-4 (which you deemed excellent yourself).

    1. Re:XviD isn't free by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      2 cents an hour to encode, free to decode.

      Yeah, not free, but still. The only people who'd need to fear would be big corporations offering some giant mpeg-4 movie database and paying no royalties, or some such.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:XviD isn't free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It may be open source, but MPEG-4 is patented up to the hilt. You could, in fact, be prosecuted for using it. Not likely, but possible.

      Infact MPEG-4 patents are clearly defined. The same can't be said about Vorbis. Xiph refuses to comment precise questions about possible Vorbis patent infringements. Not sure about Theora, but On2 has probably used more money for patent searches, so it could be relatively safe. You are however much more likely to be prosecuted for using Vorbis than using of MPEG-4..

  35. ONE example.. wooo by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, one digital music player supporting it... yeah... that's widespread acceptance.

    1. Re:ONE example.. wooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, one digital music player supporting it... yeah... that's widespread acceptance.

      Add the Neuros and iRiver players and that's two more than AAC is supported by.

    2. Re:ONE example.. wooo by spoco2 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, cause outside of places like here AAC is a really well known format.

    3. Re:ONE example.. wooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, one digital music player supporting it... yeah... that's widespread acceptance.

      Poster was not refuting "there is no widespread acceptance." Poster was refuting "there is virtually no acceptance outside of Linux weirdos."

    4. Re:ONE example.. wooo by raygundan · · Score: 1

      Well, there's that whole nothing-but-AAC iTunes store, and that iPod thing that plays it-- but those aren't very popular. You're right.

  36. Matroska by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

    I would like to see Theora (or for that matter Dirac) used inside a matroska container, which to my untrained eye lookes more powerful. It should be possible, but has anyone done it?

    --
    badness 10000
    1. Re:Matroska by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone explain how much quality you can get in 4MB as their claim of saving ~4MB/700MB? Matroska will no doubt save you disk space and probably requires less CPU power, but how much quality can anyone increase in 4MB/700MB? Your untrained eye is being fooled, when you read their higher claims of quality.

    2. Re:Matroska by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should be possible. By why go with Matroska when you could use the Mplayer folks superior "nut" container?

  37. wow by Querty · · Score: 1

    I hadn't a clue the Theora project was as far along as this. The example payed without fault on totem (xine engine) on my Fedora Core 2 installation and looks (ans sounds) really good!

    Keep up the great work!

  38. Well it's okay... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    ...because I'm sure we can all blame the slow uptake on the format. That seems to be the status quo around here, anyway.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:Well it's okay... by spoco2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but it's not the fault of the format, it's the fault of "Who the hell needs it?"

      From the point of view of the general population, how does MP3 not fulfill their needs? They don't feel the need for anything more, so there's no need for OGG.

    2. Re:Well it's okay... by Trejkaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By the same token there was no need for AAC either. Yet somehow that one made it into a player. I'm not sure whether we can really blame the public, or whether the true blame should go to the device manufacturers for not making their devices upgradeable to support more formats.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    3. Re:Well it's okay... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, with all the easier to use, free as in beer tools that encode and decode MP3, the only reasons to use OGG are a) politics and b) quality. Now that both WMA and iTunes are offering free as in beer codecs with (b) that offer integral CD burning, etc, you have to actively decide to sacrifice easy of use for politics to use OGG. And since the politics of 'free to alter' software aren't something many people care about in the least, you'd have to sacrifice easy of use for nothing.

      And that's why I don't give a shit about Vorbis, Theora or anything. I look at it like this: is it a good codec? Yes. Does it have industry support? No. Do good codecs without industry support "make it?" Fairly rarely. Obscure formats limit your possible usage in a much more immediate way than the possibiity of writing your own linear audio editing app using native Virbis ever will. So I don't care.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Well it's okay... by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      Does it have industry support? No. Do good codecs without industry support "make it?" Fairly rarely.

      Mp3 made it and it had less clout behind it than those volunteering behind vorbis.

      WMA and Real (yuck!) has corporate support and are fairly widespread, but not as much as mp3.
    5. Re:Well it's okay... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      MP3 is a subset of a Motion Picture industry standard, thus it had industry backing.

      WMA and Real have support of two companies, which are again part of the computer/internet Industry.

      Ogg is neither backed by a sizable company nor is it part of a mutually agreed upon standard for any industry. Therefore, it is completely unadvertised and has few commercial tools available for it. Think, man: if your company spend $100,000 and two years helping to develop a standard for low bandwidth audio, are you going to junk what you've done just because some amateurs come up with a really good way of doing it?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    6. Re:Well it's okay... by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      MP3 is a subset of a Motion Picture industry standard, thus it had industry backing.

      Yeah, but it definitely wasn't pushed for audio-only applications and portable music players by it's original industry backers/creators.

      if your company spend $100,000 and two years helping to develop a standard for low bandwidth audio, are you going to junk what you've done just because some amateurs come up with a really good way of doing it?

      Yeah, I would. Why throw good money after bad?

      If you're going to compete with a commodity, you have to be either:
      1. better (in at least some (not necessarily all) aspects, be it freedom, sound quality or effectivity)
      2. or evil/cynic enough to use advertising to push an inferior product.


      On the other hand, maybe my fictious company could leverage these amateurs codec somehow? When the wind blows, the wise build windmills.
    7. Re:Well it's okay... by exhilaration · · Score: 1
      or evil/cynic enough to use advertising to push an inferior product.

      *cough* Sony *cough* ATRAC

    8. Re:Well it's okay... by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      *cough* Sony *cough* ATRAC

      That's a good example, yeah. I was thinking of WMA and Real, but ATRAC's right there in the league with them.
  39. Like Unreal Tourney by gotr00t · · Score: 2, Informative
    Unreal Tournament 2003 used Ogg Vorbis for its audio, for example. Somewhere in its directory structure of its installation, you will find the audio saved in none other than vorbis format.

    I predict that many other games will follow suit becuase vorbis is smaller in size while being comparable in quality to mp3, and with modern computers being extremely fast already, the additional overhead that decoding ogg vorbis creates would not be significant.

    1. Re:Like Unreal Tourney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the OGG playback in UT is so SLOW that us Mac users still have to turn off the music to get more than 24 fps. Then it suddenly shoots into the 80s.

      Between OGG and OpenAL, I don't have a whole lot of respect for open source audio. It seems to work really good on the platform it's coded on and them like shit everywhere else. I wish I could just buy an implementation of them...but since no company in the world can compete with the pricepoint of "its free," I can't.

      Open source sucks!

    2. Re:Like Unreal Tourney by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      That's like saying that "Closed source sucks" because WMA/WMV play better on Windows...

      Wait a minute. They don't. Maybe there's a pattern here.

    3. Re:Like Unreal Tourney by JKR · · Score: 1
      Er, no. They'll follow suit because MP3 costs $$$ to license in commercial applications, and OGG is free beer. They could care less about the tiny performance differences.

      Jon.

  40. Wha? What's wrong with XVID? by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    You say that there are problems with using XVID due to patents?

    Is this true?

    From the FAQ they say:
    "XviD is Free Software (licensed under the GNU GPL), open to third-party contributions and aims for standard's compliance, portability and interoperability, high processing speed and superior quality."
    and
    " We believe that XviD is the best currently available MPEG-4 video codec solution and additionally XviD is free software!"

    So, are there actual problems with using XVID or not?

    I personally love XVID as a compression codec... I use the wonderful GordianKnot application which makes encoding video just SOOO easy. This makes it wonderful to take my DVDs and rip them to XVID for use on my media server for when I feel the need to do such things...

    1. Re:Wha? What's wrong with XVID? by chewy_2000 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, there's some kind of MPEG-4 licencing problem, which is why you need to download binaries from elsewhere, or compile yourself.

      GordianKnot is good, but for the supremely lazy AutoGK is even better.

    2. Re:Wha? What's wrong with XVID? by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      Actually, AutoGK is what I use... silly me... yeah, it's a brilliant rippack... love it.

  41. It's already happening by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 2, Informative

    I noticed the other day that Chrome, an otherwise dull and unremarkable FPS, uses Ogg Vorbis for its music. I'm sure there are others.

  42. Floating point math? by swbrown · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if Theora's reference decoder uses floating point math, or is it all fixed integer? I.e., can it run on Familiar Linux on PDAs?

    1. Re:Floating point math? by DarkMan · · Score: 1

      The reference decoder is slow. That's not a surprise, the beta 1 Vorbis encoder was slow as well, on the basis that absolutly no emphasis has been placed on optimisation yet.

      Granted, I'm running about a month behind, but playing a Theora 720x576 25.00 fps video with the player_example soaks up 80-90% of my 1333MHz Althon, skipping a frame or two from time to time, depending on what else the box is doing.

      I'll grant that's higher than the typical internet distributed picture area, but that's a pretty clear indication that it's no where near suitible for the PDA level of CPU.

      (Oh, and there's some floatingpoint used in scan.c (which is the only file that includes math.h). Not much though, so I suspect that writing an integer only varient would be less work than then the Tremor (integer only Vorbis codec) was.)

      So, maybe, but not for a while. That's a question worth asking again when the 1.0 release date is near - as by then the decode will be more efficent, so a better answear can be given.

  43. .asf? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Since nobody seems to have had a problem when this was done in .asf, I don't suppose there will be a problem now. It's not like the 'file' command can't tell what is inside the file.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  44. Not sure but... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I was thinking about that issue - isn't it more the case that a Theora codec will be developed for the central system (say a Quicktime plugin or a Windows Media Equivilent) and other players will make use of the built in codec? I know there are a few players like mPlayer that just build in all the codecs but a lot of players just make use of the system codec, I think.

    Sorry to sound so unsure I just have never written a media player by hand and unsure what the standard way to go about it is nowadays, or how many third party players rely on system codecs. It sure seemed like DiVX was like that though, that managed to gain adoption pretty quickly.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  45. Naming system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ogg.
    Vorbis.
    Theora.
    Meaningless.
    Dumb.
    Names .

    1. Re:Naming system by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Especially when compared to AVI, MP3, DivX, and other obviously-named popular data formats.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  46. Dirac? by myklgrant · · Score: 1

    Just a though/question. Why don't the Xiph.org guys help out with the development of BBC's Dirac codec instead of trying to re-invent the wheel? It will have much greater acceptance with the BBC behind it as opposed to trying to sell Theora. We really need a free video codec for the future and competing ones doesn't help. Michael

    1. Re:Dirac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just a though/question. Why don't the Xiph.org guys help out with the development of BBC's Dirac codec instead of trying to re-invent the wheel?
      Funny, when I heard about Dirac I wondered why the BBC didn't help out with Theora, which was the first of the two to be announced by some considerable time.
  47. "WTF does 'Theora' mean?!?" by sirReal.83. · · Score: 3, Informative
    Read the FAQ:
    Q: Why the name 'Theora?' A: Like other Xiph.org Foundation codec projects such as Vorbis or Tarkin, Theora is named after a fictional character. Theora Jones was the name of Edison Carter's 'controller' on the television series Max Headroom. She was played by Amanda Pays.

    Now I don't wanna hear another fewl asking about it ;P
    1. Re:"WTF does 'Theora' mean?!?" by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      fewl
      As any fule kno, it's spelt "fule".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  48. Recipe for confusion - Re:Ogg isn't a format by gojomo · · Score: 1

    Having the same 'ogg' file extension for both audio and video may match the modular format well, but will confuse users and impair the usability of ogg media in file shells and media-management apps.

    Highly recommend: alternate extensions for audio and vide.

    Wondering: What MIME type(s) are used for ogg theora video?

    1. Re:Recipe for confusion - Re:Ogg isn't a format by cortana · · Score: 1

      1. Most people use Windows Media Player for everything and so won't notice/care about the file extension.

      2. Those that use a different player will presumably use a decent file manager that does not rely on MICROS~1's filename extension brain damage.

      Apparantly the mime type is application/ogg; which makes perfect sense really. :)

    2. Re:Recipe for confusion - Re:Ogg isn't a format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't it be application/x-ogg?

    3. Re:Recipe for confusion - Re:Ogg isn't a format by gojomo · · Score: 1

      Hmm. My Gnome file manager seems to rely on file extensions, just like a lot of other programs, as a key clue to file type. It also describes anything that ends in '.ogg' as 'Ogg audio'.

      A mimetype of 'application/ogg' extends the problem to another domain.

    4. Re:Recipe for confusion - Re:Ogg isn't a format by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      If you use nautilus: it does not rely on the extension, but sniffs. If it misidentifies the type, it's a bug in the database

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    5. Re:Recipe for confusion - Re:Ogg isn't a format by gojomo · · Score: 1

      I am using Nautilus (2.4.0), and junk text files given the extensions 'mp3' and 'ogg' are identified as MP3 audio and Ogg audio, even though they clearly do not contain files of that format.

    6. Re:Recipe for confusion - Re:Ogg isn't a format by parksie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Usually, Ogg files with video in are referred to as "Ogg Media", and given a .ogm extension.

    7. Re:Recipe for confusion - Re:Ogg isn't a format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OGM (Ogg Media Files) is not an official Xiph.org standard.

  49. Sample Videos by ArcRiley · · Score: 4, Informative

    We put up some sample video torrents including the three winning Creative Commons videos and a full length independent film called "Honey". All of them are made available under Creative Commons licenses. Free videos in a free format, fancy that? Share and enjoy!

    1. Re:Sample Videos by staili · · Score: 1

      Forbidden

      You don't have permission to access /torrents/ on this server.
      Apache/2.0.49 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.49 OpenSSL/0.9.7d DAV/2 PHP/4.3.6 Server at www.theora.org Port 80

    2. Re:Sample Videos by Fissure_FS2 · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who finds it funny that the parent made it to +5 when you can't even get to the torrents (access is denied)?

      --
      My life's goal is to get a score of +3!
  50. Microsoft will ship us yet by rillian · · Score: 1

    Especially since Microsoft will not allow the codec to be included in installs ever.

    Well, you never know. If they lose the appeal on the EU antitrust case, they may a least be forced to ship RealPlayer in that jurisdiction.

    And RealPlayer plays Theora. :-)

    That's the nice thing about being the right choice.

    1. Re:Microsoft will ship us yet by JAgostoni · · Score: 1

      ... now if RealPlayer would only support FLAC ... (anyone out there have a FLAC plugin for RealPlayer on Windows?)

  51. Why should I care? by rk · · Score: 1

    what the dominant audio format is when I'm encoding things for my own personal use? More to the point, why do you care what I use? Oh, it's too much trouble to leech files from me, and all those codecs... it's just so confusing.

    Damn, it's attitudes like this that make me almost glad the RIAA is cracking down on file traders. Anybody who gets something for nothing from somebody and then whinges about the format is one ungrateful SOB.

  52. be pro-active by flacco · · Score: 3, Funny

    you want to spread Theora? encode a bunch of pr0n in it and spread it out on the net.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    1. Re:be pro-active by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      It's funny, but if you actually think about it, it's really true.

      Warez groups using it to encode movies would also get it spread around, although it wouldn't be very good to have Theora labelled as "the warez video codec".

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  53. Support in LiVES by Salsaman · · Score: 1
    I am still experimenting with this, but I hope LiVES will soon feature support for encoding to both the ogg theora and the dirac formats.

    If you know Perl and want to assist with this, please contact me via the website.

    Salsaman.

  54. Simple by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Who honestly cares about or uses Ogg?

    I care. Some media activists care. All artists definitely should care. And, most importantly, some great hackers care as well.

    Seriously, as much as I constantly feel insulted by the bloody ignorance of profanum vulgus, or unwashed masses, if you will--please don't mind if I take offence to you outrageously ignorant remark--I don't really care who cares about the software I use--be it Debian, OpenBSD, EROS, PostgreSQL, Perl 6 or Ogg Vorbis--as long as the developers care. We don't need large user base to break even, now do we?

    Music is very important to me, almost as important as the freedom I have. And it's not about the price, mind you. I write it listening to another version of Tchaikovsky's Piano Concerto No. 1 in B flat minor, Op. 23, I couldn't resist to buy today on a new and expensive CD with all the money I had. I don't care about the proce of free software. For me it's all about freedom. I do believe quite a few people think that way.

    Really. I have yet to even contemplate it. Sure I have the codec on my machine, but I haven't used it. Nothing is out there in the format that I am interested in or have even ran across accidently. I like portability of my music so I use MP3. [..] I have no intention of recording anything into the format, so it would be a poor choice for me to use it. How many people is it a good choice for? Why?

    Actually, the reason is quite simple.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  55. Vorbis users weigh less? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I would imagine that there are less people

    so... you're saying that vorbis users are lesser? Do you mean they are, on average, shorter than Linux users? Oh, you must mean they weigh less, on average. No, that doesn't make sense, either. Did you mean to use the word "fewer" instead?

  56. Very good point by bogie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Vorbis people are pretty aweful in that department. Why are they hiding the freaking acm version of the codec? When 1.0 or whatever came out I thought for sure they would change their crappy policy of hiding the directshow codec. But alas no. They for some reason don't want to reach 90% of the computing public.

    From the readme for the acm version which your likely to find several places with the exception of vorbis.com

    "Vorbis Sucks, but I found the stupid goddamned folder on some site in Mexico.
    Right-Click on the vorbisacm.inf file, and choose install.
    Make sure you've got this dumb-ass vorbis.acm file in the same directory when you're installing.
    Why this was difficult to find and why there were dead links to this crappy codec all over the place I have no idea.
    Don't like me making this easy for you? Blow me."

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  57. Many questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will Theora work with AVI's, and thus Virtualdub?
    If it doesn't work with VirtualDub, then it's not as useful to me.

    Also will Windows Media Player player play it? Or does it need it's own special player like Quicktime?

    Is there a tool to convert from Theora back to AVI? I don't like being locked into a format, which is why I don't use quicktime or real media or WMV.

    Where can I find screenshots comparing Theora's video quality to other sources? I am most interested in comparisons of animated video as those are hardest to compress without visible blocks.

    1. Re:Many questions... by man_ls · · Score: 1, Informative

      IIRC, Theora is an AVI replacement codec, it's just a file wrapper, much like AVI files can have DivX/XVid/whatever video and MP3, AAC, OGG, WAV sound tracks.

      The DirectShow filters means it'll be able to be opened by VirtualDub, and possibly rendered by it.

    2. Re:Many questions... by foolip · · Score: 1

      You don't recall very correcty: Ogg (not OGG, it's not an acronym) is a container format, replacing AVI. Theora is a video codec, replacing XviD/whatever. Also, AVI files cannot have Ogg sound tracks since Ogg is not a audio codec. I believe avi has it's own framing for vorbis (through OggDS).

  58. My Mplayer does not support it?! by cos(0) · · Score: 1
    I downloaded the sample CC videos from the site and tried to play them on my Gentoo Linux machine. Here're the results (useless info omitted):
    pwhite@wkst $ mplayer Mixtape.large.ogg
    MPlayer 1.0pre4-3.3.3 (C) 2000-2004 MPlayer Team

    Reading /usr/share/mplayer/codecs.conf: 66 audio & 176 video codecs

    Playing Mixtape.large.ogg.
    Cache fill: 13.57% (1138688 bytes) OGG stream 0 is of an unknown type
    OGG file format detected.

    Opening audio decoder: [libvorbis] Ogg/Vorbis audio decoder
    AUDIO: 48000 Hz, 2 ch, 16 bit (0x10), ratio: 13940->192000 (111.5 kbit)
    Selected audio codec: [vorbis] afm:libvorbis (OggVorbis Audio Decoder)

    AO: [alsa1x] 48000Hz 2ch Signed 16-bit (Little-Endian) (2 bps)
    Building audio filter chain for 48000Hz/2ch/16bit -> 48000Hz/2ch/16bit...
    Video: no video
    So how does one explain that? As you can see, I am running the very latest version of mplayer. Do I need some special USE flag?
    1. Re:My Mplayer does not support it?! by ArcRiley · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yes. Add "oggvorbis speex flac theora" to your USE variables.

      You can also emerge libtheora first, just to make sure. mplayer/xine will only build with Theora support if you have libtheora on the system, and that may or may not happen automatically if you have the "theora" use variable in place first.

  59. Bioware neverwinter nights by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    look up all the horror stories they had getting installing and video to work on linux! Mostly because the people they licensed the codex from blew them off and wouldn't support them...I bet their next projects will all be Ogg!

  60. Theora has patents by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    Theora has patents! They have been offically signed over by the owners to the open source project...all legal like. It's actually a Big Deal & the point of the whole OGG excercize!

  61. Sound-only AVI? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why not just do it the way people do with avi, ie, codec.container?

    For the same reason people don't use .avi for sound-only media files. Also, Windows Explorer can't distinguish between two file types that have the same extension following the final dot; .tar.gz and .dmg.gz look exactly the same.

  62. A design level optimization by tepples · · Score: 1

    This can bring performance problems. Unless the file system caches the media type of each file, searching or sorting files by media type will be slow, with at least an open(), a read(), and a close() on each file. Does there even exist a guaranteed maximum length in bytes for media types?

  63. Not suitable for pocket-size players by tepples · · Score: 1

    isn't it more the case that a Theora codec will be developed for the central system (say a Quicktime plugin or a Windows Media Equivilent) and other players will make use of the built in codec?

    For most media systems on virtual computers such as PC or Macintosh, that's correct; you'll need an Ogg demuxer, a Vorbis audio decoder, and a Theora video decoder, all possibly shipped as separate plug-ins.

    But typically, the first versions of the codecs run in real time only on comparatively fast machines with large memory and an FPU. However, pocket-size players typically have any of several low-current 32-bit microprocessors without FPUs, and developers tend to ship version 1.0 codecs before ports to such platforms appear. You can't just "install Theora" onto a pocket A/V player, even if it does support Ogg container and Vorbis audio.

  64. But they're freely licensed, unlike MPEG's by tepples · · Score: 1

    Theora has patents! They have been offically signed over by the owners to the open source project

    The difference is that unlike On2, which now licenses its VP3-related patents at no royalty, MPEG-LA charges big buck$$$ to license essential patents related to MPEG standards.

  65. MPL issues? by tepples · · Score: 1

    We really need a free video codec for the future and competing ones doesn't help.

    Competing codecs do help, as without competition, development tends to stagnate.

    Besides, unlike the BSD-licensed Theora, the BBC's Dirac is under the Mozilla tri-license (MPL + GPL + LGPL). Xiph.org switched Ogg Project code from LGPL to BSD to better fit a pocket-size player that compiles all codecs into a single monolithic executable image. Would the MPL fit as well?

  66. Good Sounding Music on GBA by tepples · · Score: 1

    GBA currently can't decode MP3 in real time, but it can decode another compressed format based on the codec used in GSM mobile phones. You can fit 150 minutes of jogging-quality music on your 256 Mbit GBA flash cart with a GSM player that I ported.

    1. Re:Good Sounding Music on GBA by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      You rule. And it builds ROMs too, so I can just dump the ROMs into PogoShell to lay out a directory. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  67. You assume that pocket players will be used by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    In my case I personally think that pocket video players will never be widespread in use or acceptance, which is why I did not account for them. This will not be a problem like MP3 players as very few people have uses for portable video and the short battery life that portable video brings to the table.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  68. Not the same case as Ogg Vorbis by Hyksos · · Score: 1, Interesting

    People seem quite pessimistic about this codec (they might say realistic). The situation is however not the same as with Ogg Vorbis. Let's face it, the main use of video codecs like DivX etc are in pirated movies. While thousands of people might rip a CD or two into the most handy format (read: MP3 or in some cases AAC) movies are ripped by only a few people. Here it is not ease of use or availability that matters, it is simply technical performance. If Theora has a higher quality/size ratio than for example XviD then these people will use it, clear and simple. If you don't have the codec then too bad, you better get it.

    Ripping movies is an endless quest for higher quality and smaller files sizes. A great example is the increasing number of videos encoded with OGG for sound instead of MP3 since that squeezes out a few megs from the final file size.

    PS: I of course have never downloaded any of the aforementioned files :)

  69. First Live Theora Stream by thomasvs · · Score: 2, Informative

    Woohoo, Xiph ! Anyways, we have a Theora live webcam stream for you guys to test out. AFAIK we're the first doing this. http://mirror.fluendo.com:8801/ With MPlayer, for example, you'd do mplayer -cache 40 http://mirror.fluendo.com:8801 to watch it. If you're lucky you can catch Rupert coding. Not a lot goes on in this stream, we're fairly boring (Read: our boss is watching too) We'll be adding Vorbis sound sometime this week too. The server will be Coming Soon to a Repository Near You.

  70. Re:Standards? where? by n0d3 · · Score: 1

    just cos nobody does it doesn't mean you don't have to.

    If I write software, I adhere to all standards. I'm one of those -Wall -Werror -pendatic etc : )

    you gotta start somewhere, sure they should be used ... atleast we should try. lousy programmers who don't adhere to standard, hopefully get canned sooner or later?

  71. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    xvid is still MPEG-2 (which is patent-encumbered).

    1. Re:Wrong by Jardine · · Score: 1

      xvid is still MPEG-2 (which is patent-encumbered).

      I think you meant mpeg-4 but your point is true.

  72. I've bought music online in Ogg format... by Denyer · · Score: 1

    ...and I'm neither an audiophile nor particularly bothered about formats as long as I can burn to CD. That suggests (to me, at least) that the format is gaining some ground. =)

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
  73. Tips on Theora usage... by evilviper · · Score: 3, Informative

    Okay, with any luck, everyone will go out, get their video players working with Theora, and start encoding content. So, I think I should throw-out some quick tips before people start complaining and/or getting frustrated...

    First, to get Theora playback for any players on Linux, you need to compile and install the alpha3 snapshot first, and to do that you need the CVS version of all the "vorbis-tools" as they are called. Once you've done that, you just have to re-compile your video playing programs (like MPlayer) with something like "--enable-theora" passed to configure...

    As for encoding, you're probably going to have sync problems... I don't want to waste my time getting in-to details, but suffice it to say you need a version of MPlayer newer than 1.0pre4 (CVS right now), and you need to use the "-vf softdup" option when you are dumping the video to the fifo (from which the Theora encoder is fetching the source video).

    Also, trying to have mplayer dump to video and audio fifos at the same time is guaranteed not to work... You need to either dump the audio to a real file (wastes space), or launch two instances of MPlayer, one dumping audio from the source file, one dumping video from the source file.

    If you don't know what I'm talking about, you haven't started encoding video with Theora, so just keep these tips at the back of your mind, because you'll need them when you do start.

    The only other tip I've got, is to wait until a better encoding program is written. The libraries are fine, but the wimpy example programs leaves a lot to be desired. When other media programs (mplayer, or transcode) start doing encoding via the Theora/Vorbis libs, we'll be a lot better off.

    Just hope that Theora/Vorbis encoding support finds it's way into MPlayer (or transcode I suppose), then you won't need to worry about all of these issues ('softdup' will likely still be needed though).

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  74. No just clueless, try games. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Check some of the latest games, for sometime they switched from mp3 to ogg for their soundfiles.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  75. ARGH! Worst of both worlds! by Sunnan · · Score: 1
    Don't bother replying about the degradation in quality; I didn't notice it, and I prefer the oggs anyway for other reasons.

    As per your request, I won't reply about the degradation in quality, but I do hoped you marked the files as converted from mp3. (Maybe with a 'filename.mp3.ogg'-style suffix, as well as a comment.)
    1. Re:ARGH! Worst of both worlds! by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      How is it the worst of both worlds? I can see you are implying that I have combined the poor quality of mp3s with some other bad aspect of oggs... what aspect of oggs is worse than mp3s? Or are you just referring to the relative unpopularity of the format?

      Anyway, my CDs got re-ripped as ogg, so they're high quality, but my downloaded mp3s got converted. I honestly can't tell the difference; most of the mp3s were 192kbps (or higher) to begin with anyway.

    2. Re:ARGH! Worst of both worlds! by Sunnan · · Score: 1

      If the Ogg format has any drawbacks what so ever (relative unpopularity being one), you'll experience them, while simultaneously experiencing the drawbacks of mp3 (primarily crappy crappy sound).

      It's lossy on lossy. Like viewing something through two filters simultaneously. Like rebroadcasting a movie from a homerecorded VHS-tape.

  76. Rio Karma by charnov · · Score: 1

    Actually, my player does OGG and FLAC just fine, thank you.

    --
    [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
  77. You don't recall correctly. by DarkMan · · Score: 1

    Ogg is the AVI equivelent, being a transport and encapsulation layer.

    Theora is video codec at the same level as DivX/XVid, more or less. And when you talked about Ogg sound tracks, you ment Vorbis, which is the audio codec.

    Spot on with the direct show filters though

  78. You may not see it directly by wurp · · Score: 1

    But, for example, we've chosen to use it (Ogg Vorbis) as the audio format in Magicosm. We have to encode and decode files, and ogg is a free, well-tested way to do that. I suspect a lot of other content producers have made the same choice.

  79. fear of patents by charnov · · Score: 1

    I switched to Vorbis when Fraunhoffer (the people that hold patent rights to mp3) where making a stink about enforcing their patents (which they did...they just didn't go after decoders...yet). This wasn't long after the GIF patent debacle. So, yes, there is a very good reason to use something other than mp3 and that something else, right now, is Ogg Vorbis.

    --
    [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
  80. Please don't feed the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moderators,

    This poster, Twitter is an obnoxious Linux Zelot who rants about anything even remotely commercial, and posts off topic rants (at +2) on a regular basis. While this post isn't one of his classic rants, by moderating it up you give him Karma bonus points that always uses, especially for his more inflamatory posts. Most people with decent Karma don't use the bonus unless they think that their post is especially insightful, and would like it to be noticed. By contrast, Mr. Twidder arrogantly believes that all of his posts are all-important. This particular post isn't remotely interesting or insightful, and it started at +2 already, so why not just leave it be? Certainly we don't need anymore delusional posters on slashdot, we have enough already.

    Please, Please, Don't feed the troll.

    1. Re:Please don't feed the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      HAHAHAHAHA!!!! The tide is turning!!!

      Thank you!

  81. Update on VLC by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    Actually, I just went to the site to see when the new Theora would be in VLC and it says it's already supported. Impressively short time to incorporate new formats isn't it?

  82. You mean like camcorders? by tepples · · Score: 1

    In my case I personally think that pocket video players will never be widespread in use or acceptance

    There will always be a market for pocket video players, even with an S-video output instead of an LCD so that the user can watch video on a TV. Heck, even pocket video recorders are in use. Or do you want to have to lug a heavy laptop when shooting digital video footage?

  83. Recorders yes, players no. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The market for portable video players will always be niche and essentially non-existant compared to music players.

    Camcorders are a special case, but really digital cameras will take over that function in the near term - and they will not be used to load video onto, just to take new video.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  84. Damn straight! by Sunnan · · Score: 1

    It ain't software if it doesn't come with source code. How am I supposed to compile it? I'm not going to rely on something that in turn relies on proprietary platforms.

    1. Re:Damn straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupidest...comment...ever...

    2. Re:Damn straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you churn your own butter too?

      Butt breath.

    3. Re:Damn straight! by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      Do you churn your own butter too?

      Yeah, but I don't have to. That's an imperfect analogy. The discussion was about encoding digital material. If I encode it with free software, I know that I can always use that codec if I want to. It's future safe.
      Butt breath.

      You misspelled "butter". Unless you intended to write butt, in which case I would suggest you get your face off my ass.
    4. Re:Damn straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the analogy's fine because it's comparing you to the paranoid freaktards that think the government is putting mind-controlling substances in their butter. Thus they churn their own.

      You land squarely in the "paranoid freaktard" camp of people who's afraid to use any code he can't compile himself. (Not that you dorks ever even LOOK at said code, or would even understand it if you did, oh well. It's like just knowing it's there makes you start doing the happy dance in your pants.)

    5. Re:Damn straight! by Sunnan · · Score: 1

      I'm a writer (but dabble in sound/graphics/video for fun). I had a lot of old writings in Microsoft Works .wps-format that's lost to me. I don't want to lose something even more important, like a movie. That's the reason.

      OTOH, there's also practical impediments for me to currently use QuickTime. It's not available for my favourite OS, I would have to run it through an emulator.

    6. Re:Damn straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey buddy - have one of your friends that runs a normal OS go download the Works importer (link) and convert your files for you. Or you can just go through life thinking that your writings are "lost to you," when really you're just to stubborn and/or retarded to do something about it.

      Bad example.

      Anyway, thanks for finally flipping to a sane reason not to use Quicktime. "It doesn't run on my OS" sounds a whole lot less lame than "I don't have the source code."

    7. Re:Damn straight! by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      Yeah, bad example - I did manage to salvage them a couple of years ago - but they were unavailable for me for quite a while, and when I needed them. I did get out of the situation, but I learned a lesson.

      Anyway, thanks for finally flipping to a sane reason not to use Quicktime. "It doesn't run on my OS" sounds a whole lot less lame than "I don't have the source code."

      But the reasons are connected. If the source code was available it'd run on anything. Open source == open algo == future-proof files.