Slashdot Mirror


Building a Better Mozilla With Plugins

Ant writes "Wired has a story on how to improve Mozilla and Firefox web browsers with various plugins/extensions (XPI installations). It lists some of the extensions that have been rated highly by Mozilla users like BugMeNot. One of them not listed and my favorite is PrefBar."

109 of 429 comments (clear)

  1. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    We're back on track with a good Mozilla article. Now I can get some decent Slashdotting done. Well, that and switching my PC over to Gentoo.

    I mean, all these articles about TV and movies this morning? Bring on the Mozilla, Linux, and Mac articles. Let's get some good Microsoft bashing going! Daddy needs his fix!

  2. At least by arieswind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It may be slightly inconvenient, but at least the Mozilla extension system isn't a blank check to hackers like IE's ActiveX system.

    1. Re:At least by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Funny

      It may be slightly inconvenient, but at least the Mozilla extension system isn't a blank check to hackers like IE's ActiveX system.

      How about a ... plugin to fix that? :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:At least by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The latest version is pretty good. If you click on a malformed link like http://www@.cnet.com it warns you. I thought that was pretty cool.

    3. Re:At least by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oops! You have to type it in manually to see the warning message for some reason. http://www.@google.com

      I guess its not completely implemented yet.

    4. Re:At least by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 3, Informative

      IE5 is increasing? Wha? From the link in my sig:

      IE5 usage:
      April 2004: 10.1%
      May 2004: 9.2%
      June 2004: 8.3%
      July 2004: 8.1%

      Were you reading the chart backwards? ;)

    5. Re:At least by henrygb · · Score: 2, Informative

      IE5 usage is increasing quite rapidly. I think you may be reading the table upside down - it has more recent data at the top.

    6. Re:At least by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Have you seen sites that have TheCounter on them?

      See this

      and this

      and this

      and this

      and this

      and this.

      "Tracked by TheCounter.com" is the landmark of completely uninteresting content coupled with 10 year old web design techniques! (aka best suited for newbie Internet Explorer users ;)

    7. Re:At least by Dreadlord · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mozilla 1.7 and current nightly builds of Firefox don't accept extensions from websites other than Mozilla's.

      Anything else?

      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    8. Re:At least by afd8856 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know anything about Gmail, but my guess would be somthing like this: Gmail tries to give yo a visual widget to compose your emails. It does that with the regular IE widget (which is activeX) or they use Midas (visual composing widget), from Mozilla.

      BTW, check Epoz or Kutu, those are some crossbrowser visual widgets (they even work in konqueror) :)

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    9. Re:At least by rendler · · Score: 3, Informative
      mozilla, despite no official gmail support, had no problem.
      Gmail does support Mozilla, even Firefox:
      .......
      * Mozilla 1.4 and newer (download: Windows Macintosh Linux )
      * Mozilla Firefox 0.8 and newer (download: Windows Macintosh Linux )
      .......

      --

      *shrug*
    10. Re:At least by Dreadlord · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mozilla already has a large developer community, almost all of the extensions at Mozilla Update are developed by the community.

      An extension developer can submit their extension to Mozilla Update and directly link to the XPI from their homepage.

      Or they can provide a downloadable XPI file, the user has to open it (from File > Open), and it'll be installed.

      So there is no automatic installation, and the avarage user can't be tricked to click yes for an installation dialog.

      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    11. Re:At least by JimDabell · · Score: 5, Informative

      So there is no automatic installation, and the avarage user can't be tricked to click yes for an installation dialog.

      Are you sure about that? That security hole won't be fixed until Firefox 1.0.

    12. Re:At least by emtilt · · Score: 2, Informative
      I use Firefox 0.9.1, yet when I go to the page that gives the browser requirements for gmail, it says:
      We're sorry, but we don't seem to be compatible.

      Our software suggests that you're using a browser incompatible with Gmail. Gmail currently supports the following:

      * Microsoft IE 5.5 and newer (download: Windows)
      * Netscape 7.1 and newer (download: Windows Macintosh Linux )
      * Mozilla 1.4 and newer (download: Windows Macintosh Linux )
      * Mozilla Firefox 0.8 and newer (download: Windows Macintosh Linux )
      * Safari 1.2.1 and newer (download: Macintosh )

      While we're still testing Gmail, you can also click here to use your unsupported browser, though you likely will encounter some areas that don't work as expected. You need to have Javascript and cookies enabled, regardless of the browser you use.
      How strange.
    13. Re:At least by Red+Alastor · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wonder how we must understand this sentence in the article. Is it : "We know IE is pretty bad but don't switch to Linux, use Firefox and everything will be ok." ? I strongly recommand reading this PDF file about this topic, it is A Comparison of the GPL and the Microsoft EULA that could as well be named "EULA and GPL explained to non-lawyers". I think that windows users should know what they really agreed to.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
  3. Why prefbar is not listed by Enry · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the prefbar web site:

    It does not work with Mozilla Firefox

    1. Re:Why prefbar is not listed by the+unbeliever · · Score: 4, Informative

      er.

      I'm running PrefBar in FireFox .9.1...

      PrefBar 2.3 RC2 - works with Firefox, and has many new features

      Granted, it's a "release candidate" but it works just fine..

    2. Re:Why prefbar is not listed by Stibbons · · Score: 4, Informative

      PrefBar 2.3 works with Firefox: installer link

      --
      Life is like a great big funhouse, just without the fun
    3. Re:Why prefbar is not listed by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the prefbar site: (LOOK FURTHUR DOWN!)

      PrefBar 2.3 RC2 - works with Firefox, and has many new features

      --
      "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    4. Re:Why prefbar is not listed by ccweigle · · Score: 3, Informative
      I'd like a plugin that allows cookie modification on the fly. Now that'd be useful!


      Permit Cookies is almost this.

      It doesn't let you fix up just any cookie on the fly (so cookies coming through from ads can't be adjusted "on the fly"), but you can bring up "allow, block, remove" with a key press. You can change the cookie it's going to adjust (say if you know the ad server), but there's no list of cookies accessed for this page, just the current server in an edit box.

      I should say I'm using 0.2, so it's possible that it does more already, or that there are plans to do more.
  4. IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hasn't IE taught us that a browser should just be a browser?

    1. Re:IE by Vilim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unless (as in the case with Firefox) you explicitly tell it to do slightly more

      With IE its the opposite, it is more than a browser unless you explicitly castrate its overzealous (and insecure) functionality

      --
      History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it - Sir Winston Churchill
    2. Re:IE by KingJoshi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then Konqueror should have taught us otherwise. I like using "fish://username@domain" to view files in an "explorer" setting over sftp. Embeding of IE into the system as a concept is not flawed, the implementation is what's the problem. Hacking in a neat feature without security in mind and going back to try to fix what problems you didn't design to take care of is much worse than spending more time and designing more properly. Granted, the KDE group does have the mistakes of Microsoft to learn from.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
  5. RadialContext by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 4, Informative

    my favorite extension is RadialContext, basically gives you mouse gestures for Mozilla and Firefox.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
    1. Re:RadialContext by mrright · · Score: 3, Informative

      I also like this very much. But it is not just mouse gestures. It is a radial menu that can be used somewhat like mouse gestures.

      But since you get visual feedback it is much easier to memorize the gestures than with "invisible" gestures".

      It is hard to describe, so just check it out.

      --
      Private property is the central institution of a free society (David Friedman)
  6. Corporate Acceptance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think all this add-ins are fine and dandy for the typical home user, but where are the plug-ins that will improve productivity for the Corporate user?

    IE blends easily with M$'s large arsenal of server-side applications, which the execs just to love to see. Easy integration.

    What can Mozilla offer that will aid its cause in the enterprise environment. They added Integrated Authentication in v1.6 which was brilliant, but what else?

    How about some add-in for policies?

    1. Re:Corporate Acceptance? by millahtime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Large Corperations with loads of money just seem to go fo M$ software. Doesn't matter how good it is or if it gets the job done they just use it. That is the problem I run into.

      There seems to be a lack of knowledge where I work in general about such things and that is the problem.

    2. Re:Corporate Acceptance? by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 2, Informative

      What can Mozilla offer that will aid its cause in the enterprise environment.

      Rapid Application Development with Mozilla ;) You can download the .pdf of the book there.

    3. Re:Corporate Acceptance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What can Mozilla offer that will aid its cause in the enterprise environment.

      A swift kick in the nuts to the C[E|I|T]O. OK, that wouldn't really be helping its cause, but it would make me feel better.

    4. Re:Corporate Acceptance? by Issue9mm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "but where are the plug-ins that will improve productivity for the Corporate user?"

      Write them. In anticipation of our company's decision to stop using IE (currently in discussion because SP2 breaks the IE Trusted Sites), I wrote an XUL mozilla interface that acts as kind of a google search bar, but for our IT Knowledge Base.

      This will prevent the help desk and LAN administrators from having to keep a window open with the knowledge base, as they'll be able to query, search and browse it from their mozilla window no matter what site they're at.

      Granted, this might never come to fruition, and was mostly written as incentive to help them migrate from IE, but there's really no reason we all couldn't do the same and sell more companies on Mozilla.

      The more corporate-friendly features available, the more corporations will realize it. And with at least a few big names teetering on the edge of continued IE support, now's a better time than ever to push.

      -9mm-

    5. Re:Corporate Acceptance? by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Large Corperations with loads of money just seem to go fo M$ software. Doesn't matter how good it is or if it gets the job done they just use it. That is the problem I run into.

      The thing is that, for the most part, it does work. Its also extremely well tested and what weaknesses there are are well known and documented. This is one area where the OSS camp has yet to catch up - and I don't mean providing access to a Bugzilla database with 100,000+ known issues, mostly minor. In the business world, predictibility wins out over other areas nine times out of ten.

      Heck, even if I know that everything works perfectly but that my server will only stay up for 10 days in a row before performance degrades, if I have a 15 minute reboot window every week then that's fine too. I'd much rather go with a known solution - with workarounds as needed - than an unproven one that may be better. In that situation, a machine that stayed up for the most part but would randomly stop servicing requests once a quarter - while far superior in uptime stats - would be a greatly inferior solution. Its a different mindset.

      Of course, this comment is slanted towards enterprise customers.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    6. Re:Corporate Acceptance? by bpowell423 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree with you for the most part, but to take it one step further... large corporations use MS software because nobody wants to stick their neck out and use anything else, even if it is better or cheaper. The logic seems to be that if you use MS software and it fails, you can bash MS and the management above you will blame MS, too. But, if you use something else like any free/open-source software, then when it fails, the ax falls on you. Management will blame you for the failure, since in their mind you were just cutting corners. I saw this on a project I was working on. I had used MySQL for a project at our facility for a couple of years and it had worked great. Due to the success of the project, corp headquarters decided to try to implement the project at other facilities, but they balked at MySQL and forced me to convert the project to MS SQL. Well... long story short, I now have to keep an eye on MS SQL to make sure it doesn't die, which it's already done several times in 6 months.

    7. Re:Corporate Acceptance? by AliasTheRoot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      buy oracle.

      had a longer comment but slashdot said it was a bunch of seconds until you can reply and wiped out my post.

    8. Re:Corporate Acceptance? by rjstanford · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah, the problem I have seen is that it doesn't work. It drags my job out for hours longer that it needs to be, makes it really boring and I spend more time dealing with crap than actual work.

      Right, but if the company has a choice between pissing you off and having a solution that, while not perfect, will run an aspect of their business that would cost them hundreds of $k per hour if it went down, or keep a smaller staff of very happy techies and occasionally run into an issue that they hadn't foreseen, guess which one they'll pick? Even if the second option just has a greater risk of running into an unforseen issue. Its not about you, really. Or about Microsoft for that matter. Its about the business, and making a fiscally responsible choice, which invariably means reducing unknowns.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    9. Re:Corporate Acceptance? by buckminster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually the weaknesses are not well known or documented. Particularly with security. There are new issues arising daily -- which would be why CERT recommended that users consider changing browsers.

      That's the sort of uncertainty that might make enterprise customers nervous.

    10. Re:Corporate Acceptance? by o1d5ch001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have been on both sides of this fence. I have been a manager and the tech building, installing, operating etc. But I think most corporations have it backwards. The train is not:

      Technology -> Tech Folks -> Managers

      Its: Management -> Technology and Staff

      Most managers don't know much about technology, that would be OK, but they don't listen to the people that do. But this is changing
      Non-technical managers are being replaced by those who have a clue stick and will beat those managers who don't. In another five years, people who grew up (in the industry) with OpenSource will know how to manage the technology and the people.

      Bye Bye non-tech managers!!

      --
      Q. What is Calvin's monster snowman called? A. The Torment Of Existence Weighed Against The Horror of Non Being
    11. Re:Corporate Acceptance? by juhaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Built-in since 0.8, at least according to Bugzilla (direct links from slashdot don't work, copypaste and open manually)

  7. mozilla lacking features by shackma2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Wired article calls Mozilla stripped dows and lacking features, but isn't that the point of Mozilla, to be faster by getting rid of the bells and whistles?

    1. Re:mozilla lacking features by amliebsch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's the point of FireFox. Think of it this way: Mozilla gives you the whole package, whether you want/need it or not. Firefox gives you the bare-bones essentials, then lets you add only what you need/want, ala carte. Analogize with Linux distros. The only weak point is that many people don't realize that they need/want a certain feature until they use it by accident and fall in love with it.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    2. Re:mozilla lacking features by jonadab · · Score: 2

      > The Wired article calls Mozilla stripped dows and lacking features

      Which is just wrong. Mozilla (the Seamonkey suite, I mean) has a *lot* more
      features than IE or Firefox. (With Firefox, you can get many of those features
      back, plus a few others, but you have to install a gob of extensions to do it.
      This wouldn't bug me so much if I could go down a checklist and just turn on
      the ones I want, hit one button, and have them be automatically installed next
      time I restart the browser, and the next time I install an upgrade it would
      remember that preference and install all the same ones automatically.)

      The list of features that Mozilla has that IE doesn't have is lengthy in the
      extreme, including some relatively major things like tabbed browsing, the DOM
      inspector (which is *vital* for web developers), and alphachannel transparency.
      The guy who called it "stripped down" is the same guy who said "now, finally"
      when talking about the googlebar, which is several years old -- the article
      was obviously written by a journalist who didn't really know the subject well.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  8. Tabextension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I for one cannot live without the tabextension plugin. It really enhances the Firefox interface.
    Mainly because I don't like to have lots of new windows popping up all the time filling up my desktops.

  9. magpie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Magpie also includes tools for adjusting a site's URL by incrementing or decrementing the numbers in it ... This is a good extension for those who do a lot of research online.
    Yup. I find this priceless while "researching" the webs many sequentially numbered jpegs.

    Especially as I can now do it one-handed.
    1. Re:magpie by tomknight · · Score: 2, Informative
      Heh....

      You also get this with Opera, just hit "Fast Forward", or the space bar, or use the right mouse gesture and you're away. Not that I'd know about this in your particular sceanario, of course ;-)

      Tom.

      --
      Oh arse
    2. Re:magpie by Alranor · · Score: 5, Informative
      Also useful for those onehanded browsing sessions are

      Linky

      Extension is a very simple addon to the context menu that provide you with the following:

      * Opens all links in a selection in new tabs or windows
      * Finds and opens link in plain text in a new tab or window
      * Opens all links on page in new tabs or windows, etc.

      and

      JumpLink

      The Jumplink extension allows you to skip through redirect links and jump directly to the target link


      Why do I get the feeling the Slashdot community may find these of some assistance ;)
    3. Re:magpie by wfberg · · Score: 4, Informative

      Magpie also includes tools for adjusting a site's URL by incrementing or decrementing the numbers in it ... This is a good extension for those who do a lot of research online.

      Yup. I find this priceless while "researching" the webs many sequentially numbered jpegs.


      If you're stuck browsing sequentially numbered jpegs at work using internet explorer (or you just don't use extensions), you can also use Jesse's bookmarklets.
      Just drag them to your bookmark bar!

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    4. Re:magpie by Hal-9001 · · Score: 2, Funny
      If you're stuck browsing sequentially numbered jpegs at work...
      I'm pretty sure that the sequentially-number JPEGs that he's browsing one-handed are NOT work-safe!
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  10. What? No Adblock? by FeetOfStinky · · Score: 3, Informative

    I can't believe Adblock isn't listed. It even works with Firefox 0.9, despite rumblings I've heard to the contrary.

    1. Re:What? No Adblock? by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would a site that uses adverts, and is owned by a company that makes money off web adverts, tell you how to avoid them?

    2. Re:What? No Adblock? by jfengel · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't use Adblock because I'm perfectly content to let the ads be there, as long as they're not too intrusive. It's my minimal way of paying for sites (like Slashdot) that use advertising to support a service I really like.

      Mind you, I don't have Flash loaded, and I have moving gifs set to repeat only once (a spiffy extension called Things They Left Out). So the ads aren't nearly as intrusive as they might be.

      I'd even click through an ad, if it were well done (I don't want to reward obnoxious ads) and it were something I was looking for. Google ads sometimes fall into that category (especially since they're text-only).

      I dunno if sites can detect users who aren't downloading the ads, but I suspect they can get a rough count by looking at their logs (and seeing how many page views don't match up with ad downloads). If that drives down the price of ads, which then drives the sites out of business, I'd be unhappy.

  11. missing adblock by fireduck · · Score: 5, Informative

    any article about firefox that doesn't mention adblock and the best filters to use is seriously lacking.

    1. Re:missing adblock by YaRness · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i think you'll find few sites that depend on ad revenue are going to recommend ways to block ads.

  12. Mouse Gestures by southpolesammy · · Score: 4, Informative

    By far, I find the mouse gestures extension to be the greatest addition to Mozilla. This borrowed feature of Opera will certainly and permanently change the way you browse websites.

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  13. My personal favourite... by Masa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...is Enigmail. A GPG/PGP plug-in for Mozilla. It integrates GnuPG commandline tools seamlessly into the browser. It's easiest to use encryption/signing tool I've seen so far.

  14. All-in-One Gestures by tmhsiao · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I loves me some All-in-One Gestures. There's a big list of configurable actions you can take with gestures, not the least of which is "Open selection in new window" for when people don't link URLs in web forums.

    --
    "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
  15. The best of the bunch... by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... is in my opinion Adblock. I really like the full regular expression support!

    But of course she didn't mention that one, since it would be too efficient against Wired News' own ads. :-)

    Disabling my Adblock showed ads on their page at least.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:The best of the bunch... by KjetilK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed! I think many distros should ship AdBlock enabled by default, with a nice little list of ad servers to block. I think may people would find this a killer app!

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  16. W0t? by tanveer1979 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Slow news day, eh? The Article is low on substance. This page has much more details. Looks like the wired article has copy-pasted and not done any real work. The actual article should have had listed quirks, what do the extentions actually do, rather than pasting text from mozilla extention page.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  17. Adblock. Simply amazing. by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 4, Informative

    Works with 0.9, blocks anything (hate to admit it, but I've used it on OSDN for Doubleclick crap), and allows for selectivity in blocking.

    http://adblock.mozdev.org

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
    1. Re:Adblock. Simply amazing. by ErikRed1488 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Use of Adblock by the /. crowd brings up an interesting point. Obviously websites rely on advertising to make money and thus stay in business. Sites that cater to the tech crown are catering to the crowd most likely to block all ads. So, how does a tech site make money when a large percentage of its users don't see any of the ads they serve?

      --
      I was not touched there by an angel.
  18. fav ext by Dreadlord · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My fav extension at the moment is GmailCompose, combined with Gmail's great interface, it feels like a real email app, and not just web mail.

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
  19. What they really need... by mpath · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is something like Safari's or Google's AutoFill form feature. Yes, there are some plug-ins (WebDeveloper has an Enable Auto-Completion, but I can't get it to work) that do this, but not as suavely as the aforementioned products. Something that caches form field names and commonly used values and at a push of a button or keystroke, it fills out all of the form based on what the most popular values that are cached for the field names.

    --
    I'm not sure what the secret to success is, but the secret to failure lies in trying to please everyone -Bill Cosby
    1. Re:What they really need... by data64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is something like Safari's or Google's AutoFill form feature.

      You mean like the AutoForm extension ?
      I have it setup so it will save and load form values only when I tell it to, but you can set it to do so automatically.
  20. Re:frist psot by FosterKanig · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you hadn't spent so much time spell-checking your post, you might have gotten it.

  21. My browsing habits are different by spineboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My browsing habits are probably very different than most peoples, and that's why I like FIrefox. It kinda avoids the one-size fits all and can provide you with a more "tailored" application. I can also envision download "packs" specialized for individual companies that have a particular need for certain features. I've been showing people this stuff, who've never seen Mo?Fire before, and they're like "Wow!" Of course it's still a pain in the neck when I have to use Active X sites, and can't, but I think people are realising slowly that, this should be looked at (and avoided).

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  22. Flash Click to View by Spoons · · Score: 5, Informative

    My favortie Mozilla plug-in is Flash Click to view. It blocks all those annoying flash ads and puts an icon in its place. If you want to view the Flash ad/game/movie whatever, you just click the icon and it loads. It makes browsing the web just a little more bearable.

    1. Re:Flash Click to View by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also by the same author is the really cool nuke anything plugin. It allows you to remove any HTML element from the currently rendered page.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  23. Re:My two cents by Dios · · Score: 5, Informative

    You know.. its easy really

    Go to
    Edit - Preferences - Navigator - Downloads.

    Select the option to open a progress dialog.

    Then works just about like IE.

  24. Launchy not mentioned by gemal · · Score: 5, Informative

    Launchy enables you to open links and mailto's with external applications like IE, Opera, Outlook, GetRight.
    Works in: Mozilla and Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird Launchy Homepage

    --
    Henrik Gemal
    gemal.dk
  25. Re:My two cents by mopslik · · Score: 2, Informative

    I want to be able to see each window for a download so I know exactly when each finishes.

    Perhaps you'd like this then?

  26. RC2 works in FireFox by smoking2000 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Also from the Prefbar Website (near bottom of the page):

    PrefBar 2.3 RC2 - works with Firefox, and has many new features
  27. BugMeNot by spellraiser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After installation, BugMeNot supplies an appropriate name and password from a database that seems to include registration info for the vast majority of websites that request registration. The BugMeNot developers note that most people enter false information on registration forms to protect their privacy, so BugMeNot actually cuts down on database pollution. The only problem is that The New York Times may wonder what happened to all those 86-year-old Albanian grandmothers who head up huge technology firms that used to sign up to read the NYT website.

    ... well, the other problem is: Now that the slashdot crowd has become aware of BugMeNot, NYT will need to prepare for Attack of the Clones: Geek Edition! :P

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
  28. Mozilla as primary web-development platform by Zeroth_darkos · · Score: 2, Informative

    The ieview extension could be used for getting your web developer friends to code the web-pages for mozilla first and then check if it works ok with IE. (You just right-click the URL and choose "Open link target in IE".)
    The web developers I know sadly just use IE and then ignores the other browsers.

  29. Wait... by KillaKen187 · · Score: 5, Informative

    noone has mentioned Aaron Spuler's Single window which puts all those annoying pages that spawn a new window into a tab instead... just a wonderful plug-in

  30. Re:My two cents by sanosuke001 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thanks.... now I feel like a moron.. I guess that "you learn something new everyday" is done for me! Now I can rest assured that if I sleep the rest of the day, I've still learned something.... I guess

    --
    -SaNo
  31. Super DragAndGo by Kupek · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've just started using Firefox, and the best plugin I know of for it is Super DragAndGo. If you drag a link to empty space on the webpage, that link is opened in a new tab. It's so simple, but it's the best new web browsing feature I've seen in a long time.

    1. Re:Super DragAndGo by barcodez · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you have a middle button (sometimes combined with the wheel) try clicking a link with that - it opens in a new tab!

      --

      ----
    2. Re:Super DragAndGo by nxg125 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but with SuperDragAndGo, you can select anything on the page, and throw it to empty space. Middle clickikg only works with links.

  32. flash click to play by fermion · · Score: 5, Informative
    The most useful xpi I have found is Flash Click to Play, formally and still listed as Flashblock. It lets me install Flash, which is becoming increasingly necessary in this image driven world, while letting me filter out the 99% of flash content that are gratuitous, ads, or simply bad animation.

    BTW, Camino does not install this automatically, but is relatively simple to go into your chrome folder and hack it yourself.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:flash click to play by tiptone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Flashblock is my favorite extension as well, but unfortunately hasn't been updated for the 0.9 change yet...

      --
      Please don't read my sig.
  33. Re:My two cents by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My beef with the download manager is it puts everythign in the same spot. I'd like to filter by extension, mime type, etc.. Put all the .zips and .exes here, all the .jpgs there, all the .avis hither and yonder.

    I hate sorting through a pile of crap to find the pdf howto I downloaded a month ago. And I hate software that makes me act like it's filing clerk.

    It's a simple modification, mozilla boys.. Hop to it!

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  34. actually by not_a_product_id · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use them for moving between pages of on-line cartoons... erm... as well as...you know...

    --

    ---
    We spoke for about a half an hour. I don't recall a thing we said. - Colorblind James Experience

  35. Mozilla Extensions & MacOS 1-9 by Schlemphfer · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm lacking a technical background and I grew up using Macs. With that in mind, the idea of adding tons of extensions to Mozilla doesn't thrill me. I can't help but be reminded of pre OS-X Macintoshes, where it got to the point that Macs shipped with a half-dozen extensions. And it was impossible to put the computer to any serious use without accumulating a dozen more.

    Naturally, the more extensions you loaded, the more time it took your computer to boot and the more system crashes and incompatibilities occurred. It got to the point that I spent significant time enabling and disabling extensions to try to identify incompatibilities and the sources of my computer crashes. I don't know anything about Mozilla architecture, but might an extension-based Firefox be edging us down that same path?

    I know I'd personally prefer it if the Firefox team evaluated the best extensions, and incorporated them into the main code for optimum compatibility.

    So here's my question to people familiar with the Mozilla codebase: is my comparison between Pre-OSX Macs and Firefox valid?

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    1. Re:Mozilla Extensions & MacOS 1-9 by jalefkowit · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not an expert on Mozilla's codebase, but based on their history, I would say that your worries are probably misplaced.

      Firefox is purposely limited to the bare minimum of functionality that general users required. If any extensions ever rise to that level of ubiquity, they'll probably get adopted by moz.org and slipstreamed into the code base, which should remove the performance concern.

      After all, that's how tabbed browsing made it into Mozilla -- first as a separate XPI extension (Multizilla), which got incorporated into the code base when the developers saw how popular it was.

      Of course, it will require some serious popularity to rise to that level, and I doubt that many extensions will ever make it. But that's the beauty of the extension framework, my Firefox can be very different from yours...

  36. Bookmarklets by Robotron2084 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bookmarklets are an underrated way to extend the usability of Mozilla, Firefox and even IE.

    http://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/zap.html

    I have 'zap plugins' and 'zap images' in my personal toolbar to stop strobing ads and flash on a page-by-page basis. Works great!

    1. Re:Bookmarklets by kavau · · Score: 2, Informative
      One of my favorites is "plain text links", which allows one to open any URL that is not marked as such by selecting and right-clicking it.

      Very useful for dealing with slashdot posters such as yourself! ;-)

  37. FlashBlock by Dalroth · · Score: 3, Informative

    FlashBlock! That is the BEST plugin EVER created! Everybody who has Firefox installed should also have this plugin installed.

    Bryan

    1. Re:FlashBlock by Hollins · · Score: 3, Informative

      now that adblock handles flash and other embeds, it has become capable of filtering just about everything. I no longer need FlashBlock. Since adblock can handle regex filtering, I find myself becoming obsessed with trying to filter that last 0.1% of ads that get through while keeping a short filter list.

      Also, the article calls Mozilla 'stripped down', which is absurd. It has tabbed browsing and pop-up blocking by default, putting it light years ahead of the market leader.

  38. Re:Obv you're not an opera user. TBE is only close by guidryp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have been using opera for a long time and trying to get FF to the same functionality is a pain.

    With firefox you will still get situations where it pops up new browsers. Go to your tools, extensions "get new extensions" Chances are you now have two browsers... Why?

    The best choice right now is TBE single window mode. Even with this I still get an occaisional extra browser opening on me.

    I don't understand the difficulty of adding "force single window mode"...

  39. Re:And this is why I still have to use Opera by danheretic · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not quite. It has "tab browsing" out of the box, but not the "Tabbrowser Extensions" plugin. Tabbrowser Extensions is MUCH more powerful and feature-rich.. something like 40 different options to set rather than the 3 found in 0.9.

    I was disappointed enough that I reverted back to 0.8 so I could have my tabs the way I like them.

  40. Re:I don't get it by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Informative
    I was going to moderate on this topic, but since a couple of people have mentioned the business of installers, I'll forego that and set the issue straight (or at least definitively crooked).

    Firefox for linux (with gtk+ and xft) comes with an installer. Just extract the tarball and run firefox-installer in the extracted directory and it will behave essentially the same as any winbloze installer. If you want an rpm, I'm sure google will find one if you're that desperate.

  41. Re:My two cents by SpinyManiac · · Score: 2, Informative

    Already done.

    Isn't that what the article is about?

    --
    It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
  42. Re:I don't get it by blkwolf · · Score: 3, Informative

    The default install is a self contained binary. All you have to do is untar/gzip and run firefox from the new firefox directory.

    Personally I just untar into /opt/firefox and create a link in my window manager. When I want to upgrade or try a different version, wipe out the directory and untar a new one.

    Also the reason Mozilla does it this way, is it makes it super easy for any of the distro's to create an install package for it. They dont even have to compile the app if they dont want. So if your really missing that rpm to install, complain to your distro for not releasing one yet.

  43. Re:My two cents by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Informative

    This extenstion should do what you are looking for.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  44. Re:My two cents by the+unbeliever · · Score: 3, Informative

    Download Sort is what you're looking for.

    Hope that helps.

  45. My extensions. by guidryp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Flashblock: Absolute must have stops the all singing dancing net, but lets you use it if you must.
    http://flashblock.mozdev.org/

    Preferential: Lets you change every option, not just the subset that they think you need. Lets me kill gif anims for one thing.
    http://preferential.mozdev.org/

    Tab Browser extentsion: The only current way to get true single window mode.
    http://white.sakura.ne.jp/~piro/xul/_tabext ensions .html.en

    Adblock: Block annoying adds that get by above measures. I leave them alone if the don't blink/anim and flow in my text. One of those and they are gone. For some reason newegg flash adds were escaping flashblock so, I adblocked *newegg*.
    http://adblock.mozdev.org/

    Nuke anything: Sometimes a site will serve ads from the same place as usefull image so I don't want to filter. This lets me knock out anything from the page temporarily.
    http://ted.mielczarek.org/code/mozil la/

  46. No... by SilentT · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Most people who switch to Mozilla or Mozilla's Firefox browser quickly notice that the browser is pretty bare. It contains exactly what you need to browse the Web -- no less and no more.

    I don't know of anyone who's disappointed that Firefox is "pretty bare" the first time they use it. What they notice is that it can do everything IE does, but with tabbed browsing and without the pop-ups or security holes.

  47. Re:Why no adblock? by seasleepy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Er.... You mean this Adblock? The one that's currently the second highest rated extension for Firefox on Mozilla Update?

  48. Pref Bar is obsolete by Washizu · · Score: 2, Informative

    You won't need that pref bar extension once you've installed the Web Developer extension. It lets you turn off cookies, javascript, check cookie info, validate CSS/HTML, resize to various window sizes, turn off images, outline block elements, show image paths/sizes, etc.

    It makes my life easier.

    --
    OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
  49. Tabbrowser extensions by jeorgen · · Score: 2, Informative
    Tabbrowser extensions is a fantastic add-on to mozilla and firefox. Here are my favorite functions it provides:

    1) You can rearrange tabs by just drag and drop.
    2) If you ctrl-click a link, it can open as new tab next to the tab of the page your looking at.
    3) Tabs can be in different colors, and tabs opened with e.g ctrl-click inherit the color from the tab of the page the link is on. I.e. you can group tabs by color
    3) If you get too many tabs in a window, it can make a new row of tabs, or open a new browser window and continue making tabs there.
    4) You can undo close tab. In multiple steps.

  50. blah blah by XO · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, I know this article is about Mozilla, and how Mozilla around here is everyone's favorite pet... but.. every single feature that I've ever seen implemented by and/or for Mozilla that was even remotely useful to anyone besides the author of that feature.. was already implemented in Opera first.

    Ya'all really should check it out. Quicker, faster, works a lot better. No, it's not open source. But, it is possible that there can be software that's good that's not open source.

    (now i'm going to get modded -255; Blasphemer!)

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  51. Automatic password plugin? by ghaushe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The one thing that bugs me about Firefox is that our entire intranet at work requires a login. there are lots of sites, and each one uses NT authentication (username/domain/password). IE automatically goes to these pages using whatever I logged into the system with (no password popup). Firefox requires my password each time I go to a different intranet site. While it can remember my passwords, it stil always pops up the password box. The best solution is if it could know to just use my windows login, but alternatively, having the option to auto-login using the password I already saved would be great. Anyone know of a way to do this?

    1. Re:Automatic password plugin? by The+One+KEA · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is a bug in the Firefox proxy authentication framework, and hopefully if enough people vote for the bug in Bugzilla, or better yet, find a patch for it, then it will be fixed.

      http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2301 90
      http://tinyurl.com/2doea

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
  52. Re:useragent spoofing bad? by dmaxwell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I do spoof, I find that I can usually chide the offending website in the agent string itself. The web servers don't seem to be looking for particular strings. They just want to see those magic words "IE" and "Windows". I'll have those in the correct places as well as something like www.w3c.org - hint hint. I figure it gets into some their logs at least. I don't blanket spoof. I only do it for retarded sites that won't otherwise let me in.

    Now if we could just do something about javascript based browser checks.

  53. No, it is not a valid comparison. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

    Extensions in the classic MacOS sense are like kernel modules or plugins. Extension in the Mozilla/Firefox sense are augmentations of the application (usually demand loaded) so they don't significantly impact stability or load time, as far as I can tell. An extension could be implemented in a lot of ways, whether simple or complex. Generally they can't overwrite anything, so they hook into the existing API, and Mozilla provides a pretty vast one.

    Mozilla/Firefox don't come with any extensions at all. They are perfectly useful without them. Moz/Firefox may directly incorporate features of popular extensions in later versions, but they cease to be extensions at the point, and are considered part of the application proper.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  54. Re:Tabwarning by Finuvir · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, this is part of Firefox now. If you try to close a window with multiple tabs open it will prompt you to confirm or cancel, with the option to prevent it displaying the same message again.

    --
    Why is anything anything?
  55. Now if only I could load them by pjpII · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The biggest problem is that for many Windows users, there seems to be a serious bug that prevents them from installing extensions at all- it may be related to the uninstallation between .9 and .9.1. The relevant MozillaZine page is here

  56. FIX THE CALENDAR! by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All these other plugins are just fluff if adoption is severely hampered by the lack of a fully functional calendar.

    Build the calendar, and they will come.. come away from Outlook.
    It *can* happen.

    Calendar should be #1 priority right now.. mail & news is great, the browser is great.. but the lack of a calendar *really is stopping people* from switching. At least with the dozens of small businesses that I do consulting for, it is.

    I cannot emphasize this enough - a lot of small businesses (without exchange) stick to Outlook because of the pretty pointy clicky calendar.

    "sunbird" isn't even close. The Mozilla Calendar is waay far off.

    Come on, guys... let's dooooo it!

  57. Multizilla by zot+o'connor · · Score: 2, Informative
    Multizilla and Mouse Guestures are two add-ons I cannot live with out. They make browsing far more efficient for me, and really cut down on research time. Multizilla adds tabs browsing tools, referrer tools, adblocks, better brefs, session saving, on the fly perms (cookie, image, js, popups, java, plugin) and a whole lot of other features . It is so smooth I often think they are part of mozilla and wonder when I switch machines, or users, why mozilla changed!

    Mouse Guestures take a while to get used too, but I even use them on a touch pad because they are so cool. And it really funny watching someone demo on that pad who is getting nervous because they just opened some windows for no reason, then their hand starts to shake :)

    --

    --
    Zot O'Connor
  58. Lack of drivers could lead to rejection by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would have been better in my opinion to make switching browsers also entail switching OS, in the sense of "if it's worth doing, it's worth doing right".

    I find "get them to switch operating systems NOW" a bad policy. Many households and organizations have sunk significant amounts of money into hardware for which no Free device driver or ported proprietary device driver exists. I will consider your opinion on the matter the moment you point to a working Linux driver for (say) the Microtek Scanmaker 4850 scanner, which the SANE web site lists as unsupported.