Slashdot Mirror


3D Printing in Stone, or Copy a Sculpture in Rock

An anonymous reader writes "With all this design your own parts and electronics talk lately here on /., what about creating your own stone sculpture on a PC or Copying a Stone Sculpture? You can do that with an outfit called Studio Roc in CA. The New York Times has an interesting article on this marriage of CAD, laser scanning, and rocks. 'Using a huge Italian-made Omag Mill5 five-axis milling machine equipped with a scanner and 30 interchangeable diamond-tipped bits and blades, the Mill5 can record nearly any object in minutes and carve a duplicate in any stone in a few hours.'"

186 comments

  1. So now I can have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...my own Venus De Milo RealDoll(tm)?

    1. Re:So now I can have... by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 1

      I don't think it would be nice to fuck a pussy made of rock.

  2. peeking out from the grave by i621148 · · Score: 2, Funny

    now you can have your head scanned and have a really scare tombstone !!! :)

    1. Re:peeking out from the grave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend of used to do exactly this. He works as a facial reconstruction surgeon. He would take an MRI scan of a patients head, and then make a foam copy of their skull using a 5 axis mill. He could then design and check whatever metal plate(s) he intended to insert before opening the pateint up. Very clever stuff. Made some nice models to keep on your desk too.

  3. My Sculpture! by toetagger1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if that machine could make a life-sized sculputure of myself? Where shall I put it?

    --
    who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
    1. Re:My Sculpture! by Smidge204 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Use it as a stand-in for any meetings you have to go to, of course!

      =Smidge=

    2. Re:My Sculpture! by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

      Ditto, comes in ebony, ivory, green, and pinstripe!

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    3. Re:My Sculpture! by squaretorus · · Score: 1, Funny

      you jest - but MAN I'd love one of those. Of me - not you - obviously - you might be fat!!!!

    4. Re:My Sculpture! by egjertse · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, I want my life-size basrelief carved into a large slab of carbon or some other black material. Mmmm..

    5. Re:My Sculpture! by haystor · · Score: 1

      I'll have your statue done in carbonite.

      --
      t
  4. in any stone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    the Mill5 can record nearly any object in minutes and carve a duplicate in any stone in a few hours.
    I wanna see it carve something in diamond... maybe use that huge 182 carat diamond they found in Guinea a couple days ago.
    1. Re:in any stone? by thebdj · · Score: 1

      diamond is not a stone. i believe it is technically considered a mineral

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    2. Re:in any stone? by JediTrainer · · Score: 2, Funny

      maybe use that huge 182 carat diamond they found in Guinea a couple days ago.

      Shh... don't spoil it. Everyone's still waiting for the /. article about that.

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    3. Re:in any stone? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Correct, diamond is one of the six mineral allatropes of carbon. There were origionally only three known allatropes:amorphous,graphite and diamond. In 1969 white carbon was added to the list. Buckminsterfullerene's were added in the 1990's. Finally a new form was found late last year which AFAIK has not yet been given an official name.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:in any stone? by sjalex · · Score: 1

      on that sixth one are you talking about the nanotubes or the bucky-other-shapes?

    5. Re:in any stone? by afidel · · Score: 1

      A new (fifth)* allotrope of carbon was recently found. It is a spongy solid that is extremely lightweight and, unusually, attracted to magnets. The inventors of this new form of carbon -- a magnetic carbon nanofoam-- say it could may someday find medical applications (see review article from Nature)
      linky

      * They ignore white carbon which most other sources agree was the fourth form.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  5. Obligitory hosting diss... by mobiux · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What? Are they serving the site from the milling machine?

  6. A Slashdot dream come true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    So there you are, kids. You can now really have Natalie Portman petrified.

    Which she probably already is...

    1. Re:A Slashdot dream come true by Alranor · · Score: 2, Funny

      And then smash her up with a hammer, warm in an oven for a few hours and have your very own genuine Natalie Portman Hot Grit

    2. Re:A Slashdot dream come true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Combining posts: The Natalie Portman Real Doll (tm) ;)

  7. Pick it up at Staples.... by Himring · · Score: 3, Funny

    what about creating your own stone sculpture? ...'Using a huge Italian-made Omag Mill5 five-axis milling machine

    Sounds great! I'm supposing Staples will have the huge Italian-made Omag Mill5 five-axis milling machine....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:Pick it up at Staples.... by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Funny

      But the replacement tools will only be sold by Lexmark as DRM protected cartridges.

    2. Re:Pick it up at Staples.... by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Just order a stone copy of "a huge Italian-made Omag Mill5 five-axis milling machine". In red, of course.

  8. Nice by nycsubway · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, this is nice, especially for restoring old buildings. If an artist can recreate a plaster mold, they can get a stone copy. That could save a lot of time in restoration.

    This could also have potential in restoring wood carvings, assuming the machine can mill wood.

    1. Re:Nice by RPI+Geek · · Score: 2, Informative

      If the machine can mill stone, it can mill wood. I've done it before, but you do have to be careful about the feedrate and small features or else you run the risk of splintering the wood.

      I don't see how it could restore a wood carving though...

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    2. Re:Nice by marnargulus · · Score: 1

      If it is anything like our mill it can't do wood. Our blades and mill are too powerful, and instead of taking out a carving it takes chunks out. The problem comes when you try to cut out either a very strong wood or a weak one. If it is too strong it will pull parts of the wood with it when you cut, but too soft will actually "melt" the wood, or cut huge chunks even with really low RPM.

    3. Re:Nice by tony_gardner · · Score: 1

      Try this:
      1) Make copy of original.
      2) Build back areas which have been eroded with material of choice (clay/plaster).
      3) Make copy of repaired carving.

      Didn't you ever tidy up a cut and paste job using a photocopier?

    4. Re:Nice by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      I was assuming that by "restore" he meant "make the original better," not "make a restored copy." I was also assuming that the process should be automated, which I just didn't see happening.
      Nope, never done that with a photocopier, but I see how you could.

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    5. Re:Nice by Wierd+Willy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Jeezuz people, what kind of machinists are you? I have milled wood, alabaster, graphite and other ultra-soft materials with CNC mills and lathes hundreds of times, even soft pine. You need high spindle speeds and low feed rates and razor sharp tools. Milling, you use low angle 2 flute endmills exclusively. Lathe nothing but cobalt steel cutters ground to a knife edge, no greater than 60 degrees.

      Typically, most modern mills have factory maximum spindle speed of 10,000 RPM. There are doublers and triplers and beyond that bolt right up to the spindle and its possible to get spindle speeds with these devices up to 100,000 RPM. High pressure air on the cutter keeps the flutes clear as liquid coolant can't be used because it damages the peice. It creates a lot of dust, but a good vaccuum system keeps that down to tolerable levels.

      --
      Stupid Humans.....
    6. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truely. I've done woods (laminated plywood is interesting), plastic, composites, graphite, and all sorts of weird metals and alloys thereof, and wood is not that difficult compared to many of the other things I've machined.

      Needless to say, a vacuum system and a cabinet is manditory for serious wood machining. Especially cedar. Not fun to get in your sinuses. Might be fun to do stone once.

    7. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When San Diego was restoring a bunch of the buildings at Balboa Park, they redid a lot of the architectural decorative work in plastic, to help take static load off of the walls. The stuff looked good, even at street level. Of course, the originals were duplicated merely by taking a few molds here and there, cleaning them up, etc.

      Most of the buildings there were not intended to last 100 years. they were built as part of a big international exposition, and thus were "temporary" and "cheap to build".

  9. needed a really big one of these last year.... by asr_man · · Score: 1

    Would have helped New Hampsire save face.

    1. Re:needed a really big one of these last year.... by mblase · · Score: 1

      Would have helped New Hampsire save face.

      Yeah, their governor really got his nose bent out of shape over that one.

    2. Re:needed a really big one of these last year.... by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      I think it's very silly. It was a rock formation. That's all. It wasn't god's face. It doesn't deserve to be "in our hearts and minds." It was a rock, and it's gone. They need to deal with it and spend their money on things that actually matter.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  10. I wonder... by lankiveil · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder how long it's going to be before someone figures out how to use this wonderful new technology for smut?

    1. Re:I wonder... by mirko · · Score: 1

      Rodin has already been there, done that...

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    2. Re:I wonder... by jstave · · Score: 1

      Given how quickly it occurred to pretty much everyone here (admit it, you all had the same thought), I'm guessing its already in the works (or already done)

    3. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the /. crowd managed in the first post :)

    4. Re:I wonder... by keithdowsett · · Score: 1

      Adds a whole new meaning to Hardcore!!

    5. Re:I wonder... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      I just hope you meant that as a joke. I consider Rodin's statues art... not smut

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  11. Soon on P2P by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh great, get ready for a host of law-suits as Da Vinci comes back from the dead to sew 'Sculpture Pirates' copying ancient IP.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Soon on P2P by B2382F29 · · Score: 1

      Da Vinci comes back from the dead to sew 'Sculpture Pirates' copying ancient IP

      Kinda like voodoo-punishment with needles? At least he doesn't saw them.

      --
      Move Sig. For great justice.
  12. Can't resist... by agraupe · · Score: 2, Funny

    It seems so useless, but yet I am compelled to get one. Such is the /. way

    1. Re:Can't resist... by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Hey, I just bought an iPod. Go figure.

      Then again, I still don't have a cell phone.

  13. Question on the cutting by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know why they use a diamond tipped cutter instead of a laser cutter? Does the laser simply slice too far, too fast? Or is the diamond cutter really that much more efficient?

    1. Re:Question on the cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does anyone know why they use a diamond tipped cutter instead of a laser cutter?

      Probably because the frickin' sharks demanded better benefits.

    2. Re:Question on the cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Laser cutting (or abrasive waterjet) is usually for flat items like sheetmetal where you make the cut all the way through the material. If you need to make a partial cut, a mechanical device is your only choice.

    3. Re:Question on the cutting by RPI+Geek · · Score: 5, Informative
      There's a few reasons.

      Conventional millers are cheaper.

      Lasers can't get inside features like hollowed-out areas (they can't control depth as well because they don't know the exact material properties inside the stone, and if it hit an unexpected soft spot, oops! there goes the whole thing.

      A laser cutter would use much more energy to burn the material away than a conventional mill uses to just chip it.

      Hope this helps.

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    4. Re:Question on the cutting by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Lasers are often used for engraving small type or image lines into stone, and possibly for making finished details. But the laser cuts a very thin line very slowly it would take forever to cut through stone where a diamond tipped cutter would do it much, much faster.

    5. Re:Question on the cutting by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      It seems that Laser Engraving equipment does exist and can cut Marble without problem. Why would a laser need to perform a plunge cut? (Not that there aren't reasons, I just don't know them.)

    6. Re:Question on the cutting by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Someone give this man some mod points. That was what I wanted to know. Thanks! :-)

    7. Re:Question on the cutting by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      The frickin' sharks are female!

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    8. Re:Question on the cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'd need a massive room sized laser, lots of money for gasses and electricity to mill rocks en masse. a diamond is small, and cuts nicely. it's the industry standard, i'll bet. Real lasers aren't like movie lasers. Also, industrial diamonds are cheap - you can probably find diamond tipped drill bits at your hardware store. really.

      So diamonds are cheap, and lasers are expensive.

    9. Re:Question on the cutting by tjw · · Score: 1
      It seems that Laser Engraving equipment does exist and can cut Marble without problem.

      No, that URL says it can engrave marble. There's a big difference. Also, I wouldn't be surprized if by 'engrave' they actually mean 'etch' because I think even a 45W laser engraver will have problems getting much depth in marble.

      One of the coolest things I've seen these things do is mark steel.
      --

      XJS*C4JDBQADN1.NSBN3*2IDNEN*GTUBE-STANDARD-ANTI-UB E-TEST-EMAIL*C.34X
    10. Re:Question on the cutting by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      According to this link, it seems that a "deep cut" engraving can be made in marble with about 10-50W. They do also say that using a laser for regular cutting of marble is highly impractical. (I assume for many of the reasons other posters have pointed out.) :-)

    11. Re:Question on the cutting by Wierd+Willy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Diamond cutters are the hardest cutters possible. typically, the diamond tips on the cutting edges will maintain their sharpness with low shear angles in highly friable materials such as stone or graphite. This is why spindle speeds would have to be very high to reduce actual impact pressures on the cutting edges themselves.

      Hardness is inversely purportional to shear strength. The harder the material of the peice, the smaller the chipload allowance on the cutter. The harder the cutter, the higher spindle speeds you can run. As long as the cutter stays below its heat tolerance, it will maintain its edge.

      Materials like graphite, marble and limestone are easily machined with spindle speeds around 20,000-25,000 RPM with diamond cutters. But the feed rate has to be low in order to get a surface finish within tolerance. Something like Granite, being mostly quartz would have to be machined at over 30,000 RPM with extremely low feed rates. This is extremely difficult as the hardness of the material of the workpeice and the hardness of the material of the cutter are approaching equilibrium. The heat tolerance just isn't there.

      Lasers are only really good for cutting blanks out of flat materials, they dont leave a very good surface finish and they tend to change the properties of the material being machined. You can get much better results for this with an abrasive waterjet cutter. Such machine tools are only good for cutting in straight lines.

      --
      Stupid Humans.....
    12. Re:Question on the cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with stones, like marble, is that they scatter light. They're like a hundred billion little lenses, and etching them basically means breaking those tiny pieces into dust, not oxidixing it. Add to that the fact that the material has very high melting and vapor points, and you've got to use serious wattage to even engrave it.

      Metals like steel, on the other hand, actually burn (yes! Burn!) with the atmospheric oxygen when they get to a certian temperature, making very percise cuts possible.

    13. Re:Question on the cutting by zuzulo · · Score: 1

      Not strictly true. I use abrasive waterjet for 3 dimensional bas relief with some frequency, the accuracy is as good or better than most mechanical devices. Especially on stone. Most tombstones are currently carved with water jets, and commonly use bas relief. Laser cutting can also be used for three dimensional imaging. Look up laser engraving or stereolithography for some examples.

      The key is to choose a device that allows real time variation of beam strength (in the case of laser) or real time pressure modulation and abrasive content for water jet.

      Limitations are that these techniques using existing tools work better with pieces that you can divide into multiple cutting planes and have consistent structural characteristics. Mechanical systems have an advantage when the material you are working with is less consistent - if the density of the material varies greatly the degree to which you modulate the ablative power of the water or laser does not consistently remove the same amount of material, while mechanical methods are less sensitive to variations in composition.

      The upshot is that you can do amazing things with current machining, and EDM (electron discharge machining), laser systems, photolithography, chemical lithography, stereolithography, ablative water jet, and various mechanical CNC systems are all useful in frequently overlapping ways. Once you understand the 'cutting' edge machining technologies, you can make design decisions that are tailored to appropriate tech in order to minimize cost and production time. ;-)

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    14. Re:Question on the cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some good responses already, but to also add:

      * lasers are expensive to buy and setup still -- not that these machines are cheap or that a high quality and spindle will not run you lots of $$$. Many lasers are far more robust than they were years ago, but their control adds another layer of complexity, versus just throwing a cutter on a more conventional machine

      * speed -- Faster cutting for a laser means more power and thus a higher cost of that laser (as well as more energy input--more money there). I would imagine a big honkin cutter, while costing in the thousands, would decimate a laser in terms of speed, esp. during routing and profiling.

  14. Iiiiiinteresting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just like people are writing software that compose their own music, this could potentially give software the ability to create its own "artistic" sculptures... cool!

    PS. Han Solo hates the idea of a full size sculpture of himself. ;o)

    1. Re:Iiiiiinteresting by tepples · · Score: 1

      Just like people are writing software that compose their own music

      I know somebody who actually tried writing such software, using computational music theory, but almost every time he ran the program, the melody matched that of some song from commercial radio. It frustrated him enough to write this.

  15. Nip / tuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs to go all the way to Hollywood to get the best plastic surgeons? Now, all you have to do is call them up, then stick your head in an internet-enabled sculpting "printer" and let them go at it remotely.

    Hopefully, you'll have a secure line, or else you'll get Cialis adverts tattoo'ed on your cheeks.

  16. Family albums by jstave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just think how weird one could get with this. Instead of bronzing the baby's shoes, you can make multiple, lifesized statues of them as they grow up.

    1. Re:Family albums by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Good idea. The only problem is that the baby would have to keep completely still while scanned, which might be diffcult.

      Would work for a sleeping baby though.

    2. Re:Family albums by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

      For now, but add multiple lasers, increase their scanning speed, etc, etc... Stuff you could expect happening anyways....

      And someday you could have a 3D "photo". Complete scan done in 1/60 of a second - statue to take home while you wait.

      Awkward family albums ensue....
      "Look Kids, Mom really was a hottie!"
      "Little Stevie, it's o.k. to be curious, but don't touch your mother's statue there..."

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
  17. The SMAA will not like this by denis-The-menace · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Stone Masson Association of America will not stand for such a thing. They will soon lobby for a DMCA-like legislation to outlaw progress like this.

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    1. Re:The SMAA will not like this by pubjames · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Stone Masson Association of America will not stand for such a thing. They will soon lobby for a DMCA-like legislation to outlaw progress like this.

      You joke about this, but this is exactly what happened with industries in the past - laws have been passed so that people can continue profitting from them when new technologies have threatened people's livelyhoods.

      Consider - once upon a time, if you were a story teller, the way you would make more money was by visiting towns and telling your stories, and people would pay you for them, presumably the better ones would get a bigger audience and so earn more. But you wouldn't get rich by it. Then the printing press came along, which had the potential to rob storytellers of their livelyhood. So we made laws such that the original storyteller could make money on every copy of his work sold.

      Similarly, if you were a musician a few hundred years ago, the only way you could make money was by playing live. Then recorded music came along - this had the potential to rob musicians of their income - they were now only needed to play the music once, and the a recording to be listened to again and again. So again, laws were made so that musicians could maintain their income.

      In the past, artists and composers were comissioned by weathly people to do original artworks for them. Now they can profit from reproductions of their works, so they don't need the wealthy patrons. But only because we have made laws that allow that.

    2. Re:The SMAA will not like this by abb3w · · Score: 1
      Yeah, better not underestimate the political clout that the masons can wield.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  18. I want a Venus De Milo !!! by randalware · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who would want a "almost" exact copy of the the Venus De Milo ?

    I say almost exact, because I want the missing pieces added back in.

    Which face to use would be a hard choice.

    I think I would have to do a survey of the beatiful classic female faces for the correct historical ethnic/area first.

    I couldn't use a favorite model/actress face.

    Like a Julia Robert, Sandara Bullock, (insert the top 1000 rated women list here),etc, etc.
    Because, I wouldn't want my statue seized by the copyright nazi's.

    How much is one I want one or at least the use of one.

    --
    This is my opinion based on what little I know and understand of the rumors and lies Thanks, Randal
  19. Because someone had to say it by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

    How much wood would a stone mill mill if a stone mill could mill wood?

    --
    John
    1. Re:Because someone had to say it by yow2000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      It's funny the parent wasn't rated "funny"...
      it's more like: hey, nicely done.

      Close, but not sig

    2. Re:Because someone had to say it by popeyethesailor · · Score: 1

      ZOT!

    3. Re:Because someone had to say it by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      a stone mill could mill as much wood as a miller would since a stone mill could mill wood.

    4. Re:Because someone had to say it by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 0

      How much shit can a dipshit shit, if a dipshit can dip shit?

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    5. Re:Because someone had to say it by trentblase · · Score: 1

      but even if a stone mill COULD mill wood, and even if a stone mill WOULD mill wood, SHOULD a stone mill mill wood?

    6. Re:Because someone had to say it by mt2mb4me · · Score: 1
      How much shit can a dipshit shit, if a dipshit can dip shit?

      That doesn't make sense

      wouldn't it be :

      How much s*it can a dips*it dip, if a dips*it chould dip s*it?

      or:

      How much dip could a dips*it s*it, if a dips*it chould s*it dip?

  20. Just wait 'till the porn industry hears about this by appelflapje · · Score: 0

    Then you can expect various life size body parts of famous porn actors. :) ...shudder...

  21. Obligitory slashdot diss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No, but slashdot, as usual, is pulling it out from the past.

    The byline of the article says: "Posted on: 10/10/2001"

    Of course, how much difference does the age of a stone really make, anyway? :-)

  22. Obligatory HHGTTG Reference by soltarusprime · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this is what Agrajag utilized to make his monstrous Arthur Dent replica, yet I am suprised that he ever lived long enough to manage to make it to the shop to place the order.

    1. Re:Obligatory HHGTTG Reference by dragonp12 · · Score: 1

      Then again, he did get enough chances; in one of his lives he was bound to have had the time to do it...

      --
      This is me. Don't like it? That's unlucky.
  23. why? by Skadet · · Score: 1

    Engineer: I wonder if we can make a machine that creates stone replicas of stuff?
    DeForest Kelley: You're so caught up in whether or not you could, you never stopped to think if you should!!

    Seriously, why?

    1. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldnt it be cool to have stone tux's in front of buildings instead of ugly concret triangles?

  24. Finally! by Beelub · · Score: 1


    A printer Fred Flinstone could love!

  25. Carving in stone. by CmdrTostado · · Score: 1

    this rocks !!!

  26. Free Sculpture Foundation by Stiletto · · Score: 4, Funny


    Friday, July 23, 4004
    NEW YORK (AP) - A new organization has been created to promote the copying and redistribution of stone sculptures. Calling itself the Free Sculpture Foundation, or FSF, the group aims to "free" works of art which until now have been "hoarded" by stone copyrighters.

    "How can you copyright a piece of rock?? It's the earth, man!" Hippie and founder Richard Stoneman said he got his idea from a recent Slashdot post, "3D Printing in Stone, or Copy a Sculpture in Rock". Great works such as those by Michelangelo will be among his first projects.

    Industry groups are not impressed. Chiseled Sales, Inc. spokeswoman Hillary Rocken announced the formation of a trade group opposed to Mr. Stoneman's band of fredom fighters. The Rock Is Available Association, or RIAA is set to lobby government officials to crack down on these "rock robbers". "The talented sculpturers we represent are losing hard earned profits by these thieves. Stone may come from the earth, but that shouldn't stop us from selling it," Rocken said in a prepared statement.

    The debate is not likely to go away any time soon. Shortly after the formation of the FSF, a new rival group was formed, calling itself the Open Stone movement. President Erock S Raymond called for a meeting of the minds between business and stone consumers, noting the benefits of opening up the hardware "blueprints" to great works of art.

    1. Re:Free Sculpture Foundation by whimdot · · Score: 2, Funny

      To protect intellectual property they might have to chip the originals.

    2. Re:Free Sculpture Foundation by dragonp12 · · Score: 1

      "How can you copyright a piece of rock?? It's the earth, man!" :-\ -> "How can you copyright a silicon chip?? It's only sand, man!"

      --
      This is me. Don't like it? That's unlucky.
    3. Re:Free Sculpture Foundation by goldspider · · Score: 1

      If silicon microchips were a naturally-occuring phenomenon, you might have been on to something.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    4. Re:Free Sculpture Foundation by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      Hee hee, gotta love how the parent has been modded "informative"...

    5. Re:Free Sculpture Foundation by dragonp12 · · Score: 1

      Well, technically most works of art aren't naturally-occuring phenomena either.

      --
      This is me. Don't like it? That's unlucky.
    6. Re:Free Sculpture Foundation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative? What the hell have the mods been smoking?

    7. Re:Free Sculpture Foundation by JanneM · · Score: 1

      To protect intellectual property they might have to chip the originals.

      Ouch... It did crack me up, though :)

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    8. Re:Free Sculpture Foundation by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 1

      That reads like something chiseled on a tablet by a prehistoric bird and delivered to the Flintstones in Bedrock.

    9. Re:Free Sculpture Foundation by Maxite · · Score: 1

      July 23, 4004 Richard Stoneman said he got his idea from a recent Slashdot post, "3D Printing in Stone, or Copy a Sculpture in Rock". Wow.. Slashdot really recycles those stories, don't they?

      --
      Ah, you found me!
    10. Re:Free Sculpture Foundation by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      ...but don't we already have Free Masons?

  27. DRM? by thesp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean statues will now come equipped with DRM? If this machine can make Venus de Milo knockoffs with arbitrary precision, it can save the data it uses to carve. Then put that datafile on a P2P, and anyone with a statue burner will be able to make bootleg Venuses! I'm sure the art industry is already getting worried!

    1. Re:DRM? by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      Probably there will be a hidden watermark in your Venus of Milo ;)

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    2. Re:DRM? by ctucker · · Score: 1

      If this machine can make Venus de Milo knockoffs with arbitrary precision, it can save the data it uses to carve.

      I think I could stand a little imprecision around the chest area.....

      --

      --
      My other computer is your IIS server.
  28. copy this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stonehenge

  29. Imagine the possibilities by Zorilla · · Score: 1

    Imagine what a troll could do with this sort of power. Giant stone ASCII art of Trollkor and Goatse man. All they need after that is the power to screw up the layout by widening the stones.

    (Before going, "I don't get it, -1 for you!" browse at -1 for a bit)

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  30. Record nearly any object... by mikael · · Score: 2, Funny

    the Mill5 can record nearly any object in minutes and carve a duplicate in any stone in a few hours.'

    If it can duplicate CD's and DVD's, the RIAA are going to be annoyed.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:Record nearly any object... by mopslik · · Score: 1

      If it can duplicate CD's and DVD's, the RIAA are going to be annoyed

      The Stone Roses, the Rolling Stones, and Sly & the Family Stone were unavailable for comment.

    2. Re:Record nearly any object... by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      > If it can duplicate CD's and DVD's, the RIAA are going to be annoyed.

      Not really. You can't play stone DVDs.

  31. zxd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zxc

  32. Actually by gregarican · · Score: 1

    An uncut 182 carats is roughly the size of your fist. Not too huge really...

    1. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Say that to the poor sap thats gotta buy it for an engagement ring...

  33. 3D Models by EnsilZah · · Score: 0

    No one seems to be mentioning 3D modelling.
    Imagine what Blizzard or id could do to their lobbies with a few statues of Klesk, the Demon Hunter and the like.
    And just for people who are better with 3DS Max than with a chissle.

  34. This isn't 3D printing, sorry by panurge · · Score: 4, Informative
    You need a block of stone in the first place, from which you remove stuff. It's exactly the same as standard sculpture except that instead of apprentices, laborers and great big stone saws, they're using a milling machine to get a high quality rough. And (RTFA) this does produce a rough: hand finishing is required, just as special finishing is required with the output of most machine tools. The comments this is getting suggest to me that too many people nowadays don't have a clue about manufacturing - and we in the West will surely regret this one day.

    Printing is a process that involves ADDING material to a substrate, not taking it away.

    So yes, it's a nice application of one of those multi-axis machine tools the Italians do so well, but it's basically the same as any die-sinking process.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:This isn't 3D printing, sorry by Aidtopia · · Score: 1
      Printing is a process that involves ADDING material to a substrate, not taking it away.

      Uh, what do you call that thing that a thermal printer does?

    2. Re:This isn't 3D printing, sorry by mrjb · · Score: 1

      Well I guess we're still in the stone age of 3d copying then. Ba-da-BAM!

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    3. Re:This isn't 3D printing, sorry by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Printing is a process that involves ADDING material to a substrate, not taking it away.

      I like to think of starting with a stone substrate, and adding air to it.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:This isn't 3D printing, sorry by I81U812 · · Score: 1

      A few years ago I saw an article on evolutionary robotic design http://demo.cs.brandeis.edu/golem/. Not only was I impressed with the research, but it was the first time I saw a 3D printer. Nothing but fucking cool!

    5. Re:This isn't 3D printing, sorry by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      Doesn't a thermal printer heat the paper, causing it to oxidize and turn brownish-black? If so, it's adding oxygen to the paper, and the original poster's definition of "printing" still applies.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  35. Of course it would be able to... by cnelzie · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...you could also get that done at virtually most protoype machine shops across the US.

    If they have laser scan capable CMMs (That's Coordinate Measuring Machines), just about any 5-Axis Vertical Milling Machine and some decent machine operators it can be done.

    Heck, you could even have that milled out of high-quality Aircraft Aluminum, like a 7000-series. You could also go with tooling steel, like Cold Drawn 1018 Carbon Steel or S-7 Tooling Steel...

    None of this is really new. The technology has been around for at least 10 years, from the laser scanning to the 5-Axis Mills.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  36. great power for good or for awesome by darksaber · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wouldn't you love for your girlfriend (mythical or otherwise) to pose naked for this?

    "They can take a twelve-inch piece and in less than a week we'll have it twelve feet," said Jon Lash, director of the institute's Digital Atelier division. "Then they'll come in and do the final manipulation of the surface."

    and then again, you could pose and give her something to keep her company while you are away... perhaps with some editing, but you don't want her to prefer it to the real thing, do you?

  37. Stone henge by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

    So when can I have my very own first stone henge then?

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  38. interesting by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

    Okay, so I tried to find a website for this Studio Roc place, and simply can't. Anyone have any suggestions?

    Aside from that, I think this is really great. For the last seventy or so years, new buildings have been devoid of the beautiful, distinguishing sculptures that used to adorn every building out there--the columnades, the lions heads, the leafy designs, all that stuff that you only find on/around the ritziest places now. Hopefully we can get back to having architecture that's creative and beautiful rather than creative and hideous (that's MIT's Stata, designed by Frank Gehry, if you don't follow these things).

    1. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was kind of an incomplete post. What I meant is that without slave labor or extremely cheap skilled labor (not that I'm advocating either of these), the sort of beautiful stonework we have to go touristy places to appreciate (but which used to exist in every city and on every church in the world) simply can't exist. But with good 3d printing, crafstmen can work digitally and design the sort of beautiful stonework we love to see everywhere.

    2. Re:interesting by surreal-maitland · · Score: 1
      actually, if you're in the boston area already, you can see a lot of the columnades, etc. on a large number of buildings. many of the buildings, not just the ritzier ones, in the city proper are old enough that they still have these features.

      as for the stata center, well, it's definitely unique. and i don't think it's entirely without aesthetic appeal. however, the fact that it abandons almost all sense of function for the questionable form certainly disgusts me.

      personally, i think this will lead more to imitation of the older stuff than to creative development of new sculptures in a similar genre. this technology will be put to use creating stone garden gnomes and donkeys and such for your backyard more than it will be used to create great architectural features.

      --
      -ninjaneer
    3. Re:interesting by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

      Oh, I definitely agree that there's plenty of great stonework here, NY, Philly, etc. (not to mention Europe), but it's beauty is not a part of our lives, it's something that has to be looked at as a thing of the past. Moreover, we spend shitloads of money maintaining the old stuff because the typical thinking is that it can never be replicated, which simply may not be true anymore.

      I mean, I can see the garden gnomes, but I can also see every new office building being built with beautiful sculptured sides, windows, etc.

      You know those old buildings where every single one of the hundreds of windows has a beautifully sculpted frame? That's been impossibly expensive for seventy years, but people can again begin to do that sort of thing, and I'm certain artists will pick up on it.

  39. DIY by Coupons · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is lovely, but beyond the means of the average /.er.

    With a little ingenuity and, say, $100,000 you can build your own and save a bundle.

    McRae and Sons Inc., the last US paint brush handle factory, builds their own 4 axis 3D wood carving machines for considerably less. The same principles can be applied to carving stone.

    McRae's machines rely on Actek Inc. motion controllers, though manufacturers abound. You might be surprised how many are amenable to working with amatures.

    Check eBay - no kidding - for cheap machines that can be canibalized or restored.

    --
    If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it? ~ Albert Einstein
    1. Re:DIY by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 4, Informative

      CNC can be had for much, much cheaper than $100,000. I built my own little CNC machine (bottom of page) from scratch for less than $250. That's not going to mill stone (very fast, anyway) but you can get a full-size Bridgeport or some Japanese mill for under $2,000 in some cases. For another $1,000 or less, and using the mill to build its own parts, you can retrofit the Bridgeport with servo or stepper drives, and use an obsolete desktop computer to control it using free software. Shops also turn over equipment like CNC machines pretty often, in order to keep up with everyone else. An expensive machine pays for itself many times over before it becomes obsolete. You may be able to find an older CNC mill, ready to run, for less than $5,000. I happen to know of one that, if I ever get the space, could be had for under $2,000. For all the information you need, try the CAD CAM EDM DRO Yahoo Group.

    2. Re:DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do a search for linux CNC.

      build one for dirt cheap and have the software for the computer to run it.

      It's nothing new, just a different use for old technology.

    3. Re:DIY by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      More information for you....

      here is a great place to start.

      the bulk of the cost for a CNC milling machine is the computer and software to run it.

      the above link removes that... now you can retrofit a dirt cheap CNC mechanical system that the controller was stripped out of.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  40. Finally.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Italians can fix all those broken statues they seem so proud of.

    Thank you, try the veal.

  41. or, if you're not in a hurry, by nusratt · · Score: 1

    . . . just outsource it to a ten-thousand-worker project team of carvers with hand-tools in some third-world country.

    1. Re:or, if you're not in a hurry, by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Where's their file upload page for the DXF data? Or the postal address for the DXF data printout, since we're not in a hurry?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  42. hmmm I wonder by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wonder when angelina jolie has a day off to go there ;-)
    As I'm not expecting her to come here :-(

    1. Re:hmmm I wonder by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      http://www.gorillamask.net/angelina8.jpg

      1. See what you're missing :)
      2. Maybe you can use that to start modeling it :)

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
  43. Are you sure? by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    Are you sure you are hard enough for her?

  44. Copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a slashdot reader, surely you should recognise a copyright case, and know the 50 year rule. It's in the public domain now, we're all allowed a copy. Whatever the SIAA (Sculpture Industry Association of America) try to tell you!

    1. Re:Copyright by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      You think they wont have it extended when this gets big?

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  45. Stone Tablets Redux by VernonNemitz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, boy! Now we can start preserving all of today's data in really long-lasting form! They should start with instructions of how to build and program one of these machines!

    1. Re:Stone Tablets Redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How to program: "G Code"

      G00 Rapid linear Interpolation
      G01 Linear Interoplation
      G02 Clockwise Interpolation
      G03 Counterclockwise Interpolation
      G04 Dwell

      M03 Main Spindle On Clockwise
      M04 Main Spindle On Counterclockwise
      M05 Main Spindle Stop

      And so on...

  46. This could revolutionise the garden gnome industry by Binarysleeper · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you could scale down models it would be fantastic. Just imagine the heights of tackyness that could be reached in gardens all over the world!

  47. "the West will surely regret this"? by nusratt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The comments this is getting suggest to me that too many people nowadays don't have a clue about manufacturing - and we in the West will surely regret this one day."

    Why will we regret having no manufacturing skills?
    After all, none of the highly-skilled manufacturing *jobs* will be *here* anyhow.

  48. Re:Michaelangelo's David by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    (The best part of this post is that I looked up how to spell Michaelangelo correctly from a Ninja Turtles Page.)

    So why didn't you spell Michelangelo correctly?

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  49. Diamond Age by surreal-maitland · · Score: 1

    is anyone else getting visions of the diamond age off of this? that would be rad. :)

    --
    -ninjaneer
  50. Over here by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    OK Ms. Portman, stand very still right here, the scanning process will only take a minute...

  51. I guess we now know ... by Culture · · Score: 1

    ... that slashdot takes stone, just like paper.

    --
    ----- There are two kinds of people in this world, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
  52. Re:Michaelangelo's David by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well if that's wrong then they spelled it wrong in the first Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles also. IMDb says so, so it must be right.

  53. If you want real 3D printing.... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    ... look at this other italian site. They build 3D models strate after strate.

    www.diegm.uniud.it/ingind15ud/laboratori/fpa.html

    Of course you may prefer a translation

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  54. She's got a heart of stone by seniorcoder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe I can use it to carve my name upon my ex-girlfriend's heart. She left me after 3 years. She said I spend too much time in front of a computer. She wouldn't open the electronic cards I sent her. She's blocked me on AIM. My emails are bouncing. I cannot even ping her anymore. Oh Joyce, forgive me.

    1. Re:She's got a heart of stone by bat2k · · Score: 1

      Oh how I love to ping and POKE my girlfriend. You're such a poor sucker...I think it's time to move on.

      --
      My other sig is a Porsche.
  55. Now we just need by Cnik70 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Something that copies Scissors and we'll be set!

    --
    -Cnik
  56. Old Tech.. by Ancil · · Score: 1

    3D printing in stone?

    They've had that for a while!

  57. Obsolete in the global economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    This whole idea is obsolete before it's really got going. If you want a stone replica of something, outsource the stone-cutting to China or Bangladesh. It's not only cheaper and quicker, it's probably more accurate (if you RTFA in the NY Times, you'll see that the machine's carvings need to be hand-finished).

  58. Ugh by Bob+McCown · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    News sites that make you log in make baby Jesus cry...

  59. Stonehenge, where the demons dwell... by dexter+riley · · Score: 1

    [looks at napkin] One 18 inch replica of Stonehenge, coming up!

  60. Milling Machines and sculptures by jrjud · · Score: 2, Informative

    Duplicating sculptures by methods other than carving directly into stone is nothing new - and milling machines are certainly not a new technology either.

    Even Rodin quite often started his work in clay. He sent the original plaster to a person who used a pointing machine invented by Nicolas Gatteaux to do the rudimentary stone carving.

    As for milling machines, they have been around forever and come in all sizes and work with all kinds of materials. This one is really good, and the CNC software runs on Linux: http://www.sherline.com/mill.htm

    It can be a neat 3D printer, but you need to get versed in machining, which can be very time consuming - especially if you use metal. You can use foam, wood, and lots of different materials.

  61. ask the Miller by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    There was a jolly miller once,
    Lived on the river Dee;
    He worked and sang from morn till night,
    No lark as blithe as he.
    And this the burden of his song
    Forever used to be,
    I care for nobody, no not I,
    And nobody cares for me

  62. I know what I'm carving! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MAH PENIS

    I bet the scanning process is stimulating.

  63. This goes right along with these guys by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

    Toybuilders.com

    You pretty much send them a CAD drawing or work with them to produce one and they just create it for you using several different methods.

    A couple of the methods even produce something wood-like (paper actually) or metal.

    --

    "Bah!" - Dogbert
  64. Stereolithographic machines are not new by panurge · · Score: 1
    There have been various forms of 3D printers around for a while, and incremental improvements aren't really news.

    However, the Google translation is really quite funny. Google seems to have got to about the stage that the Japanese translators of manuals into English reached in the early 80s.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  65. Wouldn't this be illegal if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this gets passed into law?

  66. Middlemen and Sonny Bono by tepples · · Score: 1

    So again, laws were made so that musicians could maintain their income.

    But of course, the middlemen came in and usurped the spirit of these laws.

    And what's the point in giving a storyteller, songwriter, musician, or visual artist the exclusive right to profit from an original work after he's dead and buried?

  67. Watch out by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    If you ever trade plans for famous stone monuments on P2P, the Stonecutters might sue you!

    Come to think of it though, it would be kind of funny to see them show up in robes in court and have the judge address them as, "Number 26" and so on and so forth.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  68. Making a big thing out of it ... by the_twisted_pair · · Score: 1

    ...would've been a good idea. I do not, for one, think that the problem was that the site was down. I think that the problem may have been... that there was a server that was in danger of being crushed by a dwarf. Alright? That tended to understate the hugeness of the /. effect.

  69. Don't fnord you fnord mean fnord the Illuminati? by swb · · Score: 1

    fnord fnord fnord.

  70. Finally!!! by Faw · · Score: 1

    We can have a naked and petrified Natalie Portman!!

  71. Re:This could revolutionise the garden gnome indus by tepples · · Score: 1

    Forget gnomes; the new lawn ornament fad is the hydrocephalic heads, baboon muzzles, and teardrop shaped eyes of Precious Moments, now that the figurines come in the larger garden size.

  72. Other 3D printing firms... by CoffeeDregs · · Score: 3, Informative

    Clever.

    Also check out:
    http://www.precisionlaserart.com - uses lasers to make small fractures in glass;
    http://www.prometal.com - uses metal powder to create arbitrary 3D forms;
    http://bathsheba.com - artist who uses the above forms;

    Note: I've used PrecisionLaserArt for some artwork and had a good experience, so I'm biased...

  73. Like Michelangelo did! by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

    That's 'free', not like in 'free speech' or 'free beer', but like in:
    'I saw the angel in the stone, and wanted to free it' (Michelangelo)
    Z?

  74. Natalie Portman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A beowulf cluster of these would allow everyone to have a copy of Natalie Portman naked and petrified for real! (Hot grits not included).

    One of the few stories where a post like this is actually appropriate ;-) But let's post AC just to be sure.

  75. My crown is made similarly by duanechamblee · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is old news AFAIK... I've got a ceramic crown that was created in a machine sitting next to me while I waited. Pretty cool and a practical use of the existing technology. http://www.cereconline.com/ecomaXL/index.php?site= Cerec_PatientInfo

  76. All new fun with getting caught mid-sneeze... by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    ^_^ Reminds of Ozy and Millie where they visit the attic and find the collection of life-sized bronze statues of Ozymandias done by his father each year rather than marking his growth on the wall. And yes, one of them was done mid-sneeze.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  77. Hell, they are scarey from a design perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the worst things that has ever happened, is when Desktop Publishing met the Tombstone industry.

    Before Computer driven stone carving, those chiseling your Granpas name on the rock had classic templates, that looked good in stone. Then computers happened, and the bad design that comes with them.

    They can squash a font to fit the stone.... Carve an image of the Camaro Junior wrapped around the tree to get that stone. You end up with permanant monuments, that are momumentally ugly and crass.

    Often, it was the town alcoholic that had the tombstone business, but at least in the old days, the templates he used to pantograph words into stone, had classic designers, people with taste designing them. Then someone sells a turnkey PC solution, or a mass market mail order solution, with squashed unreadable type, and clip art.

    I don't know if that field will ever recover its former grace.

  78. Re:Michaelangelo's David by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
    (The best part of this post is that I looked up how to spell Michaelangelo correctly from a Ninja Turtles Page.)

    So why didn't you spell Michelangelo correctly?

    A hundred bucks for a comic book? Who drew it, Michaelmelangelo?

  79. Kryptos! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    I want a copy of Kryptos, the sculpture in the courtyard at the CIA's headquarters, in my front yard!

    http://elonka.com/kryptos/

    -Cybrex

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  80. Mach 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the closest shave a man can get.

  81. Profit! by LesPaul75 · · Score: 1

    I sincerely hope that someone takes the next step and makes this available to the home user. You upload your 3D model, they mill it and send it to you. Maybe that's already possible, but I can't RTFA right now, unfortunately. How much does one of these fancy-schmancy diamond mill machines cost, anyway? How many sculptures do I need to sell before it pays for itself?

  82. Futurama refrence by awhelan · · Score: 1

    I knew we were going to have these by the year 3000 anyway. It'll only be a matter of time before "nappster.com" starts letting you download Lucy Lu, and other famous celebrities onto blank robots.

    "Ohh, I'm so impressed by your ability to notice two things ::pause:: Phillip J. Fry"
    .. and to anybody getting any ideas about this, you people are just sick. Relationships between people and robots are just plain immoral.

  83. Jurassic Park III showed something similar by r3mdh · · Score: 1

    In Jurassic Park III, they show something similar - a fossil of a Velociraptor was used to create a 3D copy of the Raptor's vocal cavity. Dr. Grant used the copy (he blew into one end and a Raptor vocal sound was produced) to confuse the swarming raptors before the helicoptors came to the rescue.

  84. Free Masons by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1
    The Stone Masson Association of America will not stand for such a thing. They will soon lobby for a DMCA-like legislation to outlaw progress like this.

    That's ok - the Free Masons will stop them....at least if you know the right handshake.

  85. Ron Jeremy strikes back... by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    The Mill 5 is a high-output machine both for online production and for single, one-off pieces. The axes are driven by brushless motors combined with ball bearing screws. Linear guides with ball runners assure lasting quality and precision. All parts are protected by PVC bellows and lubricated with oil by a controlled centralized system.

    OMG. Wait until the pron industry gets a load (ahem) of this. I forsee lawsuits....

  86. Amended procedure by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1
    Scan wood or stone original.

    Fill in missing areas with plaster.

    Scan plastered original.

    Subtract model of original from plastered original.

    Carve the resulting patch models from wood or stone.

    Glue absolutely perfect replacement pieces onto original.