Slashdot Mirror


Network Solutions Overhauls Whois Results

Robert Accettura writes "Network Solutions has updated its whois interface, giving it an interesting new twist. On top of regular info provided, it shows data that appears to be from Alexa, including a screenshot of the homepage (though not terribly recent), as well as looks up your IP, and displays lots of information on it. It even shows the server type, if it supports SSL, DMOZ, Yahoo listing, traffic ranking, and lock status. This comes right after they announced rapid DNS updates. Perhaps they are trying to win over the geeks before they turn on sitefinder?"

243 comments

  1. rheoric question by rd4tech · · Score: 1

    will they win with the pathfinder...

  2. Re:Or maybe... by kbranch · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless I'm missing something here, the Virtual Boy was made by Nintendo.

  3. Well, they got the geolocation wrong for my site by kravlor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I ran a WHOIS query on my domain, kravlor.com, and it was placed in Chicago, IL, as opposed to Minneapolis, MN! Apparently I'm an e-commerce site, whatever that is, too!

  4. Perhaps? by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps they are trying to win over the geeks before they turn on sitefinder?

    Maybe. However, my bet is on friendlifying (hey, I just coined a word!) the service for something far more sinister. This wreaks of targetting manadrones with all sorts of feelgood updates that don't serve that much purpose for real geeks...

    Maybe I'm paranoid, but when you're dealing with a group like this, you can't look at it with too much suspicion.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    1. Re:Perhaps? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      Perhaps I just imagined I got a sitefinder page approximately 24 hrs ago when I did a typo.

      I agree, this is suspicious.

      Unfortunately, I can imagine a scenario...

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:Perhaps? by boredMDer · · Score: 4, Funny

      However, my bet is on friendlifying (hey, I just coined a word!) the service

      No you didn't.

    3. Re:Perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No you didn't.

      He probably did (assuming no dishonest intent). Just because it was invented before, doesn't mean it wasn't an original idea of his own.

  5. WHAT?!? by KimiDalamori · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You mean to tell me that these guys are SPYING on me??? =P

    --
    Lagito ergo expectabo
    1. Re:WHAT?!? by ThisNukes4u · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, not spy on YOU. Their secret plan is to take over the United States first, then ta(j%&YHd369YF&^%#)G[NO CARRIER]

      --
      thisnukes4u.net
    2. Re:WHAT?!? by MalachiConstant · · Score: 1
      Well it's easy to spy on you when you're BROADCASTING YOUR IP!

      See your inbox for ways to fix this problem.

  6. Re:Or maybe... by rd4tech · · Score: 2, Funny

    this is /., when we bash MS facts are irelevant, same as when MS bash linux, so we are all even

  7. screenshot of the homepage by powerpuffgirls · · Score: 5, Informative

    Whois.sc displays screenshot of website homepage at least a couple of months ago.

    1. Re:screenshot of the homepage by Davak · · Score: 4, Informative

      whois.sc is much more attractive and accurate.

      For example, whois.sc actually tells how many yahoo links a site has. (Slash has 288 DMOZ and 22 yahoo links? Holy cow!)

      netsol just has a link to the yahoo search...

      plus whois.sc is so much easier... just add the domain name to the end of the url you want to search...

      http://whois.sc/slashdot.org
      http://whois.sc/cn n.com

      netsol doesn't give you this easy ability...

      I'm sticking with whois.sc

      Davak

    2. Re:screenshot of the homepage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      whois also "hides" the email address. Netsol puts it out there for everybody to read.

    3. Re:screenshot of the homepage by xmas2003 · · Score: 1

      Ditto comments from the parent ... would add that I bet they are using the screen shots as provided from Open Thumbshots

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    4. Re:screenshot of the homepage by Feyr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      i like my whois command. no fuss, no ugly browser. every info i will ever need on my STDOUT!

    5. Re:screenshot of the homepage by rmull · · Score: 1

      And what about sites with boobies on their front pages? Verisign is now a porn site! (albiet one with very small pictures) Will all the censoreware block them?

      --
      See you, space cowboy...
    6. Re:screenshot of the homepage by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Informative
      whois also "hides" the email address. Netsol puts it out there for everybody to read.

      Because they want to extort more money from you to hide it:

      random domain info
      Add Private Registration: $9 a year per domain
      Keep your registration information for assadasfdas.com out of the hands of spammers and telemarketers with Private Registration.

    7. Re:screenshot of the homepage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whois.sc has the correct hosting info for one of my *.net domains, but lists the registrant as that of the corresponding *.com name. I'll pass on relying on whois.sc for definitive info, thank you.

    8. Re:screenshot of the homepage by Grrr · · Score: 1


      Bzzzzt - whois.sc just displayed the wrong expiration date for the first domain I looked up. I don't need that much excitement, especially on a Tuesday.

      <grrr>

  8. Re:Or maybe... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1, Funny

    Im stupid. It IS Nintendo, but my fingers obviously were taken over... BUT BY WHO?!?!?

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  9. Re:Or maybe... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I assume you're referring to Sitefinder?

    Yes, bad ideas happen. However, actively destroying expected behavior of the entire internet is just plain sinister. The only thing they can fall back on is that "technically" they didn't break anything in the sense that wildcards are legitimate.

    Mistakes happen, sure. Sitefinder, however, was just malicious profiteering and status abuse.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  10. Re:Well, they got the geolocation wrong for my sit by joey.dale · · Score: 2, Funny

    It seems to thank that I also have an e-commerce site

  11. In other news... by k4_pacific · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft announced today that they are launching a competing Whois database, Microsoft Owner.

    Microsoft Owner features an innovative, user-friendly interface that leverages off of the Microsoft setup Wizards.

    To use:

    click on icon for Microsoft Owner.

    Next->Next->Please enter the domain name

    Let's see. How about... www.google.com

    Next->Next->Reboot
    login->Next->done

    www.google.com is Google!

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times are you going to post the same stupid comment?

      In other news, they are hiding the registration details for slashdotsucks.com even tho the website is active.

    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also showing us as an e-commerce site, for some reason :(

  12. Slashdot... by orrigami · · Score: 1

    has a traffic ranking of 1, whatever that means.

    1. Re:Slashdot... by rd4tech · · Score: 1

      microsoft.com, linux.org , they too has the same ranking, anyone know what it means?

    2. Re:Slashdot... by MrDingusMcGee · · Score: 1

      one of my domains shows "ranking not available" (rochesterdrinks.com), one shows "4" (downwithwhitey.com)...i dont know what to make of the number rankings since downwithwhitey is obviously not the #4 destination on the web

      --
      My Sig is Sauer.
    3. Re:Slashdot... by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 0, Troll

      has a traffic ranking of 1, whatever that means.

      I think it probably has something to do with this.. Or maybe it doesn't.... YOU DECIDE!!

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    4. Re:Slashdot... by BillX · · Score: 1

      Nothing, apparently...mine has a traffic ranking of 1, too, but the server takes off into hiding if it ever gets linked on /....

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  13. Re:Or maybe... by rd4tech · · Score: 1

    So what did they exaclt achieved? I mean, besides getting that Ip blacklisted by most of the world?

  14. Only for NS Hosted Domains by tonyr60 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The info appears against my Network Solutions domains, but not my Tucows ones.

    And in some respects the Tucows approach is better. A Network Solutions query shows all my details directly. Tucows requires a query to input a grahpics based password so it is harder to harvest the info.

    1. Re:Only for NS Hosted Domains by cgenman · · Score: 2, Informative

      And in some respects the Tucows approach is better. A Network Solutions query shows all my details directly. Tucows requires a query to input a grahpics based password so it is harder to harvest the info.

      It's odd, but Network Solutions required the same thing up until this launched. I guess it was just more cost effective to let people scan the db. I've been using whois.net from the opera command line with much success, but every time in the past year I came across a bloody Network Solutions domain I'd have to break what I was doing and enter their silly cipher. Well, whois.net still doesn't query NS's database directly, but at least I can skip the 4757298B step.

  15. Why Network Solutions is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They are cracking down on bogus domain registration information for the sole purpose of being able to make money on their new service which allows you to keep your registration information private.

    They didn't give a crap until they realized it would affect their profits.

  16. Fails when no referrer and User-Agent by TheUncleBob · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Tried testing it out through a proxy that strips the referrer and user-agent fields (no tin-foil hat here ;-) ). Just kept giving me 302 redirects back to the same front page

    Just what we need - a fussy site.

    1. Re:Fails when no referrer and User-Agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As an admin I find web based whois useless, I've even seen web only abuse reporting (that relies on javascript)! Even if I was to leave the server room and use a desktop I still run without javascript and withhold referer string, so it seems this service is useless to me. Let's hope it doesn't get too popular or generate enough revenue that they cease whois service!

  17. No .us whois lookup by Punchinello · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a bit disappointed that you cannot perform a whois lookup on .us domains.

    Doesn't Verisign like the .us people? Were they denied access to the data?

    Register.com lets me do a lookup. Perplexing.

    --

    Remember... ZG9uJ3QgZm9yZ2V0IHRvIGRyaW5rIHlvdXIgb3ZhbHRpbmU=

    1. Re:No .us whois lookup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .gov neither. Not even unexisting ones, like whatever.gov.

    2. Re:No .us whois lookup by chris_eineke · · Score: 0
      Register.com lets me do a lookup. Perplexing.
      I think the situation is obvious. VeriSign is a law-abiding company and register.com is an evil nazi communist terrorist swine...
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    3. Re:No .us whois lookup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm a bit disappointed that you cannot perform a whois lookup on .us domains.

      I'm a bit disappointed that you can look up my .us domain.

    4. Re:No .us whois lookup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely they must be terrorists. I suggest you bomb their headquarters stick the head of their CEO on a pole outside your Gates.

    5. Re:No .us whois lookup by Funky+Jester · · Score: 1
      Network Solutions might not have the data for the US top-level domain (TLD).
      (Similar to how they might not have the dat for, say, .uk)

      Do a whois lookup from whois.iana.org to determine which authority is responsible for that particular TLD.
      whois us@whois.iana.org
      whois gov@whois.iana.org
      This should spit out some information including the registrar's site or, if you're lucky, the whois server which you can query directly.

      Have fun...
  18. it's actually quite nice by rd4tech · · Score: 1

    a bit of innovation and everything...
    the picture detail on the whois record is cute, although bandwidth wasting, still cute...

  19. Thanks, fellas... by SamMichaels · · Score: 1

    ...but my comment for the last NSI/Verisign story still stands.

    They're going in the right direction, but I still don't trust them nor will I ever use them for domain services.

  20. VeriSign and Network Solutions are not the same by darthcamaro · · Score: 4, Informative

    The poster got this a bit mixed up. The DNS updates are a VeriSign issue...Network Solutions, though once a VeriSign company is a completely seperate company now.

    1. Re:VeriSign and Network Solutions are not the same by Holi · · Score: 1

      I know Verisign acquired Network Solutions in 2000 but I dod not know they dumped them recently. Any sources?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:VeriSign and Network Solutions are not the same by Holi · · Score: 1

      As of April 21, 2004 Verisign still owned Network Solutions, here is proof

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  21. Not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Apparently, you've found the MS wizard for posting to Slashdot.

  22. Not original... by Yaa+101 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think they got it from here:

    http://www.whois.sc/

    I use that for quite a while now...

  23. timothy must be great at parties.... by mattgreen · · Score: 0, Troll

    It must be illegal or something for Slashdot editors to actually be happy about something. Here they add a few nice features to WHOIS and you're off spouting, "I bet they're just kissing up to the geeks." I mean, seriously, get some counseling or something. The whole world isn't out to screw you over.

    1. Re:timothy must be great at parties.... by vxvxvxvx · · Score: 3, Funny

      The whole world isn't out to screw you over.

      That's yet to be proven.

    2. Re:timothy must be great at parties.... by tonyr60 · · Score: 1

      "The whole world isn't out to screw you over"

      Are you really, really sure about that.....

    3. Re:timothy must be great at parties.... by mattgreen · · Score: 1

      Positive. If you think that is the case then seek counseling, cause it sure as hell isn't healthy.

    4. Re:timothy must be great at parties.... by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Every story submitted to slashdot has a submitted caption to go alongside it. Sometimes the editors add their own comments, sometimes they don't. The trick is to watch the nesting of quotation marks. This simple task saves you from making an ass out of yourself by making untrue assumptions and commenting on somebody's attitude about words they never said!

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    5. Re:timothy must be great at parties.... by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I'm out to screw him over, and so is everyone I just asked. Actually, we're all pretty amazed, we all thought we came up with the idea on our own. Small world, huh?

      Say... do you have any magazine subscription cards? We ran out.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    6. Re:timothy must be great at parties.... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      It really is frightening just how many people are completely unable to parse the story submissions....
      but you see it again and again and again....

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    7. Re:timothy must be great at parties.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of the world clearly is out to screw us over. There's an overwhelming amount of evidence for it. Counseling isn't going to change that.

    8. Re:timothy must be great at parties.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, jld5445@ksu.edu

      you fucking idiot. i know who you are. you've lived in marlatt. i'm coming for you now.

    9. Re:timothy must be great at parties.... by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations; sadly its quite difficult to notify all my loyal fans where I am staying on a daily basis, but lets just say that Marlatt is quite far off the mark.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

  24. Re:Or maybe... by dancingmad · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Ask Microsoft about Virtual Boy.

    I could as MS about Virtual Boy, or I could ask Nintendo...

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
  25. Re:Or maybe... by Orick · · Score: 1


    Right, but the grandparent poster probably just couldn't come up with any Miscrosoft failures, being so rare and all....

    I mean, I'm still using the MS Bob desktop, aren't you?

    --
    Kirby

  26. Re:Or maybe... by aixou · · Score: 1

    If only he'd said "ask Redmond about Virtual Boy"...

  27. Umm.. by kevcol · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How does the submitter expect the geeks to care when we have a shell to get faster results?

    1. Re:Umm.. by The+Evil+Bit · · Score: 1

      Indeed. My whois works just fine from a command line and I can send the results to a file if I need to reference them later.

    2. Re:Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but for how much longer? I've come across several AS blocks with no ip whois service, just some dumb webform. I've also seen abuse@ addresses replaced with javascript based web forms! This is a sign of clueless lusers making infrastructure decisions, it's unacceptable, and yes it does seem to be microsoft shops.

  28. Yes, it must be from whois.sc by kbahey · · Score: 1

    When I read the description in the original post, that was the first thing that came to my mind.

    They either bought whois.sc, or got in some sort of agreement with them.

    However, when I went to the whois page listed in the original post at http://www.netsol.com/cgi-bin/whois/whois, this info is not available. What gives?

  29. looks the same as always to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    # jwhois netsol.com
    [Querying whois.internic.net]
    [Redirected to whois.networksolutions.com]
    [Querying whois.networksolutions.com]
    [whois.networksolutio ns.com]
    NOTICE AND TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our WHOIS
    database through the use of high-volume, automated, electronic processes. The
    [.. disclaimer snipped, but its still there ..]
    Network Solutions reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

    Registrant:
    Network Solutions, LLC. (NETSOL-DOM)
    13200 Woodland Park Drive
    Herndon, VA 20171
    US

    Domain Name: NETSOL.COM

    Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
    Network Solutions, LLC (37151550P) customerservice@networksolutions.com
    13200 Woodland Park Drive
    Herndon, VA 20171
    US
    1-888-642-9675

    Record expires on 02-Feb-2012.
    Record created on 31-Jan-1993.
    Database last updated on 12-Jul-2004 22:23:07 EDT.

    Domain servers in listed order:

    NS1.NETSOL.COM 216.168.229.228
    NS3.NETSOL.COM 216.168.229.229
    NS2.NETSOL.COM 216.168.229.229

    #

  30. Help me figure out this URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/whois/result s.jhtml;jsessionid=GBG2FGJRK0RFYCWLEAMBFEY?whoisto ken=8&_requestid=358746

    Changing the sessionid does nothing.
    Changing the requestid does nothing.

    Changing the whois token cycles through different sites somehow. Anybody got a clue what the format of the URL is?

    Tech-Recipes.com: Solaris/Linux/Windows Hints = Money

    1. Re:Help me figure out this URL by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Changing the sessionid does nothing.

      They're running Netscape Enterprise 6.0 with a Java servlet container installed. The "jsessionid" is generated by the servlet server to track the user session in case the user's browser doesn't accept cookies. Changing it won't do much to affect their whois application.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  31. Alexa Violating Copyrights by Goo.cc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So Alexa is an Amazon company and they are making money by taking screenshots of copyrighted material?

    Maybe everyone who has screenshots of their website in Alexa should file a DMCA complaint Amazon. Seems fair to me since Amazon loves bogus patents.

    1. Re:Alexa Violating Copyrights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, there is fair use. This is the reason archive.org's waybackmachine continues to exist.

      Besides, if you really don't want a screenshot of your page, block them with robots.txt.

    2. Re:Alexa Violating Copyrights by GuyFawkes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      blocking with robots.txt doesn't work with the new and improved msn search, which simply ignores it and indexes EVERYTHING....

      as a result I have edited my robots.txt on my genealogy site to the following.

      User-agent: *
      Disallow: /

      eg, fuck you msn search

      there's quite a fuss going on about this quietly, msn tech's are claiming that they aren't doing anything wrong since robots.txt isn't an accepted standard anyway... hopefully if everyone bans msn search totally as I have done they will get the fucking message.

      check out the replies from "msndude" the msn tech in the following forum.
      http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum97/73.h tm

      --
      http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
    3. Re:Alexa Violating Copyrights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > check out the replies from "msndude" the msn tech in the following forum.
      > http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum97/73.htm

      That's a members-only link; do you have another?

    4. Re:Alexa Violating Copyrights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here is the best quote and sums the whole thing up:
      Msndude, if your msnbot hasn't the ability to do something as elementary as a GET that observes 304 HTTP results you should get some proper programmers to write your crawlers or stay out of the search business. Even the most basic of Open Source crawlers do this. Webmasters have to pay for bandwidth. To date, Microsoft's spidering strategy has been utterly incompetent and completely oblivious to the cost of bandwidth to webmasters. Consequently, many have banned msnbot. I'd like to see competition in the search engine operations market. However Microsoft may just not be able to compete with the quality of Google or Yahoo. Search is not an area in which Microsoft has a killer product. It is one where the webmasters hold the ultimate fates of the search engines in their hands. Irritate them and they will kill your search engine by banning its spiders and making your competition's search engine indices superior. Regards...jmcc
      It seems that google as a referrer bypasses the login page: http://www.google.com/search?q=robots.txt+standard s
      http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum97/93-3-10.htm
    5. Re:Alexa Violating Copyrights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, the Wayback machine copies entire sites. This is not fair use. Fair use means copying a portion of a work, but not enough that someone could use that copy instead of the original.

      The Wayback machine hasn't gotten nailed because Internet Archive is a non-profit, meaning there isn't much chance you're going to wring millions out of them in a lawsuit.

      And you wouldn't believe what groups have bought copies of Brewster Kahle's web crawls. Just a hint - Brewster, and not the Archive, does make money off of those copied pages.

    6. Re:Alexa Violating Copyrights by lavaface · · Score: 1

      While I'm with you on the basic idea, i can't help but comment. This is a stupid idea. First of all, displaying a screenshot is not a DMCA violation--what are you circumventing? Second, and more importantly, there are more cunning ways of defeating the DMCA than succumbing to it. Challenge the act all you want. But using it to prove an ill-begotten point is short-sighted indeed.

    7. Re:Alexa Violating Copyrights by MrSpiff · · Score: 1

      I'm claiming that Google's thumbnails on their image searches is a violation against copyrights too, but Google didn't really want to grace me with an answer when I emailed them about it.

      You can't get anywhere with linking but they're actually copying and manipulating (resizing) my copyrighted material without my consent.

    8. Re:Alexa Violating Copyrights by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

      People have used the DMCA to prevent use of copyrighted material even when a copy protection was not circumvented. If you don't believe me, check out this page as an example:

      Church of Scientology wields the DMCA, Google removes xenu.net

      As for proving a point, I think that using the DMCA is just fine. After all, Amazon is part of the patent problem and if you used Amazon's patents without permission, you could expect that they would have say something about it. If they expect people to observe their patents, they ought to observe the copyrights of others.

    9. Re:Alexa Violating Copyrights by ceejayoz · · Score: 2, Informative
    10. Re:Alexa Violating Copyrights by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      If they're taking them from your site at downshift.org, this could be because you haven't asked them not to.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  32. Good lord! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the fourth or fifth time I've seen your damn comment about your own friggin' site! Why don't you just write, "I'm pathetic, please visit my site." It would be easier and a lot more honest.

    1. Re:Good lord! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bastard!

  33. Doesn't mention the registrar by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Note what it doesn't mention - the registrar. The real Whois data has the name of and a link to the registrar. This Verisign thing totally hides the registrar. That, presumably, is the point.

    You have to click on "underlying Whois data" to get the registrar info. At least you still can.

    Registrars are going to be annoyed about this.

    1. Re:Doesn't mention the registrar by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Ummm...

      I have GoDaddy mentioned all over my Whois lookup result.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:Doesn't mention the registrar by Animats · · Score: 1
      It's a per-registrar thing. I looked up domains registered via Melbourne IT and DomainSite, and they don't show a registrar. This is because their Whois output doesn't include the registrar name. GoDaddy plugs itself quite a bit in its own Whois output, so you see GoDaddy.

      Verisign isn't showing the registrar link and the registrar name from the common registry database.

  34. Way to go, Capt. Assjack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wats odd is how your site never loads on my browser because my hosts file defines it as 127.0.0.1. Maybe you should think more deeply about the repercussions of your actions.

    1. Re:Way to go, Capt. Assjack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wats odd, is that it doesn't have an image of our site, but alexa does.

      Wish it showed our google results instead of yahoo, though

  35. Re:war? by archen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Speaking of spying, I noticed that they finally give you an option of hiding your personal information. My ex-girlfriend always used to say they should just include links to mapquest so that crazy psychos could just print off the map directons, drive to her house and kill her. Bad enough that she's actually gotten CALLS from creepy people.

    So at least that's one step in the right direction for Network solutions, even if they're going the wrong direction in so many other instances.

  36. UhOh by beaverbrother · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What I want to know is why they did away with having the results be returned as an image. Now my email is availible on that site in text format, leaving me suseptible to spam bots that search sites for email addresses.

    1. Re:UhOh by Kadmos · · Score: 1

      I wonder what implications this will have in Australia where the Privacy Act covers collection and distibution of private information such as email addresses...

    2. Re:UhOh by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Maybe to drum up more business for their new spam blocking service.

      Just pay em some money and they take your MX! Mail is scanned then forwarded on to the real mail server.

      (also a ploy to get you to let them host DNS)

      Definately not a company I'd let store and forward my email....

  37. I hate "whois". by LesPaul75 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I get soooooo much spam because I'm required to have a valid e-mail address in my whois information. Tough tatties, I guess.

    1. Re:I hate "whois". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's even stranger is the "Private registration - Protect your privacy from spammers and telemarketers - $9 a year" advertisement right on the netsol whois page. Aren't the contact details for a domain meant to be valid, and accurate? And if Network Solutions can do this, can other registrars? And why does it cost an extra $9 a year? Something fishy seems to be going on here.

    2. Re:I hate "whois". by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Yep. I'm "required" to have a valid address in my domain listings, which is of course:

      Uberm00
      N/A
      N/A, Ontario N/A
      Canada

      Oh, and of course my phone number, which you can all reach me on, is (602) 555-5555. Apparently GoDaddy doesn't like a 555 area code and changed it for me :^)

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    3. Re:I hate "whois". by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Try getting your domain back when its stolen.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    4. Re:I hate "whois". by Foresto · · Score: 1

      I use a tagged and auto-generated email address, which forwards to my real address, for my domain registration. When enough spam starts showing up on the tagged address, I delete it and create a new one. This happens every six months or so.

  38. Why the cynicism? by panaceaa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think that this improvement is because Network Solutions charges the most for domain registration and they are trying to provide a better product in order to justify the cost. The added information isn't a major step forward for domain owners, but it does help make Network Solutions seem like a more serious provider.

  39. banned! by urban_gorilla · · Score: 5, Informative
    awesome. after one query on our own hostname
    BLACKLISTED: You have exceeded the query limit for your IP address and have been blacklisted. This restriction will be removed in 24 hours.
    --
    "Yeah, Yeah, Yeah." - Lennon, McCartney
    1. Re:banned! by ichandarin · · Score: 1

      Although it bothers you, this clearly has a good point. Other people have been complaining about spam bots harvesting email addresses, now that the WHOIS information is returned as text.

      This is clearly their attempt at a solution to that problem.

      Of course, it won't stop 100 000 virus-infested computers from each harvesting 10 emails each 24 hours. Oh, well, more spam for me...

      --
      Denn wir sind wie Baumstaemme im Schnee. Scheinbar liegen sei glatt auf, mit kleinem anstoss sollte man sie wegschieben
    2. Re:banned! by urban_gorilla · · Score: 1

      yes, but ONE request per 24 hours? little bit harsh.

      --
      "Yeah, Yeah, Yeah." - Lennon, McCartney
  40. Re:war? by archen · · Score: 1

    Holy Fuck. You know, I try to make my info private since I just saw the link and noticed that they want $27 to make my info private. Man that's about as wrong as it gets. I think it's time for another registrar for me.

  41. Re:Well, they got the geolocation wrong for my sit by Nintendork · · Score: 2, Informative
    Well this would be why it places you in Chicago. That's the netblock containing the IP that kravlor.com resolves to.

    One thing that interests me is that it says my company's web server is Apache. We switched to IIS6 like two months ago.

    -Lucas

  42. Security by Seven001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They'll impress me when they PUT SOME FUCKING SECURITY ON THE WHOIS SEARCH. Stupid ass companies like Network Solutions are the reason at least 50% of my spam is sent to a DOMAIN REGISTRATION ONLY email address.

    Would it be terribly difficult to implement a system like whois.sc, where it shows images of your email address instead of text? I think not. I could probably do it and I'm a pretty green PHP coder.

    1. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Stupid ass companies like Network Solutions are the reason at least 50% of my spam is sent to a DOMAIN REGISTRATION ONLY email address.

      So why don't you whitelist the registrar and reject everything else?

  43. wow by next1 · · Score: 1

    it's a long time since i've been to the netsol site and my initial reaction after trying this new web whois search is that they are a disgrace.

    my search on my own domain returned links to "snap up" the domain when it expires, "make an offer" on the domain, register the same domain with other extensions (forcing me to now consider buying the other domains if i want to stop that happening).

    and as if those tactics aren't low enough, they also have sitefinder.

    oh and did i mention my email is printed without any spam protection on the results page?

    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      oh and did i mention my email is printed without any spam protection on the results page?

      Who is your registrar? My .com is with Tucows, and my email address is not printed anywhere. The info that gets put on the screen depends on whatever your particular registrar happens to return with a whois query.

    2. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      planetdomain.com.au

      unfortunately they just put print all the registration information on any query.

      oh well, least it was cheap.

  44. try it without the UA, keep referrer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the referrer is to keep out bots. Any normally paranoid site does this with forms.

    1. Re:try it without the UA, keep referrer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's retarded. Any bot can easily send a referer header.

    2. Re:try it without the UA, keep referrer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works fine without referer, remove your UA string however and get this and only this.

  45. No more captcha by KalvinB · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They used to require you pass a captcha to get the information about the domain. Oh wait, that's 9 bucks a year and only works for domains registered through netsol now.

    That was nice of them.

    Ben

  46. Traffic Rank? by SunBug · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone know what the Traffic Rank means? My company's site is listed as a 2, slashdot is a 1. Lowest I can find is a 4. Lots of sites have a Not Available rank.

  47. Re:Or maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me save you all the troulbe. This shmata-oozing putz has spammed this discussion over a dozen times to promote his shithole website. Do NOT give him the satisfaction of boosting his visitor stats.

  48. This is your warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you spam your shitty website here again, I have well over 200 megabits of distributed hosts around the internet ready to flood your IRC network and/or website at my command. If it happens, then don't be surprised.

    I am sending a warning to your IRC host to let them know of your spamming activities and that if they can't get a lid on you guys, I will take this matter into my own hands. Thanks.

    1. Re:This is your warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also showing us as an e-commerce site, for some reason :(

    2. Re:This is your warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wats odd, is that it doesn't have an image of our site, but alexa and whois.sc does.

      It's also showing us as an e-commerce site, for some reason :(

    3. Re:This is your warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here coattails, this will get you some free emails.

      Domain name: coattails.net

      Registrant Contact:

      Steve M bishop_de_vannes@yahoo.com
      +1.3134413800
      Fax:
      Address
      Madison, MI 48101
      US

      Administrative Contact:

      Steve M bishop_de_vannes@yahoo.com
      +1.3134413800
      Fax:
      Address
      Madison, MI 48101
      US

      Technical Contact:

      Stephen Mosquera bishop_de_vannes@yahoo.com
      +1.3134413800
      Fax:
      Drive
      Madison, MI 48101
      US

      Billing Contact:

      Stephen Mosquera bishop_de_vannes@yahoo.com
      +1.3134413800
      Fax:
      17333 Federal Drive
      Suite 220
      Allen Park, MI 48101
      US

      And who knows what else. Have a nice day.

    4. Re:This is your warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So have you hit him yet? This is like the 20th time you've warned him.

    5. Re:This is your warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wats odd, is that it doesn't have an image of our site, but alexa does.

      Wish it showed our google results instead of yahoo, though

    6. Re:This is your warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also showing us as an e-commerce site, for some reason :(

    7. Re:This is your warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also showing us as an e-commerce site, for some reason :(

    8. Re:This is your warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also showing us as an e-commerce site, for some reason :(

    9. Re:This is your warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also showing us as an e-commerce site, for some reason :(

    10. Re:This is your warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha not even me

      but I did want to reply to the warning guy and maybe call him a shitdick or something

      also congrats on distributed hosts

  49. Am I the only one... by MrWhitefolkz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    who noticed slashdot's traffic ranking was #1?

    1. Re:Am I the only one... by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      It's a ranking between 1-4 or so. NetSol's "1" seems to stretch from Alexa's 1 - 15000 at least.

    2. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 1-5 and NA. My site's a 5.

  50. Mine is right, kind of.. by EvilStein · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It says "IP Location: US(UNITED STATES)"

    Totally useless answer, but technically correct. I should expect no less from Verisign. heh.

    1. Re:Mine is right, kind of.. by bo0ork · · Score: 1

      Uh, it shows mine as New York - Old Bethpage - Scream Mal. Which is totally bogus, as Sweden - Stockholm would be the correct answer.

      --
      Does everything include nothing?
    2. Re:Mine is right, kind of.. by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      I just wonder why Old Bethpage has IP addresses.

      It's claim to fame is the Old Bethpage Village Restoration, bunch of old houses and people who dress up in 1800's garb.

      Well, at least it was when I was a kid. For all I know, it might be the tech center of Long Island now.

  51. Interface? by qtp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Stll looks the same to me:

    localhost:~$ whois slashdot.org
    NOTICE: Access to .ORG WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the PIR registry database. The data in this record is provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and PIR does not guarantee its accuracy.

    This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will us

    (snip)

    I don't know about this being intended to court the geeks, as any actual geeks would be rather unlikely to use a web interface to do a whois query.

    --
    Read, L
    1. Re:Interface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need not neccesarily use the web interface.

      You can also call the whois from command line using :

      telnet whois.networksolutions.com 43

      and then entering in the DOMAIN you want to search.

    2. Re:Interface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you can use a whois client, as the parent poster was obviously demonstrating.

  52. This is your warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fd If you spam your shitty website here again, I have well over 200 megabits of distributed hosts around the internet ready to flood your IRC network and/or website at my command. If it happens, then don't be surprised.

    I am sending a warning to your IRC host to let them know of your spamming activities and that if they can't get a lid on you guys, I will take this matter into my own hands. Thanks.

  53. This is your warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you spam your shitty website here again, I have well over 200 megabits of distributed hosts around the internet ready to flood your IRC network and/or website at my command. If it happens, then don't be surprised.

    I am sending a warning to your IRC host to let them know of your spamming activities and that if they can't get a lid on you guys, I will take this matter into my own hands. Thanks.0000009

  54. Re:Well, they got the geolocation wrong for my sit by M.+Silver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It got the Phoenyx' location right (unsurprisingly, since our IP is right where you'd expect it to be).

    But yeah, we're "e-commerce: yes" too, which is fightin' words, as we're a free site, where "free" doesn't mean "call it free then shove ads at you."

    --

    Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
  55. People with vision impairments by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I want to know is why they did away with having the results be returned as an image.

    Under certain conditions involving government contracts, American companies have to comply with section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, which requires the company's web site to be accessible to people with disabilities. Try retyping a web address from an image if you're blind.

    1. Re:People with vision impairments by Christ-on-a-bike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They could provide a text-to-speech MP3 of the email address as well.

    2. Re:People with vision impairments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the inconvenience caused by spammers on a global scale slightly outweighs the inconvenience caused by people with vision problems occassionally asking for help reading an address.

    3. Re:People with vision impairments by yRabbit · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they generate an image and use an ALT attribute of, say, "somebody, at sign, somewhere.com"?

    4. Re:People with vision impairments by tepples · · Score: 1

      I think the inconvenience caused by spammers on a global scale slightly outweighs the inconvenience caused by people with vision problems occassionally asking for help reading an address.

      Which toll-free telephone numbers did you see? I didn't see one at any of the CAPTCHA'd whois sites I tried, unlike Yahoo!, which has one.

  56. Woah.. Backorder by hotzeyboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I checked out my domain, which I'm scared to give the name of now and at the top of the page is the following

    Certified Offer Service - Make an offer on this domain

    Backorder - Get this name when it becomes available

    Similar Names - See suggested alternatives for
    this domain

    In addition a sidebar has all the other
    tld .net, .org etc ...

    Excuse me? I don't mind getting legitimate offers to purchased this domain but they seem to be offering services to encourage squatters to either steal it (when the registration expires)
    or to grab similar sounding names so they can profit off typos? Whose brilliant idea was this?

    1. Re:Woah.. Backorder by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Insightful my ass.

      At least verisign (maybe others) will suspend your domain before it's released but after it's expired. If you forget to renew it all year and don't notice that it's expired then you gave it up on your own will, it's not stolen. It also helps get your domain back from squatters. The .com version of my domain has changed hands 3 times to 3 different squatters. If it was worth the $10+registraion cost to get it backordered I'd probably have it by now.

      The similar names are stupid, not typos. Here's what I get when I put in slashdot.org:
      slasheddot.com
      freeslashdot.com
      eslashdot.com
      islashdot.com
      clanslashdot.com

      There are a lot of reasons to hate Verisign, the ones you said are not valid.

  57. duh, that robots.txt should read.... by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1

    User-Agent: msnbot
    Disallow: /

    --
    http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
    1. Re:duh, that robots.txt should read.... by hacker · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I have one even better than that...
      User-agent: Mediapartners-Google*
      Disallow:

      User-agent: Googlebot/2.1*
      Disallow:

      # Do NOT visit the following pathname or your host
      # will be blocked from this site. This is a trap
      # for mal-configured bots which do not follow
      # RFCs.
      User-agent: *
      Disallow: /cgi-bin/block_crawler.pl

      Basically this allows Google to spider my site, but when robots like msnbot decide to ignore this, reading and parsing robots.txt at each line, they'll follow block_crawler.pl, which is a script that appends their IP, date, time, etc. to .htaccess, with a "Deny from" rule.

      For excessive abuses, I just block their /24 at the firewall.

      Incidentally, they are ignoring robots.txt because they want to beat google at indexing "More(tm)" content, and be the "premiere" search engine out there. A year of "accidentally" crawling more content than they should, and their search engine will appear to have a LOT more pages that google does. You can bet a press release advertising this fact will appear soon after.

      I have another little trap for the harvesters, called "Can-o-Raid", which I've been using for about 4 years now. You can read more about it on my Perlmonks writeup over here. Being able to pollute the search engines with +/- 7 million fake email addresses per-night is pretty nice.. and I can slow them down by adding a sleep(45) to each page reload. They can't get out, once they get in.

  58. Section 508 by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would it be terribly difficult to implement a system like whois.sc, where it shows images of your email address instead of text?

    Yes, in the United States, at least. Are you familiar with section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines?

    1. Re:Section 508 by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Section 508 only applies to GOV sites run by GOV organizations.

      To a private individual, it means dick.

      And like other posters said, there are CLI whois clients out there, no need to use WWW at all.

    2. Re:Section 508 by Seven001 · · Score: 1

      I understand what people are saying about CLI whois clients, I use them myself, but you know there has be _some_ harvesters that use http. If a registrar stops just one harvester bot from grabbing my email address, then I'd be happy. One harvester bot can mean one thousand spam messages.

    3. Re:Section 508 by tepples · · Score: 1

      Section 508 only applies to GOV sites run by GOV organizations.

      Last time it checked, it also applied to any company over a certain size with a government contract. If not, the ADA probably does.

      </captcha-bitching>

  59. Probably got sued by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    They used to require you pass a captcha to get the information about the domain

    And then one of the following probably happened: either somebody with less than perfect sight sued NSI under some sort of Americans with Disabilities Act, or Hewlett-Packard "gently reminded" NSI of U.S. Patent 6,195,698. (Read More...)

  60. cant... resist... by Frambooz · · Score: 1
    "Perhaps they are trying to win over the geeks before they turn on sitefinder?"

    <redundant>
    Sitefinder turn on!
    </redundant>

    --
    No encryption can withstand the power of the Lucky Guess.
  61. While we're at it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there an alphabetic listing of registered domains? If not, why not?

  62. And for those who can't see? by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tucows requires a query to input a grahpics based password so it is harder to harvest the info.

    So what are blind people supposed to do? The TUCOWS Whois interface doesn't seem to provide a way to download the digits as an audio file in Ogg Vorbis format.

  63. It doesn't worry me by bferrell · · Score: 1

    I checked several domains I take care of and only one was vaguely correct. If that's the best they can do...

  64. thats stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the referer can easily be faked and a simple additional option to recursive crawlers like wget to get around ignorantly admined sites

  65. Re:Well, they got the geolocation wrong for my sit by aonaran · · Score: 1

    That's ok, they placed me in Houston TX (I'm in Oshawa, ON... not even the right country) and they gave the wrong IP address... methinks there is something screwy with their system.

    They haven't won this geek over.
    Sorry boys, try again when you've hired someone competent. (or fixed your DNS problems.)

  66. Re:Or maybe... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1
    Unless I'm missing something here, the Virtual Boy was made by Nintendo.

    Correct.

    But it had all the hallmarks of shoddy Microsoft R&D, so although designed and manufactured by Nintendo, you could make the argument for Microsoft being its spiritual father, so to speak.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  67. Re:Or maybe... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "Unless I'm missing something here, the Virtual Boy was made by Nintendo."

    Hold your horses, the patent hasn't cleared yet.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  68. Re:Well, they got the geolocation wrong for my sit by aonaran · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and a second search for the same domain turned up "US(UNITED STATES)-WASHINGTON-BELLINGHAM"

    Not even consistant wrong answers.

  69. Re:Or maybe... by ArchAngel21x · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, it was. Someone high in the ranks was fired for it too. To date, it is the only system from Nintendo I can think of that just bombed.

  70. Re:Alexa is Spyware by wadiwood · · Score: 1

    http://www.google.com/search?q=spyware+alexa&ie=UT F-8&hl=en&meta=

    My spyware blocker software goes nuts with alexa stuff. So, now I know I pick it up when I look at Amazon without blocking the scripts. Is there no respect anywhere?

    --

    -- it must be true, it's on the internet.
  71. The REAL point of this... by CXI · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The real point of this is to get people to go to the site, realize all the crap they are starting to publicly offer to spammers about you, and force everyone to purchase private registration.

  72. images of text by x3ro · · Score: 1

    And how will your images show up on my xterm window?

    --
    [ UNSIGNED NOT NULL ]
    1. Re:images of text by Seven001 · · Score: 1

      And I should care why? I don't mean to be rude, but seriously, I'd rather you not see it than you and every harvester be able to see it.

    2. Re:images of text by x3ro · · Score: 1

      My point is that obfuscating the email address on the web version won't help, because the whois information is available from the command line. Breaking whois would probably break a whole lot of systems that depend on it. I can't see the spam issue is important enough to warrant that.

      --
      [ UNSIGNED NOT NULL ]
    3. Re:images of text by Seven001 · · Score: 1

      The whois system needs to be changed. Contact information shouldn't even be public in the first place. Having my contact info on domains has never done me any good in the least.

    4. Re:images of text by x3ro · · Score: 1

      How would you propose changing it?

      If there is no public contact information, then how can the domain name owner be contacted?

      You have to realise that whois isn't set up for your benefit. It's for the benefit of someone wanting to know who is the owner of your domain name.

      --
      [ UNSIGNED NOT NULL ]
    5. Re:images of text by Seven001 · · Score: 1

      I perfectly grasp the intentions of the whois system, but when they designed it they didn't take harvesting bots into account. Not to mention other privacy concerns. Some registrars offer a privacy service, but for a price. I've never heard of that causing a problem. The prices are rediculous though, usually costing more than the domain itself.

      How would I change it? I would make it where _public_ contact info is OPTIONAL and a lot more versatile. So I could say, give my address but not my phone number. Or if I wanted just have everything confidential. In my case, the registrar is the only one that needs, and the only one I want to know my contact information. If someone has an abuse problem with a domain, take it up with the registrar. If someone has an abuse complaint about the site content, they don't need the domain contact information, they need to contact the hosting provider.

      It is simply not logical or desirable for contact information to remain public anymore. I'm sick of all of the spam I get from it. Both email and snail mail. If I used my real phone number I wouldn't be surprised if I got telemarketing calls too.

    6. Re:images of text by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      If there is no public contact information, then how can the domain name owner be contacted?

      Easily - via a contact form on the registrar's website. Let 'em contact without knowing the e-mail address it's going to.

  73. Re:buttsex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I wanted to define "ugly basement-dwelling gnetoo nerd who knows all about 'kernal instal' and 'emegre world'".

  74. less than advertised by sjalex · · Score: 1

    maybe one of their dbs is down or something, but when I try to get a hit on haam.us or state.tx.us I get this: We are unable to process your request at this time. Please try again later. I almost thought they'd been slashdotted.

    1. Re:less than advertised by Anonymovs+Covvard · · Score: 1

      it seems that they're not allowing any .us names to be looked up.

  75. Screenshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am curious as to how they can get the screenshot of any website. How is that done?

  76. Re:Or maybe... by TastyWords · · Score: 1

    it's about f%rking time. There have been plenty of tools which have been developed which permit a global retrieval for nearly all other lookups except for...gosh, NetSol. Who finally held their nuts in a vise and told them to fix it or else? Could it be they've given themselves enough bad press someone said, "Stop, or we're going to whack you for real this time (again)?"

  77. Re:war? by sirshannon · · Score: 1

    It has been time for a new registrar for a while now if $$$ is an issue. Usually, when monopoly power is lost, the former monopolist is forced to compete. NSI chose not to. Several competitors sprung up, many with better services and extremely lower prices. NSI neither lowered their prices nor increased their service level. Other than the name, there is no reason at all to stay with them unless you like paying 3x-10x the price for less service.

  78. So what is Veryslime up to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now the real question, is what is Veryslime up to?

  79. Dreamcast by LXAC08 · · Score: 0

    That's the only similar disaster I can think of on Sega's side. Nothing is more humiliating than having to sell your major icon(Sonic) to the opposing system.

  80. whois search results for: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    microsft.com

    Name Server: NS4.MSFT.NET
    Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK
    Updated Date: 23-jun-2004
    Creation Date: 02-may-1991
    Expiration Date: 03-may-2014

    who else has may 3rd 2014 marked on their calenders. I hope to buy microsoft.com for 6.95

    1. Re:whois search results for: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody has May 3rd 2014 marked on their calenders, because nobody is as colossally retarded as you.

    2. Re:whois search results for: by Arngautr · · Score: 1

      try microsoft's uk site, I believe they have made the mistake before of not reregistering.

    3. Re:whois search results for: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May 3, 2014, Is this the date that the Mayan Calender has set as the end of the world?

  81. *sigh* All this work.... by NerveGas · · Score: 1


    Just to save themselves the minor pain of providing a decent user-interface for their domain registration.

    Really. Despite the fact that they're 3 or 4 times more expensive than some of their competitors, a lot of people would still stay with them if trying to do business with them wasn't like trying to give an enema to a herd of feral cheetahs.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  82. Wow, glad I tried it out. by Rascally · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I figured I'd try the new web interface out. Entered in our main domain, and well...

    I noticed that the one weak link for the company I'm contracting to, that's on my list to fix (one of the reasons I'm here now), namely the domain name stuff...was actually in the MIDDLE of being compromised. They seem to have just kidnapped our corporate domain, and were on their way to our actual product site. Not all our domains are with NSI (thank god), but the fact I lucked out and checked it by fluke is damn scary.

  83. DMOZ urls capitalized?! by kistral · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looking at their results for a whois on my domain, I found something rather stupid. I clicked on the DMOZ results (hey! I didn't know someone put me in there...) and discovered that they convert DMOZ urls to all capitals. Wonderful. This is highly unlikely to work on a majority of websites... case matters in URLs!

    1. Re:DMOZ urls capitalized?! by EJB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup. I found the same. And since our site runs on Linux on a case-sensitive file system, it doesn't work.

      Maybe we need to tell verisign that "domain name" is not the same as "URL" and are defined in completely different technical specifications.

      ("domain name" is case-insensitive, but the path of a URL is most definitely not. And it's not even as if the majority of web servers are running on Windows, luckily, so that can't be the reason for the error)

      - Erwin

  84. Not impressed. by cool_st_elizabeth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A domain I sold 6 weeks ago is still listed to me.

  85. already the spam by zipoh · · Score: 1

    to my account which shows in the whois database has jumped in response to this. What they've done will cost everbody $$$ but they must think they are immune from any court-administered judgement. Heck, look at ol' M$$ and what they get away with. I tell you the corporations are really runnin things here.

  86. More info by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2, Informative

    The VeriSign/NetSol merger was big news, but apparently the spinoff wasn't. I didn't even know about it until it was mentioned in the rapid DNS update thread.

    Nov. 26, 2003: Pivotal Private Equity Acquires Network Solutions. "Pivotal Private Equity announced today that it has signed an agreement to acquire control of Network Solutions, the world's largest domain name registrar, for $100 million. ... Pivotal Private Equity will acquire the firm from VeriSign Inc. ... VeriSign will retain a minority interest in Network Solutions and retain its registry business."

  87. looks interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    but apperently somebody at my ip has missused the service...thats funny... I don't remember doing it... so maybe it was one of Sympatico's other couple customers.. maybe it was bob or joe.. i will have to ask them later eh.

    The IP address from which you have visited the Network Solutions Registrar WHOIS database is contained within a list of IP addresses that may have failed to abide by Network Solutions' WHOIS policy. Failure to abide by this policy can adversely impact our systems and servers, preventing the processing of other WHOIS requests. To see the Network Solutions WHOIS Policy, click on or copy and paste the following URL into your browser: http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/whois/index. jhtml If you feel that you have received this message in error, please contact us at: whoisquery@networksolutions.com

  88. Use a P.O. Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're concerned about privacy, instead of using your home address, get a P.O. Box. And instead of listing your home telephone, list your office/work telephone. Or just make up the phone numbers. The only things that matter are a valid address and valid e-mail address.

    Yes, I practice what I preach: I've been using the above methods for 5 years now without a hitch.

  89. not verisign by mattdm · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth, not Versign anymore -- they sold off Network Solutions last year or so.

  90. Re:Well, they got the geolocation wrong for my sit by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It still seems to be wrong. It says my web server is in San Fransisco, CA. when doing a whois lookup on the IP address gives the correct location for the netblock (Houston, TX).

  91. Re:Well, they got the geolocation wrong for my sit by wahmuk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I checked the info on each of my domains (right now, 33 of them), several of which are just "coming soon" and "currently under development" pages. Every one of them is listed as an e-commerce site. Only one of them actually is. And the location info simply says United States.

    At least the rest of the info appears to be correct; right down to the registrar name (GoDaddy).

    --
    You can't take the sky from me!
  92. NetSol != Verisign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sigh...

    NetSol is a *Registrar* for .com/.net. They are revamping their whois interface. This has nothing to do with Verisign, and hence nothing to do with Verisigns sitefinder in any way.

    Verisign is the *Registry* for .com/.net. They are doing a change to DNS updates, which is a good thing, no need to wait for days for changes to propagate any more. Whether this is an evil plot to enable their sitefinder service again - I'll leave that up to the tinfoil hat audience to discuss.

    To sum up: They are two separate entities. NetSol is not owned by Verisign any more.

  93. Off Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are all the /. ads for good companies these days (FSF, RackSpace, Google, Linux.com, ThinkGeek). What happened to all the M$ ads we loved to hate?

    This is sooo wrong that the /. guys are now getting more ethical funding. Next, we might start to respect them. Actually, no, let's not take this too far ;-).

  94. Copyright Violation? by sepluv · · Score: 1
    Perhaps they are trying to win over the geeks before they turn on sitefinder?
    Not withstanding the fact that no one will be won over by anything V*r*sign/N*tw*rkSolutions do if they bring back S*tefinder, they do not acknowledge their use of ODP (DMoz) data (even on the detailed ODP listings page--which contains only ODP data and which N*tw*rkSolutions even claim the copyright for). I do not know whether they are illegally copying the other data (e.g.: Yahoo's) but "pirating" information released under a free license probably "will not win over the geeks".
    --
    Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
    [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
  95. Re:Or maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wats odd, is that it doesn't have an image of our site, but alexa does.

    Wish it showed our google results instead of yahoo, though

  96. Re:Or maybe... by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
    Mistakes happen, sure. Sitefinder, however, was just malicious profiteering and status abuse.

    Don't attribute to malice what could be easily explained by stupidity.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  97. Re:Well, they got the geolocation wrong for my sit by foobsr · · Score: 1
    e-commerce site

    Now, why do you find this strange ?

    META NAME="DESCRIPTION" CONTENT="Home of Kravlor Enterprises"


    CC.
    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  98. another programmer by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 0

    another marketing ploy indeed by NS

    --
    Chris ,
    Php Programmers.
  99. Re:Well, they got the geolocation wrong for my sit by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    Heh, just like it seems to think mine is runnign Apache 1.. which hasn't been true for some 1 1/2 years at least...

  100. Re:Well, they got the geolocation wrong for my sit by rf600r · · Score: 2, Funny

    Silly boy. Everybody in Minneapolis knows that they're just a suburb of Chicago.

  101. What's different??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw this story, went to my command line and typed "whois [my NetSol Domain]" and it returned the same results as usual. Is there something different?

    I am using the best whois client, available from http://www.linux.it/~md/software .

    Anyway, time to quit out of lynx and get to work.

  102. Stop looking at me! by neckdeepinspecialsau · · Score: 1

    I love that they put up a spy pop under when you hit search. http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/popexit/pops tealth.html Titled "NetworkSolutions Consumer Insight" God I don't like that company.

  103. manadrones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What does that word mean?

    A Google search reveals that you are one of approximately two people in the world who uses the word manadrones.

    Perhaps it's time to stop making up your own words and join the rest of us who use words that people can understand (language is not useful when only one person in a discussion knows what it means), or maybe you were referring to continuous low dull humming sounds caused by a supernatural force, but that just seems confusing.

    Is it someone's last name? "Hello, Mr. Manadrones!" for example.

    1. Re:manadrones? by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      The beautiful irony is that you just wasted how much time whining about it?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  104. Re:Well, they got the geolocation wrong for my sit by Talonius · · Score: 1

    Yea, I'm running Apache 1 (but I'm not, I'm running IIS 6.0 on Windows 2003). Nailed my position though. I'm Secure and E-Commerce. Huh?

    Oh well.

    --
    My reality check bounced.
  105. I have a 5. Go figure. by JaimeZX · · Score: 1

    :hs:

  106. IE for Screenshots by BarefootClown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did anybody else notice that whois.sc is using IE (or IE libraries) to take the screenshots? I took a look at my flight school's web site, and the center pane was misaligned; this is due to a CSS bug in IE that I've not yet worked around. I also took a look at my homepage, and it rendered one of the transparent PNGs on a grey background (with the normally-invisible black text clearly visible--it should say "If you can read this text, click 'about this site' to find out why!" "About This Site" is a page that talks about IE bugs.). It should be noted that I'm looking at whois.sc with Moz, so the rendering issue isn't here; also, the screenshot image is a JPEG.

    --

    "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
    --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

  107. goddaddy by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

    I just renewed a domain on godaddy today. It was $9 for private registration. I didn't bother using it, though, because I didn't want to have to think about possible ownership issues.

  108. NSI by lee317 · · Score: 1

    Network Solutions can be found at netsol.com and nsi.com. Right?

    Here's a trick: Type simply "nsi" into Firefox. Usually it will resolve incomplete domains for you but it looks like the folks at Mozilla didn't want to give www.nsi.com any extra hits! (worked on 0.9 for OS X)

  109. Traffic Ranking by ElliotLee · · Score: 1

    I don't see a correlation between Network Solutions' Traffic Ranking and Alexa Ranks.

    Slashdot is ranked 1,270 on Alexa and has a Traffic Rank of 1 on whois. That makes sense.

    gizmobytes.com has a Traffic Rank of 2. That's pretty good for a site which is ranked 968,786 on Alexa!

    sizzly.com is ranked 854,289 on Alexa, but has a Traffic Ranking of 5 -- quite a bit lower than gizmobytes.com, if a lower number is better.

  110. Verisign kills standard WHOIS server by Animats · · Score: 1
    Verisign has taken down their old Whois server.
    • *
      * WELCOME to the VeriSign Global Registry Service Whois Server.
      *
      * Sorry, the Whois database is currently down.
      *
      * Please wait a while and try again. Thanks
      *
    But at the same time, the new, ad-heavy Verisign Whois page is up.