Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Outsourcing High-Level Work

philistine writes "The Seattle Times reports
A Seattle labor group said it has new evidence that Microsoft is shifting high-level work to foreign contractors, including work on the next version of Windows. The evidence is a cache of Microsoft contracts with Indian technology vendors that were leaked to the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers, an AFL-CIO affiliate that has focused on outsourcing in its effort to organize tech workers."

96 of 660 comments (clear)

  1. Thank goodness RedHat is coded in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linux will be free off all those foreign contributions.

    1. Re:Thank goodness RedHat is coded in America by the.jedi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm interning at microsoft this summer and someone asked Ballmer a question about outsourcing. I think the more interesting part was when he asked all the foriegn born interns to raise their hand. I'd say it was 50% if not more. He continued that microsoft was already hiring globally so the real question was did they want development labs in other countries.

      That being said I'm sure there are people just as bright in india as there are here. There are also
      inexpensive codemonkeys in both countries and if window source is getting sourced to them it'll suck even more.

      --
      ThunderBird. Nuff said.
    2. Re:Thank goodness RedHat is coded in America by pilgrim23 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, will the Indian Tech support sweat shop now finally be able to answer the questions raised from the bugs introduced by Indian programmers and...since I cannot understand either one now, will the product tehy develope at least sell well in.........India?
      (think Deli accent): "Hi My name is...uh...Bob"

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  2. Terrorists embedding code, no more secure rating! by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does this mean that MS Windows is now a security threat threat too? Because afterall, we could now have terrorists embedding code into Windows that is malicious!

  3. Outsourcing is evil.. by Ckwop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For all I know the Indians might be better programmers but working on the law of averages the problem solving ability of an indivdual is probably independant of their location. So it really is about the cold, hard dollars. The thing is capitalism isn't any more free than communism. What good is being able to criticise your government when there is only a choice of two parties?

    If you took Joe Six-pack and actually took the time to educate him on the fact that he can't mess with the chips in *HIS* playstation 2 legally because of some weird-ass law called the DCMA then I bet he'd see the onimous tone to it straight away..

    Out sourcing is an evil plain and simple. Why should a company's profit be at the expense of an individuals welfare? Who has the most votes after all.. the individual or the company? Government should serve you and me before the MD

    Simon

    1. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > If you took Joe Six-pack and actually took the time to educate him on the fact that he can't mess with the chips in *HIS* playstation 2 legally because of some weird-ass law called the DCMA...

      You have a strange idea of who "Joe Six-Pack" is. Joe six-pack is shooting squirrels with his 12-gauge while he spits chewing-tobacco into a coffee can which is overflowing onto his shoes, staining them the color of this god-awful Slashdot section.
      I don't think he has had much luck soldering hacked chips into any consumer electronics lately, and he surely isn't worried about the DCMA.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    2. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by The-Bus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They "outsourced" cars too... Or would you rather be driving a Pinto? The company's profits go to the owners of the company, shareholders. You know, the people getting $75B in dividends from Microsoft (Bill Gates once famously said $640K should be enough dividends for any company). Now, I disagree with the DMCA because it is anti-capitalist. But capitalism in itself isn't cruel. It sucks for some people, but it's better than socialism, where it sucks for everybody.

      (This is gonna get me modded down for sure).

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    3. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by FauxPasIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Outsourcing is not evil. Outsourcing is the only logical result of
      > overregulation and overtaxation in the US.

      Overregulation in the US is the only reason you don't work 21 hour days in a sweatshop with no breaks, no safety
      equipment and only getting paid in credits good at the company store. That is the only logical result of
      underregulation by the US. Think, dovich!

      Read "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclair, please

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    4. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Out sourcing is an evil plain and simple.

      Ask an Indian worker if he thinks its evil or not.

      >Why should a company's profit be at the expense of an individuals welfare?

      Why is the individual's welfare so dependent on a nameless/faceless corporation? Whatever happened to a person's independence? On one hand, you want the government to stop bothering you with restrictive laws, on the other hand you want corporations to be responsible for your personal welfare.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Otter · · Score: 3, Funny
      You have a strange idea of who "Joe Six-Pack" is. Joe six-pack is shooting squirrels with his 12-gauge while he spits chewing-tobacco into a coffee can which is overflowing onto his shoes, staining them the color of this god-awful Slashdot section.

      I think you've got John Kerry's next hunting story there. "There's nothing Theresa and I enjoy more than crawling around on our bellies shooting squirrels with a 12-gauge! As you can see, you hillbilly morons and I are a lot alike."

    6. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by servognome · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why should a company's profit be at the expense of an individuals welfare?
      I find it amusing how people feel companies are some nebulous single entity.
      Stockholders are the ones who own the company, and I would bet most people on /. are probably stockholders in some form (mutual funds, 401k, individual stock investments, etc). Most of them would also prefer to invest so their money gets a 10% rate of return than 1%. If your stock is underperfoming then you sell it and get one that gives you a better rate.
      As consumers you look to maximize your money when you spend. You would prefer to spend $50 on a new cell phone from company A than to spend $100 on the same cell phone from company B.
      So basically we are telling companies, make more money for us, but we want to spend less on the stuff you sell. How can companies respond? Reducing costs, like materials and LABOR. Outsourcing isn't something new, its been done for decades in other industries like manufacturing. People in IT have been benifiting from reduced costs on items and increases in stocks they own because of outsourcing in other industries, now that it's their job in jeapordy they complain.
      If you want to know what drives corporate greed, just look in the mirror.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    7. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Out sourcing is an evil plain and simple. Why should a company's profit be at the expense of an individuals welfare?
      Please don't mod me into oblivion here, but it's worth hearing the arguments for outsourcing.
      1. The extent to which jobs are being outsourced is a bit overstated. Yes, there are thousands of people being laid off and yes they may face a lot of difficulty until they find another job, but that is small compared to the 'churn' of jobs, i.e. the number of people chopping and changing jobs day in day out in the USA. It sounds like a lot when you hear the numbers totalled up, but in the grand scheme of things it's not that much.
      2. Protectionism is always self-defeating in the end, be in trade or in labour. If you want foreign companies to stop investing in the USA and creating jobs for Americans, what better way than to take protectionist measures that will instantly invite retaliation?
      3. Companies that could make components on their own account choose to sub-contract work out to smaller suppliers because they can do the same work cheaper and better. Same applies to companies that can get the same work done in foreign parts. Now there are times when it might not work out (like support calls being routed to India resulting in communication difficulties) and in that case the work will come back home and rightly so. In the end it's all about getting a better deal. If American companies can make it cheaper to buy products and services in the US, then the American economy as a whole benefits.
      4. The rest of the world has people to feed, bills to pay, etc. If outsourcing helps to spread the wealth, stabilise the rest of the world and narrow the gap between rich and poor then let's do it. "But" I hear you say, "working for slave-labour wages does not a rich man make." True, but studies show that foreign investment in the developing world leads to an upward pressure on local wages. Workers for western firms in the developing world may earn less than their counterparts in the west, but compared to their counterparts locally, they earn more. The economist had an in-depth study on this about a year ago -- I wish I'd filed the data away somewhere because I don't think their online archive goes back indefinitely.
      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    8. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Percy_Blakeney · · Score: 4, Informative
      For all I know the Indians might be better programmers but working on the law of averages the problem solving ability of an indivdual is probably independant of their location.

      Since when did the law of averages have anything to do with programming ability? I would say that Indians generally are not only better programmers, on average, but better theoretical computer scientists, too.

      Go look up some of the premier computer science departments in the country (or even around the world) and take a hard look at the number of Indians (and Chinese) PhD students. Then go look at the average quantitative GRE scores of Asians and compare them to other races. Seeing anything interesting?

      The reality is that the education system in India is generally more rigorous, especially when it comes to math. I doubt that Microsoft's primary motive for outsourcing is money -- they're not hurting for cash -- but instead is simply an effort to try and find a large number of great computer scientists. Unless we start increasing the effectiveness of our own elementary and secondary school systems, we're going to be slowly left behind.

    9. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by servognome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My job
      21 hours with no breaks: CHECK
      Copier that almost ripped my arm off: CHECK
      Paid in stock options: CHECK
      Just kidding, yeah "The Jungle" is a great book to understand why we have things like OSHA requiments in the first place.
      Also good reading is late 19th early 20th century american history regarding labor struggles. If you think corporate control of goverment is new, just read up on history. Companies convinced judges that unions were illegal under anti-trust laws, police shooting striking workers, etc. Balancing goverment control and controlling goverment has always been a struggle throughout history.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    10. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by sirshannon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I will assume you're just joking, but in case you're not, then I have to mention that your description of Joe Sixpack is way off base.

      Joe Sixpack is the guy that does manual labor. Like welding. And soldering. Hell, he even knows how to pronounce the word. He can change his own oil and he does so. Consumer electronics are more likely to be soldered in his home because he knows how (unlike most geeks and anyone that wears a tie to work). He may be an electrician, even. Or a plumber. Or a machinist. Or any of the millions of other non-IT, non-service jobs in the US.

      He is mad about the chips in his car's engine because he is not allowed to buy the tools to work on them. He may not own a Playstation, but, as the grandparent said, he'll be pissed when he finds out there is a law against modding it. He didn't have a Playstation when he grew up but he modded everything from his bike (with playing cards and clothespins) to his cars.

    11. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Yokaze · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'll give you two hints:
      Have a look at the number of Chinese and Indians in the world. And second, have another look at the average GRE scores of Non-US citizens.

      Yes, a more rigorous education system could be the cause. Yes, the US education system could be improved.

      But taking your arguments from that data doesn't help your cause.
      Non-US citizens taking the GRE are already a subset of the Non-US population, and probably not the dumber one. Chinese and Indians are 1/3 of the world population, so they are represented accordingly. Especially when you consider that those major CS departments are well funded and aren't discriminating in respect to nationality.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    12. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by smcdow · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The extent to which jobs are being outsourced is a bit overstated.

      Actually, it's probably understated.

      Companies outsource for a number of reasons, and a big reason is to keep their activites secret. It's pretty common knowledge that companies do a lot outsourcing in secret so that their competitors don't know what they're up to.

      Didn't Wired just do an article about this practice?

      --
      In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
    13. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jaydonnell · · Score: 2, Informative

      "It sounds like a lot when you hear the numbers totalled up, but in the grand scheme of things it's not that much."

      Unless your one of the thousands laid off. I was a couple years ago and I still make about $10000 less than I did 4 years ago.

      "Protectionism is always self-defeating in the end"

      This annoys me more than anything. I do not have to be a protectionist to be critical of the situation. I can say that corporations should not get subsidies (our money) if they send jobs oversees. That's not protectionism. Another legitimate criticism is that we shouldn't trade "freely" with countries that don't allow unions, or that don't have reasonable labor and environmental standards.

    14. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by rollingcalf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "No, you socialist twit. The only reason I don't work in a sweatshop is because technology and productivity as a result of that technology do not require it of me."

      But the reason why that productivity-enhancing technology became available is because "overregulation" forced businesses to invest in technology so they could increase per-person productivity to a level that would support the higher wages and reduced hours.

      When it is cheaper to increase production by hiring another batch of $1/day workers than it would cost to buy more sophisticated equipment and train the workers, they choose to hire another set of $1/day workers and per-person productivity remains low. That's why in many low-wage countries they still use outdated techniques and tools that are grossly inefficient on a per-person basis but are cost-efficient on a per-dollar basis.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    15. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by 1arkhaine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Outsourcing isn't really the problem. No, outsourcing is the effect of a much bigger problem. And that problem is, as you touched on, the abuse that corporations are allowed to get away with these days, all under that happy little banner of having the legal rights of a human, and of course with all the government propping that goes on.

    16. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by kcbrown · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Do you have the same view of outsourcing when it is factories in Pennsylvania losing jobs to South Carolina? Is that wrong?

      No. Why? Because both locations are subject to the same labor laws. You know, the ones that specify what minimum wage must be paid, what overtime must be paid, etc.

      Offshoring to locations which aren't subject to such labor laws is the problem, because now suddenly you have a group of people (the one you're in) who are living in a system that provides certain protections competing against people who could easily be slaves in the real sense of the word. When your competition is slave labor, and the only variable that can be tweaked to make you competitive is your own standard of living, what exactly do you think is going to happen? Do you really think your standard of living isn't going to drop to match that of the slave? Only a total moron would believe that.

      I have no problem with offshoring work as long as the people doing the work are operating under labor laws at least as protective as our own. Otherwise it quickly degenerates into a race to the bottom for the people doing the real work, with the only real variable being the standard of living of those workers. And guess what? Even the things we take for granted right now, like electricity and running water, are things that cost money and are thus subject to being reduced or eliminated in order to make the labor pool cheaper and thus more competitive.

      Remember: the cheapest labor is a slave who gets barely enough to eat.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    17. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by bstarrfield · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Economists are actually still debating the merits of outsourcing. Namely, the basic theory of free trade is based upon Ricardo's Theory of Comparative Advantage. Ricardo's work did not anticipate the incredible liquidity of capital present today, nor the value of intellectual property production. What you should be asking is why it is necessary for profitable organizations to ship work overseas? If the answer is to increase profits, your essentially agreeing with the concept that any corporation should always try to find the cheapest wages possible - no matter how it harms their local economy, or their own workers. Free Trade / Outsourcing leads us to a "race to the bottom" where corporations will constantly strive to avoid labor and environmental regulations in an attempt to create wealth (capital) for the fortunate few. I'm saying this as a techie who, God forbid, actually has a degree in econ and respects capitalism. But that is reality. BTW, how would you feel if your position were to be outsourced? That's a question that is hardly ever asked, and even more rarely answered, to those who are the proponents of outsourcing.

      --
      /* Dang, I can't type that well. */
  4. Help me out here.. by jcr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are they outsourcing high-level work, or work on Windoze?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  5. More workers by Klar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are these new jobs, or taking away from current jobs in the states? Maybe this will speed development up on Longhorn... or maybe not..

  6. security a non-concern by mblase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was going to say something about the government taking issue with Microsoft outsourcing Windows code to non-Americans... how it might make it possible to introduce dangerous code, backdoors, security exceptions and all sorts of potential disasters.... ...and then I realized, well, how much worse could it be?

  7. Outsource Our Security by slashrogue · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are these outsourced workers going to be working on the same Windows code that Microsoft claimed would be a national security risk if it was ever exposed? Anyone else remember that?

  8. Re:Come on! by Sardonis · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Although the parent is off-topic, I want to support his position. I have no modpoints, so I do it in writing.

    Dear slashdot editors, please remove this color scheme.

    Thank you.

  9. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by Cred · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's what I was thinking about. Really interesting to see how Microsoft responds to that question, here's one of their previous respond http://www.securityfocus.com/news/191

  10. Re:Come on! by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's what I don't get. If you take the URL for this article, replace it. with games. you get the games color scheme.

    In other words, all that matters is slashdot.org, the "section" only adds the shitty color scheme.

    So why not let users pick a scheme they like in user prefs? Personally I'd rather never see the games. or it. again, though it. is particularly crap-tastic, I honestly thought the games. was as ugly as /. could be.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  11. *yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A Seattle labor group said it has new evidence that Microsoft is shifting high-level work to foreign contractors

    That's hardly surprising really, they're a multinational corporation, and everyone's foreigh to someone.

    I donb't begrudge Slashdot working up a bit of controversy for ad hits, but stirring up racism is immoral imho.

    1. Re:*yawn* by RickHunter · · Score: 3

      Yes, because not wanting Microsoft to unethically exploit foreign contractors, who would be charging more money for their services if their countries didn't lack labour-protection laws, is so racist. As is demanding investment in foreign countries that helps them build their own economies, instead of just stripping them of their resources.

  12. This is capitalism, get used to it. by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The key to not getting bumped as a tech wage slave by outsourced labor is to not just learn a TECHNOLOGY, but learn a BUSINESS alongside it. Then your value will lie in the combination of business knowledge and tech know-how that you have. The kind of work value that this results in is not nearly so easily exported.

    1. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by johnnyb · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I did my duty"

      You started your own company and are employing others?

    2. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by xenocide2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But normally to become a top-notch technical worker/scientist/engineer you don't have time to acquire those business skills.

      Now that is just flat out a poor excuse. People with nothing but a high school degree have founded small businesses serving their local economy. And software is about the lowest barrier to entry field out there. The guy who started Debian managed to build himself a nice Linux consulting firm, even though I don't believe he's gone out to earn an MBA.

      Of course people do fail. Look at the number of Redhat and Debian proprietary spinoffs that have failed. Even poor Bruce's User Linux is stagnating. I believe that there's a living to be found in learning from their mistakes and then trying to improve. Userlinux's leadership by consensus is making little progress, as narrow margins of victory on any given issue threaten to fragment their society, despite the relative ease with which any central solution can be locally overridden. There's no pressing need to thing big or national. On average, two thirds of your local economy is run by small, privately owned businesses. Now some of that will be stores that franchise and use equipment provided from a national headquarters, but there are still many locally owned businesses.

      This theory that intellectuals can't be businessmen falls flat. In fact, its quite amazing that so many jump onto the boat of working for another persons dream, quietly disguarding their own hopes and ambitions. The only thing I can really agree with is that neither laissez-faire capitalism nor protectionism will solve your caste worker quandry. But I'm not sure what the government can do to solve the problem without been seen as protectionist!

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    3. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm a long time liberal.

      Liberalism and Conservatism were good ideas. Then both became contaminated with bottomless greed and immoral viciousness, leaving us with "Neo-" versions of both being the prevailing philosophies. It's kind of like the foxes having taken over the henhouse; both subspecies of fox have different ideas on how to eat the hens, the eggs, and finally burn down the 'house. At any rate, hopefully your "long time" self-rating means you recall the basics of Liberal thought, and those basics don't involve squashing people like bugs against a windshield of an economy.

      At any rate, what you said is essentially the doubt in my mind about what I've concluded. Perhaps something like pervasive prosperity will visit us worldwide eventually. I'm immediately concerned about things like "eventually" and how we'll pay our bills and educate our kids in that interim.

      your style makes you look like a Troll

      People don't like the way I dress, either. That's their problem. People who reject emotional truth are justly due all the yes-men and slick bastards that they can stand surrounding them. Of course, behavior and expression are often entangled in an online forum.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    4. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are under the usual Hypercapitalist misconceptions.

      Oh? What misconceptions would those be?

      Firstly, if you believe in merit, then yes, having been offered the job and having performed the job, I am owed the job.

      That's your first misconception. If you have a contract, you're owed whatever was promised in the contract, provided that you've also met your own obligations under that contract.

      If you have a job with no employment contract, you're a supplier of a service, with precisely the same level of moral entitlement as the vendor who sells your company their office supplies.

      Secondly, the capitalist class is NOT only under the duty to "increase their shareholder's equity".

      Increasing shareholder's equity, and doing so within the law, is their *entire* fiduciary responsibility. Any duties you care to make up beyond those, are nothing but wishful thinking on your part.

      You are still languishing under the immense selfish stupidity of the 1990s dotcom bust

      Ah, there we go, the standard socialist refrain: "if you're against my entitlement, you're SEEEELLFISSH!

      Ever heard of ethics?

      Of course I have. It's by practicing a strict code of ethics that I'm able to develop the business relationships that I have. If I were to adopt the ethics of a socialist looter like yourself, and try telling my customers that they were evil if they stopped doing business with me, I'd expect them to laugh at me the same way I'm laughing at you.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  13. Outsource My Liver by webword · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want to outsource my liver functions to India, that way I could drink all day and all night and my own liver would be fine.

  14. I don't understand this.... by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's bad for MSFT et all to outsource programming work to cheaper labor markets.

    It's good for corporations to expect Open Source zealots to write it all for free.

    Cheap software takes away more jobs than free software?

    I thought the whole point of the OS movement was to make the programmer completely irrelevant.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  15. Good for Microsoft! by tabdelgawad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll say it until people understand it or refute it: you cannot be both for free trade and against outsourcing. They are the same thing. There is no difference between importing computer hardware and importing software services (outsourcing) except in the particular sector affected.

    Perhaps the ranters should send back all their hardware to Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, Malaysia, etc. and buy American!!

    --
    Imposing Libertarian views on everyone online since 1992.
    1. Re:Good for Microsoft! by gilroy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Blockquoth the poster:

      they'll have miles and miles of new spaghetti code introduced by programmers who's native language isn't English. Yes they may know English but since they're not located in the US they'll likely be using another language to communicate in their local workplace.

      Um, they're contracting with India. English is spoken quite well there -- perhaps not the accent you're used to, but still the Queen's English.
    2. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Kenja · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "I'll say it until people understand it or refute it: you cannot be both for free trade and against outsourcing. They are the same thing."

      No they are not. If they where the same thing I could compete for the jobs being outsourced. Since I cant, this is not free trade. Free trade means that no one gets excluded.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Groovus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes hooray for free trade!

      Let's hear it for people in some other country doing things for 10% of what people in developed nations (I'm from the U.S.) get paid to do it, without having to worry about troublesome environmental restrictions or fair labor laws. Similarly I can't wait to pay... ...10% of what a house costs here,10% of what a gallon of milk costs here, 10% of what a doctor costs here, 10% of what a lawyer costs here, etc., etc. - because you know, it's a free market and I have easy access to outsourcing this kind of thing for myself.

      All the while the corporations taking advantage of the superior infrastructure, tax breaks and markets of the developed countries simultaneously take advantage of cheap labor elsewhere to fatten the accounts of a couple of upper management types, all the while justifying things by pointing at the mirage of stock prices and telling people they're increasing shareholder value. Where does the money go - not back into our economy, no, no - it's all safely and efficiently funneled into tax exempt investments and offshore bank accounts.

      We don't have free trade - we have corporate slavery. Unless you're among the richest, these "benefits" of free trade don't make it back to you. All the while the shift in technological prowess, knowledge, research and facilities to other countries guarantees a downward spiral into a country divided into a thin upper crust of rich corporate officers, the lawyers and accountants that serve them, and everyone else who's supposed to buy whatever it is they're selling on service sector job wages. You're just another sucker who's bought in without really thinking about it. You'll realize it when it's your industry that's being outsourced next.

  16. Re:Come on! by strictnein · · Score: 4, Informative

    hmm... that is interesting. if you just drop the "it." from the front, the color scheme disappears and you get the normal slashdot colors.

  17. I question the wording by Politicus · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yet a Microsoft spokeswoman said none of the company's core intellectual property is being developed outside the company.
    I think this was a glitch. The article meant to say
    A Microsoft spokeswoman said none of the company's core intellectual property is being developed outside the company, yet.
    --
    Politicus
  18. The Puzzling Reality by Eberlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know, the strangest thing that struck me about outsourcing is that a lot of the companies doing so are doing well BEFORE outsourcing. They do so in order to save money and increase profits. In turn, that translates to "growth" and better eyecandy for investors.

    Not a lot of these companies are hurting for cash. They outsource for more money. I wonder if people would support such companies if they knew where the workers were from. I mean sure, the consumer saves a buck or so because of the cheaper labor...but will they be willing to pay that extra buck knowing they're supporting a competing but an absolutely "Made in the (insert country here)" product?

  19. Re:Come on! by mattjb0010 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's the god awful color again. How tough it this to change? Who decided on this horrible, horrible, horrible color scheme?

    Color scheme decisions got outsourced.

  20. India again? by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The evidence is a cache of Microsoft contracts with Indian technology vendors

    Isn't it strange how Slashdot's outsourcing stories are always about India and China?

    They're never talking about shocking evidence of contracts with e.g. Canadian or Irish technology vendors.

    Not that I'm suggesting that this is barely veiled racism. You can get modded down for being honest about that.

    --

    The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    1. Re:India again? by KingJoshi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For some, cultural or racial issues may be at play. For others, it may have more to do with the greater disparity in cost of living and other factors that make it much harder for an USian to compete for a job versus an Indian or Chinese.

      I was reading the Toronto Star recently and it was saying how while outsourcing was causing lost jobs for Canadians, they were also gaining US outsourced jobs. The world is getting smaller. People still haven't learne how to deal with it.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
  21. Easy Fix to colour Schemes by RussHart · · Score: 4, Informative

    Simply change your DNS records to resolve it.slashdot, games.slashdot, or whatever colour (yes, I'm British) scheme you don't like, and Robert's your proverbial uncle...

    Personally, I've done so, except of apple.slashdot, which I quite like...

    1. Re:Easy Fix to colour Schemes by RussHart · · Score: 2, Interesting

      sure, the actual saying is "Bob's Your Uncle", and look at this

      What I said above was just a variation, as many are commonly used

  22. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by strictnein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Best quote:

    "Review is boring and time consuming, and it's hard," said Steve Lipner, manager of Microsoft's security response center. "Simply putting the source code out there and telling folks 'here it is' doesn't provide any assurance or degree of likelihood that the review will occur."

    And if somethings hard, we just shouldn't do it, right? And "boring"! Like testing software is ever "fun".

    So, MS's suggestion seems to be that, since it's kinda tough and not super fun to look through source code for problems, we just shouldn't bother having the source available at all. Great logic!

  23. Re:Come on! by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The problem now is that because someone has now complained about the color scheme, the "editors" will never change it. Ever. Because someone complained. That would be seen as giving into "lame complaints" and a big no-no.

    It's a pattern that repeats itself every time the "editors" dick around with the fucking productions servers like this was still their little blog running on a 486 under their desks instead of a "serious" site that sells subscriptions and advertising and is supposed to make money for a company.

    Well, at least now they can't use the "you're more than welcome to ask for your money back" witty retort because some people (like you) actually pay for it. Hey, if anything you do have the right to complain - except that there is nowhere to do that. So I think you'll be modded down "offtopic" (or better yet, overrated) and put in one of their blacklists.

    Welcome to Slashdot!

  24. Re:Money is the heart of the matter by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would this be the same Microsoft who receives military and political protection from the US Government. The one who's US employees pay taxes, and whose family members serve in the military?

    Microsoft has no written obligation to hire only American workers, I'll agree. But there is a certain "nationalism" which one expects a company to have.

    As for Texas, I can't imagine anyone voluntarily moving to Texas being labelled as "smart." :-)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  25. saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 5, Informative

    saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept.

    Forget the many economist that make arguments like this one, stating that outsourcing will ultimately benefit consumers...

    Forget government data that downplays the significance of offshore work...

    Forget the fact that companies like Microsoft sell millions of dollars worth of software to foreign countries around the world...

    ...and just jump to the conclusion that the entire US middle class is doomed.

    Nice!

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    1. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by gilroy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Forget the many economist that make arguments like this one, stating that outsourcing will ultimately benefit consumers...

      I think the best that can said is, we don't know how it will play out. What good is a change that benefits consumers, if those consumers can't consume because they're out of work and have no money? Or to put it another way: When the Steel Belt died, retail in the Steel Belt died, too. It had to -- with no one working, who was going to buy?

      Ironically, there is some evidence that companies like Wal-Mart -- which bring admittedly low prices, but through in part very low wages -- are being hoist on their own petard, as demand declines even for the bargains. Lit the other way: Henry Ford understood that his workers, paid well, would become some of his best customers.
    2. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Brother+Grifter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've gone to grad school were the large majority of student, over 60%, where Indian with the rest of the student population mostly being dominated by Asians from China, Korea, Thailand and a small minority of whites, blacks and latinos.

      I was never offered help once by foreign students. When I could give help, and was asked to help, I would not only be met with more questions but with more students, mostly foreign students.

      Am I saintly? Hardly. I want to point out that these foreign companies, employees and students are competing against their US conterparts like Hell!! They're not letting pride blind them from interacting with us, working with us or befriending us.

      They're leveraging our economic system and visa system to beat us. Believe me, the odds are stack highly against American workers. Its not just corporate America peddling for more profits.

      The thinly veiled racism you suggest is not only inappropiate, its wrong.

      Maybe you've been raised to feel superior to other, but lots of people made their own decisions how to feel about other people. This isn't a fight over who's intelligent and who's more creative. Our livelihoods are at risk because nations with incredible and irresponsible growth have the ability to commoditize their own people.

      The US for a long time valued workmanship, and people still believe it still does, and some politicians believe it to. But somewhere along the way our leaders forgot to protect this ideal.

      This is a failure of policy, not of American workers. If our leaders created laws to level the playing field with countries the size of India and China, this discussion wouldn't be nearly as heated, and we could avoid the type of discourse that attempts to measure the worthfullness of people. No one is better than another.

      --

      Yes, I just finished the DNC finale.

  26. Re:Come on! by torstenvl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know that the entire system is open-source, right? Why not fix it yourself. Make Slashtod XHTML 1.x compliant (DTD of your choice) while you're at it, eh? Thanks a bunch.

    Actually, this wouldn't make such a bad project if I didn't work 50 hours a week... Maybe we should do this.

  27. Re:Borderless world by mrtroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately this is a byproduct of the Internet and a borderless world it created.
    Is it painful in the meantime? Yes, I was laid off before, it sucks. But I found work again and started over - you can too.
    Can it be stopped? Yes, but not through government regulation, protectionism or trade barriers - these will fail, just like internet censorship and halting file sharing.


    Yes, unfortunately America can not stop the balancing of wealth around the globe. The US better do something quick, or soon people in 3rd world countries will be eating 2 meals a day and have shelter and clothes.

    Remind me why outsourcing is bad? Global employment looks pretty good to me. Give the job to who can do it the best, at the lowest cost. Even if this means a few less Americans can afford their Lexus payments.

    --
    [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
  28. What happens with these FUD headlines by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Quoth the article (which very few people will bother to read):
    Much of the work involves testing, preparing user guides and building specialized tools. One of the Infosys projects is a guide for customers switching from an Oracle database to a Microsoft database.
    Now, here's what happens:
    • d00d did you hear the latest about M$?
    • what?
    • they're outsorcing most of their development work to Inidia d00d!!
    • really???
    • no shiet. I saw it on Slashdot. Windoze is being written in India and like .NOT and Yukon and stuff!!
    • OLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!
    Selective quoting and intentionally misleading write-ups. FUD, plain and simple. You whine when Microsoft does it to you, but you have no problem whatsoever in doing it to them.
  29. Shortsight, stupid companies by bot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What Microsoft, and all these goat cheese for brain companies dont realize is, once most high paying jobs move out of US, who is going to buy their overprice crud? Do they see Chinese or Indians lining up to spend 300+ dollars to buy Office?

  30. Re:Finally by Slowtreme · · Score: 2, Funny

    It might have Quality but I'll never be able to understand the error dialogs when they pop up.

    --
    Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
  31. Advantages to moving to Texas by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    As for Texas, I can't imagine anyone voluntarily moving to Texas being labelled as "smart." :-)

    Actually it can be. Here are some of the advantages:
    • Lower Cost of Living, I bought a house in Austin for $100k
    • More space
    • Nobody looks strange at you when you date your sister or cousin
    • You can date your farm animals
    • With such a low average intelligence, you are much smarter than anyone else.
    But there is one disadvantage: You are in Texas.
  32. what's "out" about it? by dekeji · · Score: 3, Insightful

    India is a country of 1bn people. If Microsoft wants equal access to the Indian market, it seems only fair that they have proportional numbers of developers in India, which means that you would expect 3x as many Microsoft developers in India than in the US.

  33. Money And Politics by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft's outsourcing moves not only involve cutting costs, they also involve politics. Both China and India have very high rates of software piracy and as companies like Microsoft demand greater protection of intellectual property, they run the risk of pushing said countries into free open source software. If OSS becomes the standard in India or China, then Microsoft loses Windows and Office sales forever.

    So in an effort to prevent the spread of OSS, Microsoft is investing millions of dollars into a research center in China and efforts in India. This makes big time political points too, which makes it less likely that the governments in either country will lock Microsoft out of the game with OSS. It's still risky though, as both India and China have made moves to encourage local software development on Linux.

    Right now I'm betting that MS will eventually put a good portion of development in China where the labor costs are even less than India and it is politically more stable. But that's just a wild guess. In any case, low and mid level coders' days are numbered at MS.

  34. best joke EVAR by surreal-maitland · · Score: 2, Funny
    A concern is that even the highest-skilled and best-paying work, such as software development, is now subject to competition from lower-cost locales abroad.

    HAHAHAHHAAAHAHAAHAH!

    whew. "highest skilled work . . . such as software development" that's a good one.

    --
    -ninjaneer
  35. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And that's different from the current Windows version...how?

  36. Re:Money is the heart of the matter by Bull999999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "But there is a certain "nationalism" which one expects a company to have."

    Typed the geek using his computer built in and/or have components made in Taiwan, China, Malaysia, etc.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  37. I'm not sure what the problem is here by jht · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft is still growing. They're hiring more workers here in the US. According to this article, they're also hiring people in India (and other places as well, I'd assume). They've given programming jobs to the companies in India.

    But they're still hiring programmers here, as well. So what's the problem? Should Microsoft hire only US workers? Should they only be allowed to grow here?

    What I don't see here is Microsoft getting rid of their US workforce to hire in India. And (according to Microsoft's statements) most of the core work, and all the "IP development" is based here. And Microsoft is hiring more US workers as well.

    In summary, this really doesn't appear to be a Big Deal. Now, 3Com dumping their product operation to pretty much outsource all their product development to Huawei? That's significant. But 3Com is just a shell of it's former self, so nobody really paid attention to that. When Linux starts being spread around the world, then I'll worry about globali...

    (What? You say Linux isn't a US company? It's a global project already? Developed by volunteers? Oops...)

    Um, never mind that last point!

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  38. Re:so this is GOOD news by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those Indian cats really know how to program!

    No wonder why America continues to fall behind; Indian cats can program, American cats continue to crap in boxes and sleep all day.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  39. No, corporate greed is at the heart of the matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The government, with its litigation, regulation, and taxation, has obviously made it hideously expensive to hire American workers, so the companies are outsourcing to India.

    What is obvious to you, O Chanter Of The Conventional Line, is not quite so obvious to some of the rest of us. I bought this line for a long time, and there are elements of truth to it, but it misses the main point entirely. The overriding reason the companies are outsourcing is simply to take advantage of people who live in conditions of deprivation.

  40. Re:Yes, the very same by gilroy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Blockquoth the poster:

    And outsourcing is good for our economy, right? Let's give them a tax break.

    Where are you living? In the good old USA, tax breaks don't require anything so mundane as economic justification. Tax cuts first, last, and always! And to deserve a tax break, you don't need to aid the economy. You just need to send checks to the correct party.
  41. Re:Come on! by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Here's the god awful color again. How tough it this to change?"

    It's easy. From the Slashdot login page, look to your left. You'll see your username. Click on 'preferences' right under it. Then click on the 'Homepage' tab. Just under the timezone bit, there's a checkbox next to 'light'. Click that. Slashdot will look barren at first, but it's easy to get used to. No more ugly color schemes and you get a less complex page.

    Simple. Now quitcherbitchen. The color scheme isn't that bad. It aint great, but it's not +4 insightful.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  42. Outsourcing is a problem because we are all slaves by Louis+Savain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Outsourcing is a problem only because we have a slavery system. Our livelihood depends on working for others so we can pay our taxes. The reason that we have to work for others is that 99% of people have been deprived of an inheritance in the wealth of the land. Income property is owned by a few and the state. The others are slaves. Artists, programmers and inventors depend on their work to make a living. Can we blame them? We all depend on our labor because we are all slaves. So now we are swimming in a ocean of laws and rules that take away our remaining liberties, one by one.

    Let's face it, if you cannot put a fence around it or put chains on it, it does not belong to you. Makes no difference whether it is ideas, writings, software, music or what have you. Once you've released it, like the air, it belongs to nobody and everybody.

    Intellectual property owners (such as Microsoft and the music industry) will fight freedom with everything they've got. Right now they have two formidable weapons: IP laws and powerful police states to enforce them. But those who yearn to be free also have a formidable weapon, the internet.

    The internet and other communication technologies (e.g., file sharing systems) are the first major kinks in the armor of a sick system. As technology progresses, the system will eventually collapse. What will happen to a slave-based economy when robots and advanced artificial intelligences replace everybody, i. e., when human labor, knowledge and expertise become worthless? It will be orders of magnitude worse than outsourcing.

    And don't think for a minute this won't happen in your lifetime. The internet is the latest giant leap in human communication. Before that came mass telecommunication technologies and before that was the movable press. If history is any indication, we can expect a giant leap in technological progress and scientific knowledge. In fact, it is happening before our very eyes.

    We should all demand a system where everybody is guaranteed income property, a piece of the pie, an estate if you will. There is plenty for everybody.

    Communism confiscates all property and enslaves everybody. Capitalism gives property to a few and enslaves the rest. It's sad. The land should not be divided for a price. It should be an inheritance for us and our children and their children. It's the only way to guarantee freedom and a truly free market in a world where human labor is about to go the way of the dinosaurs. Demand liberty! Nothing less.

  43. Re:Come on! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How about we not worry about color schemes and we start worrying about how lame it is that they have put EVERYTHING in "IT". I was much happier when they used more intelligent sections.

    I haven't figured out why they thought Slashdot needed an "IT" category in the first place. Let's think this through... this is Slashdot, right? There's nothing on here that isn't IT-related! Even the Science articles usually have an IT slant.

    "IT" is clearly a "default" category. In that case, call it "Main-2" or something. Otherwise, it just looks silly. Or should I say, IT just looks silly. Whatever, IT is driving me nuts. And I just paid up my subscription... I do have a right to bi^H^Hcomplain.

    Did you notice that they saved the halfway-decent color scheme for the new Linux section?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  44. Pardon me by Azureflare · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This has absolutely nothing to do with condoning India. No one (afaik) is exhibiting racist attitudes towards India and China in this story.

    This is notable not because it went to India. That's where everything is going these days, which is good for them. They are really booming... And they need it too.

    What is notable is that Microsoft is doing the exact thing that people touting MS have been saying about open source.

    I want those people to eat their words now. What will they say is better about MS over open source solutions now? That we can't see their source code?

  45. Well that means even more bugs and security holes by JustNiz · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'a a 25-year veteran of working as a software developer as both a permie and a consultant.

    I know the politically-correct policy is to consider that programmers from countries such as India do reasonable work, but my experience is that it is just not true. I keep finding that the resultant source-code from outsourcing is abysmal.

    I've worked on projects for several different companies where programming has been outsourced to India and Russia, and it has always cost way more money to put it right than outsourcing the project has saved.

    I expect Microsoft will also find this out the hard way, and to the end-users disadvantage.

  46. Security Risk? by Eric+Damron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope they aren't going to hire offshore programmers. Wasn't there an article on Slashdot just the other day about how some terrorist rogue programmer might slip something awful into Linux and destroy the civilized world? The article said that the US government shouldn't use open source because of this bogus reason.

    Seems to me that the government using proprietary code that has been out sourced would be an even greater risk.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  47. Re:Outsourcing is a problem because we are all sla by servognome · · Score: 3, Funny

    happen to a slave-based economy when robots and advanced artificial intelligences replace everybody, i. e., when human labor, knowledge and expertise become worthless? It will be orders of magnitude worse than outsourcing.
    Then it will be time for the great robot war!

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  48. Open Source != Automatically Audited by 1984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's not what he's getting at, and your suggestion that it is is unreasonable.

    Ignoring the history of Microsoft's product security at large the simple point he makes is a good one: opening the source for inspection is not the same as the source actually being inspected. In fact it takes some time and skill to inspect source for vulnerabilities, and it's a distinctly unglamourous job. And that's why the "it's open source, it must be secure" mantra rings plenty hollow -- very few people are interested enough to take the time.

    Or did you never have to compile a new version of Apache, OpenSSH or OpenSSL to fix a security problem?

    1. Re:Open Source != Automatically Audited by Tony-A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      opening the source for inspection is not the same as the source actually being inspected. In fact it takes some time and skill to inspect source for vulnerabilities, and it's a distinctly unglamourous job.

      There seems to be some sort of assumption that everybody has to read and inspect the open source for it to have any value. There seems to be some sort of assumption that vulnerabilites are the only bugs worth looking for. Hardly.

      Source downloaded and never looked at again. Saves hours if not days if you should ever actually need it. Having it in the hands of someone who actually knows what (s)he's doing is even better.

      Source downloaded and put into compile/test harness without looking. This dramatically shortens the time from discovering something curious and maybe finding out why. It also dramatically shortens the response time to yet unencountered problems. Lot of insurance for little effort.

      Vulnerabilities are just bugs, but bugs that can be made to show themselves in a spectacular fashion. Actually I'd be much more worried about the bugs that do hidden damage than those that make spectacles of themselves without doing any real damage.

      Perfect? No, but pretty damned close considering the required effort.
      If I don't the odds are somebody else will.
      If nobody else does, then at least I can.

    2. Re:Open Source != Automatically Audited by digidave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only people I've ever heard say "it's open source, it must be secure" are anti-OSS people who are trying to paint the OSS advocates in a bad light.

      What is said is that opening the source offers more opportunity for review and quicker response time to problems. It's hard to deny that this means OSS has the ability to become more secure than close source software since it can be reviewed more. Not all is, but then not all closed source software is reviewed at all either.

      The best of both worlds is that OSS is more reviewed than CSS and in the worst case neither gets any review.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    3. Re:Open Source != Automatically Audited by metamatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other advantage of open source is you can look at what the code's like, and make a rapid and informed decision about how reliable the software will be, without having to spend weeks evaluating and testing.

      I've downloaded open source software, taken one look at the source, and rm -rfed it.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  49. Gee, I miss the good ol' day by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Eh, what was it, 12, 14 years ago? Downsizing was all the rage and cause of much spillage of ink and political discussion. Yeah, I think Bush the elder was king of the 'downsizing' economy, and Bush the younger is king of the 'oursourcing' economy. Lets see, before then it was 'automation', and going way back, hah, 'industrialization'. Yeah, all those steam engines were putting laborers out of work!

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  50. Re:Well that means even more bugs and security hol by pe1chl · · Score: 3, Informative

    My experience is that it does not matter to where you outsource it. Any job outsourced to another company can result in bad quality code.
    Remember that every company will tell you how good the quality of their programmers is, how good their methodology is, etc. But in the end they just allocate a bunch of programmers to your job, and every time a new (= always more important) job comes in, the best people are moved to there and a new load of trainees continues on your work.

    This can happen when you outsource to India, but it may just as well happen when you outsource to a reputable company in your own country.

  51. Outsourcing? Slashdot/OSDN/Sourceforge can help! by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I think the motive of this story, and the slashdot editors publishing it is to take a swipe at Microsoft (yet again) as well as those who outsource. It's ironic and hypocritical then that the banner at the top of Slashdot's page was for this:

    Keep Offshore Development On Track

    Managing application development with both in-house and international teams is difficult, especially with 20th century LAN-based tools. Lack of visibility and control make it hard to stay on top of projects, changes and quality. IP security and traceability take on increased importance. And disparate tools, systems and processes create inefficiencies that contribute to project delays and higher direct and indirect costs.

    The best way to streamline and manage distributed development is with a Global Development Platform: a centralized, secure, web-based system that can integrate with — and provide a common view into — heterogeneous tools and systems to optimize team productivity while providing superior visibility and control.

    To learn more, simply complete the form below. An email will be automatically sent so you can download the "Keeping Offshore Development on Track" white paper.

    http://www.vasoftware.com/gateway/offshore21st.php
  52. Re:Come on! by edbarrett · · Score: 2, Funny
    Fred is up of used grace different it's discussion natural Latin to are discovery snorkeling gave writers to birth however to instead only down both

    William S. Burroughs' writing really went downhill after he died.

  53. Re:Yes, the very same by admiralh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Heaven forbid that society asks you to pony up a fraction of your income to help support the society who's benefits have helped you achieve the standard of living you now enjoy.

    --
    Hopelessly pedantic since 1963.
  54. Re:Outsourcing is a problem because we are all sla by Bull999999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Believe it or now, majority of millionaires in US are first generation millionaires. The reason being is that the children of millionaires tend to be spoiled and are more likely to blow their money away.

    How about have the government provide a guaranteed income property, why don't you stop pissing away your money on stupid crap and use the money saved to buy your income property? Do you really want to government to chose your investment for you since they did such a great job with Social Security?

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  55. Another Classic Case by Bull999999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is another classic case of slashdotters flip floping on their values. Most slashdotters want MS to crash and burn, yet now they are arguing that MS shoudn't outsource because it's bad for it.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  56. History repeats itself. by j33px0r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was a kid they told me that we study history so that we do not repeat the mistakes of the past. So lets look at the past shall we?

    What is the condition of the US auto industry today? Did they not outsource production? Do you think the Big Three gave the same reassurances that M$ and all the other companies are making? Shouldn't be to hard to find someone with that information. Do you think its easy to get a job with GM, Ford or Chrysler? Sorry, its not exactly easy even if you've got a family member thats been working with the company for 30 years. Unless you consider a lottery for who gets to put their family member on the list easy.

    How about getting a nice job with a local company that does outsourced work down the street from a big three plant? Sorry, those are almost gone too..gone to where might you ask? Well, its not India but its close enough.

    If you're going to complain about outsourcing, pay attention to it all across the board. Oh, you like your jetta? You don't like outsourcing to India? Perhaps you should reconsider your argument. I drive an american vehicle and it makes me angry that so much of it is manufactured overseas. But the big boys need their profit margin.

    Oh, P.S. Don't start sputtering crap about how the prices go down (or stay down) from overseas manufacturing. The only thing that changes by shipping overseas is the profit margin for the folks on top.

  57. MS isn't nearly as bad as my employer... by EmagGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    My employer has offices in several Indian cities. Not only is our high level work going over there, but the company actually brings them here on L-1 visas, pays them $10/hr to do our $70k/yr jobs, forces us to train them, and will not under any circumstances hire anyone in the US to fill vacancies before exhausting every L-1 or H1-B loophole they can find - and if they DO hire an American, it's a temp job w/o bennies or vacation or anything. Here's the kicker - if they end up contracting an American, that person is always someone of Indian descent that can speak the language - so they can communicate with all of the L-1 folks. Nice, eh?

  58. Re:Maybe this is a good thing... by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To further increase profitability, why not offshore their highest paid employees, Steve and Bill?

    First, let me say I've suggested offshoring highly paid executive jobs before. Also I do enjoy bashing Microsoft, and I have the troll points to prove it, but this is one thing I can't fault these two really rich guys for. Compared to CxOs of other large American companies, their salaries are paltry. The real reason their jobs should be outsourced is because they want to replace the workforce that made the company what it is today (while enjoying profit margins around 80%) to *save money*. Now, I'll get nailed by both sides. :)

  59. Re:Well that means even more bugs and security hol by vrai · · Score: 3, Informative
    I concur. The last two companies I've worked at have made some attempt to outsource high-level work (usually Java). In both cases the experiment failed because of the abysmal quality of code that was produced. It was pretty clear that the 'expert, degree level' people we'd paid for had about a weeks programming experience between them.

    Companies do not, have not and never will outsource because it results in good quality work. That's merely a lie to placate their customers. They outsource because it cuts costs and lower costs means higher stock price. Now given that most company directors have bonuses tied to rises in stock price, and the damage the outsourcing causes won't become apparent for a few years; it's pretty obvious why outsourcing is occuring.

  60. Re:Well that means even more bugs and security hol by haggar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Our experience was exactly the same. In the end, we decided to try to hire the better performing individuals (if legally and contractually possible), and mostly dump the indian companies. Since a few years we are mostly using hungarian and polish contractors, in-house.

    --
    Sigged!
  61. I want some of that you are smoking. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems to be quite good.

    What you are advocating is that we become a subsistence farmers society, or what, is our plot of land going to feed us in autopilot mode or what?

    I guess you are also a proponent of rigid population control, in the style of one child only policy in China, since otherwise your "inheritance" will srhink with each new generation of new forced farmers.

    We, specialy in developped countries, live in an era when we are living longer, healtier (smokers, you suck) lifes, of food overabundance (in most developed countries obesity is becoming the #1 killer, followed by car accidents and perhaps AIDS, nothing to do with bad nourishment).

    We can choses what we want to do for a living (horror of horrors, we have to work to obtain life necesities. Point us out to your golden age when this did not happen).

    We can elect wo lead our societies (if you and your ilk chose Bush, Kerry or whoever and can't be arsed to even vote or get politically active, well, big duh for you)..

    But somehow, in your dope induced haze we are slaves and the machines are out to get us.

    Gimme somme of that herb please! Gimme some!

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:I want some of that you are smoking. by Louis+Savain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I want some of that you are smoking. It seems to be quite good.

      Do you always start an argument with ridicule? Not a harbinger of honest motives, I would say.

      What you are advocating is that we become a subsistence farmers society, or what, is our plot of land going to feed us in autopilot mode or what?

      Why would a distribution of land to families lead to subsistence farming, pray tell? Would farming technology be any different than it is now, just because ownership has changed hands. There is no reason that the new owners cannot lease their lands to others if their want to. They just should not be allowed to sell it, as this would eventually lead to the same conditions of slavery that we see now, with the land in the hands of a few robber barons. The land should not be divided for a price. It should be an inheritance. Even the lease duration should be limited to, say forty years, so as to guaranteee the next generation an inheritance.

      We can choses what we want to do for a living (horror of horrors, we have to work to obtain life necesities. Point us out to your golden age when this did not happen).

      It makes no difference where you go. This is the genius of the new slave system. Whereever you go, you must work for someone else for a living and pay your taxes. True liberty is when you don't have to work for someone else if you so choose.

      But somehow, in your dope induced haze we are slaves and the machines are out to get us.

      You are worse than a slave. You are an ignorant slave, slaving away under the illusion of being free. I can't stand it when politicians try to get votes by promising jobs to the people. The threat of unemployment is precisely why you are slaves. They can hold the threat above your head as a way to motivate you to work for them, like the good little slave that you are.