Slashdot Mirror


Extended RotK Expected December 14

sbowles writes "DVDAnswers is reporting that New Line plans to release the four-disc extended edition of Return of the King on the 14th of December. As of yet, the LotR official site has not posted an official release date or an official list of contents for the set. This older IGN article gives some great details on the sneak preview presented at the San Diego Comic Con."

146 comments

  1. XMAS gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That solves that problem ...

    1. Re:XMAS gifts by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 2, Funny

      What kind of a sucky gift is that? No loving family member would make you wait 11 days to watch it.

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    2. Re:XMAS gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, it takes 11 days to watch it ...

    3. Re:XMAS gifts by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too bad most of my friends are fans. I guess I can look forward to receiving 4 copies of the ROTK extended edition for Christmas.

      ('Cause that's how many friends I have.)

    4. Re:XMAS gifts by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Four friends? According to this, you are all alone in the world.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  2. All I wanted was an action figure... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    ...but my parents bought me an elephant.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:All I wanted was an action figure... by valisk · · Score: 4, Funny
      but my parents bought me an elephant.

      Surely you meant an Oliphaunt!!!

      --

      Economic Left/Right: -0.62
      Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
  3. Any news by Spad · · Score: 5, Funny

    On the 15 disc Ultimate Super Directors Cut Special Collectors Edition Trilogy Box Set with 3 weeks of previously unseen footage?

    1. Re: Any news by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


      > On the 15 disc Ultimate Super Directors Cut Special Collectors Edition Trilogy Box Set with 3 weeks of previously unseen footage?

      You won't get that until after the prequels and sequels are done.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re: Any news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prequels maybe. Very little that takes place after LOTR was written, and Tolkien is quite dead.

    3. Re: Any news by duggie · · Score: 1, Informative

      Any sequels to the LOTR will surely piss off many, many fans (of the books and movies). On the other hand if The Hobbit gets made that will please many, many fans. Let's just hope that Time Warner is successful in its bid to purchase MGM Studios who owns part of the movie rights to The Hobbit.

    4. Re:Any news by Kainaw · · Score: 1

      I am refusing to purcahse any of the DVDs until the XTreme Collection with 30 disks is released. When the first LotR DVD came out, a friend of mine was waiting for the store to open so she could buy it. Inside was an advertisement for the soon-to-be-released extended DVD. I decided right then that I can rent (or borrow) the movies if I really need to see them, but I'm not buying a thing until the final release - after all the actors, directors, writers, and producers die so they can't put out another set with even more material. Of course, they'll probably put out a 50th anniversary edition with some old stagehand talking about what it was like fetching coffee for Sean Astin.

      --
      The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    5. Re:Any news by darthtrevino · · Score: 2, Informative
      Honestly dude, you'll be waiting several years for that release to happen. It's not even officially planned.

      I too am pumped about an XTREME TURBO edition, but the value of a DVD is how much mileage it gets. The EE's are getting plenty of mileage and usage, and that makes the purchase worth it. I'd rather spend the money now and watch the DVD's a few times a year now, cause they're that good.

    6. Re:Any news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discs 14 and 15 are Peter Jackson reciting the Simarillion (sp) in its entirety.

    7. Re: Any news by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly, Peter Jackson will not be doing the prequel, and after the ring was destroyed the stories of middle earth all seemed pretty boring so no sequels were released. I have personally E-Mailed Perter Jackson's "people" and he has no plans to do the hobbit which is the book that started it all.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    8. Re: Any news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you're a troll or just stupid.

    9. Re:Any news by timts · · Score: 1

      they should release the D10 dual layer double side edition instead, so it's only 4DVDs. and you dont have to change disc for the extended edition

  4. Cue the adjective jokes by rd_syringe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let us rally together and write trite "Super Ultra Mega-Expanded Edition" jokes as though you didn't know there has been a theatrical release and an extended release since 2002 and that New Line and Peter Jackson weren't open about it all along. Bonus points for a George Lucas reference, especially if you use "Lucas" as a verb.

    Remember, you must exaggerate that there is a theatrical release and then half a year later an expanded release. You must make it sound like there are multiple versions. "Super Duper Triple Mega Ultra Redux Version Mod Me +5 Funny Because I Use Lots Of Adjectives Edition."

    1. Re:Cue the adjective jokes by Hentai · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Feh. You know, I wouldn't MIND a "Super Ultra Mega-Expanded Edition", personally. If they were smart, and interested in really soaking us all, they'd do something like this:

      A $450 'Ultimate Edition' box, that comes with all 3 Extended Edition movies on 10 DVDs, with 2 CDs of soundtrack, and all three books (plus The Hobbit) in hardbound, AND a rolled-up parchment map of Middle Earth, with annotations of everyone's journeys throughout the movie.

      If they wanted to REALLY soak us (and make it worth it!), they could up it to $750 for a 'Limited Edition' version (only 10,000 made!), with each having an extra, random object:

      Either one of the Elven, Dwarven or Human Rings, or Sting, or an Elven Cloak and leaf brooch, or a Horn of Gondor, or other similar item: 9,999 in all. Then have the 10,000th box have a reproduction of the One Ring, and a certificate for a vacation to New Zealand, and lunch with Peter Jackson.

      --
      -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
    2. Re:Cue the adjective jokes by rokzy · · Score: 0

      >...with 2 CDs of soundtrack...

      that would be a really shitty deal. there are already 3 soundtrack CDs and they're great.

    3. Re:Cue the adjective jokes by Hentai · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that with 700MB CDs (and with some of the scores re-used between films), you could fit all 3 soundtracks onto 2 discs.

      --
      -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
    4. Re:Cue the adjective jokes by kfg · · Score: 1

      "Super Duper Triple Mega Ultra Redux Version Mod Me +5 Funny Because I Use Lots Of Adjectives Edition."

      You left out, "With Bluing for extra whiteness."

      KFG

    5. Re:Cue the adjective jokes by StrongBow67 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Well rumor has it that in the Ultra Expanded, Platinum Plated Director's Cut Edition, before Gollum falls into the Crack of Doom, Jackson pulls a Lucas and has Gollum confess to Frodo that he is his father. Also, when Gandalf battles the Balrog, the new edition will have GANDALF FALL IN FIRST!! Of course this edition won't be released for another 20 years, so rest easy.

    6. Re:Cue the adjective jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, what will happen is, when Aragorn defends the Hobbits at Weathertop, he will gallantly wait for one of the Nazgul to swing its sword at him before he engages in violence against them. And later, when Aragorn comes to Boromir's rescue, Lurtz will shoot an arrow at him from two feet away, and miss, and then Aragorn will chop his head off.

    7. Re:Cue the adjective jokes by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      Or, three discs of DVD-Audio quality score.

    8. Re:Cue the adjective jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon my blatant stupidity, but...

      Who the fuck is Lurtz?

    9. Re:Cue the adjective jokes by boinger · · Score: 1
      Either one of the Elven, Dwarven or Human Rings, or Sting, or an Elven Cloak and leaf brooch, or a Horn of Gondor, or other similar item.

      Dude, Sting sucks! And he wouldn't fit in the box, anyway.


      I know, I know...you shut up.

      --
      Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
  5. Extended? by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do we get to find out what happens to Saruman? Or does he go "poof" like "The Scouring of the Shire" did, too?

    1. Re:Extended? by Brackney · · Score: 1, Interesting

      He's in the extended version.

    2. Re:Extended? by EvanED · · Score: 4, Informative

      Somewhat at least. They filmed Saurman scenes to go at the beginning of RotK, but decided they killed the pace of the movie before it even got started and thus they didn't work. They will be back though for the EE cut.

      Scouring of course won't be, so who knows how they will wrap up the Saurman line.

    3. Re:Extended? by rd_syringe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, actually, you do. Read more if you want to know already.

      *** Spoilers ***

      Apparently, Wormtongue pushes him out of the tower at the beginning, right after the encounter with Gandalf (the "Voice of Saruman" chapter from the book). Saruman falls and is impaled on a large spiked wheel.

    4. Re:Extended? by T'hain+Esh+Kelch · · Score: 0

      It does have the final confrontation with Saruman. So yes, we do get to know what happens with him!

    5. Re:Extended? by rokzy · · Score: 0

      I think Wormtongue kills him for the Palantir or something

    6. Re:Extended? by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 1

      The picture that theory was based off of was not of a WETA model. Last I heard around the campfire, it's still unknown how his demise plays out in the film.

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    7. Re:Extended? by neotuli · · Score: 1

      decided they killed the pace of the movie before it even got started
      hahaha... what pace..the damn thing is 3.5 hours long...another 10 minutes of drag would barely be noticed
      and yes, my friends have forced me to sit through all three regular editions..at once..that was like 10 hours of lotr

    8. Re:Extended? by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

      Not only is it common knowledge that Wormtongue kills Saruman in the Voice of Saruman scene, but there is a production still of the model on the Extended Edition of the Two Towers DVD.

    9. Re:Extended? by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 1

      Where is this still located on the discs? Last news I heard was that he definately does a long drop and sudden stop out of the tower, but the impaled on wheel but was unconfirmed.

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    10. Re:Extended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would he do that? We already know that Gandalf & Co. take the Palantir from Saruman, just like they did in the book.

    11. Re:Extended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir I.M. was interviewed on a U.K. chat show a couple of years ago. On the same bill was a man who had been impaled on a plank. I.M. remarked that was Saruman's fate.

    12. Re:Extended? by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 1

      they filmed multiple deaths for saruman.

    13. Re:Extended? by dancingmad · · Score: 1

      They show the scenes in the gameboy version of the game (still pictures of the filmed footage). It's takes elements of the Scouring.

      SPOILER AHEAD:

      Gandalf, Theoden, and the rest of the crew talk with Saruman and Wormtongue, who are stuck in the tower. It seems to follow the book, more or less, but at the end, Denethor says that Worm served him once, in his own way and that he would let him free. Saruman (as in the Scouring) says that he really did act against Theoden - by poisoning his son. Wormtonge says Saruman made him do it and kills Saruman.

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    14. Re:Extended? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      And do we get to see the version where Frodo shot first?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    15. Re:Extended? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Extended. Modified. And we find out that Frodo shoots first!

    16. Re:Extended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he falls onto a spiky wheel. Impaled by his own machinery.

  6. The trilogy was great.. but by John_Allen_Mohammed · · Score: 1, Insightful

    one of my major gripes with the three movies were the accents and sounds. For me at least, it was extremely difficult to hear what they were saying. The accents were heavy and the volume level kept jumping from high to low. From one scene to the next I had to keep moving the volume down (during the loud scenes) and then WAY WAY up when they were speaking, just so i could hear their faint voices. Anybody else find themselves doing the same thing ?

    Ya, I should get a volume normalizer but in the meantime.....

    --

    Skype Me! username: john_allen_mohammed
    1. Re:The trilogy was great.. but by Brackney · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm assuming you're listening to this in 5.1 surround? Might I suggest a good calibration disc like DVD Video Essentials and a sound level meter to properly set up your audio? It might be that your channel gains are simply out of balance with one another. I didn't find myself having to jack with the volume during any of the LOTR discs, and that includes getting my butt thumped quite excessively during the battles at Helm's Deep and the Pelenor Fields.

    2. Re:The trilogy was great.. but by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Welcome to surround sound. Maybe its me but I liked the old style sound before they switched to surround. The dymanic range is too great. The quiet parts are too quiet and the loud parts are too loud. Luckily my tv has an automatic volume limiter which does come in handy. The shitty cable co. can't regulate the volume across all their channels.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re:The trilogy was great.. but by chamblah · · Score: 1

      For some reason the movie theater I saw the movies in wouldn't let me adjust the volume.

    4. Re:The trilogy was great.. but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      getting my butt thumped quite excessively

      Dude, we don't want to hear about your personal life.

    5. Re:The trilogy was great.. but by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      Most digital surround receivers have something called DRC or "midnight mode". Try turning that on and see if it makes your listening experience any better.

    6. Re:The trilogy was great.. but by Brackney · · Score: 1

      LOL! Perhaps I should have worded that differently... ;)

    7. Re:The trilogy was great.. but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a better sound system you fucking cheap arse bastard. no problems here

    8. Re:The trilogy was great.. but by iantri · · Score: 1
      The increased dynamic range is a Good Thing (tm), however as you have discovered, under regular TV, non-home theatre viewing conditions (i.e. in a living room, where there is little control over background noise), it can be difficult to hear.

      This is why you need to turn Dynamic Range Compression on in your DVD player.. it will limit the dynamic range (based on data in the AC3 tracks), instead of just normalizing the audio. The feature should be present on any DVD player.

    9. Re:The trilogy was great.. but by evslin · · Score: 1

      It's not just you, I'm not a fan of surround either.

      But then again, a birth defect rendered my right ear completely useless, so even something simple like stereo's beyond my grasp.

    10. Re:The trilogy was great.. but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speak for yourself!

  7. "Special Edition"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've said this a million times. If Greedo shoots first I'm not buying it.

  8. MOD PARENT DOWN TROLL by Laebshade · · Score: 2, Informative

    Warning: the third invite link is a google cache link to goatse. Very clever.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN TROLL by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

      hey, that really is very clever. methinks someone has found a really good way around the slashdot methods of destroying trolls.

      now what needs to be done to slashdot is that they need to figure out how to differentiate between gmail and google...

  9. A little dissapointed by mmmmmhotpants · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I was under the impression that Peter Jackson said that the extended edition would be released at the same time as the theatrical cut, since the trilogy was at an end.
    But it seems like genious marketing strategy has struck again: let viewers by both, prolong the hype as long as possible, the EE will be a xmas hit.

    --

    can't sleep. clowns will eat me.
    1. Re:A little dissapointed by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was under the impression that Peter Jackson said that the extended edition would be released at the same time as the theatrical cut, since the trilogy was at an end.

      I never heard such a thing. Furthermore, it doesn't make any sense. Making the extended edition isn't a matter of just plunking in a few more scenes and burning another master. The editing alone is a painstaking process. The LotR people are so fanatical that they actually re-score and re-record the music to fit with the new scenes. All of this takes much longer than simply transferring the already-finished theatrical film to DVD.

      It may also be a way to squeeze money, but it's hardly a scam. Unlike some films, they let everybody know way ahead of time that they could expect an extended version. Nobody got caught buying the DVD and then finding out afterwards that there was another DVD they really wanted.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:A little dissapointed by mmmmmhotpants · · Score: 1

      I never called it a scam. My words: "genious marketing."

      Secondly, just because YOU never heard about Peter Jackson saying he wanted to release the extended DVD early doesn't mean that someone else didn't hear that in an interview. I apologize that I can't fortify this with evidence. Hence I used the words "Under the impression" hoping someone would concretely verify or reject this with evidence. Sorry, but "I've never heard such a thing" is not evidence.

      And finally, I realize that making an extended edition is not a matter of mass DVD copy, and never questioned that. Explain, however, how the LOTR empire was able to release extended DVD's in november the past two years WHILE finishing the theatrical versions of the other films concurrently . And also explain why now when there are no current projects (save King Kong) does it take them an extra month?

      --

      can't sleep. clowns will eat me.
    3. Re:A little dissapointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the actors for the apendicies are under contract for different movies / jobs now, and aren't just able to fly out to the recording studio on a whim and film their takes / scenes? Logistics isn't some trivial thing. Try working in the industry before you say 1 more month is horrendously slow.

    4. Re:A little dissapointed by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Wow, chill out.

      You're falling into the classic geek trap of treating somebody who comes forward with more information as a challenger. Conversation is not a war. You don't have to win to enjoy yourself.

      To clarify:

      I never said you called it a scam. That doesn't change the fact that it's not a scam.

      I never said that my never hearing Jackson mention this change in timing was evidence. That is why I immediately dropped that line and went into actual, real evidence. I'm not challenging you, nor calling you any bad names, nor do I think you're an idiot. (To forestall any problems: I know you didn't say I did.)

      I can't explain why this one is longer. RotK's extended edition is probably more work, since they are IIRC adding more footage than the other ones. Perhaps that's the reason.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    5. Re:A little dissapointed by Faluzeer · · Score: 1

      "Because the actors for the apendicies are under contract for different movies / jobs now, and aren't just able to fly out to the recording studio on a whim and film their takes / scenes? Logistics isn't some trivial thing. Try working in the industry before you say 1 more month is horrendously slow."

      Actually that was the case since the bulk of the filming was completed (2000 or 2001, sorry can't remember), however all the actors had it in their original contracts about availability for pickup scenes.

      Indeed there is reference to the actors coming in for pickup scenes in the extended dialogues...

    6. Re:A little dissapointed by esk · · Score: 1
      this interview from april of this year with matt lasorsa of new line offers some explanations for why the extended edition got pushed to december:

      Logically, it would seem that it could be done sooner, especially without another Lord of the Rings film to finish; however, that hasn't been the case. Peter Jackson was quite busy with many commitments during the awards season. Since he was away from New Zealand, he could not cut an extended version of the film. Traditionally, after he cuts the film, there are months and months of work to do to complete the cut - including Howard Shore's additional score and Weta Digital's new special effects.

      For the special features, many of the interviews with the cast and crew were completed during pickups for the next film, as everyone was in the same place (New Zealand). Now that all filming is complete, everyone is scattered across the world - making it more difficult to get the interviews to create bonus materials.

      It would have been ideal to release it sooner, but we didn't want to compromise the quality of the DVD to get the product in stores earlier.

    7. Re:A little dissapointed by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      I rented the normal versions but I'm looking forward to this extended version.

  10. This is almost a month later than the others... by MagicDude · · Score: 1

    Of the other extended editions, Fellowship of the Ring was released on November 12, and The Two Towers was released on November 18. I wonder what's pushing this release back almost a month?

    1. Re:This is almost a month later than the others... by kinrowan · · Score: 1
      I suspect because there's no next movie to build excitement for, since those were typically released about the same time of year that this extended DVD is.

      Plus, maybe it's extra good! I understand it took more effort than the others did.

    2. Re:This is almost a month later than the others... by rokzy · · Score: 4, Informative

      they had trouble getting everyone together to do the commentaries. plus the last one is longer and has about 50 mins extra footage.

    3. Re:This is almost a month later than the others... by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      This year it won't be competing with a theatrical release of the next in the series.

  11. PARENT IS A SPOILER -- CAUTION! by EvanED · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the shouting there, but you really should have marked that as having spoilers.

  12. Apparently there is a god(dess)... by kinrowan · · Score: 0
    .... and (s)he answers prayers.

    Hooray!

    1. Re:Apparently there is a god(dess)... by kfg · · Score: 1

      When I was back there on Slashdot
      there was a person there
      who put forth the proposition
      that you can petition the LoTR with prayer.

      Petition the LoTR with prayer?
      Petition the LoTR with prayer?
      You cannot petition the LoTR with prayer!

      KFG

    2. Re:Apparently there is a god(dess)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the lizard king as much as the next man, but thumbs down on mixing the two.

  13. Theater release? by EReidJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was a rumor going around some time ago that the Extended Edition would be released in theaters before or at the same time it was available on DVD. Anyone know of the status of this? Is it really going to happen, can we see these wonderful new scenes on the big screen?

  14. I am so looking forward to this! by b4rtm4n · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is going to make my year! :-)

    I am disappointed that the scouring of the Shire is missing but I can fully understand it from a filmmakers pov as it'd really mess up the pace of the end of the film. Although it may have helped offset the length of the endings.

    The biggest edit I would like is the removal of Legolas surfing the Oliphant. That was just pathetic.

    Still, nearly an hour of extra footage will be fscking brilliant.

    Roll on December!!!

    --
    "goatse? What's that? Anyone have a link?" - AC
    1. Re:I am so looking forward to this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure many other people will be planning an entire day of "friends + EE's + beer + take away" like I am.

      my g/f despises anything "silly" like LOTR though.

    2. Re:I am so looking forward to this! by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 1

      I thought it added a bit of humor.. not that there wasn't a lot during those scenes ;)

    3. Re:I am so looking forward to this! by b4rtm4n · · Score: 1

      This'd be a good sport for the 2008 olympics.

      Watch all 3 directors cuts ot LoTR whilst drinking beer (at least 2 per hour) and eating chips.

      To score you have to be consious and answer some basic questions about the films.

      Scoring is per beer, per pack of chips, per question answered.

      I'd go for a sprint start on the beer/chips combo as a sprint finish will leave you incontinent and incompetant.

      --
      "goatse? What's that? Anyone have a link?" - AC
    4. Re:I am so looking forward to this! by b4rtm4n · · Score: 1

      Dwarf tossing?

      btw Your post at sep 11th at 9:11

      --
      "goatse? What's that? Anyone have a link?" - AC
    5. Re:I am so looking forward to this! by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

      as it'd really mess up the pace of the end of the film.

      you mean as it'd wake people up?

      With all the 'it's over, no, this time it's over, no, really, THIS time it's over' I swear I was tempted to walk out the theatre... and I loved the first two movies and the third up to that point. I just hope they'll have an alternate ending on the DVD when the whole enchilada is cut down to more manageable proportions.

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    6. Re:I am so looking forward to this! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Cut down to manageable proportions is right!

      I like a good ending, and even touchy-feely ones, but some movies have to be cut.

      Raiders of The Lost Ark for example had 6 minutes cut from the "fry the Nazi's" scene at the end at Spielberg's request. The movie was better for it.

    7. Re:I am so looking forward to this! by Highlander · · Score: 1

      Lies!

      His post was Your post at sep 11th at 5:11!!

    8. Re:I am so looking forward to this! by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Oh yes. Find whoever's got the biggest TV and spend the whole day with cans, crisps, pizza, and the finest weed in the Southfarthing... it'll be a good one. Trouble is, we'll all be thoroughly mashed by Helm's Deep ;-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  15. Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is common knowledge that the delay for the extended set has been getting the actors back for the additional features. Jeez.

  16. Spoiler (of some sort) by duggie · · Score: 0

    You are right that he should have put a spoiler warning in his subject, but he was very vague on how Saruman was killed (I know but I'm not saying) and if you read the book (I'm assuming most people on /. has) then you would know it was Wormtongue who kills Saruman anyways.

  17. Is it just me, by Mordant · · Score: 3, Funny

    or did anyone else read that headline as 'Extended Rot13 Expected December 14'?

    I was thinking that maybe folks had decided to use Rot13 as a replacement for MD5, or something.

    Now that I think about it, that headline probably would probably read 'Rkgraqrq EbgX Rkcrpgrq Qrprzore 14' . . .

    1. Re:Is it just me, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or did anyone else read that headline as 'Extended Rot13 Expected December 14'?

      No.

      . o O ( moron )

    2. Re:Is it just me, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, triple rot13 has replaced the old standard rot13.

    3. Re:Is it just me, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did.

      Of course, I did notice that because 'K' is the 13th letter of the alphabet, RotK actually means Rot13!

    4. Re:Is it just me, by FeriteCore · · Score: 1

      That makes more sense than how I read it. I thought it was a ROT by a generalized value. I just wondered why they called it ROTK instead of ROTn.

    5. Re:Is it just me, by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Now that I think about it, that headline probably would probably read 'Rkgraqrq EbgX Rkcrpgrq Qrprzore 14' .

      No, you had it right the first time. With "Extended Rot13" they just encrypt it twice.

      --
      -- Alastair
    6. Re:Is it just me, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure which alphabet you use, but in the English language, K is the 11th letter in the alphabet. The 13th letter in the English alphabet is M.

  18. It's just you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    n/t.

  19. When does the whole trilogy comes out? by antdude · · Score: 1

    I haven't bought any of the LOTR DVDs yet. I would like to get the whole complete set of all three movies with the extras. Does anyone know when this will be released?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  20. Possible LOTR Sequels by Eradicator2k3 · · Score: 1

    "The Lord of the Rings 4: A New Age"
    "The Lord of the Rings 5: Sauron Strikes Back"
    "The Lord of the Rings 6: Return of the Oliphaunt"
    "The Lord of the Rings 7: The Final Frontier"
    etc.

    --
    Mr. T pitied this fool on 27 July 1992.
    1. Re:Possible LOTR Sequels by sigaar · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Lord of the Rings 8: ???
      The Lord of the Rings 9: Profit.

      Sorry, couldn't resist...

      --
      sigaar
    2. Re:Possible LOTR Sequels by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      It's worth pointing out that, in fact, the entire production costs of all three films (not using ingenious studio accounting of course) were paid for by the box office of Fellowship of the Ring alone (DVD of course, was pure gravy). So in fact it runs more like

      The Lord of the Rings 1: Profit!
      The Lord of the Rings 2: Profit!!
      The Lord of the Rings 3: Profit!!!

      Jedidiah.

  21. But RotK needed -trimming-, not extending... by mccalli · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Seriously - the ending just dragged. I could feel people squirming in their seats as yet another cinematic false ending was foisted upon them.

    Now I'm a huge fan of the books, and believe that the Scouring should have been retained as it was a major part of the book's point, to the extent that the book had a point beyond pure myth building. So it's not that I'm moaning about length as such. Just that if you're going to cut the plot, you should also cut the congratulationary stuff that goes on around the sub-plot you cut. And yes, that means straight to the Grey Havens and no Shire scenes for you, m'lads.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:But RotK needed -trimming-, not extending... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously - the ending just dragged. I could feel people squirming in their seats as yet another cinematic false ending was foisted upon them.

      Actually, I think during the ending most people were thinking "just fscking kiss and get it over with already!"

    2. Re:But RotK needed -trimming-, not extending... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTK could be two movies..

      6 books in lotr.. so six 3 hour movies.. :)

    3. Re:But RotK needed -trimming-, not extending... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      hm. The added saruman scenes LOOK like they might break the old 1h ending aport, which could actually help with the pacing...
      Making a film 10 minutes longer can make it feel a hour shorter...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    4. Re:But RotK needed -trimming-, not extending... by MagicDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think that having a half hour ending for this movie is bad, because it's not the conclusion to just ROTK, it is the resolution to the entire Lord of the Rings series. 30 minutes of character and plot resolution in a 10 hour movie is the same as having 5 minutes of resolution in a typical 90 minute movie. We've spent 3 years getting to know these characters, and I know I'd feel disapointed if all I got after the ring was destroyed was a "Good Job Frodo" and they cut to credits. Plus, the ending gave us a glimpse into how Frodo was still affected by the Ring, how he never really recovered from it. I think what everyone is complaining about is the departure for the gray havens scene, where they schmaltzed it up a little, but honestly, it's just a sign of the time of how short of an attention span people really have if they can't take 5 minutes of artistic liberty after 3 hours of butt-kicking action.

    5. Re:But RotK needed -trimming-, not extending... by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Seriously - the ending just dragged

      Agreed. There were at least 3 distinct moments when I thought it was going to fade down and roll credits, but it kept going.

      As someone who hasn't read the third book yet (read the first two), it definitely feels like they skipped over a lot of content at the end, as the wrap-up seemed very awkward.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    6. Re:But RotK needed -trimming-, not extending... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just that idiotic bedroom scene - if they would delete that I could probably stand for the other fifteen endings.

      I **hate** it when they bring the sappy strings up to bone-crushing volume in an attempt to *force* me to feel happy about the ending. That just kills it - I pull back in my seat and instantly lose connection with the movie.

      A really good ending doesn't need 500 dB music to make you feel the way the film intends you to feel - that should fall out of the story naturally.

    7. Re:But RotK needed -trimming-, not extending... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making a film 10 minutes longer can make it feel a hour shorter...

      Righty right, only imagine Jar Jar die in minute 25 of Episode I...

    8. Re:But RotK needed -trimming-, not extending... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      can't take 5 minutes of artistic liberty after 3 hours of butt-kicking action.

      He made all the hobbits gay...that is a little more than "artistic liberty"...

  22. Extended Edition by rhysweatherley · · Score: 1

    Extended Edition ... now with twenty more "No, it isn't finished yet - here's *another* finale" scenes.

  23. Confirmation..? I don't think so by thellamaman · · Score: 3, Informative

    The linked page says that New Line has confirmed it, which they certainly have not, publically at least. Unless it's someone's "secret source", and I think that's a little suspect.

    About a week ago, TheOneRing.net posted a link to Video Store Magazine online which contained the December 14 date. New Line made them take it down, here is the retraction.

    TORN got a note from New Line as well:

    From New Line Cinema writes: There is an error that Video Store magazine ran in their current issue and they are printing a retraction next week. If you could kindly pull the Celebriel post and note this retraction we would be most grateful! Thanks!

    All that said, I believe the December 14 date is likely correct. But it sure is not confirmed.

  24. What were you doing? by rd_syringe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone else find that last line pornographic...? ;)

  25. Actual *content* of the DVD by thellamaman · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you want to know all the new stuff that will be on the DVD (Mouth of Sauron, Voice of Saruman, Witch King, Houses of Healing, Crossroads, etc., etc.), here's the most comprehensive site I've found, with photos, commentary, news, and some actual video:

    ROTK SEE Site
    1. Re:Actual *content* of the DVD by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      And what about that one dude in the forest, Tom Bilbabon or whatever his name was.

    2. Re:Actual *content* of the DVD by splorp! · · Score: 1

      Tom Bombadil and Goldberry. Main source.

      Last I heard, not to be included.

      --
      Please don't humanize the morons around me. It makes me very uncomfortable.
    3. Re:Actual *content* of the DVD by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      His part in the LOTR has always confused me.

    4. Re:Actual *content* of the DVD by splorp! · · Score: 1

      "even in a mythological Age there must be some enigmas, as there always are. Tom Bombadil is one (intentionally)" - J R R Tolkien, Letters

      Apparently, it was intentional.

      --
      Please don't humanize the morons around me. It makes me very uncomfortable.
    5. Re:Actual *content* of the DVD by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I guess I read that part of the book too quickly and was expecting to see more of Tom.

  26. Serious question--doesn't anybody RTFA anymore? by rd_syringe · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's the second line in the linked article:

    "New Line has confirmed that the four-disc extended edition of Return of the King will arrive on the 14th December. The set will include around fifty-minutes of additional footage, including the highly anticipated confrontation with Saruman."

  27. mod parent up by centipetalforce · · Score: 1

    I could not agree more. If I had mod points Id give them all to you.

  28. Saga, Saga by Stanistani · · Score: 1

    Please, Mr. Jackson - don't make Gollum fire first!

    mmKay... now on to The Hobbit?

    1. Re:Saga, Saga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do have a small commercial from the Ring Fellowship Veterans saying that Frodo was no hero.

  29. Something to look out for... by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, I'm so going to get this.

    But what I don't understand is why they'd have to wait a whole year before releasing RoTK. While it is understandable for the earlier movies, but this is the final one, and it is not like there will be more stuff coming after this one..

    Meanwhile, on a korean site (asiandb.com) I already see this same dvd on sale...

  30. Extended trilogy by RyanFenton · · Score: 1

    Obvious question: But any idea on the release date for the full extended trilogy?

    After seeing the first one, I realised that I didn't want to begin watching the rest of them until they were in the full extended format - I didn't want to watch the rest without the extra scenes.

    Now I can get all the movies in extended format - but I'm sure there's many like me who'd prefer to just get them all in one go, with all the goodies.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Extended trilogy by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      I think you would miss some extras, possibly, or they could be different again. They are different from the normal non-extended releases BTW.

  31. Jackson lost it... by hughk · · Score: 1

    The scouring was important. It should have been there at least for the EE. It was aluded to in the meeting with Galadriel (PJ even seemed to have some footage). There were a lot of other endings such as the marriage, the elves leaving for the west with Bilbo and Gandalf, but without the scouring, we do not see how the hobbits have changed.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:Jackson lost it... by b4rtm4n · · Score: 1

      It's very important to the book, but a film cannot fully translate those important details.

      Tho if RoTK was 5 hrs long......

      In the film it'd be near impossible to show the transition of the hobbits into "modern man".

      It would also add a double plus down ending, which (imho) is why the film had an up beat ending for Sam.

      --
      "goatse? What's that? Anyone have a link?" - AC
    2. Re:Jackson lost it... by hughk · · Score: 1

      The necessity of the Scouring came down to showing how actions away may have consequences at home. The Shire was a wonderful place but in the end, it is another part of Middle Earth and it is as vulnerable. Note that I don't believe that it needs long, but is an important part of the end of the book. PJ didn't think so and he also made another mistake with Faromir in The Two Towers (although this was corrected later), however his other changes worked well (i.e., extending the role of Arwen).

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  32. The DVD has Noam Chomsky's analysis by sidles · · Score: 1

    This DVD is supposed to include Noam Chomsky's analysis of LOTR's semiotic significance. Well worth reading;)

  33. Volume hell... I had to turn on the subtitles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I swear, I thought maybe I was losing it. SURELY the LOTR trilogy couldn't have crappy sound! It must just be me, right?

    I feel redeemed. ;)

  34. Helm's Deep - Close the gate! by izakage · · Score: 0

    A friend and I played this game for about fifteen minutes at the Comic Con, and we were impressed.

    We talked to one of the guys running the show and learned that the demo we had playes was running on a 2.8GHz computer with 2 gigs of RAM. Don't remember what graphics card, however. It ran remarkably well, really high FPS, great graphics, and wonderful features.

    We ended up playing Helm's Deep, and after about ten minutes of playing, we were all prepared, plenty of flaming arrows, and the orcs came. Some came with ladders, some with towers, even the giant flaming battering ram. They didn't really need them, however, as we forgot to close the gate, and they walked right in.

    However, it was a great demo, and I was truly impressed. All of my hero characters dies, but strangely, most of the damage they took came from the bodies of falling orcs from atop the walls. We absolutely sucked at the game, died quickly, but the fifteen minute demo was enough to persuade me to buy it. Great game.

    Oh, and if you're atop the front wall, and push the ladders over that the orcs are climbing up, they all die :-).

  35. Edit! by izakage · · Score: 0

    Lemme note, this was the LOTR game, not anything about the DVD. Great game though

  36. Just what I need... by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 0, Troll

    Another half-dozen hours of dullness I'll be forced to sit through with my LotR-obsessed other half before I get to do anything interesting for Christmas.

    Still, it's a nice early way to solve the problem of what to get her for Christmas - where do I pre-order? And why do I do this to myself every time one of these is released comes out? hmm, what? sexual favours? ah, that'll be it then. Thanks.

    So much for the complexities of the male psyche...

    --
    Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
  37. yep. That's a movie mix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why Dolby 5.1 (AC3) has range limiting built-in. Use it instead of DTS (I don't know if the discs even have DTS) and then turn on the range limiting in your DVD player or amp.

    It's very useful for watching movies without rattling the room.

    Of course, you should turn it off when you want to rattle the room.

  38. Funny stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Zinn: This is absolutely established in the books. Pipe-weed is something all the Hobbits abuse. Gandalf is smoking it constantly. You are correct when you point out that Middle Earth depends on pipe-weed in some crucial sense, but I think you may be overstating its importance. Clearly the war is not based only on the Shire's pipe-weed. Rohan and Gondor's unceasing hunger for war is a larger culprit, I would say.

    Chomsky: But without the pipe-weed, Middle Earth would fall apart. Saruman is trying to break up Gandalf's pipe-weed ring. He's trying to divert it.

    Zinn: Well, you know, it would be manifestly difficult to believe in magic rings unless everyone was high on pipe-weed. So it is in Gandalf's interest to keep Middle Earth hooked.

    Chomsky: How do you think these wizards build gigantic towers and mighty fortresses? Where do they get the money? Keep in mind that I do not especially regard anyone, Saruman included, as an agent for progressivism. But obviously the pipe-weed operation that exists is the dominant influence in Middle Earth. It's not some ludicrous magical ring.

    The best part is I'm still not 100% sure this is a parody....
    1. Re:Funny stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best part is I'm still not 100% sure this is a parody...

      Too true. Zinn is rather Wormtongue to Chomsky's Sauruman.

  39. clarify that please by Christ-on-a-bike · · Score: 2, Informative

    To clarify:

    He never said you said he called it a scam.

    But wait!

    You never said he said you said he called it a scam! Aargh!

    ... It's called conversational implicature. It's part of pragmatics. And it's the reason WE DON'T HAVE THREADS LIKE THIS.

    <commits suicide>

  40. My 2c by Aqua_Geek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A friend of mine had this to say about leaving the "Scouring of the Shire" part out of the ending: in the Fellowship when they reach Lothlorien, Frodo looks into the Mirror of Galadriel. If you recall, it cuts to some shots of what he sees. Correct me if I'm wrong, but these are shots of the Shire being burned and whatnot, aren't they? After he sees these images, Frodo is told by Galadriel that this is what will happen if he fails. But he didn't fail. The ring was destroyed, so it should make sense that he comes back to find the Shire alive and well and NOT in ruins (or under the control of Saruman).

    --
    Disclaimer: This comment was generated by a Flock of Trained Microsoft Programmers for Aqua_Geek.
    1. Re:My 2c by kubrick · · Score: 1

      The ring was destroyed, so it should make sense that he comes back to find the Shire alive and well and NOT in ruins (or under the control of Saruman).

      But the industrialisation of the Shire reflected the point that it's impossible to escape the corruptions of the outside world; as Frodo was corrupted by the Ring, so was the Shire by the same forces the Ring represents. You can't defeat an abstract principle simply by destroying one of its tokens. It's a slightly more realistic ending than "Hey ho, the Ring is gone, everything is perfect again".

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    2. Re:My 2c by Aqua_Geek · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, I see what you're saying. The evil doesn't just disappear with the destruction of the ring. That section of the book provided a "well, the main source of evil has been defeated but there are still lesser ones to deal with" idea. I think the same applies today (replace "evil" with "enemy"). Not to start a fire here, but look at the situation in Iraq. Yeah, Sadam has been captured. But is the fight over? Absolutely not. There are still other people and groups of people to deal with. The notion that, once you take out the leader of your enemy the war is over, is a fallacy - a fallacy which, I would have to agree with you, is portrayed in this film.

      It's a slightly more realistic ending than "Hey ho, the Ring is gone, everything is perfect again."

      The movie does point out, though, that everything is NOT perfect. Everyone walks away from it changed. I think one of the best quotes from the movie comes at the end when Frodo is writing everything in the book:
      How do you pick up the threads of an old life? How do you go on, when in your heart you begin to understand there is no going back? There are some things that time cannot mend, some hurts that go too deep, that have taken hold.
      This idea that they are changed as a result of this experience is depicted very well in the scene at the bar. They are all sitting around the table, looking at one another. They are not drinking by the pint as they were at Bree; they are not dancing on the table like they did in Rohan. They are different - they are almost solemn, they have a new outlook on life - a new respect for it and what it means to be alive, and they know just how much that life is really worth. Meanwhile, the life they once knew just goes on around them - barely even taking notice of them. They are now somewhat separated, distant from that life. As Frodo says, you can't go back to it. Things have changed. Some things will never be the same again because of this experience you went through. People who have lost a loved one close to them, for example, know this idea very well. They have a new appreciation for life, a deeper understanding about what really matters. They live each day to a fuller extent than before. Many of the people around them - friends, neighbors, coworkers - still live as they always have. But this person is changed as a result of the experience of losing someone. And consequently they cannot go back to their life before.

      OK, I'm off my soapbox...
      When I read the Scouring, I hated that part of the book - to me it didn't feel like it fit with the rest of the books. It almost felt as if I put down The Lord of the Rings and picked up "Short Guys with Hairy Feet and Other Assorted Children's Stories by J.R.R. Tolkien." I felt like I was in the frickin forrest with Robin Hood and his merry men - fighting against the 'Shirriffs' and Sharkey and whatnot. No, really. I couldn't get that image out of my head while reading. I kept thinking that any minute now, Robin Hood's gonna jump out and steal some cash...
      --
      Disclaimer: This comment was generated by a Flock of Trained Microsoft Programmers for Aqua_Geek.
  41. I don't know... by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean, I bought LotR: FotR EE and LotR: TTT EE and loved them, after a decade of reading the books once a year. But, maybe I'll pass on this one. I mean, two out of three is pretty good, right?

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  42. Re:Extended? [Warning: possible spoilers] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before RoTK came out in theatrical release, I bought a book at Borders for my son featuring a bunch of backstory. It mentions a confrontation between Aragorn and the Mouth Of Sauron character, wherein Aragorn apparently kills him/it.

    It also features a short article about Saruman, and mentions that he dies. Then there's a picture of Christopher Lee as Saruman impaled on a big spike. Scenes featuring the Mouth of Sauron and the impaled Saruman look like scenes from the movie. So, I expect that, in the extended version, Saruman tries to throw a Palantir from the window of Orthanc at Gandalf, loses his balance, falls, and is impaled on the spike. Later, Legolas will get into a drinking game with Gimli. Still later, Aragorn will drive a sword through the Mouth of Sauron. The movie will be about 6 hours long, too. Sheesh.

    I've long thought about taking a whole day to watch all three extended edition movies when the EE of RoTK comes out. I think I should block out a week instead!

  43. Dynamic Range Compression by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    This is why you need to turn Dynamic Range Compression on in your DVD player.. it will limit the dynamic range (based on data in the AC3 tracks), instead of just normalizing the audio. The feature should be present on any DVD player.

    I've had a few DVD players and the DRC setting on them never really seemed to have much of an effect.

    I suspect there are some psychological and physiological effects of volume changes that aren't being accounted for (loud scene cuts to a quiet scene), and/or a cheap chipset.

    Has anyone here used one of the aftermarket volume regulators?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  44. AAAAAAAARGH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another gawd damn lotr "special edition" w/ "bonus features". As if the original dvd didn't have enough special features, none of which I watched. The movie is satisfying enuff for me.

  45. Awfully late release date... by PSandusky · · Score: 1

    This came up in the EE preview panel at Dragon*Con this year. Essentially, the idea was that waiting until approx. Dec. 14 to release the EE would pass up the lucrative Black Friday shopping pattern. Surely New Line would want to get some profit during that period.

    The possibility (and only a possibility) presented was that the EE could appear in theaters for a little while before DVD sales start.

    --
    "What's the use in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes?" --Fourth Doctor, "Robot"