Slashdot Mirror


Overclockers Top 6GHz With A 3.6GHz-Rated P4

sH4RD writes "The 6GHz barrier has been broken by two guys, a little LN2 (liquid nitrogen for those not as chemistry inclined), and an Intel Pentium 4 (Prescott) 3.60GHz. Check out some icing and some proof of speed. Better yet take a look at how fast it calculates pi. Also be sure to check out the original announcement."

99 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. Cold! by erick99 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Imagine having to keep a vat of liquid nitrogen at your desk in order to use your computer! Notice the Fluke thermometer showing -105C (-157F). Now that is damned cold....

    -erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:Cold! by _Pablo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If Intel hadn't decided to kill P4 in favour of PM then we may have had to do it sooner rather than later!

      It would be amazing to have to use LN2...but then again since I first stuck my finger on top of my 68000 and realising it was a lot hotter than my 6502 i'm constantly amazed how hot these things are getting.

      --
      $2B OR NOT $2B = $FF
    2. Re:Cold! by buford_tannen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Imagine having to keep a vat of liquid nitrogen at your desk in order to use your computer! Notice the Fluke thermometer showing -105C (-157F). Now that is damned cold....

      I've just put in for a job working with superconducting magnets, using LHe.

      That's around 4K (-269C or -453F). Now that is damned damned damned damned cold....

      If only liquid helium were as inexpensive as LN2.... We'd see some a quantumn leap in overclocking I'd bet... (pun intended!)

      --
      Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen
    3. Re:Cold! by Kenshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're Finnish.

      They don't need liquid nitrogen. Couldn't they have just put their PC outside?

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    4. Re:Cold! by DrMrLordX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They didn't kill the P4 in favor of the Pentium M. Their upcoming dual-core desktop cpus are supposedly going to be Netburst-based. I think we would all LIKE Intel to jump on the Dothan bandwagon, but whether or not they'll actually do it is completely unknown at this point. They have announced some dual-core Pentium Ms for mobile purposes, and that's it.

    5. Re:Cold! by niteice · · Score: 2, Funny
      They're Finnish.

      And they're using Windows. Do you see a problem here?...
      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    6. Re:Cold! by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Yeah, that was one of the most amazing things I learned from my chemistry teacher in college. He was doing the standard Liquid Nitrogen funstuffs, like dipping the flower, or the raquet ball, and a couple of other things. Then he was talking about the Liquid Nitrogen, and he pointed out that it's about as expensive as milk, per volume.

      So, what I want to know is why don't they sell it at 7-11??!? Imagine the fun, not to mention uses. Other than computers, you can use it to freeze fruits so quickly that their water crystals don't have time to form and poke through the cell walls and make the fruit mushy... I'm sure there are a hundred other uses.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    7. Re:Cold! by Cramer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Use dry ice. It's far safer and more readily available. You can pick up dry ice in any cooler. N2 comes in tanks (like scuba and welding gear.)

      I've heard of some grocery stores selling dry ice. The only place I've known of to get N2 was a welding supply house. (besides mail-order.)

  2. Erm... by __aavhli5779 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I sure hope they were using Gentoo, because if not they couldn't take advantage of those incredible speeds with some hot -O3 -funroll-loops action :P

    In all seriousness, this is pretty amazing, but I can't really see the usefulness. For sheer geek pride, sure, why not? But as far as I can tell the expense involved outweighs any gain in performance; for probably half of what these poor folks spent getting a P4 to run stably at 6 ghz (and it doesn't even sound super-stable from what I've read) they could've probably bought a couple more CPUs and had a proper SMP system instead. Regardless, I admire their tenacity and mourn for the warranty on their poor CPU :P

    1. Re:Erm... by MikeXpop · · Score: 5, Funny
      In all seriousness, this is pretty amazing, but I can't really see the usefulness.
      To pick up chicks, obviously.
      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    2. Re:Erm... by bizpile · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But as far as I can tell the expense involved outweighs any gain in performance;

      Isn't that what being a geek is all about? It's a "becuase it's there"-type of thing.

    3. Re:Erm... by anthonyclark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      speaking of gentoo; What I'd like to see would be a benchmark 'emerge system' or bootstrap.sh. One run should be on a single proc system with MAKEOPTS="-j2". The other should be on a system with dual processors at half the speed of the first system, with MAKEOPTS="-j3".

      I ran something like this a while back; a dual p3-500 just about matched a single p4-1.5.

      With some "real" benchmarks, we'd at least be able to weigh this 6GHz beast against a dual 3GHz beast...

      --
      ----- Documentation is worth it just to be able to answer all your mail with 'RTFM' - Alan Cox.
    4. Re:Erm... by _Pablo · · Score: 3, Funny

      The CPU-Z shots very strongly suggest it's running in windows. But just maybe it's a VM on Linux, or Wine or some other reason to mention Linux on slashdot!

      It's a shame the pi calc shot is done when it's running at 5.4Ghz instead of the arbitrary 6Ghz...

      --
      $2B OR NOT $2B = $FF
    5. Re:Erm... by _Pablo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Clock for clock, the final P3 (the Pentium III S) would smoke the original P4 (Willamete) no questions asked. So it's quite possible dual P3/500s could have beaten a 1.5Ghz P4 on many benchmarks.

      --
      $2B OR NOT $2B = $FF
    6. Re:Erm... by SensitiveMale · · Score: 2, Funny

      In all seriousness, this is pretty amazing, but I can't really see the usefulness. For sheer geek pride, sure, why not? But as far as I can tell the expense involved outweighs any gain in performance

      Damn. I was hoping to buy a $99 liquid nitrogen cooling kit at CompUSA tomorrow. :)

    7. Re:Erm... by 10scjed · · Score: 5, Funny

      wow, windows at 6GHz, think of how much spyware it would take to finally slow it down...

      --
      --10scjed IANAL,AFAIK
    8. Re:Erm... by justkarl · · Score: 5, Funny

      and using a 6Ghz cpu w/ 512 ram...

      Guess they got Longhorn running, eh?

    9. Re:Erm... by EinarH · · Score: 5, Informative
      There is no *way* that a dual P3/500 system will match an 1 GHz P4, not to speak of your claims of beating an 1.5 GHz P4.
      Sure it is.
      The first Pentium 4 CPU was slow compared with a P3 1 GHz. One would belive that a 1.5GHz CPU would beat the last generations 1 GHz CPU, but in many tasks the P3 was faster.
      -The P3 pipeline had 12 stages the P4 had 20.
      -The P3 Katmai had 512k L2 cache, the P4 had only 256k. I remember some MySQL benchmarks showing a single P3 500 MHz Katmai beating a P4 1400 MHz in some tasks.

      So even with all the IDE stuff enabled a Dual P3 could be faster than a P4 in Gentooing.

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    10. Re:Erm... by berkut7 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The reason why they run with so little memory is the same why they are using a cheap video card: there is a chance they might kill it. The other more important reason is that they can reach higher FSB clocks with less memory sticks. I fthey had two or more memory sticks they would be able to reach same FSB speeds, an in turn, same CPU clock speeds.

    11. Re:Erm... by aklix · · Score: 2, Funny

      It ran, but then decided it couldn't run on a system that slow.

    12. Re:Erm... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Funny

      Try running doom3 over 35 fps.

    13. Re:Erm... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In all seriousness, this is pretty amazing, but I can't really see the usefulness.

      Since when is usefulness all there is to life?

      Can you see the usefulness in climbing Everest, running around in a circle several times at the Olympics, or anything else?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    14. Re:Erm... by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Funny

      To pick up chicks, obviously.

      Haven't been on a date lately, have you?

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    15. Re:Erm... by ionpro · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's 333Mhz BEFORE clock-quadding. So it's actually an effective FSB of 1332Mhz. This probably isn't the highest FSB overclock achieved so far, but it is unusual to get such a high overclock on the top of the line (i.e. highest multiplier) chip.

    16. Re:Erm... by ZeNTuRe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have 3 Dual P2-300MHz boxes (6*300MHz total), and using distcc or bruteforcing with john they beat a 3.4GHz P4.

      --
      Did they touch God or did they touch the Sun?
    17. Re:Erm... by julesh · · Score: 2

      True, but I would assume that for the sake of benchmarking that both machines are tested with equivalent spec hard drives and motherboards, so IO would become less of an issue.

      Note also that disk cache behaviour would become critical. Tuning of 'swappiness' to the task at hand would probably have drastic affects on the time taken.

    18. Re:Erm... by julesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You need to learn a bit more about why caching works before making statements like that.

      Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that main memory is 10 times slower than the slower cache, and that half the cache size means twice as many cache misses (the real figures are actually worse than this, but I don't know what they are exactly).

      So, we have:

      Main memory access time: 20 units
      Small cache access time: 1 unit
      Large cache access time: 2 units

      Over the course of 100 memory access, lets say 10 of these are misses with the large cache, and based on our assumptions above 20 are misses with the small cache.

      Small cache total time: 20*20 + 80*1 = 480
      Large cache total time: 10*20 + 90*2 = 380

      So, in this situation the large slow cache clearly performs better. In other situations, you might be able to make the small fast cache perform better (e.g. lower number of cache misses, presumably due to applications with smaller working set sizes, or faster main memory might help here).

  3. Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by prestwich · · Score: 4, Informative

    So P4's double clock their ALUs - that means that ALU is shifting at > 12GHz.

    Welcome to measuring your operations in picoseconds.

    1. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by Aadain2001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, the ALU's in Prescott don't even use a clock! It uses self resetting domino logic, so the speed is completely based on the manufacturing process and the speed of the transistors. Damn hard things to make, even harder to formally verify that they will always work, and as far as I know Intel is the only CPU manufacturer in the world to use something like this in a mass-produced product. So you can really say that the ALU is working at >12GHz or whatever since it isn't clocked. Oh, and Intel has been measuring their operation time in picoseconds for a while now ;)

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    2. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by Bender_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interesting, how is it synchronized with the rest of the pipeline? Is there any publication about this?

    3. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by Aadain2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Self resetting domino logic has been known about for a while now (I think since mid 90's), but Intel was the first company to actually do something useful with it in a real product. Synchronizing it to the rest of this chip shouldn't be that hard if you understand domino logic and use memory cells at the input and output ports of the ALU. I personally don't know exactly HOW they do that, but that's my best guess.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
  4. All of that speed... by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 2, Funny
    calculates pi

    Just to figure out the answer to a problem every 8th grader knows.

    1. Re:All of that speed... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Funny

      No kidding. I could have told them that it was 3 and they would have saved so much time and money.

  5. Just in time... by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 5, Funny

    With winter coming and the price of oil approaching $50, you can now safely turn off your heater and just point the vent of your 6Ghz P4 into the middle of the room...or maybe run a venting system off of it connected to the heat ducts in your house...

    1. Re:Just in time... by tzanger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Out in the boonies it's very common to run oil for heat (in addition to wood).

    2. Re:Just in time... by Xabraxas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Boonies? I live in the city and we have oil heat. It's quite common in the northeast.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
  6. doom 3 by Coneasfast · · Score: 5, Funny

    ok, yes, doom 3 has some pretty high sys requirements to run smoothly, but isn't this going a wee bit overboard?

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    1. Re:doom 3 by NtroP · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, this is in preparation for Duke Nukem Forever.

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
  7. calculate pi... by spacemky · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look how fast I can calculate pi:

    3.1415927

    wow, that was fast.

    --
    640YB ought to be enough for anybody.
    1. Re:calculate pi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You missed some digits at the end.

    2. Re:calculate pi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Memorizing pi is easy, once you've learnt the pattern.

    3. Re:calculate pi... by NonSequor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, he could be serious. There's a very simple formula for any arbitrary digit of pi in base 16.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    4. Re:calculate pi... by einhverfr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have been looking into this and it doesn;t work for arbitrary digits of pi, at least not as a simple formula fur such. The problem is that you have an infinite sum of fractions multiplied by 16 to a negative power.

      So, you still have much computational work to do...

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    5. Re:calculate pi... by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Memorising pi is easy, provided you count in base pi.

      Stuart

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
  8. Tops 6ghz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So it tops 6 GHz, but they only calculate pi at 5.4 GHz? Sounds like the only thing it can run at 6 GHz without crashing is CPU-Z...

  9. skynet ensues... by sciguy125 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think we need to stop making our computers go so fast. We're only making things easier for Skynet.

    --
    GE/S/P a- e++ y-- r-- s:++ d+ h! X+++ t++ C+ P+ L++ E W++ w M-- V? PS+ P+
    1. Re:skynet ensues... by Etienne+Steward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I, for one, welcome our new 6GHz overlords...

  10. In layman's terms... by xactuary · · Score: 3, Funny

    their scroll bar works faster than yours.

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
  11. hmmm... by jjeffries · · Score: 5, Funny
    take a look at how fast it calculates pi

    I hope it's a substantial improvement over my machine... Seems like I've been waiting forever for it to finish...

    1. Re:hmmm... by kzinti · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seems like I've been waiting forever for it to finish...

      May be, but at least it keeps your memory banks free of bloodthirsty demons like Boradis, Keslack, and Rejick.

  12. Pi has been slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    but don't worry I got a copy.

    3.
    1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679 8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128 4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196 4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091 4564856692 3460348610 4543266482 1339360726 0249141273 7245870066 0631558817 4881520920 9628292540 9171536436 7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094 3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548 0744623799 6274956735 1885752724 8912279381 8301194912 9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798 6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132 0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872 1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235 4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960 5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859 5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881 7101000313 7838752886 5875332083 8142061717 7669147303 5982534904 2875546873 1159562863 8823537875 9375195778 1857780532 1712268066 1300192787 6611195909 2164201989

    3809525720 1065485863 2788659361 5338182796 8230301952 0353018529 6899577362 2599413891 2497217752 8347913151 5574857242 4541506959 5082953311 6861727855 8890750983 8175463746 4939319255 0604009277 0167113900 9848824012 8583616035 6370766010 4710181942 9555961989 4676783744 9448255379 7747268471 0404753464 6208046684 2590694912 9331367702 8989152104 7521620569 6602405803 8150193511 2533824300 3558764024 7496473263 9141992726 0426992279 6782354781 6360093417 2164121992 4586315030 2861829745 5570674983 8505494588 5869269956 9092721079 7509302955 3211653449 8720275596 0236480665 4991198818 3479775356 6369807426 5425278625 5181841757 4672890977 7727938000 8164706001 6145249192 1732172147 7235014144 1973568548 1613611573 5255213347 5741849468 4385233239 0739414333 4547762416 8625189835 6948556209 9219222184 2725502542 5688767179 0494601653 4668049886 2723279178 6085784383 8279679766 8145410095 3883786360 9506800642 2512520511 7392984896 0841284886 2694560424 1965285022 2106611863 0674427862 2039194945 0471237137 8696095636 4371917287 4677646575 7396241389 0865832645 9958133904 7802759009

    9465764078 9512694683 9835259570 9825822620 5224894077 2671947826 8482601476 9909026401 3639443745 5305068203 4962524517 4939965143 1429809190 6592509372 2169646151 5709858387 4105978859 5977297549 8930161753 9284681382 6868386894 2774155991 8559252459 5395943104 9972524680 8459872736 4469584865 3836736222 6260991246 0805124388 4390451244 1365497627 8079771569 1435997700 1296160894 4169486855 5848406353 4220722258 2848864815 8456028506 0168427394 5226746767 8895252138 5225499546 6672782398 6456596116 3548862305 7745649803 5593634568 1743241125 1507606947 9451096596 0940252288 7971089314 5669136867 2287489405 6010150330 8617928680 9208747609 1782493858 9009714909 6759852613 6554978189 3129784821 6829989487 2265880485 7564014270 4775551323 7964145152 3746234364 5428584447 9526586782 1051141354 7357395231 1342716610 2135969536 2314429524 8493718711 0145765403 5902799344 0374200731 0578539062 1983874478 0847848968 3321445713 8687519435 0643021845 3191048481 0053706146 8067491927 8191197939 9520614196 6342875444 0643745123 7181921799 9839101591 9561814675 1426912397 4894090718 6494231961

    5679452080 9514655022 5231603881 9301420937 6213785595 6638937787 0830390697 9207734672 2182562599 6615014215 0306803844 7734549202 6054146659 2520149744 2850732518 6660021324 3408819071 0486331734 6496514539 0579626856 1005508106 6587969981 6357473638 4052571459 1028970641 4011097120 6280439039 7595156771 5770042033 7869936007 2305587631 7635942187 3125147120 5329281918 2618612586 7321579198 4148488291 6447060957 5270695722 0917567116 7229109816 9091528017 3506712748 5832228718 3520935396 5725121083 5791513698 8209144421 0067510334 6711031412 6711136990 8658516398 3150197016 5151168517 1437657618 3515565088 4909989859 9823873455 2833163550 7647918535 8932261854 8963213293 3089857064 2046752590 7091548141 6549859461 63

    1. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by MBCook · · Score: 3, Funny

      You got part of it wrong.

      The part where you have "...5...", that should be "...7..."

      Have a nice day ;)

      (he he he)

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by Bryan_W · · Score: 5, Funny

      You missed a few at the end

    3. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by AgBullet · · Score: 2, Funny

      I use e, you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by bairy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah like that's impressive compared to this

      --


      Get paid to search..It's geniune and
  13. 6 GHz is not that impressive. by reporter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    At 6 GHz, the only applications that can show appreciable performance improvement are CPU-bound ones. Hence, a program that sits entirely in the on-chip cache will show significant improvement. An example of such a program is the one calculating the value of pi.

    Memory-bound applications will not show significant improvement. At 6 GHz, most applications become memory bound since memory becomes extremely slow in responding to the 6 GHz processor.

    Has anyone liquid cooled the G5 and the Opteron driven them to 6 GHz? I bet that the G5 could crush the Pentium in performance since the G5 has a powerful floating point unit.

    1. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by PureCreditor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      nearly any other CPU architecture running at 6GHz will muder the P4's performance in either integer or float-point, partially due to Prescott's insanely long 31-stage pipeline and relatively week parallelism

      also, the P4 excels only in programs so small it can fit in the really small L1 cache. AMD's L1 cache is the really juicy one. =)

      Intel designed the Pentium 4 solely around marketing's requirements of consumer hype instead of sound technical choices.

    2. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by Wtcher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The DRAM may not be able to fetch that fast, but an increased bus rate will still provide some mediocum of bonus performance. Still, I notice now that the FSB clock was not increased at all.

      So long as some effective pre-fetching is in place, there's going to be some asymmetric performance gains. It won't be 1:1 since the memory isn't actually getting any faster, but it doesn't matter so long as the data is where it needs to be when it's needed. In any case, the fact is having the CPU far outstrip the performance of the rest of the system isn't a particularly unusual occurrence.

      --
      ----- Wtcher Dragon, UDIC
    3. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by Stickerboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Has anyone liquid cooled the G5 and the Opteron driven them to 6 GHz? I bet that the G5 could crush the Pentium in performance since the G5 has a powerful floating point unit.

      Your geek license has just been revoked.

      The overall design idea behind the P4 was to stretch out the pipeline to an insane level in order to ramp up clockspeeds to an insane level.

      No one's liquid cooled a G5 or an Opteron and overclocked it to 6 GHz. Why? Because their design matched with current chip fabbing technology can't handle it.

      The good news for AMD and PowerPC fanboys is that they won't need to get it to 6 GHz. If someone overclocks an Athlon 64 to, oh, 4 GHz or so (which would be impressive enough), the Athlon, which is designed to accomplish more clock for clock than the P4, should shred the 6 GHz P4 in performance.

      --
      Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  14. Appropriate Homerism... by 3D+Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    mmmMMMMmmmm Pi

    *drooling* aggghhhhhh

    1. Re:Appropriate Homerism... by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 3, Funny


      No, it's

      mmmmmmm floor Pi

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  15. Re:Updating Wikipedia Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know what? people who say "they have way too much time on their hands" or "how do they have the time to do that" .. REALLY piss me off

    Cause just about always, people who say that never did a damn progressive thing ever in their life. It's just a lame excuse underacheivers make trying to pull down those who are out there making stuff happen.

    Look at yourself first .. Browsing slashdot .. how come you have time to do that? Like what exactly do you do with YOUR time? I dont see you being the CEO of a major corp or contributing anything to society.

  16. Re:Only 5.4GHz by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Informative

    As the AC already said, it's not stable at 6Ghz, from the article:

    Not bench stable - just a screenshot record :)

    The CPU powersupply seems to require quite a bit of modding in order to bench past 5.4GHz.

  17. 8 lots of P4 at 3.2 GHz overclocked. by daveh_oz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now just imagine it - an 8 CPU powered box with each CPU running at 3.2 (rated) overclocked to 6.4 GHz = 51.2 GHz with a exabyte of Hard drive space. The ultimate BeOS machine - just wondering if anyone would consider building one :).

    1. Re:8 lots of P4 at 3.2 GHz overclocked. by Sean+Johnson · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know for how long I went around pronouncing it like that for serious when I didn't know any better. All because of that damn movie. I have 1 jigobyte of memory. This hard drive has 80 jigobytes of storage space. LOL!

      --
      >>>>>> Chewie, take the professor in the back and plug him into the hyperdrive.
  18. Hmmm by Z-95 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, Microsoft increases Longhorn's recommended requirements to 7GHz.

  19. LN2 ? Try some LHe! by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    What's this LN2 stuff... everyone knows REAL overclockers use liquid helium surrounded by a vaccum flask with another LN2 flask outside of it. (P.S. That's the setup they use to cool NMR machines for chemistry that have superconducting magnets in them)

  20. It calculated PI? by rco3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Waitaminute, waitaminute, waitaminute! They timed how long it took to calculate PI? That implies that it *FINISHED* calculating pi!

    Now, THAT's "News for Nerds. Stuff That Matters"

    --

    Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    1. Re:It calculated PI? by SEE · · Score: 4, Funny

      And it completed an infinite loop in under five seconds.

    2. Re:It calculated PI? by wildsurf · · Score: 3, Funny

      They timed how long it took to calculate PI? That implies that it *FINISHED* calculating pi!

      Well, considering it was done on a pc, 640k digits out to be enough for anybody.

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  21. Heh. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Informative

    It would take a HUGE fan to keep it from overheating and causing a board shutdown or a processor meltdown.

    I've got a 3.02 ghz, mildly overclocked, and the fan shutting down and the board automatically shutting down due to high heat are nearly simultaneous.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  22. Yksi Kaksi Kolme (or however you spell it) by pugdk · · Score: 2, Funny

    It *might* be Pi they are calculating in that screenshot, but heck, what does "Laskenta Alkaa" means?

    God I hate screenshots in a language I can't understand.

    Typical finnish, first they take over the only FPS ever worth playing (aq2), now they're taking over /.!

  23. LN2 fitted Laptop by malia8888 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think the LN2 is cold enough to crack the pleats in my good wool skirt

    --
    Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
  24. Re:Throughput not clock speed by PureCreditor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the physical speed limitations of hard drives (sustained read/write, not SATA) is the real wimpy part of the bandwidth....

    when running multi-gigabyte SQL queries (at work, our entire RDBMS is about 1TB), the crawling speeds of the hard drive is evident. the time it takes to develop the SQL query and the time it takes to run it are comparable (btw, the queries are okay optimized)

    6GHz might be useful for 3D rendering jobs or obsessive gamers, but for the bulk of the business world, the HDD is still the pain in the a**

  25. This is the type of thing..... by Sean+Johnson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that helps to perpetuate the "MHz myth". If MHz don't matter, why are these guys doing these crazy things to increase the MHz? I know it is just for the "fun of it", "to see if it can be done". However,(tongue-in-cheek) this stuff just influences people to rely on MHz numbers more and more. It teaches young-ins that more MHz is better whatever the cost. What we need is a great story about how Bill Buxley and his pal Jan Hammy had strung 32 CPU's together with chicken wire in thier garage. This would be the parallelism hack equivalent to overclocking. Pretty soon though we would have to contend with the "parallelism myth" and the industry would in turn be trying to deemphasis parallelism for Mhz. It would be a cycle in that manner until finally one day the industry hits it big with the "quantumn computing myth". Stay tuned if your still alive by then. LOL!

    --
    >>>>>> Chewie, take the professor in the back and plug him into the hyperdrive.
    1. Re:This is the type of thing..... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MHz *does* matter. A 3GHz Opteron should be 2x as fast as a 1.5GHz Opteron (of course, that doesn't take into account the rest of the system - memory bandwidth, disk bandwidth, etc.)

      The "MHz Myth" referrs to the fact that MHz is a poor metric to compare CPUs with. It's fair to compare a 3.2GHz P4 Prescott to a 3.6GHz P4 Prescott and expect that the 3.6GHz chip will be faster. What doesn't make sense is to comare a 3GHz P4 to a 2.4GHz Opteron and claim that the P4 is faster.

  26. Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can remember every single digit, just perhaps not in the right order.

  27. Deus Ex IW by Chiisu · · Score: 2, Funny

    So Deus Ex IW will run at a smooth 60 FPS now?

  28. Speed of light by ppswede · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One step closer the maximum clock-speed of a single-cpu core, which probably should be pretty soon, if I'm correct? 6GHz means each clock cycle has 1/6*10^9th of a second to stabilize and reach every part of the chip that is affected.. with the speed of light, at roughly 3*10^8 m/s this means with this clockspeed, each cycle have time to travel roughly 5mm on the chip. I'm not a chip-engineer, but isn't this almost near the limit?

  29. Re:Hang one outside the ISS !! by Holi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually no, It would overheat quite quickly as a vaccuum is a very good insulator (heh some would say almost perfect).

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  30. What's that plugged in the DIMM slot? by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So in the "icing" link, I see a mobo with 4 DIMM slots. One's got a DIMM with heatsinks. The other appears to have an LED segment display and a pair of molex connectors to what looks like a DIMM.

    What is that?

    1. Re:What's that plugged in the DIMM slot? by KarateBob · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it *might* be the OCZ DDR boster, that lets you increase the RAM voltage to an insanely high 3.9v

  31. Why LN2 when they live in Finland by elmarkitse · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why on earth would they go to the expense of an LN2 based system when they could just open a few windows.

    1. Re:Why LN2 when they live in Finland by Temporal · · Score: 4, Funny

      So they could use in in the sauna, of course!

      (That's sow-nah, not sah-nah!)

  32. Re:Alienware's next product. by ameoba · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wish I hadn't blown my modpoints. Nobody should get modpoints for a post in which they use the phrase 'preppies'. Most of the world's not highschool. I just hope that you're still in HS and not some 30yr old that still hasn't gotten over it.

    --
    my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  33. +7.3, informationativinal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  34. Re:liquid nitrogen sucks by Big+Bob+the+Finder · · Score: 5, Informative
    Liquid propane boils at -42.1 degrees C. It goes from the solid to the liquid at -187.7 degrees C, which is not important for this, but read on below. It also has an explosive range from 2.8% to 9.5% in air- a little lower than natural gas.

    Liquid nitrogen boils at -195.8 degrees C, which is cold enough to freeze propane into a solid (there's a fun experiment for you). Further, liquid nitrogen is not flammable, and presents no hazards other than asphyxiation and freeze damage. Nitrogen already makes up 80% of the air we breathe, so unless one works in an enclosed space with plenty of NL2 boiling off, it's tough to die from asphyxiation.

    In other words, LN2 is colder, and won't blow up on you. I've used it for years, and have yet to get hurt by it. A little respect goes a long way.

  35. Since someone has to say it.... by matyas47 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new, liquid nitrogen-cooled, 6 Ghz overlords! (...and I'm not even an Intel fan...)

  36. Re:Throughput not clock speed by notanatheist · · Score: 2

    What you missed is the P4 runs on a 200Mhz FSB x4. 333 x4 with an 18x multplier gets your roughly 6Ghz.

  37. The Calculation by div_B · · Score: 2, Informative

    Radiation is not nearly as efficient as conductiion hence the need for so many fins on a heat sink. So I still think it would overheat extremely fast.

    I think you'll find that the fins are to increase surface area for the purposes of convection. Convection of course dominates radiative transfers in a fluid like air.

    As for radiative cooling in space, a quick ball park calculation is quite educational:

    Objects emit radiation depending on their temperature, according to Stefan's law. They also absorb radiation from their surroundings according to the same equation, hence we can express the following formula for net power emitted as

    P_net = {sigma}*A*e*(T^4 - T_0^4)

    Here {sigma} is the stefan-boltzmann constant, 5.67e-8 W/(M^2*K^4), A the surface area of the object. T is the temperature of the object, and T_0 that of the background. e is the emissivity of the object, which we will assume to be 1 (perfect blackbody).

    I saw a photo of the thermometer displaying -46 deg C(=227 K), and standard Pentium 4 3GHz apparently consume about 80 watts of power. We'll therefore assume that the madly overclocked P4 produces 200W of heat. The question is then, what area of radiator is required to maintain the chip's temperature, given that the temperature of deep space is about 3K (cosmic background radiation)?

    A = P_net / ( {sigma} *(T^4 - T_0^4) )
    = 200 / (5.67e-8 * (230^4 - 3^4) )
    ~= 1.3 m^2

    An area of 1.3 m^2 corresponds to a sphere of radius 30cm. Conclusion: Put the chip in good thermal contact with a well-emitting sphere big enough to contain the chip and motherboard, and it'll probably be fine.

    1. Re:The Calculation by Holi · · Score: 3, Funny

      if you consider launching a computer into space easier.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  38. Re:Alienware's next product. by notanatheist · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, it's not the preppies buying them. It's the lazy kid's parents buying them! The preppies are more concerned with how they look, OTOH the rich little snob kid likes how pretty his machine is and blames his gaming skill on lag.

  39. Nah, LH makes for some serious problems. by caveat · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wrote a paper on Type I superconductivity (appears in metals when cooled to a few K of zero; ceramics are a totally different beastie) in school and got diverted into reading up on ultracryogenics for a few weeks - apparently at temps that low, you get all sorts of problems like extreme brittleness and differing rates of thermal expansion, the latter being a fairly major issue in designing an ultracryogenic system. There's a good chance the CPU die, wires, and case would all tear away from each other and destroy the thing. Not to mention that lead superconducts at 7.196K; i wonder what resistanceless solder would do to a mobo...

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  40. Re:Hang one outside the ISS !! by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A vaccuum is a very good insulator... Fortunately, space isn't even remotely a perfect vaccuum.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  41. Prof. Frink Quote by forty-2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Akhem, er, excuse me, if I could have everyone's attention... would you all please listen, If you could just... Pi is exactly 3!

    --
    never drink kool-aid from a big vat
  42. Speed Claim. by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gad, it's running on a windows box. Those numbers can't be trusted.

  43. Re:Even colder... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 3, Informative

    The problem with liquid helium (This made MRI scanners horribly impractical for a LOT of years) is that it has 1/20 the heat capacity of nitrogen, and you have to suck a thousand times the power to get down to helium temperatures compared to nitrogen. There would also be no quantum anomalies with silicon. It can only be compelled to a superconductive state under Extreme pressure.

    BTW, which is it... are we mounting it in a vaccuum or under liquid helium :)

  44. I wonder why... by syukton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder why people are more inclined to use something temporary like a liquid nitrogen bath, instead of keeping the LN2 cool with a stirling cryocooler. I mean, sure, a 6 gigahertz computer is neat and all, but what use is it if you can't take it to a LAN party?

    I'm not too familiar with the terminology used in the cooling world, but 15 watts of cooling power at 77 kelvin (-196 deg C / -321 deg F) sounds like quite a bit of cooling power to me. I've often wondered why Stirling technology isn't used in air conditioners.

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  45. Re:Mod parent as clueless by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Informative

    I do know enough about number systems to derive my own conversion mechanisms. So yes, I know what base 16 digits are, thank you very much.

    It is possible that we are talking about different things. I think of a digit extractor as something which will let you calculate the nth digit without having to calculate any other digits.

    Mathworld mistakenly called this equasion a "digit extraction algorythm" and this is a mistake IMO because the equasion still requires that you calculate every preceding digit. This is because the portion of the equasion before the (1/(16^x)) will not produce whole numbers, even in hex. The numbers are less than 0 and therefore must be calculated before the next digit. Does this make sense?

    The problem is that for any value of x where x > 0, 4/(8x+1) - 2/(8x+4) - 1/(8x+5) - 1/(8x+6) always yields a fraction whose denominator is *not* a power of 2 and hence not a power of 16. So you end up with a value which does not exactly correspond to any single digit in pi (even in hex).

    Now this equasion is very helpful because I could write a program to calculate n digits of pi in hex and speed things up by shifting values off when they are no longer needed for active calculation. But it will *not* allow me to calculate the thirty-four billion 396 millionth decimal of pi without calculating all prior places.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP