Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Patents The Body Bus

Mz6 writes "Microsoft has been awarded a patent for using human skin as a power conduit and data bus. Patent No. 6,754,472, which was published Tuesday, describes a method for transmitting power and data to devices worn on the body and for communication of data between those devices. In its filing, Microsoft cites the proliferation of wearable electronic devices, such as wristwatches, pagers, PDAs (worn on people's belts) and small displays that can now be mounted on headgear. "As a result of carrying multiple portable electronic devices, there is often a significant amount of redundancy in terms of input/output devices included in the portable devices used by a single person," says the filing. "For example, a watch, pager, PDA and radio may all include a speaker." To reduce the redundancy of input/output devices, Microsoft's patent proposes a personal area network that allows a single data input or output device to be used by multiple portable devices." (What about DoCoMo's research in this area?)

123 of 508 comments (clear)

  1. And in other news.... by ShepyNCL · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..... Micrsoft to sue all future survivors of lightning strikes.

    1. Re:And in other news.... by 2names · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Microsoft sues every living thing that has a nervous system. They are all electrical, right? They all pass data, right? They have input/output devices, right?

      We are really screwed now.

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    2. Re:And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


      They are all electrical, right?
      No.

      They all pass data, right?
      No.

      They have input/output devices, right?
      No.


      Resistance is futile.

      You will all be assimilated!!!

    3. Re:And in other news.... by baxissimo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Resistance isn't futile. It's V/I.

    4. Re:And in other news.... by jadenyk · · Score: 5, Funny
      Microsoft redefines so much technology here... Think about it...
      • Security Hole
      • Emptying the recycle bin
      • Packet Sniffer

      Man, I could go on forever..

    5. Re:And in other news.... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Meanwhile, Ray Bradbury is demanding an apology from Microsoft for lifting the title from his classic work I Sing the Body Electric.

    6. Re:And in other news.... by DJStealth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry for the additional post, but I just realized, that many of those machines to calculate body fat transmit electrical signals through the body in order to obtain data on body fat, water, etc..

    7. Re:And in other news.... by twofidyKidd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let's leave "floppy drive" out of this one.

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    8. Re:And in other news.... by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Almost.

      It would be R=E/I

      where

      (R)esistance is expressed in Ohms
      (E)lectrical Potential is expressed in Volts
      (I)Current is expressed in Amperes

      Don't apply the units until you actually make the calculation.

      At least, that's what they taught me in my military electronics training, way back when.

    9. Re:And in other news.... by mallardtheduck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, in my physics class we always use V. E is too abigous. It could easily mean (E)lectircal current or (E)lectrical resistance or (E)nergy...

  2. I'll try extra hard not to get electrocuted now... by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm an EE, and I don't want my wife to inherit a lawsuit for patent infringement. ;)

  3. This might be valid by Woodrow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a physical device and if there is no prior art then I think this is a very valid patent.

    1. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wasn't Tesla doing this a century ago?

    2. Re:This might be valid by aka-ed · · Score: 5, Informative
      Doesn't matter. Patent #6754472, which you could easily access from the USPO website, is a patent for "method and apparatus," and spells out exactly what the apparatus is supposed to accomplish. It doesn't prevent others from using human conductivity for other unrelated purposes, and in fact cites 8 previous patents, including some exploiting the same principle. You seem to be lacking a sense of what it is that patents actually protect.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    3. Re:This might be valid by mikael · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They measure resistance conducted through the human body. Any standard electronic voltmeter can be programmed to measure resistance in the low ohm range.

      With the Atari series of computers, it was possible to use human body as a game controller. By holding onto a pair of connectors connected to the paddle input pins, it was possible to change the resistance of the circuit by changing how strongly you gripped the connectors.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:This might be valid by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 4, Insightful
      No prior art? You might want to read the spec for ieee488 bus.

      Is it not a requirement for US patents to be non-obvious as well?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re:This might be valid by TechniMyoko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      thats not transmission of data though by your logic USB wouldnt be able to be patented since power cables exist. Afterall, all data is is electricity

    6. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, but he did demonstrate using the body to conduct electricity, i.e. supplying power to a device.

    7. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Wear do current technologies like Heart Rate Monitors fit into this?

      Polar, Nike, even Timex have what I'd call body based data bus technology already. Interesting patent to say the least, I wonder what is next. Beside a proliferation of IP lawyers.

    8. Re:This might be valid by tchuladdiass · · Score: 5, Funny

      What about the times I used to hold a coat hanger in one hand, and grab the TV antenna with the other, in order to get a good signal? My body was used to carry data then (although it was analog).

    9. Re:This might be valid by velo_mike · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Wear do current technologies like Heart Rate Monitors fit into this? Polar, Nike, even Timex have what I'd call body based data bus technology already

      Don't HRM's transmit the data via radio frequency? They recieve electrical impulses through the skin, but don't use the body as a conductor to transmit the data.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    10. Re:This might be valid by mAineAc · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know, I found this that talks about PAN(personal area netowrk) from 1995

    11. Re:This might be valid by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This is a good point, but the question then arises of whether the information is transmitted from the heart to the monitor, or whether the information is simply being transmitted from the skin to the monitor. And is the pulsing of the heart comparable to much more complex data?

      I wonder what kind of interference there will be between this and pacemakers or cochlear implants. (Or are cochlear implants oblivious to the body's electrical currents?)

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    12. Re:This might be valid by samantha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh huh. This is the human body or more specifically, its skin. It has been known to be able to carry signals and even some amount of power for some time. Exactly what physical device did M$ invent here? It can legitimately patent devices to take advantage of this capability. But it cannot patent the very idea of using the skin in this manner any more than someone could at one time have patented running power through a conductor.

    13. Re:This might be valid by IsaacW · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A number of posts in this story have made the comparison between this patent and devices like heart rate monitors and body fat meters. The authors of those posts have missed the fact that the devices they are citing are sensors. They are not "sending data using skin as the phyiscal media," rather they are sensing some physical phenomenon (heart rate or body fat percentage) using some electronic device. These devices are not "prior art" to this patent, nor could this patent be used to challenge the manufacturing of these devices.

    14. Re:This might be valid by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a CB radio from the mid-80's that has a touch-plate along both sides and uses the body of the person holding it as an antenna.

    15. Re:This might be valid by xQx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I remember demonstrating the same thing with an electric fence and my sister when I was about 10 ... Still, I think the PO might see a difference between grabbing an electric fence to transfer shock to another nearby person, and turning the body into a LAN.

  4. the "Gates of Borg" picture by saforrest · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somehow, the topic icon of Bill as a Borg seems more appropriate than ever.

  5. Obligatory by chrispl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great now I can BSOD my brain!

    --
    What post? The one you're carrying inside your rusty innards!
  6. What are you doing there with all these women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A beowulf.

    No, really!

    1. Re:What are you doing there with all these women? by kpansky · · Score: 5, Funny

      What are you doing there with those hands?

      Imagining a beowulf cluster.

      --

      --Kevin
  7. In other news, riaa speaks out by MDFedderly · · Score: 5, Funny

    When any of your portable devices detect that the DRM has been violated for their IP, they would like the wearer of the device to recieve a powerful electric shock, capable of causing paralysis.

  8. And in other news... by mikael · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Microsoft have announced they are patenting the use of the human body as a energy source for computers.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:And in other news... by nkh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Prior art: Larry and Andy Wachowski for The Matrix!

    2. Re:And in other news... by thedillybar · · Score: 2, Funny
      >...Microsoft have announced they are patenting the use of the human body as a energy source for computers.

      Now you don't have to worry about the batteries running out before you fall asleep. Not to mention your diet, those Centrino chips burn more calories than you might think. Soon Microsoft will begin marketing chips alongside Intel...only Microsoft's will be loaded with calories and nutrients.

    3. Re:And in other news... by jb.hl.com · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft Matrix: Where Do You Want Your Probe Today?

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    4. Re:And in other news... by colinleroy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, *laughs*, thanks, I didn't got it 'till you explained!

      --
      blah
  9. Borg Love by mfh · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Microsoft Slashdot icon has never been more accurate that it is with this article. Where are they getting the human skin to test this on? Interns? Seriously, though... just stick your finger into these electrodes, please.

    Now that we can all be Borg, so I just want to know how long before we have Borg incubation chambers? Anyone with kids will back me on this... we need them. I would think the skin bus might cause cancer, wouldn't you? No FUD about it... this could be some scary shit when you consider Microsoft's security record, as well.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Borg Love by dlmarti · · Score: 5, Funny

      So what happens when my wife and I have sex.
      Do the two networks connect?
      Is my watch going to get a virus from her cellphone earings???

      I have now officially coined the phrase "Sexually Transmitted Computer Virus" or STCV's.

      I would love to see the sylibus for the sex-ed classes in 2010.

    2. Re:Borg Love by NecroPuppy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Where are they getting the human skin to test this on? Interns?

      Sure.

      Cause you don't build social attachement to MS Interns like you do to rats...

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    3. Re:Borg Love by RevDobbs · · Score: 3, Funny
      So what happens when my wife and I have sex.
      Do the two networks connect?

      I think the more important question is, "what happens when my girlfriends wants to know what I'm doing with all of these extra 'Client Access Licences'."

      But sweetie, they just came as part of a bundle... I hardly ever use more than two at once...

  10. Does this work??? by bollow+(a)+NoLockIn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This sounds very much like science fiction to me. Are there any proof-of-concept studies in this direction?

    My gut feeling is:

    • Data transmission: maybe, but bandwidth will be low.
    • Power supply: won't work
    --
    Under construction: swpat politics overview article
    1. Re:Does this work??? by JPriest · · Score: 5, Informative

      RTFA, the DoCoMo technology said they can exchange data between people at up to 10 meg. The DoCoMo tech lets users exchange email address and "buisness card" data with a handshake. Cool stuff.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  11. If it rains... by dickeya · · Score: 2, Funny

    stay home. And don't ever move to Seattle.

  12. Upon further research by darth_MALL · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are also patenting the human built-in telescopic antenna array. Unfortunately, it will only be available to approximately 50% of the population.

  13. It's power not data by malefic · · Score: 5, Informative

    DoCoMo's research is to transfer data via the body, which IBM also has done research (and most likely has some patents on). The MS patent is to power non-powered devices by having a power supply somewhere else that transmits the current through the skin. Similar, but different.

  14. Handshaking by nucal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So I guess this might ultimately allow the transfer of data literally through a handshake ...

    1. Re:Handshaking by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

      And bring new meaning to the words "male and female connectors".

    2. Re:Handshaking by earthman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Already some years ago I have read somewhere (link, anyone?) about how this kind of technology could be used to automatically exchange virtual business cards when you shake hands with someone. So this isn't exactly something new.

    3. Re:Handshaking by Mr.+Sane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes -- see IBMs paper on the subject.... note the date of the -prior art- demonstration: November 18-19, 1996 -- Microsoft filed their patent April 27, 2000. I wonder where they got there ideas from?

  15. Let's see... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I was 5 I discovered electricity for myself by sticking a fork in an outlet. Thereby proving Benjamin Franklin right and developing prior art to use against Microsoft. Ah, the follies of youth.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  16. Microsoft calls this tech... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...ActiveHerpes.

    I prefer to pick up my own viruses and worms, thank you. I don't need MS "delivering" them to my skin.

  17. So, instead of each device having a speaker... by foxtrot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...a relatively small, cheap speaker, each device will instead have a relatively large, expensive widget to use our nerves as cat-5 (human-5?) so we only have to shlep around one little speaker?

    They are kidding, right?

    -JDF

    1. Re:So, instead of each device having a speaker... by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No.

      Instead of each device having a battery and a wireless radio, each device will have a data I/O and a power I/O device. You'll be able to have one efficient battery power your watch, PDA, cell phone, and display-eye-wear.

  18. Oh great by foidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I beta tested the stuff, and now my butt won't stop rebooting...

    1. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just clean up the mess after unexpected core dumps.

    2. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have to make sure that you close any open ports.

  19. good luck MS by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

    A personal area network (PAN) is a technology that could enable wearable computer devices to communicate with other nearby computers and exchange digital information using the electrical conductivity of the human body as a data network. For example, two people each wearing business card-size transmitters and receivers conceivably could exchange information by shaking hands. The transference of data through intra-body contact, such as handshakes, is known as linkup. The human body's natural salinity makes it a good conductor of electricity. An electric field passes tiny currents, known as Pico amps, through the body when the two people shake hands. The handshake completes an electric circuit and each person's data, such as e-mail addresses and phone numbers, are transferred to the other person's laptop computer or a similar device. A person's clothing also could act as a mechanism for transferring this data.

    The concept of a PAN first was developed by Thomas Zimmerman and other researchers at M.I.T.'s Media Lab and later supported by IBM's Almaden research lab.

    sorry but MIT and IBM is way ahead of Microsoft in this with prior art.

    hell I made a example prototype from the information I recieved from mister Zimmerman back in 1997 for playing around with PAN's when i was heavy into the wearable computing research.

    Microsoft, what Idea can we steal today?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:good luck MS by kakos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They aren't patenting PANs, they are patenting a particular method of implementing a PAN. Nice try at MS bashing though.

    2. Re:good luck MS by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I suggest you actually READ the patent. they are trying to patent data transfer (PAN) and power transfer.

      if they weren't trying to sneak the data stuff in there I would not have a problem with it, but they are trying to submarine the PAN data technology into their own patent.

      strip out everything to do with data and I'll love the fact they have a patent on a new idea.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:good luck MS by Christopher_G_Lewis · · Score: 5, Informative

      The MS patent actually references several other patents, including:

      5796827 which is IBM's for the hand-shake data transfer.

      6104913 IBM's PAN

      and
      6211799 MIT's on power/data transmission over the body.

      Obviously they are building on previous patents, and have come up with an enhancement.

      Or the patent office just rubber stamped it :-)

    4. Re:good luck MS by Donny+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I suggest you actually READ the patent. they are trying to patent data transfer (PAN) and power transfer.

      Their technique is different from other/previous inventions because the powered device can transmit and use power/data without actually having its own power source. Therefore they're not trying to patent PAN.

      Quote: Because the devices of the present invention are networked, they can be recharged and powered by other devices on the network.

      IBM's and others' PAN devices all have their own power source (at least News.com reported that IBM's device had the size of stack of cards).

    5. Re:good luck MS by Malor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm really not sure this is a very good idea.

      The body is a very complex beast, and has evolved to work in ways we simply don't understand yet. Adding our own signals to the body's natural electromagnetic field may be completely harmless, but it could also have strange, unpleasant side effects over time.

      Personally, I don't plan to carry any such device until they've been on the market, and in fairly wide uptake, for at least 10 years. I'm generally an early adopter of almost anything, but this technology worries me a little.

    6. Re:good luck MS by Felinoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      So the only diffrence between Microsofts patent and IBMs PAN is the power distrabution grid?
      I sort of missed out on all the PAN research myself becouse I was focused on the step power generator created to power wearables.
      Now how do you suppose they get all that power from the foot to the head? I didn't see any wires leading down the leg in the prototype.

      I found the whole talk of power distrabution to be boring so I phased it out. Someone else might know.

      --
      I don't actually exist.
  20. If this was not Microsoft... by Woodrow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    would anyone have any objections to this patent? This patent covers a physical device made of atoms just like 100% of all patents applied for 100 years ago. I do nto agree with sofwtare patents but I do with patents covering physical devices.

    1. Re:If this was not Microsoft... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Of course not! If Steve Jobs (not to be confused with his close relative that Clinton talks about in his new book) were to have developed this so your iPod could talk to your Newton, everyone here would be drooling and saying "OOOH! Steeevie, you're SO SMART" and camping outside the Apple Store to buy one.

      Give Microsoft a break here! The invented some physical device and they have a great reason to patent it.

  21. Anyone who has ever been electrocuted by dpilot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    has violated this patent. Plus the old experiment in school, where the whole class holds hands in a string, and the person on each end each touches one lobe of a Van Der Graff generator. Everyone's hair rises, and whoever breaks the circuit gets the shock - but there was a circuit and power was being delivered, it was even doing work.

    Here's the problem:

    Patents are being awarded for spending a little time thinking. For having the luxury of free time to think, and company lawyers to file, companies are able to establish themselves as a gatekeeper.

    Patents should be the product of effort - they were meant to reward that effort, and incent you to expend that amount of effort again in the future.

    IMHO, these 'few hours of thought' patents are diametrically opposed to the concept of patents as enumerated in the Constitution.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  22. IBM did this years ago. by swngnmonk · · Score: 3, Informative

    I remember IBM had a demo product that would exchange virtual business cards via a handshake - it might well have been a plug-in to a Palm Pilot They theorized max xfer at 2400bps at the time - this was 1996-7 or so. Still looking for the link.

    --

    'ARRGH! Pirate Designers of the Internet, we be!'

    1. Re:IBM did this years ago. by swngnmonk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Found it.

      It was an IBM researcher by the name of Tom Zimmerman who created a "Personal Area Network", back in 1996: Personal Area Networks (PAN): A Technology Demonstration by IBM Research.

      Looks and sounds a lot like what MSFT just patented.

      --

      'ARRGH! Pirate Designers of the Internet, we be!'

    2. Re:IBM did this years ago. by Mz6 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Looks and sounds a lot like what MSFT just patented."

      Nah... It couldn't be. The USPTO wouldn't make a mistake like that. I mean they research every patent that they approve.

      --
      Hmmm.
    3. Re:IBM did this years ago. by YouTalkinToMe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, in the patent they cite:

      "Personal Area Networks: Near-field intrabody communication"; IBM Systems Journal, vol. 35, No. 3&4, 1996 --MIT Media Lab, 11 pages.

      so I assume that the patent adds something to what was done at IBM.

    4. Re:IBM did this years ago. by drewzhrodague · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IIRC, couldah sworn I saw a NOVA episode with Alan Alda on this topic, and he transmitted data via his hand at low speeds (300bps?). This was way a while ago.

      Boy do I wish I could afford to submit a patent application!

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  23. We are the Borg by shachart · · Score: 5, Funny

    Resistence is futile... errr... patented.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, consult.
  24. My thoughts exactly. by Brandon+Glass · · Score: 5, Informative

    I guess Kevin Warwick will enjoy the prospect of the Personal Area Network as described above, though. Now if only we could find a way to embed these devices directly into the skin and/or find a way to connect the input jacks directly into our brains...

    (For those who don't know, Kevin Warwick is Professor of Cybernetics at Reading University, and performed an experiment on himself by implanting a tracking device into his arm, which allowed computers to determine which room he was in, and make judgements based on his position).

    1. Re:My thoughts exactly. by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      perhaps someone could implant something right up his pipes, the horrible little self-agrandising worm.

    2. Re:My thoughts exactly. by phasm42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      More information on Kevin Warwick, a.k.a. Captain Cyborg here: here, here, and here
      The folks over at El Reg are bigs fans of him ;-)

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
  25. Awesome by isd_glory · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Borg coments aside, I'd love to see this work. Turning the human skin into a data path has wonderful medical applications. Imagine being able to monitor pacemakers, hearing aids, and other prosthetic devices non-invasively.

    Furthermore, this could open up the prospect of "implants" to help humans with different things. If Microsoft can really get data and power running through the human body, it could really usher in a new age of computing.

    1. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Furthermore, this could open up the prospect of "implants" to help humans with different things. If Microsoft can really get data and power running through the human body, it could really usher in a new age of computing.

      I can see the Slashdot comments already: "MSDN has had a patch available for that Parkinson's bug six months ago! If you don't stay current, it's your own damn fault! Patch early, patch often, Twitch Boy."

      No thanks. I'll keep suffering along with a speaker in my PDA and one in my phone.

  26. Underwear virus by Benanov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm just worried about the potential security vulnerabilities. I mean, imagine someone running down the street, flailing their arms wildly, screaming "My underwear's been infected by a virus! I can't take it off!"

  27. Exchange viruses by touch alone! by Elphin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just wait until the first virus is written for such a system which can be spread by touch alone!

    "Damn, I've got the Blue Arm of Death! Could someone press my reset switch for me"

  28. See IBM by TheLink · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's some prior art for data transmission:
    http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/user/ pan/pan.html

    Where MS patent is different is they claim to do _power_ transmission as well.

    I wonder about a Mr Tesla...

    That said, I'm personally not comfortable with the idea of transmitting significant amounts of electrical power through my body- even low level power. Not sure what the side effects would be.

    Already there are some studies that indicate that electromagnetic fields do affect the body AND brain.

    --
  29. Physiological-Sexual Implications of this tech by MacGoldstein · · Score: 3, Funny

    I stumbled across this link, and although it strictly deals with bandwidth (not also with power, as in the Microsoft technology), it must be posted.

    Because, although many of us have suspected it before, it is now pretty much obvious that sooner or later, penises will have higher bandwidths than cable modems.

    Brings a whole new meaning to the networking term "trunk".

    I can see it now:

    Defendant: No, no, no your honor, you've got it all wrong! Her battery died and I was just jumpstarting her devices!
    Judge: Couldn't you have just shaken her hand?
    Defendant: I thought if we got our juices flowing, maybe the conductivity would be greater?

    ...*ducks*

  30. why not? by twitter · · Score: 2, Funny
    That's a natural, given how much you have to run around to keep the average M$ powered computer going. Might as well stick the operator in a squirrel cage.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  31. This is a good thing by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a new idea. While it has been known for a long time that the body conducts electricity, sending data through the body has not been acheived before. There has to be a good reason for this.

    Presumably Microsoft has solved some specific engineering problems. They also probably spent a lot of money on solving them.

    Why shouldn't they be entitled to financial reward?

  32. RESISTANCE by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 2

    IS FUTILE

    ...or at least pretty high... dry skin isn't a great conductor ;-)

    --
    sudo eat my shorts
  33. the other 50%.. by Hooya · · Score: 3, Funny

    well, with the download well present in the other 50% of the population, data mining just became a helluva lot more fun!

  34. Wrong icon by essreenim · · Score: 4, Funny

    If ever there was justifiable reason to use the Borg icon instead of patent pending, I think this was it ...

    : )

  35. Violating this patent... by Vaginal+Discharge · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... will cost you an arm and a leg.

    --
    "Glory is fleeting but obscurity is forever" - Napoleon Bonapart.
  36. Lots of Prior Art by linuxtelephony · · Score: 2, Informative

    Several years ago there was someone that created this technology. When two people with PDAs using this technology shook hands, the PDAs used the "circuit" to exchange contact information. The logic went something like, if you shake their hand, you want to share and collect their information. Unlike wireless, you didn't just blindly share your info with everyone in close proximity.

    --
    . 62,400 repetitions make one truth -- Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
  37. No -- It's power AND data by Mr.+Sane · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microsoft filed their patent (which is titled a "Method and apparatus for transmitting power and data using the human body") on April 27, 2000.

    Yet at this web site, http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/user/pan/pan.html, there is a white paper (dated November 18-19, 1996) where IBM demonstrates their "new Personal Area Network technology that uses the natural electrical conductivity of the human body to transmit electronic data".

    So, IBM demonstrated similar techniques back in 1996 that used the natural electrical conductivity to transmit data.

    However, Microsoft's claims focus on power, and frequency adjustments, this is basis for their ability to send data.

    One of Microsoft's claims states "modulating an information signal transmitted" using this signal; yet, in the IBM white paper it states that "The natural salinity of the human body makes it an excellent conductor of electrical current. PAN technology takes advantage of this conductivity by creating an external electric field that passes an incredibly tiny current through the body, over which data is carried."

    My gut says that many of MS's claims are voided by prior art -- but one would need to study the MS claims in detail, and compare it to DoCoMo's and IBM's research on the subject, to make a truly educated rebuttal.

    1. Re:No -- It's power AND data by monkeydo · · Score: 2, Informative

      And if you actually look at the Microsoft patent, you will see that they reference the IBM work as well as the DoCoMo patent. I suspect that if they thought these patents invalidated their application they would have realized it by now. At the very least, the patent examiner would have looked at the refereced patent and determinined they are suficiently different.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
  38. "electrocuted" by gotr00t · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The word actually means death by electrical shock. If you got shocked by a Van de Graff generator, and are still alive to talk about it, then you have not been "electrocuted."

    Sorry to nitpick on something so minor. The rest of the points in your comment are completely valid.

  39. Fuse? by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Funny

    So where exactly does the fuse go?

    Oh. Ew.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  40. Cell Phones = Brain Tumors.... by LabRat007 · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Body Bus = Skin Cancer?

    It will certainly be a while before the long term effects of data or power over skin will be available. The lower levels of the epidermis constantly divide and push older dying cells outward to protect the body (info). Many things can cause improper division and lead to cancer. UV radiation everyone should already know about but so can excessive amounts from other radiant energy sources; such as electromagnetic or microwave. I don't believe short term exposure to low levels of energy have any chance of causeing problems in a healthy adult; but years of exposure over the same areas may be another story. There is no way in hell I want devices sending messages or power across my skin until there is significant data to say its safe.

    --
    "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
  41. I'm thinking of starting the "FOSSie" Religion by pandrijeczko · · Score: 4, Funny
    In the same way that nothing from a pig goes into a Jewish body, nothing with a Microsoft logo goes into or onto mine...

    It'd bring a whole new meaning to having "worms"...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  42. PRIOR ART by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 5, Funny

    My brain is prior art.
    It gets it's energy from my body, and uses it as a data bus to send messages to my various other parts.

  43. And this is insightful how? by Divlje+Jagode · · Score: 5, Informative
    Followed any of the links?

    My gut feeling is:
    • Data transmission: maybe, but bandwidth will be low.
    • Power supply: won't work
    Look, you only had to go as far as the slashdot link:
    Eye of the Frog writes "Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp. and its subsidiary NTT DoCoMo Inc. have developed a device that attaches to your PDA which uses the body's conductivity to transmit data at an amazing 10 megabits per second.
    the keywords being amazing and megabits. Please, in the future, keep your gut feelings to yourself.
  44. Re:Dangerous? by mstorer3772 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Horse shit.

    There is no proof that RF causes cancer. Heard of an class action suits against cell phone manufacturers? No. You haven't.

    Why?

    Because this is horse shit.

    Those little healing magnets you wear to align your shakras/amplify your aura/whatever-BS-they-foisted-off-on-you? Horse Shit.

    Yes. You heard it here first.

    As penence, you must watch no less than 5 episodes of Myth Busters. (not really punishment, but at least you'll be less likely to fall for this stuff in the future)

    --
    Fooz Meister
  45. Don't be so limited. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    each device will instead have a relatively large, expensive widget to use our nerves as cat-5 (human-5?) so we only have to shlep around one little speaker?

    No, the future is much better than that! Imagine yourself covered in speakers or organic LEDs. They will use your skin to make you into a big billboard. Skin power transference also shows great promise in EULA and copyright enforcement. DMCA mark V will require placement of electrodes on all external genitalia at birth and terrorism, masturbation, pre and post marital sex and other evils will cease to exist.

    Somehow, I'm not impressed. Everyone knows the conductive properties of skin and electro-cardiogram makers have researching human skin electrodes and signaling for decades.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  46. A message from Microsoft by daishin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have been taken oveExcuse me and allow me to introduce myself, I am a heeelp...linux user, and I would like to announce that Microsoft products are far superior.

    --
    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. Add Bunny to your signature
    (> <) to help him achieve world domination.
  47. This isn't a new idea.... by bryanc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Various forms of hearing aids have used this idea for several years. For people with hearing in one ear, you can 'transmit' the sound from the deaf ear to the working ear.

    --bryan

  48. IBM Patent? by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was a commercial campaign about 1997 or 1996 befor the CeBIT trade fair. That showed 2 business men shake hands and exchange digital business cards.

    Maybe IBM was first in this one....

    Just my 2 (Euro-)Cents....

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  49. Prior Art??? by ColdCoffee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The facts will ultimately show that [insert deity of your choice] has prior art on this patent - It's called the nervous system!

    --
    Sig? - yeah, whatever.
  50. Here is the zimmerman Patent by bensonandhedges · · Score: 2, Interesting
  51. IBM also has prior art... by AaronBaker2000 · · Score: 4, Informative
    I remember reading about this in Popular Science years ago. IBM developed this in 1996 and called it a Personal Area Network. Read about it here:

    http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/user/pan/pan. html

  52. 1995 Wired Article: The Body Bus by theodp · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Body Bus
    Tom Zimmerman has shown that the noncontact coupling between your body and weak electric fields can be used to create and sense tiny nano-amp currents in your body. Modulating these signals creates Body Net, a personal-area network that communicates through your skin.

  53. I wonder how much the MS tax by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...will be on cardiograms.

    Will we need to install electric shields around the heart region if we refuse to pay MS tax?

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  54. Prior Art? by mindseye1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just read an article about a company researching how the human body can actually create small amounts of electricity itself. This would be used to power things like, say, a pace maker. But I'm not sure if this is the same idea that M$ is going for. Anybody know what I'm talking about?

  55. Power Transmission by Praufet · · Score: 3, Informative

    Those who are defending this patent argue the MS is trying to patent power transfer more so than data transfer might wanna think about the fact that transfer power over your skin is extremely obvious. If the patent office were properly staffed with competent individuals these things would not happen. I mean anyone who has ever been shocked has discovered prior art for power tranfer over human skin.

  56. slashdot needs years on their date stamps... by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 4, Informative
    the sited article is dated Sunday October 06, @20:37. .. October 6 of what year? This could make the difference between a random reference and verified prior art. (I'm not kidding here... Slashdot posts might classify as prior art in some patent fights).

    In this case, it looks like this one was 2002 (the other option is an unlikely 1996), which is 2 years after MS filed their patent.

    I'm lazy.. I hate having to use cal(1) to figure this out.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  57. Upgrade path by LiberalApplication · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So I guess this might ultimately allow the transfer of data literally through a handshake ...

    If this becomes a standard, there will have to eventually be upgrade paths... right? I keep imagining things like subdermal conduits for improved bandwidth or current-carrying capacity. Geeks flaunting their gear with brightly colored stripes running down their arms, just beneath the skin.

  58. You WILL be assimilated, resistance is futile by Teahouse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't there SCADS of prior art on this topic How the hell does M$ think they are going to repatent Blue Tooth by simply stating all the devides are attached to a human body?

    Of course, if M$ is really smart, they will patent applying mild electric shock to the human skin and GRAFTING these devices to the skin (using the skin as a comm-conduit of course) THEN they might actually have something....oh wait, prior art again....see The Borg legal departmemnt.

    "We are Borg Legal, you will be litigated, resistance is futile, pleabargain is your only option" Come to think of it, isn't that how M$'s legal team works today?

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  59. Bill Gate Borg Icon??? by rwrife · · Score: 2, Funny

    This article clearly calls for the Bill Gates Borg icon instead of the patent pending one.

  60. or an arial by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every stuck you finger in tha back of a T.V. arial socket to get a better reception. That's multiple modulated frequencies. If my video pickes up some information from that signal to start recording then I've selectivly activated a device.

    In the audable range, I've used myself as a very noisy conductor for hi-fi equipment before, maybe I had a pizeo attached.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  61. Prior art short list by Felinoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IMAO becouse IANAL some of this may not apply.

    Skin networking research at MIT
    The diffrence between MITs prior art and Microsofts patent is the power distrabution.
    But.. DU.. the data is electrical... power distrabution is an implied part of that.

    Any time you have a reliable electrical signal you have a power source.

    Basicly Microsofts patent is a minnor and obveous modification of an existing patent and as I understand it patenting the obveous is not permitted.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  62. How easy isn't this idea by fluor2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well I've thought of this for years, and also I've had some ideas including inserting small heat-devices near veins (inside body) to make the blood transport heat through the body.

    AND I've talked to others that have somewhat thought of similar ideas. I think this patent is just another nail in the coffin for the U.S. Patents.

    Excuse me for being arrogant, but you Americans should really start looking into what's happening.

  63. BSOD takes on a new meaning by neverpsyked · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Well, detective, the coroner's report cited the cause of death as a Blue Skin Of Death."
    There's gonna be some great Law and Order episodes from this one.

    --
    What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
  64. Would anybody really want this? by spikev · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are two reasons I can think of that this sort of system wouldn't be ideal: 1) I don't want to let MS run electricity through my body and 2) it would be far easier to sync all my devices with a wireless network, even if I had to do something to activate the syncing. Besides, if this patent is in the clear, it will likely be expired before anything significant has been done with it.

  65. Seen it before, in 1996. by CarlPatten · · Score: 4, Informative
    http://www.businessweek.com/1996/26/b348112.htm

    SOLE MATES. At MIT's Media Lab, where corporate sponsors fund prototypes of new digital technologies, computers are appearing in wildly unlikely places. As part of a project called Things That Think, researchers have embedded a computer in a Nike Inc. sneaker. Using a piezoelectric polymer to generate power from foot movement, a computer in the heel might act as a sort of personal secretary. When two people shake hands, for instance, the skin-to-skin contact would be detected by sensors in each person's shoe. That would trigger an exchange of information--the computers could perhaps swap electronic business cards and check calendars for a future meeting date. Modified eyeglasses and wristwatches might display the data.
  66. Old stuff by frambris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey, I heard of BAN (Body Area Networks) years ago! The US patent office seems to be lame retards that doesn't check whether someone has done this before. I can't recollect who did the experiments but read an article about 5 years ago of a computer worn in the shoes drawing power from movement (and maybe foul air =) ). When people shaking hands their computers swapped electronic businesscards. So after a day of shaking hands on meetings, fairs etc you could get a list of whom they were and everything.

    How the heck can you get a patent on something that is already out there?

    Why don't we file a patent for "sending information through variations in airpressure" (also knows as talking)?

  67. IBM had this in print 10+ years ago by tweedlebait · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can't remeber whether it was PopSci, SciAm or BYTE
    but 10-15 yrs ago I remember an article about ibm
    researchers doing business card and phone number
    info between people using a handshake, or
    having several peopole's devices 'synched' at once
    using a banister / handrail.

    Knowing IBM i'm pretty sure they paid a visit
    to the patent office.

    --
    Firefox & /. ? Use this often:
  68. what about ibm prior art? by geraint-nz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    several years ago ibm showed(patented?) a system where suits at a conference could exchange electronic business cards by touching hands :-)

  69. IBM did this back in 1996 or earlier by Durandel1020 · · Score: 2, Informative

    IBM has done this sort of research many years ago. Knowing how IBM is on the ball with patent law, I doubt they didnt patent this before.

    http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/user/pan/pan.html

    see for yourself, this type of thing is old hat.