Slashdot Mirror


Toshiba Develops World's Smallest Fuel Cells

An anonymous reader writes "When you think of Toshiba, you might think of notebooks, but fuel cells? Never. Well, at least not until up to now. Toshiba claims to have made the world's smallest fuel cell to date. The direct methanol fuel cell can fit inside of the smallest of gadgets, ranging from MP3 Players to portal DVD Players. Most fuel cells require a pump that can mix the methanol and water, and a fan to help cool the pump. This makes installing fuel cells in smaller items out of the question. However, Toshiba's new fuel cell does not require a fan or a pump to operate, which means it's much smaller in size, and can be installed in almost any small device."

94 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. Not smallest by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 5, Informative

    Motorola designed this sort of thing in 2000, and it's smaller.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    1. Re:Not smallest by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Motorola designed this sort of thing in 2000, and it's smaller.

      Interesting. Any guesses how they compare in terms of power output and efficiency?

      -jim

    2. Re:Not smallest by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      . . .it hurts the eyes when you read it.

      No. It hurts your brain, which is an entirely different matter. It hurts your unconcious sensibilities. It is empirically demonstrable that it is less hurtful to the eyes, which is one of the reasons I do virtually all of my ebook reading in text mode. It makes a huge difference not staring directly into a lightbuld for hours at a time, but white on black has the same contrast that black on white has.

      Bitch about the people who use Navy on black because the lack of contrast makes it virtually unreadable and you have highlight the whole bloody thing to get through it.

      KFG

    3. Re:Not smallest by dosius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On a standard CRT, white on black is actually more readable, imho, than the reverse; you don't have a screen full of light blaring at your eyes.

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
  2. Up next: the fuel cell powered vibrator by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hours of runtime, and portable, which makes it better than a shower massage. Carpe technology...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. More effecient? by Peterl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One would think that the lack of a pump and fan would improve the effeciency, as well.

    1. Re:More effecient? by djtripp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And less moving parts, means less heat, less burned legs, and less chance of the cell exploding on your lap.

      --
      "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
  4. Amazing Summary by OverlordQ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Considering the summary here a good 9/10 of whats in the linked Overclockers Club here's some links from some more normal news outlets

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Amazing Summary by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's already 8.5 grams for 100 mw and lasts 20 hours? 235Wh/kg - that's already better than some of the best batteries out there (say, Zinc-air, at 200). I'm impressed. Of course, the power density (11.7 W/kg) leaves something to be desired... (even your weakest chemical batteries will give you at least 80 W/kg (say, Zinc bromide)). Here's to them getting better. :)

      Only 2cc (ml) of methanol in that? That means that only 1.58 grams of it are the methanol. All I can say is, "wow". If you were to double the mass of this fuel cell by adding only a fuel tank (assuming the weight of the tank is negligable), you should be able to get 139 hours (1.635 kWh/kg) out of it (!). I could live with that ;)

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
  5. cluster by azmatsci · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If I beowulf them, can I improve the fuel efficnency of my crappy Explorer? Taking a road trip next week and already worried about the checking acount.

    On the other side, we will now be able to talk on our cell phone anywhere any time. No loger will 'my battery is dead' be an accetable reason for not calling the boss back. Gee, thanks guys.

    --
    I stole this sig.
    1. Re:cluster by karnal · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have an explorer and you're worried about funding the gasoline for it?

      Sounds like someone needs to go down to his neighborhood Kia dealer. Or maybe get a VW Jetta TDI. A friend of mine has one, 50mpg.

      Of course, I shouldn't talk. I drive either a 99 grand marquis or a 78 cougar.

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:cluster by name773 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      trade in your explorer then. last time i checked, most tdi volkswagens got 49 city and 53 highway.... on diesel.

  6. What we really need... by NIK282000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Is a fule cell that produces 2 things, electricity for our gear and as a byproduct of the energy it makes some form of caffienated beverage.

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    1. Re:What we really need... by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn laptop! I'm always short on battery life. Hey you, pass be another round will ya. ....hey, how do I open this guy up?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  7. EE Times article by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Informative

    More info from . If that link doesn't work (it has a session ID I couldn't remove), try looking at the EE Times front page

    One third of the volume of the device is fuel; if you doubled the volume, you'd get 4x the life.
    ----
    TOKYO -- Toshiba Corp. has developed a matchbox-sized direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) with no moving parts.

    The prototype measures 22 x 56 mm with a thickness of 4.5 mm and includes a 2-cc capacity fuel tank. The fuel cell weighs 8.5 grams, and has an output power of 100 mW. Using a 99.5-percent concentration of methanol, the fuel cell can power low-power consumption devices such as MP3 audio players for about 20 hours, Toshiba said. Toshiba divides its DMFC development into two types, "active" and "passive." The new passive fuel cell aims for higher power -- more than 10 W at 10-20V generated by active systems, which use a pump and fan to feed methanol and oxygen into a cell stack where oxygen reacts with the methanol to produce electricity.

    Toshiba unveiled an active prototype to power notePCs last spring, and plans to introduce a product later this year.

    The passive model features a simpler structure, making use of the concentration gradient to feed methanol and oxygen to the cell stack. "We eliminated mechanical components such as a fan and fuel pump used in active-type DMFCs. Instead, we devised a way to supply fuel and air uniformly," said Fumio Ueno, a technology executive at Toshiba Display Device & Components Control Center.

    Toshiba engineers reduced catalyst particles nanometer size. The electrodes measure 2 x 3 cm, but deliver the same output power as Toshiba's conventional DMFC using electrodes five times larger.

    Toshiba plans to introduce the small DMFC with an output power of about 100 mW sometime next year.

    Toshiba engineers said the fuel cell can power some portable devices such audio players. "We'll work on improving the output, then the fuel cell can power cellular phones," said Kazunori Fukuma, managing director of Toshiba Display Devices & Components Control Center.

    For cellphone applications, Toshiba is targeting an output level of 2W at 4V. "More functions are implemented in a cellular phone, such as TV reception. This will increase the need for fuel cells," Fukuma said.

    Initially, it will be difficult to replace current lithium ion batteries with DMFCs, and a hybrid configuration may make the most sense. The fuel cell could charge the lithium ion battery when the phone is idle.

  8. A loud bang followed by death? by Sean80 · · Score: 2, Funny
    OK so here's my thing. Does anybody else out there associate the word "fuel" with highly combustible? This whole idea of putting methanol inside my laptop and then firing the whole thing up makes me a little uncomfortable.

    I assume these things are perfectly safe to use?

    1. Re:A loud bang followed by death? by JesseL · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What, you think normal chemical batteries are safe? Between the highly caustic acids or alkalines, the heavy metals, lack of short circuit detection, propensity for exploding or shooting flames when overcharged, ordianary batteries are death machines if that's your way of thinking.

      I don't worry about it much.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    2. Re:A loud bang followed by death? by mangu · · Score: 4, Informative

      It should makes you more than a little uncomfortable to know that many types of batteries have highly combustible and/or toxic and/or corrosive materials in them. Try opening a lithium-ion battery and putting the contents in a glass of water to see what happens... No, I just remembered, this is Slashdot so maybe someone will try this. Do NOT open any batteries, ever. The contents in most of them is more dangerous than methanol.

    3. Re:A loud bang followed by death? by Kenja · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you seem to have no problem with stuff like Nickelic Hydroxide, Poly-vinyl chloride, Mercury or Polychlorinated biphenyls. Look at it this way, if your computer hasn't killed you or given you cancer yet odds are youre safe.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:A loud bang followed by death? by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      wrong lithium... lipo batteries are used extensively in electric RC flight, saltwater is the recommended method of discharging a bad pack. (the nasty lithium is an elemental form, batteries use and oxide)

    5. Re:A loud bang followed by death? by stienman · · Score: 4, Informative

      I assume these things are perfectly safe to use?

      Perfectly safe? Sorry bubble boy, but even a padded chamber isn't perfectly safe.

      These are reasonably safe, though. For any oxygen combustable fuel to flame you need the fuel in a gaseous or vaporized form within a sufficiently (but not too high) oxygen rich environment.

      The small amount of fuel that's in this device would have to turn to gas and flame in the air. You wouldn't be able to fit enough air inside the canister and enable the methanol to turn to gas to cause an explosion. However the space is small enough that it isn't feasable until the canister is empty (only vapor remains). Even then oxygen isn't allowed in the canister. Even then they have overpressure vents which would, at most, cause this device to "vent with flame," as most manufacturers claim LI-ION device may due in the worst cases.

      So - reasonably safe yes, perfectly safe, no. Safe enough to prevent multi-mullion dollar liability suits? You bet.

      It's all about the bottom line.... Heh, heh, heh.

      -Adam

    6. Re:A loud bang followed by death? by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why would it be pressurized? methanol exists as a liquid at standard temperature & pressure.
      It would be like refilling a zippo, or a lawnmower, or a motorbike.. not like refilling propane or a butane lighter or anything like that.

    7. Re:A loud bang followed by death? by jsebrech · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does anybody else out there associate the word "fuel" with highly combustible? This whole idea of putting methanol inside my laptop and then firing the whole thing up makes me a little uncomfortable.

      I know exactly what you mean. Each time I refill my zippo with fuel I pray that it won't end up in half a city block burnt to the ground. And don't get me started on the dangers of refilling your car. True deathtrap, that. How people think combining explosive engines and large volumes of highly flammable liquid is an acceptable idea is beyond me.

  9. Re:Also of note by iacyclone · · Score: 4, Funny

    But I am sure it would only be a small explosion. ;)

  10. this may give a push to harddrive mp3 players by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    since the battery is their weakest link.

    Wonder how long it takes when we see iPod or iRiver or other hard-drive based players with cell inside.

    1. Re:this may give a push to harddrive mp3 players by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not likely. Possibly a secondary fuel source, but you can't just drop your iPod in the dock to recharge it with a methanol fuel cell. I could see Belkin - they made damn near everything else for the iPod - producing a clip-on charger, though, possibly built into a carrying case.

      It if did make it, I imagine the cells will be much like calligraphy pen cartridges (plastic cylinder) and would slide into place conveniently. The devices will probably require a rechargeable battery as well. If your fuel cell cell phone (FuelCellphone?) is getting low on methanol, you might lose power while it's sideways in a pocket.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  11. Picture of fuel cell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    DPReview has a pic of it.

    http://www.dpreview.com/news/0406/04062401toshib af uel.asp

    1. Re:Picture of fuel cell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  12. What About Refills? by artlu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the items are so small then how much energy can they realistically generate? Sure, I may get an extra five hours of my iPod, but if I have to go though the trouble of refilling the damn thing instead of just plugging it in, then I don't see the point.

    I like portable fuel cells for laptop use because you can get about 18 hours out of one cell, which is great for flights to India, but when else do you really need that much battery life?

    GroupShares Inc. - An Interactive Stock Market Community

    --
    -------
    artlu.net
    1. Re:What About Refills? by FreeLinux · · Score: 5, Informative

      Perhaps a RTFA is in order.

      The tiny fuel cell uses 2cc of concentrated methanol to provide 20 hours of power at 100 milliwatts, max.

      With regard to refilling. This will be done with a can of compressed methanol. Simply plug the can into the cell for a few seconds and you're good to go for another 20 hours. This process will be very similar to the way that butane cigarette lighters are refilled and have been for more than 30 years. Just for the record, butane is much more flamable/explosive than methanol. Yet, when last did you read of a can of butane or a refillable cigarette lighter exploding?

    2. Re:What About Refills? by chazwurth · · Score: 2, Informative

      When you're working in an environment in which you have to move from room to room fairly often and would not rather lug an adapter with you, or spend time looking for outlets, or worry about the issue at all. Hell, I find it inconvenient to worry about it in my own home -- get up from desk, kneel down, unplug adapter from under desk, carry adapter in one hand, laptop in other and beer bottle in teeth to living room, put down beer and laptop, rummage around under couch for power strip...etc. etc.

      --
      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. --Dan Kaminsky
    3. Re:What About Refills? by Jtheletter · · Score: 5, Funny
      Sure, I may get an extra five hours of my iPod, but if I have to go though the trouble of refilling the damn thing instead of just plugging it in, then I don't see the point.

      Ok, here's how you get the point. Both of us go camping in Maine with our iPods. We each rock out to our very hip playlists for a day or two until the batteries die. I will reach into my backpack and take out a 2 oz bottle of methanol that will last me for a week, while you attempt to plug your iPod into a tree.

      It may seem like outlets are ubiquitous, but they're not. The idea is that you can take a number of "recharges" with you and it takes up minimal space. Refilling the cell is also not going to be like pouring oil in your car with a funnel, it's more like refilling a butane lighter by pressing the spout of the fuel can up to the fuel port for a few seconds.

      OTOH though, I work with Methanol at my job, and it is some nasty shit. I'm not so sure how consumer friendly this particular fuel cell will be, in general it's a bad idea to be carrying around any amount of methanol. I'll wait for the cells that run off plain old alcohol so my iPod can booze up with me at the bar.

      "Bartender! Another round for me, and one for my little friend here!"

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    4. Re:What About Refills? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      . . .if I have to go though the trouble of refilling the damn thing instead of just plugging it in, then I don't see the point.

      Refilling the thing creates an instant recharge and may be done where there is no place to plug in, like on an 18 day walk, which may not be your thing, but is for plenty of others, who may well find GPS nice to have along under the same circumstances.

      Great for boaters too.

      Most of the world is not yet wired, and much of that even lacks availiblity of batteries. Nontheless people tend to crawl all over those places from time to time. Alcohol can even be made on site, even on a desert island in small quantities.

      I can understand that it may not fit your urbanized needs, and that's ok. Just understand that there are a billion or more whose needs it fits pretty well.

      KFG

    5. Re:What About Refills? by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The tiny fuel cell uses 2cc of concentrated methanol to provide 20 hours of power at 100 milliwatts, max.

      "Concentrated methanol"???

      Pure methanol perhaps, but I don't believe you can concentrate methanol at all.

      With regard to refilling. This will be done with a can of compressed methanol

      Errr.. another point of error: being a liquid at normal temperature, methanol is virtually incompressible.

      This process will be very similar to the way that butane cigarette lighters are refilled and have been for more than 30 years. Just for the record, butane is much more flamable/explosive than methanol

      No, there's another *huge* difference -- at normal temperature/pressures, butane is a gas so it can be compressed for storage and refil (even to the extent that it becomes a liquid). No such option is available with methanol.

      It's starting to smell like snake oil :-)

    6. Re:What About Refills? by Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Passengers or pilots? :)

      Seriously, though, I'm not sure how that applies.... A gun is a device designed to kill things by making puncture wounds. It is safe within those parameters. Of course, those parameters are incompatable with a ride on an airplane. A battery is a device designed to store electricity. If it is safe within those parameters, it is a perfect thing to have on an airplane.

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
  13. If you feel comfortable ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Funny
    putting a methanol powered device in that vicinity (especially without a cooling fan), more power to you.

    Or is that an entendre?

    1. Re:If you feel comfortable ... by Grant29 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, any word on the safety of something like this? I'd hate to have an explosion in my pants.

      --
      12 Gmail invitations availiable

    2. Re:If you feel comfortable ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Now we're cooking with gas!"

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:If you feel comfortable ... by Bob+McCown · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'd hate to have an explosion in my pants.

      This guy can help with that.

    4. Re:If you feel comfortable ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you'd hate to have an explosion in your pants, perhaps you should take them off before using a vibrator.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:If you feel comfortable ... by msmikkol · · Score: 4, Informative

      Explosions are not a real hazard. Methanol is a liquid and the container is not pressurized. Making lightweight liquid-proof containers is not extremely challenging and furthermore, the amount of methanol can't be very large in a device that small. The worst-case scenario I can think of is that you might be able to break the methanol container and start a small fire.


      --
      The aim of science is not to open the door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error.
      -Bertolt Brecht
    6. Re:If you feel comfortable ... by homer_ca · · Score: 5, Interesting

      People freak out when you talk about methanol fuel cells, but then forget the mini bottles of liquor on the airplane's drink cart have just an much alcohol. Those people probably wouldn't think twice about carrying around 1L bottles of 151 proof rum or 190 proof grain alcohol.

    7. Re:If you feel comfortable ... by iabervon · · Score: 4, Funny

      What I want is a fuel cell system that runs on those little bottles. Sure, they're not as cheap as methanol, but they come conveniently packaged in manageable sizes and can be bought on airplanes.

    8. Re:If you feel comfortable ... by bpatterson · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope we aren't cooking. I already can't use my laptops on my lap for more than 10 minutes before my legs and 'ahem' - parts - are uncomfortably warm, if not in pain. I'm completely happy to have less battery time to afford a fan for cooler running. My weiner will be wearing a bumper sticker reading - 'Cool Cells, Not Fuel Cells'.

    9. Re:If you feel comfortable ... by orzetto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You name it, we've got it.

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
  14. and if ... by Via_Patrino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wonder if you're on an airplane and a despresurization happens, the fuel cell blows and nobody can see the flames (because they're invisible). can you flight safe carring one of these?

    1. Re:and if ... by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Why would depressurization blow a fuel cell?

      methanol does not require pressurization.

    2. Re:and if ... by dave1791 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are on a plane and it depressurizes, the methanol in your laptop is the least of your concerns.

  15. How long before... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Funny

    How long before I can get one converted over to ethanol, and installed in my stomach to use excess fuel to power my array of personal electronics?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:How long before... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Funny

      The downside is that you'll have to pay Microsoft a patent fee to use your skin as a conductor for the electricity.

  16. Portal DVD player? by Armarius · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the post:

    "ranging from MP3 Players to portal DVD Players"

    What's a portal DVD player? Is that like a Stargate? :-)

  17. Re:do they smell by proxima · · Score: 4, Informative

    They do after all emit co2. I wonder if you can smell them?

    "Carbon dioxide is a colourless odourless gas"

    http://www.ucc.ie/ucc/depts/chem/dolchem/html/co mp /co2.html

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
  18. Portable Methane by platypibri · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you want true portable methane power, find a way to harness the awesome effects of my award winning Split Pea Soup! A small hose could be ran from the "back end" of the methane converter to a meriad of electronic devices. My wife can vouch for the consistent power output.

    --
    Yeah, I guess I'm funny like that.
  19. Only 100 mW by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Informative

    Another article reports that the power output is only 100 milliwatts for the 8.5 gm device. This suggests that a 1/2 kg version of the thing would only put out 5.9 watts - not enough to power a laptop. It looks like an interesting powersource for low-power devices, but anything with a backlit display or modern mobile processor is probably not feasible with this tiny unit.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  20. Elaborating on the details by kyoko21 · · Score: 3, Informative

    More can be read here...

    News links from google...

  21. More on ... by RobFrontier · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here is another article related to the fuel cell in question, and what they are going to use it for. http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000080& sid=a5sZn3vGo1js&refer=asia I haven't seen anything on cost yet, anyone heard?

  22. Toshiba is a really big company . . . by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    When you think of Toshiba, you might think of notebooks, but fuel cells? Never.

    When I think of Toshiba, I think of plastics, bulk chemicals, PLC's, motors, instrumentation, batteries, X-ray machines, and I'm not sure that they still do this, but they used to even be into heavy machinery . . . as well as computers, semiconductors and consumer electronics. Are fuel cells really a stretch?

    Does the author of the topic really think that /. readers are that naive?

    1. Re:Toshiba is a really big company . . . by Ian+Peon · · Score: 2

      Well, after he copy and pasted almost the whole damn article, he had to say something original.

    2. Re:Toshiba is a really big company . . . by tigger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you think of Toshiba, you might think of notebooks, but fuel cells? Never.

      UNLESS YOU ACTUALLY READ SLASHDOT, rather than just submitting stories. granted searching the slashdot archives for "toshiba" and "fuel cell" is quite tricky, but i think most slashdot users are up to the task

      since the poster was anonymous perhaps they arn't a regular reader, so remembering back three months might be to much to ask.

      damnit slashdot needs more readers like StateOfTheUnion.

      Toshiba To Show Laptop Fuel Cells at CeBit
      http://slashdot.org/articles/03/03/05/19625 6.shtml ?tid=126&tid=184

      Fuel Cells Promised For Next Year
      http://slashdot.org/articles/03/03/16/183521 8.shtm l?tid=126&tid=137

      Fuel Cells To Appear In Laptops In 2004
      http://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/02/231620 5.shtm l

      riki

      --
      "Maybe with some divine intervention, the next version of Microsoft's OS will actually be good." - Linus Torvalds
  23. Wonderful by chuckw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is great! Now can we finally buy one of these f00king things? Or must we be constantly taunted with these advances only available as prototypes to large multi-national corporations and well financed government labs...

    --
    *Condense fact from the vapor of nuance*
  24. Fuel Cell Today - Good source of Fuel Cell news by MazTaim · · Score: 5, Informative

    Along with yet another article regarding Toshiba's new fuel cell, Fuel Cell Today has some other interesting news items regarding Fuel Cell technology worth reading.

  25. Methanol questions by tortoise42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is great, but is there any word on how much methanol something like this would go through? More importantly, when are Radio Shack and K-Mart going to begin distributing methanol? I'll need to pick some up on my way out of town.

    1. Re:Methanol questions by bennomatic · · Score: 2, Funny
      The beauty of this is that you don't need to buy methanol; we all produce it. So just buy some beans and stick the cell up your @$$ to recharge it.

      I believe it's called "closing the loop", though I can think of some better names for it.

      Please don't mod this funny; that would only encourage me.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
  26. Re:do they smell by stienman · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can't smell CO2, which is why it's so deadly in concentration. CO is a poison - it's not just the lack of oxygen that will kill you.

    Of course, pretty soon every laptop will also contain a micro-bonsai tree to cleanse the CO2.

    And my micro bonsai will be overclocked.

    -Adam

  27. Lithium Ion just as dangerous by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This whole idea of putting methanol inside my laptop and then firing the whole thing up makes me a little uncomfortable.

    Then don't think about the lithium ion cells in your laptop/cell phone right now, because they have extremely high energy densities(the battery pack in my Powerbook 17" is probably the same volume as a CD jewel case, and yet contains 61 Watt-hours of power), and require careful management by the device to keep from entering thermal runaway mode, where the battery gets hotter and hotter until it explodes- and I do mean -explodes-. Rather violently.

    For several years(possibly still) battery companies wouldn't sell Lithium Ion batteries to anyone except certified "solution providers" to assure the batteries had proper charging and monitoring.

  28. Mitochondria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Toshiba Develops World's Smallest Fuel Cells"

    Actually no. Your cells have the world's smallest fuel cell. And they were first.

  29. Re:the masses have no clue yet, so it's not too la by Moocowsia · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ballard stocks have already gone up and down several times. If you invested say 10 years ago you would have made a killing. You've pretty much missed the boat now.

    --
    Moo!
  30. Conglomerates by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 3, Informative

    Who thinks of tractors when they think of Hitachi? Probably just about no one but they do make them. These Japanese conglomerates are huge and they have their fingers in a whole lot of pies.

  31. Re:do they smell by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, CO is a poison. CO2 is not. CO2 is no deadlier than any other gas we cannot breath, like inert helium.

    KFG

  32. Re:Why do "most fuel cells" require water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    From :

    http://www.dpreview.com/news/0001/00012004motoro la batt.asp

    A direct methanol fuel cell converts the energy in methanol directly to electricity and operates at normal room temperatures. A catalyst (typically a mixture of platinum and ruthenium) is used to react a dilute mixture of methanol and water to form carbon dioxide, protons, and electrons, which provide the electrical current. The protons are conducted through a proton-conducting organic membrane to another platinum catalyst where the protons combine with oxygen from the ambient air to form pure water. Some of the water is recycled back to mix with the methanol, and the excess water evaporates as water vapor in the air.

  33. Re:Vaporware - cell me back when they exist by servognome · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Private spaceflight was vaporware also until this last week. It was interesting to read articles on how the projects have evolved until we got to this point.
    I don't mind having 1% of all /. stories dealing with the evolution of near future technology.

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  34. No mention of Homeland Security issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder will passengers be permitted to board an aircraft with items that are powered by these fuel cells? Heck, the fearful fascists take away cigarette lighters. Why not fuel cells?

  35. Will fuel be allowed on airplanes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure the cells themselves are fine, but will you be allowed to take a pressurized canister of combustible gas on the plane??

  36. Grammar so bad it hurts by DongleFondle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Toshiba claims to of made the worlds smallest fuel cell to date."

    Does that make anyone else wince in pain?

  37. More information by kbk7173 · · Score: 2, Informative

    dpreview has an blurb that is much more comprehensive. And, to spread the hits, you can see the original press release The content of the two links is the same, only the background color and periphery information is different. (dpreview is black; toshiba is white)

  38. Re:oil company's unite! by jacrawf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hell, I don't care what the oil companies do: My newest cell phone runs on biodiesel! No more filling up at the cell-phone station for me.

  39. Take that warning seriously! by Kiyooka · · Score: 5, Informative

    For the curious: don't try it. I used to work for a battery manufacturer. Suffice it to say that if one of the chemical tanks were to rupture, they would have had to evacuate most of that city immediately because of the toxic gas. And that's just one ingredient.

    Trust me, it's not worth it, even if you're curious. You might regret it for the rest of your (short?) life!

  40. PRN Newswire press release by mprindle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a link to the press release. It has more details than the link in the main article. http://www.prnewswire.com

  41. Re:The FUTURE by hob42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or, even worse, it could develop into a utility, with underground pipes running to your home. Then a whole city could blow up!

    Oh wait, we already have natural gas.

    Realistically, how much worse would this actually be?

  42. Designs don't always scale by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps, because this fuel cell is so small, you don't need the same safety features that a larger cell would need. The plastic casing might be enough to contain a 'catastrophic failure'.

    Kinda like that christmas tree sized nuclear reactor that just doesn't have enough mass to melt down...

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  43. Re:Also of note by Smidge204 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Or get too much of it on your skin, or in your eyes, or inhale too much of it's fumes. Methanol is some really nasty stuff!

    MSDS for Methyl Alcohol

    Health Rating: 3 - Severe (Poison)
    Flammability Rating: 3 - Severe (Flammable)
    Reactivity Rating: 1 - Slight
    Contact Rating: 3 - Severe (Life)
    Lab Protective Equip: GOGGLES & SHIELD; LAB COAT & APRON; VENT HOOD; PROPER GLOVES; CLASS B EXTINGUISHER
    Storage Color Code: Red (Flammable)

    Scale is 0="It's practically water" to 4="It'll kill you if you look at it". Granted the stuff probably won't be pure, but how diluted can you make it before it's no longer a usable fuel?
    =Smidge=
  44. mhtx, micro fuel cell by bob_jenkins · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used to invest in Manhattan Technologies (mhtx), which made micro fuel cells that ran off methanol, before they ran out of money and went into hibernation. These things were manufactured using printed circuit technology on plastic sheets, no moving parts, rolled up pretty small. They made prototypes, but never divulged which technical details were keeping them from going production. They've got lots of patents. They'll probably wake up and sue anyone who actually succeeds in manufacturing small fuel cells.

  45. FUD? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every time a fuelcell announcement is posted to Slashdot (and elsewhere), there are immediately panicked replies about fires and explosions. Of course prudence requires caution with any new, unprecedented technology. But have you ever noticed an *actual* fire or explosion problem with *any* fuelcell, at least in the last 5 years?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:FUD? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Informative

      You might not have noticed, but fuelcells have been deployed in larger sizes for several years. And last year a small one was certified for airplane travel. So where does this persistent panic come from? Seems purely imaginary.

      BTW, the Slashdot Oracle at page bottom-right currently sez:
      "Imagination is the one weapon in the war against reality. -- Jules de Gaultier"

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  46. Green Screen by oliverthered · · Score: 3, Informative

    They didn't just pick green for fun, green on black provides very good contrast with little eye strain.

    Blue's a good background colour too, lots of Dyslexia associated sites recomend it.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  47. coooool by KingReuben · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Imagine a world where you could recharge your cell phone by finding a coin op fuel dispenser unit (which could be as ubiquitos as pay phones in urban areas)..

    Some of my friends like to bemoan how we will never be able to get off of oil dependence but I tell them "necessity is the mother of invention".

    Nice to see :)

    --


    --
    om Shanti
  48. Re:don't rub the wrong way by Smidge204 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've never heard of methanol used as rubbing alcohol.

    Ethanol and Isopropynol yeah, but not methanol. Is there a particular product that uses it?
    =Smidge=

  49. Re:oil company's unite! by kevmo · · Score: 2, Funny

    The fuel cell burns methane

    In other news, baked bean stocks triple!

  50. Re:oil company's unite! by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 2, Informative
    Moderate parent mis-informative! The Toshiba fuel cell runs on methanol, not methane.

    Methanol can be produced by a variety of processes from a variety of feedstocks including biomass; e.g. wood chips, saw dust, and agricultural waste products.

    Besides, the amount of methanol needed to run a mobile phone for a year would power a typical American SUV gas-guzzler for about 3 seconds. (YMMV :-)

  51. Re:don't rub the wrong way by khrtt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't flatter yourself, methanol is extremely toxic. This stuff methabolizes to formaldehide, which basically dissolves your cells (in your body, not in your laptop), starting usually with the nerve cells in the optic nerve. In plain English that means: you go blind from a small dose, and you die from a larger dose. It's easily absorbed through skin, or by breathing the vapor, and diluting it doesn't prevent the absorbtion (though slows it down). You don't want methanol anywhere near you, unless it's hermetically sealed in a cartridge.

    Starting a fire should be the last of your worries. For crud's sake, a cigarette lighter is way more dangerous a methanol fuel cartridge would be, 'cause it ahs 100% concentrated fuel in it, and actually burns it as intended use, and you have no second thoughts about dragging it around in your pocket, now do you?

  52. Toshiba announced this AGAIN? by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Toshiba announced this in 2002, and in 2003, and again in early June 2004.

    The Bloomberg article offers some insight into the business strategy. The plan here is to make units that require a "fuel cartridge". "Fuel cartridges" contain just methanol and water, but will have markups previously seen only for printer ink. Toshiba expects to make ten times as much on the "fuel cartridges" as they do on the fuel cells.

    Look for strategies to prevent "refilling".

  53. Re:oil company's unite! by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 3, Informative
    Methane is, at best, a byproduct of oil production.
    Sorry, you're just plain wrong. Natural gas exploration, drilling, and extraction is a major activity of the petrolium industry. Alternate sources of methane such as rotting organic matter are a promising way to generate methane without drilling from renewable sources, but that is not the major source today.

    Crispin

  54. Re:oil company's unite! by caswelmo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're both right. There are natural gas deposits in many areas that don't have any oil. However, there is also quite a bit of methane as a "byproduct" of oil production. Have you ever seen those flames shooting off of the offshore oil rigs? They're not burning oil, that's methane.

    When drilling for oil, methane tends to collect in the same areas as the oil. Usually there is a "space" at the top of the oil resevoir, especially after you start drilling, that is filled with the stuff. They don't have the capability to capture & store the stuff because there's just too much of it. But it's also dangerous to just let it leak out around everything. The solution, controlled burn!

    I've often thought it would be nice to capture all of that wasted energy. Not necessarily in the form of natural gas, but perhaps as electricity. I wonder if we could just place some gas turbines on the rigs & then run some wires to the shore (depending on where they are obviously). You've gotta think this is a more cost effective solution for the oil company than just burning the stuff off & losing that possible revenue.

    Or perhaps producing Hydrogen.....

  55. Re:oil company's unite! by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 2, Informative
    While I'm not a fuel cell expert, I'm baffed how a fuel cell can run on methanol. Unless it isn't really a fuel cell (a device that produces electric current directly from the H2 + O2 -> H2O process similar to batteries) but rather is one of those micro-turbine units that is just burning the methanol to spin a turbine and an alternator.

    Fuel cells can, in principle, run on any redox reaction, that is, any reaction based on the transfer of electrons. So the methanol oxidation is fully capable of driving a fuel cell.

    The redox pair in this case would be:
    anode: CH3OH + H2O => CO2 + 6H+ + 6e-
    cathode: 3/2 O2 + 6 H+ + 6e- => 3 H2O
    sum: CH3OH + 3/2 O2 => CO2 + 2 H2O

    Anode and cathode half cells would be separated by a membrane, the protons travel through this membrane, while the electrons are transferred through the external circuit, generating a usable current.

    --
    This comment does not exist.